Hubbry Logo
Swift parrotSwift parrotMain
Open search
Swift parrot
Community hub
Swift parrot
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Swift parrot
Swift parrot
Swift parrot
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Swift parrot, swift waylitja
A swift parrot in eucalypt feeding on lerp in Hobart, TAS.
Swift parrot close-up
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Psittaciformes
Family: Psittaculidae
Tribe: Platycercini
Genus: Lathamus
Lesson, 1830
Species:
L. discolor
Binomial name
Lathamus discolor
(Shaw, 1790)
Distribution of the swift parrot
From Atlas of Living Australia
Synonyms[2]

Psittacus discolor Shaw, 1790
Psittacus sanguinolentus Kerr, 1792
Psittacus lathami Bechstein, 1811
Psittacus humeralis Bechstein, 1811
Psittacus banksianus Vieillot, 1818
Psittacus australis Kuhl 1820
Lathamus rubrifrons Lesson, 1830

migrant in Canberra, ACT

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor), also known by the palawa kani name swift waylitja,[3][4] is a species of broad-tailed parrot, found only in southeastern Australia. The species breeds in Tasmania during the summer and migrates north to southeastern mainland Australia from Griffith-Warialda in New South Wales and west to Adelaide in the winter. It is a nomadic migrant, and it settles in an area only when there is food available. The Swift Parrot was voted 2023 Bird of the Year in The Guardian Australia and BirdLife Australia's biennial poll.

The species is critically endangered,[5][6] and the severe predation by introduced sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps) on breeding females and nests in some locations has demonstrated an unexpected but potentially serious new threat. Genetic evidence for the effective population size suggests that the minimum potential population size is now around 300–500 individual swift parrots.[7][8] This supports the results of earlier studies that use demographic information about swift parrots to predict that the species could be extinct by 2031.[5][9]

Habitat for the critically endangered swift parrot is being "knowingly destroyed" by logging because of government failures to manage the species' survival.[10]

Denominations

[edit]

The swift parrot's name is related to its speed during the flight and wing. The name swift waylitja is derived from the palawa kani word waylitja which means parrot.[11][12]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The surgeon John White described the swift parrot in 1790 as the red-shouldered paroquet (Psittacus discolor).[13] It was placed in the genus Lathamus by René Primevère Lesson in 1830.

Despite their superficial resemblance to lorikeets in appearance and behaviour, the swift parrot belongs to tribe Platycercini, making them more closely related to rosellas than to lorikeets.[14] Like lorikeets, they possess brush-tipped tongues, although the "bristles" or papillae are shorter and more localised.[15] Their close resemblance to more distantly-related genera is an example of convergent evolution.[16]

A 2011 genetic study including nuclear and mitochondrial DNA found that the swift parrot was an early offshoot from a lineage giving rise to the genera Prosopeia, Eunymphicus and Cyanoramphus, diverging around 14 million years ago.[17]

"Swift parrot" has been designated the official common name by the International Ornithologists' Union (IOC).[18]

Description

[edit]

The swift parrot is about 25 centimetres (10 in) long and has long pointed wings and long tapering tail feathers.[19] It is mainly green with bluish crown and red on the face above and below the beak. The adult female is slightly duller, and the juvenile has a dark brown iris and a pale orange bill.[20] The forehead to throat is crimson and there is also crimson patch at the top, edge of the wing. They are noisy, always active and showy, and are very fast with their direct flight.[21]

Breeding

[edit]

The species breeds in Tasmania from September to February. It nests in tree cavities, but is highly selective in the types of cavities it uses as nests. It prefers cavities with small entrances, deep chambers and wide floors.[22] Tree cavities with these traits are rare and comprise only 5% of the available cavities in Tasmanian forests.[22] These cavities are more likely to occur in large trees.[23] These characteristics of tree cavities are important for passive defense of their nests against native Tasmanian predators.[24] Tree cavities suitable for nesting are highly vulnerable to disturbance. Wildfire caused the collapse of 62.8% of known swift parrot nest cavities (and 48.6% of nesting trees).[25] Deforestation (primarily driven by native forest logging) has been an important contemporary cause of habitat loss for swift parrots. In just one area of swift parrot breeding habitat, the southern forests, 33% of total forest cover was lost/disturbed by logging between 1996–2016, and 23% of potential swift parrot nesting habitat was logged over this same time period.[6] The local extent of deforestation is also positively correlated with other threats to the parrots like predation by sugar gliders.[26]

A juvenile swift parrot in Tasmania.

Swift parrots select where to breed in Tasmania based on the local availability of both food and nesting sites.[27][28] The parrots settle wherever in Tasmania their preferred food (nectar from flowering Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus ovata) is abundant, but birds can only breed where suitable nesting sites are also available nearby.[28] Because swift parrots prefer to breed in the most resource rich patch of food, they are able to rear their nestlings in the 'best' conditions each year.[29] Successful swift parrot nests have a mean clutch sizes of 3.8 eggs, and produce 3.2 fledglings, equating to breeding success of 86.9%.[29] However sugar gliders, which are introduced to Tasmania,[30] are a major nest predator of swift parrots.[26] Sugar gliders can result in locally severe parrot nesting failure, and there is a positive relationship between the severity of glider predation and land-cover of mature forest within 500m of a swift parrot nest.[26] This relationship means that in locations where forest cover is low and disturbed, nest failure of swift parrots can be as high as 100%.[26] Sugar gliders are tolerant of forest disturbance, and have high rates of occupancy of swift parrot habitat in Tasmania.[31] On offshore islands where sugar gliders are absent, swift parrots have higher breeding success.[26]

Distribution

[edit]

Genetic evidence has shown that the swift parrot is a single, genetically mixed and nomadic population that moves around the landscape each year.[32] Because they are nomadic, swift parrots can occur across a very large potential area, but settlement at a given location depends on the local availability of food.[27][33] However, in the Tasmanian breeding range, swift parrots need both food and suitable nesting sites to occur in close proximity in order to nest at a given site.[28] The swift parrot migrates each year across Bass Strait between Tasmania and the mainland of Australia. They arrive in Tasmania during September and return to south-eastern Australia during March and April.[21] They can be found as far north as south-eastern Queensland and as far west as Adelaide in South Australia, although recent sightings have been restricted to the south-eastern part of the state. Because swift parrots are nomadic migrants,[27] their occurrence at any one location are difficult to predict. Although they will repeatedly return to the same locations, local occurrence may only happen intermittently depending on whether or not food (flowering trees) is available in a given year.[27]

Important Bird Areas

[edit]
Swift Lorikeet (Lathamus discolor) illustrated by Elizabeth Gould (1804–1841) for John Gould's (1804–1881) Birds of Australia (1972 Edition, 8 volumes).

BirdLife International has identified the following sites as being important for swift parrots:[34]

New South Wales
Victoria
Tasmania

Habitat

[edit]
Mudgereeba, SE Queensland, Australia

Usually inhabiting: forests, woodlands, agricultural land and plantations, and also in urban areas.

Diet

[edit]

Swift parrots are primarily nectar feeders, preferring nectar from flowering Eucalyptus spp. In Tasmania, their settlement of breeding habitat is regulated by the occurrence of flowering in their two main food trees Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus ovata.[27] In the winter, their habitat use is broader, with foraging occurring on a range of flowering Eucalyptus spp. across southeastern mainland Australia.[33][35]

Conservation status

[edit]

Modelling of demographic data predicted that the swift parrot is Critically Endangered.[5] Further modelling showed that other aspects of their life history (sex ratio bias and shared paternity) makes their population declines worse than originally predicted.[9] Genetic evidence showed there is only one swift parrot population, so threats at different times and places can potentially act on the entire population.[32] Although expert opinion has estimated the species population size as approximately 2,000 individuals,[36] extensive genetic evidence suggests this is overly optimistic, and that the (minimum) census size of the population may be around 300–500 individuals.[7][8] Severe deforestation of their breeding range has been long recognised as the principal threat to the species.[37] Logging has already had severe impacts on habitat availability in recent decades[6] and there is evidence that up to 23% of swift parrot breeding habitat has been logged just in the Southern Forests region of Tasmania over the last 20 years.[6] Deforestation also affects the rate of predation by sugar gliders – where mature forest cover is diminished, parrots suffer worse predation rates.[26] Sugar glider predation is worst where logging is severe; these threats interact in a synergistic manner.[26]

Given the severity of deforestation across the breeding range,[6] and the relationship between deforestation and sugar glider predation intensity,[26] habitat loss in critical breeding areas of Tasmania may be the species most severe threat. Unfortunately, there is evidence that weak and ineffective policy for protection of threatened species in Tasmania's logged forests is likely to continue to threaten the swift parrot into the future.[38]

Matthew Webb and Dejan Stojanovic, two of the Eureka prize finalists from the Australian National University's Difficult Bird Research Group, say governments have stalled on management plans that would protect known feeding and nesting habitat in Tasmania.[39] The researchers analysed logging in Tasmania's southern forests during the 20-year course of the previous regional forest agreement. They found that a third of the eucalypt forest in this area had been logged between 1997 and 2016 and a quarter of old growth trees that provide nesting habitat for swift parrots had been cleared. "It is very clear that critical breeding habitat is being logged and that current logging regimes are not sustainable," the paper states.

Australia

[edit]

Swift parrots are listed as Endangered on the Australian Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), which has been criticised for failing to protect them and other threatened species.[40]

Victoria

[edit]

The swift parrot is listed as threatened on the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act (1988).[41] Under this Act, an Action Statement for the recovery and future management of this species has been prepared.[42]

  • On the 2007 advisory list of threatened vertebrate fauna in Victoria, the swift parrot was listed as Endangered.[43]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Swift parrot

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) is a small, nectarivorous parrot endemic to southeastern Australia, distinguished by its rapid flight and annual migration between summer breeding grounds in Tasmania and winter foraging habitats on the mainland.
Breeding occurs primarily in eucalypt forests along Tasmania's southeastern coast from September to March, with pairs nesting in tree hollows and feeding on nectar and lerps from species such as Eucalyptus globulus and E. ovata.
In autumn, the entire population—estimated to have declined rapidly—migrates northward up to 5,000 kilometers to woodlands in New South Wales and Victoria, where it exploits flowering eucalypts in dry sclerophyll forests, parks, and urban areas.
Listed as critically endangered since 2016, the swift parrot's survival is imperiled by ongoing habitat destruction through native forest logging in breeding areas and invasive nest predation by sugar gliders, with population models forecasting potential extinction without intervention.

Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Classification and Etymology

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) belongs to the order Psittaciformes, family , subfamily Platycercinae, and is the sole species in the monotypic genus Lathamus. Its full taxonomic classification is as follows: Kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Aves, order Psittaciformes, family , subfamily Platycercinae, genus Lathamus, species discolor. The species was first described in 1790 by George Shaw as Psittacus discolor, based on specimens from documented by John White, though the genus was later reassigned to honor English ornithologist John Latham. The genus name Lathamus derives from John Latham, who provided early descriptions of the bird in his 1781 work A General Synopsis of Birds, recognizing its distinct swift flight and . The specific epithet discolor, meaning "of different colors" in Latin, alludes to the parrot's striking contrast between its predominantly green body and vivid red facial patches, yellow undertail, and blue flight feathers. The common name "swift parrot" reflects its agile, fast-flying behavior during migration, distinguishing it from slower congeners in the parrot family. This underscores its morphological and behavioral uniqueness within , where it exhibits traits intermediate between broad-tailed parrots and lorikeets, such as a brush-tipped for nectar feeding despite lacking the specialized lorikeet jaw structure.

Genetic and Phylogenetic Insights

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) comprises a monotypic within the family , with molecular phylogenetic analyses positioning it among Australasian and highlighting convergent adaptations for nectarivory, such as a brush-tipped , distinct from those in true lorikeets (subfamily ) due to retention of a muscular . These traits reflect parallel evolutionary responses to similar dietary pressures rather than close shared ancestry with lorikeets, as inferred from broader parrot phylogenies incorporating mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Population genetic studies indicate a single panmictic breeding spanning and , with no significant genetic structure despite nomadic migrations, based on genotyping of samples collected over six years from breeding sites. (Ne) estimates derived from seven loci across this dataset revealed critically low values, signaling elevated risk and vulnerability to events, with temporal sibship methods yielding Ne approximations below 500 individuals. Comparative analyses using the same 324 individuals genotyped at 3,761 (SNP) loci versus microsatellites demonstrated that SNPs provide more precise Ne estimates due to greater marker , though both marker types confirmed persistently small Ne consistent with observed declines. A chromosome-level assembly for L. discolor, completed in 2024 using PacBio HiFi reads from a specimen, spans approximately 1.2 Gb with scaffold N50 of 52 Mb, enabling annotation of 18,299 protein-coding genes and facilitating future investigations into adaptive traits like migration and nectarivory. The associated complete mitochondrial (17,040 bp) and multi-tissue transcriptomes further support conservation by identifying functional genomic variation potentially linked to resilience, underscoring the ' genetic homogeneity and the need for targeted interventions to mitigate erosion of diversity.

Physical Characteristics

Plumage and Morphology

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) is a slim, medium-sized parrot measuring approximately 25 cm in length, with a wingspan of 32 to 36 cm and a weight ranging from 50 to 74 g. Its plumage is predominantly bright green, with crimson patches on the forehead, throat, and chin bordered by yellow, a dark blue crown, and yellow-green cheeks. Red markings also appear on the shoulders, wing bend, and underwing coverts, which are scarlet and conspicuous in flight, while the tail is long, pointed, and purple-red. Morphologically adapted for swift aerial movement and nectarivory, it features angular pointed wings, a streamlined body, a short curved bill, and a specialized brush-tipped tongue. Adult males exhibit brighter and more extensive red facial and underbody plumage compared to females, which are slightly duller overall with reduced red extent and a creamy white underwing stripe. Juveniles possess even duller plumage than adult females, featuring muted red markings, a brown iris, and a brown bill, with a pale pinkish wash on the undertail coverts.

Flight and Adaptations

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) exhibits flight characteristics suited to its nomadic , with rapid, direct bursts from cover and sustained over long distances to track seasonal food resources. Individuals have been observed reaching speeds of up to 88 km/h, enabling efficient coverage of expansive foraging areas. This velocity, combined with agile maneuvers in the outer canopy of eucalypts, facilitates access to and prey while minimizing energy expenditure during nomadic movements on the mainland. Morphological adaptations enhance aerodynamic efficiency and maneuverability. The species possesses long, slender, pointed wings that support high-speed, sustained flight, including crossings of —approximately 240 km—in flocks during daylight hours, typically requiring about five hours. A long, slender, stiff tail, akin to that of lorikeets, provides stability and precise control during rapid ascents, descents, and hovering near flowering branches. These traits, evolved in conjunction with nectarivory, allow the to pollinate trees like the Tasmanian blue gum () while traversing variable wind conditions over water and land. Migration underscores these adaptations' functionality, with post-breeding departures from in late February leading to dispersals across southeastern , occasionally extending over 4,000 km round-trip to coastal southeast —the longest recorded for any . Such journeys, undertaken annually from to , rely on the bird's capacity for flight, flock coordination, and opportunistic shifts to exploit ephemeral flows, though increasingly constrains these movements.

Geographic Distribution

Breeding Range in Tasmania

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) breeds exclusively in Tasmania, with its range primarily concentrated along the east and southeast coasts, mirroring the distribution of Tasmanian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) forests. Breeding sites extend from St Helens in the northeast to Southport in the southeast, encompassing offshore islands such as Bruny and Maria Islands. Annual variation in breeding distribution occurs due to fluctuating availability of from flowering eucalypts and suitable nest hollows in mature trees. While core habitat aligns with blue gum-dominated grassy forests, sporadic breeding has been recorded in northwest and western forests when local conditions align with and nesting needs. In the 2023-24 season, populations were notably concentrated in southern forests and the aforementioned islands, correlating with peak flowering intensity. Nesting occurs in tree hollows of large eucalypts within these regions, typically from to , with habitat selection driven by proximity to abundant lerp insects and nectar sources on E. globulus. The extent of occupied breeding habitat has been modeled to show dynamic occupancy, influenced by annual resource pulses rather than fixed geographic boundaries. Fragmentation from historical clearance for and has reduced available sites, contributing to population pressures.

Non-Breeding Migration to Mainland Australia

The Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) migrates annually from to following the breeding season, which spans September to January. Departure from begins as early as late February, with most birds crossing in small flocks by March to April to reach non-breeding areas during the austral winter. Return migration to commences in early . On the mainland, the species disperses broadly across eucalypt woodlands and forests, with the core non-breeding range encompassing box-ironbark forests in Victoria and coastal to western slopes regions in New South Wales. Smaller numbers occur in the Australian Capital Territory, southeastern South Australia, and southern Queensland. This distribution reflects opportunistic movements rather than fixed routes, as birds track spatially variable food resources across a landscape spanning multiple states and territories. Migration is driven by the need to exploit winter nectar and lerp resources from flowering eucalypts, such as grey box (Eucalyptus microcarpa), yellow gum (E. leucoxylon), and white box (E. albens), which are scarce in during this period. Annual variability in non-breeding locations correlates with eucalypt flowering , influenced by rainfall and temperature; for instance, conditions in 2002 and 2009 concentrated birds in coastal refugia. Such flexibility allows to environmental fluctuations but exposes the population to patchy habitat loss across this extensive range.

Habitat Requirements

Preferred Forest Types

The Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) primarily inhabits eucalypt-dominated forests and woodlands, selecting sites based on the availability of mature trees with hollows for nesting and profuse flowering for nectar foraging. In its Tasmanian breeding range, it favors dry sclerophyll forests along the southeast coast, particularly those dominated by Tasmanian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus), which supply both nesting cavities in large, old-growth trees and seasonal nectar resources. These forests often occur in a narrow near-coastal band between Swansea and Orford, where blue gum distribution aligns closely with observed nesting densities. Additional breeding habitat includes stringybark (Eucalyptus obliqua), white gum (Eucalyptus viminalis), and gum-topped stringybark (Eucalyptus delegatensis) associations, though blue gum remains the dominant preferred type due to its higher frequency of mast flowering events critical for breeding success. During non-breeding migration to mainland southeastern , the species shifts to dry woodlands, with a strong preference for box-ironbark forests comprising species such as white box (E. albens), yellow box (E. melliodora), and grey box (E. microcarpa), which provide lerp insects, , and winter flowering. Swamp mahogany () woodlands along coastal fringes also attract foraging flocks, especially in , supporting higher densities where flowering synchronizes with arrival in April–May. While adaptable to wetter eucalypt forests if food is abundant, the avoids heavily logged or fragmented stands lacking large trees (>50 cm ), as these reduce hollow availability and foraging efficiency.

Microhabitat Features

Swift parrots select microhabitats characterized by large, mature eucalypt trees with structural features supporting both nesting and foraging needs. In breeding areas of eastern Tasmania, nesting occurs in tree hollows of eucalypts such as Eucalyptus obliqua, E. globulus, and E. pulchella, where trees exhibit signs of senescence including dead limbs and greater than 20% dead crown branches. These nest trees have a mean diameter at breast height (DBH) of 105 cm (range 33–202 cm) and mean height of 23 m (range 10–45 m), typically containing at least five potential hollows, with a mean of 8.6. Preferred hollows feature small entrances approximately 5 cm in diameter, deep chambers around 40 cm, and floors about 12 cm wide, often positioned 14 m above ground (range 5–40 m), with 82% between 6–20 m; 70% occur in branches rather than trunks, predominantly as knotholes or branch stubs. Nest sites are situated in close proximity—within about 10 km—to flowering foraging resources to minimize energy expenditure during breeding. For foraging microhabitat, swift parrots preferentially exploit large trees with DBH of 60 cm or greater, as these provide higher flowering frequency and intensity essential for and lerp resources. In , breeding foraging focuses on E. globulus (Tasmanian blue gum) and E. ovata (black gum), with parrots selecting trees approximately 40% larger than random available trees. Non-breeding microhabitats on , such as box-ironbark woodlands, emphasize retention of mature eucalypts including E. leucoxylon (yellow gum) and E. tricarpa (red ironbark), aiming for densities of at least five trees per hectare exceeding 60 cm DBH across age classes to sustain lerp and availability. These features align with the species' nomadic behavior, tracking episodic flowering events in structurally complex, old-growth forests where hollow availability and canopy resources overlap. Hollow formation in suitable trees requires 100+ years, underscoring the reliance on long-unharvested stands for microhabitat persistence.

Foraging Ecology

Primary Food Sources

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) primarily consumes from the flowers of species, which provides the bulk of its carbohydrate intake during periods of high floral abundance. Lerps, the crystalline excretions produced by psyllid insects (Psyllidae) on eucalypt foliage, serve as another key food source, offering accessible sugars when availability fluctuates. These dietary staples support the parrot's nomadic strategy, with preferences tied to trees exhibiting high flowering intensity and lerp density. In breeding grounds in , nectar from Tasmanian blue gum () dominates the diet, coinciding with peak flowering from July to October. On the non-breeding mainland range, the parrots target from species such as swamp mahogany (), spotted gum (), forest red gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis), mugga ironbark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon), and white box (Eucalyptus albens). , a sweet sap leakage from damaged eucalypt bark, supplements the diet during nectar shortages, while incidental consumption of insects, fruits, and seeds occurs but constitutes a minor proportion. Observations indicate that lerp often involves stripping foliage to access psyllid colonies, highlighting its nutritional importance equivalent to nectar in provision.

Seasonal and Behavioral Variations

During the breeding season from September to March in Tasmania, swift parrots (Lathamus discolor) primarily forage on nectar and pollen from flowering Tasmanian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) and black gum (E. ovata), selecting trees with abundant blooms and nesting in proximity to these resources to minimize energy expenditure. This specialization aligns with the peak flowering period of these eucalypts, providing high-energy food essential for reproduction, with birds exhibiting territorial behavior around prime flowering patches. In the non-breeding period from to May, most swift parrots migrate across to southeastern , where they adopt a nomadic strategy in dry forests and woodlands, tracking irregular flowering events of such as grey box (E. microcarpa) and also consuming lerps—sweet exudates from psyllids—as a supplementary protein-rich resource when is scarce. This dietary shift reflects adaptive behavioral flexibility, with birds forming small to medium-sized flocks to exploit ephemeral food patches, contrasting the more localized, pair-based during breeding. Overall, these variations are driven by the unpredictable and seasonal availability of eucalypt nectar, prompting irruptive movements and dietary opportunism, including occasional intake of and , to sustain the amid varying resource pulses across their range. A minority of individuals remain in year-round, potentially relying on alternative low-flowering resources, though this exposes them to heightened competition from like honey bees.

Reproductive Biology

Breeding Cycle and Sites

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) is a seasonal breeder, arriving in Tasmania from its mainland Australian wintering grounds in early to mid-August, with breeding commencing in September and extending through January, occasionally into February depending on local conditions and food availability. The core breeding period peaks from October to December, aligning with the flowering of primary nectar sources such as Tasmanian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) and black gum (E. ovata), which provide essential foraging resources for courtship, egg-laying, and early chick-rearing. Females typically lay clutches of up to six eggs in a single brood, with an average of three fledglings surviving per successful attempt, though overall productivity is limited by factors such as nest predation. Post-breeding, adults and juveniles disperse within Tasmania into January before departing en masse across Bass Strait from late February to March, returning to non-breeding sites on the mainland. Breeding sites are concentrated in the east and southeast of , mirroring the distribution of E. globulus forests along the coast from St Helens to , with smaller populations recorded near Deloraine in the north and sporadically in the northwest, west coast, and . These areas feature dry eucalypt forests or woodlands, often in remnant patches as small as 0.01 km², where pairs select territories proximate to profuse flowering events for sustained and availability. Nests are excavated or reused in large hollows within living or dead trunks and branches of mature eucalypts, including (E. obliqua), white peppermint (E. pulchella), white gum (E. viminalis), and gum-topped (E. delegatensis), with multiple pairs sometimes nesting in close aggregation within suitable stands. Site fidelity is low, with individual hollows rarely reused across seasons, reflecting the species' opportunistic response to variable floral resources.

Nesting Success and Predation

Nesting success for the swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) is critically low on the Tasmanian mainland, primarily due to predation by the introduced (Petaurus breviceps), which targets incubating females and destroys eggs or nestlings. Sugar gliders account for over 50% mortality of nesting females annually, often by entering tree hollows to kill the female on the nest, leading to nest failure and a skewed adult favoring males. This predation pressure has driven population viability analyses projecting an 86.9% decline in swift parrot numbers over three generations, underscoring the causal link between glider incursions and reproductive failure. In areas with high cover of mature , nest survival rates improve, as denser canopies and structural complexity may hinder glider access to hollows, though empirical monitoring confirms predation remains pervasive even in preferred habitats. Nest cavity morphology influences outcomes; swift parrots select hollows where smaller entrance diameters correlate with greater depth and floor area, potentially offering partial defense against gliders, but these features do not fully mitigate the threat. On predator-free islands such as Bruny and Maria Islands, exceeds mainland rates, with high fledging outputs when nesting occurs there, though such events are infrequent and insufficient to offset continental losses. The female-biased mortality exacerbates mating disruptions, shifting the species from toward or due to female scarcity, further reducing per-nest productivity as unpaired males or multiple mating attempts yield lower overall fledging success. Conservation interventions, including glider-proof nest boxes installed in low-predation zones, have shown promise in enhancing local breeding outcomes by excluding gliders while accommodating access. Other predators, such as feral cats or foxes, pose secondary risks during non-breeding phases, but impacts dominate nesting failures. Long-term monitoring emphasizes that retention alone cannot reverse declines without targeted predator control.

Population Estimates and Dynamics

In the late , surveys estimated the swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) breeding population at approximately 1,320 pairs in , equating to a total population of around 5,000 individuals when including non-breeding birds. By the mid-1990s, this had declined to 940 breeding pairs, reflecting an initial documented reduction of about 29% over roughly a decade, based on targeted nest and occupancy surveys in key breeding forests. These estimates, drawn from field observations by researchers such as (1989) and Brereton (1996), highlighted early vulnerabilities in the ' migratory cycle, with breeding concentrated in Tasmania's eastern forests and non-breeding ranges on . Subsequent analyses through the confirmed a persistent downward trajectory, with population viability models projecting further losses driven by cumulative degradation and nest predation rates exceeding 50% annually for females. Monitoring from 2009 to 2015 indicated a negative temporal abundance-occupancy relationship across surveyed sites, underscoring accelerating declines prior to intensified conservation interventions.

Recent Assessments (Post-2020)

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) was assessed as Critically Endangered by the in assessments reaffirmed through 2023, with no upward reclassification despite ongoing monitoring. A 2022 analysis of long-term ecological data from nesting sites projected a 92.3% over 11 years under current conditions, attributing this primarily to nest predation and factors, while emphasizing improved nest survival in areas with high . Population monitoring from 2009 to 2022, culminating in an August 2024 report, estimated 750 mature individuals (range: 300–1,000), confirming a continuing decline driven by loss and predation. A July 2024 Victorian action statement similarly pegged the wild population at approximately 750 birds and declining, incorporating population viability analysis that highlighted risks from low breeding success. Surveys in key breeding areas during February–March 2025 focused on bud availability in swift parrot important breeding areas (SPIBAs), revealing variable resources but underscoring persistent threats to . Habitat assessments post-2020 quantified ongoing losses, with 717 hectares of important breeding and migratory lost in the over the preceding two decades as of February 2025, equating to 1.4% of critical extent. A March 2025 study of breeding range forests reported 13,567 km² of cover as of 2020, with 74% classified as mature but subject to degradation from fire and . Modeling from April 2025 projected a 16% over 50 years from winter loss in alone, with sensitivity to rates; halving current loss could mitigate to 8%, while doubling would accelerate to 30%. The 2024 National Recovery Plan integrated these data, prioritizing anti-predation measures and amid evidence of factors exacerbating declines.

Conservation Challenges

Threat Assessment

The Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) is classified as critically endangered by the IUCN due to ongoing population declines driven by multiple interacting threats, including , predation, and environmental changes. These factors have reduced the species' population to an estimated 750 individuals as of recent assessments, with breeding severely compromised.

Habitat Alteration from Logging

Commercial in Tasmania's native eucalypt forests, particularly those dominated by and E. ovata, has resulted in substantial loss and fragmentation of the Swift Parrot's breeding . Between 2001 and 2023, significant occurred in known breeding areas, with rates accelerating post-2014 despite protective measures. The National Recovery Plan identifies activities as a primary ongoing , noting that reduces nesting site availability and food resources during the critical breeding season from to March. Cumulative impacts from habitat clearance have diminished connectivity, forcing parrots to travel greater distances for foraging and increasing vulnerability to other stressors.

Predation by Introduced Species

Introduced sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps), originally from , pose the most acute threat to breeding Swift Parrots by preying on adult females and nestlings in . Studies indicate that over 50% of nesting females may be killed by sugar gliders annually in heavily infested areas, skewing adult sex ratios toward males and reducing reproductive output. This predation is exacerbated by habitat alteration, which increases glider densities through and understory changes favoring the predator. The National Recovery Plan prioritizes glider control measures, such as targeted , to mitigate these impacts, though implementation challenges persist due to the gliders' rapid reproduction and wide dispersal.

Climate and Other Stochastic Factors

Climate change threatens Swift Parrot survival by altering the timing and extent of eucalypt flowering, which synchronizes with the ' migratory and breeding cycles. Projections suggest that up to 25% of current nesting may become climatically unsuitable by 2100 due to shifts in and patterns disrupting nectar availability. events, including bushfires and droughts, further compound risks by destroying sites and nests; for instance, the 2019-2020 Australian fires indirectly affected mainland winter habitats. Additional pressures such as vehicle collisions and competition from other nectarivores add to mortality, though their quantitative impacts remain less studied compared to habitat and predation threats.

Habitat Alteration from Logging

The swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) relies on mature and old-growth Eucalyptus globulus (blue gum) forests in eastern Tasmania for breeding, where these trees provide essential hollows for nesting and nectar from flowering canopies for foraging. Logging operations, including selective harvesting and clear-felling, directly remove these large, senescent trees, which take over 100 years to develop suitable nest hollows, thereby reducing available breeding sites and fragmenting contiguous habitat patches critical for the species' nomadic movements. Forestry practices in have led to extensive degradation of swift parrot breeding , with regenerated eucalypt stands from post-logging replanting providing inferior resources due to smaller sizes, lower hollow availability, and altered flowering patterns that fail to support breeding densities observed in unlogged forests. A 2025 analysis quantified this degradation as equivalent to outright loss, revealing that human-induced changes across the ' core breeding range have compounded historical from and earlier logging phases spanning the 19th and 20th centuries. Despite the swift parrot's uplisting to critically endangered status under Australian federal law in 2017, policy frameworks have permitted ongoing in identified high-risk areas, including coupes with confirmed parrot territories, contributing to an estimated annual attrition rate that outpaces natural regeneration. Conservation assessments from 2023–2024 documented the clearance of thousands of hectares of priority blue gum by state operations, highlighting failures in integrating species-specific protections into wood production plans and underscoring the causal link between such alterations and observed nesting failures.

Predation by Introduced Species

The sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps), native to but introduced to in the , represents the principal introduced predator threatening the Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor), particularly during the breeding season in Tasmanian eucalypt forests. Nesting females are disproportionately targeted, with sugar gliders responsible for approximately 85% of documented nest predation events on parrots in mainland , often chewing into nest hollows to kill incubating or brooding birds. This predation exerts female-biased mortality, skewing adult sex ratios toward males (up to 6:1 in some studies) and disrupting the species' historically monogamous , which has shifted toward and reduced breeding success. Predation intensity correlates with ; in degraded or edge-dominated forests, incursions into nests increase due to higher glider densities and easier access, with models projecting population declines of over 90% within decades absent intervention. Experimental predator-proof nest boxes have demonstrated efficacy in reducing losses, allowing higher fledging rates, though scalability remains limited by the ' nomadic breeding . On mainland wintering grounds, feral (Felis catus) and European red (Vulpes vulpes) pose supplementary predation risks, particularly to foraging juveniles and adults, as these mammals are known to prey on small- to medium-sized birds including parrots; however, quantitative data specific to Swift Parrots is sparse compared to sugar glider impacts, with implicated in broader avian declines but not as a dominant driver for this species. National threat abatement plans prioritize and fox control, yet breeding-season predation by sugar gliders overshadows these as the acute demographic threat.

Climate and Other Stochastic Factors

Climate change alters the timing, intensity, and spatial patterns of eucalypt flowering, which provides critical nectar resources for the swift parrot during breeding and non-breeding periods, potentially desynchronizing food availability with the species' migratory cycle. Flowering of key species such as Eucalyptus globulus and E. ovata in Tasmania varies annually and is influenced by climatic variables like rainfall and temperature; projections indicate reduced synchrony under warmer, drier conditions, exacerbating food scarcity. These shifts remain poorly quantified but compound existing pressures on the species' foraging ecology. Drought events, intensified by variability, have driven adaptive responses in swift parrot distribution, such as extended migrations to refuge areas with persistent flowering. For instance, consecutive in Victoria during the early 2000s prompted birds to travel over 1,000 km northward to for resources, highlighting vulnerability to prolonged dry periods that suppress lerp and production. Such reduce overall suitability and increase energetic costs of movement, with potential carry-over effects on breeding success. Bushfires represent a major threat, capable of rapidly destroying vast tracts of breeding and habitat; the 2019–2020 Australian fires affected up to 20% of potential swift parrot range, delaying recovery of eucalypt flowering for decades in severely burned areas. Increased fire frequency and intensity, linked to anthropogenic , further diminish post-fire regeneration and nectar yields, amplifying risk for this small population. The swift parrot's limited numbers—estimated below 2,000 mature individuals—heighten susceptibility to these unpredictable events, as stochastic losses can trigger demographic Allee effects and without rapid recolonization. Other episodic factors, including cyclones or disease outbreaks, pose lesser but cumulative risks in fragmented habitats, though empirical data on their incidence remains sparse.

Recovery Efforts and Outcomes

The National Recovery Plan for the Swift Parrot, approved in 2024 jointly by Australian federal and state governments (, Victoria, ), outlines objectives to maintain breeding and foraging habitat, reduce threats including predation, and achieve a positive trend by 2032, with an estimated implementation cost of $14 million over five years (2022–2027). Key actions include protecting critical habitat through strategic plantings ($250,000 annually) and exclusion trials for predators ($100,000 annually), alongside annual progress reporting and a five-year review by 2027. 's Swift Parrot Recovery Project (2021–2025), funded at $250,000 per year, complements this by monitoring breeding seasons, protecting 260 hectares of habitat via conservation covenants on , planting 1,600 forage trees, and sequencing the species' genome to assess feasibility, with a report due in 2024.

Policy and Habitat Protection

Habitat-focused efforts emphasize conserving mature eucalypt forests in Tasmania's breeding range and mainland wintering sites, with over 100 hectares additionally protected under private covenants through the NRM South Saving Swift Parrots project (2018–2023), which also involved and climate modeling for flowering patterns. Identification of 30,000 hectares of suitable , including 16,000 hectares on unreserved private land, supports targeted , though Regional Forestry Agreements permit ongoing in some areas. BirdLife Australia has criticized the 2024 plan for inadequately halting in critical breeding zones, arguing it undermines recovery by allowing continued habitat loss despite the species' uplisting to critically endangered in 2016.

Captive Breeding and Reintroduction Trials

Captive breeding remains exploratory, with the 2024 national plan mandating an assessment of its necessity by 2027 ($75,000 allocation) based on ongoing genetic analysis, but no large-scale programs or reintroduction trials are currently active. Informal private breeding initiatives in were proposed in 2016 for potential reintroduction, but lack official endorsement or documented outcomes. In-situ efforts prioritize wild population viability over ex-situ intervention, reflecting challenges in replicating the species' migratory and nectar-dependent . Predator control targets introduced sugar gliders, responsible for low nest survival rates (around 17% without intervention), through density mapping, trapping trials, and exclusion methods, with research confirming higher nest success in glider-reduced areas featuring high mature forest cover. The NRM South project and Tasmania's initiative have advanced glider studies and control techniques, including community-led nest-box management. Outcomes have been limited, with the estimated at 300–1,000 individuals in 2020 (down from 2,000 in 2010) and predictions of further decline to under 100 by 2031 absent intensified measures. Monitoring from 2023–2024 showed a slight uptick in breeding abundance, including flocks of up to 50 birds, and a less severe decline trajectory than earlier models, attributable to localized protections, though overall trends remain negative due to persistent habitat degradation and predation. BirdLife Australia projects within 10 years if logging exemptions persist, highlighting tensions between conservation policy and forestry interests.

Policy and Habitat Protection

The Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) is listed as endangered under Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), requiring federal approval for actions likely to significantly impact its habitat or members. The National Recovery Plan for the species, approved on April 30, 2024, and jointly developed by the Australian, Tasmanian, Victorian, and Queensland governments, outlines strategies to protect breeding and foraging habitats across public and private land tenures. Key objectives include identifying and securing critical habitat areas by 2032, with priority actions such as mapping breeding sites, restricting developments in high-value zones, and implementing management interventions to mitigate forestry-related losses, including adjustments under Regional Forest Agreements that have reduced allowable timber harvests in Tasmanian native forests. The plan allocates approximately $125,000 annually for habitat protection efforts, coordinated by a national recovery team comprising government agencies and NGOs. In , where breeding occurs primarily in Tasmanian blue gum () forests, the state government funds a dedicated Swift Parrot Recovery Project with $250,000 annually from 2021 to 2025, focusing on enhancement and reduction in collaboration with partners like the Landscape Recovery Foundation and universities. Measures include conservation covenants securing 260 hectares on and plantings of 1,600 forage trees to bolster breeding resources, alongside spatial prioritization identifying 30,000 hectares of suitable for protection, of which 16,000 hectares are on unreserved private land. Logging in identified breeding areas is subject to EPBC assessments and state prescriptions, with federal interventions halting operations in specific coupes—such as a 2024 court-ordered pause in southern Tasmanian forests pending swift parrot impact evaluations—though Regional Forest Agreements provide exemptions for sustainable native forest harvesting, leading to ongoing disputes over adequacy. Monitoring under the recovery plan includes annual reporting and a five-year review by 2027 to evaluate condition and policy effectiveness, with actions integrated into broader ecosystem protections benefiting co-occurring . Despite these frameworks, sources acknowledge persistent pressures from , while independent assessments highlight gaps, as evidenced by repeated legal challenges from conservation groups documenting clearance post-approval.

Captive Breeding and Reintroduction Trials

In response to the swift parrot's critically endangered status and projected population decline to fewer than 200 individuals by 2026, conservationists have initiated preliminary efforts to establish an insurance population and explore supplementation options. Zoos Victoria, in partnership with BirdLife Australia and the Swift Parrot Recovery Team, has been assessing the viability of a since at least 2020, aiming to reduce risk through genetic management and potential releases alongside habitat restoration and threat abatement. Moonlit Sanctuary in Pearcedale, Victoria, commenced a small-scale breeding program by introducing two unrelated pairs of young swift parrots, leveraging expertise from successful of the congeneric (Neophema chrysogaster), with goals of increasing captive numbers for awareness and potential future wild augmentation. No breeding successes or fledging rates from this initiative have been publicly reported as of 2023. A private European initiative, coordinated by the Gesellschaft für Arterhaltende Vogelzucht since 2016, focuses on breeding healthy, non-mutated swift parrots through genetic profiling and screening for diseases like (PBFD), explicitly aiming to build a stock for possible reintroduction in collaboration with Australian in-situ researchers. This program emphasizes but operates outside formal national frameworks and has not contributed birds to Australian conservation to date. The 2024 Victorian action statement for the swift parrot identifies an urgent need for ex-situ programs to complement wild threat , recommending avoidance of in any captive stock. similarly proposes and artificial propagation as priority actions, contingent on monitoring breeding distribution and habitat . No formal reintroduction trials have been conducted, as recovery strategies under the 2024 National Recovery Plan prioritize in-situ interventions like predator exclusion and protection over releases, given the ' nomadic migrations and ongoing wild breeding in . Challenges include the parrot's specialized diet, high mobility, and vulnerability to predation post-release, which have delayed supplementation efforts in favor of stabilizing the estimated 300–1,000 wild individuals.

Debates on Management Approaches

Management approaches for the swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) are contentious, primarily centering on the trade-offs between native forest in 's breeding habitats and species recovery. Conservation organizations, including the Wilderness Society and BirdLife Tasmania, advocate for a moratorium on in all identified swift parrot breeding areas, arguing that industrial forestry remains the dominant threat despite the bird's critically endangered status, with an estimated breeding population of fewer than 1,000 individuals as of 2023. They contend that cumulative habitat loss—such as the 23% reduction in nesting habitat within Tasmania's Southern Forests Special Species Timber Area between 1997 and 2016 due to harvesting—exacerbates predation by introduced sugar gliders and precludes population recovery, dismissing adaptive forestry prescriptions as insufficient to halt fragmentation. In opposition, Sustainable Timber Tasmania and state forestry regulators promote an framework that integrates real-time acoustic monitoring, on-ground surveys, and operational adjustments to detect and safeguard active nests while permitting scheduled harvesting in production forests. This approach, outlined in their 2021–2026 Swift Parrot Management Plan, involves deploying over 40 acoustic recorders across logging coupes—yielding more than 10,000 hours of data in —and excluding operations near confirmed breeding sites during the season, with documented successes like fledgling detections in the Eastern Tiers in January 2025. Proponents assert this balances economic viability under Regional Forest Agreements with conservation, avoiding blanket bans that could undermine sustainable timber supply without proportionally benefiting the parrot, given other threats like glider predation. The 2024 National Recovery Plan, endorsed by federal and state governments, attempts reconciliation by prioritizing maintenance and glider control trials (e.g., allocating $350,000 annually for winter ) alongside monitoring, but it explicitly defers to existing arrangements and protects critical only outside dedicated zones, drawing criticism for evading direct reforms despite evidence of ongoing decline since the 2011 plan's failures. Independent analyses, such as a 2018 review, highlight systemic policy inertia permitting clearance even in high-value areas, fueling legal challenges like the January 2024 court-ordered halt in potential breeding forests south of . These disputes underscore empirical tensions: while targeted protections mitigate immediate nest losses, broader integrity demands unresolved scrutiny, with environmental advocates prioritizing risk over industry concessions and managers emphasizing verifiable, site-specific interventions.

References

  1. https://australian.museum/learn/animals/birds/swift-parrot/
  2. https://www.threatenedspecieslink.tas.gov.au/pages/swift-parrot.aspx
  3. https://nre.tas.gov.au/conservation/threatened-species-and-communities/lists-of-threatened-species/threatened-species-vertebrates/swift-parrot
  4. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/swift-parrot-lathamus-discolor
  5. https://birdlife.org.au/bird-profiles/swift-parrot/
  6. https://bie.ala.org.au/species/Lathamus%2Bdiscolor
  7. https://planetofbirds.com/psittaciformes-psittacidae-swift-parrot-lathamus-discolor/
  8. https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/species.jsp?avibaseid=F5E8A0CEB4D2CC74
  9. https://www.oiseaux.net/birds/swift.parrot.html
  10. https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/Lathamus_discolor
  11. https://www.worldbirdnames.com/bird/swift-parrot/12134.html
  12. https://www.swifft.net.au/resources/Swift%2520Parrot_A4%2520Bro_2024_v1.pdf
  13. https://birdkeeper.dk/artikler-om-papeg-jearter/23302971
  14. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/19284-Lathamus-discolor
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4130445/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790315001232
  17. https://www.nespthreatenedspecies.edu.au/media/rftl2a4l/2-2-genetic-evidence-confirms-severe-extinction-risk-for-critically-endangered-swift-parrots.pdf
  18. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/acv.12655
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.11102
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411239/
  21. https://bio-prd-naturekit-public-data.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/species_assessments/Lathamus_discolor_conservation_advice_10309.pdf
  22. https://www.marwell.org.uk/animals/swift-parrot/
  23. https://threatenedspecies.bionet.nsw.gov.au/profile?id=10455
  24. https://www.swifft.net.au/cb_pages/sp_swift_parrot.php
  25. https://www.rares.world/wp2/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Aves-Psittacidae-Lathamus-discolor-Swift-Parrot-2019CC-v-1.pdf
  26. https://parrots.org/encyclopedia/swift-parrot/
  27. https://birdlife.org.au/bird-profiles/swift-parrot
  28. https://wilderness.org.au/protecting-nature/endangered-animals-and-plants/the-swift-parrot
  29. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10561076
  30. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-recovery-plan-swift-parrot-2024.pdf
  31. https://www.threatenedspecieslink.tas.gov.au/Pages/Swift-parrot-breeding-activity-2022.aspx
  32. https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/Swift%2520Parrot%2520Monitoring%2520Data%2520Analysis%2520for%25202023-24%2520breeding%2520season.PDF
  33. https://www.difficultbirds.com/s/Webb-et-al-2012-nesting-requirements-of-the-swift-parrot.pdf
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Location-and-area-of-habitat-occupied-by-breeding-swift-parrots-based-on-occupancy-models_fig2_322258484
  35. https://www.swifft.net.au/cb_pages/swift_parrot.php
  36. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/lathamus-discolor-swift-parrot.pdf
  37. https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/SwiftParrotHabitat.pdf
  38. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/swift-parrot-background-doc.pdf
  39. https://www.greenfleet.com.au/blogs/news/swift-parrot-creating-critical-habitat
  40. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/swift-parrot-background-doc.doc
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263020616_Foraging_preferences_of_Swift_Parrots_on_Tasmanian_Blue-gum_Tree_size_flowering_frequency_and_flowering_intensity
  42. https://www.lls.nsw.gov.au/help-and-advice/natural-resource-management/threatened-species/swift-parrot
  43. https://bio-prd-naturekit-public-data.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/actionstmts/Swift_Parrot_AS_10309.pdf
  44. https://www.publish.csiro.au/pc/pdf/PC050158
  45. https://aussieanimals.com/profiles/swift-parrot-lathamus-discolour/
  46. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/swipar1/cur/introduction
  47. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/3e126491-7bc9-413d-b0c3-2a32642f791d/content
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000632071500110X
  49. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.12214
  50. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2656.12969
  51. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12834
  52. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01584197.2017.1311221
  53. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/env/pages/5e1da7da-3322-49d8-80d6-4b5210acb1d4/files/swift-parrot-year-3-scorecard.pdf
  54. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/[biodiversity](/page/Biodiversity)/threatened/recovery-plans/swift-parrot-2024
  55. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60aeedcba1139e1df81549c0/t/6704545f1b174e1d0c9871aa/1728337015991/Swift%2Bparrot%2Bmonitoring%2Band%2Btrend%2Banalysis_2009-2022_Final_August%2B2024.pdf
  56. https://nrmsouth.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Aug-2025-report.pdf
  57. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aec.70030
  58. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-92231-1
  59. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/csp2.70057
  60. https://theconversation.com/sugar-gliders-are-eating-swift-parrots-but-whats-to-blame-19555
  61. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1071/MU15094
  62. https://www.publish.csiro.au/pc/pdf/PC18020
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320799001007
  64. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/swift-parrot-sugar-glider-tasmania-logging-nest-spd
  65. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/tap-cat-report.pdf
  66. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/impacts-feral-cats.pdf
  67. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/recovery-plans/swift-parrot-2024
  68. https://www.difficultbirds.com/s/Responses-of-Critically-Endangered-migratory-Swift-Parrots-to-variable-winter-drought.pdf
  69. https://nre.tas.gov.au/conservation/threatened-species-and-communities/lists-of-threatened-species/threatened-species-vertebrates/swift-parrot-recovery-project
  70. https://nrmsouth.org.au/project/saving-swift-parrots/
  71. https://birdlife.org.au/news/swift-parrot-recovery-plan-undermined/
  72. http://www.parrotsdailynews.com/private-breeders-started-a-breeding-project-for-the-swift-parrot-lathamus-discolor/
  73. https://www.zoo.org.au/fighting-extinction/local-threatened-species/swift-parrot/
  74. https://moonlitsanctuary.com.au/swift-parrots-in-swift-decline/
  75. https://wilderness.org.au/news-events/swift-parrot-recovery-plan-again-favours-industrial-logging-over-conservation-all-but-guaranteeing-extinction-of-worlds-fastest-parrot
  76. https://sttas.com.au/priorities-programs/management-for-the-swift-parrot/
  77. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/10/tanya-plibersek-announced-swift-parrot-plan-without-showing-recovery-team-who-helped-develop-it
  78. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/jan/31/court-orders-temporary-halt-to-logging-in-tasmanian-forest-ahead-of-swift-parrot-case
  79. https://www.publish.csiro.au/pc/Fulltext/pc18020
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.