Hubbry Logo
ZabbaleenZabbaleenMain
Open search
Zabbaleen
Community hub
Zabbaleen
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Zabbaleen
Zabbaleen
from Wikipedia

The Zabbaleen (Egyptian Arabic: زبالين Zabbalīn, IPA: [zæbbæˈliːn]) is a word which literally means "garbage people" in Egyptian Arabic.[2] The contemporary use of the word in Egyptian Arabic is to mean "garbage collectors". In cultural contexts, the word refers to teenagers and adults who have served as Cairo's informal garbage collectors since approximately the 1940s. The Zabbaleen (singular: زبال Zabbāl, [zæbˈbæːl]) are also known as Zarraba (singular: Zarrab), which means "pig-pen operators."[2] The word Zabbalīn came from the Egyptian Arabic word zebāla ([zeˈbæːlæ], زبالة) which means "garbage".

Key Information

Spread out among seven different settlements scattered in the Greater Cairo Urban Region, the Zabbaleen population is between 50,000 and 70,000.[3] The largest settlement is Mokattam village, nicknamed "Garbage City," located at the foot of the Mokattam Plateau, next to Manshiyat Nasser.[4] The Zabbaleen community has a population of around 20,000 to 30,000, over 90 percent of which are poor Coptic Christians living in self-built homes, many in slum conditions.[5]

For several generations, the Zabbaleen supported themselves by collecting trash door-to-door from the residents of Cairo for nearly no charge. The Zabbaleen recycle up to 80 percent of the waste that they collect via local Egyptian companies, whereas most Western garbage collecting companies only recycle 20 to 25 percent of the waste that they collect.[6][7]

The Zabbaleen use donkey-pulled carts and pickup trucks to transport the garbage that they collect from the residents of Cairo. They then transport the garbage to their homes in Mokattam Village, where they sort the collected items, then either sell the sorted items to middlemen or create new materials from it themselves. The living situation for the Zabbaleen is poor; they live amongst the trash that they sort in their village, and with the pigs to which they feed their organic waste. Nevertheless, the Zabbaleen have formed a strong and tight-knit community.

However, their way of life has come under threat after the Cairo municipal authorities’ decision in 2003 to award annual contracts of $50 million to three multinational garbage disposal companies.[8][9][10] The government authorities do not compensate the Zabbaleen for these changes, and as a result, the takeover of waste collection threatens the socio-economic sustainability of the Zabbaleen community.[11]

The Zabbaleen faced a major challenge when the Egyptian Agricultural Ministry ordered the culling of all pigs in April 2009 in response to national fears over the possible spread of H1N1 influenza.[12][13] This governmental decision posed a major setback to the Zabbaleen because pigs, who eat the organic waste, are an essential component to their recycling and sorting system. Immediately after the culling of pigs, observers noticed a visible increase in piles of trash and rotting food on the streets of Cairo.[14] There are also worries that the Egyptian government is seeking to remove the Mokattam Village entirely and relocate the Zabbaleen further outside of Cairo by a further 25 km, to a 50-feddan (51.9-acre) plot in Cairo's eastern desert settlement of Katameya.[15][16]

Historical background

[edit]

First wave of migration

[edit]

Around the 1910s, a group of Muslim migrants from the Dakhla oasis in the Western desert of Egypt relocated to Cairo in an area known as Bab El Bahr, which is situated between Attaba and Ramses square in downtown Cairo.[2][17][18][19] These people are known as the Wahiya (singular: wahi), which means people of the oasis.[18][19] The Wahiya assumed the sole responsibility for the collection and disposal of Cairo's household waste under the framework of contracts with building owners in Cairo. In this system, the Wahiya paid the owners of buildings an initial sum and then collected monthly fees from the tenants for their services.[17][18][20]

Second wave of migration

[edit]

In the 1930s and 40s, there was a second wave of migration. This new group, mostly landless peasants, is known as the Zabbaleen. The descendants of subsistence farmers, the Zabbaleen originate from the El Badari district in Asyut, a rural region in Upper Egypt, which is the southern part of Egypt.[17][18][19] As farming ceased to be a viable way of life, the Zabbaleen faced economic hardships which prompted them to migrate to Cairo in search of work. Henceforth, the Wahiya collaborated with the Zabbaleen, who purchased waste from the Wahiya for use as fodder for pig farming. Initially, the Zabbaleen settled in the Imbaba district of the Giza governorate, but were given a four-day eviction notice from the governor of Giza in 1970.[4] Thereafter, the Zabbaleen settled mainly in an abandoned quarry at the foot of the Mokattam hills, east of Cairo, which is under the jurisdiction of the Cairo Governorate.[21] Although the governor of Cairo granted the Zabbaleen administrative permission to settle in the area, he did not issue a lease or legal tenure. Thus, because of their precarious situation, the Zabbaleen initially lived in makeshift settlements of tin huts, made mostly of barrels that the Zabbaleen found amongst the waste that they collected.[4][17][18][22] This Zabbaleen community later emerged as the informal garbage collectors and recyclers of Cairo. The literal meaning of the word Zabbaleen is garbage-men (singular: Zabbal). The Zabbaleen are also known as Zarraba (singular: Zarrab), which means pig pen operators, because they raise pigs that eat the organic components of the waste that they collect.[2]

1989 agreement between Wahiya and Zabbaleen

[edit]

Prior to the migration of the Zabbaleen, the Wahiya had used the refuse, after drying it, as a source of energy--specifically as fuel for public baths and bean cookeries.[2] However, this use of dried refuse became obsolete in the 1930s when fuel oil became the preferred fuel for public baths and bean cookeries. This coincided with the migration of the Zabbaleen, who used the organic components of the wastes to feed their pigs.[2] Thus, the Wahiya began to sell the organic refuse to the Zabbaleen.[2] Because the Zabbaleen needed to obtain waste food before it rots, they preferred to collect the refuse themselves using their own donkey carts.

The Zabbaleen can be distinguished from the Wahiya in at least two ways. First, the Wahiya retained control over the access and collection rights to the monthly fees paid by the residents, whereas the Zabbaleen usually do not have a share in the monthly fees paid by residents. In fact, the Zabbaleen are often obliged to pay the Wahiya in order to gain access to the waste garbage.[3] However, what the Zabbaleen do acquire are the rights to the refuse itself.[23] Hence, the relationship between the Wahiya and the Zabbaleen was hierarchically constituted. The Wahiya acted as the middlemen between the Zabbaleen and Cairo's households.[19] Quoting Assaad, "The wahiya assume overall responsibility for regular removal of the wastes vis-à-vis residents and building owners and are responsible for collection of the wastes from individual dwelling units to the street level. The Zabbaleen, on the other hand, are responsible for the haulage and disposal of the wastes."[23]

A donkey at Mokattam Hill in Cairo

Second, the Zabbaleen collect the garbage on donkey-pulled carts, separate out recyclables, breed pigs to recycle organic waste, and engage in the process of recycling, whereas the Wahiya do not.[20] The Zabbaleen also sell the sorted secondary materials such as paper, tin, glass, plastic materials, rags, and aluminum cans to intermediaries.[24] Because Cairenes are generally not aware of the distinction between the Wahiya and the Zabbaleen (also called zarraba), they tend to refer to both groups as Zabbaleen. It should be noted, however, that these two groups are distinct, serving different functions in the informal economy of collecting Cairo's municipal solid waste (MSW).[25]

In response to government pressures to upgrade and modernize the refuse collection system, the Wahiya and the Zabbaleen made an agreement which resulted in the establishment of the Environmental Protection Company, a private-for-profit company, in 1989.[18] Within the framework of the EPC, the Wahiya contracted groups of Zabbaleen to collect and dispose of MSW. The Wahiya continued to collect user fees from tenants, but now they also assumed the responsibility to cover hauling costs out of the fees they collected.[26] The formation of the EPC officially established the Wahiya and the Zabbaleen as key participants in the collection of MSW, formalizing a relationship that had already existed for decades.[17]

The municipal authorities grew increasingly intolerant of the Zabbaleen's donkey carts, which, according to Assaad, were considered an eyesore and a traffic hazard by the government.[27] This was precisely in the neighborhoods that were being more fully served given Cairo's narrow, winding streets that are not wide enough for large garbage trucks. Regardless, in the early 1990s, the garbage collectors had to comply with the municipality's requirements to use motorized trucks, rather than donkey carts, as the authorities introduced a system of mechanization to transport solid waste.[20] In the absence of government support, the Zabbaleen had to find ways to purchase the newly required motorized trucks themselves, and many resorted to credit loans, emptying their personal savings, or even selling small plots of land in their ancestral villages.[20] Within the EPC, the Wahiya conducted administration, marketed the company's services, collected the fees from tenants, and supervised service deliveries. On the other end, the Zabbaleen, "many of whom might otherwise have been homeless and without employment, collected and transported the waste." In more recent years, as the Zabbaleen became more involved in the work, some received a minimal fee from the Wahiya.[17]

Notable people

[edit]
  • Yousriya Loza Sawiris: a Coptic businesswoman and a member of the sawiris family, despite not being a part of the zabaleen community. She is considered by many the Queen of the zabaleen neighbourhood and turned recycling in Cairo into a proper business, both expanding the operations and giving many zabbaleen job opportunities.[28][29] She is married to Onsi Sawiris and mother of Naguib Sawiris and Samih Sawiris.

Zabbaleen settlements

[edit]

Main settlements

[edit]

There are seven main settlements, in which the Zabbaleen reside in the Greater Cairo Urban Region: Ein El Sira, Moatamdia, El Bargil, Tora, Ezbet el Nakhl, Helwan, and Mokattam.[20] Due to urban expansion, municipal authorities have moved most of these settlements to more peripheral locations.[20] The number of Zabbaleen living in these areas total to about 60,000-70,000.[11] Of these settlements, the largest is Mokattam, also often known as Garbage City, with approximately 20,000 inhabitants. It is located east of Cairo, situated at the foot of Mokattam mountain. Mokattam was created as a result of a series of evictions from the Imbaba area located in the Giza governorate, most notably when the Zabbaleen were given a four-day eviction notice from the governor of Giza in 1970.[20][30]

Although Mokattam village is relatively close to the center of Cairo, it is not easily accessible from Cairo because it is situated on a plateau, and is surrounded by the cliffs of the Mokattam hills on one side and by the Manshiet Nasser squatter settlement on the other side.[4] Vehicular access to the Zabbaleen Mokattam is possible only through three entrances, two of which are accessible only by crossing through the crowded, narrow, and steep streets of Manshiet Nasser.[4] Because of the high congestion and road traffic, conflicts have often broken out between the residents of the Manshiet Nasser settlement and the Zabbaleen, who need to haul their donkey carts loaded with garbage through the streets of Manshiet Nasser. Occasionally, these conflicts have taken on religious overtones, as the inhabitants of the Manshiet Nasser settlement are mostly Muslims, whereas the inhabitants of the Mokattam settlement are mostly Coptic Christians.[4]

Mokattam village is situated at the foot of the Mokattam mountains, which brings many environmental hazards. In 1993, a rockslide from Mokattam Mountain fell near the bordering area of the Zabbaleen settlement, resulting in the deaths of 40 people.[31] In 2008, another rockslide from the Mokattam hills killed more than 100 people in El-Duweiqa, another shantytown in the Mokattam district.[32] These rock slides brought public attention to the precarious location of shantytowns located below the Mokattam mountains, as well as to the Zabbaleen.[33] Some attribute these frequent rock slides to various development and construction activities on Mokattam Mountain's upper plateau, on which the upper middle class residential district of Mokattam City is located.[34]

Living conditions

[edit]

The living conditions in Mokattam Village, and the other Zabbaleen settlements, are poor. In the 1970s, "the streets were so stacked with heaps of assorted refuse that some of them could not be located. The air was heavily polluted by the smoke generated from fires that were either lit deliberately to dispose of unwanted waste, or resulted from the spontaneous combustion of organic residues."[4] There have been frequent fires in Mokattam, two of which were particularly severe and devastated the settlement in the 1970s.[4]

In its early years, the Mokattam Settlement lacked basic services; there were no health centers, pharmacies, or schools. Basic amenities such as piped water, sewage networks, and electricity were also missing.[4] During the beginning decades of the Mokattam settlement, the community suffered from "high mortality and morbidity rates (especially among children), poor environmental conditions, and low income."[20] In 1983, the average household income per month was estimated at LE 70 (approximately US$11.50 in January 2005), within the lowest 10th percentile of national urban income levels, with an average large household size of 8 persons.[3][24] However, the living conditions of the Mokattam settlement improved after the settlement received significant funding from international donors, including the World Bank's 1981 donation which was part of an upgrading program called the Zabbaleen Environmental Development Program (ZEDP).[20]

Health

[edit]

The Zabbaleen community is characterized by poor health and high rates of disease, especially those related to their garbage collecting activities.[35] According to Assad, "reported infant mortality rates, particularly from tetanus, were extremely high. In 1981, infant mortality was estimated at about 240 deaths per thousand births (EQI Report #3, 1981: 36)."[4] The infant mortality rate dropped to 117 per thousand in 1991, but the infant mortality rate in the Mokattam community is still substantially higher than the average infant mortality rate of Cairo for the 1990-95 period, which was 45.6 per thousand.[31]

Religion

[edit]
Church of Saint Simon, Muquattam, Cairo
St. Simon the Tanner's Hall

Egypt is a Muslim-majority country. However, over 90 percent of the Zabbaleen community in the Mokattam village are Coptic Christians.[5] Communities where almost everyone is Christian are rare to find in Egypt outside of the Zabbaleen community of Mokattam. According to Engi Wassef, in her commentary in her documentary film Marina of the Zabbaleen, many people in the Zabbaleen village say that even if they could live outside of the village or buy a house elsewhere, they would not because they are happy to live within their own religious community and freely practice their religion.[22]

Cave church

[edit]
Cave church past Manshiyat Naser

The local Coptic church in Mokattam Village was established in 1975.[36] After the establishment of the church, the Zabbaleen felt more secure in their location and only then began to use more permanent building materials, such as stone and bricks, for their homes. Given their previous experience of eviction from Giza in 1970, the Zabbaleen had lived in temporary tin huts up till that point.[4] In 1976, a large fire broke out in Manshiyat Nasir, which led to the beginning of the construction of the first church below the Mokattam mountain on a site of 1,000 square meters.[37] More churches have been built into the caves found in Mokattam. Currently, there are seven cave churches hidden among the caves of Mokattam Mountain. The Monastery of St. Simon the Tanner is the largest and it has an amphitheater with a seating capacity of 20,000.[38][39] This church is the largest church in the Middle East and the largest religious building in Egypt. It is named after the Coptic saint, Simon the Tanner, who lived at the end of the 10th century, when Egypt was ruled by the Muslim Fatimid Caliph Al-Muizz Lideenillah. Simon the Tanner is the Coptic saint who is associated with the legend of the moving of the Mokattam Mountain. Adjacent churches to the Monastery of St. Simon the Tanner include St. Paul's Church, St. Mark's Church, and St. Simon the Tanner's Hall.[38][40] The cave churches of Mokattam are also a point of interest for many tourists visiting Cairo.

Zabbaleen recycling methods

[edit]

Many sources state that the Zabbaleen have created one of the most efficient recycling systems in the world, which recycles up to 80 percent of all the waste that they collect.[6][11][21] In contrast, most Western garbage collecting companies can only recycle about 20 to 25 percent of the waste that they collect.[11] According to Fahmi, 2005, "it was estimated that, in 1997, the Zabbaleen informally handled one-third of the garbage of Cairo's 14 million people, mainly that from poorer districts," meaning that the Zabbaleen collected up to 3,000 tons of garbage every day.[7] The Zabbaleen are able to recycle up to 80 percent of the waste that they collect through their family-run micro-enterprises that generate jobs, including those for production of handmade crafts from rags and paper, and incomes for some 40,000 people.[20] In fact, according to Fahmi, "in the mid-1990s, nearly 700 Zabbaleen families owned collection enterprises, 200 owned and operated small- and medium-scale recycling enterprises, and 120 owned trading enterprises, in addition to maintenance workshops and community-based service businesses."[41] What is distinctive about the Zabbaleen from many other urban informal waste collecting-groups that scavenge trash for useful products is that the Zabbaleen invest heavily in their tools and know-how for recycling. These Zabbaleen micro-entrepreneurs have invested "an estimated 2.1 million Egyptian pounds (LE) (US $ 1⁄4 LE 6.19 -May 2004 rates) in trucks, plastic granulators, paper compactors, cloth grinders, aluminium smelters, and tin processors."[42] By investing in such infrastructure, the Zabbaleen continually upgraded and enhanced their methods of recycling plastic, paper, cardboard, glass, metal, and fabrics. Thus, the city of Cairo and its administration had been able to manage its solid waste at almost no cost to the municipal administration because of such efforts by the Zabbaleen.[41] Hence, the income that the Zabbaleen generate is mainly derived from their recycling and sorting activities, not from the minimal fees (LE 2–4) that they collect from residents.

Trash collecting procedure

[edit]

In the 2016 documentary "Zabbaleen: Trash Town" by Artyom Somov and Vitaly Buzuev, it is stated that each Zabbaleen family is assigned a section to collect garbage from and that they are not to stray from their assigned allotment.[citation needed] There is a gender division of labor in the process of collecting and sorting the trash in the Zabbaleen system. Usually, it is the Zabbaleen men, sometimes accompanied by children, who go pick up the trash door-to-door from each household.[43] This trash is completely unsorted because there is not a system of recycling at the source in Egypt. It is rare for girls to go to collect the trash and it stops almost entirely after girls reach the age 10.[22] The means of transportation that the Zabbaleen use to transport the trash that they collect are donkey-pulled carts and pickup trucks. After the Zabbaleen pick up the trash, they take the trash back to their village, a trip that may take anywhere from between 10 minutes to an hour.[22]

Sorting

[edit]

When the men return to the village with the collected trash, usually their families are waiting for them so that they can begin sorting the trash. The majority of those who sort the trash are women, while certain families specialize in sorting certain materials such as paper, plastic, aluminum, glass, etc. The women and children sort the garbage into 16 different types of trash and sort out the recyclables.[22] The sorting of garbage is a time-consuming task in which women and children may spend up to 10 to 12 hours each day separating the garbage.[20] First, the trash is sorted into the main 16 categories, such as paper, plastic, cardboard, cans, etc. So for example, all different types of paper are placed into one pile while all different types of plastic are placed in another pile. Sorting within categories does not take place until after the trash is sorted first into the major categories.[22] For instance, the major category of paper would be sorted into white paper, yellow paper, thick paper, newspaper, thin paper, etc. Each sub-sorted material is then sold to factories and middlemen for a marginal profit.

Use of pigs

[edit]

The initial and very integral step of sorting the trash is the responsibility of Zabbaleen community members who own pigs. The pigs are fed the organic waste. After the organic waste has been eaten by the pigs, the rest of the trash is sorted into different categories such as PT plastic, paper, cans, etc.[22] Thus, as Engi Wassef, the director of Marina of the Zabbaleen notes, "One of the reasons why Coptic Christians are given a kind of monopoly status on the garbage collection and sorting system is because the Muslim religion does not allow for breeding or eating or living near pigs. It's considered a dirty animal."[22]

In addition to their use in sorting out organic waste, pigs are an important source of income. After the pigs have grown, the Zabbaleen sell the pork to large tourist facilities and resorts. According to Fahmi and Sutton, "Hitherto, the Zabbaleen claimed to collect 6,000 tons of MSW a day, of which 60% was food waste and organic garbage which their pigs consume. Every 6 months, the waste collectors sell adult pigs, 5 to 15 pigs to a trader for LE 7 per kilogram (US$ 1.25 per kilogram). The trader then takes pigs to the slaughterhouses, where a kilogram is sold for LE 30–35 (US$ 5–6.25). The waste collectors can earn around LE 450 (US$ 80) per pig."[44]

Creation of goods using recycled materials

[edit]

After the sorting of materials is finished, the Zabbaleen sell the sorted materials, such as paper, tin, rags, plastic materials, cloth, etc.[45] The Zabbaleen sell these sorted materials to factories that then reuse these products, such as paper, in the creation of new material. According to Engi Wassef, the director of the documentary film, Marina of the Zabbaleen, PT plastic, which is the plastic used to make plastic bottles for water and other beverages, is one of the most highly sought out materials.[22] In the case of PT plastic, the Zabbaleen would even export this material to China. However, the simple re-sale of sorted materials is not the only activity that the Zabbaleen do in terms of re-using these materials. They also create new materials from the materials that they have sorted. For example, granulators are used to change regular opaque-colored plastic into small plastic pellets. From these plastic pellets, a variety of plastic product can then be made, including garbage bags and plastic hangers.[22] Handmade crafts are also made from rags and paper.[20] Thus, the Zabbaleen system is a multi-tier system that is not limited to the simple collection of waste but also encompasses the creation of new materials from found recyclables.

International recognition

[edit]

The official website of the documentary Garbage Dreams states that, "Far ahead of any modern 'Green' initiatives, the Zabbaleen survive by recycling 80 percent of the garbage they collect."[11] By comparison, most Western garbage collecting companies can only recycle about 20 to 25 percent of the waste that they collect.[11] After the takeover of the municipal waste collection, the three private companies, two from Spain and one from Italy, that were awarded with contracts to dispose of Cairo's trash were only required to recycled 20 percent of the trash that they collect.[11][46] The rest of the trash that foreign companies do not recycle are placed into new landfills.[46] The efficiency and environmental friendliness of the Zabbaleen "waste collection and recycling system received major world recognition and approval at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992."[47] The Mega-Cities Project sought to encourage the Zabbaleen system of waste collection and recycling as a model to be encouraged in other developing world cities such as Manila and Mumbai.[47] The Zabbaleen waste collection system has received international funding from the World Bank, the Ford Foundation and Oxfam for specific projects to upgrade and improve the recycling of solid waste.[47]

Contracting out municipal waste collection

[edit]

Selling of contracts to foreign companies

[edit]

In 2003, the government of Egypt sold annual contracts reaching US$50 million to international companies to collect Cairo's solid waste. The three companies that were awarded with contracts for cleaning Cairo are Spanish companies Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas and Urbaser, Enser, and AMA, an Italian company. The Egyptian Company for Garbage Collection, a domestic company, was also awarded with contracts.[48] There was a precedent for this approach to trash collection two years earlier, in 2001, when the government agreed to sign a contract with Onyx, a French company, to manage the waste of Alexandria, the second largest city in Egypt. Through this contract, the Egyptian government agreed to pay $446 million to Onyx for the treatment of one million tons of waste per year for 15 years, a sum that was ten times greater than what the government had previously paid before for its municipal waste management.[49]

Impact on Cairo

[edit]

Significantly, the foreign companies, despite the large value of their contracts, are only required to recycle 20 percent of the waste that they collect; the remaining 80 percent are placed into landfills.[50] In contrast, the Zabbaleen recycle up to 80 percent of all the MSW that they collect. The foreign companies collected the trash from garbage bins placed at central collection points on the streets. However, many inhabitants of Cairo preferred the door-to-door garbage pick-up done by the Zabbaleen, especially because the bins were not plentifully located or located in inconvenient places.[50] Thus, residents expressed their discontent with the new system, especially because they were being charged more for what seemed to be a more inconvenient system. Under the new system, residents were required to pay a monthly bill for garbage collection that accompanies their electricity bill. The garbage collection fee was based upon the percentage of each electricity bill so that the garbage collection fee increases proportionately to electricity consumption.[9] Two years after the new system was imposed, Rashed writes in the Al-Ahram Weekly, "residents of the governorate have been voicing increasingly vociferous complaints that the companies are working well below full capacity. The streets are not as clean as they were during the first days of the privatisation. Both company workers, and garbage receptacles, appear to be increasingly thin on the ground."[51]

Impact on Zabbaleen

[edit]

The subcontracting of MSW collection to foreign companies had an immediate negative impact upon the Zabbaleen community as documented in Mai Iskander's film, Garbage Dreams. Contracting out MSW to foreign companies meant that the Zabbaleen would lose access to garbage, which was the basis of their recycling and sorting activities. In the documentary Garbage Dreams, Laila, a social worker in Mokattam Village, says, "The city contracted with foreign waste disposal companies because they perceived the Zabbaleen to be old-fashioned. But they didn't come tell us, "You need to modernize your ways." This was all done behind our backs. "we're replacing you with the companies." So we can be like the developed countries."[11] In contrast, because officials from the Cairo Cleaning and Beautification Authority (CCBA) regarded the Zabbaleen recycling methods as unhygienic and backwards, they were optimistic about the process and hoped for a positive impact on Cairo's environment. However, because the mechanized equipment of the foreign companies are too large for the streets of Cairo, citizens were required to bring their trash to designated collection centers and bins, which were not always placed in easily accessible locations.[50] Therefore, residents preferred to continue to have their trash picked up from their doors by the Zabbaleen, who were able to come directly to their doors even if their homes were located in narrow alleys. Eventually, the foreign companies realized that they needed the Zabbaleen and thus, subcontracted them.[52] This system failed, however, because the companies underpaid the Zabbaleen. According to Fahmi and Sutton, "while company sources mention salaries ranging between LE 300 to LE 450 per month (US $50–$75), some Zabbaleen claim that the salaries on offer are actually closer to LE 150 per month." One Zabbal with eight children gave a similar figure: whereas he used to make LE 10 a day (US$1.60), foreign contractors offered him LE 5 a day.[50]

Pig cull

[edit]

Government order

[edit]

In April 2009, the first cases of the H1N1 influenza were found in Mexico. By the end of that month, it was estimated that up to 169 people died due to the epidemic.[53] All of the deaths, except for one, occurred in Mexico. Egypt responded to this outbreak of H1N1 by ordering the culling of its swine population, an act which had a devastating impact on the livelihood of 70,000 Zabbaleen families.[53][54] This decision was made not by the Health Ministry, but directly by the Parliament.[55] International organizations, including the United Nations criticized the Egyptian government for its decision.[56] Egypt was the only country in the world to take such a drastic decision as to cull an estimated 300,000 pigs.[12] This decision was made despite the general agreement that H1N1 is not transmitted by pigs. Furthermore, there were no cases of swine flu found in Egypt during the time when the pig cull was executed.[54] The actual slaughter of the pigs was ordered by the Egyptian Agricultural Ministry in April 2009.[54] Although government authorities stated that the slaughtering itself was humane, and in accordance with Islamic law, witnesses testify a lot of cruelty and violence in the culling. According to Slackman, "Piglets were documented being stabbed and tossed into piles, large pigs beaten with metal rods, their carcasses dumped in the sand."[12] Interviews conducted among those within the Zabbaleen communities of Mansheyet Nasser (Mokattam), Ard el Lewa, and Bulaq el Dakrour reported police beatings when protests against the culling would occur.[57] H1N1 influenza was officially declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in June 2009. The pandemic was then declared to be officially over by the World Health Organization on August 10, 2010.

Explanations for the cull

[edit]

When first ordering the pig cull, the Egyptian government asserted that it was a precaution to forestall national fears of the imminent pandemic.[54] Later, after the pig cull, the government stated that its decision to order the pig cull was directly affected by the global breakout of H5N1 virus, more commonly known as bird flu, several years earlier and a fear that the two strains of viruses could possibly combine to form a more lethal virus.[55] Later, the Egyptian government openly stated that the pig cull was no longer just an act to prevent swine flu; rather, it was part of a plan to clean up the Zabbaleen and allow them to live in sanitary conditions. According to Sabir Abdel Aziz Galal, chief of the infectious disease department in the Ministry of agriculture, "We want them to live a better life. humanely treated; it's a very difficult life."[12] In contrast to the explanations officially given by the Egyptian government, many other observers, especially in the Western media, as well as the Zabbaleen themselves perceived a religious bias in the execution of the pig cull. In a New York Times article, Slackman asserted that, "The Zabbaleen are Christians. Egypt is a majority Muslim country. The Zabbaleen are convinced that the government wants to use the swine flu scare not to help improve their lives but to get pigs out of Egypt. Islam prohibits eating pork."[12] In another New York Times article, Audi writes, "Most of Egypt's pig farmers are Christians, and some accuse the government of using swine flu fears to punish them economically."[56] According to Rev. Samaan Ibrahim, a priest from a Zabbaleen neighborhood, "The bottom line is pigs are not welcome in Egypt."[12] In an article by the BBC, Fraser argues along a similar line, saying that the Coptic Christian minority were targeted by the government for a main source of their income, the rearing of pigs.[53] A similar opinion is voiced by Engi Wassef in her documentary, Marina of the Zabbaleen. Fahmi and Sutton echo a similar explanation: "The adverse effect of the slaughtering of the pigs on the Zabbaleen's livelihoods might be part of the ongoing gentrification of garbage city for land speculations and the taking over of their recycling economy by entrepreneurial businesses."[58]

Effect on the Zabbaleen

[edit]
Increased trash on a street in Mokattam village after pig cull

The pig cull negatively affected the Zabbaleen in several ways. First, because the pigs eat the organic waste, they are a vital component in their recycling system, the pig cull literally destroyed the Zabbaleen recycling system. Deprived of their pig herds, the Zabbaleen stopped collecting such organic trash, leaving food piles to rot in the streets, leading to the increase of trash in the streets.[54] According to Engi Wassef, recycling and sorting activities in the Zabbaleen villages all but ceased after the pig cull, because without the pigs, the sorting and recycling activities of the Zabbaleen became economically unfeasible. Less trash was brought into the village, because there was no place to put the trash. Hence, the entire recycling system was broken, placing the Zabbaleen out of work.

Another negative effect of the pig cull on the Zabbaleen was the loss of the economic value of the pigs themselves. According to Fahmi and Sutton, pigs are the main source of income for the Zabbaleen.[54] Before the cull, the Zabbaleen had collected 6,000 tons of MSW daily, of which 60 percent was organic waste which was consumed by the pigs.[54] Every six months, the Zabbaleen would take their pigs to traders, earning around 450LE (approximately US$80) per pig.[54] Although the Egyptian government made financial compensations for some of pigs slaughtered; compensations were not given to all of the Zabbaleen who lost pigs to the cull and those who received compensation received far less money compared to what they would have received from selling the pigs to traders. According to one Zabbaleen pig breeder, "The government paid me between LE 50 (US$10) and LE 250 (US$50) for each pig I lost, depending on its size, whilst meat processors would have given me as much as LE 1,000 (US$200)."[58] The pig cull also resulted in increased cases of malnutrition and anaemia in Zabbaleen children because prior to the cull, pork had been the only affordable source of animal protein for most of the Zabbaleen.[59]

Effect on Cairo

[edit]

Many observers noticed an immediate increase in piles of trash on the streets of Cairo after the pig cull. Because in the Zabbaleen system of recycling, it is the pigs who initially eat the organic waste, the pig cull had a negative effect on the cleanliness of Cairo's streets. According to Khalil in an article by Al Masry Al Youm, "The elimination of the pigs prompted more trash than usual to immediately start clogging the streets of the capital."[55] In a New York Times article from September 2009, Slackman states that the Egyptian government was warned before its actual execution that the pig cull, if executed, "the city would be overwhelmed with trash."[60] Slackman notes that after the pig cull, "rotting food piles up on the streets of middle-class neighborhoods like Heliopolis and in the poor streets of communities like Imbaba."[60] In an article by Bloomberg, Williams also observes a garbage crisis piling up on the streets of Cairo after the pig cull.[61] This piling up of organic MSW became hazardous because the organic waste then became a source of infectious diseases and led to an increase of rat infestation.[53]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Zabbaleen (: زبالين, meaning "garbage people") are a predominantly Coptic Christian community of informal waste collectors residing in settlements on the outskirts of , , where they have developed one of the world's most efficient manual systems, recovering up to 80% of collected refuse through labor-intensive sorting and resale of materials. Numbering between 50,000 and 70,000 individuals across seven main villages such as —often called "Garbage City"—and Moqattam, the Zabbaleen, who trace their origins to rural migrants in the mid-20th century, collect and process two-thirds of Greater 's municipal without formal contracts or mechanized equipment, relying instead on carts, family labor, and on-site disassembly of items like plastics, metals, and organics for or sale to manufacturers. Their operations sustain local livelihoods amid Egypt's limited public , achieving rates four times higher than those of multinational firms previously contracted by authorities, which managed only about 8% recovery before contracts lapsed around 2017. As a marginalized Coptic minority—constituting over 90% of residents in areas like Moqattam—the Zabbaleen have endured relocation pressures, risks from uncollected residues, and economic disruptions from imported waste-management models that prioritized lower labor costs over material recovery, yet their adaptive, decentralized approach has persisted, informing global discussions on informal economies and circular systems superior to top-down alternatives in resource-scarce urban environments. Distinctive cultural features include vast cave churches hewn into cliffs, such as the Church of Saint Simon the Tanner, which draw thousands weekly and symbolize communal resilience amid surrounding trash heaps.

Origins and Historical Development

Early Migration Waves

The foundational migration waves establishing Cairo's informal waste collection system, which the Zabbaleen later dominated, began in the early 20th century. Around 1910, the first wave consisted of Muslim migrants known as wahiya from oasis regions, including Dakhla in Egypt's Western Desert, who relocated to urban areas seeking economic opportunities. These migrants secured contracts with building owners to collect household waste, charging residents fees while using organic portions for fuel, thereby monopolizing the nascent trade. A second wave in the 1930s and 1940s brought predominantly Coptic Christian farmers from , particularly Asyut province, driven by severe droughts and crop failures that rendered agriculture unsustainable. Facing limited employment options—exacerbated for by in other sectors—these migrants subcontracted waste hauling from the wahiya, sorting refuse at home and feeding organic waste to pigs raised for sales, primarily to non-Muslim establishments. This integration marked the Zabbaleen's emergence as hands-on recyclers, leveraging family labor and to process up to 80% of collected materials by later decades, though initial numbers of migrants remain undocumented in primary records.

Establishment of Waste Collection Practices

The Zabbaleen, Coptic Christians originating from rural , initiated waste collection practices in during the 1930s and 1940s amid migration driven by agricultural land scarcity and . These migrants initially integrated into the pre-existing informal system dominated by Wahiya collectors, who secured contracts with building owners for waste rights and levied monthly fees on residents, typically disposing of refuse in unregulated dumpsites. The Zabbaleen rented portions of this waste from Wahiya primarily for organic fractions to feed pigs, leveraging their rural pig-rearing expertise to generate income through sales, while beginning to process inorganics for resale. This arrangement evolved as Zabbaleen families sought fresher, uncontaminated organics for pig feed, prompting them to bypass intermediaries by directly approaching households for collection using hand-pulled carts and donkeys. Offering services at no charge or nominal fees undercut the Wahiya's paid model, as Zabbaleen derived value from separating organics for animal and recyclables—such as metals, plastics, , and —sold to informal workshops for reprocessing into raw materials. Household participation grew due to the convenience and cost savings, establishing a decentralized, family-operated network where occurred in home-based operations. By the 1950s and 1960s, these practices had coalesced into a self-sustaining , with Zabbaleen communities handling a significant share of Cairo's municipal —estimated at up to 60% by later decades—while achieving efficiencies of 80% or more through manual labor-intensive methods, contrasting sharply with formal dumping rates exceeding 90%. The system's resilience stemmed from its adaptation to local incentives, including low and direct economic returns from , though it remained unregulated until partial formalization efforts in the 1980s via NGO-supported and licensing.

Key Agreements and Formal Recognition

In 1992, the Zabbaleen waste collection and system garnered major international recognition at the Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, where it was endorsed as an exemplary model of sustainable urban in developing regions, capable of recovering and approximately 80% of collected refuse. This approval, highlighted by initiatives like the Mega-Cities Project, positioned the Zabbaleen practices as a benchmark for global environmental policy, influencing discussions on informal sector contributions to circular economies. Domestically, formal agreements with the Egyptian government have been limited, with the Zabbaleen primarily operating through informal subcontracts under the Wahiya—Muslim middlemen who secured resident payments for collection rights since the mid-20th century—rather than direct state contracts. A pivotal recognition occurred in the late when the government allocated in the Moqattam Hills for Zabbaleen relocation from central slums, enabling the development of a semi-permanent settlement known as Garbage City; this program, supported by nongovernmental organizations, encouraged upgrading tin shacks to permanent stone structures and implicitly acknowledged their essential role in municipal sanitation. Tensions arose in 2002–2003 when the Egyptian government signed 15-year contracts worth up to $50 million with four multinational firms for integrated across Cairo's zones, aiming to modernize services but effectively marginalizing the Zabbaleen by redirecting collection routes and reducing their access to refuse. These agreements, part of a broader under the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, prioritized formal privatization over the Zabbaleen's informal efficiency, leading to increased uncollected waste and economic hardship for collectors until the contracts expired or were terminated around 2017 amid performance failures. Post-2017, selective formal reintegration emerged as certain governorates, including and Qalyubia, began contracting Zabbaleen cooperatives through Wahiya associations for door-to-door collection, restoring their handling of roughly two-thirds of Greater Cairo's daily 15,000–20,000 tons of waste while providing some workers with official in operations. This partial formalization, however, has not extended to comprehensive or nationwide policy, leaving the community vulnerable to future policy shifts and reliant on for full governmental endorsement of their contributions.

Settlements and Demographics

Primary Locations

The Zabbaleen primarily inhabit seven settlements scattered across the Urban Region, serving as hubs for , sorting, and . These communities house a total population estimated between 50,000 and 70,000 individuals, predominantly Coptic Christians engaged in informal . The largest and most prominent settlement is , located at the base of the Plateau in the Manshiyat Nasser suburb on Cairo's eastern outskirts. Often referred to as "Garbage City," this densely populated area, with approximately 20,000 to 30,000 residents, processes a significant portion of Cairo's household waste through collection and on-site operations. The settlement's proximity to the city center facilitates efficient waste transport via donkey carts and trucks, while its hillside terrain accommodates expansive sorting yards and rudimentary workshops. Other notable Zabbaleen settlements include Ein El Sira, Moatamadia, El Baragil, and Tora, each functioning as localized waste processing centers tied to specific neighborhoods in . These smaller communities, varying in size and , collectively support the Zabbaleen's role in up to 80% of collected organic waste historically, though their operations remain informal and vulnerable to urban development pressures. The distribution of settlements reflects the Zabbaleen's adaptive migration patterns, originating from rural areas and establishing footholds near waste generation sources since the mid-20th century.

Population and Community Structure

The Zabbaleen comprise an estimated 50,000 to 70,000 individuals dispersed across seven settlements in the region, with the majority concentrated in Manshiyat Nasr near the hills. This population primarily consists of Coptic Christians, an ethnoreligious minority in , who maintain distinct social and cultural practices tied to their heritage. Community organization revolves around extended family units and clans, where waste collection and recycling form hereditary enterprises passed down through generations. Family structures emphasize collective labor, with men typically handling collection and transportation using donkeys or vehicles, while women and children sort and process materials in home-based workshops. Endogamous marriages within the community strengthen these bonds, fostering tight-knit networks that support mutual aid and resource sharing amid economic challenges. Social cohesion is further reinforced by communal institutions, including Coptic churches that serve as centers for religious, educational, and welfare activities. Despite external pressures, such as government policies on , these family-centric and faith-based structures enable resilience, with community-based organizations emerging to address and needs. Demographic data on age and distributions remain limited, but reports indicate high involvement of in labor roles, reflecting intergenerational continuity in the .

Living Conditions and Infrastructure

The Zabbaleen primarily reside in densely packed settlements such as , often referred to as "Garbage City," on the outskirts of , where housing consists of multi-story structures constructed from recycled materials like red bricks and salvaged metal. These homes are frequently overcrowded, with families sharing limited space amid ongoing garbage sorting activities on ground floors, contributing to pervasive unsanitary environments. Infrastructure in these areas has seen incremental improvements since the , when initial tin shacks lacked basic utilities; by the late , NGOs and initiatives introduced piped , grids, partial networks, and paved roads in parts of Moqattam village. access has become more widespread, though indoor remains less common than electrical wiring. , often through communal taps, still faces scarcity issues affecting , while relies on inadequate communal latrines or septic pits, heightening risks of diseases like and . Ongoing challenges include vulnerability to environmental hazards, such as the 2008 rockslide in Moqattam that killed over 100 residents due to unstable terrain and poor drainage, and persistent exposure to waste-related pollutants without comprehensive treatment systems. Recent urban development projects, including 2025 upgrades to water, sanitation, and electricity networks in , aim to address these deficiencies, though implementation varies and full integration remains incomplete. Unpaved alleys and flooding during rains continue to exacerbate living conditions in many sub-areas.

Religious and Cultural Identity

Coptic Christian Heritage


The Zabbaleen are predominantly Coptic Christians, a religious minority that constitutes about 10% of Egypt's population. Their Coptic heritage originates from migrations of rural farmers from Assiut province in Upper Egypt during the 1930s and 1940s, when economic pressures drove them to Cairo in search of work. These migrants, facing limited opportunities due to their minority status, adapted to informal garbage collection, leveraging their Christian identity to raise pigs for consuming organic waste—a practice restricted for Muslims under Islamic dietary laws.
This religious heritage has shaped the community's occupational niche and social cohesion. Pigs not only facilitated efficient waste processing but also provided and , integrating faith-based allowances into economic survival strategies. Coptic traditions, including wrist tattoos of crosses as markers of faith, underscore their distinct identity amid Egypt's Muslim majority. In settlements like and , the Zabbaleen have carved out religious institutions such as the Monastery of into the mountainside, honoring a 10th-century Coptic saint associated with miraculous feats like moving the Mokattam mountain. These cave churches serve thousands for worship and community support, including nurseries for hundreds of children, reinforcing resilience and cultural continuity despite marginalization. The enduring Coptic practices preserve ethnoreligious ties from , sustaining the community through prayer and mutual aid in the face of poverty and discrimination.

Religious Institutions and Practices

The Zabbaleen, over 90 percent of whom are Coptic Orthodox Christians, have developed a network of cave churches in the Hills as their primary religious institutions. The Monastery of Saint Simon the Tanner, established in 1975 after the community's relocation to the area, serves as the central complex and the largest Coptic Orthodox monastery in . This site encompasses seven churches and chapels carved directly into the rock by the Zabbaleen themselves starting in the late 1970s, featuring intricate engravings of biblical narratives on the cavern walls. Key structures within the monastery include the Virgin Mary and St. Simon Cathedral, capable of seating 20,000 worshippers, and St. Simon’s Hall with capacity for 2,000. These institutions were excavated following a 1976 fire in the community's prior settlement, providing a sense of permanence and security amid evictions. Elevated to diocesan status under a , the complex functions as a spiritual fortress, hosting pilgrims and supporting social initiatives like education centers. Coptic Orthodox practices among the Zabbaleen emphasize traditional liturgies, hymn-singing amplified by acoustics, and major festivals held in the large halls. Weekday services include prayers and exorcisms performed by priests for the possessed and mentally ill, underscoring a literal scriptural exemplified by the 975 AD legend of the Mountain's miraculous movement. The churches also feature sites of reported healings, with displays of abandoned wheelchairs from the paralyzed, reinforcing communal resilience and miraculous intervention amid and .

Waste Collection and Recycling Operations

Collection and Transportation Methods

The Zabbaleen conduct through an informal system, where collectors visit households and commercial establishments across , often under arrangements with building owners who contract their services in exchange for monthly payments from residents. This method, which provides regular pickups at low cost—historically around 2 Egyptian pounds per household—has enabled the Zabbaleen to handle a substantial share of the city's waste, collecting up to 80% of household refuse in serviced areas through labor-intensive, community-organized efforts. For transportation, the Zabbaleen initially relied on -pulled carts to haul collected garbage from urban collection points to their settlements, such as on Cairo's outskirts, allowing navigation through narrow streets inaccessible to larger . In , municipal authorities mandated the replacement of these donkey carts with small pickup trucks to improve and , prompting the to invest in motorized transport while retaining some animal-drawn methods for specific routes. By the early , pickup trucks had become predominant, enabling larger loads—up to several tons per —and faster delivery to sorting sites, though donkeys persist in congested areas due to their maneuverability and lower operational costs.

Sorting, Processing, and Recycling Techniques

The Zabbaleen employ a labor-intensive, manual sorting process conducted primarily within family homes in Mokattam Village, where collected waste is separated by hand into up to 16 distinct categories, including plastics, paper, glass, metals, textiles, and organics. Women and girls typically handle this sorting for 10-12 hours daily, sifting through mixed household refuse that often includes hazardous materials such as sharp metals, broken glass, and medical waste like syringes, without specialized protective equipment. This family-based division of labor—men and boys focused on collection and transport, females on initial separation—enables a high recovery rate, with the community recycling approximately 80-85% of the 3,000-6,000 tons of municipal solid waste they process daily from Cairo. Inorganic recyclables are further processed through micro-enterprises using basic, low-cost equipment; for instance, plastics are granulated into pellets for resale, paper is compacted or dried for repulping, and textiles are woven into rugs or other goods. Sorted materials are sold to itinerant traders or wholesalers, generating the bulk of household income—up to 90% from activities—while non-recyclable residues are discarded or buried locally. Organic waste, comprising about 60% of inflows, was historically fed directly to pigs for consumption and subsequent meat production, achieving near-total utilization before the 2009 culling; post-culling, adaptations include limited composting in small community facilities or selective rejection of organics to avoid unprofitable handling. This decentralized, adaptive system contrasts with mechanized alternatives by leveraging intimate knowledge of waste streams for maximal extraction, though it relies on informal networks without standardized or protocols, contributing to documented risks from direct exposure. Empirical assessments highlight its superiority in recovery efficiency over privatized contractors, who achieve only 20-25% amid higher operational costs.

Historical Role of Pigs in Waste Management

The Zabbaleen, primarily Coptic Christians who migrated from to Cairo's periphery starting in the 1930s and 1940s, initially combined with as a means of . As pig rearers facing land scarcity, they began purchasing organic household refuse from Muslim waste collectors known as wahiyyin, who handled initial gathering but discarded organics as worthless. This organic fraction—typically food scraps and biodegradable materials—served as low-cost feed for the Zabbaleen's backyard swine herds, transforming urban garbage into a viable resource for and enabling the community's into Cairo's informal waste economy. Pigs fulfilled a critical function in waste processing by consuming the organic portion, which comprised roughly 60% of the volume handled by the Zabbaleen—estimated at up to 6,000 tons daily before policy disruptions. Through instinctive , the animals separated and devoured edible scraps directly from unsorted piles, reducing bulk, preventing rot-induced contamination of inorganic recyclables like plastics and metals, and achieving near-complete disposal of organics without mechanical intervention. This biological preprocessing supported the Zabbaleen's manual sorting and efficiency, yielding recovery rates of 80% or higher from collected streams, far exceeding formal systems reliant on landfills or . Beyond disposal, pigs generated supplemental revenue through the sale of , a rare commodity in predominantly Muslim supplied mainly to Coptic communities and tourist-oriented outlets. Each mature could fetch approximately $80 upon slaughter every six months, offsetting collection costs and sustaining household incomes in the absence of subsidies or formal wages. This closed-loop system, rooted in the Zabbaleen's rural agricultural heritage, exemplified resource-efficient adapted to urban densities, persisting as a of their operations for decades until external interventions altered its viability.

Production of Recycled Goods and Byproducts

The Zabbaleen operate community-owned workshops where sorted inorganic waste—primarily plastics, metals, , , and textiles—is processed into marketable raw materials and semi-finished products. Plastics, such as PET bottles, are cleaned, shredded, and melted into pellets or fibers, including , which are sold to Egyptian manufacturers for in textiles and . Metals like aluminum, iron, and are melted down and formed into ingots or scraps traded to local foundries for producing household wares and materials. and are pulped into recycled stock for and industries, while is crushed into cullet for rebottling or new glassware production. These operations enable the Zabbaleen to recycle approximately 80% of collected waste, far exceeding typical municipal rates. In addition to raw materials, Zabbaleen workshops and home-based enterprises manufacture low-tech consumer goods from repurposed . Recycled plastics are molded into items such as clothing pegs, spoons, sticks, buckets, brooms, jugs, and flip-flops, which are distributed locally through informal markets. offcuts and rag from garment factories are woven or patched into carpets, cushion covers, and handbags, often by women trained through community programs. Aluminum cans are flattened and crafted into jewelry, including rings and earrings, with some products exported to and via partnerships with Egyptian NGOs. These artisanal goods generate supplementary income and demonstrate adaptive techniques. Byproducts from organic waste processing have shifted since the 2009 pig culling, which eliminated the prior conversion of scraps into . Residual organics, once fed to pigs, are now partially used for production in small-scale digesters or explored for composting to create sold to farmers, though adoption remains limited due to infrastructural constraints. Some organic refuse continues to serve as fuel for in communal baths or cooking, reflecting resource-scarce . These byproducts contribute marginally to livelihoods but underscore ongoing challenges in organic post-intervention.

Government Interventions and Policy Shifts

Introduction of Privatized Waste Contracts

In the early 2000s, the Egyptian government initiated a shift toward privatized solid in to address perceived inefficiencies and hygiene issues in the informal system dominated by the Zabbaleen. Officials viewed the Zabbaleen's door-to-door collection and manual as outdated and unsanitary, prompting contracts with multinational corporations to formalize operations across divided urban zones. This policy aligned with broader neoliberal reforms emphasizing market-driven services over community-based labor. By 2003, the government awarded multi-year contracts—valued at up to $50 million each—to four international firms, including European waste management companies, for integrated collection, transportation, and partial processing in Cairo's governorates. These 15-year agreements granted contractors primary access to household waste, sidelining the Zabbaleen who had previously handled approximately one-third of the city's 14 million residents' garbage without formal remuneration beyond resale of recyclables. The contracts mandated mechanized collection and limited recycling emphasis, prioritizing disposal over the Zabbaleen's high-recovery rates of up to 80% for organic and inorganic materials. Implementation involved zoning Cairo into sectors, with firms like those from and assuming control in areas such as central districts, reducing Zabbaleen routes and forcing reliance on secondary waste streams or negotiations for scraps. Government rationale centered on and foreign to handle Cairo's growing volume—estimated at 15,000 tons daily by the mid-2000s—though empirical data later showed privatized systems underperformed in diversion from landfills compared to informal methods. Initial rollout faced logistical challenges, including incomplete coverage and accumulation of uncollected refuse, highlighting tensions between top-down and localized, adaptive practices.

The 2009 Pig Culling Campaign

In April 2009, the , through the , ordered the of the country's entire —estimated at 300,000 to 400,000 animals—as a precautionary measure against the H1N1 swine flu pandemic, despite no confirmed cases in and international health experts, including the , stating that pigs were not a vector for human-to-human transmission of the virus. The decision targeted pigs primarily raised by the Zabbaleen, Coptic Christian communities who integrated into their informal system, using the animals to consume organic household waste and thereby reduce volume by up to 60 percent before sorting recyclables. Slaughter operations commenced on April 29, 2009, with government teams enforcing the cull, often amid protests from Zabbaleen residents and pig farmers in areas like Moqattam village, where pigs represented a key income source through sales of to non-Muslim markets and tourist sectors, yielding approximately $80 per . The policy disproportionately affected the Zabbaleen, who managed much of Cairo's uncollected organic waste via pig consumption, leading to immediate disruptions in their operations as families lost both the animals' waste-processing utility and revenue streams supporting around 70,000 households. ![Trash accumulating on a street in Moqattam Village][float-right] The cull's aftermath saw unprocessed organic waste accumulate in Cairo's streets, exacerbating issues and contradicting government assurances of alternative waste handling, with empirical observations confirming heightened trash volumes and risks by mid-. Zabbaleen collectors reduced organic waste pickups due to economic unviability without pigs, prompting some to sell at lower prices or abandon routes, while officials later acknowledged the policy's flaws in disrupting the city's ecosystem. By , reports indicated streets "almost unlivable" from piled refuse, validating pre-cull warnings from environmental and urban experts about the irreplaceable role of Zabbaleen pigs in waste reduction.

Post-Intervention Adaptations and Recovery

Following the 2009 culling of approximately 300,000 pigs, which eliminated a primary mechanism for processing organic waste, the Zabbaleen experienced halved household revenues as families lost income from selling an average of 12 pigs each, previously valued at around 1,000 euros per animal. Organic waste accumulation led to widespread rotting in Cairo's streets, increased pest proliferation, and disposal costs for the , prompting initial adaptations such as reduced collection of organics and a shift toward inorganic . Pig traders, comprising five to six major operators and smaller merchants, diversified into scrap metal and other recyclables to offset losses, while some households raised smaller like chickens for eggs, milk, and meat to sustain basic needs. The earlier privatization of waste contracts starting in 2003, awarded to multinational firms such as FCC and Urbaser, further reduced Zabbaleen access to collectible by 30-50 percent, as companies prioritized large-scale over door-to-door methods suited to Cairo's high-rise buildings. In response, Zabbaleen collectors persisted informally by subcontracting with private firms, scavenging residual , and maintaining direct payments from residents, who often paid both formal fees and informal tips to ensure reliable service. Women in the increasingly sought external or cut household expenditures on and to cope with volatility. These strategies preserved core operations, with the proportion of former collectors shifting to full-time roles rising post-reforms. Recovery accelerated after multinational contracts largely expired by 2017, amid recognition of their inefficiencies, allowing Zabbaleen to regain prominence through formalization via local associations. Efforts led by figures like Leila Iskandar post-2013 integrated Zabbaleen into official systems, forming 44 disposal companies involving about 1,000 families to handle selective collection, with initial pilots in southern offering free services for six months. By 2025, the Waahi association secured contracts in and Qalyubia governorates for collection, enabling the Zabbaleen to manage roughly two-thirds of Greater 's municipal from 22 million residents while achieving rates up to 80 percent—far exceeding typical Western systems at 20-30 percent. This resurgence underscores the community's resilience, though challenges like relocation pressures and incomplete organic processing persist.

Impacts and Controversies

Effects on Cairo's Waste Management Efficiency

The Zabbaleen system's informal door-to-door collection covers 50-60% of Cairo's , approximately 9,000-11,000 tons daily out of the city's total generation of 15,000-20,000 tons, enabling high recovery rates through manual sorting and resale of recyclables. This approach achieves efficiencies of 80-85%, substantially outperforming global municipal averages of 20-40% and benchmarks in developing contexts. By integrating waste as a resource for micro-enterprises, the Zabbaleen minimize diversion and provide cost-free service to residents, fostering a that reduces downstream processing burdens on formal systems. Government privatization efforts starting in , which contracted multinational firms for collection in select districts, displaced Zabbaleen operations and yielded recycling rates as low as 20%, prioritizing to dumps over value recovery. This shift reduced overall system efficiency, as private operators covered less ground with higher costs and generated more residual waste, exacerbating incomplete collection in transition zones. Empirical assessments indicate fragmented the integrated Zabbaleen model, leading to losses without commensurate gains in coverage or diversion metrics. The 2009 pig culling campaign, which eliminated an estimated 300,000-400,000 pigs that consumed 60% of collected organic waste, directly impaired processing capacity and triggered widespread garbage accumulation. Without this biological disposal mechanism, unprocessed organics piled in streets, prompting open burning and described as a "national scandal" by local observers, with collection efficiency dropping due to overload on sorting facilities. Recovery efforts post-culling involved Zabbaleen adaptations like composting trials, but initial disruptions underscored the causal role of integrated waste streams in maintaining throughput. By 2017, expiration of many private contracts allowed Zabbaleen reintegration, restoring higher volumes and stabilizing amid Cairo's growing stream. Long-term data affirm that Zabbaleen-dominated areas sustain superior diversion rates, highlighting how disruptions prioritizing formalization over empirical performance can temporarily degrade urban metrics.

Economic and Livelihood Consequences for Zabbaleen

The 2009 pig culling campaign, enacted by the Egyptian government in response to swine flu concerns, eliminated a vital component of Zabbaleen livelihoods by removing their primary means of processing organic waste and generating supplementary income. Pigs, which consumed up to 60% of collected household waste, reduced the volume needing and sorting while providing through for meat, often fetching around $80 per animal to tourist areas. The slaughter of an estimated 300,000 pigs nationwide devastated thousands of Zabbaleen families who relied on , with individual losses reported as high as 70,000 Egyptian pounds (approximately $10,000 USD at the time). Although partial financial compensations were offered, they were insufficient and not distributed to all affected parties, exacerbating economic hardship. This policy shift compounded prior disruptions from the 2003 privatization of waste collection contracts, which integrated Zabbaleen into arrangements with multinational firms but often resulted in reduced direct payments from households and lower overall earnings. Post-culling, Zabbaleen collectors experienced an approximate halving of incomes, as articulated by Ezzat Naem, head of the Zabbaleen union, due to curtailed organic waste collection and diminished efficiency. The absence of pigs led to increased unprocessed organic refuse, raising transportation costs and complicating sorting processes, which further strained family-based operations central to their . Livelihood adaptations emerged over time, including limited resumption of illegal pig rearing by 2014 and shifts toward composting organic materials, yet these measures failed to fully restore pre-2009 revenue streams amid ongoing regulatory uncertainties. The combined interventions contributed to heightened poverty and vulnerability for an estimated 60,000 Zabbaleen residents, underscoring the fragility of their trash-to-resource model when disrupted by top-down policies. Empirical observations post-2009 revealed persistent income volatility, with many families diversifying into lower-yield activities or facing emigration pressures.

Health, Environmental, and Public Policy Debates

The Zabbaleen face elevated risks due to direct contact with unsorted , including injuries from sharp objects, respiratory disorders from dust and fumes, and high prevalence of hepatitis C from handling medical waste without protective gear. in their communities stands at 11.7 percent, more than double the Cairo average, though improved from prior rates of 25 percent through targeted interventions. These conditions stem causally from occupational exposure in informal settings lacking standard , contrasting with formal waste workers who use equipment but achieve lower recovery rates. Environmentally, the Zabbaleen's system recycles up to 80 percent of collected waste, diverting materials from landfills and reducing methane emissions compared to unprocessed dumps, though localized pollution arises from open sorting and burning of non-recyclables. Pigs previously consumed organic fractions, minimizing decomposition-related odors and pest proliferation, a process disrupted by the 2009 culling that left uneaten organics to accumulate, exacerbating street litter and vector breeding. Empirical evidence post-culling shows increased waste volumes in Cairo, underscoring the ecological role of integrated biological processing over mechanical alternatives. Public policy debates center on the efficacy of government interventions versus informal efficiencies. The 2009 pig slaughter, enacted despite World Health Organization advisories that H1N1 transmission to humans occurs primarily via respiratory routes rather than swine, failed to curb infections—891 human cases emerged afterward with two fatalities—while causing buildup and economic harm without health benefits. Privatized contracts from 2003 onward, awarded to multinational firms, reduced yields to 20-30 percent as Zabbaleen access to sorted declined, leading to reversals by 2017 reintegrating informal collectors after evident failures in coverage and . Critics argue these top-down shifts prioritize ideological modernization over data-driven outcomes, as Zabbaleen methods demonstrate superior material recovery at negligible public cost, challenging assumptions favoring formalized systems despite their lower environmental returns.

Long-Term Outcomes and Empirical Lessons

Following the 2009 pig culling, experienced immediate and sustained disruptions in organic waste processing, as the Zabbaleen ceased collecting such materials without their primary disposal mechanism, resulting in uncollected garbage piles that exacerbated rodent infestations and disease risks across the city. Privatized waste contracts, initiated in the early with foreign firms, demonstrated low collection efficiency by 2009–2010, covering only portions of the city while failing to match the Zabbaleen's prior coverage, and these agreements largely expired by without establishing viable alternatives. By the 2020s, the Zabbaleen had adapted by focusing on inorganic , regaining a dominant role in collecting approximately 60% of Greater 's solid waste—generated by over 20 million residents—and achieving recycling rates of up to 80% of what they process, far exceeding typical municipal systems in developing cities. Empirical data underscores the Zabbaleen's system as one of the most efficient informal operations globally, with recovery rates sustained through manual sorting and small-scale enterprises that generate livelihoods for tens of thousands, in contrast to privatized models that prioritized collection over and yielded lower overall . Post-intervention analyses reveal that the loss of pigs, which naturally processed 60–70% of household organic without energy-intensive , led to higher dumping rates and environmental burdens, as alternative formal composting or scaled poorly in Cairo's context. Recent integrations of , such as apps for tracking, have begun formalizing Zabbaleen operations without displacing their core efficiencies, suggesting hybrid models outperform pure . Key lessons from these outcomes include the causal superiority of localized, adaptive systems over ideologically driven top-down policies, as evidenced by the 2009 culling's misalignment with epidemiological realities—pigs were not primary swine flu vectors—yielding net negative effects on and . Empirical comparisons highlight that informal sectors like the Zabbaleen achieve higher diversion from landfills through economic incentives tied to material value, rather than subsidized contracts prone to inefficiency and . Policymakers must prioritize integrating proven local practices, such as biological , to avoid disruptions that amplify urban vulnerabilities in resource-constrained settings, with Cairo's experience demonstrating sustained high metrics only upon Zabbaleen resurgence.

Economic Role and Global Comparisons

Contributions to Cairo's Economy

The Zabbaleen, Cairo's informal waste collectors, handle 50-60% of the city's , processing an estimated several million tons annually from a total Cairo output of approximately 9.6 million tons per year. This collection occurs primarily through door-to-door services provided at no direct cost to households or the municipality, relying instead on the resale value of recovered materials. Their recycling operations achieve rates of 80% or higher for collected —far exceeding typical municipal systems in developed countries, which often recover 20-30%—by sorting organics for , metals, , and paper for industrial reuse. This efficiency includes annual recovery of 290,000 tons of alone, supplying low-cost secondary raw materials to Egyptian sectors such as textiles, , and . Economically, the Zabbaleen sustain livelihoods for tens of thousands of workers in collection, sorting, and value-added , forming a sector that generates income through informal markets and supports downstream industries without relying on subsidies. Their model minimizes use and associated disposal costs for , effectively subsidizing the city's while channeling waste-derived value into local supply chains. This system, operational since the mid-20th century, has been internationally noted for its contributions, as recognized at the 1992 Rio .

Recycling Efficiency Metrics

The Zabbaleen recycling system recovers approximately 80% of the they collect, encompassing both organic and inorganic materials through manual sorting, composting, and resale of recyclables such as plastics, metals, and paper. This rate exceeds that of most formal operations globally, where recovery typically ranges from 20-25% before landfilling or . Prior to the 2009 , organic constituted up to 60% of collected refuse, much of which was consumed by pigs, enhancing overall diversion from landfills; post-culling, adaptations like production and manual composting have sustained high recovery levels. In terms of scale, the Zabbaleen handle 50-60% of Cairo's daily solid output, estimated at 20,000 tons, recycling around 11,000 tons across their neighborhoods. Their efficiency stems from low-cost, labor-intensive methods: is sorted at source by families using donkeys or carts for , with recyclables processed into raw materials for industries like textiles and manufacturing, generating secondary economic value. Comparative studies highlight that multinational contractors introduced in the early achieved only about 8% rates, underscoring the Zabbaleen's superior material recovery despite lacking mechanized infrastructure. Empirical assessments, including those from environmental NGOs, affirm the system's sustainability metrics: per ton collected, Zabbaleen operations divert far more material from disposal than centralized models, with minimal energy inputs beyond and labor. However, challenges like inconsistent collection in slums (where rates drop to near 0%) and vulnerability to policy disruptions temper absolute efficiency claims, though overall metrics remain a benchmark for informal urban worldwide.

International Recognition and Policy Implications

The Zabbaleen waste collection and recycling system garnered significant international attention at the 1992 Conference on Environment and Development (Rio Earth Summit), where it was highlighted as a model of efficient, community-based in urban settings. This recognition stemmed from empirical data showing recycling rates of up to 80% of collected waste—far exceeding typical municipal systems in developed nations, which often achieve 20-30%—achieved through low-cost, labor-intensive sorting and reuse by families in Moqattam village. The World Bank has supported initiatives to study and scale elements of the model, citing its role in handling 50-60% of Cairo's at minimal public expense while generating livelihoods for approximately 30,000-60,000 people. Policy implications from the Zabbaleen experience emphasize the value of integrating informal, community-led systems into formal frameworks rather than displacing them through . Egypt's 2003 contracting of multinational firms to manage , which mandated only 20% and sidelined Zabbaleen operations, resulted in reduced overall efficiency, increased landfill use, and economic hardship for collectors, demonstrating how top-down interventions can undermine high-recovery rates without addressing local capacities. International analyses, including those from the International Institute for Environment and Development, advocate for policies that formalize informal recyclers through training, technology integration (e.g., digital sorting apps), and secure contracts, as seen in recent Egyptian pilots backed by corporations and government to build a . Globally, the Zabbaleen model informs waste policy debates by illustrating causal trade-offs: while informal systems excel in material recovery and cost-effectiveness—recycling two-thirds of Greater Cairo's waste for free—their reliance on manual labor raises health risks from unsorted organics, underscoring the need for hybrid policies that preserve efficiency gains while enforcing sanitation standards. This has influenced approaches in other developing cities, promoting recognition of waste pickers as essential actors in achieving UN Sustainable Development Goal 11 (sustainable cities) and Goal 12 (responsible consumption), with calls for data-driven integration over exclusionary formalization. Empirical lessons highlight that disrupting proven informal networks, as in Cairo's privatization, often leads to higher emissions and costs, whereas supportive policies could replicate 80% recovery rates elsewhere.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.