Hubbry Logo
Storage clampStorage clampMain
Open search
Storage clamp
Community hub
Storage clamp
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Storage clamp
Storage clamp
Storage clamp
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
a clamp of sugar beet, not covered

A clamp is a compact heap, mound or pile of materials.[1] A storage clamp is used in the agricultural industry for temporary storage of root crops such as potato, turnip, rutabaga, mangelwurzel, and sugar beet.

A clamp is formed by excavating a shallow rectangular depression in a field to make a base for the clamp. Root crops are then stacked onto the base up to a height of about 2 m (6 ft 7 in). When the clamp is full, the earth scraped from the field to make the base is then used to cover the root crops to a depth of several inches. Straw or old hay may be used to protect the upper surface from rain erosion.

A well-made clamp will keep the vegetables cool and dry for many[vague] months. Most clamps are relatively long and narrow, allowing the crops to be progressively removed from one end without disturbing the remaining vegetables. The use of a clamp allows a farmer to feed vegetables into market over many months.

See also

[edit]
  • Bunker silo – Structure for storing crops
  • Prehistoric storage pits
  • Food preservation – Inhibition of microbial growth in food
  • Root cellar – Structure for storing vegetables, fruits, nuts or other foods
  • Brick clamp – Open-air brick kiln
  • Charcoal clamp – Covered fire for producing charcoal
  • CLAMP – Manga artist group, an artist collective named after potato clamps[2]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Storage clamp

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A storage clamp is a traditional, low-cost agricultural storage structure used for root crops and tubers such as potatoes, carrots, beets, turnips, and other cold-hardy . It consists of a compact mound or pile of harvested produce layered with insulating materials like and topped with to regulate and while providing protection from freezing. Also known as a clamp or , this method enables temporary outdoor storage without , extending by mimicking natural ground conditions in cool, moist environments typically at 0–10°C (32–50°F) and 85–100% relative . Rooted in pre-refrigeration practices and documented in USDA resources like Agriculture Handbook 66 since the mid-20th century, storage clamps offer simplicity and accessibility for resource-limited farmers in temperate regions, supporting by reducing losses through thermal buffering.

Definition and Overview

Definition

A storage clamp is a traditional agricultural structure consisting of an earthen mound or pile designed for the temporary outdoor storage of root crops such as potatoes and turnips. It functions as an above-ground heap that insulates the produce against and fluctuations while allowing controlled access for harvesting, typically maintaining viability for several months in temperate climates. Storage clamps vary in shape, from compact mounds to long, narrow ridges. Compact mounds are often circular or oval, while elongated designs, typically measuring 10-30 in length and 1.5-4 in width at the base, with a height of 1.5-2 meters, facilitate progressive removal of crops from one end without disturbing the entire structure. This design is built directly on the field without any permanent , relying on the natural for support and drainage, distinguishing it from fixed buildings or underground pits that require excavation or construction. The basic components of a storage clamp begin with a base layer of excavated or for elevation and moisture control, followed by the stacked root crops arranged in a ridge-like formation. This is then protected by a layer of insulating materials such as or leaves (15-30 cm thick), followed by a covering of 15-30 cm of to form a ridged dome that sheds and prevent ingress while promoting ventilation. Historically, this method has been employed for storing potatoes and similar root vegetables over winter in field settings.

Purpose and Applications

Storage clamps serve as a primary method for the temporary post-harvest storage of root crops, such as potatoes, carrots, beets, and turnips, by creating controlled cool and humid conditions that mimic natural dormancy and thereby preserve crop viability. This approach protects the produce from excessive water loss, frost, and decay through insulation provided by layers of straw and soil, allowing storage durations of several months in suitable climates without the need for mechanical refrigeration. In agricultural applications, storage clamps are particularly valued by small-scale and traditional farmers for enabling the supply of crops to markets throughout the winter season, facilitating staggered sales to prevent price fluctuations due to oversupply. They are commonly employed in regions with mild winters, including parts of , , and , where ambient temperatures support the required storage environment, as well as in tropical and subtropical areas for short-term holding of crops like and jicama. Economically, storage clamps offer a low-infrastructure solution for resource-limited operations, historically playing a crucial role in rural by minimizing losses and extending the availability of staple root crops before widespread became available. This method remains relevant for operations seeking cost-effective preservation, supporting stable income through prolonged without high capital investment.

History

Origins and Traditional Use

The practice of storing crops in earthen pits traces its origins to ancient European agricultural techniques, particularly among Celtic and communities in Britain, where underground pits were used to preserve harvested grains against moisture through anaerobic sealing with clay and soil. These early methods, dating back to the Iron Age (circa 800–50 BCE), primarily focused on grain storage. Roman occupation from the CE introduced a wider variety of , including carrots and beets, which were stored in cool, dark cellars or pits to maintain freshness through winter, laying the groundwork for more structured storage systems in temperate climates. The formalized use of storage clamps—mounded heaps of roots covered with straw and soil—emerged in the 18th and 19th centuries during Britain's Agricultural Revolution, coinciding with the widespread adoption of as a staple crop following their introduction from the in the late . In Britain and , clamps became a practical, low-cost solution for field storage, especially suited to small-scale farmers lacking capital for built structures. By the early , these methods were integral to potato cultivation, with examples like stone-lined pits in and semi-subterranean chambers in documented as essential for overwintering crops like and turnips. Agricultural texts from the period, such as those describing field clamps in corner plots, highlight their role in enabling subsistence farming amid and land enclosures. Traditional clamps peaked in usage during the 19th and early 20th centuries as the primary method for storing potatoes, carrots, and beets, forming the backbone of rural economies in temperate regions. In subsistence farming communities across Britain and , clamps allowed families to preserve harvests through winter without , with structures like those on —pits lined with straw and topped with earth—protecting against frost while permitting ventilation to prevent rot. Their cultural significance is evident in period agricultural literature and , where clamps symbolized ; for instance, they were adapted in colonial by European settlers into related practices like root cellars for root storage. During wartime efforts, such as the UK's WWII "Dig for Victory" campaign, clamps were revived for home-grown potato storage, underscoring their enduring practicality in .

Evolution and Decline

In the early , storage clamps underwent refinements to address limitations in ventilation and insulation, particularly for crops like potatoes. Traditional unventilated clamps, which relied on earthen mounds covered with , often suffered from accumulation and uneven , leading to rot. Improvements included the introduction of ventilated designs featuring triangular air ducts beneath the pile and openings at the top for natural air circulation, which helped regulate and reduce condensation risks. These enhancements extended storage viability to several months in temperate climates while minimizing losses from diseases such as silver scurf and . Hybrid variations emerged, incorporating wooden frames to support the structure and improve stability, especially in regions with variable soil conditions. The decline of storage clamps accelerated from the 1930s to the 1950s, driven by the rise of mechanized farming, refrigeration technologies, and bulk silos, which offered greater efficiency and scalability. Clamps were labor-intensive, requiring manual piling, covering, and monitoring. In the Netherlands, early 1900s agricultural critiques highlighted rot risks, with unventilated clamps incurring 20-25% losses from poor airflow and frost penetration, prompting a shift to ventilated barns by the late 1940s. By 1955, over 1,160 barn facilities with 244,000 tonnes capacity had replaced clamps, enabling controlled environments at 2-10°C and 90-100% humidity to curb disease and extend storage to year-round. In industrialized nations, clamps became largely obsolete by the 1980s, as bulk silos and refrigerated units reduced labor and losses to under 5%, though they persisted in developing regions for small-scale, low-cost storage. Since the , storage clamps have seen a niche revival in organic and sustainable farming practices, valued for their low-energy requirements and minimal needs. These traditional methods align with zero-input storage goals, using natural insulation to maintain viability without electricity, appealing to eco-focused operations aiming to cut post-harvest emissions. In organic systems, clamps store roots like potatoes and turnips with losses as low as 10% when properly ventilated, supporting and by avoiding chemical preservatives. This resurgence reflects broader trends, where clamps complement modern alternatives in resource-limited settings.

Construction

Site Preparation

Site selection for a storage clamp begins with identifying well-drained, level fields to prevent accumulation that could lead to rot in stored crops. Low-lying areas prone to flooding must be avoided, as excess can compromise the clamp's integrity. The site should be cleared of weeds, debris, and any potential prior to . This work is typically undertaken in autumn after , when the ground is marked out as a strip. A shallow or base layer may be lightly dug to firm the . To prevent contamination from pests or , the site should be positioned away from areas, with barriers such as trenches recommended. These measures help maintain and reduce risks in the stored produce.

Building Process

The building process of a storage clamp involves manual labor using basic tools such as forks for layering crops and , and shovels for excavation and covering. This method allows for scalable construction, where clamp size varies with the volume of produce. The first step is to excavate a shallow base, 10-20 cm deep, across the designated area to create a firm depression for the initial layering of materials; the base should be compacted to prevent . This excavation utilizes that can later be repurposed for covering, and it assumes prior site preparation with adequate drainage to avoid water accumulation. Next, layer the harvested crops, such as potatoes or other root vegetables, into ridges or a long, narrow heap starting narrow at the ends and building upward to a height of 1-1.5 meters, alternating each layer with 10-15 cm of to promote ventilation and prevent moisture buildup between the tubers. The heap is shaped with A- or V-like sides for stability, ensuring the crop pile does not contact the sides of the depression directly to maintain . Finally, cover the completed heap by scraping 15-30 cm of from the surrounding sides to form a smooth, dome-shaped over the straw-topped crop layers, then add along the top for enhanced waterproofing and . This outer covering seals the clamp while leaving space for a central ventilation if needed, completing the assembly.

Usage and Management

Suitable Crops

Storage clamps are ideally suited for root crops that exhibit strong dormancy and tolerate cool, moist environments, preserving their physiological integrity by minimizing water loss and decay. Primary examples include potatoes, which serve as the mainstay crop and can store effectively for 4-6 months when properly managed; carrots; beets; turnips; rutabagas; mangelwurzels; parsnips; ; salsify; and winter radishes. For optimal results, select firm, disease-free tubers and roots harvested at full maturity, as immature or damaged produce is prone to rot and reduced . The clamp's structure supports the high these crops require to avoid shriveling, aligning with their need for consistent around . Crop-specific considerations enhance suitability: potatoes benefit from a pre-storage curing period of 1-2 weeks at 60-75°F to heal skins and prevent loss. Unsuitable for clamp storage are leafy greens and fruits, which demand drier conditions to prevent , mold growth, or ethylene-induced spoilage; additionally, overripe or damaged produce of any type should be avoided to halt rot propagation throughout the clamp.

Storage Conditions and Maintenance

The internal environment of a storage clamp is designed to maintain cool, moist conditions that preserve root crops such as potatoes and carrots, with temperatures typically 3–6.5 °C for potatoes and 0–2 °C for carrots to minimize and rot. Relative humidity is kept high at 90-98%, achieved through the insulating properties of earthen covers and layers, which buffer against external fluctuations while preventing excessive drying. Ventilation is facilitated by chimneys or vent boards integrated into the , allowing to dissipate excess , reduce on the crop surface, and prevent the buildup of respiratory gases like CO2 that could accelerate deterioration. Routine maintenance involves regular inspections to detect early signs of issues, including heat spots—localized temperature rises above 4°C that signal potential rot—visible mold growth, or entry points for pests such as and slugs. These checks require probing the clamp with thermometers at depths of about 50 cm and visually examining accessible areas, with any compromised sections promptly repaired by adding or to seal gaps. To enhance during prolonged storage, the ends of the clamp can be gradually opened as needed, ensuring the structure remains stable while promoting even cooling; storage duration generally spans 3-8 months, varying by crop type and environmental factors. When retrieving crops, harvesting proceeds progressively from one end of the clamp to minimize disturbance to the remaining pile and reduce exposure to air and light, using hand tools like forks to carefully lift layers without bruising the produce. Any spoiled or diseased portions encountered during this process must be immediately discarded to prevent spread of rot or pathogens, with unloading ideally conducted in dry weather to avoid introducing additional moisture. This methodical approach aligns with the requirements of suitable root crops, ensuring quality retention over the storage period.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Benefits

Storage clamps offer significant cost-effectiveness, particularly for small-scale farmers in resource-limited settings, as they require minimal materials such as and for construction, eliminating the need for expensive or mechanical equipment. This approach is especially advantageous in developing regions where capital is scarce, allowing producers to store root crops like potatoes and beets without incurring high upfront costs associated with refrigerated facilities. From a perspective, storage clamps utilize , biodegradable insulation materials without relying on synthetic components. They demand low input, as they leverage the earth's and insulation properties rather than energy-intensive mechanical cooling systems, making them an option for post-harvest storage. Practically, storage clamps are suitable for small-scale operations, accommodating varying yields by adjusting the size of the . They can store crops for 4–6 months for beets or 3–4 months for salsify without . They maintain stable microclimates that preserve the nutritional quality of stored produce by reducing oxygen levels and increasing , thereby minimizing spoilage and extending for several months. Additionally, their off-grid design enables effective storage in remote or rural areas lacking access to , supporting in isolated communities.

Limitations and Risks

Storage clamps, while effective for small-scale traditional storage, are highly labor-intensive to construct and dismantle, often requiring manual effort for piling crops, layering with or ventilation materials, and covering with to ensure even protection. This process demands skilled labor to avoid uneven covering, which can lead to hotspots of decay, and typically involves significant person-hours, making it impractical for rapid turnover. A primary associated with storage clamps is rot, particularly in poorly ventilated structures or during wet , where accumulation can cause up to 20-25% crop loss through fungal or bacterial infections such as or soft rot. Pest infestations further exacerbate losses, with , , and mites using the straw covering as shelter to access and damage tubers. Weather vulnerabilities compound these issues, as exposure to low temperatures below can cause chilling or freezing damage to tubers, with actual freezing occurring at -1 to -2°C, while flooding or excessive leads to penetration and accelerated spoilage. Additional limitations include their seasonal nature, restricting use to cooler periods without advanced modifications, and unsuitability for large commercial operations due to limited capacity per clamp and challenges in scaling ventilation and monitoring. Over time, clamps result in greater quality degradation—such as increased , , and spread—compared to controlled environments like ventilated buildings.

Modern Alternatives

Contemporary Methods

In contemporary , refrigerated bulk storage has become the predominant method for preserving and other crops on a commercial scale. These climate-controlled warehouses maintain temperatures between 2°C and 10°C with 90-95% relative humidity and employ forced air circulation systems, typically at rates of 20-40 cubic feet per minute per , to ensure uniform cooling, remove excess and CO₂, and prevent buildup or decay. This approach, which evolved from early ventilated structures in the late , now accounts for the majority of commercial storage in regions like and , enabling storage durations of 4-6 months while minimizing post-harvest losses to 4-8%. Recent innovations include (VFD) fans for -efficient airflow adjustment and phase-change materials (PCM) for , enhancing sustainability in these facilities as of 2025. For sugar beets and similar crops, and bunkers provide efficient large-scale alternatives, featuring vertical or horizontal structures with integrated ventilation systems to regulate and . These facilities use perforated ducts and high-pressure axial fans to create uniform microclimates in piles up to 9 meters high, reducing respiration rates by over 70% and inhibiting microbial growth during extended storage periods of several months. Automated controls, including and sensors, allow remote monitoring to maintain conditions around 0-2°C and 95% relative humidity, making this method standard in industrial settings for beets and root vegetables. Other innovations further enhance preservation by targeting physiological processes like . Modified atmosphere storage reduces oxygen levels to 2-3% while elevating CO₂ to 5-10%, slowing respiration and extending for root crops such as potatoes and beets up to 6 months without significant quality degradation. At the home scale, root cellars—simple underground or basement structures maintaining 0-4.5°C and 85-95% through natural insulation and ventilation—offer accessible options for small quantities of carrots, beets, and potatoes. Alternatively, plastic-lined pits, such as those using buried metal containers filled with and covered with , provide low-cost, improvised storage mimicking traditional clamps but with improved moisture retention for 2-4 months.

Comparisons and Transitions

Storage clamps, while effective for basic preservation, typically result in postharvest losses of 10-15% due to factors like rot, sprouting, and moisture issues. In contrast, modern refrigerated systems can achieve losses under 10% by maintaining controlled conditions that minimize respiration, pests, and decay. Cost-wise, clamps require minimal investment for materials like straw and soil, representing a fraction (around 10-20%) of the costs for modern facilities, which can range from $100-200 per ton of capacity depending on scale and features. Clamps demand more manual labor for construction, packing, and monitoring compared to automated silo operations, but they are environmentally advantageous, requiring zero electricity and thus having a lower carbon footprint relative to energy-intensive modern alternatives. In developing countries, clamps serve as an accessible bridge to mechanized storage, enabling smallholder farmers to preserve root crops like potatoes and yams with minimal , as seen in and where traditional methods retain substantial portions of the harvest after extended periods. Hybrid approaches, such as ventilated pits, integrate clamp simplicity with basic airflow systems to further limit spoilage to 6% or less for tubers, offering a practical adaptation for resource-limited settings. Looking ahead, clamps hold potential as a niche in climate-resilient farming, particularly where rising costs make electricity-dependent less viable, supporting low-loss storage (5-15% under improved practices) in variable without grid reliance. This aligns with broader trends toward sustainable, off-grid solutions amid global challenges.

References

  1. https://www.ars.usda.gov/is/np/CommercialStorage/CommercialStorage.pdf
  2. https://www.sustainablemarketfarming.com/tag/vegetable-storage-clamps/
  3. https://vric.ucdavis.edu/postharvest/undergnd.htm
  4. https://www.fao.org/4/x5415e/x5415e04.htm
  5. https://orgprints.org/8241/1/Storage_organic_produce_report.pdf
  6. https://ubblab.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/4/6/47469791/fruit_&_vegetables_harvesting%2C_handling_and_storage%2C_2nd_ed.pdf
  7. https://www.fao.org/4/t0073e/t0073e05.htm
  8. https://www.roman-britain.co.uk/the-celts-and-celtic-life/farming-in-celtic-britain/
  9. http://www.dry-stone.co.uk/Pages/Books/Articles/Article%20pdfs/General/Potato%20Houses.pdf
  10. https://www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk/lookingback/18903711.looking-back-potato-pie-not-pie-clamp/
  11. https://www.legendarydartmoor.co.uk/2019/03/10/potato-caves/
  12. https://dig-for-victory.org.uk/growing-advice/dig-victory-leaflets-ww2/storing-potatoes-food-seed/storing-potato-clamps/
  13. https://edepot.wur.nl/411164
  14. https://www.sustainablemarketfarming.com/2020/08/18/storing-potatoes/
  15. https://self-sufficient.co.uk/Potato-Clamp-Storing-Potatoes.htm
  16. https://www.waldeneffect.org/blog/How_to_make_a_potato_storage_mound/
  17. http://thedeliberateagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/12/leaf-bags-for-easy-garden-root-storage.html
  18. https://www.grit.com/farm-and-garden/vegetables/mangel-wurzel-zm0z21sozbut/
  19. https://www.sustainablemarketfarming.com/2020/10/06/root-crops-in-october/
  20. https://www.rhs.org.uk/vegetables/root-vegetables-storing
  21. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/storing_root_vegetables
  22. https://www.fao.org/4/s8620e/S8620E07.htm
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280878680_ANALYSIS_OF_TUBER_STORAGE_TECHNIQUES_IN_AFRICA_A_REVIEW
  24. https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/energy/files/2016/05/BenefitsAdjustableSpeedFanBulkPotatoStorage.pdf
  25. https://spudman.com/article/storage-evolution/
  26. https://www.potatonewstoday.com/2025/04/07/the-future-of-potato-storage-notes-on-advances-in-modern-ventilation-energy-efficiency-and-a-future-that-waits-around-the-corner/
  27. https://www.techmark-inc.com/sugarbeet-storage.html
  28. https://agrovent.com/blog/efficient-beet-storage-and-ventilation-systems-by-agrovent/
  29. https://www.almanac.com/content/root-cellars-types-and-storage-tips
  30. https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1030953-real-time-sensing-of-potato-postharvest-quality-for-crop-loss-management-in-bulk-storage-environment.html
  31. https://www.coldstorageinchina.com/potato-cold-storage-1000-ton-cost/
  32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44187-025-00587-0
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272327070_Effectiveness_of_three_different_storage_structures_and_curing_process_for_the_storage_of_sweet_potato_Ipomoea_batatas_in_Ghana
  34. https://www.academia.edu/97468583/Comparative_analysis_of_hybrid_underground_pit_storage_structure_for_yam_and_sweet_potato_tubers
  35. https://www.greenclimate.fund/document/climate-resilient-aggregation-storage-warehousing-receipts-and-trading-facility-dry-grains
  36. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/cultivating_climate_resilience_on_farms_and_ranches.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.