Hubbry Logo
Self-consciousnessSelf-consciousnessMain
Open search
Self-consciousness
Community hub
Self-consciousness
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Self-consciousness
Self-consciousness
Self-consciousness
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Svetlana reflects herself in the mirror (painting by Karl Briullov, 1836).
Part of a series on
The Self
Constructs
Theories
Processes
Value judgment
As applied to activities
Interpersonal
Social
Politics

Self-consciousness is a heightened sense of awareness of oneself. It is not to be confused with consciousness in the sense of qualia. Historically, "self-consciousness" was synonymous with "self-awareness", referring to a state of awareness that one exists and that one has consciousness.[1] While "self-conscious" and "self-aware" are still sometimes used interchangeably, particularly in philosophy, "self-consciousness" has commonly come to refer to a preoccupation with oneself, especially with how others might perceive one's appearance or one's actions. An unpleasant feeling of self-consciousness may occur when one realizes that one is being watched or observed, the feeling that "everyone is looking" at oneself. Some people are habitually more self-conscious than others. Unpleasant feelings of self-consciousness sometimes become associated with shyness or paranoia.

Notable opponents of self-consciousness include Thomas Carlyle.[2][3]

Impairment

[edit]

When feeling self-conscious, one becomes aware of even the smallest of one's own actions. Such awareness can impair one's ability to perform complex actions. Adolescence is believed to be a time of heightened self-consciousness. A person with a chronic tendency toward self-consciousness may be shy or introverted.[4]

Psychology

[edit]

Unlike self-awareness, which in a philosophical context is being conscious of oneself as an individual, self-consciousness – being excessively conscious of one's appearance or manner – can be a problem at times.[5] Self-consciousness is often associated with shyness and embarrassment, in which case a lack of pride and low self-esteem can result. In a positive context, self-consciousness may affect the development of identity, for it is during periods of high self-consciousness that people come the closest to knowing themselves objectively. Self-consciousness affects people in varying degrees, as some people are constantly self-monitoring or self-involved, while others are completely oblivious about themselves.[6]

Psychologists frequently distinguish between two kinds of self-consciousness, private and public. Private self-consciousness is a tendency to introspect and examine one's inner self and feelings. Public self-consciousness is an awareness of the self as it is viewed by others. This kind of self-consciousness can result in self-monitoring and social anxiety. Both private and public self-consciousness are viewed as personality traits that are relatively stable over time, but they are not correlated. Just because an individual is high on one dimension does not mean that they are high on the other.[7]

Different levels of self-consciousness affect behavior, as it is common for people to act differently when they "lose themselves in a crowd". Being in a crowd, being in a dark room, or wearing a disguise creates anonymity and temporarily decreases self-consciousness (see deindividuation). This can lead to uninhibited, sometimes destructive behavior.[citation needed]

Emotions

[edit]
Main article: Self-conscious emotions

See also

[edit]
Main article: Outline of self

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Self-consciousness

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Self-consciousness is the awareness of oneself as a distinct , encompassing the of one's own mental states, behaviors, physical features, and personal continuity over time, often in relation to the external world or social context. This capacity enables reflective evaluation of one's actions and identity, distinguishing it from mere by involving a meta-level focus on the as an object of attention. In empirical terms, self-consciousness manifests in behaviors like self-recognition and , with disruptions linked to conditions such as autism or depersonalization disorders. Philosophically, self-consciousness has been central to inquiries into and , with empiricists like defining it as the of one's internal mental processes, serving as the basis for continuity of the self. Debates persist between pre-reflective forms—where awareness is inherent to without explicit reflection—and higher-order reflective self-consciousness requiring deliberate monitoring of one's states. These distinctions influence understandings of subjectivity, though empirical validation remains challenging due to reliance on introspective reports, which are prone to distortion. Psychologically, objective self-awareness theory, developed by Duval and Wicklund, describes how self-directed prompts automatic comparison to internal or social standards, often heightening to align or inducing discomfort if discrepancies arise. Empirically, Gordon Gallup's mirror self-recognition test provides a behavioral assay, where passing involves using a mirror to inspect a mark on one's body unseen directly, demonstrated reliably in humans after 18-24 months and select animals like great apes, suggesting rudimentary self-concepts tied to visual self-detection. Controversies surround its sufficiency as a self-consciousness marker, as failures in species like gorillas may reflect ecological irrelevance rather than absence, and cultural variations affect human performance. In , the —comprising regions like the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate—underpins self-referential cognition during rest or , correlating with trait self-consciousness and showing developmental maturation into adulthood. These findings underscore causal links between neural activity and self-focused processing, prioritizing mechanisms over purely phenomenological accounts.

Philosophical Perspectives

Historical Development

The philosophical concept of self-consciousness traces its origins to thought, where precursors emphasized introspective self-knowledge as essential to human understanding. , as depicted in Plato's dialogues such as the Apology (c. 399 BCE), invoked the Delphic maxim "" to advocate dialectical examination of one's beliefs and virtues, positioning self-examination as the path to wisdom and ethical living. built upon this in De Anima (c. 350 BCE), Book III, arguing that the (nous) achieves self-reflexivity by contemplating intelligible forms while simultaneously grasping itself as the thinking agent, since "the is thinkable in the same way as its objects." This reflective capacity distinguished human from mere sensation, grounding in the mind's potential for actualizing thought upon itself. In the 17th century, provided a foundational modern articulation through methodical in his (1641), culminating in the indubitable certainty of the thinking self: "I think, therefore I am" (). Descartes derived this from first-principles skepticism, stripping away sensory and external certainties to reveal the self's existence as a thinking substance (res cogitans), immune to hyperbolic because doubting itself affirms thought. This introspective foundation prioritized subjective certainty over empirical observation, influencing subsequent by framing self-consciousness as the bedrock of knowledge. The 19th and early 20th centuries shifted toward relational and temporal dimensions in idealist and phenomenological traditions. G.W.F. Hegel, in Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), portrayed self-consciousness as inherently social, emerging dialectically through desire and reciprocal recognition in the "struggle for recognition" between master and bondsman, where independence requires affirmation by another consciousness. extended this existentialist turn in (1943), conceiving self-consciousness as a "pre-reflective" pour-soi (for-itself) infused with nothingness, inherently aware of its and yet prone to "" in denying its temporal projects. These developments emphasized self-consciousness as dynamic and intersubjective, departing from Cartesian isolation toward causal interdependence with others and time. Post-1950s reframed self-consciousness through linguistic and cognitive structures, analyzing it as first-person self-reference embedded in thought and language. Philosophers examined phenomena like immunity to error through misidentification in self-ascriptions, linking authority to semantic indexicals ("I") and belief formation, as in debates over self-knowledge's rational warrant distinct from third-person empirical . This approach integrated self-consciousness with logical and psychological realism, prioritizing clarity in how thoughts about oneself avoid external verification pitfalls.

Core Theories and Concepts

A fundamental distinction in theories of consciousness separates creature consciousness, which denotes the subjective perspective of an organism experiencing its environment (as in Thomas Nagel's analysis of bat echolocation, where consciousness involves "something it is like" for that creature), from state consciousness, which specifies particular mental states as targets of awareness, including self-referential ones central to self-consciousness. Self-consciousness emerges in the latter as reflective access to one's own states, enabling judgments like "I am in pain" without external mediation, grounded in logical constraints on self-reference rather than metaphysical speculation. Higher-order thought (HOT) theories, developed by David Rosenthal, maintain that self-consciousness requires a meta-representational thought about a state, rendering it conscious only through this higher-level monitoring, which explains introspective reportability but risks unless HOTs are dispositional. representationalism counters that phenomenal self-consciousness inheres in direct, non- representations of the self-as-subject, where sensory states inherently include self-referential content without higher-order involvement, preserving causal immediacy in experience. Sydney Shoemaker's 1968 criterion of immunity to error through misidentification (IEM) bolsters this by showing that core self-ascriptions (e.g., bodily sensations) derive from direct acquaintance, immune to errors of identifying the wrong subject, thus favoring models over HOTs' potential for misidentification via detached representation. Daniel Dennett's narrative self theory construes self-consciousness as a dynamic "center of narrative gravity," an abstract construct from autobiographical stories rather than a unified entity, logically dissolving the self into distributed brain processes without illusion but at the cost of explanatory parsimony for persistent agency. Critics argue this reduces self-consciousness to eliminativism, incompatible with IEM-secured self-reference and logical requirements for a singular locus of rational deliberation, contrasting with unified self models that posit a coherent, non-illusory knower substantiated by constraints on error-free self-attribution. Central to these debates is reflexivity, the capacity of consciousness to self-intimate without regress: a state knows itself qua state via inherent , as in pre-reflective where experience discloses its own occurrence directly, avoiding HOTs' ladder of meta-states while enabling non-inferential self-knowledge. This logical feature underscores self-consciousness as causally primitive, immune to reductionist dissolution, prioritizing first-person authority over narrative or higher-order constructs.

Psychological Frameworks

Self-Awareness and Its Dimensions

Self-awareness refers to the capacity to direct toward one's own mental states, behaviors, or observable attributes, serving as a foundational element in psychological models of self-consciousness. In psychological frameworks, it is distinguished from broader self-consciousness by its focus on attentional mechanisms rather than dispositional traits or emotional consequences. Early theories emphasized transient shifts in focus, while later models incorporated individual differences and hierarchical structures. Duval and Wicklund's objective theory, outlined in their 1972 , posits that directed toward the induces an objective perspective, prompting comparison of one's attributes or actions against internalized standards. This discrepancy detection generates discomfort proportional to the gap identified, motivating behavioral or cognitive adjustments to align the with those standards, such as increased effort toward goals or attitude-behavior consistency. Experimental manipulations, like mirrors or audiences, reliably elicit this state, demonstrating its causal role in self-evaluation processes. Building on such attentional dynamics, Fenigstein, Scheier, and Buss developed the Self-Consciousness Scale in 1975, differentiating private self-consciousness—heightened awareness of internal thoughts, feelings, and bodily states—from public self-consciousness, which involves vigilance toward one's appearance and actions as perceived by others. The private subscale, comprising 10 items assessing (e.g., "I am constantly thinking about my reasons for doing things"), correlates with enhanced emotional insight but also rumination risks, while the public subscale, with items like "I'm concerned about what other people think of me," predicts and . Psychometric analyses across cultures, including factor analyses yielding Cronbach's alphas above 0.75 for both subscales, affirm their reliability and validity, with private scores linking to therapeutic outcomes in introspection-based interventions. Morin, in a , delineates levels of progressing from minimal, involving basic bodily sensations and agency without explicit evaluation; to reflective, entailing meta-cognitive appraisal of one's thoughts and traits against norms; and culminating in , where individuals construct coherent autobiographical stories integrating past experiences into a unified . These levels align with developmental sequences, as minimal awareness appears in infancy via tasks, while forms emerge around age 4-5 through theory-of-mind milestones. Empirical support derives from tasks showing differential activation across levels, with reflective awareness fostering adaptive self-regulation but levels enabling long-term identity coherence. Empirically, heightened self-focus from these dimensions promotes behavioral consistency, as objective amplifies attitude- alignment by prioritizing standard adherence over habitual responses. For instance, self-focused individuals exhibit greater persistence in goal-directed tasks when discrepancies are salient. Conversely, this focus can suppress spontaneous actions, overriding automatic stereotypes or impulses in favor of deliberate control, as evidenced in experiments where mirrors reduce implicit effects on by enhancing evaluative . Such inhibition of spontaneity underscores self-awareness's dual role in precision versus fluidity.

Emotional and Motivational Roles

Self-conscious emotions, such as guilt and pride, arising from heightened self-awareness, motivate individuals toward goal-directed and moral behaviors by signaling discrepancies between actual and ideal self-states. Guilt, in particular, prompts reparative actions and ethical conduct, as evidenced by studies linking guilt-proneness to reduced likelihood of behaviors like theft or dishonesty among undergraduates. Pride similarly drives achievement-oriented efforts, reinforcing valued social characteristics and enhancing reputational benefits through sustained task engagement. These functions align with adaptive mechanisms where self-consciousness integrates emotional responses to foster long-term social valuation and self-regulation. Conversely, self-consciousness can engender maladaptive affective states like , which serves an evolutionary signaling role in maintaining group cohesion by indicating submission and to others, often manifested physiologically through . Excessive self-focus in social contexts heightens evaluation apprehension, impairing performance on complex tasks via increased , as extensions of Zajonc's demonstrate that perceived scrutiny amplifies dominant responses but disrupts novel or difficult activities. This dualism reflects short-term boosts in simple task from presence, contrasted with long-term inhibition from chronic . Individual differences modulate these roles, with meta-analyses revealing women experience higher levels of guilt and —self-conscious emotions tied to public —than men, though differences in and are minimal. These patterns, observed across diverse samples, stem from a interplay of emphasizing relational concerns in females and biological factors influencing emotional reactivity, rather than stereotypes alone. Higher public self-consciousness in females correlates with intensified motivational vigilance in social settings, potentially amplifying both adaptive prosocial drives and vulnerability to apprehension.

Neuroscientific Underpinnings

Neural Correlates

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), particularly its ventral and rostral portions, exhibits consistent activation during self-referential tasks in studies, supporting its role in processing stimuli related to one's own traits, experiences, and identity. A by Qin and Northoff integrated data from over 20 studies, revealing that mPFC activity integrates stimulus-induced responses with intrinsic resting-state fluctuations, potentially underlying the subjective sense of as a coherent entity rather than isolated perceptions. This region's involvement extends to distinguishing self from others, with anterior mPFC showing parametric modulation based on self-relevance intensity. The (DMN), encompassing the mPFC, , and , demonstrates heightened activity during introspective self-reflection, such as retrieval or mentalizing about one's mental states, in contrast to suppression of task-positive networks like the during externally directed tasks. This anticorrelation underscores a functional opposition between endogenous self-focused and goal-oriented external processing, with DMN hubs facilitating narrative construction of personal continuity. Disruptions in DMN connectivity, observed via resting-state fMRI, correlate with altered self-perception in conditions like , though causality requires validation through interventions like . For bodily aspects of self-consciousness, the anterior insula processes interoceptive signals from visceral and somatosensory sources, enabling awareness of internal bodily states as integral to the phenomenal . evidence links insula activation to heartbeat detection accuracy and subjective embodiment feelings, with its integration of autonomic inputs posited as foundational for distinguishing self-generated sensations from external ones. The right (TPJ) contributes to for self-location and first-person perspective, where transient disruptions—via electrical stimulation in patients or manipulations—induce out-of-body experiences by decoupling visuospatial and proprioceptive cues. Blanke and colleagues' analysis of neurological cases demonstrated TPJ lesions in 10 patients producing autoscopic phenomena, implicating it in the spatial unity of and body through Bayesian-like inference of sensory congruence. Recent intracranial recordings distinguish neural patterns for phenomenal self-consciousness (raw subjective experience) from access consciousness (reportable self-knowledge), with posterior cortical sites showing early, widespread gamma oscillations for the former and frontal for the latter, though these signatures remain debated for specificity to self versus general awareness. A 2023 review synthesizes evidence for multidimensional neural substrates, emphasizing hierarchical processing from sensorimotor (TPJ, insula) to higher-order reflective (mPFC, DMN) levels in bodily self-consciousness. These findings, primarily correlational from fMRI and EEG, highlight the need for causal tests via in animal models or precise human lesional data to affirm mechanistic roles.

Experimental Paradigms

The mirror self-recognition (MSR) test, introduced by Gallup in 1970, evaluates self-recognition by applying a visible mark to a subject's body (e.g., odorless dye on the face) and observing responses to a mirror reflection after habituation. Chimpanzees exposed to mirrors for several days subsequently touched the mark on their own body while viewing the reflection, rather than exploring the mirror surface, providing behavioral evidence of self-recognition in great apes. This paradigm has been replicated in other nonhuman primates like orangutans, though gorillas show inconsistent results, highlighting species-specific thresholds for rudimentary self-awareness. In neuroscientific extensions, MSR failures in humans with prefrontal lesions underscore cortical involvement in visual self-monitoring. Own-body illusion tasks probe bodily self-consciousness through multisensory conflicts, inducing perceived of a surrogate body via synchronous visuotactile . Participants typically view a fake or virtual body (e.g., via rubber hand or full-body setup) stroked in temporal and spatial congruence with their hidden real body, leading to proprioceptive drift toward the illusionary limb or body. These illusions demonstrate that body arises from Bayesian integration of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive cues, with disruptions (e.g., asynchronous ) abolishing the effect. Advancements in the 2020s incorporate for immersive, first-person perspectives, enhancing ; for instance, VR avatars with congruent stroking evoke stronger and alter implicit bodily attitudes, as measured by skin conductance or kinematic responses. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigms contrasting self-referential judgments with other- or non-social tasks isolate neural signatures of self-processing. In a seminal 2002 study, participants rated trait adjectives for self-descriptiveness, relevance to a familiar other, or , revealing heightened activation in the medial (mPFC), particularly the ventral portion, during self-judgments. This mPFC specificity persists across trait domains and is modulated by judgment intimacy, with self-conditions showing parametric increases tied to personal . Replicable findings implicate the cortical midline structures in distinguishing self from close others, independent of semantic content. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies post-2020 have captured the millisecond-scale temporal dynamics of self-other distinction, complementing fMRI's . Source localization analyses of self-identity tasks (e.g., judging current vs. past self-traits) identify early parietal oscillations (~200-400 ms) for spatial self-binding, followed by frontal P300-like components (~400-600 ms) for evaluative integration. In virtual reality-EEG hybrids, self-perspective immersion suppresses mu/alpha rhythms over sensorimotor areas during self-other action , reflecting attenuated sensorimotor simulation for owned actions. These patterns underscore rapid, hierarchical processing where early multisensory convergence precedes later reflective self-other demarcation.

Evolutionary and Developmental Trajectories

Evolutionary Origins

Self-awareness, a precursor to full self-consciousness, likely evolved gradually in as an to increasing , enabling individuals to model others' mental states and detect in group interactions. Comparative studies show that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) demonstrate visual self-recognition in the , where marked individuals use reflections to investigate their own bodies after initial social responses to the image subside, indicating a rudimentary awareness of self distinct from others. This capacity, observed consistently since Gordon Gallup's 1970 experiments, correlates with ' advanced coalitionary behaviors and theory-of-mind-like inferences, suggesting proto-self-consciousness facilitated survival in competitive social hierarchies by anticipating rivals' intentions. Such traits counter narratives positing self-consciousness as solely a cultural emergent, as from non-human reveals biological foundations tied to encephalization and neocortical expansion driven by group-living demands. The adaptive value of self-consciousness lies in bolstering through tracking and formation, though it incurs cognitive costs like heightened anxiety from recursive self-evaluation. studies reveal that self-aware invest in long-term social bonds, where awareness of one's status influences and , enhancing fitness in fission-fusion societies. However, this trades off against immediate action, as evidenced by elevated stress responses in self-recognizing chimpanzees during social scrutiny, mirroring human anxiety patterns linked to . Fossil and neuroanatomical proxies indicate that in Homo sapiens, emerging around 300,000 years ago, reorganization supported these functions, with brain shapes already approaching modern configurations despite variable symbolic artifacts. A pivotal human advancement occurred with propositional language, estimated to have capacity roots at least 135,000 years ago, enabling recursive self-reference and narrative justification that amplified self-consciousness beyond primate levels. This linguistic leap, coinciding with behavioral modernity around 50,000–100,000 years ago, allowed abstract reflection on personal agency and future consequences, transforming proto-awareness into introspective selfhood adaptive for large-scale cooperation. Early evidence of symbolic behavior, such as pigment use and abstract markings from African sites dated to the Middle Stone Age, aligns with this timeline, predating widespread cultural diffusion and underscoring an evolutionary continuum rather than abrupt invention.

Human Ontogeny

Self-recognition in human infants emerges prominently around 18 months of age, as demonstrated by the mirror mark test, where children touch a visible mark on their own body after observing it in a mirror, indicating awareness of the reflection as self-referential. This milestone, first systematically documented in a study of 88 children aged 3 to 24 months, marks a transition from treating mirrors as social stimuli or novel objects to self-directed behaviors like self-admiration or . Such visual self-recognition precedes the development of , typically attained by age 4 to 5 years, when children understand that others hold false beliefs independent of their own knowledge, as evidenced in false-belief tasks. In childhood, self-consciousness shifts from primarily egocentric, concrete self-appraisals—focused on immediate actions and basic emotions—to more abstract, public forms involving awareness of others' evaluations, accelerating during early with cognitive maturation. Longitudinal observations show children around ages 8 to 12 begin incorporating social comparisons into self-view, but by ages 13 to 18, heightened public self-consciousness manifests as increased concerns over appearance and peer judgments, correlating with physiological responses like elevated during social scrutiny. exacerbates these fears of social evaluation, with neural activation in regions like the medial linking to transient spikes in self-focused attention and anxiety about . This developmental trajectory reflects expanding social horizons beyond family, fostering amid peer influences. By adulthood, self-consciousness exhibits trait-like stability, with year-to-year correlations in self-report scales (e.g., private and dimensions) remaining moderate to high, akin to broader trait consistencies observed longitudinally from onward. However, excessive or maladaptive self-consciousness can be modulated through interventions like training, which meta-analyses from the indicate reduces ruminative self-focus and enhances non-judgmental awareness, thereby lowering self-consciousness scores in randomized trials. These effects stem from practices altering activity, promoting detachment from habitual self-evaluation. Cross-species comparisons underscore the relative uniqueness of human self-consciousness ontogeny: while great apes like chimpanzees achieve mirror self-recognition by 2 to 3 years—roughly paralleling human timelines—non- species, including most mammals and birds, rarely pass standardized tests, with isolated exceptions like failing to generalize beyond visual cues. This scarcity highlights advanced cortical expansions enabling sustained, reflective in humans, distinct from episodic or olfactory-based recognition attempts in other taxa.

Clinical Manifestations

Impairments and Deficits

represents a profound deficit in self-consciousness, characterized by the patient's lack of awareness of their own neurological impairments, such as hemiplegia following a . This condition was first termed by in 1914 to describe unawareness of motor deficits like . Neurologically, is strongly associated with damage to the right hemisphere, particularly involving cortical regions such as the insula, temporal, and parietal lobes, as well as subcortical structures, which disrupts the integration of sensory and motor feedback essential for . Post- for hemiplegia often manifests as or about the deficit, reflecting a failure in the brain's error-detection mechanisms rather than deliberate deception. Depersonalization entails a detached, unreal quality to one's self-experience, where individuals report feeling alienated from their own thoughts, emotions, or body as if observing themselves externally. This deficit in the subjective sense of and is linked to hypoactivity in the anterior insula, a region critical for integrating interoceptive signals and generating the feeling of embodied selfhood. studies confirm reduced insula activation during states of depersonalization, whether induced experimentally or occurring in clinical contexts like trauma aftermath, impairing the binding of bodily sensations to a coherent self-narrative. Such neurological underpinnings prioritize disrupted afferent processing over purely factors in explaining the core detachment. In autism spectrum disorder (ASD), deficits in self-consciousness often involve delayed development of self-other distinction, impairing the ability to differentiate one's perspective from others', as evidenced by challenges in theory of mind tasks. However, private —encompassing internal monitoring of one's own mental states—appears relatively intact, with studies showing typical performance on self-referential tasks and private self-consciousness scales that assess without social components. supports this dissociation, indicating preserved physical self-representation but alterations in psychological self-processing networks. Basic self-non-self boundaries, such as bodily , remain unaffected, suggesting the deficit targets intersubjective rather than core phenomenal self-consciousness. Age-related declines in reflective self-consciousness, involving metacognitive evaluation of one's own thoughts and behaviors, correlate with atrophy, which accelerates after age 60 and affects like . Frontotemporal degeneration, mimicking advanced aging in prefrontal regions, leads to reduced and impaired recognition of personal errors or social . Volumetric MRI studies quantify frontal volume loss at 0.9-1.5% annually in older adults, disrupting circuits for autonoetic awareness—the subjective reliving of personal experiences tied to selfhood. This neurological progression underlies observable lapses in introspective depth, independent of general cognitive slowing.

Associated Psychopathologies

In , disruptions to self-boundaries manifest as core symptoms such as , where individuals experience thoughts as externally imposed rather than self-generated, aligning with criteria for delusions in the disorder. These anomalies reflect an underlying ipseity disturbance, characterized by diminished sense of first-person perspective and increased permeability between self and world, as measured by scales like the Inventory of Psychotic-Like Anomalies of Self-Experience (IPSE). Empirical studies indicate that such self-disorders precede and predict transition to full in ultra-high-risk populations, with basic self-demarcation deficits evident early in the schizophrenia spectrum. Social anxiety disorder involves chronic public self-consciousness, wherein individuals exhibit heightened awareness of themselves as observed by others, exacerbating in social contexts. Lifetime stands at approximately 13%, with 12-month rates around 8%, positioning it as one of the most common anxiety disorders. Genetic estimates range from 30% to 50%, supported by twin and studies showing shared variance with traits like , though environmental factors modulate expression. Narcissistic personality disorder features an inflated self-focus that often conceals underlying fragility, with pervasive patterns of , entitlement, and impaired per DSM-5-TR criteria, yet subclinical narcissistic traits can confer adaptive benefits such as resilience in competitive environments. Pathological forms involve unstable regulation, where exaggerated self-appraisal alternates between and deflation, leading to interpersonal exploitation and , though diagnostic emphasis risks over-pathologizing evolutionarily selected traits for status-seeking without sufficient evidence of universal maladaptiveness. In , rumination represents maladaptive hyper-self-consciousness, involving repetitive, self-critical focus on negative internal states that perpetuates symptom severity. Functional MRI studies from the 2010s demonstrate rumination-linked hyperactivity in the , including increased amygdala and hippocampal engagement during self-referential processing, correlating with prolonged episodes and relapse risk in remitted patients. This pattern underscores rumination's role in sustaining depressive loops, distinct from adaptive reflection, with evidence from meta-analyses linking it to altered connectivity in prefrontal and temporal regions.

Empirical Assessment

Measurement Tools

The (SCS), developed by Fenigstein, Scheier, and Buss in 1975, is a 23-item self-report designed to assess dispositional differences in self-focused attention, distinguishing between private self-consciousness (introspective awareness of inner states), public self-consciousness (awareness of oneself as a social object), and (discomfort from public scrutiny). reliability for its subscales typically ranges from 0.75 to 0.84 across studies, with evidence of through correlations with related constructs like and embarrassment proneness. Validity is supported by factor analytic work confirming the three-factor structure, though revisions have addressed item comprehension issues in non-college samples to improve accessibility without altering core psychometric properties. The Situational Scale (SSAS), introduced by Govern and Marsch in 2001, captures transient, context-dependent shifts in self-focused attention through 20 items rated on a scale of current awareness intensity. It differentiates private self-awareness (e.g., attention to internal feelings), public self-awareness (e.g., concern with external appearance), and collective self-awareness (e.g., group identity salience), with subscale alphas exceeding 0.80 and test-retest reliability around 0.70 over short intervals. is evidenced by manipulations like mirrors increasing public subscale scores, aligning with objective self-awareness theory predictions for situational elevations in self-focus. Neuroimaging techniques provide implicit measures of self-consciousness via blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), particularly during self-referential tasks such as trait judgments about oneself versus others. Increased mPFC activation correlates with heightened self-processing, offering a physiological proxy less susceptible to introspective demands than self-reports, with meta-analyses confirming its specificity for self-referential activity over general . This approach complements behavioral scales by quantifying neural engagement without reliance on verbal articulation. Self-report instruments like the and SSAS face critiques for potential cultural biases, as evidenced by lower scores on emotional items in East Asian versus Western samples, possibly reflecting collectivist norms that de-emphasize individualistic . Such measures may also conflate self-consciousness facets, prompting calls for multi-method integration—including physiological and observational data—to enhance validity and mitigate response artifacts like social desirability.

Key Findings from Studies

Meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies reveal overlapping neural substrates between self-referential processing, a core component of self-consciousness, and empathic responses, including activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and , suggesting moderate rather than strict causality. These shared circuits imply that heightened self-consciousness may facilitate in empathy tasks, with behavioral correlations around r=0.25-0.35 in trait measures, though directional effects vary by context such as private versus public self-focus. Under psychological stress, self-focused attention—manifesting as acute self-consciousness—exhibits an inverted-U relationship with performance, aligning with the Yerkes-Dodson law where moderate enhances efficiency via adaptive monitoring, but excessive levels trigger disruptive rumination and skill disruption, as evidenced in tasks like and . Experimental manipulations inducing self-focus under high-stress conditions consistently show performance decrements of 10-20% beyond optimal arousal thresholds, replicable across lab paradigms involving evaluative audiences. Randomized controlled trials of (MBSR) programs, developed by Kabat-Zinn since the 1970s, demonstrate reductions in chronic public self-consciousness, with effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.5-0.8) in alleviating negative self-representations and symptoms over 8-week interventions. These outcomes stem from decreased hyperactivity linked to self-referential rumination, sustained at 6-month follow-ups in multiple RCTs. Recent computational modeling integrates self-referential loops in large language models to probe self-consciousness mechanisms, revealing emergent patterns of recursive self-attribution that mimic human-like without full phenomenal , as tested in 2024-2025 benchmarks.

Sociocultural Dimensions

Cultural Variations

Cross-cultural research reveals variations in the expression of self-consciousness tied to societal structures of versus collectivism. In collectivist societies, such as those in , individuals often adopt interdependent self-construals, emphasizing relational harmony and heightened awareness of the self as perceived by others, which aligns with elevated public self-consciousness compared to independent self-construals dominant in Western individualist cultures. This pattern manifests in greater sensitivity to social evaluation and contextual cues in , where objective self-awareness experiments indicate stronger attentional shifts toward others' viewpoints. Shame-based cultural frameworks, as analyzed by Benedict in her 1946 study of Japanese society, intensify social self-focus by prioritizing external sanctions and group over internal guilt mechanisms prevalent in Western guilt cultures. These dynamics correlate with lower scores on Hofstede's cultural dimensions, where nations like score 46 on the index, reflecting tighter social interdependence and amplified concern for reputational self-presentation. Despite these differences, core markers of self-recognition exhibit relative universality. Mirror self-recognition emerges in toddlers across diverse populations, typically between 18 and 24 months, though report variations in timing and performance, with non-Western children sometimes showing delayed or context-dependent responses that challenge strict universalist interpretations. Globalization appears to attenuate traditional divides, as evidenced by 2020s analyses showing individuals in interconnected contexts developing hybrid, integrated self-construals that blend interdependent and independent elements, potentially narrowing expressive gaps in self-consciousness. Twin studies further underscore genetic contributions, with estimates for facets linked to self-consciousness—such as and —remaining stable (around 30-50%) across North American, European, and Asian samples, indicating that cultural variations overlay rather than supplant biological substrates. This consistency cautions against attributing differences solely to , as shared genetic factors persist amid environmental divergence.

Social and Contextual Influences

The presence of an audience reliably increases self-consciousness by inducing evaluation apprehension, leading individuals to heighten and conform behavior to anticipated scrutiny. Cottrell et al. (1968) demonstrated this through experiments where participants performed tasks more efficiently on well-learned activities under observation, attributing the effect to the motivational pressure of potential judgment rather than mere distraction. This situational modulation aligns with objective self-awareness theory, where external cues like observers redirect inward, amplifying discrepancies between actual and ideal self-states. Power asymmetries in immediate social contexts further elevate self-consciousness among subordinates, who engage in vigilant self-regulation to signal compliance and mitigate risks of dominance challenges. Experimental manipulations of show lower-status individuals exhibit greater behavioral inhibition and attentional focus on superiors' cues, a pattern conserved across and humans as an adaptive response to hierarchical costs like exclusion or . Evolutionarily, this heightened vigilance in subordinates likely served status signaling in ancestral groups, where miscalibrated self-presentation could undermine formation or resource access, independent of cultural overlays. Contemporary digital environments, particularly visual platforms like , amplify public self-consciousness via asynchronous observation and curated self-presentation, fostering chronic anxiety over perceived flaws. A 2020 study found that Instagram usage correlates with elevated through mechanisms of upward social comparison, where users internalize idealized portrayals, prompting intensified self-scrutiny akin to real-time audience effects but scaled by algorithmic amplification. Longitudinal from the early indicate this effect persists across demographics, with passive scrolling exacerbating state self-consciousness more than active posting, as virtual audiences simulate perpetual evaluation without reciprocal feedback. Gender influences on situational self-consciousness reveal women experiencing stronger public variants, with meta-analyses confirming higher trait levels tied to greater sensitivity to social gaze, though gaps narrow under egalitarian norms. While accounts emphasize learned vigilance for relational harmony, biological evidence— including estrogen-modulated neural circuits for social threat detection—undermines attributions to environment alone, as twin studies disentangle heritable variance from rearing effects. This interplay manifests in experiments where women show amplified self-focused under mixed-gender observation, suggesting hormonal baselines interact with to sustain differences despite cultural convergence.

Debates and Open Questions

Ontological and Epistemological Disputes

Illusionists such as Daniel Dennett and Thomas Metzinger contend that the self in self-consciousness is not a substantial entity but a narrative construct or illusory model generated by the brain. Dennett describes the self as a "center of narrative gravity," a fictional coherence emerging from disparate mental processes without underlying unity. Metzinger's self-model theory posits the phenomenal self as a transparent representational model that, while adaptive for agency and ownership, lacks ontological reality, akin to an error in phenomenal content. Realist perspectives counter that empirical evidence undermines eliminativist claims, pointing to persistent neural signatures of self-representation that persist across states and resist reduction to mere fiction. For instance, reveals stable activations in regions like the medial prefrontal cortex and associated with bodily self-consciousness, suggesting causal integration beyond illusory epiphenomena. Evolutionarily, self-consciousness incurs metabolic costs—such as heightened cortical energy demands for integration and reflection—that would not persist if purely illusory, implying functional reality for adaptive behaviors like long-term and social coordination. Epistemologically, access to self-consciousness via is constrained by inferential processes rather than direct transparency, yet yields reliable first-person data for hypothesis-testing about mental states. Alison Gopnik's framework holds that self-knowledge arises from and evidence akin to third-person mindreading, challenging illusions of privileged access but affirming introspection's utility in detecting internal states through developmental and empirical validation. Integrated information theory (IIT), developed by since the early 2000s, offers a realist by equating with integrated (Φ), extendable to self-consciousness as maximally irreducible causal structures in neural systems. This implies a substantial basis for unified self-experience, grounded in quantifiable causal power rather than narrative alone, though IIT faces criticism for entailing panpsychist commitments, attributing consciousness-like properties to simple systems with high Φ, which strains empirical .

Interdisciplinary Challenges

Philosophical inquiries into self-consciousness often emphasize speculative elements like —the subjective, introspectively accessible qualities of experience—that elude direct empirical quantification, creating a rift with psychological approaches that prioritize operational definitions through behavioral and cognitive metrics, such as self-attribution tasks or reflective judgment assessments. This disparity manifests in philosophy's focus on the "hard problem" of why phenomenal experience accompanies physical processes, versus psychology's reliance on third-person observables, like performance in theory-of-mind experiments, which may capture but overlook irreducible subjectivity. Such tensions impede synthesis, as philosophical debates resist falsification while psychological metrics risk reducing self-consciousness to proxy indicators without validating underlying mechanisms. Neuroscience exacerbates interdisciplinary hurdles by predominantly identifying correlational patterns, such as fMRI activations in the during self-referential tasks, without establishing causation, prompting 2024 analyses to urge shifts toward interventional methods like (TMS) or lesion studies to discern necessary neural contributions to self-consciousness. reveals associations between prefrontal-insular activity and , yet confounds like reverse inference limit claims to , underscoring the need for experimental manipulations that disrupt specific circuits and observe downstream effects on . Evolutionary perspectives reveal further discord, with debates over gradualist models—positing incremental adaptations across hominins—contested by archaeological and genetic data indicating a punctuated onset of advanced self-consciousness in Homo sapiens circa 100,000–50,000 years ago, marked by symbolic artifacts like engravings and practices absent in earlier lineages. Fossil records show no linear progression toward reflective selfhood in Neanderthals or archaic humans, despite comparable sizes, challenging uniform selection pressures and suggesting rapid cognitive saltations tied to genetic innovations for enhanced . Emerging AI frameworks, including large-scale models like those from xAI since 2023, provide testable simulations to probe self-consciousness thresholds, enabling hypothesis-driven experiments on emergent properties such as self-modeling or recursive reasoning, though empirical evaluations confirm these systems simulate rather than instantiate genuine . Integrating causal interventions across disciplines—combining philosophical criteria with neuroscientific manipulations and evolutionary timelines—offers a path to empirical convergence, prioritizing verifiable mechanisms over isolated silos.

References

  1. https://iep.utm.edu/self-con/
  2. https://oecs.mit.edu/pub/qk3nm299
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10851942/
  4. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00719/full
  5. http://www.the-philosopher.co.uk/2023/10/self-consciousness-battle-between.html
  6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-022-00641-1
  7. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/
  8. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_4
  9. https://www.animalcognition.org/2015/04/15/list-of-animals-that-have-passed-the-mirror-test/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9334443/
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627323003082
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12025022/
  13. https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/scsnl/documents/Neuron_2023_Menon_20_years.pdf
  14. https://today.uconn.edu/2018/08/know-thyself-philosophy-self-knowledge/
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/socrates-and-selfknowledge/introduction-socrates-and-the-precept-know-yourself/FCFA794C8AAD6FDF463866F13DA90F62
  16. https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Aristotle/De-anima/de-anima3.htm
  17. https://philosophybreak.com/articles/i-think-therefore-i-am-descartes-cogito-ergo-sum-explained/
  18. https://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/meditations/full-text/section2/
  19. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/hegel-on-self-consciousness-desire-and-death-in-the-phenomenology-of-spirit/
  20. https://researchfeatures.com/sartres-idea-of-consciousness-ego-brief-sketch/
  21. https://philosophy.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Burge-1992-Philosophy-of-Language-and-Mind-1950-1990.pdf
  22. https://davidrosenthal.org/DR-HO-Theories-Handbook.pdf
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229606580_Consciousness_and_Higher-Order_Thought
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3712269/
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154287
  26. https://pages.uoregon.edu/donovan/writings/newman.pdf
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286743332_Weaknesses_and_strengths_of_Dennett%27s_narrative_self_theory_Contributions_to_the_debate_on_personal_identity
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260210038_Theories_of_Consciousness_as_Reflexivity
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-021-00603-z
  30. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1973-26817-000
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S006526010860252X
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313719334_Public_and_private_self-consciousness_Assessment_and_theory
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019188699400149M
  34. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00387.x
  35. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/P_Silvia_On_2001.pdf
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277544152_Behavioral_Indecision_Effects_of_Self-Focus_on_Automatic_Behavior
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3083636/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661318302729
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11202235/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426012/
  41. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00601/full
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656606000857
  43. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-08688-001
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22468881/
  45. https://kurdishstudies.net/menu-script/index.php/KS/article/download/990/604/1816
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053811911005167
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3806720/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3713343/
  49. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41408-7
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6488299/
  51. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/18/5115
  52. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/25/3/550
  53. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-pdf/127/2/243/13733497/awh040.pdf
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38944172/
  55. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2023.1145924/full
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424003336
  57. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.167.3914.86
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248481800164
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371812/
  60. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37375-z
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221015546
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12167262/
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2555408/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9232421/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2660989/
  66. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0096
  67. https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-44
  68. https://philarchive.org/archive/MENEOS-5
  69. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aao5961
  70. https://news.mit.edu/2025/when-did-human-language-emerge-0314
  71. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-of-knowledge/202307/how-did-human-self-consciousness-evolve
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10145355/
  73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4679817/
  74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dev.420050403
  75. https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/social-cognition/according-experts/development-theory-mind-early-childhood
  76. https://childpsychology.pressbooks.sunycreate.cloud/chapter/development-of-self-2/
  77. https://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/view/parents-find-children-are-self-conscious-toward-their-appearance
  78. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/teens-self-consciousness-linked-with-specific-brain-physiological-responses.html
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/009265669190006C
  80. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-17966-001
  81. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.951808/full
  82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513361/
  83. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/130/12/3075/283181
  84. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/070674371005500604
  85. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/behavioral-and-cognitive-neurology-of-stroke/anosognosia-and-denial-after-right-hemisphere-stroke/EDB57D18A60CF21183280DF17BE9480A
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10132272/
  87. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mila.12441
  88. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/depersonalization/pulling-the-threads-together/AFAA6CA31C40B5F3CB81EE6B6B619FA0
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7658103/
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5572253/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3117464/
  92. https://tidsskrift.dk/sjcapp/article/download/24086/21928/58102
  93. https://canlab.la.psu.edu/publications/pdfs/CompensationChapter_StussKnightBook_CabezaDennis_final.pdf
  94. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/129/9/2508/329891
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4219858/
  96. https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article/38/6/1277/1858795
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4585074/
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/social-anxiety-disorder
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309381825_Heritability_of_social_anxiety_disorder_A_systematic_review_of_methodological_designs
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10187400/
  101. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14060723
  102. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00666/full
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5153413/
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381191930878X
  105. https://psycnet.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/t16721-000
  106. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/per.2410020103
  107. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/psychology/pdf/scales/SCSR_article.pdf
  108. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810001905069
  109. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-11651-005
  110. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Development-and-Validation-of-the-Situational-Scale-Govern-Marsch/c6a80a765bc215287a12e165d80e512002ea81dc
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198449/
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763419302623
  113. https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-023-06660-0
  114. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00930/full
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410528/
  116. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754073910361981
  117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28682203/
  118. https://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/doi/10.1308/rcsbull.2019.20
  119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351518026_The_Effects_of_Mindfulness-Based_Stress_Reduction_on_Negative_Self-Representations_in_Social_Anxiety_Disorder-A_Randomized_Wait-List_Controlled_Trial
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647439/
  121. https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.392.pdf
  122. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1680/14/1/44
  123. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-23978-001
  124. https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Influence_Compliance/Markus_Kitayama_1991_Culture_and_the_self.pdf
  125. https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~heine/docs/mirrors.rtf
  126. https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/31/ivy.php
  127. https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/
  128. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=orpc
  129. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34166010/
  130. https://henrich.fas.harvard.edu/publications/cultural-variations-childrens-mirror-self-recognition
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10985239/
  132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7000299_Is_the_Genetic_Structure_of_Human_Personality_Universal_A_Cross-Cultural_Twin_Study_From_North_America_Europe_and_Asia
  133. https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01617
  134. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-29881-x
  135. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5095155/
  136. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3383914/
  137. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5494206/
  138. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305120912488
  139. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44202-024-00241-3
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10600286/
  141. https://stanmed.stanford.edu/how-mens-and-womens-brains-are-different/
  142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3030621/
  143. https://philarchive.org/archive/SCHPPI-15
  144. https://phantomself.org/metzinger-on-the-unreality-of-the-self/
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3734106/
  146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10316713/
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10089106/
  148. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2021.697129/full
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11628302/
  150. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/how-we-know-our-minds-the-illusion-of-firstperson-knowledge-of-intentionality/2027E56069E2B1BBE8E6A0FA40773185
  151. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.02103
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4574706/
  153. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-purpose/202310/an-intriguing-and-controversial-theory-of-consciousness-iit
  154. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia/
  155. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness/
  156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303264797000701
  157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627324000886
  158. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10503954
  159. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11949584/
  160. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.b.10041
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9620754/
  162. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/genes-linked-to-self-awareness-in-modern-humans-were-less-common-in-neandertals/
  163. https://arxiv.org/html/2505.19806v1
  164. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-04154-3
  165. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.770360/full
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.