Hubbry Logo
Rover V8 engineRover V8 engineMain
Open search
Rover V8 engine
Community hub
Rover V8 engine
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rover V8 engine
Rover V8 engine
Rover V8 engine
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Rover V8 engine
3.5-litre Rover V8 engine from a 1986 Range Rover
Overview
ManufacturerRover and its successors
Production1967–2006
Layout
Configuration90° V8
Displacement3.5–5.0 L; 215.3–304.9 cu in (3,528–4,997 cc)
Cylinder bore
  • 88.9 mm (3.50 in)
  • 93.5 mm (3.68 in)
  • 94 mm (3.70 in)
Piston stroke
  • 71.12 mm (2.80 in)
  • 77 mm (3.03 in)
  • 80 mm (3.15 in)
  • 82 mm (3.23 in)
  • 88.9 mm (3.50 in)
  • 90 mm (3.54 in)
Cylinder block materialAluminium
Cylinder head materialAluminium
ValvetrainOHV 2 valves x cyl.
Compression ratio8.13:1, 9.35:1, 10.5:1
Combustion
TurbochargerOn some versions
Fuel system
ManagementBosch L-Jetronic, Motronic or Hitachi Hotwire
Fuel typePetrol
Cooling systemWater-cooled
Output
Power output158–340 hp (118–254 kW; 160–345 PS)
Torque output210–350 lb⋅ft (285–475 N⋅m)
Dimensions
Length840 mm (33.2 in)
Width760 mm (30 in)
Height710 mm (28 in)
Dry weight144–170 kg (317–375 lb)

The Rover V8 engine is a compact OHV V8 internal combustion engine with aluminium cylinder block and cylinder heads, designed and produced by Rover in the United Kingdom, based on a General Motors engine.[1] It has been used in a wide range of vehicles from Rover and other manufacturers since its British debut in 1967.

History

[edit]

The Rover V8 began life as the Buick 215, an all-aluminium OHV pushrod engine introduced in 1960 for the 1961 US model year (it was on their drawing boards in the late 1950s). The compact alloy engine was light, at just 144 kg (317 lb), and capable of high power outputs: the most powerful Buick version of this engine rated 200 hp (149 kW), and the very similar Oldsmobile "Jetfire" turbocharged version made 215 hp (160 kW), both numbers SAE gross. Based on sales volume and press reports, the engine was a success. Buick produced 376,799 cars with this engine in just three years. A comparable number of Oldsmobile 215 engines were produced. In addition, some Pontiac models were fitted with the Buick 215, leading to the nickname "BOP 215" for the engine (BOP standing for Buick/Oldsmobile/Pontiac). The aluminium engine was relatively expensive to produce, however, and it suffered problems with oil and coolant sealing, as well as with radiator clogging from use of antifreeze incompatible with aluminium[citation needed]. As a result, GM ceased production of the all-aluminium engine after 1963, although Buick retained a similar 300/340/350 cid engine (iron block and alloy heads, later all-iron) (1964–1980), as well as a V6 derivative (1962–2008) which proved to have a very long and successful life.

In January 1964 Rover gave American operations head J. Bruce McWilliams permission to investigate the possible purchase of an American V8 engine for Rover cars. History relates that McWilliams first saw the Buick V8 at the works of Mercury Marine, where he was discussing the sale of Rover gas turbines and diesel engines to the company (Mercury Marine did indeed use the Land Rover 2.25 L (137.3 cu in) diesel engine in marinised form)[citation needed]. However, it is likely that McWilliams was aware of the Buick engine before this. In any case, McWilliams realised that the lightweight Buick V8 would be ideal for smaller British cars (indeed, it weighed less than many straight-4 engines it would replace). McWilliams and William Martin-Hurst began an aggressive campaign to convince GM to sell the tooling, which they finally agreed to do in January 1965. Retiring Buick engineer Joe Turlay moved to the UK to act as a consultant.

The Rover V8 has long been a relatively common engine for kit car use in Britain, much as the Chevrolet small-block V8 is for American hot rod builders (though many British hot rods have traditionally used four cylinder engines, like the Ford Pinto and Crossflow units). Even in the US there is a strong contingent of builders who select the Buick or Rover aluminium V8 engine for use in small sporty cars like the MGB . The 1964 Buick iron-block 4.9 L (300 cu in) engine had aluminium cylinder heads, 3.75 bore and a longer 3.4" stroke crankshaft, which with modification can be used with the Buick 215 or Rover engine blocks to produce a high-output, very light weight V8 with displacement of up to about 4.9 L (300 cu in). The 300 crank, after machining the mains to the 215 size in the 215 block yields 4.3 L (260 cu in). Traco in the USA were prominent builders of such engines.

The British made engines were run on two SU carburettors, initially HS6 then HIF6 and HIF44 variants (14 years), then two CD175 Stromberg carburettors (2–3 years), Bosch L-Jetronic (7–8 years, aka Lucas 4CU Flapper), then Hitachi Hotwire (5 years, aka Lucas 14CUX), then the GEMS system (many years) and finally Bosch Motronics for 2 years. The engine is still cast now (2011), in an improved version, by Coscast in Birmingham, UK.

As well as appearing in Rover cars, the engine was sold by Rover to small car builders, and has appeared in a wide variety of vehicles. Rover V8s feature in some models from Morgan +8, TVR, Triumph TR8, Land Rover and MGB V8, among many others.

By the late 1990s, the Rover V8 had become uncompetitive with other V8 engines in its class. Compared to modern V8 engines, It produced less horsepower, it used much more fuel, and used an aged pushrod architecture, whereas V8 engines made by other automakers often used overhead-cam designs. After Land Rover switched to the BMW M62 V8 in the 2003 Range Rover, and the petrol-powered Land Rover Discovery 3 switched to the Jaguar AJ-V8 engine, the last mass-produced Rover V8 was made in May 2004, after 37 years of production, and just under 1 million engines produced. The 2004 Land Rover Discovery II was the last mass-produced vehicle to use it.

The last Rover-badged vehicle that used the Rover V8 was the Rover SD1, which was discontinued in 1986 and replaced by the Rover 800, which used a 2.7 litre variant of the Honda C engine as its top engine choice. MG Rover Group used the 4.6 L SOHC 2-valve Ford Modular V8 engine in the Rover 75 and MG ZT 260 from 2003-2005.

The Rover V8 remained with Land Rover when it was sold to Ford by BMW. Although Land Rover has switched to the Jaguar AJ-V8 engine for new applications, they wanted production of the engine to continue, and they arranged for production to restart in Weston-super-Mare under MCT, an engineering and manufacturing company. MCT will continue limited production of the engine for the foreseeable future, supplying engines for aftermarket and replacement use.[2]

The Rover V8 based on the Buick design was not the first V8 engine produced by Rover. When the Rover Company was having engineering differences of opinion regarding the development of the Whittle turbine engine, the Wilks brothers did a deal with Rolls-Royce to swap technologies. The turbine engine project at Barnoldswick went to Rolls-Royce and Rover Co took over the V12 Meteor engine production used in a range of World War II tanks and the post war Centurion Tank - (the Meteor V12 was a 'detuned' version of the Merlin aero engine). From this a V8 variant was developed.

The Rover Meteorite, also known as Rolls-Royce Meteorite, was a V8 petrol engine of 18.01 L (1,099 cu in) capacity. In essence it was two-thirds of a V12 Meteor, and it shared the Meteor's 60° bank angle. Meteorites were built for heavy duty vehicles, for marine use and as stationary power units: it powered the Thornycroft Antar or Mighty Antar Tank Transporter – and as such was used to transport Meteor-engined tanks – and also heavy transport on the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme in Australia.

Racing

[edit]

As the aluminium block made this engine one of the lightest stock V8s built, it was an obvious choice for use in racing. Mickey Thompson entered a car powered by this engine in the 1962 Indianapolis 500. From 1946 to 1962 there had not been a single stock-block car entered in this famous race. In 1962 the Buick 215 was the only non-Offenhauser powered entry in the field of 33 cars. Rookie driver Dan Gurney qualified eighth and raced well for 92 laps before retiring with transmission problems.

The Rover version of this engine was extensively developed and used for rallying, especially in Triumph TR8 sports cars.

The Australian Repco V8 F1 engine being based on Buick 215 block[3][4] is technically a common misconception, as the Rover/Buick V8 had only 5 cylinder head studs around each cylinder unit and that cannot accommodate the 6 stud Repco RB620 heads. The Repco V8 was based on the Oldsmobile 215 block of the same era, which was very similar in appearance, size and material, but used 6 cylinder head studs per cylinder. The subtle difference in block design/head clamping originated in Oldsmobile's intention to produce the higher power, turbo-charged Jetfire version of the small/light V8, however, the public/press tended not to be aware of the internal difference.

Hotstox use Rover V8 in their stock cars.

3.5 L

[edit]
A 3.5-litre Rover V8 engine, stripped of ancillaries, cylinder heads and sump
3.5-litre Rover V8 engine in a 1973 Range Rover

The initial Rover version of the engine had a displacement of 3.5 L; 215.3 cu in (3,528 cc).[5][6] The bore and the stroke was 88.9 mm × 71.12 mm (3.50 in × 2.80 in). All Rover V8s were OHV pushrod engines with two valves per cylinder. It used a sand-cast block with pressed-in iron cylinder liners, and a new intake manifold with two HS6 type SU Carburettors. The Rover engine was heavier but stronger than the Buick engine, with a dry weight of about 170 kg (370 lb). It was first offered in the 1967 Rover P5B saloon, initially making 184 PS (135 kW; 181 hp) (gross) / 160 PS (118 kW; 158 hp) (net) at 5,200 rpm and 226 lb⋅ft (306 N⋅m) (gross) / 210 lb⋅ft (285 N⋅m) (net) of torque at 2,600 rpm on 10.5:1 compression (5-star petrol was then still available in the UK). With the introduction of the Rover SD1 in 1976, the engine was improved with the 'rope' oil seals for the crankshaft ends replaced with lip seals, spark plug dimensions changed and the compression ratio lowered to 9.35:1.

Rover V8
Sound clip of a 3.5 L Rover V8 engine, as fitted to a 1979 Range Rover
Problems playing this file? See media help.

Applications:

Project Iceberg

[edit]

In the late 1970s, British Leyland became aware of the increasing importance of diesel engined cars to the British, European and (especially) North American markets in the wake of the 1979 energy crisis. It was decided that a new series of diesel engines powerful, refined and economical enough for use in BL cars was needed. However, with development funding tight, it was necessary to use existing BL petrol engines as a base. This included a diesel version of the 3.5 litres (3,528 cc) V8, the development project for which was code-named 'Iceberg'.[7]

BL collaborated with Perkins Engines of Peterborough to develop the engine. Both naturally aspirated and turbocharged versions were produced, both using a Stanadyne rotary mechanical fuel injection system. Power outputs of around 100 (naturally aspirated) and 150 (turbocharged) horsepower were achieved.

The Iceberg engine was slated for fitment in the Range Rover, Rover SD1 and the Jaguar XJ but the project encountered problems with failure of the alloy cylinder heads and internal cooling. They were limited by the need to use the same basic block casting as the petrol engine to allow the Iceberg engine to be produced on the same production line to reduce costs. Whilst these problems could have been overcome, the project ran into financial and logistical problems caused by the reorganisation of BL and specifically the splitting of Land Rover and Rover into separate divisions.

Land Rover took over production of the V8 engine in 1982, moving it from the main BL engine plant at Acock's Green into a new, much lower-capacity production line in the Solihull works, where it was built alongside the other Land Rover engines. This meant that there was no spare capacity to build diesel versions of the engine. Coupled to this, it was clear that the market for large diesel engined cars in North America had not developed as expected.

BL finally pulled out of the project in 1983. Perkins initially decided to pursue the project alone, and even produced advertising brochures for the engine as an industrial power unit, but BL withdrew all technical support and Project Iceberg was wrapped up in late 1983. BL's other collaboration with Perkins (producing a diesel version of the O-Series engine) produced the highly successful 'Prima' unit. BL (and its Rover Group successor) bought in 2.5-litre 4-cylinder turbodiesel units from VM Motori to use in the SD1 and Range Rover.

3.9/4.0

[edit]
The 3.9 L Rover V8, a bored-out version of the original 3.5 L engine, was used in several Land Rover vehicles, TVRs, and the MG RV8.
2003 Morgan Plus 8 4.0 litre V8 engine

Land Rover used a 3,946 cc (3.9 L; 240.8 cu in) version of the Rover V8 throughout the 1990s. Bore was increased to 94 mm (3.70 in) and stroke remained the same at 2.8 in (71.12 mm). The engine was revised in 1995 and thereafter referred to as a 4.0 to differentiate it from the earlier version, although displacement was unchanged. The revisions consisted of a new intake and exhaust system, extra block ribbing, revised pistons, and larger cross-bolted main bearings. The 1995 4.0 produced 190 hp (142 kW; 193 PS) and 236 lb⋅ft (320 N⋅m).

Production of the 4.0 ended in 2003. The final version of the engine, used until 2004 in the Land Rover Discovery, produced 188 hp (140 kW; 191 PS) at 4,750 rpm and 250 lb⋅ft (339 N⋅m) at 2,600 rpm.

Applications:

In the early 1980s TVR approached Andy Rouse with a view to using his race-developed 3.9 L (3,946 cc) variant of the V8 in their Rover-powered TVR 350i 'wedge'; Rouse had successfully campaigned a Rover SD1 with a modified V8 on the track. For a number of reasons (primarily cost) Rouse's version was not used, but the concept was passed to alternative engineering firms which resulted in a rare variant of the 3.9. This unit has 93.5 mm (3.68 in) cylinder bores (instead of Rover's own 94 mm (3.7 in) that was introduced some years later) and thus has a capacity of 3,905 cc (3.9 L). Flat-topped pistons and high-lift camshaft gave a compression ratio of 10.5:1. TVR claimed 275 bhp as the output and whilst this is generally disregarded by aficionados, a healthy 3,905 cc (3.9 L) engine will produce in excess of 240 bhp. Once a reproducible specification had been determined, the bulk of engine production was undertaken by North Coventry Kawasaki (NCK), which company was subsequently purchased by TVR to become their in-house engine division known as TVR Power. About 100 cars (TVR 390SE) were built with the 3,905 cc (3.9 L) engine; TVR's later '400' offering being based on the then-current Range Rover 4L of 3,946 cc (3.9 L).

Applications:

4.2

[edit]

Land Rover extended the 3,946 cc (3.9 L) engine for the top LSE[note 1] specification of the Classic Range Rover. The "4.2"-litre engine had an actual displacement of 4,275 cc (4.3 L; 260.9 cu in), and used the crankshaft castings from the failed "Iceberg" diesel engine project.[8] Bore remained the same at 94.0 mm (3.70 in), while stroke increased to 77.0 mm (3.03 in).

Applications:

4.3

[edit]

For the Griffith and Chimaera, TVR Power, a Coventry-based subsidiary of sportscar maker TVR, built a Rover V8-version with a 4.3 L; 261.2 cu in (4,280 cc) displacement using the 77 mm (3.03 in) stroke crankshaft and 94 mm (3.7 in) bore size. The bore and stroke were identical to Rover's 4.2 engine but Rover rounded down to 4.2 L while TVR rounded up to 4.3 L.

The main difference between the Land Rover and TVR versions lies in the usage of Land Rover 3.9 pistons (usually of the 9.35:1 compression version, some report of low compression (8.13:1) pistons being used in a small number of engines) of which the tops were machined down to match the deck height, thus increasing static compression ratio. Head gaskets were originally copper and slightly thicker than the composite gaskets of later engines. TVR 4.3 engines tended to have elaborately ported cylinder heads with minimized valve guide protrusion into the ports, and Duplex timing chain with timing adjustment by vernier gear were specified although in practice, not all engines received it. Camshafts were usually Kent Cams 214 spec,[9] although 'big valve' versions could have a 224 or even a 234 (race) cam installed.

The so-called 'pre-cat' versions of the Griffith predominantly used this engine, although a 4.0-litre version was also available. The Chimaera was introduced with choice of 4.0- and 4.3-litre engines. A small number of 'Big Valve' versions, sporting modified cylinder heads with 43 mm (1.7 in) intake and 37 mm (1.5 in) exhaust valves and a more radical camshaft profile, found their way to early Griffiths and Chimaeras.

Applications:

4.4

[edit]
Leyland P76 V8 engine

Leyland of Australia produced a 4,414 cc (4.4 L; 269.4 cu in) version of the aluminium V8 for their Australia-only 1973 Leyland P76. The bore and the stroke was 88.9 mm × 88.9 mm (3.50 in × 3.50 in), making it a square engine. The block deck height was extended and longer conrods were fitted 158.75 mm (6.250 in) between centres. A Bendix Stromberg two-barrel carburettor was used in place of SU carburettors.[10] This rare engine produced 200 hp (149 kW; 203 PS) and 280 lb⋅ft (380 N⋅m) and, although export (to the UK) versions were planned, the closure by British Leyland of their Australian operations in 1975 precluded the widespread application of this engine. British Leyland did import one complete P76 engine for assessment but it was never fitted to a vehicle and was sold off on the demise of the company.

Applications:

  • 1973–1975 Leyland P76
  • 1976–1979 Leyland Terrier truck

4.5

[edit]

Not to be confused with the later 4.6-litre engine which TVR badged as a '4.5' for the Chimaera, there also existed a version with an 80 mm (3.15 in) crank and 94 mm (3.7 in) bore giving 4,444 cc (4.4 L; 271.2 cu in) capacity, which was used by TVR in the low-volume special 450 SEAC, the race version thereof and the subsequent Tuscan Challenge racers. A tiny number of Griffith and Chimaera road cars were built with a version of this engine, known as the '450 BV' (Big Valve).

4.6

[edit]
A 4.6-litre Rover V8 engine with SU carbs, fitted to a Rover P6.

In 1995, Land Rover enlarged the Rover V8 to 4,552 cc (4.6 L; 277.8 cu in). The bore remained the same size as the previous 4.0 at 94 mm (3.7 in), but the engine was stroked by 10.9 mm (0.43 in) giving 82 mm (3.23 in) in total. Output was 225 hp (168 kW; 228 PS) and 280 lb⋅ft (380 N⋅m).

Production of the 4.6 ended at Solihull, UK, in 2004. The final version, introduced in the Range Rover P38, produced 218 hp (163 kW; 221 PS) at 4,750 rpm and 300 lb⋅ft (407 N⋅m) at 2,600 rpm.

The last mass-produced application of the Rover V8 was in the Land Rover Discovery, up until the vehicle was redesigned in 2005. It is still used by some hand-built sports cars built by some independent manufacturers.

Applications:

5.0

[edit]

A 5.0 L; 304.9 cu in (4,997 cc) variant of the Rover V8 was used in two models by British sportscar manufacturer TVR. The bore and the stroke was 94 mm × 90 mm (3.70 in × 3.54 in). These models, the Griffith and Chimaera used the 5.0 L (4,997 cc) unit in their top-end specifications. The factory quotes up to 340 bhp (254 kW; 345 PS) and 350 lb⋅ft (475 N⋅m) of torque.

Applications:

Moreover, in the mid-1980s, hot rodders discovered the 215 could be stretched to as much as 5.0 L (305 cu in), using the Buick 300 crankshaft, new cylinder sleeves, and an assortment of non-Buick parts.[11] It could also be fitted with high-compression cylinder heads from the Morgan +8. Using the 5-litre Rover block and crankshaft, a displacement of 5.2 L (317.8 cu in) is possible and used primarily in racing applications,[12] stretching the design to its limits it is possible to achieve displacements of over 5.6 L (339.2 cu in) and possibly even displacements near of 6.3 L (383.4 cu in), though the latter has not been tested in practice as of yet.[citation needed]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Rover V8 engine

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Rover V8 engine is a compact, overhead-valve (OHV) V8 featuring an cylinder block and heads, originally licensed and adapted by the from ' Buick small-block V8 design in the early . First introduced in production vehicles in 1967 with the Rover P5B saloon, it became a hallmark of British due to its lightweight construction—typically around 150 kg—and under-stressed operation, which allowed for easy tuning and long-term durability. Developed under the leadership of Rover's chief engineer Joe Turlay with technical assistance from GM, the engine's origins trace back to Buick's 1950s prototypes, with Rover acquiring the rights and tooling in 1964 after identifying a surplus supply from . Initial displacement was 3,528 cc (3.5 litres), producing approximately 160 at 5,200 rpm and 215 lb-ft of , equipped with features like hydraulic lifters and a nodular iron for enhanced reliability. Over its lifespan, variants expanded to displacements including 3,948 cc (3.9 L), 4,278 cc (4.2 L), 4,554 cc (4.6 L), and up to 5.0 L, with power outputs ranging from 130 in base forms to over 200 in tuned applications, often paired with SU or carburettors and later electronic . Production spanned from 1967 to 2004, primarily at Rover's facility in the UK, under successive ownerships including , , , and Ford (for ), with nearly one million units built. Its versatility saw it installed in diverse vehicles, from luxury saloons like the 3500 and SD1 to off-road icons such as the original (from 1970) and , as well as sports cars including the , , , and GT V8. The engine's popularity endured due to its compact dimensions (fitting into smaller engine bays than competitors), low centre of gravity for improved handling, and adaptability for racing, military, and aftermarket modifications, cementing its status as a British engineering legend despite the company's turbulent history.

Overview and Design

Basic Architecture

The Rover V8 engine employs a 90-degree V8 configuration featuring an overhead valve (OHV) valvetrain with two valves per and a single mounted in the block. The block and heads are constructed from lightweight aluminum alloy, fitted with wet liners to enhance durability and heat dissipation. Key dimensions include a deck height of 8.96 inches. The original bore measures 88.9 mm and the stroke 71.12 mm, with a bore spacing of 4.24 inches (107.7 mm), dimensions derived from its Buick predecessor that enable a compact overall size of approximately 28 inches in length and 26 inches in width, facilitating installation in smaller engine bays. It utilizes a water-cooled system compatible with crossflow radiators, where coolant circulates through the block and heads before passing via a thermostat housing typically integrated into the intake manifold for efficient temperature regulation. The nodular iron crankshaft is supported by five main bearings for smooth operation and longevity. Later variants evolved the bore and stroke while preserving this foundational layout.

Key Features and Innovations

The Rover V8 engine distinguished itself through its pioneering all-aluminum , which included both the block and heads, making it one of the earliest mass-produced V8 engines to achieve such lightweight design without sacrificing structural integrity. This approach, originating from the 215 cubic inch licensed in 1965, utilized an aluminum alloy (GM 4097-M) comprising approximately 11-13% , 1% , and balance aluminum for enhanced strength-to-weight ratio, superior thermal conductivity, and improved cooling efficiency compared to traditional cast-iron blocks. The dry weight of the typically ranged from 132 to 150 kg, enabling a favorable that enhanced vehicle handling and balance, particularly in applications like the and ; in contrast, contemporary iron-block V8s, such as the Chevrolet small-block, often exceeded 250 kg dressed, imposing greater front-end mass and reducing agility. A key innovation was the modular design of the cylinder heads, which allowed interchangeability across engine displacements while accommodating variations in combustion chamber volumes to optimize compression ratios and efficiency. Early heads featured 34-36 cc chambers with smaller valves (38 mm intake, 33 mm exhaust), while later iterations reduced chamber size to 28 cc for higher compression, promoting better fuel economy and performance without requiring piston redesigns. This flexibility stemmed from standardized bolt patterns and port configurations, enabling engineers to swap heads between 3.5 L and 4.6 L variants, though chamber differences necessitated recalibration of compression ratios—typically achieving 9.35:1 or higher with the smaller chambers. The wedge-shaped combustion chambers, integral to the aluminum heads, facilitated efficient flame propagation and were adaptable for both carbureted and fuel-injected setups, underscoring the engine's versatility over four decades of production. The accessory drive system evolved to support increasing demands for auxiliaries, transitioning from dual V-belts in pre-1994 models—driving components like the , water pump, and via separate pulleys—to a single arrangement post-1994, which integrated mounts for and improved reliability through reduced slippage and easier maintenance. This upgrade coincided with a shift to crank-driven oil pumps, eliminating distributor dependency and allowing for more compact accessory layouts, thereby enhancing overall engine bay efficiency. Exhaust manifold design emphasized flow optimization, with early cast-aluminum manifolds featuring siamesed ports—where adjacent cylinders (e.g., 1-2 and 3-4) shared outlets—to promote scavenging and reduce backpressure while maintaining lightweight construction aligned with the block. These integral aluminum manifolds provided better thermal management than iron alternatives but were later supplemented by optional tubular upgrades in performance applications, offering 4-into-1 configurations for superior high-rpm exhaust and reduced weight penalties from heat expansion mismatches with the aluminum heads. Cylinder head innovations included specialized variants like the "A" head (3-bolt pattern per side, pre-1995) for standard compression and the "H" head (4-bolt pattern per side, post-1994) for higher-compression setups with heritage profiles, both supporting sizes up to 45 mm intake and 35 mm exhaust in upgraded forms to boost airflow without extensive machining. The "A" head prioritized compatibility with earlier blocks, while the "H" head's reinforced bolting enabled greater boost tolerance in forced-induction applications, exemplifying the engine's adaptive engineering for evolving emissions and performance standards.

Development History

Origins and Acquisition

The Buick 215 V8 engine was developed by in 1960 as a lightweight, all-aluminum powerplant for the company's new senior compact cars, debuting in the 1961 model year across the , F-85, and . With a displacement of 3.5 liters (215 cubic inches), it produced 155 horsepower at 4,800 rpm in its base two-barrel form, offering a favorable due to its construction from aluminum alloy 4097-M and weighing just 318 pounds complete. Despite its innovative design, discontinued the 215 after the 1963 model year primarily due to high production costs stemming from the complex aluminum casting process, which resulted in significant scrap rates from issues and oil leaks. Additional challenges included between the aluminum block and components, as well as elevated claims, prompting GM to pivot toward larger cast-iron V8 engines as their compact models were enlarged into intermediate-sized vehicles for 1964. Rover Company officials first took notice of the engine at the 1964 London Motor Show, where it was displayed in a exhibit, sparking interest in adapting it for their own vehicles to provide V8 performance in a compact package. After negotiations, acquired the manufacturing rights, tooling, technical data, and a supply of engines from in January 1965 for £75,000, though the deal did not include ongoing support from the American firm. Upon acquisition, faced initial engineering hurdles in adapting the engine for British production, particularly reconciling the original imperial measurements with the metric standards prevalent in the UK, which necessitated redesigns of components and tooling to align with local manufacturing practices.

Project Iceberg and Initial Production

Following the acquisition of the 215 V8 design and tooling in early 1965, initiated a secretive redesign project to adapt the all-aluminum engine for British manufacturing and automotive applications. Under the leadership of managing director William Martin-Hurst and with technical consultation from engineer Joe Turlay, the team focused on modifications to suit local production capabilities and preferences. Key adaptations included remachining the cylinder heads to fit twin SU-HIF carburetors in place of the original Rochester units, and shifting to sand-cast blocks with pressed-in cylinder liners produced by British foundries such as Birmingham Aluminium Casting (Reddiac), moving away from ' die-casting process. The bore dimension was standardized at 88.9 (equivalent to the original 3.5 inches), facilitating metric tooling while retaining the 71.1 stroke for the 3,528 cc displacement. Production of the adapted engine commenced at Rover's Solihull facility in October 1967, after approximately two years of development and validation. The initial specification delivered 160 bhp at 5,200 rpm and 210 lb-ft of torque at 2,600 rpm, providing a significant performance uplift over the preceding 3.0-liter inline-six. It debuted in the Rover P5B saloon, an uprated version of the existing P5 model, which benefited from the V8's compact dimensions and lightweight construction (around 144 kg dry) for improved handling and refinement. Early output was modest, with several thousand units assembled in the first full year as Rover invested heavily in new tooling and qualified domestic suppliers to replace imported components from GM. This transition ensured self-sufficiency and supported integration into the P5B lineup, where demand quickly grew due to the engine's versatility. Extensive testing during 1965–1967 included runs and on-road evaluations at and various proving grounds, confirming the engine's inherent balance from its 90-degree V configuration. Dyno results demonstrated consistent power delivery and efficiency, while road trials underscored its superior smoothness and reduced (NVH) relative to the torquey but vibratory inline-six predecessors, establishing it as a benchmark for luxury saloon refinement.

Production Evolution and Discontinuation

The Rover V8 engine's production evolved through several key technical milestones to address performance, emissions, and reliability demands. In the , carburetion systems transitioned from twin SU HIF6 units, used in models like the 1971 Rover 3500S, to Zenith-Stromberg CD2 carburetors introduced in the 1970 to better meet emerging emissions regulations while maintaining drivability off-road. By the late and into the , electronic ignition was adopted, with Lucas systems—such as the 18AC distributor—introduced in the 1976 to replace points-based setups, improving starting reliability and reducing maintenance. The 1990s marked a shift to electronic fuel management, beginning with Bosch L-Jetronic injection in 1982 for the SD1 Vitesse and progressing to full Bosch systems by 1999 on the 4.6 L variant, enabling finer control over fueling and ignition for enhanced efficiency and power output up to 225 bhp. Primary manufacturing occurred at the in the UK, where production relocated in 1982 from the earlier facility to integrate with assembly lines, allowing for streamlined output of both engine and vehicle production. Additional machining was handled at the Alvis plant, while engines were supplied to MG Rover for passenger car applications and to for use, reflecting the engine's broad integration across group brands. By 2004, cumulative production approached one million units, underscoring the engine's longevity and versatility in sustaining high-volume output over decades. Ownership transitions significantly influenced production direction. Following Rover's acquisition of rights from in 1965, the engine became integral to after the 1968 merger, where it underwent initial British adaptations like sand-cast blocks. purchased the Rover Group in 1994, implementing limited updates such as refined but focusing on integration with existing lines rather than major redesigns. In 2000, Ford acquired from , retaining the V8 for its lineup while MG Rover handled residual passenger car production independently. These shifts ensured continued manufacturing under varying corporate priorities, with remaining the core site. Discontinuation began phasing in the early 2000s due to escalating costs of maintaining the aluminum block design against newer lightweight alloys and stringent Euro 4 emissions standards effective from 2000, which the aging architecture struggled to meet without prohibitive modifications. The 4.6 L variant ended production in 2002 with the BMW-powered Range Rover L322 launch, followed by the 4.0 L in 2003, with the final mass-market use in the 2004 Land Rover Discovery II. Limited runs persisted until 2006 for specialty and military applications, including Land Rover vehicles and commercial variants like the LDV Convoy, before full cessation.

Engine Variants

3.5 L Variant

The 3.5 L variant of the Rover V8 engine, introduced in 1967, served as the foundational displacement for the entire engine family, with production continuing until 1995. This undersquare design featured a displacement of 3,528 cc, achieved through a bore of 88.9 mm and a stroke of 71.12 mm. It utilized an all-aluminum block and heads, contributing to its lightweight construction at approximately 170 kg dry weight. Power output varied significantly based on tuning and delivery systems, ranging from 158 hp in early carbureted forms to up to 203 hp in later injected versions. Torque similarly spanned 210-245 lb-ft, with peak figures often achieved around 4,000 rpm. Initial models employed twin SU HS6 carburetors, delivering responsive characteristics and a rev range extending to 5,500 rpm. From the late 1970s, electronic systems—primarily Lucas and later Bosch L-Jetronic—were adopted, improving efficiency and power while maintaining the engine's broad torque curve. Compression ratios evolved from 10.5:1 in early high-performance setups with A-series heads to lower figures like 8.5:1 and 9.35:1 in later emissions-compliant versions, accommodating varying fuel qualities and ratings. The A-head design, with its shallower combustion chambers, enabled higher ratios for enhanced in the original iterations. This variant's compact overhead-valve architecture and crossflow heads provided excellent response, making it a benchmark for smooth power delivery across its operational range. As the base engine, the 3.5 L version underpinned all subsequent displacements, influencing designs through the with over one million units produced, dominating installations in early V8-equipped vehicles until the . However, high-mileage examples are prone to failures due to the aluminum construction's differential expansion relative to liners, often exacerbated by overheating or issues. Regular , including proper sequencing during reassembly, mitigates these risks.

3.9 L and 4.0 L Variants

The 3.9 L variant of the Rover V8 engine, with a displacement of 3,946 cc achieved through a bore of 94.0 mm and a stroke of 71.1 mm, was introduced in 1989 for the Range Rover Classic as an evolution of the 3.5 L unit, offering improved low-end torque for better off-road performance. This version produced between 182 and 190 hp at around 4,750 rpm and 220 to 240 lb-ft of torque at 3,000 rpm, depending on the application and tuning, with electronic (EFI) standard to enhance efficiency and drivability over the carbureted 3.5 L predecessor. The 3.9 L engine featured a of approximately 9.35:1 and retained the lightweight aluminum block design, contributing to its widespread use in vehicles like the Discovery from its 1989 launch. In 1994, the engine was revised and rebranded as the 4.0 L variant for marketing purposes, maintaining the same 3,946 cc displacement but incorporating enhancements such as revised inlet and exhaust valves, a stronger seven-bearing with cross-bolted caps for improved durability, and the Thor electronic control unit (ECU) for better fuel management and emissions compliance. The 4.0 L produced 175 to 205 hp and similar torque figures to the 3.9 L, with EFI as standard and adaptations for U.S. markets including low-emission vehicle (LEV) standards through refined catalytic converters and oxygen sensors. Key differences between the two included the 4.0 L's electronic refinements and more robust bottom end to handle higher stresses in 1990s applications like the Range Rover P38A and Discovery Series I. Both variants were prized for their reliability in demanding conditions, with the seven-bearing design reducing vibration and enhancing longevity in Land Rover's four-wheel-drive lineup through 2002.

4.6 L Variant

The 4.6 L variant of the Rover V8 engine, with a displacement of 4,554 cc, featured a bore of 94.0 mm and a stroke of 82.8 mm, derived from increasing the stroke of the preceding 4.0 L version. This configuration allowed for naturally aspirated power outputs ranging from 221 to 225 hp at around 4,750 rpm, with peak of 280 lb-ft delivered at 3,600 rpm. The engine maintained the all-aluminium OHV design with two valves per cylinder and a of 9.3:1, contributing to its smooth power delivery and suitability for heavy vehicles. Introduced in 1994 for the Land Rover Range Rover P38A and entering wider production by 1996, the 4.6 L version incorporated multi-point fuel injection as standard, initially via the GEMS system and upgraded to Bosch Motronic in 1999 for improved efficiency and emissions compliance. This variant emphasized enhanced performance over its predecessors, with revised cylinder heads and block ribbing for better rigidity, while retaining the lightweight construction that aided vehicle handling in both road and off-road scenarios. Its torque characteristics made it particularly effective for towing and low-speed traction, aligning with the demands of luxury SUVs. The engine found applications beyond , powering sports cars such as models including the and Cerbera, where its tunable nature allowed outputs up to 285 hp in tuned configurations. In the , it provided reliable service through 2002, with production ceasing as the platform transitioned to newer powertrains, though its under-stressed design ensured durability in demanding off-road environments. Aftermarket popularity stemmed from straightforward modifications like exhaust and intake upgrades, often yielding significant power gains while preserving the engine's inherent robustness.

5.0 L Variant

The 5.0 L variant represented the largest displacement iteration of the Rover V8 engine family, introduced in the early and produced until the early primarily for performance applications. With a displacement of 4,997 cc, it employed a bore of 94.0 mm—inherited from the 4.6 L version—and a lengthened of 90.0 mm to achieve its increased capacity. This configuration allowed for enhanced low-end torque suitable for high-performance , while maintaining the engine's characteristic compact dimensions and lightweight aluminum construction from the original Buick-derived design. Developed during the later years of Rover's stewardship under and continued by third-party manufacturers, the 5.0 L variant featured updated cylinder heads and a strengthened bottom end with five-bolt caps for improved durability under higher stresses. was standard, with some versions utilizing advanced systems like Bosch units to meet evolving emissions standards, contributing to smoother operation through hydraulic lifters that reduced (NVH). Balance shafts were incorporated in certain tuned setups to further refine the engine's inherent balance, making it well-suited for luxury-oriented performance roles. As the final mass-produced variant of the Rover V8 lineage, production was limited to approximately 50,000 units across all applications, reflecting the engine's impending discontinuation amid shifting automotive priorities and stricter regulations. Primarily deployed in British sports cars such as the and , the 5.0 L delivered power outputs ranging from 225 to 260 hp in milder configurations, rising to over 300 lb-ft of for robust , though tuned examples in models exceeded 340 hp. In these vehicles, it enabled 0-60 mph times under 8 seconds, emphasizing the variant's role in late-model high-end applications where refinement and power were paramount. Despite its potential for luxury integration, such as in updated models, the 5.0 L saw limited adoption there due to the transition to newer architectures.

Other Displacement Variants

The Rover V8 engine was occasionally adapted to less common displacements for niche applications, such as export markets, prototypes, and performance vehicles, resulting in limited production runs totaling fewer than 5,000 units across these variants. These modifications typically involved adjustments to bore and stroke to meet specific power or regulatory needs, while retaining the core aluminum block and OHV design derived from the original 215. The 4.2 L variant featured a displacement of 4,275 cc, achieved with a 94.0 mm bore and 77.0 mm stroke, delivering between 168 and 200 hp depending on tuning. It saw use in US-market Range Rovers such as the , with limited production of approximately 948 units during the early . The 4.4 L variant had a 4,414 cc displacement from a 92.08 mm bore and 82.55 mm stroke, produced for the Australian sedan from 1973 to 1975, with around 1,200 units built to meet local requirements. In the 1980s, the 4.5 L update for applications achieved 4,447 cc via a 92.0 mm bore and 84.0 mm , offering 200-220 hp in carbureted form for enhanced torque in sports cars like the Tasmin series. This configuration prioritized raw performance in niche British exotics, with later adopted in higher-output versions.

Applications and Performance

Road Vehicle Applications

The Rover V8 engine debuted in production road vehicles with the 1967 Rover P5B, where the 3.5 L variant provided 151 hp in a luxury often favored by British officials. This was followed by its installation in the 3500 from 1968 to 1976, offering 150 bhp and transforming the saloon's performance with its smooth power delivery and compact aluminum design. The engine continued in the from 1976 to 1986, initially with a 3.5 L carbureted version producing 155 hp, later upgraded to a fuel-injected 190 hp unit in the Vitesse variant for enhanced acceleration to 60 mph in under . Within the Land Rover lineup, the Rover V8 became synonymous with the brand's off-road capability and luxury SUVs. The , introduced in 1970, featured the 3.5 L engine with outputs from 127 to 165 hp through 1986, evolving to 3.9 L and 4.0 L variants (164–190 hp) from 1989 to 2002, and a 4.6 L HSE option (225 hp) from 1994 to 2001, enabling top speeds over 120 mph while maintaining rugged utility. The adopted the V8 from 1989, starting with a 3.5 L (until 1993) and progressing to 3.9 L/4.0 L (1993–2004) and 4.6 L (2002–2004) versions, balancing family transport with towing capacity up to 7,700 lbs. Limited Defender conversions, such as the 1998 50th edition with a 4.0 L fuel-injected unit (190 bhp), extended its use into specialized off-road vehicles until around 2002. Beyond Rover and , the engine powered several other British marques in sports cars and saloons. fitted the 3.5 L Rover V8 (137 hp) to the GT V8 from 1973 to 1976, achieving 0-60 mph in 7.8 seconds and a top speed of 124 mph with uprated suspension for better handling. The , produced from 1978 to 1981 primarily for export markets like the , used the same 3.5 L engine (132–150 hp) in both convertible and coupe forms, delivering spirited performance with a 0-60 mph time of about 7 seconds. revived the MGB platform as the MG RV8 roadster from 1992 to 1995, equipping it with a 3.9 L V8 (185 bhp) and a five-speed manual, resulting in 2,007 units mostly sold in . In the sports and exotic car segment, the Rover V8 found favor for its tunability and light weight. utilized it extensively in models like the Griffith (1991–2002) and (1992–2003), starting with 4.0 L versions (240 hp) and progressing to 4.6 L (up to 320 hp in tuned forms), achieving 0-60 mph in under 5 seconds and top speeds exceeding 150 mph. Morgan's Plus 8, produced from 1969 to 2004, adapted the for 3.5 L (initially 155 hp), 3.9 L, and 4.6 L (220 hp from 1996) engines, preserving the brand's traditional styling while offering 0-60 mph in 6.5 seconds. Marcos employed the V8 in roadsters such as the Mantula (1984–1993, 3.5 L) and Mantara (1992–1998, 3.9 L to 5.0 L), delivering supercar-like performance with 0-60 mph around 6 seconds and top speeds near 140 mph. The Rover V8's versatility extended to the British kit car scene, where its availability and power made it a staple for enthusiast builds. It powered popular Lotus Seven replicas like the Westfield SEiGHT (from 1991, with 3.9 L versions achieving 0-60 mph in 4.2 seconds), alongside and kits, enabling lightweight sports cars with exceptional power-to-weight ratios often exceeding 200 bhp per ton. Thousands of such conversions were completed, broadening the engine's reach beyond factory production. Internationally, the engine saw use in the Australian-market sedan from 1973 to 1975, featuring a unique 4.4 L derivative (192 ) for its top trim, providing smooth for family motoring despite production challenges. In the , Range Rovers with Rover V8s were imported from 1987 onward, gaining popularity among luxury buyers for their blend of off-road prowess and V8 refinement until the engine's phase-out around 2002.

Racing and Competition Use

The 215 V8, from which the V8 was derived, saw its earliest prominent racing application in the 1962 , where entered three cars powered by modified versions of the lightweight aluminum V8. These engines were bored out to 255 cubic inches (approximately 4.2 L) and tuned for , producing around 330 horsepower at 6,500 rpm while maintaining a stock block configuration, marking the first such entry since 1946. Although only one car qualified and retired early due to mechanical issues, the setup highlighted the engine's potential for high-revving performance in open-wheel . In the 1970s and 1980s, the Rover-specific V8 found success in saloon car and rally competition. The , equipped with a tuned 3.5 L V8 producing up to 290 horsepower, competed in the British Saloon Car Championship from 1980 onward, winning every round on track in 1983 (though later disqualified for a technical infringement) and the overall title via in 1984. In rallying, the V8 (later productionized as the TR8) entered events like the RAC Rally from 1978 to 1980, with the 3.5 L engine tuned to approximately 220 horsepower for improved torque on mixed surfaces; achieved a fourth-place finish in the 1978 RAC Rally. Land Rovers, powered by the durable 3.5 L Rover V8, dominated early Paris-Dakar Rallies, winning outright in 1979 and 1981 amid grueling desert conditions. On circuits and in , the engine powered specialized variants like the Tuscan in GT-style events during the and , where a 4.0 L version delivered over 300 horsepower in a lightweight chassis for agile handling in series such as the Tuscan Challenge one-make races. In the , V8 Hotstox stock car series from the to favored the Rover V8 for its robustness, with the aluminum block withstanding high-impact crashes better than iron competitors, often tuned to 350-400 horsepower in 3.5 L to 4.6 L displacements. The engine's advantages in competition stemmed from its low weight—around 140 kg (310 lb) dry—enhancing vehicle balance and responsiveness, alongside broad tuning options like dry-sump lubrication, ported heads, and upgrades that could yield 350 horsepower naturally aspirated without . As of 2025, the Rover V8 continues in historic racing, appearing in events like the and Members' Meeting, where restored SD1s and TVRs demonstrate its enduring appeal in grids; for instance, a V8-powered made a notable debut run at the 82nd Goodwood Members' Meeting.

Legacy and Aftermarket

Replacement and Production End

The Rover V8 engine faced increasing challenges from stricter emissions regulations, such as Euro 4 standards introduced in 2000, which required substantial redesigns to achieve compliance without compromising performance; these modifications were deemed prohibitively expensive given the engine's aging architecture. demands further pressured the design, as its pushrod configuration lagged behind modern overhead-cam alternatives in optimizing combustion and reducing consumption. Additionally, the aluminum block exhibited vulnerability to corrosion in salty environments, like coastal regions or areas using road salt for winter de-icing, leading to accelerated wear on liners and passages that compounded reliability issues over time. Under BMW's ownership of the Rover Group from 1994 to 2000, the company initiated a shift toward its proprietary powertrains to streamline manufacturing and parts commonality across brands. The BMW M62 4.4 L V8 replaced the Rover V8 in the Range Rover L322 starting in 2002 and continued until 2005, offering improved refinement and integration with BMW's electronics. Following Ford's acquisition of Land Rover in 2000, the Jaguar-derived AJ-V8 family was adopted as the primary successor; the 4.4 L AJ-V8 debuted in the Land Rover Discovery 3 in 2005 and the updated L322 Range Rover in 2006, providing higher output and better emissions performance while sharing production facilities. The replacement occurred gradually, with the Rover V8 persisting in models like the Series II until its phase-out in May 2004, marking the end of assembly for new vehicles; however, limited production for aftermarket and replacement use has continued as of 2025 by companies such as MCT. Spare parts production extended into 2006 to support existing fleets. Economic considerations accelerated the transition, as updating the Rover V8's tooling and components for contemporary standards proved far costlier than adopting licensed designs from and , especially amid the Rover V8's high material expenses relative to iron-block rivals. The 2005 collapse of MG Rover, the remnants of the original , symbolized the broader demise of independent British engine development, though it had limited direct bearing on Land Rover's ongoing operations under Ford.

Modern Modifications and Availability

The aftermarket ecosystem for the Rover V8 engine remains robust, supported by specialist firms offering rebuilt engines in displacements from 3.9 L to 5.0 L, typically priced between £5,000 and £10,000 depending on specifications and condition. Companies like TWS Motors provide performance-oriented rebuilds with upgraded components such as high-compression pistons and ported heads, catering to enthusiasts seeking reliable drop-in replacements. Electronic upgrades, including aftermarket ECUs like Megasquirt systems, allow for precise and ignition mapping, enabling conversions from carbureted to setups while improving drivability and emissions compliance. Common modifications focus on enhancing power and durability, with supercharging kits—such as Eaton M112 units—capable of boosting output to over 400 hp when paired with intercoolers and ECU remapping. Stroker kits, including custom crankshafts and forged pistons, can increase displacement to 5.2 L for greater , often combined with aluminum block reinforcements like improved head gaskets to address common overheating issues in high-stress applications. Fuel injection conversions remain popular for pre-1990s carbureted engines, utilizing standalone ECUs to replace Lucas systems and support modern fuels. Parts availability persists through new old stock inventories held by organizations like the Rover Car Club and suppliers such as Rimmer Bros, which stock , bearings, and manifolds for ongoing maintenance. Reproduction components, including cylinder heads and crankshafts, are increasingly sourced from manufacturers in and , offering cost-effective alternatives to OEM parts while maintaining compatibility. On the used market, engine cores typically range from £1,000 to £3,000, with complete running units available via platforms like eBay and specialist breakers, though condition varies widely. In 2025, the Rover V8 continues to power restorations of classic vehicles like early Range Rovers, preserving their original character with rebuilt units. It remains a favored choice for builds, such as chassis, where its compact size and suit frames for constructors. Emerging trends include electric hybrid swaps, with companies like Jensen International Automotive (JIA) offering plug-in conversions that retain the V8 for low-speed while adding electric motors for up to 730 in PHEV configurations on classic Range Rovers. The engine holds a niche in off-road competitions, appearing in events like Winter Romp trials where modified V8 Defenders tackle extreme terrain. Challenges include parts scarcity for pre-1980 units, particularly thin-wall castings and early flanged liners prone to cracking under modern fuels and loads, often requiring custom fabrication or GM-sourced alternatives. Additionally, the broader environmental shift toward is reducing demand for V8 rebuilds, as regulations and owner preferences favor EV conversions over fossil-fuel upgrades.

References

  1. https://www.britishv8.org/Articles/Rover-Autocar-Article.htm
  2. https://www.aronline.co.uk/engines/rover-v8/
  3. https://www.autocar.co.uk/slideshow/brief-history-rover-v8
  4. https://www.teambuick.com/reference/215_v8_engine_specs.php
  5. http://www.carnut.com/specs/engdim.html
  6. https://www.autozine.org/technical_school/engine/Construction1.html
  7. https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/featherweight-wonder-inside-buicks-1961-aluminum-v8/
  8. https://rimmerbros.com/Images/PDFs/V8Engine.pdf
  9. https://www.hagerty.com/media/magazine-features/hagerty-magazine/buicks-little-aluminum-v-8/
  10. https://ateupwithmotor.com/model-histories/buick-special-skylark-rover-v8-3800-v6-history/
  11. https://classicsworld.co.uk/history/a-brief-history-of-the-rover-v8/
  12. https://silodrome.com/rover-v8-engine-history/
  13. https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/from-sports-cars-to-tanks-the-most-versatile-engine-ever/
  14. https://www.roverv8.net/specs.html
  15. https://www.ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Land-Rover/413/Land-Rover-109-Series-III-35-V8.html
  16. https://www.v8forum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4219
  17. https://www.roverparts.com/roverlog-news-blog/land-rover-head-gaskets-a-practical-guide/
  18. https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/future-classic/future-classic-range-rover-classic-3-9/
  19. https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/land-rover-range-rover-1988.html
  20. https://www.legacyoverland.com/blog/2023/10/9/the-land-rover-35l-v8-engine-power-unleashed-and-evolution-to-39l-v8-efi
  21. https://www.aronline.co.uk/cars/land-rover/discovery/
  22. https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/land-rover/range-rover/100629/make-your-v8-last-forever
  23. http://www.v8engines.com/engine-4.htm
  24. https://www.gomog.com/allmorgan/40difference.htm
  25. https://discoweb.org/index.php?threads/3-9-vs-4-0-v8-reliability-which-is-better.64618/
  26. https://www.encycarpedia.com/us/land-rover/94-range-rover-4-6-v8-suv
  27. https://rimmerbros.com/c/revving-up-the-rover-v8-engine-legacy-impact
  28. https://www.classicsworld.co.uk/history/a-brief-history-of-the-rover-v8/
  29. https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=66&t=27047
  30. https://forum.britishv8.org/read.php?6,31122
  31. https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/buying-guide-tvr-350i-1983-1989/
  32. https://www.retromotor.co.uk/slideshow/14-classic-cars-powered-by-the-rover-v8-engine/
  33. https://www.silodrome.com/rover-v8-engine-history/
  34. https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/11-sports-cars-powered-by-the-rover-v8/
  35. https://www.trdrivers.com/tr8_brief_history.html
  36. https://www.autoweek.com/car-life/a1896881/one-last-hurrah-1994-mg-rv8/
  37. https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/buying-guides/buying-guide-tvr-chimaera-1992-2003/
  38. https://www.tvr-car-club.co.uk/tvr-chimaera.html
  39. https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/morgan-plus-8-buyers-guide/
  40. https://www.goodwood.com/grr/road/news/8-sportscars-with-a-rover-v8-rumble/
  41. https://www.aronline.co.uk/opinion/leyland-p76-vs-rover-p8/
  42. https://www.teambuick.com/reference/library/215-300-lightweight.php
  43. https://www.aronline.co.uk/cars/rover/sd1/motor-sport/
  44. https://www.supercars.net/blog/trail-blazer-1982-twr-rover-sd1/
  45. https://ateupwithmotor.com/model-histories/triumph-tr7-tr8/3/
  46. https://www.roverparts.com/roverlog-news-blog/range-rover-classic-dakar/
  47. https://www.tvr-car-club.co.uk/tvr-tuscan-racer.html
  48. https://www.v8hotstox.co.uk/
  49. https://www.goodwood.com/grr/event-coverage/members-meeting/video-jamie-chadwicks-historic-debut-in-v8-rover-sd1/
  50. https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1025356_luxury-cars-ditching-v8-engines
  51. https://www.landroverofrichmond.com/tools-resources/range-rover-a-journey-through-engines-powertrains
  52. https://www.aronline.co.uk/opinion/mg-rover-20-years-on/
  53. https://www.thewedgeshop.com/rover-v8.html
  54. https://www.simmonites.com/product-category/engines/reconditioned/
  55. https://thewedgeshopstore.com/tws-motors-performance-rover-v8-engine-builds/
  56. https://www.megasquirt-v8.co.uk/ms_complete.php
  57. https://www.reddit.com/r/LandRover/comments/n0izto/supercharging_options_for_p38_range_rover/
  58. https://www.v8tuning.co.uk/pistons-and-conrods
  59. https://www.megasquirt-v8.co.uk/ms_what_is_ms.php
  60. https://rimmerbros.com/Category--Rover-V8-Engines--m-558
  61. https://www.partsgeek.com/makes/land_rover.html
  62. https://www.ebay.co.uk/b/bn_7023221678
  63. https://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=214429
  64. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N869U-jI_08
  65. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjAU6B1dfdE
  66. http://robisonservice.blogspot.com/2019/01/new-failures-in-1983-2004-land-rover-v8s.html
  67. https://www.electriccarconverts.com/our-conversions/land-rover/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.