Hubbry Logo
FlappingFlappingMain
Open search
Flapping
Community hub
Flapping
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Flapping
Flapping
Flapping
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
History and description of
English pronunciation
Historical stages
General development
Development of vowels
Development of consonants
Variable features
Related topics
This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

Flapping or tapping, also known as alveolar flapping, intervocalic flapping, or t-voicing, is a phonological process involving a voiced alveolar tap or flap; it is found in many varieties of English, especially North American, Cardiff, Ulster, Australian and New Zealand English, where the voiceless alveolar stop consonant phoneme /t/ is pronounced as a voiced alveolar flap [ɾ], a sound produced by briefly tapping the alveolar ridge with the tongue, when placed between vowels. In London English, the flapped [ɾ] is perceived as a casual pronunciation intermediate between the affricate [tsʰ], with higher class associations, and the glottal stop [ʔ], with lower class associations.[1] In these named varieties, outside of Britain, /d/, the voiced counterpart of /t/, is also frequently pronounced as a flap in such positions, making pairs of words like latter and ladder sound similar or identical. In similar positions, the combination /nt/ may be pronounced as a nasalized flap [ɾ̃], making winter sound similar or identical to winner.

Flapping of /t/ is sometimes perceived as the replacement of /t/ with /d/; for example, the word butter pronounced with flapping may be heard as "budder".[2]

In other dialects of English, such as South African English, Scottish English, some Northern England English (like Scouse), and older varieties of Received Pronunciation, the flap is a variant of /r/ (see Pronunciation of English /r/).[3]

Terminology and articulation

[edit]

The terms flap and tap are often used synonymously, although some authors make a distinction between them. When the distinction is made, a flap involves a rapid backward and forward movement of the tongue tip, while a tap involves an upward and downward movement.[4] Linguists disagree on whether the sound produced in the present process is a flap or a tap, and by extension on whether the process is better called flapping or tapping,[5] while flapping has traditionally been more widely used.[6][7] Derrick & Gick (2011) identify four types of sounds produced in the process: alveolar tap, down-flap, up-flap, and postalveolar tap (found in autumn, Berta, otter, and murder, respectively).[8]

In Cockney, another voiced variant of /t/ that has been reported to occur to coexist with the alveolar tap (and other allophones, such as the very common glottal stop) is a simple voiced alveolar stop [d], which occurs especially in the words little [ˈlɪdʊ], hospital [ˈɒspɪdʊ] and whatever [wɒˈdɛvə]. That too results in a (variable) merger with /d/, whereas the tap does not.[9]

In Cardiff English, the alveolar tap is less rapid than the corresponding sound in traditional RP, being more similar to /d/. It also involves a larger part of the tongue. Thus, the typical Cardiff pronunciation of hospital as [ˈɑspɪɾl̩] or [ˈɑspɪɾʊ] is quite similar to Cockney [ˈɒspɪdʊ], though it does not involve a neutralization of the flap with [d].[10]

Distribution

[edit]
Examples of flapping in American English
"Betty Botter" tongue twister
A recitation of the tongue twister "Betty Botter" with flapping
Pronunciation of latter and ladder with and without flapping
[ˈlætɚ ˈlædɚ ˈlæɾɚ]
Pronunciation of winter and winner with and without flapping
[ˈwɪntɚ ˈwɪnɚ ˈwɪɾ̃ɚ]
Pronunciation of seventy with and without t-voicing, and with flapping
[ˈsɛvn̩ti ˈsɛvn̩di ˈsɛvɨɾ̃i]
Problems playing these files? See media help.

Flapping of /t/ and /d/ is a prominent feature of North American English. Some linguists consider it obligatory for most American dialects to flap /t/ between a stressed and an unstressed vowel.[7][11] Flapping of /t/ also occurs in Australian, New Zealand and (especially Northern) Irish English, and more infrequently or variably in South African English, Cockney, and Received Pronunciation.[12][13][14]

The exact conditions for flapping in North American English are unknown, although it is widely understood that it occurs in an alveolar stop, /t/ or /d/, when placed between two vowels, provided the second vowel is unstressed (as in butter, writing, wedding, loader).[6][15] Across word boundaries, however, it can occur between any two vowels, provided the second vowel begins a word (as in get over [ɡɛɾˈoʊvɚ]).[6][15] This extends to morphological boundaries within compound words (as in whatever [ˌwʌɾˈɛvɚ]).[16] In addition to vowels, segments that may precede the flap include /r/ (as in party)[11][17] and occasionally /l/ (as in faulty).[18][19] Flapping after /l/ is more common in Canadian English than in American English.[20] Syllabic /l/ may also follow the flap (as in bottle).[21] Flapping of /t/ before /ən/ (as in button) is observed in Australian English.[22] In North American English, [t] and [ʔ] (t-glottalization) were the only realizations of /t/ before /ən/,[23] but studies in the 2020s have found [ɾ] in younger US speakers.[24]

Morpheme-internally, the vowel following the flap must not only be unstressed but also be a reduced one (namely /ə/, morpheme-final or prevocalic /i, oʊ/, or /ɪ/ preceding /ŋ/, /k/, etc.[a]),[26][27] so words like botox, retail, and latex are not flapped in spite of the primary stress on the first syllables,[11] while pity, motto, and Keating can be.[26] The second syllables in the former set of words can thus be considered as having secondary stress.[6]

Word-medial flapping is also prohibited in foot-initial positions. This prevents words such as militaristic, spirantization, and Mediterranean from flapping, despite capitalistic and alphabetization, for example, being flapped. This is known as the Withgott effect.[28][29]

In North American English, the cluster /nt/ (but not /nd/) in the same environment as flapped /t/ may be realized as a nasal flap [ɾ̃]. Intervocalic /n/ is also often realized as a nasal flap, so words like winter and winner can become homophonous.[30] According to Wells (1982), in the United States, Southerners tend to pronounce winter and winner identically, while Northerners, especially those from the east coast, tend to retain the distinction, pronouncing winter with [ɾ̃] or [nt] and winner with [n].[31]

Given these intricacies, it is difficult to formulate a phonological rule that accurately predicts flapping.[7] Nevertheless, Vaux (2000) postulates that it applies to alveolar stops:

  • after a sonorant other than l, m, or ŋ, but with restrictions on n;
  • before an unstressed vowel within words, or before any vowel across a word boundary;
  • when not in foot-initial position.[32]

Exceptions include the preposition/particle to and words derived from it, such as today, tonight, tomorrow, and together, wherein /t/ may be flapped when intervocalic (as in go to sleep [ˌɡoʊɾəˈslip]).[33] In Australian English, numerals thirteen, fourteen, and eighteen are often flapped despite the second vowel being stressed.[34][35] In a handful of words such as seventy, ninety, and carpenter, /nt/ is frequently pronounced as [nd], retaining /n/ and voicing /t/, although it may still become [ɾ̃] in rapid speech.[36][37]

Homophony

[edit]

Flapping is a specific type of lenition, specifically intervocalic weakening. It leads to the neutralization of the distinction between /t/ and /d/ in appropriate environments, a partial merger of the two phonemes, provided that both /t/ and /d/ are flapped.[5][38] Some speakers, however, flap only /t/ but not /d/. Yet, for a minority of speakers, the merger can occur only if neither sound is flapped. That is the case in Cockney, where /t/ is occasionally voiced to [d], yielding a variable merger of little and Lidl.[39] For speakers with the merger, the following utterances sound the same or almost the same:

Homophonous pairs
/-t-, -nt-/ /-d-, -n-/ IPA Notes
aborting aboarding əˈbɔɹɾɪŋ
alighted elided əˈlaɪɾəd With weak vowel merger.
ante Annie ˈæɾ̃i
anti- Annie ˈæɾ̃i
at 'em Adam ˈæɾəm
at 'em add 'em ˈæɾəm
atom Adam ˈæɾəm
atom add 'em ˈæɾəm
auntie Annie ˈæɾ̃i
banter banner ˈbæɾ̃əɹ
batter badder ˈbæɾəɹ
batty baddie ˈbæɾi
beating beading ˈbiːɾɪŋ
Bertie birdie ˈbəɹɾi With fern-fir-fur merger.
Bertie Birdy; Birdie ˈbəɹɾi With fern-fir-fur merger.
betting bedding ˈbɛɾɪŋ
biting biding ˈbaɪɾɪŋ
bitter bidder ˈbɪɾəɹ
bitting bidding ˈbɪɾɪŋ
bitty biddy ˈbɪɾi
blatter bladder ˈblæɾəɹ
bleating bleeding ˈbliːɾɪŋ
boating boding ˈboʊɾɪŋ
bruter brooder ˈbɹuːɾəɹ With yod-dropping after /ɹ/.
butting budding ˈbʌɾɪŋ
butty buddy ˈbʌɾi
canter canner ˈkæɾ̃əɹ
canton cannon ˈkæɾ̃ən
canton canon ˈkæɾ̃ən
carting carding ˈkɑɹɾɪŋ
catty caddy ˈkæɾi
centre; center sinner ˈsɪɾ̃əɹ With pen–pin merger.
chanting Channing ˈt͡ʃæɾ̃ɪŋ
cited sided ˈsaɪɾɨd
citer cider ˈsaɪɾəɹ
clotting clodding ˈklɒɾɪŋ
coating coding ˈkoʊɾɪŋ
courting chording ˈkɔɹɾɪŋ
courting cording ˈkɔɹɾɪŋ
cuttle cuddle ˈkʌɾəl
cutty cuddy ˈkʌɾi
daughter dodder ˈdɑɾəɹ With cot-caught merger.
daunting dawning ˈdɔɾ̃ɪŋ
daunting donning ˈdɑɾ̃ɪŋ With cot-caught merger.
debtor deader ˈdɛɾəɹ
diluted deluded dɪˈluːɾəd
don't it doughnut ˈdoʊɾ̃ət With weak vowel merger and toe-tow merger.
dotter dodder ˈdɑɾəɹ
doughty dowdy ˈdaʊɾi
eluted alluded əˈluːɾəd With weak vowel merger.
eluted eluded ɪˈluːɾəd
enter in a ˈɪɾ̃ə In non-rhotic accents with pen-pin merger.
enter inner ˈɪɾ̃əɹ With pen-pin merger.
eta Ada ˈeɪɾə
fated faded ˈfeɪɾɨd
flutter flooder ˈflʌɾəɹ
fontal faunal ˈfɑɾ̃əl With cot-caught merger.
futile feudal ˈfjuːɾəl With weak vowel merger.
garter guarder ˈɡɑɹɾəɹ
gaunter goner ˈɡɑɾ̃əɹ With cot-caught merger.
goated goaded ˈɡoʊɾəd
grater grader ˈɡɹeɪɾəɹ
greater grader ˈɡɹeɪɾəɹ
gritted gridded ˈɡɹɪɾəd
gritty Griddy ˈɡɹɪɾi
hearty hardy ˈhɑːɹɾi
heated heeded ˈhiːɾɨd With meet-meat merger.
Hetty; Hettie heady ˈhɛɾi
hurting herding ˈhɜːɹɾɪŋ With fern-fir-fur merger.
inter- in a ˈɪɾ̃ə In non-rhotic accents.
inter- inner ˈɪɾ̃əɹ
iter eider ˈaɪɾəɹ
jaunty Johnny ˈd͡ʒɑɾ̃i With cot-caught merger.
jointing joining ˈd͡ʒɔɪɾ̃ɪŋ
kitted kidded ˈkɪɾɨd
kitty kiddie ˈkɪɾi
knotted nodded ˈnɒɾɨd
latter ladder ˈlæɾəɹ
lauded lotted ˈlɑɾəd With cot-caught merger.
linty Lenny ˈlɪɾ̃i With pen-pin merger.
liter leader ˈliːɾəɹ With meet-meat merger.
little Lidl ˈlɪɾəl
looter lewder ˈluːɾəɹ With yod-dropping after /l/.
manta manna ˈmæɾ̃ə
manta manner ˈmæɾ̃ə In non-rhotic accents.
manta manor ˈmæɾ̃ə In non-rhotic accents.
Marty Mardi ˈmɑːɹɾi In the term Mardi Gras.
matter madder ˈmæɾəɹ
mattocks Maddox ˈmæɾəks
meant it minute ˈmɪɾ̃ɨt With pen–pin merger.
metal medal ˈmɛɾəl
metal meddle ˈmɛɾəl
mettle medal ˈmɛɾəl
mettle meddle ˈmɛɾəl
minty many ˈmɪɾ̃i With pen–pin merger.
minty mini ˈmɪɾ̃i
minty Minnie ˈmɪɾ̃i
motile modal ˈmoʊɾəl With weak vowel merger.
mottle model ˈmɑɾəl
mutter mudder ˈmʌɾəɹ
neater kneader ˈniːɾəɹ
neuter nuder ˈnuːɾəɹ, ˈnjuːɾəɹ, ˈnɪuɾəɹ
nighter nidor ˈnaɪɾəɹ
nitre; niter nidor ˈnaɪɾəɹ
noted noded ˈnoʊɾɨd
oater odour; odor ˈoʊɾəɹ
otter odder ˈɒɾəɹ
painting paining ˈpeɪɾ̃ɪŋ
panting panning ˈpæɾ̃ɪŋ
parity parody ˈpæɹəɾi With weak vowel merger
patter padder ˈpæɾəɹ
patting padding ˈpæɾɪŋ
patty paddy ˈpæɾi
petal pedal ˈpɛɾəl
petal peddle ˈpɛɾəl
pettle pedal ˈpɛɾəl
pettle peddle ˈpɛɾəl
platted plaided ˈplæɾəd
planting planning ˈplæɾ̃ɪŋ
pleating pleading ˈpliːɾɪŋ
plenty Pliny ˈplɪɾ̃i With pen–pin merger.
plotting plodding ˈplɒɾɪŋ
potted podded ˈpɒɾɨd
pouter powder ˈpaʊɾəɹ
punting punning ˈpʌɾ̃ɪŋ
putting pudding ˈpʊɾɪŋ
rated raided ˈɹeɪɾɨd With pane-pain merger.
rattle raddle ˈɹæɾəl
righting riding ˈɹaɪɾɪŋ
roti roadie ˈɹoʊɾi
rooter ruder ˈɹuːɾəɹ With yod-dropping after /ɹ/.
rotting rodding ˈɹɒɾɪŋ
router ruder ˈɹuːɾəɹ With yod-dropping after /ɹ/.
runty runny ˈɹʌɾ̃i
rutty ruddy ˈɹʌɾi
sainting seining ˈseɪɾ̃ɪŋ
Saturday sadder day ˈsæɾəɹdeɪ
satyr Seder ˈseɪɾəɹ
saunter sauna ˈsɔɾ̃ə In non-rhotic accents.
scented synod ˈsɪɾ̃əd With pen-pin merger.
scenting sinning ˈsɪɾ̃ɪŋ With pen-pin merger.
seating seeding ˈsiːɾɪŋ With meet-meat merger.
sent it senate ˈsɛɾ̃ɨt
set it said it ˈsɛɾɨt
shunting shunning ˈʃʌɾ̃ɪŋ
shutter shudder ˈʃʌɾəɹ
sighted sided ˈsaɪɾɨd
sighter cider ˈsaɪɾəɹ
sinter sinner ˈsɪɾ̃əɹ
sited sided ˈsaɪɾɨd
skitting skidding ˈskɪɾɪŋ
sorted sordid ˈsɔɹɾɨd
slighting sliding ˈslaɪɾɪŋ
stunting stunning ˈstʌɾ̃ɪŋ
tarty tardy ˈtɑɹɾi
tenter tenner ˈtɛɾ̃əɹ
tenter tenor ˈtɛɾ̃əɹ
tenting tinning ˈtɪɾɪŋ With pen-pin merger.
title tidal ˈtaɪɾəl
toting toading ˈtoʊɾɪŋ
traitor trader ˈtɹeɪɾəɹ With pane-pain merger.
tutor Tudor ˈtuːɾəɹ, ˈtjuːɾəɹ, ˈtɪuɾəɹ
tweeted tweeded ˈtwiːɾəd
utter udder ˈʌɾəɹ
waiter wader ˈweɪɾəɹ With pane-pain merger.
wattle waddle ˈwɑɾəl
weighted waded ˈweɪɾəd With pane-pain merger.
wetting wedding ˈwɛɾɪŋ
winter winner ˈwɪɾ̃əɹ
wheated weeded ˈwiːɾəd With wine-whine merger.
whiter wider ˈwaɪɾəɹ With wine–whine merger.
writing riding ˈɹaɪɾɪŋ

In accents characterized by Canadian raising, such words as riding and writing may be flapped yet still distinguished by the quality of the vowel: riding [ˈɹaɪɾɪŋ], writing [ˈɹʌɪɾɪŋ].[40] Vowel duration may also be different, with a longer vowel before /d/ than before /t/, due to pre-fortis clipping.[41]

Withgott effect

[edit]

In a dissertation in 1982, M.M. Withgott demonstrated that, among speakers of American English, words seem to be chunked into pronunciation units she referred to as a foot, similar to a metrical unit in poetry. Such chunking was said to block flapping in the word ‘Mediterranean’ ([[Medi[terranean] ], cf. [ [sub[terranean]]). How a word is chunked relates to its morphological derivation, as seen by contrasting morphologically similar pairs such as the following (where the vertical bar shows where Withgott argued there is boundary between neighboring feet):

Initial-type t vs. flapped-t
military [ˈmɪlɨ | tʰɛɹi] vs. capital [ˈkʰæpɨɾl̩]
militaristic [ˌmɪlɨ | tʰəˈɹɪstɪk] vs. capitalistic [ˌkʰæpɨɾə | ˈlɪstɪk]

The medial t in càpitalístic can be flapped as easily as in post-stress cátty [ˈkʰæɾi], in contrast to the medial t in mìlitarístic, which comes at the beginning of a foot, and so must be pronounced as [tʰ], like a t at the beginning of a word.

Long, seemingly monomorphemic words also are chunked in English for purposes of pronunciation. In such words [t]’s — as well as the other unvoiced stops — are pronounced like initial segments whenever they receive secondary stress or are at the beginning of a foot.

T-to-R rule

[edit]

The origins of the T-to-R rule lie in the flapping of /t/ and the subsequent reinterpretation of the flap as /r/, which was then followed by the use of the prevailing variant of /r/, namely the approximant [ɹ]. It is applied in Northern England English and it is always stigmatized. The application of that rule means that shut in the phrasal verb to shut up /ʃʊrˈʊp/ has a different phonemic form than the citation form of the verb to shut /ʃʊt/. The rule is typically not applied in the word-internal position.[42]

The T-to-R rule has also been reported to occur in the Cardiff dialect (where the merged consonant can surface as either an approximant or a flap) and South African English (where only a flap is possible). In the Cardiff dialect, the rule is typically applied between any vowel (including long vowels) and /ə/ or the reduced /ɪ/ (also across word boundaries), so that starting /ˈstaːtɪŋ/ and starring /ˈstaːrɪŋ/ can be homophonous as [ˈstaːɹɪn ~ ˈstaːɾɪn]. In South African English, the merger is possible only for those speakers who use the flapped allophone of /r/ (making the starting–starring minimal pair homophonous as [ˈstɑːɾɪŋ]), otherwise the sounds are distinguished as a flap (or a voiceless stop) for /t/ ([ˈstɑːɾɪŋ ~ stɑːtɪŋ]) vs. approximant for /r/ ([ˈstɑːɹɪŋ]). There, the merger occurs word-internally between vowels in those environments where flapping is possible in North American English.[43][10]

Homophonous pairs
/t/ /r/ IPA Notes
battle barrel ˈbæɾəl
batty Barrie ˈbæɾi
batty Barry ˈbæɾi
betty berry ˈbɛɾi
but a borough ˈbəɾə In Cardiff English. But has an alternative form /bə/, with an elided /t/.[44]
butter borough ˈbʌɾə
catty carry ˈkæɾi
catty kar(r)ee ˈkæɾi
daughter Dora ˈdɔːɾə
Fetty ferry ˈfɛɾi
hotter horror ˈhɒɾə
jetty jerry ˈd͡ʒɛɾi
Lottie lorry ˈlɒɾi
matty marry ˈmæɾi
otter horror ˈɒɾə With h-dropping.
petty Perry ˈpɛɾi
starting starring ˈstɑːɾɪŋ
tarty tarry ˈtɑːɾi Tarry in the sense "resembling tar".

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Flapping

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Flapping, also known as alveolar flapping or intervocalic flapping, is a phonological process found in many dialects of English, particularly North American varieties, in which the alveolar stops /t/ and /d/ are realized as a voiced alveolar flap [ɾ], a brief tap of the tongue against the alveolar ridge. This typically occurs in intervocalic positions, especially when the /t/ or /d/ follows a stressed and precedes an unstressed or syllabic , resulting in a rapid, ballistic movement of the tip without a of . The process neutralizes the distinction between /t/ and /d/ in affected contexts, leading to homophones such as latter and ladder, or writer and rider, which are pronounced identically with the flap. Examples abound in everyday words like water (pronounced [ˈwɔɾɚ]), butter ([ˈbʌɾɚ]), city ([ˈsɪɾi]), and better ([ˈbɛɾɚ]), where the flap replaces the stop sounds. Flapping can also apply across word boundaries, as in said it or caught a, provided no intonational phrase boundary intervenes, though it is blocked word-initially, before stressed syllables, or following fricatives. Phonetic research indicates that flapping is highly sensitive to prosodic factors, with flaps occurring in approximately 98% of cases before unstressed syllables in a corpus of over 3,000 words, while aspirated [tʰ] prevails before stressed ones. The following segment also influences realization: flaps are favored after vowels like [ə], [ɪ], or [ɚ], whereas tense vowels such as [ɛ] or [eɪ] promote [tʰ]. Although primarily associated with /t/ and /d/, lenition to a flap occasionally affects /n/ in similar environments, though this is less common. Variation exists across speakers and dialects; for instance, some produce more consistent flapping within words than across them, with gender differences showing females maintaining greater articulatory strength in flaps. In obligatory-flapping dialects, such as many in the United States and Canada, the rule exemplifies allophonic alternation, serving as a key example in phonological teaching.

Phonetic and Phonological Basics

Terminology

Flapping refers to a phonological lenition process in which intervocalic voiceless alveolar stops (/t/) and often voiced alveolar stops (/d/) are realized as a voiced alveolar flap [ɾ]. This transformation exemplifies stop weakening, a common type of lenition where consonantal articulation is reduced in strength between vowels, leading to a more approximant-like quality. The process is known by several alternative names, including alveolar flapping, intervocalic flapping, and t-voicing, reflecting its site of articulation and positional constraints. Another term, the t-to-r rule, highlights the perceptual similarity of the flap to a rhotic sound like /r/, originating from observations in English where /t/ assumes an r-like realization. In phonetic terminology, a flap differs from a the tongue's : a flap involves the tongue tip moving backward and then forward against the alveolar ridge, while a tap features an upward and downward motion with a single brief contact. However, these terms are frequently used interchangeably in the study of to describe the rapid, single-contact articulation represented by the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) symbol [ɾ]. The [ɾ] is officially classified as a tap in the IPA chart, though some analyses treat it as a rhotic due to its partial obstruction and rhotic in certain contexts.

Articulation

The alveolar flap, also known as a tap, is produced when the tip of the tongue briefly contacts the alveolar ridge in a single quick flip or strike, creating a momentary closure of the vocal tract. This articulatory gesture is typically voiced throughout, with the vocal folds vibrating continuously, and the duration of contact is short, usually ranging from 20 to 50 milliseconds. The flap realizes primarily in intervocalic positions, particularly following a stressed vowel and preceding an unstressed one, where voicing is assimilated from the adjacent vowels, ensuring the sound remains sonorant-like without devoicing. Phonetic variants of the flap include the standard alveolar tap [ɾ], which involves direct contact at the alveolar ridge; a postalveolar tap, articulated slightly further back; and articulatorily distinct motions such as the down-flap (tongue approaching from below the ridge) and up-flap ( moving vertically upward then downward). A retroflex-like variant [ɾ̺] may occur in some productions, with slight curling. Acoustically, these variants exhibit short transitions due to the rapid , lacking a release burst, and often showing a brief intensity dip rather than complete silence. In contrast to non-flapped alveolar stops like /t/, which feature a sustained closure (typically 50-100 ms), aspiration in voiceless cases, and a prominent release burst, the flap involves no prolonged closure or audible burst, resulting in a smoother transition. Phonetic evidence from spectrograms highlights this distinction: flaps appear as brief vertical striations indicating voicing with minimal interruption in structure, whereas stops show a period of during closure followed by a burst of upon release.

Geographic and Dialectal Distribution

In English Varieties

Flapping is a prominent feature in many varieties of , where it is typically obligatory for intervocalic /t/ and /d/ when the preceding is stressed and the following is unstressed, resulting in realizations such as [ˈbʌɾɚ] for "" and [ˈlæɾɚ] for "". This process, realized phonetically as a voiced alveolar flap [ɾ], occurs in the phonological environment where the flap is preceded by a or in a stressed and followed by an unstressed , often fitting the pattern V(C)CV with C as /t/ or /d/. In , flapping extends to certain /nt/ clusters, producing nasalized flaps as in "winter" [ˈwɪɾ̃ɚ], and corpus analyses indicate near-categorical application in casual speech, with rates over 90% in natural contexts. Similarly, in , flapping is near-obligatory under comparable conditions but interacts with , such that the diphthongs /aɪ/ and /aʊ/ raise before voiceless consonants prior to flapping, yielding forms like "writing" [ˈrʌɪɾɪŋ] or "" [ˈrʌɪɾəɹ]. Flapping shows variability across other English varieties. In , it occurs inconsistently in intervocalic positions, particularly in unaccented contexts, but at lower rates than in , with production influenced by prosodic accents and speaker variation. exhibits similar variability, with higher flapping rates among working-class speakers, especially women, though less consistently than in North American dialects. In Irish English, flapping of /t/ is variable and often involves a ballistic movement in syllabic coda positions. in rarely features flapping, which is largely absent in intervocalic /t/ and /d/, with stops preserved even in casual speech. Flapping is also prevalent in , where it applies obligatorily to intervocalic /t/ and /d/ in many dialects, akin to North American patterns. Within North American dialects, flapping rates vary sociolinguistically; for instance, in , it is variable but increases in casual speech, aligning with broader patterns of in informal registers, though some speakers maintain stops more frequently than in other varieties even in relaxed contexts. Representative examples across dialects include minimal pairs like "metal" and "medal" or "writing" and "riding," both rendered with flaps in North American casual speech, highlighting the process's role in neutralizing underlying distinctions.

In Other Languages

In non-English languages, flapping typically manifests as a rhotic consonant, often realized as the alveolar flap [ɾ], serving as a distinct phoneme or allophone that contrasts with trills or approximants in various phonological contexts. This realization is particularly prevalent in Romance languages, where the single orthographic in intervocalic position produces a brief apical tap against the alveolar ridge, distinguishing it from the multiple vibrations of the trill associated with geminate . In Spanish, the flap [ɾ] is the standard allophone of the rhotic phoneme /r/ in intervocalic and word-initial positions after a consonant, as in pero [ˈpeɾo] 'but', where the tongue tip makes a single quick contact with the alveolar ridge. This contrasts phonemically with the trill in words like perro [ˈpero] 'dog', maintaining a robust opposition that prevents homophony and underscores the flap's role as a lenited rhotic variant. Portuguese exhibits a parallel system, with the intervocalic single realized as a flap [ɾ] in many dialects, such as Brazilian Portuguese caro [ˈkaɾu] 'dear', where it functions as the weak rhotic opposing the strong rhotic (often a uvular fricative [ʁ] or trill ) in geminates like . This binary rhotic inventory is a hallmark of Ibero-Romance phonology, enabling contrasts like cara [ˈkaɾɐ] 'face' versus carra [ˈkaʁɐ] (hypothetical geminate form). Beyond Romance, flapping appears as a core realization of rhotics in several Asian languages. In Korean, the liquid phoneme /l/ (often transcribed as /r/ in romanization) surfaces as a flap [ɾ] in syllable-initial positions, including word-initially and intervocalically, as in saram [saɾam] 'person', where it contrasts with the lateral approximant in coda positions. Japanese features a single rhotic phoneme /ɾ/, uniformly realized as a brief flap across all positions, including loans like ringu [ɾiŋɡɯ] 'ring', with the tongue tip tapping the alveolar region without lateral airflow. This flap lacks the continuant or rhotic quality of English /ɹ/, positioning it closer to taps in other languages. Austronesian languages frequently employ the flap [ɾ] as the primary of /r/, reflecting a typological preference for tapped rhotics in the family. In Tagalog, /r/ is realized as [ɾ] intervocalically and initially, as in bara [baɾa] '', where it functions as a non-lateral contrasting with /l/. In Malay (and its standardization as Indonesian), the rhotic /r/ varies between a trill and flap [ɾ], with the latter predominant intervocalically in connected speech, aiding rhythm without merging with laterals. These patterns align with broader Austronesian , where flaps facilitate fluid vowel sequences. Phonologically, the flap often serves as a rhotic phoneme that contrasts with trills or approximants, preserving lexical distinctions while undergoing lenition in specific environments. In some Romance varieties, such as Galician, coronal stops like /d/ from Latin exhibit lenition to a flap-like [ɾ] or weak fricative [ð̞] intervocalically, as part of a transversal weakening process affecting coronals. This historical lenition highlights the flap's role in diachronic sound change, bridging stops and rhotics. Cross-linguistically, flapping is common in Romance and Austronesian families, where it supports rhotic inventories with minimal articulatory effort, but rarer in Germanic languages outside English, though attested in dialects like Bavarian German, where /r/ flaps to [ɾ] in certain liquid clusters to resolve sonority plateaus.

Phonological Consequences

Homophony and Neutralization

In varieties of English that exhibit , such as North American dialects, the intervocalic alveolar stops /t/ and /d/ are both realized as a voiced flap [ɾ] when followed by an unstressed , resulting in neutralization of the underlying voicing contrast. This process merges phonemically distinct segments into a single surface form, as exemplified by the "writer" (underlying /ˈɹaɪtɚ/) and "rider" (underlying /ˈɹaɪdɚ/), both surfacing as [ˈɹaɪɾɚ] in the absence of other distinguishing features. Such neutralization is incomplete from a phonetic perspective, with subtle acoustic remnants of the original contrast persisting, including vowels preceding /d/-origin flaps that are approximately 6–9 ms longer than those before /t/-origin flaps, alongside marginally longer flap closure durations for /d/ (around 1 ms difference). These cues, however, are often too weak to reliably signal the underlying distinction in isolation. The merger induced by flapping generates between words that were historically distinct, particularly in minimal pairs involving /t/ and /d/. Common examples include "latter" and "ladder" (both [ˈlæɾɚ]), "metal" and "medal" (both [ˈmɛɾəɫ]), and "writing" and "riding" (both [ˈɹaɪɾɪŋ]), where the flapped form erases the voicing difference and creates potential in flapped dialects. This derived arises specifically in the flapping environment—intervocalically before unstressed syllables—and contributes to phonological learning challenges, as learners must acquire rules that avoid excessive creation to maintain lexical contrasts. In some dialects, Canadian raising mitigates the extent of this merger by conditioning a raised variant [ʌɪ] of the diphthong /aɪ/ before voiceless /t/, while /aɪ/ remains low before voiced /d/. Consequently, "writer" surfaces with [ˈɹʌɪɾɚ] and "rider" with [ˈɹaɪɾɚ], preserving a vowel quality distinction despite the identical flap. This interaction highlights how allophonic vowel alternations can compensate for consonantal neutralization, reducing homophony in affected pairs. Perceptually, native speakers of flapped varieties experience minimal confusion from these mergers, relying instead on contextual cues, prosody, and lexical knowledge for disambiguation. Experimental evidence indicates poor discrimination of isolated flapped tokens, with identification accuracy hovering around chance levels (44–57% for /t/ vs. /d/, often biased toward /d/) and no significant benefit from enhancing subtle acoustic cues like vowel duration. In connected speech or real words, however, comprehension remains robust, aided by word frequency and surrounding context, underscoring the role of top-down processing in resolving potential ambiguities. From a phonological standpoint, flapping operates as a rule that effectively deletes or relaxes the stricture associated with stop manner and place features, transforming [+stop] segments into a brief [-continuant] tap while neutralizing the [±voice] specification. This feature delinking leads to the observed merger, yet the persistence of indirect cues (e.g., via preceding ) has sparked debates on incomplete neutralization, challenging strict modular models of and supporting theories that allow phonetic traces of underlying contrasts to surface.

Blocking Effects and Exceptions

One notable blocking effect on flapping in American English is the Withgott effect, where intervocalic /t/ remains an unreleased aspirated stop rather than flapping when it occurs at the beginning of a following a morphological boundary. For instance, in "Mediterranean" [ˌmɛdɪtəˈɹeɪniən], the medial /t/ is foot-initial after the prefix "medi-" and thus does not flap, preserving an aspirated [tʰ], whereas in "capitalistic" [ˌkæpɪtəˈlɪstɪk], the corresponding /t/ is foot-internal and flaps to [ɾ]. This pattern similarly applies to "militaristic" [ˌmɪlɪtəˈɹɪstɪk], where the /t/ after "mili-" resists flapping due to foot structure, contrasting with flapping in simpler forms like "" [ˈsɪɾi]. In certain non-North American varieties, flapping is altered or blocked by a process known as the T-to-R rule, where intervocalic /t/ develops into an approximant [ɹ] rather than a flap [ɾ]. This occurs in Northern English dialects, such as West Yorkshire English. For example, "starting" may be pronounced [ˈstaːɹʔɪŋ] with [ɹ] for /t/, creating potential homophony with "starring," though the rule is now lexically restricted and declining. Historical observations trace this innovation to the 19th century, with early documentation in dialect surveys noting its productivity before the rise of t-glottaling reduced its occurrence. Additional exceptions include inhibition of flapping across major syntactic boundaries, such as between clauses, even without pauses, as flapping applies more readily within prosodic words but is blocked at higher domain edges. In careful or formal speech, flapping rates decrease significantly, with speakers retaining stops more often in deliberate articulation to enhance clarity. Dialectal variation also shows flapping in /nt/ clusters (e.g., "winter" [ˈwɪnɾɚ]) but resistance in /nd/ (e.g., "blender" retaining [nd]), particularly in Australian and New Zealand English, due to nasal place assimilation constraints. In compounds, blocking is variable, often occurring at morphological junctions similar to the Withgott effect, preserving stops to maintain base form integrity. Phonologically, these blocking effects are formalized as domain-specific rules, where flapping applies within feet or prosodic words but is inhibited foot-initially or across word boundaries, as captured in Optimality Theory constraints prioritizing foot alignment over lenition (e.g., AlignL(Ft, σ) >> *Flap). Experimental production studies provide , showing higher retention of stops (with voice onset times >50 ms) in non-final dactylic sequences or isolated/listed items, compared to <20 ms in flapped contexts, confirming prosodic and attentional factors in blocking.

Development and Variation

Historical Origins

Flapping represents a lenition process, characterized by the weakening of alveolar stops (/t/ and /d/) into a voiced tap [ɾ] in intervocalic positions, which traces its roots to broader patterns of consonant reduction observed across . In these languages, intervocalic stops often undergo progressive weakening, including voicing and articulatory reduction, as seen in the historical development from Proto-Indo-European voiceless stops to fricatives or approximants in various daughter branches. This lenition trajectory aligns flapping with other weakening phenomena, such as spirantization, where consonantal stricture relaxes to facilitate smoother transitions between vowels. In English, the precursors to modern flapping appear in Middle English, where intervocalic voicing of /t/ is evidenced by variant spellings suggesting a tapped or voiced realization, as in forms of words like bottom rendered with . This process intensified in , but flapping as a distinct alveolar tap emerged more prominently in North American varieties during the 19th and 20th centuries, diverging from norms. Scholarly attention first documented its prevalence in during the 1930s, with dialect surveys revealing it as a characteristic feature of intervocalic coronal stops; for instance, Haugen (1938) described the tap as an of /t/ in words like pity, contrasting it with unreduced variants in typical. By the mid-20th century, flapping had become near-obligatory in , particularly following stressed vowels before unstressed ones, as noted in pronunciation guides like John Kenyon's American Pronunciation (6th edition). Historical records indicate it was rare in 18th-century texts and pronunciation dictionaries, but became more variable and widespread in 19th-century North American speech. Comparatively, analogous processes appear in other , such as Dutch, where word-final /t/ may be glottalized as [ʔ] or deleted in casual speech, reflecting shared Indo-European tendencies toward stop weakening in weak positions. In dialects, a related innovation known as the T-to-R rule—where intervocalic /t/ surfaces as [ɹ]—emerged in northern varieties around the early , as documented in surveys showing its productivity before declining in the . Evidence from historical corpora, including 19th-century phonetic transcriptions and dialect maps, demonstrates an increasing frequency of flap realizations in texts and recordings, correlating with and the rise of that standardized General American features across rhotic dialects.

Sociolinguistic Factors

Flapping exhibits significant stylistic variation, with flap frequencies around 79% in casual speech (pseudorandomized lists) and 73% in more formal reading tasks (minimal pairs), though near-categorical for /d/ (99-100%). This pattern reflects speakers' reduced attention to speech in spontaneous settings, where flapping occurs more frequently in less monitored tasks like pseudorandomized lists compared to minimal pair readings. For instance, in broadcast speech—a semi-formal style—flapping rates for intervocalic /t/ average around 76% in carrier sentence contexts, highlighting its prevalence even outside fully casual environments. Regional and ethnic patterns further shape flapping's distribution, with near-categorical application (over 90%) in urban varieties, but greater variability and lower rates in Appalachian and Southern U.S. dialects. In (AAVE), flapping is particularly robust in casual forms, often exceeding 95% in intervocalic positions, aligning with broader patterns of consonant lenition in informal AAVE speech. These differences underscore how social and geographic identities influence phonetic realization, with urban mainstream varieties favoring consistent flapping as a normative feature. Among immigrant communities, flapping acquisition follows generational patterns, as seen in studies of Korean-English bilinguals where first-generation speakers show adoption rates around 68%, but second- and 1.5-generation individuals approach native-like norms (around 93%) through sustained community exposure. Gender and age also play subtle roles: females exhibit slightly higher flapping rates than males (89% vs. 86% for /t/), potentially linked to sociolinguistic norms of expressiveness, while younger speakers tend to flap more consistently, reflecting ongoing stabilization of the feature across generations. Perceptually, flapping serves as a key marker of the "American" accent, often signaling informality or regional identity to non-native listeners. In L2 learning contexts, this leads to intelligibility challenges, as flaps are frequently misperceived as /d/ by speakers (with discrimination accuracy below 70%) or as /r/ by Romance language learners, due to articulatory similarities with alveolar taps in their L1 phonologies.

References

  1. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7494&context=facpub
  2. https://sites.psu.edu/wildlinguist/flaps/
  3. https://repository.upenn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/4c478a80-ab63-4169-b7ec-608f9fcd260b/content
  4. https://people.brandeis.edu/~smalamud/ling100/f09-outline-segmental-phonology.pdf
  5. https://web.stanford.edu/~zwicky/phonological-hierarchy.pdf
  6. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/featgeom/dejong-flapping.pdf
  7. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/4c478a80-ab63-4169-b7ec-608f9fcd260b/download
  8. https://epa.oszk.hu/02800/02819/00027/pdf/EPA02819_alkalmazottnyt_2023_ksz2_003-020.pdf
  9. https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2017/yoneyama17_interspeech.pdf
  10. http://phonetics-cediel.blogspot.com/2011/08/intervocalic-alveolar-flapping.html
  11. https://open.maricopa.edu/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/2-7-classifying-consonants/
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/ttor-in-west-yorkshire-english1/B84DCB1781647E307E0154A73A260319
  13. https://do-server1.sfs.uwm.edu/link/=E5946825Z4/edu/E39956Z/an%2Bintroduction%2Bto%2Benglish%2Bphonetics%2Brichard%2Bogden.pdf
  14. https://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/documents/2012/cathcart_phonlabreport.pdf
  15. https://pressbooks.utrgv.edu/engl6360/chapter/manner-of-articulation/
  16. https://ocw.uci.edu/upload/files/consonants.pdf
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/individual-variation-in-english-flaps-and-taps-a-case-of-categorical-phonetics/414D749A3A40A12B1D3C2C07E93B046F
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236664263_Acoustic_correlates_of_flaps_in_North_American_English
  19. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/2-7-classifying-consonants/
  20. https://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~robh/howto.html
  21. http://www.bermudez-otero.com/tromsoe.pdf
  22. https://assta.org/proceedings/sst/sst2002/Papers/evans027.pdf
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/phonetic-variation-of-irish-english-t-in-the-syllabic-coda/6B615A0242B261EEA706962A8BA102A7
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/accents-of-english/scottish-english/8F9A7B0E0E0F0E0F0E0F0E0F0E0F0E0F
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231905320_English_Flapping_and_the_feature_vibrant
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/whats-in-the-r-a-review-of-the-usage-of-the-r-symbol-in-the-illustrations-of-the-ipa/7E1FA64F2B742A68AAF41099BB950D43
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347389020_Spanish_rhotics_and_the_phonetics-phonology_interface
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362512682_Portuguese_Has_Two_Underlying_Rhotics_Evidence_from_Lisbon_and_Carioca_Varieties
  29. https://journals.librarypublishing.arizona.edu/jslat/article/244/galley/238/view/
  30. https://www.academia.edu/54627230/Phonetic_variation_in_the_Korean_liquid_phoneme
  31. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2023/full_papers/443.pdf
  32. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00951955/file/the_phonology_of_japanese_r_pre_final.pdf
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/indonesian/AE405481B94A4E0B7234A8BBE9C6F5FD
  34. https://zorc.net/rdzorc/Blust-RobertA/Blust-2013=Austronesian_Languages.pdf
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327339736_Flapping_of_coronal_n_l_d_s_in_Spanish_A_transversal_lenition_process
  36. https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5186/
  37. https://cl.indiana.edu/davis/Capitalistic2005.pdf
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447019314627
  39. https://ntffpu.uni-plovdiv.bg/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/033_Mary-_Anne_-Walter.red_.1.pdf
  40. https://www.antimoon.com/how/flap-t.htm
  41. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/homes/patrick/englen.pdf
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346925298_Flapping_in_American_English
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0095447005000239
  44. https://kuppl.ku.edu/sites/kuppl/files/documents/publications/Herd_Jongman_Sereno_flaps_JPhon_2010.pdf
  45. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstreams/51ab5290-b049-4a87-938a-005b77e9ee83/download
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373838861_Variable_Speech_Styles_in_the_Production_of_English_Flapping
  47. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=facpub
  48. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/items/5011cee1-f86a-454a-b258-eb6c462f3ce5
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.