Hubbry Logo
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera lituraMain
Open search
Spodoptera litura
Community hub
Spodoptera litura
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura
from Wikipedia

Spodoptera litura
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Superfamily: Noctuoidea
Family: Noctuidae
Genus: Spodoptera
Species:
S. litura
Binomial name
Spodoptera litura
(Fabricius, 1775)
Synonyms
  • Noctua litura Fabricius, 1775
  • Noctua histrionica Fabricius, 1775
  • Noctua elata Fabricius, 1781
  • Prodenia ciligera Guenée, 1852
  • Prodenia tasmanica Guenée, 1852
  • Prodenia subterminalis Walker, 1856
  • Prodenia glaucistriga Walker, 1856
  • Prodenia declinata Walker, 1857
  • Mamestra albisparsa Walker, 1862
  • Prodenia evanescens Butler, 1884
  • Orthosia conjuncta Rebel, 1921

Spodoptera litura, otherwise known as the tobacco cutworm or cotton leafworm, is a nocturnal moth in the family Noctuidae. S. litura is a serious polyphagous pest in Asia, Oceania, and the Indian subcontinent that was first described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1775.[1] Its common names reference two of the most frequent host plants of the moth. In total, 87 species of host plants that are infested by S. litura are of economic importance.[2] The species parasitize the plants as larvae through vigorous eating patterns, oftentimes leaving the leaves completely destroyed. The moth destroys economically important agricultural crops and decreases yield in some plants completely.[3] Their potential impact on the many different cultivated crops, and subsequently the local agricultural economy, has led to serious efforts to control the pests.[4]

S. litura is often confused with its close relative, Spodoptera littoralis. These two species are hard to discriminate between because the larvae and adult forms are identical. Inspecting the genitalia is the most certain way to tell the two species apart.[5]

Description

[edit]

Sex differences

[edit]

Morphology

[edit]

There are slight but obvious differences in morphology between males and females of S. litura that allow for the easy differentiation of the two sexes. Male forewing length is 14–17 millimetres (1258 in) while female forewing length is slightly larger and measures 15–18 millimetres (5834 in). The orbicular spot on the forewing is also more pronounced in the males.[6]

Differences in food regulation

[edit]

Regulation of macro nutrient input differs between males and females. Experimental results show that when S. litura are presented with two nutritionally complementary diet options, one rich in protein and a second rich in carbohydrates, females tend to consume more protein than males while no differences in carbohydrates exist. Body utilization of the macro nutrients differed as well. Females were very efficient at converting the protein consumed into body growth and mass, reflecting the bodily requirements to produce eggs. Males, on the other hand, were more efficient at depositing lipid from ingested carbohydrates. This fits in well with the migration patterns associated with mating. Males usually go out to find females during mating season, so the lipid deposits are thought to be energy reserves that will help the males in preparation for the migration.[7]

Similar species

[edit]

Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera littoralis are very closely related species. Discriminating between the two species can be difficult because the larvae and adult forms look identical. In fact, these two species are so similar that previous records that have claimed the presence of S. litura in areas such as Russia, Germany, and the UK may actually have been referring to S. littoralis.[5] Since both species are polyphagous, taking note of the host plant is not helpful in correct identification.[8] The only way to properly differentiate between the two is by inspecting their genitalia. In S. littoralis, the ductus and ostium bursae are the same lengths while in S. litura, they are of different lengths. In males, the juxta have characteristic shapes for each species.[5]

Range

[edit]

S. litura is the most common in South Asia.[9] However, its natural range extends from the Oriental and Australasian areas to parts of the Palearctic region as well.[6] The countries with the most widespread population of S. litura include but are not limited to China, Indonesia, India, Japan, and Malaysia.[2] The range of S. litura has also extended into non-indigenous regions through international trade. Moths in their egg, larvae, or pupae stages can be present in the soil, flower, or vegetation that are being transported across various regions. Pupae especially can be moved long distances, provided that they are not crushed, because of the relatively long pupation period.[5]

Habitat

[edit]

S. litura is a general herbivore and takes residence on various plants.[10] The lower and upper limits of habitable temperatures are 10 and 37 °C (50 and 99 °F), respectively. Therefore, it is well suited for tropical and temperate climate regions.[5] As caterpillars, S. litura can only move short distances. However, adult moths can fly up to a distance of 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi) for a total duration of 4 hours. This helps disperse the moths into new habitats and onto different host plants as food sources are depleted.[5]

Life cycle

[edit]
A page of a 1957 brochure of US Department of Agriculture on controlling tobacco cutworms, with a photograph of its eggs
1957 USDA brochure
Emerging larvae
Larva

Although the length of a life cycle varies slightly throughout the different regions, a typical S. litura will complete 12 generations every year. Each generation lasts about a month, but temperature causes slight variations: life cycles in the winter tend to be slightly more than one month, and life cycles in the summer tend to be less than a full month.[5]

Egg

[edit]

Eggs are spherical and slightly flattened. Each individual egg is around 0.6 mm in diameter with an orange-brown or pink color. These eggs are laid on the surface of leaves in big batches, with each cluster usually containing several hundred eggs. Females have a typical fecundity of 2000 to 2600 eggs.[5] However, experiments have shown that high temperatures and low humidity are inversely related to fecundity.[2] When laid, the egg batches are covered with hair scales provided by the female, which gives off a golden brown color. Egg masses are 4–7 millimetres (53235128 in) in total diameter, and eggs will hatch 2–3 days after being laid.[5]

Eggs

Larva

[edit]

Larvae body length ranges from 2.3 millimetres (23256 in) to 32 millimetres (1+14 in). The larva is variable in color based on age. Younger larvae tend to be a lighter green while older ones develop to a dark green or brown color. A bright yellow stripe along the dorsal surface is a characteristic feature of the larvae. The larvae also have no hair. Newly hatched larvae can be found by looking for scratch marks on leaf surfaces. Since S. litura is nocturnal, the larvae feed at night. During the day, they can usually be found in the soil around the plant. There are six instar stages, and by the last stage, the final instar can weigh up to 800 mg.[5]

Newly hatched 1st instar larva

Pupa

[edit]

Pupation lasts around 7 to 10 days and takes place on the soil near the base of the plant. The pupa is typically 15–20 millimetres (19322532 in) long, and its color is red-brown.[5] A characteristic feature is the presence of two small spines at the tip of the abdomen that are about 0.5 millimetres (5256 in) long each.[6]

Spodoptera litura pupa
Pupa

Adult

[edit]

Adult moths are on average 15–20 millimetres (19322532 in) long and have a total wingspan of 30–38 millimetres (1+3161+12 in). The body is a gray-brown color. The forewings are patterned with dark gray, red, and brown colors. The hindwings are grayish-white with a gray outline.[5] The mean female longevity is 8.3 days while for males it is 10.4 days.[11]

Male

Mating

[edit]

There is no mating activity on the first night that the moth emerges.[11] The second night, however, accounts for about 70% of the matings.[1] This night marks the maximum activity. Females mate an average of 3.1 times while the males have a mating average of 10.3. During copulation, males transfer a mean of 1,052,640 sperm per mating.[11] Eggs during mating are laid in a cluster covered with hair from the female's abdomen. This acts as a protective layer from parasites predating on eggs.[12] Since S. litura is a nocturnal moth, all reproductive activities occur during the scotophase (dark phase). These reproductive activities include calling, courtship, mating, and oviposition. Several studies have pointed out that the female lifespan decreases after mating. The reasons for this are still not fully known. Several possible explanations include physical injuries from the male genitalia or the male accessory gland secretions that force females to commit more resources to reproduction instead of on herself.[1]

Male accessory glands

[edit]

Male accessory glands (MAGs) are a reproductive evolutionary strategy adopted by males to gain higher fertilization. MAGs contain many different kinds of molecules including carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. When MAGs are transferred from the male to the female during copulation, it exerts a wide range of effects on female post-mating behavior. One of these effects include suppressing female receptivity to future matings by reducing their sexual receptivity or sexual attractiveness. Experiments have shown that females exposed to MAGs do not engage in mating call behavior the night they are exposed to the secretion. A successful mating that resulted in fertilized eggs led to an even longer break from sexual receptivity.[1]

Mating also has an effect on stimulating egg production and ovulation. This phenomenon may also be a result of the mechanical stimulation of male genitalia during copulation. However, studies have shown that MAG secretions are necessary for the maximum stimulation of the eggs. As a result, female longevity is negatively correlated with the number of eggs laid because a large portion of resources end up being used for the development of eggs instead of on herself.[1]

Pheromones

[edit]

In sexually reproductive animals, recognition and attraction of potential mates can occur in the form of pheromones.[13] In moth species, pheromones are produced by the females by pheromone glands and are released to attract males of their own species.[14] Accurate recognition of compatible mates is essential for reproductive success because failure to do so will come with steep costs: wasted time and energy, higher risk of predation, and reduction of viable offspring. Therefore, there is a strong selection for correct mate recognition signals that maximize reproductive fitness. Both S. litura and S. littoralis share the same 11 components that make up their pheromones (in different amounts), with (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z9,E11–14:Ac) acting as the major component.[13]

There is an inverse relationship between pheromone concentration within the bodies of females and the calling behavior of a female. This is because pheromones are released during female calling. It has been previously stated that the male accessory gland suppresses female calling and subsequently, re-mating. With calling suppressed, pheromone concentration builds up in the body of mated females. Therefore, when pheromone glands are analyzed, mated females will have a higher titre than virgin females. It is important to note that this result is different from previous studies on other insect species.[14]

Circadian rhythm

[edit]

The circadian rhythm also affects pheromone release. It has been found that higher amounts of pheromones are released during scotophase (dark period) and that lower levels are released during photophase (light period). This pattern is thought to coincide with male flight patterns, which would maximize responsiveness to the pheromone signals being sent.[14]

Heterospecific matings

[edit]

Heterospecific matings can be expected for phylogenetically closely related species with adjacent distribution, as is the case for S. litura and S. littoralis. Overlap in pheromone composition as discussed above also contributes to the lack of total reproductive isolation between the two species. Previous experiments have already shown that mating reduces the lifespan of female S. litura. This lifespan decreases even further when mating with a heterospecific S. littoralis male. It has also been shown that females lay significantly more eggs after a conspecific mating rather than after a heterospecific mating. Therefore, there is an evolutionary benefit to recognizing and mating with a mate of the same species.[13]

Predators

[edit]
predatory bug of larva infesting castor

So far there are a reported 131 species of natural enemies that prey on S. litura at different points in their life cycle. These include different species of parasites that specifically target either the egg, larval, or pupal stage. There are also 36 species of insect and 12 species of spider that are known to be natural predators to the moths. The identity of these predators vary depending on the region being studied. Additionally, infections from fungi and viruses have been observed. The most commonly reported viruses are nuclear polyhedrosis viruses and granulosis viruses.[5] For example, in Karnataka, a granulosis virus was found in dead S. litura larvae. In this study, both eggs and larvae were susceptible, and the mortality rate ranged from 50% to 100% depending on the stage of the larvae. The older larvae were killed more rapidly than the younger larvae.[5]

Chemical signals

[edit]

There are many ways the predators can locate its prey. One way is the release of chemical cues from the larvae that can act as a locator for predators searching for prey. The stink bug Eocanthecona furcellata is a predator that uses these types of chemical signals to locate and attain prey. Its prey locating behavior is activated when exposed to two chemical compounds released by S. litura larvae.[15]

Host plants

[edit]

S. litura has over 112 host species belonging to over 40 plant families, making the species highly polyphagous.[9] S. litura cause severe damage to their hosts by their vicious eating habits as larvae. Some common host plants include but are not limited to: tobacco, cotton, soybean, beet, cabbage, and chickpeas.[3] When the host plant in a particular area is depleted, big groups of larvae will migrate to find a new food source.[5]

Interaction with humans

[edit]

Pest activity

[edit]

Some external signs of pest activity that can be seen are large holes on leaves, injured stem bases, and discoloration of leaves.[8] Because S. litura acts as a pest on many different kinds of agricultural crops, its presence can cause economic losses in regions where these crops are cultivated. For example, S. litura has been responsible for the 71% yield loss of groundnut in the southern states of India.[3] Another figure shows that S. litura can decrease tobacco yield by 23–50%. This can cause major economic strain since 36 million people are directly or indirectly involved in the production, sale, marketing, or transport of the tobacco crop. The significant impact on agriculture S. litura can have as pests has earned the species a spot on the quarantine list for many countries including the United States of America.[8]

Pesticides

[edit]

Due to its presence in many important crops in agriculture, pesticides are always being applied on the species throughout the year. This has caused the rapid evolution of pesticide and insecticide resistance in S. litura.[9] In addition, the sheer amount of pesticides being used have caused concern for pesticide residue on food, environmental damage, and the destruction of beneficial species. Therefore, recent research studies have focused on other biological ways to effectively control these pests.[4] A current study of controlling this pest focuses on using the fungus Nomuraea rileyi on the larval stage of this moth. It was found that spraying a solution of this fungus on larvae in a laboratory setting has led to effective control of the late second and early third instar stages of the larvae on castor crops. When tested in the field, there was a very high larvae mortality of 88–97% 19 days after application of the fungal solution.[16]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Yu, Jin-Feng; Li, Cong; Xu, Jin; Liu, Jian-Hong; Ye, Hui (2014). "Male Accessory Gland Secretions Modulate Female Post-Mating Behavior in the Moth Spodoptera litura". Journal of Insect Behavior. 27 (1): 105–116. Bibcode:2014JIBeh..27..105Y. doi:10.1007/s10905-013-9414-4. S2CID 16139914.
  2. ^ a b c "Spodoptera litturalis and Spodoptera litura" (PDF). EPPO. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 13, 2017. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
  3. ^ a b c Abbas, Naeem; Shad, Sarfraz Ali; Razaq, Muhammad (2012-07-01). "Fitness cost, cross resistance and realized heritability of resistance to imidacloprid in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 103 (3): 181–188. Bibcode:2012PBioP.103..181A. doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.05.001.
  4. ^ a b Seth, Rakesh K.; Khan, Zubeda; Rao, Dev K.; Zarin, Mahtab (2016-06-01). "Flight Activity and Mating Behavior of Irradiated Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Males and Their F1 Progeny for Use of Inherited Sterility in Pest Management Approaches". Florida Entomologist. 99 (sp1): 119–130. doi:10.1653/024.099.sp115. ISSN 0015-4040.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Maes, K. (2014). "Spodoptera litura (taro caterpillar)". www.cabi.org. CABI Compendium 44520. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.44520. Retrieved 2017-09-26.
  6. ^ a b c "PM 7/124 (1) Spodoptera littoralis, Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera frugiperda, Spodoptera eridania". EPPO Bulletin. 45 (3): 410–444. 2015-12-01. doi:10.1111/epp.12258. ISSN 1365-2338.
  7. ^ Lee, Kwang Pum (2010-11-01). "Sex-specific differences in nutrient regulation in a capital breeding caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)". Journal of Insect Physiology. 56 (11): 1685–1695. Bibcode:2010JInsP..56.1685L. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.06.014. PMID 20619268.
  8. ^ a b c "Noctuidae - Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)" (PDF). LepIntercept. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2017. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
  9. ^ a b c Ahmad, Munir; Saleem, Mushtaq Ahmed; Sayyed, Ali H (2009-03-01). "Efficacy of insecticide mixtures against pyrethroid- and organophosphate-resistant populations of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Pest Management Science. 65 (3): 266–274. doi:10.1002/ps.1681. ISSN 1526-4998. PMID 19051214.
  10. ^ Jitendra, Yadav; Ching-Wen, Tan; Shaw-Yhi, Hwang (2010-12-01). "Spatial Variation in Foliar Chemicals Within Radish (Raphanus sativus) Plants and Their Effects on Performance of Spodoptera litura". Environmental Entomology. 39 (6): 1990–1996. doi:10.1603/EN10118. ISSN 0046-225X. PMID 22182566.
  11. ^ a b c Etman, Ahmed a. M.; Hooper, G. H. S. (1980-04-01). "Developmental and Reproductive Biology of Spodoptera litura (f.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Australian Journal of Entomology. 18 (4): 363–372. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.1979.tb00868.x. ISSN 1440-6055.
  12. ^ Fukuda, T.; Wakamura, S.; Arakaki, N.; Yamagishi, K. (April 2004). "Parasitism, development and adult longevity of the egg parasitoid Telenomus nawai (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) on the eggs of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Bulletin of Entomological Research. 97 (2): 185–190. doi:10.1017/S0007485307004841. ISSN 1475-2670. PMID 17411481. S2CID 24593677.
  13. ^ a b c Saveer, Ahmed M.; Becher, Paul G.; Birgersson, Göran; Hansson, Bill S.; Witzgall, Peter; Bengtsson, Marie (2014). "Mate recognition and reproductive isolation in the sibling species Spodoptera littoralis and Spodoptera litura". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2: 18. Bibcode:2014FrEEv...2...18S. doi:10.3389/fevo.2014.00018. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0023-EA9B-3. ISSN 2296-701X.
  14. ^ a b c Lu, Qin; Huang, Ling-Yan; Liu, Fang-Tao; Wang, Xia-Fei; Chen, Peng; Xu, Jin; Deng, Jian-Yu; Ye, Hui (2017-06-01). "Sex pheromone titre in the glands of Spodoptera litura females: circadian rhythm and the effects of age and mating". Physiological Entomology. 42 (2): 156–162. doi:10.1111/phen.12185. ISSN 1365-3032. S2CID 89807432.
  15. ^ Yasuda, Tetsuya (1997-03-01). "Chemical cues from Spodoptera litura larvae elicit prey-locating behavior by the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 82 (3): 349–354. Bibcode:1997EEApp..82..349Y. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00149.x. ISSN 1570-7458. S2CID 84406457.
  16. ^ Devi, P. S. Vimala (1994). "Conidia Production of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Nomuraea rileyi and Its Evaluation for Control of Spodoptera litura (Fab) on Ricinus communis". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 63 (2): 145–150. Bibcode:1994JInvP..63..145D. doi:10.1006/jipa.1994.1028.
Male
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Spodoptera litura (Fabricius, 1775) is a noctuid in the family , commonly known as the , leafworm, or cluster . Native to tropical and temperate regions of , it has established populations across , , the Pacific Islands, parts of , and . It is considered a quarantine pest in the and the . This highly polyphagous feeds on over 120 host from more than 40 botanical families, including major crops such as , , , , , , and , leading to severe defoliation and yield losses ranging from 5% to 100% in affected fields. The life cycle of S. litura is rapid and multivoltine, typically completing in 23–30 days under optimal conditions (25–28°C), with females laying 1,500–2,500 eggs in clusters on undersides. Eggs are spherical, pale green, and hatch in 3–4 days; larvae progress through six instars over 15–20 days, growing from tiny blackish-green hatchlings to 40–50 mm long, dark gray or green caterpillars with yellowish stripes and black spots, which skeletonize foliage. Pupation occurs in reddish-brown, soil-borne cocoons for 11–13 days, yielding adults with a 28–38 mm , forewings patterned in dark brown with white markings, and hindwings whitish. As a serious economic pest, S. litura has developed resistance to multiple insecticides, prompting strategies including biological controls and trapping.

Taxonomy

Classification

Spodoptera litura belongs to the kingdom Animalia, phylum Arthropoda, class Insecta, order , superfamily Noctuoidea, family , subfamily Noctuinae, tribe Prodeniini, genus Spodoptera, and species S. litura. The species was first described by in 1775. Within the , the genus occupies a position in the Noctuinae, characterized by its diverse and often economically significant . S. litura is phylogenetically closely related to other members of the genus, such as S. littoralis, with which it forms a sister pair based on mitochondrial analyses. The genus as a whole comprises polyphagous lepidopteran pests that have undergone taxonomic revisions, initially placed in subfamilies like Acronictinae before being stabilized in Noctuinae.

Synonyms and nomenclature

Spodoptera litura was originally described as Noctua litura by in 1775 in his work Systema Entomologiae. Subsequent reclassifications placed it in the genus Prodenia by Achille Guenée in 1852, reflecting early taxonomic arrangements within the family. In 1963, Pierre Viette clarified the distinction between S. litura and the closely related S. littoralis, establishing the current generic placement in under (ICZN) rules, with Spodoptera litura as the accepted valid name. The species has accumulated several junior synonyms over time, primarily due to historical misidentifications and regional descriptions. Key synonyms include:
  • Noctua litura Fabricius, 1775
  • Noctua histrionica Fabricius, 1775
  • Noctua elata Fabricius, 1781
  • Prodenia litura (Fabricius, 1775)
  • Prodenia ciligera Guenée, 1852
  • Prodenia tasmanica Guenée, 1852
  • Prodenia subterminalis Walker, 1856
  • Mamestra albisparsa Walker, 1862
  • Prodenia glaucistriga Walker, 1856
  • Prodenia declinata Walker, 1857
  • Prodenia evanescens Butler, 1884
These synonyms are documented in comprehensive reviews such as Holloway (1989). Common names for S. litura vary regionally and reflect its pest status on various crops, including tobacco cutworm, cotton leafworm, cluster caterpillar, rice cutworm, tropical armyworm, and taro caterpillar. In some contexts, it is referred to as the common cutworm.

Identification

Morphological description

Spodoptera litura displays characteristic morphological traits across its life stages that facilitate identification in agricultural and ecological contexts. Adults are nocturnal moths with a body length of 15–20 mm and a of 30–38 mm. The forewings are grayish brown, featuring white wavy lines, dark spots, and a prominent black reniform spot near the middle, while the hindwings are white with brown margins and a violet sheen. The body is whitish to yellowish, suffused with pale red, and covered in light brown scales on the head, , and , with hair-like tufts present. Eggs are spherical and slightly flattened, measuring approximately 0.6 in , with a ribbed surface featuring 37–65 longitudinal ridges and a pale yellow color that darkens to black before hatching. They are laid in clusters of 20–350 eggs, typically in a single layer, and covered by creamy white to light brown hairs from the female's . Larvae possess a stout, smooth body that grows from 2.3 mm in the first to 32–45 mm when fully developed, progressing through six instars with progressively wider head capsules (from ~0.25 mm to over 1 mm). The body is dark gray to blackish-brown dorsally, accented by pale yellow dorsal and lateral stripes bordered by black semilunar marks; the head is shiny black, and the body bears conspicuous black tubercles with long hairs, including two large black spots on the first and eighth abdominal segments and a distinct black patch on the first abdominal segment. Pupae are reddish-brown, measuring 15–22 mm in length, and form within rough earthen cells in the , with the terminal abdominal segment ending in two short spines. Key diagnostic features include the black spot on the forewing and the smear-like feeding marks left by larvae on foliage, which appear as irregular patches of scraped epidermal tissue.

Sexual dimorphism

Sexual dimorphism in Spodoptera litura is evident in both morphological and physiological traits, reflecting adaptations to reproductive roles. Adult females are generally larger than males, with body lengths averaging 16.20 ± 1.03 mm compared to 15.30 ± 1.16 mm in males, and wingspans of 32.97 ± 1.39 mm versus 32.11 ± 0.92 mm, respectively. Females exhibit a more robust, blunt suited for production, while males have a slender, pointed abdomen; additionally, males typically exhibit an ochreous patch on the forewings, absent in females. Physiologically, the sexes differ in nutrient regulation during the larval stage, which influences adult reproductive success. Females select diets higher in protein (e.g., ratios from 42:0 to 14:28 protein:carbohydrate) and consume more protein overall to support egg development through vitellogenesis, converting ingested protein more efficiently into body growth and reproductive tissues. In contrast, males prioritize carbohydrate intake, exhibiting greater efficiency in converting carbohydrates to lipids, which are likely allocated to energy reserves for mating and potential migration. These differences emerge late in the final larval instar, highlighting sex-specific geometric foraging strategies on two-dimensional food surfaces. Reproductive structures further underscore dimorphism, with females possessing larger ovaries adapted for high , enabling the production of up to several thousand eggs per individual. Males, meanwhile, have well-developed accessory glands that produce spermatophores, complex structures containing and seminal fluids transferred during copulation to fertilize eggs and modulate female post-mating behavior. These glands begin developing in the pupal stage and are essential for successful delivery in this capital-breeding .

Similar species

Spodoptera litura is morphologically similar to several other species in the genus Spodoptera, particularly in adult wing patterns and larval body markings, which can complicate field identification without detailed examination. Key confusable species include S. littoralis, S. frugiperda, S. exigua, and S. eridania, with distinctions often relying on subtle differences in spot shapes, stripe patterns, and geographic ranges. S. littoralis (Egyptian cottonworm) closely resembles S. litura in adult forewing features, such as the elongate orbicular spot and dark hour-glass markings along the outer margin, as well as in components that show significant overlap. However, S. littoralis is primarily restricted to , , and the , with little distributional overlap with S. litura in , and definitive separation requires examination of male genitalia, where the vesica morphology differs. In larvae, S. littoralis typically lacks the interrupted spiracular stripe on abdominal segment 1 and the apical white dots on dorsal triangles that are often present in S. litura. S. frugiperda (fall armyworm) shares a broad host range and has become invasive in regions overlapping with S. litura in and following its spread from the , but adults are smaller with less bold wing markings, featuring an indistinct reniform spot and smaller black hour-glass shapes. Larval identification highlights differences in spotting, with S. frugiperda showing distinct inverted "Y" marks on the head and less pronounced dorsal lines compared to the more uniform dark gray body and yellow stripes of S. litura. Compared to S. exigua (), which co-occurs with S. litura across much of , S. litura adults exhibit a prominent black-followed reniform spot on the forewing that is absent in the grayer, less patterned wings of S. exigua. Larvae of S. litura display more obvious middorsal lines and spiracular stripes interrupted by black spots, whereas S. exigua larvae have a mesothoracic lateral dark spot and scattered white dorsal dots without such interruptions. S. eridania (southern armyworm), native to the and first detected in West and in 2018 where it has established, though primarily outside core S. litura ranges in , differs in adult forewings that lack the contrasting transverse lines and white-outlined spots characteristic of S. litura. In larvae, while both have a dark lateral spot on the first abdominal segment, S. litura shows more pronounced dorsal triangles with white apical dots and bolder spiracular stripes than the variable greenish or brownish forms of S. eridania.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic distribution

Spodoptera litura is native to South and East Asia, with its original range encompassing regions such as , , , and extending through . The species has established populations across tropical and subtropical areas in these regions, where frost events are rare or absent, supporting its year-round survival and reproduction. Limited populations are also established in African overseas territories such as and . The pest has been introduced and has expanded its range to , , and parts of the Pacific Islands through human-mediated dispersal, primarily via in agricultural commodities and crops. Historical records indicate introductions to , , and various Pacific islands, likely facilitated by the transport of infested plant material, with establishments dating back to the mid-20th century in many cases. Recent monitoring has confirmed ongoing presence and occasional new detections in isolated Pacific locations post-2000, underscoring continued spread risks. Despite its wide distribution, S. litura remains absent from the and the , where it is regulated as a quarantine pest to prevent entry and establishment. In the United States, it is listed as a federal quarantine pest, with interceptions reported at ports but no established populations. The is influenced by suitability, favoring temperatures between 25–30°C, and anthropogenic factors such as global trade networks that enable long-distance dispersal.

Habitat preferences

_Spodoptera litura thrives in tropical and subtropical climates, with optimal development occurring at temperatures between 24–30°C and high relative levels of 75–90%. Development slows below 20°C and ceases above 35–37°C, while temperatures exceeding 40°C are lethal to all life stages. The species prefers microhabitats in agricultural fields, gardens, and forested edges, where larvae feed on foliage, particularly shaded or undersides of leaves during the day to avoid and predation. Pupae form in litter or under fallen leaves near host plants, typically at depths of 4 cm, with wet sandy loam soils facilitating higher pupation success compared to drier or compacted types. Larvae and eggs are vulnerable to excessive rainfall, which can reduce survival rates by promoting fungal infections or washing away clusters, though moderate precipitation supports multivoltine populations by extending favorable growing seasons. Seasonally, S. litura is multivoltine in warm , producing 3–8 generations per year depending on temperature and rainfall, with up to four generations observed in temperate areas like from May to October. Altitudinal variations allow occurrence up to moderate elevations in hilly regions, though populations decline above 1000 m due to cooler temperatures limiting development. In irrigated agricultural systems, artificial moisture mimics rainy season conditions, attracting oviposition and boosting local abundance.

Life cycle

Eggs

The eggs of Spodoptera litura are spherical to somewhat flattened, measuring 0.4 to 0.7 mm in diameter, with a surface sculpted by approximately 40 longitudinal ribs. They are typically pale creamy white to light green in color upon deposition, turning darker as development progresses. Eggs are laid in clusters of 200 to 300, arranged in multiple overlapping layers, and covered with brown hair-like scales derived from the female's abdominal tufts, which provide a protective . This scale covering not only camouflages the cluster but also deters predation by making the eggs less accessible to natural enemies such as parasitic wasps and predatory insects. Oviposition occurs primarily at night, with gravid females preferring the undersides of host plant leaves to shield the eggs from direct sunlight and environmental extremes. A single female typically deposits 2,000 to 2,600 eggs over 3 to 5 nights, often in several batches, with total reaching up to 2,673 eggs under optimal conditions. This nocturnal behavior aligns with the moth's crepuscular activity patterns, minimizing exposure to diurnal predators and during the day. Under favorable conditions of 25 to 30°C, eggs hatch in 3 to 4 days, with embryonic development completing in 2 to 5 days depending on . Development is highly sensitive to humidity levels, requiring relative humidity above 70% to prevent ; lower humidity significantly increases egg mortality by causing of the . The protective hair scales further mitigate water loss, but prolonged exposure to dry conditions can lead to up to 50% or higher mortality rates in egg batches. first larvae then transition to the host plant surface for initial feeding.

Larvae

The larvae of Spodoptera litura typically progress through six s, with head capsule width increasing progressively across stages, approximately doubling in later instars—for example, from about 0.3 mm in the first to 2.5 mm in the sixth. Body length also grows substantially, reaching a total of up to 45 mm in the final . This instar progression follows Dyar's rule, where each molt results in a consistent growth ratio of around 1.4–1.5 times the previous head capsule size, enabling reliable identification of developmental stages. Morphologically, early instars (first to third) are pale green or yellowish with a black head and sparse markings, transitioning to darker green, brown, or blackish hues in later instars, often featuring longitudinal yellow stripes, dark semilunar spots on abdominal segments, and conspicuous black tubercles bearing long hairs. These changes enhance on foliage and , with the stout, smooth body becoming more robust in mature larvae. The total larval development time spans 15–20 days under optimal conditions, with early instars (first to third) lasting 2–3 days each and later instars (fourth to sixth) extending to 3–5 days due to increased feeding demands. Development rate is temperature-dependent, accelerating at higher temperatures; for instance, the full larval period shortens to about 16 days at 30°C compared to 26 days at 25°C, with optimal growth around 25–28°C. At 28°C, early instars develop faster, contributing to shorter overall durations without compromising survival. Feeding is primarily nocturnal, with larvae defoliating leaves by scraping the in early instars and causing or complete consumption in later stages, often leaving only veins intact. Early instars are gregarious, collectively on the leaf underside, while later instars become solitary and more destructive, capable of cutting young at the base in high densities. As polyphagous feeders attacking over 100 plant species across 40 families, S. litura larvae show a preference for crops such as and , where they cause significant economic damage through rapid defoliation.

Pupae

Following pupation, mature larvae of Spodoptera litura descend from host plants and burrow into the to depths of 2.5–12.5 cm, preferring moist sandy under litter for protection. They construct earthen cells reinforced with , forming a chamber that aids in maintaining humidity and shielding from environmental stressors during the non-feeding transformation phase. This prepupal wandering and burrowing phase typically lasts about 1 day, during which the larva curls into a C-shape before shedding its . The pupae are obtect in form, with appendages closely appressed to the body and no free external wing cases visible; they measure 15–20 mm in length and exhibit a reddish-brown coloration, often starting pale yellowish before darkening. The terminal abdominal segment features two short spines or hooks, aiding in anchoring within the pupal chamber. Development within the pupa occurs over 7–13 days at 25°C, encompassing histogenesis and eversion under optimal conditions of 75% relative humidity, after which adults eclose. Pupal survival is vulnerable to high mortality rates, often exceeding 50% due to predation by soil-dwelling arthropods such as , ground beetles, and parasitoids including ichneumonid wasps that target the stage. In mild climates with infrequent frosts, pupae can overwinter successfully, entering a state of quiescence that allows persistence through cooler periods without .

Adults

Adult Spodoptera litura moths are medium-sized noctuids with a grey-brown body measuring 15–20 mm in length and a of 30–38 mm. The forewings are grey to reddish-brown, featuring a variegated pattern of dark and pale markings, including prominent dark and pale spots near the tip and a golden or yellowish streak along the anterior margin. The hindwings are pale with a diffuse dark border. The body is covered in scales, with the often displaying a darker dorsal line, and the antennae are filiform in both sexes. The adult lifespan typically ranges from 7 to 10 days under conditions at temperatures around 25–28°C, with s generally outliving males to facilitate oviposition; mean is approximately 10.0 ± 1.41 days, compared to 9.00 ± 1.41 days for males. Adults emerge in the evening, with peak emergence occurring at , after which they rest motionless on vegetation during the day to avoid predation. Feeding in adults is minimal and consists primarily of , honeydew, or water, serving mainly to sustain energy for flight and reproduction rather than growth, in contrast to the voracious feeding of larvae.
  • S. litura* adults are strong fliers and strictly nocturnal, becoming active at for and . They exhibit significant dispersal capabilities, with individuals capable of migrating up to 700 km, often aided by prevailing winds during seasonal movements between regions such as and . Flight occurs at altitudes of 100–1000 m, with take-off typically at and landing , enabling long-range colonization of new habitats.

Reproduction and behavior

Mating system

The mating system of Spodoptera litura is characterized by in females and in males, with adults engaging in multiple copulations over their short adult lifespan. Females typically mate three or four times during their lifetime, while males can mate up to ten times. Mating does not occur on the night of but begins on the second night post-emergence, when calling and responsiveness peak under scotophase conditions. This timing aligns with the nocturnal activity patterns of both sexes, optimizing reproductive opportunities within their 8–10 day adult longevity. Courtship in S. litura involves males initially locating calling females through plumes, followed by close-range behaviors such as wing fanning to disperse ultrasonic courtship songs that may modulate female receptivity. Upon mounting, copulation ensues, lasting approximately 30–60 minutes, during which the male transfers a containing roughly one million from the accessory glands. The serves as a nutrient-rich package that influences female post-mating behaviors, including reduced receptivity to further suitors. These interactions ensure efficient transfer and fertilization, with last-male sperm precedence observed in rematings. Heterospecific matings with closely related species like are rare but feasible due to similarities in blends, particularly when S. littoralis females pair with S. litura males. However, such crosses result in hybrid inviability, with drastically reduced hatching rates (often near zero) and lowered female longevity, reinforcing between the species. No viable offspring emerge from reciprocal crosses involving S. litura females and S. littoralis males, attributed to genital mismatches and post-zygotic barriers.

Pheromone communication

The sex pheromones of Spodoptera litura are produced and released by virgin and mated females from specialized pheromone glands located in the ovipositor on the eighth abdominal segment. The primary components of the female sex pheromone blend consist of (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z9,E11-14:Ac), (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z9,E12-14:Ac), (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:Ac), and (E)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (E11-14:Ac), typically in a ratio of approximately 100:27:20:27. This multi-component blend ensures species-specific attraction, with Z9,E11-14:Ac serving as the major attractant and the others modulating male response. Biosynthesis of these acetate esters occurs via fatty acid derivatives in the pheromone gland cells, involving desaturases and reductases encoded by genes such as those in the Δ9 and Δ11 desaturase families. Emission of the by females exhibits a clear , with titres peaking during the scotophase (night phase) and reaching maximum levels in the first scotophase after eclosion, typically between 20:00 and 22:00 under laboratory conditions mimicking . This rhythm is synchronized with the nocturnal activity of adults and is influenced by light-dark cycles, ensuring that release aligns with optimal windows; titres decline sharply during photophase (day). Interestingly, does not suppress production as in many lepidopterans; instead, mated females maintain or even exhibit elevated titres 16–24 hours post-, potentially facilitating remating behavior. Males detect these pheromones primarily through highly sensitive antennae equipped with olfactory receptor neurons expressing specific pheromone receptors, such as SlitOR13, SlitOR16, and SlitOR14, which respond selectively to the blend components. Odorant-binding proteins in the antennal sensilla facilitate transport of the hydrophobic pheromones to these receptors, enabling precise discrimination. The functional role of the pheromone is long-range attraction of males, with the active space extending up to approximately 80–100 m downwind under low wind conditions (0.5 m/s), guiding oriented flight toward the female. This specificity in blend ratio and composition minimizes cross-attraction to other Spodoptera species, though close relatives like S. littoralis show partial overlap, occasionally leading to interspecific mating and hybrids in sympatric areas.

Chemical signals in ecology

The larvae of Spodoptera litura employ non-reproductive chemical signals primarily via oral secretions for ecological interactions. Oral secretions in S. litura are produced by salivary glands and include a complex mixture of compounds such as fatty acid-amino acid conjugates like volicitin [N-(17-hydroxylinolenoyl)-L-glutamine], synthesized in the and incorporated into the regurgitant. Volicitin elicits the emission of volatile organic compounds from host plants, which attract parasitoids and predators, functioning as an indirect defense mechanism in the plant-herbivore-natural enemy triad. These secretions integrate with larval behaviors like thrashing to enhance survival, while complementing physical on host plants.

Ecology

Host plants

Spodoptera litura is a highly polyphagous species, capable of feeding on more than 120 plant species across over 40 botanical families. This broad host range includes economically important crops such as those in the Solanaceae, Fabaceae, and Malvaceae families, with examples encompassing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), soybean (Glycine max), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea), and cotton (Gossypium spp.). Among these, preferred hosts for larval development and oviposition include tobacco, rice (Oryza sativa), and groundnut, where the larvae primarily consume foliage leading to significant defoliation. Nutritional quality of host plants influences host selection and larval performance in S. litura. Females tend to oviposit on plants with high protein content, as these enhance larval protein levels and overall development. Additionally, secondary metabolites present in host plants, such as and , can modulate larval growth rates and survival, with some acting as feeding deterrents or growth inhibitors depending on concentration. Host utilization by S. litura exhibits geographic variations, reflecting regional crop availability and climate. In , solanaceous plants like and are more commonly exploited, while in , cruciferous species such as (Brassica oleracea) are frequently utilized.

Predators and natural enemies

Spodoptera litura populations are regulated by a diverse array of natural enemies, including predators, parasitoids, and pathogens (over 130 species reported globally as of 2014), which collectively contribute to biological control in agricultural ecosystems. Predators include 36 species of predatory insects from 14 families, such as ladybugs (Coccinellidae) and ground beetles (Carabidae), that actively on eggs and larvae. Additionally, 12 species of spiders from 6 families prey on early larvae, while several species of birds and reptiles target larger larvae and pupae in field settings. Parasitoids, particularly from the orders and Diptera, exert significant mortality on S. litura at different life stages. Egg parasitoids like Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) attack egg masses, while larval parasitoids such as tachinid flies (Diptera: , e.g., Exorista sorbillans) infest larvae, with field rates reaching up to 50% under natural conditions. In total, 71 parasitoid species have been recorded, predominantly Hymenopterans targeting eggs and early larvae, and Dipterans focusing on later instars. Pathogenic microorganisms also play a crucial role in suppressing S. litura populations. Fungi such as infect larvae through cuticle penetration, leading to mycosis and death. Viruses, notably Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SlNPV), cause rapid larval liquefaction and are highly specific to this host. Bacteria like (Bt) produce toxins that disrupt larval function, resulting in . The 1993 review identifies four fungal, four viral, seven bacterial, four protozoan, and four species as pathogens, primarily affecting larvae. These natural enemies demonstrate high potential for biological control within (IPM) strategies, where their combined action can reduce S. litura densities without relying solely on chemical inputs; chemical signals from the host may further enhance predator and avoidance behaviors, aiding natural regulation.

Human interactions

As an agricultural pest

Spodoptera litura, commonly known as the cutworm or cluster , is a highly polyphagous lepidopteran pest that inflicts substantial damage through larval defoliation across numerous . The larvae feed voraciously on foliage, often skeletonizing leaves or completely stripping , which severely compromises and vigor. This feeding behavior leads to significant yield reductions in affected ; for instance, in , infestations of 2-8 larvae per can cause 23-50.4% yield loss, while in groundnut, losses can reach up to 71% depending on intensity and crop stage. Commercially, S. litura impacts over 120 species, including major field like , , , and such as and , resulting in widespread economic repercussions for . The pest's outbreak patterns exacerbate its destructive potential. As a multivoltine , S. litura can complete up to 12 generations per year in tropical regions, enabling rapid population buildup. Outbreaks typically peak during seasons, with elevated activity in , , and mid-August, when favorable and support larval development and dispersal. Early-instar larvae feed gregariously, scraping the leaf in groups, which accelerates damage and facilitates rapid defoliation of large areas. Globally, S. litura holds major pest status in and , where it causes extensive losses to economically vital crops and poses a high risk to other regions. It is regulated as a pest in the due to its potential for establishment and damage via trade in plant material. In the United States, frequent interceptions at ports—over 700 recorded—underscore its exclusion efforts, as introduction could threaten diverse agricultural systems. Historical epidemics in during the 1980s and 1990s, including severe crop failures in 1987 and 1997, resulted in millions of dollars in losses, highlighting the pest's capacity for region-wide devastation.

Management and control

Management of Spodoptera litura relies on (IPM) approaches that combine chemical, biological, cultural, and emerging technological strategies to mitigate its impact as a polyphagous pest, while addressing the challenges of insecticide resistance and environmental concerns. Overreliance on synthetic pesticides has led to widespread resistance, prompting a shift toward sustainable methods that reduce chemical inputs and preserve . Chemical control traditionally involves insecticides such as pyrethroids (e.g., alpha-cypermethrin) and organophosphates (e.g., ), which target larval stages but have induced high resistance levels in field populations. For instance, field studies have documented resistance ratios up to 120-fold to in S. litura populations from agricultural regions (as of 2013), attributed to metabolic mechanisms like S-transferases. Newer molecules like and flubendiamide offer higher efficacy with lower resistance risks, achieving larval mortality rates of 90-96% at recommended doses, but their selective use within IPM is essential to delay resistance development. Excessive chemical applications also harm non-target organisms and contribute to ecological imbalances, underscoring the need for alternatives. Biological control employs microbial agents and natural enemies to suppress S. litura populations effectively and sustainably. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins, particularly Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab expressed in transgenic crops or applied as sprays, disrupt larval midgut function, resulting in 80-95% mortality in susceptible strains. Nucleopolyhedrovirus (SlNPV) isolates are highly virulent, with field applications at 250-500 larval equivalents per hectare (LE/ha) yielding 70-90% larval reduction in crops like soybean and cotton. Egg parasitoids such as Trichogramma spp. (e.g., T. yousufi) can parasitize up to 60-80% of eggs when released at 50,000-100,000 individuals per hectare, preventing larval establishment. Entomopathogenic fungi like Beauveria bassiana and Isaria fumosorosea infect larvae via cuticle penetration, achieving 70-100% mortality in laboratory and field trials when applied at 10^8-10^9 conidia/ml, with synergistic effects when combined with other agents. Cultural and IPM practices form the foundation of non-chemical suppression, emphasizing prevention and monitoring. Crop rotation with non-host plants like cereals disrupts S. litura life cycles, reducing larval densities by 40-60% in subsequent susceptible crops such as or . traps for monitoring adult moths enable timely interventions, with densities of 5-10 traps per correlating to economic thresholds of 10-15 moths per trap per night. Resistant crop varieties, including and RNAi-engineered lines, limit feeding damage by 50-70%. Light traps deployed at 1-2 per capture nocturnal adults, reducing populations by 30-50% in vegetable fields when integrated with sanitation practices like to destroy pupae. Recent advances focus on precision technologies and molecular tools to enhance control efficiency and minimize environmental impact. (RNAi)-based approaches, such as dsRNA targeting essential genes like or synthase delivered via transgenic host plants, achieve 70-90% larval mortality and durable resistance in crops like and , with field trials post-2023 demonstrating reduced chemical needs. and AI algorithms, enables rapid detection of outbreaks, covering 50-100 hectares per flight and identifying larval hotspots with 85-95% accuracy, as shown in soybean fields affected by related Spodoptera species in 2023 studies. Additionally, as of 2025, field resistance to diamide insecticides has been confirmed in Australian populations of S. litura, necessitating updated IPM rotations to preserve efficacy. These innovations support IPM by optimizing biological and cultural interventions while curbing resistance and overuse of pesticides.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.