Hubbry Logo
SharchopsSharchopsMain
Open search
Sharchops
Community hub
Sharchops
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sharchops
Sharchops
Sharchops
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Sharchops (Dzongkha: ཤར་ཕྱོགས་པ, Wylie: shar phyogs pa; "Easterner") are the populations of mixed Tibetan, Southeast Asian and South Asian descent that mostly live in the eastern districts of Bhutan.[1]

Key Information

Ethnicity

[edit]

The Sharchops are an Indo-Mongoloid[dubious – discuss] people who migrated from Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, or possibly Burma,[2] c. 1200 – c. 800 BC.[3] Van Driem (1993) indicates that Sharchops are closely related to the Mönpa and that both are descendants of the indigenous Tibetic peoples (pre-Ngalop) of Bhutan. Due to the societal prominence and political power of Dzongkha-speaking Bhutanese, however, Sharchops are marginalized in Bhutan.[4] The Sharchops are the largest ethnic group in Bhutan.[5][6]

Population

[edit]

The Sharchops comprise most of the population of eastern Bhutan, a country whose total population in 2010 was approximately 708,500.[7] Although they have long been the largest single ethnic group in Bhutan, the Sharchop have been largely assimilated into the culturally and politically dominant Tibetic Ngalop culture.[8] Together, the Ngalop, Sharchop, and tribal groups constituted up to 72 percent of the population in the late 1980s, according to official Bhutanese statistics.[8][9] The 1981 census claimed that Sharchops represented 30% of the population, and Ngalops approximately 17%.[10] The World Factbook, however, estimates that the "Bhote" Ngalop and Sharchop ethnic groups together comprise approximately 50% of Bhutan's population, at 354,200 people.[7] Assuming Sharchops still outnumber Ngalops at a 3:2 ratio, the total population of Sharchops in Bhutan is approximately 212,500.

Language

[edit]

Most Sharchops speak Tshangla, a Tibeto-Burman language; fewer speak the Olekha language.[11] They also learn the national language, Dzongkha. Because of their proximity to Northeastern India, some speak Assamese. Bodo is also known to many of them because of socio cultural and trade relations.

Tshangla is also spoken by the Monpa (Menba) national minority across the border in China, distributed in Mêdog, Nyingchi and Dirang. Tshangla is similar to the Kalaktang and Dirang languages spoken by the Monpa of Arunachal Pradesh, India.[12]

Lifestyle

[edit]

Sharchop peoples practice slash-and-burn and tsheri agriculture, planting dry rice crops for three or four years until the soil is exhausted and then moving on,[8] however the practice has been officially banned in Bhutan since 1969.[13][14]

Most of the Sharchops follow matrilineal lines in the inheritance of land and livestock.[15]

Religion

[edit]

Most Sharchops follow Tibetan Buddhism with some elements of Bön, although those who live in the Duars follow Animism.[8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sharchops

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Sharchops (also known as Sharchop, meaning "easterners" in Dzongkha) are an ethnic group primarily inhabiting the eastern districts of Bhutan, where they constitute the majority of the population. Believed to be among the earliest indigenous inhabitants of the country, they are of mixed Tibeto-Burman origin, blending Tibetan, South Asian, and Southeast Asian ancestries, and are racially Mongoloid in appearance similar to other Bhutanese groups. As Bhutan's largest or second-largest ethnic group, the Sharchops have undergone significant cultural assimilation into the dominant Ngalop Tibetan-Buddhist framework, while retaining distinct linguistic and regional traditions. The Sharchops predominantly speak Tshangla (also Tsangla), a Sino-Tibetan language closely related to Tibetan dialects and serving as a lingua franca in eastern Bhutan, though Dzongkha is the national language. Their culture reflects influences from neighboring regions including Tibet, Burma, and Assam, manifesting in agricultural lifestyles, animistic-Buddhist syncretism, and participation in Bhutan's Vajrayana Buddhist practices, with over 99% adherence to Buddhism. Historically, government policies have promoted intermarriage and cultural unity among ethnic groups, contributing to the Sharchops' integration while preserving their identity as eastern Bhutanese. Exact population figures remain uncertain due to limited official ethnic censuses aimed at national cohesion, but estimates suggest they comprise 25-40% of Bhutan's approximately 780,000 inhabitants.

History

Origins and Migration

The Sharchops, an ethnic group primarily inhabiting eastern Bhutan, are widely regarded as the region's earliest settlers, with anthropological accounts tracing their origins to ancient Indo-Mongoloid populations from adjacent areas in northeast India and northern Burma (present-day Myanmar). Their physical and cultural traits, including a blend of Southeast Asian and South Asian influences, distinguish them from later Tibetan migrants, supporting a narrative of pre-Tibetan establishment in the eastern Himalayan foothills. Linguistic analysis of Tshangla, their primary language—a Sino-Tibetan tongue in the Bodish subgroup—further aligns with Tibeto-Burman migrations eastward from proto-Tibetan heartlands, potentially dating to periods before the 7th-century spread of Tibetan Buddhism. Historical migrations into are estimated to have occurred over the , driven by movements from Assam, , and Burmese borderlands, where similar ethnic groups persist. These inflows preceded the 8th–9th century arrival of Ngalop Tibetans from the north and west, who introduced and centralized Buddhist governance, leading to cultural intermingling without displacing Sharchop territorial cores in like Mongar and Trashigang. Genetic studies of Himalayan , including those proximate to , reveal predominant ancestry from groups at the Tibetan Plateau's northeastern periphery, augmented by minor eastern admixtures consistent with such routes, though Bhutan-specific Sharchop sequencing remains . Settlement patterns reflect adaptive migrations suited to Bhutan's rugged eastern terrain, with Sharchops exploiting forested valleys for subsistence agriculture and herding, establishing semi-autonomous communities that resisted full assimilation until post-17th-century Drukpa unification efforts. Oral traditions and regional ethnographies occasionally invoke legendary figures like Lhase Tshangma—a purported Tibetan prince—as eponymous ancestors, but these lack corroboration from archaeological or documentary evidence and may represent later Tibetan overlays on indigenous lineages. Empirical data from migration histories underscore a unidirectional eastern influx, with minimal reverse flows, shaping Sharchops as a foundational layer beneath Bhutan's multi-ethnic stratification.

Settlement and Early Development

The Sharchops are regarded as descendants of the earliest major ethnic group to establish permanent settlements in Bhutan, concentrating in the eastern and southeastern regions such as Trashigang, Mongar, and Samdrup Jongkhar districts. Their ancestral origins link to tribal populations from northern Burma (present-day Myanmar) and northeastern India, with linguistic and ethnographic evidence suggesting they represent Bhutan's aboriginal inhabitants prior to later Tibetan migrations. These settlements formed in secluded, forested valleys at elevations around 28°N latitude and 92°E longitude, where steep Himalayan terrain and dense vegetation historically limited external influences and fostered isolated community growth. Early Sharchop development transitioned from nomadic or semi-nomadic slash-and-burn (thersi) cultivation to fixed villages comprising 20 to 200 households, enabling more stable agrarian economies based on rice, maize, millet, turnips, and barley, supplemented by pork and fermented staples. Livestock rearing, including cattle, yaks, and goats, supported subsistence, while rudimentary trade networks with adjacent Indian territories exchanged forest products and grains for essentials like salt and iron tools. This shift, likely occurring over centuries in response to ecological pressures and resource availability, laid the foundation for enduring village autonomy under local headmen who mediated disputes and resource allocation. Social organization emphasized patrilineal descent and endogamy, with preferred cross-cousin marriages reinforcing kinship ties within extended families that formed the core of village units. Absent a native written script, early knowledge transmission relied on oral traditions in Tshangla, using Tibetan Uchen for rudimentary records where needed, which preserved customs amid gradual integration with incoming Ngalop groups from the west. These patterns of settlement and development persisted with minimal disruption until the 17th-century unification under the Drukpa lineage, reflecting adaptive resilience to Bhutan's rugged topography.

Interactions with Other Groups

The Sharchops, as early inhabitants of eastern , engaged in cultural exchanges with incoming Tibetan-speaking groups from the north and west, adopting while preserving indigenous animist practices such as spirit offerings to local deities. These interactions, dating back to migrations around the 7th-9th centuries CE, involved shared religious sites and trade in forest products, contributing to a blended Tibeto-Burman in the region. Relations with the Ngalops, who consolidated power in central and western Bhutan from the 17th century onward under the Drukpa Kagyu tradition, led to gradual assimilation of Sharchops into the national Dzongkha-speaking framework, including administrative integration during the unification era led by Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyal in 1616-1651. Despite linguistic distinctions, intermixing through marriage and relocation has rendered Sharchops and Ngalops increasingly indistinguishable, collectively comprising the Drukpa ethnic core that accounts for approximately 50% of Bhutan's population as of recent estimates. Sharchops experienced relative marginalization compared to Ngalops in political influence, yet maintained autonomy in eastern dzongkhags like Trashigang. Interactions with Monpa communities along the northern -India-Tibet borders involved religious synergies, as both groups adhere to the sect, facilitating cross-border pilgrimages and ritual exchanges predating modern boundaries. Historical migrations provided eastern as a refuge for persecuted groups, including Tibetan refugees, enhancing Sharchop-Monpa ties through shared descent from indigenous Tibetan lineages. Tensions arose with Lhotshampa (Nepali-origin) settlers in southern Bhutan from the early 20th century, as Sharchops perceived them as demographic newcomers dominating the south through immigration waves post-1950s, straining resource allocation and cultural homogeneity. While generally amicable with other indigenous groups, Sharchops aligned with Ngalops in viewing Lhotshampas as outsiders, contributing to ethnic policies in the 1980s-1990s that emphasized Drukpa cultural preservation amid southern unrest.

Demographics

Population Estimates

Estimates of the Sharchop population in Bhutan vary significantly due to the absence of official ethnic census data since the 1980s, with the government prioritizing national unity over detailed breakdowns amid historical sensitivities around ethnic demographics. The Joshua Project, drawing from field research and demographic modeling, places the figure at 68,000 as of recent assessments. PeopleGroups.org, another NGO compilation, reports a higher 98,000. Older data from 1981, when Bhutan’s total population was approximately 300,000, indicated Sharchops comprised about 30% of the populace, equating to roughly 90,000 individuals. Extrapolating this proportion to Bhutan’s 2023 population of 786,385 yields an implied estimate of around 236,000, though such projections are unreliable without updated verification, as migration, assimilation, and policy changes may have altered distributions. Some academic sources suggest up to 158,200 or even 44% of the population (potentially over 300,000 historically), but these remain highly disputed due to methodological variances and lack of primary data. Sharchops are concentrated in eastern districts and are sometimes aggregated under broader "Bhote" or Ngalop categories in international reports, which may undercount them as a distinct group; for instance, the CIA World Factbook's 2010 estimate attributes 50% of the population to Ngalop (including Sharchops) without separation. This variability underscores reliance on non-governmental estimates, which prioritize ethnographic rather than census-based approaches.

Geographic Distribution

The Sharchops, an ethnic group of mixed Tibetan, Southeast Asian, and South Asian descent, are primarily distributed across the eastern regions of , where they form the of the in that area. This concentration reflects their historical settlement patterns as early inhabitants of the eastern Himalayan foothills. Their core habitat lies in southeastern Bhutan, particularly south of Trashigang (also spelled Tashigang), encompassing thickly forested zones with comparatively lower rainfall than central or western Bhutan. Key districts include Trashigang, Mongar, and adjacent eastern dzongkhags, though precise delineations by administrative boundaries vary due to intermingling with neighboring groups like the Ngalops. Small numbers may extend into southern border areas influenced by historical migrations from Assam and Burma, but the overwhelming majority remains in Bhutan's eastern dzongkhags. No significant diaspora populations outside Bhutan are documented in reliable demographic data.

Language

Tshangla Linguistic Features

Tshangla, a Trans-Himalayan language of the Tibeto-Burman family, exhibits phonological simplicity relative to neighboring Tibetic languages like Dzongkha, lacking lexical tone and complex consonant clusters. Its consonant inventory includes voiceless, aspirated, and voiced stops (/p, pʰ, b/; /t, tʰ, d/; /k, kʰ, g/), affricates (/ts, tsʰ/; /tʃ, tʃʰ, dʒ/), fricatives (/s, z, ʃ/; with dental /θ, ð/ in some varieties), nasals (/m, n, ɲ, ŋ/), liquids (/ɾ, l/), and approximants (/w, j, h/). Syllable onsets permit limited clusters, primarily with /r/ (e.g., mrekpe 'smeared with'), while codas are restricted; intervocalic lenition affects aspirates in some contexts. The vowel system comprises five basic qualities (/i, e, a, o, u/), with no contrastive length or diphthongs as phonemes, though loanwords introduce elements like /y, ø/. Morphologically, Tshangla displays agglutinative tendencies, with verbs inflecting for person, aspect, mood, and tense via suffixes, yielding at least 15 distinct forms per paradigm—more elaborate than Dzongkha's eight categories. Past tense markers include allomorphs like -pa/-pha/-ba (e.g., chot-pa 'prepared'), varying by verb class. Personal pronouns feature singular forms such as dʑaŋ '1SG', nan '2SG', rok '3SG', with a single plural suffix =bak applied across categories, lacking dedicated duals. Possession employs forms like jaga 'my' in standard varieties, diverging in dialects (e.g., jo in Bjokapakha). Negation relies exclusively on the prefix ma-, without the ma-/mi- distinction found in Tibetic languages. Syntactically, Tshangla follows an ergative-absolutive alignment, with predicate-final and reliance on postpositions rather than prepositions. incorporation and serial constructions are common, facilitating compact expressions of complex . Non-finite complements use suffixes like -pe/-/-be, while equative copulas vary by variety (single in standard Tshangla vs. dual gɨ- and ai in Bjokapakha). These features underscore Tshangla's internal diversity, with dialects like Bjokapakha showing innovations in and tense marking that highlight subgrouping within the language cluster.

Usage and Status

Tshangla serves primarily as a in , , and informal social interactions among its speakers in eastern Bhutan, where it functions as a regional facilitating communication across various Tibeto-Burman ethnic groups. With an estimated ,000 speakers concentrated in districts such as Trashigang, Mongar, and Samdrup Jongkhar, it remains the dominant spoken in these areas, though intergenerational transmission occurs mainly within families rather than through institutional channels. The language holds no official recognition in Bhutan, where Dzongkha functions as the national language for administration and English as the medium of instruction in schools; Tshangla is not taught formally in educational settings, limiting its presence in literacy development or public domains. Traditionally oral and lacking a standardized script, it is rarely written, with occasional adaptations using Tibetan orthography for religious or limited literary purposes, such as the publication of a New Testament translation in 2023. Despite these constraints, Tshangla exhibits sustained vitality as a within its ethnic community, supported by radio broadcasts and informal urban usage among migrants, though national policies prioritizing pose potential long-term pressures on its exclusivity in eastern regions.

Culture and Society

Traditional Lifestyle and

The Sharchops maintained a subsistence-based economy rooted in known as tsheri or slash-and-burn agriculture, predominant in eastern 's hilly terrain. Communities cleared forested areas by controlled burning to release soil nutrients from ash, enabling the planting of staple dryland crops such as rice, millet, and maize for three to four years until fertility declined, after which fields were abandoned for fallow periods or new sites. This practice, while effective for short-term yields in nutrient-poor soils, contributed to localized deforestation and was officially prohibited by royal decree in 1969 to promote settled farming. Animal husbandry supplemented agriculture, with households rearing cattle, pigs, poultry, and occasionally yaks for milk, meat, draft labor, and manure fertilization, ensuring dietary diversity and resilience against crop failures. Local barter systems facilitated exchange of surplus produce, livestock products, and handwoven textiles—often produced by women using backstrap looms—for essential goods, reflecting a self-sufficient village economy with minimal cash transactions prior to mid-20th-century modernization. Traditional lifestyles centered on clustered villages of multi-story wooden houses elevated on stone bases to deter wildlife and flooding, with ground floors housing livestock and upper levels for human habitation and grain storage. Daily routines involved communal labor in fields, seasonal migrations for herding in higher pastures, and gender-divided tasks where men handled plowing and heavy herding while women managed weaving, foraging, and household provisioning, fostering social cohesion through kinship-based cooperation.

Customs, Festivals, and Kinship

Sharchops practice the Nyingmapa tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, blended with pre-Buddhist Bon animism, evident in rituals to appease local deities such as village soil guardians known as shibdag. Daily customs emphasize agricultural labor, with women skilled in weaving textiles for household use and ceremonial purposes. Archery serves both as a sport and ritual activity, underscoring values of precision and communal harmony without violence. Religious festivals incorporate masked dances using wooden figures to portray heroic figures battling evil spirits, often led by lamas who craft dough and butter effigies for blessings of health and prosperity. The annual Kangsee festival in December features community gatherings for raising prayer flags, lighting butter lamps, burning incense to deities, performing traditional songs and dances, and competing in archery, darts, and horse racing, alongside feasts of local foods to honor ancestors and invoke bountiful harvests. Sharchops mark their regional New Year as Sharchop Losar, distinct from the western Bhutanese calendar and focused on eastern seasonal cycles. Local tshechus in eastern districts like Trashigang and Mongar include ritual circumambulations and offerings tied to harvest thanksgiving. Kinship structures recognize consanguineal and affinal relatives up to the seventh degree, supported by Tshangla's lexicon of approximately 30 specific terms—far exceeding English's roughly 10—such as amchi for mother's elder sister and aku for father's younger brother, which strengthen extended family bonds and enable "standby parent" caregiving systems. This complexity sustains large households, with individuals potentially linked to over 2,000 kin, prioritizing labor availability in agrarian life. Patrilineal inheritance favors the eldest son for the household, while descent traces through males; parallel cousins share sibling terminology and are marriage-prohibited, but cross-cousin unions are traditionally preferred to maintain alliances within clans. Marriages, largely monogamous and arranged parentally with growing emphasis on mutual consent, feature flexible post-marital residence determined by which household requires additional labor, though endogamy persists in rural settings.

Family and Social Structure

The Sharchops maintain patrilineal descent, tracing lineage primarily through the male line from father to son, which forms the basis of their kinship organization. Family units are typically extended, encompassing large networks of relatives recognized up to the seventh degree of kinship, supported by a rich Tshangla lexicon of over 30 specific terms for kin relations—far exceeding the roughly 10 in English—such as ajang for maternal uncle or khotkin for cross-cousin. This elaborate address system, central to their ngew culture, treats parallel cousins (children of same-sex siblings) with sibling terms like kota (younger brother), reinforcing expansive family bonds and contributing to larger household sizes historically adapted to high mortality environments through "standby" parental roles among aunts and uncles. Marriage practices emphasize endogamy within the community, particularly in rural areas, with a traditional preference for cross-cousin unions known as kothkin or sergamathang (e.g., mother's brother's daughter or father's sister's daughter), which consolidate property, enhance solidarity, and minimize conflicts by intertwining affinal and consanguineal ties. These arrangements, often initiated by parents with stages like proposal (phuenmay) and horoscope matching (tsel-jur), are predominantly monogamous, though polygamy occurs with spousal consent; post-marital residence is typically virilocal, with the wife joining the husband's household, though flexible based on economic needs. Divorce requires mutual consent or compensation and remains uncommon due to social and legal barriers. Such practices sustain dense relational webs, where one individual might identify up to 2,400 relatives across blood and marriage lines spanning multiple districts and countries. Inheritance follows patrilineal norms, with the traditionally receiving the primary and , though modern wills allow greater flexibility amid Bhutan's evolving legal framework promoting equal shares among sons and daughters. revolves around these kin , with villages led by headsmen and status signaled by attire; relations are upheld through reciprocal , shared rituals, and communal support, though and are eroding cross-cousin preferences in favor of exogamous matches.

Religion

Predominant Practices

The Sharchops predominantly adhere to the of Tibetan , the oldest among Tibetan Buddhist sects, which forms the core of their religious . This affiliation accounts for nearly all Sharchops, with surveys estimating 99.85% practicing overall. Central to Nyingma practices are tantric rituals, including recitation, deity visualization, and initiations (wang) conducted by qualified lamas to transmit esoteric teachings. These elements emphasize direct realization of the mind's innate purity through meditation, considered the pinnacle of Nyingma doctrine. Daily and communal observances reinforce these principles, such as maintaining household shrines for offerings of incense, butter lamps, and tsok (feast) foods to accumulate merit and propitiate deities. Sharchops participate in annual tshechu festivals at local monasteries, featuring cham masked dances that dramatize Buddhist narratives, expel malevolent spirits, and impart ethical lessons to the laity. Monastic institutions play a pivotal role, with many Sharchop males undertaking temporary or lifelong ordination for scriptural study, meditation retreats, and ritual performance, fostering community cohesion and spiritual authority. Core ethical commitments include nonviolence (ahimsa), generosity toward monastics, and cultivating compassionate intentions, aligning with broader Vajrayana precepts that all actions generate karmic consequences.

Syncretic and Indigenous Beliefs

The Sharchops integrate pre-Buddhist indigenous beliefs, rooted in Bon shamanism and animism, with the Nyingmapa tradition of Vajrayana Buddhism, which predominates among them and accommodates local spirit propitiation more readily than other sects. These syncretic practices emphasize appeasement of nature spirits (tsen or mountain deities, often depicted as wrathful red entities inhabiting rocks and cliffs), territorial guardians, and ancestral figures to avert misfortune, illness, or crop failure. Bon-influenced rituals, surviving from Bhutan's pre-8th-century spiritual landscape, involve offerings of blood, alcohol, or symbolic substitutes at sacred sites, conducted by lay shamans or lamas to harmonize human activities with supernatural forces. In rural eastern districts like Mongar and Trashigang, community phayul (territorial deity) worship persists alongside monastic festivals, where Buddhist chants invoke protection from malevolent lu (water spirits) or drey (valley guardians), reflecting causal linkages between environmental harmony and prosperity drawn from empirical agrarian needs rather than doctrinal purity. Historical Bon elements, such as divination through animal entrails or herbal exorcisms—though diminished by centralizing Buddhist reforms since the 17th century—endure in folk healing for ailments attributed to spirit imbalance. This blending, documented in ethnographic accounts, underscores Sharchop resilience in adapting indigenous causal realism (e.g., spirits as tangible mediators of natural events) into Buddhist frameworks without full subsumption. Syncretism manifests in annual rituals like mountain-sealing ceremonies, where villages in Tshangla-speaking areas collectively offer butter lamps, , and incantations to bind tsen during agricultural peaks, ensuring safe herding and harvests; these predate formalized but now feature tantric empowerments. While urban increasingly align with state-sponsored , rural adherence to these practices—prioritized for their observed in averting landslides or epidemics—highlights a pragmatic divergence from elite monastic narratives. Government tolerance, absent outright prohibition since the cultural policies, allows , though rituals involving live sacrifices have largely transitioned to vegetarian proxies amid modernization pressures.

Ethnic Relations and Modern Developments

Assimilation and Government Policies

The Bhutanese has implemented policies since the mid-20th century to promote national cohesion amid ethnic diversity, often prioritizing Ngalop cultural norms as the basis for a unified Drukpa identity, which has encouraged assimilation among Sharchops despite their numerical predominance in the east. In 1969, authorities banned traditional (), a practice integral to Sharchop semi-nomadic lifestyles, compelling communities to adopt permanent settlements, raise like goats and yaks, and integrate into centralized agricultural systems. This shift facilitated greater administrative oversight and cultural standardization but disrupted longstanding economic patterns tied to Sharchop autonomy. Cultural policies intensified in the 1980s under the "" framework, including the 1985 promotion of , a code of etiquette mandating Ngalop-style national dress, architectural norms, and for all citizens, regardless of . Sharchops, sharing with Ngalops but favoring the sect and distinct dialects like Sharchopkha, experienced these measures as extensions of enforcement, extending to religious institutions where Nyingma practices faced subtle marginalization in favor of and Drukpa lineages aligned with the monarchy. policies designating as the sole national medium further pressured Sharchopkha usage in education and administration, contributing to linguistic assimilation, though recent initiatives under Gross National Happiness have acknowledged local dialects for cultural preservation. Politically, assimilation efforts intersected with security concerns; in the 1990s, government actions targeted Sharchop-linked opposition groups like the Druk National Congress, framing dissent as threats to unity and justifying arrests and cultural conformity drives. These policies, reinterpreted by the 1980s as essential for national security amid southern border pressures, have resulted in substantial Sharchop integration into dominant norms, with many adopting Dzongkha and Ngalop customs while retaining core Buddhist practices. Critics from human rights perspectives argue this process privileges Ngalop hegemony, though Sharchops' indigenous status and religious overlap have buffered them relative to southern groups.

Challenges and Cultural Preservation

The Sharchops, residing primarily in eastern Bhutan, face ongoing assimilation into the dominant Ngalop culture, which emphasizes Dzongkha language and Drukpa customs, leading to a dilution of their distinct ethnic identity over time. This process has been accelerated by national policies promoting Dzongkha as the unifying language since its declaration in 1961, with institutional support through the Dzongkha Development Commission established in 1989, potentially marginalizing Tshangla despite its continued regional use as a lingua franca. Economic underdevelopment in the eastern regions exacerbates these cultural pressures, as rural-urban migration from east to west—driven by limited opportunities—disrupts traditional agrarian lifestyles and kinship networks, with Sharchops often viewed as less privileged compared to the Ngalop elite. Modernization challenges further erode Sharchop practices, including the integration of animist elements into Nyingmapa and endogamous cross-cousin marriage preferences, as younger generations prioritize English and for and amid broader Bhutanese development goals. While Tshangla remains non-endangered relative to other minority languages, socio-economic shifts threaten its vitality, with no formal written tradition beyond borrowed limiting documentation and transmission. Cultural preservation among Sharchops relies on informal mechanisms, such as maintaining large kinship-based and regional festivals that blend Buddhist rituals with soil-god , though these are confined to isolated villages. Bhutan's overarching framework supports ethnic diversity through multilingualism policies that tolerate Tshangla's use without aggressive suppression, allowing persistence in eastern communities. However, lacking targeted programs, preservation efforts are vulnerable to ongoing assimilation and migration, with animist influences diminishing as dominant Buddhist prevails.

References

  1. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/547499-BHUTAN-2023-INTERNATIONAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf
  2. https://www.britannica.com/place/Bhutan
  3. https://dice.missouri.edu/assets/docs/sino-tibetan/Sharchops.pdf
  4. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-the-ethnic-composition-of-bhutan.html
  5. https://www.drukasia.com/blog/bhutan-ethnicity/
  6. https://www.joshuaproject.net/people-profile.php?peo3=11685
  7. https://bhutanculturaltravel.com/bhutan-people/
  8. https://www.countryreports.org/country/Bhutan/expandedhistory.htm
  9. https://www.gobhutantours.com/the-sharchops-ethnic-group-in-bhutan/
  10. https://www.dechenrabgyal.com/2017/12/15/demystifying-language-ethnicity-and-region-case-of-sharchokp-and-tshangla/
  11. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28827-2
  12. http://bhutantenpatravel.com/bhutan/people.html
  13. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35839.htm
  14. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/bhutan/78404.htm
  15. https://www.gobhutantours.com/major-bhutan-ethnic-groups/
  16. https://antrocom.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/doji-sarma-borderland-peril-cultural-identities.pdf
  17. https://factsanddetails.com/south-asia/Bhutan/People_Bhutan/entry-7895.html
  18. https://d1i1jdw69xsqx0.cloudfront.net/digitalhimalaya/collections/journals/jbs/pdf/JBS_15_01.pdf
  19. https://www.hisfeet.com/unreached-people-groups-in-bhutan/
  20. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/bhutan/110948.htm
  21. https://minorityrights.org/country/bhutan/
  22. https://www.peoplegroups.org/explore/groupdetails.aspx?peid=1225
  23. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/bhutan-population/
  24. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2023/countries/bhutan/
  25. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/concept/1447374
  26. https://countrystudies.us/bhutan/19.htm
  27. https://www.italian-journal-linguistics.com/app/uploads/2021/07/9_-Wangdi.pdf
  28. http://people.umass.edu/scable/LING748-SP12/Materials/Tshangla-Basics.pdf
  29. https://www.isbsbhutan.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Seline_Grollmann_ISBS-conference-paper.pdf
  30. https://www.academia.edu/2831350/Tshangla_verb_inflections
  31. https://www.isw.unibe.ch/e41142/e41180/e523709/e547774/1994d_ger.pdf
  32. https://travel.com/regions/asia/bhutan/bhutan-official-and-widely-spoken-languages/
  33. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/tsj/
  34. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/tshangla.htm
  35. https://bhutan.virginia.edu/subjects/7390/text-node/40886/nojs
  36. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/print/11685/BT
  37. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/vibrant-celebration-kangsee-sharchop-community-thinley-dhendup
  38. https://www.bookmytour.bt/blog/holidays-festivals-in-bhutan-lets-celebrate
  39. https://www.visitbhutan.com/festival.php?festival_category=Festivals%2Bin%2BEastern%2BBhutan
  40. https://dorji-wangchuk.com/2023/06/12/why-sharchops-have-big-family/
  41. https://www.ichlinks.com/archive/elements/elementsV.do?elementsUid=13877693747483304219
  42. https://www.raon.ch/pages/story/bt/btstmarriage01.html
  43. https://dorji-wangchuk.com/2016/11/22/sharchop-ngew-culture/
  44. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v7i11/ART20192523.pdf
  45. https://factsanddetails.com/south-asia/Bhutan/Religion_Bhutan/entry-7898.html
  46. https://saarcculture.org/cultural-identities-3/
  47. https://factsanddetails.com/south-asia/Bhutan/Religion_Bhutan/entry-7899.html
  48. http://thoughtsbuddha.blogspot.com/2012/10/nyingma-bhddhism-in-bhutan-nyingma.html
  49. https://elevatedestinations.com/2023/08/11/bhutan-traditions/
  50. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/bhutan
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317835664_Propitiating_the_Tsen_sealing_the_mountain_Community_mountain-closure_ritual_practice_in_Eastern_Bhutan
  52. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-733
  53. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2266&context=himalaya
  54. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2000/sa/695.htm
  55. https://www.hurights.or.jp/archives/focus/section2/1996/03/bhutan-human-rights-in-peril.html
  56. https://www.nrc.no/globalassets/pdf/reports/bhutan---land-of-happiness-for-the-selected.pdf
  57. https://www.bhutantoday.bt/%25F0%259D%2590%258E%25F0%259D%2590%258F%25F0%259D%2590%2588%25F0%259D%2590%258D%25F0%259D%2590%2588%25F0%259D%2590%258E%25F0%259D%2590%258D-%25F0%259D%2590%258F%25F0%259D%2590%25AB%25F0%259D%2590%259E%25F0%259D%2590%25AC%25F0%259D%2590%259E%25F0%259D%2590%25AB%25F0%259D%2590%25AF%25F0%259D%2590%25A2%25F0%259D%2590%25A7-2/
  58. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/uscri/1999/en/15364
  59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n248.7?seq=1
  60. https://eastasiaforum.org/2014/05/29/finding-a-future-for-minorities-in-bhutans-emerging-democracy/
  61. https://www.moit.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CNDP-Vol2_Existing-Conditions-and-Development-Issues.pdf
  62. https://ddrn.dk/15884/
  63. https://lt4all.elra.info/media/papers/P5/72.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.