Hubbry Logo
Old Style and New Style datesOld Style and New Style datesMain
Open search
Old Style and New Style dates
Community hub
Old Style and New Style dates
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Old Style and New Style dates
Old Style and New Style dates
Old Style and New Style dates
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Issue 9198 of The London Gazette, covering the calendar change in Great Britain. The issue spans the changeover; the date heading reads: "From Tuesday September 1, O.S. to Saturday September 16, N.S. 1752".[1]

Old Style (O.S.) and New Style (N.S.) indicate dating systems before and after a calendar change, respectively. Usually, they refer to the change from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar as enacted in various European countries between 1582 and 1923.

In England, Wales, Ireland, and Britain's American colonies, there were two calendar changes, both in 1752. The first adjusted the start of a new year from 25 March (Lady Day, the Feast of the Annunciation) to 1 January, a change which Scotland had made in 1600. The second discarded the Julian calendar in favour of the Gregorian calendar, skipping 11 days in the month of September to do so.[2][3] To accommodate the two calendar changes, writers used dual dating to identify a given day by giving its date according to both styles of dating.

For countries such as Russia where no start-of-year adjustment took place,[a] O.S. and N.S. simply indicate the Julian and Gregorian dating systems respectively.

Differences between Julian and Gregorian dates

[edit]
Main article: Gregorian calendar § Difference between Gregorian and Julian calendar dates

The need to correct the calendar arose from the realisation that the correct figure for the number of days in a year is not 365.25 (365 days 6 hours) as assumed by the Julian calendar but slightly less (c. 365.242 days). The Julian calendar therefore has too many leap years. The consequence was that the basis for the calculation of the date of Easter, as decided in the 4th century, had drifted from reality. The Gregorian calendar reform also dealt with the accumulated difference between these figures, between the years 325 and 1582, by skipping 10 days to set the ecclesiastical date of the equinox to be 21 March, the median date of its occurrence at the time of the First Council of Nicea in 325.

Countries that adopted the Gregorian calendar after 1699 needed to skip an additional day for each subsequent new century that the Julian calendar had added since then. When the British Empire did so in 1752, the gap had grown to eleven days;[b] when Russia did so (as its civil calendar) in 1918, thirteen days needed to be skipped.[c]

Britain and its colonies or possessions

[edit]
Memorial plaque to John Etty in All Saints' Church, North Street, York, recording his date of death as "28 of Jan: ⁠170+8/9⁠"

In the Kingdom of Great Britain and its possessions, the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 introduced two concurrent changes to the calendar. The first, which applied to England, Wales, Ireland and the British colonies, changed the start of the year from 25 March to 1 January, with effect from "the day after 31 December 1751".[6][d] (Scotland had already made this aspect of the changes, on 1 January 1600.)[7][8] The second (in effect[e]) adopted the Gregorian calendar in place of the Julian calendar. Thus "New Style" can refer to the start-of-year adjustment, to the adoption of the Gregorian calendar, or to the combination of the two. It was through their use in the Calendar Act 1750 that the notations "Old Style" and "New Style" came into common usage.

Start-of-year adjustment

[edit]
Further information: Julian calendar § New Year's Day, Regnal year, and Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 § New Year's Day

When recording British history, it is usual to quote the date as originally recorded at the time of the event, but with the year number adjusted to start on 1 January.[9] The latter adjustment may be needed because the start of the civil calendar year had not always been 1 January and was altered at different times in different countries.[f] From 1155 to 1752, the civil or legal year in England began on 25 March (Lady Day);[10][11] so for example, the execution of Charles I was recorded at the time in Parliament as happening on 30 January 1648 (Old Style).[12] In newer English-language texts, this date is usually shown as "30 January 1649" (New Style).[13] The corresponding date in the Gregorian calendar is 9 February 1649, the date by which his contemporaries in some parts of continental Europe would have recorded his execution.

The O.S./N.S. designation is particularly relevant for dates which fall between the start of the "historical year" (1 January) and the legal start date, where different. This was 25 March in England, Wales, Ireland and the colonies until 1752, and until 1600 in Scotland. Thereafter, in both cases, it became 1 January.

In Britain, 1 January was celebrated as the New Year festival from as early as the 13th century, despite the recorded (civil) year not incrementing until 25 March,[14][g] but the "year starting 25th March was called the Civil or Legal Year, although the phrase Old Style was more commonly used".[3] To reduce misunderstandings about the date, it was normal even in semi-official documents such as parish registers to place a statutory new-year heading after 24 March (for example "1661") and another heading from the end of the following December, 1661/62, a form of dual dating to indicate that in the following twelve weeks or so, the year was 1661 Old Style but 1662 New Style.[17] Some more modern sources, often more academic ones (e.g. the History of Parliament) also use the 1661/62 style for the period between 1 January and 24 March for years before the introduction of the New Style calendar in England.[18][9]

Other notations

[edit]
Further information: Adoption of the Gregorian calendar and List of adoption dates of the Gregorian calendar by country

Russia

[edit]
Further information: Adoption of the Gregorian calendar § Russia

The Gregorian calendar was implemented in Russia on 14 February 1918 by dropping the Julian dates of 1–13 February 1918,[h] pursuant to a Sovnarkom decree signed 24 January 1918 (Julian) by Vladimir Lenin. The decree required that the Julian date was to be written in parentheses after the Gregorian date, until 1 July 1918.[19]

It is common in English-language publications to use the familiar Old Style or New Style terms to discuss events and personalities in other countries, especially with reference to the Russian Empire and the very beginning of Soviet Russia. For example, in the article "The October (November) Revolution", the Encyclopædia Britannica uses the format of "25 October (7 November, New Style)" to describe the date of the start of the revolution.[20]

Latin notation: st.v. and st.n.

[edit]

The Latin equivalents, which are used in many languages, are, on the one hand, stili veteris (genitive) or stilo vetere (ablative), abbreviated st.v., and meaning "(of/in) old style"; and, on the other, stili novi or stilo novo, abbreviated st.n. and meaning "(of/in) new style".[21] The Latin abbreviations may be capitalised differently by different users, e.g., St.n. or St.N. for stili novi.[21] There are equivalents for these terms in other languages as well, such as the German a.St. ("alter Stil" for O.S.).

Transposition of historical event dates and possible date conflicts

[edit]
Thomas Jefferson's tombstone. Written below the epitaph is "Born April 2. 1743. O.S. Died July 4. 1826."

Usually, the mapping of New Style dates onto Old Style dates with a start-of-year adjustment works well with little confusion for events before the introduction of the Gregorian calendar. For example, the Battle of Agincourt is well known to have been fought on 25 October 1415, which is Saint Crispin's Day. However, for the period between the first introduction of the Gregorian calendar on 15 October 1582 and its introduction in Britain on 14 September 1752, there can be considerable confusion between events in Continental Western Europe and in British domains. Events in Continental Western Europe are usually reported in English-language histories by using the Gregorian calendar. For example, the Battle of Blenheim is always given as 13 August 1704. However, confusion occurs when an event involves both. For example, William III of England arrived at Brixham in England on 5 November (Julian calendar), after he had set sail from the Netherlands on 11 November (Gregorian calendar) 1688.[22]

The Battle of the Boyne in Ireland took place a few months later on 1 July 1690 (Julian calendar). That maps to 11 July (Gregorian calendar), conveniently close to the Julian date of the subsequent (and more decisive) Battle of Aughrim on 12 July 1691 (Julian). The latter battle was commemorated annually throughout the 18th century on 12 July,[23] following the usual historical convention of commemorating events of that period within Great Britain and Ireland by mapping the Julian date directly onto the modern Gregorian calendar date (as happens, for example, with Guy Fawkes Night on 5 November). The Battle of the Boyne was commemorated with smaller parades on 1 July. However, both events were combined in the late 18th century,[23] and continue to be celebrated as "The Twelfth".

Because of the differences, British writers and their correspondents often employed two dates, a practice called dual dating, more or less automatically. Letters concerning diplomacy and international trade thus sometimes bore both Julian and Gregorian dates to prevent confusion. For example, Sir William Boswell wrote to Sir John Coke from The Hague a letter dated "12/22 Dec. 1635".[22] In his biography of John Dee, The Queen's Conjurer, Benjamin Woolley surmises that because Dee fought unsuccessfully for England to embrace the 1583/84 date set for the change, "England remained outside the Gregorian system for a further 170 years, communications during that period customarily carrying two dates".[24] In contrast, Thomas Jefferson, who lived while the British Isles and colonies converted to the Gregorian calendar, instructed that his tombstone bear his date of birth by using the Julian calendar (notated O.S. for Old Style) and his date of death by using the Gregorian calendar.[25] At Jefferson's birth, the difference was eleven days between the Julian and Gregorian calendars and so his birthday of 2 April in the Julian calendar is 13 April in the Gregorian calendar. Similarly, George Washington is now officially reported as having been born on 22 February 1732, rather than on 11 February 1731/32 (Julian calendar).[26] The philosopher Jeremy Bentham, born on 4 February 1747/8 (Julian calendar), in later life celebrated his birthday on 15 February.[27]

There is some evidence that the calendar change was not easily accepted. Many British people continued to celebrate their holidays "Old Style" well into the 19th century,[i] a practice that the author Karen Bellenir considered to reveal a deep emotional resistance to calendar reform.[28]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Old Style and New Style dates

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Old Style and New Style dates distinguish between the Julian calendar, known as Old Style (O.S.), and its successor, the Gregorian calendar, or New Style (N.S.), which corrected the Julian system's progressive misalignment with the solar year. The Julian calendar, established in 45 BCE by Julius Caesar, fixed the average year at 365.25 days through a leap day every four years, but this overestimated the tropical year by about 11 minutes annually, accumulating to a ten-day error by the late 16th century. In response, Pope Gregory XIII issued the bull Inter gravissimas on 24 February 1582, directing the omission of ten days in October and altering leap year rules to skip the extra day in century years not divisible by 400, thereby reducing future drift to one day every 3,300 years. Catholic realms including , , , and the adopted the reform immediately in 1582, with 4 October followed directly by 15 October to realign the with the vernal equinox for accurate computation of . Protestant countries, wary of papal authority, delayed adoption; Britain and its colonies switched in 1752, skipping eleven days (2 to 14 ) and shifting the year-start from 25 to 1 . Further transitions occurred in (1753), (1873), (1918 after the Bolshevik Revolution), and (1923), while some Eastern Orthodox churches retain the for liturgical purposes, creating a 13-day difference today. The notation clarifies historical records affected by these shifts, as pre-reform dates appear offset from modern equivalents, and (e.g., 24 February 1719/20 O.S.) accounts for varying new-year conventions alongside calendar types. This , grounded in astronomical observation rather than arbitrary decree, underscores the empirical basis for aligning civil timekeeping with celestial cycles, though initial resistance stemmed from confessional divides rather than scientific dispute.

Origins and Flaws of the Julian Calendar

Establishment Under

The Roman Republican prior to reform consisted of 355 days arranged in 12 lunar months, with an intercalary month of approximately 27 or 28 days inserted irregularly by pontiffs every second year to approximate the solar year of about 365.25 days; however, political manipulations often skipped intercalations, causing the to drift ahead of the seasons by roughly three months by the mid-1st century BC. In 46 BC, , influenced by Egyptian solar calendars encountered during his campaigns, commissioned a comprehensive overhaul advised by the Alexandrian Sosigenes, who calculated the at 365 days and 6 hours. This reform, enacted via the Lex Iulia de Kalendis, extended that year—known as the "Year of Confusion"—to 445 days by inserting 67 additional days through two extraordinary months (Intercalaris Prior and Intercalaris Posterior) before , thereby resetting alignment with the equinoxes. The proper commenced on , 45 BC, establishing a solar year of 365 days with months fixed at alternating 30 or 31 days ( at 28, except every fourth year when a leap day—"bis sextum"—was added after February 23 to account for the quarter-day excess, yielding an average of 365.25 days). This structure eliminated pontifical discretion, standardized the civil year starting , and drew on Egyptian precedents for precision, though it overestimated the solar year by about 11 minutes annually, a discrepancy accumulating to one day every 128 years.

Inherent Inaccuracies Leading to Seasonal Drift

The prescribed an average year length of 365.25 days by inserting a leap day every fourth year, a simplification derived from astronomical estimates available in the BCE. This approach, while improving upon prior Roman lunar-solar inconsistencies, embedded a systematic overestimation because it treated the fractional day as exactly 0.25 without further refinement. The true length of the —the interval between vernal equinoxes central to seasonal alignment—is approximately 365.2422 days, rendering the Julian average longer by about 0.0078 days (roughly 11 minutes and 14 seconds) annually. This discrepancy arises from the of Earth's equinoxes and slight variations in orbital parameters, which the Julian rule's rigid quadriennial cycle failed to accommodate, as confirmed by later observations like those underpinning the . Consequently, the calendar dates advanced ahead of the solar progression, causing a gradual backward shift of astronomical events relative to fixed dates. Over centuries, this error accumulated at a rate of approximately one day every 128 years, leading to progressive seasonal drift where, for instance, the vernal receded from its intended alignment established at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. By the late , the cumulative excess approached 10 days, with calendar spring arriving after the actual , disrupting agricultural cycles and ecclesiastical computations tied to solar positions. Such misalignment underscored the calendar's inherent limitations, as the unadjusted leap mechanism prioritized arithmetic simplicity over empirical solar precision, inevitably eroding synchrony with .

The Gregorian Reform for Astronomical Precision

Scientific and Ecclesiastical Motivations

The Julian calendar's average year length of 365.25 days exceeded the of approximately 365.2422 days by about 0.0078 days annually, resulting in a cumulative drift of roughly one day every 128 years relative to the seasons. By the late , this discrepancy had advanced the vernal by 10 days from its intended date of March 21 to around March 11, as determined by astronomical observations compiled by scholars like Aloysius Lilius and refined by . The reform addressed this through revised rules that omitted three every 400 years, shortening the average year to 365.2425 days and reducing future drift to about one day every 3,300 years, thereby restoring alignment between calendar dates and solar events like equinoxes and solstices. Ecclesiastically, the primary concern was the misalignment of movable feasts, particularly , which the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD had defined as the first Sunday after the first full moon on or following the vernal equinox fixed at March 21 in the . The 10-day drift threatened to detach from its seasonal and astronomical basis, potentially causing it to occur before the equinox in violation of Nicaean canons and disrupting the liturgical cycle tied to and spring renewal. , advised by the commission including Clavius, promulgated the reform via the 1582 bull to realign the equinox and preserve the church's computus for , ensuring feasts remained synchronized with natural cycles as established in early Christian tradition rather than allowing further secular drift. This dual motivation reflected empirical astronomical data from Jesuit observatories and the theological imperative to maintain doctrinal continuity, overriding potential disruptions to historical records for long-term precision.

Key Changes: Leap Year Rules and Date Skipping

The Gregorian reform altered the Julian leap year rule, which designated every fourth year as a leap year regardless of divisibility by higher multiples, resulting in an average year length of 365.25 days. Under the new rules promulgated in the 1582 papal bull , a year remains a leap year if divisible by 4, but century years (divisible by 100) are excluded unless also divisible by 400; thus, years such as 1700, 1800, and 1900 are common years, while 1600 and 2000 qualify as leap years. This adjustment yields 97 leap years over 400 years rather than 100, shortening the average year to 365.2425 days and more closely approximating the tropical solar year of approximately 365.2422 days. The change mitigates the Julian calendar's overcount of about 0.0078 days per year, preventing a cumulative drift of roughly three extra days every four centuries. To rectify the immediate discrepancy accumulated since the Julian calendar's implementation in 45 BCE, which had advanced calendar dates ahead of astronomical reality by about 10 days by the late —shifting the vernal from March 21 to around March 11—the reform mandated skipping 10 days in 1582. Specifically, Thursday, October 4, 1582 (Julian), was followed immediately by Friday, October 15, 1582 (Gregorian), omitting dates 5 through 14 and thereby realigning civil dates with the solar for ecclesiastical purposes like computing . This one-time correction addressed the pontifices' initial misapplication of in the early Julian era and subsequent steady drift, ensuring the calendar's long-term without further abrupt adjustments. The skipped days affected only adopting regions, with the leap rule change applying prospectively to halt future divergence.

Initial Catholic Adoption in 1582

The papal bull Inter gravissimas, issued by on 24 February 1582, promulgated the reform, mandating its implementation across Catholic territories to correct the Julian calendar's accumulated error of approximately 10 days relative to the solar year. The bull specified that the revised rules—omitting leap days in century years not divisible by 400—would apply prospectively, while the immediate date adjustment would skip 10 days to realign the vernal equinox with 21 March. This reform, developed by astronomers including Christoph Clavius, aimed to restore ecclesiastical accuracy for determining , as the Julian calendar's overestimation of the solar year by about 11 minutes annually had caused a drift of 10 days by the 16th century. Implementation occurred swiftly in core Catholic realms under direct papal or allied influence. In the and affiliated Italian territories, such as the Grand Duchy of and the , the transition took effect on 15 October 1582, with Thursday, 4 October (Julian) immediately followed by Friday, 15 October (Gregorian), effectively omitting 5–14 October. King decreed adoption for the , the Kingdom of , , and , enforcing the same October skip, which extended to overseas colonies including the and parts of the under Spanish administration. Similarly, King Sebastian of ordered the change for and its empire, aligning with the papal directive without delay. France endorsed the bull but deferred full civil enforcement, opting to skip 10 days from 9 December to 20 December 1582 in some regions, though inconsistent application led to local confusion and resistance from Protestant areas. The Polish-Lithuanian , under Catholic , initially received the bull but faced implementation hurdles due to political instability following King Stephen Báthory's death, postponing widespread use until 1586 under . This rapid uptake in southern and central Catholic contrasted with Protestant skepticism elsewhere, reflecting the reform's primary ecclesiastical authority within the Roman Church, where obedience to the papal mandate ensured astronomical and liturgical synchronization without significant domestic opposition in adopting states.

Divergences in Date Calculation

Quantitative Differences Over Time

The divergence between Julian (Old Style) and Gregorian (New Style) dates arises from the 's average year length of 365.25 days, which exceeds the by approximately 0.0078 days (11 minutes and 14 seconds), while the adjusted this to 365.2425 days for greater solar alignment. This excess causes the to accumulate a drift of roughly 1 day every 128 years relative to the Gregorian. Post-1582, after skipping 10 days to realign the vernal equinox, the calendars remained synchronized in until century years not divisible by 400, where the Julian inserts an extra leap day (e.g., 1700, 1800, 1900), widening the gap by 1 day each time. The quantitative difference, expressed as days by which Gregorian dates precede corresponding Julian dates for the same astronomical event, thus steps up periodically:
PeriodDays Difference (Gregorian ahead)
Oct 1582 – Feb 170010
Mar 1700 – Feb 180011
Mar 1800 – Feb 190012
Mar 1900 – Feb 210013
By 1752, during Britain's adoption, the discrepancy had reached 11 days due to the 1700 non-leap in Gregorian. Currently, for dates in the through 2099, the lags 13 days behind the Gregorian, requiring addition of 13 days to a Julian date to obtain the Gregorian equivalent. This stepwise increase persists until 2100, when another divergence to 14 days occurs, absent further reforms. Over longer epochs, the total drift from the 's 45 BCE inception exceeds 3 days per 400 years on average, compounding seasonal misalignment if unreformed.

Impact on Equinoxes and Religious Feasts

The Julian calendar's overestimation of the solar year by approximately 0.0078 days led to a cumulative drift wherein the vernal equinox advanced earlier in the calendar by about one day every 128 years. By 1582, this had shifted the astronomical vernal equinox to March 11 Julian, rather than the March 21 date fixed by the Council of Nicaea in 325 for ecclesiastical purposes. The Gregorian reform mitigated this by excising 10 days from October 1582, restoring alignment so the vernal fell on or near March 21 Gregorian, with modified rules designed to limit future drift to about one day over 3,000 years. In contrast, persistent use of the in non-adopting regions amplified the discrepancy; as of the , the Julian calendar trails by 13 days, placing its March 21 equinox on April 3 Gregorian and causing seasonal markers to lag progressively behind astronomical reality. This calendrical divergence profoundly affected religious feasts, particularly , computed as the first Sunday after the paschal succeeding the ecclesiastical vernal of March 21. The Gregorian alignment preserved 's proximity to the astronomical spring equinox, fulfilling Nicene intentions for seasonal accuracy, whereas Julian adherence shifted the effective later, often delaying Orthodox Pascha by 13 days or more relative to Western dates. Consequently, Eastern and Western Easters frequently diverge by whole weeks—typically 0, 1, 4, or 5—due to asynchronous s across calendars, as the Julian paschal calculation lags correspondingly. Fixed feasts like (December 25 Julian, equivalent to Gregorian since 1900) also desynchronized from solstices, with Julian observances occurring post-astronomical , while Easter-dependent feasts such as and inherited timing offsets, exacerbating inter-church liturgical separations. The reform's ecclesiastical rationale thus underscored restoring equinox-based computations to avert such drifts, prioritizing astronomical fidelity over unaltered tradition in Catholic domains.

Regional Adoption Patterns and Resistances

Swift Implementation in Catholic Europe

The papal bull Inter gravissimas, issued by Pope Gregory XIII on February 24, 1582, called for the immediate correction of the Julian calendar's drift by omitting 10 days in October 1582, with Thursday, October 4, followed directly by Friday, October 15, in compliant territories. This reform was enacted without delay in the Papal States and most of Italy under direct papal jurisdiction, aligning ecclesiastical and civil calendars to restore the vernal equinox to March 21 for precise computation of Easter. Spain, under King Philip II, decreed adoption on the same terms, with the date skip occurring on October 15, 1582, reflecting royal obedience to papal authority on liturgical matters despite Spain's vast requiring coordinated dissemination of the . followed identically in October 1582, as did the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, where King enforced the change amid Catholic-majority adherence, minimizing disruptions to religious observances. These implementations proceeded with administrative efficiency, as Catholic monarchs prioritized astronomical accuracy for feast calculations over potential public confusion from the abrupt skip. France adopted the reform slightly later, on December 9, 1582, under King Henry III, skipping from December 9 to December 20 to accommodate seasonal activities, yet still within the same year as the bull's issuance, demonstrating the French crown's deference to Rome amid ongoing Wars of Religion. Minor Catholic principalities, such as the and the , aligned concurrently in 1582, ensuring broad continental uniformity. Resistance was negligible in these regions, as the reform's rationale—correcting centuries of solar misalignment evident in shifts—aligned with clerical consensus on scriptural imperatives for seasonal fidelity. Overall, this rapid uptake across Catholic Europe, affecting over 20% of the continent's population by late 1582, underscored the centralized influence of the papacy in temporal affairs.

Protestant Delays and Rational Skepticism

Protestant territories in Europe, including principalities within the , the , , and Britain, generally postponed for over a century after its promulgation, primarily due to entrenched opposition to papal authority and perceptions of the reform as a mechanism to reassert Catholic dominance. This resistance stemmed from the Reformation's core rejection of Rome's spiritual supremacy, with figures like decrying the calendar's introduction as intertwined with indulgences and ecclesiastical overreach, though the delay persisted beyond initial theological critiques into practical governance. By the late 17th century, accumulating errors in the —evident in the eastward drift of the vernal equinox by approximately 10 days—prompted pragmatic reassessments, yet adoption remained piecemeal, reflecting a preference for secular or regionally derived justifications over immediate compliance with a bull issued by . In German Protestant states, skepticism manifested in demands for astronomical validation independent of Vatican computations; Lutheran astronomers, building on observations by figures like , debated the precision of the proposed 10-day omission in 1700, ultimately aligning with it to avert further misalignment in solar observations and ecclesiastical computations like . On February 18, 1700, these states transitioned by advancing to , skipping the intervening days, a move coordinated with and to standardize trade and navigation amid the 10-day Julian deficit. This selective embrace underscored a rational calculus: the reform's centennial leap year rule reduced average year length from 365.25 to 365.2425 days, better approximating the of 365.2422 days as measured by contemporary instruments, though Protestant rulers framed it as a civic necessity rather than deference to Catholic initiative. Sweden's experience highlighted both the pitfalls of incremental skepticism and the empirical pressures overriding it; in 1700, authorities opted for a phased approach, proposing to omit 40 leap days over 40 years to bridge the gap without abrupt disruption, but administrative lapses— including erroneously observing leap years in 1704 and 1708—exacerbated the drift, necessitating a February 30 in 1712 as a corrective anomaly. By 1753, with the discrepancy at 11 days, Sweden abandoned this hybrid strategy for direct Gregorian alignment, omitting February 17–28 to synchronize with Catholic Europe's prior shifts, driven by navigational demands and astronomical data confirming the Julian overestimation of the solar year by about 0.0078 days annually. Such errors validated first-order critiques of hasty papal fixes while affirming the reform's causal efficacy in stabilizing seasonal markers. Britain's 1752 adoption via the Calendar (New Style) Act exemplified delayed rationalism tempered by politics; parliamentary debates emphasized the Julian drift's impact on —now falling up to 10 days early relative to the Nicene Council's vernal decree—overriding anti-papist qualms, with the Act skipping September 3–13 to enforce the 11-day correction and redefine excluding century years not divisible by 400. Public unrest, including cries of "Give us our eleven days," reflected not just lost wages but toward imposed temporal authority, yet empirical imperatives from astronomy and commerce prevailed, as the reform's projected error rate of one day per 3,300 years outperformed the Julian's one per 128 years. Colonial extensions, such as in , followed suit, minimizing discrepancies in transatlantic records despite initial Anglican resistance rooted in doctrinal autonomy. These delays, while ideologically motivated, inadvertently allowed Protestant scholars to independently verify the reform's solar accuracy through telescopic and chronometric advances, fostering a legacy of evidence-based calendrical governance.

Britain's 1752 Transition and Colonial Effects

The British Parliament enacted the Calendar (New Style) Act in 1751, which mandated the adoption of the Gregorian calendar across , , and the British colonies. This legislation addressed the accumulated discrepancy of eleven days between the Julian and Gregorian systems by decreeing that the day following Wednesday, 2 September 1752, would be Thursday, 14 September 1752, effectively omitting the intervening dates. Additionally, the act shifted the legal from 25 March to 1 , applying retroactively to 1752 and eliminating the dual-year convention for dates in and February thereafter. The transition synchronized British civil dating with Protestant northern Europe, where similar adoptions had occurred decades earlier, but lagged behind Catholic states by over 170 years due to historical resistance rooted in anti-papal sentiments. included isolated protests over perceived losses in wages or rents for the skipped period, though the act stipulated pro-rata adjustments for such obligations to mitigate financial disruptions. Claims of widespread riots chanting "Give us our eleven days" appear exaggerated or apocryphal, likely stemming from satirical artworks like William Hogarth's An Election Entertainment rather than verified contemporary accounts of mass disorder. In the American colonies, the reform was implemented concurrently under British authority, with colonial legislatures and administrators aligning their records to the new in 1752. This uniformity affected legal documents, observances, and personal milestones, such as birthdays and contracts, necessitating adjustments that occasionally led to ambiguities in pre-transition records. For instance, events dated in the omitted September days were retroactively assigned to the nearest equivalent post-skip date, influencing subsequent historical interpretations in colonial America. The change facilitated trade and communication with Gregorian-using regions but introduced short-term administrative challenges, including the need for revisions and public notices to educate populations on the altered dating.

Late Adoptions in Orthodox and Non-Western Regions

In Eastern Orthodox countries, civil adoption of the Gregorian calendar occurred primarily in the early , driven by modernization, wartime coordination, and secular governance, despite ecclesiastical adherence to the for religious observances. transitioned in 1916, aligning civil dates with by skipping 13 days. Soviet followed on February 1, 1918 (Gregorian), when January 31 (Julian) was immediately followed by February 14 (Gregorian), also omitting 13 days to synchronize with international standards amid revolutionary upheaval. Greece implemented the change on March 1, 1923, with February 15 (Old Style) succeeded by March 1 (New Style), reflecting a 13-day discrepancy accumulated since 1582. and adopted it in 1919, shortly after territorial gains in the and necessitated alignment with allies using the Gregorian system. These shifts were civil mandates, often provoking resistance from Orthodox clergy and traditionalists who viewed the as integral to liturgical accuracy, such as preserving the date of Pascha relative to the vernal equinox. In non-Western regions, adoption lagged due to indigenous calendar traditions, colonial influences, and isolation from European papal reforms, with transitions tied to political upheavals or Westernization drives. , previously using a , decreed the effective January 1, 1873, ending the lunisolar year on December 31, 1872, as part of Meiji-era reforms to facilitate global trade and diplomacy. adopted it on January 1, 1912, supplanting the traditional under the newly established Republic, though lunar dating persisted for festivals. The initiated partial alignment in 1917 by adopting Gregorian dates while retaining Rumi year numbering, but the Republic of Turkey completed the switch to full Gregorian usage and reckoning on January 1, 1926, under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's policies. A few non-Western states resisted full civil adoption; employs its own , approximately 7-8 years behind the Gregorian due to differing computations of the era, while officially uses the Gregorian for government purposes alongside the Bikram Sambat but retains the latter for cultural events. In Islamic-majority areas like , the Gregorian was gradually incorporated for civil and fiscal matters by the mid-20th century, coexisting with the Hijri for . These late or partial adoptions highlight practical needs for international synchronization outweighing traditionalist concerns in governance and commerce.

Prevalent Notational Systems

English-Language O.S. and N.S. Abbreviations

In English-language , the abbreviations O.S. and N.S. distinguish dates based on prevailing calendar conventions prior to and following reforms aligning with the Gregorian system. O.S. denotes "Old Style," referring to reckoning under the —characterized by its rule of every fourth year—or the pre-reform civil year commencing March 25 (the traditional ). N.S. signifies "New Style," applied to dates using the Gregorian calendar's refined solar alignment (skipping three leap years every four centuries) or a year starting , as standardized post-1752 in Britain and its territories. These markers gained prominence after Britain's Calendar Act of 1751, which omitted eleven days in 1752 (advancing from September 2 to September 14) and shifted the new year to effective 1752, prompting historians to retroactively clarify earlier records prone to dual interpretations. For instance, events before 1752 might append O.S. to affirm Julian computation, such as George Washington's birth recorded as February 11 O.S. (equivalent to February 22 N.S. after adjustment). In contexts without year-start variance, like until 1918, O.S. simply flagged Julian dates against Gregorian equivalents marked N.S., a convention adopted in English scholarship for consistency. Usage conventions emphasize placement immediately after the date, often in parentheses for precision, as in "July 4, 1776 (N.S.)" for American Independence to reflect Gregorian alignment despite colonial adherence to Julian until 1752. Scholarly texts from the late 18th century onward, including genealogical and periodical references, standardized this to mitigate errors from the 10- to 13-day Julian-Gregorian drift accumulating since 1582. Ambiguities persist where only one marker appears, requiring contextual verification of the underlying ; for pre-1700 dates, O.S. typically implies both Julian rules and March year-start unless specified otherwise.

Dual Dating for Ambiguous Periods

Dual dating, commonly referred to as double dating, addressed ambiguities in dates falling between January 1 and March 24 under the Julian calendar's English reckoning, where the new year legally commenced on March 25 (Lady Day). This period created confusion because continental European practice treated January 1 as the new year's start, leading historians and record-keepers to denote such dates with dual years, typically the lower number as the regnal or legal year (pre-March 25) and the upper as the historical or vernal year (post-January 1). For example, a date recorded as "24 February 1709/10" signified an event in the legal year 1709 but the historical year 1710, preventing misinterpretation in cross-referencing with foreign or scholarly sources. This convention emerged in the late and gained prevalence among English intellectuals, clergy, and administrators by the , influenced by awareness of Roman and Italian dating norms that favored January 1. Diarists like and official documents, including parliamentary records, employed it to align with emerging standardized , though inconsistent adoption persisted among the general populace until the 1752 reforms. The practice mitigated errors in legal, , and genealogical contexts; for instance, George Washington's birth on 11 1731/32 reflected the dual system in Virginia's colonial records, later converted to 22 1732 under New Style for modern equivalence. In the ambiguous transition period around 1751–1752, dual dating intersected with the day-skip adjustment under the Calendar (New Style) Act, which advanced the calendar by 11 days in September 1752 while shifting the new year to January 1 effective 1752. Pre-reform dates in early 1752, such as those in January or February, retained dual year notation in some ledgers to denote lingering Julian year-end adherence, though the Act's provisions largely resolved year ambiguities by mandating Gregorian alignment. Post-reform, dual dating faded for domestic use but remained essential for interpreting archival materials or international treaties, as seen in Anglo-Dutch agreements where discrepancies between Protestant delays and Catholic adoptions necessitated explicit dual references. Official publications like exemplified dual dating by appending "O.S." or clarifying year splits in announcements spanning ambiguous intervals, ensuring clarity for readers navigating mixed calendar influences. Scholarly analysis underscores that failure to apply dual dating in these periods can shift events by up to a year, as evidenced in misdated accessions or births in 18th-century British peerage records.

Continental and Latin Equivalents

In scholarly and historical contexts across , the Latin phrases stilo veteri (or veteri stilo, abbreviated V.S.) and stilo novo (or novo stilo, abbreviated N.S.) were employed to denote dates according to the Julian and Gregorian calendars, respectively, mirroring the English Old Style and New Style conventions. These terms, derived from the Latin stilus meaning "style" or "method," facilitated precise notation in multilingual documents, particularly in , , and records where calendar discrepancies arose post-1582 . On the European continent, vernacular equivalents emerged in national historiographies and legal texts, adapting the Latin framework to local languages while retaining functional similarity. In French-language sources, dates in the were marked as style ancien (abbreviated A.S. or S.A.), contrasting with style nouveau (N.S.) for Gregorian dates, a practice evident in post-reform chronicles and contracts to resolve ambiguities in bilateral agreements. German texts similarly distinguished alter Stil (old style, Julian) from neuer Stil (new style, Gregorian), often without standardized abbreviations but applied in astronomical almanacs and regional histories to clarify events spanning adoption dates, such as in Protestant principalities delaying the reform until the 1700s. In Italian and other Romance-language contexts, terms like stile vecchio (old style) and stile nuovo (new style) paralleled the Latin originals, used in Tuscan and papal records from the late onward to annotate dual-dated entries amid early Catholic adoption of the Gregorian system. These notations emphasized the reform's 10-day shift (later 11 or 12 days), ensuring chronological accuracy in cross-border trade and scientific correspondence, though inconsistencies persisted in Orthodox-influenced regions favoring Julian persistence. Overall, such equivalents promoted interoperability but required contextual verification, as local customs sometimes prioritized civil over astronomical reckoning.

Year-End Adjustments and Dual Year Usage

Traditional March-Based New Year

In the ancient Roman calendar, the year originally commenced on , reflecting the onset of spring and the traditional start of agricultural and military activities. This structure consisted of ten months beginning in March, with winter days unassigned until later reforms. By the , Christian influence in Europe adapted this vernal alignment, establishing —the Feast of the , or —as the predominant new year's day across much of the continent. This date symbolized the Gabriel's announcement to the Virgin Mary, conceptually linking creation and renewal, and gained traction from the ninth century onward in to coincide with religious observance. The tradition persisted widely until the eighteenth century, with March 25 serving as the civil and benchmark for year transitions. In England specifically, from the around 1155 until the Calendar (New Style) Act of 1751, marked the official start of the legal year under the . This convention treated and as the final months of the preceding year, necessitating for clarity in historical records (e.g., dates from to March 24 were often annotated as belonging to the "old" year). While not typically marked by public festivities, held practical significance for quarter-day payments, tenancies, and fiscal accounting, influencing enduring customs like the UK's tax year beginning on April 6 (adjusted for the 1752 calendar skip). The shift away from this system in 1752 aligned Britain with but retained echoes in legal and historical contexts.

Reforms Aligning to January 1

In , the of , issued by King Charles IX on August 9, 1564, during his progression through the provinces, mandated that the civil year begin on uniformly across the kingdom, with the change taking effect in 1565. Prior to this , French provinces employed disparate new year dates, including (which varied annually), , or , leading to inconsistencies in legal, fiscal, and ecclesiastical records; the edict sought to resolve these discrepancies by adopting the Roman consular tradition of , named for , the god of beginnings. This reform preceded the Gregorian calendar's introduction by nearly two decades and applied solely to the year's commencement, without altering the Julian reckoning of days. Scotland followed suit with an passed in 1599, effective January 1, 1600, which shifted the legal new year from March 25 to January 1 while maintaining the Julian calendar's leap rules and day count until the 1752 adoption of Gregorian adjustments. This change aligned Scottish civil dating more closely with continental practices, facilitating trade and diplomacy, though persisted in some ecclesiastical contexts until full standardization. In parts of the and northern Italian states, such as the , civil authorities had informally favored for fiscal and administrative purposes by the early 16th century, reflecting lingering Roman influence amid fragmented local customs; however, these lacked the kingdom-wide enforcement seen in until papal endorsement via the 1582 bull , which explicitly reaffirmed in Gregorian-adopting realms. These pre-Gregorian shifts reduced ambiguities in cross-border correspondence but did not address the Julian calendar's accumulating drift against the solar year, leaving date conversions reliant on contextual historical analysis.

Historiographical Challenges with Transposed Dates

Methods for Converting Historical Events

Converting dates of historical events from Old Style () to New Style () requires first establishing the event's location to identify the local adoption date of the , as discrepancies arose from regionally staggered implementations between 1582 and the early 20th century. For pre-adoption dates, the Julian date must be adjusted forward by the accumulated drift, which stemmed from the 's excess of approximately 0.0078 days per year due to over-frequent ; this drift reached 10 days by 1582 and increased thereafter. Post-adoption dates are already in Gregorian reckoning, though events near transition points, such as England's 1752 skip of 11 days (September 2 followed immediately by September 14), demand verification against original records to avoid conflating skipped days with omissions. A straightforward method for approximate conversions in regions like Britain or its colonies applies fixed offsets based on the century of the event: add 10 days for Julian dates from 1583 to February 28, 1700 (or March 1 in March-start years); 11 days from March 1, 1700, to February 28, 1800; 12 days from March 1, 1800, to February 28, 1900; and 13 days thereafter, reflecting the Gregorian omission of leap years in 1700, 1800, and 1900 (which were leap years in Julian reckoning). This approach assumes proleptic extension of Gregorian rules backward and ignores local new-year variations, such as England's pre-1752 start, which could render a February date as, for example, 10 February 1600 Old Style equivalent to 20 February 1600/1 New Style if dual-dated. Adjustments must account for whether the original record used Julian leap rules, where years divisible by 4 were leaps without century exceptions. For precise conversions, particularly across centuries or involving ambiguous leap status, the Julian Day Number (JDN) serves as an intermediary, providing a continuous count of days from , 4713 BC (noon UT) in the , independent of shifts. To convert a Julian date (year Y, month M, day D):
  • Adjust for astronomical month numbering: if M > 2, else Y--, M += 12.
  • Compute JDN = floor(365.25 * (Y + 4716)) + floor(30.6001 * (M + 1)) + D - 1524 (for Julian; the -0.75 offset applies in some variants for pre-epoch dates).
Then, from JDN to proleptic Gregorian date:
  • a = ((JDN - 1867216.25)/36524.25), Z = JDN + 1 + a - (a/4) (for Gregorian adjustment).
  • Further steps yield adjusted Y, M, D via (365.25 * Y) + (30.6001 * (M + 1)) + D + offsets.
This method ensures causal alignment with solar es, as the aimed to restore the vernal equinox to March 21; for instance, Julius Caesar's assassination on March 15, 44 BC (Julian) converts to March 27 proleptic Gregorian, reflecting three omitted Julian leaps by that . Tools implementing these formulas, such as those from astronomical observatories, facilitate verification, though manual application demands cross-checking against primary sources to mitigate transcription errors in historical ledgers.

Notable Examples of Date Discrepancies

A prominent instance of date discrepancy arises in the recording of George Washington's birth, noted as February 11, 1731, under the (Old Style), which adjusts to February 22, 1732, in the (New Style) accounting for the 11-day shift and the traditional March commencement of the new year. Similarly, Thomas Jefferson's gravestone at inscribes his birth as April 2, 1743, reflecting the Old Style date, though the Gregorian equivalent is April 13, 1743, following the 1752 adoption in British colonies that retroactively aligned prior dates. The , fought between forces loyal to William III and James II, occurred on July 1, 1690, Old Style, corresponding to July 11, 1690, New Style, as the 10-day divergence prevailed before the 1700 omission widened the gap. In Russian history, the Bolshevik of power known as the transpired on October 25, 1917, per the then used, equating to November 7, 1917, Gregorian, a misalignment persisting until Russia's 1918 added 13 days. These cases highlight how unadjusted Old Style dates can mislead modern interpretations, necessitating conversion for chronological accuracy across divergent calendar regimes.

Persistent Confusions and Scholarly Debates

One persistent source of confusion arises from the inconsistent across regions, leading to discrepancies in dating international events and correspondence. For instance, diplomatic letters and trade documents from the 17th and 18th centuries often included both Julian and Gregorian dates to avoid misinterpretation, as the day difference ranged from 10 days in the 1582 reform to 13 days by the . This practice highlights how varying national transitions—such as Britain's in , which omitted 11 days in , or Russia's delayed shift until —created challenges in synchronizing chronologies for cross-border historical . In genealogical research, such variances frequently result in apparent inconsistencies, like differing recorded birth dates for the same individual across records, complicating family lineage verification. Further confusions stem from the mechanics of conversion itself, particularly around and skipped days. Historians note dilemmas in double dating for periods straddling the under the old March-start convention, where events in or might be ambiguously recorded as belonging to the prior year (e.g., 24 1700/01). The 1582 omission of 10 days caused immediate practical disruptions, including disputes over contract expirations and event scheduling, while century-end rules under Julian reckoning (omitting skips every 100 years unless divisible by 400) led to ongoing errors in software and manual calculations. Examples include the British calendar act of 1750, which mandated adjustment but left residual uncertainty about validating omitted dates for legal purposes, and Peter the Great's 1700 reforms in , which engendered misunderstandings about year numbering and day alignments persisting into modern scholarship. Scholarly debates center on the appropriate use of proleptic Gregorian extensions—applying the calendar retroactively before —versus preserving original Julian dates for historical fidelity. Critics argue that proleptic conversions distort contemporary perceptions of time, as medieval actors operated under Julian assumptions, potentially misleading analyses of seasonal or astronomical events; for example, imposing Gregorian rules backward can alter computations or harvest timings in pre-reform records. Proponents of regularization, however, advocate it for computational consistency in and large-scale datasets, though this is contested as unconventional and prone to over-simplifying regional variations. These tensions influence historiographical practices, with some fields like early modern favoring context-specific notations to avoid , while others prioritize modern uniformity for cross-era comparisons, underscoring the trade-off between empirical accuracy and analytical convenience.

References

  1. https://www.familysearch.org/en/blog/what-calendar-do-we-use-gregorian
  2. https://www.history.com/articles/6-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-gregorian-calendar
  3. https://www.papalartifacts.com/february-24-1582-pope-gregory-xiii-issues-the-proclamation-inter-gravissimas-resulting-in-the-gregorian-calendar-replacing-the-julian-calendar/
  4. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/gregory-xiii-reforms-calendar
  5. https://libguides.ctstatelibrary.org/hg/colonialresearch/calendar
  6. https://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/year-countries.html
  7. https://education.myheritage.com/article/understanding-historical-dates-and-calendars-for-genealogical-research-2/
  8. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/the-gregorian-calendar/
  9. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240227-how-julius-caesar-made-the-longest-year-in-history-and-brought-us-leap-years
  10. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/romancalendar.html
  11. https://news.wsu.edu/news/2020/02/19/wsu-experts-explain-origins-leap-year/
  12. https://www.magellantv.com/articles/julius-caesars-legacy-to-time-the-julian-calendar
  13. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/january-1/new-years-day
  14. https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/julian-calendar.html
  15. https://www.thecollector.com/julian-calendar/
  16. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/Numbers/Math/Mathematical_Thinking/calendar_calculations.htm
  17. https://www.polysyllabic.com/?q=calhistory/julian/problems
  18. https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/t/Tropical%2BYear
  19. https://www.hermetic.ch/cal_stud/cal_art.html
  20. https://www.timeanddate.com/date/perfect-calendar.html
  21. https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/how-humanitys-most-enduring-calendar-failed-us-all-ec3591908e9a
  22. https://worldhistoryedu.com/the-switch-to-the-gregorian-calendar-and-how-ten-days-vanished/
  23. https://cdendro.se/dendro/ancient-history/the-gregorian-calendar-reform/
  24. https://reasons.org/explore/blogs/impact-events/why-leap-years-are-important
  25. https://www.oikoumene.org/resources/documents/frequently-asked-questions-about-the-date-of-easter
  26. https://theunitedindian.com/news/Gregorian-Calendar-vs-Julian-Calendar
  27. https://www.rosettacalendar.com/calendars.html
  28. https://www.pas.rochester.edu/~blackman/ast104/calendars.html
  29. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Extras/JulianErrors/
  30. https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/julian-gregorian-switch.html
  31. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Inter-gravissimas
  32. https://www.britannica.com/story/ten-days-that-vanished-the-switch-to-the-gregorian-calendar
  33. https://www.lindahall.org/about/news/scientist-of-the-day/pope-gregory-xiii/
  34. https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/zh/watches-and-culture/watchmaking-knowledge/encyclopedia/gregorian-calendar
  35. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Gregorian-calendar
  36. https://study.com/academy/lesson/origins-of-the-julian-gregorian-calendars.html
  37. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/zylquk/if_the_divergence_in_lag_between_julian_and/
  38. https://worldhistoryedu.com/difference-between-julian-calendar-and-gregorian-calendar/
  39. https://familyhistorydaily.com/genealogy-help-and-how-to/1752-calendar-change/
  40. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03168a.htm
  41. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/263433/cna-explains-why-eastern-and-western-easter-dates-differ-and-why-2025-is-different
  42. https://www.goarch.org/-/julian-calendar-vs.-gregorian-calendar
  43. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Julian_and_Gregorian_Calendars
  44. https://www.thecenterforruleoflaw.org/rule-of-law-blog/october-4-1582-the-gregorian-calendar-is-introduced-by-pope-gregory-xiii
  45. https://familytreemagazine.com/history/gregorian-calendar-adoption-map/
  46. https://thecatholicheroes.com/history-biographies/the-history-and-impact-of-the-gregorian-calendar-reform-how-a-papal-decree-reshaped-time/
  47. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-important-events/new-year-old-calendar-origins-and-controversy-gregorian-calendar-005047
  48. https://medium.com/knowlobby/when-time-changed-the-julian-and-gregorian-calendars-deb6a9ca931d
  49. https://www.sizes.com/time/cal_Gregadoption.htm
  50. http://www.hhogman.se/change-of-calendars-sweden.htm
  51. https://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/year-text-British.html
  52. https://www.theguardian.com/science/1999/jun/24/technology1
  53. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/gregorian-calendar-adopted-england
  54. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Give-us-our-eleven-days/
  55. https://www.iflscience.com/the-calendar-riots-the-myth-and-truth-of-britains-missing-11-days-75336
  56. https://www.monticello.org/research-education/thomas-jefferson-encyclopedia/old-style-os/
  57. https://grapevinelibrary.info/2025/03/the-1752-calendar-change-plus-where-did-my-eleven-days-go/
  58. https://www.goarch.org/-/changing-times-changing-dates
  59. https://www.prlib.ru/en/history/619010
  60. https://lidenz.com/time-to-take-a-look-at-the-impact-of-the-russian-julian-calendar/
  61. https://secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0200307180
  62. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/when-did-east-asian-countries-adopt-western-calendar-ask-smithsonian-180964764/
  63. https://www.t-vine.com/turkey-adopts-european-time-and-calendar-26-december-1925/
  64. https://seasia.co/2025/09/16/these-countries-dont-use-the-gregorian-calendar
  65. https://longislandgenealogy.com/CalanderChange.html
  66. https://blog.newspapers.com/7-common-historical-newspaper-abbreviations-and-terms/
  67. https://www.archontology.org/articles/conventions.php
  68. https://www.exploreyourgenealogy.co.uk/the-calendar-change-and-double-dating-1414
  69. http://www.cree.name/genuki/dates.htm
  70. https://www.usgenweb.org/research/calendar.html
  71. https://www.mass.gov/news/happy-new-year
  72. https://www.historyjournal.net/article/406/7-5-7-953.pdf
  73. http://parallax-viewpoint.blogspot.com/2015/08/synchronised-dates.html
  74. https://homesteadmuseum.blog/2025/05/31/its-all-relative-genealogy-workshop-preview-double-dating-its-not-just-for-couples-anymore/
  75. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/19553/pg19553-images.html
  76. https://kids.kiddle.co/Old_Style_and_New_Style_dates
  77. https://www.geo.fr/histoire/le-chiffre-de-geo-10-le-nombre-de-jours-supprimes-du-calendrier-francais-en-decembre-1582-223741
  78. https://www.calendarz.com/fr/blog/double-birthdays-famous-figures-two-dates-julian-gregorian
  79. https://www.familysearch.org/de/blog/welchen-kalender-verwenden-wir-alles-zum-gregorianischen-kalender
  80. https://www.stilkunst.de/c31_calendar/help/help-kalender-einfuehrung_gregorianisch.php
  81. https://wheelandcross.substack.com/p/new-year-traditions-ancient-roman
  82. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-ancient-traditions/march-25-0015100
  83. https://www.tudorsociety.com/25-march-lady-day-new-year/
  84. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/researchguidance/datingdocuments/juliangregorian.aspx
  85. https://www.wealddown.co.uk/museum-news/lady-day/
  86. https://www.alpes-isere.com/en/sit/chateau-de-roussillon-120944/
  87. https://culturalstoryweaver.com/le-poisson-davril-french-april-fools-day/
  88. https://histoiresfrancaises.com/en/blogs/news/histoire-de-nouvel-an
  89. https://www.folger.edu/blogs/collation/untangling-dating/
  90. https://familytreemagazine.com/history/convertingjulian-genealogy-dates/
  91. http://aulis.org/Calendar/Old_%2526_New_Style_Dates.html
  92. https://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/JD_formula
  93. https://quasar.as.utexas.edu/BillInfo/JulianDatesG.html
  94. https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/jdc/
  95. https://www.archives.gov/legislative/features/washington
  96. https://www.infoplease.com/askeds/old-style-vs-new-style-years
  97. https://www.monticello.org/thomas-jefferson/brief-biography-of-jefferson/
  98. https://www.boynevalleydaytours.com/battle-of-the-boyne.htm
  99. https://www.britannica.com/question/Why-is-it-called-the-October-Revolution-if-it-took-place-in-November
  100. https://www.jewishgen.org/blog/?p=from-julian-to-gregorian-reconciling-dates-in-genealogical-records
  101. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/calendar-reform-under-peter-the-great-absolutist-prerogatives-plural-temporalities-and-christian-exceptionalism/F86C0ED9716AA7CF49C72E9798FD58CB
  102. https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2009/04/making_time_saf.html
  103. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1682
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.