Hubbry Logo
Open wagonOpen wagonMain
Open search
Open wagon
Community hub
Open wagon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Open wagon
Open wagon
Open wagon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A Class Ow goods wagon on the Saxon narrow gauge railways with Heberlein brakes
Open wagon for peat, 750 mm (2 ft 5+1⁄2 in)

An open wagon (or truck in the UK) forms a large group of railway goods wagons designed primarily for the transportation of bulk goods that are not moisture-retentive and can usually be tipped, dumped or shovelled. The International Union of Railways (UIC) distinguishes between ordinary wagons (Class E/UIC-type 5) and special wagons (F/6).[1][2] Open wagons often form a significant part of a railway company's goods wagon fleet; for example, forming just under 40% of the Deutsche Bahn's total goods wagon stock in Germany.

UIC standard goods wagons

[edit]

Since the 1960s, the majority of goods wagons procured by European railway administrations have been built to standards laid down by, or based on, those established by the UIC. In addition to open wagons the table also shows wagons with opening roofs (Class T), whose design is based on open wagons.

  • Examples of standard open wagons
  • Twin-axled UIC Type 1 open wagon, used as an ash wagon, on a transporter wagon in Zittau
    Twin-axled UIC Type 1 open wagon, used as an ash wagon, on a transporter wagon in Zittau
  • A Czech (ČD) twin-axled open wagon of UIC Type 2 in Raspenava
    A Czech (ČD) twin-axled open wagon of UIC Type 2 in Raspenava
Norm UIC 571-1:
Ordinary class
two axles 		UIC 571-2:
Ordinary class
four axles 		UIC 571-3:
Special class
Class Type 1
"French" 		Type 2
"German" 		Wagon with sliding roof
four axles 		Hopper wagon
two axles 		Saddle-bottomed wagon
four axles
without roof with roof without roof with roof
Class Es Ea(o)s Taems
to 1979: Taes 		Fcs Tds Fals Tals
Axle base 4.85 m
(15 ft 11 in) 		5.40 m
(17 ft 8+5⁄8 in) 		− 6.00 m
(19 ft 8+1⁄4 in) 		−
Bogie pivot pitch − 9.00 m
(29 ft 6+3⁄8 in) 		− 7.50 m
(24 ft 7+1⁄4 in)
Length over buffers 9.04 m
(29 ft 7+7⁄8 in) 		10.00 m
(32 ft 9+3⁄4 in) 		14.04 m
(46 ft 3⁄4 in) 		9.64 m
(31 ft 7+1⁄2 in) 		12.54 m
(41 ft 1+3⁄4 in)
Loading length, min. 7.79 m
(25 ft 6+3⁄4 in) 		8.76 m
(28 ft 8+7⁄8 in) 		12.71 m
(41 ft 8+3⁄8 in) 		12.40 m
(40 ft 8+1⁄4 in) 		− −
Loading area, ca. 22 m2
(240 sq ft) 		24 m2
(260 sq ft) 		35 m2
(380 sq ft) 		33 m2
(360 sq ft) 		− −
Loading volume, ca. 36 m3
(1,300 cu ft) 		36 m3
(1,300 cu ft) 		71 m3
(2,500 cu ft) 		74 m3
(2,600 cu ft) 		40 m3
(1,400 cu ft) 		38 m3
(1,300 cu ft) 		75 m3
(2,600 cu ft) 		72 m3
(2,500 cu ft)
Unladen weight, max. ... 12.5 t
(12.3 long tons; 13.8 short tons) 		22.0 t
(21.7 long tons; 24.3 short tons) 		24.0 t
(23.6 long tons; 26.5 short tons) 		13.0 t
(12.8 long tons; 14.3 short tons) 		13.5 t
(13.3 long tons; 14.9 short tons) 		15.0 t
(14.8 long tons; 16.5 short tons) 		15.5 t
(15.3 long tons; 17.1 short tons)
Doors per side 2 1 2 1 − −
Door width ... 1.80 m
(5 ft 10+7⁄8 in) 		1.80 m
(5 ft 10+7⁄8 in) 		4.00 m
(13 ft 1+1⁄2 in) 		− −

Class E – Ordinary open high-sided wagons

[edit]
Eaos: A Polish (PKP), four-axle, ordinary, open wagon with 9.00 m bogie pivot pitch in Lubań
Eanos-x055:A longer, four-axle, ordinary, open wagon with steel floor and 10.70 m bogie pivot pitch

These wagons have a level floor and solid sides with at least one door on each side. They are mainly used for transporting bulk goods, coal, scrap, steel, wood and paper. The majority of wagons have folding sides and end walls, otherwise they are given the letters l (fixed sides) or o (fixed end walls). Wagons may have one or two folding end walls. Steel rings enable ropes, nets or covers to be attached to secure the load.

Some of these wagons can also be completely tipped over, in other words, at certain places they can be lifted up and emptied by being turned about their longitudinal axis. This requires a very robust underframe. Sometimes the wagons are fitted with rotatable couplings so that they do not have to be individually uncoupled.

In 1998, the Deutsche Bahn (DB) had about 16,000 four-axle Class E wagons. They have increasingly retired their twin-axled E wagons since the 1990s and they are now rarely seen.

Class F – Special open high-sided wagons

[edit]

The majority of these are self-discharging wagons which use gravity-unloading (hopper cars and saddle-bottomed wagons), but in addition there are also:

  • Side-tipping wagons (box tip, trough-tip or side-tip wagon),
  • Bucket wagon, other open wagons without side doors

In addition to hopper and saddle-bottomed wagons there were also wagons with opening roofs.[citation needed]

Typical loads for these wagons are all sorts of bulk goods, like coal, coke, ore, sand or gravel. Because bulk goods are often moved in large quantities, these wagons are frequently used in so-called unit or block trains that only comprise one type of wagon and only shift one type of product from the dispatcher to the recipient.

Hopper wagons

[edit]
Main article: Hopper car
Further information: Hopper wagons with loading hatches

Hopper wagons can only be unloaded by gravity with no external assistance and are therefore also classed as self-discharging wagons. The majority may be filled, when at rail or road level, by high-level discharge chutes (whose ends are more than 70 cm above the top of the rails) or conveyor belts. Because a controlled amount of the load can be discharged at any place the wagons may be sent anywhere and are even used individually. Railway companies also use hoppers as departmental wagons in maintenance of way trains for ballasting the track.

Since the 1990s there has been a trend for new hopper wagons to be built as bogie wagons which have not yet been standardized by the UIC.

[edit]

Saddle-bottomed wagons

[edit]
A Polish (PKP) Falns saddle-bottom wagon – a four-axle, open wagon with high-level gravity discharge to both sides and loading volume of 82 m3 (107 cu yd) – in Horka

Saddle-bottomed wagons are large-volume hoppers are exclusively unloaded by gravity and are therefore classed as self-discharging hoppers. Unlike normal hopper wagons, however, their discharge cannot be controlled and the entire load must be dropped. To unload the flaps on the side swing out allowing the load to empty. This is aided by the floor which slopes downwards on both sides like a gable roof. The discharging chutes on either side are relatively high up. These wagons are frequently seen in unit trains for transporting bulk goods such as coal or mineral ore from mines or ports to steelworks or power stations.

The most modern type of four axle saddle-bottomed wagon in the DB is the four axle Falns 121 with a loading volume of 90 m3 (120 cu yd). It was built from 1992 in several batches. By February 2008 another 100 of these wagons were to have been delivered to the DB and another 300 by 2010. These latest wagons will have an axle load of 23.5 t (23.1 long tons; 25.9 short tons) and an unladen weight of no more than 24.5 t (24.1 long tons; 27.0 short tons), resulting in a load limit of 69.5 t (68.4 long tons; 76.6 short tons).

Side-tipping wagons

[edit]

Side-tipping wagons have hydraulic, pneumatic or electric tipping equipment, that enables the wagon body to be lifted on one side. Depending on the design, they may be tipped to both sides or just one side only. In order to prevent wagons from falling over during the tipping operation, some are equipped with track pinch bars with which they can be securely anchored to the trackbed. These wagons are often seen in unit trains being used to remove excavated material from major construction sites.

  • Example of side-tipping wagons
  • A Czech (ČD) side tipper
    A Czech (ČD) side tipper
  • The ČD groups these wagons into Class Ua
    The ČD groups these wagons into Class Ua
  • The tipping system can be seen from the end
    The tipping system can be seen from the end
  • US-style bogie on a side-tipping wagon
    US-style bogie on a side-tipping wagon
  • Coupling and main air pipe on a side-tipping wagon
    Coupling and main air pipe on a side-tipping wagon

Specialized wagons

[edit]

Lorry or mine car

[edit]
Further information: Minecart § Lorry or mine car, Mineral wagon, and Decauville wagon
A 30 cu ft (0.85 m3) mine car, drawing from the United States Bureau of Mines

A lorry or mine car is an open railroad car (gondola) with a tipping trough, used in mining. It is known in the UK as a tippler or chaldron wagon,[3] and in the US as a mine car.[4]

Chaldrons

[edit]
Main article: Chaldron
Replica of a chaldron wagon

The first railway bulk-cargo gondolas, the first freight wagons, were the chaldron cars of the early coal-carrying plateways. These were relatively short in length and tall in proportion, with a tapered body that widened upwards, above the wheels. Once locomotive haulage began, the unstable and top-heavy nature of this design became a problem with increasing speeds and later wagons became lower and longer.

Modalohr road trailer carriers

[edit]
Main article: Modalohr

Modalohrs are specialized wagons for carrying road trailers and road tractors on the AFF route from France to Italy and Luxembourg to Spain and vice versa; there are plans to expand this service.[5] A deck between the bogies (trucks) pivots (swings) 30°, allowing the trailers to be loaded from the sides. The cars are built by Lohr Industrie.

Intermodal open wagons

[edit]
Further information: Class U special wagon § Intermodal container well wagons

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Open wagon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An open wagon is an unenclosed railway freight vehicle featuring side walls but no roof, designed for transporting bulk commodities such as , , minerals, timber, , metal, , , and wood that tolerate exposure to the elements. These wagons enable straightforward loading via overhead cranes or grabs and unloading by tipping, dropping sides, or self-discharging mechanisms in specialized variants like and tippers. Originating in the with early wooden constructions for and mineral haulage, open wagons evolved to steel-framed designs by the early , becoming essential for and due to their durability and capacity for irregular loads. High-sided models predominate for containing loose materials, while low-sided or flat variants accommodate oversized items like machinery or pipes.

Historical development

Origins in early rail transport

The earliest precursors to open wagons appeared in British colliery wagonways during the 17th and 18th centuries, evolving from wooden sledges and carts used to haul coal over rudimentary tracks laid with wooden rails or plates. By the mid-17th century, flanged-wheel wagons were employed in mining regions like Northumberland and Durham to transport heavy loads from pits to rivers or ports, reducing friction and enabling horse-drawn haulage over distances up to several miles. These primitive vehicles, often open-topped wooden boxes mounted on simple axles, prioritized capacity for bulk commodities over speed or durability, with designs reflecting the immediate needs of the coal trade that dominated early rail development. The chaldron wagon emerged as a standardized form in the North East of England by the early , consisting of a four-wheeled wooden body with end doors for unloading, typically holding 53 (approximately 2.7 metric tons) of . Derived from pre-railway coal wains, these open carts were the first widespread rail vehicles for above-ground freight, their capacity derived from the chaldron measure—a volumetric unit of 36 bushels standardized to limit loads and prevent excessive wear on horse-drawn routes or early tracks. Empirical constraints on wagon weight, such as those mirroring haulage limits to avoid track indentation or breakage on wooden rails, ensured viability; overloading risked derailing fragile laid on longitudinal sleepers. George Stephenson's engineering on the , opened in as the world's first public steam-powered line, integrated chaldron wagons into commercial service, hauling from collieries to for export. This system demonstrated fixed wagon-load , where owners rented vehicles for dedicated commodity runs, slashing delivery costs from mines to markets and catalyzing broader industrial expansion by facilitating reliable bulk and distribution. The causal linkage to the lay in this efficiency: prior wagonways had confined transport to short hauls, but steam integration with open wagons scaled output, with annual tonnage via such routes surging from localized pit volumes to national supply chains.

19th and 20th century evolution

In the mid-19th century, open wagons predominantly featured wooden construction, which provided initial economy but suffered from brittleness under increasing speeds and loads, often leading to structural failures during impacts or prolonged . By the , empirical observations of these weaknesses prompted transitions to reinforcements in frames and sides, enhancing rigidity and extending service life, as seen in British open wagons incorporating metal strapping for load-bearing stress points. This shift was driven by industrial demands for reliable bulk transport, with early iron-augmented designs allowing capacities around 10-15 tons for commodities like and . The completion of the US transcontinental railroad in 1869 markedly expanded gondola usage for hauling aggregates, timber, and mining ores essential to western expansion, necessitating designs capable of withstanding rugged terrains and heavier payloads. Post-Civil War advancements in production enabled all-steel gondolas by the late , with lengths reaching 36 feet and load capacities up to 30 tons, a significant improvement over wooden predecessors limited to about 3-5 tons in the 1830s-1850s. In , riveted steel underframes emerged around for open wagons, as in Victorian designs, permitting greater durability against dynamic stresses from steam haulage and supporting bulk goods like minerals without frequent repairs. Early 20th-century refinements incorporated basic stress analysis principles, such as reinforced corner bracing and iron brake blocks replacing wooden ones from the 1870s onward, to mitigate failures from speed-induced flexing—evident in Great Eastern Railway trials yielding 14-ton steel-framed variants by the 1880s. These material evolutions prioritized causal factors like load distribution and impact resistance, empirically boosting wagon longevity from years to decades while scaling capacities to meet surging industrial freight volumes, though wood persisted in non-structural elements until broader steel adoption.

Standardization and post-WWII advancements

Following World War II, the International Union of Railways (UIC) advanced standardization of European freight wagons, including open types, through agreements in the 1950s and 1960s that harmonized components such as running gear and braking systems across member states. These efforts culminated in the UIC 571 series leaflets, defining ordinary open wagons like the Ea (two-axle) and Eaos (four-axle bogie) types for bulk goods transport on the standard 1435 mm gauge, with typical load capacities reaching 60-70 tonnes by the late 20th century to optimize interoperability and efficiency. In parallel, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) codified gondola classifications under Mechanical Designation Class G for open-top cars, specifying subtypes like GA with fixed sides, ends, and drop bottoms for rapid unloading of aggregates, facilitating standardized design and maintenance in North American freight networks. Material innovations post-1945 significantly enhanced wagon performance, with high-tensile-strength alloys enabling tare weight reductions of up to 25% compared to pre-war mild constructions while maintaining or increasing structural integrity and limits. This shift, evident in 1970s designs such as drop-bottom gondolas that supported faster cycle times for and handling, contributed to overall rail efficiency gains amid rising freight volumes. By employing ultra-high-strength steels like those tested in modern prototypes, wagon manufacturers achieved boosts without proportional weight increases, as demonstrated in industry validations reducing empty wagon mass for equivalent strength. In the 2020s, adoption of lightweight composites in freight wagon components has driven further advancements, with designs incorporating these materials yielding 10-20% overall weight savings that translate to proportional improvements in heavy-haul operations, according to analyses of optimized body structures. Such innovations, including hybrid steel-composite floors, enhance load capacities and reduce lifecycle emissions, aligning with data from rail sector reports on sustainable freight evolution. These developments underscore a continued emphasis on empirical metrics for payload-to-tare ratios, supporting global standardization trends beyond initial post-war frameworks.

Classification and regional variations

UIC European classification

The UIC classification system for European freight wagons designates open high-sided wagons under Class E for ordinary types and Class F for specialized variants, enabling standardized identification and interoperability across member networks. Class E encompasses reference wagons with side and end tipping capabilities on a flat floor, typically two-axled, optimized for bulk commodities requiring top-loading and manual or mechanical discharge without enclosed protection. This open-top design facilitates direct access for cranes or shovels, contrasting with covered wagons that prioritize cargo shielding from weather, as evidenced by structural specifications in UIC Leaflet 571-2 for high-sided models. Subtypes within Class E include Eaos (bogie-mounted, four-axle, with side and end flaps) for heavy loads like aggregates, often featuring side heights up to 2.8 meters and payloads standardized at approximately 65 tonnes in modern iterations compliant with limits of 20-22.5 tonnes. Eanos variants incorporate lower side walls suited for denser metal, maintaining flat floors for stability during transit. These codes derive from alphabetic suffixes indicating running gear (e.g., 'a' for bogies, 's' for two axles), discharge features ('o' for end, 'l' for side), and modifications, ensuring compatibility with European track gauges and loading gauges per UIC norms. Class F addresses specialized configurations, such as hoppers with funnel-shaped floors for unloading of fine minerals and Fakks side-tippers equipped with hydraulic or mechanical pivoting mechanisms for directional discharge. These differ from Class E by incorporating engineered discharge aids, enhancing efficiency for cohesive or abrasive loads while adhering to UIC standards outlined in technical leaflets governing dimensions, braking, and structural integrity since the system's formalization in 1965. The supports cross-border operations by mandating verifiable technical inscriptions on wagons, including index codes for route fitness and limits.

North American gondola equivalents

In North America, equivalents to European open wagons are primarily cars, classified under (AAR) standards as "G" for unequipped gondolas or "E" for equipped variants with features like drop ends or covers. These cars have fixed sides and ends with flat bottoms composed of dump doors that open to the side, enabling unloading via rotary dumping or grabs rather than gravity flow, in contrast to sloped-floor open hoppers. Typical designs support 100-ton gross weight ratings, with side heights of 4 to 5 feet optimized for bulk commodities like , , and aggregates, accommodating heavier axle loads up to 71,500 pounds per on standard four-axle bogies. Regional adaptations stem from North America's emphasis on long-haul unit trains over mixed-traffic networks, permitting bulkier structures due to larger loading gauges and track infrastructure rated for 286,000-pound gross weights since the 1990s, compared to Europe's lower limits of 20-23 metric tonnes per favoring lighter, more modular wagons. Rotary-dump gondolas, prevalent in service during the peak when such traffic comprised over 40% of rail tonnage, facilitate rapid inversion unloading at power plants, though volumes have declined post-2010 due to natural gas competition and reduced production from 1.1 billion short tons in 2008 to 578 million in 2023. Gondolas still represent about 10% of active freight car fleets in bulk service, with operators like Union Pacific reporting capacities up to 267,000 pounds per car suited for exposure to without covers, prioritizing durability over frequent interchanges.

Other global standards

In Russia, open wagons for 1520 mm gauge railways adhere to standards, including general technical conditions for open-top designs suited to bulk cargoes like transported via the , which handles up to 120 million tonnes of diverse freight annually. These wagons prioritize robust construction for harsh Siberian conditions, with payload capacities typically ranging from 60 to 70 tonnes to support high-volume mineral extraction and export. Australian open wagons, optimized for Pilbara iron operations, incorporate extended lengths and heavy-duty designs, such as those used by Fortescue Metals Group with payloads up to 137 tonnes per wagon and tare weights of 23 tonnes, enabling trainsets exceeding 34,000 tonnes total capacity over 2.8 km. Rio Tinto variants similarly achieve 116 tonnes per wagon across trains of up to 236 cars stretching 2.4 km, reflecting adaptations for low-density, high-volume to maximize throughput on dedicated heavy-haul networks. In , low-sided open wagons of the BOY series, including BOYEL for enhanced loading, are tailored for minerals such as and , featuring side heights reduced for easier mechanized loading and payloads around 50 s on 20-25 loads, diverging from higher-sided norms to suit regional handling practices and cargo densities. These designs underscore causal adaptations to local ore characteristics, prioritizing unloading efficiency over universal enclosure for protection against weather. Chinese railway standards under TB specifications govern open wagons for bulk freight, emphasizing high-volume and transport on the extensive network, where such vehicles form a core component of freight operations amid total rail exceeding 4 billion tonnes annually as of 2019.

Design and technical features

Structural components and materials

The underframe serves as the foundational load-bearing element in open wagons, comprising longitudinal center sills, side sills, and crossbearers welded into a rigid girder structure to transmit vertical, lateral, and longitudinal forces from the payload to the running gear. Side walls consist of vertical pillars or stakes interconnected with horizontal framing and sheeting, designed to resist outward pressure from contained bulk cargoes while accommodating vibrational stresses during transit. End walls, typically fixed or hinged, integrate with the underframe and sides to form a continuous perimeter, enhancing torsional stiffness and preventing cargo spillage under dynamic loading. Construction materials prioritize high-strength low-alloy steels, such as grades with minimum yield strengths of 355 MPa (e.g., S355), which provide greater resistance to deformation than traditional mild steels used in earlier designs. Higher grades like Amstrong 420MC or 500MC, with yield strengths up to 500 MPa, further improve payload-to-tare weight ratios in modern applications. The transition to all-welded fabrication post-1950s eliminated riveted joints, minimizing stress concentrations and initiation sites that previously accelerated structural degradation. Emerging hybrid designs incorporate aluminum alloys or foam-filled elements within steel frameworks, yielding mass reductions of approximately 20-21% without compromising structural capacity or margins. performance, evaluated through standards from bodies like the UIC, supports operational lifespans exceeding 30 years for well-maintained wagons under cyclic loads simulating millions of ton-miles annually, with failure primarily occurring at weld imperfections or corrosion-prone areas rather than bulk material yielding.

Capacity, dimensions, and loading mechanisms

Open wagons exhibit standardized dimensions tailored to track gauges and loading gauges, with four-axle designs commonly featuring internal lengths of approximately 12 to 15 meters, widths around 2.9 to 3.2 meters, and side heights varying from 1.5 to 2.5 meters to accommodate bulk cargoes without exceeding vertical clearance limits. Longer variants, up to 20 meters over buffers, appear in articulated or heavy-haul configurations but are less common in standard European UIC types. Payload capacities typically range from 60 to 80 tonnes for standard four- units, scaling with axle loads of 20 to 23 tonnes per , while volumetric capacities fall between 70 and 90 cubic meters; higher loads up to 94 tonnes occur in reinforced six- models, though these increase tare weights to 30-43 tonnes and demand upgraded infrastructure. These parameters balance structural integrity against track and bridge load limits, where exceeding axle ratings risks or dynamic instability, particularly at operational speeds up to 100 km/h when loaded. Loading occurs via open tops or side/end doors, typically 2 to 4 meters wide and 2 meters high, facilitating mechanical or manual filling, while unloading mechanisms prioritize efficiency through gravity-assisted designs. Standard side-unloading doors enable shovel or conveyor discharge, but hopper variants incorporate drop-bottom gates—often pneumatically or lever-operated—that open to funnel loads onto tracks or conveyors, minimizing labor compared to crane dependency in non-self-discharging types. This gravity mechanism trades off floor space for sloped interiors, potentially reducing uniform capacity by 5-10% but enabling rapid emptying in under a minute per wagon when aligned with receiving pits.

Types and variants

Ordinary open high-sided wagons

Ordinary open high-sided wagons, designated under UIC Class E, are designed with fixed vertical sides typically 2.1 meters high to retain loose bulk cargoes such as , scrap metal, ores, coke, and . These wagons feature flat floors, enabling versatile top-loading via shovels, grabs, or conveyors, which facilitates rapid filling without specialized . The absence of sloped bottoms or discharge aids distinguishes them from hopper types, requiring manual or mechanical unloading from the sides or top for versatility in general freight operations. Standardized models like the Eaos, per UIC Leaflet 571-2, employ four-axle underframes with lengths of 12.8 to 15 meters, internal widths of 2.76 meters, and volumes around 72 cubic meters. capacities reach 60 to 66 tonnes, supported by continuous top chords and double on each side for access, with construction ensuring durability under heavy loads. These dimensions comply with UIC standards for across European networks, allowing efficient integration into mixed freight trains. Variants within this class include subtypes optimized for higher payloads or specific reinforcements, such as those with strengthened side walls for denser materials, while maintaining the core open-top, high-sided profile. Lower-sided configurations, akin to Ea types, accommodate oversized items like pipes or timber by reducing side heights to under 1 meter, prioritizing volume over containment for irregular loads. Eaos models predominate in fleets like those of , with thousands in service for bulk transport, underscoring their role in standard rail freight due to cost-effective design and loading efficiency.

Hopper and self-discharging wagons

Hopper wagons represent a specialized subset of open wagons engineered for the efficient -assisted discharge of loose bulk commodities, characterized by sloped or funnel-shaped floors that direct materials toward underside gates or doors. In the UIC classification, F-class wagons denote those without flat floors, equipped for self-discharging via , with subtypes such as featuring low side walls and longitudinal discharge slots for rapid emptying of cargoes like or . These designs contrast with ordinary open wagons by prioritizing flowable bulks, enabling unloading times as short as several minutes under optimal conditions. In North American railroading, open hopper cars employ analogous bottom-discharge mechanisms, often with multiple hinged doors or slopes that converge to central outlets, facilitating the transport and swift release of aggregates, minerals, and grains. Discharge is typically controlled by manual levers, pneumatic actuators, or alone, with gates preventing premature spillage during transit. Compared to European F-class variants, U.S. hoppers frequently incorporate steeper slopes and reinforced outlets to handle higher-volume flows, though both achieve faster turnaround than non-self-discharging types by minimizing manual intervention. The primary advantage lies in reduced residue retention, as gravity flow extracts 98-99% of load versus higher losses in shovel-based unloading from flat floors, lowering operational costs and waste. However, efficacy depends on material properties; dry, granular loads discharge cleanly, while damp or cohesive substances risk arching or clumping, necessitating auxiliary aids like vibrators or air slides to ensure complete evacuation. Capacities align with standard open wagons, often 50-100 metric tons, but optimizations for self-flow enhance suitability for high-throughput sectors like energy production and aggregates.

Specialized and historical variants

Side-tipping open wagons, classified in Europe under UIC types like Ua, feature hydraulic or mechanical levers to rotate the body laterally, facilitating rapid discharge of aggregates, spoil, or minerals without fixed infrastructure. These wagons, often with capacities of 20-40 tonnes, enable unloading at construction sites or quarries by tilting to one side, reducing reliance on manual labor or stationary tipplers. The tipping mechanism, visible at the wagon's end, connects to air or hydraulic systems for controlled operation, though it demands regular maintenance to prevent hydraulic failures. Mine cars represent compact specialized variants for underground , typically narrow-gauge (600-900 mm) with tipping buckets or fixed bodies holding 1-5 tonnes of , , or . Equipped with cast and axles for durability in harsh environments, these cars often include end- or side-dumping features activated by levers or railside stops, optimizing material flow in confined tunnels. Their design prioritizes low profile and maneuverability on gradients up to 15-30%, with structural integrity tested for impacts and . Chaldron wagons, developed in the UK North East fields around 1795, were early wooden open wagons with tapered sides and a capacity of 53 (2.69 tonnes), measured in chaldron units for taxation. These four-wheeled vehicles, used on wooden-railed tramroads, included bottom doors for unloading and persisted into the on railways like the Stockton & , marking a precursor to standardized freight cars. Modern adaptations include Modalohr wagons, which employ open-frame designs with pivoting pockets to secure semi-trailers for combined rail-road transport across European networks. These six-axle units accommodate standard 4-meter-high trailers via horizontal loading ramps, maintaining gauge compatibility (UIC GB1 minimum) while exposing the trailer frame for weight efficiency. The system's cradle absorbs vertical loads through the trailer's , enhancing intermodal flexibility over traditional flat wagons.

Operations and usage

Loading, unloading, and maintenance procedures

Loading procedures for open wagons typically involve the use of front-end loaders, excavators, or overhead cranes to deposit bulk materials directly into the wagon's open top, ensuring even distribution to maintain stability during transit. These methods are suited for both single-wagon operations and block train formations, though the latter enable higher throughput via dedicated sidings and coordinated equipment. Loading rates vary by equipment and material type, but mobile loaders commonly achieve 10-50 tonnes per hour per wagon in standard operations, limited by factors such as material flow and wagon positioning. Unloading is often accomplished through gravity-assisted methods, including manual shoveling for low-volume single- scenarios or mechanized systems like rotary dumpers and tipplers for high-volume block trains. Rotary dumpers rotate the entire up to 360 degrees around its longitudinal axis, enabling rapid discharge without counterweights and achieving efficiencies of up to 1,000-2,000 tonnes per hour for unit trains by minimizing handling time. Side or front tipplers, which tilt wagons by 45-90 degrees, are alternatives offering higher throughput in constrained spaces, though they require robust . Single- unloading remains prevalent in fragmented networks but is declining in favor of block train operations, which reduce shunting and improve overall utilization by 3-8 times in cost efficiency per tonne-kilometer. Maintenance procedures emphasize periodic inspections to address wear from abrasive cargoes and environmental exposure, with visual checks for on side walls, floors, and underframes conducted per UIC protocols, often annually or after exposure to harsh conditions. materials accelerate floor and sidewall degradation, potentially shortening lifespan by 20-30% without protective linings or optimized designs, necessitating repairs like or replacement of affected components. In the , automation such as robotic inspection tools and has emerged to streamline , reducing manual labor by up to 25-50% in equipped facilities while enhancing detection of early wear.

Common cargoes and industrial applications

Open wagons are predominantly employed for the carriage of dry bulk commodities that do not require protection from moisture, including , , aggregates such as and , and scrap metal. These materials are loaded via or conveyor systems and unloaded through side tipping, end doors, or bottom hoppers, facilitating efficient handling in high-volume operations. In the United States, coal represents the largest single commodity by rail volume, comprising 27.3% of non-intermodal carloads as of early 2025, with much of this originating from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana, where open hopper cars transport low-sulfur coal to utilities and export terminals. Wyoming alone accounted for 40% of U.S. coal production in recent years, predominantly moved by unit trains of specialized open-top hoppers averaging 100-150 cars each. Aggregates and ores follow as key cargoes, supporting construction and mining sectors, while scrap metal feeds steel mills, with bulk commodities overall forming 52% of rail freight car loads. In , open wagons handle minerals and materials, contributing to rail's role in freight where such bulk goods form a substantial share of tonne-kilometres, though exact wagon-type breakdowns emphasize , , and in industrial corridors. Globally, open wagons support operations by hauling dense ores like iron, as seen in historical designs optimized for , and aggregates for projects, with rail bulk freight emphasizing economy for high-density loads over long distances compared to alternatives. Bulk dry goods in open configurations account for a core segment of rail's freight capacity, estimated in market analyses at roughly half of wagon production value dedicated to open types for commodities like and aggregates.

Advantages and limitations

Economic and operational efficiencies

Open wagons facilitate significant economic efficiencies in , particularly for bulk commodities over long distances exceeding 500 km, where rail costs per net are substantially lower than alternatives. For instance, direct rail shipment for bulk averages approximately $70 per net , compared to over $210 for over-the-road ing under comparable conditions, yielding savings of roughly three times on a per- basis for hauls where rail's scale advantages dominate. Per tonne-km, rail bulk typically ranges from $0.02 to $0.05, versus $0.10 to $0.15 for s, driven by higher capacities and lower consumption per unit moved, with empirical confirming rail's edge for non-perishable, high-volume loads like aggregates or ores. These efficiencies stem from open wagons' ability to achieve 80-90% in dedicated bulk services, minimizing empty returns through optimized and direct loading protocols. Operational efficiencies are further enhanced by deploying open wagons in block or unit trains, which consolidate homogeneous loads to reduce intermediate handling and shunting expenses. Such configurations can cut terminal handling costs by 20-50% relative to mixed-freight operations, as cars move as intact blocks with fewer reclassifications, lowering labor and equipment demands at yards. This approach maximizes throughput for bulk flows, enabling railroads to distribute fixed costs across larger volumes and achieve economies from longer consists, with studies indicating overall shipment cost reductions of 5-25% through improved and reduced dwell times. In comparison to containerized intermodal systems, open wagons excel for non-unitized bulk cargoes, where the need for or lashing is obviated, avoiding the added expenses of that can inflate costs by 10-20% for loose materials unsuitable for standardized stacking. While intermodal suits unitized or high-value goods with multimodal flexibility, open wagons provide superior for dedicated rail corridors handling unpackaged commodities, countering assumptions of universal intermodal superiority by prioritizing direct discharge mechanisms over transfer inefficiencies.

Drawbacks including safety and weather exposure

Exposure to precipitation in open wagons results in moisture absorption by bulk cargoes such as or aggregates, increasing effective load weight and promoting material degradation or shifting during transit. This added reduces at the wheel-rail interface, heightening slippage risks and contributing to operational inefficiencies under adverse . Such exposure also facilitates , where waterlogged loads incur penalties at destination, as seen in transport where fines and degradation diminish marketable value. The open-sided design elevates hazards for personnel, particularly during loading, unloading, or , as workers risk falls from unprotected edges. For instance, in a Canadian incident involving open-top hopper cars, a foreman suffered fatal injuries after falling while attempting to secure a load. Uneven load distribution, exacerbated by weather-induced shifting, further amplifies probabilities by unbalancing wheel-rail forces and promoting climb, especially on curved or twisted track sections. Indian railway analyses identify uneven loading as a primary trigger in freight operations, disrupting stability and brake function. Vandalism and rates are elevated for open wagons compared to covered variants, owing to unobstructed access to visible cargoes like metals or aggregates, which invites opportunistic pilferage during stationary periods. U.S. rail operators have documented surges in such incidents, with organized thefts targeting exposed freight and contributing to broader disruptions. Weather exposure accelerates on structural components like side walls and underframes, necessitating more frequent inspections and repairs, which extend overall maintenance intervals relative to enclosed designs.

Environmental and regulatory aspects

Emissions and pollution impacts

Rail freight, including that using open wagons for bulk commodities such as coal and aggregates, exhibits significantly lower per tonne-kilometer than road transport. data indicate average CO2 emissions for rail at approximately 25 grams per tonne-kilometer, compared to 90-120 grams for heavy-duty trucks hauling equivalent loads. This disparity arises primarily from rail's higher energy efficiency and greater load capacities, with electric rail networks further reducing emissions to as low as 10-20 grams per tonne-kilometer in regions like . For bulk freight typical of open wagons, lifecycle analyses confirm rail's advantage persists even when accounting for upstream fuel production and vehicle manufacturing, with rail contributing roughly 0.6% of total gases versus 72.8% for in comparable European scenarios. EU statistics highlight that shifting bulk goods from to rail can cut transport-related CO2 emissions by 70-85%, though full assessments, including and loading, temper claims of absolute reductions by emphasizing that rail optimizes only the phase. Notwithstanding these efficiencies, open wagons introduce fugitive particulate matter emissions, particularly from dusty cargoes like , where wind and vibration can aerosolize 1-5% of loads as PM2.5 and coarser dust. Studies near coal export terminals document train passages elevating ambient PM2.5 by 2-8 micrograms per cubic meter, with respirable fractions nearly doubling post-passage of uncovered cars. Weather exposure also enables leaching of contaminants like from loads during rain, contributing localized , though empirical comparisons show rail spill volumes and runoff contaminants remain lower than those from truck accidents, which occur more frequently per tonne-kilometer.

Safety regulations and innovations

Safety regulations for open wagons emphasize load securing, axle weight restrictions, and operational speeds to mitigate risks of shifting cargo, derailments, and structural failures. Under the Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Freight Wagons (UTP WAG) administered by the Intergovernmental Organisation for International by Rail (OTIF), applicable to conventional freight wagons including open types, the maximum operating speed is limited to 160 km/h with a corresponding maximum of 25 tonnes to ensure track compatibility and stability. In the United States, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) enforces Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices (MSRP) Section C for freight car construction, mandating safety appliances such as handholds, ladders, and sill steps on open hopper and cars to reduce worker injury risks during coupling, uncoupling, and inspection, with periodic inspections required under (FRA) rules. UIC Loading Guidelines further specify securing protocols for bulk loads in open wagons, including lashing points and pressure limits (e.g., 10 kg/cm² for UIC-marked wagons) to prevent load displacement under dynamic forces. Innovations in open wagon have increasingly incorporated sensor-based monitoring to address load imbalance, a primary cause of freight . systems mounted on bogies enable real-time weighing and detection of uneven distribution, allowing operators to adjust loads before transit and potentially averting instabilities that contribute to 20% of freight incidents in some analyses. Wireless sensor networks for detection, tested in experimental setups on loaded wagons, use accelerometers and data to identify anomalies like climb or track irregularities, with data-driven algorithms improving early warning capabilities. These technologies, emerging in the , support through integration with train control systems, reducing unplanned downtime and enhancing overall fleet . To counter weather-induced degradation of and associated safety hazards like slippery surfaces from , automated covering systems have been adopted for open wagons, featuring quick-deploy mechanisms that shield loads from , UV exposure, and without compromising unloading efficiency. Such covers, often made from UV-resistant, waterproof , comply with load security standards while minimizing manual handling risks. Amid the shift toward containerized freight, hybrid wagon designs with convertible features—such as retractable roofs or modular side extensions—allow open configurations to adapt to covered needs, extending operational versatility and reducing exposure vulnerabilities in variable climates, as seen in European interoperability standards. These adaptations reflect broader trends in digitalization, where AI tools now assist in wheelset to preempt failures that could lead to wagon-specific hazards.

References

  1. https://railwaywagons.com/rail-freight-wagons/general-purpose-wagons/open-wagons/
  2. https://adortech.com/blog/types-of-rail-freight-wagons
  3. https://blog.railcargo.com/en/artikel/power-auf-r%25C3%25A4dern-start-der-wagenserie/der-offene-g%25C3%25BCterwagen
  4. https://www.rail-wagons.com/news/what-is-an-open-top-wagon-and-when-is-it-the-ideal-freight-solution-226062.html
  5. https://www.victorianrailways.net/freight/freight%2520pages/openwaghist/openwag01.html
  6. https://www.rail-wagons.com/news/what-is-a-railway-freight-wagon-and-why-is-it-vital-for-global-trade-226057.html
  7. https://ash-logistics.com/open-wagon-rail-transportation-services.php
  8. http://igg.org.uk/rail/1-hist/01hist.htm
  9. https://www.nmrs.org.uk/assets/pdf/M69/M69-77-84-railways.pdf
  10. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co206060/chaldron-wagon-stockton-darlington-railway
  11. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co206056/cramlington-colliery-chaldron-wagon-c-1826
  12. https://www.sdr1825.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2017-Gwyn-and-Cossons-HE-report-EarlyRailways_ReviewandSummaryofRecentResearch.pdf
  13. https://www.accurascale.com/en-us/blogs/news/chaldrons-the-wagons-that-fuelled-the-industrial-revolution
  14. https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9659987.shedding-light-coal-wagon-history/
  15. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=bachman&book=inventors&story=stephenson
  16. https://www.midcontinent.org/equipment-roster/wooden-freight-cars/
  17. http://igg.org.uk/rail/4-rstock/04arstock3.htm
  18. https://www.scribd.com/document/672810522/The-American-Railroad-Freight-Car-From-the-Wood-Car-Era-to-the-Coming-of-Steel
  19. https://www.aar.org/chronology-of-americas-freight-railroads/
  20. https://www.american-rails.com/gondola.html
  21. https://www.gersociety.org.uk/rolling-stock/wagons/1880-1889
  22. https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/article/2625/development-of-freight-wagons/
  23. https://nl.dbcargo.com/resource/blob/1430008/9767e97bb070ccbbf77efd84e7d64948/freight_wagon_catalog_v2011-data.pdf
  24. https://jbritton.pennsyrr.com/index.php/mechanical-department/aar-mechanical-designations
  25. https://www.worldautosteel.org/projects/mass-reduction-a-report-by-fka/
  26. https://blackstonemodels.com/new/800gondola/dbgonhistory.php
  27. https://industry.arcelormittal.com/repository2/fce/Brochures/FreightRail_leaflet_EN.pdf?flipbook=0
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-97152-7
  29. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/global-lightweight-composites-rail-market-analysis-key-s9lve
  30. https://www.era.europa.eu/system/files/2022-11/appendix_6_p12_en.pdf
  31. https://setarejahanro.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/e571-2.pdf
  32. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/uic_loading_guidelines-volume_1-01042025.pdf
  33. https://www.railcartracking.com/aar-car-type-codes-explained-resources-2/
  34. http://www.greatnorthernempire.net/GNE_AARCarCodes.htm
  35. https://trforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2013v52n2_06_HeavyAxleLoads.pdf
  36. https://www.freightwaves.com/news/why-is-europe-so-absurdly-backward-compared-to-the-u-s-in-rail-freight-transport
  37. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6277001
  38. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=64924
  39. https://www.up.com/news/service/tr101221-what-is-a-gondola-rail-car
  40. https://www.aar.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/AAR-Railroads-Coal.pdf
  41. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/885/1/012002/pdf
  42. https://www.russiangost.com/p-66651-gost-22235-76.aspx
  43. https://www.railwaygazette.com/news/fortescue-opens-the-worlds-heaviest-haul-railway/33125.article
  44. https://www.irfca.org/faq/faq-stock2.html
  45. https://www.carecprogram.org/uploads/CAREC-RSA-PRC_21MAY2021_WEB.pdf
  46. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/153207/2/645641.pdf
  47. https://cosmiccrf.com/understanding-the-key-components-of-a-railway-wagon-structure/
  48. https://www.steelavailable.com/en/steel-s355-the-ideal-material-for-heavy-duty-applications/
  49. https://www2.arpel.org/virtual-library/u4821G/245372/freight-cars_of_the_40s_and_50s_model_railroader.pdf
  50. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12206-023-1116-z
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069114/
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245481244_Fatigue_tests_of_railway_axles
  53. https://www.searates.com/reference/open/
  54. https://m.railwayspare-parts.com/quality-11658530-standard-gauge-rail-cargo-wagon-open-top-61-ton-load-capacity
  55. https://railcargo.nl/en/overview-of-wagons/
  56. https://setarejahanro.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/e571-3.pdf
  57. https://www.rail-wagon.com/Quick-Unloading-Coal-Hopper-Wagon-Auto-Air-Control-Bottom-Doors-70T-Pay-Load-p.html
  58. https://adortech.com/blog/railcar-unloading-systems
  59. https://www.bulk-online.com/en/article/technical-article/rotary-dump-or-bottom-dump-wagons-review-concepts-higher-capacity-coal
  60. https://gueterwagenkatalog.dbcargo.com/catalogue/by-wagon-category/e-open-wagons/Eaos-x-057-9120458
  61. https://gueterwagenkatalog.dbcargo.com/catalogue/by-wagon-category/e-open-wagons/Eaos-x-051-9120456
  62. https://vagontranslogistic.com/en/product/eaos-wagons/
  63. https://www.scribd.com/document/348235436/Eaos-103-pdf
  64. https://shop.uic.org/en/108-eaos-high-sided-open-wagons-standardised-571-2
  65. https://www.progressiverailroading.com/mechanical/article/Suppliers-update-hopper-cars-components-to-meet-efficiency-sustainability-demands--71607
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hopper-cars
  67. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4222334A/en
  68. https://www.nettervibration.com/en/vibration-solutions-for-your-application/emptying-and-unloading-with-vibration
  69. https://sedirogluinternational.com/en/products/product-feeding-section/bucket-tipping-wagon-mining-bucket-tipping-car
  70. https://csm.xinhaimining.com/product/transportation/Tipping-bucket-mine-car
  71. https://www.accio.com/plp/mining-cart
  72. https://www.lohr.fr/catalogue/the-lohr-uic-wagons/
  73. https://www.railweb.ch/en/finally-a-wagon-to-carry-standard-semi-trailers-throughout-europe/
  74. https://www.beumergroup.com/products-systems/loading-technology/wagon-unloading/
  75. https://practicalmaintenance.net/wp-content/uploads/Construction-Working-and-Maintenance-of-Equipments-for-Unloading-Bulk-Materials.pdf
  76. https://www.drycargomag.com/takraf-wagon-unloading-equipment-delivers-on-design-promise
  77. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-02/2015-07-swl-final-report.pdf
  78. https://www.railfreight.com/policy/2023/02/09/single-wagon-traffic-vs-block-trains-financial-support-should-not-be-a-vicious-circle/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025008701
  80. https://itif.org/publications/2022/06/13/to-do-encourage-freight-rail-automation-not-freight-rail-employment/
  81. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/benefits-of-applying-advanced-technologies-to-rail-freight-shipping
  82. https://freightcaramerica.com/railcars/open-top-hoppers/
  83. https://www.trinityrail.com/railcars/open-hoppers/
  84. https://www.aar.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AAR-RIO-Feb-7-25-FINAL.pdf
  85. https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/freight-rail-overview
  86. https://data360files.worldbank.org/data360-data/metadata/WB_WDI/WB_WDI_IS_RRS_GOOD_MT_K6.pdf
  87. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/rail-freight-wagon-121868
  88. https://www.rsilogistics.com/blog/comparing-the-costs-of-rail-shipping-vs-truck/
  89. https://www.bitre.gov.au/sites/default/files/op_023a.pdf
  90. https://www.rsilogistics.com/blog/rail-rates-on-car-blocks-and-unit-trains-benefits-to-railroad-opportunity-to-shipper/
  91. https://railtec.illinois.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018_Jun_015_article_TheStar-LongFreightTrains.pdf
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146522004161
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316184234_A_Study_into_the_Effect_of_the_Presence_of_Moisture_at_the_WheelRail_Interface_during_Dew_and_Damp_Conditions
  94. http://blog.midwestind.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/rail_info_118791_1.pdf
  95. https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/2017/r17w0267/r17w0267.html
  96. https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/railways/uneven-loading-in-freight-trains-major-cause-of-derailment-says-railway-board/114989179
  97. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/summary-of-learning-5-freight-train-derailments/summary-of-learning-5-freight-train-derailments
  98. https://www.constructionworld.in/transport-infrastructure/metro-rail-and-railways-infrastructure/railway-board-warns-of-derailment-risks-from-uneven-loading/64663
  99. https://www.aar.org/issue/cargo-theft/
  100. https://www.vtg.com/products-and-services/fleet/wagon-maintenance
  101. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/maps-and-charts/specific-co2-emissions-per-tonne-2-daviz
  102. https://www.viia.com/en/viias-blog/co2-savings-in-numbers-rail-transport-vs-road-transport/
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210670719307115
  104. https://ce.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/4377_finalreportEdBEV.pdf
  105. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/coal-dust-blowin-wind
  106. https://www.ucdavis.edu/climate/news/coal-trains-increase-air-pollution-san-francisco-bay-area
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1309104215000057
  108. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/using-ai-to-track-air-pollution-from-open-top-coal-trains-180982846/
  109. https://otif.org/fileadmin/new/3-Reference-Text/3D-Technical-Interoperability/3D1-Prescriptions-and-other-rules/UTP-WAG-2021_e-In-force.pdf
  110. https://www.a1.digital/news/weighing-technology-freight-wagons-in-rail-transport/
  111. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Data-driven-design-of-a-derailment-detection-system-Asperti-Zanelli/27f870fb8e0645164ac02387365e268c4193b0d7
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10490569/
  113. https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/railway-wagons-tarpaulin-cover.html
  114. https://welpackind.com/railway-wagon-tarpaulin-cover/
  115. https://www.rssb.co.uk/about-rssb/insights-and-news/news/rssb-launches-new-tool-to-manage-rail-freight-wagon-wheelset-condition
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.