Hubbry Logo
Alkali feldspar graniteAlkali feldspar graniteMain
Open search
Alkali feldspar granite
Community hub
Alkali feldspar granite
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Alkali feldspar granite
Alkali feldspar granite
Alkali feldspar granite
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Alkali feldspar granite
Igneous rock
Alkali feldspar granite. Holocrystalline texture, coarse-grained. Great amounts of potassium feldspar (orthoclase, pink-reddish in colour)
Composition
PrimaryPotassium feldspar, quartz
SecondaryPlagioclase; dark minerals

Alkali feldspar granite, some varieties of which are called 'red granite',[1] is a felsic igneous rock and a type of granite rich in the mineral potassium feldspar (K-spar). It is a dense rock with a phaneritic texture. The abundance of K-spar gives the rock a predominant pink to reddish hue peppered with minor amounts of black minerals.[2][3]

QAPF diagram for classification of plutonic rocks

Chemical composition

[edit]

As shown in the QAPF diagram, alkali feldspar granite contains between 20% - 60% quartz. Less quartz content would lead to "quartz alkali feldspar syenite". More than 90% of the total feldspar content is in the form of alkali feldspar. Less than that amount would designate the rock as a granite.[4]

Mineral assemblage of igneous rocks

Other incorporated silicate minerals may include, very minor amounts of plagioclase feldspar, mica in the form of muscovite and/or biotite, and amphibole (often hornblende). Oxide minerals such as magnetite, ilmenite, or ulvospinel. Some sulfides and phosphates (mainly apatite) may also be present.

Occurrence

[edit]

Alkali feldspar granites generally occur with other alkali-rich granitoids, such as monzogranite and syenogranite, forming part of the A-type granites. They are found in a wide range of tectonic settings and their origins remain uncertain.[5]

Uses

[edit]

Granitic rocks in general are of interest to geologists, geochemists, etc., because they provide 'crystallized' telltale clues of their environment of formation.[6]

Alkali feldspar granite is used as construction material in the form of dimension stones, and polished slabs or tiles for building facades, pavements, and kitchen countertops.[3]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Alkali feldspar granite

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Alkali feldspar granite is a plutonic characterized by coarse-grained texture and a mineral assemblage dominated by alkali , which comprises over 90% of the total content, along with (typically 20-60% of felsic minerals) and minor mafic components such as or . This rock type features in amounts less than 10% of the total , distinguishing it from other granites like monzogranite or syenogranite. Accessory minerals may include , , and opaque oxides like or , while peralkaline variants incorporate sodic minerals such as , , or . The rock often displays phaneritic or textures, with the latter featuring prominent alkali feldspar phenocrysts up to several centimeters in size, and its color typically ranges from pink to red or white, imparted by the potassium-rich s like or . These granites form through the slow cooling and of silica-rich (high SiO₂, often >70 wt%) magmas under relatively low-pressure and high-temperature conditions, frequently resulting in hypersolvus varieties where a single perthitic alkali phase develops above the solvus temperature in the alkali . Many alkali granites are classified as A-type granites, linked to anorogenic or post-collisional tectonic environments within continental interiors, where they intrude as batholiths or stocks during periods of extension or rifting. Geochemically, they exhibit high ratios of FeO/MgO, elevated alkali contents (K₂O + Na₂O), and enrichment in incompatible trace elements, often with metaluminous to peralkaline affinities. These rocks play a key role in crustal evolution, contributing to the generation of large igneous provinces and serving as hosts for economic deposits of rare-earth elements, iron, and . Notable occurrences include the A-type suites in the and examples like the Mount Evans Batholith in .

Definition and Classification

Definition

Alkali feldspar granite is a plutonic classified as a variety of , distinguished by its phaneritic texture—characterized by visible crystals typically ranging from medium to coarse-grained—and the predominance of , which constitutes over 90% of the total content, with comprising less than 10%. This composition aligns with the (IUGS) criteria for granitic rocks, where the rock's essential minerals are and , and it occupies a specific field in the QAPF modal classification diagram. The rock typically displays a distinctive pink to reddish hue, attributed to the abundant potassium-rich alkali , such as or , which imparts the color during crystallization. Essential minerals include (20-60% by volume) and alkali , with the total content generally ranging from 40-80%, complemented by minor mafic minerals like or . This mineral assemblage reflects its derivation from silica-rich magmas under conditions favoring alkali feldspar stability. Alkali feldspar granite is often associated with A-type granites, formed in anorogenic settings, though its detailed petrogenesis involves specific magmatic processes covered elsewhere. The term highlights its distinction from other granites like monzogranite or syenogranite, emphasizing the near-exclusive dominance of alkali feldspar over plagioclase.

Classification

Alkali feldspar granite is classified within the IUGS scheme for plutonic rocks using the modal QAPF diagram, which plots the relative proportions of quartz (Q), alkali feldspar (A), plagioclase (P), and feldspathoids (F), normalized to 100% for these components when mafic minerals are less than 90% of the rock. On this diagram, alkali feldspar granite falls in the field defined by 20-60% Q, 0-10% P, and A comprising more than 90% of the total feldspar (A + P), with F typically at 0-5% or absent. This placement distinguishes it as a quartz-bearing, alkali feldspar-dominated granitic rock. Within the broader IUGS classification of granitic rocks, alkali feldspar granite represents a of the granite group, characterized by its high alkali feldspar content and low . It is related to but distinct from syenogranite, which has alkali feldspar comprising 65-90% of total feldspar, particularly where the emphasis is on the transitional nature between and due to elevated relative to pure syenites. The rock is differentiated from monzogranite, which occupies an adjacent field on the with a more balanced ratio of alkali feldspar to (typically 35-65% each of total feldspar) and similar content of 20-60%. In contrast, it differs from , which has minimal (<5%) and lacks the significant Q component, placing it outside the granite fields. When modal mineral data are unavailable, chemical classification employs the CIPW norm, which calculates hypothetical mineral proportions from whole-rock oxide compositions to approximate the QAPF parameters and confirm the rock's granitic affinity. This normative approach supports the identification of alkali feldspar granite by highlighting high normative and relative to .

Petrology

Mineralogy

Alkali feldspar granite is dominated by and as its primary rock-forming minerals. , typically in the form of or , constitutes 35-90% of the rock and makes up more than 90% of the total content. These feldspars often occur as large megacrysts, which can exhibit a perthitic texture resulting from subsolidus exsolution of sodic and potassic components during slow cooling. forms 20-60% of the mineral assemblage and typically appears as anhedral grains intergrown with the feldspars. Accessory minerals include minor amounts of , which is limited to less than 10% of the total feldspar and is predominantly sodic (albite-rich, An₀-An₅). Micas such as or are present, contributing to the rock's color and providing insight into its potassium enrichment. Amphiboles, including or sodic varieties like in peralkaline subtypes, occur and are more common in mafic-leaning variants. Opaque minerals, primarily and , serve as indicators of its oxidation state. Trace accessories such as , , and are ubiquitous but minor and provide geochemical tracers for magmatic evolution without significantly altering the overall modal composition. In varieties with very low content (<10%), the rock may be termed alaskite, emphasizing the dominance of felsic phases.

Texture

Alkali feldspar granite displays a phaneritic texture, defined by its coarse-grained, crystalline fabric resulting from slow crystallization in intrusive settings, where individual mineral grains are visible to the naked eye. This texture typically features equigranular arrangements of minerals with average grain sizes of 2-5 mm, though variations include porphyritic forms where larger crystals dominate. In porphyritic varieties, alkali feldspar phenocrysts can reach up to 1 cm in length, embedded within a finer groundmass of similar composition, reflecting episodic crystallization during magma evolution. A distinctive microstructural feature is the presence of graphic intergrowths, where quartz forms vermicular or rod-like inclusions within alkali feldspar, creating a eutectic-like pattern that indicates simultaneous late-stage crystallization of these phases. The overall fabric is holocrystalline and massive, with all components fully crystallized and lacking glassy remnants, which underscores the rock's plutonic origin. However, in tectonically deformed examples, subtle foliation may develop through alignment of mafic minerals or recrystallization, imparting a weak planar structure without altering the primary igneous character. The low color index of alkali feldspar granite, ranging from 0-20% mafic minerals such as biotite or hornblende, contributes to its predominantly light-colored appearance, often pinkish or whitish due to the abundance of feldspar and quartz. This leucocratic nature enhances the visibility of the phaneritic grains and intergrowths, distinguishing it from more melanocratic granitic rocks.

Chemical Composition

Major Elements

Alkali feldspar granites are characterized by a silica- and alkali-rich bulk composition, with major element oxides determined through whole-rock analyses typically employing X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry or classical wet chemistry methods. These techniques provide precise quantification of oxide abundances by preparing fused glass beads or pressed pellets from powdered samples, ensuring accurate representation of the rock's chemical makeup. Typical compositions feature high SiO₂ contents ranging from 70 to 77 wt%, reflecting their highly evolved, felsic nature, alongside Al₂O₃ at 12 to 14 wt%. Alkali oxides are elevated, with K₂O between 4 and 6 wt% and Na₂O from 3 to 5 wt%, yielding a high alkali index (Na₂O + K₂O > 8 wt%) that underscores their alkaline affinity. In contrast, CaO and MgO remain low at <1 wt% each, contributing to their metaluminous to peraluminous character, as indicated by molar ratios of Al₂O₃/(CaO + Na₂O + K₂O) near or slightly above 1. Other major oxides, such as total Fe as Fe₂O₃ (1-5 wt%) and TiO₂ (<0.3 wt%), are subordinate but consistent with minimal mafic mineral content.
Major OxideTypical Range (wt%)
SiO₂70–77
Al₂O₃12–14
Na₂O3–5
K₂O4–6
CaO<1
MgO<1
Compared to the average bulk continental crust (SiO₂ ≈ 60.6 wt%, Al₂O₃ ≈ 15.9 wt%, Na₂O + K₂O ≈ 4.9 wt%, CaO ≈ 6.4 wt%, MgO ≈ 4.7 wt%), alkali feldspar granites show enrichment in SiO₂, K₂O, and Na₂O, with depletions in CaO, MgO, and FeO, highlighting their fractionated, crust-derived signatures. This composition aligns with A-type granite affinities, often linked to anorogenic settings. The mineral proportions, dominated by alkali feldspar and quartz, directly reflect these oxide abundances.

Trace Elements

Alkali feldspar granites, often classified as A-type granites, exhibit characteristic enrichments in high field strength elements (HFSE), reflecting their anorogenic origin and limited fractionation of phases like titanomagnetite or amphibole that would otherwise deplete these elements. Typical concentrations include zirconium (Zr) ranging from 300 to 1900 ppm, niobium (Nb) from 20 to 150 ppm, and yttrium (Y) from 40 to 150 ppm, which are notably higher than in I- or S-type granites. These enrichments signify derivation from sources with low water activity and high temperatures, allowing retention of HFSE in the melt. Rare earth elements (REE) in alkali feldspar granites total 100–1000 ppm, displaying fractionated patterns with enrichment in light REE relative to heavy REE and a pronounced negative europium (Eu) anomaly, indicative of plagioclase fractionation during magmatic evolution. This pattern underscores the role of accessory minerals like zircon and monazite in controlling REE distribution, contributing to the overall incompatible element signature. In contrast, these granites show depletions in large ion lithophile elements (LILE) such as barium (Ba <500 ppm) and strontium (Sr <100 ppm), resulting from early crystallization and removal of alkali feldspar and plagioclase. Titanium (Ti) contents are also low, typically <0.5 wt% as TiO₂, consistent with the absence of Ti-rich mafic phases. These depletions highlight the evolved nature of the magma and minimal interaction with mantle-derived components rich in LILE. Isotopic signatures further support significant crustal involvement in the petrogenesis of alkali feldspar granites, with initial ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios commonly ranging from 0.705 to 0.710 and εNd values from -5 to +2. These values indicate mixing between enriched mantle and crustal materials, rather than purely juvenile sources, as the elevated Sr ratios reflect radiogenic ingrowth in older continental crust. The moderately negative to low positive εNd suggests partial melting of Proterozoic or older crustal protoliths, with possible minor mantle input. Analytical determination of trace elements in alkali feldspar granites primarily relies on inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which provides high sensitivity for detecting concentrations down to parts per billion. Samples are typically digested using acid mixtures (e.g., HF-HNO₃) prior to analysis, enabling precise quantification of HFSE, REE, and LILE. This technique has become standard due to its multi-element capability and accuracy, facilitating geochemical discrimination of granite types.

Formation and Petrogenesis

Tectonic Settings

Alkali feldspar granites, classified as a type of A-type granite based on their geochemical signatures, predominantly form in anorogenic tectonic environments characterized by extension and minimal subduction influence. These settings include within-plate magmatism in continental interiors, such as rifts, failed rifts, and stable cratonic blocks, where melting of lower crustal or mantle sources occurs under low water fugacity conditions. The association with A-type granites underscores their formation in non-subduction zones, often linked to tensional tectonics that facilitate ascent of anhydrous, silica-rich melts. A key example of such intraplate settings is magmatism driven by mantle plumes or hotspots, as seen in the White Mountain igneous province of New England, USA, where alkali feldspar granites intruded during the Jurassic-Cretaceous (190–82 Ma). Post-collisional extension also plays a significant role, particularly after continental collisions, allowing for the emplacement of these granites in regions like the southern North China Craton during the late Paleoproterozoic. While rare, they can occur in back-arc basins under extensional conditions, but they are notably absent from active subduction arcs, which favor calc-alkaline I-type granites instead. Temporally, alkali feldspar granites exhibit a distribution with relative scarcity in the Archean eon, becoming more prevalent from the late Paleoproterozoic onward into the Phanerozoic, reflecting the evolution of continental lithosphere and increasing intraplate extension events. Age-frequency peaks for A-type granites, including alkali-rich variants, occur around 2.7 Ga (late Archean), 1.85 Ga and 1.45 Ga (Proterozoic), and 0.6 Ga, 0.3 Ga, and 0.1 Ga (Phanerozoic), highlighting their episodic formation tied to supercontinent cycles and rifting.

Magmatic Processes

Alkali feldspar granite, often classified as an A-type granite, primarily forms through partial melting of lower crustal or upper mantle sources under relatively dry, anhydrous conditions. These melts arise from the anatexis of granulitic residues in the lower crust, which have been depleted of earlier orogenic granites, leading to enrichment in alkalis such as potassium and sodium due to the volatile-poor environment that favors the mobilization of incompatible elements. This process typically occurs at high temperatures (above 800–900°C) and low water contents, preventing the stabilization of hydrous minerals and promoting the extraction of silica- and alkali-rich magmas. A-type granites are further subdivided into A1 subtypes, typically derived from mantle or lower crustal sources in anorogenic settings, and A2 subtypes from remelting of upper crustal igneous rocks in post-collisional environments. Following partial melting, fractional crystallization plays a crucial role in refining the magma composition by preferentially removing early-formed mafic minerals, such as amphibole and biotite, which depletes the melt in iron, magnesium, and calcium while concentrating quartz and K-feldspar. This differentiation enhances the peraluminous to metaluminous character of the granite, with progressive enrichment in silica (up to 75 wt% SiO₂) and alkalis, resulting in the dominance of alkali feldspar over plagioclase. In some cases, this process can involve fractional crystallization of trapped melt from mantle-derived precursors, further amplifying the felsic and alkali signatures. Magma mixing may contribute to the petrogenesis, particularly in extensional rift settings, where interaction between ascending basaltic magmas from the mantle and resident crustal melts introduces additional heat and volatiles, hybridizing the composition and aiding alkali enrichment. Such mingling is evidenced by magmatic enclaves and isotopic variations, though it remains subordinate to crustal melting in most models. Emplacement of these magmas occurs in shallow to mid-crustal plutons at depths of 5–15 km, where slow cooling rates—spanning thousands to tens of thousands of years—facilitate the growth of large alkali feldspar megacrysts through low nucleation rates and prolonged magmatic conditions. This plutonic setting allows for efficient differentiation without significant volatile loss, preserving the characteristic A-type geochemistry.

Occurrence

Global Distribution

Alkali feldspar granite exhibits a widespread global distribution, predominantly associated with Precambrian cratons and shields where it forms extensive anorogenic intrusions. These rocks are particularly abundant in ancient stable continental interiors, such as the Canadian Shield in North America and the Baltic Shield in northern Europe, where they constitute significant components of Proterozoic magmatic provinces dating from approximately 2.5 to 1.0 billion years ago. In these settings, alkali feldspar granites often appear as large batholiths and plutons emplaced during periods of crustal extension following major orogenic events. Beyond Precambrian terrains, alkali feldspar granites are also prevalent in Mesozoic and Cenozoic magmatic belts, reflecting renewed anorogenic activity in continental rift zones and post-collisional extensions. Notable examples include occurrences in the of northeastern Africa and the Great Xing'an Range in eastern China, where intrusions formed between 200 million and 50 million years ago. These younger associations highlight the rock's role in diverse tectonic environments, from intraplate rifting to back-arc settings. Alkali feldspar granites are frequently linked to rapakivi granite suites and broader A-type granite complexes, comprising a substantial portion of granitic plutons within anorogenic provinces worldwide. This association underscores their characteristic anhydrous, metaluminous to peralkaline compositions derived from mantle-influenced sources. The global prevalence spans all continents, with irregular age distributions tied to episodic crustal reworking, though they remain most voluminous in Proterozoic shields. Identification and mapping of these granites on a global scale increasingly utilize remote sensing techniques, such as multispectral satellite imagery from Landsat and , combined with geochemical surveys to detect their high silica, alkali, and trace element signatures. These methods enable efficient discrimination of alkali feldspar granites from other felsic intrusions across vast, remote shield areas, facilitating comprehensive inventories of their distribution.

Notable Localities

One prominent example of alkali feldspar granite is the Pikes Peak Batholith in Colorado, USA, a composite intrusion emplaced approximately 1.08 billion years ago during the Mesoproterozoic era. This batholith, spanning about 50 by 100 kilometers with extensive outcrops along the Front Range and Rampart Range, features biotite-hornblende granites and late-stage alkali feldspar-rich phases, including fayalite and riebeckite-bearing varieties that exhibit rapakivi textures characterized by ovoid alkali feldspar megacrysts mantled by plagioclase. Its formation involved fractional crystallization of mantle-derived magma with crustal assimilation in an intracratonic, post-orogenic setting, resulting in A-type affinities and shallow emplacement at around 5 km depth. In the Oslo Rift of southeastern Norway, Permian alkali feldspar granites form part of the rift's batholithic stage, intruded between 286 and 272 million years ago amid late Paleozoic continental extension. Notable complexes include the Drammen and Finnemarka batholiths, covering up to 650 km², which consist of mildly peraluminous to metaluminous high-silica granites (70–79 wt.% SiO₂) dominated by perthitic alkali feldspar, biotite, and accessory fluorite and zircon. These rift-related intrusions, with minor crustal input evident from isotopic signatures (εNd +3.5 to +4), are associated with the broader Oslo Rift magmatism that includes carbonatite complexes like Fen, reflecting mantle-derived alkaline sources during lithospheric thinning. The Bushveld Complex in South Africa hosts Proterozoic alkali feldspar granites within the Lebowa Granite Suite, emplaced around 2054 million years ago as the final magmatic phase of this large igneous province. These sheet-like intrusions, 1.5–3.5 km thick and covering approximately 30,000 km², overlie the Rustenburg Layered Suite and underlie the Rooiberg volcanics, comprising A-type granites with 71–77 wt.% SiO₂, high K₂O/Na₂O ratios (>1), and iron-rich minerals such as annite and aegirine-augite. The suite's development involved repeated injections into the basement, contributing to polymetallic mineralization including tin deposits in phases like the Bobbejaankop granite. In , the New England Batholith in eastern exemplifies alkali-rich granite occurrences within a broader to plutonic assemblage. Middle to Late intrusions, such as those in the northern segments, include alkali-enriched variants like the K-rich Moonbi Plutonic Suite, characterized by metaluminous I-type compositions with shoshonitic affinities, elevated ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios (~0.7045), and associations with forearc to back-arc tectonic evolution of the New England Orogen. These granites, intruded into deformed trench-slope sediments, reflect initial magmatism around 305 Ma transitioning to more fractionated alkali phases.

Uses and Economic Importance

Construction Applications

Alkali feldspar granite serves as a premium dimension stone in , valued for its uniform texture and consistent color variations, typically ranging from pink to red due to the prevalence of . This makes it suitable for facades, , and countertops in both residential and commercial buildings, where its aesthetic appeal enhances architectural designs. The rock's interlocking and provide structural integrity, allowing it to withstand heavy foot traffic and environmental exposure in high-use areas. Polished slabs of alkali feldspar granite exhibit exceptional polishability, achieved through the fine-grained quartz-feldspar matrix that allows for a smooth, reflective surface finish. This property, combined with its inherent resistance to weathering from the durable mineral composition, ensures longevity in outdoor applications such as cladding and paving. The stone's low and hardness, rated around 6-7 on the , minimize degradation from freeze-thaw cycles and chemical erosion, making it ideal for durable building elements. Quarrying of alkali feldspar granite employs advanced techniques like diamond wire sawing to extract large, intact blocks with minimal waste, enabling precise cutting for dimension stone production. This method involves tensioning a diamond-impregnated wire to slice through the rock face, facilitating the recovery of blocks up to several cubic meters in size from suitable deposits. Global production of dimension stone, including granite varieties like alkali feldspar granite, is approximately 80 million tons annually as of 2023, supporting widespread construction demand. These applications highlight the stone's role in iconic architecture, where its properties contribute to both visual impact and structural resilience. For instance, durable granites similar in composition have been used in monumental sculptures exposed to harsh weather.

Industrial and Scientific Uses

Alkali feldspar granite serves as a significant source of (K-feldspar) for industrial applications, particularly through operations that extract it for use in ceramics, , and abrasives. In these rocks, K-feldspar acts as a flux to lower melting temperatures and enhance material properties such as strength, durability, and whiteness in ceramics, while improving clarity and in . For abrasives, the mineral's contributes to grinding and applications. A notable example is the Borucu deposit in , Central , where alkali feldspar granites with high alkali content (Na₂O + K₂O of 9.20-9.66 wt%) are processed via to reduce (Fe₂O₃ from 0.32% to 0.13 wt%), meeting second-quality standards for ceramics and showing potential for and abrasives after further refinement. Economically, alkali feldspar granite contributes to global reserves and production, with major deposits in and other regions supporting industry. holds reserves of 720 million metric tons and produced approximately 6.2 million metric tons in 2023, accounting for about 23% of the global total of 27 million metric tons (USGS, 2024). Processed from these sources typically markets at around $110 per metric ton, reflecting its value in high-demand sectors like (50% of U.S. use) and ceramics. In scientific research, alkali feldspar granite is valuable for , enabling precise of magmatic and events. crystals within these granites are commonly dated using U-Pb methods, such as LA-ICP-MS or SIMS, to determine ages; for example, in East Antarctic alkali feldspar granites, this technique has yielded ages of 550-500 Ma, linking intrusions to the . Additionally, ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar on K-feldspar provides cooling ages, serving as a thermochronometer for post-magmatic histories, particularly in low-grade metamorphic settings where it records geological events below greenschist facies. These granites also act as proxies in studies of crustal evolution, especially within A-type frameworks. Characterized by alkali feldspar-rich textures, high LILE and HFSE contents, and iron-rich mafics, A-type granites like those in alkali feldspar varieties form from mantle-derived alkaline magmas in anorogenic settings, offering insights into stabilization and comprising about 6% of granitic compositions in terranes. Their geochemical signatures help trace deep planetary processes, with occurrences extending to lunar and meteoritic analogs, highlighting their role beyond in understanding magmatism. Alkali feldspar granites, particularly A-type varieties, also host economic deposits of rare-earth elements, iron, and , contributing to mineral resource extraction in regions such as the .

References

  1. https://www.science.smith.edu/~jbrady/petrology/rock-library/igp-rocks/afgranite/afgranite.php
  2. https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/0942/ds942.pdf
  3. https://home.wgnhs.wisc.edu/how-to-identify-red-granite-wisconsin-state-rock/
  4. http://courses.washington.edu/ess212/Lab_files/ESS%20212%20Lab%20Plutonic%20Rocks.pdf
  5. https://www.alexstrekeisen.it/english/pluto/alkalifeldspargranite.php
  6. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/bgsrcs/rcs_details.cfm?code=AFGN
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012825276900520
  8. https://www.science.smith.edu/~jbrady/petrology/rock-library/rl-page17s.php
  9. https://geologyistheway.com/igneous/classification-of-plutonic-rocks/
  10. https://www.alexstrekeisen.it/english/pluto/syenogranite.php
  11. https://www2.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens212/igrockclassif.htm
  12. https://www.minetoshsoft.com/cipw/index.html
  13. https://zarmesh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/International-Union-of-Geological.pdf
  14. https://www.alexstrekeisen.it/english/pluto/perthite.php
  15. https://geologyistheway.com/igneous/alkali-feldspar-granite/
  16. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/geology/publications/pp/160/appendix-sec2.htm
  17. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ds942
  18. https://physci.mesacc.edu/Geology/Luther/GLG101IN/GLG101IN_Lab05_PlutonicRocks/GLG101IN_Lab05_PlutonicRocks2.html
  19. https://www.alexstrekeisen.it/english/pluto/graphic.php
  20. https://www.florence-rockinart.it/en/materials/granite/
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/11/6/557
  22. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1985/0755/report.pdf
  23. https://www.utdallas.edu/~rjstern/pdfs/AliIJES12.pdf
  24. https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/staff/mclemore/documents/McLemoreetal.pdf
  25. http://www.i2massociates.com/downloads/4.1RudnickGaoCrustcomposition.pdf
  26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00402202
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291978400_Trace_element_geochemistry_of_A-type_granites
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279653468_Nd-Sr-O_isotopic_geochemistry_constraints_on_the_age_and_origin_of_the_A-type_granites_in_Eastern_China
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039914099003185
  30. https://faculty.uml.edu/Nelson_Eby/Research/A-type%20granites/A-type%20granites.htm
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024493720301560
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344109514_The_Late_Cretaceous_A-type_alkali-feldspar_granite_from_Mt_Pozeska_Gora_N_Croatia_Potential_marker_of_fast_magma_ascent_in_the_Europe-Adria_suture_zone
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824002134
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012821X23001383
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226212978_A-type_granites_geochemical_characteristics_discrimination_and_petrogenesis
  36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00032-6
  37. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060583
  38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-024-02152-x
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226069776_Rapakivi_granites_in_the_geological_history_of_the_Earth_Part_1_Magnetic_associations_with_rapakivi_granites_age_geochemistry_and_tectonic_setting
  40. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0869593809030010
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824005249
  42. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/lower-cretaceous-alkali-feldspar-granites-in-the-central-part-of-the-great-xingan-range-northeastern-china-chronology-geochemistry-and-tectonic-implications/4A0DD7627D20C4D313D8CCCC8E77CC7A
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024493706003252
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386462754_Remote_sensing_and_geochemistry_of_A-type_granites_North_Arabian-Nubian_shield_Insights_into_the_origin_and_evolution_of_the_granitic_suites_and_processes_responsible_for_rare_metals_enrichment
  45. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/pikes-peak-batholith-colorado-front-range-and-a-model-origin-gabbro-anorthosite
  46. https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=geo_faculty
  47. https://www.nhm.uio.no/english/about/organization/research-collections/people/emeriti/rtronnes/4/oslorift-excursion-articl/eurogranites-2008-oslorift.pdf
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00283318
  49. https://portergeo.com.au/database/mineinfo.php?mineid=mn129
  50. http://www.largeigneousprovinces.org/sites/default/files/BushveldLIP.pdf
  51. https://www.ga.gov.au/bigobj/GA3700.pdf
  52. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JB086iB11p10530
  53. https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/421/2017/se-8-421-2017.pdf
  54. https://sandatlas.org/commercial-granite/
  55. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-stone-dimension.pdf
  56. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-021-07577-3
  57. https://www.rockstone.biz/world-stone-statistic/
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395987001_Pegmatites_and_alkali_feldspar_granites_as_sources_of_industrial_k-feldspar_a_study_from_Borucu_Aksaray_Central_Turkiye
  59. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-feldspar.pdf
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/zircon-u-pb-dating
  61. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2011TC003057
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.