Hubbry Logo
Stanley AronowitzStanley AronowitzMain
Open search
Stanley Aronowitz
Community hub
Stanley Aronowitz
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Stanley Aronowitz
Stanley Aronowitz
Stanley Aronowitz
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Stanley Aronowitz (January 6, 1933 – August 16, 2021) was an American sociologist, trade union official, and political activist. A professor of sociology, cultural studies, and urban education at the CUNY Graduate Center, his longtime political activism and cultural criticism was influential in the New Left movement of the 1960s, 1970s, and beyond. He was also an advocate for organized labor and a member of the interim consultative committee of the International Organization for a Participatory Society [de].[8] In 2012, Aronowitz was awarded the Center for Study of Working Class Life's Lifetime Achievement Award at Stony Brook University.[3]

Key Information

Biography

[edit]

Born on January 6, 1933, and raised in New York City, Aronowitz attended public primary school in The Bronx before enrolling in The High School of Music & Art in Manhattan.[7][9] He then attended Brooklyn College until being suspended by its administration for engaging in a demonstration. Instead of returning to school the next year, Aronowitz moved to New Jersey, where he worked at several metalworking factories.

Aronowitz became involved in the American labor movement in New Jersey, and in 1959, while laid off from his job as a metalworker, he found work with the New Jersey Industrial Union Council. Collaborating with the council's president, Aronowitz cowrote New Jersey's unemployment compensation law, subsequently enacted by the state legislature in 1961.

His work with the Industrial Union Council led to Aronowitz's appointment as director of the organizing and boycott department of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America. Aronowitz spent four years traveling throughout the United States to develop the union's campaigns.

In the 1960s, while employed with the Clothing Workers, Aronowitz began participating in the Civil Rights Movement. He engaged in lunch counter sit-ins and gave speeches on the labor movement's behalf to the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee on the confluence of African-American civil rights and economic issues.

Through his work in civil rights, Aronowitz secured the role of labor coordinator, appointed by Bayard Rustin, on the planning committee of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom in 1962–3. Aronowitz was tasked with soliciting the support of American labor unions for the march, and while encountering resistance from the majority of trade unions, most notably the AFL–CIO, he secured the endorsement of the United Auto Workers, United Packinghouse Workers of America, as well as rubber and clothing workers' unions.[5]

Writings

[edit]
Aronowitz c. 1982

Aronowitz was the author of numerous books on class, culture, sociology of science, and politics. With Fredric Jameson and John Brenkman, he was a founding editor of Duke University's Social Text, a journal that is subtitled "Theory, Culture, Ideology". He defended the journal from criticism after it published a hoax article in its summer 1996 issue (see Sokal Affair).[10]

In that article, he stated that with this publication, "Our objective was to interrogate Marxists' habitual separation of political economy and culture and to make a contribution to their articulation, even reunification." Aronowitz, however, was not a working editor at the time of the Sokal scandal and had not seen the paper before publication. In an interview in the Brooklyn Rail after the publication of Taking it Big: C. Wright Mills and the Making of Political Intellectuals, he cited Mills's influence on his beliefs when he states, "My own insights, as a result of my own experience as a worker, as a trade unionist, and as an activist, were stimulated and, to some extent, guided by Mills’s example. His three major books on American social structure—The New Men of Power, White Collar, and The Power Elite—together constitute a compelling intellectual program for our own times."[3]

2002 gubernatorial campaign

[edit]

In 2002, he was the Green Party of New York's nominee for governor. It was his first and only campaign for public office. He was just the second Green candidate for governor. Described as "The Anti-Candidate, Out To Anger The Rich" by the New York Times, he said of his campaign "My job is to start a public conversation, to show voters they have a choice and to get enough of a vote so we can stay on the ballot and speak out." In June 2002, his campaign had raised approximately $25,000 and was expected to raise just $150,000.[11] His campaign finished in 5th place, receiving 41,797 votes (.89%).

Other activities

[edit]

In 1965 Aronowitz was one of the lecturers at the Free University of New York shortly after it was founded.[12]

In 1976, Aronowitz (then living in San Diego and teaching at UC-Irvine, joined the New American Movement. In 2010, he would write a lengthy essay titled, "The New American Movement and Why It Failed" for the journal Work and Days.[13]

In 2005 Aronowitz co-founded the journal Situations: Project of the Radical Imagination. He has also published articles in numerous publications and with a core group of intellectuals—faculty and students—at the Graduate Center, he spearheaded the effort to create the Center for Cultural Studies (now the Center for the Study of Culture, Technology and Work) in the spirit of fostering intellectual debate, multidisciplinarity, and the toppling of high cultural privilege in academia.[citation needed] In 1969, Aronowitz, Jeremy Brecher, Paul Mattick Jr., and Peter Rachleff, began sporadically publishing a magazine and pamphlet series called Root & Branch.[14][15]

Personal life

[edit]

Aronowitz lived in New York City. He was first married to Jane O'Connell until divorcing in 1962 and was then married to Ellen Willis from 1998 until her death in November 2006.[7][16] He had five children, including Nona Willis-Aronowitz.[17][7]

Aronowitz died on August 16, 2021, from complications of a stroke, in Manhattan.[7][18]

Works

[edit]
Library resources about
Stanley Aronowitz
By Stanley Aronowitz

Aronowitz has authored, co-authored, or edited over 26 different books, as well as authored over 200 articles and reviews.[19]

Bibliography

[edit]
Title Publication Date Publisher ISBN
Honor America : The Nature of Fascism, Historic Struggles Against It and a Strategy for Today 1970 Times Change Press ISBN 0878100113
False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness 1973 McGraw-Hill Education ISBN 0822311984
Food, Shelter, and the American Dream 1974 Seabury Press ISBN 082640104X
Crisis In Historical Materialism: Class, Politics, and Culture in Marxist Theory 1981 Praeger Publishers ISBN 0897890116
Working Class Hero : A New Strategy for Labor 1983 Adama Books ISBN 0915361132
Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society 1988 Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 0816616590
The Politics of Identity: Class, Culture, Social Movements 1992 Routledge ISBN 0415904366
Roll Over Beethoven: The Return of Cultural Strife 1993 Wesleyan University Press ISBN 0819552550
Dead Artists, Live Theories, and Other Cultural Problems 1993 Routledge ISBN 0415907381
Radical Democracy 1994 Blackwell ISBN 1557865469
The Death and Rebirth of American Radicalism 1996 Routledge ISBN 0415912415
From The Ashes Of The Old: American Labor and America's Future 1998 Basic Books ISBN 0465004091
The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning 2001 Beacon Press ISBN 0807031232
How Class Works: Power and Social Movement 2004 Yale University Press ISBN 0300105045
C. Wright Mills 2004 SAGE Publications ISBN 0761973710
Just Around The Corner: The Paradox of the Jobless Recovery 2005 Temple University Press ISBN 1592131387
Left Turn: Forging a New Political Future 2006 Routledge ISBN 1594513112
The Last Good Job in America: Work and Education in the New Global Technoculture 2007 Rowman & Littlefield ISBN 0742560260
Against Schooling: For an Education That Matters 2008 Routledge ISBN 1594515034
Taking It Big: C. Wright Mills and the Making of Political Intellectuals 2012 Columbia University Press ISBN 0231135408
The Death and Life of American Labor: Toward a New Workers' Movement 2014 Verso Books ISBN 1784783005
Against Orthodoxy: Social Theory and its Discontents 2015 Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 1137438878

Coauthored works

[edit]
Author(s) Title Publication Date Publisher ISBN
Jack Barnes, Stanley Aronowitz, Peter Camejo, Michael Harrington, George Breitman, and Carl Haessler The Lesser Evil? Debates on the Democratic Party and Independent Working-Class Politics 1977 Pathfinder Press ISBN 0873485181
Stanley Aronowitz and Henry A. Giroux Education Under Siege: The Conservative, Liberal and Radical Debate over Schooling 1986 Routledge ISBN 0710213182
Stanley Aronowitz and Henry A. Giroux Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture, and Social Criticism 1991 University of Minnesota Press ISBN 0816618801
Stanley Aronowitz and Henry A. Giroux Education Still Under Siege 1993 Bergin & Garvey ISBN 0897893115
Stanley Aronowitz and William DiFazio Jobless Future: Sci-Tech and the Dogma of Work 1995 University of Minnesota Press ISBN 0816621942

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Stanley Aronowitz

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Stanley Aronowitz (January 6, 1933 – August 16, 2021) was an American sociologist, labor organizer, and Marxist intellectual who analyzed the decline of the working class and the failures of institutional labor movements. Born in and raised in , Aronowitz worked in metalworking factories during the before becoming a for groups such as the Amalgamated Clothing Workers and the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Union in the 1960s, while also participating in civil rights activism, including efforts to secure union backing for the 1963 March on Washington. After earning a B.A. from for Social Research in 1968 and a Ph.D. from Union Graduate School in 1975, he transitioned to academia, teaching at institutions including the , UC Irvine, and from 1983 onward at the , where he became a Distinguished Professor of in 1998 and directed the Center for the Study of Culture. Aronowitz authored or edited over 25 books, including False Promises: The Shaping of American Consciousness (1973), which critiqued the integration of unions into capitalist structures; The Jobless Future (1994), examining technological displacement of labor; and How Class Works (2003), exploring power dynamics in contemporary society. He founded the journal in 1979 and co-founded Situations, and organized the Socialist Scholars Conference in 1965, influencing radical scholarship and . A member of the , Aronowitz advocated for extra-electoral strategies to revive worker power, arguing that reliance on Democratic Party politics had undermined labor's autonomy; he ran unsuccessfully for New York governor on the ticket in , receiving less than 1% of the vote. His work emphasized the need for autonomous working-class movements against both capital and state bureaucracies, though critics noted its alignment with broader academic left-wing ideologies that prioritized theoretical over practical organizing successes.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family

Stanley Aronowitz was born on January 6, 1933, in the borough of to Nathan "Nat" Aronowitz and Frances (Helfand) Aronowitz, second-generation children of Eastern European Jewish immigrants whose families had settled in urban Jewish enclaves like the . His paternal grandparents were Jewish immigrants who raised Nat amid the tenements, where he assisted in small-scale labor like delivering seltzer before pursuing brief stints in and other trades. On his mother's side, his maternal grandfather had emigrated from as a Jewish peasant fleeing , eventually working as a cutter in a men's while grappling with financial instability from failed ventures. Nat Aronowitz's career reflected the precarious working-class existence of the , encompassing roles as a cub reporter, textile factory worker, (WPA) employee, worker, and factory hand, culminating in persistent frustration over economic insecurity despite efforts toward stability. Frances Aronowitz served as a bookkeeper while maintaining strong ties to organized labor as a member of a (CIO) retail union, where she participated in sit-down strikes during the turbulent , embodying a more pronounced than her husband's. The couple's union activism and immersion in socialist currents among Jewish working-class networks shaped household discussions, though Nat's aspirations for upward mobility clashed with the realities of scarcity. Aronowitz's early years unfolded in the amid the Great Depression's protracted aftermath, marked by familial exposure to job instability, union militancy, and the resentments of workers confronting employer boldness and economic setbacks. This environment instilled an incipient sense of class antagonism without formal ideological indoctrination, as the family's second-generation status distanced them from direct immigrant hardships yet preserved echoes of labor radicalism through maternal relatives' factory toil and strike participation. Neighborhood dynamics in the working-class , blending aspirations for security with persistent precarity, reinforced these influences during his formative period before adolescence.

Early Influences and Self-Education

Aronowitz, born in 1933 to working-class parents active in New York City's labor unions, encountered radical ideas early through family discussions and his own reading, including Karl Marx's Capital during high school. After enrolling at , he faced suspension in 1950 for protesting the institution's anti-communist policies, leading him to abandon formal higher education at age 17 and enter the workforce full-time. This marked the beginning of his autodidactic pursuits, where he immersed himself in philosophical and radical texts, starting with works like those of Spinoza and extending to Marxist theory, , and autonomist thinkers, compensating for what he later described as negligible learning from conventional schooling. In his late teens and early twenties, Aronowitz took manual labor jobs in factories, including six years on the shop floor of a wire mill organized by the , exposing him directly to the physical demands and hierarchies of mid-century industrial work. These experiences, amid postwar economic shifts, fostered initial encounters with union militants who introduced him to socialist critiques of , contrasting the era's promised upward mobility with observed realities of exploitation, repetitive toil, and stagnant wages for unskilled workers. His self-directed study during off-hours—drawing from texts on class struggle and critiques of bureaucracy—sharpened an awareness of how industrial decline eroded the "American Dream" for many, fueling a toward liberal reforms that prioritized individual effort over , though Aronowitz's own trajectory highlighted the limits of personal resilience in altering systemic conditions. This period of gritty, hands-on labor and voracious independent reading laid the groundwork for Aronowitz's lifelong emphasis on worker agency, as he witnessed firsthand how technological routinization and managerial control deskilled trades, breeding disillusionment with both corporate and complacent union leadership. Rather than viewing these hardships as mere personal hurdles overcome by determination, his early observations—rooted in empirical encounters with declining sectors—propelled a turn toward advocating collective upheaval, informed by historical analyses of labor's failures to challenge capital's dominance.

Formal Education and Initial Career Steps

Aronowitz briefly pursued formal higher education after graduating from the High School of Music and Art in , enrolling at in 1950. His studies there lasted less than a year before he was suspended in the fall of that year, amid reports of involvement in political activism on campus. This interruption marked the beginning of a period dominated by manual labor rather than structured academia, as he prioritized immediate economic needs over degree completion. In the , Aronowitz supported himself through entry-level industrial positions, including work as a shipping clerk and in factories. These roles provided firsthand exposure to shop-floor dynamics, fostering his growing interest in labor issues amid postwar economic shifts. By the late , he transitioned into union organizing, initially with the Amalgamated Workers of America, where practical experience from production jobs informed his efforts to mobilize workers facing bureaucratic inertia and apathy. Aronowitz resumed formal education in the late 1960s through adult and alternative programs tailored to working professionals. In 1967, while on leave from organizing with the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union (OCAW), he earned a degree from for Social Research in June 1968. He later obtained a Ph.D. from Union Graduate School in 1975, an institution focused on nontraditional, self-directed learning often aligned with labor and community educators. These credentials, acquired via flexible union-supported and evening formats, bridged his manual labor background toward intellectual pursuits without full-time campus immersion.

Labor Organizing Career

Union Roles and Organizing Efforts

Aronowitz worked as a machinist in factories in New York and during the early before transitioning to union organizing roles. He joined the (ILGWU) as an organizer, focusing on campaigns among garment workers in , where he sought to build membership and address shop-floor grievances amid postwar industry contraction. By the late , he shifted to the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Union (OCAW), serving as an organizer and later organizing director in , where he led recruitment drives and contract negotiations in chemical plants and refineries facing pressures. In this capacity, Aronowitz contributed to New Jersey's Industrial Union Council efforts, including helping draft the state's unemployment compensation amendments in 1961, which expanded benefits for laid-off industrial workers but fell short of addressing structural job losses from technological shifts. His organizing emphasized rank-and-file participation over top-down directives, as seen in his support for strikes in the early , unauthorized actions by auto and steel workers that bypassed union bureaucracy to demand better safety and pay, yielding temporary concessions like increases in some facilities but often resulting in disciplinary backlash. These efforts secured modest wage hikes—typically 5-10% in negotiated settlements—but were undermined by broader , including to low-wage regions and rising imports that eroded bases by the mid-. During the mid-1960s, Aronowitz pushed anti-war resolutions within OCAW locals against U.S. escalation in , framing the conflict as diverting resources from domestic job protections; however, union leadership resisted, citing fears of red-baiting and member apathy toward amid personal economic insecurities. This dissent highlighted tensions between ideological mobilization and pragmatic survival strategies, with outcomes limited by workers' prioritization of immediate gains over broader dissent, exacerbated by Taft-Hartley Act constraints on strikes and growing fostered by expanding service-sector alternatives to unionized industry. Despite these campaigns' short-term successes in local contracts, long-term union density in affected sectors declined from 35% in 1960 to under 25% by 1970, attributable more to global market competition and than solely to internal bureaucratic inertia Aronowitz critiqued.

Involvement in Broader Social Movements

Aronowitz extended his labor organizing into the civil rights movement during the late 1950s and early 1960s, serving as a key liaison between unions and activists. As an organizer for the Amalgamated Clothing Workers and later the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union (OCAW), he coordinated labor support for the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, securing commitments from a dozen industrial unions under the direction of Bayard Rustin. This role emphasized intersections of racial injustice and economic exploitation, framing civil rights demands as inseparable from class-based worker struggles against systemic wage suppression and job discrimination. His engagement with the (SDS) further bridged labor and student activism; in 1962, Aronowitz contributed to drafting the , which critiqued corporate liberalism while advocating rooted in workplace power. Despite such involvement, Aronowitz assessed the New Left's broader shift toward cultural and identity-focused campaigns—such as those prioritizing racial separatism over unified economic action—as causally weakening proletarian solidarity. Empirical patterns from the era, including declining union density from 35% in 1954 to under 25% by 1970 amid rising identity-based fragmentations, supported his view that diverting resources from bread-and-butter organizing eroded labor's institutional strength without commensurate gains in cross-class alliances. Aronowitz also channeled anti-war efforts through union channels during the escalation, mobilizing rank-and-file opposition within OCAW locals despite bureaucratic resistance and threats of expulsion from conservative leadership aligned with president George Meany's pro-war stance. These activities, peaking around 1965–1968 when U.S. troop levels reached 500,000, highlighted tensions where anti-war agitation risked alienating skilled trades but aligned with his insistence on linking imperialist to domestic labor costs, such as inflated spending diverting funds from social programs. Early intersections with feminist concerns emerged in his for women's union integration during the , as female membership rose from 15% to over 25% of the , though he later noted how gender-specific demands often splintered broader class coalitions, contributing to postwar labor's diminished .

Academic and Intellectual Career

University Appointments and Teaching

Aronowitz began his formal academic career in the early after earning a Ph.D. from Union Graduate School in 1975, initially serving as an assistant professor in community studies at Community College (now the , part of CUNY) from 1972 to 1976. He held adjunct and visiting teaching positions at institutions including during 1980–1981 and around the same period, where he lectured on topics intersecting labor organizing and . These early roles reflected his transition from union activism to academia, often as a non-tenure-track instructor amid the expansion of urban public universities in the post-1960s era. In 1983, Aronowitz joined the faculty of the as a professor of , later expanding to urban education, and was elevated to in 1998. He remained there until his retirement, achieving status following his death in 2021, during which time he also directed the Center for the Study of Culture, Technology, and Work. , as a hub for interdisciplinary graduate programs in New York City's public system, provided a platform for Aronowitz to integrate his practical experience in labor movements with scholarly inquiry, though the institution's emphasis on radical perspectives has drawn scrutiny for potentially insulating analysis from broader empirical labor data amid academia's prevailing ideological tilts. Aronowitz's teaching focused on courses in , social movements, and , prioritizing detailed examinations of historical case studies—such as postwar union dynamics and technological shifts in work—over purely theoretical abstractions, drawing directly from his organizing background to ground discussions in verifiable events and metrics. He mentored numerous doctoral students and junior faculty in and related fields, fostering a cohort oriented toward critical analyses of power structures, yet his approach implicitly highlighted tensions between academic discourse and on-the-ground labor realities, critiquing ivory-tower detachment from measurable economic indicators like union density declines. This pedagogical style bridged his activist roots with university settings, though it operated within CUNY's environment, where systemic left-leaning biases in hiring and curriculum have been noted to amplify certain viewpoints at the expense of balanced empirical scrutiny.

Development of Sociological Frameworks

Aronowitz joined the faculty of the ( in 1983 as a professor of , where he was elevated to status in 1998 and directed the Center for the Study of Culture, Technology and Work. There, he cultivated sociological approaches that fused empirical fieldwork from labor contexts with , promoting analyses of power structures rooted in verifiable data such as union records and workplace dynamics rather than abstract ideological constructs. This integration reflected his commitment to a radical sociology that examined how institutional elites shaped social relations, prioritizing causal mechanisms observable in historical labor patterns over unsubstantiated assumptions of egalitarian progress. A key influence was , whose 1956 work framed society as divided between concentrated elite power and fragmented masses, a dichotomy Aronowitz adopted to underscore systemic barriers to collective agency. In frameworks developed through books like False Promises (1973), he applied this lens to workplaces, using data from labor surveys and strike analyses—such as post-World War II rates peaking at 35% in by 1954 before declining—to illustrate how sustained managerial dominance. These efforts argued against as an empirical reality, positing it as a ideological veil obscuring how skill hierarchies and metrics reinforced class immobility, evidenced by stagnant for non-supervisory workers amid rising output per hour from 1947 onward. By the late and , Aronowitz shifted from rigid orthodox Marxism's focus on industrial proletariats toward post-1960s emphases on knowledge workers and scientific production as potential sites of transformation, as explored in The in (1981). He anticipated the expansion of educated labor—projecting by 1980 that professional and technical occupations would comprise over 20% of the workforce, up from 10% in 1950—but frameworks underestimated how digital technologies would entrench inequalities through and rather than fostering broad empowerment. This evolution incorporated Gramscian notions of cultural consent, analyzing how technical expertise became a vector for control, grounded in case studies of automation's impact on job autonomy from the onward.

Key Intellectual Themes

Critiques of Postwar Labor and Bureaucracy

In False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness (1973), Aronowitz argued that postwar labor unions, particularly the , had become co-opted by capitalist interests through institutionalization, transforming militant workers' organizations into bureaucratic entities that prioritized stability over class struggle. He contended that union leaders, insulated from rank-and-file pressures, abandoned demands for shorter workweeks and in favor of no-strike clauses and collaborative bargaining, thereby pacifying workers and stifling revolutionary potential. Aronowitz advocated for militant, decentralized rank-and-file control to revive worker agency, viewing postwar pacts like the 1959 steel industry agreements as mechanisms that subordinated labor to capital's needs. Aronowitz cited declining strike activity as evidence of this pacification, pointing to data showing a sharp drop from 3,600 major work stoppages in to fewer than 200 annually by the late , attributing it to bureaucratic unions' suppression of militancy rather than genuine worker satisfaction. Post-New Deal frameworks, he argued, channeled labor unrest into routinized negotiations that preserved capitalist structures while eroding . Aronowitz's analysis influenced 1970s and 1980s reform efforts, such as rank-and-file caucuses in the and Teamsters, which sought to challenge entrenched leadership and push for democratic reforms inspired by his emphasis on control. However, critics note that his framework overlooked how bureaucratic stability facilitated postwar prosperity, enabling real wage growth of approximately 2.5% annually from to 1973 through predictable bargaining that secured benefits like pensions and health coverage for millions. Union density peaked at 35% in the , correlating with economic expansion and reduced volatility, as institutionalized buffered against the strikes and ideological extremism—such as communist-led disruptions—that plagued prewar organizing and empirical socialist experiments in states like the , where unchecked militancy contributed to economic inefficiencies and authoritarian consolidation. This stability, rather than mere co-optation, arguably sustained labor's gains until global competition eroded them in the , a causal dynamic Aronowitz underemphasized in favor of ideological .

Analysis of Capitalism, Technology, and Work

Aronowitz, in collaboration with William DiFazio, contended in The Jobless Future: Sci-Tech and the Dogma of Work (1994) that scientific and technological advancements under capitalism would eliminate more jobs than they generate, necessitating a societal shift toward reduced work hours and expanded leisure to mitigate widespread unemployment and social dislocation. He drew on Harry Braverman's deskilling thesis from Labor and Monopoly Capital (1974), which posits that capitalist production systematically separates mental conception from manual execution, degrading workers' skills and autonomy into repetitive, machine-tending tasks, a process accelerated by automation. Aronowitz argued this dynamic not only dehumanizes labor but also entrenches inequality by concentrating control and rewards among a technical elite while consigning the majority to precarious, low-wage roles or joblessness. Central to his analysis was a critique of automation's role in exacerbating economic divides, where technological efficiency serves capital's imperatives rather than human needs, predicting a "jobless future" of mass and pauperization absent radical interventions like income redistribution or work-sharing mandates. Yet empirical data since the contradicts these forecasts: spurred a resurgence in U.S. labor growth, averaging 2.5-3% annually from 1995 to 2005—up from 1.4% in the prior two decades—driving real increases and broader access to that elevated living standards across income quintiles. Rather than mass pauperization, total U.S. rose from 123 million in 1994 to over 160 million by 2023, with net job creation in tech-enabled sectors offsetting displacements through market-driven reallocation and skill adaptation. Aronowitz's emphasis on technology's contribution to precarious labor influenced discussions of contingent work, framing gig platforms as extensions of deskilled, insecure employment that undermine stable livelihoods. This perspective, however, underemphasizes causal mechanisms in capitalist innovation, where flexible gig arrangements have enabled entrepreneurial entry for millions—such as independent drivers or creators monetizing assets via platforms like Uber or Etsy—fostering adaptive income strategies and supplementing traditional wages amid rising productivity. From 2010 to 2023, gig participation correlated with higher self-employment rates (reaching 10.1% of the U.S. workforce in 2022) and voluntary flexibility preferences among 36% of participants, per surveys, rather than uniform exploitation. These outcomes reflect technology's capacity to expand opportunity frontiers under competitive markets, yielding efficiency gains that, while unevenly distributed, have empirically outpaced the dystopian deskilling Aronowitz anticipated.

Engagement with Marxism and Class Theory

Aronowitz maintained that class remained the foundational category for analyzing social conflict under capitalism, but he broadened its scope beyond the traditional industrial proletariat to encompass service-sector employees and intellectual laborers, arguing that these groups constituted emergent sites of antagonism due to their alienation within knowledge-based production. This expansion drew from Antonio Gramsci's conceptions of hegemony and "common sense," which Aronowitz interpreted as mechanisms through which dominant classes shape cultural consent, thereby integrating non-economic factors into class formation without diluting material bases. He also engaged autonomist Marxist traditions, emphasizing worker self-activity and refusal of work as spontaneous counters to capitalist valorization, particularly in post-Fordist contexts where rigid factory discipline gave way to flexible exploitation. While critiquing orthodox Marxism's deterministic emphasis on economic base as overly reductive—positing that it neglected cultural and ideological superstructures' relative autonomy—Aronowitz preserved an anti-capitalist orientation centered on systemic contradictions driving class polarization. He rejected Soviet-style as a bureaucratic deformation incompatible with genuine worker , instead advocating rooted in participatory institutions and cultural transformation, akin to Gramsci's emphasis on organic intellectuals fostering counter-hegemony. This positioned his framework against both vulgar materialism and the New Left's occasional disdain for class analysis, insisting on undiluted causal priority of production relations while incorporating contingency in outcomes. Aronowitz contended that capitalism's inherent instabilities—such as technological displacement and intensified exploitation—would inexorably radicalize the toward , echoing Marxist dialectics of contradiction. However, empirical trends contradict this prognosis: U.S. union membership rates fell from 22.2% in to 10.1% by , with absolute numbers declining by 2.9 million since 1983 amid workforce expansion from 88.3 million to over 136 million workers, indicating workers' preference for individualized mobility over ideological mobilization despite persistent inequalities. This decline, accelerating in the under neoliberal policies, underscores how cultural fragmentation and voluntary exit from organized labor—rather than inevitable —shaped post-industrial class dynamics, challenging deterministic expectations of proletarian convergence.

Political Activism and Campaigns

Advocacy in Labor and Left Movements

Aronowitz served as editor of Studies on the Left from 1964 to 1967, a journal that advanced scholarship by critiquing postwar liberalism and promoting independent radical analysis outside traditional frameworks. This editorial role helped foster coalitions among intellectuals, students, and labor activists seeking alternatives to both consensus and , though the journal's influence waned amid the 's internal divisions by the late . In the mid-1970s, Aronowitz joined the New American Movement (NAM), a socialist organization emerging from remnants that emphasized building democratic socialist institutions through rank-and-file labor organizing and community coalitions. NAM integrated by prioritizing women's liberation within class struggle, reflecting Aronowitz's advocacy for linking gender issues to broader anticapitalist efforts; however, the group's emphasis on and multi-tendency debates contributed to its fragmentation and dissolution by 1981, as membership stalled below 1,000 active participants amid competing priorities. By the 1990s, Aronowitz critiqued the rise of within left movements, arguing in The Politics of Identity (1992) that cultural fragmentation diluted unified against , privileging symbolic recognition over structural economic demands. He supported innovative labor strategies amid and , analyzing in works like From the Ashes of the Old (1998) how campaigns targeting service-sector workers could revive militancy, though empirical trends showed union density falling from 15.8% in 1990 to 13.1% by 2000, partly due to such debates exacerbating tensions between class-focused and identity-based factions. His writings raised awareness of technology-driven job displacement but highlighted causal fractures in left coalitions, where prioritizing cultural over workplace power led to diminished mobilization, as evidenced by declining participation in national labor actions post-NAFTA ratification in 1994.

2002 New York Gubernatorial Campaign

In 2002, Stanley Aronowitz sought the nomination for , securing it amid efforts to maintain the party's following the national Nader controversy of 2000. His platform centered on anti-corporate reforms, including opposition to unchecked corporate power, alongside demands for a , enhanced union democracy to empower rank-and-file workers, and progressive economic redistribution through increased taxation on high earners and corporations. Additional planks addressed social issues such as funding abortions via insurance mandates, comprehensive sex education in schools, free tuition at public colleges like CUNY and SUNY, opposition to the impending , and the closure of the Indian Point nuclear plant. Aronowitz faced formidable opponents in the November 5, 2002, general election: incumbent Republican , Democrat , and Independence Party candidate , with the race dominated by major-party dynamics and McCall's appeal to minority voters through identity-focused messaging. Campaigning on a shoestring budget reliant on personal loans and small donations, Aronowitz highlighted radical critiques of and but struggled with weak infrastructure, media marginalization, and a voter base skewed toward the unwaged and academic circles rather than broad working-class support. Aronowitz garnered 41,797 votes, or approximately 0.9% of the total, falling short of the 50,000-vote threshold required to preserve ballot status in New York. This meager performance underscored the electoral constraints on radical platforms, as utopian emphases on systemic overhaul alienated pragmatic working-class voters loyal to Democrats amid economic anxieties, revealing Aronowitz's ideas' confinement largely to and activist niches rather than mass appeal. In post-campaign analysis, Aronowitz conceded that while the run amplified visibility for left critiques, it exposed the pitfalls of third-party bids under duopoly constraints, including resource scarcity and the "McCall factor" of entrenched Democratic allegiance. He advocated pivoting toward extraparliamentary movement-building—such as labor-minority-green alliances—over vote-chasing, arguing that electoral radicalism demands unsustainable infrastructure without a mobilized social base, thereby affirming the practical limits of translating academic theorizing into viable politics.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Empirical Rebuttals

Ideological and Theoretical Critiques

Critics from conservative perspectives have argued that Aronowitz's Marxist framework romanticized by downplaying the causal realities of historical implementations, such as the Soviet Union's mass repressions in the gulags, which resulted in millions of deaths between 1930 and 1953, and Venezuela's under Hugo Chávez's socialist policies, which Aronowitz endorsed and which led to exceeding 1 million percent in 2018. This optimism persisted despite evidence that centralized planning and class warfare incentives eroded and , contrasting with market-driven systems where profit motives have empirically spurred technological advancements, as seen in U.S. GDP growth averaging 3.2% annually from 1947 to 1973 under postwar . Aronowitz's theoretical emphasis on and worker agency in texts like False Promises (1973) has been faulted for oversimplifying capitalism's dynamics, neglecting how incentive structures in free markets—such as rights and —foster and efficiency, evidenced by the post-1980s tech boom that lifted global living standards without relying on proletarian upheaval. Analyses aligned with his views, portraying science and technology as mere instruments of ruling-class power, faced empirical rebuttal through events like the 1996 Sokal hoax, which exposed vulnerabilities in such postmodern critiques by demonstrating their tolerance for pseudoscientific claims under ideological guise. Even among leftist scholars, Aronowitz's theories drew scrutiny for over-optimism about autonomous worker movements overcoming bureaucratic and structural constraints, as his underestimation of institutional inertia ignored cases where union militancy, like the U.S. wildcat strikes he analyzed, failed to reverse trends driven by global capital mobility. Conservative profiles further contend that his academic influence propagated by framing postwar institutions as inherently oppressive, thereby discouraging empirical engagement with capitalism's adaptive mechanisms over abstract revolutionary ideals.

Failures of Advocated Labor Strategies

Aronowitz prescribed labor strategies centered on rank-and-file militancy, including strikes and drives against bureaucratic union leadership, to counteract postwar labor's integration into corporate structures and revive worker agency. These approaches yielded sporadic short-term concessions, such as localized wage adjustments during outbreaks involving over 100,000 miners challenging national union controls. However, they often provoked employer countermeasures, including accelerated plant closures and , as firms sought stability in lower-cost regions amid disruptive actions. U.S. manufacturing employment, a sector central to Aronowitz's focus, plummeted from 19.5 million jobs in 1979 to 17 million by 1999, coinciding with peak activity and work stoppages that reached their zenith in before sharply declining. Recessions in the early exacerbated losses, with 1.5 million and 2 million jobs shed respectively, but sustained militancy contributed to , as and policies from the onward incentivized relocating operations overseas to evade unrest. Union density in eroded dramatically, falling from 38% in 1977 to record lows of 7.7% by 2021, underscoring how reformist confrontation failed to stem structural relocation. Empirical data rebuts attributions of decline solely to union betrayal or neoliberal policies, highlighting global competition and worker-driven legal shifts. The U.S. labor share of income dropped from about 64% in the late 1970s to 58% by the 2010s, driven primarily by offshoring to regions with far lower costs—Chinese manufacturing wages in the 1980s and 1990s were a fraction of U.S. levels, often under 10% adjusted for productivity. Right-to-work laws, proliferating across states in this era, reduced unionization by roughly 4 percentage points within five years of adoption while correlating with lower childhood poverty (by 2.29 points in affected counties) and enhanced economic mobility, indicating preferences for workplace flexibility over mandatory dues and militancy. Aronowitz's framework underemphasized internal union pathologies, such as infiltration in the Teamsters via exposed under the 1970 RICO Act, and UAW corruption scandals from the 1970s onward involving and concessions that eroded member trust independently of external pressures. By prioritizing anti-bureaucratic insurgency over competitive adaptation—like skill upgrading or cost alignment with Asian benchmarks—these strategies inadvertently hastened market-driven , favoring capital mobility over sustained reform.

Broader Impact on Policy and Movements

Aronowitz exerted significant influence on the academic left through his long tenure as a of at the , where he helped integrate Marxist class theory with , mentoring scholars in critiques of , , and from the 1980s onward. This shaped interdisciplinary programs emphasizing Western Marxist thought, fostering a generation focused on and labor alienation, though primarily within insulated academic circles rather than broader institutional reforms. His involvement in organizations like the New American Movement in the late 1970s highlighted early attempts to bridge labor activism with socialist , yet the group's dissolution by 1982 underscored challenges in translating intellectual critique into sustained organizational power. In extramural movements, Aronowitz's rhetoric echoed in the 2011 encampments, where he authored supportive analyses framing the protests as a revival of class antagonism against and jobless growth, influencing anti-work sentiments that questioned wage labor's centrality. Participants drew on his warnings of a "jobless future" amid , amplifying demands for decommodified time and union revitalization, though the movement's horizontal structure and aversion to electoral politics—mirroring his own skepticism of reformist institutions—led to its fragmentation by 2012 without securing legislative gains like enhanced worker protections or wealth taxes. Empirically, Aronowitz's broader imprint remained negligible, as advocated shifts toward rank-and-file union control and drastic work-hour reductions (e.g., to weekly without cuts) faced rejection amid fiscal constraints and competitive disincentives, correlating with U.S. private-sector union plummeting from 16.8% in 1983 to 5.9% in 2023. Admirers, including labor scholars, praise his foresight on technological displacement and inequality's entrenchment post-1970s, viewing his critiques as vital for sustaining oppositional discourse against neoliberal consensus. Critics, however, argue his uncompromising dismissal of bureaucratic unions as irredeemable exacerbated left fragmentation, prioritizing theoretical purity over adaptive strategies that could have bolstered worker agency through -compatible reforms, thereby hindering practical leverage in arenas like revisions. This net effect privileged inspirational critique over viable movement-building, as evidenced by the persistence of unaddressed distortions in labor markets despite decades of such .

Personal Life and Legacy

Family, Relationships, and Later Years

Aronowitz entered a long-term partnership with writer and cultural critic in the late , following their meeting in the late ; the couple married in 1998 as her second marriage and his third. Together they raised daughter Nona Willis-Aronowitz, born in 1984, whom Aronowitz regarded as part of their unit despite the unconventional start to their relationship. Aronowitz fathered five children in total across his marriages, navigating family responsibilities alongside his roles as a labor organizer and itinerant academic, which often demanded extended absences from home. In his later years, following Willis's death in 2006, Aronowitz resided in and sustained deep involvement with labor institutions, notably as a key figure in the Professional Staff Congress (PSC) union at the , where he advocated for faculty rights and critiqued institutional power dynamics. He continued writing and engaging in leftist intellectual circles despite health setbacks, including a in late 2019 from which he initially recovered, allowing him to maintain public commentary on work, class, and . This period exemplified the interplay between his personal stability in urban academia and the disruptive he championed, as he balanced familial ties—visiting with children and grandchildren—with ongoing union mobilization and theoretical pursuits.

Death and Posthumous Assessments

Stanley Aronowitz died on August 16, 2021, at his home in , New York, at the age of 88, from complications of a . Following his death, tributes from labor activists, academics, and left-wing organizations highlighted his decades-long commitment to organizing workers and critiquing capitalist structures. The Professional Staff Congress at CUNY described him as an inspirational teacher and major figure in modern labor scholarship, while the Graduate eulogized his role as a mentor to left-wing thinkers. Posthumous evaluations from allies praised Aronowitz's early analyses of and flexible labor markets as prescient, particularly in anticipating the rise of precarious gig work that became prominent decades later. These assessments, often from Marxist-leaning outlets, credited his work with providing intellectual tools for understanding post-Fordist economies, though such views reflect the ideological commitments of the sources. Debates over his enduring relevance contrast academic influence with limited practical outcomes, as U.S. union membership stagnated or declined despite his for revitalized class-based movements. Private-sector union density fell from 14.7% in 1984 to 5.7% in , underscoring the empirical resilience of capitalist and the failure to achieve the mass socialist mobilization Aronowitz envisioned. While his theories shaped niche fields like the sociology of work and , broader assessments note that systemic left-wing biases in academia may inflate perceptions of his transformative impact on policy or movements, absent verifiable shifts in union power or economic structures.

Major Works

Seminal Books and Monographs

Aronowitz's False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness, published in 1973 by McGraw-Hill and reissued in 1992 by with a new introduction and epilogue, examines the historical development of American working-class consciousness through , technological changes, and union dynamics. The work critiques the integration of unions into corporate structures post-World War II, arguing that this process fragmented class solidarity and limited unions' role as agents of broader , drawing on from industrial sectors like and auto where peaked at over 1 million steelworkers in the before set in. It challenges empirical assumptions that economic hardship alone fosters revolutionary awareness, citing historical strikes and wage showing accommodation to capital rather than rupture. In How Class Works: Power and Social Movement, released in 2003 by Yale University Press, Aronowitz reasserts class as a central mechanism of power, defining it not merely by economic position but by social groups' capacity to influence institutional outcomes through movements. The monograph analyzes post-1970s shifts, incorporating labor statistics such as the decline in union density from 20.1% in 1983 to 12.1% by 2002, to argue against narratives of class obsolescence amid globalization and service-sector growth. It emphasizes empirical cases of class mobilization, like environmental and anti-globalization protests, where non-traditional workers exerted influence outside formal wage relations. Aronowitz's The Death and Life of American Labor: Toward a New Workers' Movement, published in 2014 by , diagnoses the near-collapse of organized labor, with union membership falling to 6.7% of the private-sector workforce by 2013 per data, attributing this to neoliberal policies, , and internal union bureaucratization since the 1970s. The book proposes revival through rank-and-file organizing and alliances with community groups, referencing empirical examples like the and rise of worker centers, while critiquing failed predictions of perpetual job growth in against stagnant averaging $23 per hour in by 2013.

Collaborative and Edited Works

Aronowitz co-authored The Jobless Future: Sci-Tech and the Dogma of Work with sociologist William DiFazio, published in 1994 by the University of Minnesota Press. The work critiques the displacement of traditional employment by computer-driven capitalism, projecting a future of widespread joblessness unless restructured through self-organizing social systems rather than reliance on technological optimism or state intervention. A second edition in 2010 included updates reflecting persistent underemployment amid economic recoveries, emphasizing empirical trends like the 1980s manufacturing losses exceeding 1.2 million jobs from automation and offshoring. These collaborations with DiFazio extended Aronowitz's labor analyses into technological determinism, blending autonomist Marxism with empirical case studies of deindustrialization, though critics noted the emphasis on theoretical reconfiguration over quantifiable policy alternatives like retraining efficacy data. Aronowitz edited the three-volume C. Wright Mills collection in the SAGE Masters in Modern Social Thought series, released in 2004, compiling key essays and analyses of the sociologist's contributions to power elite theory and intellectual independence. The volumes aggregate over 40 selections from Mills's contemporaries and successors, highlighting intersections of class, bureaucracy, and culture, while Aronowitz's introduction frames Mills as a model for politically engaged scholarship amid mid-20th-century U.S. labor shifts. In Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered, co-edited with Peter Bratsis in 2002, Aronowitz curated contributions rethinking Marxist state analyses through autonomist and post-Fordist lenses, incorporating dialogues with feminist theorists on identity's role in class struggles. The anthology prioritizes conceptual debates over longitudinal data on state-labor interactions, fostering networks among radical academics but diluting focus on verifiable causal mechanisms in policy failures, such as union density declines from 35% in 1954 to under 12% by 2000. Such edited projects amplified Aronowitz's influence in and autonomist circles, integrating labor critiques with , yet often subordinated empirical validation—like randomized evaluations of worker cooperatives—to speculative extensions of Gramscian .

References

  1. https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/stanley-aronowitz/
  2. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/aronowitz-stanley-1933
  3. https://www.gc.cuny.edu/news/memoriam-distinguished-professor-emeritus-stanley-aronowitz-influential-labor-advocate-and-scholar
  4. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/21/us/stanley-aronowitz-dead.html
  5. https://libcom.org/library/break-past-stanley-aronowitz
  6. https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/workplace/article/view/184699/184289
  7. https://inthesetimes.com/article/a-post-political-labor-movement
  8. https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2021/11/the-radical-educational-imagination-of-stanley-aronowitz.html
  9. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/news/5170-our-theorist-of-outrage-memories-of-stanley-aronowitz-1933-2021
  10. https://runawayinequality.org/stanley-aronowitz-remembered/
  11. https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/stanley-aronowitz
  12. https://keywiki.org/Stanley_Aronowitz
  13. https://www.academia.edu/64915286/Stanley_Aronowitz
  14. https://www.inTheseTimes.com/article/labor-movement-richard-trumka-stanley-aronowitz-afl-cio-unions
  15. https://libcom.org/article/notes-postal-strike-stanley-aronowitz-and-jeremy-brecher
  16. https://jacobin.com/2021/08/stanley-aronowitz-labor-unions-academica-marxism-education-obituary
  17. https://whorulesamerica.ucsc.edu/power/history_of_labor_unions.html
  18. https://solidarity-us.org/on-remembering-stanley-aronowitz/
  19. https://www.nytimes.com/books/first/a/aronowitz-ashes.html
  20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/466649
  21. https://psc-cuny.org/clarion/2021/october/remembering-aronowitz-psc-activist/
  22. https://csitoday.com/2021/08/remembering-dr-stanley-aronowitz/
  23. https://marxistsociology.org/2021/08/stanley-aronowitz-knew-that-freedom-begins-where-work-ends/
  24. https://brooklynrail.org/2012/08/express/mills-and-his-legacy/
  25. https://logosjournal.com/article/stanley-aronowitz-taking-it-big-c-wright-mills-and-the-making-of-political-intellectuals/
  26. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089692057800800214
  27. https://logosjournal.com/article/stanley-aronowitz-and-that-big-factory/
  28. https://dukeupress.edu/false-promises
  29. https://www.marxists.org/archive/glaberman/1974/02/falsepromises.htm
  30. https://www.bls.gov/wsp/factsheets/work-stoppages-by-decade.htm
  31. https://www.bls.gov/web/wkstp/annual-listing.htm
  32. https://aeon.co/essays/postwar-prosperity-depended-on-a-truce-between-capitalism-and-democracy
  33. https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/labor-unions-and-the-us-economy
  34. https://www.bls.gov/wsp/factsheets/summary-of-work-stoppages-in-the-united-states.htm
  35. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/24707
  36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt2vb
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374169652_Henry_Bravermann_deskilling_theory_in_the_21st_century
  38. https://jacobin.com/2015/06/american-unions-labor-aronowitz
  39. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45b/002.html
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319444320_The_Jobless_Future
  41. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/the-resurgence-of-growth-in-the-late-1990s-is-information-technology-the-story.htm
  42. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.14.4.3
  43. https://www.heritage.org/jobs-and-labor/report/automation-and-technology-increase-living-standards
  44. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/gig-economy-and-precarious-work.pdf
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10894568/
  46. https://guides.newman.baruch.cuny.edu/HRgigeconomy
  47. https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2003/september-193
  48. https://read.dukeupress.edu/nps/article-pdf/1/2-3/105/2246915/105aronowitz.pdf
  49. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47596
  50. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2016/union-membership-in-the-united-states/home.htm
  51. https://www.epi.org/unequalpower/publications/private-sector-unions-corporate-legal-erosion/
  52. https://mronline.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/File03.Aronowitz.pdf
  53. https://www.routledge.com/The-Politics-of-Identity-Class-Culture-Social-Movements/Aronowitz/p/book/9780415904377
  54. https://logosjournal.com/article/reversing-the-labor-movements-free-fall/
  55. https://www.gp.org/rip_stanley_aronowitz
  56. https://archive.newpol.org/issue34/aronow34.htm
  57. https://results.elections.ny.gov/contest/4082
  58. https://results.elections.ny.gov/candidate/7081
  59. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14931/5826
  60. https://archive.iww.org/history/library/Dolgoff/newbeginning/6/
  61. https://aflcio.org/about/leadership/statements/outsourcing-america
  62. https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-labor-strikes-every-year/
  63. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2017/05/us-manufacturing-jobs-have-declined-this-is-where-theyve-really-gone/
  64. https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-9/forty-years-of-falling-manufacturing-employment.htm
  65. https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/352/1iie3411.pdf
  66. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/closer-look-why-unions-manufacturing-have-been-since-1970s-ryan
  67. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-decline-of-the-u-s-labor-share/
  68. https://itimanufacturing.com/manufacturing-move-china/
  69. https://www.nber.org/digest/202208/impacts-right-work-laws-unionization-and-wages
  70. https://manhattan.institute/article/long-run-effects-of-right-to-work-laws
  71. https://www.history.com/articles/how-mafia-infiltrated-american-labor-unions
  72. https://inthesetimes.com/article/uaw-history-militant-corruption-concessions-gary-jones-indictment
  73. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/abs/10.1257/jep.26.4.57
  74. http://politicsslashletters.org/commentary/stanley-aronowitz-and-cultural-studies/
  75. https://logosjournal.com/article/notes-on-the-occupy-movement/
  76. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304388004577532900935027954
  77. https://criticallegalthinking.com/2012/01/02/wither-wall-street-challenge-of-the-occupy-movement/
  78. https://psc-cuny.org/clarion/2011/november/viewpoint-four-perspectives-occupy-wall-street/
  79. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
  80. https://www.labornotes.org/blogs/2015/02/review-can-labor-save-itself
  81. https://againstthecurrent.org/atc177/p4476/
  82. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/28/nyregion/public-lives-the-anti-candidate-out-to-anger-the-rich.html
  83. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/judith-levine-ellen-willis/
  84. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/ellen-willis-1941-2006/
  85. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/10/arts/10willis.html
  86. https://forward.com/fast-forward/474291/stanley-aronowitz-longtime-labor-and-civil-rights-activist-dies-at-88/
  87. https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/08/27/on-the-life-and-death-of-stanley-aronowitz/
  88. https://booksrun.com/9780822311980-false-promises-the-shaping-of-american-working-class-consciousness-revised-edition
  89. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300105049/how-class-works/
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289073174_How_Class_Works_Power_and_Social_Movement
  91. https://www.versobooks.com/products/2386-the-death-and-life-of-american-labor
  92. https://read.dukeupress.edu/labor/article/13/1/92/15027/The-Death-and-Life-of-American-Labor-Toward-a-New
  93. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674510/the-jobless-future/
  94. https://www.amazon.com/Jobless-Future-Second-Stanley-Aronowitz/dp/0816674515
  95. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119395485.ch13
  96. https://www.amazon.com/Wright-Masters-Modern-Social-Thought/dp/0761973710
  97. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL8030718M/C_Wright_Mills_%2528SAGE_Masters_in_Modern_Social_Thought_series%2529
  98. https://legalform.blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/aronowitz-and-bratsis-state-theory-reconsidered.pdf
  99. https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviews/7760_taking-it-big-review-by-paul-reynolds/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.