Hubbry Logo
Primary flight displayPrimary flight displayMain
Open search
Primary flight display
Community hub
Primary flight display
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Primary flight display
Primary flight display
Primary flight display
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A Boeing 737's primary flight display

A primary flight display or PFD is a modern aircraft instrument dedicated to flight information. Much like multi-function displays, primary flight displays are built around a Liquid-crystal display or CRT display device. Representations of older six pack or "steam gauge" instruments are combined on one compact display, simplifying pilot workflow and streamlining cockpit layouts.

Most airliners built since the 1980s—as well as many business jets and an increasing number of newer general aviation aircraft—have glass cockpits equipped with primary flight and multi-function displays (MFDs). Cirrus Aircraft was the first general aviation manufacturer to add a PFD to their already existing MFD, which they made standard on their SR-series aircraft in 2003.

Mechanical gauges have not been eliminated from the cockpit with the onset of the PFD; they are retained for backup purposes in the event of total electrical failure.

Components

[edit]

While the PFD does not directly use the pitot-static system to physically display flight data, it still uses the system to make altitude, airspeed, vertical speed, and other measurements precisely using air pressure and barometric readings. An air data computer analyzes the information and displays it to the pilot in a readable format. A number of manufacturers produce PFDs, varying slightly in appearance and functionality, but the information is displayed to the pilot in a similar fashion. FAA regulation describes that a PFD includes at a minimum, an airspeed indicator, turn coordinator, attitude indicator, heading indicator, altimeter, and vertical speed indicator [14 CFR Part 61.129(j)(1)].

Layout

[edit]
PFD with key instrument displays labelled
PFD of a Garmin G1000

The details of the display layout on a primary flight display can vary enormously, depending on the aircraft, the aircraft's manufacturer, the specific model of PFD, certain settings chosen by the pilot, and various internal options that are selected by the aircraft's owner (i.e., an airline, in the case of a large airliner). However, the great majority of PFDs follow a similar layout convention.

The center of the PFD usually contains an attitude indicator (AI), which gives the pilot information about the aircraft's pitch and roll characteristics, and the orientation of the aircraft with respect to the horizon. Unlike a traditional attitude indicator, however, the mechanical gyroscope is not contained within the panel itself, but is rather a separate device whose information is simply displayed on the PFD. The attitude indicator is designed to look very much like traditional mechanical AIs. Other information that may or may not appear on or about the attitude indicator can include the stall angle, a runway diagram, ILS localizer and glide-path “needles”, and so on. Unlike mechanical instruments, this information can be dynamically updated as required; the stall angle, for example, can be adjusted in real time to reflect the calculated critical angle of attack of the aircraft in its current configuration (airspeed, etc.). The PFD may also show an indicator of the aircraft's future path (over the next few seconds), as calculated by onboard computers, making it easier for pilots to anticipate aircraft movements and reactions.

To the left and right of the attitude indicator are usually the airspeed and altitude indicators, respectively. The airspeed indicator displays the speed of the aircraft in knots, while the altitude indicator displays the aircraft's altitude above mean sea level (AMSL). These measurements are conducted through the aircraft's pitot system, which tracks air pressure measurements. As in the PFD's attitude indicator, these systems are merely displayed data from the underlying mechanical systems, and do not contain any mechanical parts (unlike an aircraft's airspeed indicator and altimeter). Both of these indicators are usually presented as vertical “tapes”, which scroll up and down as altitude and airspeed change. Both indicators may often have “bugs”, that is, indicators that show various important speeds and altitudes, such as V speeds calculated by a flight management system, do-not-exceed speeds for the current configuration, stall speeds, selected altitudes and airspeeds for the autopilot, and so on.

The vertical speed indicator, usually next to the altitude indicator, indicates to the pilot how fast the aircraft is ascending or descending, or the rate at which the altitude changes. This is usually represented with numbers in "thousands of feet per minute." For example, a measurement of "+2" indicates an ascent of 2000 feet per minute, while a measurement of "-1.5" indicates a descent of 1500 feet per minute. There may also be a simulated needle showing the general direction and magnitude of vertical movement.

At the bottom of the PFD is the heading display, which shows the pilot the magnetic heading of the aircraft. This functions much like a standard magnetic heading indicator, turning as required. Often this part of the display shows not only the current heading, but also the current track (actual path over the ground), rate of turn,[1] current heading setting on the autopilot, and other indicators.

Other information displayed on the PFD includes navigational marker information, bugs (to control the autopilot), ILS glideslope indicators, course deviation indicators, altitude indicator QFE settings, and much more.

Although the layout of a PFD can be very complex, once a pilot is accustomed to it the PFD can provide an enormous amount of information with a single glance.

Airbus

[edit]

Starting with the A350-1000, Airbus proposes a common symbology on the PFD and HUD centered on a flightpath vector and an energy cue instead of a flight director, supplementing the usual pitch and heading indications to improve situational awareness, and helping incorporating synthetic vision into the PFD.[2]

Drawbacks

[edit]

The great variability in the precise details of PFD layout makes it necessary for pilots to study the specific PFD of the specific aircraft they will be flying in advance, so that they know exactly how certain data is presented. While the basics of flight parameters tend to be much the same in all PFDs (speed, attitude, altitude), much of the other useful information presented on the display is shown in different formats on different PFDs. For example, one PFD may show the current angle of attack as a tiny dial near the attitude indicator, while another may actually superimpose this information on the attitude indicator itself. Since the various graphic features of the PFD are not labeled, the pilot must learn what they all mean in advance.

A failure of a PFD deprives the pilot of an extremely important source of information. While backup instruments will still provide the most essential information, they may be spread over several locations in the cockpit, which must be scanned by the pilot, whereas the PFD presents all this information on one display. Additionally, some of the less important information, such as speed and altitude bugs, stall angles, and the like, will simply disappear if the PFD malfunctions; this may not endanger the flight, but it does increase pilot workload and diminish situational awareness.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Primary flight display

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Primary Flight Display (PFD) is an electronic instrument in modern aircraft cockpits that serves as the pilot's primary reference for critical flight , integrating data from multiple traditional gauges into a single digital screen to display attitude, airspeed, altitude, heading, and vertical speed. As a core component of the (EFIS), the PFD uses technologies like cathode ray tubes (CRT) or liquid crystal displays () to present this in a standardized layout, enhancing pilot situational awareness and reducing the need to scan multiple instruments. The evolution of the PFD traces back to the late , when advancements in microprocessors and digital display technology began replacing analog "six-pack" instruments—such as the , , and —with integrated electronic systems, marking the onset of cockpits in . This transition, accelerated in the with the adoption of EFIS in commercial and aircraft, addressed limitations of mechanical gauges, including inaccuracy, high maintenance, and cluttered panels, while improving data accuracy and reliability. By the , PFDs had become standard in most new aircraft designs, incorporating features like color-coded speed ranges, flight director guidance, and synthetic vision for low-visibility operations. Key elements of a typical PFD include a central attitude director indicator (ADI) showing pitch and roll relative to the horizon, flanked by vertical tapes for (with color bands indicating safe operating limits) and altitude (including vertical speed trends), as well as a heading rose or arc at the bottom for reference. Additional symbology covers lateral and vertical deviations from navigation sources like instrument landing systems (ILS) or flight management systems (FMS), along with annunciations for , , and approach modes. These features collectively minimize during flight, particularly in , and support advanced functionalities such as avoidance and terrain awareness. Despite variations by manufacturer—such as , , or —PFD layouts adhere to human factors principles for intuitive use across types.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

A primary flight display (PFD) is a modern electronic instrument that consolidates essential flight information into a single screen, typically utilizing (LCD) or cathode ray tube (CRT) technology. It integrates the functions of the traditional "six pack" of analog gauges—, , , , turn coordinator, and vertical speed indicator—providing pilots with a unified view of primary flight parameters. This design replaces disparate mechanical instruments with a digital interface, enabling clearer visualization and reducing clutter. The primary purpose of the PFD is to deliver critical , including attitude (pitch and roll), , altitude, heading, and vertical speed, in an intuitive format that enhances pilot during all phases of flight. By presenting this information synthetically, often through graphical symbols like horizon lines and flight path vectors, the PFD minimizes the need for pilots to scan multiple instruments, thereby reducing head-down time and improving in high-workload environments. This consolidated display supports rapid , particularly in where visual references are limited. The PFD represents an evolution from standalone mechanical instruments to digital formats within s, streamlining pilot workflow by allowing seamless integration with other systems for a more efficient monitoring process. As a core component of architectures, it has become standard in commercial airliners since the 1980s, business jets, and aircraft such as the Cirrus SR-series, which incorporated integrated s starting in 2003.

Historical Development

Prior to the 1970s, aircraft cockpits relied on separate analog instruments known as the "basic six" or "six pack," which included the , , , , turn coordinator, and vertical speed indicator, arranged for efficient pilot scanning. This configuration originated in with the development of key gyroscopic and pitot-static instruments, becoming standardized after for both and civilian to provide essential flight data in mechanical cockpits. The shift toward digital primary flight displays (PFDs) began in the 1970s with the introduction of cathode-ray tube (CRT) technology in applications, enabling the integration of multiple instruments into electronic formats, followed by commercial adoption driven by advances in computing power and display reliability. A pivotal milestone occurred in with the debut of the , the first wide-body airliner featuring a two-crew with CRT-based PFDs that consolidated attitude, , altitude, and heading information, reducing panel clutter and enhancing crew efficiency. Early implementations retained mechanical backup instruments to mitigate reliability concerns associated with electronic failures, such as power loss or display malfunctions, ensuring redundancy in critical flight phases. Widespread adoption in accelerated in the early 2000s, exemplified by Cirrus Aircraft's SR-series, which made the Avidyne Entegra PFD standard equipment starting in March 2003, marking the first certified piston aircraft with integrated glass cockpits. This transition was propelled by improvements in (LCD) technology for brighter, more reliable screens, alongside aviation regulations from bodies like the FAA that certified these systems for reduced workload and improved , while still mandating backup options.

Technical Components

Core Display Elements

The core display elements of a primary flight display (PFD) integrate essential into a single electronic screen to provide pilots with critical real-time information for control and . According to FAA regulations under 14 CFR § 61.129(j)(1), a PFD in technically advanced airplanes must include, at a minimum, an , turn coordinator, , , , and vertical speed indicator (VSI), ensuring compliance for commercial pilot training. These elements are derived from sources such as pitot-static systems for and altitude measurements. At the center of the PFD is the attitude director indicator (ADI), which depicts the aircraft's pitch and roll relative to the horizon using an artificial separating sky (typically blue) from ground (brown or black). The ADI includes a flight path marker (FPM), a dynamic symbol representing the aircraft's velocity vector or actual flight path angle, aiding in precise trajectory awareness. Bank angle is shown via a rotating scale or pointer on the ADI, with warnings for excessive angles approaching stall conditions. Airspeed is presented on a vertical tape typically positioned to the left of the ADI, featuring a scrolling scale with the current speed aligned to a fixed index, often in knots. This tape includes color-coded ranges, such as green for normal operating speeds, amber for caution zones like low-speed awareness below 1.3 , and red for limits including (e.g., stall speed or maximum operating speed ). Altitude appears on a similar vertical tape to the right of the ADI, displaying height above in feet with selected altitude bugs (e.g., markers) indicating target levels for climb or descent. The vertical speed indicator (VSI) is integrated as a vertical tape or pointer adjacent to the altitude display, showing climb or descent rates in feet per minute, with scales matching typical aircraft performance ranges. The heading display, usually at the bottom of the PFD, utilizes a or digital tape to indicate magnetic heading, incorporating track deviation indicators for alignment. Additional elements enhance predictive and coordinative awareness: trend vectors project short-term changes in attitude, , or altitude (e.g., arrows indicating future position over 6-10 seconds), with smooth motion to avoid pilot distraction. The slip/skid indicator, often a segmented or on the ADI, reveals uncoordinated flight by showing sideslip, with alerts for excessive conditions.

Data Sources and Processing

The primary data for , altitude, and vertical speed on a primary flight display (PFD) is derived from the aircraft's , which consists of a to measure total (ram plus static) pressure and static ports to capture ambient static pressure. These pressure differentials are used to compute , , and vertical speed, providing essential aerodynamic and information to the PFD. Attitude (pitch and roll) and heading information for the PFD are sourced from an inertial reference system (IRS) or attitude heading reference system (AHRS), which employ ring laser gyros and accelerometers to detect three-dimensional accelerations and maintain orientation relative to a reference frame. The IRS establishes a vertical reference via sensing during alignment and detects Earth's rotation for alignment, outputting pitch, roll, yaw, and heading data to the PFD for real-time attitude depiction. In modern systems, AHRS often incorporates solid-state sensors and magnetometers for enhanced precision in providing these parameters. Raw sensor inputs from the pitot-static system, IRS/AHRS, and outside air temperature probes are processed by the (ADC), a dedicated unit that converts pressures and inertial data into display-ready formats such as , , baro-corrected altitude, and . The ADC applies corrections for non-standard temperature and pressure conditions—using to derive static air temperature and adjusting for density variations—to ensure accurate computations, which are then transmitted to the PFD and other . In integrated setups like Airbus's (ADIRU), the ADC combines with IRS functions for streamlined processing. For improved heading and track accuracy, PFD data processing integrates inputs from navigation systems such as GPS, which aids AHRS/IRS by providing position and velocity corrections to mitigate gyro drift over time. Backup mechanisms include redundant sensors, such as dual ADCs and AHRS units, ensuring continued PFD operation; in case of primary failure, the system reverts to standby instruments or a secondary source within one second, maintaining essential flight parameters via independent power and data paths. Despite the shift to digital PFDs, traditional pitot-static hardware remains indispensable, as it supplies the fundamental pressure data that electronic processing cannot fully replicate without physical sensing.

Layout and Symbology

Standard Layout Conventions

The standard layout of a (PFD) follows a conventional "T" configuration, with the or sphere positioned centrally to dominate the pilot's visual focus, airspeed tape arranged vertically on the left side, altitude tape on the right side, or rose at the bottom center, and vertical speed indicator (VSI) integrated adjacent to the altitude tape. This arrangement prioritizes the most critical flight parameters in a manner that facilitates rapid cross-checking, retaining the spatial relationships of traditional analog instruments while integrating them into a single electronic screen. Symbology on PFDs adheres to standardized color coding to enhance interpretability, where typically indicates normal operating ranges (such as safe s), denotes cautionary conditions approaching limits, and red signals warnings like or proximity. Dynamic scaling is employed on tapes for and altitude, where the numerical resolution expands automatically near critical values—such as or decision altitudes—to provide greater precision during high-workload phases like approach and . These visual cues ensure consistent meaning across displays, minimizing by aligning with pilots' expectations from training. Navigation aids are incorporated directly into the PFD layout for seamless integration, including (ILS) glideslope and localizer deviation needles scaled to the attitude sphere, as well as flight director command bars that overlay the to guide pitch and bank deviations. These elements appear in the central and upper portions of the display, allowing pilots to monitor lateral and vertical guidance without shifting gaze to separate instruments. Influenced by international standards such as , which defines interfaces and formatting for cockpit display systems in , PFD layouts emphasize ergonomic principles that mimic the familiarity of analog dials while enabling efficient scanning of primary parameters. This design supports efficient eye movement patterns, with the central attitude director serving as the anchor for sequential checks of speed, height, and direction, thereby reducing pilot workload and enhancing during instrument flight.

Variations by Manufacturer

Boeing's primary flight displays (PFDs) in aircraft like the 787 Dreamliner utilize tape-style formats for and altitude indications, drawing from traditional electromechanical designs to maintain pilot familiarity while integrating cues from multifunction displays (MFDs) for enhanced . These PFDs consist of five 9-by-12-inch displays arranged across the instrument panel, with software hosted on a common core system that supports seamless data sharing between PFDs and MFDs. Synthetic vision systems, which provide 3D terrain rendering, are available as an optional enhancement for the 787's , tested in collaboration with to improve low-visibility operations. Airbus incorporates innovative symbology on the PFDs of the A350-1000, introduced in 2018, featuring a flightpath vector that indicates the aircraft's actual trajectory relative to the horizon and an energy cue to aid in during approach. This harmonized symbology aligns with (HUD) elements, promoting consistent visual cues across the for improved . In general aviation, Garmin's G1000 system employs circular attitude indicators on its PFDs, mimicking traditional analog instruments with a blue-over-brown horizon line for intuitive pitch and roll depiction, tailored for smaller aircraft like the Cessna 172. The G1000 PFD supports customizable softkeys along the bottom bezel, allowing pilots to configure displays for functions such as navigation sources, terrain alerts, or weather overlays, enhancing adaptability in general aviation environments. Honeywell and Rockwell Collins (now Collins Aerospace) emphasize modular PFD designs in business jets, enabling scalable integration and software updates without full system overhauls, as seen in Honeywell's Primus Epic platform with high-resolution DU-1310 displays serving as primary or multifunction units. These systems prioritize redundancy through dual PFD configurations, such as the four-display setup in Rockwell Collins' upgrades for aircraft like the Beechjet 400A/XP, where two dedicated PFDs ensure continued operation if one fails. Collins Aerospace's Pro Line Fusion further supports this modularity with touchscreen PFDs that allow customizable layouts for business jet cockpits, focusing on intuitive access to flight data. Recent advancements as of 2024 include Honeywell's next-generation Integrated Cockpit System, featuring enhanced PFD symbology for improved resolution and integration, and Garmin's G5000 Prime for , incorporating advanced interfaces and dynamic symbology updates.

Advantages

Situational Awareness Benefits

The (PFD) consolidates essential flight parameters such as attitude, , altitude, and heading into a single integrated screen, significantly reducing the time pilots spend scanning multiple analog gauges in traditional cockpits. This consolidation minimizes head movements and by presenting correlated data in a unified format, allowing for quicker and more efficient monitoring during critical flight phases. Enhanced visualization features on the PFD, including trend lines for parameters like and altitude, as well as predictive symbols such as velocity vectors, enable pilots to anticipate deviations and maintain precise control. The velocity vector, which indicates the aircraft's actual flight path relative to the horizon, supports intuitive steering and improves overall path tracking accuracy without requiring constant reference to separate instruments. Studies demonstrate that such symbology enhances by facilitating proactive decision-making in dynamic conditions. In low-visibility environments, the integration of synthetic vision systems (SVS) on the PFD overlays realistic 3D terrain, runway, and obstacle depictions, providing pilots with an intuitive out-the-window view that mitigates risks like . This capability markedly improves terrain awareness and path compliance, with flight tests showing SVS achieving lateral path errors of 0.05 nautical miles (95% of the time) compared to 0.25 nautical miles for baseline displays. Quantitative assessments indicate a 20% reduction in pilot workload during instrument approaches when using advanced PFD symbology, as measured by Task Load Index scores. In glass cockpits, the PFD's alignment with navigation displays delivers consistent attitude and positional cues, helping to prevent by countering misleading vestibular sensations in . SVS enhancements on the PFD further bolster this by offering realistic 3D perspectives that low-time pilots rated highest for spatial awareness in simulated low-visibility scenarios.

Integration in Glass Cockpits

In glass cockpits, the Primary Flight Display (PFD) serves as the central component of the (EFIS), working alongside Multi-Function Displays (MFDs) to consolidate critical flight parameters such as attitude, , and altitude while MFDs handle supplementary data like navigation and weather information. This integration ensures a unified presentation of flight information, reducing pilot workload by minimizing the need to scan disparate instruments. The PFD shares real-time data with the (FMS) to provide engagement cues, trajectory predictions, and performance calculations, enabling seamless automation of flight path guidance. In the , for instance, the PFD interfaces with the FMS through the Common Core System (CCS), which processes and distributes data via protocols over Ethernet, allowing the PFD to display FMS-derived guidance while feeding performance metrics into the Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) for integrated engine monitoring and alerts. Similarly, in the , the PFD forms part of the within a fully architecture, linking to the FMS via keyboard cursor control units and contributing data to the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) for system status and checklist management. For reliability, glass cockpits incorporate reversion modes where PFD failure prompts automatic transfer of its data to an adjacent MFD or standby instruments, maintaining access to essential flight information without reconfiguration. This backup integration, often triggered by sensor or display faults, ensures continued operation by populating standby attitude indicators or compact formats on surviving displays. A key synergy involves head-up display (HUD) mirroring of PFD symbology, projecting critical elements like attitude, airspeed, and flight path vectors onto the windshield for head-up operations without diverting the pilot's gaze from the external view. In systems like the and A350, this mirroring extends to harmonized PFD designs that replicate HUD cues, such as energy chevrons and trajectory symbols, fostering consistency across head-up and head-down displays.

Drawbacks and Limitations

Potential Failure Modes

Primary flight displays (PFDs) can experience several common failure modes, including screen blackouts due to electrical or hardware malfunctions, unreliable data from sensor issues such as icing or blockage, and software glitches that result in erroneous or frozen indications. These failures often stem from dependencies on air data computers and attitude heading reference systems (AHRS), where a in data processing can propagate misleading information across the display. Such malfunctions significantly increase pilot workload, as crews must revert to scattered backup analog gauges like standby attitude indicators, potentially leading to , especially in (IMC). Loss of primary attitude and data has been a contributing factor in numerous loss-of-control incidents, with pilots reporting confusion from conflicting indications between captain and first officer displays. To mitigate these risks, modern incorporate redundant dual PFDs, allowing essential flight information to remain available to both pilots following a single failure, and automatic reversionary modes that transfer PFD symbology to adjacent multifunction displays (MFDs) or activate a basic attitude director indicator (ADI) configuration. These systems include failure flags and monitoring to detect and isolate faults, ensuring that catastrophic misleading data is extremely improbable. A notable example is the 2009 crash of , where icing caused temporary blockage, resulting in unreliable indications on the PFDs and contributing to crew confusion and eventual loss of control in IMC. PFD failure rates are generally low, with (MTBF) for systems like the at approximately 10,000 hours, though their criticality escalates in IMC where backup reliance becomes essential. Between 1996 and 2006, incorrect instrument indications, including unreliable , contributed to approximately 300 accidents worldwide.

Training and Standardization Issues

The variability in primary flight display (PFD) layouts and symbology across manufacturers, including subtle differences in flight director bars and attitude indicators between and systems, requires pilots to undergo type-specific training, which can complicate transitions between aircraft fleets and increase the risk of errors during initial familiarization. To address these inconsistencies, industry efforts have focused on standardization through , which defines interfaces and basic symbology for cockpit display systems to promote uniformity in PFD presentation across implementations. Complementing this, FAA Advisory Circular 25-11B and guidelines establish minimum requirements for PFD symbology consistency, ensuring essential elements like attitude and indications remain predictable while allowing manufacturer-specific enhancements. Pilot for PFD operation typically involves simulator sessions that emphasize developing efficient scan patterns, such as the "T-scan" or "cross-check" methods to monitor attitude, , and altitude indicators sequentially, alongside failure recognition exercises to identify degraded modes like warnings or blanked data fields. A key focus is "scan discipline," where instructors stress maintaining a rhythmic visual flow to avoid fixation on any single element, often reinforced through eye-tracking feedback in advanced simulations to optimize attention allocation during high-workload phases like approach and landing. One significant challenge is pilots' over-reliance on PFDs, which can lead to skill atrophy in interpreting analog backup instruments, such as standby attitude indicators, potentially compromising performance during display failures. To mitigate this, FAA Part 61 mandates recurrent training, including biennial flight reviews that incorporate proficiency checks to sustain manual flying skills and backup instrument usage. Following the widespread adoption of glass cockpits in the post-2000s era, particularly after their introduction in around 2003, certification training hours for PFD-equipped aircraft have increased, with transition programs typically requiring 2 to 50 hours, averaging 17 hours, beyond traditional analog training to build familiarity and reduce accident risks associated with unfamiliar interfaces.

Modern Developments

Advanced Features

Modern primary flight displays (PFDs) have advanced through the integration of synthetic vision systems (SVS), which overlay 3D rendering directly onto the to provide pilots with enhanced situational awareness during poor weather conditions like fog or heavy rain. These systems draw from high-resolution onboard databases to depict surrounding , obstacles, and runways in a realistic, wireframe or photo-textured format, allowing for precision navigation where natural visibility is limited to as low as 1,000 feet. Flight tests have demonstrated that SVS reduces lateral navigation errors by up to 67 feet and vertical errors by up to 40 feet compared to traditional displays, meeting (RNP) standards for -challenged approaches. Post-2018 implementations, such as those in Honeywell's avionics suite, further refine SVS with high resolution and 3D symbology for stabilized approaches and traffic avoidance. A key enhancement in PFD symbology appeared with the A350-1000 in 2018, introducing harmonized flightpath vectors and energy cues centered on the display to show the aircraft's predicted trajectory and real-time energy margins. The flightpath vector illustrates the actual and anticipated flight path relative to the horizon, while the energy cue provides a vertical indicator of excess or deficit energy based on speed, altitude, and configuration, helping pilots maintain optimal performance without over-relying on cues. This optional feature, available across the A350 fleet, promotes consistent pilot training and reduces mode confusion by replacing traditional flight director bars with more intuitive predictive elements. Augmented reality (AR) overlays have elevated PFD capabilities by fusing enhanced vision systems (EVS) with imaging to enable visualization in zero-visibility scenarios. Systems like Universal Avionics' ClearVision combine multispectral cameras with symbology on split-screen PFDs or head-up displays, projecting outlines, thresholds, and edges for landings as low as Category III conditions. This integration supports full low-visibility operations without external aids, with the elements dynamically adjusting to aircraft position for seamless transition from approach to rollout. Post-2023 innovations incorporate AI-assisted predictions to create adaptive PFDs that dynamically adjust symbology based on flight phase, such as emphasizing descent profiles during approach or energy cues in cruise. AI algorithms process from sensors and flight parameters to prioritize critical information, reducing . These adaptive features, part of broader roadmaps like the FAA's 2024 Adaptive Cockpit initiative, use to model aircraft status and pilot , ensuring symbology evolves contextually without overwhelming the display. As of 2025, advancements include AI enhancements in EVS for and alerts on PFD-like displays. Beyond core symbology, post-2018 PFD advancements emphasize seamless integrations, such as Universal Avionics' suite, which embeds SVS and engine performance data into a unified interface for holistic monitoring during all flight phases. Touch-enabled elements in systems like Thales' adaptive interfaces further customize displays in real time, enhancing usability in high-workload scenarios.

Regulatory Standards

The (FAA) regulates primary flight displays (PFDs) under 14 CFR Part 25, which establishes airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes, including requirements for the reliability of and provisions for backup systems to ensure continued safe operation in the event of primary display failure. Specifically, §25.1309 mandates that equipment, systems, and installations, such as PFDs, must be designed to perform intended functions under foreseeable operating conditions without unacceptable risk, with AC 25-11B providing guidance on demonstrating compliance for electronic flight displays through and measures. The (EASA) imposes equivalent standards via Certification Specifications (CS-25) for large aeroplanes, which emphasize consistency in human-machine interfaces to minimize and ensure intuitive operation of displays like PFDs. CS-25.1303, for instance, requires instruments to be plainly visible and arranged to permit efficient crew coordination, with additional guidance in CS-25 Amendment 25 for evaluating human factors in display design to support safe flight path management. Certification of PFDs involves rigorous processes outlined in RTCA for software assurance, which categorizes development and verification objectives based on design assurance levels ( A-E) to mitigate errors in airborne software controlling display functions. Complementing this, RTCA DO-160 specifies environmental testing procedures for displays, including categories for temperature, vibration, electromagnetic interference, and altitude to verify performance under operational stresses. Internationally, the (ICAO) harmonizes these through Annex 6, Part I, which sets operational guidelines for PFDs in all-weather flights by requiring aircraft to carry approved instruments for (IFR) operations, such as attitude indicators and displays, to enable safe low-visibility approaches. These standards promote global , with guidance in the Manual of All-Weather Operations (Doc 9365) detailing PFD integration for precision approaches. Post-2023 regulatory updates have intensified focus on cybersecurity for digital PFDs, with the FAA proposing amendments to 14 CFR Part 25 in 2024 to mandate assessments and against unauthorized access to , including displays. Similarly, EASA's Regulation (EU) 2023/203 introduces Part-IS requirements for in , requiring organizations to implement cybersecurity measures for digital flight systems by 2025-2026. For integration with unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), emerging FAA rules under 14 CFR Part 107 and proposed beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations (as of August 2025) extend PFD-equivalent standards to remote pilot stations, mandating certified displays for situational awareness in automated flights.

References

  1. https://skybrary.aero/articles/primary-flight-display-pfd
  2. https://skybrary.aero/articles/electronic-flight-instrument-system-efis
  3. https://genesys-aerosystems.com/the-evolution-of-aircraft-displays-from-analog-instruments-to-digital-efis-displays/
  4. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2020/august/flight-training-magazine/ol-how-it-works-pfd
  5. https://www.spartan.edu/news/six-pack-aircraft-instrumentation/
  6. https://pilotinstitute.com/flight-instruments-explained/
  7. https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety-studies/Documents/SS1001.pdf
  8. https://deltamuseum.org/research/history/aircraft/jets/jets/boeing-767-1982-present
  9. https://aviationsafetymagazine.com/features/glass-cockpit-reliability/
  10. https://planeandpilotmag.com/g1-1999-2003/
  11. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac_25-11b.pdf
  12. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-61/subpart-F/section-61.129
  13. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/10_phak_ch8.pdf
  14. https://skybrary.aero/articles/air-data-computer-adc
  15. https://skybrary.aero/articles/inertial-reference-system-irs
  16. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_23_1311-1C.pdf
  17. https://www.flighttestsafety.org/images/stories/workshop/2013/session4paper2knutlande-paper.pdf
  18. https://arincinsider.com/understanding-arinc-661/
  19. https://www.aviationtoday.com/2005/06/01/boeing-787-integrations-next-step/
  20. https://www.aviationtoday.com/2017/12/18/boeing-nasa-test-nextgen-synthetic-vision-787-sims/
  21. https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/airbus-introduces-hud-symbology-primary-flight-display
  22. https://static.garmin.com/pumac/190-00498-08_0A_Web.pdf
  23. https://aerospace.honeywell.com/us/en/products-and-services/products/cabin-and-cockpit/avionics/cockpit-and-flight-displays
  24. https://www.nextantaerospace.com/rockwell-collins-nextant-aerospace-and-constant-aviation-launch-next-gen-flight-deck-package-for-beechjet-400a-xp-operators/
  25. https://www.collinsaerospace.com/what-we-do/industries/business-aviation/flight-deck/pro-line-fusion
  26. https://www.openpr.com/news/3944021/primary-flight-display-market-predicted-to-reach-us-1-47-bn
  27. https://theaircurrent.com/industry-strategy/garmin-g5000-prime-part-25-strategy/
  28. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870004005
  29. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20040040154/downloads/20040040154.pdf
  30. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA430680.pdf
  31. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20040085699/downloads/20040085699.pdf
  32. https://www.aviationtoday.com/2022/08/19/national-aviation-day-looking-back-boeing-integrated-787s-avionics-systems/
  33. https://www.flightglobal.com/cockpit-mock-up-shows-off-a380s-avionics-integration/47845.article
  34. https://aviationsafetymagazine.com/features/broken-glass/
  35. https://www.airbus.com/sites/g/files/jlcbta136/files/2021-10/A330neo-cockpit-commonality-with-A350-innovations.pdf
  36. https://skybrary.aero/articles/degraded-flight-instrument-display-guidance-flight-crews
  37. http://aviationsafetymagazine.com/features/when-glass-goes-dark/
  38. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/AirFrance447_BEA.pdf
  39. https://planeandpilotmag.com/blocked-pitot-tubes/
  40. https://www.flightdeckfriend.com/ask-a-pilot/differences-between-airbus-and-boeing
  41. https://pilotinstitute.com/airbus-vs-boeing/
  42. https://aviation-ia.sae-itc.com/standards/arinc661p1-9-661p1-9-cockpit-display-system-interfaces-user-systems-part-1-avionics-interfaces-basic-symbology-behavior
  43. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/online-publications/easy-access-rules-large-aeroplanes-cs-25
  44. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/77748/dot_77748_DS1.pdf
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S000368701730073X
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891757/
  47. https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1637&context=jaaer
  48. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/use-it-or-lose-it/
  49. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-61
  50. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20000032979/downloads/20000032979.pdf
  51. https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1558&context=jaaer
  52. https://universalavionics.com/home/products/enhanced-vision
  53. https://aerospace-innovations.com/advances-in-avionics-displays/
  54. https://www.faasafety.gov/files/events/SO/SO15/2025/SO15137976/Adaptive_Cockpit_-_Technology_Roadmapping.pdf
  55. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2024-10-22/universal-avionics-all-artificial-intelligence
  56. https://www.rtca.org/do-178/
  57. https://www.rtca.org/do-160/
  58. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/08/21/2024-17916/equipment-systems-and-network-information-security-protection
  59. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/easy-access-rules-information-security-regulations-eu-2023203
  60. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/07/2025-14992/normalizing-unmanned-aircraft-systems-beyond-visual-line-of-sight-operations
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.