Hubbry Logo
Biofloc TechnologyBiofloc TechnologyMain
Open search
Biofloc Technology
Community hub
Biofloc Technology
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Biofloc Technology
Biofloc Technology
Biofloc Technology
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Biofloc technology (BFT) is a system of aquaculture that uses "microbial biotechnology to increase the efficacy and utilization of fish feeds, where toxic materials such as nitrogen components are treated and converted to a useful product, like a protein for using as supplementary feeds to the fish and crustaceans."[1]

In high nitrogen environments, the beneficial heterotrophic bacteria are typically limited by carbon levels. Therefore, adding a readily available source of carbon allows the bacteria to simultaneously take up a greater portion of nitrogen (contributing to better water quality) as well as generate biomass that then serves as food for the cultured animals.[2]

The species of fish and crustaceans must be carefully chosen in order for the BFT system to realize its full potential.

History

[edit]

The first BFT was developed in the 1970s at Ifremer-COP (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea, Oceanic Center of Pacific) with Penaeus monodon, Fenneropenaeus merguiensis, Litopenaeus vannamei, and L. stylirostris.[3][4] Israel and USA (Waddell Mariculture Center) also started Research and Development with Tilapia and L. vannamei in the late 1980s and 1990s.

Commercial application started in 1988 at a farm in Tahiti (French Polynesia) using 1000m2 concrete tanks with limited water exchange achieving a record of 20–25 tons/ha/year in 2 crops.[5] A farm located in Belize, Central America also produced around 11-26 tons/ha/cycle using 1.6 ha poly-lined ponds. Another farm located in Maryland, USA also produced 45-ton shrimp per year using ~570 m3 indoor greenhouse BFT race-ways.[6] BFT has been successfully practiced in large-scale shrimp and finfish farms in Asia, Latin, and Central America, the USA, South Korea, Brazil, Italy, China, India, and others. However, research on BFT by Universities and Research Centers are refining BFT for farm application in grow-out culture, feeding technology, reproduction, microbiology, biotechnology, and economics.

The role of microorganisms

[edit]

Microorganisms play a vital role in feeding and maintaining the overall health of cultured animals. The flocs of bacteria (biofloc) are a nutrient-rich source of proteins and lipids, providing food for the fish throughout the day.[7] The water column shows a complex interaction between living microbes, planktons, organic matter, substrates, and grazers, such as rotifers, ciliates, protozoa and copepods which serves as a secondary source of food.[8] The combination of these particulate matters keeps the recycling of nutrients and maintains the water quality.[9][10]

The consumption of floc by cultured organisms has proven to increase the immunity and growth rate,[11] decrease feed conversion ratio, and reduce the overall cost of production.[12] The growth promotional factors have been attributed to both bacteria and plankton, where up to 30% of the total food is compensated in shrimp.[13][14]

Species compatibility

[edit]

In BFT, there is a species compatibility norm for culturing. To improve growth performance, the candidate species must be resistant to high stocking density; Population density, adjust to fluctuations in dissolved oxygen (3–6 mg/L), settling solids (10–15 mL/L) [15] and total ammonia compounds, and have omnivorous habits or the ability to consume microbial protein.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Biofloc Technology

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Biofloc Technology (BFT) is a sustainable aquaculture system that leverages microbial communities, including bacteria, algae, and organic particles, to form dense aggregates known as bioflocs, which recycle nutrients from waste, maintain water quality, and serve as a natural feed source, thereby enabling high-density production with minimal or zero water exchange. Originating in the 1970s through early experiments at the French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER) in Tahiti led by Gérard Cuzon, BFT gained prominence in the 1990s and 2000s via pioneering research by scientists such as Yoram Avnimelech in Israel and Wilson Wasielesky in Brazil, who demonstrated its efficacy in zero-water-exchange shrimp farming. The technology's core principles revolve around manipulating the carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio—typically 10:1 to 20:1—by adding carbon sources like molasses or glucose to stimulate heterotrophic bacteria, which rapidly assimilate toxic ammonia and nitrite into microbial biomass, thus preventing accumulation of harmful compounds and supporting self-purification in culture systems. This process not only stabilizes water parameters but also converts up to 30% of nitrogen waste into protein-rich bioflocs that contribute 10-30% of the nutritional needs for cultured species, reducing reliance on commercial feeds. BFT offers substantial benefits, including improved growth performance—such as 44-46% weight gain in —and survival rates exceeding 96% in species like African catfish under optimized conditions, alongside enhanced immune responses and resistance against pathogens like bacteria through competitive exclusion and effects. Economically, it lowers feed conversion ratios by up to 30%, cuts water usage and effluent discharge by minimizing exchanges, and decreases operational costs for and , promoting environmental amid rising global demands projected to nearly double by 2050 according to assessments including the (FAO). Primarily applied to marine and freshwater species such as (Litopenaeus vannamei), (Oreochromis niloticus), and common carp (Cyprinus carpio), BFT has enabled commercial yields of 11-26 metric tons per hectare per cycle in systems like those in since the mid-1990s, though challenges persist in managing high energy needs, floc density, and species-specific adaptations.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Biofloc technology (BFT) is a zero- or low-water exchange system in that leverages microbial communities to recycle nutrients from waste into protein-rich flocs for consumption by cultured animals. This approach enhances by converting toxic nitrogenous compounds, such as , into microbial while minimizing discharge and promoting in intensive production. The foundational principles of BFT revolve around maintaining a carbon-nitrogen (C:N) balance, typically at a of 10:1 to 20:1, to favor the proliferation of heterotrophic over . This ensures efficient nutrient uptake by stimulating that assimilates directly into cellular protein, thereby reducing free levels in the . BFT functions as a suspended-growth system, characterized by continuous that keeps organic particles in suspension, leading to the formation of bioflocs—aggregates comprising , , , and particulate organic matter. By integrating biofiltration (nitrogen removal) and supplemental nutrition (flocs as feed) within the same culture environment, BFT optimizes resource use and reduces reliance on external inputs. In operation, carbon sources like or are added to the system to drive the microbial process, where heterotrophic rapidly consume produced from animal waste and uneaten feed. This assimilation transforms waste into bacterial incorporated into bioflocs, which animals graze upon, providing a natural protein source that can reduce the requirement for commercial feed by 20-30%. The overall flow promotes a closed-loop cycling, maintaining stable water parameters and enhancing by limiting introduction through water exchange. Ammonia reduction in BFT primarily occurs through heterotrophic bacterial assimilation, as simplified in the following equation: \ceNH4++organic C−>[heterotrophic bacteria]biomass+CO2+H2O\ce{NH4+ + organic\ C ->[heterotrophic\ bacteria] biomass + CO2 + H2O} This process immobilizes nitrogen into microbial protein, preventing toxic accumulation and supporting floc formation.

Historical Development

Biofloc technology originated in the early 1970s at the French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER) in Tahiti, French Polynesia, where pioneering experiments focused on shrimp species under conditions of limited water availability. This initial development addressed water scarcity challenges in aquaculture, with key contributions from researcher Gérard Cuzon, who collaborated with U.S. private corporations to refine heterotrophic bacterial systems for nutrient recycling. By the 1980s, parallel advancements occurred in Israel, where Yoram Avnimelech at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology explored heterotrophic systems in tilapia ponds, emphasizing microbial conversion of waste into protein sources to minimize water exchange. In the 1990s, research intensified in the United States at the Waddell Center under J. Stephen , leading to the first commercial applications in in by the mid-decade. This period marked broader adoption in , including , and , driven by viral disease epidemics in traditional shrimp ponds that necessitated biosecure, low-water systems. A seminal advancement came with publications on zero-water exchange systems, such as those building on Avnimelech's work, which demonstrated scalable heterotrophic biofloc for intensive production without effluent discharge. The 2000s saw expanded studies in the Americas, with Wilson Wasielesky at the Federal University of Rio Grande in and Tzachi Samocha at standardizing protocols for diverse like and . International bodies, including the (FAO), promoted sustainable intensification in through guidelines, aligning it with global efforts to reduce aquaculture's environmental footprint. Post-2010, commercial systems proliferated in and , transitioning from experimental setups to industrial-scale operations amid rising demand for water-efficient methods. Global adoption accelerated from niche research to widespread industrial use, particularly in and , supported by sustainability objectives like the (SDGs), especially SDG 14 on life below . Between 2015 and 2025, adoption surged due to climate-driven needs, positioning biofloc as a resilient strategy in regions facing and environmental pressures. By the early , biofloc enabled higher yields with minimal resource use.

Biological Components

Role of Microorganisms

Microorganisms form the cornerstone of biofloc technology, driving nutrient cycling and water quality maintenance through diverse bacterial, protozoan, and algal communities. Heterotrophic bacteria, such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas species, serve as primary floc builders by rapidly proliferating in response to organic carbon inputs, forming the bulk of biofloc aggregates. Autotrophic nitrifying bacteria, including Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter, facilitate ammonia oxidation, while protozoa and algae contribute to floc stabilization by grazing on excess bacteria and providing structural integrity, respectively. The primary functions of these microorganisms revolve around nitrogen management and bioremediation. Heterotrophic bacteria assimilate dissolved ammonia nitrogen (NH₃ or NH₄⁺) into microbial biomass, which can contain up to 50% protein on a dry weight basis, thereby converting potentially toxic waste into a nutritious supplement for cultured organisms. Autotrophic nitrifiers perform sequential oxidation: Nitrosomonas converts ammonia to nitrite via the reaction NH4++1.5O2→NO2−+H2O+2H+\text{NH}_4^+ + 1.5\text{O}_2 \rightarrow \text{NO}_2^- + \text{H}_2\text{O} + 2\text{H}^+ followed by Nitrobacter transforming nitrite to nitrate through NO2−+0.5O2→NO3−.\text{NO}_2^- + 0.5\text{O}_2 \rightarrow \text{NO}_3^-. Collectively, these processes enable bioremediation by decomposing organic matter and effectively reducing total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) levels in optimized systems, preventing accumulation of harmful compounds. Microbial interactions in biofloc systems are predominantly symbiotic, enhancing overall efficiency. Heterotrophic bacteria provide organic substrates that support protozoan and algal growth, while protozoa regulate bacterial populations through predation, maintaining floc balance and preventing dominance by any single group. , in turn, release oxygen and fixed carbon that benefit bacterial . These dynamics are highly sensitive to environmental conditions: optimal pH ranges of 7-8 promote nitrifier activity and heterotrophic growth, whereas dissolved oxygen levels above 4 mg/L are essential to sustain aerobic processes and avoid anaerobic shifts that could produce toxic byproducts.

Biofloc Formation and Dynamics

Biofloc formation in systems is initiated by introducing organic carbon sources, such as or wheat bran, to establish a that promotes and . These carbon inputs, typically added at rates equivalent to 10-20 times the total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration, stimulate the aggregation of microorganisms into flocs within 24-48 hours under continuous . The resulting microbial aggregates, known as bioflocs, range in size from 50 to 200 μm, forming dense clusters that enhance by immobilizing dissolved nutrients. The composition of bioflocs primarily consists of microbial biomass bound together by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which comprise 80-95% of the and facilitate floc stability through their gel-like matrix of and proteins. On a dry weight basis, bioflocs typically contain 12-50% protein and 0.5-41% , varying with carbon source and environmental conditions, while the remaining fractions include carbohydrates (14-59%) and ash (3-61%). Density and settleability are key properties, often quantified by floc , with an optimal range of 10-20 mL/L indicating balanced aggregation without excessive solids accumulation. Biofloc dynamics are governed by environmental factors that influence maturation and stability, including rates of 0.1-10 W/m³ to maintain suspension and prevent at rates of 1-3 m/h. levels between 5 and 35 ppt support diverse microbial communities, while temperatures of 25-32°C optimize floc development; deviations, such as exceeding 32°C, can lead to excessive EPS production and floc bulking. Imbalances in the C:N , particularly below 10:1, cause floc degradation through accumulation and reduced bacterial efficiency, disrupting overall system . Monitoring biofloc concentration relies on the Imhoff cone method, where a 1 L water sample is allowed to settle for 10-20 minutes to measure settled floc volume, ensuring it remains within the optimal 10-20 mL/L to avoid oxygen depletion or poor water clarity. Floc loading rates can be estimated using the equation for biomass production: Biomass production=C input×efficiencyN demand\text{Biomass production} = \frac{\text{C input} \times \text{efficiency}}{\text{N demand}} where efficiency reflects carbon conversion to microbial biomass (approximately 0.4 g biomass per g C input), and N demand is based on TAN levels, guiding carbon additions to sustain floc quality.

System Design and Operation

Key Components and Setup

Biofloc systems rely on specialized infrastructure to support microbial activity and maintain water quality in a controlled environment. Core components include lined ponds or tanks, which are typically round to promote efficient mixing and prevent dead zones, with depths of 1 to 2 meters to optimize oxygen distribution and floc suspension. These are constructed using high-density polyethylene (HDPE) liners, 30-40 mil thick, to ensure impermeability and durability against erosion. For smaller installations, tanks made from tarpaulin, fiberglass, or HDPE are common, often with capacities of 15,000 liters or more per unit. Aeration systems form another essential element, utilizing paddlewheel aerators or fine-bubble diffusers to deliver 25-35 horsepower per hectare, maintaining dissolved oxygen levels above 5 mg/L while constantly agitating the water to keep bioflocs in suspension. Carbon source dosing equipment, such as manual or automated pumps, is integrated to precisely add carbohydrates like molasses, wheat flour, or tapioca, targeting a carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio of 10-20:1 for heterotrophic bacterial growth. Setting up a biofloc system begins with site selection in shaded, low-evaporation locations to reduce water loss and temperature fluctuations, ideally in areas with access to reliable power for aeration and minimal contamination risks. Following construction, the system is filled with water and inoculated with mature biofloc from an established source, typically comprising 10-20% of the total volume, to jumpstart the microbial community; alternatively, initial bacterial seeding can use pond soil, ammonium sulfate, and carbon sources in a separate maturation phase lasting several days. Initial stocking occurs once floc density reaches 10-50 mL/L, with densities such as 300-500 post-larvae per square meter for shrimp or 150-300 juveniles per cubic meter for tilapia, depending on species tolerance to high solids. Systems vary in scale from small backyard setups with tanks under 100 m³, suitable for experimental or hobbyist use, to commercial operations covering 0.1-2 s in lined for higher yields of 20-25 tons per . Initial setup costs for a 0.1- pond range from approximately $12,000 to $18,000 USD (as of 2024 estimates), encompassing liners, , and basic , while larger scales increase proportionally due to expanded equipment needs. Water emphasizes zero or minimal exchange, with excess solids and removed every 2-4 weeks via basins or clarifiers to prevent accumulation beyond 500 mg/L , thereby sustaining system stability.

Management Practices

Effective management of biofloc systems requires consistent daily interventions to sustain and microbial activity. must be regulated to ensure dissolved oxygen (DO) levels remain above 5 mg/L, preventing hypoxic conditions that could harm cultured and floc-forming . Carbon dosing, typically using sources like or glucose, is adjusted based on total ammonia (TAN) measurements to promote heterotrophic bacterial growth and , often targeting a carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio of 15:1. Feed management involves reducing conventional inputs by 20-30% compared to clear-water systems, as bioflocs serve as a supplemental protein source, improving feed conversion ratios to around 1.2-1.3. These practices leverage the microbial communities' role in recycling to minimize waste accumulation. Routine monitoring is essential for system stability, with weekly assessments of key parameters using test kits or probes. should be maintained between 7 and 8.5, often through additions of if fluctuations occur, while total is kept above 100 mg/L as CaCO₃ to buffer against acidification from . Recent studies have investigated the effects of different alkalinity sources (e.g., CaCO₃, MgCO₃, and combinations) on biofloc dynamics, water quality, and growth performance in Penaeus vannamei shrimp culture. Floc quality is evaluated visually and via settleability tests to ensure dense, protein-rich aggregates, and such as species are periodically introduced to bolster beneficial microbial populations and suppress pathogens. Daily TAN and DO checks guide immediate adjustments, preventing imbalances that could disrupt floc formation. Harvesting and maintenance procedures help control density and solids buildup. Partial harvests of cultured organisms are conducted to keep densities optimal, typically every few weeks depending on growth rates, allowing for sustained production without . management involves weekly removal of 10-20% of settled solids from the system bottom via siphoning or settling chambers to avoid excessive (TSS) that could reduce DO and promote anaerobic zones. Troubleshooting common issues promptly is critical to avoid system failure. In cases of floc crash—often triggered by insufficient carbon or over-aeration—operators increase carbon dosing to restore the C/N balance and enhance bacterial proliferation. For disease outbreaks, affected sections are quarantined, and (UV) disinfection is applied to water inflows to eliminate pathogens while preserving beneficial microbes. These responses, combined with vigilant monitoring, ensure resilience in biofloc operations.

Species Compatibility

Suitable Species

Biofloc technology is particularly effective for species that can utilize microbial flocs as a supplementary feed source, with Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) serving as a primary candidate due to its rapid growth and high survival rates in floc-rich environments. In biofloc systems, L. vannamei typically achieves growth rates of 1-2 g per week under optimal conditions, supported by the nutritional contribution of bioflocs that enhance feed efficiency. Survival rates for this species often exceed 80%, reflecting its resilience to the high-density, low-water-exchange conditions inherent to biofloc setups. Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is another primary species well-suited to biofloc systems, owing to its physiological tolerance to elevated levels of suspended solids, which are prevalent in floc-dominated water columns. This omnivorous fish can ingest and digest bioflocs, allowing it to thrive at stocking densities that would stress other species in conventional aquaculture. Secondary species such as African catfish (Clarias spp.) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) also demonstrate compatibility with biofloc technology, exhibiting robust performance in floc-based cultures. These species benefit from the protein-rich bioflocs, which support their growth in intensive systems. Polyculture integrations, such as combining L. vannamei with O. niloticus, further optimize resource use by leveraging complementary feeding habits, where tilapia consumes excess flocs generated by shrimp activity. Key adaptations enabling success in biofloc systems include the filter-feeding capabilities of species like L. vannamei, which can derive 20-30% of their nutritional requirements directly from biofloc consumption, reducing reliance on formulated feeds. Optimal stocking densities for shrimp post-larvae (PL) in biofloc tanks range from 250-500 PL/m³, balancing growth and water quality management. Performance in biofloc systems often yields 20-40% higher production compared to traditional pond methods, attributed to improved feed conversion and reduced mortality. A standard metric for assessing growth is the specific growth rate (SGR), calculated as: SGR=100×ln⁡(final weight)−ln⁡(initial weight)days\text{SGR} = 100 \times \frac{\ln(\text{final weight}) - \ln(\text{initial weight})}{\text{days}} This formula quantifies daily percentage weight gain, with biofloc-reared L. vannamei and O. niloticus frequently showing SGR values exceeding 2-3% per day under favorable conditions.

Limitations and Incompatibilities

Biofloc technology is incompatible with certain fish species that cannot tolerate elevated levels of (TSS), typically exceeding 200-500 mg/L in mature systems. Salmonids, such as those in the genus (e.g., Oncorhynchus mykiss and Salmo salar), are particularly unsuitable due to their preference for oligotrophic, clear-water environments and sensitivity to high TSS concentrations, which can impair function and reduce growth performance. Similarly, other finfish like require pristine water conditions and exhibit stress or mortality in biofloc setups where suspended particulates obscure visibility and alter water clarity, leading to behavioral disruptions and reduced feed intake. A primary limitation of biofloc systems is the high energy demand for continuous , which maintains dissolved oxygen levels and suspends flocs but can constitute 10-25% of total operating expenses in electricity-intensive operations. In dense cultures with high stocking densities, oxygen depletion poses a significant , as microbial respiration and decomposition rapidly consume available oxygen, potentially dropping levels below 3 mg/L and causing mass mortality if aeration fails. Closed-system designs, while minimizing water exchange, can amplify risks under suboptimal management, allowing pathogens like Vibrio spp. to proliferate and trigger outbreaks, such as vibriosis, due to concentrated waste products and limited dilution. Biofloc performance is constrained in cold-water environments, where temperatures below 20°C lead to floc instability and deflocculation, as microbial activity slows and heterotrophic fail to maintain aggregate formation, resulting in poor and system collapse. This makes the technology less viable for cold-water and introduces scale-up challenges in temperate climates, where seasonal cooling necessitates costly infrastructure like greenhouses to sustain optimal temperatures of 28-30°C for floc dynamics. Brief microbial imbalances, such as shifts toward filamentous , can exacerbate these issues by promoting floc bulking and reduced settling. Preliminary approaches like hybrid biofloc-clear water systems or selection of cold-tolerant microbial strains offer potential adaptations, though they require further validation.

Benefits and Challenges

Advantages

Biofloc technology offers substantial environmental benefits by minimizing usage and effluent discharge in systems. Compared to traditional pond , which often requires daily water exchanges of 10-30%, biofloc systems achieve up to 90% reduction in consumption through zero or minimal exchange practices, promoting in water-scarce regions. Additionally, the technology facilitates high removal efficiencies of and from effluents, exceeding 90% in optimized setups, by converting waste into microbial that recycles nutrients within the system, thereby lowering the associated with and discharge. Economically, biofloc technology reduces operational costs, particularly feed expenses, which constitute 50-70% of production budgets in conventional aquaculture. By leveraging bioflocs as a natural protein source—derived from microbial aggregation and dynamics—the system cuts feed costs by 20-30%, as cultured organisms consume floc particles alongside formulated feeds, enhancing overall resource efficiency. It also supports higher stocking densities, yielding 2-3 times more biomass per unit area than traditional methods, which accelerates production cycles and improves profitability for commercial farms. The global biofloc market was valued at USD 1.42 billion in 2024, with significant growth in Asia holding about 48% share and a projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 10% as of 2025. From a health perspective, biofloc systems bolster animal welfare by providing microbial probiotics within the flocs, which enhance innate immunity and reduce reliance on antibiotics. Studies indicate improved disease resistance in species like shrimp and tilapia, with improved survival rates against pathogens such as Vibrio spp., due to the immunostimulatory effects of biofloc components. Key performance metrics underscore these advantages, including a feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 1.0-1.2 in biofloc setups, compared to 1.5-2.0 in clear-water systems, reflecting superior nutrient utilization.

Drawbacks and Mitigation

Biofloc technology requires intensive to maintain dissolved oxygen levels above 5 mg/L and suspend flocs, leading to high that can reach 15–30 kWh per kg of produced, depending on system intensity and species cultured. This energy demand stems from the elevated oxygen needs of heterotrophic and high stocking densities, often accounting for over 50% of operational costs in intensive setups. Effective implementation demands significant technical expertise for ongoing monitoring of parameters like total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) and , as improper management can destabilize the microbial community and compromise system performance. Biofloc overgrowth, resulting in (TSS) exceeding 500 mg/L, poses risks of anaerobic zones forming within aggregates, which release toxic compounds such as and lead to sudden oxygen crashes, potentially causing mass mortality events. Scalability challenges are pronounced in developing regions, where high startup costs for like aerators and liners—often exceeding those of traditional systems—limit adoption among smallholder farmers, compounded by variability in floc quality due to inconsistent carbon sources or environmental fluctuations. Certain , such as filter-feeding bivalves, exhibit incompatibilities with dense floc environments, further restricting broad application. To address energy intensity, adoption of , including low-speed paddlewheels or solar-powered variants, can reduce consumption by up to 60% through optimized oxygen transfer efficiency (1.1–3.3 kg O₂/kWh) and renewable integration, making systems more viable in electricity-scarce areas. programs for farmers, coupled with via IoT sensors for real-time TAN (target <0.5 mg/L) and DO tracking, minimize expertise gaps by enabling predictive adjustments and reducing response times to imbalances. Hybrid clear-water biofloc systems, which incorporate to maintain lower TSS while retaining floc benefits, enhance nursery performance and consistency, particularly for species like and . Disease risks in biofloc systems arise from potential proliferation within flocs, but measures such as UV sterilization mitigate this by inactivating like , achieving up to 99.5% suppression and thereby reducing outbreak incidence through enhanced water disinfection without chemical residues.

Applications and Future Directions

Current Applications

Biofloc technology (BFT) has become a cornerstone of intensive in Asia, where it dominates the global market with approximately 48% share, valued at USD 681 million in 2024. In and , BFT is extensively applied in , enabling high-density production of species like Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon), contributing to regional exports exceeding USD 5 billion annually for shrimp alone. For instance, Vietnamese farms using semi-BFT models have achieved yields of up to 24.8 tons per with survival rates around 87%, while Indian operations post-2020 have scaled super-intensive systems stocking over 150 shrimp per square meter to boost output and . In , BFT adoption focuses on both and finfish, particularly in , which has emerged as a key player in farming, where BFT enables sustainable high-density culture (up to 400 individuals per m³) with lower environmental footprints, as demonstrated in recent studies showing improved feed efficiency and waste recycling. represents an emerging frontier for BFT, particularly among smallholder farmers in , where it is applied to African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fingerling production to enhance reproductive performance and larval quality amid limited . The continent's biofloc market reached USD 85 million in 2024, driven by government initiatives for sustainable in regions like . Beyond single-species systems, BFT is integrated into multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) setups worldwide, combining or with and detritivores to recycle nutrients and maintain , as seen in combined shrimp-tilapia- models that improve overall by 20-30%. Globally, BFT's market was valued at USD 1.42 billion in , with projections for a 9.1% CAGR through 2033, fueled by its role in zero- or low-discharge facilities that now comprise a majority of intensive operations in adopting regions. In , recent analyses of 37 shrimp farms highlight BFT's edge in , with higher profitability compared to conventional systems. These applications underscore BFT's scalability, from smallholder setups to commercial scales yielding 20-40 tons per in optimized systems.

Emerging Developments

Recent innovations in biofloc technology include the development of AI-driven monitoring systems that enable predictive management of parameters such as dissolved oxygen, , and levels. These systems integrate (IoT) sensors with algorithms to provide real-time data analysis and automated adjustments, reducing operational risks and improving efficiency in commercial setups. Pilots implemented post-2020 have demonstrated up to 30% improvements in fish growth rates through proactive interventions, as seen in smart biofloc applications for and farming. Genetic selection efforts focus on breeding strains of aquatic species that better utilize bioflocs as a feed source, enhancing assimilation and growth performance. While CRISPR-based editing in has advanced disease-resistant varieties, its specific application to floc-consuming traits remains in early stages, primarily through conventional selection in integrated systems. Research frontiers emphasize the integration of biofloc technology with recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) to support urban farming initiatives, where space and water resources are limited. Hybrid RAS-biofloc models achieve over 90% water recycling while maintaining floc-based , enabling year-round production in controlled environments. is emerging to enhance floc stability, with nano-oxygen bubbles improving nitrogen cycling and microbial activity, thus optimizing oxygen transfer and reducing energy demands in dense cultures. Additionally, efforts to develop climate-resilient variants address saline variability, as biofloc systems at varying salinities (e.g., 5-35 ppt) have shown enhanced immune responses and reproductive performance in species like red . Future impacts include the expansion of biofloc applications to new species such as Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) and , where recent trials have established viable culture protocols with improved water quality and reduced feed costs. Policy frameworks promoting sustainable are encouraging biofloc adoption through incentives for low-emission systems, potentially scaling production in regions facing . These advancements are projected to contribute to broader goals by minimizing nutrient effluents and supporting circular economies in . Challenges ahead involve the of biofloc protocols to ensure consistent performance across diverse setups, as current variations in carbon sources and methods hinder scalability. Ongoing 2025 studies highlight the need for frequent management to mitigate heavy metal accumulation in effluents, with weekly removals showing lower in cultured and better overall system health. Assessments of biofloc-derived indicate potential benefits for enrichment when used as but underscore risks of contaminants if not properly treated. Recent 2025 research has examined the impact of different alkalinity treatments on biofloc dynamics and growth performance in Penaeus vannamei shrimp culture, finding that CaCO₃ treatments optimize shrimp growth while MgCO₃ and combinations enhance water quality and floc density.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117240/
  2. https://www.comm.toronto.edu/~bkf/pessoal/2012_this_first.pdf
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9952110/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25516-4/
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0044848612002852
  6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-016-0108-8
  7. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/53211
  8. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.813091/full
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308052605_Biofloc_technology_A_practical_guide_book_The_World_Aquaculture_Society
  10. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc0461en
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380693419_A_Review_on_Biofloc_System_Technology_History_Types_and_Future_Economical_Perceptions_in_Aquaculture
  12. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1731815/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356507016_Biofloc_Aquaculture_as_an_Environmentally_Friendly_Climate_Adaptation_Option
  14. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/10/1489
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396367474_Role_of_microorganisms_in_the_biofloc_aquaculture_system
  16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.043
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260215902_The_size_of_biofloc_determines_the_nutritional_composition_and_the_nitrogen_recovery_by_aquaculture_animals
  18. https://bluebiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s44315-025-00025-x
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jwas.13041
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320297549_Factors_controlling_biofloc_characteristics
  21. https://aquaculture.mgcafe.uky.edu/sites/aquaculture.ca.uky.edu/files/srac_4503_biofloc_production_systems_for_aquaculture.pdf
  22. https://www.aquast.org/uploads/pdf_575.pdf
  23. https://journals.aesacademy.org/index.php/aaes/article/view/09-01-017
  24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.791738
  25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101489
  26. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.791738/full
  27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102797
  28. https://extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/fnr/fnr-495-w.pdf
  29. https://institutodepesca.org/index.php/bip/article/download/1839/1576/12054
  30. https://ejabf.journals.ekb.eg/article_299577_20e9c472aebfbe0217bbb89c785ef9ae.pdf
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513423002879
  32. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1060846/full
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7496572
  34. https://aquaculturemag.com/2019/02/19/study-backs-biofloc-benefits-in-shrimp-production/
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227621003549
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/specific-growth-rate
  37. https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/4/144
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7812359/
  39. https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/economic-aspects-of-red-tilapia-production-using-biofloc-technology-under-different-electrical-energy-sources-in-colombia/
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/24/4019
  41. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-20611-8
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10796188/
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852424010514
  44. https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/tilapia-production-using-biofloc-technology/
  45. https://dataintelo.com/report/biofloc-technology-market
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8667556/
  47. https://extension.missouri.edu/media/wysiwyg/Extensiondata/Pro/AquacultureExtension/Docs/ShrimpProductionInBio-flocSystems.pdf
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21008517
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384318790_The_Future_of_Biofloc_Development_Techniques_for_Aquaculture_A_Comprehensive_Review_of_Current_Scenarios_and_Potential_Improvements
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144860920301886
  51. https://bioflux.com.ro/docs/2025.1037-1045.pdf
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552400203X
  53. https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/5/218
  54. https://vietfishmagazine.com/aquaculture/binh-dinh-expanding-semi-biofloc-technology-in-whiteleg-shrimp-farming.html
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364475774_Super-intensive_shrimp_culture_Analysis_and_future_challenges
  56. https://www.aquafeed.com/newsroom/news/brazilian-researchers-prove-biofloc-as-sustainable-solution-for-intensive-tilapia-farming/
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305383656_Biofloc_technology_application_in_African_catfish_fingerling_production_The_effects_on_the_reproductive_performance_of_broodstock_and_the_quality_of_eggs_and_larvae
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0044848623002661
  59. http://www.fis-net.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=8-2025&day=4&id=135358&l=e&country=144&special=&ndb=1&df=0
  60. https://fishvigyan.com/biofloc-technology-a-simple-green-way-to-farm-fish-and-shrimp
  61. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/7/2204
  62. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/biofloc-fish-farming-ai-use-in-agri-biofloc-farms
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0044848624002989
  64. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/are.15030
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144860925000330
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653525004667
  67. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-024-01804-w
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653522022548
  69. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aquaculture/articles/10.3389/faquc.2025.1580560/full
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513425001838
  71. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wer.70081
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.