Hubbry Logo
Mask of WarkaMask of WarkaMain
Open search
Mask of Warka
Community hub
Mask of Warka
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Mask of Warka
Mask of Warka
Mask of Warka
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Mask of Warka in the National Museum of Iraq today

Key Information

The Mask of Warka (named after the modern village of Warka located close to the ancient city of Uruk), also known as the Lady of Uruk, dating from 3100 BC, is one of the earliest known representations of the human face. The carved white marble female face is probably a depiction of Inanna. It is approximately 20 cm (8 inches) tall, and was probably incorporated into a larger wooden cult image, though it is only a presumption that a deity is represented. It is without parallels in the period.[1] It is in the National Museum of Iraq, having been recovered undamaged after being looted during the United States invasion of Iraq in 2003.

It could depict a goddess. Inanna has been suggested.[2] Shells may have served as the whites of the eyes, and a lapis lazuli, a blue semi-precious gemstone, may have formed the pupils.[3]

Description

[edit]

The Mask of Warka is unique in that it is the first accurate depiction of the human face. Previous attempts, like the Tell Brak Head, were not anatomically accurate, and featured exaggerated noses and ears. At 21.2 centimetres (8.3 in) tall, the mask was most likely originally part of a whole, life sized statue, probably made of wood, with the exposed areas of "skin" (arms, hands, feet, and most obviously the head) being the only ones made of the much rarer white marble. The back of the head would have been covered with bitumen and then colored metal — most likely either gold leaf or copper. This combination would have then extended over the forehead in waves. This hairpiece would have been attached to the Mask with metal studs, which could possibly have been engraved. The hollowed out eyes and eyebrows bear traces of an ancient inlay, perhaps shell and lapis lazuli. Perforations at the ears indicate that the image once wore jewelry. Parts of the eyebrows and hair were also emphasized with colored inlays.[4]

The back of the head is flat, with drill holes for attachment.[1]

Discovery

[edit]

The Mask of Warka was discovered on 22 February 1939 by the expedition of the German Archaeological Institute, led by Dr A. Nöldeke, in the city of Uruk south of modern Baghdad. The Mask was found in the Eanna (or Ianna) district of the city — so named for the goddess Inanna to whom the temples are dedicated.[5]

Theft and recovery

[edit]

When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, the National Museum of Iraq (where the Mask of Warka was stored) was looted. The Mask is thought to have been taken between April 10 and 12 of that year, along with forty other pieces, including the Warka Vase and Bassetki Statue.[6]

The effort to recover these artifacts was spearheaded by Marine Reserve Colonel Matthew Bogdanos, who started an investigation with his team on April 21. However, it was the 812th Military Police Company (Combat Support) USAR, out of Orangeburg, New York, that recovered the Mask just before October.[7] According to Bogdanos, "An informant, an individual, an Iraqi, walked into the museum with a tip that he knew where antiquities were being held or hidden, without identifying the mask. Acting on that information, members of the investigation who were still in Baghdad went to that location, conducted a reconnaissance, and then conducted a raid. The results of the raid were ultimately good, but Bogdanos explains that hopes were not initially high. “Initially they didn't find the Mask, but they found the owner of the farm-- it's a farm in northern Baghdad-- and after interviewing the farmer, he admitted that he did in fact have an antiquity, in this case the Mask, buried in the back of his farm. The investigators went behind the farm and uncovered the Mask exactly where he had placed it, and it is intact and undamaged."[8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
  • Mask of Warka
    Mask of Warka
  • The Mask of Warka, in profile, the Iraq Museum in Baghdad
    The Mask of Warka, in profile, the Iraq Museum in Baghdad
  • The Mask of Warka at the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, back view
    The Mask of Warka at the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, back view
  • The Mask of Warka at the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, in profile
    The Mask of Warka at the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, in profile
  • Warka Mask in Iraq National Museum
    Warka Mask in Iraq National Museum
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mask of Warka

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mask of Warka, also known as the Lady of , is a sculpted female head carved from white limestone, dating to approximately 3100–2900 BCE during the Late or , and representing one of the earliest known naturalistic depictions of a face in ancient Mesopotamian . Unearthed on February 22, 1939, by a expedition led by A. Nöldeke within a temple precinct dedicated to the at the Sumerian of (modern Warka, southern ), the artifact stands about 20 cm tall and originally featured inlaid eyes of shell and , emphasizing large, staring almond-shaped eyes that convey a serene yet authoritative gaze. Scholars interpret it as possibly portraying herself or a high-ranking priestess, highlighting early advancements in sculptural realism and religious iconography in proto-urban Sumerian society. Housed in the National Museum in since its discovery, the mask was among treasures looted during the 2003 museum thefts amid the but was recovered in June 2003 from a residence, underscoring vulnerabilities in protection during conflict.

Discovery and Provenance

Archaeological Excavation

The Mask of Warka was unearthed on 22 February 1939 during excavations at the Eanna precinct in the ancient city of , located in modern-day Warka, southern . The discovery was made by an expedition from the , directed by Dr. A. Nöldeke. This precinct, a major religious complex, included temples dedicated to the Sumerian goddess , providing the stratigraphic context for the artifact's recovery from what appears to have been a or dedicatory deposit. The excavation efforts at , initiated earlier by the Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft and continued through the , focused on uncovering the site's monumental architecture and associated artifacts from the . The mask's find within the Eanna district underscores the precinct's role as a center for elite and sacred activities, with the artifact recovered from layers dating to circa 3100 BCE based on associated pottery and architectural features. Following its discovery, the Mask of Warka was documented, initially conserved, and transferred to the Iraq National Museum in , where it entered the permanent collection for further analysis and public exhibition. This prompt relocation ensured the artifact's protection and accessibility for scholarly study, establishing its through German-Iraqi archaeological collaboration.

Initial Documentation and Dating

The Mask of Warka was documented during the 1939 excavation season of the German Archaeological Institute at Uruk (modern Warka, Iraq), where it was recovered from the Eanna temple precinct in a stratigraphic layer associated with the Late Uruk period. Expedition field notes and preliminary reports established its context amid temple foundations and votive deposits, confirming recovery from a secure archaeological horizon without evidence of disturbance at the time. Dating to circa 3100–2900 BCE derives from the artifact's position within IV–V ceramic and architectural phases, corroborated by comparative typology of co-occurring pottery sherds—such as beveled-rim bowls and hammerhead bowls—and sealings that align with radiocarbon-calibrated sequences for these horizons elsewhere in southern . No direct was applied initially, as methods prevalent in 1939 relied on relative and artifact associations rather than absolute techniques. Material authentication involved on-site visual examination and basic petrographic assessment post-excavation, identifying the sculpture as carved from fine-grained ( or variety), a locally sourced soft stone suitable for detailed carving and common in contemporaneous votives. These analyses, detailed in the expedition's archival records, ruled out forgery through consistency with regional lithic sources and absence of modern tool marks. Custody documentation in German expedition logs tracked the artifact's transfer to Baghdad for conservation and storage in the Iraq Museum by 1940, forming an unbroken provenance chain until subsequent events.

Physical Description

Materials and Construction

The Mask of Warka is carved from a single block of white gypsum alabaster, a soft form of the mineral gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate), which allowed for intricate detailing despite its relative fragility. This material choice reflects the availability of local gypsum deposits in southern Mesopotamia and its suitability for fine sculptural work during the Uruk period. The artifact measures 21.2 cm in height, with a narrow form emphasizing the facial features. Manufacturing techniques evident on the mask include initial rough shaping followed by precise incising for elements such as curls and eyebrows, and for the eye sockets and attachment points. The eye apertures suggest original inlays, possibly of shell for the whites and for the irises or pupils, which are now missing, leaving hollow recesses. Surface polishing achieved a smooth, lustrous finish, demonstrating advanced control over abrasion tools on the soft stone to minimize fractures during refinement. The back of the mask is flat, with visible holes indicating it was designed for attachment to a larger or architectural element, such as a or temple fixture. Irregular breakage at the base further supports this modular construction, as the mask likely formed the head of a composite figure rather than a freestanding piece. No metallic tools or pigments remain, consistent with reliance on stone, , or early implements for carving circa 3100 BCE.

Anatomical and Artistic Features

The Mask of Warka measures approximately 20 cm in height, achieving a life-sized scale for a with proportions that reflect anatomical realism rather than the stylized abstractions of preceding Mesopotamian sculptures. Its facial structure demonstrates individualized features without disproportionate exaggeration, including almond-shaped eyes positioned to convey depth and attentiveness, originally enhanced by inlays of shell and . The nose is absent owing to breakage sustained in antiquity, while the lips are modeled subtly to form a composed, serene expression. This frontal orientation and tranquil demeanor diverge from the rigid, schematic profiles and exaggerated traits common in earlier regional art, such as the geometric distortions seen in Ubaid-period figurines. The hair appears as layered, wavy strands carved directly into the , potentially overlaid with metal elements or separate attachments to accentuate texture and volume, thereby suggesting a feminine quality through its undulating form. These elements collectively prioritize over symbolic idealization, evidencing advanced sculptural technique in capturing subtle human .

Historical and Cultural Context

Uruk Period Society

The (c. 4000–3100 BCE) witnessed the formation of the world's earliest known at in southern , where settlement expanded to 230–250 hectares by the Late Uruk phase (c. 3500–3100 BCE), supporting a of approximately 40,000 to 80,000 based on archaeological surveys of and surrounding rural support. This predated comparable in , with Uruk's scale driven by agricultural intensification and labor organization rather than Nile floodplain dynamics. Complex societal structures emerged through monumental architecture, including multi-level temple platforms in the Eanna precinct that required coordinated labor forces, alongside administrative technologies like cylinder seals impressed on clay for tracking commodities and labor. systems, evidenced by pictographic tablets from Uruk's archival deposits, enabled causal advancements in bureaucratic oversight, allowing elites to manage surplus allocation and mitigate risks in expanding trade networks for materials like and . The Eanna temple complex functioned as the core of a redistributive , centralizing inflows of , grains, and textiles from peripheral villages for processing and elite-directed output, fostering through control over these resources. This temple-centered model, distinct from later palace economies, relied on administrative seals and ledgers to enforce obligations, underpinning Uruk's stability amid population growth and environmental pressures like fluctuating flows. The Mask of Warka, originating from Eanna's deposits, embodies this era's mediation of economic flows, though its precise depositional context aligns with administrative rather than peripheral zones.

Role in Sumerian Religious Practices

The Mask of Warka was unearthed in the Eanna temple precinct at , a complex dedicated to activities during the late (circa 3100–2900 BCE), indicating its probable integration into local cult practices as a dedicatory or representational element within sacred architecture. Archaeological context from German excavations in 1939 places it among temple fills and structures associated with offerings, akin to the deposition patterns of contemporaneous artifacts in Sumerian shrines. Analogous to hordes of smaller limestone votive figures recovered from Uruk's temples—such as stylized human statuettes with clasped hands and prominent eyes, intended as perpetual intercessors for devotees—the mask likely served a similar votive function, albeit on a more monumental scale, possibly as a component of a larger temple installation or surrogate for . These votive practices, evidenced by over thousands of such figurines stratified in temple levels, underscore a of devotion to ensure communal and divine favor, without direct epigraphic confirmation on the mask itself. While the lacks inscribed texts naming specific figures, post-Uruk records from the Early Dynastic era (circa 2900–2350 BCE) document the deification of city patrons and temple intermediaries, reflecting continuity in practices where elite female representations mediated ritual efficacy, as paralleled in of processional female forms on early administrative seals from the site. The mask's stylistic emphasis on alert, oversized eyes aligns with this broader corpus, suggesting a role in evoking watchful divine oversight during ceremonies, though empirical links remain inferential from contextual deposition rather than explicit artifactual evidence.

Interpretations and Debates

Identity of the Depicted Figure

The identity of the figure portrayed in the Mask of Warka has been subject to scholarly debate, with interpretations ranging from a divine entity to a mortal individual, primarily due to the absence of any accompanying inscriptions or explicit contextual markers that definitively name the subject. Archaeological evidence from the Uruk IV period (circa 3200–3000 BCE), including the mask's discovery in fragmented form within the Eanna temple precinct, provides limited clues: the site's later association with ritual practices does not conclusively link the artifact to specific mythological figures, as Uruk-period predates the detailed textual corpora that retroactively attribute deities to such locations. This empirical gap underscores the speculative nature of identifications reliant on post hoc mythological projections rather than contemporaneous material correlates. A prevailing interpretation among archaeologists favors a figure, such as a or queen, grounded in the mask's unprecedented realism—evident in the individualized rendering of facial features, subtle , and absence of divine like horned crowns or exaggerated symbolic elements typical of later depictions. This view challenges goddess hypotheses by prioritizing the artifact's portrait-like qualities, which align with early Sumerian conventions for commemorating elite mortals in temple settings, potentially as votive dedications by or for priestesses who embodied divine roles during rituals. Proponents argue that the lack of idealization distinguishes it from contemporaneous stylized figures on items like the , suggesting a causal link to representation over abstracted . An alternative perspective posits the mask as depicting , the Sumerian goddess of love and war, drawing on the Eanna precinct's eventual dedication to her cult as described in later texts from the Early Dynastic period onward (circa 2900–2350 BCE). Supporters cite iconographic parallels, such as female figures receiving offerings in art, and the mask's serene, authoritative gaze as evoking her attributes; however, this attribution faces criticism for , as Inanna's full mythological profile and consistent visual markers (e.g., star symbols or weaponry) emerge only in subsequent eras, projecting later religious developments onto pre-literate artifacts without direct evidence. Minority opinions propose a generic votive figure or royal consort, but these remain marginal amid the broader unresolved tension between the mask's human-scaled realism and its sacred depositional context. Overall, the absence of conclusive empirical indicators perpetuates uncertainty, with interpretations hinging more on interpretive frameworks than verifiable provenance.

Symbolism and Artistic Intent

The enlarged eyes of the Mask of Warka conform to Mesopotamian artistic conventions where such features symbolize unwavering attentiveness to the divine, facilitating the figure's functional role as a perpetual intercessor in temple rituals. Comparative evidence from Early Dynastic votive statues, such as those from Tell Asmar dated circa 2900–2350 BCE, demonstrates that oversized eyes denoted states of constant prayer or expectancy toward gods, emphasizing practical efficacy in cult practices over abstract emotional expression. This interpretation prioritizes the mask's likely use as a votive dedication within Uruk's Eanna temple complex, where it would have anchored supplicatory acts rather than embodying a romanticized "spiritual gaze." The subtle downward tilt of the eyes, evident in profile views, may evoke supplicatory deference akin to meditative or ritual submission motifs in contemporaneous Near Eastern iconography, such as bowed figures on cylinder seals from contexts around 3100 BCE. Artistically, this directed gaze underscores causal intent: directing viewer attention toward the object's ritual utility in invoking divine favor, rather than projecting inward contemplation onto static . Modern attributions of serene emotion or divine introspection thus risk , as the carving's form derives from pragmatic needs for visibility and symbolic clarity in dimly lit sanctuary settings. The mask's relative naturalism represents an advancement in Uruk sculpture, enabling personalized depictions that enhanced worshippers' engagement with specific deities like , diverging from prior geometric abstractions in favor of anatomical fidelity to humanize foci. Yet, claims of it as the "earliest portrait" warrant scrutiny, lacking quantitative anatomical analyses—such as proportional metrics against skeletal remains from graves—to substantiate hyper-realistic intent beyond stylistic evolution. This balance highlights technical achievements in marble carving while cautioning against unsubstantiated hype, grounded instead in the artifact's evidentiary role as a cultic tool circa 3100 BCE.

Looting, Recovery, and Preservation

2003 Theft During Iraq War

The Mask of Warka was stolen from the Iraq National Museum in Baghdad between April 10 and 12, 2003, as part of extensive looting that ensued after the city's capture by coalition forces. This theft occurred amid a security vacuum, with looters exploiting the absence of guards to ransack galleries and storerooms, resulting in the removal of approximately 15,000 artifacts overall. The Mask, displayed in a protective case, was specifically targeted and extracted during these incursions. Museum staff had evacuated the premises two days prior to the initial break-ins on , in anticipation of advancing U.S. forces, leaving the site's vast collections unguarded. Pre-existing institutional weaknesses compounded the risks, as the museum had been closed to the Iraqi public for 24 years under the regime, limiting routine security drills and public awareness of its holdings. Contemporaneous video recordings captured crowds of looters freely entering and pillaging the facility over multiple days without interference. The reflected opportunistic chaos in the post-regime collapse environment, where local individuals took advantage of the disorganized transition, though some points to insider aiding the selection of high-value items like the Mask. No organized involvement in the thefts has been substantiated, with the events primarily attributed to civilian crowds responding to the sudden power void.

Recovery and Restoration Efforts

The Mask of Warka was recovered on September 23, 2003, following an anonymous tip-off to U.S. and Iraqi authorities amid public appeals by the U.S. military and international media campaigns urging the return of looted artifacts. It was located buried approximately half a meter underground in a field or orchard north of Baghdad, wrapped in cloth and placed in a plastic bag, by Iraqi police and U.S. soldiers during a joint operation. The artifact showed no major damage from the looting or burial, though existing ancient fractures were noted, allowing for relatively straightforward repatriation to the Iraq National Museum. Restoration efforts commenced immediately upon return to the Iraq National Museum, focusing on reassembling the pieces from pre-existing breaks using conservation techniques suitable for ancient stone artifacts. By early 2004, the mask had been stabilized and repaired, with analyses confirming its authenticity and absence of modern interventions beyond necessary conservation. These works involved international expertise coordinated through U.S.-led efforts to support Iraqi heritage recovery, though specific methods like adhesives were tailored to the material's fragility without altering original features. Long-term preservation has faced ongoing challenges due to inadequate climate control in the , including fluctuating levels that pose risks to the porous , and persistent regional from conflict and political upheaval limiting secure access and maintenance. Despite repatriation successes, these factors have intermittently threatened display conditions, underscoring the vulnerability of Iraqi to environmental and threats post-2003.

Art Historical Significance

Innovations in Early Sculpture

The Mask of Warka, dated to approximately 3100 BCE, exemplifies early sculptural innovation through its status as the earliest documented nearly life-size representation of a human face with anatomical precision. Measuring about 20 cm in height, the artifact captures realistic facial proportions, including defined cheekbones, a straight nose, and full lips, marking a departure from the stylized, diminutive figurines typical of preceding periods. This level of naturalism predates comparable Egyptian Old Kingdom portraiture by roughly 400 years, highlighting Uruk's advanced capabilities in three-dimensional human depiction. Crafted from white marble via subtractive carving, the mask demonstrates meticulous control over material removal to achieve subtle contours and textures. Artisans employed fine incisions to render details such as individually delineated hair locks, arched eyebrows, and the subtle modeling of eyelids, techniques requiring steady-handed precision on a soft yet workable stone. These methods reflect an understanding of stone's properties and the use of specialized tools, enabling depths and shadows that convey lifelike volume without additive elements. Such technical proficiency points to the existence of dedicated craft workshops in , an urban hub with evidence of labor specialization during the late . The mask's execution implies systematic training and division of skilled labor, countering notions of isolated artistic feats by evidencing institutionalized production capacity that supported complex societal functions. This craftsmanship underscores Uruk's role in pioneering scalable artistic endeavors, laying groundwork for subsequent Mesopotamian sculptural traditions.

Comparisons with Contemporaneous Artifacts

The Mask of Warka, measuring approximately 20.3 cm in height and crafted from , exhibits a level of facial naturalism uncommon among contemporaneous Uruk-period votive statues, which typically feature stylized proportions, oversized eyes, and rigid, schematic forms standing 15–30 cm tall with clasped hands in prayer poses. These votive figures, dedicated in temple complexes like the Eanna precinct at around 3200–3000 BCE, prioritize symbolic representation over anatomical accuracy, contrasting with the mask's subtle modeling of cheeks, lips, and jawline that suggests individualized portraiture. While both artifact types served ritual functions in Sumerian temples, the mask's superior detailing in hair texture and eye sockets—originally inlaid with shell or —marks an advancement in sculptural realism absent in the more uniform, mass-produced votives. In comparison to the Tell Brak Head, a gypsum sculpture from northern Syria dated to circa 3300 BCE and measuring about 10 cm high, the Mask of Warka demonstrates refined proportions without the exaggerated noses, ears, and facial distortions characteristic of the earlier piece, which reflects Late Chalcolithic stylistic conventions rather than proto-urban naturalism. Excavation reports from Tell Brak indicate the head's attachment to a wooden body for cultic use, similar to the hypothesized reconstruction of the Warka mask, yet the latter's balanced features and smoother contours highlight a technological and artistic progression tied to Uruk's urban temple economy by 3100 BCE. Regionally, the mask surpasses contemporaneous Iranian examples, such as rudimentary clay or stone heads from in the late fourth millennium BCE, which lack comparable facial subtlety and remain more abstract, as noted in proto-Elamite stratigraphic analyses. Levantine counterparts from sites like , featuring inlaid-eye idols or schematic busts around 3000 BCE, emphasize symbolic exaggeration over the Warka mask's empirical observation of human anatomy, underscoring southern Mesopotamia's lead in naturalistic sculpture during the Uruk expansion phase.

Current Status and Research

Museum Housing and Accessibility

The Mask of Warka has been permanently housed in the in since its recovery in 2003. Following conservation efforts after the , it was placed on display as a key artifact in the museum's Sumerian collection. The museum maintains custody under Iraqi state authority, with no recorded international loans due to the object's extreme age and fragility. The artifact is exhibited in a secure, climate-controlled case designed to preserve its surface and intricate details, with post-2003 upgrades including reinforced vaults and systems to mitigate risks from . Public accessibility has varied; the museum partially reopened in 2004 and fully in 2009, but ongoing regional conflicts have periodically restricted visitor numbers and . High-resolution photographs and 3D scans are available online through academic databases and platforms, enabling global research without physical handling.

Ongoing Scholarly Analysis

Following its recovery and restoration in the early , scholarly examination of the Mask of Warka has prioritized contextual reappraisal within Uruk's Eanna precinct, drawing on archival stratigraphic data from pre-war German excavations. The artifact was unearthed in 1939 amid temple-related deposits in the Eanna district, associated with structures dedicated to , indicating likely use as part of a or votive deposit rather than a . Recent archaeological syntheses reaffirm this placement in Uruk IV levels (ca. 3300–3000 BC), with no evidence supporting alternative depositional scenarios like intentional interment, though precise positioning remains uncertain due to fragmentary recovery. Material and stylistic consistency with contemporaneous Uruk carvings has dispelled any post-recovery authenticity concerns, as affirmed in 2019 analyses linking the mask's features—such as large eyes and detailed headdress—to without invoking modern fabrication hypotheses. Non-invasive conservation assessments post-2003 focused on surface stabilization and fracture mapping, but peer-reviewed publications report no advanced spectrometry or residue studies specific to the mask, relying instead on comparative typology for dating to ca. 3100–2900 BC. Unresolved questions center on functional details, such as potential inlays for eyes or attachments for a larger figure, prompting advocacy for computed tomography (CT) scanning to probe internal voids noninvasively. German-Iraqi collaborative projects at emphasize local expertise and sovereignty in future analyses, aiming to integrate the mask into broader digital stratigraphic models of Eanna without invasive sampling.

References

  1. https://www.worldhistory.org/image/10265/the-mask-of-warka/
  2. https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-other-artifacts/mask-warka-0019266
  3. https://uruk-warka.dk/news/2023/Mask_of_Warka.pdf
  4. https://heritagelab.center/index.php/2024/10/23/heritage-in-crisis-the-theft-and-return-of-the-mask-of-warka/
  5. https://factrepublic.com/facts/12184
  6. https://www.dainst.org/en/departments/orient-department/about-us/branches-and-research-units/baghdad-branch/infrastructures/uruk-excavation-house
  7. https://unive.it/pag/16584/?tx_news_pi1%255Bnews%255D=4110&cHash=521553b08552f30c7563469e2b249b5d
  8. https://cdli.ox.ac.uk/wiki/the_late_uruk_period
  9. https://phys.org/news/2022-01-european-archaeologists-iraq-years-war.html
  10. https://smarthistory.org/warka-vase/
  11. https://ruyafoundation.org/en/2017/12/warka-fiorio/
  12. https://digitalmapsoftheancientworld.com/ancient-art/sumerian-art/
  13. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2003/09/18/5500-year-old-mask-lost-in-iraq-looting-is-recovered/
  14. https://learnodo-newtonic.com/mask-of-warka
  15. https://our.oakland.edu/bitstreams/37ea63fe-f8b6-4153-982e-f99d5ed100e6/download
  16. https://indroyc.com/2023/05/18/the-mask-of-warka/
  17. https://worldhistoryedu.com/ancient-city-of-uruk/
  18. https://oi.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/uruk_countryside.pdf
  19. https://academic.oup.com/book/37433/chapter/331532053
  20. https://www.persee.fr/doc/arnil_1161-0492_2016_num_26_1_1102
  21. https://ehrafarchaeology.yale.edu/document?id=mh60-023
  22. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/uruk-and-the-origins-of-the-sacred-economy/
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/j.ctv1bxgzmn
  24. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/samplechapter/0/2/0/5/020568517X.pdf
  25. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/oip44.pdf
  26. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004496804/B9789004496804_s006.pdf
  27. https://www.worldhistory.org/uruk/
  28. https://www.ancientpages.com/2016/09/15/sumerian-mask-of-warka-from-uruk-sculptured-face-may-depict-goddess-inanna/
  29. https://you.stonybrook.edu/undergraduatehistoryjournal/2023/12/03/protection-devotion-and-destruction-the-symbolism-of-eyes-in-ancient-mesopotamian-art/
  30. https://smarthistory.org/standing-male-worshipper-from-the-square-temple-at-eshnunna-tell-asmar/
  31. https://bcps.journals.ekb.eg/article_267389_90373801e3dac9476a5fed3ccf30f302.pdf
  32. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2005/nov/21/iraqandthearts.iraq
  33. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/12/16/antiquities-looted-iraq-museum-returned-seals
  34. https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Iraq-s-treasured-Lady-of-Warka-returns-home-2555941.php
  35. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2018/04/10/iraq-museum-looting--15-years-on.html
  36. https://www.army.mil/article/73851/mission_becomes_battle_for_treasure
  37. https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-973.html
  38. https://www.science.org/content/article/mixed-news-iraqi-antiquities
  39. https://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/09/23/sprj.nilaw.warka.mask/
  40. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3133070.stm
  41. https://allmesopotamia.wordpress.com/tag/mask-of-warka/
  42. https://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2009/feb/23/iraqandthearts-iraq
  43. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9aDJ1aHLFY
  44. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1013
  45. https://fiveable.me/archaeology-of-mesopotamia/unit-4
  46. https://www.historyofcreativity.com/mid124/ancient--mesopotamia
  47. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/saoc63.pdf
  48. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1355/the-iraq-museum-a-brightness-in-the-darkness/
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2009/feb/23/iraq-archaeology
  50. https://www.academia.edu/124534297/The_History_of_Archaeological_Work_and_Attitudes_Towards_Antiquities_at_Nineveh_and_Uruk
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.