Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Secondary suite
View on Wikipedia

A secondary suite (also known as an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), in-law apartment, granny flat, granny annex or garden suite[1]) is a self-contained apartment, cottage, or small residential unit that is located on a property that has a separate main, single-family home, duplex, or other residential unit. In some cases, the ADU or in-law is attached to the principal dwelling or is an entirely separate unit, located above a garage, across a carport, or in the backyard on the same property.[2] Reasons for wanting to add a secondary suite to a property may be to receive additional income, provide social and personal support to a family member, or obtain greater security.[2]
Description
[edit]Background
[edit]Naming conventions vary by time-period and location but secondary suites can also be referred to as an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), mother-in-law suite, granny flat, coach house, laneway house, Ohana dwelling unit, granny annex, granny suite, in-law suite, and accessory apartment.[3][4] The prevalence of secondary suites is also dependent on time and location with varying rates depending on the country, state, or city.[5] Furthermore, regulations on secondary suites can vary widely in different jurisdictions with some allowing them with limited regulation while others ban them entirely through zoning, limit who may live in the units (for example, family members only), or regulate if units can be rented.[5][6][7][8]
Spatial relationship to main residence
[edit]
A secondary suite is considered "secondary" or "accessory" to the primary residence on the parcel. It normally has its own entrance, kitchen, bathroom and living area. There are three main types of accessory units: interior, interior with modification, and detached. Examples include:
- A suite above a rear detached garage (a "garage apartment, garage suite, coachhouse, or Fonzie flat"),
- A suite above the main floor of a single-detached dwelling, (an "up-and-down duplex")
- A suite below the main floor of a single-detached dwelling (a "basement suite").
- A suite attached to a single-detached dwelling at grade (similar to a "duplex", but that word implies two distinct legal parcel of land with houses that simply share a wall)
- A suite detached from the principal dwelling (a "garden suite" or "guesthouse" (called a "laneway house" if it faces the back lane)).
- A granny flat, granny annex, mother-in-law cottage and the like are generic familial names for an ADU.
Benefits and drawbacks
[edit]Benefits
[edit]- Higher density residential areas have many advantages. They require less resources for transport, heating and cooling, infrastructure and maintenance. They allow for closer-knit communities by facilitating interaction between neighbors, especially children and teenagers.
- Creating affordable housing options as secondary suites are typically small, easy to construct, and require no land acquisition.[6][5][9][10]
- Enabling seniors to "age-in-place" by creating small and affordable units where seniors can downsize in their own neighborhood.[11][5] Some of the recent popularity of secondary suites in the United States can be attributed to the activities of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) and other organizations that support seniors.[5]
- Supporting diverse and multi-generational households as seniors, young-adults, or other relatives can live on the same property as their families while maintaining independence and privacy.[11][5][6][12][13] For seniors, this arrangement can improve social life, allow to easily provide care, and possibly live in more walkable neighborhoods when they can no longer drive.[14][15][16]
- Facilitating homeownership by providing a reliable extra income that can support mortgage payments and home maintenance.[6][17][5]
- Creating sustainable and energy-efficient housing as smaller and/or attached units require fewer resources.[18][11]
- ADUs can be integrated into the scale and character of single-family neighborhoods while also promoting workforce housing in these neighborhoods.[11][19]
- Municipal budgets may benefit from new taxable housing that does not require new infrastructure or significant utility upgrades.[6]
Drawbacks
[edit]Linked properties cannot easily be sold separately. In case of shared ownership each party may require permission from the other party to make changes to the building.
By country
[edit]Australia
[edit]In Australia, the term 'granny flat' is often used for a secondary dwelling on a property. The land is not subdivided with construction requiring approval from the council or relevant authority. The approval processes vary between States and Territories, and between councils. This is different from a dual occupancy, where two primary dwellings are developed on one allotment of land, being either attached, semi-detached or detached.[20] In 2018, New South Wales led the construction of new granny flats while Victoria had the fewest number of new granny flats constructed.[21][22] In 2019, the federal government launched a study concerning prefabricated buildings and smaller homes citing affordable housing, extra space for family members, and support for the construction industry as reasons for the study.[23] The government set aside $2 million for the initial study and then plans to set up an innovation lab to help manufacturers design prefabricated buildings.[23]
Canada
[edit]
Secondary suites have existed in Canada since the 19th century where they took the form of coach houses, servant houses, stables converted to permanent apartments, and small apartments for young people within large houses.[24] Secondary suites became increasingly popular during the economic crisis of 1929 and the housing shortage following WWII. During this period the Canadian government actively supported the creation of secondary suites.[24] However, suburbanization and zoning changes in the 1950s and 60s led to a decrease in secondary suites in Canada.[24] More recently, secondary suites are increasing in popularity and many municipalities are reexamining their regulations to support secondary suites.[24]
CMHC (government program)
[edit]The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation provides a financial assistance program to help Canadians create affordable housing for low-income seniors and adults with a disability within a secondary suite. The program is called the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP) -- Secondary/Garden Suite. The maximum fully forgivable loan depends on the location of the property:
- Southern areas of Canada: $24,000/unit
- Northern areas of Canada: $28,000/unit
- Far northern areas: $36,000/unit
A 25% supplement in assistance is available in remote areas.[25]
British Columbia
[edit]After adopting legislation in 2009 to support secondary suites, Vancouver, British Columbia has become a leading city of their construction in North America.[26][27][28] In the city, approximately a third of single-family houses have legally permitted secondary suites, many of which are laneway houses.[29][30] The Housing Policy Branch of British Columbia's Ministry of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services published a guide for local governments to implement secondary suite programs called 'Secondary Suites: A Guide For Local Governments'.[31] The current issue is dated September 2005. The intent of the guide is to "help local governments develop and implement secondary suite programs". It also highlights good secondary suite practices as well as providing practical information to "elected officials, planners, community groups, homeowners, developers, and others interested in secondary suites".
Europe
[edit]In German speaking countries an interior secondary suite is known as an Einliegerwohnung.[32]
In the United Kingdom, "granny flats" are increasing in popularity with one in twenty UK households (5%) having such a space.[33] 7% of householders say they have plans to develop this type of space in the future.[33] 27% of those surveyed were making plans for older relatives, 25% were planning for grown-up children, 24% were planning to rent as holiday lets, and 16% were planning to take in lodgers.[33]
In Norway, particularly in the bigger cities, it is quite common to build separate adjoined smaller flats that the owner of the main flat will rent out.[citation needed]
In Sweden, a friggebod is a small house or room which can be built without any planning permission on a land lot with a single-family or a duplex house.[34][35]
United States
[edit]
In the United States, secondary suites are generally referred to as accessory dwelling units or "ADUs". Zoning permissions and laws concerning accessory dwelling units can vary widely by state and municipality.[36] Accessory dwelling units were popular in the early 20th century in the United States, but became less common after WWII when a shift to suburban development occurred and many municipalities banned ADUs through zoning regulations. With increases in the price of housing in many cities and suburbs, increased awareness of the disadvantages of low-density car-oriented development patterns, and an increased need to care for aging Americans, many government entities and advocacy groups have supported ADUs.[37] Some critics perceive ADUs to be a threat to the character of single-family residential neighborhoods. Several states have enacted legislation to promote accessory dwelling units.
California
[edit]In California, Government Code Sections 65852.150, 65852.2 & 65852.22 pertain to local regulation of ADUs.[38] SB 1069 and AB 2299 are California bills approved in 2016 and effective 1 January 2017, that limit local government authority to prohibit ADUs in certain cases (and also reduce cost and bureaucracy hurdles to construction).[39][40][41][42] On 1 January 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two types of accessory units, the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and the junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU or JDU). State-exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 square feet (74 m2), while JADUs are limited to 550 square feet (51 m2).[43]
Statewide Reforms
[edit]From 2019 to 2024, California has passed numerous laws that expanded ADU development and production: AB 68/SB 13 (2019) eliminated parking - minimums requirements , owner‑occupancy rules, and required to approve ministerial permit review within 60 days, reduced impact fees by required they should be proportional to the size of the unit and prohibited from imposing impact fee on ADUs that under 750 sq.feet. AB 1033 (2023) allowed homeowners sell standalone ADUs or convey them as condominiums.[44] SB 1211/AB 2533 (2024) expanded ADUs on multifamily properties, allows up to eight detached ADUs per lot, and also eased coastal approvals and give an easier pathway for homeowner to legalize their unpermitted ADUs .[45] AB 2097 (2022) removed mandatory parking requirements within half-mile of major transit stops.[46]These reforms increase ADU permitting from under 10,000 in 2017 and to over 83,000 in 2022 and now statewide accounting for around 19 % of new housing developments.[47]
Local Reforms
[edit]Berkeley in January 2025, started a four year ADU and JDUs amnesty program for unpermitted ADUs and JDUs, that allows permitting inspection and legalization of around 4,000 pre-2020 units without penalty.[48][49] Also in 2024, it became one of the first cities that supported sales of ADUs under AB 1033[50] San Francisco in May 2025, the Board of Supervisors allowed ADUs built on or after that date to be sold independently from main residence or as a condo.[51][52]
The City of San Diego from 2021 to 2024 issued approximately 5,720 permits for ADUs under its California Density Bonus Law. 875 of this units were constructed through the program bonus provisions, which allow have additional units when they comply with affordability requirements. 368 units under bonus program were designated and build like income - restricted and they subject to affordability covenants restrictions.[53] The bonus program is design to incentivize the development of smaller housing units within already existing residential neighborhoods. According to local planning documents, most of ADUs approved through the program were built on lots previously developed with single-family housing (RS zoning).[44] In June 2025, new proposed regulations capped up to three units per single-family lot (one covered ADU, one detached ADU, and one JDU) mandated one off-street parking space for bonus and affordable ADU and outside TPAs, set new fire-safety requirements for ADU located in High and Very High Hazard Severity Zones, enforced affordability deed restrictions, and allow ADU sales or conversion into condominium under AB 1033, new "Community Enhancement Fee" will be impose for ADU under 750 sq. ft. [54]
Los Angeles, adopted Ordinance No.186,481 in December 2019 to align its local ADU regulations and requirements with updated state law. The ordinance added Section 12.22 A.33 to the Los Angeles Municipal Code, that establishing standards for ADUs, junior ADUs (JADUs), and also movable tiny homes (MTH).[55] The City of Los Angeles also set up new JADU regulations under pending state legislation (AB 1154).[56] Couple jurisdictions in the Los Angeles region have implemented pilot programs to support the development of ADUs designated for income-restricted housing. These program provide financial assistance to property owners with low-interest or forgivable loans, and also they provide rental assistance with housing vouchers or other subsidies like grants.[57]
Sacramento In 2021, Sacramento launched a ADU Resource Center, offering free plans for homeowners, permits support, waiving fees, and eliminated parking minimums, that support ADU permitting by 123 % (76 to 170) in the first year of launch.[58][59] Its 2040 General Plan (2024) allows three-story small apartment buildings and removed single-family-only zoning and parking mandates.[60] A UC Davis study found eliminating parking mandates reduces auto dependency and boosts ADU uptake.[61]
Pasadena, California expanded its ADU loan program in 2025 to offer up to $225,000 at 1 % interest, with Section 8 leasing requirements.[62][63]
Junior Accessory Dwelling Units in California (JADU/JDU)
[edit]A Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU or JDU) is a type of housing unit defined by California law as being no larger than 500 sq. ft. and located within the walls of a single-family housing JADUs can be created through the conversion of existing spaces, like bedrooms or attached garages, within the primary home.[64] State regulations allow JADUs to share some features with the main dwelling, such as bathrooms and central mechanical systems. They must include a separate entrance and a kitchen,but kitchen facilities can be limited to basic appliances that do not require permanent installation. [64]
Other states
[edit]
The states of Vermont[65][66] and New Hampshire[67][68] have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction. The State of Illinois considered, but did not adopt, HB 4869 which would have required municipalities to permit (and reasonably regulate) accessory dwelling units (ADUs).[69]
Several local governments across the United States have enacted ordinances to both permit and promote accessory dwelling units. Some cities have included accessory dwelling units in larger missing middle housing and affordable housing strategies including Seattle,[70][71][72][73] Portland,[74][75][76] and Minneapolis.[77][78][79][80][81][82][83] Many other communities have maintained wide-spread single-family zoning but still updated codes to permit accessory dwelling units. Notable examples include large cities such as Los Angeles, CA[84] and Chicago, IL.[85] Diverse smaller jurisdictions that permit accessory dwelling units include Lexington, KY,[86] Santa Cruz, CA,[87][88] and the County of Maui in Hawaii.[89]
Honolulu, Hawaii has a unique form of accessory dwelling units known as an "Ohana Dwelling Unit".[90] Ohana Dwellings were created as a permitted use in the zoning code in 1981 as a way to encourage the private sector to create more housing units (without government subsidy), preserve green fields (open space) and ease housing affordability.[91][92][93] In 2015, Honolulu amended its zoning code to allows ADUs as a sort of Ohana Dwelling, but with fewer restrictions.[94] To prevent creating further complexities for existing Ohana Dwellings, some of which have been condominimized and owned separately from the main house, Ohana Dwellings remain a permitted use (with different requirements and benefits than ADUs) in the zoning code. ADUs are an important component of Honolulu's Affordable Housing Strategy.[95]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Garden Suites, September 2017, retrieved 22 February 2023
- ^ a b "Smart Growth / Smart Energy Toolkit – Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)". www.mass.gov. Retrieved 2 October 2016.
- ^ Spevak, Eli; Stanton, Melissa (2019). The ABCs of ADUs (PDF). AARP.
- ^ "The many and confusing synonyms for ADUs". 4 June 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g Brinig, Margaret; Garnett, Nicole (1 January 2013). "A Room of One's Own? Accessory Dwelling Unit Reforms and Local Parochialism". Urban Lawyer. 45: 519–569.
- ^ a b c d e Coppage, Jonathan (March 2017). "Accessory Dwelling Units: A Flexible Free-market Housing Solution" (PDF). R Street.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Units". American Planning Association. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- ^ Chapple, Karen; Wegmann, Jake; Mashhood, Farzad; Coleman, Rebecca. "Jumpstarting the Market for Accessory Dwelling Unites: Lessons Learned from Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver" (PDF). San Francisco chapter of the Urban Land Institute.
- ^ MRSC. "Accessory Dwelling Units Issues & Options" (PDF). mrsc.org.
- ^ Florida Housing Coalition. "Accessory Dwelling Unit Guidebook" (PDF).
- ^ a b c d Communities, AARP Livable. "ADUs Are Good for People and Places". AARP. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- ^ "American Planning Association". American Planning Association. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- ^ Nichols, Jane Louise; Adams, Erin (1 March 2013). "The Flex-Nest: The Accessory Dwelling Unit as Adaptable Housing for the Life Span". Interiors. 4 (1): 31–52. doi:10.2752/204191213X13601683874136. ISSN 2041-9112. S2CID 110003613.
- ^ PhD, Phoebe S. Liebig; MSG, Teresa Koenig; PhD, Jon Pynoos (21 November 2006). "Zoning, Accessory Dwelling Units, and Family Caregiving". Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 18 (3–4): 155–172. doi:10.1300/J031v18n03_11. ISSN 0895-9420. PMID 17135101. S2CID 8557380.
- ^ "Making Room: Housing for a Changing America" (PDF). aarp.org.
- ^ Binette, Joanne; Vasold, Kerri (2018). "2018 Home and Community Preferences: A National Survey of Adults Ages 18-Plus". AARP. doi:10.26419/res.00231.001. S2CID 188245934. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Units: Case Study" (PDF). huduser.gov. June 2008.
- ^ "Studying the Benefits of Accessory Dwelling Units". Frameworks. 21 April 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- ^ "Promoting Workforce Housing Expanding Locations and Development Potential". Montgomery County Planning Commission.
- ^ Planning & Land Management, Territory Planning Branch (2002). "Dual Occupancy Review" (PDF). Retrieved 21 August 2008.
- ^ Chesher, Isabelle (17 June 2019). "New research reveals where most granny flats in Australia are being built". Domain. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ HIA Economics Research Note (May 2019). "No one looks after Granny better than NSW". Housing Industry Association (HIA).
- ^ a b Ireland, Judith (15 June 2019). "Morrison government's bid to grow tiny home industry". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ a b c d Lessard, Guillaume (September 2018). "Accessory Dwelling Units: Principles and Best Practices" (PDF). Arpent.
- ^ Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP) -- Secondary/Garden Suite Archived 2006-09-09 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Create or legalize a secondary suite". vancouver.ca. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ "'Granny Flats' Can Densify Cities If We Let Them". Bloomberg.com. 22 November 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ "20.810.060 Conversions of Existing Accessory Structures". Vancouver Municipal Code. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ "Why Vancouver Trounces the Rest of Cascadia in Building ADUs". Sightline Institute. 17 February 2016. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ "Incentivizing ADU Development – A Proven Housing Solution for Cities & States". www.housable.com. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ "Secondary Suites: A Guide for Local Governments" (PDF). September 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 July 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
- ^ "§ 11 Einliegerwohnung – Rechtsportal". www.rechtsportal.de. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ a b c "1 in 3 homes are multi-generational". www.aviva.com. 11 September 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- ^ Edwards, Catherine (18 July 2019). "Swedish word of the day: friggebod". The Local Sweden. Retrieved 2 April 2021.
- ^ "You Say 'Friggebod', I Say 'Freedom'". Tiny House for Us. 8 December 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2021.
- ^ "Land Use and Zoning Basics". findlaw.com.
- ^ "Accessory Dwellings". Accessory Dwellings. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
- ^ "Codes Display Text".
- ^ "Senate Bill No. 1069, Chapter 720, Land use: zoning". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. 27 September 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
- ^ "Assembly Bill No. 2299, Chapter 735, Land use: housing: 2nd units". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. 27 September 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
- ^ Pender, Kathleen (3 December 2016). "New California housing laws make granny units easier to build". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 15 June 2018. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
- ^ Wong, Queenie (27 September 2016). "California eases restrictions on 'granny units'". The Mercury News. San Jose, Cal. Archived from the original on 19 October 2016. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook" (PDF). hcd.ca.gov. December 2020.
- ^ a b "California Department of Housing and Community Development, Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook" (PDF).
- ^ Insurance, Craft Guard (19 March 2025). "New ADU Laws California 2025: Understanding The Latest Regulations". Craft Guard Insurance. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Wikipedia: AB 2097
- ^ Wikipedia: SB 1534
- ^ Dineen, J.K. "Berkeley is legalizing a type of housing that could add thousands of units to the market". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 7 July 2025. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Gecan, Alex N. (8 January 2025). "Own an illegal ADU in Berkeley? New program offers amnesty". Berkeleyside. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Leonard, Christian. "You will soon be able to buy a cottage in someone's backyard in Berkeley". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 28 May 2025. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Toledo, Aldo. "New San Francisco ADUs could soon be sold as condos". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 29 May 2025. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Yang, Junyao (1 July 2025). "S.F. passes law to let homeowners sell new in-law units as condos". Mission Local. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ City of San Diego Planning Commission. "Report No. PC-25-016: ADU Home Density Bonus Program." April 2025. [1]
- ^ "City Council Adopts Reforms to Accessory Dwelling Unit Program". Incide San Diego. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)". Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ AB 1154 summary
- ^ "Can income-restricted ADUs expand the affordable housing stock in Los Angeles?". Brookings. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Officer, Public Information (29 April 2022). "Accessory dwelling unit construction sees 123 percent increase in city of Sacramento". Sacramento City Express. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ "Homepage". adu.cityofsacramento.org. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ Wikipedia: California housing shortage
- ^ Volker, Jamey M B; Thigpen, Calvin (25 February 2022). National Center for Sustainable Transportation (NCST); University of California, Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies (eds.). "Not Enough Parking, You Say? A Study of Garage Use and Parking Supply for Single-Family Homes in Sacramento and Implications for ADUs". Journal of Transport and Land Use. 15 (1): 183–206. doi:10.5198/jtlu.2022.1947.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) - ^ "Pasadena Launches Second Round of ADU Loan Program – Pasadena Now". pasadenanow.com. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ "City of Pasadena Announces Reduced Fees to Support ADU Construction and Affordability - Office of the City Manager". 6 May 2025. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ a b "Accessory Dwelling Units | California Department of Housing and Community Development". www.hcd.ca.gov. Retrieved 22 July 2025.
- ^ "Bill Status S.237 (Act 179)". legislature.vermont.gov. Retrieved 7 February 2021.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Units". State of Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Units". New Hampshire Housing. Retrieved 7 February 2021.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Units in New Hampshire: A Guide for Municipalities" (PDF). State of New Hampshire, Housing.
- ^ "Illinois General Assembly – Bill Status for HB4869". www.ilga.gov. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ^ "Neighborhood upzones for affordable housing: Q&A on proposal with Seattle mayor's adviser". The Seattle Times. 9 May 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ "Seattle City Council COUNCIL – Record No: CB 119444". seattle.legistar.com. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ "Seattle City Council – Record No: CB 119544". seattle.legistar.com. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ "Accessory Dwelling Unit – SDCI | seattle.gov". www.seattle.gov. Retrieved 19 February 2021.
- ^ "Better Housing by Design project documents". Portland.gov. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
- ^ "About the Residential Infill Project". Portland.gov. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "Portland just passed the best low-density zoning reform in US history". Sightline Institute. 11 August 2020. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "Owner-Occupancy Requirement for Accessory Dwelling Units Amendment". www2.minneapolismn.gov. Retrieved 19 February 2021.
- ^ "Residential Buildings with up to Three Units". www.minneapolismn.gov. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ "Housing". minneapolis2040.com. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ Kahlenberg, Richard D. (24 October 2019). "Minneapolis Saw That NIMBYism Has Victims". The Atlantic. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ "Three Cheers for Minneapolis (The 3 is for Triplex)". Strong Towns. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "Allowing Intentional Community Cluster Developments". www.minneapolismn.gov. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ PBS NewsHour (23 November 2019). "How Minneapolis became the first to end single-family zoning". Youtube.
- ^ "ADU | DRP". planning.lacounty.gov. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "City Council Approves Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance" (PDF). City of Chicago (Press release). 16 December 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 December 2020. Retrieved 25 April 2023.
- ^ "ADU proposal". City of Lexington. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "City of Santa Cruz Accessory Dwelling Unit Development Program". Retrieved 29 October 2015.
- ^ "ADU". sccoplanning.com. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "Maui County Zoning Code, Section 19.35". Retrieved 15 August 2011.
- ^ City and County of Honolulu. "Revised Ordinances of Honolulu, (ROH) Section 21-8.20" (PDF). Land use Ordinance. Retrieved 15 August 2011.
- ^ "Ohana Housing Program Evaluation". Honolulu: Office of Information and Complaint. September 1984. Retrieved 15 August 2011.
- ^ Lau, Questor (May 2014). "Black boxes and gray spaces: how illegal accessory dwellings find regulatory loopholes". Retrieved 4 August 2016.
- ^ "Ohana Zoning a 5 year review" (PDF). State of Hawaii Legislative Reference Bureau. Retrieved 22 January 2015.
- ^ "Honolulu Ordinance 15-41 Relating to Accessory Dwelling Units" (PDF).
- ^ "Implementing [Honolulu's] Affordable Housing Strategy" (PDF). Honolulu Office of Housing. Retrieved 19 July 2017.
Secondary suite
View on GrokipediaDescription
Background
A secondary suite, also termed an accessory suite, in-law suite (in Canadian contexts), granny flat (common in Australia and elsewhere), casita (in Southwestern U.S. or Spanish-influenced areas), or guest quarters, constitutes a self-contained residential unit featuring independent kitchen, bathroom, sleeping, and living facilities, typically integrated within or adjacent to a primary single-family dwelling on the same lot. This housing form emerged prominently in mid-20th-century North America as a pragmatic response to post-World War II demographic pressures, including multigenerational living needs and the demand for affordable rental options amid suburban expansion. In Canada, where the terminology "secondary suite" gained traction, such units addressed housing shortages by leveraging existing structures, often in basements or attics, though they frequently operated informally outside zoning regulations.[15][16] Regulatory evolution reflects tensions between urban densification and neighborhood preservation ideals. By the late 20th century, secondary suites proliferated covertly in Canadian cities—comprising up to 10-20% of rental units in places like Vancouver and Toronto—despite bylaws that prohibited them to maintain single-family zoning exclusivity. Provincial building codes began formalizing definitions; for instance, the British Columbia Building Code, updated in 2019, specifies a secondary suite as "a self-contained dwelling unit that is part of a house containing not more than two dwelling units," with requirements for separate entrances and fire separations to ensure safety. These adaptations stemmed from empirical recognition of suites' role in supplying low-cost housing, as documented in federal studies by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), which highlight their flexibility in responding to market shifts without necessitating new multi-unit developments.[17][18][19] The concept parallels U.S. accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which trace similar informal origins but faced postwar exclusionary zoning; both underscore causal links between land-use restrictions and affordability crises, with suites enabling incremental density increases—typically 20-40% more units per lot—while minimizing infrastructure strain compared to high-rise alternatives. Empirical data from municipal surveys indicate secondary suites lower vacancy rates and stabilize rents in owner-occupied neighborhoods, though legalization efforts accelerated only post-2000 amid evidence of their under-theorized prevalence in census undercounts.[20][21]Spatial relationship to main residence
Secondary suites, also known as accessory dwelling units in some regions, can occupy internal, attached, or detached positions relative to the main residence, each configuration influencing construction costs, privacy levels, and regulatory compliance. Internal suites are fully contained within the primary structure, utilizing spaces such as basements, attics, or upper floors, while sharing the building's exterior walls, roof, and often utilities like heating systems.[22][23] This setup minimizes land use but may require structural reinforcements for separate entrances and soundproofing to ensure independent living quarters with kitchens, bathrooms, and sleeping areas.[24] Attached secondary suites connect directly to the main house by sharing at least one wall or through integrated additions, such as conversions of attached garages or rear/side extensions, sometimes positioned above the primary structure like in garage-top units.[25][26] These configurations allow shared access points and infrastructure, reducing excavation needs compared to detached options, though they demand careful integration to match architectural styles and comply with zoning limits on lot coverage.[27] Detached secondary suites form standalone buildings on the same lot, positioned in rear yards as cottages, carriage houses, or laneway structures, providing maximal separation for privacy and noise isolation but requiring independent foundations, utilities, and adherence to setback distances from property lines.[22][26] In areas like Vancouver, detached laneway houses emerged as a response to urban density pressures, with over 1,000 units built since 2009 under permissive bylaws.[28] Jurisdictional variations exist; for instance, British Columbia definitions emphasize suites "contained within a single-family dwelling," favoring internal placements to preserve zoning for principal residences, though some municipalities permit attached or limited detached forms.[29][30]Benefits and drawbacks
Benefits
Secondary suites provide homeowners with an opportunity to generate supplemental rental income, which can offset mortgage payments, property taxes, or maintenance costs. In the United States, for instance, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), a comparable form, enable owners to earn steady revenue from tenants amid high housing demand, as evidenced by federal analyses showing this income stream helps mitigate rising homeownership expenses.[31] In Canada, secondary suites similarly supplement household income for mortgaged owners, particularly in urban areas where rental markets are tight.[32] Construction of secondary suites can enhance property values by adding functional living space and income potential. Integrating a detached building into the main house versus classifying it as a guest house both legitimately increase property value if permitted and code-compliant; however, connection to the main house typically adds more to gross living area (GLA)-based valuation.[33] Appraisals in California indicate that properties with ADUs often command higher median values due to this dual utility, with some markets seeing increases of 10-25% post-construction, though outcomes vary by location and local regulations.[34] Empirical data from upzoning policies permitting such units further supports modest value appreciation tied to expanded housing options on existing lots.[35] These units contribute to housing affordability by increasing supply in established neighborhoods without requiring new land development, thus promoting infill density over urban sprawl. State housing departments note that secondary suites or ADUs are cost-effective to build relative to larger multifamily projects, yielding naturally occurring affordable rentals for low- and moderate-income households.[36] In Canadian contexts, they respond flexibly to market shifts, providing accessible options amid shortages of purpose-built apartments.[20] Socially, secondary suites facilitate multigenerational living arrangements, allowing elderly relatives to age in place with proximity to family support while maintaining independence. Canadian census data from 2021 highlights how such shared roofs foster intergenerational relationships, emotional support, and economic pooling, with benefits including reduced isolation for seniors.[37] U.S. policy analyses similarly emphasize ADUs' role in enabling caregivers or family members to reside nearby, addressing mobility challenges without institutional care.[38] This setup aligns with broader trends in household composition, where extended family cohabitation has risen due to affordability pressures and demographic shifts.[39]Drawbacks
Secondary suites can impose significant management responsibilities on property owners, including handling maintenance, repairs, tenant disputes, and cleaning between rentals, often without the economies of scale available to dedicated landlords.[40][41] These duties may lead to time-intensive oversight, as owners must address issues promptly to avoid escalation, potentially contracting out services at additional cost.[40] Privacy concerns arise from the close proximity to the main residence, with noise transmission between units, shared entrances or yards, and potential disturbances from tenants affecting owners' quality of life.[42][43] Low ceilings, dampness, and inadequate soundproofing in converted spaces like basements can further compromise tenant well-being and lead to health issues such as mold-related respiratory problems.[42] High upfront renovation costs, often exceeding $40,000 for compliance with building codes, electrical, plumbing, and fire safety standards, represent a substantial barrier, particularly for older homes requiring structural modifications.[13][44] Delays in permitting and securing reliable contractors can extend timelines, inflating budgets and disrupting occupancy.[45] Neighborhood-level impacts include increased on-street parking demand, exacerbating congestion in areas with limited spaces, as secondary suite occupants may rely more on vehicles without dedicated off-site parking.[46][47][48] An influx of residents can strain local infrastructure, such as sewer systems and roads, potentially overwhelming capacity in established single-family zones without corresponding upgrades.[42][48] Noise from additional households and visual clutter from unregulated suites, including garbage accumulation, may also degrade community aesthetics and prompt complaints.[46][49] Unauthorized or illegal secondary suites carry risks of fines, eviction orders, and safety hazards from non-compliant wiring or egress, as municipal enforcement targets code violations that could endanger occupants during emergencies like fires.[50] While some studies note negligible average impacts on traffic or parking from legalized suites, resident surveys consistently highlight perceived declines in property values due to densification fears.[51][20][48]By country
Australia
In Australia, secondary suites, commonly referred to as secondary dwellings, granny flats, or ancillary dwellings, are self-contained residential units located on the same lot as a primary dwelling, typically used for extended family members, rental income, or ageing in place.[52] These units must include essential facilities such as a kitchen, bathroom, and living area, and are subject to state and territory planning laws, with local councils enforcing additional zoning and setback requirements.[53] Nationally, they are promoted as a means to address housing affordability and density without requiring new subdivisions, though approvals emphasize compliance with the National Construction Code for safety and habitability.[54] Regulations vary significantly by jurisdiction, reflecting decentralized planning authority. Common requirements include a maximum floor area (often 60 square metres, excluding verandas or carports), minimum lot sizes (frequently 450 square metres for streamlined approvals), and restrictions on subdivision to maintain them as accessory to the primary residence.[52] [55] In many cases, they qualify as "complying development," bypassing full planning permits if standards are met, but a building permit is always required.[56] Recent reforms, such as Queensland's amendment effective 26 September 2022, have removed prior restrictions limiting occupancy to relatives, enabling broader rental use to boost housing supply.[57] State-specific rules are summarized below:| State/Territory | Maximum Size | Key Requirements | Approval Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | 60 m² | Lot ≥450 m²; permitted in R1–R5 zones under State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021; setbacks from boundaries. | Complying development possible without planning permit if criteria met.[52] [58] |
| Victoria | 60 m² | On same lot; must include kitchen, bathroom, toilet; no subdivision allowed. | Building permit required; planning permit often exempt for small second dwellings.[59] [60] |
| Queensland | Varies, typically ≤60 m² | No residency restrictions since 2022; complies with building code for rentals. | Development approval may be needed; focus on local planning schemes.[57] [61] |
| Western Australia | 70 m² | Deemed-to-comply if ≤70 m² and meets siting; ancillary to primary dwelling. | No planning approval needed if compliant; local variations apply.[62] |
| South Australia | 60 m² | ≤1 bedroom typically; under Planning and Design Code; excludes verandas/carports. | Development approval required; limited to ancillary use.[63] [53] |
| Australian Capital Territory | 90 m² | Larger allowance than most states; block size minimums apply. | Development approval typically needed.[64] |
.jpg)