Hubbry Logo
Shared services centerShared services centerMain
Open search
Shared services center
Community hub
Shared services center
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Shared services center
Shared services center
Shared services center
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

TeliaSonera shared service center in Vilnius, Lithuania
Nasdaq shared services center in Vilnius, Lithuania
Lufthansa shared services centre in Kraków, Poland
Shared services center of local government in Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Poland
Danske Bank campus – a large shared services center in Vilnius, Lithuania

A shared services center – a center for shared services in an organization – is the entity responsible for the execution and the handling of specific operational tasks, such as accounting, human resources, payroll, IT, legal, compliance, purchasing, security. The shared services center is often a spin-off of the corporate services to separate all operational types of tasks from the corporate headquarters, which has to focus on a leadership and corporate governance type of role. As shared services centers are often cost centers, they are quite cost-sensitive also in terms of their headcount, labour costs and location selection criteria.

Overview

[edit]

A shared service is an accountable entity within a multi-unit organization tasked with supplying the business unit, respective divisions and departments with specialized services (finance, HR transactions, IT services, facilities, logistics, sales transactions) on the basis of a service level agreement (SLA) with a costs charge out on basis of some type and system of transfer price.[1]

Shared service centers are deployed for a variety of reasons:[2]

  • to reduce costs of decentralization, to increase the quality and professionalism of support processes for the business,
  • to increase cost flexibility for supporting services,
  • to create a higher degree of strategic flexibility.

Reported cost reductions of costs of services organized in shared service center are as high as 70% of the original costs, but average about 50%.

Shared service centers are not to be confused with corporate staff departments. Different from staff departments, shared service centers have measurable outputs (by quantity and quality), with costs per unit of service provided. Tasks not organized in shared service centers include corporate control, corporate legal, management development policy, IT-governance and other support typical for the statutory duties of the executive board.

Shared services training:

Many organizations in private and public sectors use a competency-based training course to identify and fill skill gaps.

Critical issue

[edit]

Specific requirements

[edit]

To reap the benefits a multiple shared service centers sets specific requirements to the resource allocation process in the internal organization of the firm. A critical issue is that the manager of a business unit and the manager of a shared service center will prepare a service level agreement (SLA), but the approval of the SLA is a reserved power of the executive board. This is to balance the overall budget of the firm as well as to avoid budget gaming between the managers of the business unit and the shared service center.

A common mistake is to grant the shared service center a status equal to that of business unit or division. This creates confusion as it conflicts with the primacy of the units responsible for managing market opportunities. Also shared service centers should not report to their corresponding corporate staff department (with the exception of the financial shared service center) as this creates the risk that the corporate staff department uses the shared service centers to deploy functional authorities. Managers of business units will then perceive the shared service center as an implicit control device, impairing the quality of services.

It is equally important that deploying a shared service center in a multi-unit organization makes the executive board accountable to the managers of the business unit for the performance of the shared service centers. This is because the use of the services of the shared service centers is mandatory, the executive board reduces the scope of resources of the business units, whilst the accountability of the manager of the business unit for business performance remains unchanged.

Deployment

[edit]

The deployment of shared service centers requires that the managers of the business units develop the competence to be a professional principal of the shared service, knowing how to articulate their demand and what value services have to their business.

In the accounting system a shared service usually will have the status of cost and investment center. As some shared-service centers, e.g. for purchasing and for customer service, dependent on their activities, actually perform value-creating activities, to the judgement of fiscal authorities, transborder transfer prices may be subject to taxation.

Cost charge

[edit]

With respect to cost charge out a critical issue is that costs charged based on activity based costing (ABC) do not provide an incentive to the shared service center to be efficient because ABC implies that the costs of non-used over capacity will be charged out as well. It is better to cost charge out on time-driven activity based costing.[3] The superior solution for cost charge out is cost allocation based on the deployment of a corporate wide general ledger, which includes the recording of the internal use of resources for products and customers. This method eliminates the effect of double marginalization inherent to transfer prices and subsequently improves the performance of the firm.[4]

Standardized processes

[edit]

Another critical issue in shared service centers is the way processes are standardized. At the end of the day shared service centers have to contribute to the competitiveness and the (financial) performance of the firm. As competition shifts to innovation of business models and in relation to this there is a higher dynamics in the composite customer value proposition to be performed, changes in the customer value proposition need to be translated timely and effectively in (back office) processes. As a consequence standardization of processes cannot be based on "best practice processes" as used to be promoted by IT (enterprise systems)[5] but need to be based on basis of modularity.[6]

Coordination of demand and supply

[edit]

In practice the coordination of demand and supply of services between business units and shared service centers, as expressed in a SLA turns out not to be effective, this only serves a generic capacity planning. In sync with the shift in business firms from budget-driven strategy execution to strategy execution based on validated cause-effect diagrams, the specific performance of shared service centers needs to be defined through cause-effect relations, linking the customer value proposition to back-office processes and vice versa.[7] In this way, beyond defining shared service centers as cost centers, the contribution of shared services centers to competitiveness and performance can be established and controlled. Also this is an enormous boost to the morale and motivation of workers in shared service centers.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Shared services center

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A shared services center (SSC) is a dedicated, centralized organizational unit that consolidates and delivers standardized support functions—such as , , , , and —to multiple business units or departments across an enterprise, operating like an internal to enhance and reduce duplication. These centers focus on process , , and continuous improvement, often spanning multiple locations and leveraging dedicated personnel, processes, and technologies to serve as a single point of service delivery. The concept of shared services traces its roots to the , when early forms of centralization, such as "typing pools" for administrative tasks, emerged to manage high costs of equipment and training, evolving over decades into modern SSCs driven by , advancements, and the need for cost optimization in large corporations. Today, SSCs are implemented in various models, including global, regional, or national scopes, and can be fully internal, outsourced to third-party providers, or a hybrid, with implementation typically progressing through phases like assessment, design, rollout, and optimization. Common functions handled by SSCs include transactional activities like payroll processing, invoice management, and IT support, allowing business units to focus on core strategic objectives rather than routine operations. Key benefits of SSCs include significant cost reductions—often 25-50% in areas like and HR through , lower labor costs, and technological efficiencies—alongside improved service consistency, better data accuracy for , and enhanced compliance via centralized controls. Additionally, they promote operational flexibility, such as scaling during mergers or market changes, foster cross-functional collaboration by breaking down , and enable strategic insights through aggregated reporting and performance metrics. As of 2025, SSCs increasingly incorporate AI and generative AI for process automation and enhanced . While primarily adopted by large enterprises and organizations, SSCs have become integral to modern business models, with agreements (SLAs) and systems often used to ensure accountability and customer-like treatment of internal departments.

Definition and Origins

Core Definition

A shared services center (SSC) is a centralized organizational unit that consolidates and delivers common support functions to multiple business units or entities within a company or across organizations. It operates as a dedicated entity comprising people, processes, and technologies structured to provide these services efficiently, often treating internal departments as customers. Key characteristics of an SSC include the centralization of back-office operations, the of standardized processes to ensure consistency, the leveraging of through resource consolidation, and a service-oriented delivery model that emphasizes defined service levels and process improvements. This model focuses on optimizing administrative tasks rather than core business activities, enabling better across the enterprise. Unlike outsourcing, which transfers functions to external vendors, SSCs emphasize internal service provision to maintain greater control and alignment with organizational goals. Typical functions handled by SSCs include , processing, management such as employee data handling, , IT support, and elements like order management, but exclude strategic or revenue-generating core operations.

Historical Development

While early forms of shared services, such as typing pools for administrative tasks in the , represented initial centralization efforts to manage costs, the modern concept of shared services centers (SSCs) emerged in the mid-, primarily within functions of U.S. corporations, as a response to corporate restructuring trends that sought to consolidate fragmented support activities and recapture lost following widespread in the late and early . This period was marked by aggressive divestitures, spin-offs, and the creation of semi-autonomous business units, which inadvertently led to redundant resources, duplicated systems, and higher operational costs across organizations. By the mid-1990s, SSCs gained broader adoption as companies blended centralization with decentralized service delivery, influenced by accelerating that demanded standardized processes across borders and early IT advancements, such as (ERP) systems, which facilitated and remote management. Key milestones in SSC adoption included pioneering implementations by multinational corporations in the 1990s, such as , which established internal organizations to support its rapid global expansion and manage back-office functions like HR and for international clients. Similarly, launched its Finance Services Center in 1997 in as an early brownfield site for consolidating and , marking a shift toward location-specific . The 2000s saw accelerated growth, driven by the widespread deployment of platforms like , which enabled seamless centralization of processes across disparate business units and geographies, transforming SSCs from siloed departments into integrated hubs. Post-2000, SSCs evolved from in-house, domestic models to global configurations, with significant to low-cost regions to leverage talent pools and further reduce expenses. emerged as a primary destination, hosting a surge in Global Capability Centers (GCCs) that handled IT, , and analytics for multinational parents, fueled by the country's English-speaking workforce and growth. In parallel, (CEE) became a key hub starting in the late 1990s and accelerating after EU enlargement in 2004, attracting investments in service centers for multilingual support in and customer operations due to skilled labor at competitive costs. As of 2025, SSCs are integrating (AI), automation, and to create hybrid models that combine captive operations with outsourced elements, enhancing agility and scalability. Generative AI and (RPA) are prioritized for streamlining and order-to-cash processes, with nearly 80% of global services (GBS) leaders deploying AI tools for decision support and efficiency gains. platforms further enable and multi-region deployment, while hybrid structures—blending nearshoring in with —address talent shortages and geopolitical risks.

Strategic Motivations

Cost Reduction Drivers

Shared services centers (SSCs) primarily drive cost reductions through the consolidation of duplicate functions across an , which eliminates redundancies in staffing and administrative overhead. By centralizing support activities such as , HR, and IT into a single unit, companies can reduce headcount requirements significantly, with 93% of surveyed organizations attributing their savings mainly to personnel cost reductions via capacity optimization and labor arbitrage effects. This consolidation leverages , allowing shared resources like IT infrastructure and facilities to serve multiple units more efficiently than in fragmented setups. Bulk purchasing and resource sharing further lower per-unit costs by enabling volume-based negotiations for supplies, software licenses, and vendor services that would be uneconomical in decentralized models. In decentralized environments, lead to redundant investments in tools, training, and systems, whereas SSCs avoid these by standardizing and deployment across the enterprise. contributes substantially, often by relocating operations to lower-wage regions, which can cut personnel expenses by moving activities from high-cost to medium- or low-cost countries. leverage, including and common IT platforms, amplifies these savings by streamlining processes and reducing manual labor needs. Typical cost savings in support functions range from 20% to 40%, achieved as SSCs mature through these mechanisms. For instance, (FTE) reductions often exceed planned levels of 10-30%, with many organizations realizing over 30% in personnel costs alone. These ongoing savings offset initial setup costs, which include investments in technology implementation, process reengineering, and facilities, within a period of 2-4 years. In comparison, decentralized models perpetuate higher baseline costs due to duplicated efforts, making SSCs a financially superior alternative for scalable operations. As of 2025, advancements in AI and are further enhancing these cost motivations by enabling and hyper-automation, potentially increasing savings beyond traditional levels.

Operational Efficiency Gains

Shared services centers (SSCs) achieve operational efficiency through the of processes, which minimizes variations in execution and significantly reduces errors in routine tasks such as processing and handling. This uniformity also streamlines employee by establishing a consistent framework that eliminates the need for multiple, location-specific protocols, allowing staff to master core procedures more quickly and effectively. Furthermore, centralization in SSCs pools specialized expertise from across the , enabling faster issue resolution through dedicated teams that address complex queries more efficiently than decentralized units. Technology plays a pivotal role in amplifying these gains, particularly through shared IT platforms like portals that empower users to handle routine requests independently, such as updating personal records or submitting expense reports. These systems reduce manual interventions by automating repetitive workflows, with implementations in financial reconciliations achieving up to 85% of processes without human input, thereby accelerating cycle times and freeing resources for higher-value activities. Advanced tools, including (RPA) and AI-driven chatbots, further enhance this by handling rule-based tasks end-to-end, such as data validation and predictive customer support. Consistent processes in SSCs foster quality improvements by ensuring adherence to regulatory standards and facilitating easier compliance audits through centralized documentation and audit trails. This uniformity also supports benchmarking against industry best practices, allowing organizations to measure performance metrics like agreements (SLAs) and iteratively refine operations for superior reliability and . A key advantage of SSCs is their , which enables them to absorb volume fluctuations—such as seasonal peaks in HR inquiries or demands—without requiring proportional increases in staff, thanks to the leveraged capacity of centralized resources and automated scaling features in digital platforms. This flexibility not only maintains service continuity but also supports organizational growth by efficiently reallocating expertise as needs evolve.

Implementation Framework

Planning and Requirements

The establishment of a shared services center (SSC) begins with a thorough assessment phase to evaluate feasibility and build a robust . This involves developing a detailed of potential financial and operational benefits, including cost savings from consolidation and efficiency gains from , often through a cost-benefit model that compares current expenses against projected SSC outcomes. Function mapping is a critical component, where organizations identify and categorize processes suitable for centralization, such as transactional activities in or HR, using tools like process matrices to delineate responsibilities. Maturity evaluation assesses the current state of operations, existing processes against industry standards to identify gaps in , , and skills, ensuring the SSC targets areas with the highest improvement potential. Key requirements for a successful SSC include a strong governance structure to oversee strategy and operations. This typically features a steering committee comprising senior executives from business units and SSC leadership to define policies, resolve conflicts, and align the center with organizational goals, often formalized through service level agreements. A skilled team is essential, responsible for leading transitions, mitigating resistance, and fostering adoption through targeted training and communication strategies. IT infrastructure readiness is paramount, necessitating integrated data systems such as (ERP) platforms to enable seamless process , real-time data sharing, and across functions. Stakeholder alignment is achieved by actively involving business units in scope definition from the outset. This collaborative approach, often via workshops and impact assessments, ensures buy-in by addressing concerns and clarifying expectations, while distinguishing core strategic functions—retained locally for —from non-core, repetitive tasks ideal for SSC migration, such as or processing. Legal and regulatory considerations must be integrated early, particularly for global SSCs. Compliance with data privacy regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires evaluating data handling practices to safeguard personal information during centralization, including secure transfer mechanisms and consent protocols. Cross-border implications demand analysis of tax structures, rules, and jurisdictional variances to avoid penalties and optimize operations, such as selecting locations with favorable incentives while adhering to international standards.

Deployment Models

Shared services centers (SSCs) can be deployed through various models, primarily categorized as greenfield, brownfield, or hybrid approaches. In a greenfield model, organizations build an entirely new SSC from scratch, allowing for complete customization of processes, , and culture to align with strategic goals, though it requires significant upfront and time. Conversely, the brownfield model involves and consolidating existing facilities or operations into an SSC, leveraging current assets for faster and lower initial costs, but potentially facing challenges from legacy systems and entrenched practices. Hybrid models combine elements of and , such as outsourcing low-value activities like while retaining higher-value functions internally, offering a balanced approach to risk and control. Location plays a critical role in SSC deployment, with options including onshore (within the same country for and cultural alignment), nearshore (in adjacent regions for proximity and moderation, a growing trend as of 2025 for balancing and talent access), or offshore (in distant low-cost locations for substantial savings). These choices depend on factors like labor , talent availability, and needs; for instance, offshore models are common for routine tasks in or IT to achieve significant reductions, often 30% or more. Deployment often follows a phased rollout strategy to minimize disruption, beginning with a pilot in one function such as or HR to test processes and gather insights before scaling enterprise-wide. Each phase typically spans 6-18 months, including build-out, testing, and stabilization periods, enabling iterative improvements and risk mitigation. Technology integration is integral during deployment, with (ERP) systems like or implemented to centralize data and standardize workflows across the SSC. Automation tools, including (RPA) and, as of 2025, generative AI for advanced process handling, are deployed concurrently to handle repetitive tasks, ensuring seamless transitions and enhancing efficiency from the outset. For broader coverage, SSCs may adopt global or regional models; global setups often use multi-site configurations for 24/7 operations, while regional ones focus on localized needs. A prominent structure is the hub-and-spoke model, where a central hub manages core operations and regional spokes handle localized support, facilitating scalability and time zone alignment.

Process Standardization

Process standardization in shared services centers (SSCs) involves establishing uniform procedures across functions such as , HR, and IT to promote consistency and scalability. Key approaches include process mapping with tools like (BPMN), which provides a standardized graphical representation for documenting workflows and identifying redundancies. Additionally, defining key performance indicators (KPIs) for each process step—such as cycle time, error rates, and cost per transaction—ensures measurable alignment with organizational goals. Frameworks like are often adopted to minimize defects and variability, integrating statistical methods to refine processes before centralization. These methods yield significant benefits by reducing process variability, which facilitates of staff and accelerates for new employees. For instance, enables the application of tools like RPA, which can lead to up to a 30% improvement in , enhancing overall and enabling SSCs to handle higher volumes without proportional increases in resources. By applying best practices globally, organizations achieve consistent across business units, supporting as the SSC expands. A primary challenge addressed through is harmonizing diverse legacy from various units, which often involve incompatible systems or regional variations that hinder integration. Global process owners (GPOs) play a crucial role here, overseeing end-to-end —such as in order-to-cash cycles—to consolidate high-volume activities and mitigate fragmentation. This harmonization simplifies complexity, paving the way for automation and reducing integration risks associated with disparate systems. Continuous improvement is embedded via regular audits and updates to maintain process standards amid evolving business needs. Many SSCs implement continuous improvement programs (CIP) with defined benchmarks, conducting periodic reviews—such as annual benchmarking against industry standards—to identify deviations and refine KPIs. This iterative approach ensures adaptability, with 27% of SSCs having fully developed CIP structures that include incentives for ongoing enhancements.

Operational Management

Cost Allocation Methods

Cost allocation methods in shared services centers (SSCs) ensure that the expenses of centralized functions, such as , HR, and IT, are distributed equitably among business units, promoting transparency and . These methods typically balance fairness, accuracy, and administrative simplicity, drawing on established principles to link costs to consumption or benefit. Direct methods allocate costs based on measurable usage, such as per transaction or activity volume, allowing business units to be charged precisely for services consumed. For example, in accounts payable processes, costs may be assigned per invoice processed, using historical data from prior periods to forecast and bill accurately. This approach fosters cost consciousness by tying expenses directly to demand, as seen in variable pricing models where allocation reflects actual volume. Indirect methods distribute costs using broader proxies, such as a fixed percentage of a business unit's revenue or headcount, when direct tracing is impractical for overhead functions like general accounting. An example formula used in some organizations for such allocation employs a general corporate allocator (GCA), calculated as: GCA=Net Revenue+Total Assets+Labour Expense3\text{GCA} = \frac{\text{Net Revenue} + \text{Total Assets} + \text{Labour Expense}}{3} Costs are then apportioned proportionally to each unit's GCA share, providing a reasonable approximation of benefit without granular tracking. Hybrid models combine elements of direct and indirect approaches to address varying service complexities, such as applying fixed allocations for baseline and usage-based charges for variable demands like IT support tickets. Overall SSC costs can be expressed as: Total SSC Cost=Fixed Overhead+Variable Usage Costs\text{Total SSC Cost} = \text{Fixed Overhead} + \text{Variable Usage Costs} with allocation to units via: Allocated Cost=Cost per Unit×Usage Volume\text{Allocated Cost} = \text{Cost per Unit} \times \text{Usage Volume} This flexibility accommodates diverse SSC operations while minimizing disputes. Implementation often relies on (ABC), which traces expenses to specific activities—such as employee in HR—before assigning them to consuming units based on drivers like full-time equivalents (FTEs) or transaction counts. ABC enhances accuracy by establishing cause-and-effect relationships, reducing arbitrary distributions common in traditional methods. To ensure transparency, SSCs deploy dashboards and reporting tools that provide real-time visibility into cost breakdowns, enabling business units to review and validate charges monthly or quarterly. Over time, SSC cost allocation has evolved from simple cost-plus models—where charges included a markup on incurred expenses—to value-based pricing that aligns fees with delivered business outcomes, such as efficiency gains or risk reduction. This shift reflects SSCs' maturation from mere cost centers to strategic partners, with hybrid and transaction-based methods gaining prevalence to support sophisticated service-level agreements (SLAs).

Demand-Supply Coordination

Demand-supply coordination in shared services centers (SSCs) involves aligning fluctuating service requests from business units with available resources to ensure efficient operations and service delivery. This coordination relies on predictive tools and structured processes to anticipate needs and allocate capacity effectively, preventing underutilization during low-demand periods and overload during peaks. Standardized processes serve as enablers for this alignment by providing consistent frameworks for service handling. As of 2025, (AI) tools, including generative AI for , are increasingly integrated to enhance forecasting accuracy and automate resource adjustments. Forecasting demand in SSCs utilizes advanced to analyze historical data, seasonal trends, and business activity patterns, enabling proactive capacity adjustments. Capacity planning models, such as modeling, simulate interconnected system behaviors to predict demand fluctuations and optimize resource use in service environments. These models help SSCs identify potential gaps between demand and supply, facilitating strategic decisions on and . Service level agreements (SLAs) play a crucial role in prioritizing requests by defining response times, service quality thresholds, and escalation procedures based on request urgency. In SSCs, SLAs establish clear expectations between the center and business units, allowing high-priority requests—such as those impacting revenue or compliance—to be fast-tracked over routine ones. This prioritization mechanism ensures that critical demands are met without compromising overall throughput. Queue management systems in SSCs employ multiserver queueing models with priority scheduling to handle incoming requests efficiently, distributing workloads across available staff to match supply with demand variations. algorithms, informed by , optimize staffing levels during peaks and troughs by calculating fair shares of capacity among service classes, minimizing wait times and incentives for collaboration. These techniques model SSCs as priority-based systems where higher-priority queues receive preferential service, balancing individual and collective efficiency. AI-driven automation, such as (RPA), further supports queue handling, with over 70% of SSCs reporting RPA in production as of 2024. Integration of (ERP) modules provides real-time visibility into demand patterns and resource status across the SSC, enabling swift identification and resolution of potential bottlenecks. ERP systems centralize data from , HR, and functions, offering dashboards for monitoring service queues and on an ongoing basis. This connectivity streamlines workflows, automates request , and supports data-driven adjustments to prevent delays in service delivery. For scalability, SSCs implement dynamic staffing through on-demand platforms that rapidly scale workforce capacity during demand spikes, such as end-of-quarter processing surges. Outsourcing select functions to external providers complements internal resources, allowing temporary augmentation without long-term commitments. These adjustments ensure supply elasticity, maintaining service continuity amid variable business needs.

Performance Measurement

Performance measurement in shared services centers (SSCs) involves evaluating operational effectiveness through a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators to ensure alignment with organizational goals and agreements. These metrics help identify areas for improvement, validate cost savings, and enhance service delivery to internal clients. Key indicators (KPIs) are typically categorized into input, operational, and output types, allowing for a holistic assessment of the service partnership between SSCs and business units. As of 2025, KPIs increasingly include and AI adoption rates to reflect . Essential metrics include cycle time, which measures the duration required to complete processes such as or query resolution, often targeted to reduce and improve throughput. Error rates track defects in transactions, such as invoice discrepancies, with benchmarks in high-performing operations aiming for rates below 1%. Customer satisfaction (CSAT) scores gauge internal client feedback through surveys, with good scores typically ranging 75-85% to reflect reliable service. Utilization rates assess staff , with industry targets often set at 80-85% to balance and workload without burnout. A widely adopted framework is the , which evaluates SSC performance across four perspectives: financial (e.g., cost per transaction), customer (e.g., CSAT and service levels), internal processes (e.g., cycle time and error rates), and learning/growth (e.g., employee training and ). This approach integrates strategic objectives with measurable outcomes, as demonstrated in studies of SSC implementations where it facilitated cost reductions of 20-30% while improving service quality. Benchmarking against industry standards, often sourced from reports by and APQC, enables SSCs to compare metrics like utilization and error rates with peers, identifying gaps and best practices. Continuous monitoring tools, such as dashboards integrated with systems, support real-time tracking to ensure ongoing alignment. Quarterly reviews of these metrics drive targeted improvements, with output KPIs shared with stakeholders to foster accountability and iterative enhancements.

Challenges and Risks

Key Operational Hurdles

One of the primary operational hurdles in centers (SSCs) is cultural resistance from business units, where managers often oppose centralization due to perceived loss of and the unique ways each unit conducts business. This resistance manifests as overt or passive-aggressive pushback against efforts, complicating the shift to unified processes across the . Additionally, integration with legacy systems poses significant challenges, as consolidating disparate IT platforms—such as older systems—into a single global standard like or requires rapid implementation amid compatibility issues and data silos. Talent retention emerges as another critical difficulty, particularly in competitive locations like or , where high attrition rates stem from employees seeking better financial incentives or career advancement elsewhere. In global capability centers akin to SSCs, over 90% of staff prioritize hybrid work flexibility, with over 70% valuing short commutes under 30 minutes, exacerbating turnover when rigid structures fail to accommodate these preferences. issues further compound these problems, as SSCs must handle organizational growth across multiple international sites without proportional , demanding flexible to support increasing transaction volumes and diverse needs. Demand-supply imbalances, such as surging internal service requests outpacing capacity, can lead to SLA failures and operational strain in these setups. Technology risks, including cybersecurity threats, present substantial vulnerabilities in SSCs due to shared exposing services to disruptions from vendor errors or fourth-party failures. , often triggered by configuration mistakes in interfaces or external outages, can halt operations across business units, amplifying financial and productivity losses. As of 2025, emerging hurdles include disruptions from AI integration, where skills gaps and issues affect nearly 60% of SSC leaders adopting generative AI, leading to uneven implementation and service inconsistencies. Remote and hybrid work coordination adds complexity, with 71% of SSCs operating over half their in distributed models, resulting in challenges like Gen Z talent attrition—84% of leaders expect high turnover within three years due to location-agnostic hiring demands and gaps.

Mitigation Strategies

To address key operational hurdles in shared services centers (SSCs), organizations implement a range of mitigation strategies encompassing human, technological, and structural elements. programs are essential for fostering cultural buy-in during SSC transitions. These programs typically involve multi-channel communication strategies, such as town halls and tailored messaging, to engage stakeholders and dispel fears of disruption, as demonstrated by the University of Kansas's pre-launch roadshows that began nine months ahead of implementation. Additionally, robust initiatives equip talent for new roles, including on-demand videos with quizzes and mentorship programs to standardize processes and build skills in areas like and process execution. For instance, UC Berkeley's two-month bootcamp for SSC staff incorporates tracks to enhance proficiency in shared functions. Contingency planning for IT risks further supports resilience by outlining exit strategies, data transfer protocols, and annual testing of disaster recovery plans to ensure service continuity amid disruptions. Technology solutions play a in preempting failures. System redundancy, achieved through duplicated and networks, minimizes downtime by providing options in mission-critical SSC operations. Complementing this, AI-driven leverages cognitive and historical data to forecast equipment or issues, enabling proactive interventions that can reduce costs by 40% to 75% in targeted functions. Such tools, including for , allow SSCs to transition staff toward higher-value roles while maintaining operational stability. Effective structures ensure long-term . Centralized oversight committees, comprising senior executives and functional representatives, monitor performance via short service-level agreements and facilitate to align SSC offerings with needs. Regular audits, conducted annually or post-changes, verify compliance, , and process efficiency, helping to mitigate risks like service outages. Best practices emphasize adaptive growth. Phased evolution involves segmenting implementations into 3- to 6-month cycles, selecting diverse pilot groups with strong support to gather feedback and refine processes iteratively. For specialized functions, strategic partnerships with third-party providers enable SSCs to broker services, achieving over 30% cost savings through collaborative reengineering and .

References

  1. https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/shared-services
  2. https://www.pwc.at/en/publikationen/global-best-practices/sharedservicecenter-english.pdf
  3. https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/Shared-services
  4. https://www.scottmadden.com/insight/what-are-shared-services/
  5. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/services/consulting/services/shared-services-survey.html
  6. https://www.ssonetwork.com/shared-services/articles/top-10-developments-that-changed-shared-services
  7. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/gx/en/insights/2002-2013/shared-services/shared-services-management-fad-or-real-value.pdf
  8. https://www.iaop.org/Download/Download.aspx?ID=1920
  9. https://chazeypartners.com/article/how-is-your-shared-services-organization-stacking-up-against-an-award-winning-shared-services-center-of-13-years-ago/
  10. https://www.iofm.com/ap/organizational-structure/shared-service-center/global-business-services-the-evolution-of-shared-services
  11. https://eber.uek.krakow.pl/eber/article/download/54/61/259
  12. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28360/1/MPRA_paper_28360.pdf
  13. https://www.auxis.com/learn/shared-services/shared-services-trends/
  14. https://www.anlage.co.in/top-7-global-shared-services-trends-for-2025/
  15. https://www.pwc.at/de/publikationen/financial-services/shared-services-multiplying-success.pdf
  16. https://www.everestgrp.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Shared-Services-Centers-Understanding-Key-Drivers-for-Success.pdf
  17. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2016/09/gbs-pov-value-drivers.pdf
  18. https://kpmg.com/ch/en/insights/transformation/shared-service-centers-finance-tax.html
  19. https://www.deloitte.co.uk/makeconnections/assets/pdf/shared-services-handbook-hit-the-road.pdf
  20. https://blog.softexpert.com/en/shared-services-center/
  21. https://www.processmaker.com/blog/what-is-a-shared-services-center/
  22. https://yrci.com/a-beginners-guide-to-the-shared-service-model/
  23. https://www.wns.com/Portals/0/Documents/Whitepapers/PDFFiles/651/18/WNS-WP-taking-it-to-the-next-level.pdf
  24. https://www.adlittle.com/en/insights/report/beyond-cost-efficiencies-shared-service-centers
  25. https://zalaris.com/consulting/resources/blog/hr-shared-services-explained-benefits-functions-&-best-practices
  26. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/five-characteristics-of-the-best-shared-service-centers
  27. https://www.heflo.com/blog/shared-services-automation
  28. https://www.scottmadden.com/content/uploads/2020/08/ScottMadden_SSOW-Digital_Workshop-A_Designing-and-Implementing-SS-Model.pdf
  29. https://www.imanet.org/-/media/2b85bcf1f2c64b73b28a0562ff7947e9
  30. https://www.ssonetwork.com/business-process-outsourcing/articles/how-to-navigate-the-outsourcing-or-shared-services
  31. https://www.everestgrp.com/2019-12-is-your-shared-services-center-driving-automation-across-your-enterprise-blog-51890.html
  32. https://www.ssonetwork.com/shared-services-the-basics/articles/how-to-choose-the-right-location-7-factors-to-cons
  33. https://www.ssonetwork.com/business-process-outsourcing/articles/setting-up-an-offshore-shared-services-center-loca
  34. https://www.emagia.com/resources/glossary/financial-shared-services-for-ar/
  35. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/606e6b7313afd9187a236955/t/60724626e0dff50b4ab183f7/1618101799035/accenture-pa-centralization.pdf
  36. https://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/ebusiness/erp-shared-services-1539807.pdf
  37. https://www.bizagi.com/en/blog/why-your-shared-services-center-needs-automation
  38. https://caroldiaz.substack.com/p/10-shared-services-trends-shaping
  39. https://umbrex.com/resources/shared-services-playbook/
  40. https://www.ssonetwork.com/shared-services/articles/q-a-key-performance-indicators-kpis
  41. https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp4447.pdf
  42. https://www.pwc.com/ph/en/consulting/assets/2016/PwC_SSC2016_Multiplying_Success.pdf
  43. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-shared-services-pricing-approaches
  44. https://www.erawa.com.au/sites/default/files/24102/08.105-Shared-Service-Cost-Allocation-Review-KPMG-Report.pdf
  45. https://www.ssonetwork.com/shared-services/articles/charging-methodologies-of-shared-services-and-bpo
  46. https://www.betsol.com/blog/it-cost-allocation-models-for-shared-services/
  47. https://www.peeriosity.com/shared-services/articles/2017/02/creating-effective-service-level-agreements-for-shared-services-2/
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11213-025-09739-w
  49. https://www.deloitte.co.uk/sharedservicesconference/assets/img/insights/deloitte-uk-analytics-in-shared-services.pdf
  50. https://eab.com/resources/research-report/engage-shared-services-customers-in-the-conversation-around-service-expectations-and-ongoing-performance/
  51. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/msom.2021.1034
  52. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/msom.2016.0606
  53. https://www.scottmadden.com/content/uploads/2020/10/ScottMadden_Finance-SS-Benchmark-Highlights_07252022_.pdf
  54. https://www.unit4.com/blog/why-psos-are-using-erp-leverage-benefits-shared-service-centers
  55. https://scalehub.com/how-bpos-sscs-can-overcome-the-talent-shortage-and-other-staffing-obstacles/
  56. https://chazeypartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/How-to-Nail-Your-Performance-Measurement-in-Shared-Services.pdf
  57. https://www.prohance.net/pdf/State-of-the-Shared-Services-and-Outsourcing-Industry-Global-Market-Report-2025.pdf
  58. https://opsdog.com/categories/kpis-and-metrics/shared-services
  59. https://www.balto.ai/blog/what-is-csat-in-customer-service/
  60. https://www.getparallax.com/blog/how-digital-services-succeed-part-1-the-utilization-fallacy
  61. https://www.ascendsoftware.com/blog/what-good-looks-like-ap-benchmarks-every-modern-team-should-know-in-2025
  62. https://www.ssonetwork.com/human-resources/whitepapers/tools-templates-balanced-scorecard-for-hr-services
  63. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312286
  64. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3929384/shared-services-metrics-library
  65. https://www.apqc.org/resource-library/resource-collection/finance-shared-services-key-benchmarks
  66. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/gx/en/insights/archive/capturing-promise-shared-services/capturing-the-promise-of-shared-services.pdf
  67. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/leadership/organizational-culture-change.html
  68. https://www.ssonetwork.com/shared-services/articles/the-challenges-facing-shared-services-centers
  69. https://focusonbusiness.eu/en/education/the-role-of-team-leaders-in-employee-retention-in-shared-services-centres-part-1/1789
  70. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/employee-experience-still-matters-talent-retention-at-gccs
  71. https://www.startingpoint.ai/post/growing-shared-services-teams
  72. https://www.isc2.org/Insights/2025/09/security-of-shared-service-environments
  73. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/business-strategy-growth/evolution-of-shared-services.html
  74. https://www.accs.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Ease-the-Transition-to-Shared-Services-with-a-Plan-for-Change-Management-Hurdles.pdf
  75. https://assets.cio.gov/assets/files/resources/CIOC-Federal-Shared-Services-Implementation-Guide.pdf
  76. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/services/consulting/services/about-our-shared-services-practice.html
  77. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/sg/pdf/2021/01/Digital-labor-transforms-shared-services.pdf
  78. https://www.scottmadden.com/insight/considering-phased-approach-implementing-shared-services/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.