Hubbry Logo
Luis de MolinaLuis de MolinaMain
Open search
Luis de Molina
Community hub
Luis de Molina
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Luis de Molina
Luis de Molina
Luis de Molina
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Part of a series on
Catholic philosophy
  
Aquinas I
Ethics
Metaphysics
Schools
Philosophers
Ancient
Medieval
Modern
Contemporary

Luis de Molina SJ (29 September 1535 – 12 October 1600) was a Spanish Jesuit priest, jurist, economist and theologian renowned for his contributions to philosophy and economics within the framework of the second scholasticism.

A prominent member of the School of Salamanca, pioneered a distinctive theory of divine grace and human freedom known as Molinism, which defends human autonomy in the face of divine omniscience.[1]

His pro-liberty perspectives influenced not only theological debates on free will but also extended to economic and political thought, making him an intellectual precursor to individual rights and market dynamics. His work in developing early economic principles, particularly regarding human action, voluntarism, and property rights, laid a foundation that later contributed to Austrian economic theory and the evolution of modern libertarian thought.[2]

Life

[edit]

Born into a noble and wealthy family in Castile, Luis de Molina followed the aspirations of his parents who wanted him to become a jurist. After learning Latin and literature at the Cathedral School of Cuenca, he enrolled at the University of Salamanca.[3]

During his studies, Molina discovered the Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius of Loyola, which led him to join the Society of Jesus and abandon his law studies.[3] In 1553, he became a novice in Alcalá de Henares, where he showed a taste and talent for Christian philosophy. In 1554, he was sent by his superiors to study philosophy at the university of Coimbra.[3]

Following the advice of Pedro da Fonseca, he continued his studies after obtaining his master's degree in 1558 in order to become a priest and obtain a doctorate in theology. Between 1563 and 1567, he was a professor of philosophy and theology in Coimbra.[4] At the request of their superiors, Molina and Fonseca then left to teach at the University of the Holy Spirit in Évora.[4]

After expounding his theological views in his work Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia, better known simply as Concordia and which was a commentary on the first part of the Summa Theologiae of Thomas Aquinas, he was violently attacked by Tomas de Lemos and Domingo Báñez. The latter went so far as to denounce Molina to the Spanish Inquisition.[5] As a result, he returned to his village of Cuenca to serve as a parish priest and write his major work, De iure et iustitia.[5]

In 1597, Pope Clement VIII asked Cardinal Michele Bonelli to gather theologians to verify the conformity of Molinism with the Catholic faith. Taking the name of Congregatio de Auxiliis, this assembly would sit until 1607, when Paul V declared this doctrine acceptable.[6]

Sent to Madrid in 1600 by his superiors to teach moral theology at the university of Alcalá. He died in that city on October 12, 1600.[7]

Doctrine

[edit]

Molinism

[edit]
Main article: Molinism

Molinism was an attempt to reconcile the Augustinian doctrines of predestination and efficacious grace with the new ideals of the Renaissance concerning free will. Assuming that man is free to perform or not to perform any act whatever, Molina maintains that this circumstance renders the grace of God neither unnecessary nor impossible: not impossible, for God never fails to bestow grace upon those who ask it with sincerity; and not unnecessary, for grace, although not an efficient, is still a sufficient cause of salvation (gratia mere sufficiens, "merely sufficient grace"). Nor, in Molina's view, does his doctrine of free will exclude predestination. The omniscient God, by means of His scientia media ("middle knowledge", a phrase of Molina's invention, though the idea is also to be found in his older contemporary Fonseca), i.e. his power of knowing future contingent events, foresees how we shall employ our own free-will and treat his proffered grace, and upon this foreknowledge he can found his predestinating decrees.

These doctrines, which opposed both traditional understanding of Augustinism and Thomism concerning the respective roles of free will and efficacious grace, and the teachings of Martin Luther and John Calvin, excited violent controversy in some quarters, especially on the part of the Dominican Order and of the Jansenists, and at last rendered it necessary for the Pope (Clement VIII) to intervene. At first (1594) he simply enjoined silence on both parties so far as Spain was concerned; but ultimately, in 1598, he appointed the Congregatio de auxiliis Gratiae for the settlement of the dispute, which became more and more a party one. After holding very numerous sessions, the congregation was able to decide nothing, and in 1607 its meetings were suspended by Paul V, who in 1611 prohibited all further discussion of the question de auxiliis and of discussions about efficacious grace, and studious efforts were made to control the publication even of commentaries on Aquinas.[citation needed]

Several regent Masters of the Dominican College of St. Thomas, the future Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum), were involved in the Molinist controversy. The Dominicans Diego Álvarez (c. 1550–1635), author of the De auxiliis divinae gratiae et humani arbitrii viribus,[8] and Tomás de Lemos (1540–1629) were given the responsibility of representing the Dominican Order in debates before Pope Clement VIII and Pope Paul V.[9]

Contract law

[edit]

Although he is a convinced supporter of contractual consensualism,[10] Molina remains aware of the differences that still exist between civil law and canon law, but calls for their disappearance.[11] With his opinions, he also prepares the emergence of a theory of the autonomy of the will, later formulated by Pedro de Oñate.[12]

Like most members of the School of Salamanca, he discusses the respect of the principles of equity and commutative justice in contractual exchanges, which he considers fundamental.[13]

But what is introduced for the common good must not be to the detriment of one person rather than another, by excoriating what natural law prescribes, so that you do not do to another what you do not reasonably wish to be done to you. but it would be to the detriment of one rather than the other, if you did not preserve equality

— Luis de Molina, De iustitia et iure, tract.2, disp.350, col.405, n°6

Discussing the “diamond-water paradox”, Molina cogitated a theory of just price where the utility wasn't take into account. Thus, in his De jure et Justitia he said, “the just price of a pearl, which can be used only to decorate, is higher than the just price of grain, bread, or horses, even if the utility of these things is superior.”

Furthermore, he discusses the effect of defects of consent on the validity of contractual commitments[14] and allows, with Lessius, to distinctly separate the matters of contract law and testamentary law.[15]

Economy

[edit]

In his writings on economics, Molina helped further develop a theory of price inflation proposed by Juan de Medina and Martín de Azpilcueta in Salamanca, writing that "[i]n equal circumstances, the more abundant money is in one place, so much less is its value to buy things or to acquire things that are not money."[16]

Works

[edit]
  • De liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, praedestinatione et reprobatione concordia, 4 vols., Lisbona, 1588; 2nd ed. Antwerp, 1595.
  • De Hispanorum primogeniorum origine ac natura (in Latin). Lugduni: Pedro Landri. 1588.
  • De jure et justitia, 6 vols., 1593–1609.
  • Commentaria in primam partem divi Thomae (in Latin) (2 vols., fol. ed.). Cuenca. 1593.
  • De Hispanorum primogeniorum origine ac natura, 1588
    De Hispanorum primogeniorum origine ac natura, 1588
  • De iustitia et iure, 1733
    De iustitia et iure, 1733

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Luis de Molina

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Luis de Molina (1535–1600) was a Spanish Jesuit theologian, , and whose doctrine of middle knowledge sought to harmonize human with , providence, and foreknowledge, forming the core of the theological system known as . Born in , he entered the Jesuit order in 1553 and studied and at and Évora in before teaching moral and authoring works that influenced both metaphysics and . In his Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis (1588), Molina posited that possesses a "middle knowledge" of counterfactuals—what free creatures would do in any possible circumstance—allowing divine to operate without negating libertarian , a framework that countered deterministic interpretations of prevalent among Dominicans. This innovation ignited the De Auxiliis controversy (1597–1607), a protracted between defending Molina's and Dominicans advocating physical premotion as essential for efficacious grace, culminating in Pope Paul V's decree permitting both positions without condemnation. Molina's De iustitia et iure (1593–1609), a six-volume treatise on and , extended his scholastic rigor to economic matters, defending moderate on loans via lucrum cessans (foregone profit), articulating the through communis aestimatio (common estimation in open markets), and critiquing monopolies and arbitrary —ideas that advanced the School of Salamanca's proto-modern analyses of exchange, , and . His integration of empirical observation, such as market dynamics observed in Portuguese ports, with principles underscored a causal realism in applying to human affairs, distinguishing his contributions from purely speculative medieval precedents.

Biography

Early Life and Family Background

Luis de Molina was born on September 29, 1535, in Cuenca, a city in New Castile (modern-day Castilla-La Mancha), . The Molina held noble status with deep historical roots in the region, having contributed significantly to the Christian reconquest of Cuenca from Muslim rule in 1177. His father, Don Diego de Molina, was a whose profession reflected the family's orientation toward legal and mercantile pursuits, while his mother was Doña María de Hinojosa. Coming from an affluent background, the family anticipated Molina would follow a in or the , aligning with the practical aspirations common among Spain's emerging and professional classes during the . Little is documented about Molina's siblings or immediate childhood experiences, though his noble parentage provided access to early education focused on and , setting the stage for his later scholarly trajectory. By age eighteen in 1553, Molina entered the Society of , diverging from familial expectations toward a religious and theological path.

Education and Jesuit Formation

Molina received his initial education at the of Cuenca, where he studied Latin and literature from 1547 to 1551. Born into an affluent merchant family in , on September 29, 1535, he was initially groomed for a in family business or , reflecting the practical expectations for sons of prosperous traders in 16th-century Castile. In 1551, at age sixteen, Molina enrolled at the to study , a leading institution for juridical training in Renaissance Spain. During his time there, he encountered theological writings that sparked a profound vocational shift, leading him to discern a religious calling amid the intellectual ferment of the era. This period marked his transition from secular ambitions to ecclesiastical pursuits, influenced by the Society of Jesus's emerging emphasis on rigorous scholarship and missionary zeal. Molina entered the Society of Jesus on September 29, 1553, at age eighteen, forgoing a promising legal career. The Jesuit order, founded in 1540 by , required a demanding formation process, including a two-year focused on , obedience, and poverty vows, followed by advanced studies in philosophy and theology. After initial training in , Molina relocated to in 1554, studying philosophy at Coimbra University and theology at , completing his doctoral requirements by 1562. This decade-long Jesuit regimen equipped him with Thomistic foundations while exposing him to Iberian scholastic debates, shaping his later innovations in reconciling divine grace with human liberty.

Academic Career and Professorships

Molina completed his philosophical and theological formation within the Society of Jesus by 1563 and began his teaching career as a of philosophy at the in . He held this position for five years, instructing students in Jesuit scholastic traditions amid the order's emphasis on rigorous intellectual discipline. In 1568, Molina advanced to the professorship of theology at the University of Évora, another Jesuit institution in , where he delivered lectures on the of over the subsequent two decades until 1588. This extended tenure solidified his reputation as a leading interpreter of Thomistic doctrine, during which he also engaged in jurisprudence and moral philosophy, contributing to the School's developments in these fields. His time in encompassed 29 years of combined study and instruction, fostering environments that integrated theology with emerging analyses of human action and society. Following his return to around 1588, Molina dedicated himself primarily to writing major treatises, including his commentary on Aquinas's Secunda Secundae published in Cuenca in 1593. In 1592, he accepted an appointment as professor of moral theology at the University of , serving until his death on October 12, 1600, and continuing to influence Jesuit theological education in the final phase of his career.

Final Years and Death

In the final years of his life, following his departure from the University of in 1583, Molina resided primarily in and Cuenca, dedicating himself to scholarly writing amid growing theological controversies surrounding his doctrines. He continued developing his extensive treatise De iustitia et iure, with initial volumes published starting in 1593, though the full work extended to 1609 and was completed posthumously by fellow . By 1600, Molina's health had deteriorated, prompting his summons by Jesuit superiors to to assume a professorship in moral theology. However, he succumbed to shortly after arriving, on October 12, 1600, at the age of 65. His death occurred against a backdrop of intensifying scrutiny from Dominican theologians and Roman authorities over the De auxiliis dispute, with Molina reportedly dying under the impression of impending papal condemnation and amid unsubstantiated rumors of his effigy being burned in . Despite these tensions, his intellectual legacy persisted through ongoing publications and defenses by his order.

Theological Framework

Foundations of Molinism

Molinism's foundational framework, articulated by Luis de Molina in his Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione (published in in 1588), centers on a tripartite division of divine to harmonize God's and providence with human libertarian . Molina posits that God's unfolds in logical moments prior to and following his creative decree: natural , middle (scientia media), and free (scientia libera). This structure enables God to possess infallible foreknowledge of contingent free actions without causally determining them, addressing tensions in reconciling Augustinian grace with undetermined human choice. Natural knowledge comprises God's eternal, prevolitional grasp of all metaphysically necessary truths and possibilities, including all feasible worlds and essences independent of his will to create. It encompasses pure potentials, such as logical necessities and what could occur in any conceivable scenario, forming the broadest scope of divine cognition before any volitional act. Middle knowledge follows immediately, consisting of God's prevolitional awareness of futuribilia—counterfactual conditionals of creaturely freedom, specifying what any possible would voluntarily choose under any hypothetical circumstances God might arrange. For instance, it includes truths like "If Peter were placed in circumstance C with grace G, he would freely accept it," grounded in the intrinsic natures of agents and situations rather than divine causation. Free , occurring postvolitionally after God's decree to actualize a specific world, yields infallible cognition of all that will occur in the chosen feasible reality, incorporating the actualized counterfactuals from middle . Through this sequence, God surveys via middle an array of "feasible worlds"—those where creatures act freely in alignment with his providential aims—then elects and decrees one, ensuring his will is sovereignly accomplished without negating libertarian , as agents retain the ability to do otherwise in the actualized circumstances. Molina's innovation, while drawing on precedents in Aquinas and earlier scholastics, systematically elevates middle to resolve debates over efficacious grace, positing that divine assistance concurs with but does not predetermine free responses, rendering grace efficacious precisely when freely embraced. This framework underpins Molinism's broader theological edifice, influencing subsequent Jesuit defenses against deterministic interpretations of .

Middle Knowledge and Counterfactuals

In his 1588 treatise Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione, Luis de Molina articulated the concept of scientia media, or middle knowledge, as a distinct logical moment in God's . This encompasses counterfactuals of creaturely freedom: contingent propositions stating what any possible would do under any feasible set of circumstances, independent of God's causal determination. Molina positioned middle knowledge chronologically after God's natural of all necessary and possible truths but before the divine free decree that actualizes a specific world order. Molina's counterfactuals take the form of subjunctive conditionals, such as "If agent A were situated in circumstance C (including divine graces offered), A would freely perform action X." These truths, Molina argued, are not necessitated by God's essence nor dependent on his will, yet they are infallibly known by divine prior to creation. By surveying this middle knowledge, God can actualize a world order where human libertarian free choices align with providential ends, such as salvation for the elect, without coercing those choices or rendering them illusory. Molina supported the reality of such counterfactuals through scriptural , notably Matthew 11:21–23, where Jesus declares that Tyre and would have repented if exposed to the miracles performed in and , implying divine awareness of unactualized free responses to hypothetical graces. Similarly, 1 Corinthians 2:8 suggests God permitted events knowing that, if had comprehended the divine plan, he would not have crucified the Lord of glory. This framework, Molina contended, preserves genuine creaturely freedom—defined as without necessity—while upholding exhaustive divine foreknowledge and , avoiding both Pelagian self-salvation and deterministic that negates . Critics, including Dominicans in the ensuing De Auxiliis controversy, challenged middle on grounds that counterfactuals of lack sufficient grounding, potentially implying contingency in God's or unresolved modal paradoxes. Molina countered that these truths arise from the intrinsic natures of free agents in possible scenarios, known eternally by God without reliance on middle terms or empirical actualization. The doctrine's logical priority ensures God's decrees incorporate but do not originate free acts, facilitating a compatibilist resolution to the grace- tension central to post-Tridentine theology.

Reconciliation of Grace, Providence, and Free Will

Molina's doctrine of scientia media, or middle knowledge, serves as the cornerstone for integrating divine grace, providence, and human free will, positing that God knows not only necessary truths and future actualities but also counterfactual conditionals of creaturely freedom—what any free agent would do in every possible circumstance prior to his creative decree. This knowledge enables God to actualize a specific world order where his providential aims, including the distribution of salvific graces, align seamlessly with the libertarian free choices of individuals, without necessitating causal determination of the will. In his Concordia Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis (1588), Molina argues that such counterfactual awareness resolves the tension between divine sovereignty and human liberty by allowing God to arrange external circumstances and internal graces in ways that elicit free cooperation, rather than coercing or predetermining responses. Central to this framework is the distinction between sufficient and efficacious grace: sufficient grace imparts the intrinsic power to perform a good act, but its efficacy depends on the recipient's free assent, which foreknows via middle knowledge without rendering the act inevitable. Molina contends that does not irresistibly move the will physically, as in certain Thomistic views, but instead provides graces tailored to circumstances where the agent would freely accept them, thereby ensuring to glory occurs conditionally on foreseen meritorious acts enabled by grace. Providence thus operates through "weak actualization," where realizes scenarios known to yield desired outcomes via free decisions, preserving the agent's ability to do otherwise in the very moment of choice. This approach counters deterministic interpretations of grace by affirming that human will remains the proximate cause of action, while God's remote causation via providential ordering and gratuitous aids upholds his omnipotence and foreknowledge. Molina illustrates this with scriptural examples, such as Pharaoh's hardening, interpreting it as God permitting self-induced obduracy in response to prior free rejections, known counterfactually, rather than initiating it unilaterally. Critics, including Dominicans like Domingo Báñez, challenged middle knowledge as speculative and insufficient to guarantee efficacious outcomes without divine concurrence determining the will, but Molina maintained its necessity for upholding Catholic teaching on free cooperation with grace against both Pelagian excess and predestinarian overreach. Ultimately, the system posits a logical ordering of divine cognition—natural knowledge of possibles, middle knowledge of counterfactuals, then free decree of actuality—ensuring providence encompasses all events without violating the contingency inherent to free will.

Juridical and Economic Theories

Principles of Contract Law

In De iustitia et iure (1593–1609), Luis de Molina addresses principles of contract law extensively in Treatise II, Volume 2, under De contractibus, spanning Disputations 252 to 507. He frames contracts as sources of obligation rooted in , distinguishing enforceable contractus from unenforceable pacta by the presence of mutual consent and just cause. Central to Molina's theory is the requirement of free and from all parties, which binds them morally and juridically to the agreement's terms, provided it aligns with commutative . Consent must be voluntary, without , and informed regarding the contract's object and value, ensuring and fairness in exchanges. A just cause (causa iusta) is indispensable, mandating a licit purpose—such as mutual benefit or equivalent value—and prohibiting agreements that inherently unjust, like those involving absent justification such as lucrum cessans (foregone profit). Molina classifies contracts into categories including promises, gifts, loans (mutuum), sales, pledges, mandates, and partnerships, each governed by rules ensuring equivalence and moral rectitude, such as determining the through market consensus. Obligations arising from valid contracts are perfect and enforceable via , reflecting natural rights to and acquired through consensual transfer. Violations warrant restitution, underscoring contracts' role in upholding justice without reliance on alone. His consensualist framework advanced early modern jurisprudence by emphasizing subjective will alongside objective fairness.

Economic Analysis and Just Price

Luis de Molina developed his economic analysis within the framework of moral in De Iustitia et Iure, published between 1593 and 1609, particularly in Tractatus II on contracts and commutative . He emphasized that economic exchanges must align with , rejecting arbitrary pricing in favor of principles derived from human reason and . Molina's approach integrated Aristotelian and Thomistic traditions but advanced toward a more dynamic understanding of value formation through voluntary transactions. Molina defined the (pretium iustum) as the value established by the common estimation (communis aestimatio) of prudent buyers and sellers in an , free from , , or monopoly. This estimation reflects the interplay of : when goods abound, prices fall due to eager sellers and reluctant buyers; conversely, raises prices as buyers compete. He argued that (concurrentium) among participants naturally converges toward fairness, rendering market prices a reliable indicator of , provided no occurs. Unlike earlier cost-of-production theories, such as those of , Molina critiqued fixed expense-based pricing for encouraging artificial inflation of costs to justify higher charges. Instead, he incorporated subjective elements, including , , labor expended, risks borne, and transportation costs, noting that ornamental goods like pearls command higher prices than necessities like grain due to differing estimations of usefulness. The admits a range or interval rather than a precise point; minor deviations from the common market rate remain licit, with theologians like Molina allowing narrower bounds than civil lawyers' half-plus rule (prices between half and double the median). Sellers bear responsibility to disclose defects, ensuring , which underscores the ethical dimension of pricing as an act of virtue. Molina's theory supported regulated markets while opposing interventions that distort natural estimation, such as absent or excess. This framework anticipated elements of modern by prioritizing voluntary exchange and market signals over imposed norms, though always subordinated to . His analysis condemned from or duress but affirmed that freely agreed prices in competitive conditions fulfill commutative .

Positions on Usury, Interest, and Markets

In his treatise De iustitia et iure (1593–1609), Luis de Molina examined within the framework of commutative , distinguishing it from permissible charges grounded in extrinsic titles rather than the mere loan of itself. He rejected the strict medieval on all as usurious, arguing that no explicit biblical text forbids lending at to non-needy parties, and instead emphasized contextual moral legitimacy when compensation addressed real economic costs. Molina contended that , while sterile in its natural use (consumption), acquires a productive potential in commercial economies, justifying returns for its temporary transfer. Molina endorsed two primary justifications for interest: damnum emergens (emergent damage), compensating the lender for actual losses incurred by forgoing the money's alternative uses, such as personal necessities or business opportunities; and lucrum cessans (ceased profit), reimbursing the opportunity cost of profits the lender could have earned elsewhere, like in trade or investment. He extended scholastic precedents by applying lucrum cessans broadly to market conditions where capital's scarcity and profitability were evident, provided the rate remained moderate and not exploitative—typically aligning with prevailing commercial norms rather than exceeding 10–12% in 16th-century Spain. This position marked a pragmatic evolution from earlier theologians like Thomas Aquinas, accommodating the rise of credit in early modern finance while upholding the intrinsic prohibition on interest from the loan contract alone. Regarding markets, Molina advocated a dynamic conception of the , determined by voluntary exchanges under sufficient among buyers and sellers, rather than arbitrary fiat or medieval controls. He posited that market prices reflect common estimation (estimatio communis), incorporating supply, demand, and subjective utilities, and deemed interventions distortive unless addressing monopoly or . In this view, entrepreneurial and asymmetries justify profit margins, fostering efficient allocation without violating , as long as no occurs. Molina's analysis thus prefigured subjective value theory, emphasizing individual consent and market as safeguards against usurious excess or inequitable .

Major Controversies

The De Auxiliis Dispute

The De Auxiliis dispute originated with the 1588 publication of Molina's Concordia Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, which advanced the doctrine of middle knowledge (scientia media) as a means to harmonize God's infallible foreknowledge and providential with human libertarian , positing that God knows counterfactuals of creaturely freedom prior to decree yet elects based on foreseen responses without necessitating them. This framework clashed with the Dominican interpretation of Thomas Aquinas's teachings on grace, as articulated by theologians such as Domingo Báñez, who emphasized gratia efficax (efficacious grace) as intrinsically determining the will's assent to God's salvific will, rendering resistance impossible and prioritizing divine causality over conditional human cooperation. Báñez and other Dominicans, including those at the , contended that Molina's position undermined by making divine election contingent on hypothetical human merits, potentially introducing Pelagian elements into Catholic . Tensions escalated in the 1590s through public disputations and mutual denunciations to ecclesiastical authorities; for instance, a 1581-1582 debate in between Jesuit Prudencio de Montemayor and Dominican Miguel de Palacios foreshadowed the rift, but Molina's Concordia—despite initial imprimatur from Portuguese censors—prompted formal complaints, leading to its temporary suspension by the in 1590 and Molina's personal defense before the Portuguese tribunal in 1593-1594, where he was exonerated of charges. , including Roberto Bellarmine, countered that the Dominican view risked making the author of by implying irresistible divine motion, while Dominicans accused of compromising divine sovereignty. By 1597, the controversy had spread across Iberian universities and reached , prompting to convene the Congregatio de Auxiliis on March 28, 1598, a rotating commission of cardinals and theologians tasked with examining arguments from both orders through plenary sessions, written briefs, and oral defenses. The Roman proceedings, spanning 1598 to 1606, featured over 80 meetings where Jesuits (defending Molina's system) and Dominicans (upholding Báñez's physical premotion) presented exhaustive theological analyses, with Molina himself summoned in 1600 but dying on October 12 of that year in Madrid before traveling to Rome, leaving his ideas represented by successors like Bellarmine and Gregorio de Valencia. Early phases favored neither decisively, but by 1605, under Clement VIII's influence, the commission leaned toward condemning Molinist propositions as novel and incompatible with Aquinas, drafting censures against 40 theses from the Concordia. Following Clement's death, however, Pope Paul V intervened in August 1605 by suspending judgments and, on August 28, 1607, issued decrees prohibiting both parties from anathematizing the other's doctrines or publishing further attacks, effectively declaring neither Molinism nor strict Thomism heretical while mandating adherence to Trent's formulations on grace and free will. This non-resolution preserved doctrinal pluralism within the Church but perpetuated order-specific teachings, with Jesuits continuing to promote middle knowledge and Dominicans efficacious grace, influencing subsequent Catholic theology without papal endorsement of either system.

Inquisition Scrutiny and Condemnations

The publication of Molina's Concordia Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis in 1588 prompted immediate scrutiny from ecclesiastical authorities, including the , which initially approved the work but soon faced Dominican complaints alleging errors akin to , leading to a temporary ban on its sale. In , the examined the text amid rising tensions in the De Auxiliis controversy, denouncing it in 1591 as incompatible with the decrees of the , particularly on the efficacy of grace and human . This ruling heightened personal risks for Molina, as novel theological positions were suspect in post-Reformation , echoing investigations of figures like . By 1594, following disputes at the , the intervened to curb escalating condemnations, prohibiting theologians from censuring opposing views on grace and while collecting expert opinions from universities and faculties across ; this process continued until at least October 1598. Molina himself narrowly escaped formal condemnation multiple times during the broader investigations, with rumors circulating of potential posthumous anathematization or even burning in effigy in . Although initial Roman assessments in 1598 labeled aspects of Concordia as Semipelagian and recommended prohibition, these were deferred pending further reports from the . No definitive condemnation of emerged from proceedings, as the dispute escalated to papal oversight; Pope Clement VIII's 1597 Congregatio de Auxiliis shifted focus from inquisitorial to curial examination, involving 85 hearings over a . Molina died on October 12, 1600, amid ongoing scrutiny, but in 1607, decreed that both Molinist and Dominican positions could be taught without mutual accusations of , effectively validating Molina's system as permissible Catholic doctrine without endorsing its truth. Later claims of a condemning by Paul V were exposed as forgeries, with Innocent X in 1655 declaring no trust should be placed in them.

Resolution Under Papal Intervention

intervened in the escalating De Auxiliis controversy in 1594 by imposing a moratorium on public disputes between and Dominicans regarding Molina's doctrines on grace and . In 1596, he summoned all relevant documents from the Spanish commissions to for review. To systematically examine the theological issues, Clement established the Congregatio de Auxiliis Divinae Gratiae in 1597, a special commission comprising cardinals, consultors, and theologians from both orders, tasked with debating Molina's Concordia and the competing Thomist views on efficacious grace and . The congregation convened over 85 sessions between 1598 and 1605, alternating presentations from Jesuit and Dominican representatives, including detailed analyses of middle knowledge, divine concursus, and human liberty. Despite the thorough proceedings, Clement VIII refrained from issuing a definitive condemnation of Molina's positions, though consultors largely favored the Dominican interpretation; the reportedly inclined toward reproving certain Molinist formulations but prioritized unity. His death on March 3, 1605, left the matter unresolved. Pope Paul V, elected on May 16, 1605, inherited the congregation's work and, recognizing the risk of schism between the Jesuit and Dominican orders, sought a pragmatic closure. On August 28, 1607, Paul promulgated a affirming that Molina's Concordia contained no formal and could not be censured as such; it permitted both Molinist and Bañezian (Thomist) systems to be taught in Catholic schools and universities, while strictly prohibiting mutual accusations of error or between proponents. This ruling effectively suspended definitive judgment, allowing theological pluralism on the issues of divine foreknowledge and with grace without endorsing either side as exclusively orthodox. In 1611, Paul V extended restrictions by forbidding the publication of new works on the de auxiliis questions without prior apostolic approval, aiming to quell ongoing polemics. The intervention preserved institutional harmony in the Church but left the core compatibilist tensions—between God's infallible providence and creaturely —officially undecided, influencing subsequent Jesuit theology while permitting Dominican critiques to persist in moderated form.

Principal Works

Concordia Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis

Concordia Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione (The Harmony of Free Will with the Gifts of Grace, Divine Foreknowledge, Providence, Predestination, and Reprobation) is Luis de Molina's principal theological treatise, first published in Lisbon in 1588. The work spans seven disputations divided into multiple parts, systematically addressing apparent tensions between human liberty and divine causation. Molina, a Jesuit theologian, composed it amid Counter-Reformation debates, drawing on Thomistic principles while innovating to defend libertarian free will against deterministic interpretations of grace prevalent in some Dominican traditions. The treatise's core argument posits that operates congruously with human freedom, where God's efficacious graces are tailored to individuals' foreseen responses without coercing the will. Molina introduces scientia media (middle knowledge) as God's prevolitional cognition of counterfactuals of creaturely action—specifically, what any free creature would freely do under any hypothetical circumstances ordered by . This knowledge, logically situated between God's natural knowledge of necessary truths and free knowledge of decreed actualities, enables God to actualize a world compatible with both and libertarian freedom. For instance, in Disputation 52 of Part IV, Molina refutes seven arguments claiming divine foreknowledge necessitates future contingents, arguing instead that such knowledge reflects, rather than determines, free choices. Molina structures the Concordia to dissect predestination, reprobation, and providence through scriptural, patristic, and philosophical lenses, rejecting both Pelagian overemphasis on merit and Calvinist-style double predestination. He contends that predestination to glory follows from foreseen congruous cooperation with sufficient grace, while reprobation arises from foreseen non-cooperation, preserving divine sovereignty without imputing sin to God. Part IV, focused on foreknowledge, exemplifies this by integrating middle knowledge into a framework where divine concursus (cooperation) suffices for action without physical premotion that would render choices necessary. This approach, later termed Molinism, aimed to uphold Augustinian grace as intrinsically ordered to free acceptance, influencing subsequent Catholic theology despite sparking the De Auxiliis controversy.

De Iustitia et Iure Treatise

De iustitia et iure is Luis de Molina's extensive Latin on and rights, composed primarily between 1593 and his death in 1600, with posthumous publication and completion extending to 1609. The work comprises six volumes structured as a series of disputations, drawing on Thomistic moral theology while addressing practical issues in , , and arising from Spain's global and colonial expansion. Molina frames primarily as a , emphasizing commutative in exchanges and contracts, and integrates of human actions to evaluate moral legitimacy in market behaviors. The is divided into two main tracts: the first focusing on as a , including obligations, restitution, and contracts; the second on (), covering property, dominion, and public authority. Key disputations examine topics such as the , determined not by intrinsic costs but by free agreement reflecting and ; , permitted as extrinsic titles like lucrum cessans (foregone profit) or damnum emergens (emerging loss); and , where Molina defends the legitimacy of enslaving war captives or those justly punished, while critiquing unjust trades in free persons. He argues for the moral permissibility of professional moneylending, distinguishing it from prohibited when tied to legitimate risks or opportunity costs, marking a shift from earlier scholastic prohibitions. Molina's analysis incorporates empirical observations of markets, such as price fluctuations due to abundance or , to support subjective theories of value over objective cost-based measures. In juridical matters, he develops concepts of dominion and rights grounded in human reason and , influencing later traditions by prioritizing voluntary in transfers and limiting tyrannical authority. The work's casuistic method resolves specific cases through first principles, such as the causality of in economic acts, without deferring uncritically to civil laws that contradict or divine equity. Editions proliferated after initial Lyon publications around 1602–1620, with a notable five-volume Geneva edition in 1733, reflecting its enduring use in Jesuit and . Despite facing scrutiny from the for perceived laxity on and other issues, the evaded formal condemnation and shaped debates on , establishing Molina as a pioneer in integrating theological with proto-modern economic reasoning.

Other Theological and Ethical Writings

Molina composed extensive commentaries on key sections of Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae, extending his engagement with scholastic theology beyond grace and . His Commentaria in primam partem D. Thomae (Cuenca, 1593, three volumes) dissected the prima pars, treating doctrines of , the , creation, angels, and humanity's end, integrating empirical observations on phenomena to support Thomistic principles. These volumes, prepared during his teaching at (1571–1583), emphasized reconciling faith with reason through detailed disputations, often drawing on and contemporary Portuguese explorations for illustrations of in the natural order. In moral theology, Molina's Disputationes in primam secundae Sancti Thomae Aquinatis (posthumously published 1606) analyzed the foundational treatise on , , habits, virtues, vices, , and grace's role in moral formation. Composed amid his later career, this work advanced ethical reasoning by distinguishing voluntary acts from coerced ones and exploring how interacts with habitual virtue, providing a systematic basis for without delving into specific juridical applications reserved for his later treatise. Molina also addressed polemical theology, notably in unpublished disputations defending the of Mary, which he publicly upheld in lectures at around 1560–1570, predating widespread Jesuit endorsement. These efforts, preserved in manuscripts later edited as Neue Molinaschriften (1935), critiqued Protestant denials of original sin's transmission while affirming Aquinas's framework on sanctifying grace. Such writings underscored Molina's commitment to orthodox against challenges, prioritizing scriptural and patristic consensus over innovative speculation. His ethical reflections extended to practical disputations on vows and ecclesiastical discipline, integrated into broader theological appendices, reflecting Jesuit emphasis on probabilistic reasoning in conscience formation. These lesser-known outputs, often tied to his professorships, influenced subsequent moral manuals by clarifying ambiguities in Aquinas on topics like restitution and equity, though they garnered less controversy than his grace doctrines.

Legacy and Influence

Impact on Catholic Theology and Philosophy

Molina's most enduring contribution to lies in his formulation of , a system designed to reconcile with human through the concept of scientia media, or middle knowledge. This posits that God possesses knowledge not only of necessary truths and future events but also of counterfactual conditionals—what free creatures would do in any possible circumstance—allowing to actualize a world where humans freely cooperate with efficacious grace without coercion. In his 1588 work Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, Molina argued that God arranges external circumstances based on this middle knowledge to ensure aligns with libertarian free will, preserving human responsibility for while upholding divine sovereignty. This framework profoundly influenced Jesuit theology, becoming a cornerstone for the Society of Jesus in countering deterministic interpretations of grace prevalent in some Dominican (Thomist) traditions. Molina's approach emphasized sufficient grace enabling free assent, challenging stricter views of physical premotion where grace intrinsically determines the will. The ensuing De Auxiliis controversy (1598–1607) pitted Molinists against Thomists like Domingo Báñez, but Pope Paul V's 1607 decree prohibited mutual accusations of heresy, effectively endorsing as a legitimate Catholic position alongside for reconciling and . This papal intervention ensured 's integration into Catholic doctrinal pluralism, shaping seminary curricula and theological manuals into the and beyond. Philosophically, Molina's invocation of middle knowledge advanced Catholic metaphysics by incorporating and counterfactual reasoning, bridging Aristotelian-Thomistic with a robust defense of contingency against nominalist extremes. His ideas spurred innovations in the philosophy of divine action, influencing later figures like in Jesuit and prompting critiques that refined understandings of efficient and volition. While not universally adopted—Thomism retained dominance in papal encyclicals like Aeterni Patris (1879)—Molinism's emphasis on cooperative grace informed Vatican II's pastoral , particularly in documents affirming human freedom under divine initiative, such as . Its enduring appeal lies in providing a non-Calvinist alternative for Catholics wary of , fostering ongoing debates in analytical on providence and . In his multi-volume treatise De Iustitia et Iure (1593–1609), Luis de Molina advanced early economic ideas rooted in Scholastic , emphasizing subjective elements in value determination over pure cost-based measures. Molina rejected the cost-of-production theory of just price associated with , arguing that it incentivized artificial expense inflation to justify higher prices. Instead, he proposed that the just price emerges from market dynamics, incorporating supply, , and individual , with market prices serving as a practical indicator within an acceptable interval that accounts for volatility. This approach anticipated subjective value theory by recognizing that the price of goods like exceeds that of due to and perceived utility, rather than intrinsic worth or labor input alone. Molina also contributed to monetary theory by articulating principles akin to the , explaining how an influx of precious metals from the raised prices through increased money supply, while applying supply-demand logic to exchange rates and condemning absent genuine risk or service. He defended interest on loans as legitimate when involving risk, , or compensation for deferred use, effectively challenging strict prohibitions and legitimizing money-lending as a profession under conditions of equity. These views positioned him within the School of Salamanca's broader shift toward market-oriented ethics, influencing later economic thought by integrating moral constraints with voluntary exchange. On legal thought, Molina's De Iustitia et Iure systematically explored as a , distinguishing —binding universally via reason and divine order—from , which must align with the former to be valid. He viewed as originating in natural communal use post-Fall, evolving into exclusive through human and ius gentium (law of nations), essential for prudent stewardship of creation's goods amid . Contracts required mutual and equivalence to ensure commutative , with Molina emphasizing subjective estimation in exchanges while prohibiting or exploitation. His framework treated as objective limits on legislative power, protecting acquired entitlements against arbitrary state interference, a principle that underscored the primacy of individual in legal relations.

Modern Reception and Scholarly Assessments

In of , Molina's doctrine of middle knowledge—positing that possesses counterfactual knowledge of what free creatures would do in any possible circumstance—has experienced a significant revival since the mid-20th century, particularly among analytic philosophers seeking to reconcile divine with libertarian human freedom. This framework, originally articulated in Molina's Concordia (1588), addresses theological by allowing God's foreknowledge to depend on, rather than determine, human choices, influencing debates on providence and . Scholars such as and have adapted and defended Molinist positions, arguing it preserves both divine sovereignty and genuine free will against deterministic alternatives like . Critiques persist, however, with detractors questioning the metaphysical grounding of middle knowledge, such as its reliance on unactualized counterfactuals of creaturely , which some view as epistemically or logically problematic. A 2011 collection edited by Ken Perszyk surveys these debates, featuring proponents who apply to problems of evil and divine hiddenness, alongside opponents who favor or as more coherent alternatives. Protestant thinkers, including Jacob Arminius, selectively incorporated elements of Molina's ideas in the , but modern evangelical assessments often highlight tensions with scriptural emphases on . Within Catholicism, Molina's views remain influential yet non-binding, with post-Vatican II theology occasionally invoking them in discussions of grace's sufficiency without supplanting Thomistic interpretations. In economic thought, Molina's De Iustitia et Iure (1593–1609) is assessed as a foundational text in the Salamanca School, anticipating modern concepts like the —where increased currency supply raises prices—and subjective value theory via supply-demand dynamics for determining just prices. Scholars credit him with early insights into arbitrage-free markets and monetary inflation's effects during Spain's 16th-century silver influx, influencing later liberals like , who praised the school's empirical approach over medieval . Political philosophy evaluations emphasize Molina's natural rights , deriving civil authority from voluntary consent rather than divine right alone, which prefigures Lockean ideas and underscores his role in shifting from feudal to proto-liberal governance models. Recent works, such as Kirk MacGregor's 2017 biography, integrate these facets, portraying Molina as a whose interdisciplinary rigor counters narratives of scholastic stagnation.

References

  1. https://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/molina.htm
  2. https://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/molinism.htm
  3. https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/7/3/article-p417_417.xml
  4. https://www.conimbricenses.org/encyclopedia/luis-de-molina-de-iustitia-et-iure/
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/great-christian-jurists-in-spanish-history/luis-de-molina/C15452675EA280091D4588268CC211C1
  6. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/luis-de-molina-kirk-r-macgregor/1121372364
  7. https://www.jesuits.org/stories/free-will-luis-de-molina/
  8. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004262188/B9789004262188_001.pdf
  9. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10436a.htm
  10. https://www.hetwebsite.net/het/profiles/molina.htm
  11. https://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-10-number-1/luis-de-molina
  12. https://carm.org/molinism/what-are-the-origins-of-molinism/
  13. https://voice.dts.edu/review/luis-de-molina-the-life-and-theology-of-the-founder-of-middle-knowledge/
  14. https://etsjets.org/publication/luis-de-molina-the-life-and-theology-of-the-founder-of-middle-knowledge/
  15. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1204&context=eleu
  16. https://archive.org/details/ondivineforeknow0000moli
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321058574_Luis_de_Molina_-_Middle_Knowledge_and_Two_Key_Applications
  18. https://www.ej-theology.org/index.php/theology/article/download/94/55
  19. https://toconnor.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OConnor_Impossibility-of-Middle-Knowledge-1992.pdf
  20. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/school-salamanca/
  21. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=ijli
  22. https://brill.com/display/title/19890?language=en
  23. https://www.academia.edu/35150846/The_Economic_Thought_of_Luis_de_Molina
  24. https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2020/Muellerjustprice.html
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2114534
  26. https://fee.org/articles/free-market-economists-400-years-ago/
  27. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004262188/B9789004262188_009.pdf
  28. https://www.marketsandmorality.com/index.php/mandm/article/viewFile/822/780
  29. https://www.uclm.es/es/departamentos/daef/-/media/Files/A05-Investigacion-departamentos/daef/documentos_trabajo/2010-2-DT-DAEF.ashx?la=es
  30. https://eh.net/encyclopedia/usury/
  31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought/article/late-spanish-doctors-on-usury-and-the-evolving-scholastic-tradition/47BE6FF1ACE9614D750EABB57A27BAAC
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1882146
  33. https://www.independent.org/article/1995/09/01/free-market-economists-400-years-ago/
  34. https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/41982/1/pdf.pdf
  35. https://www.conimbricenses.org/encyclopedia/de-auxiliis-controversy/
  36. https://philarchive.org/archive/TORDAC-3
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2214132420000047
  38. https://www.jesuits.org/stories/free-will-luis-de-molina-2/
  39. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/luis-de-molina
  40. https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/congregatio-de-auxiliis
  41. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004310315/B9789004310315_003.pdf
  42. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004310315/B9789004310315_002.pdf
  43. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004409309/BP000008.xml
  44. https://www.scribd.com/document/792738357/Molina-On-Divine-Foreknowledge
  45. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/title/32720.pdf
  46. https://www.uibk.ac.at/philtheol/jaeger/publ/jaeger_molina-on-foreknowledge.pdf
  47. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3254&context=doctoral
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319128147_Luis_de_Molina%27s_Doctrine_of_Predestination
  49. https://www.scribd.com/document/631730614/Luis-de-Molina-De-iustitia-et-iure
  50. https://www.conimbricenses.org/luis-de-molina-on-slavery-and-the-slave-trade-de-iustitia-et-iure-2/
  51. https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/11/4/article-p702_018.xml
  52. https://brill.com/view/title/19890
  53. https://librarysearch.uncsa.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001671268706631&context=L&vid=01UNCSA_INST:UNCSA&lang=en&adaptor=Local%2520Search%2520Engine
  54. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/molinism
  55. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004262188/B9789004262188_012.pdf
  56. https://www.academia.edu/56733551/The_Philosophical_Impact_of_Molinism_in_the_17th_Century
  57. https://newdirection.online/2018-publications-pdf/NDreportEN-NewVirtueEconomics.pdf
  58. https://rlo.acton.org/archives/75705-now-available-treatise-money-luis-de-molina.html
  59. http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/download/7381/6633
  60. https://academic.oup.com/book/6416
  61. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/free-will-foreknowledge/
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00048402.2013.812671
  63. https://denverjournal.denverseminary.edu/the-denver-journal-article/luis-de-molina-the-life-and-theology-of-the-founder-of-middle-knowledge/
  64. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/economics-early-modern/
  65. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=tcl
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.