Hubbry Logo
MegaceropsMegaceropsMain
Open search
Megacerops
Community hub
Megacerops
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Megacerops
Megacerops
Megacerops
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Megacerops
Temporal range: Late Eocene (Priabonian), 38–33.9 Ma
↓
Mounted skeleton, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Perissodactyla
Family: †Brontotheriidae
Subfamily: †Brontotheriinae
Tribe: †Brontotheriini
Subtribe: †Brontotheriina
Infratribe: †Brontotheriita
Genus: †Megacerops
Leidy, 1870
Species
  • †M. coloradensis Leidy, 1870 (type species)
  • †M. kuwagatarhinus Mader and Alexander, 1995
Synonyms
  • Brontotherium Cope, 1873
  • Brontops
  • Menodus
  • Titanotherium
  • Ateleodon
  • Oreinotherium

Megacerops ("large-horned face", from méga- "large" + kéras "horn" + ōps "face") is an extinct genus of odd-toed ungulate (hoofed mammal) belonging to the family Brontotheriidae, an extinct group of rhinoceros-like browsers related to horses. It was endemic to North America during the Late Eocene epoch (38–33.9 mya), existing for approximately 4.1 million years.[1]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Megacerops was named by Leidy (1870). Its type species is Megacerops coloradensis. It was synonymized subjectively with Menodus by Clark and Beerbower (1967). It was assigned to Brontotheriidae by Leidy (1870), Carroll (1988), Mader (1989), and Mader (1998).[2][3]

According to Mihlbachler and others,[4][5] Megacerops includes the species of the genera Menodus, Brontotherium, Brontops, Menops, Ateleodon, and Oreinotherium.

Description

[edit]
Restoration of M. coloradensis
Megacerops head reconstruction at the American Museum of Natural History

All of the species had a pair of blunt horns on their snout (the size varying between species), with the horns of males being much longer than those of the females. This could indicate that they were social animals which butted heads for breeding privileges.

Despite resembling the rhinoceros, it was larger than any living rhinoceros: the living animal easily approached the size of the African forest elephant, the third-largest land animal today. It stood about 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in) tall at the shoulders with an overall length (including tail) of 4.63 m (15.2 ft).[6]: 666  Its skull reached 89.5 cm (35.2 in) in greatest length, with some specimens possessing substantial canines, up to 70 mm long.[6]: 494, 523  Megacerops resembled a large rhinoceros, possessing blunt Y-shaped horn-like protrusions on its nose up to 43 cm in length.[6]: 553  Its mass is estimated to be in the range of 3.3–3.8 t (3.6–4.2 short tons) [7][8]

The dorsal vertebrae above the shoulders had extra long spines to support the huge neck muscles needed to carry the heavy skull. The shape of its teeth suggests that it preferred food such as soft stems and leaves, rather than tough vegetation. It may have had fleshy lips and a long tongue for carefully selecting food.

Paleobiology

[edit]
AMNH 518, from South Dakota. This M. coloradensis specimen has a healed broken rib, not pictured here.

The skeleton of an adult male was found with partially healed rib fractures, which supports the theory that males used their 'horns' to fight each other. No creature living in Megacerops' time and area except another Megacerops could have inflicted such an injury.[9] The breathing movements prevented the fractures from completely healing. The adults may have also used their horns to defend themselves and their calves from predators, such as hyaenodonts, entelodonts, Bathornis or nimravids.

Oxygen isotope analysis of Megacerops tooth enamel from the White River assemblage has found them to have low δ18O values, which likely reflects the preference of the genus for moist environments.[10]

Distribution

[edit]

Fossils were uncovered in the northern plains states. Life-sized models of Megacerops families (a male, female, and juvenile) are displayed at the James E. Martin Paleontological Research Laboratory, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, and a different set at the Canadian Museum of Nature.

Many remains have been found in South Dakota and Nebraska. In the past, specimens exposed by severe rainstorms were found by Native Americans of the Sioux tribes. The Sioux called them "thunder beasts", a name preserved in the ancient Greek translation (bronto-, thunder; therion, beast).[11] Many of the skeletons found by the Sioux belonged to herds which were killed by volcanic eruptions of the Rocky Mountains, which were volcanically active at the time.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Megacerops

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Megacerops is an extinct of large, horned odd-toed (perissodactyl) belonging to the Brontotheriidae, known from the late Eocene epoch (approximately 37–33 million years ago) in . These rhinoceros-like browsers reached shoulder heights of up to 2.5 meters (8 feet) and weights around 1.5 metric tons (3,300 pounds), making them among the largest land mammals of their time. Fossils, primarily from formations like the White River Group in regions such as , , , and , reveal a robust build with short legs, a high-arched back, and low-crowned teeth adapted for on soft . The most was a pair of elongated bony appendages on the , forming a "slingshot" or Y-shaped configuration above the —larger in males, possibly used for intraspecific combat or display, while females had smaller versions likely for defending calves. Strong neck musculature supported these structures, enabling powerful head-butting behaviors inferred from skeletal evidence. The includes such as the type M. coloradensis, described from Chadronian (late Eocene) deposits, and others like M. kuwagatarhinus from , reflecting diversity within before the family's at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, possibly due to climatic cooling and habitat changes. Originally named Brontotherium or Brontops, Megacerops ("great horned face") exemplifies early perissodactyl following the Cretaceous-Paleogene , with no close relation to modern rhinoceroses despite superficial similarities. Isotopic analyses of teeth suggest a diet of C3 plants in forested or woodland environments, consistent with low-abrasion .

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Nomenclatural History

The genus Megacerops was originally described by Joseph Leidy in 1870, with the M. coloradensis based on a partial and other fossils collected from the White River Group in . This naming occurred amid early explorations of Eocene mammal faunas in , where fragmentary specimens often complicated identifications.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full) Subsequent paleontological work during the late , particularly by , led to the proposal of several junior synonyms for Megacerops, including Brontotherium (established in 1873 for B. gigas from ) and Brontops (introduced in 1873 for horned forms), primarily due to incomplete cranial and postcranial remains that obscured generic distinctions among late Eocene brontotheres.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full) Titanotherium, another early synonym dating to Leidy's contemporaneous work, was similarly applied to similar but poorly preserved material from the same stratigraphic horizons.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full) These names proliferated as rival collectors during the era described additional specimens without resolving overlaps in morphology. In 1913, provided a major taxonomic revision, recognizing Megacerops as the senior and valid genus for late Eocene (Chadronian) species like M. coloradensis, while synonymizing Brontops and Titanotherium under it and restricting Brontotherium to earlier or distinct forms based on horn morphology and dental features.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full) 's framework, further elaborated in his 1929 , emphasized phylogenetic separation within , though it involved oversplitting into numerous species. A significant modern update came in 2004, when Mihlbachler, Lucas, and Emry synonymized Brontotherium hatcheri (Osborn, 1908) with M. coloradensis following comparative analysis of cranial proportions, horn bases, and occlusal patterns, which revealed insufficient diagnostic differences to warrant separation. This revision underscored the challenges of Chadronian brontothere due to and taphonomic variation.

Classification and Species

Megacerops belongs to the family within the order , and is classified in the infratribe Brontotheriita, representing one of the terminal genera within the North American brontotheres.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090(2008)501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full) The genus includes two recognized species: the type species M. coloradensis, described from late Eocene deposits in and characterized by prominent Y-shaped frontal horns in males formed by fused nasal and frontal bones, and M. kuwagatarhinus, known primarily from and southeastern , distinguished by more divergent horn bases that bifurcate distally. Some specimens previously assigned to potential synonyms, such as M. vogti, are now considered variants or referable to these core species based on shared cranial morphology. Diagnostic traits of the include paired protuberances on the frontal bones that develop into sexually dimorphic horns, with males exhibiting larger, forward- or laterally directed structures, and low-crowned (brachyodont) molars featuring a W-shaped ectoloph suited for soft vegetation.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090(2008)501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full) Taxonomic revisions in the , building on earlier work, have confirmed these two valid North American through integrated morphological and biostratigraphic analyses, resolving prior synonymies of genera like Menodus and Brontotherium under Megacerops while emphasizing horn morphology and dental patterns for delimitation.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090(2008)501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full)

Evolutionary Relationships

Brontotheriidae represents an early diverging lineage among perissodactyls, with the family originating during the early Eocene approximately 53 million years ago from basal forms such as Eotitanops, which exhibit primitive dental and cranial features indicative of their position near the root of brontothere evolution. This origin aligns with the broader radiation of perissodactyls following the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, where brontotheres developed as a distinct characterized by increasing body size and specialized adaptations distinct from contemporaneous equids and ceratomorphs. Megacerops occupies a derived phylogenetic position as a late-surviving within , primarily documented from the Chadronian stage (late Eocene, ~37–34 million years ago), marking the culmination of diversification among horned brontotheres before the family's abrupt . Phylogenetic analyses place Megacerops in the infratribe Brontotheriita, supported by cladistic studies incorporating cranial and postcranial characters that resolve it as sister to or closely allied with genera like Allops. Key evidence for these relationships includes shared derived traits such as dolichocephalic (elongated) skulls with reduced facial regions and expanded nasal structures, which contrast with the more brachycephalic forms of earlier, hornless brontotheres like Palaeosyops. These synapomorphies, evident in specimens from North American deposits, underscore Megacerops' role in the terminal radiation of horned lineages, evolving from less specialized ancestors through progressive modifications in horn morphology and cranial robusticity. The extinction of Megacerops and coincided with the Eocene-Oligocene transition around 34 million years ago, a period of pronounced that shifted climates from humid, forested environments to cooler, more seasonal ones, disrupting the niches these taxa had dominated. This event involved a stepwise decline in brontothere diversity, with larger species like Megacerops persisting longer due to reduced in open habitats but ultimately succumbing to and dietary shifts toward more abrasive vegetation. While direct competitive exclusion by emerging chalicotheres or rhinocerotoids remains speculative, the phylogenetic isolation of as a side of perissodactyl evolution highlights their vulnerability to these paleoenvironmental pressures.

Physical Characteristics

Size and General Build

Megacerops exhibited a robust build characteristic of large terrestrial herbivores, with adults attaining shoulder heights of up to 2.5 and body lengths up to 4.6 meters (including ). Weight estimates place individuals between 2,500 and 3,800 kilograms, underscoring its adaptation as a exceeding many modern rhinoceroses in scale. The skeletal proportions featured pillar-like limbs for weight-bearing support, a barrel-shaped torso to accommodate a voluminous digestive system, and a short , all contributing to stability on varied Eocene terrains. While resembling rhinoceroses in overall form, Megacerops differed with a more elongated neck, facilitating access to mid-level browse in forested or habitats. is apparent in assemblages, where males were generally larger and exhibited more pronounced horn structures than females, likely tied to .

Skull and Dental Features

The skull of Megacerops exhibits a distinctive saddle-shaped profile, with a deeply concave dorsal surface, expanded zygomatic arches, an elongated postorbital cranium, and a relatively abbreviated region. These features contribute to a dolichocephalic overall form, with skull lengths reaching up to approximately 77 cm from premaxillaries to . The nasal region features a large nasal incision extending posteriorly, accommodating the base of the prominent paired horns. The most striking cranial elements are the paired bony horns formed by enlargements of the frontal and , which are laterally positioned and exhibit , with males possessing larger structures. These horns typically diverge laterally in a Y- or slingshot-like configuration, composed entirely of rather than keratin sheaths, and measure up to 45 cm in length along their outer edge. The robust zygomatic arches, which flare widely and deepen posteriorly, provide extensive attachment sites for the masseter and temporalis muscles, facilitating a wide gape suitable for leaf-stripping behaviors. The of Megacerops follows the perissodactyl pattern with a dental formula of I^{0-1}/^{3} C^{1}/^{1} P^{4}/^{4} M^{3}/^{3}, totaling around 40 teeth, though upper incisors are reduced. The molars are low-crowned (brachyodont) and bunoselenodont, featuring crescent-shaped (selenodont) cusps connected by lophs that form a W-shaped ectoloph for grinding soft . Premolars are submolariform, with well-developed deuterocones and reduced tetartocones, while the canines are lanceolate and the incisors form a cropping arcade. Cranial morphology varies within the , with differences in horn orientation and shape among .

Postcranial Skeleton

The postcranial of Megacerops was characterized by robust adaptations suited to a graviportal stance, supporting the animal's large body mass and facilitating weight-bearing on terrestrial habitats. The forelimbs featured a sturdy and , providing structural strength for load distribution rather than agility or speed. The elbow joint was configured for stability under heavy loads, and the manus terminated in a three-toed, mesaxonic foot, with the central digit bearing most of the weight to enhance support. Hindlimb elements similarly emphasized durability, with the exhibiting proportions indicative of a pillar-like, graviportal posture that minimized energy expenditure during locomotion. The was broad, promoting lateral stability, while the reduced phalanges formed compact, hoof-like structures optimized for weight support on firm ground. The included a vertebral column with 7 , 18–19 dorsal vertebrae, and 5 , forming a robust framework that accommodated the elongated . Notably, the dorsal vertebrae proximal to the shoulders possessed elongated neural spines, which anchored powerful neck musculature to counterbalance the heavy during foraging.

Paleobiology and Ecology

Diet and Feeding Adaptations

Megacerops was primarily a browser, consuming soft leaves and twigs from low-growing shrubs and vegetation, as evidenced by dental microwear analysis of its molars, which show low levels of abrasion consistent with a diet of silica-poor rather than gritty or fibrous material. This folivorous diet is supported by the low-crowned, bunodont teeth adapted for grinding softer matter, with microwear patterns indicating a leaf-dominated browsing strategy throughout the Eocene. Unlike grazers, which exhibit high abrasive wear from silica-rich grasses, Megacerops' dental textures reflect selective feeding on tender, less abrasive foliage, positioning it as a specialized in forested ecosystems. Stable isotope analysis of carbon (δ¹³C) and oxygen (δ¹⁸O) from Megacerops tooth enamel further confirms a diet based on C₃ photosynthetic plants, with δ¹³C values around -11.8‰ indicative of consumption in mixed woodland environments with a combination of closed-canopy and open areas, rather than exclusively open grasslands. These isotopic signatures, enriched by approximately 13-14‰ relative to dietary vegetation, suggest reliance on riparian or densely vegetated habitats where C₃ shrubs and trees dominated, aligning with the Eocene's humid paleoclimate. Oxygen isotopes also point to access to relatively stable water sources, reinforcing the inference of a browsing lifestyle in moist, wooded settings. As a large-bodied perissodactyl, Megacerops employed a bulk-feeding strategy, processing substantial volumes of low-quality foliage through fermentation, a digestive common to its and inferred from the broad pelvic structure accommodating a voluminous caecum for microbial breakdown. This post-gastric allowed efficient extraction of nutrients from fibrous leaves, though less selective than foregut systems in ruminants. In terms of niche partitioning, Megacerops occupied a low-abrasion niche distinct from contemporaries; its microwear indicates softer diets compared to some sympatric titanotheres with slightly higher wear, while avoiding direct competition with oreodonts (e.g., Agriochoerus, also low-abrasion browsers but smaller) and early horses through size-mediated resource access to taller or denser layers.

Locomotion and Habitat Preferences

Megacerops possessed a graviportal limb structure, with robust, pillar-like bones that minimized bending stress and facilitated energy-efficient locomotion suited to its enormous size. This supported a slow, walking , with estimated maximum speeds of 10–15 km/h, optimized for steady travel through dense rather than rapid evasion or pursuit. The distal shows minimal asymmetry in the trochlear ridges, akin to that of proboscideans, indicating a locomotion style capable of bursts of faster movement despite the animal's bulk, differing from the more knee morphology seen in open- rhinos. Fossil footprints attributable to brontotheres like Megacerops are exceedingly rare, but those documented suggest a foot posture, with broad, weight-distributing pads that aided stability on soft, uneven floors. This stance, inferred from postcranial elements such as the straight metapodials and reduced digital flexibility, underscores an evolutionary emphasis on endurance over agility in navigating cluttered terrains. In terms of habitat preferences, Megacerops inhabited subtropical and expansive floodplains across late Eocene , environments characterized by warm, humid climates with annual temperatures exceeding 20°C and precipitation levels supporting lush vegetation. Pollen records from contemporaneous sediments reveal a diverse flora dominated by mixed deciduous angiosperms (e.g., and ) and (e.g., Taxodiaceae), indicative of paratropical woodlands interspersed with riverine wetlands, swamps, and lakes that provided reliable water sources and . Isotopic data from Megacerops tooth enamel (δ¹³C values around -11.8‰) and associated , including early equids like Mesohippus and primitive rhinocerotids such as Hyracodon, point to a for moist biomes with mixed closed-canopy and open areas over drier uplands, where carbon isotope signatures would reflect more open, C₄-dominated grasslands. These tolerances aligned with the late Eocene's greenhouse conditions, allowing Megacerops to flourish before the Eocene-Oligocene boundary transition around 33.9 Ma, associated with and , reduced suitable humid habitats, and contributed to brontothere .

Social Behavior and Reproduction

Fossil evidence, including the discovery of monospecific bone accumulations, suggests that Megacerops lived in gregarious groups, likely forming herds for protection and resource access, consistent with the sociality inferred for many large Eocene perissodactyls. The prominent, sexually dimorphic horns of male Megacerops—larger and more robust than those of females—indicate a role in intraspecific competition, such as head-butting or display behaviors during mating seasons to establish dominance. This inference is supported by pathological evidence from fossils, including a specimen exhibiting partially healed rib fractures attributable to impacts from conspecifics, pointing to agonistic interactions among males. Regarding reproduction, direct fossil evidence is limited, but the presence of and combat-related injuries implies a polygynous where dominant males secured breeding privileges within social groups. Juvenile remains occasionally found in association with adult fossils suggest some level of group-based , though specifics remain inferred from analogous behaviors in extant large herbivores.

Fossil Record and Distribution

Temporal Range

Megacerops first appeared during the Chadronian North American Land Mammal Age (NALMA), approximately 37 to 34 million years ago. The genus reached its peak abundance in the Chadronian stage, where it represents the dominant and terminal member of the brontothere clade in North American faunas. This temporal distribution aligns with the Priabonian stage of the late Eocene, characterized by faunal associations including the oreodont Leptauchenia and the early horse Mesohippus, which co-occur with Megacerops in biostratigraphic assemblages defining the Chadronian NALMA. The last occurrence of Megacerops is recorded in the terminal Chadronian NALMA, immediately preceding the Eocene-Oligocene boundary at approximately 33.9 million years ago, coinciding with the of all brontotheres. using ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar methods on volcanic tuffs within the White River Formation, a key stratigraphic unit preserving Megacerops fossils, supports this range with ages clustering between 37 and 34 million years ago; for instance, sanidine crystals from relevant ash layers yield dates of 37.8 ± 0.06 Ma and 36.67 ± 0.04 Ma. These chronostratigraphic constraints place Megacerops firmly within the late Eocene, highlighting its role as a short-lived amid the broader Eocene radiation of perissodactyls. This has been tentatively linked to climatic cooling at the Eocene-Oligocene transition, though the precise mechanisms remain under investigation.

Geographic Distribution

Megacerops fossils are primarily confined to the Laramide foreland basins of western during the late Eocene. The core distribution centers on the White River Group and equivalent formations in , , , and , where abundant remains, including skulls and postcranial elements, have been recovered from fluviolacustrine deposits. In , specimens occur in the Cypress Hills Formation of , extending the range northward into prairie exposures. Eastern limits of the genus are marked by rare occurrences, such as isolated material from the Chadron Formation in southeastern and early brontothere relatives in region of , hinting at a wider paleobiogeographic extent prior to late Eocene habitat . No records of Megacerops exist outside , in contrast to earlier brontotheres known from Eocene deposits in , underscoring the genus's to the continent during this interval. Regional provinciality is evident in species distributions, with M. coloradensis predominating in southern localities such as the Chadron Formation of , while M. kuwagatarhinus characterizes northern sites in and .

Major Fossil Discoveries

The type specimen of Megacerops coloradensis, designated as USNM 4249, consists of a partial collected from the late Eocene Chadron Formation in the and described by Leidy in 1870, marking the initial recognition of the genus as a distinct brontothere. This find from what is now laid the groundwork for understanding the morphology and diversity of late Eocene perissodactyls in . Significant assemblages have been recovered from the Big Horn Basin in , where excavations in the Chadron Formation have yielded multiple complete skeletons, contributing key insights into postcranial and ontogenetic variation within the genus. These Wyoming sites, explored since the early , represent some of the richest late Eocene localities and have helped clarify boundaries among Megacerops taxa. In , the Toadstool Geologic Park area within the has produced notable bonebeds containing Megacerops remains, including multiple individuals suggestive of structures and , preserved in the Chadron Formation's fluvial deposits. These assemblages, studied extensively since the mid-20th century, highlight taphonomic patterns favoring accumulation in riverine environments. Discoveries from the Cypress Hills Formation in have expanded the known range northward, including specimens attributable to M. kuwagatarhinus that refine understanding of horn variation and in northern populations. These finds, analyzed in studies from the 2000s onward, underscore ongoing taxonomic refinements. Overall, more than 100 known specimens of Megacerops—predominantly skulls, partial skeletons, and limb elements—exhibit taphonomic biases toward preservation in ancient river and settings of the White River Group, reflecting the animal's riparian habitats and limiting insights into soft tissues or juvenile forms.

References

  1. https://research.amnh.org/paleontology/perissodactyl/evolution/groups/brontotheriidae
  2. https://www.si.edu/object/nmnhpaleobiology_3384683
  3. https://cumuseum-archive.colorado.edu/Research/Objects/jan06_brontothere.html
  4. https://experts.colorado.edu/display/pubid_321615
  5. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995JPal...69..581M/abstract
  6. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=47980
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230881831_The_holotype_specimen_of_Menodus_giganteus_and_the_insoluble_problem_of_Chadronian_brontothere_taxonomy
  8. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/basicTaxonInfo?taxon_no=3684388
  9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2021/3479-texas-brontotheriidae
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/megacerops-kuwagatarhinus-n-sp-an-unusual-brontothere-mammalia-perissodactyla-with-distally-forked-horns/64709F6EB315F53A5F84B38A480D41E4
  11. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/pdfs/944.pdf
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4524577
  13. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade1833
  14. https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/items/9686e57d-6932-4c8c-be21-52a85adb483c
  15. https://archive.org/download/titanotheresofan02osbo/titanotheresofan02osbo.pdf
  16. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-2008/issue-311/0003-0090%282008%29501%255B1%253ASTPABO%255D2.0.CO%253B2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090%282008%29501%255B1:STPABO%255D2.0.CO%3B2.full
  17. https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/269/2021/
  18. https://dino.fandom.com/wiki/Megacerops
  19. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-2008/issue-311/0003-0090%282008%29501%255B1%253ASTPABO%255D2.0.CO%253B2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090%282008%29501%5B1:STPABO%5D2.0.CO%3B2.full
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232696713_A_New_Brontothere_Brontotheriidae_Perissodactyla_Mammalia_from_the_Eocene_of_the_Ily_Basin_of_Kazakstan_and_a_Phylogeny_of_Asian_Horned_Brontotheres
  21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.2011.539653
  22. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/621244
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018213000862
  24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.2012.635737
  25. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/512753
  26. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjes-2017-0061
  27. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2008)311[1:STPAOB]2.0.CO;2
  28. https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-vertebrate-paleontology/volume-26/issue-3/0272-4634_2006_26_685_ATTCMF_2.0.CO_2/ADDITIONS-TO-THE-CHADRONIAN-MAMMALIAN-FAUNA-FLORISSANT-FORMATION-FLORISSANT-FOSSIL/10.1671/0272-4634%282006%2926%5B685:ATTCMF%5D2.0.CO%3B2.short
  29. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/uwyo/rmg/article/47/2/113/141082/A-late-Eocene-Chadronian-mammalian-fauna-from-the
  30. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.249.4970.760
  31. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/UnitRefs/ChadronianRefs_11837.html
  32. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/books/book/1041/chapter-standard/10528964/Geochronology-and-Magnetostratigraphy-of-Paleogene
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/north-american-mammalian-diversity-and-eoceneoligocene-extinctions/7D4EE67B813B709B9AC440254E8E5574
  34. https://www.fossildiscoveryexhibit.com/geological-paleontological-points-interest/fossils-wild
  35. https://nebraskapublicmedia.org/series-media/non-series-video/paleo-sleuths-50001578/about-the-animals-brontotheres/
  36. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/geoscidiss/article/1037/viewcontent/GSBoardman_Dissertation_2013.pdf
  37. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/uwyo/rmg/article-abstract/56/1/37/599894/A-latest-Eocene-Chadronian-brontothere-Mammalia
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.