Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Thermoelectric effect
View on WikipediaThis article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2019) |
| Thermoelectric effect |
|---|
The thermoelectric effect is the direct conversion of temperature differences to electric voltage and vice versa via a thermocouple.[1] A thermoelectric device creates a voltage when there is a different temperature on each side. Conversely, when a voltage is applied to it, heat is transferred from one side to the other, creating a temperature difference.[2]
This effect can be used to generate electricity, measure temperature or change the temperature of objects. Because the direction of heating and cooling is affected by the applied voltage, thermoelectric devices can be used as temperature controllers.
The term "thermoelectric effect" encompasses three separately identified effects: the Seebeck effect (temperature differences cause electromotive forces), the Peltier effect (thermocouples create temperature differences), and the Thomson effect (the Seebeck coefficient varies with temperature). The Seebeck and Peltier effects are different manifestations of the same physical process; textbooks may refer to this process as the Peltier–Seebeck effect (the separation derives from the independent discoveries by Jean Charles Athanase Peltier and Thomas Johann Seebeck). The Thomson effect is an extension of the Peltier–Seebeck model and is credited to Lord Kelvin.
Joule heating, the heat that is generated whenever a current is passed through a conductive material, is not generally termed a thermoelectric effect. The Peltier–Seebeck and Thomson effects are thermodynamically reversible,[3] whereas Joule heating is not.
Origin
[edit]At the atomic scale, a temperature gradient causes charge carriers in the material to diffuse from the hot side to the cold side. This is due to charge carrier particles having higher mean velocities (and thus kinetic energy) at higher temperatures, leading them to migrate on average towards the colder side, in the process carrying heat across the material.[4]
Depending on the material properties and nature of the charge carriers (whether they are positive holes in a bulk material or electrons of negative charge), heat can be carried in either direction with respect to voltage. Semiconductors of n-type and p-type are often combined in series as they have opposite directions for heat transport, as specified by the sign of their Seebeck coefficients.[5]
Seebeck effect
[edit]

The Seebeck effect is the emergence of electromotive force (emf) that develops across two points of an electrically conducting material when there is a temperature difference between them. The emf is called the Seebeck emf (or thermo/thermal/thermoelectric emf). The ratio between the emf and temperature difference is the Seebeck coefficient. A thermocouple measures the difference in potential across a hot and cold end for two dissimilar materials. This potential difference is proportional to the temperature difference between the hot and cold ends. First discovered in 1794 by Alessandro Volta,[6][note 1] it is named after Thomas Johann Seebeck, who rediscovered it in 1821.
Seebeck observed what he called "thermomagnetic effect" wherein a magnetic compass needle would be deflected by a closed loop formed by two different metals joined in two places, with an applied temperature difference between the joints. Hans Christian Ørsted noted that the temperature difference was in fact driving an electric current, with the generation of magnetic field being an indirect consequence, and so coined the more accurate term "thermoelectricity".[7]
The Seebeck effect is a classic example of an electromotive force (EMF) and leads to measurable currents or voltages in the same way as any other EMF. The local current density is given by
where is the local voltage,[8] and is the local conductivity. In general, the Seebeck effect is described locally by the creation of an electromotive field
where is the Seebeck coefficient (also known as thermopower), a property of the local material, and is the temperature gradient.
The Seebeck coefficients generally vary as function of temperature and depend strongly on the composition of the conductor. For ordinary materials at room temperature, the Seebeck coefficient may range in value from −100 μV/K to +1,000 μV/K (see Seebeck coefficient article for more information).
Applications
[edit]In practice, thermoelectric effects are essentially unobservable for a localized hot or cold spot in a single homogeneous conducting material, since the overall EMFs from the increasing and decreasing temperature gradients will perfectly cancel out. Attaching an electrode to the hotspot in an attempt to measure the locally shifted voltage will only partly succeed: It means another temperature gradient will appear inside of the electrode, so the overall EMF will depend on the difference in Seebeck coefficients between the electrode and the conductor it is attached to.
Thermocouples involve two wires, each of a different material, that are electrically joined in a region of unknown temperature. The loose ends are measured in an open-circuit state (without any current, ). Although the materials' Seebeck coefficients are nonlinearly temperature dependent and different for the two materials, the open-circuit condition means that everywhere. Therefore (see the thermocouple article for more details) the voltage measured at the loose ends of the wires is directly dependent on the unknown temperature, and yet totally independent of other details such as the exact geometry of the wires. This direct relationship allows the thermocouple arrangement to be used as a straightforward uncalibrated thermometer, provided knowledge of the difference in -vs- curves of the two materials, and of the reference temperature at the measured loose wire ends.
Thermoelectric sorting functions similarly to a thermocouple but involves an unknown material instead of an unknown temperature: a metallic probe of known composition is kept at a constant known temperature and held in contact with the unknown sample that is locally heated to the probe temperature, thereby providing an approximate measurement of the unknown Seebeck coefficient . This can help distinguish between different metals and alloys.
Thermopiles are formed from many thermocouples in series, zig-zagging back and forth between hot and cold. This multiplies the voltage output.
Thermoelectric generators are like a thermocouple/thermopile but instead draw some current from the generated voltage in order to extract power from heat differentials. They are optimized differently from thermocouples, using high quality thermoelectric materials in a thermopile arrangement, to maximize the extracted power. Though not particularly efficient, these generators have the advantage of not having any moving parts.
Peltier effect
[edit]
When an electric current is passed through a circuit of a thermocouple, heat is generated (dumped, pumped) at one junction and absorbed at the other junction. This is known as the Peltier effect: the presence of heating or cooling at an electrified junction of two different conductors. The effect is named after French physicist Jean Charles Athanase Peltier, who discovered it in 1834.[9] When a current is made to flow through a junction between two conductors, A and B, heat may be generated or removed at the junction. The Peltier heat generated at the junction per unit time is
where and are the Peltier coefficients of conductors A and B, and is the electric current (from A to B). The total heat generated is not determined by the Peltier effect alone, as it may also be influenced by Joule heating and thermal-gradient effects (see below).
The Peltier coefficients represent how much heat is carried per unit charge. Since charge current must be continuous across a junction, the associated heat flow will develop a discontinuity if and are different. The Peltier effect can be considered as the back-action counterpart to the Seebeck effect (analogous to the back-EMF in magnetic induction): if a simple thermoelectric circuit is closed, then the Seebeck effect will drive a current, which in turn (by the Peltier effect) will always transfer heat from the hot to the cold junction. The close relationship between Peltier and Seebeck effects can be seen in the direct connection between their coefficients: (see below).
A typical Peltier heat pump involves multiple junctions in series, through which a current is driven. Some of the junctions lose heat due to the Peltier effect, while others gain heat. Thermoelectric heat pumps exploit this phenomenon, as do thermoelectric cooling devices found in refrigerators.
Applications
[edit]The Peltier effect can be used to create a heat pump. Notably, the Peltier thermoelectric cooler is a refrigerator that is compact and has no circulating fluid or moving parts. Such refrigerators are useful in applications where their advantages outweigh the disadvantage of their very low efficiency.
Other heat pump applications such as dehumidifiers may also use Peltier heat pumps.
Thermoelectric coolers are trivially reversible, in that they can be used as heaters by simply reversing the current. Unlike ordinary resistive electrical heating (Joule heating) that varies with the square of current, the thermoelectric heating effect is linear in current (at least for small currents) but requires a cold sink to replenish with heat energy. This rapid reversing heating and cooling effect is used by many modern thermal cyclers, laboratory devices used to amplify DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR requires the cyclic heating and cooling of samples to specified temperatures. The inclusion of many thermocouples in a small space enables many samples to be amplified in parallel.
Thomson effect
[edit]For certain materials, the Seebeck coefficient is not constant in temperature, and so a spatial gradient in temperature can result in a gradient in the Seebeck coefficient. If a current is driven through this gradient, then a continuous version of the Peltier effect will occur. This Thomson effect was predicted and later observed in 1851 by Lord Kelvin (William Thomson).[10] It describes the heating or cooling of a current-carrying conductor with a temperature gradient. If a current density is passed through a homogeneous conductor, the Thomson effect predicts a heat production rate per unit volume.
where is the temperature gradient, and is the Thomson coefficient. The Thomson effect is a manifestation of the direction of flow of electrical carriers with respect to a temperature gradient within a conductor. These absorb energy (heat) flowing in a direction opposite to a thermal gradient, increasing their potential energy, and, when flowing in the same direction as a thermal gradient, they liberate heat, decreasing their potential energy.[11] The Thomson coefficient is related to the Seebeck coefficient as (see below). This equation, however, neglects Joule heating and ordinary thermal conductivity (see full equations below).
Full thermoelectric equations
[edit]Often, more than one of the above effects is involved in the operation of a real thermoelectric device. The Seebeck effect, Peltier effect, and Thomson effect can be gathered together in a consistent and rigorous way, described here; this also includes the effects of Joule heating and ordinary heat conduction. As stated above, the Seebeck effect generates an electromotive force, leading to the current equation[12]
To describe the Peltier and Thomson effects, we must consider the flow of energy. If temperature and charge change with time, the full thermoelectric equation for the energy accumulation, , is[12]
where is the thermal conductivity. The first term is the Fourier's heat conduction law, and the second term shows the energy carried by currents. The third term, , is the heat added from an external source (if applicable).
If the material has reached a steady state, the charge and temperature distributions are stable, so and . Using these facts and the second Thomson relation (see below), the heat equation can be simplified to
The middle term is the Joule heating, and the last term includes both Peltier ( at junction) and Thomson ( in thermal gradient) effects. Combined with the Seebeck equation for , this can be used to solve for the steady-state voltage and temperature profiles in a complicated system.
If the material is not in a steady state, a complete description needs to include dynamic effects such as relating to electrical capacitance, inductance and heat capacity.
The thermoelectric effects lie beyond the scope of equilibrium thermodynamics. They necessarily involve continuing flows of energy. At least, they involve three bodies or thermodynamic subsystems, arranged in a particular way, along with a special arrangement of the surroundings. The three bodies are the two different metals and their junction region. The junction region is an inhomogeneous body, assumed to be stable, not suffering amalgamation by diffusion of matter. The surroundings are arranged to maintain two temperature reservoirs and two electric reservoirs.
For an imagined, but not actually possible, thermodynamic equilibrium, heat transfer from the hot reservoir to the cold reservoir would need to be prevented by a specifically matching voltage difference maintained by the electric reservoirs, and the electric current would need to be zero. For a steady state, there must be at least some heat transfer or some non-zero electric current. The two modes of energy transfer, as heat and by electric current, can be distinguished when there are three distinct bodies and a distinct arrangement of surroundings.
But in the case of continuous variation in the media, heat transfer and thermodynamic work cannot be uniquely distinguished. This is more complicated than the often considered thermodynamic processes, in which just two respectively homogeneous subsystems are connected.
Thomson relations
[edit]In 1854, Lord Kelvin found relationships between the three coefficients, implying that the Thomson, Peltier, and Seebeck effects are different manifestations of one effect (uniquely characterized by the Seebeck coefficient).[13]
The first Thomson relation is[12]
where is the absolute temperature, is the Thomson coefficient, is the Peltier coefficient, and is the Seebeck coefficient. This relationship is easily shown given that the Thomson effect is a continuous version of the Peltier effect.
The second Thomson relation is
This relation expresses a subtle and fundamental connection between the Peltier and Seebeck effects. It was not satisfactorily proven until the advent of the Onsager relations, and it is worth noting that this second Thomson relation is only guaranteed for a time-reversal symmetric material; if the material is placed in a magnetic field or is itself magnetically ordered (ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, etc.), then the second Thomson relation does not take the simple form shown here.[14]
Now, using the second relation, the first Thomson relation becomes
The Thomson coefficient is unique among the three main thermoelectric coefficients because it is the only one directly measurable for individual materials. The Peltier and Seebeck coefficients can only be easily determined for pairs of materials; hence, it is difficult to find values of absolute Seebeck or Peltier coefficients for an individual material.
If the Thomson coefficient of a material is measured over a wide temperature range, it can be integrated using the Thomson relations to determine the absolute values for the Peltier and Seebeck coefficients. This needs to be done only for one material, since the other values can be determined by measuring pairwise Seebeck coefficients in thermocouples containing the reference material and then adding back the absolute Seebeck coefficient of the reference material. For more details on absolute Seebeck coefficient determination, see Seebeck coefficient.
Efficiency
[edit]The efficiency of such devices varies on several conditions, including its environment and the device in question. However, they roughly operate at efficiencies as low as 5% or sometimes as high as 12%.
See also
[edit]- Barocaloric material
- Nernst effect – a thermoelectric phenomenon when a sample allowing electrical conduction in a magnetic field and a temperature gradient normal (perpendicular) to each other
- Ettingshausen effect – thermoelectric phenomenon affecting current in a conductor in a magnetic field
- Pyroelectricity – the creation of an electric polarization in a crystal after heating/cooling, an effect distinct from thermoelectricity
- Thermionic emission – the liberation of charged particles from a hot electrode
- Thermogalvanic cell – the production of electrical power from a galvanic cell with electrodes at different temperatures
- Thermopile
- Thermophotovoltaic – production of electrical power from thermal energy using the photovoltaic effect
- Physical crystallography before X-rays – history of thermoelectricity in crystals to 1895
References
[edit]- ^ "The Peltier Effect and Thermoelectric Cooling". ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu.
- ^ Goldsmid, H Julian (2017-04-01). The Physics of Thermoelectric Energy Conversion. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Bibcode:2017ptec.book.....G. doi:10.1088/978-1-6817-4641-8. ISBN 978-1-68174-641-8.
- ^ As the "figure of merit" approaches infinity, the Peltier–Seebeck effect can drive a heat engine or refrigerator at closer and closer to the Carnot efficiency. Disalvo, F. J. (1999). "Thermoelectric Cooling and Power Generation". Science. 285 (5428): 703–706. doi:10.1126/science.285.5428.703. PMID 10426986. Any device that works at the Carnot efficiency is thermodynamically reversible, a consequence of classical thermodynamics.
- ^ "THERMOELECTRIC PHENOMENA" (PDF). Retrieved 2024-08-13.
- ^ Prunet, G.; Pawula, F.; Fleury, G.; Cloutet, E.; Robinson, A.J.; Hadziioannou, G.; Pakdel, A. (2021). "A review on conductive polymers and their hybrids for flexible and wearable thermoelectric applications" (PDF). Materials Today Physics. 18 100402. Bibcode:2021MTPhy..1800402P. doi:10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100402. hdl:2262/98609.
- ^ Goupil, Christophe; Ouerdane, Henni; Zabrocki, Knud; Seifert, Wolfgang; Hinsche, Nicki F.; Müller, Eckhard (2016). "Thermodynamics and thermoelectricity". In Goupil, Christophe (ed.). Continuum Theory and Modeling of Thermoelectric Elements. New York: Wiley-VCH. pp. 2–3. ISBN 9783527413379.
- ^ See:
- Œrsted (1823). "Nouvelles expériences de M. Seebeck sur les actions électro-magnetiques" [New experiments by Mr. Seebeck on electro-magnetic actions]. Annales de chimie. 2nd series (in French). 22: 199–201. From pp. 199–200: "Il faudra sans doute désormais distinguer cette nouvelle classes de circuits électriques par une dénomination significative; et comme telle je propose l'expression de circuits thermo-électriques ou peut-être thermélectriques … " (It's undoubtedly necessary to distinguish henceforth this new class of electrical circuits by an indicative name; and as such I propose the expression "thermo-electric circuits" or perhaps "thermelectric circuits" … )
- Oersted (1823). "Notiz von neuen electrisch-magnetischen Versuchen des Herrn Seebeck in Berlin" [Notice of new electro-magnetic experiments of Mr. Seebeck in Berlin]. Annalen der Physik (in German). 73 (4): 430–432. Bibcode:1823AnP....73..430O. doi:10.1002/andp.18230730410.
- ^ The voltage in this case does not refer to electric potential but rather the "voltmeter" voltage , where is the Fermi level.
- ^ Peltier (1834). "Nouvelles expériences sur la caloricité des courants électrique" [New experiments on the heat effects of electric currents]. Annales de Chimie et de Physique (in French). 56: 371–386.
- ^ Thomson, William (1857). "4. On a Mechanical Theory of Thermo-Electric Currents". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 3. Cambridge Univ. Press: 91–98. doi:10.1017/S0370164600027310. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
- ^ Rowe, David Michael (1994). CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics. Boca Raton New York London [etc.]: CRC press. ISBN 0849301467.
- ^ a b c Leon van Dommelen (2002-02-01). "A.11 Thermoelectric effects". eng.famu.fsu.edu. Retrieved 2022-11-23.
- ^ Thomson, William (1857). "On the dynamical theory of heat. Part V. Thermo-electric currents". Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 21: 123–171. doi:10.1017/S0080456800032014. S2CID 120018011.
- ^ There is a generalized second Thomson relation relating anisotropic Peltier and Seebeck coefficients with reversed magnetic field and magnetic order. See, for example, Rowe, D. M., ed. (2010). Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano. CRC Press. ISBN 9781420038903.
Notes
[edit]- ^ In 1794, Volta found that if a temperature difference existed between the ends of an iron rod, then it could excite spasms of a frog's leg. His apparatus consisted of two glasses of water. Dipped in each glass was a wire that was connected to one or the other hind leg of a frog. An iron rod was bent into a bow and one end was heated in boiling water. When the ends of the iron bow were dipped into the two glasses, a thermoelectric current passed through the frog's legs and caused them to twitch. See:
- Volta, Alessandro (1794). "Nuova memoria sull'elettricità animale del Sig. Don Alessandro Volta … in alcune lettere al Sig. Ab. Anton Maria Vassalli …" [New memoir on animal electricity from Don Alessandro Volta … in some letters to Abbot Antonio Maria Vassalli …]. Annali di Chimica e Storia Naturale (Annals of Chemistry and Natural History) (in Italian). 5: 132–144.; see p. 139.
- Reprinted in: Volta, Alessandro (1816) Collezione dell'Opere del Cavaliere Conte Alessandro Volta … [Collection of the works of Count Alessandro Volta … ]. (in Italian) Florence (Firenze), (Italy): Guglielmo Piatti. vol. 2, part 1. "Nuova memoria sull'elettricità animale, divisa in tre lettere, dirette al Signor Abate Anton Maria Vassalli … Lettera Prima" (New memoir on animal electricity, divided into three letters, addressed to Abbot Antonio Maria Vassalli … First letter), pp. 197–206; see p. 202.
Further reading
[edit]- Rowe, D.M., ed. (2006). Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1201/9781420038903. ISBN 0-8493-2264-2. OCLC 70217582.
- Jack, P.M. (2003). "Physical Space as a Quaternion Structure I: Maxwell Equations. A Brief Note". arXiv:math-ph/0307038.
- Besançon, Robert M. (1985). Besançon, Robert M. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Physics (3rd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6902-2. ISBN 0-442-25778-3.
- Ioffe, A.F. (1957). Semiconductor Thermoelements and Thermoelectric Cooling. Infosearch. ISBN 0-85086-039-3. OCLC 600476276.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Thomson, William (1851). "On a mechanical theory of thermo-electric currents". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 3 (published 1857): 91–98. doi:10.1017/S0370164600027310.
External links
[edit]- International Thermoelectric Society
- Föll, Helmut (Oct 2019). "2.3.3 Thermoelectric Effects: General Consideration". Electronic Materials. University of Kiel.
- A news article on the increases in thermal diode efficiency
Thermoelectric effect
View on GrokipediaHistorical Development
Discovery of the Seebeck Effect
In the early 19th century, the study of electricity was rapidly advancing following Alessandro Volta's invention of the voltaic pile in 1800, which demonstrated that a continuous electric current could be generated through chemical reactions between dissimilar metals, a phenomenon then known as galvanism.[6] This breakthrough inspired researchers to explore other potential sources of electric current, including the role of heat, as scientists sought to understand the fundamental connections between thermal, electrical, and magnetic phenomena.[7] Thomas Johann Seebeck, a Baltic German physicist born in 1770, conducted pioneering experiments in this context while working in Berlin. In 1821, Seebeck assembled a closed-loop circuit using wires of dissimilar metals, most notably copper and bismuth, joined at two junctions. He positioned a magnetic compass needle within the loop and applied a temperature difference by heating one junction—often with a flame—while maintaining the other at ambient temperature. Upon heating, the compass needle deflected consistently, indicating the presence of a magnetic field around the circuit.[8][9] Seebeck initially interpreted this deflection as evidence of a new form of thermomagnetism, believing that the heat directly induced magnetic properties in the metals without involving electricity. He reported these observations in a series of papers published in the Annalen der Physik from 1822 to 1826, detailing how the effect varied with different metal pairs, such as bismuth-antimony showing particularly strong deflections.[8][9] Further investigations by Seebeck revealed that no compass deflection occurred in circuits made from a single homogeneous metal, even under significant temperature gradients, underscoring that the phenomenon required heterogeneous materials with differing thermal and electrical properties. This distinction between homogeneous and heterogeneous conductors marked an early insight into the thermoelectric nature of the effect, though Seebeck's magnetic explanation persisted until Hans Christian Ørsted and others recognized the underlying electric current in 1823.[9]Identification of the Peltier and Thomson Effects
In 1834, French physicist Jean Charles Athanase Peltier observed that an electric current passing through the junction of two dissimilar metals, such as copper and bismuth, produced heating at one junction and cooling at the other under isothermal conditions.[10][11] This phenomenon, later termed the Peltier effect, was demonstrated using a battery to pass a steady current through the junction, revealing a reversible heat transfer proportional to the current's magnitude and direction.[10][11] Peltier's findings built upon Thomas Johann Seebeck's earlier discovery of thermoelectric voltage generation but shifted focus to thermal effects at junctions.[10] Seventeen years later, in 1851, William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) extended thermoelectric understanding through theoretical analysis and subsequent experiments, identifying heat evolution or absorption within a single homogeneous conductor subjected to both an electric current and a temperature gradient.[10] Thomson's work, detailed in his paper "On a Mechanical Theory of Thermo-Electric Currents," predicted this effect—now known as the Thomson effect—and linked it to thermodynamic principles by calculating the heat transfer rates based on the material's properties and the gradient's direction relative to the current.[12][13] His experiments confirmed the reversibility of the heat changes, distinguishing it from irreversible Joule heating.[10] Thomson's contributions sparked historical debates among 19th-century scientists regarding the unification of the Seebeck, Peltier, and Thomson effects under a consistent thermodynamic framework, resolving earlier inconsistencies rooted in caloric versus dynamic theories of heat.[10] By 1854, in further publications in the Philosophical Magazine, Thomson demonstrated that these phenomena were interconnected manifestations of the same underlying transport processes, harmonious with the emerging laws of thermodynamics, thus establishing a foundational synthesis for thermoelectricity.[12]Core Thermoelectric Phenomena
Seebeck Effect
The Seebeck effect describes the phenomenon where a temperature gradient applied across a conductor or semiconductor generates a voltage difference between two points. This thermoelectromotive force arises directly from the temperature difference, without requiring an external current.[14] At the microscopic level, the effect originates from the diffusion of charge carriers—electrons in n-type materials or holes in p-type materials—from the hotter region to the cooler region due to the thermal gradient. This preferential diffusion creates a net accumulation of charge, establishing an internal electric field that balances the diffusion and results in a measurable open-circuit voltage.[15] The magnitude of this voltage is quantified by the Seebeck coefficient, denoted as , defined as where is the induced voltage difference and is the temperature difference across the material; the units are volts per kelvin (V/K). For metals, typical values range from a few microvolts per kelvin, with the sign being negative for n-type conductors where electrons dominate and positive for p-type semiconductors where holes are the primary carriers.[16] In practical configurations like thermocouples, two dissimilar materials with different Seebeck coefficients are connected in series, forming closed loops with junctions at varying temperatures; the total voltage is the algebraic sum of the individual contributions, amplifying the effect for temperature measurement.[17] The Seebeck coefficient is strongly influenced by material properties, including doping levels that alter charge carrier concentration—higher doping typically reduces by increasing carrier density and reducing the energy dependence of transport. It also shows pronounced temperature dependence, often increasing at low temperatures due to enhanced carrier asymmetry and peaking before decreasing at higher temperatures from bipolar effects or phonon contributions. Furthermore, in crystalline materials lacking isotropy, such as certain semiconductors, can vary directionally along different crystal axes, emphasizing the need for isotropic materials in uniform applications.[18][19] The Seebeck effect is thermodynamically reciprocal to the Peltier effect through the Onsager reciprocal relations, linking the coefficients via , where is the Peltier coefficient and is the absolute temperature.[20]Peltier Effect
The Peltier effect is the phenomenon involving the reversible absorption or release of heat at the junction between two dissimilar conductive materials when an electric current flows through them. The rate of heat transfer, , at such a junction is given by , where is the electric current and is the Peltier coefficient for the material pair. The Peltier coefficient is related to the Seebeck coefficient through the relation , where is the absolute temperature.[21][22] This effect arises from the energy transport by charge carriers crossing the material interface. Charge carriers, such as electrons in metals or electrons and holes in semiconductors, exhibit differences in average kinetic energy between the two materials due to variations in their electronic band structures and Fermi levels. When driven by the current, carriers moving from a material with lower average carrier energy to one with higher energy absorb thermal energy from the lattice at the junction, resulting in cooling; the reverse flow releases energy, causing heating.[22][23] The heat absorption or release is polarity-dependent: for a specific current direction in a closed circuit with two junctions, one junction cools while the other heats, and reversing the current polarity inverts these thermal responses.[21][22] The magnitude of the Peltier coefficient depends on the materials but is notably large for thermoelectric compounds. For common p-n pairs involving bismuth telluride (Bi₂Te₃), reaches approximately 110–140 mV at room temperature (300 K), reflecting the high Seebeck coefficients typical of these materials (around 200–240 μV/K per leg).[24][21] Experimental verification of the Peltier effect involves direct measurement of junction temperature changes under applied current, often conducted in vacuum to isolate the thermoelectric heat transfer from convective, radiative, and ambient influences.[25][22] The Peltier effect is the inverse of the Seebeck effect, linked by thermodynamic reciprocity.[23]Thomson Effect
The Thomson effect refers to the reversible absorption or production of heat within a homogeneous conductor carrying an electric current in the presence of a temperature gradient.[26] This phenomenon manifests as a local heating or cooling along the length of the material, distinct from effects occurring at material junctions.[2] The heat power per unit volume, denoted as , is given by the expression where is the Thomson coefficient, is the current density, and is the temperature gradient along the direction of current flow.[26] The underlying mechanism arises from the non-uniform energy transport by charge carriers subjected to the temperature gradient. In materials where the Seebeck coefficient varies with temperature, carriers diffusing from hotter to cooler regions (or vice versa) carry different average energies, leading to a net redistribution of heat and thus local heating or cooling proportional to the product of the current and the gradient.[2] This effect is particularly pronounced in semiconductors and metals with significant temperature dependence in their thermoelectric properties.[3] Thermodynamically, the Thomson coefficient is related to the Seebeck coefficient by , ensuring consistency with the second law through Kelvin's relations that interconnect the Seebeck, Peltier, and Thomson effects.[26] The sign of determines the direction of heat flow: a positive indicates that the hotter end of the conductor cools when current flows from hot to cold, enhancing cooling efficiency in certain configurations.[27] Historically, the effect was theoretically predicted in 1851 by William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin), who unified the emerging field of thermoelectricity with thermodynamic principles, completing the framework alongside the Seebeck and Peltier effects.[3] This contribution, detailed in his seminal paper, provided a reversible complement to the junction-based phenomena observed earlier.Theoretical Foundations
Transport Equations
The transport equations for thermoelectric materials are derived from the framework of linear irreversible thermodynamics, which describes the coupled flows of charge and heat in response to electrochemical and thermal gradients near equilibrium. This approach posits that the fluxes are linear combinations of the thermodynamic forces, with the coefficients satisfying Onsager's reciprocal relations that ensure symmetry in the transport matrix.[28] In this formalism, the electric current density and the heat flux density (defined as the energy flux minus the electrochemical contribution) are expressed phenomenologically as: Here, is the electrical conductivity, is the thermal conductivity, is the electric potential, is the temperature, is the Seebeck coefficient, and is the Peltier coefficient (with from Onsager reciprocity). These equations capture the Seebeck and Peltier effects as cross-coupling terms between charge and heat transport.[28] For a complete description, the Thomson effect must be incorporated, which arises when the transport coefficients vary with temperature. This introduces a distributed heat source term in the energy conservation equation. In steady state, the divergence of the heat flux satisfies: where is the Thomson coefficient and is the electrical resistivity; the first term on the right represents Thomson heating (or cooling), and the second is Joule heating. The Seebeck, Peltier, and Thomson coefficients serve as fundamental building blocks relating these phenomenological relations to measurable effects.[29][28] In practical device modeling, boundary conditions simplify these equations. For a one-dimensional thermoelectric element of length and uniform cross-section, a constant current is often assumed (, with the area), along with fixed temperatures at the ends (, ) and insulated lateral surfaces (). These assumptions enable numerical or analytical solutions for temperature profiles and performance.[28] Typical material parameters illustrate the scales involved; for bismuth telluride (BiTe), a benchmark thermoelectric material, S/m and W/m·K at room temperature.[30]Thomson Relations and Efficiency
The Thomson relations, derived by William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) in 1854 through thermodynamic analysis of reversible heat engines in thermoelectric circuits, link the Peltier coefficient , Seebeck coefficient , and Thomson coefficient to ensure consistency with the second law of thermodynamics.[31] These relations state that at a junction temperature , connecting the heat absorbed at a Peltier junction to the thermoelectric voltage generated by a temperature difference, and , describing the reversible heat evolution per unit current in a temperature gradient.[31] By treating thermoelectric effects as manifestations of a single underlying phenomenon, these equations impose reciprocity, preventing perpetual motion and aligning the effects with Onsager's reciprocal relations in nonequilibrium thermodynamics.[32] Building on the transport equations for charge and heat fluxes, the Thomson relations facilitate the derivation of performance limits for thermoelectric devices. For a thermoelectric generator operating between hot-side temperature and cold-side temperature , with temperature difference , the maximum efficiency is given by where is the dimensionless figure of merit evaluated at the mean temperature , and combines the Seebeck coefficient , electrical resistivity , and thermal conductivity .[33] This expression, first obtained by Edmund Altenkirch in 1909 under the assumption of constant material properties, shows that efficiency approaches the Carnot limit only as , but practical values of yield for typical .[33] For thermoelectric coolers, the maximum coefficient of performance (COP), derived by Altenkirch in 1911 under similar assumptions, is quantifying the ratio of heat pumped at the cold side to electrical input work.[34] High enhances COP, but real devices achieve values around 0.5-1 for K due to inherent losses. Both formulas incorporate the Thomson relations implicitly through the interdependence of coefficients in , highlighting how temperature-dependent affects and thus overall device thermodynamics. Device efficiency is fundamentally limited by irreversibilities, including Joule heating () that generates waste heat and back-diffuses across the temperature gradient, and conduction heat losses () that bypass the thermoelectric conversion.[33] These parasitic effects, unaccounted for in reversible Thomson derivations, reduce net power output and heat pumping, with the Thomson heat term further contributing to distributed irreversibility along the legs. Optimizing load matching and geometry mitigates these, but they cap practical efficiencies well below theoretical bounds even for advanced materials.Practical Applications
Thermoelectric Generators
Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) are solid-state devices that convert thermal energy directly into electrical energy through the Seebeck effect, enabling power generation from temperature gradients without mechanical components. These devices are particularly valued in applications requiring reliable, long-term operation in remote or harsh environments, where traditional engines or turbines may fail. By arranging multiple thermoelectric elements into modules, TEGs can scale output voltage and power to meet diverse needs, from micro-watt sensors to kilowatt-scale systems. Emerging terrestrial applications include waste heat recovery in automotive exhaust systems and industrial processes, contributing to energy efficiency in vehicles and manufacturing as of 2025. The basic structure of a TEG module consists of pairs of p-type and n-type semiconductor legs, known as unicouples, connected electrically in series and thermally in parallel to maximize efficiency. These unicouples are typically sandwiched between two ceramic plates, such as aluminum oxide, which provide electrical insulation, structural support, and efficient heat transfer while preventing short circuits between the legs. Configurations can involve hundreds of such couples in a compact array, with the hot junctions facing the heat source and cold junctions connected to a sink, ensuring unidirectional current flow through an external load. In operation, a temperature difference is applied across the module, with the hot side heated by an external source—such as waste heat, combustion, or radioactive decay—while the cold side is maintained at a lower temperature via conduction, convection, or radiation. This gradient drives charge carriers (electrons in n-type material and holes in p-type) from the hot to cold junctions, generating an open-circuit voltage proportional to the Seebeck coefficient and temperature difference, , where is the Seebeck coefficient and is the temperature span. When connected to an external load, current flows, producing electrical power; the optimal load matching minimizes internal losses and maximizes output. A prominent historical application of TEGs is in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs), which power deep-space missions by harnessing the decay heat of plutonium-238 (Pu-238). The Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft, launched in 1977, each employ three Multi-Hundred Watt RTGs (MHW-RTGs) fueled by Pu-238, delivering an initial electrical output of approximately 158 watts per unit at mission start, with an overall conversion efficiency of about 5-7%. These RTGs have operated continuously for over 48 years as of 2025, demonstrating the technology's durability in vacuum and extreme conditions. For a single thermoelectric couple, the maximum power output under matched load conditions is given bywhere is the internal resistance of the couple. This expression highlights the quadratic dependence on the temperature difference, underscoring the importance of large for practical power levels, though real systems incorporate multiple couples to achieve higher voltages and currents. TEGs offer key advantages, including no moving parts for silent, maintenance-free operation and high reliability over extended periods, as evidenced by their use in space exploration. However, a primary disadvantage is their low conversion efficiency, typically below 10%, limited by material properties and thermal management challenges. Efficiency in TEGs is fundamentally bounded by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT, where higher ZT values enable approaches to Carnot limits but remain constrained in current materials. Recent developments include new TEG modules from Same Sky Devices introduced in January 2025, offering power outputs from 5.4 W to 21 W for portable and IoT applications, alongside market projections estimating growth to USD 2.38 billion by 2035 at a 10.73% CAGR.[35]