Hubbry Logo
Wylfa nuclear power stationWylfa nuclear power stationMain
Open search
Wylfa nuclear power station
Community hub
Wylfa nuclear power station
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wylfa nuclear power station
Wylfa nuclear power station
Wylfa nuclear power station
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Aerial view of Wylfa just after closure

Key Information

Wylfa nuclear power station (Welsh: Atomfa'r Wylfa) is a Magnox nuclear power station undergoing decommissioning. Wylfa is situated west of Cemaes Bay on the island of Anglesey, off the northwestern coast of Wales. Construction of the two 490 MW nuclear reactors, known as Reactor 1 and Reactor 2, began in 1963. They became operational in 1971. Wylfa was located on the coast because seawater was used as a coolant.

In 2012, Reactor 2 was shut down. Reactor 1 was switched off on 30 December 2015, ending 44 years of operation at the site.

Wylfa Newydd (literally New Wylfa) was a proposed new nuclear station on a site adjacent to the old plant. An application to build two advanced boiling water reactors was submitted by Horizon Nuclear Power to the Office of Nuclear Regulation on 4 April 2017. In September 2020, parent company Hitachi withdrew from the project. In 2022, the UK Government expressed interest in the construction of a possible set of two EPR reactors on the site, and in 2024 announced it would purchase the site from Hitachi.

History

[edit]

Wylfa was the second nuclear power station to be built in Wales after Trawsfynydd in 1959. Following the closure of Trawsfynydd in 1991, Wylfa became Wales' only nuclear power station.

Construction of Wylfa, which was undertaken by British Nuclear Design and Construction (BNDC), a consortium backed by English Electric, Babcock & Wilcox Ltd and Taylor Woodrow Construction,[1] began in 1963. The reactors were supplied by The Nuclear Power Group (TNPG) and the turbines by English Electric. These were the largest and last Magnox-type reactors to be built in the UK. Wylfa was also the second British nuclear power station, following Oldbury, to have a pre-stressed concrete pressure vessel instead of steel for easier construction and enhanced safety.

Wylfa's two 490 MW Magnox nuclear reactors – Reactor 1 and Reactor 2 – became operational in 1971.[2] They typically supplied 23 GW h of electricity daily when they were both in service.

Although the original design output was 1,190 MW, unexpected accelerated ("breakaway") corrosion of mild steel components of the gas circuit in hot CO2 was detected even before the first reactor began operating. The channel gas outlet temperature, the temperature at which the CO2 leaves the fuel channels in the reactor core, had to be reduced, initially dropping the power output to 840 MW, which was later raised to 980 MW as more experience accumulated. A considerable portion of the output, up to 255 MW, was consumed by the nearby Anglesey Aluminium smelting plant.[3]

The graphite cores each weigh 3,800 tonnes (3,700 long tons); 6,156 vertical fuel channels contain 49,248 natural uranium magnox-clad fuel elements, hence the name magnox reactor. A further 200 channels allow boron control rods to enter the reactor and control the nuclear reaction. The primary coolant in the reactors is carbon dioxide gas.

The site is managed by Nuclear Restoration Services (formerly Magnox Ltd,[4][5] formerly British Nuclear Group, formerly Nuclear Electric, formerly National Power, formerly the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB)) which is a subsidiary of the site owner, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). The NDA's purpose is to oversee the decommissioning and clean-up of the UK's civil nuclear legacy.

During its operational life substantial works were needed to strengthen the reactors against deteriorating welds discovered in the safety review in April 2000. Amid public controversy, Greenpeace issued an independent safety appraisal,[6] commissioned a report from Large Associates, critical of the plant and its restart plans, but the permit to restart operation was given in August 2001. In addition to welding weaknesses, radiolytic depletion of the graphite moderator blocks was still of concern and PAWB continue to campaign for early shut-down of the plant as well as against any nuclear replacement.

Closure and decommissioning

[edit]

On 20 July 2006, the NDA announced that the station would be shut down in 2010 to enable the closure and decommissioning of the Magnox spent fuel reprocessing plant at Sellafield.[7] Springfields Fuels Limited ended production of Magnox fuel elements in 2008 due to these plans.[8] In 2010, the NDA announced an extension to 2012, beyond Wylfa's 40th anniversary as a generating power station in January 2011, due to schedule slippage at Sellafield which would allow Wylfa additional time before final defuelling.[9][10] At this time, a strategy was also devised to maximise the generation from the remaining fuel stock given that new fuel could no longer be manufactured. This required a change in the distribution of fuel within the reactors, as well as the closure of Reactor 2 in 2012 to allow this fuel to be transferred into Reactor 1.[11] Reactor 2 ceased generating on 25 April 2012 at 19:02 BST,[12] allowing Reactor 1 to continue to operate. A licence extension to operate Reactor 1 until 31 December 2015 was granted in September 2014.[13]

Reactor 1 was shut down on 30 December 2015. Defuelling started in 2016, and was completed in 2019.[14] Defuelling and removal of most buildings is expected to take until 2025, followed by a care and maintenance phase from 2025 to 2096. Demolition of reactor buildings and final site clearance is planned for 2096 to 2101.[15]

Future nuclear plant plans

[edit]
Main article: Wylfa Newydd nuclear power station
Wylfa nuclear power station from Llanbadrig Point

A second plant named Wylfa Newydd (previously referred to as Wylfa B[16]) has been proposed. Wylfa Newydd's proposal was the subject of local opposition, led by the group People Against Wylfa B (PAWB[17] – "pawb" is Welsh for "everyone"). In March 2006 the local council voted to extend the life of Wylfa A and to support the construction of Wylfa B, citing the potential loss of employment in the smelter works and nuclear station.[18]

Horizon/Hitachi plans

[edit]

Horizon Nuclear Power, originally an E.ON and RWE joint venture, bought by Hitachi in 2012,[19] announced in 2009 intentions to install about 3,000 MWe of new nuclear plant at Wylfa. Horizon planned to build two advanced boiling water reactors (ABWRs) at a site to the south of the existing Wylfa station.[20][21] On 18 October 2010, the British government announced that Wylfa was one of the eight sites it considered suitable for future nuclear power stations.[22]

In January 2012, 300 anti-nuclear protesters took to the streets of Llangefni, against plans to build a new nuclear power station at Wylfa. The march was organised by organisations including Pobl Atal Wylfa B, Greenpeace and Cymdeithas yr Iaith, which are supporting farmer Richard Jones who is in dispute with Horizon.[23]

In 2013, Horizon planned initial site work to start at Wylfa in 2015, with building work starting in 2018 and generation starting in the mid-2020s.[24] This timescale was delayed, and Hitachi planned to make the final investment decision in 2019.[25]

On 4 April 2017, Horizon submitted a Site Licence Application to the Office for Nuclear Regulation.[26][27] The scheme was extended to include a tunnel under the Menai Strait to carry the power cables to protect the conservation worth of the Strait and the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.[28] In December 2017, Horizon believed the consensus of government and industry was that the Contract for Difference financing model used for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, involving fully private sector financing, would not be used for subsequent nuclear plants, and was in discussions with government about alternative finance mechanisms.[29]

The UK government intended to invest £5 billion in the new power station. Previously, government policy had been not to invest directly in new nuclear projects.[30] Horizon Nuclear Power submitted a Development Consent Order application for the Wylfa Newydd project to the Planning Inspectorate on 1 June 2018.[31]

Area Dosemeter close to Wylfa Nuclear Power Station

Cancellation

[edit]

In January 2019, it was reported that the nuclear plant's funding was questionable, after £2 billion had been spent on the project.[32] The reports noted that a dispute between the proposed plant's builder Hitachi and the UK government over funding had thrown the future construction into doubt, and that an upcoming meeting later in the month would be the location of an announcement regarding the plant's future.[33]

On 17 January 2019, Hitachi announced that it would "suspend" work on the Wylfa project. Duncan Hawthorne, chief executive of Horizon Nuclear Power, said: "...we will take steps to reduce our presence but keep the option to resume development in future".[34] The UK government had been expected to grant a development consent order in a move to restart the project,[35] but subsequently deferred the decision deadline until 30 September 2020.[36]

In September 2020, Hitachi announced its withdrawal from the project and from the sister site at Oldbury. It will close down its development activities, but will work with the UK government and other stakeholders to facilitate future options for the two sites.[37] On 28 January 2021, Hitachi formally withdrew its Development Consent Order application. The government indicated that it would "continue to explore future opportunities" for the site.[38]

Other proposals

[edit]

In November 2020, it was reported that a US consortium of Bechtel, Southern Company and Westinghouse Electric Company was in talks with the British Government about reviving the Wylfa Newydd project, by building AP1000 reactors at the site.[39]

In January 2021, Shearwater Energy presented plans for a hybrid plant, to consist of a wind farm and small modular reactors (SMRs), to be installed adjacent to the existing Wylfa power station but separate from the proposed Wylfa Newydd site. Shearwater has signed a memorandum of understanding with NuScale Power for the SMRs. The plant could start generation as early as 2027 and would ultimately produce up to 3 GW of electricity and power a hydrogen generation unit producing up to 3 million kg of hydrogen per year.[40] In April 2022, it was announced that Wylfa and Oldbury sites are candidates for two sets of EPR reactors to be constructed as the UK plans to construct up to eight new reactors this decade. These sites would be part of the next set of plants with the first being Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C. The Wylfa and Oldbury sites are likely to begin construction next parliament.[41][42][clarification needed]

In March 2024, during the Spring Budget, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced that the site would be purchased from Hitachi for £160m.[43] This led to Wylfa being selected as the UK government's preferred site for a gigawatt-scale plant in May 2025.[44]

Following the change of government in July 2024, the gigawatt-scale proposal was abandoned – in November 2025, Wylfa was instead chosen as the site for the first planned use of small modular reactors in the UK.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wylfa nuclear power station

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Wylfa Nuclear Power Station was a twin-reactor Magnox-type nuclear power plant located west of Cemaes Bay on the Isle of Anglesey, Wales, United Kingdom. Construction commenced in 1963 at a cost of £740 million, with the station entering commercial operation in 1971 after generating its first electricity to the grid that year. The facility featured two gas-cooled reactors with a combined gross capacity of approximately 1,180 MWe, making it the largest Magnox plant in the UK and a key provider of baseload, low-carbon electricity for over four decades. One reactor ceased operations in 2012, while the second, the final Magnox unit in the UK, shut down in December 2015 after 44 years of service, exceeding its original 25-year design life through extensions justified by rigorous safety assessments. Decommissioning commenced thereafter under oversight from the Office for Nuclear Regulation, involving fuel removal, waste management, and site remediation, with the process ongoing as of 2025. The station's reliable output underscored the viability of early nuclear designs for energy security, though Magnox technology faced inherent challenges such as fuel cladding corrosion requiring specialized storage solutions. Post-decommissioning, the site has been earmarked for potential new nuclear development, leveraging its existing infrastructure and grid connections for future low-emission power generation.

Site and Technical Overview

Location and Infrastructure

The Wylfa nuclear power station occupies a coastal site on the northern shore of the Isle of Anglesey in , , positioned west of Cemaes Bay between the towns of and . This location provides direct access to the , essential for the station's seawater cooling requirements. The site covers approximately 100 hectares, encompassing reactor buildings, support facilities, and waste management structures, with terrain featuring rocky cliffs and adjacent . The core infrastructure consists of two reactors, each moderated by and fueled with encased in cans, housed in robust concrete pressure vessels within separate reactor buildings. Adjacent turbine halls contain steam turbines and generators that convert thermal energy into electrical power. The cooling system relies on direct circulation, with intake tunnels extending into the sea to draw approximately 70 cubic meters per second per reactor, and outfall diffusers discharging heated effluent to minimize environmental impact. Electrical output connects to the 400 kV National Grid transmission network via an on-site substation, facilitating export to the UK's supergrid system. Supporting infrastructure includes fuel handling facilities, storage buildings, and administrative offices, all secured within a fenced perimeter with controlled access points. The site's incorporates seismic considerations and flood defenses due to its coastal exposure, with auxiliary systems for emergency cooling and .

Reactor Design and Capacity

The Wylfa nuclear power station featured two reactors, a first-generation unique to the , characterized by moderation, gas cooling, and metal fuel clad in a magnesium-aluminum sheath to minimize absorption. These reactors utilized a low-pressure gas flowing through a core stacked with fuel channels, transferring heat to once-through boilers for generation to drive turbo-alternators. The incorporated steel pressure vessels housing the core, distinguishing it from later advanced gas-cooled reactors with pre-stressed concrete vessels, and emphasized dual-cycle capability for both electricity production and generation, though primarily optimized for power output at Wylfa. Each had a electrical capacity of 550 MWe and a thermal capacity of approximately 1,650 MWt, yielding a total station output of around 1,100 MWe, making Wylfa the largest plant by capacity. However, due to sleeve oxidation and channel flow restrictions identified during operations, output was progressively derated for safety and reliability, stabilizing at about 490 MWe per unit for a combined operational capacity of up to 980 MWe. cores contained over 6,000 fuel channels each, supporting refueling outages every 90-120 days to accommodate the low-burnup fuel cycle inherent to use.
ReactorDesign Net Capacity (MWe)Operational Net Capacity (MWe)Thermal Capacity (MWt)
15504901,650
2550490~1,650

Historical Operations

Construction and Commissioning

Construction of the Wylfa nuclear power station, comprising two reactors each rated at 490 MW electrical output, commenced on September 1, 1963, under the auspices of the as part of the UK's advanced gas-cooled reactor program. The site on was selected for its coastal location facilitating seawater cooling, and the project represented the final and largest installation in the Magnox fleet, with total construction costs reaching £740 million. Reactor 1 achieved first criticality on November 1, 1969, marking the initial self-sustaining . It connected to the grid for the first time on January 24, 1971, and entered commercial operation on November 1, 1971, following regulatory approvals and testing phases typical for designs involving graphite moderation and gas cooling. Reactor 2 followed with first criticality on September 1, 1970, and achieved commercial operation in 1971, enabling the station to supply baseline electricity to the national grid at full capacity. Commissioning proceeded without documented major delays or safety incidents attributable to construction flaws, reflecting the matured engineering practices from prior builds, though the process involved extensive fuel loading trials and system synchronization to ensure stable output from the uranium metal fuel elements clad in alloy. By late 1971, both units were synchronized, positioning Wylfa as the UK's most powerful nuclear facility at the time with a combined capacity exceeding 980 MW.

Operational History

The Wylfa station's two reactors entered commercial operation in 1971, following that began in 1963, with each unit initially rated at around 590 MWe gross capacity but operating at approximately 490 MW net. Over its lifespan, the plant supplied baseload electricity equivalent to powering a city the size of at peak output, averaging 23 GWh daily across both reactors, and contributed reliably to the grid despite the inherent limitations of the carbon-magnesiate clad fuel design, which restricted fuel enrichment and burn-up compared to later reactor types. Operations proceeded with periodic maintenance and refueling outages, enabling extensions beyond the original 25-year design life through regulatory permissions from the Office for Nuclear Regulation and Magnox Ltd., the site's operator under the A key factor in prolonging service was the inter-reactor transfer scheme, which relocated partially irradiated elements from other decommissioned stations to Wylfa after domestic Magnox fabrication ceased in , allowing continued criticality without new production. Reactor 2 ceased generation in early 2012 after 41 years, citing economic viability amid rising maintenance costs and constraints, while Reactor 1 persisted under similar extensions until its planned shutdown. A significant operational incident occurred on July 31, 1993, during routine refueling of Reactor 1, when a 25-meter fall of a detached crane grab into the reactor core prompted retrieval efforts using remote tooling, though no off-site release or core damage ensued, underscoring the robustness of containment but highlighting risks in aging graphite-moderated systems. The station maintained an otherwise strong safety record, with no INES-rated events above Level 2 during its tenure, attributable to stringent inspections and the inherent low-pressure design of reactors that minimized accident escalation potential. Reactor 1's final shutdown on December 30, 2015, concluded 44 years of at the site, five years beyond initial projections, as the last operational unit globally, driven primarily by the unavailability of replacement fuel and escalating decommissioning imperatives under nuclear policy. This marked the transition to defueling, with all spent fuel removed by 2019 for reprocessing at , reflecting the causal endpoint of design obsolescence in first-generation gas-cooled technology amid evolving and regulatory standards.

Shutdown and Immediate Aftermath

Reactor 2 at Wylfa was permanently disconnected from the electricity grid on 25 April 2012, concluding 41 years of operation for that unit, as its extended life reached its limit under regulatory approvals. Reactor 1 remained active, providing baseload power amid concerns over national energy supply constraints. The full site closure proceeded with Reactor 1's shutdown on 30 December 2015, after 44 years of total operations, making Wylfa the last operational reactor globally. This event followed a five-year extension beyond the original 2010 target, justified by the UK's need to maintain generation capacity to prevent electricity shortfalls. The shutdown process involved systematic disconnection and initial safety protocols, overseen by Magnox Ltd, the site's operator under the . Staff assembled to observe the Reactor 1 switch-off, symbolizing the transition from active generation to care and maintenance. No major incidents occurred during the final operations or immediate cessation, reflecting the reactors' history of despite their age. Immediate post-shutdown activities centered on defuelling, with spent fuel elements transferred to secure storage ponds on-site, initiating the multi-decade decommissioning timeline. The site shifted to a transitional "care and maintenance" status, prioritizing radiological safety and while preserving infrastructure for potential future reuse or full dismantlement. By early , preliminary site surveys and waste segregation began, aiming to reduce active workforce presence from operational peaks to specialized decommissioning teams.

Performance Metrics

Electricity Output and Efficiency

The Wylfa nuclear power station featured two Magnox reactors, each with a net electrical generating capacity of 490 MWe, yielding a combined capacity of 980 MWe. Reactor 1 had a thermal capacity of 1650 MWt, while Reactor 2's was 1920 MWt, resulting in thermal-to-electric efficiencies of approximately 29.7% and 25.5%, respectively—consistent with the lower efficiencies inherent to early gas-cooled, graphite-moderated designs reliant on carbon dioxide cooling and natural uranium fuel. From initial criticality in through final shutdown in December 2015, the station produced a total of 232 TWh of , equivalent to powering the entire for roughly one year at contemporary consumption levels. Reactor 1 alone supplied 126.47 TWh over its lifetime. This output reflected strong performance relative to other stations, with the plant achieving record durations of continuous operation and ranking as the highest cumulative generator among its class. Average load factors across the operational period hovered between 60% and 70%, bolstered by lifetime energy availability factors near 70% for individual units and operational factors exceeding 82% when accounting for scheduled maintenance. These metrics improved over time through life extensions and upgrades, surpassing early averages of 59% (1976–1992) and contributing to nuclear's share of rising to peaks above 25% in later years. High inter-outage load factors of 92–99% underscored the design's reliability under extended fuel cycles.

Safety Incidents and Regulatory Compliance

The Wylfa nuclear power station, featuring twin reactors, operated under the regulatory framework of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) from commissioning until 2013, after which oversight transitioned to the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), enforcing compliance with the Nuclear Installations Act 1965 and associated directives. Routine inspections and periodic reviews, including a Long Term Safety Review (LTSR) in the early 2000s, affirmed the station's adherence to operational limits, with no enforcement actions resulting in prolonged shutdowns for systemic non-compliance. The reactors maintained a collective averaging around 70-80% over their lifespan, indicative of managed technical challenges rather than pervasive lapses. Early operational incidents centered on integrity issues inherent to the design's carbon dioxide-cooled steam generators. In 1972, Reactor 2 experienced multiple leaks that curtailed output, persisting into 1973 and necessitating isolation of affected units; engineers developed an in-situ plugging technique using remote tooling to seal perforations without full disassembly, restoring partial capacity by late 1973. These events stemmed from and in the superheater sections but involved no off-site radiological impact, as systems prevented releases. A notable refuelling mishap occurred on 31 1993 at Reactor 1, when the lower portion of a grapple ("grab") detached from the during routine fuel handling under load, plummeting approximately 25 meters into a fuel chute and striking graphite blocks and potential elements below. Classified as International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) Level 2 by regulators due to the risk of fuel damage and minor contamination within the reactor vault, the incident prompted a temporary halt in operations for recovery and , with subsequent analysis revealing fatigue in the grab's attachment mechanism. No significant to workers or the public resulted, though a 1995 media report alleged initial underreporting by operators to minimize scrutiny. Later events included electrical faults leading to turbine trips, such as in 2011 at one unit, and mechanical anomalies like a June 2014 pipe leak in secondary systems that extended an outage by months for repairs, alongside a 2014 steam leak in infrastructure. In March 2016, a maintenance inspection identified a reversed fan operation in a building ventilation , causing unintended extraction of air from controlled zones and a minor airborne activity elevation, rectified promptly without exceeding dose limits. Across these, ONR/NII records show no INES Level 3 or higher events beyond the incident, underscoring a safety profile aligned with contemporary fleet performance, where probabilistic risk assessments post-LTSR confirmed core damage frequencies below 10^{-4} per reactor-year.

Decommissioning Efforts

Process and Milestones

Decommissioning of Wylfa, a -type nuclear power station, follows the Nuclear Reactors (Environmental and Other Provisions) Act 2008 framework, managed by Magnox Ltd under oversight from the (NDA). The process prioritizes defueling to remove , followed by post-operational clean-out to segregate and package intermediate-level and low-level , of facilities, and eventual segmentation of reactor structures including graphite cores. For Magnox sites, a deferred strategy is typically adopted, involving a period of safe storage (care and maintenance) lasting decades to allow radioactivity decay before final dismantling and site restoration to a green-field condition, with total timelines spanning up to 100 years or more due to the volume of legacy waste and technical challenges in handling components. Key milestones at Wylfa include the station's cessation of in December 2015, marking the transition to decommissioning after 45 years of operation. Defueling commenced shortly thereafter, with Magnox Ltd securing regulatory consent in stages; by December 2017, over 50% of the spent fuel—approximately 43,945 elements—had been removed from reactor ponds and shipped by rail to for reprocessing or storage. The defueling phase concluded on September 19, 2019, with the dispatch of the final flask containing the remaining elements, totaling 87,890 fuel assemblies extracted safely without radiological incidents exceeding limits. Post-defueling efforts have focused on hazard reduction, including retrieval and conditioning of legacy wastes and initial segmentation of non-reactor structures, contributing to a projected 99% reduction in on-site radiological hazard by the early 2020s compared to operational peaks. As of 2023, the site remains in care and maintenance preparation, with NDA business plans outlining ongoing monitoring, waste retrieval from ponds and silos, and infrastructure rationalization to minimize environmental impact while awaiting advanced techniques for decommissioning. No firm date for reactor dismantling has been set, reflecting strategic delays informed by cost-benefit analyses favoring deferred action over immediate segmentation.
MilestoneDateDescription
Generation cessationDecember 2015End of power production; initiation of decommissioning planning.
50% defueledDecember 2017Half of spent fuel removed, reducing storage pond inventories.
Full defuelingSeptember 19, 2019All 87,890 fuel elements shipped to Sellafield, completing primary hazard reduction step.
Hazard reduction targetEarly 2020sAchievement of 99% radiological hazard decrease through waste retrieval and conditioning.

Waste Management and Site Restoration

Waste management at Wylfa follows the UK's framework, emphasizing the of reduction, reuse, and prior to disposal, with radioactive wastes segregated by activity level for interim storage or treatment. Intermediate level waste (ILW), primarily arising from legacy operations and initial decommissioning, has been retrieved and packaged into 10 ductile containers (DCICs) during care and maintenance preparations, with these stored on-site pending availability of a national geological disposal facility. The majority of ILW remains in voids within the reactor building structure, deferred for retrieval during final site clearance due to a revised strategy approved by regulators, which prioritizes risk reduction over immediate removal. (LLW) is processed on-site using existing facilities, with disposals routed to the Low Level Waste Repository at Drigg or alternative pathways such as and metal , reflecting a strategic shift away from reliance on Drigg to optimize capacity and costs. Higher activity wastes utilize a small-scale interim storage facility on-site, while non-radioactive hazardous wastes, including , are handled by licensed contractors in compliance with the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, with radioactively contaminated asbestos directed to super-compaction facilities. Challenges in waste storage have been noted by the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM), which observed in October 2024 that some wastes are held in makeshift locations due to inadequate dedicated facilities, recommending improvements to enhance safety and efficiency during the care and maintenance phase. Magnox Ltd's integrated strategy, updated in 2022, adopts a waste-informed approach by mapping waste arisings before generation, particularly for anticipated volumes from reactor (estimated at 36,460 m³ of ILW across sites) and decommissioning rubble (344,500 m³ of LLW), with Wylfa's end-state waste strategy under review for completion by 2025. metals and other recyclables are segregated for reuse where radiological clearance permits, minimizing landfill use and aligning with (NDA) goals of over 95% LLW diversion from disposal over a decade. Site restoration at Wylfa proceeds in phased stages under Nuclear Restoration Services (NRS), an NDA subsidiary, beginning with care and maintenance preparations (C&MP) initiated post-defueling in October 2019, encompassing demolition of non-essential structures like the turbine hall using conventional methods. This phase, spanning about 10 years, clears most buildings to slab level except the reactor structures and select dry fuel stores, with mitigation measures including dust suppression via water sprays, groundwater monitoring, and ecological safeguards such as bat and habitat protection. The subsequent care and maintenance period, lasting decades, maintains the site in a stable, low-risk state with minimal intervention, deferring high-hazard dismantling to reduce immediate costs and hazards. Final site clearance (FSC), projected to last under 10 years, involves full dismantling of reactors and remaining contaminated assets, backfilling voids with low-permeability materials, and remediating soils and structures to regulatory clearance levels for unrestricted release or beneficial reuse, such as potential brownfield redevelopment. This revised approach, discussed with regulators including for Nuclear Regulation, shifts from earlier full excavation plans to slab-level removal, informed by site-specific risk assessments and aimed at achieving a sustainable end-state aligned with NDA targets for at least one legacy site by 2040. Restoration efforts incorporate qualitative risk assessments for contamination impacts on and , with ongoing surveys for protected and noise/dust controls per to minimize environmental effects.

Economic and Regional Impacts

Job Creation and Local Prosperity

The original Wylfa station, operational from 1971 to 2015, served as a major employer on the Isle of Anglesey, peaking at over 1,400 direct jobs during its active phase. These positions encompassed skilled roles in , , and operations, providing stable, well-compensated employment that sustained local households in a predominantly rural region with limited industrial alternatives. The station's workforce contributed to broader local prosperity by stimulating ancillary economic activity, including spending on housing, retail, and services, which supported small businesses across communities. At its height around 2015, nuclear-related employment in the area reached approximately 1,468, representing a significant portion of high-skill jobs in . Decommissioning, which commenced post-shutdown, has since reduced direct and indirect jobs to 329 across the local economy as of 2022, down from 548 in 2018, exacerbating economic pressures in the region. This decline marks a 57% drop in nuclear-linked jobs on Anglesey over the past decade, the steepest in any constituency, underscoring the station's prior role in anchoring regional stability amid sparse alternative opportunities. The loss has heightened reliance on and , sectors prone to volatility, while highlighting Wylfa's causal contribution to prior prosperity through long-term, specialized labor demand.

Supply Chain and National Contributions

The construction of Wylfa's twin reactors was awarded to a consortium including English Electric, alongside British firms Ltd. and Construction Ltd., reflecting the UK's self-reliant sector in the . This domestic-led effort utilized national expertise in design and heavy , with site work commencing in 1963 and commercial operation starting for Reactor 1 in November 1971 and Reactor 2 in January 1972. Fuel supply for Wylfa's elements was handled entirely within the , fabricated at the Springfields Fuels Laboratory in before irradiation, with spent fuel transported to for reprocessing—a process integral to the 's closed fuel cycle for reactors until the program's end. Maintenance and component procurement during four decades of operation drew from British suppliers specializing in pressure vessels, graphite bricks, and steam generators, sustaining a national honed through the fleet's development. Wylfa's operational contributions bolstered , generating 232 terawatt-hours of electricity from 1971 to 2015, equivalent to powering millions of homes and reducing reliance on imported fuels. Economically, the site generated a (GVA) of 0.66% relative to its local authority district, with ripple effects supporting upstream nuclear fabrication and downstream industries across the . As the largest and final station built, it exemplified the program's role in advancing British , including innovations in scaling that informed subsequent designs.

Environmental Record

Emissions Profile and Ecological Footprint

The Wylfa nuclear power station, featuring reactors operational from 1971 until 2015, generated electricity through without direct combustion, resulting in negligible operational such as CO2. Emissions from the station were licensed, continuously monitored, and maintained below regulatory limits to minimize environmental release. Lifecycle assessments of similar facilities indicate low overall carbon footprints during operation, comparable to or lower than renewable sources, with indirect emissions primarily from fuel supply chains rather than on-site activities. Non-radioactive air emissions during normal operations were minimal, with operational phase emissions reported as significantly lower than those from equivalent -powered facilities. Radioactive gaseous and liquid discharges were controlled and diluted in , adhering to strict environmental permits that ensured doses to the public remained far below legal limits. Over its lifetime, Wylfa's electricity output avoided substantial emissions; for instance, replacing its capacity with gas-fired generation would have produced approximately 29 million tonnes of CO2 annually at full load. Ecologically, Wylfa employed once-through cooling, abstracting large volumes from the and discharging warmed via outfalls, creating a localized plume. This elevated discharge , typically a few degrees above ambient, could alter marine and migration patterns by forming thermal barriers, though monitoring showed no widespread adverse effects on . The cooling system entrained and impinged small marine organisms at intakes, but regulatory assessments confirmed impacts were localized and mitigated through design features like screens. Fish species such as bass were observed aggregating near discharge zones due to the warmer waters, potentially benefiting local fisheries in some contexts. The station's land footprint was compact, occupying approximately 100 hectares on while delivering over 2,000 MW capacity, yielding one of the highest energy densities among power sources. Terrestrial ecological effects were limited, with site operations avoiding significant disruption beyond fenced boundaries, and post-operational land sales assessed as having no notable environmental impact. Overall, Wylfa's emphasized efficient resource use, with water abstractions and discharges managed to prevent cumulative harm to the marine environment, contrasting sharply with the broader habitat alterations from extraction.

Waste Handling and Long-Term Effects

Waste handling at Wylfa primarily involves (LLW) and intermediate-level waste (ILW) arising from reactor operations and decommissioning activities, with on-site facilities for processing, packaging, and interim storage before transfer to authorized disposal sites. LLW, which includes lightly contaminated materials like protective clothing and tools, is segregated, compacted, and supercompacted on-site to minimize volume prior to off-site shipment to facilities such as the Repository in . During decommissioning, which commenced following reactor shutdowns in 2015, additional waste streams from fuel pond retrieval and core dismantling are managed under Ltd's oversight, with new facilities developed for radiological clearance of non-active materials previously held in controlled areas. Spent fuel, removed from reactors by 2015, was largely transported to for reprocessing until operations ceased in 2022, leaving legacy ILW and waste for encapsulation and storage. The site's waste inventory contributes to ' share of the UK's legacy , predominantly from reactors, with volumes detailed in national inventories excluding proposed new builds. Current efforts focus on hazard reduction through very low-level waste (VLLW) disposal and pond decommissioning milestones achieved by 2020, adhering to (NDA) protocols for safe retrieval in radioactive environments. Independent assessments, including a 2024 Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM) visit, have identified needs for enhanced on-site storage to accommodate growing decommissioning arisings, emphasizing secure interim pending national strategies. Long-term management follows policy for geological disposal of higher activity wastes (HAW), with interim on-site storage serving as a bridge to a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF), ensuring isolation from the for millennia. policy affirms storage as temporary, not a disposal substitute, prioritizing GDF development alongside research into wasteform stability and monitoring. Empirical from life-cycle assessments of decommissioning indicate minimal environmental burdens from waste handling, with total climate impacts at 3.1 g CO₂ eq./kWh across operations, dominated by disposal facility construction rather than ongoing emissions or radiological releases. Containment systems prevent migration, with radioactivity decaying over time—short-lived isotopes like dominant initially, transitioning to longer-lived —yielding projected public doses far below regulatory limits under NDA oversight. No verifiable evidence exists of significant long-term ecological or health effects from Wylfa's waste, attributable to engineered barriers and site monitoring, contrasting with unmanaged alternatives like byproducts.

Proposed Replacement Projects

Horizon Nuclear Power Initiative

The Horizon Nuclear Power Initiative, launched in 2009, sought to develop Wylfa Newydd, a proposed station on , , to replace the decommissioned original Wylfa plant and contribute to the 's low-carbon energy goals. Horizon Nuclear Power, initially a between major utilities, planned to install two UK Advanced Boiling Water Reactors (ABWRs) supplied by Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, each rated at approximately 1,350 MWe for a total capacity of 2,700 MWe. The reactors featured enhanced safety systems, including mechanisms and robust structures, building on proven technology operational in and elsewhere. Regulatory progress included the Office for Nuclear Regulation's completion of the Generic Design Assessment for the ABWR in December 2017, confirming the design's acceptability for deployment subject to site-specific reviews. In June 2018, the Planning Inspectorate accepted Horizon's application for a Development Consent Order, advancing the project toward environmental and planning approvals. The initiative projected construction starting around 2020, with first electricity generation targeted for the mid-2020s, aiming to supply baseload power for up to 60 years while minimizing operational emissions through high . Hitachi's acquisition of Horizon in 2012 for £700 million bolstered the project's technical and financial framework, emphasizing supply chain localization and skills development in . Expected economic impacts encompassed up to 8,500 construction jobs peaking in the early phases and around 900 permanent operational roles, with opportunities estimated to support 25,000 indirect jobs nationwide. Horizon committed to environmental mitigation, including marine ecology studies for the cooling water infrastructure and commitments to limit thermal discharges and radioactive effluents within regulatory limits. The initiative aligned with nuclear policy by leveraging existing grid connections and geological suitability at the coastal site, positioning Wylfa Newydd as a key element in diversifying energy sources amid rising demand.

Cancellation Factors and Lessons

In January 2019, Horizon Nuclear Power, a subsidiary of , suspended development of the Wylfa Newydd project after failing to secure a viable agreement with the government, amid escalating construction costs estimated at around £20 billion for two Advanced Boiling Water Reactors. The suspension followed prolonged negotiations where sought financial support mechanisms, such as a or direct equity , to mitigate risks from regulatory uncertainties and delays, but these were not forthcoming under the prevailing framework. By September 2020, fully withdrew from the new-build program, citing an unchanged environment after 20 months of stasis and the prohibitive financial burden on private investors without enhanced government backing. Key factors included the absence of a competitive comparable to that offered for C, which provided revenue certainty, and broader uncertainties in the UK's nuclear post-Brexit, which inflated pre-construction expenses. Hitachi's decision reflected a strategic retreat from high-risk overseas commitments, prioritizing domestic Japanese projects where regulatory and financial predictability was higher. The Welsh Affairs Committee report highlighted governmental indecision as a core issue, noting that delays in approving financial models eroded investor confidence and allowed costs to spiral, ultimately rendering the project uneconomic without public funds. Lessons from the cancellation underscore the necessity of firm governmental commitments early in nuclear lifecycles to de-risk private investment, as evidenced by successful precedents like France's Flamanville or South Korea's standardized builds, where state guarantees stabilized costs. In the context, it revealed vulnerabilities in relying on vendor financing without parallel domestic incentives, prompting recommendations for streamlined regulatory processes and pre-agreed funding envelopes to prevent similar suspensions. The episode also illustrated pitfalls, such as from bespoke designs, emphasizing the value of modular or standardized reactor technologies to curb overruns, a shift now informing subsequent initiatives like small modular reactors. Economically, the fallout demonstrated the high of delays, with lost potential for 2,500 permanent jobs and £2.5 billion in regional GDP contributions, reinforcing the case for nuclear as a baseload enabler for amid phase-outs.

Current Government-Led Plans

In March 2024, Great British Nuclear, a public body established by the UK government to advance new nuclear projects, acquired the Wylfa site in from for £160 million, alongside the Oldbury site, to enable future nuclear development. This purchase followed Hitachi's withdrawal from the earlier Wylfa Newydd project in 2020, which had aimed for two advanced boiling water reactors but was abandoned due to cost overruns and investment challenges. On 22 May 2024, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero designated Wylfa as the preferred location for the United Kingdom's third gigawatt-scale nuclear power station, positioning it after C and Sizewell C in the national pipeline. The planned facility is envisioned to generate for up to 60 years, enhancing and supporting net-zero goals, with potential for up to 3 gigawatts of capacity based on prior site assessments. As of October 2025, under the Labour government, detailed implementation plans remain unpublished, prompting criticism from a cross-party group of MPs who, in a 24 October parliamentary report, urged swift decisions to avoid delays in deployment at Wylfa and other flagship sites. The sites are also under consideration for initial (SMR) deployments through a government-led process, though large-scale reactors remain the primary focus for Wylfa's scale and infrastructure. Local stakeholders, including Nuclear Supply Chain Anglesey Network, have emphasized readiness for skills training to support thousands of anticipated construction and operational jobs.

Controversies and Stakeholder Views

Anti-Nuclear Opposition

People Against Wylfa-B (PAWB), a local campaign group established in 1988, has coordinated much of the opposition to proposed nuclear expansions at the Wylfa site on Anglesey, arguing that a second power station would impose undue environmental, economic, and social burdens on the community. The group has highlighted risks including radioactive waste accumulation, potential accidents, and the opportunity cost of diverting funds from renewable energy alternatives. In coordination with broader anti-nuclear networks, PAWB participated in events such as a 2022 conference uniting Welsh campaigners against nuclear developments at Wylfa and other sites, emphasizing financial risks and operational failures in comparable projects. International environmental organizations like have voiced specific concerns over the technical viability of Hitachi's proposed Advanced Boiling Water Reactors (ABWR) for Wylfa Newydd, citing design flaws and construction delays observed in similar Japanese plants that could exacerbate safety vulnerabilities. further contended that the project's reliance on substantial government subsidies, potentially through mechanisms like the Regulated Asset Base model, would burden consumers with costs years before begins, while failing to address long-term waste disposal or proliferation risks. Following the government's 2024 designation of Wylfa as a preferred site for new nuclear capacity, reiterated opposition, warning of heightened financial exposure amid prior developer withdrawals. Local resistance has also centered on sociocultural impacts, with planning inspectors recommending against Hitachi's application due to fears that an influx of non-Welsh-speaking workers—potentially numbering over 2,000 for nine years—would erode the island's linguistic and cultural fabric, where Welsh speakers comprise a significant portion of the . Campaigners, including those from PAWB and allied groups, have framed such developments as a "nuclear ," particularly in critiques of the Freeport initiative, alleging insufficient on nuclear elements disguised as economic revitalization. Despite site clearance approvals in 2018 amid protests, these arguments contributed to the project's suspension by in , citing escalating costs exceeding £20 billion.

Pro-Nuclear Arguments and Empirical Benefits

The Wylfa nuclear power station, operational from 1971 to 2015, exemplified nuclear power's capacity to deliver consistent baseload , generating output sufficient to meet up to 40% of ' total demand at peak capacity of approximately 1,000 MW across its two reactors. This reliability stemmed from nuclear fission's high , enabling prolonged operation with minimal fuel volume compared to alternatives, thereby supporting grid stability without the intermittency challenges of renewables. Over 44 years, the facility produced low-carbon, domestically sourced , reducing reliance on imported and contributing to lower overall system costs through dispatchable power that complements variable sources. Empirically, nuclear operations like Wylfa have demonstrated superior environmental benefits, with lifecycle carbon emissions per unit of roughly 4-10 grams of CO2 equivalent per kWh, far below coal's 800-1,000 g/kWh or even natural gas's 400-500 g/kWh, enabling substantial avoidance of greenhouse gases during its lifespan. The station's design, while first-generation, maintained output for hundreds of thousands of households—its final 190 MW sufficed for 200,000 homes—without significant atmospheric emissions beyond trace operational releases, underscoring nuclear's role in decarbonization pathways. Proponents argue this positions sites like Wylfa for successor projects, potentially powering 6 million homes with advanced reactors, amplifying emissions reductions while advancing net-zero targets through scalable, low-footprint energy. Economically, Wylfa sustained hundreds of skilled jobs in , maintenance, and operations during its run, fostering local supply chains and in , with decommissioning activities preserving employment in ' nuclear sector. New builds at the site are projected to generate thousands of high-wage positions and billions in , revitalizing post-industrial regions by leveraging existing infrastructure for rapid deployment relative to greenfield alternatives. This aligns with broader nuclear advantages in , as domestic and cycles minimize geopolitical vulnerabilities, with Wylfa's historical performance evidencing that kept electricity bills lower by displacing costlier imports. Safety data from Wylfa reinforces nuclear's empirical edge, with zero radiation-related fatalities over decades of operation and defueling completed without incident by 2019, contrasting sharply with fossil fuels' annual thousands of deaths globally. Rigorous regulatory oversight, including long-term reviews, ensured containment integrity, with reactors achieving load factors indicative of robust performance despite design age. Advocates emphasize that such records, combined with passive features in modern designs, make nuclear statistically safer per terawatt-hour than solar or when accounting for full lifecycle risks, positioning Wylfa as a viable hub for secure, high-output energy.

References

  1. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/corwm-visits-wylfa-nuclear-power-station
  2. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/united-kingdom
  3. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a79cd74ed915d6b1deb374a/1984-aos-site-report-wylfa-en6.pdf
  4. https://www.gem.wiki/Wylfa_nuclear_power_plant
  5. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6pp4xyd011o
  6. https://www.onr.org.uk/our-work/what-we-regulate/sellafield-decommissioning-fuel-and-waste/sites/wylfa
  7. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/great-british-nuclear-to-buy-two-hitachi-sites-for-new-nuclear-development
  8. https://www.horizonnuclearpower.com/files/downloads/wylfa_scoping_report_nov_09.pdf
  9. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmwelaf/1938/full-report.html
  10. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/30/052/30052480.pdf
  11. https://world-nuclear.org/nuclear-reactor-database/details/wylfa-1
  12. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6399ac19e90e072af1ef8d29/Wylfa_Site_Environmental_Management_Plan.pdf
  13. https://www.neimagazine.com/advanced-reactorsfusion/inter-reactor-fuel-transfer-at-wylfa-12-4275091/
  14. https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=240
  15. https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=241
  16. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/appendices/nuclear-development-in-the-united-kingdom
  17. https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/delayed-reaction
  18. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/wylfa-closes-after-almost-45-years
  19. https://www.powermag.com/worlds-last-magnox-nuclear-reactor-shuts-down-for-final-time/
  20. https://www.power-eng.com/nuclear/uk-s-oldest-operational-nuclear-reactor-shuts-down/
  21. https://historypoints.org/index.php?page=wylfa-nuclear-power-station
  22. https://www.nuclearpolicy.info/news/30-year-anniversary-of-wylfa-accident-highlights-importance-of-wales-march/
  23. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/world-s-last-operating-magnox-reactor-closes
  24. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/last-nuclear-fuel-flask-leaves-wylfa
  25. https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/Early-Final-Shut-down-of-UK.html
  26. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/30/wylfa-nuclear-plant-closes-in-wales
  27. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-35158939
  28. https://www.northwaleschronicle.co.uk/news/24874686.inside-wylfa-anglesey-nuclear-power-station-decommissioned/
  29. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c9a5d37ed915d07b20fa2ba/Nuclear_electricity_in_the_UK.pdf
  30. https://inis.iaea.org/records/z3ybr-hkf98
  31. https://inis.iaea.org/records/pw3sb-9w761
  32. https://www.laka.org/docu/ines/event/329
  33. https://www.the-independent.com/news/nuclear-accident-was-covered-up-1601435.html
  34. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-14015784
  35. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-27917859
  36. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-28196879
  37. https://www.dailypost.co.uk/business/business-news/radioactive-leak-found-wylfabecause-fan-11097867
  38. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f19f0ed915d74e6228641/Magnox_reactor_dismantling_timing_and_sequencing_strategy__Gate_0_.pdf
  39. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Fuel-removal-completed-at-Wylfa
  40. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/65293/html/
  41. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/were-half-way-there
  42. https://nda.blog.gov.uk/radiological-hazard-on-all-magnox-nuclear-sites-across-uk-set-to-reduce-by-99/
  43. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-decommissioning-authority-business-plan-2023-to-2026/nuclear-decommissioning-authority-business-plan-2023-to-2026
  44. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/678f6f9cc9c786c1eb78865c/Wylfa_Site_Environmental_Management_Plan_Issue_13.1_English.pdf
  45. https://businessnewswales.com/the-committee-on-radioactive-waste-management-corwm-visits-wylfa-nuclear-power-station/
  46. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6424524b3d885d000fdade5a/Magnox_Integrated_Waste_Strategy_2022.pdf
  47. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-decommissioning-authority-strategy-effective-from-march-2021/nuclear-decommissioning-authority-strategy-effective-from-march-2021
  48. https://businessnewswales.com/anglesey-nuclear-jobs-fall-to-record-low-amid-calls-for-commitment-to-wylfa-newydd/
  49. https://www.monfm.co.uk/information/local/anglesey-nuclear-jobs-at-record-low-report/
  50. https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/wylfa-decision-crucial-nuclear-job-32476040
  51. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63316e2fe90e0711d1bdf80a/Magnox_economic_impact_assessment_2022.pdf
  52. https://businessnewswales.com/prosperity-of-anglesey-communities-relies-on-firm-commitment-to-nuclear-site/
  53. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnl0we74r1eo
  54. https://world-nuclear-news.org/articles/wylfa-preferred-site-for-uk-new-build
  55. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/100973/html/
  56. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78fd0440f0b679c0a07a78/1973-appendices-to-aos-wylfa-en6.pdf
  57. https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-can-the-uk-meet-its-climate-goals-without-the-wylfa-nuclear-plant/
  58. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a799ab7ed915d0422069b1b/2006-hra-site-report-for-wylfa-en6.pdf
  59. https://www.power-technology.com/projects/wylfa-newydd-nuclear-power-plant/
  60. https://www.onr.org.uk/media/czwp4rup/wylfa-environmental-management-plan-131.pdf
  61. https://www.avisonyoung.co.uk/documents/d/uk/waste-planning-assessment
  62. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/news/magnox-reprocessing-the-end-of-an-era-mag/
  63. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-radioactive-waste-and-material-inventory-2022/uk-radioactive-waste-inventory-2022
  64. https://nda.blog.gov.uk/triple-clean-up-at-magnox-ponds/
  65. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5da07c53ed915d35a92f790c/Radioactive_Waste_Strategy_September_2019.pdf
  66. https://www.gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2019-06/policy-on-the-management-and-disposal-of-higher-activity-radioactive-waste.pdf
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000770
  68. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-waste/decommissioning-nuclear-facilities
  69. https://www.onr.org.uk/our-work/what-we-regulate/new-reactors/licensing-of-new-reactors/wylfa-newydd
  70. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/UK-government-buys-Wylfa-and-Oldbury-nuclear-sites
  71. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-54158091
  72. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/17/business/energy-environment/hitachi-horizon-wales-nuclear-plant.html
  73. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Hitachi-withdraws-from-UK-new-build-project
  74. https://neutronbytes.com/2020/09/18/hitachi-calls-it-quits-for-uk-wylfa-nuclear-project/
  75. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-55833186
  76. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmwelaf/1938/1938.pdf
  77. https://raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/nuclear-lessons-learned
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326210661_Delivering_new_nuclear_projects_a_megaprojects_perspective
  79. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-05-07/debates/3768FF43-A8D8-4274-871A-4F1500033D11/NewNuclearProjectsWylfa
  80. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-nuclear-power-plant-earmarked-for-north-wales
  81. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/wylfa-preferred-site-for-uk-new-build
  82. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clkk7ewenyro
  83. https://www.powermag.com/uk-picks-wylfa-in-wales-as-preferred-site-for-new-mega-nuclear-project/
  84. https://www.nucnet.org/news/uk-parliamentary-committee-calls-for-quick-decision-on-new-nuclear-at-flagship-sites-10-5-2025
  85. https://www.energyvoice.com/renewables-energy-transition/nuclear/582801/mps-urge-uk-government-to-confirm-nuclear-energy-plans-at-oldbury-and-wylfa/
  86. https://www.nucnet.org/news/oldbury-and-wylfa-likely-to-be-sites-for-first-smr-deployments-in-uk-2-3-2025
  87. https://www.nsan.co.uk/government-confirms-plans-for-major-nuclear-power-plant-in-wylfa/
  88. https://www.stop-wylfa.org/about-us/
  89. https://www.stop-wylfa.org/
  90. https://beyondnuclear.org/united-front-against-nuclear-in-wales/
  91. https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2018/06/05/wylfa-hitachi-nuclear-reactor-type-awbr/
  92. https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/hitachi-set-pull-put-major-uk-nuclear-project-greenpeace-response/
  93. https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2018/08/06/new-nuclear-plants-funding-regulated-asset-base/
  94. https://www.politics.co.uk/opinion-former/press-release/2024/05/23/wylfa-nuclear-announcement-greenpeace-response/
  95. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/feb/07/planners-recommended-against-nuclear-plant-in-2019-over-welsh-language-and-cultural-concerns-hitachi
  96. https://www.nuclearpolicy.info/news/joint-media-release-beware-geeks-bearing-gifts-anti-nuclear-campaigners-warn-anglesey-freeport-plan-represents-nuclear-trojan-horse/
  97. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-45410763
  98. https://www.orano.group/en/unpacking-nuclear/7-good-reasons-for-turning-to-nuclear-power-to-combat-global-warming
  99. https://www.power-technology.com/news/uk-wylfa-nuclear-plant/
  100. https://www.nucnet.org/news/uk-industry-employment-highest-ever-as-major-new-projects-bring-big-increase-9-2-2024
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.