Hubbry Logo
Ulfberht swordsUlfberht swordsMain
Open search
Ulfberht swords
Community hub
Ulfberht swords
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ulfberht swords
Ulfberht swords
Ulfberht swords
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
One of three Ulfberht swords found in the territory of the Volga Bulgars. Its hilt (classified as Petersen type T-2) is decorated with three lines of round holes inlaid with twisted silver wire.[2]

Key Information

Four Ulfberht swords found in Norway (drawings from Lorange 1889)

The Ulfberht swords are a group of about 170 medieval swords found primarily in Northern Europe,[3][4] dated to the 9th to 11th centuries, with blades inlaid with the inscription +VLFBERH+T or +VLFBERHT+.[3][5] The word "Ulfberht" is a Frankish personal name, possibly indicating the origin of the blades.

Description

[edit]

The swords are at the transitional point between the Viking sword and the high medieval knightly sword. Most have blades of Oakeshott type X. They are also the starting point of the much more varied high medieval tradition of blade inscriptions. The reverse sides of the blades are inlaid with a geometric pattern, usually a braid pattern between vertical strokes. Numerous blades also bear this type of geometric pattern but no Vlfberht inscription.[6]

Ulfberht swords were made during a period when European swords were still predominantly pattern welded ("false Damascus"),[7][8] but with larger blooms of steel gradually becoming available, so that higher quality swords made after AD 1000 are increasingly likely to have crucible steel blades. The group of Ulfberht swords includes a wide spectrum of steel and production methods. One example from a 10th-century grave in Nemilany, Moravia, has a pattern welded core with welded-on hardened cutting edges. Another example appears to have been made from high-quality hypereutectoid steel possibly imported from Central Asia.[9]

Origin

[edit]

Ulfberht swords most likely originated in the Rhineland region, i.e., in Austrasia, the core region of the Frankish realm, later part of the Franconian stem duchy. Frankish origin of the swords has long been assumed because of the form of the personal name Ulfberht.[10]

Despite their assumed Frankish origin, the majority of the swords have been found in Northern Europe. Rather than being traded items, the swords were most likely exported as loot, ransom, or contraband — prohibitions in the Carolingian capitularia made it illegal to sell to foreigners at the time.[11] Three specimens have been found as far afield as Volga Bulgaria, at the time part of the Volga trade route.[2]

Number and distribution

[edit]

A total of 167 Ulfberht swords have been found, mostly in Scandinavia and around the Baltic Sea.[12][13] The number of swords found in Finland is unclear; Stalsberg identifies 14 Finnish Ulfberht swords, but Moilanen identifies 31.[14] In general, the exact number of swords found is debatable due to the fragmentary condition of some artifacts, and because some inscriptions appear to refer to the Ulfberht type rather than indicating that a specimen actually belongs to the type.[3][15]

The prevalence of Ulfberht swords in the archaeological record of Northern Europe does not imply that such swords were more widely used there than in Francia; the pagan practice of placing weapons in warrior graves greatly favours the archaeological record in regions of Europe that were still pagan (and indeed most of the Ulfberht swords found in Norway are from warrior graves), while swords found in continental Europe and England after the 7th century are mostly limited to stray finds; e.g., in riverbeds.[16] This is supported by the change in geographical distribution noted in the late Viking Age, when much of previously Pagan Europe was Christianized. None of the Norwegian Ulfberht swords are dated later than the early—middle 11th century, which coincides with the end of Pagan burial rites in the area.[17]

Location and dating of known Ulfberht swords[18][17][4]
Country Early Viking Age (8th - 9th ce.) Middle Viking Age (10th ce.) Late Viking Age (10th - 11th ce.) Undated Total
Norway 17 19 5 3 44
Sweden 9 3 1 4 17
Finland 2 3 2 7 14[Note 1]
Estonia 2 3 1 3 9
Latvia 1 1 4 1 7
Lithuania - 1 - 1 2
Belarus - 1 - - 1
Ukraine 1 5 - - 6
Russia 4 5 1 1 11
Russia (Kaliningrad Oblast) 2 4 2 4 12
Poland - 3 3 1 7
Czechia - 1 1 - 2
Croatia 2 - - - 2
Italy - - - 1 1
Switzerland - - 1 - 1
Germany 2 2 9 - 13
Denmark - 3 - - 3
Netherlands 2 - - 1 3
Belgium - - 2 - 2
England 1 1 2 - 4
Ireland 2 - - - 2
Iceland - 2 - - 2
Spain - - 1 - 1
France - - 1 - 1
Total 47 57 36 27 167

Dating

[edit]

The original Ulfberht sword type dates to the 9th or 10th century, but swords with the Ulfberht inscription continued to be made at least until the end of the Viking Age in the 11th century. A notable late example found in Eastern Germany, dated to the 11th or possibly early 12th century, represents the only specimen that combines the Vlfberht signature with a Christian "in nomine domini" inscription (+IINIOMINEDMN).[19] As a given name, Wulfbert (Old High German Wolfbert, Wolfbrecht, Wolfpert, Wolfperht, Vulpert) is recorded from the 8th to 10th centuries.[20]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]
  • Anders Lorange, Den yngre jernalders sværd, Bergen (1889).
  • Rudolf Wegeli, Inschriften auf mittelalterlichen Schwertklingen, Leipzig (1904).
  • Anne Stalsberg, Herstellung und Verbreitung der Vlfberht-Schwertklingen. Eine Neubewertung, Zeitschrift für Archäologie des Mittelalters, 36, 2008, 89-118 (English translation).
  • Mikko Moilanen, Marks of Fire, Value and Faith: Swords with Ferrous Inlays in Finland during the Late Iron Age (ca. 700–1200 AD), Turku (2015), ISBN 978-952-67329-6-1 (Online access).
  • M. Müller-Wille: Ein neues ULFBERHT-Schwert aus Hamburg. Verbreitung, Formenkunde und Herkunft, Offa 27, 1970, 65-91
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ulfberht swords

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Ulfberht swords are a renowned group of high-quality weapons, dating from the 9th to the 11th centuries, distinguished by their advanced blades and inscriptions featuring the name Ulfberht or variants such as +VLFBERH+T. These swords, forged from hypereutectoid with carbon content between 1.2% and 1.7%, exhibit superior strength, flexibility, and sharpness compared to contemporary iron weapons, reflecting cutting-edge metallurgical techniques likely influenced by Middle Eastern trade via the route. Approximately 170 Ulfberht swords have been unearthed, with the majority discovered in and the due to local burial practices, though fewer examples appear in the Frankish Empire. Likely produced in workshops along the in the Frankish Empire—possibly under the oversight of a monastic or figure rather than a single smith—these blades were exported to as trade goods, loot, or , before an export ban was imposed amid Viking raids. The swords' manufacture involved sophisticated methods, including forging from a single piece of or edges onto iron cores, often followed by and tempering for enhanced durability; many feature geometrical marks on the reverse blade, possibly evolving from pagan into Christian motifs. Later imitations, produced by Scandinavian or neighboring smiths using inferior materials like low-carbon iron, proliferated as the originals became symbols of prestige, underscoring the swords' cultural and economic value in Viking society. Overall, Ulfberht swords exemplify intercultural exchange, , and the martial elite's status during a pivotal era of European history.

Overview

Definition and Identification

Ulfberht swords constitute a distinct category of approximately 170 medieval artifacts, primarily excavated from sites across and dating to the 9th through 11th centuries. These swords are renowned for their blades bearing a characteristic inlaid inscription, typically rendered as +VLFBERH+T, though variants such as +VLFBERHT+ also occur, often flanked by crosses or plus signs. The term "Ulfberht" likely derives from a , suggesting a possible origin tied to skilled bladesmiths in the region. Identification of genuine Ulfberht swords hinges on the presence of this precise inscription, executed through a technique known as damascening, where silver or contrasting metal wire is hammered into shallow grooves cut along the blade's fuller. This marking, combined with the swords' exceptional metallurgy—featuring high-carbon steel of superior hardness and flexibility—distinguishes them from the majority of Viking Age blades, which were often pattern-welded from lower-quality iron. Metallographic analyses confirm that authentic examples exhibit homogeneous steel structures with carbon contents typically between 1.2% and 1.7%, far exceeding typical European production capabilities of the era. Imitations, lacking this quality, frequently display misspelled inscriptions or inferior materials, aiding in differentiation. Within the established Petersen typology of Viking swords, Ulfberht examples are primarily classified as Type X or, less commonly, Type XI, based on their configurations, including lobed pommels and straight crossguards. These swords feature straight, double-edged blades measuring around 70–90 cm in length, optimized for slashing and thrusting in close-quarters combat typical of Viking warfare. This typological placement underscores their role as high-status weapons among the elite warriors of the period.

Historical Significance

The Ulfberht swords served as prominent status symbols for warriors during the , signifying wealth, prestige, and social standing due to their exceptional craftsmanship and rarity. These blades, inscribed with the "+VLFBERH+T" , were not commonplace weapons but markers of distinction, often reserved for and high-ranking fighters who could afford or acquire such luxury items through or . Their presence in elite contexts underscores a cultural emphasis on martial prowess and hierarchy, where possessing an Ulfberht elevated one's position within Viking society. Economically, Ulfberht swords highlight the interconnected trade networks spanning Frankish Europe and from the onward, likely entering Viking hands via commerce, loot, or ransom along riverine routes from production centers in the . Their high value is evidenced by frequent deposition as in high-status burials across , where swords generally symbolized wealth and were interred with prominent individuals to accompany them into the . Norse sagas further illustrate this prestige, portraying named swords as cherished heirlooms passed down generations, with equivalents to Ulfberht blades commanding significant worth in exchanges or gifts, reinforcing their role in economic and social transactions. Militarily, the Ulfberht swords provided a tangible advantage in Viking raids and battles starting in the , owing to their superior durability, flexibility, and edge retention derived from high-carbon . This allowed warriors to deliver powerful slashing and chopping blows with reduced risk of breakage, outperforming typical iron blades and contributing to the effectiveness of Viking forces in close-quarters combat across . Their technological edge likely amplified the fearsome reputation of Viking armies, influencing outcomes in conflicts from the to the Baltic.

Physical Characteristics

Blade and Inscription

The blades of Ulfberht swords are characteristically double-edged, with lengths typically ranging from 70 to 90 cm, though preserved examples vary from about 50 to 100 cm depending on condition and any post-depositional shortening. A central fuller, or groove, runs along the to reduce weight while maintaining structural integrity, usually measuring 1 to 3.3 cm in width near the and tapering toward the point. Beneath the inscription , many blades reveal pattern-welded structures, often consisting of twisted iron and rods arranged in 3 to 14 layers to form geometric motifs such as lattices, spirals, or shapes, visible through or patterns. The defining feature of these swords is the inscription, most commonly rendered as +VLFBERH+T or +VLFBERHT+, executed as an iron hammered into the surface, with inlay depths of 0.3 to 1.6 mm. Positioned in the upper third of the near the and often within the fuller, the inscription served both decorative and functional purposes, potentially acting as a mark or brand to signify superior craftsmanship. Interpretations identify "Vlfberht" as a Frankish , possibly denoting a swordsmith, overseer, or figure associated with production. Variations in the inscription include subtle spelling differences, such as joined letters (e.g., V and L) or altered crosses, as well as more pronounced anomalies like reversed letters (e.g., F, L, or T) and pseudo-inscriptions with misspellings (e.g., +VLEFBIIIT or +VFLBERHTCC+). These deviations, observed across examples like the sword from Eura, (KM 9164:3), highlight the artisanal process, where illiterate smiths might have replicated designs from memory or templates. In some cases, additional markings such as reversed "" appear alongside the primary inscription, suggesting symbolic or invocatory elements.

Hilt and Dimensions

The hilts of Ulfberht swords are constructed for one-handed use, comprising a pommel, grip, and that provide balance and ergonomic handling. The pommel is typically of the Brazil-nut or lobed form, often 3-4 cm in height and made of iron with possible silver or inlays for decoration, reflecting Carolingian influences in early examples. The crossguard is generally straight or slightly curved, measuring 9-15 cm in length and 1-2 cm in width, serving to protect the hand while allowing fluid wrist movement. Grips are commonly formed from or , with lengths of 8-12 cm to accommodate a single hand, and were frequently wrapped in , wire, or other organic materials for enhanced friction and durability, though these perishable elements rarely survive in archaeological contexts. In some finds, such as those from Norwegian graves, evidence of wire winding around the grip indicates regional adaptations for better control during . Overall dimensions of Ulfberht swords emphasize balance and maneuverability, with total lengths ranging from 89-103 cm, where the accounts for approximately 70-90 cm and the for 10-16 cm, yielding a blade-to-hilt ratio suited to thrusting and slashing in close-quarters fighting. Weights typically fall between 1.0-1.6 kg, distributed to center the balance point near the guard for optimal handling, as seen in examples like a 89 cm sword weighing 1.04 kg from deposits. Variations in hilt design appear across finds, with some exhibiting pronounced Carolingian symmetry in pommel and guard proportions, while others display simpler Scandinavian modifications, such as reduced ornamentation or adjusted grip lengths to suit local customs and combat preferences. For instance, Petersen Type X hilts on certain Ulfberht swords feature more angular guards, contrasting with the rounded forms in Type H examples, highlighting evolutionary adaptations over the 9th-11th centuries.

Metallurgy and Construction

Steel Composition and Quality

The steel in genuine Ulfberht swords consists of high-carbon , with carbon contents typically ranging from 1.0% to 2.7% in hypereutectoid compositions. This elevated carbon level, often exemplified by samples at 1.4% or 2.7%, far exceeds the 0.2% to 0.75% found in contemporary iron used across . The material is characterized by minimal impurities, including low inclusions such as iron silicates containing , calcium, and magnesium, which enhances its overall purity and homogeneity compared to the heterogeneous structures of era-typical iron. Modern metallographic studies reveal a microstructure dominated by and lamellae, particularly in the , supporting high throughout. This structure allows the swords to achieve values up to 476 Vickers pyramid (VPH), with overall ranges of 130-476 VPH due to the hypereutectoid composition and hot-working, providing superior strength, flexibility, and sharpness. Such properties render the blades highly resistant to deformation, shattering, or dulling during combat, outperforming the brittle or overly soft local steels. In comparative terms, the crucible steel's low impurity content and consistent carbon distribution outperform Viking Age European bloomery products, which often suffered from inconsistent forging and higher non-metallic inclusions, limiting their durability and sharpness retention. These attributes underscore the advanced material quality that distinguished genuine Ulfberht swords from imitations and regional alternatives.

Forging Techniques

The production of genuine Ulfberht swords involved sophisticated metallurgical processes that set them apart from contemporary European blades, relying on high-carbon steel achieved through crucible smelting. Iron ore and charcoal were combined in clay crucibles and heated to temperatures exceeding 1,500°C, allowing the metal to fully melt and impurities like slag to separate and float to the surface, yielding ingots with carbon contents ranging from 1.2% to 2.7%. This crucible steel, likely imported via trade routes such as the Volga, formed the basis for the blade's exceptional strength and flexibility, distinguishing it from the more common bloomery iron used elsewhere. Following , the ingots underwent hot , a labor-intensive requiring skilled blacksmiths to the brittle at relatively low temperatures to avoid cracking while shaping it into a . Archaeological metallographic of specimens reveals that genuine Ulfberht blades (classified as in studies) were typically forged from a single piece or minimal folds of this homogeneous , with folding techniques occasionally employed to further refine the structure and reduce residual . Some early examples incorporated pattern-welding for the core, where twisted rods of iron and were forge-welded together to create a resilient central structure before the high-carbon edges were added, though this method was rare in the purest variants and largely phased out in favor of solid construction. The demanded advanced tooling, such as heavy and anvils, and precise control over heat to maintain the steel's hypereutectoid properties, reflecting the expertise of specialized workshops. Heat treatment followed forging to optimize the blade's performance, involving hot-working and air-cooling to achieve a pearlitic and cementitic microstructure that balanced and , as evidenced by the observed uniform properties in examined blades. Experimental replications, such as those conducted by modern smiths using period-appropriate furnaces, confirm that these steps required up to 11 hours of continuous and days of finishing, underscoring the technical prowess involved. The iconic "+VLFBERH+T" inscription was inlaid during the hot stage, using thin strips of iron or pattern-welded wire softened by heat and hammered into shallow grooves cut into the blade's surface. This technique, visible in and microscopic examinations of artifacts like the Bergen 882 specimen, ensured the letters bonded metallurgically without the need for later , though the process demanded precision to avoid distorting the blade's integrity. Overall, these methods highlight the Ulfberht's reliance on imported materials and elite craftsmanship, enabling blades that were lighter, stronger, and more durable than typical weapons.

Origin and Production

Theories of Origin

The primary scholarly theory posits that genuine Ulfberht swords originated in the Frankish Empire, specifically in the region of , which corresponds to modern-day western and central . This hypothesis is supported by 2020 research conducted by Dr. Robert Lehmann of the Helmholtz Institute in , which analyzed the of an Ulfberht sword recovered from the River near Hameln in , identifying the iron in the blade from the Siegerland region and the lead in the pommel from the area. The study suggests production at Carolingian-era monasteries, such as those in or Lorsch, which were known for ironworking and weapon manufacture under ecclesiastical oversight. Linguistic and stylistic evidence bolsters this Frankish attribution. The inscription "+VLFBERH+T" employs and derives from a Frankish , likely denoting a overseer rather than an individual smith, consistent with Carolingian sword-making traditions where blades featured maker's marks for . Reverse-side geometric patterns on some blades echo adapted pagan motifs within a Christian Frankish context, further linking them to continental production rather than Scandinavian origins. Early assumptions of Viking manufacture have been largely debunked, as no evidence of advanced production exists in during the 9th–11th centuries, with burial patterns indicating the swords arrived there via trade, loot, or ransom from Frankish territories. An alternative perspective focuses on the steel's composition, proposing that high-quality crucible steel was imported from the —possibly —via Volga trade routes, with final assembly occurring in . Metallurgist Dr. Alan Williams' analyses of Ulfberht blades reveal patterns matching Oriental , suggesting Vikings acquired ingots through exchanges of furs and , explaining the technology's apparent anachronism in medieval . This import theory aligns with the cessation of authentic production around the , coinciding with the decline of eastern trade networks.

Genuine Swords vs. Imitations

Authentic Ulfberht swords are distinguished by their use of consistent high-carbon steel, typically hypereutectoid with 1.2% to 1.7% carbon content, produced via methods that yield a pure, homogeneous structure with minimal impurities. These swords feature precise inscriptions in the form of "+VLFBERH+T," executed with uniform lettering and proper orientation, without errors such as reversed or malformed characters. Dated to the , they reflect advanced forging that allowed for exceptional hardness (around 300-350 ) and flexibility, likely sourced from Central Asian routes. In contrast, imitations, often produced from the late onward and overlapping with genuine production, employed lower-quality iron or medium-carbon (0.5% to 0.8% carbon), often with welded edges on softer iron cores to approximate the appearance of superior blades. These fakes bear pseudo-inscriptions like "+VLFBERHT+" or "+LEFBERHT+," featuring variant spellings, inconsistent cross placements, or crude lettering that deviates from the authentic formula. Some imitations incorporated pattern-welding techniques to mimic the visual layering of high-quality , though this resulted in heterogeneous structures prone to failure under stress. Of the approximately 170 known Ulfberht-inscribed swords, analyses suggest only about 30 are genuine, meaning up to 80% are imitations, as evidenced by analyses showing inferior in the majority of finds. Detection of genuine swords versus imitations relies on metallurgical testing, including and wavelength-dispersive (WDX) microanalysis, which reveal key differences in composition and processing. Authentic blades exhibit nearly slag-free with microstructures of and , enabling low-temperature without defects, while fakes display abundant inclusions, ferrite- matrices, and evidence of or that compromises integrity. These methods, applied by experts like Alan Williams, confirm that genuine Ulfberht swords represent a rare pinnacle of Viking-era , distinct from the widespread copies that flooded northern European markets.

Archaeological Context

Number of Finds

Approximately 170 Ulfberht swords have been documented through archaeological efforts, including recent discoveries such as a well-preserved example dredged from the Vistula River near , , in January 2024. As of 2025, the total remains approximately 170. Ulfberht swords have been recovered through a variety of methods, from early systematic excavations at Viking-era sites to contemporary practices like river dredging, amateur metal detecting, and professional archaeological surveys. For instance, the 2024 Polish specimen was unearthed during routine , while a corroded example was found by a farmer in , , in June 2024, likely disturbed by plowing or detecting activities. These modern recoveries complement historical finds from controlled digs, highlighting how both intentional searches and accidental encounters contribute to the corpus. Many Ulfberht swords survive in incomplete states, often as blade fragments lacking hilts, due to their deposition contexts and exposure to environmental degradation over centuries. Those retrieved from rivers, such as the 2024 find, frequently exhibit heavy from prolonged immersion in water and , though can sometimes preserve structural integrity. In contrast, examples from graves or hoards may retain more complete forms, protected by conditions, but still require extensive conservation to reveal inscriptions like "+VLFBERHT+" for identification.

Geographical Distribution

The majority of Ulfberht swords—approximately 170 in total—have been discovered in and the , reflecting their prominence in contexts. Significant numbers have also been unearthed in , , and the , indicating widespread circulation beyond the core production areas. Riverine deposits are a common recovery pattern, particularly along major waterways such as the and rivers, where swords have been found in layers suggestive of deposition or loss during travel. For instance, multiple examples from the in present-day highlight eastern extensions of distribution, while recent dredgings in the near , , have yielded well-preserved specimens. The overall distribution patterns point to exports from a Frankish core, likely the , radiating to Viking peripheries through established trade routes like the Rhine River and across the . High concentrations occur in pagan graves across these regions, often associated with elite warrior burials that underscore the swords' status as prestige items.

Dating and Chronology

Dating Methods

Dating Ulfberht swords relies on a combination of scientific and comparative archaeological techniques, as the blades themselves are not amenable to direct due to their metallic composition. is applied to associated organic materials, such as wooden hilts or , providing calibrated age ranges for the contexts in which the swords were found. For instance, analysis of wooden elements from burial sites has yielded dates aligning with the , though precision depends on the quality of the organic samples. Typological using the Petersen evaluates hilt forms against established typologies, allowing based on morphological evolution across types A through Z, with Ulfberht examples often fitting types H, I, or K from the 9th to 11th centuries. complements these methods in grave contexts by analyzing tree-ring patterns in associated timber coffins or ship burials, offering precise annual resolutions that anchor sword deposits to specific decades within the Viking period. Metallurgical approaches provide additional chronological insights through the examination of microstructure and inscription styles. Microstructural via reveals carbon distribution, effects (e.g., banding or formation), and forging patterns that evolve over time, distinguishing early high-quality blades from later pattern-welded imitations and supporting a production span from the onward. Inscription script tracks variations in the "+VLFBERH+T" or "+VLFBERHT+" markings, including , cross placements, and phonetic shifts, which correlate with workshop traditions and temporal progression, as seen in grouped variants from archaeological assemblages. Challenges in dating arise primarily from the lack of contextual information for many of the approximately 170 known Ulfberht swords, with a significant portion recovered from riverbeds or disturbed sites without associated organics, necessitating reliance on stratified burial finds for reliable chronologies.

Timeline and Evolution

The Ulfberht swords first appeared in the early phase of their production around 800–900 AD, during the height of Frankish-Viking trade networks along the and routes, when genuine high-quality imports made from were imported into from regions possibly including the Frankish Empire or . These authentic swords, numbering about 14 known examples from the early , featured hypereutectoid with low content, enabling superior strength and flexibility that surpassed contemporary European blades. techniques such as metallurgical analysis and contextual confirm this initial period as one of limited but elite importation, concentrated in amid peak . From 900–1000 AD, the Ulfberht swords entered a peak era of widespread distribution across , the , and the Baltic, with numerous inscribed blades circulating as status symbols among Viking elites, facilitated by extensive trade in high-value goods like Samanid dirhams. Genuine production continued briefly with the same advanced techniques, but as original imports waned due to shifting trade dynamics, imitations began emerging, often using inferior forged locally to mimic the prestigious inscription. This imitation surge reflected the swords' cultural prestige, though many fakes displayed telltale signs like misspelled markings or lower carbon purity. By 1000–1100 AD, Ulfberht swords had largely transitioned to imitations, coinciding with broader technological shifts in European sword-making toward pattern-welded and bloomery-based designs, as the knowledge and supply of crucible steel diminished in the region until the Industrial Revolution. Original production had ceased, leaving mostly counterfeit blades that exploited the name's reputation but lacked the material excellence of earlier examples. The last dated finds, including recent archaeological discoveries such as a possible Ulfberht sword found in 2024 in Rogaland, Norway, cluster around 1050 AD, marking the end of the Ulfberht phenomenon as Viking Age sword typology evolved into later medieval forms.

References

  1. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268620377.pdf
  2. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=13545&context=etd
  3. https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-viking-age/weapons/swords/
  4. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hic3.12529
  5. https://archaeologymag.com/2024/01/ancient-viking-sword-recovered-from-vistula-river/
  6. https://www.academia.edu/68589269/VLFBERHT_swords_Origin_material_and_manufacture
  7. https://www.reliks.com/ulfberht-sword/
  8. https://www.discoveryuk.com/mysteries/ulfberht-swords-the-superior-steel-of-the-vikings/
  9. https://www.medievalists.net/2025/05/ulfberht-sword-to-be-auctioned/
  10. https://artofswordmaking.com/gallery/ulfberht-sword-petersen-type-x
  11. http://www.vikingsword.com/vbook/vtypes.pdf
  12. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19777104.pdf
  13. https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/119919/diss2016Moilanen.pdf
  14. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hic3.12529
  15. https://archive.org/details/SwordsOfTheVikingAgeByIanPeirceEwartOakeshott
  16. https://www.hurstwic.org/history/articles/manufacturing/text/viking_sword.htm
  17. https://linde-stories.com/the-secret-science-behind-the-viking-supersword-ulfberht/
  18. https://www.spektrum.de/news/die-markenschmiede-der-franken/1693632
  19. https://www.historynet.com/singing-swords-ulfberht-blades-from-germany/
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331991806_VLFBERHT_swords_Origin_material_and_manufacture
  21. https://os.pennds.org/archaeobib_filestore/pdf_articles/bookchapters/2015_Williams.pdf
  22. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/dec/27/archaeology-vikings-sword
  23. https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2024/01/viking-ulfberht-9th-century-sword-recovered-from-vistula-river-in-poland/
  24. https://kids.kiddle.co/Ulfberht_swords
  25. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/mysterious-viking-sword-made-technology-future-001944
  26. https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/70357
  27. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/found-on-a-farm-in-norway-this-sword-belonged-to-vikings-1000-years-ago-180984478/
  28. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-sword-poland-0020228
  29. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/this-medieval-sword-spent-1000-years-at-the-bottom-of-a-polish-river-180983684/
  30. https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/69285
  31. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12529
  32. https://mellenpress.com/book/Vlfberht-The-Sword-Master-A-Re-evaluation-Based-on-9th-11th-Century-Swords-with-the-Signature-Vlfberht-on-the-Blade-and-on-Contemporary-Written-Sources/9414/
  33. https://www.academia.edu/34909016/ULFBERHT_BLADES_NEW_ANSWERS_TO_OLD_QUEST_1_pdf
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250312307_A_metallurgical_study_of_some_Viking_swords
  35. https://www.[academia.edu](/page/Academia.edu)/68589269/VLFBERHT_swords_Origin_material_and_manufacture
  36. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/sword-discovery-rogaland-0020875
  37. https://archaeology.org/news/2024/06/11/rare-type-of-viking-age-sword-discovered-in-norway/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.