Hubbry Logo
Silverleaf whiteflySilverleaf whiteflyMain
Open search
Silverleaf whitefly
Community hub
Silverleaf whitefly
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Silverleaf whitefly
Silverleaf whitefly
from Wikipedia

Silverleaf whitefly
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hemiptera
Suborder: Sternorrhyncha
Family: Aleyrodidae
Genus: Bemisia
Species:
B. tabaci
Binomial name
Bemisia tabaci
(Gennadius, 1889)
Synonyms[1]

Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring

The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci, also informally referred to as the sweet potato whitefly and cotton whitefly[2]) is one of several species of whitefly that are currently important agricultural pests.[1] A review in 2011 concluded that the silverleaf whitefly is actually a species complex containing at least 40 morphologically indistinguishable species.[3]

The silverleaf whitefly thrives worldwide in tropical, subtropical, and less predominately in temperate habitats. Cold temperatures kill both the adults and the nymphs of the species.[4] The silverleaf whitefly can be confused with other insects such as the common fruitfly, but with close inspection, the whitefly is slightly smaller and has a distinct wing color that helps to differentiate it from other insects.

While the silverleaf whitefly had been known in the United States since 1896, in the mid-1980s an aggressive strain appeared in poinsettia crops in Florida. For convenience that strain was referred to as strain B (biotype B), to distinguish it from the milder infestation of the earlier known strain A. Less than a year after its identification, strain B was found to have moved to tomatoes, and other fruit and vegetable crops. Within five years, the silverleaf whitefly had caused over $100 million in damage to agriculture in Texas and in California.[1]

Anatomy and life cycle

[edit]
Bemisia tabaci molting on leaves. The silver empty structures on the leaves are cast-off skins.

Female B. tabaci will lay 50 to 400 eggs ranging from 0.10 to 0.25 millimetres (1128 to 1128 in) on the under part of leaves. Female whiteflies are diploid and emerge from fertilized eggs whereas male whiteflies are haploid and emerge from unfertilized eggs. Eggs are laid in groups, being small in size with dimensions of 0.2 millimetres (1128 in) wide and 0.1 millimetres (1128 in) in height. Eggs are initially whitish in color and change to a brown color near hatching, within 5 to 7 days. After hatching, the whitefly nymph develops through four instar stages.

An adult Silverleaf Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on surface of Cotton leaf
Bemisia tabaci adult whiteflies on green leaf

The first instar, commonly called a crawler, is the only mobile nymphal stage. The first instar nymph can grow to about 0.3 millimetres (164 in) and is greenish in color and flat in body structure.[5][6] The mobile nymph walks to find a suitable area on the leaf with adequate nutrients and molts into an immobile stage. The next three instars remain in place for 40–50 days, until molting into an adult.[7] Silver exuvia, or shed skins are left on the leaves. The immobile instars appear opaquely white. Nymphs feed by stabbing into the plant with their mouth-parts and sucking up plant juices.[5] After the fourth instar, the nymph transforms into a pupal stage where the eyes become a deep red color, the body color becomes yellow, and the body structure thickens. This is not a true pupal stage, as is found in the Holometabola, but is similar in function. Adult whiteflies are approximately four times the size of the egg, with light yellow bodies and white wings, which is attributed by the secretion of wax across its wings and body.[7] Adult silverleaf whiteflies can reach up to 0.9 millimetres (5128 in) in length. While feeding or resting the whitefly adult folds its wings tent-like over its body.[6]

Distribution

[edit]

Native/original community

[edit]
Poinsettia is one of the silverleaf whitefly's preferred hosts.

Research indicates that the silverleaf whitefly likely came from India. Since the whitefly is predominately associated with areas exhibiting tropical/subtropical climates, the focus shifts to how these insects attained access to crops in habitats with temperate climates.[7] One hypothesis suggests that the transfer of decorative plants from tropical regions may have aided in the spread of the silverleaf whiteflies to temperate environments. The ability of the whitefly to adapt to various plants facilitates the spread of dangerous plant viruses, which these insects are notorious for transmitting.[8] Plants which are affected by the whitefly include: tomatoes, squash, poinsettia, cucumber, eggplants, okra, beans, and cotton.[5] Other common plant damages of whitefly include: removing plant sap, breakdown of the leaves of the plant, and leaf shedding.[5]

Introduced range

[edit]

The silverleaf whitefly is an invasive agricultural pest in many locations around the world, including in Florida[6] and in California.[9]

Commercial impact

[edit]

The silverleaf whitefly is considered an invasive species in the United States as well as Australia, Africa, and several European countries. It was classified as an agricultural pest in Greece around 1889 and had a significant impact on tobacco crops there. The first silverleaf whitefly was found in the United States in 1897 on a crop of sweet potatoes.[10][11]

This tiny insect causes damage to plants through feeding and transmitting plant diseases. The silverleaf whitefly feeds on its host plants by piercing the phloem or lower leaf surfaces with its mouth and removing nutrients. Affected areas of the plant may develop chlorotic spots, whither, or drop leaves. Whiteflies also produce a sticky substance called honeydew, which is left behind on the host.[7] Honeydew can induce the growth of sooty molds, which can then reduce the plants ability to absorb light. This results in slower growth, lower yield, and poor quality plants. It also requires that crops be thoroughly washed after harvesting, which raises processing costs for the grower.[citation needed]

The silverleaf whitefly is also a notorious vector for plant disease. It has transmitted gemniviruses including lettuce infectious yellows virus, tomato yellow leaf curl virus, and African cassava mosaic virus for years and over many continents[7] and is now a vector for cassava brown streak virus disease.[12]

Bemisia tabaci became a serious issue in crops across the southwestern United States and Mexico in the 1980s. Scientists speculate that this pest was introduced via infested ornamental plants brought into the United States at this time. Florida's poinsettia greenhouses were crippled by the pest beginning in 1986, and by 1991, the infestation had spread through Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona to plague growers in California. California produces approximately 90% of the United States’ winter vegetable crop, and has incurred an estimated $500 million in crop damage due to silverleaf whitefly populations.[13] Across the agricultural industry, this pest is thought to cost the state $774 million in private sector plant sales, 12,540 jobs, and $112.5 million in personal income.[clarification needed] On a national scale, the United States has suffered crop and ornamental plant damages in excess of $1 billion.[13]

This species of whitefly is a particularly devastating pest because it feeds on over 500 plant species. Common hosts are agricultural crops including tomatoes, squash, broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, melons, cotton, carrots, sweet potato, cucumber, and pumpkin, and ornamental plants such as poinsettia, crepe myrtle, garden roses, lantana, and lilies. It can cause specific damage to certain host plants, like "silverleaf" on squash, irregular ripening of tomatoes, whitestalk in broccoli and cauliflower, white stem in poinsettia, and light root in carrots.[13]

Nuclear receptors

[edit]

B. tabaci like all arthropods has ecdysone receptors (EcRs) which may be useful for insecticide development.[14] Carmichael et al., 2005 presents the X-ray crystal structure for the 1Z5X ligand-binding domain of the B. tabaci EcR.[14]

Integrated pest management

[edit]

Multiple methods of control can be used to combat these prevalent agricultural pests. Some major control methods include, application of oils, use of natural enemies such as Aphelinidae parasitoids, employment of trap crops, release of insect growth regulators, and implementation of traps.[citation needed]

Most of these control tools have a minimal effect on plant and soil properties. Scientists are currently focusing on targeting the whitefly through mechanisms that do not cause pollution or contamination (i.e., mechanisms other than insecticides). It is important to be able to reduce the number of B. tabaci individuals that settle on plants to decrease plant damages such as those caused by viral transmissions. This can be accomplished by reducing settling, decreasing oviposition, and abating population development.[15]

Biological controls

[edit]

Classical biological control has been the best long-term, sustainable solution to controlling these exotic pests. However, success of this method can be unpredictable.[16]

Entomologists with the U.S. Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center identified the most common causes of death of the whitefly as predation by other insects, parasitism, and weather induced dislodgement.[17] They emphasize the importance of exploiting the use of natural predators and have identified predators by the use of enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA). It was found that the use of the biological controls and insect growth regulators produces a higher predator-to-prey ratio.[18] Insect growth regulators, such as buprofezin and pyriproxyfen, conserve natural predators compared to conventional insecticides, which can indiscriminately kill both predator and pest populations.[18]

Natural enemies

[edit]

Predators, parasitoids, and pathogens specific to whiteflies can keep populations under control.

Species in eight arthropod orders are known to be predators of B. tabaci. These include members of the families Phytoseiidae, Coccinellidae, Syrphidae, Anthocoridae, Nabidae, and Miridae, Chrysopidae and Coniopterygidae.[19] There are currently four species of predators that are commercially available for control of B. tabaci: Delphastus pusillus, Macrolophus caliginosus, Chrysoperla carnea, and C. rufilabris.[19] D. pusillus is a species of small, shiny, black beetle which sucks out the contents of the silverleaf whitefly by piercing its exoskeleton. Adult and larval stages of this beetle feed on all life stages of the pest.[19] C. rufilabris is only able to feed on the immature stages or the larval stages of B. tabaci.[19]

Another natural enemy of the whitefly are parasitoids, which kill their host once their development has been completed. Parasitoids in the families Platygasteridae, Aphelinidae, and Eulophidae are known to attack whiteflies.[19] Establishment of several Old World species of Eretmocerus wasps has been attempted in the Western United States to control B. tabaci.[16] However, differences in climate preference by these wasps reduced their effect. The best studied of these whitefly parasitoids are Encarsia formosa and Eretmocerus eremicus, both of which are commercially available. The Encarsia formosa "Beltsville Strain", however, has been unsuccessful in control B. tabaci biotype B in commercial greenhouses; it is only able to control the species in small experimental greenhouses.[19] The species Encarsia formosa works much better at controlling the whitefly species Trialeurodes vaporariorum than it does B. tabaci. Eretmocerus sp. has been found more successful at B. tabaci than the E. formosa "Beltsville Strain". The wasps are faster at searching for patches of host nymphs are consistent at controlling the population.[19] A variable release strategy of parasitoids has been found successfully able to control populations of B. tabaci. This was done by releasing six female parasitoids per week for the first half of the growing season, and only one female per week for the remaining of the season. This improved the effectiveness of the parasitoid wasps by ensuring they were continuously available to attack the pests, but in numbers that reflected the shrinking population of pests.[19] If natural enemies are not able to control the pest population at low levels due to a significant increase in pest, an insecticide compatible with the biological control agent could be used to assist in reducing the pest population to low levels again.[19]

Another natural mechanism of controlling the population of B. tabaci is the use of fungal pathogens. The most commonly known pathogens to the whitefly pest are Paecilomyces fumosoroseus, Aschersonia aleyrodis, Verticillium lecanii, and Beauveria bassiana.[19] When spore solutions of V. lecanii are sprayed on eggs of B. tabaci approximately 89% to 90% of these eggs are killed.[19] Some strains of whitefly have developed resistance to its fungal pathogens including V. lecanii.

A technician is applying Beauveria bassiana, a fungus that is a natural enemy to silverleaf whiteflies to a plot of vegetables near Weslaco, Texas.

B. bassiana is only an effective biological control agent in conditions of low temperatures (maximum of 20 °C (68 °F)) and a humidity level greater than 96%.[19] Not enough studies have been conducted to show the productiveness of fungal pathogen in the real world environment. Much of the success of this biological control on B. tabaci has been conducted in the laboratory.[19] However, it can be concluded though that when the fungal pathogen is combined with an insecticide, the synergistic effect of the two will induce a higher mortality rate of the whitefly. P. fumosoroseus has a broad host range but can attack silverleaf whiteflies at a variety of life stages and these include eggs, nymphs, pupae, and adults stages.[19] On the other hand, A. aleyrodis only infects and destroys nymphs and pupae.[19]

Chemical controls

[edit]

Natural oils

[edit]
The sugar apple seed oil is an effective chemical control against the whitefly.

Natural oils are another important tool in the control of B. tabaci. Currently, the most effective oil in the market is the ultra-fine oil, which is a paraffinic oil product that reduces the settlement of the adult flies, decreases oviposition, and abates the transmission of the tomato yellow leaf curl virus.[15] The effect of ultra-fine oil can be strengthened through the combination with oils such as limonene or citronellal. Olive oil is also highly effective in controlling the number of whiteflies. Other natural oils such as cottonseed, castor, peanut, soybean, and sunflower can be effective. Peanut oil was the most effective out of this group in reducing the population. All of these oils cause direct mortality to immature life stages of the silverleaf whitefly on contact and reduce settling and ovipositon by adults when sprayed on plant leaves. The oil extracted from the seeds of sugar apple has also been found effective against the whitefly.[20] This oil causes the silverleaf whitefly nymph to shrink in size and therefore detach from the tomato plant, leading to starvation. Sugar apple seed oil is not phytotoxic to tomato plants of any concentrations and reduces the survival rate of the pest.[20]

Insect growth regulators

[edit]

Insecticides can be costly, and have an increasing risk of resistance by whiteflies. However, the insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen has been found successful in reducing whitefly populations on curbit plants including zucchini squash, cucumber, and pumpkin.[21] This hormone is a juvenile hormone analogue, which affects hormonal balance and chitin in immature insects, and causes deformation and death during molting and pupation. This insect growth regulator does not kill adult whiteflies, and has low toxicity to mammals, fish, birds and bumblebees.[citation needed]

Mechanical controls

[edit]

Man-made traps and covers

[edit]

Traps offer a pesticide free method of control of B. tabaci. The Light-Emitting Diode Equipped CC trap (LED-CC) was developed by plant physiologist Chang-Chi Chu and Thomas Henneberry.[22] Originally, the trap was used to monitor population of silverleaf whitefly populations, but as the trap was improved it was used in control programs to limit whitefly pest populations. The trap itself includes a green LED light that attracts and traps the whiteflies. The LED device works best at night, and is inexpensive and durable. In addition, the LED does not harm predators and parasitoids of the whitefly.[22]

Another technique used to reduce virus damage include the use of floating row covers, which are covers used to keep plants from exposure from pests. Field studies conducted in Australia have shown that the use of floating row covers coupled with insect growth regulators increase the yield of harvested fruit and quality and reduce virus damage to cucurbits.[citation needed]

Trap crops

[edit]
Squash crops are effectively used as trap crops for attracting silverleaf whitefly.

Another important control is the use of other crops as a source of trap crops. Squashes can act as trap crops for the silverleaf whitefly due to the flies’ attraction to these crops.[23] Silverleaf whiteflies are actually more attracted to the squash crop than they are to the tomato plant.[23] When squash serves as a trap crop, the tomato yellow curl leaf virus can be controlled and limited. Scientific experiments show in the fields that growing squash crops around the areas where tomato plants can be found is a useful manipulation in regulating the silverleaf whitefly population as well as the transmission of TYLCV. Other plants that can serve as trap crops include cantaloupe and cucumber.[23]

Cultural controls

[edit]

Through a cultural control method, different planting areas can limit the amount of B. tabaci infected plants. Planting different host crops away from each other will decrease the number of plants the flies will be able to infect. Thus, the best control is to maximize the distance and time interval between host crops.[24] Good sanitation in winter and spring crops is also required for the maintenance and control of the fly population.[24] Weeds and host crop residues must be removed immediately to avoid infestation. Silver/aluminum cover mulches can repel the adult silverleaf whitefly. Thus, when planting seeds, placing a reflective polyethylene mulch on planting beds will significantly reduce the rate of colonization.[24]

Cultural controls are very important to crops such as vegetables and fruit. For example, in the family Cucurbitaceae, vegetables such as watermelon and squash contract squash vein yellowing virus (SqVYV) by the silverleaf whitefly.[25] The SqVYV virus[25] discovered by plant pathologist Benny Bruton and Shaker Kousik is essentially a crippling disease of the watermelon, which leads to the vine of the watermelon to collapse, causing the death of the watermelon before harvest. Kousik and pathologist Scott Adkins at ARS Subtropical Plant Pathology Research Unit worked together in screening the watermelon germplasm for resistance to SqVYV as to search for potential sources of resistance in wild-type watermelon. Kousik examined different combinations of insecticides and silver plastic mulch that could be used to reduce the whitefly populations.[25]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci biotype B, also known as Bemisia argentifolii) is a small, highly invasive hemipteran in the Aleyrodidae, notorious as one of the world's most damaging agricultural pests due to its broad host range and multifaceted damage mechanisms. Adults are tiny, measuring about 1–1.5 mm long, with a yellowish body and white wings typically held in a characteristic roof-like or vertically tilted position over the , distinguishing them from other . Eggs are laid on the undersides of leaves in circular patterns and hatch into mobile crawlers that soon settle and develop through sessile nymphal stages into pupae before emerging as adults; the entire life cycle can complete in as little as 2–3 weeks under warm conditions, allowing for 10–15 generations per year. This pest infests over 500 plant species across more than 70 families, including major crops such as tomatoes, cotton, beans, cucurbits, brassicas, poinsettias, and ornamentals, with feeding that extracts phloem sap and injects salivary toxins leading to physiological disorders like leaf silvering (whitening and thickening of young leaves), stunting, defoliation, and reduced yields. Nymphs and adults also excrete sticky honeydew, which fosters sooty mold fungi that impair photosynthesis and contaminate harvestable produce, while the whitefly serves as a vector for over 100 plant viruses, including devastating ones like tomato yellow leaf curl virus and squash vein yellowing virus. Originally native to regions possibly including the or , the silverleaf whitefly biotype B spread aggressively worldwide starting in the , likely via infested ornamental , and now poses a major threat in subtropical and tropical areas, including the (e.g., , , , and ), where it has caused economic losses exceeding $1 billion through direct damage and control costs. Management relies on integrated approaches, including cultural practices like reflective mulches, biological controls with parasitoids such as , and targeted insecticides, though resistance to many chemicals remains a challenge.

Taxonomy and description

Species complex and biotypes

The silverleaf whitefly is part of the Bemisia tabaci species complex, a group of cryptic that are morphologically indistinguishable but genetically diverse. A seminal 2011 review identified this complex as comprising 11 high-level groups containing at least 24 distinct species. More recent genomic analyses have expanded this estimate, suggesting over 40 biological species within the complex, with ongoing studies revealing additional variants through whole-genome sequencing. Within this complex, the B biotype, synonymous with the silverleaf whitefly and historically named Bemisia argentifolii, represents the primary invasive form in the , causing significant agricultural damage since its introduction in the late . This biotype is now recognized as the Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) lineage, which is the most widespread globally, having spread across multiple continents and displaced other variants in many regions. The taxonomic history of the B biotype includes notable reclassifications; in 1994, it was elevated to full species status as Bemisia argentifolii based on biological and genetic differences from other B. tabaci forms. However, subsequent phylogenetic evidence led to its reversion to a biotype within the B. tabaci complex, emphasizing the cryptic nature of the group rather than discrete boundaries. Distinguishing biotypes within the B. tabaci complex relies on molecular methods, as morphological traits are insufficient for differentiation. The standard approach involves sequencing the mitochondrial oxidase I (mtCOI) gene, which reveals haplotype variations that define boundaries and biotype identities with high resolution.

Morphology and identification

The silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (biotype B or MEAM1), is a small hemipteran insect characterized by distinct morphological features across its life stages that facilitate identification in agricultural settings. Adults are winged insects measuring 0.8–1.0 mm in length, with a pale yellow body covered in a white, powdery waxy secretion that gives them a mottled appearance. They possess red compound eyes and four wings held in a roof-like or tented position over the body when at rest, with males slightly smaller than females. Eggs are cylindrical, approximately 0.2 mm long, and laid upright on the undersides of leaves in small scattered groups or individually, with females laying a total of 50 to 400 eggs over their lifetime, often in irregular patterns or partial arcs. Initially pale or white, they darken to light beige or pale brown at the apex as development progresses, attached via a short pedicel stalk inserted into the tissue. The nymphal stage consists of four immobile instars, progressing from 0.3 mm to about 1.0 mm in length, with an , scale-like, and flattened body that adheres closely to the surface. Early instars (first and second) are translucent and pale yellow to greenish-yellow, while the third and fourth instars, known as pseudopupae, become more opaque and feature characteristic short waxy filaments along the margins and visible red eyes through the translucent . The fourth instar, or pupal stage, is non-feeding and remains attached to the host , with the emerging adult leaving behind an (shed skin) that forms a distinctive T-shaped structure. Identification of silverleaf whitefly relies on these morphological traits, particularly distinguishing it from the (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) by the pupal case, which in silverleaf whitefly is flat and with few to no prominent marginal wax filaments or perpendicular sides, unlike the pillbox-shaped pupae of the greenhouse whitefly that exhibit long waxy filaments and more upright edges. Additionally, silverleaf whitefly eggs are laid in scattered clusters without the uniform arcs typical of greenhouse whitefly eggs. These features, observable with a hand lens, are consistent across biotypes but aid practical field recognition.

Biology and ecology

Life cycle stages

The silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci B biotype, undergoes incomplete with four distinct life stages: , (comprising four s), (the non-feeding fourth instar), and adult. Eggs are laid in groups, often in circular or arc patterns, on the undersides of leaves and hatch in 5–10 days under favorable conditions. The nymphal stage includes a mobile first instar (crawler) lasting 2–4 days, followed by three sessile instars that feed on ; the total nymphal development spans 15–25 days. The pupal stage, during which no feeding occurs, lasts 2–4 days before adults emerge. Adults are winged and live 30–90 days, depending on environmental factors, during which females lay 100–400 eggs. The total from to ranges from 20–40 days, influenced primarily by , with optimal development at 26–30°C. In warm climates, up to 15 overlapping generations can occur annually, facilitating rapid population growth. Developmental thresholds include a minimum of 10–12°C for hatch and overall immature development, below which no progression occurs. Unlike some other biotypes, the B biotype lacks a stage, allowing continuous in suitable conditions without seasonal . Sex determination in the silverleaf whitefly follows an arrhenotokous system, where females develop from fertilized (diploid) eggs and s from unfertilized (haploid) eggs. Parthenogenetic reproduction is possible in some populations of the B biotype, primarily producing male offspring, which contributes to rapid population buildup under high-density or stress conditions.

Host plants and feeding behavior

The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci biotype B) exhibits a broad host range, infesting over 500 plant species across 74 families worldwide. It preferentially targets economically important crops in the family, such as tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) and eggplants (Solanum melongena), as well as those in the family, including squash (Cucurbita pepo) and cucumbers (Cucumis sativus). Other common hosts encompass cotton (), beans (), and ornamental plants like poinsettias (Euphorbia pulcherrima). This polyphagy enables the pest to persist across diverse agricultural and natural landscapes, though it thrives most on herbaceous plants with tender foliage. The whitefly feeds using specialized piercing-sucking mouthparts, forming a stylet sheath to penetrate leaf tissues and access the phloem for sap extraction. Adults probe potential host surfaces to evaluate suitability before settling, often laying eggs in clusters on the undersides of leaves during feeding. Both nymphs and adults excrete honeydew, a sugary residue that accumulates on leaves and stems, fostering sooty mold fungal growth (Capnodium spp.) that interferes with plant light interception. Nymphs remain sessile after initial settlement, anchoring via their mouthparts for continuous phloem ingestion throughout development. Feeding induces phytotoxic responses in susceptible hosts due to saliva components introduced during stylet insertion. In cucurbits like squash, immature whiteflies trigger silverleafing—a disorder marked by leaf silvering from mesophyll disruption and air space formation between epidermal layers—which reduces and quality. In tomatoes, nymphal and adult feeding causes irregular ripening, resulting in fruits with uneven coloration, hardened white patches, and diminished market value from salivary toxins. Adult actively fly short distances of up to several hundred meters to locate new hosts but rely on currents for passive long-range dispersal, sometimes exceeding 5 kilometers. They exhibit a strong preference for young, tender foliage, where oviposition and nymphal settlement rates are highest, optimizing nutrient access and survival. Ecologically, as a , the silverleaf disrupts host physiology by depleting carbohydrates and inducing structural changes, leading to decreased photosynthetic rates and overall plant vigor. Heavy infestations exacerbate these effects through , which blocks stomata and further impairs carbon assimilation, altering in affected plants.

Distribution and invasion history

Native range

The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1, or MEAM1) is believed to have originated in the Middle East-Asia Minor region, encompassing parts of the , , and extending into the . This area, including modern-day countries such as , and possibly , represents the core of its pre-invasion distribution in tropical and subtropical zones of and Africa. The species was first described in 1889 by D. Gennadius as Aleyrodes tabaci from plants in , marking one of the earliest documented encounters, though this likely reflected an early presence rather than the point of origin. Subsequent historical records include its identification in in 1905 on , highlighting its longstanding association with agricultural and wild plants in the region. In its native range, the silverleaf whitefly inhabits arid to semi-arid ecosystems, where it primarily feeds on wild host plants from the families (such as species of and ) and (including wild nightshades like ). These environments, characterized by warm temperatures and seasonal dry periods, support its polyphagous lifestyle on uncultivated vegetation, with limited outbreaks due to effective biological regulation by native predators and parasitoids, such as lady beetles (), lacewings (), and encyrtid wasps. In these native habitats, populations remain at low densities and rarely achieve significant pest status on crops, contrasting with their behavior in introduced areas. Genetic analyses reveal the highest variability within native populations of the Middle East-Asia Minor region, which serve as the primary source for the invasive MEAM1 biotype and related lineages. This diversity, evidenced by multiple haplotypes in Indian and Pakistani collections, underscores the region's role as the evolutionary center, where environmental pressures and host interactions have shaped the . The MEAM1 biotype, in particular, traces its origins to this native genetic pool.

Introduced ranges and spread

The silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (particularly the B biotype, also known as MEAM1), was first introduced to the in the late 19th century, with early records from and around 1897–1900, though initial populations were not economically significant. A more aggressive B biotype arrived around 1986, likely via infested ornamental plants from , leading to explosive outbreaks across and rapid spread to over 50 states by the through trade in horticultural crops and vegetables. This biotype has since established across , , and much of , displacing less damaging local populations and becoming a dominant pest in tropical and subtropical agriculture. Globally, the B biotype reached in 1994, introduced via imported cuttings from the , where it quickly spread to cotton-growing regions in and . In , invasions began in the Mediterranean basin during the 1980s, with establishment in southern , , and by the mid-1980s, facilitated by the in vegetables and ornamentals; the species has since expanded to over 30 countries, including transient populations in northern areas. In 2024, the consulted on the future quarantine status of B. tabaci due to its repeated interceptions and presence in protected environments. In , B. tabaci is now widespread across sub-Saharan regions, with outbreaks intensifying in East and Central since the 1990s, driven by its adaptation to diverse agroecosystems. Dispersal of the silverleaf whitefly occurs primarily through human-mediated pathways, such as the international shipment of infested plant material, including ornamentals, vegetables, and cut flowers, which has been the main vector for long-distance introductions. Local spread is aided by natural wind currents, enabling adults to travel up to 100 km, though flight efficiency is low without wind assistance. The invasion success of the B biotype stems from its exceptionally broad host range, encompassing over 900 plant across more than 80 families, allowing persistence in diverse agricultural and non-agricultural settings. High reproductive rates, with females capable of laying up to 300 eggs over their lifespan, enable rapid population buildup under favorable conditions. Additionally, evolved resistance to multiple classes has reduced control efficacy, while competitive displacement of indigenous , such as Trialeurodes vaporariorum, occurs through resource and interference. Recent developments include detections in cooler climates, such as in greenhouses on and ornamental crops, and persistent infestations in Canadian protected cultivation systems, potentially exacerbated by warming trends enabling survival in previously unsuitable areas. models predict further northward expansion in , with potential establishment in northern latitudes under +2°C warming scenarios.

Impacts

Economic damage to agriculture

The silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci MEAM1) inflicts substantial economic damage on , with annual crop losses and control costs exceeding $1 billion due to its widespread impact on field and horticultural crops. In the United States, outbreaks in the caused losses estimated at $100–500 million per year across , , and other commodities, driven by rapid pest proliferation in southern states. More recent assessments indicate ongoing annual damages of approximately $500 million in and production, including a notable $293 million in vegetable losses from Georgia outbreaks in 2016 and 2017. Key affected crops experience severe yield reductions from direct feeding and associated effects. In cotton, heavy infestations can lead to 15–30% yield losses through nutrient extraction and lint contamination. Tomatoes face up to 100% yield loss in extreme cases, often compounded by irregular ripening disorders. Cucurbits, such as squash and melons, suffer from silverleaf disorder induced by nymphal feeding, which causes leaf silvering, reduced photosynthesis, and significant drops in market value due to unappealing appearance. Direct damage mechanisms include the excretion of honeydew by feeding adults and nymphs, creating sticky residues that promote growth on foliage and fruit; this mold impedes , resulting in yield declines and further quality degradation. Regional examples highlight the scale: the 1991 South Texas outbreak alone resulted in $24 million in losses and $29 million in from such direct effects. In , cumulative damages since 1991 total over $500 million, primarily from honeydew-related processing issues in and . Long-term economic burdens arise from escalated production costs, including intensive and multiple applications, which can be substantial in high-risk areas like . These ongoing expenses, combined with yield volatility, underscore the pest's persistent threat to agricultural profitability. Globally, cumulative economic losses from B. tabaci have exceeded $10 billion from 1980 to 2000, with regional impacts such as over $3 billion in since its establishment.

Ecological effects and disease transmission

The silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (particularly the MED and MEAM1 cryptic species), serves as a highly efficient vector for more than 300 viruses, making it one of the most significant transmitters of viral pathogens in agricultural and natural ecosystems. Among these, begomoviruses such as Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) are prominently transmitted, causing widespread damage to solanaceous crops and beyond through persistent-circulative transmission where virions are acquired from the and retained in the whitefly's body for life. Similarly, Squash vein yellowing virus (SqVYV), an ipomovirus, is vectored by nymphs and adults in a persistent manner, leading to severe and yellowing symptoms in cucurbit species. Transmission occurs primarily through nymphal stages, which acquire the virus during feeding and retain it in the salivary glands for into new hosts, facilitating rapid spread across populations. In invaded ecosystems, the silverleaf whitefly disrupts native communities by outcompeting indigenous through superior reproductive rates and broader host ranges, leading to local displacement of less invasive aleyrodids. Its feeding behavior and virus transmission further alter plant communities by selectively reducing susceptible native and wild plants while favoring virus-resistant , which can dominate habitats and shift floral compositions over time. The excretion of honeydew, a sugary byproduct of feeding, promotes mutualistic relationships with that tend whitefly colonies for this resource, thereby elevating populations and intensifying their interference with predator-prey dynamics; aggressively defend whiteflies against parasitoids and other natural enemies, reducing biological control efficacy in affected areas. These invasions contribute to through effects on native vegetation, as whitefly-vectored viruses infect and stunt plants. Secondary effects extend to pollinators, where honeydew contamination on flowers deters by bees and other insects, and virus-induced changes in plant volatiles disrupt pollinator attraction, potentially lowering services in wild ecosystems. Although the silverleaf whitefly does not vector direct pathogens, its role in transmitting viruses like Tomato mottle virus (ToMoV) undermines by devastating tomato yields in subsistence farming regions, exacerbating and economic instability in virus-prone areas. Recent post-2020 research has highlighted the whitefly's gut in modulating virus acquisition and transmission efficiency; for instance, studies on axenic (microbe-free) demonstrate that while culturable gut bacteria are not essential for transmission, symbiotic microbes like those producing homologs can enhance viral retention and vector competence in colonized . Additionally, investigations into microbiome composition during outbreaks reveal shifts in bacterial diversity that correlate with increased TYLCV transmission rates, suggesting microbial influences on vector physiology that amplify ecological spread.

Management strategies

Biological controls

Biological control of the silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci B biotype, also known as Bemisia argentifolii) relies on natural enemies, including parasitoids, predators, and entomopathogens, to suppress populations in a sustainable manner. These agents target various life stages, particularly nymphs, and have been deployed through classical introductions and augmentative releases, achieving significant reductions in pest densities without the environmental risks associated with synthetic pesticides. Parasitoids, primarily tiny wasps in the families Aphelinidae and Eulophidae, are key agents for controlling silverleaf whitefly nymphs. Encarsia formosa, a solitary endoparasitoid, attacks immature stages by laying eggs inside hosts, leading to their death as the wasp larvae develop; it provides 70–90% control in settings when released at rates of 1–2 per square meter weekly under optimal conditions of 24–28°C and 50–70% humidity. Eretmocerus species, such as E. eremicus and E. mundus, are ectoparasitoids that oviposit under the host nymph, with larvae feeding externally; E. eremicus is particularly effective in field crops like and , offering superior performance over E. formosa in warmer, arid environments due to higher host-searching efficiency and rates up to 80%. Predators contribute to suppression by consuming eggs, nymphs, and adults. The lady beetle Delphastus pusillus is a voracious specialist that can consume over 50 whitefly nymphs per day, playing a major role in open-field reductions of up to 90% when combined with parasitoids. Lacewings like prey on all immature stages, with larvae providing supplemental control in diverse cropping systems; predatory mites (e.g., Amblyseius swirskii), spiders, and entomopathogenic fungi such as Aschersonia aleyrodis also target nymphs, enhancing overall mortality in humid microclimates. Entomopathogens offer microbial options for augmentative control. The fungus infects whitefly nymphs and adults via cuticle penetration, achieving high efficacy (up to 90% mortality) under temperatures below 30°C, with strains like GHA demonstrating field persistence in cucurbit crops. Bemisia-specific nucleopolyhedrovirus (BtNPV) targets larvae, causing liquefaction and death, though its use remains experimental due to UV sensitivity and limited commercial formulations. Classical biological control efforts in the United States during the focused on importing Eretmocerus species from and the southwestern U.S., with releases in over 20 states leading to and reducing silverleaf outbreaks by approximately 90% in and vegetable systems by the early 2000s. Banker plants have been used to enhance in control. These approaches emphasize compatibility with other tactics for long-term suppression.

Chemical and physical controls

Chemical controls for silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) primarily involve synthetic insecticides and insect growth regulators targeted at different life stages, with a focus on achieving direct mortality while minimizing environmental impact. Neonicotinoids, such as , are systemic insecticides that act on the of , providing effective control against adults and nymphs in crops like and when applied as drenches or foliar sprays. However, resistance to neonicotinoids has become widespread in many populations due to repeated use, necessitating careful application to delay further development. Pyrethroids, which disrupt sodium channels in the insect , were historically used for foliar control but have largely lost efficacy against silverleaf whitefly owing to high resistance levels observed in field populations. Organophosphates, another class affecting nerve function, have been phased out in many regions due to their to non-target organisms and regulatory restrictions, though they may still be used sparingly where permitted. Insect growth regulators (IGRs) offer a selective alternative by targeting immature stages without broad-spectrum effects on beneficial . Pyriproxyfen, a mimic (IRAC Group 7C), inhibits adult emergence from nymphs and has demonstrated significant population reductions in field trials on crops like cucurbits, often achieving over 80% control of nymphs with low mammalian . Buprofezin (IRAC Group 16), a synthesis inhibitor, disrupts molting in nymphs and similarly reduces densities by interfering with development, proving effective in integrated programs for and ornamentals. Both IGRs are valued for their specificity, allowing compatibility with biological controls when rotated properly. Natural oils and soaps provide contact-based options suitable for organic or low-residue management. , derived from seeds, smothers eggs and nymphs while repelling adults through antifeedant properties, offering moderate control in greenhouse and nursery settings. Horticultural oils, such as mineral or petroleum-based emulsions, work by suffocating immature stages upon direct contact and are effective when applied thoroughly to leaf undersides during early infestations. Insecticidal soaps, typically salts of fatty acids, disrupt cell membranes of soft-bodied whiteflies, causing rapid and death, particularly against nymphs and crawlers. Physical controls emphasize non-chemical barriers to prevent whitefly establishment and reduce adult populations. Reflective mulches, such as silver- or aluminum-laminated plastic laid around bases, disorient and repel flying adults by altering reflection, achieving 30–50% reductions in landings and subsequent infestations in vegetable crops like tomatoes and cucurbits. sticky traps, placed at canopy height, exploit the whitefly's attraction to wavelengths, capturing adults effectively; in high-infestation areas, traps can collect up to 1,000 individuals per week per unit, helping monitor and suppress populations in greenhouses and field edges. Effective long-term control requires resistance management strategies to sustain insecticide efficacy. Rotating modes of action across groups—such as alternating neonicotinoids (Group 4A) with IGRs (Groups 7C and 16)—prevents selection pressure on single targets, as recommended in whitefly-specific guidelines. The Insecticide Resistance Action Committee () monitors resistance through bioassays and provides classification tools tailored to silverleaf whitefly, emphasizing and threshold-based applications to integrate these tactics without over-reliance on any one method.

Cultural and integrated approaches

Cultural practices play a crucial role in preventing and suppressing silverleaf (Bemisia tabaci) populations by disrupting the pest's life cycle and reducing host availability. , particularly avoiding consecutive plantings of solanaceous crops like and peppers, helps break the whitefly's reproductive cycle and lowers infestation risks; for instance, incorporating non-host crops such as has been shown to reduce whitefly densities and associated virus incidence in systems. Planting resistant or tolerant varieties, such as TYLCV-resistant hybrids, combined with crop-free periods, can significantly boost yields—for example, achieving up to 30.4 tons per in treated fields—while minimizing viral transmission. measures, including the removal of crop residues, weeds, and debris after harvest, prevent whitefly carryover between seasons; in , summer cleanup practices have effectively curtailed populations and virus spread in subsequent plantings. Trap cropping strategies concentrate away from primary crops by using highly attractive border plants. For example, borders treated with targeted insecticides have reduced TYLCV incidence in adjacent fields by drawing to the traps. Similarly, inert mulches like yellow plastic or reflective materials, along with living barriers such as high-density plantings, deter whitefly settling and oviposition in vegetable production systems. Effective monitoring is essential for timely intervention, with focused on undersides where nymphs and adults congregate. In , weekly inspections of the fifth below are recommended, with action thresholds set at 5 or more nymphs per or 40% of leaves infested with large nymphs or adults to prevent economic without unnecessary treatments. (IPM) frameworks combine these cultural tactics with biological and selective chemical controls to achieve sustainable suppression. Since the 1990s, USDA-coordinated programs, including national action plans from 1992–2001, have integrated crop rotations, , and monitoring with releases, reducing U.S. outbreaks by approximately 90% and saving an estimated $300 million annually in control costs by the early 2000s. Recent advancements emphasize and climate-adaptive strategies to address expanding ranges driven by warming temperatures. Drone-based enables early detection of hotspots through , facilitating targeted applications and reducing broad-scale interventions in IPM programs. Climate-adaptive IPM, incorporating adjusted planting dates and host shifts to counter prolonged activity under elevated temperatures, has been piloted post-2020 to mitigate outbreak risks in vulnerable regions like the southeastern U.S.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.