Hubbry Logo
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1Cyclin-dependent kinase 1Main
Open search
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
Community hub
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

CDK1
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search: PDBe RCSB
Identifiers
AliasesCDK1, CDC2, CDC28A, P34CDC2, cyclin-dependent kinase 1, cyclin dependent kinase 1
External IDsOMIM: 116940; MGI: 88351; HomoloGene: 68203; GeneCards: CDK1; OMA:CDK1 - orthologs
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez

983

12534

Ensembl

ENSG00000170312

ENSMUSG00000019942

UniProt

P06493

P11440

RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_007659

RefSeq (protein)

NP_001163877
NP_001163878
NP_001307847
NP_001777
NP_203698

NP_031685

Location (UCSC)Chr 10: 60.78 – 60.79 MbChr 10: 69.17 – 69.19 Mb
PubMed search[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 also known as CDK1 or cell division cycle protein 2 homolog is a highly conserved protein that functions as a serine/threonine protein kinase, and is a key player in cell cycle regulation.[5] It has been highly studied in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, and the fission yeast S. pombe, where it is encoded by genes cdc28 and cdc2, respectively.[6] With its cyclin partners, Cdk1 forms complexes that phosphorylate a variety of target substrates (over 75 have been identified in budding yeast); phosphorylation of these proteins leads to cell cycle progression.[7]

Structure

[edit]
Crystal Structure of the human Cdk1 homolog, Cdk2

Cdk1 is a small protein (approximately 34 kilodaltons), and is highly conserved. The human homolog of Cdk1, CDK1, shares approximately 63% amino-acid identity with its yeast homolog. Furthermore, human CDK1 is capable of rescuing fission yeast carrying a cdc2 mutation.[8][9] Cdk1 is comprised mostly by the bare protein kinase motif, which other protein kinases share. Cdk1, like other kinases, contains a cleft in which ATP fits. Substrates of Cdk1 bind near the mouth of the cleft, and Cdk1 residues catalyze the covalent bonding of the γ-phosphate to the oxygen of the hydroxyl serine/threonine of the substrate.

In addition to this catalytic core, Cdk1, like other cyclin-dependent kinases, contains a T-loop, which, in the absence of an interacting cyclin, prevents substrate binding to the Cdk1 active site. Cdk1 also contains a PSTAIRE helix, which, upon cyclin binding, moves and rearranges the active site, facilitating Cdk1 kinase activities.[10]

Function

[edit]
Fig. 1 The diagram shows the role of Cdk1 in progression through the S. cerevisiae cell cycle. Cln3-Cdk1 leads to Cln1,2-Cdk1 activity, eventually resulting in Clb5,6-Cdk1 activity and then Clb1-4-Cdk1 activity.[5]

When bound to its cyclin partners, Cdk1 phosphorylation leads to cell cycle progression. Cdk1 activity is best understood in S. cerevisiae, so Cdk1 S. cerevisiae activity is described here.

In the budding yeast, initial cell cycle entry is controlled by two regulatory complexes, SBF (SCB-binding factor) and MBF (MCB-binding factor). These two complexes control G1/S gene transcription; however, they are normally inactive. SBF is inhibited by the protein Whi5; however, when phosphorylated by Cln3-Cdk1, Whi5 is ejected from the nucleus, allowing for transcription of the G1/S regulon, which includes the G1/S cyclins Cln1,2.[11] G1/S cyclin-Cdk1 activity leads to preparation for S phase entry (e.g., duplication of centromeres or the spindle pole body), and a rise in the S cyclins (Clb5,6 in S. cerevisiae). Clb5,6-Cdk1 complexes directly lead to replication origin initiation;[12] however, they are inhibited by Sic1, preventing premature S phase initiation.

Cln1,2 and/or Clb5,6-Cdk1 complex activity leads to a sudden drop in Sic1 levels, allowing for coherent S phase entry. Finally, phosphorylation by M cyclins (e.g., Clb1, 2, 3 and 4) in complex with Cdk1 leads to spindle assembly and sister chromatid alignment. Cdk1 phosphorylation also leads to the activation of the ubiquitin-protein ligase APCCdc20, an activation which allows for chromatid segregation and, furthermore, degradation of M-phase cyclins. This destruction of M cyclins leads to the final events of mitosis (e.g., spindle disassembly, mitotic exit).

Regulation

[edit]

Given its essential role in cell cycle progression, Cdk1 is highly regulated. Most obviously, Cdk1 is regulated by its binding with its cyclin partners. Cyclin binding alters access to the active site of Cdk1, allowing for Cdk1 activity; furthermore, cyclins impart specificity to Cdk1 activity. At least some cyclins contain a hydrophobic patch which may directly interact with substrates, conferring target specificity.[13] Furthermore, cyclins can target Cdk1 to particular subcellular locations.

In addition to regulation by cyclins, Cdk1 is regulated by phosphorylation. A conserved tyrosine (Tyr15 in humans) leads to inhibition of Cdk1; this phosphorylation is thought to alter ATP orientation, preventing efficient kinase activity. In S. pombe, for example, incomplete DNA synthesis may lead to stabilization of this phosphorylation, preventing mitotic progression.[14] Wee1, conserved among all eukaryotes phosphorylates Tyr15, whereas members of the Cdc25 family are phosphatases, counteracting this activity. The balance between the two is thought to help govern cell cycle progression. Wee1 is controlled upstream by Cdr1, Cdr2, and Pom1.

Cdk1-cyclin complexes are also governed by direct binding of Cdk inhibitor proteins (CKIs). One such protein, already discussed, is Sic1. Sic1 is a stoichiometric inhibitor that binds directly to Clb5,6-Cdk1 complexes. Multisite phosphorylation, by Cdk1-Cln1/2, of Sic1 is thought to time Sic1 ubiquitination and destruction, and by extension, the timing of S-phase entry. Only until Sic1 inhibition is overcome can Clb5,6 activity occur and S phase initiation may begin.

Interactions

[edit]

Cdk1 has been shown to interact with:

See also

[edit]

Mastl

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), also known as cell division cycle protein 2 homolog (CDC2), is a serine/threonine protein kinase encoded by the CDK1 gene on human chromosome 10q21.2, consisting of 297 amino acids and ubiquitously expressed in tissues such as the testis, respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, lymphoid tissues, and female reproductive organs. As the master regulator of the eukaryotic cell cycle, CDK1 primarily drives the G2/M phase transition and mitotic progression by forming active complexes with cyclins A and B, phosphorylating over 300 substrates to orchestrate processes including DNA replication, chromosome condensation and segregation, spindle assembly, centrosome maturation, and cytokinesis. Its activity is essential for cell division, with depletion leading to cell death in vitro and embryonic lethality in vivo, underscoring its irreplaceable role among cyclin-dependent kinases in mammals. Originally identified in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) as Cdc2 and in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as Cdc28, CDK1 was recognized for its conserved function in initiating mitosis, a discovery that contributed to the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine awarded to Leland Hartwell, Tim Hunt, and Paul Nurse. Structurally, CDK1 features a characteristic two-lobed kinase domain typical of the CMGC family, with an N-terminal lobe containing the glycine-rich loop (G-loop) and PSTAIRE helix, and a C-terminal lobe including the activation (T-loop) segment; in its inactive monomeric form, the ATP-binding site is occluded, but binding to cyclin B induces conformational changes that expose the active site and enable phosphorylation at threonine 161 (T161) by CDK-activating kinase (CAK). Inhibitory phosphorylations at threonine 14 (T14) and tyrosine 15 (Y15) by kinases such as WEE1 and MYT1 maintain CDK1 in an inactive state until dephosphorylation by CDC25 phosphatases triggers mitotic entry. Post-mitosis, CDK1 activity is terminated through ubiquitin-mediated degradation of its cyclin partners by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Beyond its canonical cell cycle functions, CDK1 influences additional cellular processes, including DNA damage response via phosphorylation of repair factors like BRCA2, transcriptional regulation through targets such as PRC2 and RNA polymerase II/III, and morphogenesis by modulating polarity proteins like CDC42. In disease contexts, CDK1 overexpression is observed in numerous cancers—including breast, lung, colon, prostate, and glioblastoma—promoting tumorigenesis through chromosomal instability, inhibition of apoptosis, and enhancement of proliferation, making it a potential therapeutic target despite challenges posed by its broad substrate specificity and associated toxicity. Recent studies also highlight CDK1's roles in non-proliferative tissues, such as cardiomyocyte regeneration post-myocardial infarction and regulation of type I interferon signaling in autoimmune conditions like systemic lupus erythematosus.

Discovery and Nomenclature

Historical Identification

The discovery of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) traces its origins to pioneering genetic screens in yeast that identified key regulators of the cell cycle. In 1973, Leland Hartwell and colleagues isolated temperature-sensitive mutants in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, including the cdc28 mutant, which arrested cells at the G1/S transition, marking it as essential for initiating cell cycle progression, particularly at the "Start" point. This work established CDC28 as the first identified cyclin-dependent kinase, though its kinase nature was not yet known, and highlighted the genetic basis for ordered cell cycle events. Building on Hartwell's findings, Paul Nurse's group in the late 1970s conducted similar screens in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, isolating cdc2 mutants in 1976 that blocked cells in both G1 and G2 phases, underscoring its role in multiple cell cycle transitions. In 1982, David Beach, Brian Durkacz, and Nurse demonstrated functional conservation by showing that the S. cerevisiae CDC28 gene could complement S. pombe cdc2 mutants, confirming that these proteins perform homologous roles across eukaryotic species and suggesting a universal cell cycle control mechanism. Sequence analysis later revealed 62% amino acid identity between Cdc2 and Cdc28, further solidifying their evolutionary relatedness. The link to higher eukaryotes emerged in 1987 when Melanie Lee and Paul Nurse cloned the human homolog of cdc2 using a complementation assay in S. pombe mutants, demonstrating that the human gene could rescue cell cycle defects and encoding a 34-kDa protein kinase highly similar to yeast counterparts. This cloning effort connected CDK1 to maturation-promoting factor (MPF), a cytoplasmic activity inducing meiosis in frog oocytes discovered earlier. In 1988, independent studies by John Gautier, James Maller, and colleagues, as well as Marc Lohka and colleagues, identified the Xenopus cdc2 homolog as the catalytic subunit of MPF, showing it forms a complex with regulatory proteins to drive mitotic entry. By the early 1990s, following the identification of multiple cyclin-dependent kinases, the human protein was formally designated CDK1 during the 1991 Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on the Cell Cycle, reflecting its position as the founding member of the CDK family essential for G2/M progression. This nomenclature shift emphasized its dependence on cyclins for activation, a concept solidified through biochemical assays linking CDK1 to cyclin B in MPF.

Gene and Protein Naming

The human CDK1 gene is located on chromosome 10q21.2, spanning approximately 17.9 kb from position 60,778,312 to 60,796,236 on the forward strand (GRCh38 assembly). The canonical transcript (ENST00000395284.8) consists of 8 exons, with 7 coding exons, and encodes a 297-amino-acid protein of about 34 kDa. The official gene symbol is CDK1, approved by the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC:1722), reflecting its role as cyclin-dependent kinase 1; it was previously known as CDC2. Common aliases include CDC28A and P34CDC2, the latter denoting the 34-kDa protein product identified in early studies. The protein is uniformly referred to as cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) in standard biochemical nomenclature. CDK1 exhibits strong evolutionary conservation, with orthologs in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC28), fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc2), and mouse (Cdk1). The human CDK1 shares approximately 96% amino acid sequence identity with mouse Cdk1 across the full length, underscoring its preservation in mammals. In contrast, identity with yeast orthologs is lower, around 60% in the kinase domain, yet functional complementation demonstrates their shared core mechanism. Expression of CDK1 is ubiquitous in proliferating cells across tissues, essential for cell division, and peaks during embryonic development to support rapid cell cycles. In adults, it is maintained at baseline levels in quiescent cells but upregulated in response to mitogenic signals.

Molecular Biology

Gene Structure and Expression

The human CDK1 gene, located on chromosome 10q21.2, spans approximately 16.5 kb and consists of 9 exons interrupted by 8 introns. The promoter region upstream of the transcription start site contains multiple E2F binding sites, which facilitate cell cycle-responsive transcription by allowing E2F transcription factors to activate CDK1 expression. Specifically, E2F1 binds directly to these sites in the CDK1 promoter to drive its upregulation during the G1/S transition. The CDK1 gene produces primarily one major transcript, NM_001786.5, which encodes the canonical 297-amino-acid protein isoform. In addition to this predominant form, there are four minor splice variants identified in humans, though their functional roles remain less characterized. Expression of CDK1 is tightly regulated at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels to align with cell cycle demands. Transcriptionally, it is upregulated by E2F family members (E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3) binding to the promoter during G1/S phase progression. Post-transcriptionally, microRNAs such as miR-16 contribute to control by directly targeting the CDK1 mRNA, leading to its suppression in contexts like cancer suppression. In terms of tissue distribution, CDK1 exhibits high expression in proliferative tissues such as testis (fold change ~6.4 relative to average), ovary, and lymph nodes, as well as in embryonic tissues where rapid cell division predominates. In contrast, expression is low in most differentiated, non-proliferative adult tissues. The CDK1 gene is highly conserved across eukaryotic species, with over 247 orthologs identified, underscoring its essential role in cell cycle regulation.

Protein Sequence and Conservation

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) in humans is encoded by a gene that produces a protein of 297 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 34 kDa. A prominent structural feature is the PSTAIRE motif within the C-helix, spanning residues 50-56, which serves as a critical interface for cyclin binding and is characteristic of canonical CDKs. The protein includes conserved functional elements essential for kinase activity, such as the glycine-rich G-loop (residues 10-17) in the ATP-binding site, which positions the nucleotide for catalysis, and the activation segment or T-loop (residues 145-171), whose phosphorylation is required for full enzymatic activation. CDK1 exhibits high evolutionary conservation, particularly in its kinase domain, which displays nearly 100% sequence identity across vertebrate species, underscoring its fundamental role in cell cycle control. In contrast, the N- and C-terminal extensions show greater divergence, allowing species-specific regulatory adaptations. Homologs in yeast, such as Cdc28 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Cdc2 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, share approximately 63% overall amino acid identity with human CDK1, reflecting core mechanistic preservation despite differences in regulatory contexts. Sequence alignments reveal variations in regulatory phosphorylation sites that fine-tune activity. In humans, inhibitory phosphorylation occurs at Thr14 and Tyr15 within the G-loop, preventing premature activation; the yeast equivalents are Thr18 and Tyr19 in Cdc28, which occupy analogous positions but differ in exact residue numbering due to sequence length variations. These sites are part of a broader conserved motif, but their precise positioning highlights evolutionary tweaks in checkpoint mechanisms across eukaryotes.

Structural Features

Overall Architecture

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) is a compact monomeric protein with a molecular weight of approximately 34 kDa, consisting of 297 amino acids that fold into a characteristic bilobal kinase architecture conserved across eukaryotic protein kinases. This structure comprises an N-terminal lobe, rich in β-sheets and primarily responsible for ATP binding, connected via a hinge region to a larger C-terminal lobe dominated by α-helices that contributes to substrate recognition and catalysis. In its inactive monomeric form, the active site is buried within the cleft between the two lobes, rendering the kinase catalytically incompetent until activation. Key structural elements define the core folding of CDK1, including the glycine-rich loop (G-loop), a flexible region in the N-lobe that positions the ATP molecule for phosphate transfer during phosphorylation reactions. The catalytic loop, featuring the conserved HRD motif (His-Arg-Asp), is located in the C-lobe and facilitates substrate serine/threonine phosphorylation by coordinating the γ-phosphate of ATP and deprotonating the substrate hydroxyl group. These elements are stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds throughout the bilobal fold, enhancing the overall stability of the 34 kDa monomer. High-resolution crystal structures have elucidated the three-dimensional organization of CDK1, such as the human CDK1-Cks1 complex (PDB: 4YC6) resolved at 2.60 Å, which captures the inactive monomeric fold, and the CDK1-cyclin B-Cks2 ternary complex (PDB: 4YC3) at 2.80 Å, revealing subtle conformational rearrangements upon partner association that maintain the bilobal architecture while exposing the active site cleft. These structures highlight the conserved kinase fold and its intrinsic flexibility, with the PSTAIRE motif in the C-helix serving as a foundational element for cyclin recognition.

Active Site and Binding Domains

The active site of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) is embedded within its characteristic bi-lobal kinase fold, where the N-terminal lobe consists of a β-sheet and an αC-helix, and the C-terminal lobe features a larger α-helical domain, forming a cleft that accommodates the Mg-ATP cofactor essential for phosphotransfer activity. This ATP-binding pocket is conserved across CDKs, with key residues such as Lys33 coordinating the α- and β-phosphates of ATP through electrostatic interactions, and Asp145 (part of the HRD motif) facilitating Mg²⁺ ion coordination to stabilize the nucleotide. In the inactive monomeric state of CDK1, the orientation of these lobes positions the catalytic triad (including Lys33, Glu51, and Asp145) in a suboptimal configuration, preventing efficient ATP binding. Substrate binding to CDK1 occurs at a groove adjacent to the ATP cleft, but in the inactive conformation, the T-loop (residues 145–171) protrudes into this site, sterically occluding access for peptide substrates and contributing to the enzyme's autoinhibition. Phosphorylation at Thr161 within the T-loop is required to reposition this segment, exposing the substrate-binding platform and aligning the activation loop for catalysis. This rearrangement enhances catalytic efficiency by over 100-fold, as measured in structural and biochemical studies of CDK1 complexes. Binding of regulatory cyclins induces allosteric changes at the cyclin interface, primarily involving the PSTAIRE helix (αC-helix, residues 42–57) in CDK1, which rotates outward to widen the ATP cleft by approximately 2 Å and realign catalytic residues for activity. This interface features a hydrophobic groove formed by the PSTAIRE helix docking into a complementary β-sheet pocket on the cyclin, stabilizing the complex through van der Waals interactions and enabling cleft expansion for substrate access. Such conformational shifts are unique to CDKs, distinguishing them from other protein kinases by coupling cyclin recognition to active site competence. The ATP pocket of CDK1 also serves as a target for small-molecule inhibitors, such as roscovitine, which competitively binds by forming hydrogen bonds with hinge region residues like Leu83 and Glu81, mimicking ATP and blocking nucleotide access with an IC₅₀ in the low micromolar range. Structural models confirm that roscovitine's purine core occupies the adenine-binding subsite, with its side chains extending into adjacent hydrophobic pockets, thereby inhibiting CDK1 activity selectively over other kinases. This binding mode has been validated through docking simulations and correlates with observed potency in cellular assays.

Biological Functions

Cell Cycle Regulation

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), in complex with cyclin B, serves as the primary driver of the G2/M transition in eukaryotic cells, initiating mitosis by phosphorylating key substrates that remodel cellular architecture and promote chromosome segregation. The CDK1-cyclin B complex, often referred to as mitosis-promoting factor (MPF), accumulates during G2 phase and becomes activated through dephosphorylation of inhibitory sites on CDK1, triggering a cascade of events including nuclear envelope breakdown via phosphorylation of nuclear lamins and chromosome condensation through modification of condensins. Additionally, CDK1 phosphorylates components of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), enhancing its ubiquitin ligase activity to prepare for later mitotic progression. During mitosis, activated CDK1 orchestrates multiple events by phosphorylating over 200 identified substrates, as revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics studies in human cells. Representative examples include histone H1, which facilitates chromatin compaction, and various microtubule-associated proteins and motor proteins that regulate spindle assembly and dynamics. These phosphorylation events ensure proper alignment and segregation of chromosomes, with CDK1 activity peaking in prometaphase to maintain the mitotic state. The exit from mitosis is tightly controlled by the inactivation of CDK1, which involves an auto-amplification loop during entry where initial CDK1 activity activates the phosphatase Cdc25, further boosting CDK1-cyclin B through positive feedback. Inactivation occurs primarily via ubiquitin-mediated degradation of cyclin B by the APC/C, which ubiquitinates cyclin B for proteasomal destruction, leading to irreversible CDK1 shutdown and cytokinesis. CDK1 activation is integrated with cell cycle checkpoints, particularly the DNA damage checkpoint, where activation of Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in response to genotoxic stress phosphorylates and inhibits Cdc25, delaying CDK1 activation to allow DNA repair and prevent genomic instability. This mechanism ensures that mitosis proceeds only after resolution of DNA lesions.

Non-Cell Cycle Roles

Beyond its canonical role in cell division, cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) contributes to transcriptional regulation by phosphorylating key components of the transcription machinery. Specifically, CDK1 targets the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II at serine 2 and serine 5 residues, facilitating transitions in RNA processing and gene expression control independent of proliferative contexts. Additionally, CDK1 phosphorylates the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and associated factors like TAF1C, disrupting their interactions and modulating promoter-specific transcription initiation to fine-tune gene expression patterns. CDK1 also plays a critical role in DNA damage response and repair pathways. Following genotoxic stress, CDK1 promotes the recruitment of BRCA1 to sites of DNA double-strand breaks, enabling efficient activation of the S-phase checkpoint and facilitating homologous recombination repair. This function ensures genomic stability by coordinating repair factor assembly, with CDK1 inhibition impairing BRCA1 localization and sensitizing cells to DNA-damaging agents. In post-mitotic neurons, CDK1 maintains low-level activity and supports neuronal homeostasis through targeted phosphorylation events. It regulates transcription factors such as FOXO1, promoting neuronal apoptosis during developmental cell death by inducing pro-apoptotic gene expression. Recent investigations from 2023 to 2025 have uncovered CDK1's involvement in senescence escape and viral exploitation. Alternative splicing of the epigenetic regulator MRG15 enhances CDK1 transcriptional activity, enabling mouse embryonic fibroblasts to bypass senescence barriers and resume proliferation. In viral contexts, CDK1 phosphorylates the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein, influencing its phase separation and contributing to viral replication.

Regulatory Mechanisms

Cyclin-Dependent Activation

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) requires binding to cyclin regulatory subunits for activation, as monomeric CDK1 remains catalytically inactive. The primary cyclin partners are cyclin A, which associates with CDK1 during S phase progression and into late G2, and cyclin B (notably cyclin B1 in humans), which binds predominantly from G2 phase onward to drive mitotic entry. These interactions occur with high affinity, exemplified by a dissociation constant (Kd) of approximately 28 nM for the CDK1–cyclin B complex under physiological conditions. Binding of cyclin to CDK1 induces profound conformational changes that enable kinase activity. The cyclin docks onto a dedicated interface on the CDK1 lobe, realigning the flexible T-loop (activation segment) into a short β-hairpin structure while reorienting the C-helix to expose the ATP-binding active site. Furthermore, cyclin B1 acts as a copper chaperone, facilitating the transfer of copper ions to CDK1 at residues H23, M85, and H120, which are essential for kinase activation and G2/M progression. This allosteric remodeling enhances substrate access and catalytic efficiency, increasing the turnover number (kcat) by roughly 100-fold compared to the apo form. The temporal dynamics of activation are tied to cyclin B1 accumulation, which builds progressively during G2 phase in human cells to reach a threshold that triggers CDK1 engagement and the G2/M transition. This species-specific reliance on cyclin B1 ensures precise mitotic timing. The cyclin-binding interface itself exhibits strong evolutionary conservation across CDK family members and eukaryotic lineages, underscoring its fundamental role in cell cycle control.

Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation

The activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) is tightly controlled by post-translational phosphorylation and dephosphorylation at specific residues, which serve as key regulatory toggles during the cell cycle. Inhibitory phosphorylation occurs primarily at threonine 14 (Thr14) and tyrosine 15 (Tyr15) within the ATP-binding loop of CDK1. Thr14 is phosphorylated by membrane-associated tyrosine- and threonine-specific kinase (PKMYT1, also known as Myt1), while Tyr15 is targeted by Wee1 kinase; PKMYT1 can also contribute to Tyr15 phosphorylation. These sites conform to consensus sequences recognized by these kinases, such as (M/L/I)XSPX(K/R) for Wee1 priming and S/TPXK for Myt1, enabling precise inhibitory modification once CDK1 associates with cyclin B. Phosphorylation at Thr14 and Tyr15 distorts the ATP-binding pocket and hinders substrate access, effectively blocking kinase activity and maintaining CDK1 in an inactive state during G2 phase to prevent premature mitotic entry. Activation of CDK1 requires both the removal of these inhibitory phosphates and addition of an activating phosphate at threonine 161 (Thr161) in the T-loop. Thr161 is phosphorylated by CDK-activating kinase (CAK, a complex of CDK7 and cyclin H), which stabilizes the active conformation of the CDK1-cyclin B complex and enhances substrate binding. Dephosphorylation of the inhibitory sites is mediated by the Cdc25 family of phosphatases, with Cdc25B and Cdc25C primarily acting on Tyr15, while Thr14 dephosphorylation is also mediated by Cdc25 phosphatases but occurs to a lesser extent than for Tyr15. This dual mechanism ensures rapid and complete activation at the G2/M transition. Cyclin binding serves as a prerequisite for efficient phosphorylation at these sites. Quantitative studies indicate that inhibitory phosphorylation at Thr14 and Tyr15 reduces CDK1 kinase activity by more than 90%, underscoring its potent suppressive role. The interplay of these phosphorylation events forms a bistable switch that drives oscillatory CDK1 activity through interconnected feedback loops, ensuring robust cell cycle progression. Active CDK1 promotes its own activation by phosphorylating and activating Cdc25 phosphatases while simultaneously inhibiting Wee1 and Myt1 kinases, creating a positive feedback loop that amplifies dephosphorylation at Thr14/Tyr15 and leads to irreversible mitotic commitment. Additionally, during mitosis, the ATR-Chk1 pathway promotes CDK1 activity by Chk1-mediated phosphorylation of Myt1 at Ser143, which inhibits Myt1 and reduces inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK1 at Thr14 and Tyr15. This bistability is further reinforced by a parallel loop involving Greatwall kinase (Gwl), which CDK1 activates to inhibit protein phosphatase 2A:B55 (PP2A:B55), preventing premature reversal of mitotic phosphorylations. Conversely, negative feedback via anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) degradation of cyclin B resets the system by inactivating CDK1. Dysregulation of these sites, such as mutations at Thr14 or Tyr15 (e.g., Y15F), impairs G2/M checkpoint function, leading to defective DNA damage responses and unchecked mitotic entry, which is implicated in genomic instability.

Inhibitory Proteins

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) regulate CDK1 primarily through two families: the CIP/KIP family, which includes p21^{Cip1/Waf1} (encoded by CDKN1A) and p27^{Kip1} (encoded by CDKN1B), acting as stoichiometric inhibitors that bind directly to CDK1-cyclin complexes; and the INK4 family (p15^{INK4B}, p16^{INK4A}, p18^{INK4C}, p19^{INK4D}), which are stoichiometric inhibitors that primarily target CDK4/6 with minimal direct inhibition of CDK1. The CIP/KIP proteins exhibit broad specificity, inhibiting multiple cyclin-CDK pairs including CDK1 bound to cyclin A or B, whereas INK4 proteins enforce allosteric inhibition on CDK4/6 to prevent cyclin D binding, indirectly limiting upstream signals that promote CDK1 activation. The inhibitory mechanisms of p21 and p27 involve docking at the cyclin subunit interface of the CDK1-cyclin complex, where their N-terminal domains induce conformational changes that distort the CDK1 active site, impair ATP binding, and sterically occlude the substrate recruitment groove, thereby blocking phosphorylation of downstream targets essential for cell cycle progression. This binding is cooperative and tight, with p27 showing preferential inhibition of CDK1-cyclin B complexes by inserting a helical segment into the ATP-binding cleft, reducing catalytic efficiency by over 100-fold in vitro. In contrast, INK4 proteins have negligible affinity for CDK1, as their ankyrin repeats specifically disrupt CDK4/6 lobe alignment without affecting CDK1's monomeric or complexed forms. These protein-protein interactions complement covalent modifications like phosphorylation, providing layered control over CDK1 activity. Cell cycle specificity underscores the roles of these inhibitors in maintaining quiescence and checkpoints. p27 levels peak in G0 and early G1 phases, where it sequesters CDK1-cyclin complexes to enforce growth arrest and preserve stem cell quiescence, but decline sharply upon S-phase entry due to targeted degradation. This degradation occurs via the SCF^{Skp2} ubiquitin ligase complex, which recognizes p27 phosphorylated at Thr187 by cyclin E-CDK2, marking it for proteasomal breakdown and allowing CDK1 activation for G2/M transition. p21 similarly accumulates in response to DNA damage during G1/S but can also restrain CDK1 in G2/M under stress, contributing to checkpoint enforcement. INK4-mediated inhibition, though indirect for CDK1, sustains G1 restriction by curbing Rb phosphorylation, preventing premature S-phase onset that could amplify CDK1-driven proliferation. Recent studies have revealed nuanced regulation of p21 inhibition, including hyperphosphorylation events that modulate its affinity for CDK1. For instance, multi-site phosphorylation of p21 by CDK8 within the p53-p21 feedback loop stabilizes the inhibitor and amplifies its suppressive effects on CDK1-cyclin complexes, enhancing DNA damage responses in cancer cells. Additionally, phosphorylation at Ser130 by CDK5 promotes p21 turnover in S phase but can transiently boost inhibitory potency against residual G1 CDK1 activity in proliferative contexts like obesity-associated disorders. These modifications highlight p21's dynamic role in fine-tuning CDK1 restraint beyond simple binding.

Protein Interactions

Key Binding Partners

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) interacts with a diverse array of proteins beyond its core cyclin partners, which are essential for its activation. These interactions encompass substrates, regulators, and adaptors that modulate CDK1's activity and localization during the cell cycle. Comprehensive interactome studies, including affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) and yeast-two-hybrid screens, have identified over 600 unique interactors for human CDK1 in databases such as BioGRID. Similarly, studies reveal over 200 confirmed substrates phosphorylated by CDK1, highlighting its broad regulatory reach. Among its substrates, CDK1 phosphorylates key proteins to drive cell cycle transitions and structural remodeling. For instance, retinoblastoma protein (Rb) is phosphorylated by CDK1 at multiple sites, including Thr373, Ser780, and Ser795, to maintain its hyperphosphorylation during S/G2/M phases, contributing to cell cycle progression. Lamins, components of the nuclear lamina, undergo CDK1-mediated phosphorylation at sites such as Ser22, Ser392, and Ser404, promoting their depolymerization and subsequent nuclear envelope breakdown at mitotic entry. Aurora kinases, critical for mitotic spindle assembly, are also regulated by CDK1, which promotes Aurora A activation and localization to centrosomes by enabling its autophosphorylation at Thr288, ensuring proper microtubule organization. These examples illustrate CDK1's role in phosphorylating over 200 substrates, often at consensus motifs like (S/T)PX(K/H/R), as cataloged in signaling databases. CDK1's activity is finely tuned by regulatory binding partners, primarily phosphatases and kinases that control its phosphorylation state. Cdc25 phosphatases (Cdc25A, Cdc25B, and Cdc25C) bind CDK1-cyclin complexes and dephosphorylate inhibitory residues Thr14 and Tyr15, activating the kinase; this interaction exhibits high stoichiometry in mitotic extracts, with Cdc25C showing a dissociation constant (Kd) in the nanomolar range for the CDK1 Thr14/Tyr15 diphosphorylated form. Conversely, Wee1 and Myt1 kinases bind CDK1 to add inhibitory phosphates at the same sites, with Wee1 demonstrating a binding affinity (Kd ≈ 10-50 nM) and 1:1 stoichiometry to monomeric CDK1, preventing premature activation. These regulators form a feedback loop, where activated CDK1 further phosphorylates Cdc25 and Wee1 to amplify or dampen its own activity. Adaptor proteins like the 14-3-3 family facilitate indirect regulation by sequestering CDK1-phosphorylated partners, thereby preventing untimely interactions. 14-3-3 isoforms bind phosphoserine/threonine motifs on substrates such as Cdc25C (at Ser216) and Wee1 (at Ser642), sequestering them in the cytoplasm to inhibit their access to CDK1 during interphase; this binding has a typical Kd of 100-500 nM and involves dimeric 14-3-3 structures that clamp the phosphorylated partner. Such adaptations ensure spatial and temporal control of CDK1 signaling without direct binding to the kinase itself.

Functional Complexes

CDK1 forms several multi-subunit complexes that integrate its kinase activity with regulatory networks to orchestrate precise cell cycle transitions. The maturation-promoting factor (MPF), a pivotal complex, consists of the CDK1-cyclin B core heterodimer along with associated regulators such as the phosphatase Cdc25C, which drives oocyte maturation by triggering germinal vesicle breakdown and chromosome condensation. Cdc25C activates MPF through dephosphorylation of inhibitory residues on CDK1 (Thr14 and Tyr15), establishing a positive feedback loop that rapidly amplifies kinase activity during meiotic resumption in oocytes. This complex's activity is essential for progression from prophase I arrest to metaphase II, ensuring proper spindle assembly and polar body extrusion in species ranging from starfish to mammals. CDK1 also participates indirectly in regulating the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) assembly by phosphorylating subunits of the origin recognition complex (ORC), particularly ORC1 and ORC2, which inhibits pre-RC reloading on replication origins after firing. This phosphorylation event, occurring during S and G2 phases when CDK1 activity is high, prevents re-licensing and thus blocks DNA re-replication, maintaining genomic stability. The mechanism involves CDK1-mediated exclusion of ORC from chromatin, coordinated with the degradation of licensing factors like Cdt1, ensuring origins are licensed only in G1 phase. At the conclusion of mitosis, CDK1 inactivation enables the activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome associated with CDH1 (APC/C^{CDH1}), a ubiquitin ligase complex that targets cyclin B for proteasomal degradation. During interphase, CDK1 phosphorylates CDH1 at multiple sites, inhibiting its binding to APC/C and preventing premature degradation of cell cycle regulators; upon CDK1 shutdown via cyclin B destruction, CDH1 is dephosphorylated, activating APC/C^{CDH1} to ubiquitinate remaining cyclins and other substrates like Aurora kinases. This reciprocal regulation ensures timely mitotic exit and G1 entry. Recent structural analyses have illuminated the architecture of CDK1-containing complexes, including a cryo-EM structure of the CDK1-cyclin B1-CKS1 complex bound to separase (a regulatory partner) at approximately 3.5 Å resolution, revealing how the cyclin B docking groove and CKS1 enhance substrate recruitment and multisite phosphorylation. These insights highlight the conformational dynamics within MPF-like assemblies, where cyclin B positions substrates for efficient CDK1 action while CKS1 tethers phosphorylated motifs to propagate signaling cascades.

Pathophysiological Roles

Involvement in Cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) is frequently overexpressed in solid tumors, with significantly elevated expression observed in approximately 71% of analyzed cancer types according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. This upregulation is particularly prominent in lung cancer (fold change ~6.9), and elevated in breast cancer (fold change ~2.3), where CDK1 levels are substantially higher in tumor tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. High CDK1 expression consistently correlates with poor clinical outcomes, including reduced overall survival and disease-free survival across multiple tumor types, such as lung adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hyperactive CDK1 drives oncogenic processes by forming a complex with cyclin B1, which is often co-overexpressed in tumors, leading to premature activation and bypass of cell cycle checkpoints, particularly the G2/M transition. This deregulation allows cells to evade DNA damage-induced arrests, promoting uncontrolled proliferation and mitotic errors that culminate in genomic instability, a hallmark of tumorigenesis. The cyclin B1/CDK1 complex phosphorylates key substrates to override inhibitory phosphorylations at Thr14 and Tyr15 on CDK1, facilitated by upregulated CDC25 phosphatases, thereby accelerating entry into mitosis despite unrepaired genomic damage. CDK1 inhibition shows differential sensitivity based on p53 status, with p53-mutant cells exhibiting resistance in preclinical models of embryonal tumors. Recent studies from 2023 to 2025 have linked elevated CDK1 expression to immune modulation, including correlations with tumor mutational burden and CD8+ T cell infiltration in breast and colorectal cancers, potentially influencing immunotherapy responses. As a diagnostic biomarker, CDK1 expression levels in TCGA datasets show strong prognostic value, with high levels associating with increased tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability in over 15 cancer types, enabling risk stratification and potential guidance for personalized therapies. Immunohistochemical validation confirms CDK1 as a reliable indicator of aggressive disease in breast, lung, and liver tumors.

Other Diseases

In neurodegeneration, particularly Alzheimer's disease, hyperactivation of CDK1 contributes to the pathological hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, which disrupts microtubule stability and promotes neurofibrillary tangle formation. Studies using roscovitine-derived inhibitors targeting CDK1 and related kinases have demonstrated reduced tau phosphorylation at disease-relevant sites in neuronal models of Alzheimer's. In mouse models such as the 5XFAD transgenic line, which recapitulates amyloid plaque deposition and cognitive decline, administration of CDK inhibitors like kenpaullone—known to target CDK1 among others—significantly attenuates amyloid-beta plaque accumulation, neuroinflammation, and memory impairments. These findings suggest that CDK1 dysregulation exacerbates neuronal damage beyond its canonical cell cycle role, linking aberrant mitotic signaling to degenerative processes. CDK1 also plays a critical role in viral infections by facilitating pathogen replication through manipulation of host cell cycle machinery. In HIV-1 infection, CDK1 phosphorylates SAMHD1 at threonine 592 in complex with cyclin A2, inactivating its dNTPase activity and thereby alleviating restriction of viral reverse transcription to enable efficient replication in non-dividing cells like macrophages. Similarly, for human papillomavirus (HPV), CDK1 interacts with viral E1 helicase to initiate and sustain DNA replication; phosphorylation by CDK1 targets E1 to replication origins, promoting viral genome amplification in differentiating keratinocytes. Recent 2024 research highlights CDK1's involvement in COVID-19 pathogenesis, where its upregulation contributes to the cytokine storm by enhancing inflammatory signaling and immune cell dysregulation, positioning CDK inhibitors as potential repurposed therapeutics to mitigate hyperinflammation without directly targeting viral replication. In developmental disorders, dysregulation of CDK1 is associated with primary microcephaly, a condition characterized by reduced due to impaired . Mutations in genes like STIL, which encode centrosomal proteins, lead to mitotic defects by interfering with CDK1-mediated dissociation of STIL from centrosomes during early , resulting in abnormal spindle assembly and cytokinesis failure in neural progenitors. This premature or defective CDK1 activation disrupts the timing of and mitotic entry, contributing to progenitor cell and depleted cortical pools observed in patients. Such mitotic aberrations underscore CDK1's essential role in maintaining progenitor proliferation balance during brain development. Regarding aging, CDK1 influences stem cell exhaustion, a hallmark of age-related tissue decline, by driving excessive cell cycle progression in quiescent stem cell populations. Elevated CDK1 activity in senescent mesenchymal stem cells correlates with reduced proliferative capacity, as inhibition of CDK1 restores division potential and delays exhaustion in aging models. In progeria syndromes like Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), caused by LMNA mutations producing progerin, CDK1 levels are upregulated due to persistent DNA damage responses that aberrantly activate cell cycle checkpoints, accelerating stem cell depletion and premature aging phenotypes such as vascular and skeletal fragility. This dysregulation parallels normal aging but occurs at an accelerated rate, emphasizing CDK1's contribution to stem cell maintenance failure across lifespan pathologies.

Therapeutic Implications

CDK1 Inhibitors

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) inhibitors encompass a range of small-molecule compounds designed to block its kinase activity, primarily through competition at the ATP-binding site or alternative mechanisms, aiming to disrupt cell cycle progression in proliferative diseases like cancer. Most clinically advanced CDK1 inhibitors are ATP-competitive, binding to the conserved ATP pocket shared among the CDK family, which poses significant selectivity challenges due to the high structural homology (over 70% sequence identity in the kinase domain) between CDK1 and other CDKs such as CDK2 and CDK9. This similarity often results in off-target effects, limiting therapeutic windows and contributing to toxicity in normal proliferating tissues. Prominent ATP-competitive inhibitors include roscovitine (also known as seliciclib), a analog that potently inhibits / with an IC50 of 0.65 μM, alongside comparable activity against CDK2, CDK5, CDK7, and CDK9 ( range 0.2–0.7 μM). Similarly, dinaciclib (SCH727965), a macrocyclic pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidinone, exhibits nanomolar potency against CDK1 ( 3 nM), as well as CDK2, CDK5, and CDK9, demonstrating broad-spectrum inhibition that arrests cells in G2/M phase by preventing mitotic entry. These agents highlight the of ATP-competitive strategies but selectivity hurdles, as their pan-CDK profiles can inadvertently suppress essential non-mitotic CDKs, exacerbating adverse effects compared to more targeted approaches. To address selectivity limitations, allosteric inhibitors have emerged for the CDK family, such as type II and type III compounds that bind to inactive conformations (e.g., DFG-out motif) of kinases like CDK2, inducing structural rearrangements that sterically hinder ATP access without directly competing in the active site. These inhibitors exploit subtle differences in allosteric pockets among CDKs, potentially offering improved specificity; however, CDK1-specific allosteric leads remain preclinical. In parallel, artificial intelligence-driven design has accelerated discovery, as demonstrated by a 2024 deep learning framework (LSTM-based RNN) that generated novel CDK1 inhibitors with predicted binding affinities exceeding -10 kcal/mol and superior drug-likeness (QED > 0.73), outperforming known scaffolds in selectivity simulations against CDK2 and CDK4. These AI-optimized preclinical candidates, refined through iterative virtual screening, target unique residues like Ala31 and Lys33 in CDK1, positioning them as promising leads for further experimental validation. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) represent a biologic-inspired class of CDK1 inhibitors that induce ubiquitin-mediated degradation rather than reversible inhibition, leveraging bifunctional molecules to recruit E3 ligases (e.g., cereblon) to CDK1 for proteasomal clearance. Thalidomide-based hybrids, such as those conjugating CDK-binding warheads to pomalidomide (a cereblon ligand), have shown feasibility in degrading related CDKs like CDK2 and CDK12, with analogous constructs for CDK1 demonstrating sustained suppression in preclinical models by promoting ubiquitination and halting mitotic progression. Recent 2025 research highlights progress in PROTAC-mediated CDK1 degradation for tumor treatment, including breast cancer models. This degradation approach circumvents resistance mechanisms associated with transient inhibition and enhances durability of CDK1 knockdown. Selectivity profiles vary markedly between pan-CDK inhibitors (e.g., roscovitine and dinaciclib, which broadly target multiple CDKs including CDK4/6) and emerging CDK1-specific agents designed to spare G1-phase regulators like CDK4/6, thereby minimizing toxicity to non-dividing cells and improving safety margins. For instance, efforts to avoid CDK4/6 inhibition reduce disruptions to retinoblastoma pathway control in normal tissues, a common liability of pan-inhibitors that can cause myelosuppression. Endogenous parallels, such as the CDK inhibitory protein p21, which binds CDK1 to enforce cell cycle checkpoints without broad off-targeting, further inspire the pursuit of highly selective synthetic inhibitors.

Clinical Applications

Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) has shown promise in clinical trials for hematologic malignancies, particularly in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a phase 1/2 trial of dinaciclib, a multi-CDK inhibitor including CDK1, 58% of 48 evaluable patients with relapsed/refractory CLL achieved an overall response rate (ORR), with responses observed even in high-risk subgroups such as those with del(17p) or p53 mutations. Combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors have also demonstrated activity; for example, in the phase 1b KEYNOTE-155 trial, pembrolizumab plus dinaciclib yielded an ORR of 29.4% in 17 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, with partial responses but no complete responses, and manageable toxicity. Beyond cancer, preclinical studies suggest potential for CDK1 targeting in non-oncologic conditions like neurodegeneration. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of CDK1 provided neuroprotection in models of ischemic neuronal death, reducing cell cycle re-entry and apoptosis in affected neurons without compromising cell viability in healthy tissue. Although specific knockdown in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) models remains underexplored, broader evidence of cell cycle dysregulation in ALS motor neurons supports investigating CDK1 modulation to mitigate neuronal loss. Clinical translation of CDK1 inhibitors faces challenges, including toxicity from cell cycle arrest in proliferating normal tissues, such as bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal effects observed in trials. Patient selection using biomarkers like high CDK1 expression, which correlates with poor prognosis in various cancers including leukemia, could improve outcomes by identifying responsive subsets. Future directions include continued development of selective CDK1 degraders and inhibitors to enhance therapeutic precision in oncologic and neurodegenerative applications.

References

  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-02080-z
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4097832/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2876151/
  4. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/hartwell-lecture.pdf
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/300706a0
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3293803/
  7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3293802/
  8. https://www.ensembl.org/id/ENSG00000170312
  9. https://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Transcript/Summary?db=core;g=ENSG00000170312;r=10:60778312-60796236;t=ENST00000395284
  10. https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P06493/entry
  11. https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=CDK1
  12. https://omim.org/entry/116940
  13. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/17/7/1061/1064699
  14. https://www.yeastgenome.org/locus/S000000364
  15. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000170312-CDK1
  16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/983
  17. https://reactome.org/content/detail/R-HSA-8961920
  18. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-023-00407-7
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525001616315957
  20. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000170312-CDK1/tissue
  21. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb4184
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7769
  23. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cell-and-developmental-biology/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.770939/full
  24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6329/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4413027/
  26. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsob.120136
  27. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/4YC6
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5706343/
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022283619301871
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15474478/
  31. https://www.scielo.br/j/eq/a/mQdDXgMNskCG576PkVbdpTn/
  32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-023-02468-8
  33. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aad3925
  34. https://celldiv.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1747-1028-5-11
  35. https://rupress.org/jcb/article/185/2/193/35036/The-decision-to-enter-mitosis-feedback-and
  36. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1999.0500
  37. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embj.2019101801
  38. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cell-and-developmental-biology/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.1020643/full
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8835803/
  40. https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/pdf/S1097-2765(09)00509-7.pdf
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19124971/
  42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-08309-z
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520308030
  44. https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/fulltext/S1097-2765(08)00763-6
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9240681/
  46. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57538-7
  47. https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00959-2
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3135293/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10667339/
  50. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(25)00790-9
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5196020/
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982218312843
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4594418/
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7065656/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC317144/
  56. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaw2106
  57. https://portlandpress.com/biochemsoctrans/article/40/5/981/65230/Cell-cycle-regulation-by-the-intrinsically
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17654117/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1592794/
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10375532/
  61. https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/13/9/1181
  62. https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.6.4.387
  63. https://thebiogrid.org/107420/summary/homo-sapiens/cdk1.html
  64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26845289/
  65. https://reactome.org/content/detail/R-HSA-5244669
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2898447/
  67. https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.9.2.345
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3507455/
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4666901/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10629557/
  71. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2443.2002.00544.x
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3047751/
  73. https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.e15-11-0787
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8482764/
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9452984/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4558161/
  77. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1591706/full
  78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30213139/
  79. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18698753/
  80. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01616412.2025.2520983
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1618588/
  82. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/pdf/S2211-1247%2813%2900124-1.pdf
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC15145/
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090123224003102
  85. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822%2813%2901575-3
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8145766/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9337930/
  88. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0700854104
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0223523425008554
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0223523424004276
  91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20663931/
  92. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38732-x
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024163761
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-025-00931-8
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12174868/
  96. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23949430/
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864641/
  98. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41420-018-0044-7
  99. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/23/6/2131
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6132956/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.