Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Tectonics of Mars
View on Wikipedia

Like the Earth, the crustal properties and structure of the surface of Mars are thought to have evolved through time; in other words, as on Earth, tectonic processes have shaped the planet. However, both the ways this change has happened and the properties of the planet's lithosphere are very different when compared to the Earth. Today, Mars is believed to be largely tectonically inactive. However, observational evidence and its interpretation suggests that this was not the case further back in Mars's geological history.
At the scale of the whole planet, two large scale physiographic features are apparent on the surface. The first is that the northern hemisphere of the planet is much lower than the southern, and has been more recently resurfaced – also implying that the crustal thickness beneath the surface is distinctly bimodal. This feature is referred to as the "hemispheric dichotomy". The second is the Tharsis rise, a massive volcanic province that has had major tectonic influences both on a regional and global scale in Mars's past. On this basis, the surface of Mars is often divided into three major physiographic provinces, each with different geological and tectonic characteristics: the northern plains, the southern highlands, and the Tharsis plateau. Much tectonic study of Mars seeks to explain the processes that led to the planet's division into these three provinces, and how their differing characteristics arose. Hypotheses proposed to explain how the two primary tectonic events may have occurred are usually divided into endogenic (arising from the planet itself) and exogenic (foreign to the planet, e.g., meteorite impact) processes.[2] This distinction occurs throughout the study of tectonics on Mars.
In general, Mars lacks unambiguous evidence that terrestrial-style plate tectonics has shaped its surface.[3] However, in some places magnetic anomalies in the Martian crust that are linear in shape and of alternating polarity have been detected by orbiting satellites. Some authors have argued that these share an origin with similar stripes found on Earth's seafloor, which have been attributed to gradual production of new crust at spreading mid-ocean ridges.[4] Other authors have argued that large-scale strike-slip fault zones can be identified on the surface of Mars (e.g., in the Valles Marineris trough), which can be likened to plate-bounding transform faults on Earth such as the San Andreas and Dead Sea faults. These observations provide some indication that at least some parts of Mars may have undergone plate tectonics deep in its geological past.[5]
Physiographic provinces
[edit]Southern highlands
[edit]The southern highlands are heavily cratered and separated from the northern plains by the global dichotomy boundary.[4] Strong magnetic stripes with alternating polarity run roughly east to west in the southern hemisphere, concentric with the south pole.[6] These magnetic anomalies are found in rocks dating from the first 500 million years in Mars's history, indicating that an intrinsic magnetic field would have ceased to exist before the early Noachian. The magnetic anomalies on Mars measure 200 km width, roughly ten times wider than those found on Earth.[6]
Northern plains
[edit]The northern plains are several kilometers lower in elevation than the southern highlands, and have a much lower crater density, indicating a younger surface age. The underlying crust is however thought to be the same age as that of the southern highlands. Unlike the southern highlands, magnetic anomalies in the northern plains are sparse and weak.[2]
Tharsis plateau
[edit]
The Tharsis plateau, which sits in the highland-lowland boundary, is an elevated region that covers roughly one quarter of the planet. Tharsis is topped by the largest shield volcanoes known in the Solar System. Olympus Mons stands 24 km tall and is nearly 600 km in diameter. The adjoining Tharsis Montes consists of Ascraeus, Pavonis, and Arsia. Alba Mons, at the northern end of the Tharsis plateau, is 1500 km in diameter, and stands 6 km above the surrounding plains. In comparison, Mauna Loa is merely 120 km wide but stands 9 km above the sea floor.[4]
The load of Tharsis has had both regional and global influences.[2] Extensional features radiating from Tharsis include graben several kilometers wide, and hundreds of meters deep, as well as enormous troughs and rifts up to 600 km wide and several kilometers deep. These graben and rifts are bounded by steeply dipping normal faults, and can extend for distances up to 4000 km. Their relief indicates that they accommodate small amounts of extension on the order of 100 m or less. It has been argued that these graben are surface expressions of deflated subsurface dikes.[7]
Circumferential to Tharsis are so-called wrinkle ridges.[2] These are compressional structures composed of linear asymmetric ridges that can be tens of kilometers wide and hundreds of kilometers long. Many aspects of these ridges appear to be consistent with terrestrial compressional features that involve surface folding overlying blind thrust faults at depth.[8] Wrinkle ridges are believed to accommodate small amounts of shortening on the order of 100 m or less. Larger ridges and scarps have also been identified on Mars. These features can be several kilometers high (as opposed to hundreds of meters high for wrinkle ridges), and are thought to represent large lithosphere-scale thrust faults.[9] Displacement ratios for these are ten times those of wrinkle ridges, with shortening estimated to be hundreds of meters to kilometers.
Approximately half of the extensional features on Mars formed during the Noachian, and have changed very little since, indicating that tectonic activity peaked early on and decreased with time. Wrinkle ridge formation both around Tharsis and in the eastern hemisphere is thought to have peaked in the Hesperian, likely due to global contraction attributed to cooling of the planet.[2]
Hemispheric dichotomy
[edit]Hypsometry
[edit]
Gravity and topography data show that crustal thickness on Mars is resolved into two major peaks, with modal thicknesses of 32 km and 58 km in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively.[10] Regionally, the thickest crust is associated with the Tharsis plateau, where crustal thickness in some areas exceeds 80 km, and the thinnest crust with impact basins. The major impact basins collectively make up a small histogram peak from 5 to 20 km.
The origin of the hemispheric dichotomy, which separates the northern plains from the southern highlands, has been subject to much debate. Important observations to take into account when considering its origin include the following: (1) The northern plains and southern highlands have distinct thicknesses, (2) the crust underlying the northern plains is essentially the same age as the crust of the southern highlands, and (3) the northern plains, unlike the southern highlands, contain sparse and weak magnetic anomalies. As will be discussed below, hypotheses for the formation of the dichotomy can largely be divided into endogenic and exogenic processes.[2]
Endogenic origins
[edit]
Endogenic hypotheses include the possibility of a very early plate tectonic phase on Mars.[11] Such a scenario suggests that the northern hemispheric crust is a relic oceanic plate. In the preferred reconstruction, a spreading center extended north of Terra Cimmeria between Daedalia Planum and Isidis Planitia. As spreading progressed, the Boreal plate broke into the Acidalia plate with south-dipping subducting beneath Arabia Terra, and the Ulysses plate with east-dipping subducting beneath Tempe Terra and Tharsis Montes. According to this reconstruction, the northern plains would have been generated by a single spreading ridge, with Tharsis Montes qualifying as an island arc.[4] However, subsequent investigations of this model show a general lack of evidence for tectonism and volcanism in areas where such activity was initially predicted.[12]
Another endogenic process used to explain the hemispheric dichotomy is that of primary crustal fractionation.[13] This process would have been associated with the formation of the Martian core, which took place immediately after planetary accretion. Nevertheless, such an early origin of the hemispheric dichotomy is challenged by the fact that only minor magnetic anomalies have been detected in the northern plains.[2]

Single plume mantle convection has also been invoked to explain the hemispheric dichotomy. This process would have caused substantial melting and crustal production above a single rising mantle plume in the southern hemisphere, resulting in a thickened crust. It has also been suggested that the formation of a highly viscous melt layer beneath the thickened crust in the southern hemisphere could lead to lithospheric rotation. This may have resulted in the migration of volcanically active areas toward the dichotomy boundary, and the subsequent placement and formation of the Tharsis plateau. The single plume hypothesis is also used to explain the presence of magnetic anomalies in the southern hemisphere, and the lack thereof in the northern hemisphere.[14]
Exogenic origins
[edit]Exogenic hypotheses involve one or more large impacts as being responsible for the lowering of the northern plains. Although a multiple-impact origin has been proposed,[15] it would have required an improbable preferential bombardment of the northern hemisphere.[2] It is also unlikely that multiple impacts would have been able to strip ejecta from the northern hemisphere, and uniformly strip the crust to a relatively consistent depth of 3 km.
Mapping of the northern plains and the dichotomy boundary shows that the crustal dichotomy is elliptical in shape.[16] This suggests that formation of the northern plains was caused by a single oblique mega-impact. This hypothesis is in agreement with numerical models of impacts in the 30-60° range, which are shown to produce elliptical boundary basins similar to the structure identified on Mars.[2] Demagnetization resulting from the high heat associated with such an impact can also serve to explain the apparent lack of magnetic anomalies in the northern plains. It also explains the younger surface age of the northern plains, as determined by significantly lesser crater density. Overall, this hypothesis appears to fare better than others that have been proposed.
Tectonic implications of magnetic anomalies
[edit]
The southern highlands of Mars display zones of intense crustal magnetization. The magnetic anomalies are weak or absent in the vicinity of large impact basins, the northern plains, and in volcanic regions, indicating that magnetization in these areas have been erased by thermal events. The presence of magnetic anomalies on Mars suggests that the planet maintained an intrinsic magnetic field early on in its history.[2] The anomalies are linear in shape and of alternating polarity, which some authors have interpreted as a sequence of reversals and a process akin to seafloor spreading.[4] The stripes are ten times wider than those found on Earth, indicating faster spreading or slower reversal rates. Although no spreading center has been identified, a map of the magnetic anomalies on Mars reveals that the lineations are concentric to the south pole.
Mantle plume origin
[edit]A process similar to seafloor spreading has been proposed to explain the presence of the concentric stripes around the Martian south pole. The process is that of a single large mantle plume rising in one hemisphere and downwelling in the opposite hemisphere. In such a process, new crust produced would be emplaced in concentric circles spreading radially from a single upwelling point, consistent with the pattern observed on Mars. This process has also been invoked to help explain the Martian hemispheric dichotomy.[14]
Dike intrusion origin
[edit]An alternative hypothesis claims that the magnetic anomalies on Mars are the result of successive dike intrusions due to lithospheric extension. As each dike intrusion cools, it would acquire thermoremanent magnetization from the planet's magnetic field. Successive dikes would be magnetized in the same direction, until the magnetic field reverses its polarity, resulting in the subsequent intrusions recording the opposite direction. These periodic reversals would require that the dike intrusions migrate over time.[17]
Accretion of terranes
[edit]Another study assumes a process of crustal convergence instead of generation, arguing that the magnetic lineations on Mars formed at a convergent plate margin through collision and accretion of terranes. This hypothesis suggests that the magnetic lineations on Mars are analogous to the banded magnetic anomalies in the North American Cordillera on Earth. These terrestrial anomalies are of similar geometry and size as those detected on Mars, with widths of 100–200 km.[18]
Tectonic implications of Valles Marineris
[edit]
Recent research claims to have found the first strong evidence for a plate tectonic boundary on Mars.[5] The discovery refers to a large-scale (>2000 km in length and >150 km in slip) and quite narrow (<50 km wide) strike-slip fault zone in the Valles Marineris trough system, referred to as the Ius-Melas-Coprates fault zone (Fig. 7). The Valles Marineris trough system, which is over 4000 km long, 600 km wide, and up to 7 km deep, would, if located on Earth, extend all the way across North America.[4]
The study indicates that the Ius-Melas-Coprates fault zone is a left-slip transtensional system similar to that of the Dead Sea fault zone on Earth.[5] The magnitude of displacement across the fault zone is estimated to be 150–160 km, as indicated by the offset rim of an old impact basin. If normalizing the magnitude of the slip to the surface area of the planet, the Ius-Melas-Coprates fault zone has a displacement value significantly larger than that of the Dead Sea Fault, and slightly larger than that of the San Andreas Fault. The lack of significant deformation on both sides of the Ius-Melas-Coprates fault zone over a distance of 500 km suggests that the regions bounded by the fault behave as rigid blocks. This evidence essentially points to a large strike-slip system at a plate boundary, in terrestrial terms known as a transform fault.[5]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Tanaka, K. L.; Skinner, J. A.; Dohm, J. M.; Irwin III, R.P; Kolb, E. J.; Fortezzo, C. M.; Platz, T.; Michael, G. G.; Hare, T. M. (2014). "Geologic map of Mars". Scientific Investigations Map. USGS. doi:10.3133/sim3292.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Golombek, M. P.; Phillips, R. J. (2010). "Mars Tectonics". In Watters, T. R.; Schultz, R. A. (eds.). Planetary Tectonics. pp. 183–232. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511691645.006. ISBN 9780511691645.
- ^ Carr, Michael H. (2006). The surface of Mars. Vol. 6. Cambridge University Press. p. 16. ISBN 0-521-87201-4.
{{cite book}}:|work=ignored (help) - ^ a b c d e f g Vita-Finzi, C.; Fortes, A. D. (2013). Planetary Geology: An Introduction (2 ed.). Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
- ^ a b c d e Yin, A. (2012). "Structural Analysis of the Valles Marineris Fault Zone: Possible Evidence for Large-scale Strike-slip Faulting on Mars". Lithosphere. 4 (4): 286–330. Bibcode:2012Lsphe...4..286Y. doi:10.1130/L192.1.
- ^ a b Connerney, J. E.; Acuña, M. H.; Wasilewski, P. J.; Ness, N. F.; Reme, H.; Mazelle, C.; Vignes, D.; Lin, R. P.; Mitchell, D. L.; Cloutier, P. A. (1999). "Magnetic Lineations in the Ancient Crust of Mars". Science. 284 (5415): 794–798. Bibcode:1999Sci...284..794C. doi:10.1126/science.284.5415.794. PMID 10221909.
- ^ Wilson, L.; Head III, J. W. (2002). "Tharsis-Radial Graben Systems as the Surface Manifestation of Plume-Related Dike Intrusion Complexes: Models and Implications" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 107 (E8): 5057–5080. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5057W. doi:10.1029/2001JE001593.
- ^ Schultz, R. A. (2000). "Localization of Bedding Plane Slip and Backthrust Faults Above Blind Thrust Faults: Keys to Wrinkle Ridge Structure". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 105 (E5): 12035–12052. Bibcode:2000JGR...10512035S. doi:10.1029/1999JE001212.
- ^ Tanaka, K. L.; Schultz, R. A. (1994). "Lithospheric-Scale Buckling and Thrust Structures on Mars: The Coprates Rise and South Tharsis Ridge Belt". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 99 (E4): 8371–8385. Bibcode:1994JGR....99.8371S. doi:10.1029/94JE00277.
- ^ a b Neumann, G. A.; Zuber, M. T.; Wieczorek, M. A.; McGovern, P. J.; Lemoine, F. G.; Smith, D. E. (2004). "Crustal Structure of Mars from Gravity and Topography" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 109 (E8): E08002–E08017. Bibcode:2004JGRE..109.8002N. doi:10.1029/2004JE002262.
- ^ a b Sleep, N. H. (1994). "Martian Plate Tectonics" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 99 (E3): 5639–5655. Bibcode:1994JGR....99.5639S. doi:10.1029/94JE00216.
- ^ Pruis, M. J.; Tanaka, K. L. (1995). "The Martian northern plains did not result from plate tectonics" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Institute. 26: 1147–1148. Bibcode:1995LPI....26.1147P.
- ^ Halliday, A. N.; Lee, Der-Chuen (1997). "Core Formation on Mars and Differentiated Asteroids". Science. 388 (6645): 854–857. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..854L. doi:10.1038/42206. hdl:2027.42/62720. S2CID 205030294.
- ^ a b Citron, R. J.; Zhong, S. J. (2012). "Constraints on the Formation of the Martian Crustal Dichotomy from Remnant Crustal Magnetism". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 212: 55–63. Bibcode:2012PEPI..212...55C. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2012.09.008.
- ^ Frey, H.; Schultz, R. A. (1988). "Large Impact Basins and the Mega-Impact Origin for the Crustal Dichotomy on Mars". Geophysical Research Letters. 15 (3): 229–232. Bibcode:1988GeoRL..15..229F. doi:10.1029/GL015i003p00229.
- ^ Andrews-Hanna, J.C.; Banerdt, W.B.; Zuber, M.T. (2008). "The Borealis basin and the origin of the martian crustal dichotomy". Nature. 453 (7199): 1212–1215. Bibcode:2008Natur.453.1212A. doi:10.1038/nature07011. PMID 18580944. S2CID 1981671.
- ^ Nimmo, F. (2000). "Dike Intrusion as a Possible Cause of Linear Martian Magnetic Anomalies". Geology. 28 (5): 391–394. Bibcode:2000Geo....28..391N. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<391:DIAAPC>2.0.CO;2.
- ^ Fairén, A.; Ruiz, J.; Anguita, F. (2002). "An Origin for the Linear Magnetic Anomalies on Mars through Accretion of Terranes: Implications for Dynamo Timing". Icarus. 160 (1): 220–223. Bibcode:2002Icar..160..220F. doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6942.
Tectonics of Mars
View on GrokipediaOverview
Definition and Scope
Tectonics on Mars encompasses the study of crustal deformation, stress regimes, and the resulting structural features that shape the planet's lithosphere. This includes the formation of faults, fractures, folds, and other landforms driven by a combination of endogenic (internal) and exogenic (external) forces acting on the Martian crust. Unlike dynamic processes on other bodies, Martian tectonics is characterized by episodic activity rather than continuous global renewal, reflecting the planet's smaller size, rapid cooling, and lack of a current global magnetic field.[6] Mars exhibits a stagnant lid tectonic regime, in which the rigid lithosphere acts as an immobile "lid" over a convecting mantle, contrasting sharply with Earth's mobile plate tectonics. In this mode, there are no active subduction zones, seafloor spreading centers, or lateral plate motions that recycle crust; instead, heat loss occurs primarily through conduction and localized volcanism. This stagnant lid has dominated Martian geodynamics for much of its history, likely since around 4 billion years ago, limiting widespread resurfacing and preserving ancient crustal structures.[7][6] The primary tectonic processes on Mars involve volcanic loading, where massive igneous provinces like Tharsis exert gravitational stress on the lithosphere, inducing flexural bending and extensional fractures. Impact events contribute through shock-induced deformation and isostatic rebound, while internal stresses from mantle convection, planetary cooling, and early despinning generate compressional and extensional features such as graben systems (normal fault-bounded troughs) and lobate scarps (thrust fault escarpments). These mechanisms have produced a diverse array of structures, including radial grabens around volcanic centers and wrinkle ridges in basin fills.[6][8] The modern understanding of Martian tectonics originated with the Mariner 9 orbiter mission in 1971, which first imaged extensive tectonic landforms, including the vast Valles Marineris canyon system and surrounding fault networks, revealing that Mars' surface had been profoundly modified by deformational processes beyond impacts and volcanism alone.[9] These early observations introduced key terminology, such as "lobate scarps" for compressional scarps and "graben systems" for extensional rifts, establishing the framework for subsequent studies. One prominent outcome of these ancient processes is the hemispheric dichotomy, the stark elevation contrast between the southern highlands and northern lowlands.[8][6]Comparison to Earth
Both Mars and Earth display tectonic features shaped by internal stresses, including normal and thrust faults, as well as compressional folds like wrinkle ridges, which form due to crustal deformation. Volcanism has also influenced tectonics on both planets, with magmatic intrusions and eruptions contributing to surface uplift, fracturing, and the development of volcanic edifices that interact with surrounding fault systems. These shared elements reflect fundamental processes of planetary cooling and differentiation, though expressed differently due to each body's size and thermal history.[10][2] A primary difference lies in the absence of global plate tectonics on Mars, where the lithosphere behaves as a stagnant lid over a convecting mantle, in contrast to Earth's mobile plates driven by vigorous convection. This Martian style emphasizes vertical tectonics, such as isostatic rebound and radial fracturing induced by the loading of the Tharsis volcanic province, rather than horizontal plate motions. The divergence stems from Mars' smaller size, which led to thinner mantle convection and more rapid early cooling, limiting the heat flux necessary for sustained plate recycling.[11][12] Evidence from crustal magnetization indicates that Mars once possessed an active dynamo-generated magnetic field, similar to Earth's current one, which ceased around 4 billion years ago due to core cooling and solidification. This early dynamo likely supported more dynamic convection and possibly episodic plate-like motions during Mars' Noachian period, but its shutdown correlates with the transition to a rigid, immobile lithosphere and the dominance of localized tectonics. Earth's ongoing dynamo, sustained by a hotter core and plate-driven heat loss, continues to facilitate global tectonics.[13] Global models indicate an average crustal thickness of 42-56 km, thicker in the southern highlands (up to ~90 km) and thinner in the northern lowlands, compared to Earth's oceanic crust (5-10 km) and continental crust (30-70 km).[3][14] Impacts have modified the crust on both planets, but their effects are more pronounced on Mars, where the lack of plate tectonics prevents recycling of impact-altered material.Surface Provinces
Southern Highlands
The southern highlands of Mars constitute a vast physiographic province covering more than 60% of the planet's surface, primarily south of approximately -18° latitude, and extending into parts of the northern hemisphere such as Arabia Terra and Terra Sabaea.[15][16] This region features rugged, elevated terrain with average elevations ranging from 0 to 8 km above the Martian datum, contrasting sharply with the lower-lying northern lowlands.[17] The highlands are characterized by densely packed impact craters, many dating to the Noachian period (approximately 4.1 to 3.7 billion years ago), reflecting intense early bombardment that shaped the ancient crust.[16] Key tectonic features include large ancient impact basins, such as the partially exposed Hellas Planitia (diameter ~2,400 km), Argyre Planitia (~900 km), and Isidis Planitia (~1,500 km), which dominate the landscape and attest to the region's cataclysmic formative history.[16] Superposed on this cratered terrain are compressional structures like wrinkle ridges and lobate scarps, exemplified by the Hellespontes Montes surrounding Hellas, formed through early crustal shortening likely driven by global contraction or isostatic responses to loading.[16] These features indicate a period of significant horizontal compression in the Noachian crust, with ridge orientations often reflecting regional stress fields from mantle dynamics.[18] The formation of the southern highlands involved heavy meteoritic bombardment during the Noachian, followed by isostatic adjustment that thickened the crust to an average of about 57 km, with local variations up to 60 km or more in elevated areas.[19] This process stabilized the terrain early in Martian history, resulting in a dominantly ancient surface with minimal subsequent modification. Volcanic resurfacing was limited, confined mostly to early and middle Noachian edifices and scattered late Noachian flows, underscoring a transition to tectonic quiescence after the Noachian period, when global activity waned dramatically.[16][20]Northern Lowlands
The northern lowlands of Mars, located primarily north of approximately 18°N latitude, represent a vast topographic depression covering about 30% of the planet's surface, with elevations ranging from -5 to 0 km relative to the Martian datum.[16] This region includes major basins such as Utopia Planitia and Acidalia Planitia, characterized by extremely low relief and smooth plains that contrast sharply with the elevated southern highlands. The lowlands' formation involved significant infilling during the Hesperian period, masking older crustal structures and contributing to the planet's hemispheric dichotomy.[21] Tectonic features in the northern lowlands primarily reflect later volcanic and sedimentary processes rather than intense early deformation. Widespread volcanic flooding during the early Hesperian deposited thick plains units, interpreted as basaltic lavas emanating from sources possibly linked to Tharsis but not detailed here, which smoothed the basin floors. Overlying these are possible sedimentary infills, including the Vastitas Borealis Formation, a thin veneer of late Hesperian deposits likely sourced from massive outflow channel floods that transported water and sediments into the basins. Subtle wrinkle ridges, formed by Hesperian-era compressional stresses, deform these units with typical heights of 50-300 m and spacings of ~80 km, indicating regional contraction without the prominence seen in highland terrains.[22] The combined sedimentary and volcanic fill in the northern lowlands reaches depths of up to 10 km in major basins, contributing to a thinned crust estimated at ~30 km thick, compared to thicker highland crust.[23] This infill has buried early Noachian or older crust, preserving remnant magnetic anomalies from the planet's ancient dynamo in localized high-northern latitude patches.[24] Evidence for past oceans or megafloods includes shoreline-like features, outflow channel termini, and hydrated minerals in the plains, which smoothed the terrain through erosion and deposition.[21] The region's minimal crater density, with many surfaces dating to the Amazonian period, points to ongoing resurfacing by volcanic flows, eolian processes, and possible glacial activity that has preserved the lowlands' youthful appearance.[21]Tharsis Plateau
The Tharsis Plateau is a vast volcanic and tectonic province situated in the equatorial western hemisphere of Mars, extending over approximately 30 million square kilometers and spanning about 5,000 km in diameter. This elevated region rises to heights of up to 10 km above the planetary mean radius, forming one of the most prominent topographic features on the planet.[25][26] The plateau hosts major volcanic shield complexes, including the Tharsis Montes (Ascraeus Mons, Pavonis Mons, and Arsia Mons) and the immense Olympus Mons, the largest volcano in the Solar System. These structures are accompanied by extensive radial graben systems, which result from lithospheric flexure induced by the massive volcanic load.[27][28] Formation of the Tharsis Plateau is attributed to prolonged mantle plume activity initiating in the Hesperian period, which drove massive igneous eruptions, isostatic uplift, and circumferential compression of the surrounding lithosphere. This process generated a total erupted volume of approximately 3 × 10^8 km³, accounting for a substantial portion of Mars' current rotational bulge.[29][30] The resulting stresses from this uplift are believed to have influenced the development of nearby features such as Valles Marineris.[25]Other Key Provinces
Elysium Planitia, located in the northeastern quadrant of Mars, represents a secondary volcanic province characterized by a cluster of low-relief shield volcanoes, including Elysium Mons, Albor Tholus, and Hecates Tholus, which form the second-largest volcanic complex on the planet after Tharsis.[31] These features include small shields and volcanic domes, indicative of late-stage effusive volcanism that persisted into the Amazonian period.[28] Tectonic signatures in the region encompass grabens and linear fault depressions, often radial to the volcanic centers, suggesting localized extension possibly linked to subsurface plume activity and uplift.[32] Evidence from seismic data recorded by the InSight lander further supports contemporaneous volcanic and tectonic processes in Elysium Planitia.[33] Hellas Planitia, situated in the southern highlands, is a vast impact basin approximately 2,300 km in diameter and reaching depths of up to -7 km, making it the deepest topographic depression on Mars.[16] Formed around 4.0–4.2 billion years ago during the Noachian period, the basin's excavation triggered significant post-impact tectonics, including isostatic rebound that produced radial and circumferential faults, as well as thrust faulting along its margins.[34] These structures reflect compressional stresses from the impact and subsequent lithospheric adjustments, with wrinkle ridges and lobate scarps indicating episodic deformation extending into later epochs.[34] Arabia Terra serves as a transitional zone between the southern highlands and northern lowlands, featuring densely cratered terrain with numerous ancient impact structures dating back to the Noachian era.[35] Prominent tectonic and erosional features include inverted channels—sinuous ridges formed by the differential wind erosion of less resistant surrounding materials, exhuming former fluvial deposits.[36] These landforms, along with minor faulting and pedestal craters, highlight prolonged surface modification through erosion rather than dominant endogenic tectonics, though subtle stresses from nearby basins like Hellas contributed to regional fracturing.[37] Collectively, these provinces exhibit episodic tectonic activity, with Hellas Planitia's formation around 4 billion years ago generating regional stresses that influenced fault patterns in adjacent areas.[38]Hemispheric Dichotomy
Morphological and Hypsometric Features
The hemispheric dichotomy on Mars is defined by a pronounced contrast in elevation between the southern highlands and northern lowlands, with the former averaging approximately +2.5 km above the planetary datum and the latter -3 km, resulting in an overall topographic difference of about 5.5 km.[39] This bimodal hypsometry reflects the planet's global-scale topographic asymmetry, where the southern hemisphere occupies roughly two-thirds of the surface and rises gradually to form rugged terrain, while the northern plains form a vast basin-like depression.[40] Morphologically, the southern highlands are characterized by densely packed impact craters exceeding 10 km in diameter, many of which are heavily degraded and date to the Noachian period, contributing to a heavily modified, undulating landscape.[41] In contrast, the northern lowlands consist of smooth, sparsely cratered plains primarily composed of volcanic and sedimentary deposits from the Hesperian and Amazonian periods, with fewer large craters due to resurfacing processes.[41] The transition between these provinces occurs along a irregular boundary near 30°N latitude, marked by a 1-2 km high escarpment, fretted terrain featuring isolated mesas and knobs, and chaotic terrains with jumbled blocks indicative of mass wasting or erosional dissection.[41] Crustal thickness varies significantly across the dichotomy, with the southern highlands exhibiting an average of about 50 km based on gravity modeling from Mars Global Surveyor data, compared to roughly 30 km in the northern lowlands, underscoring the structural basis for the topographic divide. These estimates derive from admittance analysis correlating gravity anomalies with topography, assuming Airy isostatic compensation and a crustal density of around 2.9 g/cm³. Additionally, the southern highlands display stronger crustal magnetic anomalies, consistent with their thicker, older crust. This dichotomy influences nearly the entire planetary surface, with the transitional features highlighting a complex boundary zone shaped by prolonged geological activity.[41]Endogenic Formation Theories
Endogenic formation theories for the Martian hemispheric dichotomy emphasize internal planetary processes, such as mantle dynamics, that could have generated the observed crustal thickness and elevation contrasts between the northern lowlands and southern highlands during Mars' early history. These models propose that asymmetric convection or localized thermal anomalies in the mantle led to differential crustal production and modification, without relying primarily on external impacts or erosion. Such mechanisms are supported by geophysical modeling that aligns with the planet's small size and rapid cooling, which would have limited prolonged tectonic activity. One prominent endogenic model involves degree-1 mantle convection, where a large-scale, hemispheric asymmetry in mantle flow produces an upwelling in the northern hemisphere that thins the crust through enhanced partial melting and resurfacing, while a corresponding downwelling in the southern hemisphere promotes crustal thickening via reduced melting and potential subduction-like processes. This convection pattern is thought to have initiated shortly after Mars' accretion around 4.5 billion years ago (Ga), driven by factors such as an endothermic phase transition at the core-mantle boundary or initial compositional heterogeneities. Numerical simulations indicate that this mode of convection could establish the dichotomy within the first 100 million years (Myr) of planetary history, consistent with the lack of later major resurfacing events. Another proposed mechanism is the giant impact hypothesis, interpreted here through its endogenic consequences, where a massive collision forming the Borealis basin excavates and removes much of the northern crust, followed by isostatic rebound and mantle upwelling that further thins the lithosphere in that region. This process would redistribute material internally, with the impact-induced heating triggering convective adjustments that amplify the hemispheric contrast. Modeling suggests this could occur during the late stages of accretion, around 4.5 Ga, aligning with the elliptical shape of the northern lowlands and the absence of a central peak or ring structures typical of smaller basins. Early plume activity represents a related endogenic process, wherein localized mantle plumes generate intense heating that erodes and thins the northern lithosphere through widespread partial melting and volatile release, while the southern hemisphere remains relatively stable. Such plumes, potentially arising from core-mantle boundary instabilities, could have focused magmatism and crustal recycling in the north, contributing to the topographic dichotomy. This model integrates with observations of early volcanic provinces and predicts formation timescales of 100-500 Myr post-accretion. Overall, these endogenic models collectively predict dichotomy formation within the first 100-500 Myr of Mars' history, a timeframe corroborated by isotopic dating of southern highland crust, which reveals ages as old as approximately 4.5 Ga, indicating minimal subsequent modification. In contrast to exogenic erosion models, endogenic theories better account for the deep-seated crustal thickness variations observed via gravity data.Exogenic Formation Theories
Exogenic formation theories for the Martian hemispheric dichotomy propose that external processes, such as impacts, erosion, and resurfacing, primarily shaped the planet's north-south crustal and topographic divide without relying on deep internal mantle dynamics. These models emphasize surface or near-surface modifications during the Noachian period (approximately 4.1–3.7 Ga), when Mars experienced intense bombardment and early climatic activity. Observations from orbital data, including gravity anomalies and stratigraphic mapping, support the idea that up to 5 km of topographic relief and 15–30 km of crustal thickness variation arose from material excavation or redistribution in the northern hemisphere.[42] One prominent exogenic mechanism involves widespread erosion and deposition, particularly by aqueous processes, which stripped material from what were originally highlands in the north and deposited it into basins. During the Noachian, regional erosion along the dichotomy boundary, possibly facilitated by a transient ocean or episodic flooding, removed substantial volumes of sediment—estimated at around 57,000 km³ over an area of 284,000 km² west of Ares Vallis alone—leaving isolated remnant mounds that were once part of contiguous highland plateaus like Mawrth Vallis. This retreat of the boundary hundreds of kilometers southward occurred between 4.0 and 3.7 Ga, with phyllosilicate-rich deposits (~350 m thick) preserving evidence of water-rock interactions and sediment transport. Models indicate that such erosion could account for 1–10 km of net material removal across the northern lowlands, consistent with sediment volumes inferred from lowland fill and hypsometric profiles showing the north as a thinned, basin-like terrain. Wind-driven processes may have contributed secondarily, but aqueous erosion dominates as the primary agent in these scenarios.[43] Another exogenic hypothesis attributes the dichotomy to the cumulative effects of multiple large impacts concentrated in the northern hemisphere, excavating and thinning the crust through overlapping basin formation. Proposed in the early 1990s, this model suggests that a series of giant impacts during the Late Heavy Bombardment (~4.0–3.8 Ga) created the broad lowland expanse, with basin rims partially defining the irregular dichotomy boundary. While it explains some topographic details, such as the external portions of the lowlands beyond single-basin margins, the hypothesis requires supplementary resurfacing or erosion to fully account for the smoothed northern plains and lack of prominent rim structures. Gravity and topographic data indicate that these impacts could have removed 10–20 km of crust locally, contributing to the overall 26 km thickness contrast observed today.[44][45] Volcanic resurfacing represents a complementary exogenic process, where preferential lava flooding masked and infilled older northern terrain, enhancing the elevation contrast with the southern highlands. Linked to early Tharsis plume activity migrating from higher latitudes toward the equator around 3.9–3.5 Ga, this resurfacing produced vast smooth plains that embay ancient massifs, infill large craters, and erase magnetic signatures in the north—features absent in the cratered southern crust. The volume of basaltic lavas required aligns with Tharsis' total output (~3 × 10^8 km³), with northern deposits estimated at several kilometers thick, supporting models where up to 5 km of volcanic cover contributed to the hypsometric dichotomy. This mechanism is particularly effective in explaining the relatively young crater ages (~3.8 Ga) and subdued topography of the lowlands.[29]Crustal Magnetism
Characteristics of Magnetic Anomalies
The remnant crustal magnetic field of Mars was comprehensively mapped by the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft's magnetometer instrument between 1999 and 2006, revealing a globally distributed but highly heterogeneous pattern of anomalies observed at altitudes of approximately 400 km. These measurements indicate that Mars lacks a present-day global dynamo-generated field but retains intense localized crustal magnetism, primarily in the form of alternating positive and negative anomalies that reflect variations in the remanent magnetization of ancient rocks. The anomalies are characterized by their linear and striped morphologies, with individual features extending from 100 to 1,500 km in length, often aligned roughly parallel to lines of latitude in the southern hemisphere.[46][13][47] The strongest magnetic anomalies are concentrated in the Noachian-aged southern highlands, where field intensities reach up to 200-250 nT at 400 km altitude, contrasting sharply with the northern lowlands, where anomalies are weak or entirely absent. This hemispheric asymmetry correlates with the planet's ancient crustal dichotomy, with robust signals overlying old, heavily cratered terrains but showing notable absences beneath major volcanic provinces like Tharsis and the large impact basins (Hellas, Argyre, and Utopia). The magnetization intensities required to produce these observed fields range from 10 to 100 A/m, implying a thick layer of magnetized crust, potentially up to 50 km deep in some regions, far exceeding typical terrestrial crustal magnetization.[46][48][49][24] These magnetic anomalies formed during episodes of dynamo activity in Mars' early history, approximately between 4.5 and 3.7 billion years ago, when thermoremanent magnetization was acquired in iron-rich minerals within the cooling crust under the influence of an active core dynamo; recent studies suggest the dynamo persisted until at least 3.7 Ga.[13][50][51][52][53] Subsequent demagnetization has modified this signal, with large impacts causing shock-induced and thermal erasure over diameters exceeding 1,000 km, and widespread volcanism reheating and overwriting the magnetic imprint in younger terrains. The preserved anomalies thus provide a snapshot of the planet's magnetic history, highlighting regions that escaped significant alteration since the dynamo ceased.Mantle Plume Interpretations
One prominent interpretation of Martian crustal magnetic anomalies posits that they result from the interaction between rising mantle plumes and the lithosphere during the planet's early history. In this model, hot mantle plumes ascend from the core-mantle boundary, heating the overlying crust to temperatures exceeding the Curie point of magnetic minerals (approximately 580°C for magnetite), thereby thermally demagnetizing previously magnetized regions.[54] Alternating episodes of upwelling and quiescence, combined with potential lithospheric drift over fixed plumes, produce striped or linear magnetic patterns as "hot spot tracks," where magnetized crust alternates with demagnetized zones formed during plume activity.[55] This process contrasts with more localized demagnetization from dike intrusions, as plumes induce broad-scale thermal alteration across hundreds of kilometers.[54] Supporting evidence for this plume-driven mechanism emerges from the spatial distribution of magnetic anomalies, particularly their alignment with proposed plume tracks beneath the hemispheric dichotomy transition zone. High-amplitude anomalies in the southern highlands exhibit elongated, east-west trending lineations that form concentric patterns centered near the centroid of thickened southern crust (approximately 76.5° E, 84.5° S), consistent with radial spreading of plume-induced crustal material.[56] These lineations, observed in Mars Global Surveyor magnetometer data, suggest that degree-1 mantle convection—dominated by a single large plume—generated alternating polarity stripes as new crust cooled in the presence of a reversing dynamo field.[56] The absence of strong anomalies in the northern lowlands further implies widespread demagnetization by plume upwelling, which thinned the lithosphere and homogenized magnetization in that region.[54] Mantle plume activity is inferred to have peaked around 4.0 billion years ago, coinciding with the later phases of Mars' core dynamo cessation (recently estimated between approximately 4.0 and 3.7 Ga).[54][53] Plumes likely contributed to crustal thinning in the north by promoting partial melting and isostatic subsidence, while enhancing magnetization preservation in the south through episodic resurfacing.[56] Numerical models of degree-1 convection demonstrate that such plumes can account for the observed magnetic lineation patterns and the overall dichotomy morphology, with the plume center closely matching the southern crustal thickness maximum (within ~245 km).[56] This early plume activity may represent a precursor to later volcanic provinces like Tharsis, where persistent upwellings sustained long-term magmatism.[55]Dike Intrusion Interpretations
The dike intrusion model posits that linear magnetic anomalies in Mars' southern hemisphere crust result from repeated injections of magnetized magma along faults during the planet's early history, with the intrusions carrying magnetic minerals such as magnetite that acquired thermoremanent magnetization while the internal dynamo was active. These dikes, emplaced as swarms, would form coherent, striped patterns observable in magnetic maps due to their alignment and the contrast in magnetization between the intrusions and surrounding crust. Evidence for this interpretation includes the observed linear anomalies, which are typically 100–200 km wide and parallel to major fault systems in the Noachian crust, suggesting that the dikes exploited pre-existing tectonic weaknesses. The widths of these anomaly patterns align with the scale of terrestrial dike swarms adjusted for Mars' thicker crust and higher magnetization intensities (up to 10 times Earth's crustal values), where multiple parallel dikes spaced 10–50 km apart could collectively produce the observed signals. Modeling indicates that a minimum crustal layer thickness of 35–60 km is required to sustain the anomaly amplitudes, consistent with early Martian crustal structure. Tectonically, these intrusions are linked to episodes of global extension and associated crustal thinning, likely driven by internal heating and mantle upwelling that induced rifting across the planet's surface around 4 billion years ago.[58] This extension facilitated magma ascent along reactivated faults, contributing to the hemispheric dichotomy through localized thinning in the northern lowlands while building thickened crust in the south. These intrusions may also delineate boundaries between accreted terranes in the southern highlands.Terrane Accretion Interpretations
One interpretation of Mars' crustal magnetic anomalies attributes them to the accretion of distinct terranes during the planet's formative stages. In this model, Proto-Mars formed through the assembly of magnetic fragments—likely a mosaic of proto-continents and oceanic-like crust—that collided at convergent margins, leaving linear and banded anomalies as markers of suture zones where these terranes were sutured together. This process resembles Phanerozoic terrane accretion on Earth, such as the assembly of the North American Cordillera, but occurred on a global scale early in Martian history.[59] Supporting evidence derives from the patchy and irregular distribution of magnetic anomalies mapped by the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft, concentrated in the ancient southern highlands. These anomalies exhibit discrete patches of alternating polarity and intensity, consistent with multiple independent crustal blocks that were magnetized separately before incorporation into the southern crust, suggesting the presence of 5–10 such terranes. The absence of similar features in the northern lowlands further supports a tectonic origin tied to early crustal assembly rather than uniform planetary cooling. Tectonically, these collisions would have generated widespread compression, leading to crustal shortening and thickening predominantly in the southern hemisphere, which may have contributed to the development of the hemispheric dichotomy by enhancing topographic contrasts across the planet. Models indicate that terrane accretion transpired approximately 4.5 billion years ago, contemporaneous with the onset of Mars' core dynamo, allowing the anomalies to preserve primary thermoremanent magnetism from that era before the field weakened around 4.0 billion years ago or later.Major Tectonic Features
Valles Marineris
Valles Marineris represents one of the most prominent extensional tectonic features on Mars, manifesting as a vast system of interconnected canyons that exemplifies the planet's crustal response to regional stresses. This canyon complex extends approximately 4,000 km along the Martian equator, with widths reaching up to 200 km and depths plunging to 7 km in places, making it vastly larger than Earth's Grand Canyon—its total area is about seven times greater, while fault displacements along its boundaries can exceed 10 km.[60][61] The structure formed primarily during the Hesperian era, a period marked by significant volcanic and tectonic activity on Mars.[62] The tectonic origin of Valles Marineris is attributed to the development of graben structures driven by extensional forces associated with the uplift of the nearby Tharsis bulge, which induced horizontal stretching of the Martian lithosphere.[63] This extension likely initiated as a rift zone, where normal faulting created the initial troughs, followed by episodes of vertical subsidence and mass wasting through slumping along the steep walls.[63] The connection to Tharsis loading underscores how isostatic adjustments from volcanic loading contributed to the regional extension that shaped the canyons. Subsequent modifications, including erosional processes, further deepened and widened the system over time. Prominent features within Valles Marineris include extensive layered deposits exposed in the canyon walls and floors, which consist of sedimentary and possibly volcanic materials that record the depositional environment during and after initial rifting. Outflow channels emanating from the eastern segments, such as those leading to Chryse Planitia, suggest episodes of fluid release, likely groundwater or subsurface water outbursts, that carved additional valleys and indicate hydrological activity tied to tectonic disruption.[64] These elements highlight Valles Marineris not only as a tectonic scar but also as a site preserving evidence of Mars' dynamic geological and climatic past.Tharsis Radial Structures
The Tharsis radial structures consist of extensive networks of grabens and faults that radiate outward from the Tharsis volcanic province, primarily manifesting as Solis Fossae and Sirenum Fossae in the southern hemisphere. These features form linear to arcuate troughs, with Solis Fossae extending northeastward and Sirenum Fossae trending southwestward, both centered on volcanic centers such as Arsia Mons and Syria Planum. The grabens exhibit widths typically ranging from 1 to 2 km and topographic depths of 100 to 500 m, representing surface expressions of subsurface dike intrusions and crustal fracturing.[65][66] These structures formed primarily through lithospheric stretching induced by the isostatic adjustment to the massive volcanic loading of the Tharsis rise, which spans approximately 4 to 3 billion years ago during the Late Noachian to Early Hesperian periods. The accumulation of volcanic material, driven by underlying mantle plumes, generated tensile stresses that propagated outward, causing extensional failure and the development of rift-like grabens over distances of 2,000 to 4,000 km from the Tharsis center. This process involved both flexural bending of the lithosphere under the load and localized dike emplacement, with the radial pattern reflecting the symmetric stress field around the rising dome.[65][67][66] The scale of deformation indicates a global extensional strain of 1 to 4 percent associated with Tharsis loading, with individual faults penetrating to depths of up to 2 to 3 km into the crust, based on topographic and geophysical modeling. The patterns of these grabens demonstrate a flexural response to the volcanic load, as evidenced by their concentric and radial orientations relative to Tharsis topographic highs. Some faults within these networks show evidence of reactivation during the Amazonian period, linked to ongoing volcanic or plume-related activity, though at reduced rates compared to earlier epochs.[65][67]Global Fracture Patterns
The global fracture patterns on Mars comprise a diverse array of tectonic structures that record the planet's deformational history, including compressional lobate scarps formed by thrust faulting, extensional grabens resulting from crustal stretching, and transcurrent strike-slip faults accommodating lateral shear.[68] Lobate scarps, characterized by their scalloped, arcuate traces and uplifted scarplet blocks, are widespread in the northern lowlands such as Arcadia Planitia, where they indicate horizontal shortening of the lithosphere.[69] Extensional grabens, often appearing as parallel troughs bounded by normal faults, dominate in regions like Cerberus Fossae in Elysium Planitia, where they form elongated systems up to 1,000 km long due to vertical extension.[70] Transcurrent faults, evidenced by offset linear features and en echelon patterns, occur sporadically across the crust, as documented in Tharsis-margin terrains, reflecting shear-dominated deformation.[71] These fracture systems exhibit pronounced spatial patterns, with extensional grabens and rifts concentrated along equatorial latitudes and compressional scarps and ridges more abundant toward the poles, delineating a hemispheric-scale stress distribution.[72] The cumulative length of mapped faults planetwide surpasses 680,000 km, underscoring the extensive scale of Martian tectonism despite the absence of plate tectonics.[69] This equatorial extension and polar contraction arise from competing principal stress regimes: radial tensile stresses induced by the flexural loading of the Tharsis bulge, which promotes normal faulting in low-latitude zones, contrasted with circumferentially compressive stresses from planetary cooling and contraction, favoring thrust and wrinkle-ridge formation at higher latitudes.[22] Finite element models of lithospheric stresses confirm that Tharsis-driven tension dominates in the tropics, while global thermal contraction imposes compression globally, with magnitudes up to several hundred MPa in the upper crust.[72] A significant portion of these global fractures formed or were reactivated during the Amazonian period, the most recent epoch spanning the last 3 billion years, implying persistent localized tectonic activity on an otherwise cooling planet.[73] For instance, thrust-related shortening structures in Arabia Terra show multiple episodes of activation over the past 2 billion years, as indicated by overlapping landslide deposits triggered by fault motion.[73] Seismic data from the InSight lander further support this, with marsquakes originating from depths of 15–36 km beneath extensional features like Cerberus Fossae, linking recent seismicity to fault reactivation.[33]Modern Evidence
InSight Seismology
The InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) lander, deployed by NASA in 2018, touched down on the Elysium Planitia region of Mars and operated until December 2022, providing the first seismic data from another planet. Equipped with the Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) instrument, a highly sensitive broadband seismometer, InSight detected 1,319 marsquakes over its mission lifetime, ranging from low-amplitude signals to events up to magnitude 4.7. These detections revealed a seismically active Martian interior, with more detections at night when atmospheric noise from wind is lower, allowing better recording of seismic signals. Key structural insights from the seismic data include a core radius of about 1,830 kilometers, inferred from the analysis of shear and compressional wave speeds propagating through the planet. Further analysis of InSight data in 2025 confirmed a solid inner core with a radius of approximately 613 km, surrounded by a liquid outer core.[74] The crust beneath the InSight landing site is estimated to be approximately 39 ± 8 kilometers thick, varying regionally based on waveform modeling of direct and reflected seismic phases.[75] Additionally, the low seismic velocities observed in the mantle suggest a dry composition with minimal water content, contrasting with Earth's wetter mantle and indicating limited hydration since Mars' early history. These findings were derived from inverting arrival times and dispersion curves of prominent marsquakes, such as the magnitude 4.7 event S1222a.[76] Tectonically, the InSight data highlight ongoing shallow crustal activity, with many marsquakes originating from the Cerberus Fossae graben system, approximately 1,600 kilometers away from the lander, implying recurrent faulting driven by stresses from the nearby Elysium volcanic rise. Event depths are predominantly less than 50 kilometers, with no evidence of deep seismicity akin to plate subduction zones on Earth, supporting a model of localized, non-plate-like tectonics. Seismic velocities further indicate sparse water in the crust, consistent with a desiccated upper mantle that limits brittle failure and promotes aseismic deformation in some regions. These observations align broadly with gravity models of crustal thickness but underscore seismology's unique role in detecting active dynamics.Gravity and Topographic Data
Gravity and topographic data from orbiting spacecraft have provided critical insights into the structure and dynamics of Mars' crust, revealing variations in density and thickness that inform tectonic processes. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), launched in 2005 and operational since 2006, has contributed extensively to high-resolution gravity measurements through radio tracking, enabling the development of detailed gravity field models. A seminal model, the Goddard Mars Model 3 (GMM-3), achieves a spherical harmonic degree and order of 120, incorporating data from MRO alongside earlier missions like Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Odyssey to map gravity anomalies at resolutions approaching 100 km. These models, combined with topographic data from the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA), allow for the separation of crustal and mantle contributions to the gravity field, highlighting isostatic adjustments and lithospheric flexure. Prominent gravity anomalies underscore major tectonic provinces on Mars. The Tharsis volcanic province exhibits a pronounced positive free-air gravity anomaly of approximately +300 mGal, reflecting the dense volcanic load and underlying mantle upwelling that dominate this elevated region.[77] In contrast, the Hellas impact basin displays a significant negative anomaly of about -200 mGal, indicative of low-density crustal material and partial isostatic rebound following excavation. These features confirm the hemispheric crustal dichotomy, with the northern lowlands showing thinner crust and lower elevations compared to the thicker, elevated southern highlands, as derived from admittance analyses that correlate gravity with topography. Tectonic interpretations from these data emphasize lithospheric responses to loading and unloading. Gravity anomalies over Tharsis reveal flexural support and partial isostasy, with a compensation depth of 20-30 km beneath the province, suggesting that volcanic constructs are buoyed by crustal roots while the surrounding lithosphere bends under the load. Such patterns indicate that tectonic stresses from Tharsis emplacement influenced global fracture systems and regional warping, with the anomalies providing evidence for viscoelastic relaxation over geological timescales. Updated gravity models from the 2020s, building on MRO data, refine crustal thickness estimates and bolster models of an endogenic origin for the dichotomy. The southern hemisphere averages about 58 km in crustal thickness, compared to roughly 32 km in the north, supporting scenarios involving degree-1 mantle convection that thickened the southern crust through prolonged magmatism. These gravity-derived thicknesses align broadly with seismic estimates of crustal structure from the InSight mission, reinforcing a consistent view of Mars' interior layering.Tectonic Evolution
Noachian Era
The Noachian Era, spanning approximately 4.1 to 3.7 billion years ago, marked the initial formation and stabilization of Mars' primary crust following the solidification of a global magma ocean, which occurred shortly after planetary accretion around 4.5 billion years ago. This period was characterized by intense meteoritic bombardment, including the formation of major impact basins such as Hellas and Argyre, which contributed to widespread crustal fracturing and the excavation of deep megaregolith layers in the southern highlands. Concurrently, an active core dynamo generated a global magnetic field, imprinting strong crustal magnetizations that are preserved as magnetic anomalies today, particularly in the southern hemisphere where the crust remained intact.[78][79][80] Tectonic processes during this era were dominated by impact-induced fracturing, which created extensive networks of faults and grabens across the nascent crust, while the early initiation of the crustal dichotomy—evident in the topographic contrast between the elevated southern highlands and the northern lowlands—likely arose from asymmetric crustal thickening or giant impact events that redistributed material. These impacts also facilitated the formation of magnetic anomalies through shock remanent magnetization of iron-rich minerals in the cooling crust, with the dynamo remaining active until at least the late Noachian. Proto-Tharsis plumes, driven by early mantle convection, began to influence regional tectonics by inducing localized uplift and extensional stresses in the southern highlands, setting the stage for later volcanic activity.[41][81][82] The southern highlands, heavily saturated with craters larger than 32 km in diameter, preserve the record of this bombardment, with the vast majority—over 90%—of Mars' large impact structures forming during the Noachian and contributing to a global contraction of approximately 0.1% strain as the planet cooled. This contraction manifested in subtle compressional features amid the dominant extensional fracturing, reflecting the thermal evolution from a hot, convecting interior to a more rigid lithosphere.[83][84]Hesperian Era
The Hesperian Era, spanning approximately 3.7 to 3.0 billion years ago, represented a period of peak tectonic and volcanic activity on Mars, characterized by the rapid growth of the Tharsis volcanic province and associated deformational processes. This era saw the emplacement of vast volumes of mafic lavas, estimated at around 3.3 × 10^7 km³ in the ridged plains units alone, which resurfaced significant portions of the southern highlands and northern lowlands. The loading from Tharsis volcanism, a massive rise spanning roughly 8000 km in diameter and up to 10 km in elevation, induced flexural stresses that drove widespread extension across the lithosphere, contributing to an estimated 1-2% global extensional strain.[85][86][87] Central to Hesperian tectonics was the opening of Valles Marineris, a ~4,000-km-long extensional rift system that formed along radial fractures peripheral to Tharsis, involving deep-seated faulting, subsidence, and erosional widening to depths of up to 9 km. This rifting was exacerbated by gravitational spreading of the Tharsis bulge, with fault displacements reaching 0.5-4.5 km in regions like Noctis Labyrinthus and Syria Planum, and was contemporaneous with intrusive magmatism that facilitated volatile release. Compressional features, such as wrinkle ridges, emerged in response to lithospheric shortening induced by volcanic loading and isostatic adjustments, with these structures—typically 1-4 km deep décollements—forming concentrically around Tharsis and achieving shortening strains of 0.2-0.5% over hundreds of kilometers in areas like Lunae Planum.[88][85][89] Widespread flooding events, triggered by tectonic fracturing and cryovolcanic outbursts, carved major outflow channels such as Kasei Valles and Mangala Valles, releasing subsurface aquifers through breaches in chaotic terrains adjacent to Valles Marineris. These channels, sourced from elevated regions like Echus Chasma at ~3.5 km altitude, facilitated the redistribution of at least 7.5 × 10^6 km³ of water, forming temporary ocean basins in the northern plains and eroding Hesperian intercrater terrains. The Hesperian ridged plains, emblematic of this era's flood-style volcanism, exhibit subtle lobate scarps and thrust faults that record the interplay of extension and compression, with volcanic resurfacing rates peaking at ~1 km² per year before transitioning to the more subdued Amazonian quiescence.[85][88][89]Amazonian Era
The Amazonian Era, spanning from approximately 3.0 billion years ago to the present, represents a period of relative tectonic quiescence on Mars, characterized by diminished global activity compared to earlier epochs, yet punctuated by episodic volcanism, localized faulting, and evidence of ongoing contraction due to planetary cooling. During this time, the planet's interior heat loss slowed significantly, leading to a predominantly stagnant lid tectonic regime with limited resurfacing, where less than 1% of the surface shows modifications attributable to processes within the last 10 million years.[90] Cumulative effects from Noachian and Hesperian loading, such as the Tharsis bulge, influenced the distribution of stresses, but Amazonian tectonics primarily involved low-volume, localized deformation. Late-stage volcanism in the Tharsis region persisted into the Amazonian, with distributed dike-fed eruptions forming over 650 small volcanoes, many dated to less than 200 million years ago through crater counting.[91] These edifices, associated with major shields like Olympus Mons (average age ~69 Ma) and Arsia Mons (~202 Ma), indicate episodic magma ascent along radial and circumferential dike swarms, contributing to minor extensional stresses.[91] In Elysium Planitia, young basaltic lava flows from Cerberus Fossae fissures, such as those in Athabasca Valles (~2.5–20 Ma) and Marte Vallis (~9 Ma), cover areas totaling thousands of cubic kilometers and demonstrate recent effusive activity linked to mantle upwelling.[92] True polar wander, driven by mass redistribution from this late volcanism, likely occurred during the late Hesperian to early Amazonian transition, reorienting the spin axis by 5–10° to align paleopolar deposits, such as the Dorsa Argentea Formation, with volcanic loads equivalent to ~4.4 × 10¹⁹ kg of lava.[93] Localized extension dominated in regions like Cerberus Fossae, where grabens and normal faults formed as recently as <20 Ma, potentially triggered by dike intrusion or residual Tharsis stresses, producing fresh scarps and boulder tracks indicative of seismic activity.[94] Complementing this, global contraction from interior cooling has generated compressional features, including lobate scarps and wrinkle ridges, with some fault reactivations extending into the Amazonian, as evidenced by overlapping small grabens on older thrusts.[73] Seismological data from the InSight mission (2018–2022) confirm recent tectonic activity, detecting over 47 repetitive low-frequency marsquakes (magnitudes 2–4) sourced to Cerberus Fossae, implying ongoing upper mantle mobility and possible magma-related slip rather than purely crustal faulting.[94] These events, clustered in families with similar waveforms, suggest episodic fault activation within the last few million years, underscoring that Mars retains a dynamically evolving interior despite its overall tectonic dormancy.[94]References
- https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<391:DIAAPC>2.3.CO;2
