Hubbry Logo
Bow (watercraft)Bow (watercraft)Main
Open search
Bow (watercraft)
Community hub
Bow (watercraft)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bow (watercraft)
Bow (watercraft)
Bow (watercraft)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The prow of HMS Caroline (1914)

The bow (/baʊ/) is the forward part of the hull of a ship or boat,[1] the point that is usually most forward when the vessel is underway. The aft end of the boat is the stern.[2]

Prow may be used as a synonym for bow or it may mean the forward-most part of the bow above the waterline.

Function

[edit]
HMS Dreadnought, with an inverted bow
The seaworthy bow of a Severn class lifeboat in Poole
A heavily laden barge in France. Note the bluff bow and the limited freeboard.
Flared bow of a cruise ship

A ship's bow should be designed to enable the hull to pass efficiently through the water. Bow shapes vary according to the speed of the boat, the seas or waterways being navigated, and the vessel's function. Where sea conditions are likely to promote pitching, it is useful if the bow provides reserve buoyancy; a flared bow (a raked stem with flared topsides) is ideal to reduce the amount of water shipped over the bow.[3]

Ideally, the bow should reduce the resistance and should be tall enough to prevent water from regularly washing over the top of it. Large commercial barges on inland waterways rarely meet big waves and may have remarkably little freeboard at the bow, whereas fast military vessels operating offshore must be able to cope with heavy seas. On slower ships like tankers and barges, a fuller bow shape is used to maximise the volume of the ship for a given length. The bow may be reinforced to serve as an ice-breaker.[4]

The forward part of the bow is called the "stem" or "forestem". Traditionally, the stem was a timber (or metal) post into which side planks (or plates) were joined. Some boats such as the Dutch barge "aak" or the clinker-built Viking longships have no straight stem, having instead a curved prow.

Types

[edit]

Many types of bows exist. These include:

Notable bow types

Etymology

[edit]

From Middle Dutch boech or Old Norse bógr (shoulder). Thus it has the same origin as the English "bough" (from the Old English bóg, or bóh (shoulder, the bough of a tree), but the nautical term is unrelated, being unknown in this sense in English before 1600.[5]

Prow

[edit]

The "prow" (French: proue) is the forward-most part of a ship's bow above the waterline. The terms prow and "bow" are often used interchangeably to describe the most forward part of a ship and its surrounding parts.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bow (watercraft)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The bow of a watercraft is the forward-most part of a boat, ship, or vessel, typically featuring a pointed or tapered shape designed to cleave through water and reduce hydrodynamic resistance during forward motion. This section contrasts with the stern at the rear and plays a critical role in the vessel's stability, maneuverability, and performance in various sea conditions by parting waves and minimizing drag. In nautical terminology, directions relative to the bow define port (left) and starboard (right) when facing forward, ensuring standardized communication on board. Bow designs have evolved significantly to optimize for specific operational needs, such as speed, , and wave-handling capabilities, with variations tailored to vessel types like yachts, cargo ships, or naval craft. Common types include the plumb bow, which is nearly vertical and parallel to the waterline to maximize length for speed in modern racing or performance boats; the clipper bow, a sharply raked and curved design originating from 19th-century sailing ships for enhanced aesthetics and wave deflection; and the , a protruding underwater bulb that reduces on large commercial vessels, improving fuel economy by up to 15% in certain conditions. Other notable configurations are the raked bow for better seaworthiness in rough waters, the axe bow for slicing through waves with minimal pitching on high-speed ferries, and innovative forms like the X-bow or inverted bow, which enhance stability and reduce slamming in adverse weather for offshore supply ships. The design of the bow influences not only efficiency but also safety features, such as placement, points, and access, while modern (CFD) simulations allow engineers to refine shapes for environmental factors like calm seas versus heavy swells. Historically, bows transitioned from ornate, figurehead-adorned prows in ancient galleys to streamlined forms in the industrial era, reflecting advancements in materials like and composites that enable lighter, stronger constructions today. These elements collectively ensure the bow remains a foundational aspect of , balancing form, function, and adaptability across maritime applications.

Definition and Role

Definition

In nautical terminology, the bow refers to the forwardmost part of a ship's hull, serving as the when the vessel is . It typically extends from the stem—the extreme forward point of the hull—to the point where the hull sides begin to curve inward toward the midship section. This configuration allows the bow to form the initial boundary of the hull as it meets the . The bow is distinctly positioned opposite the , which is the aft or rear end of the vessel, and separate from the midships, the central portion of the hull. It encompasses both the above-waterline structure, such as the area, and the below-waterline portions, including the forward and hull plating that interact directly with the . This comprehensive extent ensures the bow integrates seamlessly with the overall hull form. Due to its prominent forward position, the bow is often analogized to the "nose" or "head" of the vessel, evoking the image of a living entity navigating through its environment. This descriptive comparison highlights its role as the ship's .

Primary Functions

The bow of a primarily functions to cleave through the , minimizing frontal resistance and enabling efficient forward progress. By parting the with a streamlined , typically pointed or flared, the bow reduces the wave-making and frictional drag encountered at the forward section of the hull, which is critical for and speed in various sea states. This role is fundamental to the vessel's ability to navigate smoothly, as excessive resistance at the bow would significantly increase power requirements and limit operational range. A key operational purpose of the bow is to provide forward , which supports the vessel's trim and mitigates excessive pitching in waves. The volume and shape of the bow contribute to the longitudinal distribution of , countering the natural tendency for the to submerge under load or wave action, thereby maintaining a level attitude and enhancing overall stability during transit. This distribution helps prevent bow emergence or excessive immersion, ensuring consistent performance and crew safety in moderate to heavy seas. Additionally, the bow absorbs and distributes impact forces from head seas or collisions, safeguarding the integrity of the hull and internal structures. In encounters with oncoming waves, the bow deflects and dissipates , preventing concentrated loads that could lead to structural fatigue or flooding. During collisions, the bow's —often incorporating —allows controlled deformation to absorb , limiting damage propagation to the main body of the vessel. In rough conditions, the bow's configuration enables the vessel to shoulder waves, effectively pushing them aside and reducing slamming forces on the deck and forward areas. This minimizes vertical accelerations and water ingress, improving and operational comfort without compromising forward . These roles underscore the bow's contribution to hydrodynamic in practical .

Design and Engineering

Hydrodynamic Design

The hydrodynamic design of a ship's bow focuses on optimizing the interaction between the hull and surrounding to minimize drag, primarily through shapes that efficiently part the water and reduce both wave-making and frictional resistance. Streamlined bow forms, such as fine entries with gradual , allow the vessel to displace with minimal , lowering frictional resistance by smoothing the flow along the hull. This design principle ensures that water particles accelerate and decelerate smoothly around the bow, reducing viscous drag that arises from shear stresses at the hull surface. As the ship advances, the bow generates the primary wave system, consisting of a transverse and divergent waves that propagate outward, which consumes significant . Effective bow design aims to minimize loss by controlling wave and pattern, ensuring the of the generated waves aligns closely with the ship's hull length for reduced interference and dissipation. This involves shaping the bow to suppress excessive wave breaking and spray, thereby optimizing the overall wave distribution and limiting the power required to overcome . One advanced approach to wave mitigation is the , which incorporates a submerged bulbous protrusion ahead of the conventional bow. This feature generates a secondary wave system that interferes destructively with the primary , partially canceling out the crest and reducing the overall . At design speeds, typically around 15-20 knots for large vessels, this interference can lower total resistance by 10-15%, enhancing without substantially increasing frictional drag due to the bulb's streamlined contour. The influence of bow design on wave resistance is quantitatively assessed using empirical methods derived from systematic model experiments on hull forms, such as those developed by Taylor. These methods account for bow-induced wavelength matching through parameters like prismatic coefficient and to minimize energy loss at hull length-to-wavelength ratios near 1.2.

Structural Engineering

The bow plays a critical role in maintaining the overall hull integrity of a watercraft by distributing loads and providing reinforcement against the primary structural stresses encountered during operation. Longitudinal bending moments and shear forces, particularly those induced by wave impacts in head seas, are absorbed and redistributed through the bow's framework, which acts as the forward compressive terminus of the hull . This configuration ensures that the vessel's longitudinal strength is preserved, preventing excessive deformation under conditions. The bow integrates seamlessly with the stem—a curved, upright structural member—and the surrounding shell to form a robust forward assembly capable of withstanding localized stresses from potential or grounding incidents. The stem provides vertical support and aligns with the , while the is welded or riveted to create a continuous barrier that transfers impact forces into the broader hull structure without compromising watertight integrity or causing . This integration is essential for dissipating grounding-induced shear and compressive stresses, where the bow may experience concentrated loads up to several times the vessel's displacement. In steel-hulled vessels, the bow typically incorporates increased thickness (not less than 1.2 times the amidships bottom thickness) in high-stress areas forward of the collision bulkhead, along with dense internal framing such as floors, web frames, and longitudinal girders, to accommodate design loads exceeding standard conditions. These reinforcements are proportioned to handle vertical wave moments and shear forces in head seas, often with a safety factor that accounts for up to 1.5 times the nominal design load to mitigate slamming effects. Such practices, governed by society rules, enhance the bow's ability to resist deformation while minimizing weight penalties. Material selection for the bow has evolved to prioritize impact resistance and durability in marine environments, with high-tensile steels (yielding 355–460 MPa) increasingly used for their superior strength-to-weight ratio and ability to absorb energy from collisions or waves. Composite materials, such as fiber-reinforced polymers, offer alternatives for smaller or specialized craft, providing enhanced corrosion resistance and reduced maintenance needs without sacrificing structural performance. In saltwater exposure, both steel and composites require protective measures like epoxy coatings or cathodic systems to prevent degradation from galvanic corrosion or biofouling. The structural integrity of the bow also supports overall vessel stability by preserving the hull's hydrodynamic form under load.

Classification of Bows

Traditional Bow Shapes

Traditional bow shapes in watercraft, prevalent before the , were primarily optimized for vessels and early powered ships, emphasizing hydrodynamic efficiency, structural balance, and practical utility under wind or manual propulsion. These designs varied based on vessel purpose, with forms like the raked, , and plumb bows emerging as staples in maritime construction during the age of sail. Each shape influenced vessel performance, from speed in trade routes to cargo capacity in merchant fleets, reflecting adaptations to prevailing materials like wood and rigging systems. The raked bow, characterized by a stem sloping backward from the vertical at an , was a common feature in historical ships, providing enhanced balance by distributing weight forward and improving stability in varying sea conditions. This design also contributed to aesthetic appeal, giving vessels a graceful, elongated profile that became iconic in naval and commercial craft of the 18th and 19th centuries. In contrast, the bow featured a curved, outward-flared profile with a sharp entry, specifically engineered for high-speed performance in 19th-century ships engaged in global trade routes such as and transport. Popularized during the and , this bow maximized effective while minimizing the wetted surface area, thereby reducing drag and enabling superior velocities under sail. Exemplified by vessels like the , launched in 1869 but embodying the era's clipper innovations originating in the 1830s-, the design allowed speeds exceeding 17 knots in optimal conditions, revolutionizing fast merchant shipping. The plumb bow, with its near-vertical stem aligned perpendicular to the , offered simplicity in and maximized usable deck space for loading, making it ideal for practical and vessels of the . This straightforward form extended the relative to overall hull dimensions without overhangs, promoting efficient utilization and ease of maintenance in bulk-carrying ships.

Modern Bow Designs

Modern bow designs for powered vessels have evolved significantly in the 20th and 21st centuries to enhance hydrodynamic , reduce fuel consumption, and improve in various operational conditions, particularly for commercial and offshore applications. These innovations prioritize minimizing wave resistance and structural stresses at higher speeds and in rough seas, adapting to the demands of engine-powered unlike earlier sail-dependent forms. Key developments include submerged protrusions and specialized forward hull shapes that optimize water flow and vessel stability. The , a prominent 20th-century , consists of a submerged, rounded extension below the at the forward hull, designed to generate interference waves that counteract the vessel's primary . This reduces at cruising speeds, leading to lower fuel consumption—typically by 10-15% on large ships. The design was first implemented on the German SS Bremen, launched in 1928 and entering service in 1929, marking the debut of the Taylor-type bulbous bow in commercial shipping. By disrupting and optimizing wave patterns, it improves overall propulsion efficiency without significantly affecting maneuverability at low speeds. Axe bows represent another advancement tailored for high-speed operations, featuring a near-vertical stem with a sharp, axe-like and minimal above the . Developed in the 1980s through collaboration between Damen Shipyards, , and MARIN, this design pierces waves head-on rather than riding over them, reducing pitching motions and slamming loads. It is commonly applied to high-speed ferries and patrol vessels, such as Damen's Fast Crew Suppliers, where it achieves up to 20% reductions in fuel usage and emissions by lowering hydrodynamic resistance and enhancing motion stability in rough conditions. The deep, fine entry lines further contribute to superior , allowing consistent speeds in adverse weather. Wave-piercing bows, including inverted configurations like the X-BOW, emerged in the late for specialized uses in offshore supply vessels operating in harsh environments. These designs feature a fine, submerged forward section with reduced , enabling the bow to pass through waves rather than over them, thereby minimizing vertical accelerations and deck wetness. Early examples appeared in the with Rolls-Royce's UT-series platform supply vessels, such as the UT 754 WP Far Solitaire launched in 2012, which incorporated a wave-piercing bow to improve stability during supply operations. The X-BOW, introduced by Ulstein in 2005, refines this concept with a flared, inverted shape that further dampens wave impacts and enhances . In offshore applications, it can reduce fuel consumption by 6-8% through improved hydrodynamics and lower propulsion demands during station-keeping, compared to conventional flared bows. This design has become standard for platform supply vessels in recent decades, prioritizing safety and efficiency in dynamic seas.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Eras

The development of watercraft bows in pre-modern eras reflected adaptations to regional materials, environmental challenges, and cultural needs, from riverine transport to open-sea warfare and trade. In ancient Egypt around 3000 BCE, reed boats constructed from bundled papyrus stems featured simple curved prows that rose gently upward, aiding in maneuvering through the Nile's shallow, vegetated waters and preventing the vessel from grounding during navigation. These designs, often lashed together without metal fasteners, prioritized buoyancy and ease of assembly using locally abundant reeds, embodying the Egyptians' reliance on the river for daily transport, fishing, and ceremonial purposes. By approximately 500 BCE, Greek triremes marked a shift toward militarized bows, with reinforced ram prows sheathed in to puncture enemy hulls during maneuvers in naval battles. Built primarily from lightweight pine for speed, these bows were integrated into slender hulls powered by three banks of oars, allowing for agile tactics that proved decisive in conflicts like the . The design emphasized propulsion efficiency through oar configuration over refined hydrodynamic shaping, aligning with the Mediterranean's reliance on human-powered galleys for warfare. In the subsequent Roman period, innovations like the —a pivoting boarding bridge with a spiked end mounted forward—required structural reinforcements at the bow to bear the device's weight and operational stresses, yet early bows continued to favor oar-driven mobility and stability for troop deployment rather than optimized wave resistance. During the Viking Age from the 8th to 11th centuries, longships incorporated high, flared prows carved from durable heartwood, often adorned with snarling dragon heads to evoke fear among coastal communities. These upward-curving stems, formed from naturally bent trees, effectively parted waves for better in the North Atlantic's rough conditions while symbolizing and warrior prowess. The clinker-built construction, with overlapping planks riveted together, enhanced flexibility and strength at the bow, supporting the ships' dual roles in exploration, raiding, and trade across and beyond. In the medieval era spanning the 12th to 15th centuries, cog ships prevalent in northern European trade routes adopted straight or subtly raked bows suited to cargo-laden voyages in coastal and Baltic waters. Constructed from robust planks joined in clinker style—overlapping and caulked for watertightness—these bows provided a stable platform for loading goods and withstood the rigors of frequent beaching for commerce. This practical design, influenced by Hanseatic mercantile culture, focused on volume and durability over speed, using heavy timbers to support high-sided hulls that maximized payload capacity.

19th and 20th Centuries

In the mid-19th century, during the waning years of the Age of Sail, ship designers introduced bows on vessels to prioritize speed for transoceanic voyages, particularly for carrying high-value cargoes like and from . American builders pioneered these sharp, raked bows in the , enabling ships such as the Flying Cloud to achieve record passages, with the design reducing wave resistance and enhancing hydrodynamic efficiency for long-distance trade routes. As steam technology advanced and iron hulls became prevalent in the latter half of the century, shipbuilders shifted to plumb bows—vertical stems at the —on iron-hulled steamers to improve transverse stability and structural integrity under powered , contrasting the raked forms of sailing ships. Early 20th-century innovations addressed rising fuel demands following , with the emerging as a key advancement for commercial and naval vessels. Pioneered through model tests at the in 1910 by naval architect David W. Taylor, these experiments revealed that a protruding bulb below the could cancel interfering wave patterns, reducing total resistance by approximately 6% at high speeds above 25 knots. German liners like the Bremen (1929) and Europa (1930) were among the first large passenger ships to adopt prominent , enhancing and enabling transatlantic crossings with lower operational costs amid postwar economic constraints and oil price fluctuations. World War II further influenced bow configurations, particularly in military applications where tactical needs shaped design priorities. Warships often retained reinforced ram bows for potential maneuvers in close-quarters combat, a holdover from prewar doctrines emphasizing collision as a last-resort weapon, though actual uses were rare due to the dominance of gunfire and torpedoes. Flared bows became standard on surface combatants like battleships and cruisers to boost reserve and seaworthiness in rough seas, deflecting spray and improving stability during high-speed operations. Meanwhile, submarine bows evolved toward more streamlined profiles, as seen in late-war designs like Germany's Type XXI , which integrated smoother contours to minimize hydrodynamic drag and enhance underwater performance, laying groundwork for postwar fleet submarines. By the 1940s, U.S. Navy capital ships such as the Iowa-class battleships incorporated Taylor's refinements, achieving resistance reductions that supported speeds exceeding 33 knots while conserving fuel for extended Pacific campaigns.

Terminology

Etymology of "Bow"

The term "bow" derives from bōg, attested around 900 CE and signifying "" or "bend," reflecting the curved profile of the ship's hull likened to a bent or shoulder in early linguistic usage. Its application to the forward part of a first appears in texts circa 1300 CE. The bōg derives from the Proto-Germanic root *bugon-, dating to approximately 500 BCE, which pertains to concepts of bending or arching and is connected to the Proto-Indo-European *bheug-. In nautical contexts, this root extended through bógr (also meaning ""), influencing the term's application to the vessel's prow due to its arched form. The term is differentiated from the contemporaneous term for the curved archery weapon—though both share the underlying denoting .

"Prow" and Synonyms

In nautical terminology, the term "prow" refers to the forwardmost projecting part of a ship's hull, particularly the portion above the , and serves as a for the more general "bow." Its etymology traces to "proe" around the 13th century, derived from Latin "prōra" and ultimately "prōra," meaning "before" or "forward," emphasizing the directional aspect of the ship's front. While "bow" encompasses the entire forward section of the hull, including both above- and below-waterline elements, "prow" more narrowly denotes the visible, upright extension or the ornamental projection at the apex, often distinguishing it in descriptive contexts. This distinction highlights the prow's role in aesthetics and visibility, contrasting with the bow's broader hydrodynamic function. Other related synonyms include "stem," which specifically names the upright timber or curved plate forming the bow's apex and connecting to the keel, and "forefoot," the lower, curved portion of the stem below the waterline where it meets the keel. These terms refine the anatomy of the forward hull, with "stem" focusing on structural integrity and "forefoot" on the submerged transition. In , such as Shakespeare's (c. 1610–1611), "prow" often evoked the decorative or ornamental front of vessels, as in Ariel's description of appearing "on the prow" amid supernatural chaos, underscoring its symbolic prominence over mere utility. This usage reflected the era's elaborate ship figureheads adorning prows for protection and prestige.

References

  1. https://nauticalchannel.com/new/bow-and-stern
  2. https://www.predictwind.com/glossary/b/bow
  3. https://www.boaterexam.com/boating-resources/boat-terminology/
  4. https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/types-of-bow-designs-used-for-ships/
  5. https://www.boats.com/how-to/different-bow-types-for-yachts/
  6. https://boattest.com/article/bow-shapes-explained
  7. https://maritimepage.com/bow-of-a-ship-what-is-it-and-different-types/
  8. https://webhelper.brown.edu/joukowsky/courses/maritimearchaeology11/files/17920584.pdf
  9. https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/library/online-reading-room/ships/ShipShapes/Ship%20Shape%20Pamphlet%20-%20PDF.pdf
  10. https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/physical/navigation-and-transportation/transportation-and-ship-design
  11. https://navymuseum.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/Science-Behind-the-Concept-Cards_Science-of-Hulls.pdf
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0734743X88900255
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335072078_Hydrodynamic_Design_Study_on_Ship_Bow_and_Stern_Hull_Form_Synchronous_Optimization_Covering_Whole_Speeds_Range
  14. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/simple-analytical-relations-for-ship-bow-waves/AD9636CDD23B883D138A7936F618B244
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678221000583
  16. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1910.0072
  17. https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/shearing-and-bending/
  18. http://www.shipstructure.org/pdf/81symp11.pdf
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0951833994900086
  20. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/5436028/Bo.pdf
  21. https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/archives/conventional_ocean_service/2_svr2014/SVR_Part_3_e-July14.pdf
  22. https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/hull-ship-understanding-design-characteristics/
  23. http://scholar-press.com/uploads/papers/z7E7dIWMTLTZSCgANDWGDDPMbiuELYAAuQeax0fL.pdf
  24. https://irispublishers.com/gjes/pdf/GJES.MS.ID.000778.pdf
  25. https://feadship-insights.nl/articles/whats-in-a-bow-shape
  26. https://classicyacht.org/articles/13479543
  27. https://www.rmg.co.uk/cutty-sark/history/10-things-you-should-know
  28. https://ecoclipper.org/News/the-clipper-bow/
  29. https://www.nationalhistoricships.org.uk/register/438/cutty-sark
  30. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/m/merchant-ship-shapes.html
  31. https://www.imarest.org/resource/bows-at-the-forefront-of-ship-design.html
  32. https://www.greatoceanliners.com/ss-bremen
  33. https://maritimepage.com/bulbous-bow-ship-design/
  34. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/426363/1/RINA_paper_.pdf
  35. https://www.damen.com/insights-center/articles/sea-axe-design
  36. https://www.motorship.com/news101/offshore-and-specialised/the-ut-story-40-years-of-vessel-success
  37. https://www.rolls-royce.com/m/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/news/publications/id21-tcm92-56967.pdf
  38. https://ulstein.com/innovations/hull-innovations/x-bow
  39. https://ulstein.com/innovations-hull/the-ulstein-x-bow-beautifully-bold.-brilliantly-efficient
  40. https://www.academia.edu/128785060/A_primer_on_Ancient_Egyptian_papyrus_watercraft_Identification_Construction_and_Usage_from_the_Predynastic_to_the_Middle_Kingdom_Augmented_with_details_from_modern_reed_boats_and_Experimental_Archaeology
  41. https://www.academia.edu/32114898/Ancient_Greek_Warship_500_322_BC
  42. https://www.academia.edu/101732077/THE_CORVUS_ROMAN_NAVAL_BOARDING_DEVICE_A_NEW_PERSPECTIVE_ENGINEERING_AND_RECONSTRUCTION
  43. https://www.academia.edu/42271243/The_Viking_Longship
  44. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=honors_et
  45. https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-history/what-is-a-clipper-ship-2/
  46. https://naval-encyclopedia.com/industrial-era/clippers.php
  47. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/items/a48af0dc-e420-4d15-8789-0e3be64f52f6
  48. https://naval-encyclopedia.com/docs/Worlds-Fastest-Battleships.pdf
  49. https://www.nytimes.com/1930/03/26/archives/europa-profited-by-bremen-tests-new-liners-propellers-smaller-but.html
  50. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/bulbous-bow.htm
  51. https://cimsec.org/ram-19th-century-naval-warfare-dead-end/
  52. https://www.atma.asso.fr/dyn/memoires/memoire_42.pdf
  53. https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1989/evolution-of-modern-u-s-submarines-from-end-of-world-war-ll-to-1964
  54. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bow
  55. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/bough
  56. https://www.etymonline.com/word/bow
  57. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/bough_n?tl=true
  58. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/bow_n1?tl=true
  59. https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/prow-of-a-ship/
  60. https://www.etymonline.com/word/prow
  61. https://officerofthewatch.com/tools/maritime-dictionary/
  62. https://www.nauticed.org/sailingterms
  63. https://www.litcharts.com/shakescleare/shakespeare-translations/the-tempest/act-1-scene-2
  64. https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/ship-figureheads-decoration
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.