Hubbry Logo
SocinianismSocinianismMain
Open search
Socinianism
Community hub
Socinianism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Socinianism
Socinianism
Socinianism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Fausto Sozzini (1539–1604), the theologian namesake of Socinianism[1][2]

Socinianism (/soʊˈsɪniənɪzəm, səˈ-/ soh-SIN-ee-ə-niz-əm, sə-) is a Nontrinitarian Christian belief system developed and co-founded during the Protestant Reformation by the Italian Renaissance humanists and theologians Lelio Sozzini and Fausto Sozzini, uncle and nephew, respectively.[1][2]

It was developed among the Polish Brethren in the Polish Reformed Church between the 16th and 17th centuries,[1][3][4] and embraced by the Unitarian Church of Transylvania during the same period.[1][3][5] Socinianism is most famous for its unitarian belief but contains a number of other distinctive theological doctrines, such as the denial of divine foreknowledge regarding the actions of free agents and rejection of the pre-existence of Christ.[1][2]

Origins

[edit]

The beliefs of Socinianism date from the wing of the Protestant Reformation known as the Radical Reformation and have their root in the Italian Anabaptist movement of the 1540s, such as the anti-trinitarian Council of Venice in 1550. Lelio Sozzini was the first of the Italian anti-trinitarians to go beyond Arian beliefs in print and deny the pre-existence of Christ in his Brevis explicatio in primum Johannis caput – a commentary on the meaning of the Logos in John 1:1–15 (1562).[6] Lelio Sozzini considered that the "beginning" of John 1:1 was the same as 1 John 1:1 and referred to the new creation,[citation needed] not the Genesis creation. His nephew Fausto Sozzini published his own longer Brevis explicatio later, developing his uncle's arguments. Many years after the death of his uncle in Switzerland, Fausto Sozzini was consulted by the Unitarian Church in Transylvania, attempting to mediate in the dispute between Giorgio Biandrata and Ferenc Dávid.

He moved to Poland, where he married the daughter of a leading member of the Polish Brethren, the anti-trinitarian minority, or ecclesia minor. In 1565, it had split from the Calvinist Reformed Church in Poland. Sozzini never joined the ecclesia minor, but he was influential in reconciling several controversies among the Brethren: on conscientious objection, on prayer to Christ, and on the virgin birth. Fausto persuaded many in the Polish Brethren who were formerly Arian, such as Marcin Czechowic, to adopt his uncle Lelio's views.

Fausto Sozzini furthered his influence through his Racovian Catechism, published posthumously, which set out his uncle Lelio's views on Christology and replaced earlier catechisms of the Ecclesia Minor. His influence continued after his death through the writings of his students published in Polish and Latin from the press of the Racovian Academy at Raków, Kielce County.

The term Socinian started to be used in the Dutch Republic and the Kingdom of England from the 1610s onward, as the Latin publications were circulated among early Arminians, Remonstrants, Dissenters, and early English Unitarians. In the late 1660s, Fausto Sozzini's grandson Andreas Wiszowaty and great-grandson Benedykt Wiszowaty published the nine-volume Biblioteca Fratrum Polonorum quos Unitarios vocant (1668) in Amsterdam, along with the works of F. Sozzini, the Austrian Johann Ludwig von Wolzogen, and the Poles Johannes Crellius, Jonasz Szlichtyng, and Samuel Przypkowski. These books circulated among English and French thinkers, including Isaac Newton, John Locke, Voltaire, and Pierre Bayle.

In Great Britain and North America, Socinianism later became a catch-all term for any kind of dissenting belief. Sources in the 18th and 19th centuries frequently attributed the term Socinian anachronistically, using it to refer to ideas that embraced a much wider range than the narrowly defined position of the Racovian catechisms and library.

Beliefs

[edit]

Socinian theology, as summarised in the Racovian Catechism, rejected the views of orthodox Christian theology on God's knowledge, on the doctrine of the Trinity and the divinity of Christ, and on soteriology.

Christology

[edit]
Further information: Incarnation (Christianity)

The Racovian publications, like the Sozzinis, rejected the pre-existence of Christ and held that Jesus did not exist until he was conceived as a human being. This view had been put forward before by the 4th-century bishop Photinus, but it conflicts with the mainline Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, and Catholic views, which hold that the Logos referred to in the Gospel of John was Jesus.

Human nature

[edit]
Further information: Tree of the knowledge of good and evil

The Socinians held that humans were created mortal in the beginning and would have died naturally whether Adam and Eve had eaten from the tree or not.[7] They also rejected the doctrine of original sin.[8]

Atonement

[edit]

Socinianism also rejected the propitiatory view of atonement.[9]

Predestination and omniscience

[edit]

The Socinians believed that God's omniscience was limited to what was a necessary truth in the future (what would definitely happen) and did not apply to what was a contingent truth (what might happen). They believed that, if God knew every possible future, human free will was impossible and as such rejected the "hard" view of omniscience.[10] Modern process theology and open theism advance a similar viewpoint.

Skepticism

[edit]

Later writers such as Archibald Alexander Hodge (1823–1886) asserted that Socinian theology was rooted in skepticism.[citation needed] However, the original Polish Socinians were believers in miracles and the virgin birth,[11][12][13] although there were a few radicals, such as Symon Budny and Jacobus Palaeologus, who denied these.[14]

Conscientious objection

[edit]

Although not directly a doctrinal belief, the principle of conscientious objection and the obedient relation of the believer to the state became a distinct position of Socinianism as it was formalized in the Racovian publications. Before F. Sozzini's arrival in Poland, there had been a wide range of positions from the total otherworldliness, common property, and withdrawal from the state of Marcin Czechowic of Lublin through to the advocacy of military service by Symon Budny. The next generation of Polish Brethren stabilized between these two positions, carrying wooden swords to follow the letter of the law and allowing senior Socinians such as Hieronim Moskorzowski to vote in the Sejm.[15]

Offshoots

[edit]

The direct doctrinal descendants of the original Socinians are the Unitarian Christians of Transylvania and England. Although the Polish Brethren never adopted the name "Unitarian" while in Poland, when they were disbanded in 1658, those who fled to Holland eventually embraced the term "Unitarian" (which they got from the Transylvanians), as they preferred not to be called Socinians.[16] The term had been used by the Unitarian Church of Transylvania as early as 1600. Socinian theology continued in Transylvania, where Polish exiles such as Andrzej Wiszowaty Jr., taught in the Unitarian College (1726–1740), as evidenced in the Summa Universae Theologiae Christianae secundum Unitarios of Mihály Lombard de Szentábrahám, recognized as the statement of faith of the Unitarian Church of Transylvania by Emperor Joseph II in 1782. Early English Unitarians such as Henry Hedworth and John Biddle retroactively applied the term "Unitarian" to the Polish Brethren. By 1676 there were at least three Socinian meeting houses in London, even if the Act of Toleration of 1689 saw Socinians and Catholics excluded from official recognition. Socinian ideas continued to have significant influence on Unitarians in England throughout the entire period of their development.

Modern Socinians (in Christological terms) include the small number of "Biblical Unitarian" churches such as the Christadelphians, the Church of God General Conference and the Church of the Blessed Hope,[17][18][19][20] though these churches are not direct descendants of the Polish Brethren.

[edit]

At the time of Fausto Sozzini, Symon Budny held a variant of unitarianism including denial of the virgin birth of Jesus and arguing that Jesus was the son of Joseph, for which he was excluded from the Racovian community.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Socinianism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Socinianism was an anti-Trinitarian Christian movement that emerged in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth during the late , systematized by the Italian theologian (Fausto Sozzini, 1539–1604), who rejected core orthodox doctrines such as the , the preexistence and divinity of Christ, , and vicarious atonement in favor of a unitary conception of God and rational exegesis of scripture.
Originating from earlier influences by Socinus's uncle Laelius Socinus and thinkers, the movement coalesced in under conditions of relative , establishing communities known as the with up to 300 congregations and a prominent academy at Raków by the early 17th century. Core tenets, as articulated in the Racovian Catechism (1605), defined Christianity as a revealed path to salvation through adherence to Jesus's ethical teachings, portraying him as a human prophet empowered by God rather than co-eternal deity, while denying , eternal punishment, and coercive church authority.
Socinianism advocated for , pacifism, and , influencing Enlightenment rationalism and figures like , though it faced severe persecution, culminating in the expulsion of adherents from in 1658 and suppression elsewhere as by both Catholic and Protestant authorities. Its legacy persisted in Dutch Remonstrant circles, English , and later American developments through migrants like , marking it as a precursor to modern liberal theology despite its doctrinal deviations from .

Historical Development

Italian Roots and Early Influences


Socinianism emerged from heterodox strands of the Italian Reformation in the mid-16th century, amid Renaissance humanism's emphasis on critical inquiry and original-language biblical study. Italian reformers, facing the Inquisition's suppression, developed rational critiques of Trinitarian dogma, influencing later anti-Trinitarian thought. Precursors included Camillo Renato, an Anabaptist thinker active in the 1540s who explicitly denied the Trinity's co-equality, positioning him as a forerunner to Socinian rationalism. Bernardino Ochino, a prominent preacher and former Capuchin general who fled Italy in 1542, expressed ambiguous views on the Godhead in his dialogues, blending spiritualist piety with doctrinal flexibility that resonated with emerging non-orthodox circles. The Sozzini family of provided the movement's foundational figures. Lelio Sozzini (1525–1562), a jurist and polyglot scholar, traveled extensively from the 1540s, visiting , Zurich, and , where he corresponded with reformers like and while concealing private doubts about Trinitarian orthodoxy. He amassed manuscripts from radical sources, including works by and Italian exiles, fostering an intellectual network that questioned divine mysteries through reason and scripture. Lelio's unpublished inquiries into and the , preserved in his library, seeded the anti-Trinitarian framework later systematized by followers. Fausto Paolo Sozzini (1539–1604), Lelio's nephew, inherited this legacy in , initially pursuing before immersing himself in theological debate by the 1560s. Exposed to his uncle's collection and Italian heterodox traditions, Faustus honed a scriptural that rejected innate ideas of the , prioritizing human and ethical over metaphysical speculation. Despite Italy's repressive climate, which drove many thinkers abroad, these Sienese origins—rooted in familial scholarship and evasion of Catholic orthodoxy—formed Socinianism's doctrinal core before its propagation in tolerant Polish-Lithuanian contexts.

Formation in Poland-Lithuania


Anti-Trinitarian sentiments emerged within the Polish-Lithuanian in the mid-16th century, influenced by Italian humanists and reformers such as Lelio Sozzini, who visited in 1551. Early proponents included Piotr of Goniądz (Petrus Gonesius), who publicly rejected the at the Secemin Synod on January 24, 1556, and elaborated these views at the Brest Synod on December 15, 1558. Tensions culminated in a formal split from the Calvinist Reformed Church at the Piotrków Synod in 1564, establishing the anti-Trinitarian faction known as the or Ecclesia Minor. This group further consolidated at the Węgrów Synod on December 25, 1565, where 45 ministers united and rejected , marking the initial organizational steps of the movement. The arrival of (Faustus Socinus) in in June 1579 provided intellectual leadership and doctrinal coherence to the disparate anti-Trinitarian tendencies, including ditheistic and tritheistic variants. Settling in , Socinus engaged with the , authoring key treatises such as De Jesu Christi invocatione in 1579 and De Sacrae Scripturae auctoritate in 1580 to defend rational interpretations of scripture and Christ's role. He unified the movement by opposing radical positions, notably defending the Brethren against Jacobus Palaeologus at the Chmielnik Synod in 1581, which approved his stance allowing limited civil participation while rejecting violence. By 1596, Socinus had assumed formal leadership, transforming the into a structured church emphasizing reason, moral reform, and rejection of Trinitarian orthodoxy. This formation occurred amid relative in the Polish-Lithuanian , facilitated by noble patronage and synodal governance, though internal debates persisted over issues like and . Socinus's efforts laid the groundwork for subsequent codification, distinguishing Socinianism from earlier strains through its systematic theology.

Organizational Growth and Key Texts

Faustus Socinus assumed leadership of the anti-Trinitarian faction among the Polish Reformed Church upon his arrival in Poland-Lithuania in 1579, guiding the disparate groups toward doctrinal cohesion and organizational structure. Under his influence, the movement, known as the or Minor Reformed Church, adopted a with regular synods to debate and resolve theological issues, fostering unity amid internal controversies. This period marked the formal emergence of Socinianism as a distinct body, emphasizing rational inquiry and scriptural interpretation over traditional creeds. The organization's growth accelerated in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, particularly through the establishment of Raków as a central hub. Founded in 1569 as an anti-Trinitarian settlement, Raków featured a operational by 1600 and the from 1602, which served as intellectual and publishing centers disseminating Socinian literature across . By the height of the movement between 1585 and 1638, Socinianism supported approximately 300 churches, drawing adherents primarily from nobility, burghers, and intellectuals in a tolerant Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. This expansion reflected the appeal of Socinian rationalism amid debates, though it remained a minority within . Key texts underpinning Socinian theology included Socinus's De Jesu Christo Servatore (On Christ the Savior), completed in 1578 and representing his core Christological arguments against atonement theories reliant on divine satisfaction. This , along with works like his 1578 discussion of human fallibility, shaped the movement's rejection of and emphasis on moral example in . The Racovian Catechism, compiled by church leaders and first published in 1605 at Raków, systematized these views into a comprehensive , addressing , Christ, scripture, and ethics in a question-and-answer format for catechetical use. Revised in and translated into vernacular languages, it became the authoritative doctrinal standard, printed via Raków's press to propagate Socinian principles.

Persecution, Decline, and Diaspora

The Socinians, known in Poland as the (Bracia Polscy), enjoyed relative tolerance under the of 1573, which protected religious dissenters from persecution, but faced intensifying opposition from the Catholic and Orthodox clergy amid geopolitical tensions, including the Swedish Deluge (1655–1660). Accusations mounted against them for alleged subversive activities, denial of core Christian doctrines like the , and that critics claimed undermined national defense during wars. Persecution culminated on July 20, 1658, when the Polish Sejm decreed that all Socinians must convert to Roman Catholicism or emigrate, with a three-year deadline to sell property and depart; their academy at Raków was ordered razed, and shrines confiscated. Jesuit agitators, notably Mikołaj Cichowski, fueled the decree through polemics portraying Socinians as atheists and societal threats. By 1660, the group was effectively crushed in Poland, with estimates of 20,000 members affected, many facing property loss or forced conversion. The movement's decline in its Polish-Lithuanian heartland stemmed from this expulsion, compounded by internal debates over and external isolation, as neighboring Protestant states like Brandenburg-Prussia offered limited refuge due to similar orthodox pressures. Surviving communities dwindled through assimilation or suppression, with the last organized Polish Socinian congregation dissolving by the early . Diaspora communities formed primarily in the , where exiles integrated with Arminian in around 1663–1736, disseminating Socinian texts like the Racovian Catechism and influencing rationalist theology. Smaller groups reached , , and , where their anti-Trinitarian and rationalist ideas subtly shaped Unitarian precursors and Enlightenment discourse on reason and , though often anonymously to evade charges. By the late , overt Socinian organization faded, but their emphasis on scriptural reason persisted in heterodox European thought.

Core Theological Beliefs

Rejection of the Trinity and Godhead

Socinians affirmed a unitary conception of God as a single, indivisible, eternal spirit—the Father alone—rejecting any internal distinctions or plurality within the divine essence. This position, central to their theology, derived from a literal interpretation of biblical monotheism, particularly passages such as Deuteronomy 6:4, which declares, "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one," precluding the orthodox Trinitarian formulation of three coequal persons in one substance. They contended that the Trinity doctrine, formalized at councils like Nicaea in 325 CE and Constantinople in 381 CE, imported extraneous philosophical concepts from Platonism and Aristotelianism, absent from apostolic Scripture. The Racovian Catechism (1605), the authoritative compendium of Socinian doctrine produced by the church's ministers in Raków, , explicitly delineates as "one in essence and person," dismissing Trinitarianism as a corruption that compromises and unity. It argues that attributing distinct persons to the implies either three gods—violating —or a composite being, which contradicts the incorporeal, unchanging nature of divinity described in texts like 44:6 ("I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no "). Faustus Socinus, whose writings shaped this catechism, further critiqued Trinitarianism in works like his Tract Concerning , Christ, and the (circulated posthumously from 1605 onward), asserting that eternal generation of the Son or procession of the Spirit introduces temporal relations into an atemporal , rendering the doctrine logically incoherent and unsupported by direct scriptural warrant. Regarding the Holy Spirit, Socinians denied its personhood, interpreting pneuma hagion (holy spirit) as God's operative power or influence rather than a hypostasis coeternal with the Father and Son. The Racovian Catechism substantiates this by referencing instances where the Spirit functions as an impersonal force, such as in Luke 1:35, where it "overshadows" Mary, akin to divine energy rather than agency. This rejection extended to creedal language like the Athanasian Creed's "three persons, one God," which Socinus labeled a "mystery" masking contradiction, prioritizing rational clarity over ecclesiastical tradition. By 1621, when the catechism faced bans in Poland amid Counter-Reformation pressures, these views had solidified the Socinians' identity as anti-Trinitarians, influencing later unitarian movements despite doctrinal refinements in response to critiques.

Christology and the Nature of Jesus

Socinians maintained that Jesus Christ was fully by nature, a mortal man without divine essence or pre-existence before his conception in the Virgin Mary. They rejected the orthodox doctrines of the and , asserting that no union of divine and human natures was possible due to the infinite qualitative difference between God and creation. This view stemmed from their rational interpretation of Scripture, prioritizing reason to resolve apparent contradictions in Trinitarian formulas, as articulated by Faustus Socinus in works like his Brevis explicatio (1562), where he attributed to Christ an official rather than essential divinity. Central to Socinian Christology was the affirmation of Jesus's miraculous conception by the , rendering him sinless and uniquely equipped for his prophetic mission, yet entirely dependent on for power and authority. The Racovian Catechism (1605), the movement's authoritative confessional text, describes Christ as "truly man by nature," conceived supernaturally but without , his commencing at birth and traceable to according to the flesh. Terms like "" denoted his special generation and subordination, not ontological equality or co-eternity with the Father; similarly, "" referred to Christ as the interpreter of divine will (interpres divinae voluntatis), not a pre-existent person. Socinians interpreted scriptural ascriptions of divinity to Jesus—such as "God" in John 1:1 or Thomas's confession in John 20:28—as honorific titles reflecting his exalted office and delegated authority from God, rather than literal claims to the divine essence. Christ performed miracles not through inherent deity but by God's empowerment, obeyed the Father perfectly unto death, and was rewarded with resurrection, immortality, and a heavenly enthronement at God's right hand, from which he would exercise judgment. This framework positioned Jesus as prophet, priest, and king in a mediatorial role, exemplary in obedience and doctrine, but emphatically not co-equal or consubstantial with the one true God, the Father.

Human Nature, Sin, and Free Will

Socinians posited that human beings were created by God with inherent rationality and , enabling and the capacity for obedience to divine commands without necessitating intervention beyond persuasion and example. This view contrasted sharply with Reformed doctrines of , emphasizing that humans possess the natural faculties to discern good from evil and choose accordingly. Regarding sin, Socinians rejected the traditional doctrine of as inherited guilt or a corrupted nature transmitted from to all humanity, arguing instead that Adam's transgression served primarily as a pernicious example that inclined subsequent generations toward wrongdoing through imitation rather than imputation or metaphysical propagation. They maintained that no individual is born inherently sinful or incapable of ; sin arises from personal, voluntary acts of the will, as evidenced in their interpretation of biblical figures like , whom they acknowledged as prone to iniquity but not universally representative of an inescapable . Faustus Socinus explicitly denied original sin's Augustinian formulation, viewing it as incompatible with divine and human responsibility. Free will formed a cornerstone of Socinian , with adherents asserting that God endowed humanity with genuine liberty to accept or reject moral and religious truths, rendering untenable and salvation dependent on rational persuasion rather than . The Racovian Catechism (1605), a key Socinian confessional text, underscores this by portraying Adam's endowment with as the basis for his singular lapse, which did not irrevocably bind posterity but highlighted the ongoing human potential for ethical choice under divine guidance. This stance, articulated by figures like Johann Crell and reinforced in Socinus's writings, prioritized internal moral devotion over coerced assent, influencing later rationalist theologies.

Atonement, Salvation, and Predestination

Socinians rejected the orthodox doctrine of penal , viewing Christ's death not as a satisfaction of divine through vicarious punishment but as an expiatory sacrifice demonstrating 's love and obedience to divine will, thereby providing a means for human to . In the Racovian (1605), Christ's suffering is described as a "bloody death as an expiatory sacrifice" that delivers believers from the guilt and punishment of , yet it emphasizes that Scripture portrays as humans being reconciled to through Christ rather than being propitiated toward humanity. This perspective aligns with a moral exemplar or governmental theory, where the serves to confirm Christ's messianic authority, inspire moral transformation, and establish the by offering remission of s and eternal life to those who respond in faith. Faustus Socinus himself argued in works like De Jesu Christo Servatore (1578) that Christ's death primarily ratified his doctrinal teachings and provided a pattern of suffering for believers, rather than effecting a legal transfer of guilt. Salvation, in Socinian theology, requires active human participation through faith, repentance, and ethical obedience to Christ's precepts, enabled by divine grace but not coerced by irresistible forces. The Racovian Catechism states that the way of salvation consists in "the knowledge of God and of Christ... with a lively or efficacious faith," accompanied by a "true correction of life" and assistance from the Holy Spirit, rejecting any notion of salvation by mere imputation apart from personal renewal. Faith here is not passive assent but a working faith that conforms the will and affections to Christ's doctrine, often linked to baptism as a sign of regeneration, with eternal life promised to believers and damnation to unbelievers based on their response. This conditional soteriology underscores human agency, portraying Christ as the revealer of the path to salvation—through imitation of his example—rather than its sole procurer in a juridical sense. Socinians firmly denied absolute predestination, interpreting God's eternal decree as conditional upon foreseen human faith and obedience rather than an unconditional election independent of human will. According to the Racovian Catechism, predestination means God's purpose "to give eternal life to those who should believe in him, and yield him obedience," affirming free will as the capacity to obey when strengthened by divine aid, without necessitating total depravity or divine coercion. This rejection extended to limiting divine foreknowledge of future contingents to preserve contingency and moral responsibility, as articulated by figures like Jerome Moscorovius, who argued that God's decrees adapt to human choices rather than predetermine them irrevocably. Consequently, salvation's availability post-Christ's advent depends on individual response, aligning with Socinian rationalism's emphasis on reason-compatible doctrines over mysterious divine sovereignty.

Epistemological and Philosophical Stance

Primacy of Reason over Mystery

Socinians elevated human reason as the ultimate arbiter in matters of , insisting that theological doctrines must conform to rational comprehension and rejecting any elements deemed contrary to it. This stance positioned reason above divine mysteries, which they viewed as incompatible with a rational who communicates truths accessible to the human mind. Faustus Socinus (1539–1604), the movement's central figure, argued that from could not include propositions repugnant to reason, as such contradictions would undermine divine benevolence and clarity. Consequently, Socinians dismissed incomprehensible dogmas, such as the , as human inventions rather than scriptural truths, prioritizing logical coherence over traditional acceptance of paradox. In interpreting Scripture, Socinians applied reason as the primary hermeneutical tool, subordinating or mystical to rational . They maintained that the Bible's content, as God's word, must align with innate rational principles, allowing believers to discern truth without reliance on supra-rational . Joachim Stegmann Sr., in works like Brevis disquisitio (1633) and De iudice et norma controversiarum fidei (1644), explicitly argued that reason serves as the judge and norm for resolving doctrinal controversies, rendering religious mysteries superfluous since all essential truths fall within reason's grasp. This approach transformed into a rational enterprise, where scriptural passages were exegeted to eliminate apparent contradictions, often reinterpreting prophetic or apocalyptic texts through a literal, non-metaphysical lens. The primacy of reason over mystery distinguished Socinianism from orthodox Christianity, which often affirmed doctrines "above reason" yet not against it. Socinians contended that reveals nothing beyond human cognitive limits, rejecting the notion of as assent to the incomprehensible; instead, belief required rational persuasion. This epistemological commitment, rooted in and anti-scholastic critique, influenced later rationalist movements by modeling theology as subservient to philosophical scrutiny, though it drew condemnation for subordinating revelation to finite human faculties.

Approach to Scripture and Skepticism

Socinians regarded the Bible as divinely inspired and authoritative for Christian doctrine, yet insisted that its interpretation must align with rational comprehension, rejecting any reading that implied contradictions or irrational "mysteries." Faustus Socinus, in works such as his De Jesu Christo Servatore (1578), argued that scriptural passages must be harmonized through reason to avoid logical inconsistencies, prioritizing clear, literal meanings over allegorical or traditional glosses that elevated obscurity. This approach positioned scripture supra rationem (above reason) in origin but not contra rationem (against reason) in content, demanding that doctrines like the Trinity be discarded if they defied human understanding despite apparent biblical support. Central to Socinian was a skeptical stance toward traditions and patristic interpretations, which they viewed as accretions corrupting the primitive gospel. Influenced by , figures like Socinus and his uncle Laelius emphasized individual rational inquiry over dogmatic authority, testing revelations against natural reason and empirical consistency rather than accepting them on alone. The Racovian Catechism (1605), a foundational Socinian text compiled by ministers including Moskorzewski, explicitly subordinated mysterious or anthropomorphic biblical language—such as divine wrath or —to rational ethical principles, dismissing them as accommodations to human capacity rather than literal truths. This rational skepticism extended to and claims, which Socinians accepted only if they served instruction without violating laws' intelligibility; otherwise, they reinterpreted them figuratively to preserve doctrinal coherence. Critics, including Reformed theologians like John Owen in his A Brief Declaration and Vindication of The Doctrine of the (1669), charged that this method effectively elevated human reason above scripture, leading to the erosion of orthodox . Yet Socinians maintained their fidelity to the biblical text, claiming their approach purified it from pagan philosophical intrusions like substantial Trinitarianism, fostering a grounded in accessible ethics over esoteric metaphysics.

Rationalist Methodology and Its Limits

Socinians adopted a methodology that subordinated theological doctrines to rational scrutiny, insisting that Scripture must be interpreted in accordance with human reason to discern authentic divine truth. This approach, articulated by Faustus Socinus (1539–1604), treated reason as the essential tool for illuminating biblical texts, rejecting any interpretation that implied logical absurdities or contradictions with observable reality. For instance, doctrines like the Trinity were dismissed not merely on scriptural grounds but because they defied rational coherence, such as the notion of three co-equal persons in one essence. The Racovian Catechism (1605), a foundational Socinian text compiled by ministers in Raków, Poland, emphasized that "without [reason] we could neither understand nor believe the Scriptures," positioning it as indispensable for grasping revelation while affirming Scripture's overall authority. This extended to probabilistic argumentation in matters of , where Socinians prioritized evidence and logical consistency over dogmatic assertion, influencing their rejection of in favor of and moral accountability. Yet, the methodology's limits emerged in its dependence on fallible human cognition, which critics from orthodox traditions argued introduced subjective bias and eroded objective ; Socinians countered that reason, as a divine gift, aligned with God's rational order. Internally, the approach constrained full supernaturalism: while accepting events like ' as historically verifiable through and reason, it reinterpreted or rejected (e.g., denying the virgin birth's literal necessity) that strained empirical plausibility, thus bounding within a scriptural framework rather than pure . Ultimately, this created tensions, as the acknowledged reason's service role but implied 's extension into areas of incomplete comprehension, such as , preventing a complete naturalization of .

Ethical Teachings and Practices

Pacifism and Conscientious Objection

Socinian ethics derived pacifism from a rational interpretation of Christ's commands in the Sermon on the Mount, particularly to love enemies and abstain from retaliation, rendering participation in war incompatible with Christian discipleship. Faustus Socinus articulated this in his 1581 Reply to Palaeologus, where he defended conscientious objection to military service, asserting that Christians bore no obligation to wield arms or engage in bloodshed, as such actions contradicted the non-violent example of Jesus. This stance extended to rejecting oaths and civil magistracy, viewed as entailing coercive violence. The , as the institutional embodiment of Socinianism, initially enforced strict among members, prohibiting enlistment in armies or defensive militias, which isolated them during conflicts like the Swedish Deluge of 1655–1660. Their refusal to bear arms contributed to the 1658 decree expelling them from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, alongside charges of denying the , as lawmakers deemed non-combatant sects a security liability. By the mid-17th century, geopolitical pressures prompted internal debates and partial revisions; figures like Andrzej Wiszowaty and Benedykt Wiszowaty upheld pacifist principles in writings up to 1680, but practical exigencies led some adherents to accommodate defensive warfare without fully abandoning the ideal. This conscientious objection reflected Socinian prioritization of individual moral integrity over state demands, influencing later non-resistant traditions, though the movement's dispersal curtailed unified practice. Academic analyses note that while early texts evince absolutist non-violence, 17th-century Socinian literature increasingly grappled with dilemmas of survival in a militarized society, revealing tensions between doctrinal purity and communal viability.

Social Ethics, Oaths, and Community Discipline

Socinians emphasized ethical conduct rooted in rational interpretation of Scripture and of Christ's example, viewing as contingent upon free-willed obedience to divine precepts rather than ritual or . This approach prioritized personal regeneration and detachment from worldly pursuits that conflicted with teachings, such as coercive political power, while permitting limited aligned with ethical constraints. They advocated to safeguard religious liberty and prevent temporal authorities from enforcing doctrinal uniformity, influencing broader calls for tolerance amid . Regarding oaths, Faustus Socinus maintained that Scripture neither mandates nor prohibits them unequivocally, adopting a neutral stance that distinguished Socinians from stricter Anabaptist rejections. The Racovian Catechism (1605), a foundational Socinian text, explicitly permitted oaths for certain civil purposes, allowing members to affirm truth in legal or official contexts without violating conscience, provided they avoided idolatrous implications. This flexibility enabled participation in oaths required for civil offices, though Socinians barred involvement in roles entailing violence or injustice against fellow believers. Community discipline among the , the primary Socinian body, was rigorous and central to ecclesiastical life, enforcing and doctrinal purity through synods and ministerial oversight. Members faced mutual accountability, with imposed for persistent immorality, , or failure to uphold communal ethical standards, as seen in regular provincial assemblies that adjudicated disputes and expelled nonconformists to preserve group cohesion. Church governance operated as a voluntary of rational believers, rejecting hierarchical in favor of scriptural consensus and elder-led correction, though this structure contributed to internal schisms over time. Such practices underscored Socinian commitment to a morally elevated , free from state interference yet internally self-regulating.

Reception, Criticisms, and Controversies

Orthodox Christian Responses and Condemnations

The doctrines of Socinianism, particularly its rejection of the , the and full divinity of Christ, and vicarious , were viewed by adherents of Nicene as a direct assault on the foundational creeds of , reviving errors akin to and condemned at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, which affirmed the Son's consubstantiality (homoousios) with the Father. Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and Reformed theologians alike regarded these positions as heretical, emphasizing that Socinian subordinated divine to human reason, thereby undermining the mystery of the as articulated in the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed of 381 AD. In the Catholic tradition, Socinianism faced explicit opposition as an antitrinitarian incompatible with the dogmatic definitions of the ecumenical councils, including I, I, (431 AD), (451 AD), and later Vatican I (1870), which reiterated Trinitarian orthodoxy against rationalist reductions. Polish Socinians, organized as the Ecclesia Minor or , encountered suppression through Catholic-influenced state actions; after decades of theological disputes and Jesuit-led refutations, the (Polish Diet) decreed their expulsion from the on January 30, 1658, citing their "blasphemous" denial of Christ's divinity and leading to the dispersal of approximately 20,000 adherents, many fleeing to or the . Reformed synods issued formal condemnations amid fears that Socinianism eroded , satisfaction theory, and scriptural authority. The international (1618–1619) investigated and rejected Conrad Vorstius's candidacy for the Leiden theology chair in 1612, deeming his works—such as Tractatus Theologicus (1610)—to propagate Socinian errors on divine immutability, foreknowledge, and Christ's nondeity, labeling them a threat to confessional standards like the . Domestically in , the Reformed Church's of Czarków (1631) and subsequent of Brest-Litovsk (1638) excommunicated Socinian ministers, dissolved ecclesiastical ties, and affirmed Trinitarian , viewing the Racovian (1605) as a of that warranted separation to preserve doctrinal purity. Eastern Orthodox engagement was limited, as Socinianism emerged primarily in Western Protestant and Catholic contexts without significant penetration into Orthodox territories; however, Orthodox theology, rooted in the first seven ecumenical councils, inherently anathematizes its Christological denials as distortions of the hypostatic union and divine energies, consistent with patristic critiques of rationalism in figures like St. Gregory Palamas. No dedicated Orthodox synod targeted Socinianism, reflecting its geographic and confessional isolation from Eastern Christendom, though modern Orthodox evaluations classify it among post-Reformation deviations from conciliar faith.

Internal Socinian Debates and Schisms

The Socinian movement, also known as the , experienced significant internal tensions following the death of Faustus Socinus in 1604, particularly over the ethical implications of Christian involvement in and violence. These debates, often termed the (ius gladii), centered on whether believers could legitimately wield coercive power, serve as magistrates, bear arms in defense, or swear oaths of allegiance, drawing from Anabaptist influences emphasizing . Socinus had initially counseled strict separation from state power, arguing in works like De Iure Magistrate (c. 1580s) that Christians should abstain from magistracy and to avoid contradicting Christ's pacifist teachings, a position formalized in early synodal decisions such as the 1570 prohibiting arms-bearing. By the early 17th century, geopolitical pressures in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth— including and Swedish invasions—prompted revisions, fracturing the community into pacifist and more pragmatic factions. Jonas Schlichting (1592–1661), a prominent Racovian rector, defended absolute in tracts like Confessio (1638), insisting Christians renounce all violence, even defensive, as incompatible with apostolic ethics, leading to his temporary by moderates in 1637 for overly rigid interpretations. Conversely, figures like Johann Crellius (1590–1633) advocated nuanced engagement, permitting defensive warfare under magisterial duty in De Patriarcharum Iuribus (1629) while upholding church-state separation, reflecting adaptations to survival amid Catholic dominance. These positions clashed at synods, such as the 1616 Racow assembly, where allowances for were debated but not resolved, exacerbating factionalism. Theological disputes compounded these ethical rifts, including variances on predestination's rejection and Christ's exemplary versus substitutionary models, though less schism-inducing than political ones. By the 1630s, unresolved tensions contributed to minor expulsions and weakened cohesion, with pacifist "Minor" congregations forming separatist tendencies, foreshadowing the 1658 national banishment. No formal denominational schisms occurred, but the debates eroded unity, as evidenced by declining academy enrollment at Racow from over 800 students in 1620 to fewer than 200 by 1650, amid mutual accusations of compromising scriptural fidelity.

Causal Consequences: From Heresy to Secular Influences

The classification of Socinianism as by both Catholic and Reformed authorities precipitated severe ecclesiastical and political repercussions, culminating in systematic suppression across Europe. In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, where Socinian communities had flourished under relative tolerance following the of 1573, growing opposition from and Orthodox clergy led to the Brethren's formal condemnation at the Rakow Synod of 1601 and subsequent marginalization. By 1658, amid the Deluge wars and Catholic resurgence, the decreed the exile of the (Socinians), resulting in the dispersal of approximately 20,000 adherents, many of whom fled to Dutch provinces, Prussian territories, and , carrying texts like the Racovian Catechism (first published 1605) that disseminated rationalist critiques of Trinitarian dogma. This forced diaspora, while fracturing organized Socinian churches, paradoxically amplified the movement's intellectual diffusion through refugee networks and clandestine printing presses in the , where Socinian ideas intermingled with and Collegiant . In , influxes of Polish exiles and translations of Socinian works, such as the 1652 English edition of the Racovian Catechism, ignited anti-Trinitarian controversies during the , prompting parliamentary inquiries and executions like that of Francis Kett in 1589 for Socinian-leaning views, yet fostering underground sympathy among latitudinarians who prioritized reason over confessional orthodoxy. The resultant schisms and defenses of religious liberty, as articulated in Socinian pleas against coerced uniformity, causally contributed to broader debates, evidenced by their invocation in John Locke's (1689), which echoed Socinian arguments for separating civil and ecclesiastical coercion. Beyond ecclesiastical confines, Socinianism's insistence on scriptural interpretation via reason—rejecting mysteries like the and as irrational—exerted causal pressure on emerging secular by modeling a methodology that subordinated to empirical and logical scrutiny, influencing Enlightenment figures who divested of elements. Dutch Collegiants, imbibing Socinian , advanced a "reasonable " devoid of priestly , which paralleled Spinoza's pantheistic critiques and fed into deistic currents that viewed Christ primarily as a exemplar rather than divine redeemer. , in his Philosophical Dictionary (1764), praised Socinian tolerance and anti-dogmatism as antidotes to , while their ethical emphasis on human agency and —absent or —anticipated secular humanism's focus on rational ethics over divine fiat, as seen in the dilution of doctrines into utilitarian frameworks by 18th-century . These trajectories, though not uniformly acknowledged due to Socinianism's heretical stigma, underscore a causal lineage from suppressed to the erosion of confessional monopolies, enabling pluralistic secular governance.

Legacy and Offshoots

Direct Descendants in Unitarianism

The anti-Trinitarian doctrines and rationalist of Socinianism directly shaped early Unitarian denominations, particularly through the Polish Brethren's articulation of and ethical in the Racovian of 1605, which rejected divine and emphasized Scripture's moral teachings over metaphysical speculation. This catechism, produced at the Socinian center in Raków, , circulated widely in Latin and influenced continental dissenters by prioritizing empirical biblical and denying satisfaction theories of in favor of Christ's exemplary obedience. In , the Unitarian Church, organized in 1568 under following the Diet of Torda, adopted parallel non-Trinitarian positions that aligned with Socinian , including rejection of co-equal divine persons; Faustus Socinus arrived in Kolozsvár in November 1578 at the invitation of Giorgio Biandrata to reinforce these views amid debates with , though tensions arose over Socinus's insistence on Christ's non-divinity. The church's survival as the oldest continuously operating Unitarian body stems from this Socinian-adjacent framework, which privileged scriptural unity of and tolerated internal doctrinal diversity while facing external persecutions. English Unitarianism emerged as a direct import of Socinian ideas, with John Biddle (1615–1662) studying Polish Brethren texts, including the Racovian Catechism, during his imprisonment in the 1640s; his 1647 Twelve Arguments Drawn out of Scripture echoed Socinian subordinationism by arguing Christ's inferiority to the Father based on New Testament subordination passages like John 14:28. Biddle's Glastonbury congregation, established around 1655, propagated these views through publications like his 1652 A Confession of Faith Touching the Holy Trinity, fostering a lineage of rational monotheism that persisted despite the 1662 Blasphemy Act's suppression. This transmission preserved Socinian skepticism toward creedal orthodoxy, influencing later Presbyterian and Congregationalist shifts toward Unitarianism in the 18th century.

Broader Impact on Enlightenment Rationalism

Socinian doctrines prioritizing reason as the arbiter of scriptural interpretation—rejecting any tenet contra rationem while accepting Scripture as supra rationem—provided a foundational critique of dogmatic authority that resonated in early Enlightenment . By insisting that religious truths must cohere with human , Socinians like Faustus Socinus advanced a "religio rationalis" that minimized mysteries, such as the or as satisfaction, in favor of ethical and moral emphases derivable from reason applied to texts like the . This rationalistic hermeneutic, articulated in works like the Racovian Catechism (first published 1605), prefigured Enlightenment deism's elevation of over revealed mysteries unsupported by evidence or logic. The movement's advocacy for religious toleration and , rooted in doctrines affirming and rejecting coercive orthodoxy, directly informed key Enlightenment thinkers. John Locke's The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695), which portrayed primarily as a moral exemplar rather than a divine satisfier, drew from Socinian sources in his library and echoed their subordination of to rational ethics, though Locke avoided full anti-Trinitarianism. Socinian ideas on toleration, first systematically defended by the in the late 16th century, influenced Locke's Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) and, through him, broader liberal , including concepts later enshrined in American constitutional thought by figures like . Socinianism also accelerated biblical criticism by promoting the "accommodation" theory, wherein scriptural authors purportedly tailored divine truths to the cultural and intellectual limitations of ancient audiences, rendering the text fallible and open to rational emendation. This view, which dismissed elements like angelic interventions as "" incompatible with enlightened reason, fueled 18th-century critics such as Johann Salomo Semler (1725–1791), who sought an authentic core canon stripped of mythological accretions. By naturalizing scriptural reason—rejecting self-authenticating (autopistia) in favor of reason's primacy—Socinians contributed to Enlightenment attitudes that demystified , paving the way for secular epistemologies while eroding traditional orthodoxies.

Modern Scholarly Evaluations and Relevance

Modern scholars have increasingly re-assessed Socinianism as a rationalist theological movement that prioritized scriptural interpretation through reason and ethical conduct over traditional metaphysical doctrines, viewing it as a significant challenge to 17th-century . In her 2010 analysis, Sarah Mortimer describes Socinianism as promoting a moralistic centered on Christian and tolerance, which contrasted with the doctrinal rigidity of Trinitarian confessions and contributed to debates on reason's role in faith during the . This perspective aligns with broader historiographical efforts to rehabilitate Socinianism from its historical condemnation as , emphasizing its anti-Trinitarianism and rejection of as early forms of rational critique against medieval . Orthodox Christian evaluators, however, maintain that Socinianism's deficiencies in grasping supra-natural metaphysics—such as portraying in creaturely terms—inevitably distorted biblical , leading to denials of Christ's , the , and vicarious . John Owen's 17th-century critiques, echoed in modern Reformed scholarship, link this to broader threats against scriptural authority, warning that similar reductions persist in contemporary theologies that excise metaphysical depth for ethical . Ogonowski's comprehensive underscores these tensions, compiling Polish scholarship to argue that Socinian emphasis on reason and , once heretical markers, now appear prescient in secular ethical frameworks but at the cost of . Socinianism retains relevance as a direct antecedent to modern Unitarianism, which inherits its non-Trinitarian and ethical focus, evolving into Unitarian Universalism's pluralistic by the 20th century. Its advocacy for and conscientious objection influenced Enlightenment figures like and , fostering causal pathways to secular and anti-dogmatic , though scholars caution this trajectory diluted causal realism in by subordinating empirical divine claims to human reason. In contemporary discourse, it serves as a in the perils of over-rationalizing , with peer-reviewed works highlighting its role in shifting Western thought from confessional orthodoxy toward individualistic ethics.

References

  1. https://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/socinus.htm
  2. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2535&context=honors-theses
  3. https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc8/hcc8.iv.iv.ix.html
  4. https://www.uudb.org/socinus-laelius-sozzini-lelio/
  5. https://www.monergism.com/socinianism
  6. http://archive.uuworld.org/2004/06/lookingback.html
  7. https://www.socinian.org/files/FaustusSocini.pdf
  8. http://www.socinian.org/files/Polish-Socinians_American-Constitution.pdf
  9. http://www.socinian.org/files/FaustusSocini.pdf
  10. https://research.gold.ac.uk/31248/1/Racovian_Catechism_paper_x_History_ds%2520edits%2520AH%2520DL%2520WITHOUT%2520FIGURES.pdf
  11. https://www.biblicalunitarian.com/articles/history/the-racovian-catechism-of-1605
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/reassessing-the-polish-brethren-on-magistracy-pacifism-and-warfare-in-the-seventeenth-century/20650B7629032235D16C8115CB3B2442
  13. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2000003
  14. https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2024/10/08/why-were-the-polish-brethren-persecuted-in-17th-century-poland/
  15. https://restitutio.org/2017/12/07/121-the-socinian-movement-five-hundred-6/
  16. https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/w20000101/The-Polish-Brethren-Why-Were-They-Persecuted/
  17. https://www.academia.edu/83833902/Polish_Brethren_Refugees_among_the_Amsterdam_Remonstrants_ca_1663_ca_1736
  18. https://equip.sbts.edu/publications/journals/journal-of-theology/sbjt-204-winter-2016/socinianism-john-owen/
  19. https://brill.com/view/journals/chrc/101/2-3/article-p286_8.xml
  20. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/trinity/unitarianism.html
  21. https://gospelstudies.org.uk/theologicalstudies/pdf/jisca/01-1_037.pdf
  22. https://theologicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/jisca/01-1_059.pdf
  23. https://focusonthekingdom.org/The%2520Racovian%2520Catechism.pdf
  24. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14113a.htm
  25. https://focusonthekingdom.org/The%20Racovian%20Catechism.pdf
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384425698_Socinianism_and_Free_Will
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27333514
  28. https://biblehub.com/q/what_is_socinianism_in_theology.htm
  29. https://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/rf/article/download/1466/995/4358
  30. https://unitarius-tudastar.hu/katechism/Racovian-catechism.pdf
  31. https://www.gotquestions.org/Socinianism.html
  32. https://www.christiandoctrine.com/christian-doctrine/articles/heresy-and-error/socinianism
  33. https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Reli/ReliHill.htm
  34. https://www.modernreformation.org/resources/articles/socinianism-metaphysics-and-scripture
  35. https://studylight.org/dictionaries/eng/wtd/s/socinians.html
  36. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/monkeymind/2019/12/faustus-socinus-and-the-wisdom-of-the-west-bringing-brain-with-heart-onto-the-intimate-way.html
  37. https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/14717/
  38. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/socinianism
  39. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zygo.12677
  40. https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/theologymatters/on-the-socinian-method/
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/dilemmas-of-a-socinian-pacifist-in-seventeenthcentury-poland/38E81CFDE463E5C3D11309E9E068AA6F
  42. https://focusonthekingdom.org/Laelius%2520and%2520Faustus%2520Socinus.pdf
  43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3168587
  44. https://research.vu.nl/files/358615747/reassessing-the-polish-brethren-on-magistracy-pacifism-and-warfare-in-the-seventeenth-century.pdf
  45. https://culture.pl/en/article/the-polish-brethren-the-first-reformed-peace-church-polands-first-banned-religion
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4211087
  47. https://unitarius-tudastar.hu/katechism/The-Racovian-Catechism.doc
  48. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-69658-9_5
  49. https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/christianity/protestant-denominations/socinianism
  50. https://sb.rfpa.org/the-synod-of-dordt-9-the-case-of-conrad-vorstius/
  51. https://christiandoctrine.com/christian-doctrine/articles/heresy-and-error/socinianism
  52. https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/129261632/Historical_Journal_Polish_Brethren_s_Ideas_on_Magistracy_and_Warfare.pdf
  53. https://www.academia.edu/37483497/Johann_Gerhard_the_Socinians_and_Modern_Rejections_of_Substitionary_Atonement
  54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25778748
  55. https://academic.oup.com/book/10865/chapter/159068467
  56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zv7g6
  57. https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/10723/1/fulltext.pdf
  58. https://macmillan.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/civil_liberty/paper-Sirota.pdf
  59. https://archive.org/details/racoviancatechis00reesuoft
  60. https://iarf.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Transylvanian-Unitarian-Church.pdf
  61. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/trinity/unitarianism.html
  62. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/the-rise-of-biblical-criticism-in-the-enlightenment/
  63. https://reviews.history.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Reviews_in_History_-_Reason_and_Religion_in_the_English_Revolution_The_Challenge_of_Socinianism_-_2011_05_01.pdf
  64. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/reevaluating-socinianism-and-arminianism-in-seventeenthcentury-europe/24EE37BD05697DCCC2C59AFD45BCAC55
  65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27336764
  66. https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc621/
  67. https://isaac-newton.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/newton-and-socinianism.pdf
  68. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01916599.2024.2346029
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.