Hubbry Logo
Scotopic visionScotopic visionMain
Open search
Scotopic vision
Community hub
Scotopic vision
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Scotopic vision
Scotopic vision
Scotopic vision
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In the study of visual perception, scotopic vision (or scotopia) is the vision of the eye under low-light conditions.[1] The term comes from the Greek skotos, meaning 'darkness', and -opia, meaning 'a condition of sight'.[2] In the human eye, cone cells are nonfunctional in low visible light. Scotopic vision is produced exclusively through rod cells, which are most sensitive to wavelengths of around 498 nm (blue-green)[3] and are insensitive to wavelengths longer than about 640 nm.[4] Under scotopic conditions, light incident on the retina is not encoded in terms of the spectral power distribution. Higher visual perception occurs under scotopic vision as it does under photopic vision.[5]

Retinal circuitry

[edit]

Of the two types of photoreceptor cells in the retina, rods dominate scotopic vision. This dominance is due to the increased sensitivity of the photopigment molecule expressed in rods, as opposed to those in cones. Rods signal light increments to rod bipolar cells which, unlike most types of bipolar cells, do not form direct connections with retinal ganglion cells – the output neurons of the retina. Instead, two types of amacrine cell – AII and A17 – allow lateral information flow from rod bipolar cells to cone bipolar cells, which in turn contact ganglion cells. Thus, rod signals, mediated by amacrine cells, dominate scotopic vision.[6]

Occurrence

[edit]

Scotopic vision occurs at luminance levels of 10−3[7] to 10−6[citation needed] cd/m2. Other species are not universally color blind in low-light conditions. The elephant hawk-moth (Deilephila elpenor) displays advanced color discrimination even in dim starlight.[8]

Mesopic vision occurs in intermediate lighting conditions (luminance level 10−3 to 100.5 cd/m2)[citation needed] and is effectively a combination of scotopic and photopic vision. This gives inaccurate visual acuity and color discrimination.

In normal light (luminance level 10 to 108 cd/m2), the vision of cone cells dominates and is photopic vision. There is good visual acuity (VA) and color discrimination.

Wavelength sensitivity

[edit]
The CIE 1951 scotopic luminosity function. The horizontal axis is wavelength in nm.

The normal human observer's relative wavelength sensitivity will not change due to background illumination under scotopic vision. The wavelength sensitivity is determined by the rhodopsin photopigment. This is a red pigment seen at the back of the eye in animals that have a white background to their eye called Tapetum lucidum. The pigment is not noticeable under photopic and mesopic conditions. The principle that the wavelength sensitivity does not change during scotopic vision led to the ability to detect two functional cone classes in individuals. If two cone classes are present, then their relative sensitivity will change the behavioral wavelength sensitivity. Therefore, experimentation can determine "the presence of two cone classes by measuring wavelength sensitivity on two different backgrounds and noting a change in the observer's relative wavelength sensitivity."[9]

The behavior of the rhodopsin photopigment explains why the human eye cannot resolve lights with different spectral power distributions under low light. The reaction of this single photopigment will give the same quanta for 400 nm light and 700 nm light. Therefore, this photopigment only maps the rate of absorption and does not encode information about the relative spectral composition of the light.[9]

In scientific literature, one occasionally encounters the term scotopic lux which corresponds to photopic lux, but uses instead the scotopic visibility weighting function.[10] The scotopic luminosity function is a standard function established by the Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage (CIE) and standardized in collaboration with the ISO.[11]

The maximum scotopic efficacy is 1700 lm/W at 507 nm (compared with 683 lm/W at 555 nm for maximum photopic efficacy).[12] While the ratio between scotopic and photopic efficacies is only around 2.5 counted at peak sensitivity the ratio increases strongly below 500 nm.

Resolution

[edit]

For adaption to occur at very low levels, the human eye needs to have a large sample of light across the signal in order to get a reliable image. This leads to the human eye being unable to resolve high spatial frequencies in low light since the observer is spatially averaging the light signal.[9]

Another reason that vision is poor under scotopic vision is that rods, which are the only cells active under scotopic vision, converge to a smaller number of neurons in the retina. This many-to-one ratio leads to poor spatial frequency sensitivity.[9]

General perception

[edit]

High-level visual perception is similar with scotopic as with photopic sight with people reading with unimpaired accurately (though twice as long fixations), able to recognize faces, and show a face inversion effect.[5]

See also

[edit]
  • Photopic vision – Visual perception under well-lit conditions
  • Mesopic vision – Ability to see in low light conditions
  • Adaptation (eye) – Response of the eye to light and dark
  • Averted vision – Technique for viewing faint objects with peripheral vision
  • Night vision – Ability to see in low light conditions
  • Purkinje effect – Tendency for sight to shift toward blue colors at low light levels
  • Scotopic stilb – Deprecated unit of luminance
  • Skot (unit) – Deprecated unit of luminance
  • Spatial frequency – Characteristic of any structure that is periodic across a position in space

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Scotopic vision

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Scotopic vision refers to the mode of human visual that occurs under low-light conditions, primarily mediated by the rod photoreceptor cells in the , which are highly sensitive to dim illumination but incapable of distinguishing colors or providing high . This form of vision dominates when ambient levels fall below the threshold for effective cone photoreceptor activation, typically around 0.01 cd/m² or lower, resulting in a monochromatic, of the environment. In physiological terms, rod cells, numbering approximately 120 million per eye and concentrated in the peripheral , convert photons into neural signals through phototransduction involving the pigment , which absorbs light maximally at about 498 nm wavelength. Unlike cones responsible for in brighter conditions, rods exhibit greater sensitivity—detecting as few as five to ten photons—but saturate quickly in moderate light, contributing to the Purkinje shift where shorter wavelengths (blues) appear brighter relative to longer ones (reds) during dark adaptation. The transition to scotopic vision involves dark adaptation, a biphasic process where cone sensitivity recovers first within minutes, followed by rod-mediated enhancement that can take 20 to 35 minutes to reach maximum, enabling enhanced contrast detection in near-darkness despite reduced acuity and absence of color discrimination. This plays a critical role in nocturnal activities for humans and many animals, influencing tasks such as night driving or stargazing, though its limitations—such as a in the fovea where rod density is minimal—necessitate head movements to scan for details. In mesopic conditions bridging photopic and scotopic ranges, both rod and inputs interact, modulating and performance in real-world scenarios like .

Physiological Basis

Rod Cells and Phototransduction

Rod cells are specialized photoreceptor neurons in the vertebrate that mediate scotopic vision under low-light conditions. These cells feature a distinctive elongated structure, with an outer segment composed of a stack of membranous discs housing phototransduction machinery, an inner segment rich in mitochondria for energy production, and a synaptic terminal connecting to bipolar cells. Unlike cone cells, rods are narrower, optimizing them for capture in dim environments. The distribution of rod cells across the is non-uniform, with densities peaking in the peripheral regions—reaching up to approximately 150,000 rods per square millimeter—and progressively decreasing toward the central fovea, where rods are entirely absent to accommodate the high-acuity cone-dominated region. This peripheral concentration enhances the detection of faint light sources outside the line of direct gaze, contributing to the overall field of scotopic sensitivity. Phototransduction in rod cells begins when a photon is absorbed by the visual pigment rhodopsin, a G-protein-coupled receptor embedded in the disc membranes of the outer segment. Rhodopsin consists of the protein opsin covalently bound to the chromophore 11-cis-retinal, which undergoes photoisomerization to all-trans-retinal upon light absorption, forming active intermediates such as metarhodopsin II. This activated rhodopsin catalyzes the exchange of GDP for GTP on transducin, a heterotrimeric G-protein, leading to the dissociation of its alpha subunit. The activated transducin alpha then stimulates phosphodiesterase (PDE), which hydrolyzes cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in the cytoplasm. In the dark, high cGMP levels keep cation channels open, maintaining a depolarized membrane potential around -40 mV; the reduction in cGMP closes these channels, reducing inward current and hyperpolarizing the rod to about -70 mV, which modulates glutamate release at the synapse. Recovery of the phototransduction cascade involves the deactivation of metarhodopsin II through and binding, followed by the release and reduction of all-trans-retinal to all-trans-retinol, which is transported to the for regeneration into 11-cis-retinal. Simultaneously, , regulated by calcium-binding proteins like guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs), synthesizes cGMP to reopen channels and restore the dark state. This enzymatic amplification allows a single activated to activate hundreds of molecules, enabling high sensitivity. Rod cells exhibit remarkable sensitivity, capable of reliably signaling the absorption of a single , with human behavioral thresholds achieving detection probabilities of 60% at around 5-7 photons absorbed across multiple . This quantum efficiency supports scotopic vision at levels as low as , approximately 10−310^{-3} cd/m². In comparison to cone phototransduction, rod responses are slower in activation and recovery—taking hundreds of milliseconds versus tens of milliseconds in —due to differences in cascade and calcium feedback, which permit greater signal amplification in rods at the cost of .

Retinal Circuitry

In scotopic vision, rod photoreceptors form primary synaptic connections with rod bipolar cells in the outer plexiform layer of the . These rod bipolar cells, which are specialized ON-type bipolars, transmit signals to AII amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer, where the rod pathway integrates with the system. The AII amacrine cells, narrow-field bistratified neurons, receive input from multiple rod bipolar terminals and subsequently provide gap-junction-coupled connections to ON bipolar cells, while glycinergic chemical synapses convey the signal to OFF bipolar cells, thereby routing rod-driven information indirectly through the bipolar network to ganglion cells. A key feature of this circuitry is the high degree of signal convergence, with approximately 20-50 synapsing onto each rod bipolar cell and up to 20-25 rod bipolar cells converging onto a single AII , resulting in an overall convergence ratio of up to 100:1 from to ganglion cells in peripheral retina. This extensive pooling amplifies weak signals for enhanced sensitivity in dim but sacrifices spatial acuity due to the summation of inputs over larger receptive fields. Horizontal cells contribute to by providing feedback to rod bipolars and photoreceptors, sharpening contrast through surround suppression, while wide-field , including types, mediate inhibitory interactions among AII cells to facilitate and noise filtering under scotopic conditions. Under luminances below approximately 10^{-2} cd/m², the rod pathway dominates retinal processing, with cone signals suppressed due to the reduced responsiveness of cone bipolars and the primary activation of rod-specific circuits, contrasting with photopic conditions where direct cone-to-cone bipolar connections prevail. Additionally, neural noise reduction in this low-light regime involves mechanisms like stochastic resonance, where optimal levels of intrinsic retinal noise enhance the detection of subthreshold rod signals by facilitating spike timing in bipolar and amacrine cells.

Functional Properties

Wavelength Sensitivity

Scotopic vision relies on the photopigment in rod cells, which exhibits an absorbance spectrum peaking at approximately 498 nm in the region of the . This spectral tuning enables efficient capture under dim illumination, where absorbs primarily between 400 and 600 nm, with maximal responsiveness to shorter wavelengths compared to pigments. The sensitivity curve for scotopic vision is formalized as the scotopic luminosity function, denoted V'(λ), which quantifies relative luminous efficiency across wavelengths and reaches its peak at 507 nm. Compared to mediated by cones, scotopic sensitivity is elevated by 3-4 log units at threshold levels, allowing detection of much lower intensities, though the bandwidth of V'(λ) is narrower, concentrating responsiveness in the blue-violet range. This heightened sensitivity to shorter wavelengths enhances visibility in low-light environments, such as under , where scenes often appear bluish due to the relative prominence of blue light against the reduced of longer wavelengths. The wavelength sensitivity of scotopic vision has been measured through psychophysical experiments, involving dark-adapted observers' detection thresholds for monochromatic lights, and , which records rod-dominated retinal responses like the scotopic threshold response to low-intensity stimuli. These methods confirm the alignment of rhodopsin's spectrum with V'(λ) after accounting for ocular media transmission. Evolutionarily, this optimizes rod function for natural low-light spectra, such as the blue-enriched twilight and prevalent in ancestral nocturnal or crepuscular environments, facilitating survival through improved dim-light detection.

Spatial Resolution

Scotopic vision exhibits significantly reduced spatial resolution compared to photopic conditions, with typically limited to approximately 20/200 or worse, primarily due to the absence of rod photoreceptors in the fovea and the high convergence ratios in the rod-dominated circuitry. The rod-free fovea, which relies on sparse input under low light, creates a central for fine detail, while extensive neural convergence—where hundreds of rods may onto a single bipolar cell—further pools signals and diminishes acuity. The optimal in scotopic vision occurs in parafoveal regions at 10-20° eccentricity, where rod density peaks and the minimum angle of resolution (MAR) ranges from about 5-10 arcminutes, corresponding to grating acuities of roughly 6-12 cycles per degree. Beyond the fovea, resolution declines with increasing eccentricity due to sparser sampling and larger receptive fields, but this peripheral bias allows eccentric viewing to maximize detail perception in dim light. Several factors contribute to these resolution limits, including amplified optical aberrations from dilated pupils in low light, which degrade quality on the , and the summation of rod signals over expansive receptive fields that inherently spatial information. In comparison to , where MAR is around 1 arcminute, scotopic acuity is 10-20 times lower, shifting reliance from static fine detail to motion detection for environmental navigation. Experimental studies using grating acuity tests confirm this drop-off, showing that resolution plummets below 0.01 cd/m² as conditions transition to fully scotopic, with detectable spatial frequencies falling to 2-10 cycles per degree depending on eccentricity and .

Adaptation and Occurrence

Dark Adaptation Process

Dark adaptation is the physiological process by which the recovers sensitivity following exposure to bright , enabling the transition from photopic to scotopic vision through changes in photoreceptors and neural pathways. This recovery is characterized by a biphasic curve when measured as the for detection, reflecting the distinct adaptation kinetics of cones and . The initial phase, dominated by cones, occurs rapidly within 5-10 minutes, while the subsequent rod phase proceeds more slowly, requiring 20-40 minutes to achieve full sensitivity near 10^{-5} cd/m². The mechanisms underlying dark adaptation involve the regeneration of s and amplification in pathways. In , light exposure converts to its all-trans-retinal form, bleaching the pigment and temporarily reducing sensitivity; recovery depends on the retinoid cycle, where all-trans-retinal is transported to the for reconversion to 11-cis-retinal, which then rebinds to to reform . This biochemical regeneration is rate-limiting for the rod phase, with partial bleaching (e.g., 50%) elevating thresholds by up to 10 log units until pigment levels are restored. Concurrently, neural adaptations increase gain in rod bipolar and ganglion cell pathways, further enhancing sensitivity beyond mere recovery. A notable feature of the dark adaptation curve is the "break," occurring around 5-8 minutes post-bleach at a threshold of approximately 10^{-2} cd/m², where rods surpass cones in sensitivity and begin to dominate the response. This transition marks the onset of the , where shorter wavelengths appear relatively brighter as rod-mediated scotopic vision engages. Several factors influence the dark adaptation process. Aging slows the overall time course, with the rod-cone break delayed by about 0.65 minutes per decade and final sensitivity reduced, due to declines in retinoid cycling efficiency and photoreceptor health. impairs rhodopsin regeneration by limiting 11-cis-retinal availability, prolonging the rod phase and elevating thresholds, as demonstrated in supplementation studies where dark adaptation thresholds improved within weeks of treatment. Pre-adapting light intensity and duration also extend adaptation time, with brighter bleaches requiring longer recovery. Dark adaptation is typically measured using psychophysical thresholds in controlled settings, such as increment thresholds (detecting a increment against a background) or absolute thresholds (detecting isolated stimuli) via perimetry devices that track sensitivity recovery over time. These methods, often employing automated systems like modified Humphrey Field Analyzers, provide biphasic curves to assess function, with rod thresholds tested at peripheral locations to capture scotopic sensitivity.

Conditions of Occurrence

Scotopic vision predominates under extremely low levels, typically below 10−310^{-3} cd/m², where rod photoreceptors are the primary mediators of sight, rendering vision achromatic and sensitive to faint illumination such as or deep twilight. This regime transitions from the mesopic range, which extends from approximately 10−310^{-3} to 10 cd/m² and involves contributions from both rods and cones. In natural environments, these conditions occur during moonless nights or in dense forests, enabling like and to navigate and hunt effectively through rod-dominated visual processing. Humans experience scotopic vision in unlit settings, such as stargazing in remote areas, where the faint glow of stars provides the sole illumination. Pathological states can disrupt scotopic vision, as seen in , a form of night blindness resulting from dysfunction due to conditions like or , which severely impairs low-light . Conversely, physiological enhancements, such as dilation in response to darkness, amplify scotopic sensitivity by admitting more photons to the , thereby improving detection thresholds in dim conditions. Following dark , these mechanisms allow scotopic vision to onset effectively in such environments. From an evolutionary standpoint, scotopic vision evolved as an for crepuscular and nocturnal lifestyles in many vertebrates, including early mammals constrained by a "" during the era, with humans inheriting rod-based capabilities despite our diurnal habits. In experimental vision science, researchers simulate these low-luminance regimes using neutral filters to attenuate and isolate rod function, facilitating precise measurements of scotopic thresholds without relying on natural variability.

Perceptual Characteristics

Visual Perception in Low Light

In scotopic vision, the perceptual experience is predominantly achromatic, with a complete loss of color discrimination as rod cells, which lack the cone-mediated color pathways, dominate visual processing. Instead, observers rely on variations in brightness levels and contrast gradients to discern shapes, edges, and objects in the environment. This perception arises because rods respond only to differences, rendering hues indistinguishable under low illumination levels below approximately 0.01 cd/m². Motion detection is notably enhanced in scotopic conditions, allowing better identification of moving targets compared to stationary ones, owing to the temporal summation properties of rod photoreceptors that integrate light signals over longer durations—up to 200-300 ms. This summation amplifies sensitivity to low temporal frequencies, facilitating the perception of subtle movements in dim environments where photopic vision would fail. Rod-driven temporal contrast sensitivity extends into the mesopic range, supporting motion perception even as light levels transition from full darkness. The effective in scotopic vision expands peripherally due to the higher density of outside the fovea, enhancing overall awareness of the surroundings but at the cost of central insensitivity resembling a , as the rod-sparse fovea contributes little to detection in low light. This peripheral dominance shifts attention to off-axis regions, improving vigilance for threats or changes in the broader visual scene. The resulting blurriness stems partly from the inherently lower of rod-mediated pathways. Similarly, halo effects around point sources of light, such as streetlamps or vehicle headlights, arise from optical aberrations and light scattering in the eye, exacerbated by dilated pupils in , creating luminous rings that reduce contrast and obscure details. These artifacts highlight the noisy, probabilistic of rod signaling under photon-limited conditions. In human applications, scotopic vision poses significant challenges for night driving, where reduced contrast sensitivity and from oncoming lights increase accident risk, particularly for older adults with diminished rod function. night operations leverage this vision for and in or , often augmented by image-intensifying devices to extend peripheral detection ranges. Low-light calibration accounts for scotopic sensitivity by adjusting spectral responses and to replicate the achromatic, high-contrast perception humans experience, ensuring images align with nighttime visual reality.

Purkinje Shift

The Purkinje shift refers to the perceptual reversal in the relative brightness of long- and short-wavelength colors under scotopic conditions, where reds and oranges appear darker relative to blues and greens compared to photopic viewing. For example, in dim twilight, a red flower may fade into obscurity while a nearby retains noticeable brightness, altering the overall visual scene. This effect arises as rod-mediated vision dominates, emphasizing shorter wavelengths that cones perceive as less bright in daylight. First observed by Czech physiologist Jan Evangelista Purkinje in 1825 during subjective experiments on visual sensations, the phenomenon was noted when viewing bicolored objects after dark adaptation, with blue hues appearing brighter than red ones at dusk. Purkinje described this in his work Beiträge zur Physiologie des Sehens, attributing it to changes in the eye's sensitivity during low illumination, though the underlying rod-cone mechanisms were not yet understood. Physiologically, the shift stems from the differing spectral sensitivities of cones and : peaks at approximately 555 nm (green-yellow), driven by cone opsins, while scotopic vision peaks at 498 nm (), due to in , which exhibits reduced sensitivity to long wavelengths beyond 600 nm. As illumination drops, become active, causing the perceived crossover—where long- and short-wavelength lights appear equally bright—to occur around 520 nm, as measured in dark-adapted subjects using heterochromatic brightness matching tasks. This effect influences twilight aesthetics by enhancing the cool tones of the sky and foliage, contributing to the serene visual quality of landscapes. In , it also plays a role in animal , as certain species' color patterns exploit the shift to blend into low-light environments, with long-wavelength markings appearing subdued against shorter-wavelength backgrounds.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542177/
  2. https://www.cis.rit.edu/people/faculty/montag/vandplite/pages/chap_9/ch9p1.html
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11556/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3149353/
  5. https://msl.cs.uiuc.edu/vr/vrch5.pdf
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4302711/
  7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10848/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rod-cell
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5112133/
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10806/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4207101/
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5839725/
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2355261/
  14. https://www.webvision.pitt.edu/book/part-iii-retinal-circuits/circuitry-for-rod-cells-through-the-retina/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3561778/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698904004201
  17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545310/
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221112472301402X
  19. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00008/full
  20. https://sipi.usc.edu/~kosko/NN-Aug2005.pdf
  21. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2414037121
  22. https://www.rp-photonics.com/luminosity_functions.html
  23. https://www.yorku.ca/eye/sensit.htm
  24. https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2139864
  25. https://opg.optica.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-72-2-247
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2290546/
  27. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1900481116
  28. https://escholarship.org/content/qt9cp4f4mk/qt9cp4f4mk_noSplash_93fdc492754c974a3801d9c5fa7b566d.pdf
  29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11509/
  30. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2737597
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234356/
  32. https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2770869
  33. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/237170.237262
  34. https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2121080
  35. https://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-viii-psychophysics-of-vision/light-and-dark-adaptation/
  36. https://tilde.ini.uzh.ch/~kiper/comp_vis/HechtSchlaerPirenne.pdf
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15177205/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698999000929
  39. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11010944/
  40. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2529361
  41. https://taylorandfrancis.com/knowledge/Engineering_and_technology/Biomedical_engineering/Scotopic_vision/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5312012/
  43. https://www.allaboutvision.com/eye-care/eye-anatomy/night-vision/
  44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545246/
  45. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcs.1672
  46. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2013.0508
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9138988/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10844829/
  49. https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~lori/classes/ColorPerception/vision.html
  50. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/39/16/3041
  51. https://nba.uth.tmc.edu/neuroscience/m/s2/chapter14.html
  52. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2016.0065
  53. https://www.verywellhealth.com/halos-around-lights-5092835
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9373794/
  55. https://entokey.com/night-vision-and-military-operations/
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220184474_Perceptually_Based_Tone_Mapping_for_Low-Light_Conditions
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698902002675
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4380301/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5832080/
  60. https://monoskop.org/images/6/6f/Wade_Nicholas_J_Brozek_Josef_Purkinjes_Vision_The_Dawning_of_Neuroscience.pdf
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11022907_The_Purkinje_rod-cone_shift_as_a_function_of_luminance_and_retinal_eccentricity
  62. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2005.3156
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.