Hubbry Logo
DosimeterDosimeterMain
Open search
Dosimeter
Community hub
Dosimeter
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dosimeter
Dosimeter
Dosimeter
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Radiation dosimeter in Pripyat

A radiation dosimeter is a device that measures the dose uptake of external ionizing radiation. It is worn by the person being monitored when used as a personal dosimeter, and is a record of the radiation dose received. Modern electronic personal dosimeters can give a continuous readout of cumulative dose and current dose rate, and can warn the wearer with an audible alarm when a specified dose rate or a cumulative dose is exceeded. Other dosimeters, such as thermoluminescent or film types, require processing after use to reveal the cumulative dose received, and cannot give a current indication of dose while being worn.

Personal dosimeters

[edit]
Example of "whole body" dosimeter positioning

The personal ionising radiation dosimeter is of fundamental importance in the disciplines of radiation dosimetry and radiation health physics and is primarily used to estimate the radiation dose deposited in an individual wearing the device.

Ionising radiation damage to the human body is cumulative and related to the total dose received, for which the SI unit is the sievert. Radiographers, nuclear power plant workers, doctors using radiotherapy, HAZMAT workers, and other people in situations that involve handling radionuclides are often required to wear dosimeters so a record of occupational exposure can be made. Such devices are known as "legal dosimeters" if they have been approved for use in recording personnel doses for regulatory purposes.

Dosimeters are typically worn on the outside of clothing, a "whole body" dosimeter is worn on the chest or torso to represent dose to the whole body. This location monitors exposure of most vital organs and represents the bulk of body mass. Additional dosimeters can be worn to assess dose to extremities or in radiation fields that vary considerably depending on orientation of the body to the source.

Electronic personal dosimeters

[edit]
Main article: Electronic personal dosimeter
View of readout on an electronic personal dosimeter. The clip is used to attach it to the wearer's clothing.

The electronic personal dosimeter, the most commonly used type, is an electronic device that has a number of sophisticated functions, such as continual monitoring which allows alarm warnings at preset levels and live readout of dose accumulated. These are especially useful in high dose areas where residence time of the wearer is limited due to dose constraints. The dosimeter can be reset, usually after taking a reading for record purposes, and thereby re-used multiple times.

MOSFET dosimeter

[edit]

Metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters [1] are now used as clinical dosimeters for radiotherapy radiation beams. The main advantages of MOSFET devices are:

1. The MOSFET dosimeter is direct reading with a very thin active area (less than 2μm [clarification needed]).

2. The physical size of the MOSFET when packaged is less than 4 mm.

3. The post radiation signal is permanently stored and is dose rate independent.

Gate oxide of MOSFET which is conventionally silicon dioxide is an active sensing material in MOSFET dosimeters. Radiation creates defects (acts like electron-hole pairs) in oxide, which in turn affects the threshold voltage of the MOSFET. This change in threshold voltage is proportional to radiation dose. Alternate high-k gate dielectrics like hafnium dioxide[2] and aluminum oxides are also proposed as a radiation dosimeters.

PIN dosimeters

[edit]

PIN diodes are often used by military personnel for measuring radiation dosage.

Scintillation counter

[edit]
Main article: Scintillation counter

A scintillation counter detects ionizing radiation by measuring the light emitted from a scintillator, giving a measurement of radiation levels almost instantly. Like thermoluminescent crystals, scintillation materials begin to glow when exposed to radiation. Unlike thermoluminescent crystals, which store absorbed radiation to measure accumulated doses over a period of time, scintillation materials release light immediately, and do not need to be heated.[3]

Thermoluminescent dosimeter

[edit]
Main article: Thermoluminescent dosimeter

A thermoluminescent dosimeter measures ionizing radiation exposure by measuring the intensity of light emitted from a Dy or B doped crystal in the detector when heated. The intensity of light emitted is dependent upon the radiation exposure. These were once sold surplus and one format once used by submariners and nuclear workers resembled a dark green wristwatch containing the active components and a highly sensitive IR wire ended diode mounted to the doped LiF2 glass chip that when the assembly is precisely heated (hence thermoluminescent) emits the stored radiation as narrow band infrared light until it is depleted [4] The main advantage is that the chip records dosage passively until exposed to light or heat so even a used sample kept in darkness can provide valuable scientific data.[5]

Legacy types of dosimeters

[edit]

Film badge dosimeter

[edit]
Main article: Film badge dosimeter

Film badge dosimeters are for one-time use only. The level of radiation absorption is indicated by a change to the film emulsion, which is shown when the film is developed. They are now mostly superseded by electronic personal dosimeters and thermoluminescent dosimeters.

Quartz fiber dosimeter

[edit]
Main article: Quartz fiber dosimeter

These use the property of a quartz fiber to measure the static electricity held on the fiber. Before use by the wearer a dosimeter is charged to a high voltage, causing the fiber to deflect due to electrostatic repulsion. As the gas in the dosimeter chamber becomes ionized by radiation the charge leaks away, causing the fiber to straighten and thereby indicate the amount of dose received against a graduated scale, which is viewed by a small in-built microscope.[6] They are only used for short durations, such as a day or a shift, as they can suffer from charge leakage, which gives a false high reading. However they are immune to EMP so were used during the Cold War as a failsafe method of determining radiation exposure.

They are now largely superseded by electronic personal dosimeters for short term monitoring.

Geiger tube dosimeter

[edit]

These use a conventional Geiger–Müller tube, typically a ZP1301 or similar energy-compensated tube, requiring between 600 and 700V and pulse detection components. The display on most is a bubble or miniature LCD type with 4 digits and a discrete counter integrated chip such as 74C925/6.[citation needed] LED units usually have a button to turn the display on and off for longer battery life, and an infrared emitter for count verification and calibration. The voltage is derived from a separate pinned or wire-ended module that often uses a unijunction transistor driving a small step-up coil and multiplier stage. While expensive, it is reliable over time and especially in high-radiation environments, sharing this trait with tunnel diodes, though the encapsulants, inductors and capacitors have been known to break down internally over time.[citation needed] These have the disadvantage that the stored dose in becquerels or microsieverts is volatile and vanishes if the power supply is disconnected, though there can be a low-leakage capacitor to preserve the memory for short periods without a battery. Because of this, most units use long-life batteries and high-quality contacts. Recently-designed units log dose over time to non-volatile memory, such as a 24C256 chip so it may be read out via a serial port.

Dosimetry dose quantities

[edit]
Main article: sievert
External radiation dose quantities used in radiological protection, based on International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report 57

The operational quantity for personal dosimetry is the personal dose equivalent, which is defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection as the dose equivalent in soft tissue at an appropriate depth, below a specified point on the human body. The specified point is usually given by the position where the individual’s dosimeter is worn.[7]

Instrument and dosimeter response

[edit]

This is an actual reading obtained from such as an ambient dose gamma monitor, or a personal dosimeter. The dosimeter is calibrated in a known radiation field to ensure display of accurate operational quantities and allow a relationship to known health effect. The personal dose equivalent is used to assess dose uptake, and allow regulatory limits to be met. It is the figure usually entered into the records of external dose for occupational radiation workers.

The dosimeter plays an important role within the international radiation protection system developed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. This is shown in the accompanying diagram.

Dosimeter calibration

[edit]

The "slab" phantom is used to represent the human torso for calibration of whole body dosimeters. This replicates the radiation scattering and absorption effects of the human torso. The International Atomic Energy Agency states "The slab phantom is 300 mm × 300 mm × 150 mm depth to represent the human torso".[8]

[edit]
Ionizing radiation related quantities
Quantity Unit Symbol Derivation Year SI equivalent
Activity (A) becquerel Bq s−1 1974 SI unit
curie Ci 3.7×1010 s−1 1953 3.7×1010 Bq
rutherford Rd 106 s−1 1946 1000000 Bq
Exposure (X) coulomb per kilogram C/kg C⋅kg−1 of air 1974 SI unit
röntgen R esu / 0.001293 g of air 1928 2.58×10−4 C/kg
Absorbed dose (D) gray Gy J⋅kg−1 1974 SI unit
erg per gram erg/g erg⋅g−1 1950 1.0×10−4 Gy
rad rad 100 erg⋅g−1 1953 0.010 Gy
Equivalent dose (H) sievert Sv J⋅kg−1 × WR 1977 SI unit
röntgen equivalent man rem 100 erg⋅g−1 × WR 1971 0.010 Sv
Effective dose (E) sievert Sv J⋅kg−1 × WR × WT 1977 SI unit
röntgen equivalent man rem 100 erg⋅g−1 × WR × WT 1971 0.010 Sv

Process irradiation verification

[edit]

Manufacturing processes that treat products with ionizing radiation, such as food irradiation, use dosimeters to calibrate doses deposited in the matter being irradiated. These usually must have a greater dose range than personal dosimeters, and doses are normally measured in the unit of absorbed dose: the gray (Gy). The dosimeter is located on or adjacent to the items being irradiated during the process as a validation of dose levels received.

Dosimeters as a tracking device

[edit]

A Soviet KGB spy "Raduga" (Rainbow) dosimeter, radiation tracking device was used by deliberately contaminating items such as money, artworks, documents, propaganda literature etc. with a nuclear radiation signature which can then be tracked using this device which would vibrate when in proximity to the radiation. The process was utilized as a way of catching thieves and corrupt officials and locating hidden stashes.[citation needed]

[edit]
  • Quartz-fiber dosimeter – now largely superseded
    Quartz-fiber dosimeter – now largely superseded
  • View of quartz fiber dosimeter reading
    View of quartz fiber dosimeter reading
  • Chromoradiometer or colour dosimeter by Guido Holzknecht (1902)
    Chromoradiometer or colour dosimeter by Guido Holzknecht (1902)
  • Russian Sosna radiometer-dosimeter (Front view),
    Russian Sosna radiometer-dosimeter (Front view),
  • Russian Sosna radiometer-dosimeter (Rear view)
    Russian Sosna radiometer-dosimeter (Rear view)
  • Ukrainian Terra-P dosimeter
    Ukrainian Terra-P dosimeter
  • Russian Radex RD1503
    Russian Radex RD1503
  • Soeks 01M
    Soeks 01M
  • Swiss dosimeter SA-05A
    Swiss dosimeter SA-05A
  • Polimaster PM1603B
    Polimaster PM1603B

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Dosimeter

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A dosimeter is a device, instrument, or system that measures or evaluates, either directly or indirectly, the quantities of exposure, kerma, absorbed dose, or dose equivalent from ionizing radiation. These instruments are critical for quantifying radiation exposure to ensure safety in environments involving radioactive materials, such as nuclear facilities, medical radiotherapy, and industrial applications. Dosimeters typically operate by detecting physical or chemical changes induced by radiation, providing data that helps enforce regulatory dose limits set by organizations like the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The development of dosimeters traces back to the late 19th century, shortly after the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen in 1895, when early detection relied on photographic plates and electroscopes to record radiation effects. By 1896, utilized similar methods to study . Early chambers in the 1910s and 1920s laid groundwork for quantitative measurements, followed by Hans Geiger's invention of the precursor to the in 1908 and the Geiger-Müller counter in 1928. Significant advancements occurred during , with the introduction of badges in 1942 for personnel monitoring at sites. Post-war innovations included thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in the 1950s, with (LiF) TLD-100 becoming widely used by the 1960s for its tissue-equivalent properties and high sensitivity. Modern dosimeters are categorized into passive and active types, each suited to specific measurement needs. Passive dosimeters, such as TLDs, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters, and film badges, accumulate dose over time and require processing for readout, offering high accuracy for long-term monitoring with responses that can be corrected for various types. Active dosimeters, including electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) and chambers, provide real-time dose readings and alarms, enabling immediate feedback in high-risk scenarios like emergency response. Key properties for all dosimeters include linearity of response to dose (ideally over a wide range, e.g., 10 μGy to 10 Gy for TLDs), minimal dependence, and high precision with uncertainties typically within a few percent for reference standards in clinical applications, ensuring to international standards through calibration at facilities like the IAEA's Dosimetry . In , dosimeters play a pivotal role by verifying compliance with dose limits—such as the 20 mSv annual effective dose for radiation workers—and supporting measurements during treatments to prevent overexposure. They are indispensable in diverse sectors: in healthcare for in diagnostic imaging and therapy, where they confirm delivered doses to patients; in plants for tracking worker exposure to gamma and neutron fields; and in to assess risks from radioactive releases. Ongoing advancements, including semiconductor-based detectors like RADFETs and integration, continue to enhance portability and data accuracy, reflecting the evolution toward more robust global radiation safety frameworks.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A dosimeter is a device that measures the cumulative dose of absorbed by an object or person, typically by detecting physical or chemical changes induced by the radiation interaction with a sensitive medium. These devices quantify exposure from sources such as , gamma, or X-rays, providing essential data for assessing levels in various environments. The primary purpose of dosimeters is to support by monitoring exposure and ensuring it remains below regulatory limits, such as the (ICRP) guideline of 20 millisieverts (mSv) per year averaged over five years for occupational workers, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv. They play a critical role in , the nuclear industry, and medical settings, where they help verify compliance with safety standards and prevent overexposure during procedures like radiotherapy or nuclear operations. Dosimeters are distinguished as personal types, worn by individuals to record specific exposure at the body surface, or area types, fixed in locations to monitor ambient for environmental . This distinction enables targeted risk assessment and upholds the ALARA principle—As Low As Reasonably Achievable—which emphasizes minimizing doses through optimization of time, distance, and shielding without compromising necessary activities. Key dosimetric units include the gray (Gy) for absorbed dose, defined as one joule of energy absorbed per kilogram of matter, and the sievert (Sv) for equivalent or effective dose, which incorporates radiation type and tissue sensitivity to reflect biological impact.

Historical Development

The development of dosimeters began in the early 20th century amid growing awareness of radiation hazards to workers, particularly those handling X-rays. Photographic film was first employed as a rudimentary personnel dosimeter around 1907 by Rome Wagner, a Chicago-based X-ray tube manufacturer, who used it to monitor exposure during operations. By the 1920s, film badges had become a standard tool for personal radiation monitoring among X-ray workers, leveraging photographic emulsion to detect ionizing radiation through darkening of the film. These early devices provided a cumulative record of exposure but required laboratory processing for analysis, limiting their immediacy. During , the urgency of the spurred innovations in direct-reading dosimeters. Quartz fiber electroscopes, developed by Ole G. Landsverk at the University of Chicago's in 1944, allowed for immediate visual assessment of radiation dose via the deflection of a charged quartz fiber in an . These pen-like devices were widely deployed for real-time monitoring of workers at nuclear sites, including Hanford, where comprehensive dosimetry programs were established in 1943 to track personnel exposures amid plutonium production activities. Hanford's programs evolved through the 1980s, incorporating film badges alongside ionization chambers to ensure compliance with emerging safety protocols. In the mid-20th century, advancements built on the ancient phenomenon of , first observed by in 1663 when heating a produced a glow. Post-World War II research applied this to , leading to the introduction of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in the 1950s, which used crystalline materials like to store and release light proportional to absorbed radiation upon heating. TLDs offered greater sensitivity and stability than film badges. Concurrently, pocket ionization chambers gained prominence in the 1960s for civilian applications, distributed through programs to measure personal exposure amid nuclear threats. The late 20th century marked a transition to electronic systems, with electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) emerging in the late 1980s for the industry, enabling real-time digital readout and alarm functions. The 1986 Chernobyl accident heightened global focus on accurate personal monitoring, exposing deficiencies in Soviet and prompting international improvements in dosimeter reliability and deployment. This was reinforced by the International Commission on Radiological Protection's Publication 60 in 1990, which revised dose limits and protection concepts, influencing standards for dosimeter calibration and performance worldwide. Entering the early , optically stimulated (OSL) dosimeters, commercialized around 2000, enhanced sensitivity for low-level exposures using materials like aluminum oxide.

Principles of Operation

Fundamental Mechanisms

, encompassing alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, and neutrons, interacts with the detector material in dosimeters primarily through processes that deposit energy via , excitation, or direct collisions. Alpha particles, being heavy and highly charged, cause dense along short tracks due to their high (LET), typically stopping within micrometers of tissue-equivalent materials. Beta particles, lighter electrons or positrons, produce sparser over longer paths with lower LET, while gamma rays, as electromagnetic photons, interact indirectly through secondary electrons generated by photoelectric absorption, , or , leading to energy deposition over extended ranges. Neutrons, being uncharged, deposit energy indirectly by colliding with atomic nuclei to produce charged recoil particles or secondary radiation that then ionize the medium. These interactions result in the creation of ion pairs (approximately 30-35 eV per pair in air) or excited states in the detector material, forming the basis for quantifiable dose measurement. The core detection mechanisms in dosimeters exploit these energy depositions to produce measurable signals. involves the separation of charges in gaseous, liquid, or solid media, where an applied collects electrons and ions to generate a current or voltage proportional to the intensity. occurs when excites electrons to metastable states in insulating crystals; subsequent stimulation ( or optical) releases this energy as visible light, the intensity of which correlates with the . Chemical changes manifest as radiation-induced reactions, such as the oxidation of ions to ferric ions in aqueous solutions or the leading to darkening in photographic emulsions, altering optical or color for readout. Dosimeters generally accumulate dose over time, integrating exposure rather than providing instantaneous readings, though response can be linear (proportional to dose) or non-linear depending on the mechanism and type—linear for low doses in ionization chambers, but potentially saturating at high doses in chemical systems. Dosimeters operate via direct or indirect mechanisms to convert energy into a detectable signal. In direct mechanisms, interacts immediately with the sensitive medium to produce the primary signal, as in ionization chambers where charge collection occurs without intermediate conversion. Indirect mechanisms involve an initial energy transfer step followed by secondary detection, such as in scintillation dosimeters where excites a to emit light, which is then converted to an electrical pulse by a . The fundamental quantity measured is the , defined as the energy imparted by per unit of the irradiated material, expressed mathematically as D=εmD = \frac{\varepsilon}{m}, where ε\varepsilon is the mean imparted and mm is the . This underscores that total energy transferred equals dose multiplied by , providing a standardized metric for energy deposition independent of specific type. Calibration ensures traceability to primary standards, accounting for variations in interaction probabilities across energies.

Energy Response and Sensitivity

The energy response of a dosimeter refers to the variation in its output signal relative to the true absorbed dose as a function of incident radiation energy, often characterized by the response function R(E)=measured signaltrue doseR(E) = \frac{\text{measured signal}}{\text{true dose}}, where EE is the photon energy. This function typically exhibits under-response at low photon energies (below approximately 100 keV) due to insufficient buildup of secondary electrons, lacking electronic equilibrium in thin detector walls or sensitive volumes. For personal dosimeters, angular dependence further complicates response, with reductions up to 50% at oblique angles (e.g., 60°–90°) for shadowed detectors in low-energy fields, as the body or badge shielding attenuates incident radiation. Sensitivity, defined as the change in signal per unit dose, is influenced by material properties such as ZZ, where higher ZZ materials enhance photoelectric absorption at low energies, leading to over-response in detectors like film dosimeters exposed to low-energy X-rays (e.g., 20–50 keV), where response can exceed unity by factors of 2–5 without filtration. To achieve tissue equivalence, low-ZZ materials (e.g., in TLDs or A-150 in ionization chambers) are employed to approximate human response, minimizing discrepancies in absorption and across diagnostic and therapeutic energy ranges (50 keV to 10 MeV). In ionization chambers, sensitivity is also affected by the let-down voltage technique, where reducing the operating voltage corrects for ion recombination at high dose rates, ensuring linear response down to operating potentials of 300–400 V. Dosimeters typically operate over dose ranges from 0.1 μGy to 10 Gy, with sensitivity optimized for at the lower end and radiotherapy at the higher end, though passive types like TLDs exhibit fading—signal loss of less than 5% over months due to thermal annealing of trapped charges. For s, inherent sensitivity is low in photon-oriented dosimeters, necessitating special converters like boron-10 or lithium-6 layers to induce reactions for detection across thermal to fast energies (0.025 eV to 20 MeV).
FactorDescriptionExample Impact
Energy DependenceOver-response at low EE due to TLD response increases ~35% at 30 keV vs. 662 keV
Angular DependenceReduced signal at non-normal incidenceUp to 90% under-response at 80 keV for side incidence
Material ZZ EffectPhotoelectric dominance in high-ZZFilm over-response by factor of 3 at 40 keV
Fading in PassiveSignal decay over time<2% loss in LiF TLDs after 3 months at

Dosimeter Types

Passive Dosimeters

Passive dosimeters integrate over extended periods without requiring an external power source, accumulating dose information that is retrieved through post-exposure laboratory analysis rather than real-time readout. This design enables straightforward deployment for personal or , with key advantages including low operational costs, minimal maintenance, and the ability to assess cumulative exposures in scenarios where immediate feedback is unnecessary. Common types encompass film badges, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), optically stimulated dosimeters (OSLDs), and others like radiophotoluminescent (RPL) glass and /ESR systems, each leveraging distinct physical mechanisms to record interactions. Film badge dosimeters, among the earliest passive devices introduced in the , rely on a photographic of embedded in a base that undergoes chemical changes upon , causing proportional darkening measurable by optical . Metal filters surrounding the film facilitate discrimination of radiation energy and type by attenuating specific energies, allowing estimation of deep and shallow doses. Despite their historical prevalence in occupational settings, film badges have been largely phased out in favor of more robust alternatives due to significant signal fading—up to 30% loss over several weeks from environmental factors like humidity and temperature—and their non-reusable nature, which necessitates frequent replacement. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) function by trapping charge carriers (electrons and holes) in crystal lattice defects of materials such as doped with magnesium and titanium (LiF:Mg,Ti), which has an effective close to that of tissue for accurate equivalence. excites these carriers into metastable states; subsequent controlled heating releases them, producing whose integrated light output, captured via a , correlates linearly with up to several grays, with glow curve deconvolution enabling precise dose reconstruction and identification of exposure history. TLDs excel in high-precision measurements for gamma and fields, achieving sensitivities as low as approximately 1 μGy, making them ideal for low-level occupational and clinical , though they require annealing between uses to reset the traps. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), commercially introduced in the late 1990s, employ detectors like carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃:C) where radiation-induced trapped charges are stimulated by green laser light (typically 532 nm) to recombine and emit blue luminescence (around 420 nm) proportional to the dose, detected optically without heating. Unlike TLDs, OSLDs support multiple non-destructive readouts and reusability through optical bleaching, coupled with improved fading resistance—minimal over months under standard conditions—enhancing reliability for long integration periods. Their compact, flexible strip formats provide particular advantages for extremity and eye lens monitoring in medical and interventional settings, where conformal placement improves dose accuracy over rigid alternatives. Other passive variants include radiophotoluminescent (RPL) dosimeters, composed of silver-activated that forms stable luminescent centers upon ; these centers fluoresce under excitation, yielding a signal intensity directly tied to dose with flat response across filters for broad applicability in personnel monitoring, notable for negligible fading and reusability via high-temperature annealing. For high-dose regimes exceeding several kilograys, such as in industrial sterilization or radiotherapy validation, /ESR dosimeters exploit electron spin resonance spectroscopy to quantify stable free radicals generated in irradiated L- pellets, offering tissue-equivalent response, linearity up to 10⁵ Gy, and independence from environmental influences like temperature.

Active Dosimeters

Active dosimeters are battery-powered devices that provide real-time or near-real-time measurements of , featuring audible and visual alarms for exceeding dose or thresholds, data logging capabilities for recording exposure history, and suitability for dynamic environments such as nuclear facilities or response scenarios where immediate feedback is essential. Electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) employ detectors, such as PIN diodes, to generate electron-hole pairs in response to , enabling the quantification of through charge collection and . These devices incorporate digital displays for instantaneous readout of cumulative dose and dose rates, along with energy compensation filters to ensure accurate response across a broad energy spectrum, typically from 15 keV to 10 MeV for photons. Ionization chamber dosimeters utilize gas-filled chambers where incoming radiation ionizes the gas, producing ion pairs whose collected current is proportional to the , allowing for immediate electronic readout in portable versions. These instruments are particularly valued for their direct of exposure rates in the range of 0.1 /h or higher, providing reliable assessments in occupational settings without requiring post-processing. Scintillation dosimeters operate by converting radiation energy into visible light through excitation in a material, such as plastic or inorganic crystals, which is then detected and amplified by a (PMT) to produce an electrical signal for dose evaluation. Geiger-Müller (GM) tube-based dosimeters detect beta and gamma via ionization avalanches in a , counting pulses that are integrated over time to estimate cumulative dose, with sensitivity to energies above 50 keV. MOSFET dosimeters, specialized for in-vivo medical applications, measure radiation dose by quantifying the shift in induced in the structure due to trapped charges from , offering precise verification of delivered dose during radiotherapy. The primary advantages of active dosimeters include their alarm functions for rapid hazard notification and integration with wireless systems for remote monitoring, though limitations such as finite battery life can restrict prolonged use in field operations. Key developments in active dosimetry include hybrid active-passive systems, which combine real-time readout capabilities with long-term dose storage similar to passive devices, enhancing versatility for both immediate alerts and regulatory record-keeping while meeting standards like IEC 61526 for performance under varying radiation conditions.

Dosimetric Quantities

Absorbed Dose and Kerma

The , denoted as DD, is a fundamental dosimetric that represents the mean imparted by to in a given , per unit of that . It is defined by the equation D=dϵˉdm,D = \frac{d\bar{\epsilon}}{dm}, where dϵˉd\bar{\epsilon} is the mean energy imparted to matter of mass dmdm. This measures the physical energy transfer from any type of —whether directly or indirectly ionizing—regardless of the radiation's biological impact. The unit of absorbed dose is the gray (Gy), where 1 Gy equals 1 joule per (J/kg). Kerma, or kinetic energy released per unit mass (KK), quantifies the initial transfer of energy from indirectly ionizing radiation, such as photons or neutrons, to charged particles (primarily electrons) in a material. It is expressed as K=dEtrdm,K = \frac{dE_\text{tr}}{dm}, where dEtrdE_\text{tr} is the sum of the initial kinetic energies of all charged particles liberated by uncharged particles in the mass element dmdm. Like absorbed dose, kerma is measured in grays (Gy). Under conditions of charged particle equilibrium—where the number and energies of charged particles entering and leaving a volume are balanced—kerma approximates the collision kerma, which closely equals the absorbed dose, serving as a precursor for dose calculations in equilibrated regions. However, kerma can overestimate the absorbed dose near material surfaces or boundaries, where charged particle equilibrium is absent; in these regions, secondary charged particles generated by the radiation escape the volume without fully depositing their energy, reducing the actual energy absorption. Absorbed dose levels are linked to radiation effects: deterministic (tissue reaction) effects, such as cell death or organ dysfunction, exhibit a threshold dose above which severity increases with dose, while stochastic effects, like cancer induction, have no threshold and show probability rising linearly with dose at low levels. In dosimeter design, particularly for small detectors, cavity theory—such as the Bragg-Gray principle—relates the in a low-density cavity (e.g., gas-filled) to that in the surrounding medium by assuming the cavity does not perturb the fluence and equilibrium holds in the medium. This enables accurate dose measurement in media like tissue or using chambers, where the dose to the cavity gas is scaled by the ratio of mass collision stopping powers of the medium and gas.

Equivalent, Effective, and Operational Doses

In radiation protection dosimetry, the equivalent dose HH quantifies the biological impact of absorbed dose DD by accounting for the relative effectiveness of different radiation types in causing stochastic effects, such as DNA damage. It is calculated as H=D×wRH = D \times w_R, where wRw_R is the radiation weighting factor, a dimensionless value that varies by radiation type and energy; for example, wR=1w_R = 1 for photons and electrons, wR=2w_R = 2 for protons, and wR=20w_R = 20 for alpha particles._free_extract.pdf) The unit of equivalent dose is the sievert (Sv), which allows comparison of risks from diverse radiations despite equal absorbed doses. The effective dose EE extends this by incorporating tissue sensitivity to stochastic effects, providing a whole-body risk metric primarily for estimating cancer induction probabilities. It is defined as the weighted sum E=∑wT×HTE = \sum w_T \times H_T, where HTH_T is the equivalent dose to tissue TT and wTw_T is the tissue weighting factor summing to 1 across all tissues; notable values from ICRP Publication 103 include wT=0.12w_T = 0.12 for lungs, bone marrow, colon, , and , wT=0.08w_T = 0.08 for gonads, and wT=0.04w_T = 0.04 for organs like the , , liver, and ._free_extract.pdf) Also in sieverts (Sv), effective dose enables regulatory limits, such as 20 mSv per year averaged over five years for occupational exposure, by approximating overall detriment from partial or whole-body ._free_extract.pdf) These factors were updated in 2007 to reflect improved radiobiological , emphasizing sex-averaged risks._free_extract.pdf) Operational quantities bridge theoretical doses to practical measurements in . The personal dose equivalent Hp(d)H_p(d) represents the dose equivalent at depth dd mm in below a specified point on the body, typically where a dosimeter is worn; for instance, Hp(10)H_p(10) assesses penetrating for effective dose approximation in whole-body exposures, while Hp(0.07)H_p(0.07) evaluates dose from beta particles or low-energy photons. Defined using an ICRU phantom filled with ICRU tissue to simulate attenuation, Hp(10)H_p(10) provides a conservative estimate of effective dose for external fields, particularly for photons up to several MeV._free_extract.pdf) Similarly, the ambient dose equivalent H∗(10)H^*(10) measures dose at 10 mm depth in the ICRU for area monitoring, approximating effective dose in isotropic fields and guiding environmental assessments. These quantities, specified by ICRU reports, ensure dosimeters yield values traceable to protection standards without direct organ measurements.

Applications

Personal and Occupational Monitoring

Personal dosimeters are essential tools for monitoring individual in occupational settings, ensuring compliance with safety standards and protecting workers from excessive doses. These devices, typically worn by personnel in high-risk environments such as nuclear facilities and suites, provide quantitative measurements of personal dose equivalents like Hp(10) for whole-body exposure. By tracking cumulative exposure over time, dosimeters enable employers to implement the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, minimizing health risks from . Protocols for issuing personal dosimeters vary by workplace but generally involve periodic distribution to at-risk workers. (TLD) or optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) badges are commonly issued quarterly to capture routine exposure levels accurately without excessive administrative burden. In procedures involving potential hand exposure, such as in , ring dosimeters are provided to monitor extremity doses, worn on the finger closest to the source. Issuance is often tied to job classifications, with new workers receiving training on proper handling and return procedures to maintain dosimeter integrity. Regulatory frameworks, guided by the (ICRP), establish strict dose limits for occupational exposure to prevent deterministic and effects. The effective dose limit is 20 mSv per year, averaged over five years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv; for the lens of the eye, the limit is 20 mSv per year averaged over five years, not exceeding 50 mSv in any year; and for the skin, it is 500 mSv per year averaged over 1 cm². Lifetime exposure records are maintained in national registries to track cumulative doses and enforce these limits, with mandatory reporting for workers approaching thresholds. For declared pregnant workers, the to the embryo/ is limited to 1 mSv over the remainder of the to provide additional protection. Key practices include strategic badge placement on the chest or collar to approximate Hp(10), the personal dose equivalent at 10 mm depth, ensuring representative whole-body monitoring. Investigation levels are set at fractions of annual limits—such as 5 mSv for effective dose—to trigger reviews of anomalous readings, potentially due to malfunction or procedural errors, prompting corrective actions like reissuance or exposure audits. In high-radiation zones, personal dosimeters integrate with systems, where electronic readers verify valid dosimeters before granting entry, linking dose data to individual identification for real-time tracking. Post-accident, dose reconstruction relies on dosimeter readings combined with environmental surveys and biological assays to estimate actual exposures when direct measurements are incomplete. These monitoring strategies are exemplified in nuclear power plants, where workers wear TLD/OSL badges and extremity dosimeters during maintenance in reactor areas to comply with limits and reconstruct doses following incidents like fuel handling mishaps. Similarly, interventional radiology staff in healthcare settings use ring dosimeters during fluoroscopy-guided procedures to track hand exposures, which can approach investigation levels due to scattered radiation, while whole-body badges monitor overall risk.

Environmental and Area Monitoring

Environmental and area monitoring employs fixed or deployable dosimeters to assess ambient levels across public spaces or entire sites, providing data for and . Area monitors, such as pressurized ion chambers, are commonly deployed for continuous measurement of dose rates from gamma in the environment, offering real-time alerts for elevated exposures near nuclear facilities or contaminated areas. These instruments, often with volumes up to 50 liters, detect low-energy photons down to 35 keV, making them suitable for broad-spectrum environmental surveillance. Complementing these, environmental thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLs) are placed at fixed points to integrate cumulative doses over weeks or months, capturing variations in external gamma exposure without requiring power sources. The primary purposes of such monitoring include emergency response to radiological incidents, baseline surveys to detect , and ongoing tracking of public exposures to ensure levels remain below safety thresholds. In emergency scenarios, networks of area monitors facilitate rapid assessment of plume dispersion and ground deposition, as demonstrated by expanded post-Fukushima Daiichi systems in that integrated hundreds of fixed detectors for real-time public safety evaluations. Baseline surveys establish pre-operational radiation profiles, typically spanning 2–3 years, to distinguish anthropogenic contributions from natural background, which averages approximately 2.4 mSv per year worldwide. Public exposure tracking supports verification of compliance with dose limits, focusing on critical groups in potentially affected areas. Key technologies enhance the effectiveness of these monitoring efforts, particularly in challenging terrains or high-dose zones. Teletectors, portable dose rate meters with telescopic probes, enable remote measurements of gamma and beta radiation up to 1000 R/h from distances of several meters, minimizing operator risk during site inspections. For broader analysis, dosimeters are often integrated with weather stations to model radionuclide dispersion, incorporating wind and precipitation data to predict dose pathways in real time. IAEA guidelines outline standardized approaches for environmental dosimetry, recommending site-specific networks that account for dispersion patterns and critical exposure pathways to protect the public. Specific applications include mapping, where track-etch detectors—such as polymers exposed in chambers—quantify integrated radon concentrations over months, aiding in identifying high-risk geological areas for mitigation. Challenges in environmental and area monitoring include ensuring long-term deployment durability against environmental factors like and fluctuations, which necessitate robust enclosures and periodic . Additionally, corrections for contributions are essential, as they can account for up to 10% of natural background and vary with altitude and , requiring models to isolate terrestrial signals accurately.

Industrial and Medical Uses

In industrial applications, dosimeters play a crucial role in verifying doses for processes such as sterilization and irradiation. Alanine dosimeters, often evaluated using (EPR) spectroscopy, are widely employed to confirm absorbed doses around 10 kGy in facilities, ensuring microbial inactivation while maintaining product quality. These dosimeters provide high precision and stability for routine process control in gamma irradiators, where they help establish dose uniformity across product loads. Dose mapping, a key practice, involves placing multiple dosimeters within product carriers to identify dose variations and optimize geometry, as required by standards like ISO 11137 for sterilization validation. This mapping ensures that the minimum and maximum doses meet regulatory thresholds, typically within ±10% for verification experiments in gamma processing. In medical contexts, dosimeters are essential for verifying radiation delivery in radiotherapy and diagnostic imaging. In-phantom dosimetry simulates patient anatomy to validate treatment plans, using tools like radiochromic films for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) verification. Gafchromic EBT-XD films, in particular, offer high-resolution 2D dose distribution mapping over a range of 0.4 to 40 Gy, enabling precise assessment of beam conformity and heterogeneity corrections. For in-vivo dosimetry during treatments, metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOSFET) dosimeters provide real-time measurements at specific sites, such as tumor beds, with minimal invasiveness and energy independence within 1% for megavoltage beams. Fricke dosimeters, based on ferrous-to-ferric oxidation, are used for high-energy and beams, offering linear response and traceability for calibration in water-equivalent media. In diagnostic , patient-specific dose limits are monitored via the CT dose index (CTDI), a standardized metric in mGy that guides protocol optimization to balance quality and radiation exposure, often targeting values below 25 mGy for adult abdomen scans. Key challenges in these applications include achieving dose uniformity across large irradiation fields in industrial settings, where product density variations can lead to gradients exceeding 20%, necessitating advanced mapping techniques. to primary standards, such as those from national institutes, is critical for dosimeter accuracy but complicated by environmental factors like and beam heterogeneity in high-dose environments. These issues underscore the need for robust protocols to maintain compliance with ISO 11137 and ensure reliable process verification.

Calibration and Standards

Calibration Procedures

Calibration of dosimeters involves exposing the instrument to a known field under controlled conditions to determine its response and establish a calibration factor that relates the indicated reading to the true dose. This process ensures to primary standards and maintains measurement accuracy for purposes. Typically, calibrations are performed using reference radiation sources such as cesium-137 (Cs-137) gamma emitters, which provide a well-characterized beam for air kerma measurements in units of gray (Gy). The air kerma, defined as the released per unit mass in air, serves as the primary quantity for calibrating photon dosimeters. For passive dosimeters, such as thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), calibration is generally conducted every 12-14 months to account for potential degradation or environmental effects over time. Active dosimeters, like electronic personal dosimeters, require more frequent periodic calibrations, often every 12-14 months or after significant usage, to verify real-time response integrity. These procedures rely on transfer standards—secondary instruments calibrated against primary standards at national institutes such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the United States or the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in —to propagate accuracy to user-level calibrations. For personal dose equivalent (Hp) calibrations, anthropomorphic phantoms, such as the ISO slab (30 cm × 30 cm × 15 cm water-filled), pillar, or rod phantoms, are employed to simulate human tissue attenuation and backscatter effects. Key steps in the calibration procedure begin with pre-calibration verification, including alignment of the source, dosimeter positioning, and confirmation of environmental conditions (e.g., 20°C and 65% relative ) to meet reference standards. The dosimeter is then exposed to the known field, followed by post-exposure readout of the indicated dose. This indicated value is compared to the reference dose from a calibrated , with any discrepancies addressed through correction factors for factors like energy dependence, angle of incidence, source decay, air , and . The calibration factor CC is calculated as C=DrefDindC = \frac{D_{\text{ref}}}{D_{\text{ind}}}, where DrefD_{\text{ref}} is the reference dose and DindD_{\text{ind}} is the indicated dose, ensuring the dosimeter's output can be scaled accurately for operational use. Uncertainty analysis is integral to the process, evaluating both Type A (statistical) and Type B (systematic) components, such as those from source positioning (±0.5%) or reference instrument (±1.5%), often yielding a combined standard of around 1.8% at a coverage factor of k=1k=1. Typical overall uncertainties for well-calibrated systems are on the order of ±5%, encompassing propagation through the measurement chain. Laboratory calibrations, conducted under ISO 4037-defined and gamma qualities (e.g., N-100 to N-300 for filtered s or S-Cs-137 for gamma), are preferred for precision, while field calibrations using working standards offer practical checks but with higher uncertainties. Accuracy requirements, as outlined in ANSI N13.11, mandate that personnel dosimeters meet performance criteria through testing, including dose accuracy within specified tolerances (e.g., ±20-30% for certain energies) to ensure reliable occupational monitoring.

Response Characteristics and Traceability

Response characteristics of dosimeters are critical for ensuring accurate dose measurements, encompassing properties such as , , and batch homogeneity. refers to the proportional response of the dosimeter to increasing doses, which is essential for reliable quantification across a broad dose range; for instance, optically stimulated dosimeters (OSLDs) exhibit a linear response in the diagnostic energy range from 50 to 150 kVp. measures the consistency of readings under identical conditions, with OSLDs demonstrating of approximately 3.3% over multiple cycles. Batch homogeneity assesses uniformity across a set of dosimeters produced together, typically achieving less than 5% variation in OSLDs, which supports interchangeable use in monitoring programs. Environmental factors significantly influence dosimeter performance, necessitating robust design and correction models. Temperature variations, common in operational settings, can alter response; electronic personal dosimeters are tested over 0°C to 55°C, with acceptable limits of ±20% deviation from nominal response. effects, particularly at levels from 40% to 95% relative humidity, may introduce up to ±15% variation, often mitigated through encapsulation or post-exposure corrections. Angular response modeling accounts for directional dependence of incident , where deviations of ±20% occur at angles up to 60° for gamma energies around 660 keV, requiring geometric simulations to predict and adjust for non-isotropic fields. The overall response of a dosimeter integrates these factors, including , incidence , and . Validation through computational methods is used to predict and adjust for these dependencies. simulations play a key role in validating dosimeter responses by modeling particle interactions in complex geometries, such as those in radiotherapy, to predict energy and angular dependencies with uncertainties below 1% for perturbation factors. Inter-comparison programs, such as those organized by the (IAEA) in cooperation with EURADOS, evaluate active personal dosimeters against IEC standards in simulated workplace fields, confirming overall performance within ±20% for personal dose equivalent measurements. Traceability establishes a metrological chain linking dosimeter measurements to international standards, starting from the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), which maintains primary radiation standards and coordinates key comparisons under the Mutual Recognition Arrangement. This chain proceeds to Primary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories (PSDLs), such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which develop absolute standards using techniques like ; secondary laboratories, including Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories (SSDLs) under IAEA oversight, then disseminate calibrations to Accredited Dosimetry Calibration Laboratories (ADCLs) for end-user dosimeters. Accreditation bodies like the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) verify this chain for services, ensuring compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 through documented unbroken links and proficiency testing. Uncertainty budgets, as required by ISO/IEC 17025 for accredited laboratories, quantify contributions from factors like temperature (0.02%), pressure (0.06%), and positioning (0.02%), yielding combined standard uncertainties of approximately 0.5% for air kerma calibrations, with ensured through a coverage factor k=1k=1 for the standard uncertainty component. In radiation protection, this supports legal by enabling verifiable compliance with exposure limits, as demonstrated in efforts to link national to BIPM standards for accurate monitoring of occupational and public doses.

Recent Advances

Real-Time and Wireless Technologies

Advancements in real-time dosimetry have primarily leveraged direct ion storage (DIS) technology, which enables immediate capture and readout of without the need for . DIS-based dosimeters, such as those integrated into electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs), provide continuous monitoring and instant dose alerts, allowing users to receive notifications via connectivity when exposure thresholds are approached. For instance, advanced EPDs equipped with transmit data directly to smartphones or dedicated apps, facilitating real-time dose trending and visualization of exposure patterns over time. This capability has been particularly enhanced post-2020, with devices like the Instadose+ utilizing DIS to deliver on-demand reads accurate to within 10% of traditional methods, supporting immediate in high-risk environments. Wireless features in modern dosimeters extend real-time functionality through IoT integration, enabling remote fleet management for large-scale occupational monitoring programs. IoT-enabled badges automatically sync dose data to cloud platforms, allowing administrators to track multiple users' exposures in real time without physical retrieval of devices. Additionally, some systems incorporate GPS tracking to locate lost or misplaced dosimeters during emergencies, such as nuclear incidents or disaster response operations, ensuring continuity of monitoring and rapid recovery of assets. The RaySafe i3, for example, records radiation every second and wirelessly transfers data to a central hub, supporting scalable deployment in healthcare and industrial settings. These wireless architectures have driven post-2020 innovations, with devices like the PED2+ combining GPS and Bluetooth for enhanced traceability in dynamic scenarios. Key advances include significant miniaturization, with wearable sensors now weighing under 1 gram, making them unobtrusive for continuous use in . Low-power designs, often employing energy-efficient (BLE) protocols, extend battery life to several months, reducing maintenance needs and enabling prolonged field operations. The further accelerated adoption of these technologies in healthcare, where remote monitoring of staff radiation exposure via cloud-connected dosimeters like the Instadose+ minimized on-site interactions and supported infection control measures. Market growth reflects this momentum, with the global dosimeter sector reaching approximately $3.4 billion in 2024, projected to expand at a 7-8% CAGR through 2025, largely propelled by demand for real-time and wireless solutions in and nuclear industries. Despite these progresses, challenges persist in cybersecurity for wireless data transmission, as IoT-connected dosimeters are vulnerable to hacking that could compromise exposure records or enable unauthorized access to . Regulatory hurdles also arise, particularly in achieving approval for real-time dosimeters to demonstrate equivalence to the Hp(10) personal dose equivalent standard used in conventional systems, requiring rigorous validation against international guidelines like those from the IAEA. The U.S. FDA has emphasized cybersecurity in premarket submissions for such devices, mandating plans to address these threats while ensuring accuracy. Ongoing efforts focus on standardized and secure protocols to mitigate these issues without impeding technological adoption.

Smart Dosimeters and AI Integration

Smart dosimeters integrate (AI) to process data in real-time, enabling advanced beyond traditional . algorithms analyze patterns in dosimeter readings to predict cumulative doses for workers in high-risk environments, such as nuclear facilities, by modeling exposure trends from historical and environmental variables. For instance, a multi-stage approach using signals estimates personal dose equivalents by classifying photon energies and reconstructing dose distributions, achieving accuracies within 5-10% compared to conventional methods. , powered by models like convolutional neural networks, identifies irregular exposure events in personal monitoring data, flagging potential overexposures or equipment faults to trigger immediate alerts. Hybrid models combine dosimeter inputs with data, such as from methods, to refine predictions in dynamic scenarios, enhancing reliability for occupational safety. Computational dosimetry leverages AI to optimize traditional techniques, including simulations for virtual of dosimeters without physical sources. Neural networks approximate dose distributions, reducing computation times from hours to seconds while maintaining errors below 3%, allowing for rapid virtual testing of dosimeter responses across varied radiation fields. AI-optimized corrections address non-linearities in detector responses, particularly in mixed radiation environments, where neural networks unfold spectra to distinguish , , and beta contributions, improving dose estimation accuracy by up to 15% in complex fields. Real-time effective dose estimation integrates AI with active dosimeters, using predictive models to calculate biologically weighted doses on-the-fly, supporting adaptive alarm systems that adjust thresholds based on user-specific risk profiles. Recent advances from 2022 to 2025 highlight AI's role in elevating personal , with papers demonstrating integration in active devices for proactive monitoring. For example, machine learning-enhanced systems in 2024 enabled real-time dose forecasting in nuclear settings, correlating data with worker movements to preempt exposures. Neural networks have proven effective in handling mixed fields, as shown in thermoluminescent applications where AI classifies field types and reconstructs doses with . The global dosimeter market, projected to reach $6.81 billion by 2033, is partly driven by such , including AI for enhanced optically stimulated (OSL) readers that automate signal analysis for precise retrospective dosing. Examples include AI-augmented OSL systems that use to denoise signals, improving sensitivity in low-dose scenarios. Despite these innovations, challenges persist in AI-integrated dosimeters, including data concerns from continuous monitoring of personal exposure records and the need for rigorous validation against established standards to ensure equivalence with traditional methods. AI models require diverse, high-quality datasets to avoid biases, and their black-box nature complicates regulatory approval in . Ongoing emphasizes explainable AI to bridge these gaps, fostering trust in smart dosimetry for widespread adoption.

References

  1. https://recherche-expertise.asnr.fr/sites/default/files/documents/professionnels_sante/documentation/syllabus_chapitre_3.pdf
  2. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/magazines/bulletin/bull23-4/23405043136.pdf
  3. https://www.orau.org/blog/history/measuring-radiation-exposure-then-and-now.html
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/dosimeter
  5. https://www.iaea.org/resources/hhc/medical-physics/dosimetry-laboratory
  6. https://www.iaea.org/publications/398/absorbed-dose-determination-in-external-beam-radiotherapy
  7. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/multimedia/photoessays/dosimetry-the-role-of-dosimetry-in-protecting-workers-exposed-to-ionizing-radiation
  8. https://www.iaea.org/resources/hhc/medical-physics/radiotherapy/dosimetry
  9. https://www.landauer.com/blog/what-dosimetry-facts-and-fundamentals-radiation-dosimetry
  10. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/dosimeters?lang=us
  11. https://icrpaedia.org/Dose_limits
  12. https://www.landauer-fr.com/en/knowledge/go-further/background-dosimeter-what-are-your-duties-regarding-ambient-monitoring/
  13. https://www.cdc.gov/radiation-health/safety/alara.html
  14. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-terms-and-units
  15. https://zenodo.org/record/1234794/files/article.pdf
  16. https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/en/article/view/2107/1153
  17. http://national-radiation-instrument-catalog.com/new_page_115.htm
  18. https://oriseapps.orau.gov/cedr/pdf/hist-docs/8311.pdf
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/thermoluminescence
  20. https://www.landauer.com/blog/unveiling-science-thermoluminescent-dosimeters-key-radiation-safety-and-measurement
  21. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1709/ML17095A321.pdf
  22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18049221/
  23. https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=icrp%20publication%2060
  24. https://www.landauer-fr.com/en/knowledge/go-further/osl-technology/
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK597565/
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B012227410500185X
  27. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1606_web.pdf
  28. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1196_web.pdf
  29. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0112/ML011270424.pdf
  30. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1122/ML11229A698.pdf
  31. https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/orpnet/training/ExternalRadiation/Shared%20Documents/4_techniques_passive%20-%20Final.pdf
  32. https://radetco.com/x-ray-badges/
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1078817404000227
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-radiotherapy-in-practice/article/study-of-dosimetric-characteristics-of-a-commercial-optically-stimulated-luminescence-system/E7564C1F5D46ED081F8CEB306DF96311
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3520283/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S135044872030127X
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9958855/
  38. https://www.mirion.com/discover/knowledge-hub/articles/stories/electronic-vs-passive-dosimetry-what-is-the-difference
  39. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/dosimetry/products/electronic-personal-dosimeters.html
  40. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/electronic-personal-dosimeters
  41. https://documents.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/CAD/Datasheets/epd-trudose-specifications.pdf
  42. https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/radiation-safety-manual/measurement-radiation-and-unit-exposure
  43. https://www.nde-ed.org/NDEEngineering/RadiationSafety/radiation_safety_equipment/pocket_dosimeter.xhtml
  44. https://www.aapm.org/meetings/09ss/documents/32beddar-plasticdosimeters.pdf
  45. https://www.mirion.com/products/technologies/defense-security-systems/defense-cbrne-instruments/geiger-mueller-tubes/geiger-mueller-gm-detectors
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5720503/
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969804323000830
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X25003391
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350448722001536
  50. https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2002-N-0033-0008/attachment_1.pdf
  51. https://www.aapm.org/meetings/2014AM/ReviewCourses/documents/T06MaMeasurementchapter.pdf
  52. https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20118
  53. https://oncologymedicalphysics.com/bragg-gray-cavity-theory/
  54. https://icrpaedia.org/Absorbed%2C_Equivalent%2C_and_Effective_Dose
  55. https://icrpaedia.org/Personal_dose_equivalent
  56. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ml1233/ML12338A682.pdf
  57. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1785_web.pdf
  58. https://www.landauer.com/blog/how-often-should-dosimeters-be-exchanged
  59. https://www.mirion.com/products/medical/occupational-dosimetry/dosimetry-services/ring-extremity-dosimeters/extremity-dosimeters-ring-dose-measurement
  60. https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103
  61. https://www.landauer.com/blog/how-correctly-wear-dosimeter
  62. https://ehs.wisc.edu/labs-research/radiation-safety/radiation-monitoring/
  63. https://www.newtonlabs.com/nuke_numac100.html
  64. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1145_web.pdf
  65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16039374/
  66. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1216_web.pdf
  67. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/322862/
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135044879700019X
  69. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1904/ML19044A595.pdf
  70. https://www.mirion.com/products/medical/occupational-dosimetry/dosimetry-services/specialty-dosimeters/specialty-dosimters-radiation-monitoring
  71. https://www.cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca/eng/resources/fact-sheets/natural-background-radiation/
  72. https://www.automess.de/en/products/teletectors
  73. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/36/010/36010924.pdf
  74. https://journals.lww.com/rpae/fulltext/2013/36040/preliminary_study_on_the_measurement_of_background.5.aspx
  75. https://linevsystems.us/news/smart-alanine-epr-dosimetry-scalable-radiation-dose-verification/
  76. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1581_web.pdf
  77. https://www.steris-ast.com/resources/techtips/overview-of-a-gamma-irradiation-validation
  78. https://www.steris-ast.com/resources/techtalk-videos/techtalk-verification-dose-complying-with-iso-11137
  79. http://www.gafchromic.com/gafchromic-film/radiotherapy-films/ebt/index.asp
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8149133/
  81. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-9e2414262b3425e4af107fbdf36f87b4/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-9e2414262b3425e4af107fbdf36f87b4.pdf
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3079120/
  83. https://eprintspublications.npl.co.uk/1076/1/cirmpp5.pdf
  84. https://www.greenlight.guru/blog/iso-11137
  85. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P074_scr.pdf
  86. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/hb/2019/NIST.HB.150-4-2019.pdf
  87. https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1118/1.3602456
  88. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1306/ML13060A352.pdf
  89. https://ro-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13014-018-1065-3
  90. https://www.iaea.org/publications/7722/intercomparison-of-personal-dose-equivalent-measurements-by-active-personal-dosimeters
  91. https://www.aapm.org/meetings/09SS/documents/17Seuntjens-TheDosimetryChainBIPMPSDLsADCLs.pdf
  92. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/nvlap/Traceability_2008-Rev-A.pdf
  93. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1585_web.pdf
  94. https://www.euramet.org/publications-media-centre/news/news/improving-traceability-of-medical-and-radiation-protection-dosimetry-in-belgium
  95. https://www.mirion.com/products/medical/occupational-dosimetry/dosimetry-services/whole-body-area-dosimeters/on-demand-dosimetry-products/instadose-wireless-dosimeter
  96. https://www.raysafe.com/products/real-time-staff-dosimetry/raysafe-i3-real-time-radiation-dosimeter
  97. https://lablogic.com/radiation-safety/instruments/ped2plus
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397308541_A_button-sized_wearable_dosimeter_for_astronaut_radiation_exposure_monitoring_in_real-time
  99. https://straitsresearch.com/report/dosimeter-market
  100. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/cybersecurity
  101. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2632-2153/ad1c31
  102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265931X25000633
  103. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12714
  104. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2021.738112/full
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573324004091
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724004369
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12082979/
  108. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/21/6904
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.