Hubbry Logo
AgribusinessAgribusinessMain
Open search
Agribusiness
Community hub
Agribusiness
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Agribusiness
Agribusiness
Agribusiness
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Agribusiness is the industry, enterprises, and the field of study[1] of value chains in agriculture[2] and in the bio-economy,[3] in which case it is also called bio-business[4][5] or bio-enterprise. The primary goal of agribusiness is to maximize profit while satisfying the needs of consumers for products related to natural resources. Agribusinesses comprise farms, food and fiber processing, forestry, fisheries, biotechnology and biofuel enterprises and their input suppliers.

Studies of business growth and performance in farming have found that successful agricultural businesses are cost-efficient internally and operate in favourable economic, political, and physical-organic environments. They are able to expand and make profits, improve the productivity of land, labor, and capital, and keep their costs down to ensure market price competitiveness.[6]

Agribusiness is not limited to farming. It encompasses a broader spectrum through the agribusiness system which includes input supplies, value-addition, marketing, entrepreneurship, microfinancing, and agricultural extension.

In some countries like the Philippines, creation and management of agribusiness enterprises require consultation with registered agriculturists above a certain level of operations, capitalization, land area, or number of animals in the farm.

Evolution of the agribusiness concept

[edit]

The word "agribusiness" is a portmanteau of the words agriculture and business. The earliest known use of the word was in the Volume 155 of the Canadian Almanac & Directory published in 1847.[7] Although most practitioners recognize that it was coined in 1957 by two Harvard Business School professors, John Davis and Ray Goldberg after they published the book "A Concept of Agribusiness."[8]

"Agribusiness is the sum total of all operations involved in the manufacture and distribution of farm supplies; production operations on the farm; and the storage, processing, and distribution of farm commodities and items made from them." (Davis and Goldberg, 1956)

Their book argued against the New Deal programs of then U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt as it led to the increase in agricultural prices. Davis and Goldberg favored corporate-driven agriculture or large-scale farming to revolutionize the agriculture sector, lessening the dependency on state power and politics.[9] They explained in the book that vertically integrated firms within the agricultural value chains have the ability to control prices and where they are distributed.[9] Goldberg then assisted in the establishment of the first undergraduate program in agribusiness in 1966 at the UP College of Agriculture in Los Baños, Philippines as Bachelor of Science in Agriculture major in Agribusiness.[10][11][12] The program was initially a joint undertaking with the UP College of Business Administration in Diliman, Quezon City until 1975.[10] Jose D. Drilon of the University of the Philippines then published the book "Agribusiness Management Resource Materials" (1971) which would be the foundation of current agribusiness programs around the world.[11][13] In 1973, Drilon and Goldberg further expanded the concept of agribusiness to include support organizations such as governments, research institutions, schools, financial institutions, and cooperatives within the integrated Agribusiness System.[14]

Mark R. Edwards and Clifford J. Shultz II (2005) of Loyola University Chicago reframed the definition of agribusiness to emphasize its lack of focus on farm production but towards market centricity and innovative approach to serve consumers worldwide.[15]

"Agribusiness is a dynamic and systemic endeavor that serves consumers globally and locally through innovation and management of multiple value chains that deliver valued goods and services derived from sustainable orchestration of food, fiber and natural resources." (Edwards and Shultz, 2005)

In 2012, Thomas L. Sporleder and Michael A. Boland defined the unique economic characteristics of agribusiness supply chains from industrial manufacturing and service supply chains.[16] They have identified seven main characteristics:

  1. Risks emanating from the biological nature of agrifood supply chains
  2. The role of buffer stocks within the supply chain
  3. The scientific foundation of innovation in production agriculture having shifted from chemistry to biology
  4. Cyberspace and information technology influences on agrifood supply chains
  5. The prevalent market structure at the farm gate remains oligopsony
  6. Relative market power shifts in agrifood supply chains away from food manufacturers downstream to food retailers
  7. Globalization of agriculture and agrifood supply chains

In 2017, noting the rise of genetic engineering and biotechnology in agriculture, Goldberg further expanded the definition of agribusiness which covers all the interdependent aspects of the food system including medicine, nutrition, and health.[1] He also emphasized the responsibility of agribusiness to be environmentally and socially conscious towards sustainability.[17]

"Agribusiness is the interrelated and interdependent industries in agriculture that supply, process, distribute, and support the products of agriculture." (Goldberg, 2017)

Some agribusinesses have adopted the triple bottom line framework such as aligning for fair trade, organic, good agricultural practices, and B-corporation certifications towards the concept of social entrepreneurship.

Agribusiness system

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Agricultural value chain § Background.[edit]
Value chain representation

The term value chain was first popularized in a book published in 1985 by Michael Porter,[18] who used it to illustrate how companies could achieve what he called “competitive advantage” by adding value within their organization. Subsequently, the term was adopted for agricultural development purposes [19] and has now become very much in vogue among those working in this field, with most bilateral and multilateral aid organisations using it to guide their development interventions.

At the heart of the agricultural value chain concept is the idea of actors connected along a chain producing and delivering goods to consumers through a sequence of activities.[20] However, this “vertical” chain cannot function in isolation and an important aspect of the value chain approach is that it also considers “horizontal” impacts on the chain, such as input and finance provision, extension support and the general enabling environment. The approach has been found useful, particularly by donors, in that it has resulted in a consideration of all those factors impacting on the ability of farmers to access markets profitably, leading to a broader range of chain interventions. It is used both for upgrading existing chains and for donors to identify market opportunities for small farmers.[21]

Inputs sector

[edit]

Agricultural supplies

[edit]

An agricultural supply store or agrocenter is an agriculturally-oriented shop where one sells agricultural supplies — inputs required for agricultural production such as pesticides, feed and fertilizers . Sometimes these stores are organized as cooperatives, where store customers aggregate their resources to purchase agricultural inputs. Agricultural supply and the stores that provide it are part of the larger Agribusiness industry.

Agricultural labor

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Farmworker.[edit]
Two farmworkers, one dressed in blue covers and the other in red with a face covering, bending down. They are presumed to be cleaning and picking up onions on a grassy field. Location is unknown.
Two farm workers cleaning and picking at an onion field, location unknown
Farm workers on a field near Mount Williamson in Inyo County, California. This photograph is by Ansel Adams.

A farmworker or farmhand, is someone employed for labor in agriculture. In labor law, the term "farmworker" is sometimes used more narrowly, applying only to a hired worker involved in agricultural production, including harvesting, but not to a worker in other on-farm jobs, such as picking fruit.

Agricultural work varies widely depending on context, degree of mechanization and crop. In countries like the United States where there is a declining population of American citizens working on farms — temporary or itinerant skilled labor from outside the country is recruited for labor-intensive crops like vegetables and fruits.

Sudanese farmer reviews cantaloupe production, south of Khartoum.
A picture of a man in a cabbage farm
A Rwandan farmworker
Farmworkers in Nigeria making ridges
Agricultural labor is often the first community affected by the human health impacts of environmental issues related to agriculture, such as health effects of pesticides or exposure to other health challenges such as valley fever. To address these environmental concerns, immigration challenges and marginal working conditions, many labor rights, economic justice and environmental justice movements have been organized or supported by farmworkers.

Irrigation

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Irrigation.[edit]
Irrigation of agricultural fields in Andalusia, Spain. Irrigation canal on the left.

Irrigation is the practice of applying controlled amounts of water to land to help grow crops, landscape plants, and lawns. Irrigation has been a key aspect of agriculture for over 5,000 years and has been developed by many cultures around the world. Irrigation helps to grow crops, maintain landscapes, and revegetate disturbed soils in dry areas and during times of below-average rainfall. In addition to these uses, irrigation is also employed to protect crops from frost,[22] suppress weed growth in grain fields, and prevent soil consolidation. It is also used to cool livestock, reduce dust, dispose of sewage, and support mining operations. Drainage, which involves the removal of surface and sub-surface water from a given location, is often studied in conjunction with irrigation.

Several methods of irrigation differ in how water is supplied to plants. Surface irrigation, also known as gravity irrigation, is the oldest form of irrigation and has been in use for thousands of years. In sprinkler irrigation, water is piped to one or more central locations within the field and distributed by overhead high-pressure water devices. Micro-irrigation is a system that distributes water under low pressure through a piped network and applies it as a small discharge to each plant. Micro-irrigation uses less pressure and water-flow than sprinkler irrigation. Drip irrigation delivers water directly to the root zone of plants. Subirrigation has been used in field crops in areas with high water tables for many years. It involves artificially raising the water table to moisten the soil below the root zone of plants.

Irrigation water can come from groundwater (extracted from springs or by using wells), from surface water (withdrawn from rivers, lakes or reservoirs) or from non-conventional sources like treated wastewater, desalinated water, drainage water, or fog collection. Irrigation can be supplementary to rainfall, which is common in many parts of the world as rainfed agriculture, or it can be full irrigation, where crops rarely rely on any contribution from rainfall. Full irrigation is less common and only occurs in arid landscapes with very low rainfall or when crops are grown in semi-arid areas outside of rainy seasons.

The environmental effects of irrigation relate to the changes in quantity and quality of soil and water as a result of irrigation and the subsequent effects on natural and social conditions in river basins and downstream of an irrigation scheme. The effects stem from the altered hydrological conditions caused by the installation and operation of the irrigation scheme. Amongst some of these problems is depletion of underground aquifers through overdrafting. Soil can be over-irrigated due to poor distribution uniformity or management wastes water, chemicals, and may lead to water pollution. Over-irrigation can cause deep drainage from rising water tables that can lead to problems of irrigation salinity requiring watertable control by some form of subsurface land drainage.

Seeds

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Seed company.[edit]
A street full of seed shops in Wuhan, China, a few blocks from Wuchang Railway Station

Seed companies produce and sell seeds for flowers, fruits and vegetables to commercial growers and amateur gardeners. The production of seed is a multibillion-dollar global business, which uses growing facilities and growing locations worldwide. While most of the seed is produced by large specialist growers, large amounts are also produced by small growers who produce only one to a few crop types. The larger companies supply seed both to commercial resellers and wholesalers. The resellers and wholesalers sell to vegetable and fruit growers, and to companies who package seed into packets and sell them on to the amateur gardener.

Most seed companies or resellers that sell to retail produce a catalog, for seed to be sown the following spring, that is generally published during early winter. These catalogs are eagerly awaited by the amateur gardener, as during winter months there is little that can be done in the garden so this time can be spent planning the following year’s gardening. The largest collection of nursery and seed trade catalogs in the U.S. is held at the National Agricultural Library where the earliest catalogs date from the late 18th century, with most published from the 1890s to the present.[23]

Seed companies produce a huge range of seeds from highly developed F1 hybrids to open pollinated wild species. They have extensive research facilities to produce plants with genetic materials that result in improved uniformity and appeal. These qualities might include disease resistance, higher yields, dwarf habit and vibrant or new colors. These improvements are often closely guarded to protect them from being utilized by other producers, thus plant cultivars are often sold under the company's own name and protected by international laws from being grown for seed production by others. Along with the growth in the allotment movement, and the increasing popularity of gardening, there have emerged many small independent seed companies. Many of these are active in seed conservation and encouraging diversity. They often offer organic and open pollinated varieties of seeds as opposed to hybrids. Many of these varieties are heirloom varieties. The use of old varieties maintains diversity in the horticultural gene pool. It may be more appropriate for amateur gardeners to use older (heirloom) varieties as the modern seed types are often the same as those grown by commercial producers, and so characteristics which are useful to them (e.g. vegetables ripening at the same time) may be unsuited to home growing.

Fertilizers

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Fertilizer.[edit]
A farmer spreading manure to improve soil fertility

A fertilizer or fertiliser is any material of natural or synthetic origin that is applied to soil or to plant tissues to supply plant nutrients. Fertilizers may be distinct from liming materials or other non-nutrient soil amendments. Many sources of fertilizer exist, both natural and industrially produced.[24] For most modern agricultural practices, fertilization focuses on three main macro nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) with occasional addition of supplements like rock flour for micronutrients. Farmers apply these fertilizers in a variety of ways: through dry or pelletized or liquid application processes, using large agricultural equipment, or hand-tool methods.

Historically, fertilization came from natural or organic sources: compost, animal manure, human manure, harvested minerals, crop rotations, and byproducts of human-nature industries (e.g. fish processing waste, or bloodmeal from animal slaughter). However, starting in the 19th century, after innovations in plant nutrition, an agricultural industry developed around synthetically created agrochemical fertilizers. This transition was important in transforming the global food system, allowing for larger-scale industrial agriculture with large crop yields.

A farmer throws solid fertilizer into his field in Janakkala, Finland in 1960

Nitrogen-fixing chemical processes, such as the Haber process invented at the beginning of the 20th century, and amplified by production capacity created during World War II, led to a boom in using nitrogen fertilizers.[25] In the latter half of the 20th century, increased use of nitrogen fertilizers (800% increase between 1961 and 2019) has been a crucial component of the increased productivity of conventional food systems (more than 30% per capita) as part of the so-called "Green Revolution".[26]

The use of artificial and industrially applied fertilizers has caused environmental consequences such as water pollution and eutrophication due to nutritional runoff; carbon and other emissions from fertilizer production and mining; and contamination and pollution of soil. Various sustainable agriculture practices can be implemented to reduce the adverse environmental effects of fertilizer and pesticide use and environmental damage caused by industrial agriculture.

Production sector

[edit]

Farming

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Farm.[edit]
Church Farm in Norfolk, England
Typical plan of a medieval English manor, showing the use of field strips

A farm (also called an agricultural holding) is an area of land that is devoted primarily to agricultural processes with the primary objective of producing food and other crops; it is the basic facility in food production.[27] The name is used for specialized units such as arable farms, vegetable farms, fruit farms, dairy, pig and poultry farms, and land used for the production of natural fiber, biofuel, and other biobased products. It includes ranches, feedlots, orchards, plantations and estates, smallholdings, and hobby farms, and includes the farmhouse and agricultural buildings as well as the land. In modern times, the term has been extended to include such industrial operations as wind farms and fish farms, both of which can operate on land or at sea.

There are about 570 million farms in the world, most of which are small and family-operated. Small farms with a land area of fewer than 2 hectares operate on about 12% of the world's agricultural land, and family farms comprise about 75% of the world's agricultural land.[28]

Modern farms in developed countries are highly mechanized. In the United States, livestock may be raised on rangeland and finished in feedlots, and the mechanization of crop production has brought about a great decrease in the number of agricultural workers needed. In Europe, traditional family farms are giving way to larger production units. In Australia, some farms are very large because the land is unable to support a high stocking density of livestock because of climatic conditions. In less developed countries, small farms are the norm, and the majority of rural residents are subsistence farmers, feeding their families and selling any surplus products in the local market.

Farm mechanization

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Agricultural engineering.[edit]
An agricultural and biosystems engineer fixing an agricultural robot

Agricultural engineering, also known as agricultural and biosystems engineering, is the field of study and application of engineering science and designs principles for agriculture purposes, combining the various disciplines of mechanical, civil, electrical, food science, environmental, software, and chemical engineering to improve the efficiency of farms and agribusiness enterprises[29] as well as to ensure sustainability of natural and renewable resources.[30]

An agricultural engineer is an engineer with an agriculture background. Agricultural engineers make the engineering designs and plans in an agricultural project, usually in partnership with an agriculturist who is more proficient in farming and agricultural science.

Processing sector

[edit]

Primary processing

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Food processing § Primary food processing.[edit]
These whole, dried bananas in Thailand are an example of primary food processing.

Primary food processing turns agricultural products, such as raw wheat kernels or livestock, into something that can eventually be eaten. This category includes ingredients that are produced by ancient processes such as drying, threshing, winnowing and milling grain, shelling nuts, and butchering animals for meat.[31][32] It also includes deboning and cutting meat, freezing and smoking fish and meat, extracting and filtering oils, canning food, preserving food through food irradiation, and candling eggs, as well as homogenizing and pasteurizing milk.[32][33][34]

Contamination and spoilage problems in primary food processing can lead to significant public health threats, as the resulting foods are used so widely.[32] However, many forms of processing contribute to improved food safety and longer shelf life before the food spoils.[33] Commercial food processing uses control systems such as hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) and failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to reduce the risk of harm.[32]

Secondary processing

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Food processing § Secondary food processing.[edit]
A man using a bread peel to slide a round disk of raw flatbread dough into a brick oven
Baking bread is an example of secondary food processing.
Secondary food processing is the everyday process of creating food from ingredients that are ready to use. Baking bread, regardless of whether it is made at home, in a small bakery, or in a large factory, is an example of secondary food processing.[32] Fermenting fish and making wine, beer, and other alcoholic products are traditional forms of secondary food processing.[34] Sausages are a common form of secondary processed meat, formed by comminution (grinding) of meat that has already undergone primary processing.[35] Most of the secondary food processing methods known to humankind are commonly described as cooking methods.

Marketing sector

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Agricultural marketing.[edit]
Market display in China
Agricultural marketing covers the services involved in moving an agricultural product from the farm to the consumer. These services involve the planning, organizing, directing and handling of agricultural produce in such a way as to satisfy farmers, intermediaries and consumers. Numerous interconnected activities are involved in doing this, such as planning production, growing and harvesting, grading, packing and packaging, transport, storage, agro- and food processing, provision of market information, distribution, advertising and sale. Effectively, the term encompasses the entire range of supply chain operations for agricultural products, whether conducted through ad hoc sales or through a more integrated chain, such as one involving contract farming.

Farmers' market

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Farmers' market.[edit]
An autumn farmers' market in Farmington, Michigan
A farmers' market at twilight in Layyah, Pakistan
4 liters of blueberries in wooden baskets
Blueberries in late July 2023 at the Jean Talon Market in Montreal

A farmers' market (or farmers market according to the AP stylebook,[36][37] also farmer's market in the Cambridge Dictionary[38][39]) is a physical retail marketplace intended to sell foods directly by farmers to consumers. Farmers' markets may be indoors or outdoors and typically consist of booths, tables or stands where farmers sell their produce, live animals and plants, and sometimes prepared foods and beverages. Farmers' markets exist in many countries worldwide and reflect the local culture and economy. The size of the market may be just a few stalls or it may be as large as several city blocks. Due to their nature, they tend to be less rigidly regulated than retail produce shops.[40]

They are distinguished from public markets, which are generally housed in permanent structures, open year-round, and offer a variety of non-farmer/non-producer vendors, packaged foods and non-food products.[41][42]

Support sector

[edit]

Education

[edit]

Agricultural extension is the application of scientific research and new knowledge to agricultural practices through farmer education. The field of 'extension' now encompasses a wider range of communication and learning activities organized for rural people by educators from different disciplines, including agriculture, agricultural marketing, health, and business studies.

Extension practitioners can be found throughout the world, usually working for government agencies. They are represented by several professional organizations, networks and extension journals.

Agricultural extension agencies in developing countries receive large amounts of support from international development organizations such as the World Bank and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Cooperatives

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Agricultural cooperative.[edit]

An agricultural cooperative, also known as a farmers' co-op, is a producer cooperative in which farmers pool their resources in certain areas of activities.

A broad typology of agricultural cooperatives distinguishes between agricultural service cooperatives, which provide various services to their individually-farming members, and agricultural production cooperatives in which production resources (land, machinery) are pooled and members farm jointly.[43]

Agricultural production cooperatives are relatively rare in the world. They include collective farms in former socialist countries, the kibbutzim in Israel, collectively-governed community shared agriculture, Longo Maï co-operatives in Costa Rica, France, and some other countries, CPAs in Cuba, and Nicaraguan production cooperatives.[44]

The default meaning of "agricultural cooperative" in English is usually an agricultural service cooperative, the numerically dominant form in the world. There are two primary types of agricultural service cooperatives: supply cooperatives and marketing cooperatives. Supply cooperatives supply their members with inputs for agricultural production, including seeds, fertilizers, fuel, and machinery services. Marketing cooperatives are established by farmers to undertake transportation, packaging, pricing, distribution, sales and promotion of farm products (both crop and livestock). Farmers also widely rely on credit cooperatives as a source of financing for both working capital and investments.

Notable examples of agricultural cooperatives include Dairy Farmers Of America, the largest dairy company in the US,[45] Amul, the largest food product marketing organization in India[46] and Zen-Noah, a federation of agricultural cooperatives that handles 70% of the sales of chemical fertilizers in Japan.[47]

Governments

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Food and Agriculture Organization.[edit]
The FAO Food Price Index (1961–2025). The average for 2014–2016 is set at 100.
  Real
  Nominal
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations[48] (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger and improve nutrition and food security. Its Latin motto, fiat panis, translates to "let there be bread". It was founded on 16 October 1945.[49]

The FAO comprises 195 members, including 194 countries and the European Union (EU). Its headquarters is in Rome, Italy, and it maintains regional and field offices worldwide, operating in over 130 countries.[50] It helps governments and development agencies coordinate their activities to improve and develop agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and land and water resources. It also conducts research, provides technical assistance to projects, operates educational and training programs, and collects agricultural output, production, and development data.[50]

The FAO is governed by a biennial conference representing each member country and the EU, which elects a 49-member executive council.[51] The director-general, as of 2019 Qu Dongyu of China, serves as the chief administrative officer.[52] Various committees govern matters such as finance, programs, agriculture, and fisheries.[53]

100 lire (FAO's celebration.)
Obverse: Young woman with braid facing left. Surrounded by Repubblica Italiana [Italian Republic]. Reverse: Cow nursing calf, face value & date. FAO at bottom and Nutrire il Mondo [Feed the world] at top.
Coin minted by Italy in the 1970s to celebrate and promote the Food and Agriculture Organization.

Professionals

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Agriculturist.[edit]
An agriculturist doing routine check-up of agronomic crops

An agriculturist, agriculturalist, agrologist, or agronomist (abbreviated as agr.) is a professional in the science, practice, and management of agriculture and agribusiness.[54] It is a regulated profession in Canada, India, Japan, the Philippines, the United States, and the European Union. Other names used to designate the profession include agricultural scientist, agricultural manager, agricultural planner, agriculture researcher, or agriculture policy maker.

The primary role of agriculturists are in leading agricultural projects and programs, usually in agribusiness planning or research for the benefit of farms, food, and agribusiness-related organizations.[55] Agriculturists usually are designated in the government as public agriculturists serving as agriculture policymakers or technical advisors for policy making.[56] Agriculturists can also provide technical advice for farmers and farm workers such as in making crop calendars and workflows to optimize farm production, tracing agricultural market channels,[57] prescribing fertilizers and pesticides to avoid misuse,[58] and in aligning for organic accreditation[59] or the national agricultural quality standards.[60]

Preparation of technical engineering designs and construction for agriculture meanwhile are reserved for agricultural engineers.[61] Agriculturists may pursue environmental planning and focus on agricultural and rural planning.[62]

Studies and reports

[edit]

Studies of agribusiness often come from the academic fields of agricultural economics and management studies, sometimes called agribusiness management.[2] To promote more development of food economies, many government agencies support the research and publication of economic studies and reports exploring agribusiness and agribusiness practices. Some of these studies are on foods produced for export and are derived from agencies focused on food exports. These agencies include the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Austrade, and New Zealand Trade and Enterprise (NZTE).

The Federation of International Trade Associations publishes studies and reports by FAS and AAFC, as well as other non-governmental organizations on its website.[63]

In their book A Concept of Agribusiness,[8] Ray Goldberg and John Davis provided a rigorous economic framework for the field. They traced a complex value-added chain that begins with the farmer's purchase of seed and livestock and ends with a product fit for the consumer's table. Agribusiness boundary expansion is driven by a variety of transaction costs.[64]

As concern over global warming intensifies, biofuels derived from crops are gaining increased public and scientific attention. This is driven by factors such as oil price spikes, the need for increased energy security, concern over greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, and support from government subsidies. In Europe and in the US, increased research and production of biofuels have been mandated by law.[65]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Agribusiness

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Agribusiness encompasses the commercial enterprises involved in the production, , distribution, and of agricultural products and inputs, integrating farming with industrial supply chains to generate revenue from on a large scale. The term originated in from the work of Harvard economists John H. Davis and Ray A. Goldberg, who conceptualized it as the sum of all economic activities supporting farm output, from seeds and machinery to final consumer goods. Globally, agribusiness drives substantial economic value, with the and sector representing about 10% of world GDP and supporting livelihoods for over a quarter of the planet's through direct and indirect . Its defining achievement lies in productivity gains: in , total farm output nearly tripled between 1948 and 2021, even as total input use slightly declined, enabling abundant supply amid via , hybrid seeds, fertilizers, and precision techniques. These efficiencies have empirically reduced risks by expanding output per unit of and labor, though they rely on fuel-derived inputs and global networks. Agribusiness faces scrutiny for environmental externalities, including soil degradation, water contamination from fertilizers and manure, habitat loss via land conversion, and emissions contributing to , which stem from scaled-up and intensification to meet demand. Despite such causal links—where intensive practices amplify but also minimize farmland expansion relative to output—critiques from environmental groups often overlook countervailing data on yield-per-acre improvements that spare from cultivation. Innovations in sustainable inputs and regenerative methods offer pathways to mitigate these without sacrificing scale-driven .

Definition and Conceptual Foundations

Core Definition and Scope

Agribusiness denotes the comprehensive network of commercial operations spanning the supply of farm inputs, agricultural production, processing, and distribution of farm-derived products. This concept integrates economic activities that transform raw agricultural outputs into consumable , emphasizing efficiency, scale, and market orientation. The term originated in the mid-20th century, with economists John H. Davis and Ray A. Goldberg defining it in 1957 as "the sum total of all operations involved in the manufacture and distribution of farm supplies; production operations on the farm; and the storage, processing, and distribution of farm commodities and manufactured products thereof." Agribusiness management is the application of business principles, management techniques, and economic theories to the agricultural sector. It involves planning, organizing, directing, and controlling operations in the production, processing, distribution, and marketing of agricultural products to enhance efficiency, profitability, and sustainability within the broader agribusiness value chain. The scope of agribusiness extends upstream to input providers—such as seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, machinery, and —and downstream to facilities that add value through activities like milling, , , and , followed by , , retailing, and . This accounts for a significant portion of global economic activity; for instance, in the United States, agribusiness-related industries contribute over 5% of GDP and employ around 20 million people as of 2023 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Unlike narrow agricultural production focused on cultivation and livestock rearing, agribusiness prioritizes interconnected business systems that respond to consumer demand, , and global trade dynamics. In practice, agribusiness operates as a market-driven , where farm-level activities represent only a fraction—often less than 20%—of total , with the majority accruing in off-farm processing and stages. This structure has driven productivity gains through specialization; for example, and input innovations have increased global crop yields by over 150% since 1960, per records, though it also introduces dependencies on corporate suppliers and volatile commodity markets.

Distinction from Traditional Farming

Agribusiness represents a and industrialization of agricultural activities, extending beyond mere or production to encompass integrated economic systems focused on , scale, and , whereas traditional farming primarily entails small-scale, family-operated production oriented toward self-sufficiency or local consumption. Traditional farming, often synonymous with , relies on manual labor, limited mechanization, and natural inputs like family labor and basic tools, with outputs directed mainly at household needs or nearby markets, resulting in lower productivity and vulnerability to weather variability. In contrast, agribusiness employs advanced technologies such as , genetically modified seeds, and automated machinery to achieve , enabling larger operations that dominate global food supply chains. A core distinction lies in and coordination: traditional farming operates in isolation, with farmers handling production independently and selling raw commodities directly, often facing price volatility and limited . Agribusiness, however, integrates upstream inputs (e.g., seeds, fertilizers from specialized firms) with , , and distribution, forming complex networks that reduce costs through specialization and bulk handling; for instance, large agribusiness firms control up to 80% of certain commodity markets via contracts with producers. This integration boosts profitability, as evidenced by studies showing commercial agribusiness households in rural areas achieving 20-50% higher incomes compared to subsistence farmers due to and diversification into non-farm enterprises. Economically, traditional farming prioritizes resilience over expansion, with smallholders (farms under 5 hectares, comprising 80% of global farms as of 2020) focusing on diversified crops for rather than optimized for export. Agribusiness, driven by corporate ownership and investor capital, pursues high-yield and genetic enhancements, yielding data indicating 2-3 times higher per-acre output in industrialized systems, though this often correlates with greater input dependency and environmental externalities like soil depletion. Empirical analyses confirm that shifting from subsistence to agribusiness models reduces rates by facilitating access to , , and global markets, as seen in sub-Saharan African cases where increased welfare by 15-30%. However, traditional methods persist in regions with high land fragmentation, underscoring agribusiness's reliance on consolidated land holdings for viability.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Conceptualization

The term agribusiness emerged in the mid-1950s as a framework to describe the integration of agricultural production with upstream and downstream commercial activities, coined by professors John H. Davis and Ray A. Goldberg. Davis, a former Assistant Secretary of Agriculture under President , first employed the term around 1955 to encapsulate the "sum total" of operations spanning farm input manufacturing (such as seeds, fertilizers, and machinery), on-farm production, processing, and distribution of agricultural products to consumers. This definition highlighted the interdependence between farmers and non-farm businesses, driven by post-World War II technological advances like hybrid seeds, chemical pesticides, and mechanized equipment, which blurred traditional boundaries between farming and industry. Goldberg and Davis formalized the concept in their 1957 book A Concept of Agribusiness, which drew on input-output economic analysis pioneered by Wassily Leontief to model agriculture as a vertically integrated system rather than isolated farm operations. They argued that this holistic approach was essential for efficiency, estimating that by the 1950s, only about 20-25% of food costs reached the farm gate, with the remainder captured by input suppliers, processors, and distributors—figures underscoring the growing dominance of off-farm economic flows in U.S. agriculture. The conceptualization responded to empirical trends, including the U.S. farm sector's consolidation from over 6 million farms in 1940 to about 4.6 million by 1954, amid rising productivity that doubled output per farm worker through capital-intensive methods. Early adoption of the agribusiness paradigm at Harvard influenced and policy, with Goldberg establishing an agribusiness in the late that trained over 200 executives annually from food, farming, and related industries by the 2000s. This framework emphasized applying and to , challenging views of farming as a standalone, labor-intensive pursuit and instead positioning it within broader capitalist structures. Critics, however, noted that the model prioritized scale and corporate , potentially marginalizing smallholder farmers, though Davis and Goldberg's work itself focused on factual interdependencies without prescriptive bias toward any farm size. By the early 1960s, the concept had gained traction in , informing analyses of supply chains in commodities like corn and soybeans, where input costs (e.g., fertilizers comprising up to 20% of production expenses) directly linked farm viability to industrial suppliers.

Post-World War II Expansion and Industrialization

The period immediately following marked a pivotal shift in toward industrialization, characterized by widespread adoption of mechanized equipment and synthetic inputs in developed nations, particularly the . numbers on U.S. farms, which stood at 1.545 million in , expanded further amid postwar economic recovery, enabling larger-scale operations and reducing reliance on animal power. By the late 1940s, advancements in combines, cultivators, and other machinery improved efficiency, with postwar innovations emphasizing operator comfort, safety features like enclosed cabs, and higher horsepower engines to handle expanded acreage. U.S. investment in agricultural , which accounted for nearly 40 percent of total federal R&D expenditures by at $29.1 million annually, persisted and facilitated these technological integrations, driving productivity gains such as a nearly 20 percent increase in corn yields through intertilled cropping shifts and mechanized . This mechanization profoundly altered labor dynamics, as farm employment plummeted from over 30.5 million people (23 percent of the U.S. population) before U.S. entry into the war to far lower levels by the , reflecting a transition from labor-intensive traditional farming to capital-intensive systems. Synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides—scaled from wartime chemical production processes like the Haber-Bosch method for —became integral, boosting yields on fewer but larger farms; for instance, intertilled crops like soybeans and corn saw enhanced output due to these inputs combined with machinery. In and other industrialized regions, similar patterns emerged, supported by aid that modernized agricultural and promoted hybrid seeds and , laying the foundation for agribusiness supply chains dominated by input providers. Globally, these developments coalesced into the , whose technological precursors originated in the early 1940s but accelerated post-1945 through international efforts. The Foundation's collaboration with Mexico's government, starting in 1943, developed semi-dwarf varieties resistant to , which refined in the 1950s, yielding threefold increases in production by the 1960s when disseminated to and beyond. Irrigation expansion, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides enabled self-sufficiency in staple grains; India's adoption in the mid-1960s, for example, averted by doubling output from 12 million tons in 1965 to 20 million by 1970. Agribusiness firms, including chemical giants repurposing wartime technologies, proliferated as suppliers of these inputs, with U.S. firms like those in the emerging seed and sectors capturing growing market shares amid farmer consolidation. This era's emphasis on high-input monocultures foreshadowed corporate , though full dominance awaited later decades, as evidenced by declining farmers' share of the food dollar from wartime highs toward 40 percent pre-Depression levels. U.S. policy responses to resultant surpluses, such as price supports and export programs under the Agricultural Act of 1949, further entrenched industrialized models by subsidizing production expansions, with cropland reaching 354 million acres by 1944 and sustaining high outputs postwar. While yields surged—U.S. overall output doubled between 1948 and 1973—these gains relied on fossil fuel-derived inputs, amplifying agribusiness's role in energy-intensive farming paradigms. Empirical data from this phase underscore causal links between , chemical adoption, and , though they also initiated dependencies on proprietary technologies from agribusiness entities.

Globalization and Corporate Dominance from the 1980s

The 1980s initiated a phase of intensified globalization in agribusiness, driven by neoliberal policies of deregulation and trade liberalization that reduced barriers to international expansion for large corporations. These shifts, including preparations for global trade integration, enabled structural transformations in agricultural markets, favoring entities with scale advantages in processing, trading, and inputs. The of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), spanning 1986 to 1994, played a central role by negotiating reductions in agricultural export subsidies and domestic supports, establishing a framework for market-oriented trade that disproportionately benefited multinational agribusiness firms capable of leveraging global supply chains. This agreement, culminating in the World Trade Organization's formation in 1995, facilitated increased cross-border flows of commodities and inputs, with U.S. agricultural exports peaking in volume during the early before stabilizing amid heightened competition. Corporate consolidation accelerated concurrently, particularly in livestock slaughter and meatpacking, where industry concentration rose sharply from the 1980s into the 1990s due to mergers and vertical integration strategies. Grain trading exemplified this dominance, as four firms—Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge, Cargill, and Louis Dreyfus—controlled around 75% of the world market by the early 2000s, expanding from 1980s foundations through acquisitions and trade liberalization. Companies like Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland grew revenues significantly; for instance, Cargill's international operations expanded amid rising global demand, while ADM benefited from ethanol and commodity booms tied to deregulated markets. This era also saw penetration into developing countries' agrifood systems, with transnational corporations increasing control over value chains, from seeds to retail, often displacing local producers through superior and . In the U.S., farm-level consolidation complemented corporate power, with the number of farms declining from approximately 2.4 million in 1982 to 2.1 million by 1992, as smaller operations ceded to industrialized models reliant on agribusiness inputs. Such dynamics enhanced efficiency in global but entrenched dependency on a handful of firms for , , and distribution.

Components of the Agribusiness System

Input Sector

The input sector of agribusiness, often termed the upstream segment, supplies farmers with critical production factors including , fertilizers, agrochemicals, machinery, and ancillary services such as financing and systems. These inputs enhance by addressing biological, chemical, and mechanical needs of and operations. In 2022, the global agricultural inputs market, encompassing , fertilizers, and crop protection products, exceeded $500 billion, reflecting its foundational role in scaling food output to meet demands. Seeds represent a core input, with hybrid and genetically engineered varieties dominating modern due to superior yield potential and resilience. Major suppliers like (following its 2018 acquisition of ), Agriscience (spun off from DowDuPont in 2019), and (acquired by in 2017) control over 50% of the proprietary seed market worldwide. The global commercial seed market reached $62.7 billion in 2023, driven by demand for traits like herbicide tolerance and insect resistance, which have empirically boosted average corn yields by 20-30 bushels per acre in adopting regions since commercialization in the 1990s. Fertilizers supply essential nutrients like , , and , with consumption totaling 193.4 million metric tons globally in 2022, up from 85.7 million tons in 1961, correlating directly with expanded . Leading producers include Ltd., , and , which together account for significant shares of nitrogen-based products; however, vulnerabilities were exposed by the 2022 Ukraine conflict, causing price spikes of over 100% for . Precision fertilizer application technologies, such as variable-rate spreading, have reduced usage by 10-15% per in optimized systems without yield loss. Agrochemicals, including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides, protect against biotic stresses, with the crop protection chemicals market valued at $59.8 billion in 2023. Companies such as , , and lead innovation in low-dose formulations, though regulatory scrutiny has intensified over residues; reduces chemical reliance by 20-50% in field trials. Farm machinery and equipment, supplied by firms like Deere & Company, , and , automate labor-intensive tasks, with the global market hitting $153 billion in 2023 amid adoption of GPS-guided tractors and drones. has cut harvest times by factors of 10-20 compared to manual methods in mechanized versus traditional farms.
SubsectorKey Inputs Provided2023 Global Market Value (USD Billion)Leading Firms Example
SeedsHybrid/GM varieties, planting stock62.7,
FertilizersNPK compounds, organic amendments228 (2022, projected similar), Yara
AgrochemicalsPesticides, herbicides59.8,
MachineryTractors, harvesters, precision tools153Deere, CNH

Production Sector


The production sector in agribusiness comprises the on-farm activities of cultivating crops, raising livestock, and aquaculture operations, integrated with industrialized inputs, technologies, and management practices to maximize output efficiency. This sector emphasizes large-scale, specialized operations that leverage mechanization, biotechnology, and data-driven decision-making, distinguishing it from subsistence farming by focusing on commercial viability and supply chain coordination. Global agricultural output has expanded nearly fourfold since the 1960s, outpacing population growth by 53 percent per capita, driven by yield-enhancing practices in this sector. Crop production within agribusiness relies on hybrid seeds, synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and systems, which have propelled staple crop yields—such as and —to historic highs. In 2022, worldwide primary crop production reached 9.6 billion tonnes, a 56 percent rise from 2000 levels, with the accounting for 50 percent of and 51 percent of output. technologies, including GPS-guided machinery and sensor-based variable-rate applications, enable 15-20 percent yield increases while optimizing resource use, as evidenced by field trials and adoption data. These advancements stem from causal factors like genetic improvements and mechanized planting, countering natural yield limits through empirical selection and . Livestock production in agribusiness features consolidated, specialized facilities that enhance feed conversion efficiency and scale, with operations shifting to fewer, larger farms since the mid-20th century. This sector contributes 40 percent of global agricultural value added, supporting output through genetic selection, formulated feeds, and confined rearing systems that boost productivity metrics like milk yield per cow or meat per animal. Technological integrations, such as automated feeding and health monitoring, further improve efficiency, with U.S. data showing structural changes enabling cost reductions via economies of size. In 2024/25 projections, major producers like Brazil expanded corn output to 130 million metric tons, underscoring feed crop linkages vital for livestock scaling. Key technologies permeating the production sector include drones for aerial scouting, AI-optimized , and robotic harvesters, which automate labor-intensive tasks and mitigate variability in field conditions. Adoption of these tools correlates with reduced input waste and higher throughput, as precision methods apply fertilizers and water only where needed, grounded in rather than uniform assumptions. Overall, the sector's empirical successes in output expansion reflect integrated causal chains from input quality to , though outcomes vary by regional and policy.

Processing and Value-Addition Sector

The processing and value-addition sector in agribusiness transforms raw agricultural commodities into semi-finished or finished products, thereby increasing their economic value through physical, chemical, or biological alterations. Key activities include milling grains into flour or feed, extracting oils from seeds, pasteurizing dairy products, slaughtering and packaging livestock, canning or freezing fruits and vegetables, and producing derivatives like sugars from sugarcane or starches from corn. These processes not only extend shelf life and improve palatability but also enable diversification into higher-margin goods, such as ready-to-eat meals or industrial ingredients. Value addition further involves segregation by quality attributes, such as sorting produce by size or ripeness for targeted markets, and enhancements like fortification or branding to command premium prices. For example, converting raw soybeans into and meal separates components for distinct uses in food and , multiplying the commodity's utility and revenue potential. This sector bridges and consumer demand by mitigating perishability and adapting products to logistical and regulatory requirements, such as standards enforced by agencies like the FDA. Economically, the sector amplifies agriculture's footprint; in the United States, and related industries contributed to 5.5% of GDP and supported 10.4% of total employment in 2025, with broader agribusiness adding $1.53 trillion to the economy and sustaining over 34 million jobs as of 2023. Globally, the processed food market reached $9.37 trillion in revenue in 2025, underscoring its role in expansion. Specialized subsectors, like grain processing, generated $401.7 billion in economic impact and 1.16 million jobs in the U.S. alone. Dominant firms such as Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland, and Tyson Foods exemplify scale-driven operations, handling vast volumes of commodities through integrated facilities for efficiency and cost control. Cargill, for instance, processes grains, oilseeds, and meats across global networks, while Tyson focuses on protein value chains from farm to packaged products. These corporations invest in automation and supply chain traceability to meet rising demands for consistency and sustainability certifications.

Distribution and Marketing Sector

The distribution and marketing sector of agribusiness handles the movement of processed agricultural products from production facilities to consumers, incorporating logistics, wholesaling, retailing, and promotional efforts to ensure efficient supply chain flow. This sector assembles goods, manages storage and transportation, and facilitates sales through intermediaries like wholesalers and retailers, addressing challenges such as product perishability and seasonal variability. Wholesalers play a critical role by purchasing in bulk from processors, providing storage, and distributing to retailers, thereby reducing transaction costs for producers and enabling economies of scale in handling commodities like grains, fruits, and livestock. Retailers in this sector, including , local markets, and outlets, finalize the chain by offering products in consumer-ready forms, influencing demand through pricing, packaging, and availability. In the , retail and wholesale operations ensure access to safe, high-quality while managing efficiencies to keep prices affordable. Globally, employ about 1.23 billion people, with distribution and components integral to linking smallholder producers to national and international markets. The sector's market for services was valued at USD 0.81 billion in 2023, reflecting growing investments in amid rising global trade volumes. Marketing activities within agribusiness emphasize promotion, branding, and market intelligence to align supply with consumer preferences, including strategies like transparent labeling and regional branding to build trust and premium pricing. Innovations such as digital platforms and e-commerce have expanded direct marketing channels, reducing intermediary layers and enabling data-driven targeting for producers. Cold chain technologies and blockchain for traceability further enhance distribution by minimizing losses, which can exceed 30% for perishables in developing regions without proper infrastructure. The OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook projects steady growth in commodity trade through 2033, underscoring the sector's role in global food security via optimized distribution networks.

Support and Infrastructure Sector

The support and infrastructure sector in agribusiness provides essential enabling services and physical assets that underpin the efficiency, scalability, and resilience of production, processing, and distribution activities. This sector includes transportation networks, storage facilities, (R&D), extension services, financial mechanisms, and , which collectively address logistical bottlenecks, knowledge gaps, and risk exposures inherent in agricultural operations. By facilitating access to markets, , and capital, these elements reduce transaction costs and post-harvest losses, contributing to overall . Physical infrastructure forms the backbone of this sector, with transportation and storage being paramount. In the United States, agricultural commodities account for about 30% of total ton-miles moved across highways, railways, waterways, and pipelines, underscoring the sector's reliance on multimodal . Trucks transport the largest volume of farm-to-market goods, while inland waterways and ports handle bulk exports efficiently. Globally, the agriculture market reached an estimated USD 267.89 billion in 2025, driven by demand for cold chains and efficient supply chains to minimize spoilage. Storage infrastructure further mitigates post-harvest losses, which affect up to 20-30% of grains in developing regions without modern facilities; hermetic or scientific storage can reduce these to 1-2%, preserving supply without expanding . Research, development, and extension services drive technological advancement and . Public agricultural R&D expenditures totaled USD 47 billion globally in 2016, with leading at levels twice those of the , focusing on crop , precision farming, and climate adaptation. Extension programs bridge the gap by training farmers on best practices, boosting technology adoption, yields, and marketable crop cultivation; randomized trials in showed strengthened extension increased land under cultivation and economic participation among participants. Financial and services manage capital access and risks, enabling investment in inputs and . Agricultural empowers smallholders by funding equipment and expansion, supporting development for feeding growing populations. In the U.S., portfolios exceed $22 billion in mortgages, buffering against weather variability and stabilizing lending during climate events like droughts. These mechanisms, often backed by public guarantees, lower default rates but can introduce if premiums do not fully reflect risks.

Economic Impacts and Achievements

Contributions to GDP, Employment, and Productivity

Agribusiness, through its integrated value chains from to distribution, has substantially bolstered economic output worldwide. In the United States, the , , and related industries—core components of agribusiness—contributed $1.537 to in 2023, equivalent to 5.5% of total GDP. Globally, the agricultural sector, a foundational element of agribusiness, generated $4.0 in in 2023, accounting for roughly 4% of world GDP, with agribusiness extensions in and amplifying this figure through downstream multipliers. These contributions reflect efficiencies in large-scale operations and integration, which have sustained growth even amid fluctuating commodity prices. On employment, agribusiness sustains vast labor forces, particularly in developing economies where it anchors rural livelihoods. Worldwide, the agricultural sector employed 916 million in 2023, comprising 26.1% of total global (including and ). In the U.S., agribusiness-related industries supported 10.4% of , or approximately 22 million jobs, spanning production, food manufacturing, and wholesale trade. This breadth exceeds direct farming roles, incorporating jobs in input supply (e.g., , fertilizers) and value-added processing, which often provide higher wages and stability compared to . Productivity enhancements from agribusiness practices have been pivotal, enabling output growth without proportional resource expansion. World Bank analyses highlight that targeted investments in agribusiness have improved by fostering technology adoption, such as precision farming and hybrid seeds, contributing to annual global value-added growth of 2.6% in 2023. In the U.S., these dynamics have driven sustained increases in farming, underpinning the sector's outsized economic role relative to its direct GDP share of under 1%. Such gains stem from , , and optimizations, which have tripled global cereal yields since the 1960s while stabilizing cropland use, per FAO and USDA assessments.

Enhancements in Global Food Security and Poverty Reduction

Agribusiness advancements, including the development and dissemination of high-yielding crop varieties, synthetic fertilizers, and mechanized farming equipment, have significantly boosted global agricultural productivity since the mid-20th century. These innovations enabled crop yields to rise substantially; for instance, average cereal yields worldwide more than tripled from approximately 1.2 tons per hectare in 1961 to over 4 tons per hectare by 2020, driven by hybrid seeds and input-intensive practices central to agribusiness models. This productivity surge allowed global food production to exceed population growth, with per capita food availability reaching over 2,800 calories per day by the early 2000s, sufficient to meet basic nutritional needs on aggregate. The resulting increase in food supply has contributed to marked improvements in global metrics. Prevalence of undernourishment in developing countries fell from around one-third of the population in 1970 to 12 percent by 2015, reflecting greater access to affordable staples amid expanded output from industrialized agricultural systems. Adoption of high-yielding varieties, often supplied through agribusiness channels, directly enhanced household ; studies show farms using such varieties achieved 35 percent higher yields and reduced calorie shortfalls, thereby stabilizing in vulnerable regions. While recent disruptions like conflicts and events have reversed some gains, historical trends underscore agribusiness's role in averting widespread famines through scalable production technologies. In parallel, agribusiness has facilitated , particularly in low-income countries where accounts for up to 70 percent of and the majority of rural livelihoods. Growth in the agricultural sector proves especially potent for poverty alleviation, with empirical analyses indicating that a one percent increase in agricultural GDP growth reduces headcount by 1.6 to 2.6 percentage points in such contexts—roughly twice the impact of non-agricultural growth due to the sector's high participation rate among the poor. Agribusiness models, by linking smallholder farmers to global value chains via improved inputs and , have raised incomes; for example, inclusive arrangements in and have increased smallholder revenues by integrating them into commercial networks for cash crops like soybeans and . These dynamics have lifted hundreds of millions from since the 1990s, as higher lowered and generated off-farm jobs in and distribution.

Environmental Considerations

Resource Efficiency Gains and Technological Mitigations

technologies, including GPS-guided tractors, variable-rate applicators, and , enable targeted delivery of inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, and , reducing overuse and . These systems have achieved resource efficiency gains of up to 20% in input management on farms adopting them. For instance, variable-rate technologies, used on 32% to 45% of larger U.S. farms, optimize application based on soil variability, minimizing environmental runoff and enhancing by 20-30% while improving overall use by 15%. Genetically modified (GM) crops have contributed to resource efficiency by increasing yields and decreasing input requirements. Global adoption of GM varieties has raised average crop yields by approximately 22% and reduced pesticide active ingredient usage by 37%, thereby lowering environmental impacts from chemical applications. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm these outcomes at the farm level, with GM crops enabling higher production on existing land, which mitigates pressure on natural habitats and supports efficient resource allocation. Advanced irrigation methods, particularly drip systems, have significantly conserved in agribusiness operations. Studies indicate can reduce water use by 37%, saving an average of 2.2 acre-feet per acre in certain field trials, while improving water use efficiency by up to 30% when combined with mulching. These technologies deliver directly to plant roots, minimizing and leaching losses, which is critical in water-scarce regions where accounts for over 50% of irrigated land value in the U.S. Conservation practices like no-till farming, integrated into agribusiness models, enhance resource efficiency by reducing fuel consumption and preserving soil structure. Continuous no-till operations save over $17 per acre annually in fuel costs compared to conventional tillage, while decreasing machinery use and promoting carbon sequestration through undisturbed soil. No-till also improves water infiltration and reduces erosion, leading to long-term yield stability and lower energy demands in production. These mitigations collectively lower greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel use and input applications, with digital tools further reducing impacts like eutrophication by 29% and eco-toxicity by up to 138% in modeled scenarios.

Criticisms of Resource Depletion and Emissions

Agribusiness practices, characterized by large-scale cropping and concentrated operations, have drawn criticism for their substantial contribution to global . In 2023, agricultural activities accounted for approximately 11% of anthropogenic GHG emissions worldwide, with from ruminants producing (about 32% of ag-related emissions) and nitrous oxide from synthetic application contributing another 38%. Critics argue that the input-intensive nature of industrial farming—relying on fossil fuel-derived machinery, fertilizers, and feedstocks—exacerbates these emissions compared to diversified systems, as evidenced by lifecycle analyses showing higher per-unit outputs in conventional row-crop systems. In the United States, direct emissions from agriculture reached 9.4% of national totals in 2022, driven by manure management and soil disturbances in expansive operations. Detractors, including peer-reviewed assessments, contend that agribusiness consolidation amplifies emissions through inefficient scale, such as vast feedlots where methane capture is limited, contrasting with smaller, pasture-based alternatives that emit less per animal unit despite lower productivity. Resource depletion critiques focus on water overuse, with agriculture withdrawing 70% of global freshwater supplies, often unsustainably in irrigated monocultures like those for corn and soybeans. Over 40% of global crop production depends on extraction exceeding recharge rates, leading to declines such as the Ogallala in the U.S., where levels have dropped 30% since intensive began post-1950. Soil erosion represents another focal point, with water and wind removing topsoil at rates 10-100 times faster than natural replenishment in tilled industrial fields, reducing global and yields by 8.9 million and 5.6 million tonnes annually, respectively, valued at $3.3 billion. dominance and heavy machinery compact , diminishing by up to 50% over decades, while chemical inputs disrupt microbial communities essential for nutrient cycling, as documented in long-term field studies. These practices, critics assert, create a "soil " dynamic unsustainable for long-term productivity, with available shrinking 22% globally over two decades due to degradation.

Social and Policy Dimensions

Labor Dynamics and Rural Economies

Agribusiness operations, characterized by large-scale production and integration across supply chains, have driven a decline in traditional farm labor demand through and efficiency gains, while generating jobs in ancillary sectors like and . In the United States, overall for agricultural workers is projected to decrease by 3 percent from 2024 to 2034, with about 116,200 annual openings arising mainly from replacements rather than net growth. Globally, encompass substantial , particularly in developing regions where constitutes 30-60 percent of total labor force participation, though off-farm activities within these systems account for rising shares as economies mature. This shift reflects causal links from technological adoption to labor reallocation, reducing manual fieldwork needs but demanding skilled inputs for machinery operation and maintenance. Mechanization in agribusiness intensifies labor displacement for unskilled workers, often prompting migration to urban or non-farm roles, yet it enhances that can indirectly support rural income diversification. Empirical evidence from shows subsidized programs increasing rural households' migrant labor days by 15 percent annually, facilitating off-farm earnings. In , widespread has curtailed farm labor requirements, accelerating youth exodus to industrial sectors and contributing to aging rural workforces. However, such transitions risk marginalizing low-skill laborers without viable alternatives, as obsoletes certain roles and concentrates employment in capital-intensive operations, per FAO assessments of automation's uneven impacts. Across the , approximately 2.5 million workers exited over the past decade, underscoring broader structural declines amid rising input costs and policy shifts. In rural economies, agribusiness fosters alleviation via amplified growth effects, with reducing at rates two to three times higher than equivalent non-agricultural gains, driven by direct boosts for smallholders and multiplier linkages to local services. From 2000 to 2021, U.S. employment fell by over 500,000 jobs, correlating with rural-urban output gaps but offset partially by agrifood value-chain expansions. Wage conditions remain challenging, with U.S. farmworkers earning a $35,980 annually in 2024—below broader low-wage benchmarks—and relying on programs like H-2A, where wage rates influence but minimally elevate non-visa worker pay (e.g., a 10 percent AEWR hike yields at most 2.8 percent non-H-2A rise). In developing contexts, persistent high agricultural masks and , with aiding dietary diversity but heightening exposure to market shocks without supportive . These dynamics highlight agribusiness's role in economic transformation, contingent on policies enabling labor mobility and upgrading to mitigate displacement risks.

Role of Government Policies, Subsidies, and Regulations

Government subsidies play a significant role in agribusiness, particularly in developed economies, where they support production and stabilize incomes but often disproportionately benefit large-scale operations. In the United States, federal subsidies for crops totaled $9.3 billion in 2024, comprising 5.9% of total earnings, with the top 10% of recipients—typically large agribusiness entities—capturing 74% of payments in 2023. Similarly, the European Union's (CAP) directs approximately 80% of its subsidies to the largest 20% of s, fostering consolidation and market distortions that favor industrial-scale agribusiness over smaller producers. These payments, often decoupled from production levels since reforms like the EU's 2003 CAP changes, encourage investment in capital-intensive operations but can exacerbate environmental pressures by incentivizing expanded acreage and input use, such as fertilizers linked to higher carbon emissions. Regulations governing agribusiness focus on , , and technological approvals, with agencies like the U.S. (FDA), Agency (EPA), and Department of Agriculture (USDA) overseeing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), , and plant-incorporated protectants. In the U.S., GMO crops undergo coordinated review under these bodies, with FDA assessing substantial equivalence to non-GMO counterparts for human health safety, while EPA evaluates pesticidal traits; independent studies affirm no differential health risks from GMO versus conventional feeds. However, critics argue that such frameworks underemphasize long-term ecological effects, including potential from herbicide-tolerant crops, though empirical data show GMOs have reduced overall pesticide applications in adopting regions. regulations, enforced via residue tolerances, aim to mitigate health risks but impose compliance costs that smaller operators struggle to meet, further entrenching large agribusiness dominance. Trade policies and tariffs, as extensions of intervention, influence agribusiness by altering global supply chains and competitiveness. U.S. agricultural exports faced disruptions from retaliatory tariffs during the 2018-2020 tensions with , where duties rose 10-15 percentage points on key commodities like soybeans, reducing U.S. and prompting $28 billion in aid to offset losses. Proposed reciprocal tariffs could contract global agricultural by 3.3-4.7% and diminish GDP, with U.S. agriculture bearing heightened vulnerability due to reliance on exports for 20-25% of output value. These measures, intended to protect domestic producers, often amplify price volatility and input costs—such as tariffs elevating effective rates on agricultural imports from 1% to 12%—while CAP subsidies have been criticized for dumping surplus production in developing markets, undermining local agribusiness viability. Overall, such policies sustain agribusiness scale but distort incentives, prioritizing short-term stability over efficient and long-term .

Major Controversies

Corporate Consolidation and Market Power

Corporate consolidation in agribusiness has intensified over the past several decades, driven by mergers and acquisitions that have reduced the number of dominant players across key sectors such as seeds, agrochemicals, and meat processing. In the global seed market, four firms—Bayer, Corteva Agriscience, Syngenta (owned by ChemChina), and BASF—collectively hold approximately 51% of the market share as of recent estimates. These companies also control 62% of the global agrichemical market, exerting significant influence over farmers' input costs and crop varieties. In the United States, this concentration is even more pronounced for major row crops: Bayer and Corteva alone account for the majority of retail market share in corn, soybeans, and cotton seeds, while the four firms together control 95% of intellectual property rights for corn traits and 84% for soybeans. Such dominance stems from a series of mergers, including Bayer's 2018 acquisition of Monsanto, which reduced the "Big Six" seed companies of the early 2000s to the current "Big Four." In animal protein processing, particularly in the U.S., four firms—Tyson Foods, JBS, Cargill, and National Beef—control about 85% of slaughter and processing capacity, with similar levels of dominance in (around 70%) and (over 50%). This consolidation accelerated through mergers in the and , such as Cargill's expansions and JBS's acquisitions, enabling these packers to handle the majority of purchases from farmers. Globally, the trend extends to other areas like fertilizers and farm machinery, where top firms in each sector exhibit high four-firm concentration ratios (CR4), often exceeding 50%, as documented in analyses of critical agricultural inputs. While proponents argue that such scale enables efficiencies in research, distribution, and risk management, empirical data from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports indicate that merger activity has outpaced antitrust enforcement, leading to markets where Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) values frequently surpass 1,800, signaling high concentration under federal guidelines. The resulting has tangible effects on farmers, who face reduced bargaining leverage and increased dependency. In concentrated input markets, farmers pay higher prices for seeds and chemicals tied to proprietary technologies, with limited alternatives due to protections and ; for instance, seed companies often bundle traits with required agrochemicals, locking producers into annual repurchase cycles. In sectors, packers' dominance allows them to depress prices paid to farmers—evident during the 2020-2022 period when cattle prices fell amid disruptions, while packers reported record profits exceeding $20 billion collectively—while coordinating to maintain thin margins for producers. This dynamic contributes to consolidation itself, as smaller operations struggle with squeezed incomes and exit the industry, with U.S. farm numbers declining to 1.88 million by 2024 from over 2 million in 2017. Consumers, meanwhile, experience elevated retail prices uncorrelated with farmgate costs, as seen in price surges of 20-30% during the same period despite stable or declining input costs for producers. Critics, including farmer advocacy groups, contend that this concentration stifles by reducing competitive incentives for R&D beyond proprietary lock-ins, though industry data shows increased investment in traits; however, USDA analyses suggest that without robust enforcement, such power enables practices like captive supply arrangements, where packers control livestock forward through contracts, further eroding transparency. Regulatory responses have been limited, with the U.S. Department of challenging few agribusiness mergers post-2000, despite calls for scrutiny under Section 7 of the Clayton Act. In developing economies, similar patterns emerge via multinational dominance, exacerbating local vulnerabilities to global volatility. Overall, while consolidation has facilitated global scale in production, its unchecked progression raises causal risks of market failures, including price distortions and reduced resilience, as evidenced by sector-specific HHI thresholds and historical merger outcomes.

Health, Safety, and Ethical Debates

Agribusiness practices, particularly in large-scale production, involve extensive use, with residues detected in potentially linked to chronic health effects such as endocrine disruption and cancer, though regulatory limits by agencies like the EPA aim to keep exposures below levels causing acute harm. In operations, routine administration to promote growth in confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) has contributed to , with the WHO estimating that such overuse enables pathogenic to humans, recommending cessation in healthy animals since 2017. outbreaks, including those from pathogens like in produce and meat, are amplified in industrial-scale systems due to centralized processing and manure runoff contaminating fields, as seen in multistate U.S. incidents tracked by the FDA. Debates on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) central to agribusiness highlight a among bodies like the National Academies of Sciences that approved GM crops pose no greater health risks than conventional varieties after extensive review, though critics argue insufficient long-term data and cite isolated studies suggesting allergenicity or concerns, often contested in peer-reviewed literature. Worker safety in agribusiness remains precarious, with U.S. recording a fatality rate of 19.5 per 100,000 full-time workers as of recent data, exceeding other industries, primarily from transportation incidents like tractor rollovers and machinery entanglements, alongside non-fatal injuries such as falls affecting over 21,000 cases annually from 2021-2022. The CDC notes that chemical exposures and heat stress further elevate risks for field laborers, many operating without adequate protective equipment. Ethical concerns center on in industrial farming, where confinement systems for , , and often involve , routine mutilations without , and barren environments, compromising natural behaviors and causing , as documented in veterinary assessments. Labor ethics in agribusiness supply chains, particularly involving migrant workers who comprise a significant portion of the U.S. , include reports of , substandard , and exposure to hazardous conditions without full legal protections, with over half uninsured and reliant on temporary visas that limit mobility. These issues persist despite regulations like the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, with enforcement challenges exacerbating vulnerabilities in global operations.

Environmental and Sustainability Disputes

Agribusiness practices, characterized by large-scale farming, heavy reliance on synthetic inputs, and global supply chains, have sparked disputes over their long-term environmental sustainability. Critics contend that these operations accelerate , resource depletion, and pollution, potentially undermining global ecosystems and . Proponents counter that intensification through agribusiness technologies has spared vast lands from cultivation by boosting yields per , with global cropland per declining since the 1960s despite . Empirical analyses indicate that closing yield gaps in developing regions via industrial methods could reduce pressure on forests more effectively than low-input traditional systems, which often expand to compensate for lower . Deforestation linked to agribusiness expansion, particularly for commodities like soy, , and , remains a focal point of contention. In regions such as the Amazon and , clearing for export-oriented plantations has contributed to the loss of approximately 420 million hectares of forest since 1990, with agribusiness accounting for over 70% of tropical drivers according to advocacy reports. However, studies attribute much of this to policy failures and smallholder expansion rather than corporate agribusiness alone, noting that yield improvements in established farmlands—enabled by hybrid seeds and fertilizers—have stabilized or reduced net cropland expansion globally since 2000. A of 21st-century land-use data shows that while initial degrades by up to 52%, subsequent intensification can restore productivity without further encroachment. Water resource disputes center on agribusiness's high consumption and pollution footprint. Irrigation for industrial-scale crops utilizes about 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, exacerbating aquifer depletion in areas like California's Central Valley and India's Punjab, where over-extraction has lowered water tables by meters annually. Runoff from fertilizers and pesticides causes , responsible for 78% of global excess , leading to dead zones in waterways. Counterarguments highlight efficiency gains: and precision application in agribusiness have cut water use per unit of output by 20-30% in advanced systems since the , outperforming traditional flood methods that waste up to 50% of water. Peer-reviewed assessments emphasize that without such technologies, feeding projected populations would demand even greater volumes, underscoring causal trade-offs between scale and per-hectare conservation. Soil degradation disputes arise from , chemical overuse, and in agribusiness, which erode at rates exceeding natural replenishment—global estimates project $23 trillion in losses by 2050 from degraded affecting 34% of cropland. fertilizers, while boosting yields, contribute to acidification and compaction, with 13% of soils worldwide impaired. Yet, no-till practices promoted by agribusiness firms have reduced by 50-90% on millions of hectares, and integrated sustains fertility better than unfertilized traditional plots, where nutrient depletion hampers long-term output. Evidence from long-term trials indicates industrial systems, when managed with cover crops and rotations, preserve more effectively than fragmented smallholder farming prone to and fallowing. Greenhouse gas emissions from agribusiness supply chains, including methane from livestock feedlots and nitrous oxide from fertilizers, account for 10-12% of U.S. totals and up to 30% globally when encompassing land-use changes. Agrifood systems emitted 16.2 billion tonnes CO2-equivalent in 2022, with agribusiness-dominated livestock and rice sectors driving half via enteric fermentation and manure. Disputes intensify over mitigation: while critics from environmental groups decry emissions-intensive monocultures, data reveal that agribusiness-led breeding for methane-efficient animals and fertilizer optimization have curbed per-unit emissions by 15-20% since 2000, contrasting with higher footprints in extensive traditional grazing that expands land use. Causal analyses stress that displacing industrial efficiency with low-yield alternatives would amplify total emissions through deforestation and food waste, which already claims 30% of production. Biodiversity loss disputes target agribusiness monocultures and use, which reduce on-farm diversity and contribute to declines, with neonicotinoids implicated in 20-40% of colony losses in intensive regions. However, landscape-scale studies show that high-yield agribusiness confines farming to smaller areas, preserving more natural habitats overall—global biodiversity hotspots have stabilized where intensification occurred, unlike expanding low-productivity frontiers. Advocacy claims often overlook that traditional still employs broad-spectrum s and faces similar pest pressures, while biotech traits from agribusiness have lowered overall use by 37% since 1996 through targeted GM crops.

Technological Advancements

Precision Agriculture, AI, and Mechanization

Precision agriculture involves the use of technologies such as GPS guidance, variable-rate applicators, and soil sensors to manage field variability and optimize inputs like seeds, s, and water on a site-specific basis. This approach enables farmers to apply resources precisely where needed, reducing waste and enhancing productivity. Studies indicate that consistent use of technologies results in a 4% increase in crop production, a 7% reduction in operational costs, and decreases in energy use by 5%, application by 9%, and use by 6%. Adoption rates vary by farm size, with larger operations more likely to implement these systems due to and access to capital. In the United States, precision agriculture tools like GPS and yield monitors are used on over 70% of large farms, contributing to gains in water and . Globally, the integration of (IoT) devices and data analytics in precision farming supports sustainable practices by minimizing environmental impacts such as nutrient runoff. Artificial intelligence enhances precision agriculture through predictive modeling, image analysis from drones and satellites, and automated decision-making for crop health monitoring and pest detection. AI algorithms process vast datasets to forecast yields, optimize , and tailor use, potentially boosting yields by up to 30% in advanced applications. The global AI in agriculture market reached $1.6 billion in 2024, driven by tools that reduce chemical inputs and labor costs while improving . For instance, models enable variable-rate application of inputs, achieving input savings that lower costs and environmental footprints. Mechanization in agribusiness has advanced with autonomous , robotic harvesters, and drones that perform tasks like planting, weeding, and harvesting with minimal intervention. Agricultural markets are projected to grow from $16.62 billion in 2024 to $103.50 billion by 2032, facilitating precision tasks that enhance yield uniformity and reduce labor dependency. These systems integrate AI for and obstacle avoidance, enabling 24-hour operations and improvements in seeding accuracy that support higher emergence rates. Empirical from field trials show and drones optimizing resource use, with reductions in waste and better health monitoring leading to gains in large-scale operations.

Biotechnology, GMOs, and Genetic Innovations

in agribusiness encompasses techniques to modify crop genetics for enhanced traits such as pest resistance, herbicide tolerance, and improved nutritional profiles, primarily through genetically modified organisms (GMOs) introduced commercially in 1996. These modifications have enabled farmers to achieve higher yields and reduce input costs, with global GM crop acreage reaching 209.8 million hectares in 2024, marking a 1.9% increase from the prior year. Leading crops include soybeans at 105.1 million hectares, followed by corn, , and canola, where adoption rates exceed 90% in major producing regions. The accounts for the largest share at 75.4 million hectares, with at 67.9 million. Empirical data indicate that GM crops have boosted by increasing yields, particularly through insect-resistant (IR) traits that raised output by an average of 16.5% from 1996 to 2020. Insect-resistant cotton specifically contributed to the largest reductions in , lowering overall use by 7.2% globally over the same period while decreasing environmental impact from pesticides by 17.3%. Without GM adoption, an additional 3.4% of cropland would have been required to maintain 2019 global output levels, underscoring their role in land-sparing efficiency. These gains stem from targeted genetic insertions that confer resistance to specific pests or herbicides, allowing reduced chemical reliance and more precise farming. Scientific consensus, as articulated by bodies including the and affirmed by over 280 institutions, holds that foods from GM crops pose no greater risk to human health than those from conventional breeding, based on extensive reviews of compositional analyses, studies, and long-term field data. Meta-analyses confirm no unique allergenicity or patterns attributable to the genetic modification process itself, with safety evaluations focusing on the introduced traits rather than the method. While some critiques highlight potential unintended effects from disruption, peer-reviewed evidence shows these risks are comparable to those in non-GM breeding and manageable through rigorous pre-market testing. Advancing beyond traditional GMOs, gene-editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 enable precise alterations to native DNA without inserting foreign genes, facilitating traits such as , disease resistance, and enhanced nutrient efficiency in crops like , , and tomatoes. In 2024, applications expanded to develop climate-resilient varieties, with edited mushrooms and corn approved in the U.S. for traits reducing browning or improving yield under stress. These innovations promise further productivity gains—potentially 20-30% in targeted crops—by accelerating breeding cycles from years to months, minimizing off-target effects through improved Cas variants, and aligning with regulatory frameworks that treat edits akin to natural mutations. In agribusiness, such tools enhance value chains, enabling firms to deliver customized solutions that lower environmental footprints and support scalable food production amid .

Global and Regional Perspectives

Agribusiness in Developing Economies

In developing economies, agribusiness encompasses the commercialization, processing, and distribution of agricultural products, often integrating smallholder farmers into value chains dominated by larger firms. This sector is pivotal for , with contributing an average of 23% to GDP in low-income countries as of 2022, compared to under 1% in high-income nations. remains heavily reliant on , accounting for approximately 65% of the workforce in and , where over 857 million people are primarily engaged in farming activities and another 375 million in related agrifood jobs as estimated in recent FAO analyses. Despite this, productivity lags due to structural constraints, limiting agribusiness expansion and rural income gains. Key challenges include inadequate infrastructure, such as poor road networks and storage facilities, which exacerbate post-harvest losses estimated at 20-40% for perishables in regions like . Limited access to modern technology hinders mechanization and precision farming adoption, with barriers like high costs, lack of technical skills, and insufficient government support impeding Agriculture 4.0 transitions in emerging markets. Financial constraints further compound issues, as smallholders often lack credit for inputs or processing investments, perpetuating low yields—averaging 1-2 tons per for staples like in parts of versus 8-10 tons in developed countries. (FDI) in agribusiness, while injecting capital, has mixed outcomes; it boosts exports in host countries but risks displacing local farmers through land acquisitions, as documented in FAO assessments of large-scale deals since 2008. Opportunities arise from public-private partnerships (PPPs) and value chain integration, as seen in and where "productive alliances" between farmers' organizations and agribusinesses have increased sales by 50% and farmer incomes by 22% on average. In , contract farming models in countries like and have enhanced market access for cash crops, raising smallholder revenues through assured buyers and inputs, though success depends on enforceable contracts and equitable terms. African initiatives, such as the Alliance for a Green Revolution in (AGRA), have promoted seed and fertilizer access, yielding productivity gains in staple crops across nations like and since 2006, albeit with criticisms over dependency on inputs amid variable soil conditions. , including mobile-based advisory services, offer scalable solutions; for instance, digital platforms in have improved yield forecasts and reduced risks for over 1 million farmers by 2023. Overall, agribusiness growth in developing economies hinges on addressing infrastructural deficits and fostering inclusive models that mitigate inequality risks, as evidenced by World Bank projections indicating potential tripling of Africa's agrifood market to $1 trillion by 2030 with targeted investments in and trade policies. Empirical data underscores that causal factors like secure property rights and market liberalization correlate with higher FDI efficacy and , countering narratives overly emphasizing corporate dominance without crediting efficiency gains in supply chains.

International Trade Dynamics and Challenges

International agricultural trade in agribusiness commodities, including grains, oilseeds, meats, and processed foods, reached approximately $1.5 trillion in value for primary agricultural products in recent years, with the exporting $176 billion in 2024 while importing $213 billion, resulting in a record $39 billion trade deficit. Major exporters include the and , which dominate soybeans, corn, and beef shipments, while leading importers encompass , the , and European economies, driven by demand for feed grains and proteins. These dynamics reflect comparative advantages in land, climate, and technology—such as Brazil's tropical soybean yields and U.S. mechanized grain production—but are heavily influenced by policy interventions that alter natural market signals. Trade flows operate under World Trade Organization (WTO) frameworks established in the 1994 , which aimed to reduce distortions from pre-existing high tariffs and export subsidies that had favored developed nations' surplus producers. However, persistent domestic support measures, including price supports and input subsidies, continue to encourage in subsidizing countries, depressing global prices and undermining competitiveness for unsubsidized exporters, particularly in developing economies. For instance, ad valorem equivalents of export-distorting subsidies average 15% in , exceeding those in and exacerbating imbalances by displacing from efficient low-cost producers. Key challenges include and non-tariff barriers that protect domestic markets amid volatile prices. While bound tariffs have declined under WTO bindings, applied rates remain elevated for sensitive products like and , often exceeding 20% in importing nations. Non-tariff measures, particularly sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) standards and technical barriers to trade (TBT), impose compliance costs that disproportionately affect exporters from developing countries; U.S. analyses indicate SPS measures reduce affected agricultural exports by up to 10-15% due to certification, testing, and residue limits that may exceed scientific necessity. These measures, while justified for legitimate health risks under the WTO SPS Agreement, are frequently critiqued for serving protectionist ends, as evidenced by disputes over hormone-treated and GMO approvals. Geopolitical disruptions further complicate trade stability, as demonstrated by the 2022 , which halted exports from a region supplying 25% of global and , 15% of , and 60% of sunflower seeds, triggering price surges of over 20% in by mid-2022 and reallocating $19.4 billion in Ukrainian trade volumes. Supply chain vulnerabilities, including reliance on routes and fertilizer exports from (accounting for 15-20% of global and ), amplified food insecurity in import-dependent regions like and the , with cascading effects persisting into 2025 amid infrastructure damage and sanctions. Ongoing WTO negotiations seek to address these imbalances through caps and improvements, but progress stalls due to entrenched interests, highlighting the tension between national imperatives and global efficiency gains.

Emerging Innovations and Sustainability Shifts

Agribusiness firms are pivoting toward to enhance sequestration, , and long-term productivity, with practices including , cover cropping, and diverse rotations showing yield improvements of up to 20-30% in some implementations compared to conventional methods. Despite these potential gains, adoption lags, as only a minority of U.S. farmers have fully transitioned, constrained by upfront costs and uncertain short-term returns, even as consumer awareness of regenerative principles reaches 68%. Proponents argue these shifts address soil degradation from intensive , but critics note that agribusiness promotion of such practices may overstate without rigorous verification of net environmental benefits. Carbon farming programs, which incentivize farmers to adopt sequestration techniques like optimized use and for verifiable CO2 storage, are expanding through voluntary credit markets. BloombergNEF projects these could yield $13.7 billion in annual carbon credits by 2050, primarily from avoidance and removal activities in row crops and pastures, though geographic variability in profitability persists, with higher returns in regions like the U.S. Midwest. Corporate initiatives, such as those by , link these practices to improved and water retention, potentially boosting yields by 10-15% over time, but independent analyses question the permanence of stored carbon and the risk of greenwashing by input suppliers. AI and digital tools are driving precision sustainability innovations, enabling real-time monitoring of soil carbon levels and emissions via satellite remote sensing and machine learning models. The global AI in agriculture market expanded from $1.7 billion in 2023 to an estimated $4.7 billion by 2028, facilitating data-driven shifts like variable-rate applications that reduce inputs by 15-20% while maintaining outputs. In regions like Brazil, biosolution adoption—biological alternatives to synthetic chemicals—reached 64% among farmers by 2024, supported by policy incentives and yielding measurable reductions in chemical runoff. These technologies prioritize causal mechanisms like microbial enhancement over blanket prescriptions, though efficacy depends on soil-specific baselines rather than universal claims. Water-efficient innovations, including sensor-based irrigation and drought-tolerant hybrids, are accelerating amid projections of 40% global in agriculture by 2030, with agribusiness investments in soilless systems like cutting usage by up to 90% in controlled environments. Blockchain traceability is emerging to verify sustainable claims in supply chains, reducing in carbon and regenerative certifications, as piloted by firms tracking from farm to processor. Overall, these shifts reflect market pressures from regulations and consumer demand, yet empirical data underscores that profitability hinges on verifiable metrics like increases of 1-2% annually, rather than aspirational narratives.

Projected Economic and Productivity Forecasts

The OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook for 2025-2034 projects a 14% increase in global agricultural and fish production over the decade, with growth predominantly attributable to productivity improvements rather than land expansion or input intensification. This expansion is expected to support a 1.4% annual rise in output value, driven by yield gains in crops and efficiency enhancements in livestock and aquaculture sectors, amid constrained resources and rising demand from population growth to 8.9 billion by 2034. Emerging economies in and are forecasted to account for over 70% of the additional production, leveraging mechanization and better crop varieties to offset arable land limitations. Agribusiness market valuations reflect these productivity trends, with the global sector—spanning inputs, farming, , and distribution—valued at USD 3.4 in 2024 and projected to reach USD 4.4 by 2033, implying an average annual growth rate of approximately 2.9%. Gross agricultural production value is anticipated to hit US$4.70 in 2025, expanding at a (CAGR) of 4.01% through 2030, fueled by agritech integrations such as precision farming tools that enhance resource use efficiency. In parallel, the agritech subsector, critical to , is expected to grow from USD 32.83 billion in 2025 to USD 63.82 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 14.22%, through advancements in data analytics and that reduce costs and boost yields. USDA long-term projections to 2034 underscore regional trajectories, forecasting U.S. yields to rise steadily—such as corn at an increase supporting total output growth—while (TFP) advances mitigate pressures from climate variability and trade disruptions. Globally, these forecasts hinge on assumptions of stable trade policies and moderate weather impacts, though vulnerabilities like geopolitical conflicts and could temper gains, with emissions intensity declining via efficiency-focused practices. Overall, sustained TFP growth at 1-1.5% ly is pivotal for agribusiness resilience, enabling without proportional environmental escalation.

References

  1. https://lod.nal.usda.gov/nalt/en/page/5252
  2. https://semo.edu/blog/blog-posts/what-is-agribusiness
  3. https://ecosystemsunited.com/the-origins-and-history-of-agribusiness/
  4. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/chemicals/our%2520insights/pursuing%2520the%2520global%2520opportunity%2520in%2520food%2520and%2520agribusiness/pursuing%2520the%2520global%2520opportunity%2520in%2520food%2520and%2520agribusiness.pdf
  5. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/agricultural-productivity-in-the-united-states/productivity-growth-in-us-agriculture
  6. https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1240832/
  8. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/forests/issues/agribusiness/
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332570862_What_is_agribusiness
  10. https://www.canr.msu.edu/afre/undergraduate/agribusiness_management
  11. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/commercial-lending/agribusiness/
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323115633_Agribusiness_-_a_scope_as_well_as_an_opportunity_for_contemporary_agriculture
  13. https://agriculture.institute/agribusiness-mgt-policies/defining-agriculture-agribusiness-key-differences/
  14. https://learning.sap.com/courses/introducing-the-agribusiness-industry/defining-the-essentials-of-the-agribusiness-industry
  15. https://quizlet.com/727539366/the-scope-of-agribusiness-flash-cards/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000108
  17. https://agristuff.com/farming/agribusiness-definition-examples-challenges/
  18. https://ecosystemsunited.com/differences-between-agriculture-and-agribusiness/
  19. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v136y2021icp567-579.html
  20. https://ag.purdue.edu/commercialag/home/resource/2017/10/drivers-of-consolidation-and-structural-change-in-production-agriculture/
  21. https://academic.oup.com/wber/article/37/4/570/7220142
  22. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agribusiness
  23. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/133762/1/Edited_Hamilton_Review_Essay_CE.pdf
  24. https://livinghistoryfarm.org/farming-in-the-1950s/making-money/agribusiness/
  25. http://eagri.org/eagri50/AECO341/lec01.pdf
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-history-review/article/revisiting-the-history-of-agribusiness/E7A861C980874F8D2B0A9838DDD71462
  27. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.32106006105123
  28. https://www.iagrm.com/content/large/journals/jofm/volume_14/jofm-vol14-no1-pages-87-91.pdf
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265711642_Agribusiness_the_Family_Farm_and_the_Politics_of_Technological_Determinism_in_the_Post-World_War_II_United_States
  30. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/EuropeanRecovery08.pdf?x91208
  31. https://livinghistoryfarm.org/farming-in-the-1940s/machines/postwar-technology/
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1231807
  33. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/7196/research.pdf?sequence=3
  34. https://www.thoughtco.com/farming-post-world-war-ii-1146852
  35. https://www.foodsecurity.ac.uk/challenge/food-security-history/
  36. https://www.britannica.com/event/green-revolution
  37. https://www.treehugger.com/green-revolution-history-technologies-and-impact-5189596
  38. https://soh.omeka.chass.ncsu.edu/exhibits/show/industry-of-agriculture/postwwii-ag
  39. https://www.historians.org/resource/is-world-war-ii-bringing-the-same-result/
  40. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/44197/13566_eib3_1_.pdf
  41. https://foodsystemprimer.org/production/industrialization-of-agriculture
  42. https://www.iatp.org/documents/revisiting-crisis-design-corporate-concentration-agriculture
  43. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact5_e.htm
  44. https://econexus.info/files/Agropoly_Econexus_BerneDeclaration.pdf
  45. https://monthlyreview.org/articles/globalization-of-agribusiness-and-developing-world-food-systems/
  46. https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/88057/EIB-189.pdf
  47. https://oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/100021/student-old/?task=8
  48. https://www.edengreen.com/blog-collection/what-is-agribusiness
  49. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/agribusiness.asp
  50. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/september/global-changes-in-agricultural-production-productivity-and-resource-use-over-six-decades
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2613695/
  52. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/fao-statistical-yearbook-2024-reveals-critical-insights-on-the-sustainability-of-agriculture-food-security-and-the-importance-of-agrifood-in-employment/en
  53. https://agtech.folio3.com/blogs/practices-to-increase-crop-yields/
  54. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-105962
  55. https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields-climate-impact
  56. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/44292/13803_eib43a_1_.pdf
  57. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/moving-towards-sustainability-the-livestock-sector-and-the-world-bank
  58. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/58311/?ln=en
  59. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/PSDOnline/Circulars/2025/05/production.pdf
  60. https://www.nifa.usda.gov/topics/agriculture-technology
  61. https://www.plugandplaytechcenter.com/insights/new-agriculture-technology-modern-farming
  62. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-and-telecom-predictions/2024/agricultural-technology-predictions.html
  63. https://www.agmrc.org/value-added-agriculture/what-is-value-added-agriculture
  64. https://yasmintrading.com/what-is-agro-processing/
  65. https://extension.psu.edu/value-added-agriculture-enhancing-farm-opportunities/
  66. https://tioga.cce.cornell.edu/for-farmers/value-added-processing
  67. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy
  68. https://www.uschamber.com/security/agriculture-regulations/how-agriculture-supports-the-american-economy-and-main-street-businesses
  69. https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/food/worldwide
  70. https://www.ngfa.org/new-study-details/
  71. https://builtin.com/companies/type/agriculture-companies
  72. https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/local-regional/food-sector/aggregating-and-distribution
  73. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-markets-prices/retailing-wholesaling/wholesaling
  74. https://agriculture.institute/marketing-entrepreneurship-development/wholesale-vs-retail-key-differences/
  75. https://www.eurocommerce.eu/retail-and-wholesale-in-the-agri-food-supply-chain/
  76. https://www.fao.org/3/cd2616en/online/state-of-food-and-agriculture-2024/food-supply-chains-transformation.html
  77. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/07/29/2920314/0/en/Global-Agriculture-Supply-Chain-Management-Market-Size-To-Worth-USD-2-14-Billion-By-2033-CAGR-Of-10-20.html
  78. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/strategic-agribusiness-marketing-5-powerful-trends-for-2025
  79. https://farrellymitchell.com/strategy-execution-agribusiness/agribusiness-marketing-strategies/
  80. https://www.fao.org/4/w3240e/W3240E01.htm
  81. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2024-2033_e173f332.html
  82. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agribusiness
  83. https://extension.psu.edu/agriculture-and-infrastructure-whats-the-connection/
  84. https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/transportation-analysis/research
  85. https://www.bts.gov/data-spotlight/transportation-delivers-harvest-field-and-farm-family-tables
  86. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/agriculture-logistics-market
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5296677/
  88. https://foodforwardndcs.panda.org/food-supply-chains/reducing-post-harvest-food-loss-at-storage-transport-and-processing-levels/
  89. https://www.fao.org/research-extension-systems/agricultural-research/investments/en/
  90. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=104237
  91. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/867ca34b-e141-5a21-9491-4e2cb509297e
  92. https://www.ifpri.org/topic/agricultural-extension/
  93. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/agriculture-finance
  94. https://investments.metlife.com/financing-solutions/agricultural-finance/
  95. https://www.fdic.gov/center-financial-research/agricultural-lending-insurance-and-implications-climate-change
  96. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/agricultural-financial-support.html
  97. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/chart-detail?chartId=58270
  98. https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/gross-domestic-product-and-agriculture-value-added-2014-2023/en
  99. https://ida.worldbank.org/en/topics/results/agriculture
  100. https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/employment-indicators-2000-2023-%28july-2025-update%29/en
  101. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/17802095-386a-52a3-9cce-d8d4acfdba79
  102. http://www.ers.usda.gov/faqs
  103. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/general-information/staff-offices/office-chief-economist/sustainability/sustainable-productivity-growth-coalition/sustainable-agricultural-productivity-growth-what-why-and-how
  104. https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-production
  105. https://www.fao.org/4/x0262e/x0262e05.htm
  106. https://ourworldindata.org/hunger-and-undernourishment
  107. https://agricultureandfoodsecurity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40066-022-00365-6
  108. https://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals-data-portal/data/indicators/2.1.1-prevalence-of-undernourishment/en
  109. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/a40daae9-b168-5cb4-b48a-c7e621b75731
  110. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343519300612
  112. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/572571468154473501/agriculture-and-poverty-reduction
  113. https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/utm/benefits-and-evolution-of-precision-agriculture/
  114. https://agecon.unl.edu/economic-assessment-precision-conservation-farm-precision-experiment-data/
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11483651/
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5790416/
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9397136/
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360138522000048
  119. https://plantingseedsblog.cdfa.ca.gov/wordpress/?p=24557
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004463
  121. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-practices-management/irrigation-water-use
  122. https://www.farmers.gov/blog/save-money-on-fuel-with-no-till-farming
  123. https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/dof/ars-scientist-highlights-till-vs-no-till-farming/
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524000467
  125. https://www.statista.com/topics/10348/agriculture-emissions-worldwide/
  126. https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors
  127. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/agriculture-sector-emissions
  128. https://clf.jhsph.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/environmental-impact-of-industrial-farm-animal-production.pdf
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10632262/
  130. https://www.wri.org/insights/growing-water-risks-food-crops
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10392093/
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880921003595
  133. https://resoilfoundation.org/en/agricultural-industry/soil-water-agriculture-fao-solaw/
  134. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/farming-fishing-and-forestry/agricultural-workers.htm
  135. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.862249/full
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264999324001408
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000599
  138. https://www.fao.org/3/cb9479en/online/sofa-2022/labour-impacts-agricultural-automation.html
  139. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/01/labour-and-skills-shortages-in-the-agro-food-sector_c9915f4e/ed758aab-en.pdf
  140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211912424000683
  141. https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research-and-impact/publications/agricultural-growth-and-poverty-reduction-additional-evidence
  142. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/changes-in-the-us-economy-and-rural-urban-employment-disparities-20240119.html
  143. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12557
  144. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04308-3
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262300214X
  146. https://usafacts.org/articles/federal-farm-subsidies-what-data-says/
  147. https://www.ewg.org/research/triple-dipping-house-farm-bill-increases-likelihood-wealthy-farmers-raking-billions-each
  148. https://www.slowfood.com/blog-and-news/unfair-share-how-europes-farm-subsidies-favor-big-money-over-small-farmers/
  149. http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/age-202304-0003_the-impacts-of-agricultural-subsidies-of-common-agricultural-policy-on-agricultural-emissions-the-case-of-the.php
  150. https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/how-gmos-are-regulated-united-states
  151. https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/gmo-crops-animal-food-and-beyond
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3791249/
  153. https://www.csis.org/analysis/when-trade-war-becomes-food-fight
  154. https://kansasreflector.com/2023/02/04/billions-in-federal-farm-payments-flow-to-a-select-group-of-producers-report-shows/
  155. https://www.ifpri.org/blog/how-reciprocal-tariffs-harm-agricultural-trade/
  156. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/how-tariffs-could-reshape-global-agriculture
  157. https://www.iatp.org/files/Dumping_on_the_Poor_The_Common_Agricultural_Po.htm
  158. https://econofact.org/the-u-s-agricultural-sector-under-stress
  159. https://farmaction.us/concentrationdata/
  160. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=107516
  161. https://philhoward.net/2024/11/13/concentration-in-u-s-agribusiness-industries/
  162. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/january/concentration-in-u-s-meatpacking-industry-and-how-it-affects-competition-and-cattle-prices
  163. https://www.reuters.com/business/how-four-big-companies-control-us-beef-industry-2021-06-17/
  164. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/106795/EIB-256.pdf
  165. https://www.farmaid.org/issues/corporate-power/how-consolidation-by-meatpacking-giants-is-hurting-farmers-and-consumers-and-what-the-biden-administration-is-doing-about-it/
  166. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/farming-and-farm-income
  167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001022
  168. https://grain.org/en/article/7284-top-10-agribusiness-giants-corporate-concentration-in-food-farming-in-2025
  169. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/human-health-issues-related-pesticides
  170. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/pesticide-residues-in-food
  171. https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-2017-stop-using-antibiotics-in-healthy-animals-to-prevent-the-spread-of-antibiotic-resistance
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6017557/
  173. https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/investigations-foodborne-illness-outbreaks
  174. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/ss/ss7401a1.htm
  175. https://www.science.org/content/article/once-again-us-expert-panel-says-genetically-engineered-crops-are-safe-eat
  176. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2952409/
  177. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38251421/
  178. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/agriculture/about/index.html
  179. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9757169/
  180. https://awionline.org/content/inhumane-practices-factory-farms
  181. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/agriculture/mspa
  182. https://www.apha.org/policy-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-briefs/policy-database/2018/01/18/improving-working-conditions
  183. https://foodprint.org/issues/sustainable-agriculture-vs-industrial-agriculture/
  184. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2001403117
  185. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000939
  186. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23001036
  187. https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/resources/highlights/detail/en/c/1539317/
  188. https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2022/01/un-report-the-worlds-farms-stretched-to-a-breaking-point/
  189. https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/OpenAccessDownload/IRERE-166
  190. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  191. https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-agrifood-systems.-global--regional-and-country-trends--2000-2022/en
  192. https://ourworldindata.org/food-ghg-emissions
  193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22010226
  194. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5722879/
  195. https://www.growag.com/article/what-precision-agriculture
  196. https://www.aem.org/news/the-environmental-benefits-of-precision-agriculture-quantified
  197. https://www.agriculturedive.com/news/large-farms-most-likely-to-use-precision-agriculture-USDA-report/735396/
  198. https://mssoy.org/sites/default/files/2025-01/McFADDEN%2520%2520PA%2520PROC%25202024.pdf
  199. https://www.basic.ai/blog-post/7-applications-of-ai-in-agriculture
  200. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/technological-advances-in-farming-top-2025-breakthroughs
  201. https://artsmart.ai/blog/ai-in-agriculture-statistics-trends-2024/
  202. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003221
  203. https://www.freshconsulting.com/insights/blog/robots-in-agriculture-transforming-the-future-of-farming/
  204. https://www.bdsbearing.com/blog/the-evolution-of-agriculture-the-role-of-bearings-in-smart-farming-and-autonomous-machinery
  205. https://www.agronomyjournals.com/article/view/1650/S-7-9-132
  206. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/41121/17949_aer786a_1_.pdf
  207. https://gm.agbioinvestor.com/downloads/9
  208. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311924003332
  209. https://www.seedworld.com/latam/2025/07/21/adoption-record-transgenic-crops-reached-210-million-hectares-in-2024/
  210. https://allianceforscience.org/blog/2020/07/new-study-gmo-crops-reduce-pesticide-use-greenhouse-gas-emissions/
  211. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9578716/
  212. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%252Faeri.20220144&utm_source=chatgpt.com
  213. https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/why-do-farmers-us-grow-gmo-crops
  214. https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/genetically-engineered-crops-past-experience-and-future-prospects
  215. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2022/01/21/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5388699/
  217. https://innovativegenomics.org/news/crispr-in-agriculture-2024/
  218. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/03/18/crispr-gene-editing-applications-are-expanding-dramatically-in-agriculture-here-are-the-latest-advances/
  219. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1478398/full
  220. https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/genome-editing-agricultural-biotechnology
  221. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS
  222. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912425000070
  223. https://www.africanleadershipmagazine.co.uk/infrastructure-and-technology-address-africas-agricultural-challenges/
  224. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949948824000416
  225. https://voxdev.org/voxdevlit/agricultural-technology-africa
  226. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d19de276-10f8-48c6-b0b8-3fbeba0cdf4b/content
  227. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638199.2023.2175306
  228. https://projects.worldbank.org/en/results/2025/07/14/enhancing-the-competitiveness-of-family-farms-the-power-of-productive-alliances-in-latin-america-and-africa
  229. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/87c78b8a-a439-5ea5-bdf0-b1744c9775e7
  230. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/initiatives/alliance-for-a-green-revolution-in-africa/
  231. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-emerging-technologies-can-boost-africas-agriculture-and-agribusiness/
  232. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.842338/full
  233. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/trade-spotlight-us-agricultural-exports-close-2024-on-strong-note
  234. https://prosperousamerica.org/u-s-faces-record-agricultural-imports-worst-trade-deficit-in-history/
  235. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/global-agricultural-trade-top-10-trading-countries-20232024-ltda-pin0f
  236. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm3_e.htm
  237. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=41268
  238. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/0534eca53121c137d3766a02320d0310-0430012022/related/Unfair-Advantage-Distortive-Subsidies-and-Their-Effects-on-Global-Trade-2023.pdf
  239. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/ag_imp_exp_charts_e.htm
  240. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aepp.70007
  241. https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/45459/54376_err199_summary.pdf?v=68269
  242. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsund_e.htm
  243. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1648918/full
  244. https://www.choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/theme-articles/turmoil-in-global-food-agricultural-and--input-markets-implications-of-russias-invasion-of-ukraine/impacts-of-the-russian-ukraine-conflict-on-global-agriculture-commodity-prices-trade-and-cropland-reallocation
  245. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/negoti_e.htm
  246. https://www.keystonebioag.com/article/regenerative-agriculture-statistics/
  247. https://foodinstitute.com/focus/high-awareness-low-adoption-bridging-the-gap-in-regenerative-agriculture/
  248. http://www.agribenchmark.org/fileadmin/Dateiablage/B-Cash-Crop/Publications/BriefingPaperAB_RegenerativeAgriculture_2025_final.pdf
  249. https://www.rifs-potsdam.de/en/news/carbon-farming-agribusiness-corporations-foster-false-hopes
  250. https://about.bnef.com/insights/nature-and-agriculture/unlocking-agricultural-carbon-market-opportunities/
  251. https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13021-024-00253-5
  252. https://agriculture.basf.com/global/en/innovations-for-agriculture/trends-in-agriculture/carbon-farming
  253. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146290112500139X
  254. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/delivering-regenerative-agriculture-through-digitalization-and-ai/
  255. https://www.agmatix.com/blog/top-5-agtech-trends-for-2025-whats-next-for-regenerative-agriculture/
  256. https://www.icl-group.com/blog/4-key-agrotech-trends-2025/
  257. https://jiffygroup.com/blog/sustainable-agriculture-in-2025-6-trends-to-watch/
  258. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/emerging-technologies-in-agriculture-2025-top-7-new-farming-technologies
  259. https://www.dllgroup.com/en/blogs/blogsoverview/2025-trends-innovations-and-challenges-in-agriculture-and-food-systems
  260. https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/utm/the-economics-of-regenerative-agriculture
  261. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2025-2034_3eb15914.html
  262. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2025-2034--emerging-economies-will-drive-growth-in-animal-source-food-consumption-and-production/en
  263. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2025-2034_3eb15914/full-report/agricultural-and-food-markets-trends-and-prospects_d3812d71.html
  264. https://www.imarcgroup.com/agribusiness-market
  265. https://www.statista.com/outlook/io/agriculture/worldwide
  266. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-agritech-market
  267. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/outlooks/110966/OCE-2025-1.pdf
  268. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2024-2033_e173f332/4c5d2cfb-en.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.