Hubbry Logo
Semi-PelagianismSemi-PelagianismMain
Open search
Semi-Pelagianism
Community hub
Semi-Pelagianism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Semi-Pelagianism
Semi-Pelagianism
Semi-Pelagianism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Pelagianism
History
Proponents
Opponents
Doctrines

Semi-Pelagianism (or Semipelagianism) is a historical Christian theological and soteriological school of thought about the role of free will in salvation. In semi-Pelagian thought, a distinction is made between the beginning of faith and the increase of faith. Semi-Pelagian thought teaches that the latter half – growing in faith – is the work of God, while the beginning of faith is an act of free will, with grace supervening only later.[1]

The term "semi-Pelagianism", a 16th-century coinage, is considered a misnomer by many modern scholars. "Semi-Pelagianism" has frequently been used in a pejorative sense.

Semi-Pelagianism was, in the theory, originally developed as a compromise between Pelagianism and the teaching of Church Fathers such as Saint Augustine. Adherents to Pelagianism hold that people are born untainted by sin and do not need salvation unless they choose to sin, a belief which had been dismissed as heresy. In contrast, Augustine taught that people cannot come to God without the grace of God. Like Pelagianism, what is now called semi-Pelagianism was labeled heresy by the Western Church at the Second Council of Orange in 529.

In contrast, most Christian communions teach that the initiative for faith comes from God. Some, notably Catholics and Orthodox, teach that it then requires free collaboration on the part of man (synergism): "The fatherly action of God is first on his own initiative, and then follows man's free acting through his collaboration".[2] "Since the initiative belongs to God in the order of grace, no one can merit the initial grace of forgiveness and justification at the beginning of conversion. Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for the attainment of eternal life."[3]

Pelagian and semi-Pelagian theology

[edit]
Main article: Pelagianism

Pelagianism is the teaching that people have the capacity to seek God in and of themselves apart from any movement of God or the Holy Spirit, and therefore that salvation is effected by their own efforts. The doctrine takes its name from Pelagius, a British monk who was accused of developing the doctrine (he himself appears to have claimed in his letters that man does not do good apart from grace, claiming only that all men have free will by God's gift); it was opposed especially by Augustine of Hippo and was declared a heresy by Pope Zosimus in 418. Rejecting the existence of original sin, it teaches that man is in himself and by nature capable of choosing good.[4]

In so-called semi-Pelagian thought, both God and the human person always participate in the salvation process. Humans make free will choices, which are aided by God through creation, natural grace, "supernatural" grace, God's restrictions on demonic invasion; God continually brings the human person to real choices, which God also aids, in the process of spiritual growth to be saved. The entire process is grace; snapshot focus on the specific moments of decision are always in the context of the overarching grace of God. Semi-Pelagianism is similar to synergism, which is the traditional patristic doctrine.[5]

Patristic era

[edit]

The term "semi-Pelagianism" was unknown in antiquity, appearing for the first time only in the last quarter of the 16th century in connection with Luis de Molina's doctrine of grace: opponents of this theologian believed they saw a close resemblance to the views advocated by monks of Southern Gaul at and around Marseille after 428.

Even after this confusion between the ideas of Molina and those of the monks of Marseille had been exposed as an error, the newly coined term "semi-Pelagianism" was retained in learned circles as an apt designation for the views of those monks, most notably John Cassian, which were said to have aimed at a compromise between Pelagianism and Augustinism. It was condemned as heresy at the local Council of Orange (529) after disputes extending over more than a hundred years.[6] The monks, however, consistent with the Desert Fathers, considered their teaching to be the ancient teaching of the Church.

Several historical teachings have been wrongly claimed to be semi-Pelagian without actually being about the issue of the priority of grace before human will. In particular, in the late 400s Gallic Bishop Faustus of Riez had answered a parishioner's question about whether a deathbed confession by someone in mortal sin was legitimate: in Faustus' opinion there could be no effective absolution despite the decision to repent because there had been no satisfaction (public repudiation of sin, reparation, prayer, etc.) attempted. Faustus' formulation contradicted e.g. the declaration of Pope Celestine I in 1428 against "despair in God's mercy" and was rebutted by the writings of Bishop Avitus of Vienne, that the intention to give satisfaction (if the sinner lived, in accordance with canon 13 of the First Council of Nicaea) was perfectly adequate for a genuine repentance.[7] So Faustus' claims concern faith versus the necessity of penitence, not the priority of grace before human will.

Development of the term and subsequent use

[edit]

Early use of the term

[edit]

The first use of the term "semi-Pelagian" was by Theodore Beza. The Epitome of the Lutheran Formula of Concord (1577) rejects "the false dogma of the Semi-Pelagians, who teach that man by his own powers can commence his conversion, but can not fully accomplish it without the grace of the Holy Spirit".[8]

Between 1590 and 1600, the term "semi-Pelagianism" was applied to Luis de Molina's doctrine of grace, which at that time was accused of similarity to the teaching of the Massilians.[6]

Eastern Orthodoxy

[edit]

The Orthodox Church generally emphasizes the synergistic doctrine of theosis in its conception of salvation as a process of personal transformation to the likeness of God in Christ through the Spirit. Theosis closely links the ideas of justification and sanctification; salvation is acquired through the divinization of man. This doctrine is sometimes dismissed as semi-Pelagian by theologians of the classical Protestant traditions on the grounds that it suggests that man contributes to his own salvation.[9] The accusation is rejected by Orthodox Christianity, which unlike the established Western traditions remained for the most part uninfluenced by Augustinian theology and holds that "for the regenerated to do spiritual good – for the works of the believer being contributory to salvation and wrought by supernatural grace are properly called spiritual – it is necessary that he be guided and prevented [preceded] by grace … Consequently, he is not able of himself to do any work worthy of a Christian life".[10]

John Cassian, known particularly for his teachings on theosis, is considered a Saint in the Eastern Churches as well as in Roman Catholicism. He is generally considered to have been an early proponent of semi-Pelagianism.[11][12][13][14] But some recent scholars deny that his views were in fact semi-Pelagian. Lauren Pristas writes: "For Cassian, salvation is, from beginning to end, the effect of God's grace. It is fully divine."[15] Augustine Casiday states that Cassian "baldly asserts that God's grace, not human free will, is responsible for 'everything which pertains to salvation' – even faith".[16] Others hold that "the view of Cassian as the ringleader of 'semi-Pelagianism' rests on a conjectural chronology".[17] The Roman Catholic Church includes John Cassian in its official list of recognized saints, with a feast day on 23 July,[18] and cites him in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.[19] It did not endorse Augustine entirely[20] and, while later Catholic theologians accepted Augustine's authority, they interpreted his views in the light of writers such as Cassian.[21] West and East consider both John Cassian and Augustine of Hippo as saints.

Calvinism and Arminianism

[edit]

In more recent times, the term "semi-pelagian" has been used by some Reformed Protestants to label anyone who deviates from Augustinian doctrines of sovereignty, original sin and grace – most notably Arminian Protestants and Roman Catholics. Although Calvinist and Lutheran theologies of salvation differ significantly on issues such as the nature of predestination and the salvific role of the sacraments (see means of grace), both branches of historic Protestantism claim the theology of Augustine as a principal influence.

Many Arminians have disagreed with this generalization, believing it is libelous to Jacobus Arminius (from whose name Arminianism derives) and the Remonstrants who maintained his "Arminian" views after his death. John Wesley (an Anglican defender of Arminianism and founder of Wesleyan Methodism) and other prominent classical and Wesleyan Arminians maintain a doctrine of sin that he called "total corruption" and "entire deprivation" of the human race, which is close but not identical to the Calvinist doctrine of original sin and total depravity.[22] For Wesley, God is constantly seeking to recover his lost sheep, "not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance" (2 Peter 3:9, NIV). As theologian Thomas Oden describes Wesley's view, prevenient grace "begins to enable [not just aid, as in semi-pelagianism] one to choose further to cooperate with saving grace. By offering the will the restored capacity to respond to grace, the person then may freely and increasingly become an active, willing participant in receiving the conditions for justification."[23][24]

Jansenism and the Jesuits

[edit]

The Roman Catholic Church, as mentioned above, condemned semi-pelagianism at the Council of Orange (529), but also does not accept the Calvinist interpretation of Augustine.[25] In the 18th century, the Jesuits accused the Jansenists of affirming the radical Augustinian doctrines of Calvinism; the Jansenists, in turn, accused the Jesuits of semi-Pelagianism.[26] For example Blaise Pascal did so in his Ecrits sur la grace.[27] The 1713 papal bull of Pope Clement XI, Unigenitus, in declaring Jansenism heretical, upheld the Jesuits' objections.[28]

Modern

[edit]

The term "semi-Pelagianism", a 16th-century coinage, is considered a misnomer[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] by many modern scholars. Proposed alternatives include semi-Augustinianism, anti-Augustinianism, and antipredestinarianism. The historical theological dispute is also known as the Augustinian controversy.[36] "Semi-Pelagianism" has frequently been used in a pejorative sense.[30][37][34]

Notes

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Semi-Pelagianism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Semi-Pelagianism is a theological doctrine that developed in fifth- and sixth-century southern , positing that humans, though impaired by , retain the natural ability to initiate a movement toward God through , with then cooperating to complete the process of . This position sought a middle ground between the Pelagian emphasis on unaided human effort and the strict Augustinian view of entirely prevenient and . The term "Semi-Pelagianism" itself, however, was not used contemporaneously but was coined in the mid-sixteenth century by the Reformed theologian to critique contemporary Catholic , before being retroactively applied by Nicholas Sanders in 1571 to the earlier Gallic monastic traditions. The doctrine's primary proponents were monks associated with monasteries in (Massilia) and Lérins, including , Faustus of Riez, and Hilary of Arles, though they did not form a unified school and their views varied. , a key figure who founded monasteries in after experiences in , articulated his perspectives in his Conferences (c. 425–429), where he argued that the "beginning of faith" (initium fidei) arises from human , enabling an initial desire for God, after which grace sustains and perfects this effort. Faustus of Riez, bishop of Riez from 462 to 480, defended similar ideas in his treatise De Gratia Dei et humanae mentis libero arbitrio (c. 474), emphasizing that , though weakened by the Fall, remains capable of responding to God's call without irresistible . These teachings arose amid ongoing debates sparked by Augustine of Hippo's anti-Pelagian writings (c. 412–430), which Prosper of Aquitaine and others in transmitted and critiqued, accusing the Massilian monks of diluting the necessity of unmerited grace. Theologically, Semi-Pelagianism affirmed original sin's corrupting influence but rejected , maintaining that humans could exercise a good will toward and independently of prior grace, though full justification required divine assistance. This synergy of human initiative and divine cooperation was intended to preserve and monastic asceticism's role in spiritual progress, drawing on scriptural interpretations that highlight human agency, such as calls to "seek the Lord" in 55:6. Critics, influenced by Augustine, viewed it as a subtle form of that undermined God's sovereignty in by attributing the first salvific act to human merit. The views were formally condemned at the Second Council of Orange in 529, convened by , which endorsed Augustinian principles by declaring in Canon 6 that no one can believe or desire salvation without the Holy Spirit's , and in that humans lack the natural capacity for good thoughts or choices apart from . The council's canons (25 in total) emphasized that grace precedes and enables all meritorious acts, effectively rejecting any human initiation of faith and affirming to grace for the . Though not an , its decisions were ratified by in 531, influencing Western theology thereafter. In later centuries, the label "Semi-Pelagianism" became a polemical tool during the Protestant Reformation, with Lutherans in the Formula of Concord (1577) using it against synergists, and Catholics at the Council of Trent (1545–1563) navigating its implications to affirm cooperative grace without endorsing the fifth-century errors. Modern scholars often critique the term as anachronistic, arguing it oversimplifies diverse patristic opinions and was imposed retrospectively to fit Reformation-era disputes, though it remains a standard category in discussions of soteriology.

Theological Foundations

Pelagianism

is a theological position developed in the late 4th and early 5th centuries that emphasizes human and , denying the transmission of from to subsequent generations. According to this view, sin is not an inherited condition but a voluntary act of the individual will, allowing humans to live sinless lives through their natural capacities without the necessity of for initiating moral actions. , the key proponent (c. 360–418 CE), was a British ascetic monk who arrived in around 380 CE and became influential among the Christian elite for his teachings on ethical perfection. His writings, such as De Libero Arbitrio (On ), argued that created humans with the inherent ability to choose good over evil, making sin a matter of personal choice rather than an innate corruption. Central to Pelagian tenets is the rejection of original 's hereditary nature; interpreted Romans 5:12 as Adam's sin serving as an example of bad behavior, not a cause of universal guilt or moral incapacity. He maintained that infants are born morally neutral, without inherited sin, and thus functions symbolically to dedicate them to Christ rather than to regenerate or remit any congenital fault. Furthermore, taught that is beneficial for revealing God's law and aiding perseverance but is not essential for the initial steps toward , as alone suffices for moral progress and even achieving sinlessness. This stance positioned in opposition to emerging views on human depravity, such as those later articulated by Augustine, who insisted on grace's primacy in overcoming sin's bondage. The doctrine emerged amid the cultural and theological ferment of late Roman society, particularly in and , where ' ideas gained traction among ascetics and lay Christians concerned with moral reform following the 410 sack of Rome. ' dispute with intensified around 412 CE, as Augustine critiqued Pelagian optimism about in works like De Peccatorum Meritis et Remissione (On the Merits and Forgiveness of Sins). The controversy prompted ecclesiastical responses, culminating in the Council of Carthage in 418 CE, where over 200 bishops condemned Pelagian errors in eight canons, affirming original sin's transmission, the necessity of grace for all good works, and for sin's remission. That same year, , initially sympathetic after reviewing Pelagius' confession of faith, reversed course under pressure from African synods and issued the Tractoria, a papal decree explicitly condemning Pelagius and his follower Caelestius. The heresy faced further repudiation at the in 431 CE, which anathematized and Caelestius as heretics, solidifying the church's rejection of their teachings on and grace.

Semi-Pelagianism

Semi-Pelagianism posits that human beings, though affected by the Fall, retain sufficient to initiate the process of by turning toward , such as through a desire for divine assistance, after which grace intervenes to aid further progress. This view contrasts with the full self-sufficiency of by affirming the essential role of grace beyond the initial human act, while rejecting the Augustinian doctrine of that renders humanity incapable of any good impulse without prior divine enablement. Unlike Pelagius's precursor position, which denied any necessity of grace for moral beginnings, Semi-Pelagianism integrates grace as indispensable for completing and persevering in , positioning it as a moderated stance on human capability. Central to this doctrine is the concept of in , wherein takes precedence in sparking the initial movement toward , but becomes necessary for sustaining and perfecting that effort. Proponents held that transmits a weakened rather than inherited guilt, preserving the capacity for unaided goodwill as a starting point, though full restoration requires cooperative divine aid. This cooperative framework underscores that is not solely a divine but a , where human initiative prompts God's responsive grace without implying that grace merely assists an already perfectible nature, as in . Theologically, Semi-Pelagianism frames salvation as a dynamic process of collaboration, exemplified in monastic practices where ascetic disciplines—such as and —demonstrate human effort igniting divine favor, leading to spiritual growth through ongoing grace. This nuance highlights free will's primacy in conversion's onset, distinguishing it from stricter Augustinian that wholly precedes human response, yet it maintains grace's irreplaceable role in ensuring perseverance against sin's lingering effects. By emphasizing this balanced interplay, the sought to uphold human dignity in redemption without diminishing God's in providing the sustaining power for eternal life.

Relation to Augustinianism

Augustine's theology posits that , inherited from through propagation, transmits both guilt and a profound of , leading to that incapacitates the will from seeking or achieving salvation on its own. This depravity affects every aspect of human existence, rendering individuals spiritually dead and incapable of any meritorious action toward without divine intervention. Central to Augustinian is the doctrine of , which operates irresistibly prior to any response, awakening the enslaved will and enabling as God's gift rather than a achievement. In this monergistic framework—where God alone effects —grace precedes and empowers the will, ensuring that and perseverance are not products of effort but of divine initiative. Augustine articulates these ideas in key works such as his Confessions (composed 397–400 AD), a personal testament to grace's transformative power in overcoming personal sinfulness; On the Grace of Christ, and on (418 AD), which defends the necessity of grace against views minimizing corruption; and On the of the Saints (428–429 AD), which underscores that originates solely from God's will. Theological contrasts with Semi-Pelagianism emerge sharply in Augustine's treatment of and : rests on God's eternal foreknowledge and sovereign decree, independent of foreseen human merits, while post-Fall , though not obliterated, remains enslaved to and incapable of choosing good without liberating grace. This enslaved state means humans can will but not effect spiritual good, as 's dominion binds the will until grace intervenes efficaciously for the . Augustine's emphasis on divine sovereignty in profoundly influenced Western Christian , establishing grace as unmerited and prior to , which in turn elicited Semi-Pelagian reactions perceived as dilutions that allowed partial human initiative in the process of justification.

Historical Origins

Patristic Influences

The early , particularly those from the Eastern tradition, laid foundational ideas on the interplay between and human that later contributed to the development of cooperative soteriological concepts, though none explicitly endorsed Semi-Pelagianism. of Lyons (c. 130–202), in his of recapitulation, portrayed Christ as reversing Adam's fall by summing up all human stages of life in obedience, thereby enabling human participation in redemption through free choice rather than compulsion. He emphasized that God created humanity as free agents from the beginning, endowed with the power to choose obedience or disobedience, allowing for active involvement in the salvific process alongside divine initiative. This view underscored human responsibility in aligning with God's grace for restoration, planting early seeds of a participatory approach to without diminishing God's sovereignty. In , Clement (c. 150–215) advanced a pedagogical framework where educates and assists the human will toward virtue, portraying as a endeavor between and the soul. He taught that "works together with willing souls," providing aid to those who voluntarily seek improvement, thus highlighting human cooperation as essential to achieving likeness to . Clement's emphasis on as a divine gift enabling moral progress through education reflected an optimistic , where humans, aided by grace, actively pursue deification rather than passively receiving it. This dynamic, rooted in philosophical and scriptural , influenced later reflections on the of effort and grace. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407), associated with the Antiochene school, further elaborated on in his homilies, stressing that moral effort must accompany for effective Christian living. In his Homilies on Romans, he argued that grace saves the willing, not the unwilling, as seen in examples like the Apostle Paul, where human faith and obedience respond to God's call. Chrysostom frequently highlighted the need for personal purification and choice, stating that God does not compel but permits to operate alongside providential grace, as in his exposition of Romans 11:32. His teachings promoted a balanced where human initiative in complements divine assistance, without which grace remains ineffective. These patristic perspectives emerged amid 4th- and 5th-century theological debates in centers like and Antioch, where Eastern thinkers grappled with scriptural interpretations of human agency versus divine action, fostering ambiguous language on free will's role that resonated in subsequent Western monastic contexts. While not labeled Semi-Pelagian, their emphasis on cooperative elements—such as willing participation in redemption—provided conceptual groundwork for later developments in , influencing traditions that viewed as a joint human-divine undertaking.

John Cassian and Southern Gaul

John Cassian (c. 360–435), a Scythian-born monk who spent significant time in Egypt and Constantinople, founded two monasteries near Marseille around 415, including the Abbey of Saint Victor, which became centers for ascetic practice in southern Gaul. His major works, the Institutes (c. 420) and Conferences (c. 426), drew from Eastern monastic traditions to guide Western monks, emphasizing practical asceticism where human effort and desire play an initial role in attracting divine grace. In these texts, Cassian portrayed the monastic life as a synergy between human will and God's assistance, with the soul's innate longing initiating the process of salvation rather than grace operating unilaterally. In the monastic communities of southern , particularly around and the islands of Lérins, Cassian's ideas resonated amid a broader reaction to the perceived rigor of Augustine's doctrines on and . Honoratus of Lérins (c. 350–429), who established Lérins Abbey around 410, promoted a moderated form of that preserved human free will's capacity for good while affirming grace's necessity, influencing a network of monks wary of 's implications for moral effort. Similarly, Faustus of Riez (c. 408–490), a former of Lérins who became of Riez in 462, articulated views in his De Gratia (c. 474–480) that critiqued strict predestinarianism, arguing instead for free will's role in responding to God's universal offer of grace and rejecting the notion that some were irredeemably predestined to damnation. Central to these thinkers' theology were concepts like the "seeds of faith" or virtues implanted by God in human nature, which free will could cultivate through initial acts such as prayer, prompting grace's subsequent aid. Cassian exemplified this in Conference 13, where he described calling upon as a human initiative born of desire: "For it is impossible for a man to call upon God unless he first feels a desire for Him," with grace then responding to sustain and perfect that effort. This framework positioned human agency not as independent of grace but as its preparatory spark, contrasting with more deterministic interpretations of divine sovereignty. The spread of these ideas occurred primarily through Lérins Abbey, a hub for theological formation that trained figures like Faustus and bridged Eastern ascetic practices—such as contemplative prayer and communal discipline—with Western monastic development, fostering a distinct tradition of moderated grace theology.

Condemnation and Early Reception

Council of Orange

The Second Council of Orange, convened in 529 by with the participation of fifteen bishops, addressed lingering remnants of and Semi-Pelagian views prevalent in southern . Held on July 3 in the city of Orange, the council issued twenty-five canons that affirmed key aspects of Augustinian theology while targeting doctrines that suggested human initiative could precede . These decrees were subsequently ratified by in 531, granting them broader authority within the . Central to the council's proclamations was the insistence that precedes and enables human and , rejecting any notion of merit-based initiation of . Canon 5 explicitly states that the inception of and the desire for it are gifts of grace, not inherent human capacities, declaring, " itself is a gift of God" in reference to Ephesians 2:8. Canon 7 further condemns the idea that humans can form right opinions or choices for without the Holy Spirit's illumination, affirming, "Apart from me you can do nothing" (John 15:5). The canons also upheld the effects of , asserting in Canons 1 and 2 that Adam's transgression corrupted both body and soul, rendering all humanity incapable of spiritual good without ; yet, they allowed for a form of wherein grace empowers human cooperation, distinguishing this from full Pelagian denial of sin's bondage. The council's outcomes effectively suppressed Semi-Pelagian tendencies in the Western Church, establishing Augustinian as the normative framework for understanding grace and salvation. By condemning views that elevated human will over divine initiative—such as those influenced by earlier figures like —it marked a decisive shift toward Augustinian dominance in Latin . This ratification influenced subsequent ecclesiastical developments, including Carolingian reforms under figures like , who drew on Orange to reinforce strict Augustinian positions amid debates on .

Medieval Developments

In the early medieval period, the ninth-century monk Gottschalk of Orbais advocated strict Augustinian double predestination, accusing his opponents of Semi-Pelagianism for their emphasis on human initiative in salvation cooperating with grace. These opponents, including figures like Hincmar of Reims, prevailed as church authorities suppressed Gottschalk's views through conciliar condemnations and imperial intervention. Synods at Quierzy (853) and Valence (855) reaffirmed divine sovereignty in grace while allowing for human cooperation, marginalizing Gottschalk's stricter predestination and highlighting the persistence of more synergistic ideas among monastic and clerical figures in the Carolingian Empire. Earlier, Alcuin of York (c. 735–804) echoed the anti-Semi-Pelagian canons of the Council of Orange in his theological writings, stressing the necessity of divine grace for free will's restoration while upholding human responsibility under God's initiative. During the , (1225–1274) addressed the interplay of grace and human action in his (1265–1274), integrating a synergistic model where enables and perfects human cooperation without compromising Augustinian primacy. Aquinas distinguished between operating grace, which initiates the will supernaturally, and cooperating grace, which sustains human response, a framework some later interpreters critiqued as leaning Semi-Pelagian due to its emphasis on free consent, though it remained officially aligned with Augustinian . This approach influenced scholastic theology by balancing divine initiative with human participation, avoiding both Pelagian self-sufficiency and absolute . Scholastic debates further refined these tensions through distinctions like that between potentia (potential or sufficient grace, providing the capacity for good acts) and actus (actual or efficacious grace, actualizing those acts infallibly), as developed in Thomistic and post-Thomistic thought to explain why grace succeeds in the elect without violating freedom. (1090–1153) exemplified this in his treatise De Gratia et Libero Arbitrio, portraying human cooperation as a free response aroused and empowered by preceding grace, where the will consents to divine motion but cannot initiate independently. These discussions underscored grace's primacy while allowing for human agency, preventing a resurgence of condemned Semi-Pelagian errors. The Fourth Lateran Council (1215) reinforced Augustinian soteriology in its first canon, affirming original sin's transmission and the absolute need for baptismal grace against emerging heresies like Catharism, which implicitly undermined divine initiative. Despite this, Semi-Pelagian tendencies lingered in popular medieval piety, particularly in devotional practices emphasizing personal merit and cooperative works, such as indulgences and pilgrimages, which blurred strict boundaries between grace and human effort in lay spirituality.

Eastern Christian Perspectives

Byzantine Theology

In Byzantine theology, the concept of synergy—cooperation between divine grace and human free will—emerged as a foundational element in understanding salvation and deification (theosis), particularly from the seventh century onward, without the Western emphasis on inherited guilt from original sin. This approach viewed humanity's post-Fall condition as marked by ancestral sin, which transmitted mortality and a propensity to sin rather than personal culpability, thereby preserving the integrity of human volition as a responsive partner to God's initiative. Divine energies, as uncreated manifestations of God accessible to human experience, enabled this synergy by empowering the will to align with divine purposes, fostering a participatory ascent toward union with God. Maximus the Confessor (c. 580–662) articulated this in his Ambigua, where he emphasized the role of the human will in after the Fall, portraying it as naturally oriented toward but requiring graced cooperation to overcome passibility and achieve deification. In these texts, Maximus described the will as a dynamic faculty that, through ascetic struggle and , restores the soul's natural capacities, integrating human freedom into the cosmic process of redemption without diminishing God's primacy. His theology underscored that involves a mutual operation where human initiative responds to , exemplified in the incarnational mystery where Christ's two wills model perfect . John of Damascus (c. 675–749) further developed these ideas in his Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (c. 743), presenting as essential to human dignity and as the mechanism for theosis, where perfects rather than overrides human agency. He argued that God's foreknowledge respects volitional freedom, allowing humans to cooperate in their sanctification through virtues and sacraments, distinct from any deterministic framework. This exposition integrated patristic traditions, affirming that the will's cooperation with divine energies leads to participation in God's life, unburdened by inherited guilt. The seventh- and eighth-century iconoclastic controversies highlighted the divine-human union in the , as defenders like invoked Christ's to justify the of icons, portraying human artistic and devotional acts as responses to divine in material form. These debates reinforced theosis as a process involving human engagement with creation to reflect eternal realities, solidifying the divine-human partnership as a normative Byzantine soteriological . Although not labeled "Semi-Pelagian" in Eastern sources, this framework influenced later hesychast traditions, where became central to contemplative union with God.

Eastern Orthodox Synergy

In , synergy— the cooperative interaction between and human —forms the foundational understanding of , wherein grace restores and enables the human will without suppressing it, rejecting any notion of that renders the will incapable of response. This perspective holds that God's grace initiates and sustains the process of healing the effects of the Fall, allowing humans to participate actively in their deification (theosis), as articulated in patristic writings and affirmed across the Church's tradition. Key patristic and later texts underscore this cooperative dynamic, notably in the , an 18th-century anthology compiled by St. Nikodimos of the Holy Mountain and St. Makarios of Corinth, which collects ascetic writings emphasizing how unceasing prayer serves as the human response that opens the soul to divine energies and initiates the journey toward theosis. For instance, St. Maximos the Confessor's contributions highlight prayer as a synergistic act where human vigilance aligns with God's transformative grace, fostering inner purification and union with the divine. Modern theologian (1903–1958) further elucidates this in The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, critiquing Western soteriological imbalances—such as an overemphasis on juridical —for neglecting the holistic between grace and human freedom that characterizes Eastern thought. A core distinction from Western traditions lies in the Orthodox conception of sin's transmission: rather than Augustinian original guilt, which imputes personal culpability to all humanity, teaches , whereby Adam's transgression passes on mortality, corruption, and a propensity to , but not inherited guilt, thereby preserving responsibility and capacity for synergistic with grace from birth. This framework avoids portraying as a unilateral divine imposition and instead views it as a therapeutic restoration of the divine in humanity. A vivid example is the Hesychast tradition, where practitioners, through disciplined effort in the and stillness (), attain vision of the uncreated light of God— the same light witnessed at Christ's Transfiguration—demonstrating how ascetic practice synergistically participates in divine without merit-based achievement. In the 20th century, Orthodox leaders and theologians explicitly rejected the "Semi-Pelagian" label as a misapplied Western polemical term that conflates Eastern synergy with a heresy condemned in the Latin context for prioritizing human initiative over grace; this clarification emerged prominently in ecumenical and inter-Orthodox dialogues, where participants affirmed synergy as the authentic patristic soteriology untainted by Pelagian errors. Theologians like Kallistos Ware reinforced this in works such as The Orthodox Church, emphasizing that Orthodox cooperation presupposes prevenient grace and aligns with conciliar teachings against any diminishment of divine initiative.

Western Debates and Usage

Reformation Contexts

During the Reformation, Semi-Pelagianism emerged as a key term in Protestant debates over the nature of grace and free will, particularly within Calvinist circles where it served as a pejorative label for doctrines perceived to attribute too much agency to human effort in salvation. John Calvin (1509–1564), in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (first published in 1536 and expanded in subsequent editions), vehemently rejected views akin to Semi-Pelagianism, arguing that post-fall humanity lacks the freedom to choose good or contribute to faith without divine initiative. He critiqued Pelagius and his followers for asserting that humans possess a free will to select good or evil independently of grace, and extended this condemnation to semi-Pelagian positions that, while acknowledging some role for grace, still overemphasized human cooperation in initiating salvation. Calvin emphasized total human depravity, insisting that the will is enslaved to sin and incapable of aspiring to righteousness apart from God's regenerating grace, thereby laying the groundwork for later Reformed critiques of emerging soteriologies. This Calvinist framework directly influenced responses to Jacobus Arminius (1560–1609), whose theology was accused of reviving semi-Pelagian elements by allowing human free will a responsive role under grace. In his Declaration of Sentiments (1608), Arminius affirmed human incapacity in the lapsed state—"man is not capable, of and by himself, either to think, to will, or to do that which is really good"—but argued that divine grace restores the will's liberty without destroying it, enabling cooperation in salvation through resistible grace and conditional election based on foreseen faith. Arminius ascribed to grace "the commencement, the continuance and the consummation of all good," yet maintained that it excites rather than compels the will, a position Reformed theologians viewed as semi-Pelagian for implying human initiative in accepting grace. The Synod of Dort (1618–1619), convened by Dutch Reformed leaders, explicitly rejected Arminianism as heretical, equating its teachings on resistible grace and conditional election with Pelagian errors multiple times in its canons. The , particularly in the Third and Fourth Heads of Doctrine, affirmed , declaring all humans "conceived in ... unfit for any saving good... inclined to evil" and incapable of returning to without the Holy Spirit's renewing work. The condemned as "entirely Pelagian" any notion that grace operates merely as persuasion or that free concurs with grace as a partial cause of conversion, directly targeting Arminian views that allowed human resistance to grace. This rejection solidified Semi-Pelagianism as a rhetorical weapon in Reformed polemics, shaping intra-Protestant divides by branding non-Calvinist soteriologies—such as those emphasizing conditional election—as deviations from Augustinian orthodoxy. The Synod's decisions profoundly impacted Puritan theology and early evangelical movements, entrenching the five points of (later summarized as ) as a bulwark against perceived semi-Pelagian compromises. In and , Puritan divines like William Perkins and John Owen invoked Dort's canons to critique Arminian-leaning factions, fostering schisms that persisted in evangelical circles and using "Semi-Pelagianism" as a enduring pejorative for any granting significant role to human will. This legacy reinforced Reformed emphasis on sovereign grace, influencing confessional standards like the Westminster Confession (1646) and deepening theological fault lines within .

Jansenism and Counter-Reformation

Jansenism emerged in the as a Catholic movement reviving strict Augustinian theology, particularly in opposition to what its proponents viewed as lax interpretations of grace within Jesuit teachings. (1585–1638), a at the of Louvain and later bishop of , posthumously published his seminal three-volume work Augustinus in 1640, which drew extensively from St. Augustine to critique contemporary Catholic doctrines on grace and . In Augustinus, Jansen explicitly accused Jesuit theologians of reviving by overemphasizing human and the concept of sufficient grace, which he argued diminished the absolute necessity and efficacy of for salvation. The responded to such Augustinian critiques through the theological framework developed by (1535–1600), whose Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiæ donis (1588) sought to reconcile with human freedom. Molina introduced the doctrine of scientia media (middle knowledge), positing that God possesses knowledge of what free creatures would do in any given circumstance, allowing for human cooperation with grace without undermining or making dependent solely on human initiative. This approach, part of the broader De Auxiliis controversy between and Dominicans, emphasized sufficient grace available to all, which becomes efficacious through free human acceptance, thereby preserving the gratuity of grace while affirming . The tensions culminated in significant ecclesiastical conflicts, including the condemnation of Jansenism through papal interventions. In 1653, Pope Innocent X issued the bull Cum Occasione, which declared five propositions extracted from Augustinus—such as the impossibility of fulfilling certain divine commandments without special grace and the irresistibility of interior grace—to be heretical, though Jansenists contested whether these accurately represented Jansen's views. The Port-Royal Abbey in France became a focal point of Jansenist resistance, serving as a center for rigorous spiritual practices and intellectual defense of Augustinianism, but it faced repeated suppressions and demolitions amid royal and papal pressures. These disputes persisted, leading to Pope Clement XI's bull Unigenitus in 1713, which condemned 101 propositions from Pasquier Quesnel's Réflexions morales sur le Nouveau Testament as promoting Jansenist errors on grace and Scripture. At the heart of the Jansenist-Jesuit debate lay the distinction between efficacious grace, which Jansenists upheld as irresistibly leading to salvation in alignment with Augustine, and sufficient grace, which Jesuits defended as enabling but not compelling human response, thereby avoiding determinism. The term "Semi-Pelagianism" gained prominence in this context around 1600, as Jansen and his followers repurposed it from earlier Protestant usage to label Jesuit doctrines as a modern echo of fifth-century errors that insufficiently prioritized grace over human effort. This polemic paralleled similar Protestant concerns, such as those in Arminianism, regarding the balance of grace and free will.

Modern Interpretations

Catholic Reassessments

In the 19th and 20th centuries, Catholic scholars increasingly questioned the historical accuracy and applicability of the "Semi-Pelagian" label, originally coined in the mid-16th century by the Reformed theologian to critique contemporary Catholic . This reassessment highlighted the term's anachronistic nature, as it retroactively imposed post-Reformation categories on patristic and medieval theology, often mischaracterizing figures like and as deviating from Augustinian orthodoxy. For instance, the label was seen as unfairly applied to Cassian's emphasis on human cooperation with initiating grace, which aligned more closely with a balanced Augustinian view than with Pelagian . Key contributions came from 20th-century theologians who defended Cassian against the Semi-Pelagian charge. Catholic scholar Boniface Ramsey, in his analysis of Cassian's Conferences, argued that Cassian's doctrine affirmed grace as the indispensable initiator of salvation, with human response as a cooperative fruit rather than a precursor, thus rendering the Semi-Pelagian accusation unfounded and rooted in later polemics. Similarly, Owen Chadwick's 1950 study John Cassian portrayed Cassian as a faithful interpreter of Augustine, emphasizing prevenient grace over any autonomous human initiative, and critiqued the label as a product of 16th-century Protestant distortions rather than fifth-century realities. These works contributed to a broader scholarly consensus that the term obscured the nuanced synergy in early monastic theology. Magisterial developments reinforced this reevaluation while guarding against dilutions of grace. Pope Pius XII's 1950 Humani Generis warned against theological trends that undermine the supernatural gratuity of grace, implicitly critiquing Semi-Pelagian tendencies by rejecting views that portray divine order as merely an extension of natural human capacities without transcendent elevation. The Second Vatican Council (1962–1965), in (no. 40, 42), affirmed a synergistic model where grace initiates and sustains holiness, calling the faithful to freely cooperate through sacraments and virtuous actions, while explicitly rooting salvation in God's initiative to avoid any Pelagian overemphasis on human effort. Post-conciliar theologian (1904–1984) further developed this in works like Grace in Freedom (1969), proposing concepts such as "anonymous Christians" to illustrate how universal grace operates through human freedom, enabling non-explicit responses to God without diminishing divine primacy. Critiques of the term gained traction in mid-20th-century Catholic academia, portraying it as anachronistic and particularly misapplied to Aquinas, whose Summa Theologica (I-II, q. 109–114) integrates grace as efficaciously moving the will while preserving free , in line with Council of Orange (529) condemnations of error. Debates in journals like Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques during the 1940s and 1950s exemplified this, with articles examining patristic texts to refute Semi-Pelagian readings of Aquinas and Cassian, emphasizing instead a Thomistic harmony of grace and merit that avoids both Pelagian and deterministic extremes. These discussions underscored the term's origins in polemics, rendering it unhelpful for understanding medieval developments. The contemporary Catholic stance, as articulated in the 1992 (nos. 1996–2005, 2001), balances and grace by affirming that divine assistance freely given enables human response and merit, while explicitly rejecting strict Semi-Pelagianism—which posits human initiative as sufficient to elicit grace—as a distortion condemned alongside . This position upholds grace's primacy in justification and sanctification, ensuring human freedom operates within, not against, God's salvific plan.

Protestant Critiques

In the 19th century, Protestant theologians within the tradition, particularly , critiqued certain synergistic soteriologies as semi-Pelagian, associating them with Arminian views prevalent in . Hodge argued that semi-Pelagianism, which posits that human powers are weakened but not wholly incapacitated by the fall, allows sinners to cooperate with grace through a "gracious ability" granted by , thereby undermining the necessity of divine regeneration for . This critique extended to Methodist emphases on human response in salvation, viewing them as a modern iteration of semi-Pelagian compromise between Augustinian and Pelagian self-sufficiency. Similarly, reinforced in his essays on the Pelagian , portraying semi-Pelagianism as a deficient halfway measure that concedes but elevates human initiative over God's sovereign grace, contrary to Augustine's insistence on grace as the sole enabler of . By the 20th century, evangelical debates intensified these critiques, with addressing semi-Pelagian tendencies in rationalistic during discussions of evangelism. In his analysis, Packer highlighted how semi-Pelagianism denies by attributing to humans an innate capacity to respond to without full reliance on regenerating grace, a view he saw echoed in practices like decisionism that prioritize human choice over divine sovereignty. This built on Reformation foundations of , where critiques of human cooperation in justification were first systematized against medieval semi-Pelagian elements. Key Protestant accusations target practices such as altar calls and the as manifestations of human-initiated faith, implying that salvation begins with the sinner's voluntary act rather than God's monergistic intervention. These methods, popularized through 19th-century revivalism, are seen as fostering a synergistic where human decision supplements grace, akin to semi-Pelagian errors condemned at the Council of Orange. The 1978 further implies an anti-semi-Pelagian stance through its affirmations of scriptural teaching on and God's sovereign initiative in salvation, underscoring inerrancy's role in upholding monergistic doctrines against human-centered alternatives. Such critiques remain robust in Reformed Baptist and Presbyterian circles, where semi-Pelagianism is invoked to challenge any theology elevating over , in contrast to Wesleyan Arminianism's acceptance of enabling but not guaranteeing response.

Contemporary Relevance

In the , scholarly discussions on Semi-Pelagianism have increasingly focused on reevaluating patristic sources to distinguish historical grace doctrines from modern misapplications, as seen in Thomas C. Oden's 1993 work The Transforming Power of Grace, which draws on early to argue that classical emphasizes over human initiative, countering accusations of Semi-Pelagian tendencies in Arminian and Wesleyan traditions. The 2025 Oxford Handbook of the Pelagian Controversy further critiques the term's anachronistic use, highlighting how 5th-century debates on and grace were more nuanced than later Protestant-Catholic polemics suggest. In ecumenical contexts, the label has been contested for hindering dialogue; for instance, Reformed critiques of Catholic as Semi-Pelagian overlook shared condemnations at the Council of Orange (529), as noted in analyses of Protestant-Roman Catholic conversations. Culturally, accusations of Semi-Pelagianism persist in popular Christianity, particularly against the gospel, where human faith is portrayed as a mechanism to "unlock" divine blessings, echoing critiques that such teachings prioritize personal effort over unmerited grace, as articulated in Reformed evaluations of prosperity theology's emphasis on positive . Similarly, spirituality within evangelical circles—often summed up in the adage " helps those who help themselves"—has been labeled a modern Semi-Pelagian drift, implying initial human steps toward spiritual growth without acknowledging total dependence on grace, according to theological assessments of contemporary American Christianity. Psychological dimensions intersect these debates through mid-2010s discussions on , where compatibilist views reconcile with , prompting theologians to explore parallels with grace-enabled decision-making that avoids Semi-Pelagian . Interfaith comparisons highlight Semi-Pelagianism's emphasis on merit as akin to merit-based systems in other traditions; for example, Islamic soteriology's balance of and human deeds through mirrors the Semi-Pelagian of grace and effort, as explored in comparative studies of concepts. In , the accumulation of merit via ethical actions and karma parallels the human contribution in Semi-Pelagian thought, contrasting with purely grace-centered Christian views, according to analyses of cross-religious soteriologies. A specific instance of this tension appeared in 2022 evangelical settings, such as the Christian Conference, where speakers addressed grace's role in psychological healing amid rising emphases, cautioning against approaches that inadvertently promote human-initiated recovery over divine intervention. Looking ahead, the term Semi-Pelagianism may wane in favor of "" as global diversifies, with Pew Research Center's 2011 report documenting the distribution of Christian traditions—Catholics (50%), Protestants (37%), and Orthodox (12%)—reflecting a broad spectrum of grace-works dynamics across regions. This shift aligns with ongoing global growth in non-Western , where ecumenical efforts prioritize shared affirmations of grace over historical labels.

References

  1. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/semipelagianism-the-origins-of-the-term-and-its-passage-into-the-history-of-heresy/F6E8679FB869BD21903350986F9734A6
  2. https://www.academia.edu/116194917/Semi_Pelagianism
  3. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/manifold-grace-in-john-cassian-and-prosper-of-aquitaine/6AD32BC33E97EFBE5A8D7F1A485923A9
  4. https://www.academia.edu/18675177/_Augustine_Pelagius_and_the_Southern_Gallic_Tradition_Faustus_of_Riezs_De_Gratia_Dei_in_Grace_for_Grace_The_Debates_After_Augustine_and_Pelagius
  5. https://philarchive.org/archive/KITGAF-2
  6. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=sot_papers
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352086143_Augustine_and_Pelagius_as_a_cameo_of_the_dilemma_between_original_sin_and_free_will
  8. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2305-445X2021000100003
  9. https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/Canons%20of%20the%20Council%20of%20Carthage%20to%20Investigate%20Pelagianism.pdf
  10. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc3/hcc3.iii.xii.xxxiii.html
  11. https://orthodoxchurchfathers.com/fathers/npnf214/npnf2191.html
  12. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3176&context=auss
  13. https://www.midamerica.edu/uploads/files//pdf/journal/01mullerjournal2018.pdf
  14. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1501.htm
  15. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/15121.htm
  16. https://www.academia.edu/7073918/Augustinianism_and_Semi_Pelagianism_and_Their_Effect_on_the_God_Human_Relationship
  17. http://www.newhumanityinstitute.org/pdfs/article-patristics-on-free-will.pdf
  18. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103437.htm
  19. https://ccel.org/ccel/clement_alex/salvation/anf02.vi.v.html
  20. https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/files/16882353/TK_Jaros_thesis.pdf
  21. https://collected.jcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=theo_rels-facpub
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26188493
  23. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/cassian/conferences.xiii.html
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379942286_John_Cassian_as_a_Bridge_between_East_and_West_The_West%27s_Perception_of_the_Early_Eastern_Monastic_Tradition
  25. https://www.calledtocommunion.com/2012/09/did-the-council-of-trent-contradict-the-second-council-of-orange/
  26. http://www.crivoice.org/creedorange.html
  27. https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/Ancient%20Church%20History.council%20of%20orange.semi.pelagianism.pdf
  28. https://credomag.com/article/the-council-of-orange/
  29. https://arts.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1672722/eras-171-1-jenny-smith.pdf
  30. https://www.kul.pl/files/1516/roczniki_filozoficzne/roczniki_filozoficzne_65_3_2017/03-stefanczyk.pdf
  31. https://dokumen.pub/download/alcuin-ii-theology-and-thought-0227173945-9780227173947.html
  32. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/iustitia-dei/human-appropriation-of-justification/912551459961D68354BE09EA820E109C
  33. https://theophilogue.com/2010/05/24/thomas-aquinas-on-operating-co-operating-and-prevenient-grace-summa-theologica/
  34. https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/most/getchap.cfm?WorkNum=214&ChapNum=25
  35. https://www.ecatholic2000.com/bernard/grace-free-will.shtml
  36. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum12-2.htm
  37. https://www.helwyssocietyforum.com/divine-grace-human-responsibility-and-bernard-of-clairvaux/
  38. https://www.thetbs.org/study-materials/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Byzantine-Theology-Historical-Trends-and-Doctrinal-Themes-by-John-Meyendorff-z-lib.org_.epub_.pdf
  39. https://iota-web.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Divine-Energies-and-Divine-Action_SAMPLE.pdf
  40. https://afkimel.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/22naturally-and-by-grace22.pdf
  41. https://ia601209.us.archive.org/9/items/264557740JosephPFarrellFreeChoiceInStMaximus/264557740-Joseph-P-Farrell-Free-Choice-in-St-Maximus.pdf
  42. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cf8/ff54b83bc8d95bbcc360f8b53ffa97fbbd23.pdf
  43. https://www.oca.org/reflections/fr.-john-breck/salvation-is-indeed-by-grace
  44. https://www.goarch.org/-/the-dogmatic-tradition-of-the-orthodox-church
  45. http://orthodoxinfo.com/general/theosis-english.pdf
  46. https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Vladimir_Losskij/the-mystical-theology-of-the-eastern-church/
  47. https://www.oca.org/questions/teaching/st.-augustine-original-sin
  48. https://orthodoxbridge.com/2012/01/28/response-to-theodore-semi-pelagianism-sola-fide-and-theosis/
  49. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.ii.v.html
  50. https://evangelicalarminians.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Arminius.-Declaration-of-Sentiments.pdf
  51. https://www.crcna.org/welcome/beliefs/confessions/canons-dort
  52. https://journal.rpts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/1-Dordt-Whitla.pdf
  53. https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/are-jansenists-among-us/
  54. https://www.conimbricenses.org/encyclopedia/de-auxiliis-controversy/
  55. https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=2792
  56. https://theologicalstudies.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/49.2.2.pdf
  57. https://www.academia.edu/41931828/Not_Without_Us_A_Brief_History_of_the_Forgotten_Catholic_Doctrine_of_Predestination_during_the_Semipelagian_Controversy
  58. http://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis.html
  59. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html
  60. https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P2O.HTM
  61. https://ccel.org/ccel/hodge/theology2/theology2.iii.viii.xv.html
  62. https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/warfield/Augustine%20and%20the%20Pelagian%20-%20B.%20B.%20Warfield.pdf
  63. https://www.the-highway.com/articleSept16.html
  64. https://www.ccwtoday.org/2009/04/the-corrupt-root-and-bitter-fruit-of-altar-call-evangelism/
  65. https://www.sebts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/chicago-statement-on-biblical-inerrancy.pdf
  66. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justin-taylor/is-an-anti-calvinist-statement-by-sbc-leaders-actually-semi-pelagian/
  67. https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/Arm_Semi_Differences.html
  68. https://www.amazon.com/Transforming-Power-Grace-Thomas-Oden/dp/0687422604
  69. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-the-pelagian-controversy-9780192855398
  70. https://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2014/05/sproul-on-pelagianism-semi-pelagianism.html
  71. https://www.9marks.org/article/journalerrors-prosperity-gospel/
  72. https://www.modernreformation.org/resources/articles/the-pelagian-captivity-of-the-church
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4887467/
  74. https://maypoleofwisdom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/good-deeds-in-christianity-and-islam.pdf
  75. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/iijbs/vol21/iss1/4/
  76. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amQKtNvjyzA
  77. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2011/12/19/global-christianity-exec/
  78. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/09/13/modeling-the-future-of-religion-in-america/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.