Hubbry Logo
SlungshotSlungshotMain
Open search
Slungshot
Community hub
Slungshot
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Slungshot
Slungshot
Slungshot
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Analog of slungshot.

A slungshot is a maritime tool consisting of a weight, or "shot", affixed to the end of a long cord often by being wound into the center of a knot called a "monkey's fist". It is used to cast line from one location to another, often mooring line. The cord end is tied to the heavier line and the weighted end of the slungshot is thrown across the intervening space where a person picks it up and pulls the line across.

As a weapon

[edit]

The slungshot was often used as a civilian or improvised weapon; however, the rope was much shorter for use as a weapon. The cord is tied around the wrist, and the weight is carried in the hand or the pocket of the user. A slungshot may be swung in a manner similar to that of a flail or a blackjack.

In China and Japan

[edit]

Slungshots were also used in China and Japan, under other names and were sometimes weighted on both ends, such as with Kusari-fundo, manrikigusari, and other variants. A variant called "loaded sleeves," consisted of weights concealed in long, flowing sleeves.

Robert van Gulik stated in the postscript of his book The Willow Pattern A Judge Dee Mystery, that in 1935 when he was in Peking, he was told how "loaded sleeves" facilitated an unexpected escape for a group of foreign nuns threatened by a mob during an anti-Western uprising in China. The cornered nuns, believing they were going to be killed, reportedly raised their hands to pray. The people standing nearest incorrectly identified the bulky objects in the upraised folds of cloth, interpreting them to be dangerous "loaded sleeves". They backed away, opening a path through the crowd, and the nuns escaped. The bulky objects were their breviaries, which the nuns habitually carried in the sleeves of their robes.[1]

United States

[edit]

Abraham Lincoln's most notable criminal trial occurred in 1858 when he successfully defended "Duff" Armstrong on a charge of killing another with a slung shot. They were widely used by criminals and street gang members in the 19th century as they had the advantage of being easy to make, silent, and very effective, particularly against an unsuspecting opponent. This gave them a dubious reputation, similar to that of switchblade knives in the 1950s, and they were outlawed in many jurisdictions. The use as a criminal weapon continued at least up until the early 1920s.[2]

Carrying a slungshot or having one on one's person is a crime in the states of California,[3] Oklahoma,[4] Massachusetts,[5] Michigan,[6] Nevada,[7] Washington,[8] Minnesota,[9] New Hampshire.,[10] and Vermont (when intending to use as a weapon).[11] In March 2016, Florida repealed its longstanding first-degree misdemeanor law forbidding the carrying of a concealed slungshot.[12]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Slungshot

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A slungshot is a handheld impact weapon comprising a dense mass—such as metal, stone, or sand—secured to a flexible strap, cord, or handle, swung by the user to generate kinetic force for striking. Originally derived from maritime tools like the monkey's fist knot employed by sailors to hurl mooring lines, the slungshot evolved into a concealable device for self-defense and assault. Distinct from rigid-handheld alternatives like the or , which rely on direct manual thrusting, the slungshot's design permits greater momentum through whipping motion, amplifying impact velocity while allowing compact carry. By the , it gained notoriety among urban criminals and gang members for muggings and brawls, prompting widespread legislative bans as a concealed . Possession, manufacture, or sale of slungshots remains prohibited in numerous U.S. jurisdictions, classified as felonies in states including , , , and , with origins of such restrictions tracing to post-Civil War eras like Florida's 1868 . These laws reflect concerns over its disproportionate lethality against vital areas, despite sporadic modern advocacy for legalization in contexts like tools.

Definition and Design

Core Description

A slungshot is a handheld percussion comprising a heavy weight, such as a metal or stone mass, affixed to the end of a short flexible , cord, or , enabling the user to generate kinetic by swinging the implement to strike an opponent. The design leverages the pendulum-like motion of the weighted end to amplify impact and energy transfer, concentrating on a small area for potential incapacitation without requiring edged or elements. Originally adapted from maritime tools like the knot—used by sailors to heave lines—the slungshot's weight is typically secured by winding cord around it to form a compact, balanced head that remains attached during use. This construction allows concealment in a or under , silent operation, and versatility for either whipping strikes or, less commonly, limited-range throws, distinguishing it from rigid bludgeons like saps or blackjacks. The term "slungshot" first appeared in English usage around 1842, reflecting its evolution from improvised sailor defenses to a recognized urban associated with 19th-century street fights and later during the era. Possession remains restricted or prohibited in numerous U.S. jurisdictions due to its capacity for severe injury, often classified alongside sandclubs or metal knuckles as a dangerous concealed .

Construction Materials and Variants

A slungshot consists of a dense striking weight, such as a small mass of metal, stone, sand, or similar material, affixed to a short flexible handle, strap, cord, or chain. Metal weights, often lead for its high density and malleability, were preferred in historical examples to maximize impact force while maintaining concealability, though stone or sand provided readily available improvised alternatives. The attaching strap or cord, typically leather, hemp rope, or chain, measured 6 to 12 inches in length to allow whipping momentum without excessive encumbrance. Variants include the , a tightly wound nautical encasing a spherical weight like a or stone at the end of a , employed by sailors both for line-throwing and as a concealed due to its dual utility and compact form. Modern adaptations often substitute synthetic paracord for traditional , incorporating steel bearings for the core to enhance durability and balance. Another configuration, the loaded sleeve, integrates weights into the hem of long garment sleeves for surreptitious deployment, though less common and primarily historical. Improvised slungshots, such as a rock secured in a or cloth pouch tied to a cord, replicate the core design using everyday materials for opportunistic use. The slungshot differs from rigid impact weapons such as the or , which typically consist of a leather pouch filled with lead shot, sand, or molded lead attached to a short, semi-rigid for handheld striking without a whipping motion. In contrast, the slungshot employs a flexible cord or strap connecting the weighted head to the user's hand or , enabling a pendulum-like swing that generates greater through leverage and rather than pure manual force. This flexibility allows for rapid deployment from concealment but introduces variability in control compared to the more predictable arc of rigid tools. Unlike the agricultural-derived flail, which features a longer chain or rigid link with a substantial striking head designed for sweeping or crushing blows in open combat, the slungshot is compact and optimized for close-quarters, concealable use, often with a smaller weight (typically 4-8 ounces) suited to urban rather than engagements. The slungshot's shorter cord (usually 12-18 inches) limits its reach but enhances portability and silence in operation, distinguishing it from the flail's extended leverage that demands more space and skill to avoid self-injury. The slungshot should not be confused with projectile-launching devices like the ancient sling or modern ; the former propels stones or bullets via a cradled pouch released from a whirling motion, while the latter uses elastic bands tensioned against a frame to fire ammunition at range. By design, the slungshot remains attached to the wielder post-impact, functioning as a handheld bludgeon rather than a thrown or launched weapon, which alters its tactical application toward repeated close-range strikes over distance-based attacks. A related nautical variant, the , shares the slungshot's knotted rope-end weight but originated as a tool for heaving lines aboard ships, with weaponization occurring through for striking; however, true slungshots often incorporate denser cores like stone or metal for enhanced lethality beyond the standard monkey's fist's rope-weighted form. This evolution emphasizes the slungshot's intent as a dedicated , prioritizing concealability and ease of fabrication over maritime utility.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Origins

The slungshot, characterized by a heavy affixed to a flexible cord or strap for delivering concussive blows, lacks direct attestation in ancient civilizations as a standardized . and relied more on rigid clubs, spears, or projectile slings, with improvised weighted straps occasionally inferred from archaeological contexts but not distinctly classified as slungshots. Evidence from Mesopotamian, Egyptian, or Greco-Roman sources does not describe dedicated handheld corded weights akin to later designs, though basic principles of leveraging momentum via flexible attachments appear in broader tool adaptations, such as agricultural threshing implements repurposed for combat. Pre-modern analogs emerged prominently in East Asian martial traditions, particularly in during the feudal era. The , a (kusari) with iron weights (fundo) at both ends, served as a concealable striking and entangling tool, wielded by , , and civilians for close-quarters defense. Developed by the early 18th century in Edo-period (1603–1868), it drew from earlier chain weapons like the manriki gusari associated with the Masaki-ryū school, which traces to the 16th–17th centuries. This design allowed for whipping strikes or wrapping around limbs, emphasizing versatility over brute force. A preserved iron example in the , dated circa 1615–1868, measures 45.5 inches long and weighs approximately 2 pounds 15 ounces, highlighting its practical lethality and portability. Similar flexible weighted weapons in , such as the (shuangbiao or liuxing chui), prefigure the slungshot's mechanics, with chains connecting metal spheres for dual-end swings or throws. Historical texts and manuals from the (1368–1644) document their use in military training and bandit suppression, evolving from Song-era (960–1279) prototypes adapted from agricultural or fishing tools. These pre-modern iterations prioritized empirical effectiveness in unbalanced fights, influencing later Japanese variants through cultural exchange, though they differed in length and tactical emphasis from 19th-century Western slungshots.

19th-Century Emergence and Popularity

The slungshot transitioned from a utilitarian nautical implement to a favored among sailors during the early to mid-19th century, particularly in port cities where brawls and robberies were commonplace. Sailors fashioned the device by embedding a dense , such as a lead ball or stone, within a knot at the end of a flexible cord or strap, leveraging its original purpose for heaving lines overboard to instead deliver concussive blows at distance. This adaptation capitalized on the tool's availability aboard ships and its capacity for generating through , making it suitable for against assailants in unfamiliar urban environments. By the latter half of the 19th century, the slungshot had gained significant traction among American street gangs and criminals, especially in densely populated areas like New York City, due to its uncomplicated assembly from scavenged materials, discreet portability, and silent lethality compared to noisier alternatives like pistols. Contemporary accounts highlight its role in muggings and gang confrontations, where the weighted end could fracture skulls or incapacitate victims with a single swing, often without drawing immediate attention. Its prevalence prompted early regulatory measures, including prohibitions under New York State law by the 1860s, underscoring the device's notoriety as a tool of urban violence. This era marked the slungshot's peak civilian adoption, with its effectiveness in close-quarters ambushes contributing to a perception of it as a "thug's ," though its maritime roots distinguished it from purely terrestrial bludgeons. Usage persisted into the early among thieves and enforcers, but declining sailor culture and stricter concealability laws gradually eroded its prominence.

Regional Historical Uses

In the United States during the mid-19th century, slungshots gained prominence among sailors in port cities like New York and , where they were adapted from nautical heaving lines weighted with knots for against thugs during and to safeguard wages after disembarking. These improvised tools allowed sailors to deliver powerful strikes in close-quarters brawls common in dockside districts such as the . By the late , the weapon had spread to urban street gangs, including and Five Points groups, who favored it for its silence, ease of concealment, and effectiveness in muggings and gang melees, as noted in period police reports and accounts of crimp-gangs involved in practices. A notable legal case from 1858 involved defending a client accused of murder with a slungshot in , highlighting its role in frontier altercations. In the , slungshots and analogous belt-wrapped weights appeared in Victorian among Scuttler gangs, who employed them in organized street fights during the 1800s, reflecting adaptations of everyday items for territorial brawls documented in local histories. In , middle-class civilians carried "life preservers"—short, weighted straps similar to slungshots—for protection against garrotte attacks by criminals, a response to rising urban violence in the as described in manuals and court records of the era. By the early and into the , slungshots persisted in the United States among indigent populations and lingering criminal elements, evolving from maritime origins into a staple of improvised urban violence until stricter regulations curtailed their open use, with bans enacted in states like as early as 1868.

Weapon Mechanics and Application

Principles of Operation

The slungshot functions as a handheld flexible impact weapon, where the user secures the cord around the wrist and swings the attached weight in an arc to deliver blunt force trauma. The cord, often 12 to 18 inches long, allows the weight—typically a dense material like lead or stone weighing 4 to 8 ounces—to accelerate via the user's arm rotation and wrist snap, achieving velocities capable of fracturing bone upon contact. Operation begins with the weight held in the hand or pocket for concealment, then deployed by extending the arm to initiate pendulum-like motion, building kinetic energy through centrifugal acceleration along the cord's length. This leverages the principle of rotational dynamics, where tangential speed increases with radius, enabling greater momentum transfer than a bare fist or short rigid tool. Strikes are executed via roundhouse swings targeting the head or limbs, or chopping motions to the collarbone, with the flexible cord permitting the weight to whip forward independently of the hand's deceleration. Upon striking, the concentrated mass and high velocity produce peak forces exceeding those of equivalent rigid weapons due to minimal energy dissipation in the cord, resulting in localized tissue damage from rapid momentum change. Empirical testing is limited by legal restrictions, but historical accounts and martial reconstructions indicate effectiveness in close-quarters disruption of an opponent's balance or weapon arm. The device's simplicity relies on user strength and timing, with improper grip risking self-injury from rebound.

Techniques of Employment

The slungshot is primarily employed through swinging motions that exploit the flexible cord to accelerate the weighted end, delivering high-impact strikes to vulnerable areas such as the head, , or limbs. This flailing technique generates momentum beyond what a rigid bludgeon could achieve unaided, with the user pivoting from the hips or shoulders to amplify force. Historical accounts from 19th-century maritime contexts describe sailors adapting knots on ropes for such improvised strikes during dockside altercations, often targeting the temple or for rapid incapacitation. Key grips facilitate control and power: the fist-wrap method secures the cord around the knuckles, enabling repeated flailing without slippage and providing leverage in potential grapples. Alternatives include a wrist-loop for quicker deployment, though this risks , or a finger grip suited to shorter cords but prone to hand injury on misses. In application, the is often concealed in a or for surprise deployment, combined with feints from contemporary pugilistic styles like those of to set up strikes. Specific strike variations include the rounding blow, an overhand or arc aimed at the side of the head; the chopper, a back-handed reversal for angular attacks; and the punch, a linear extension where the weight thrusts forward upon release. motions target the jaw, though the small impact window demands precision. Beyond swinging, the slungshot can function as a fist-load by the weight to augment punches, or the cord may serve as a for close-quarters restraint. Thrown deployment, leveraging its original line-casting design, offers ranged options but sacrifices reusability. Effectiveness hinges on practice for timing, as erratic swings risk self-injury or entanglement.

Effectiveness in Combat Scenarios

The slungshot's effectiveness in combat derives from its ability to generate significant kinetic energy through centrifugal force, allowing a relatively light weight—typically 4 to 8 ounces of lead or stone—to deliver impacts comparable to heavier rigid clubs when swung at velocities up to 20-30 feet per second in skilled hands. This focused blunt force concentrates on a small area, capable of causing concussions, fractures, or lacerations upon striking the head, neck, or limbs, as evidenced by 19th-century forensic reports of skull fractures and incapacitation from single blows in street assaults. Historically, slungshots proved viable in close-quarters scenarios like dockside brawls and sailor self-defense, where users exploited surprise and concealment to target vital areas, often subduing opponents before they could close distance or draw weapons. Newspaper accounts from the 1800s describe members and sailors employing roundhouse swings or " punches" to crack skulls or knock out assailants, leveraging the weapon's silent operation and quick deployment from a pocket. Analogous flexible saps, used by law enforcement until the mid-20th century, demonstrated similar in subduing resisting suspects with one or two strikes, breaking bones or inducing without the noise of firearms. However, effectiveness diminishes against trained or armed opponents due to the need for swing arc space (ideally 2-3 feet), which can be disrupted in grapples, and the risk of the cord tangling or being seized, potentially turning the weapon against the user. Unskilled deployment at defaults to inefficient fist-loading, reducing impact below that of bare knuckles enhanced by the weight alone. In forensic terms, while capable of lethal trauma, outcomes vary with user proficiency and target resilience, with misses risking self-injury from rebound.

United States Regulations

In the , there is no federal specifically prohibiting slungshots, leaving regulation primarily to state and local jurisdictions, where they are often classified as dangerous or concealed s. Possession, manufacture, sale, or use may constitute misdemeanors or felonies depending on the state, with penalties escalating if the is carried concealed or employed in a . California Penal Code § 22210 prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, possession, or disposal of slungshots, defined alongside similar impact weapons like and sandbags; violation is punishable by up to one year in county jail or under Penal Code § 1170(h). In , Title 21 § 1281 criminalizes manufacturing or selling slungshots as a , while § 1282 deems carrying, using, or attempting to use one a punishable by up to five years and a $5,000 fine. Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 269 § 12 bans manufacturing or selling slungshots, punishable by up to two years in state or a $1,000 fine, and § 10 prohibits carrying dangerous weapons including slungshots, with penalties of 18 months to 2.5 years for subsequent offenses. In , MCL § 750.224 makes manufacture, sale, or possession of slungshots—listed with and sand clubs—a carrying up to five years in and a $2,500 fine. Some states have recently liberalized restrictions; Florida's House Bill 4009, effective September 17, 2021, repealed the prior ban on slungshots (in place since 1868), permitting their carry, manufacture, and sale by civilians. In jurisdictions without explicit bans, slungshots may still face scrutiny under general concealed weapons laws or if used to commit assault, as courts assess them as instruments capable of inflicting serious injury. Local ordinances, such as in Washington, D.C., under § 22-4514, explicitly prohibit possession of slungshots alongside other bludgeoning devices. Enforcement varies, with urban areas more likely to prosecute based on context like intent to harm. In the , slungshots qualify as offensive weapons under section 141 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, which prohibits the possession of any article made or adapted for use in causing injury to persons without lawful authority or reasonable excuse. This classification stems from the device's inherent design—a weighted mass attached to a flexible cord—intended to amplify striking force, rendering public carry punishable by up to 4 years' imprisonment on . Exceptions apply for specific contexts such as historical collections or theatrical use, but intent to use for does not constitute a defense. In Canada, slungshots are not explicitly enumerated as prohibited weapons in the federal Criminal Code's section 84(1), which focuses on automatic knives and prescribed devices rather than corded impact tools. However, provincial regulations impose restrictions; for instance, in British Columbia, slung shots offered for sale or exposed publicly are subject to confiscation under historical statutes targeting bludgeons and similar implements. Concealed carry may violate sections 90 or 88 of the Criminal Code, prohibiting hidden weapons or those carried with intent to commit an offense, with penalties including up to 5 years' imprisonment. Empirical data from enforcement indicates slungshots are treated akin to blackjacks or saps, emphasizing their potential for concealed assault over maritime utility. In , slungshots are broadly prohibited as flexible impact weapons across multiple states, often categorized under prohibited or category D items in legislation targeting devices like saps designed for . State variations exist, but federal import bans and state laws, such as those in , effectively bar possession and carry to prevent street-level violence, with violations leading to fines or imprisonment. In , under the Weapons Act (Waffengesetz), slungshots fall within Hiebwaffen (striking weapons), including types akin to Totschläger (sap-like tools), prohibiting public carry without justified need and banning certain variants outright per Anlage 2. Similar frameworks, prioritizing public safety over individual carry rights, reflect causal concerns over improvised lethality, with peer-reviewed analyses of weapons laws underscoring slungshots' role in historical as rationale for restrictions.

Debates on Legality and Self-Defense Rights

In the United States, slungshots are prohibited in several states due to their classification as dangerous weapons capable of causing serious blunt force trauma, sparking debates over whether such bans unduly restrict non-firearm options. section 22210 explicitly bans possession of slungshots, with courts upholding convictions based on the device's inherent design for harm rather than requiring proof of criminal intent, as in People v. Fannin (2001), where the defendant was convicted for carrying a homemade version despite no immediate threat. Similarly, designates carrying or using a slungshot a under Title 21, section 1282, emphasizing its potential lethality regardless of context. Proponents of legalization contend that slungshots provide an accessible, low-cost alternative for , particularly for those ineligible for permits or preferring less-lethal tools over firearms, drawing parallels to recognition of bearable arms for personal protection in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), which invalidated bans on stun guns as infringing core rights. In , where slungshots have been restricted since 1868 as concealed weapons under Statute 790.01, legislative pushes like Senate Bill 612 (2016) aimed to delist them, arguing outdated laws ignore their utility as compact impact devices without projectiles or ammunition dependencies. Advocates highlight their historical maritime origins and ease of improvisation from everyday items, positioning them as viable for de-escalating threats without permanent damage when used proportionately. Critics, including and public safety advocates, argue that slungshots' concealability and striking power—capable of fracturing skulls or causing concussions—facilitate criminal misuse more than defensive necessity, justifying state-level prohibitions to prevent escalation in confrontations. No documented U.S. court cases have successfully affirmed slungshot use under doctrines like , with possession alone often triggering charges in restrictive jurisdictions such as and , where they are deemed per se illegal. This evidentiary gap reinforces arguments that empirical risks of abuse outweigh theoretical benefits, especially absent training requirements or proportionality assessments in real-world applications.

Modern Context and Legacy

Contemporary Availability and Production

In most jurisdictions, slungshots remain classified as prohibited weapons, severely restricting commercial and widespread distribution. No major manufacturers produce them at scale, as legal barriers in numerous U.S. states and countries deem them concealed impact weapons akin to or saps. Instead, contemporary production is confined to small-scale, artisanal efforts by independent craftsmen, often for , collectible purposes, or personal use in permissive areas. Handmade slungshots, typically featuring weights such as metal nuggets, stones, or balls encased in , paracord, or fabric with a short or cord, appear sporadically on niche online platforms. Examples include variants with inserts sold via and paracord models with decorative knots advertised on groups as of 2024. Custom metal-cast versions, like carbon steel balls with engraved designs, are also offered by individual makers through outlets such as . These items emphasize craftsmanship over , with production volumes limited by demand from enthusiasts rather than broad markets. Florida's repeal of its slungshot ban in March 2016 enabled legal manufacturing, sale, and within the state for the first time since the , potentially fostering localized production. However, even there, output remains artisanal, with no evidence of dedicated commercial lines emerging. In contrast, states maintaining prohibitions—such as , New York, and —effectively halt both production and interstate , confining to private fabrication or antiques predating modern restrictions. Overall, slungshot production reflects a niche, legally constrained rather than viable industry, with buyers navigating varying state laws to avoid charges for possession or transport.

Use in Self-Defense and Criticisms

The slungshot's application in self-defense stems from its design as a compact, improvised impact weapon, allowing users to generate significant kinetic energy through swinging motions to target an attacker's head, limbs, or torso for incapacitation. Historically favored by sailors, dockworkers, and itinerant laborers in the 19th and early 20th centuries, it offered advantages in concealability under clothing or in pockets, silence during deployment, and versatility in close-quarters encounters where firearms or blades might be impractical. Proponents, including martial arts historians, highlight its potential effectiveness against unarmed assailants or multiple threats, as the weighted end—often a steel ball or stone encased in a knotted cord—can deliver blunt force trauma comparable to a sap or blackjack, fracturing bones or causing concussions with proper technique. In jurisdictions like Florida, where slungshots were legalized for civilian carry as of September 2021 under expanded self-defense provisions, they are viewed by some as a non-lethal alternative to edged weapons, fitting on keychains for everyday accessibility. Criticisms of the slungshot in center on its capacity for disproportionate harm, as the device's momentum can readily produce lethal outcomes, including skull fractures, , or fatal , elevating it beyond mere deterrence into territory even against non-lethal threats. Legal scholars and instructors warn that possession alone constitutes a in states such as , New York, and under concealed weapons statutes, potentially nullifying claims in by implying premeditated intent to harm rather than proportional response. Furthermore, operational risks to the user include self-inflicted injuries from errant swings or entanglement, particularly for untrained individuals, alongside the weapon's tendency to escalate confrontations due to its intimidating appearance. Critics, including analyses, argue it undermines principles in modern doctrine, favoring less ambiguous tools like that reduce lethality while complying with varying state proportionality requirements.

Cultural and Collectible Significance

The slungshot, often manifesting as a knot weighted for throwing or striking, holds niche cultural resonance in maritime traditions, where sailors employed it both as a practical tool for heaving lines ashore and as an for during or brawls. This dual utility contributed to its adoption in 19th-century street gang subcultures, where it symbolized rudimentary lethality and concealability among urban toughs, evolving from nautical origins to a staple of rough-and-tumble confrontations. By the early , particularly during the , it became linked to indigent populations and hoboes, who repurposed the as a emblem of and survival, tying it into transient worker lore as a "lifeline" between communities. In and pulp fiction, the slungshot recurs as a favored implement for protagonists and antagonists alike, evoking gritty realism in noir narratives where private eyes or muggers wield it for blunt-force incapacitation without firearms' legal encumbrance. This portrayal underscores its reputation as a "forgotten weapon" bridging civilian and criminal opportunism, distinct from flashier arms yet emblematic of ingenuity. Ethnographic variants, such as war clubs featuring slung stone heads with sinew-wrapped handles and , highlight indigenous adaptations in North American conflicts circa 1880, preserving heritage amid clashes. As collectibles, antique slungshots command interest among historical weapon enthusiasts, with maritime examples like World War II-era U.S. Navy monkey fist saps—crafted for shore patrol—fetching premiums for their nautical provenance and loaded construction. Rare Native American specimens, such as Apache slung shots measuring 21 inches with preserved , appear at auctions, valued for authenticity tied to late and cultural artifact status. Scholarly works cataloging their evolution from medieval precursors to Victorian-era coshes further bolster collector appeal, positioning slungshots within broader narratives of obscured impact weapons once ubiquitous in policing, military, and civilian arsenals.

References

  1. https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0790/Sections/0790.001.html
  2. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-court-of-appeal/1071903.html
  3. https://www.brixtonwindmill.org/about/history/history-in-16-objects/a-monkeys-fist/
  4. https://www.oldsaltblog.com/2018/07/the-monkey-fists-nasty-cousin-the-slungshot/
  5. https://www.recoilweb.com/striking-distance-143325.html
  6. https://www.primalsurvivor.net/blackjack-weapon/
  7. https://bartitsusociety.com/speculations-on-the-slungshot/
  8. https://law.justia.com/codes/oklahoma/title-21/section-21-1282/
  9. https://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2015/790.09
  10. https://www.wallsheinlaw.com/slungshot-legalization-makes-headway-in-florida/
  11. https://www.rflawgroup.com/florida-considers-legalization-of-the-slung-shot-no-not-sling-shot/
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slungshot
  13. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/slung-shot
  14. https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.41.250
  15. https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2020/b2019_20/statute/021_000_0000_chapter/021_063_0000_article/021_063_0001_section/021_063_0001_k/
  16. https://upsurvival.tripod.com/id24.html
  17. https://www.titansurvival.com/blogs/imported-from-titan-paracord/monkey-s-fist
  18. https://www.paracordplanet.com/blog/monkeying-around-4-monkey-fist-variations/
  19. https://skillsetmag.com/article/fun-with-impact-weapons/
  20. https://www.usacarry.com/saps-blackjacks-and-monkeys-paws-alternative-weapons/
  21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-E-YKAoE2M
  22. https://thecontentauthority.com/blog/slungshot-vs-slingshot
  23. https://www.chrisharrison.net/index.php/Research/Sling
  24. https://www.yasuragidojo.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-the-kusari-fundo
  25. https://meifushinkageryu.ca/the-fundo-kusari-in-meifu-shinkage-ryu-a-unique-chain-weapon/
  26. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/23895
  27. https://www.brownstonedetectives.com/spring-brings-the-bean-shooters/
  28. https://www.ocregister.com/2007/07/24/slungshots-sword-canes-and-shobi-zues/
  29. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5341&context=wlr
  30. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2944&context=ulj
  31. https://portoliveryachtclub.com/2011/04/11/knot-of-the-month-for-may-the-monkeys-fist/
  32. https://www.survivalsullivan.com/using-a-blackjack-or-sap/
  33. https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-blackjacks-effective-sorry-no-pic/562612
  34. https://www.police1.com/close-quarters-combat/articles/beyond-the-baton-5-forgotten-police-weapons-2A4MveWTb86tRC3d/
  35. https://journals.openedition.org/chs/551?lang=en
  36. https://www.quora.com/How-effective-is-a-monkey-s-fist-slungshot-Yes-Slung-not-Sling-They-re-completely-different-weapons-in-a-real-fight
  37. https://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2274274_Sap---Blackjack-question-for-those-who-know----.html
  38. https://www.uslawshield.com/tactical-slingshots-mere-toy/
  39. https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-pen/part-6/title-3/division-8/section-22210/
  40. https://law.justia.com/codes/oklahoma/title-21/section-21-1281/
  41. https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter269/Section12
  42. https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=MCL-750-224
  43. https://www.krudoknives.com/krudo-khronicles/slungshot-weapons-now-legal-florida/
  44. https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/22-4514
  45. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/section/141
  46. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-84.html
  47. https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/hstats/hstats/225860084
  48. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/waffg_2002/BJNR397010002.html
  49. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/waffg_2002/anlage_2.html
  50. https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/4th/91/1399.html
  51. https://www.flhouse.gov/Sections/Bills/billsdetail.aspx?BillId=55329
  52. https://www.guns.com/news/2015/04/02/what-is-a-slungshot-and-why-is-it-illegal-in-florida
  53. https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/165o96k/are_monkeyfistsslungshots_legal_in_texas/
  54. https://larrygotkin.com/apache_slung_shot_war_club_for_sale
  55. https://www.etsy.com/listing/1426615120/slungshot
  56. https://www.facebook.com/groups/148880472514579/posts/1686675562068388/
  57. https://www.instagram.com/skullslammer/p/DCRSz17suqT/
  58. https://www.losangelescriminallawyer.pro/california-penal-code-section-16590-pc-manufacturing-selling-or.html
  59. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/division/legal/lawlibrary/nrs/NRS-202.html
  60. https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/265/265-11%282%29.pdf
  61. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF_KrDPtqyk
  62. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ynr42F5c_ME
  63. https://nscblog.com/2007/11/30/the-monkeys-fist-an-ancient-parable-for-modern-times/
  64. https://cyberhobo.com/hobo-information/monkey-fist/
  65. https://www.amazon.com/Saps-Blackjacks-Slungshots-History-Forgotten/dp/1619848767
  66. https://www.liveauctioneers.com/price-result/antique-apache-slung-slung-shot-war-club-ca-1880-s/
  67. https://www.flyingtigerantiques.com/wonderful-wwii-era-usn-sailor-or-shore-patrol-officer-monkey-fist-load-loaded-nautical-sap.html
  68. https://www.lot-art.com/auction-lots/Antique-Apache-slung-slung-shot-war-club-ca-1880s/22-antique_apache-20.3.19-jasper52
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.