Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fabaceae
View on Wikipedia
| Fabaceae Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
| Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Plantae |
| Clade: | Tracheophytes |
| Clade: | Angiosperms |
| Clade: | Eudicots |
| Clade: | Rosids |
| Order: | Fabales |
| Family: | Fabaceae Lindl.[2] (Leguminosae Jussieu, nom. cons.).[3] |
| Type genus | |
| Faba (now included in Vicia) Mill.
| |
| Subfamilies[4] | |
| |
| Diversity | |
| 730 genera and 19,400 species | |
| Fabaceae distribution map. Legumes are found in four major biomes: tropical forest, temperate, grass, and succulent.[5] | |
| Synonyms | |
Fabaceae (/fəˈbeɪsi.iː, -ˌaɪ/) or Leguminosae,[6] commonly known as the legume, pea, or bean family, is a large and agriculturally important family of flowering plants. It includes trees, shrubs, and perennial or annual herbaceous plants, which are easily recognized by their fruit (legume) and their compound, stipulate leaves. The family is widely distributed, and is the third-largest land plant family in number of species, behind only the Orchidaceae and Asteraceae, with about 765 genera and nearly 20,000 known species.[7][8][9][10]
The five largest genera of the family are Astragalus (over 3,000 species), Acacia (over 1,000 species), Indigofera (around 700 species), Crotalaria (around 700 species), and Mimosa (around 400 species), which constitute about a quarter of all legume species. The c. 19,000 known legume species amount to about 7% of flowering plant species.[9][11] Fabaceae is the most common family found in tropical rainforests and dry forests of the Americas and Africa.[12]
Recent molecular and morphological evidence supports the fact that the Fabaceae is a single monophyletic family.[13] This conclusion has been supported not only by the degree of interrelation shown by different groups within the family compared with that found among the Leguminosae and their closest relations, but also by all the recent phylogenetic studies based on DNA sequences.[14][15][16] These studies confirm that the Fabaceae are a monophyletic group that is closely related to the families Polygalaceae, Surianaceae and Quillajaceae and that they belong to the order Fabales.[17]
Along with the cereals, some fruits and tropical roots, a number of Leguminosae have been a staple human food for millennia and their use is closely related to human evolution.[18]
The family Fabaceae includes a number of plants that are common in agriculture including Glycine max (soybean), Phaseolus (beans), Pisum sativum (pea), Cicer arietinum (chickpeas), Vicia faba (broad bean), Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Arachis hypogaea (peanut), Ceratonia siliqua (carob), Tamarindus indica (tamarind), Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek), and Glycyrrhiza glabra (liquorice). A number of species are also weedy pests in different parts of the world, including Cytisus scoparius (broom), Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust), Ulex europaeus (gorse), Pueraria montana (kudzu), and a number of Lupinus species.
Etymology
[edit]The name 'Fabaceae' comes from the defunct genus Faba, now included in Vicia. The term "faba" comes from Latin, and appears to simply mean "bean". Leguminosae is an older name still considered valid,[6] and refers to the fruit of these plants, which are called legumes.
Description
[edit]
Fabaceae range in habit from giant trees (like Koompassia excelsa) to small annual herbs, with the majority being herbaceous perennials. Plants have indeterminate inflorescences, which are sometimes reduced to a single flower. The flowers have a short hypanthium and a single carpel with a short gynophore, and after fertilization produce fruits that are legumes.[citation needed]
Growth habit
[edit]The Fabaceae have a wide variety of growth forms, including trees, shrubs, herbaceous plants, and even vines or lianas. The herbaceous plants can be annuals, biennials, or perennials, without basal or terminal leaf aggregations. Many Legumes have tendrils. They are upright plants, epiphytes, or vines. The latter support themselves by means of shoots that twist around a support or through cauline or foliar tendrils. Plants can be heliophytes, mesophytes, or xerophytes.[3][9]
Leaves
[edit]The leaves are usually alternate and compound. Most often they are even- or odd-pinnately compound (e.g. Caragana and Robinia respectively), often trifoliate (e.g. Trifolium, Medicago) and rarely palmately compound (e.g. Lupinus), in the Mimosoideae and the Caesalpinioideae commonly bipinnate (e.g. Acacia, Mimosa). They always have stipules, which can be leaf-like (e.g. Pisum), thornlike (e.g. Robinia) or be rather inconspicuous. Leaf margins are entire or, occasionally, serrate. Both the leaves and the leaflets often have wrinkled pulvini to permit nastic movements. In some species, leaflets have evolved into tendrils (e.g. Vicia).[3][9][18]
Many species have leaves with structures that attract ants which protect the plant from herbivore insects (a form of mutualism). Extrafloral nectaries are common among the Mimosoideae and the Caesalpinioideae, and are also found in some Faboideae (e.g. Vicia sativa). In some Acacia, the modified hollow stipules are inhabited by ants and are known as domatia.
Roots
[edit]Many Fabaceae host bacteria in their roots within structures called root nodules. These bacteria, known as rhizobia, have the ability to take nitrogen gas (N2) out of the air and convert it to a form of nitrogen that is usable to the host plant (NO3− or NH3). This process is called nitrogen fixation. The legume, acting as a host, and rhizobia, acting as a provider of usable nitrate, form a symbiotic relationship. Members of the Phaseoleae genus Apios form tubers, which can be edible.[19]
Flowers
[edit]
The flowers often have five generally fused sepals and five free petals. They are generally hermaphroditic and have a short hypanthium, usually cup-shaped. There are normally ten stamens and one elongated superior ovary, with a curved style. They are usually arranged in indeterminate inflorescences. Fabaceae are typically entomophilous plants (i.e. they are pollinated by insects), and the flowers are usually showy to attract pollinators.
In the Caesalpinioideae, the flowers are often zygomorphic, as in Cercis, or nearly symmetrical with five equal petals, as in Bauhinia. The upper petal is the innermost one, unlike in the Faboideae. Some species, like some in the genus Senna, have asymmetric flowers, with one of the lower petals larger than the opposing one, and the style bent to one side. The calyx, corolla, or stamens can be showy in this group.
In the Mimosoideae, the flowers are actinomorphic and arranged in globose inflorescences. The petals are small and the stamens, which can be more than just 10, have long, coloured filaments, which are the showiest part of the flower. All of the flowers in an inflorescence open at once.
In the Faboideae, the flowers are zygomorphic, and have a specialized structure. The upper petal, called the banner or standard, is large and envelops the rest of the petals in bud, often reflexing when the flower blooms. The two adjacent petals, the wings, surround the two bottom petals. The two bottom petals are fused together at the apex (remaining free at the base), forming a boat-like structure called the keel. The stamens are always ten in number, and their filaments can be fused in various configurations, often in a group of nine stamens plus one separate stamen. Various genes in the CYCLOIDEA (CYC)/DICHOTOMA (DICH) family are expressed in the upper (also called dorsal or adaxial) petal; in some species, such as Cadia, these genes are expressed throughout the flower, producing a radially symmetrical flower.[20]
Fruit
[edit]The ovary most typically develops into a legume. A legume is a simple dry fruit that usually dehisces (opens along a seam) on two sides. A common name for this type of fruit is a "pod", although that can also be applied to a few other fruit types. A few species have evolved samarae, loments, follicles, indehiscent legumes, achenes, drupes, and berries from the basic legume fruit.
Physiology and biochemistry
[edit]The Fabaceae are rarely cyanogenic. Where they are, the cyanogenic compounds are derived from tyrosine, phenylalanine or leucine. They frequently contain alkaloids. Proanthocyanidins can be present either as cyanidin or delphinidine or both at the same time. Flavonoids such as kaempferol, quercitin and myricetin are often present. Ellagic acid has never been found in any of the genera or species analysed. Sugars are transported within the plants in the form of sucrose. C3 photosynthesis has been found in a wide variety of genera.[3] The family has also evolved a unique chemistry. Many legumes contain toxic[21] and indigestible substances, antinutrients, which may be removed through various processing methods. Pterocarpans are a class of molecules (derivatives of isoflavonoids) found only in the Fabaceae. Forisome proteins are found in the sieve tubes of Fabaceae; uniquely they are not dependent on ADT.
Evolution, phylogeny and taxonomy
[edit]Evolution
[edit]The order Fabales contains around 7.3% of eudicot species and the greatest part of this diversity is contained in just one of the four families that the order contains: Fabaceae. This clade also includes the families Polygalaceae, Surianaceae and Quillajaceae and its origins date back 94 to 89 million years, although it started its diversification 79 to 74 million years ago.[10] The Fabaceae diversified during the Paleogene to become a ubiquitous part of the modern earth's biota, along with many other families belonging to the flowering plants.[13][22]
The Fabaceae have an abundant and diverse fossil record, especially for the Tertiary period. Fossils of flowers, fruit, leaves, wood and pollen from this period have been found in numerous locations.[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The earliest fossils that can be definitively assigned to the Fabaceae appeared in the early Palaeocene (approximately 65 million years ago).[30] Representatives of the 3 sub-families traditionally recognised as being members of the Fabaceae – Cesalpinioideae, Papilionoideae and Mimosoideae – as well as members of the large clades within these sub-families – such as the genistoides – have been found in periods later, starting between 55 and 50 million years ago.[22] In fact, a wide variety of taxa representing the main lineages in the Fabaceae have been found in the fossil record dating from the middle to the late Eocene, suggesting that the majority of the modern Fabaceae groups were already present and that a broad diversification occurred during this period.[22] Therefore, the Fabaceae started their diversification approximately 60 million years ago and the most important clades separated 50 million years ago.[31] The age of the main Cesalpinioideae clades have been estimated as between 56 and 34 million years and the basal group of the Mimosoideae as 44 ± 2.6 million years.[32][33] The division between Mimosoideae and Faboideae is dated as occurring between 59 and 34 million years ago and the basal group of the Faboideae as 58.6 ± 0.2 million years ago.[34] It has been possible to date the divergence of some of the groups within the Faboideae, even though diversification within each genus was relatively recent. For instance, Astragalus separated from the Oxytropis 16 to 12 million years ago. In addition, the separation of the aneuploid species of Neoastragalus started 4 million years ago. Inga, another genus of the Papilionoideae with approximately 350 species, seems to have diverged in the last 2 million years.[35][36][37][38]
It has been suggested, based on fossil and phylogenetic evidence, that legumes originally evolved in arid and/or semi-arid regions along the Tethys seaway during the Palaeogene Period.[5][39] However, others contend that Africa (or even the Americas) cannot yet be ruled out as the origin of the family.[40][41]
The current hypothesis about the evolution of the genes needed for nodulation is that they were recruited from other pathways after a polyploidy event.[42] Several different pathways have been implicated as donating duplicated genes to the pathways need for nodulation. The main donors to the pathway were the genes associated with the arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis genes, the pollen tube formation genes and the haemoglobin genes. One of the main genes shown to be shared between the arbuscular mycorrhiza pathway and the nodulation pathway is SYMRK and it is involved in the plant-bacterial recognition.[43] The pollen tube growth is similar to the infection thread development in that infection threads grow in a polar manner that is similar to a pollen tubes polar growth towards the ovules. Both pathways include the same type of enzymes, pectin-degrading cell wall enzymes.[44] The enzymes needed to reduce nitrogen, nitrogenases, require a substantial input of ATP but at the same time are sensitive to free oxygen. To meet the requirements of this paradoxical situation, the plants express a type of haemoglobin called leghaemoglobin that is believed to be recruited after a duplication event.[45] These three genetic pathways are believed to be part of a gene duplication event then recruited to work in nodulation.
Phylogeny and taxonomy
[edit]Phylogeny
[edit]The phylogeny of the legumes has been the object of many studies by research groups from around the world. These studies have used morphology, DNA data (the chloroplast intron trnL, the chloroplast genes rbcL and matK, or the ribosomal spacers ITS) and cladistic analysis in order to investigate the relationships between the family's different lineages. Fabaceae is consistently recovered as monophyletic.[46] The studies further confirmed that the traditional subfamilies Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae were each monophyletic but both were nested within the paraphyletic subfamily Caesalpinioideae.[47][46] All the different approaches yielded similar results regarding the relationships between the family's main clades.[10][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][excessive citations] Following extensive discussion in the legume phylogenetics community, the Legume Phylogeny Working Group reclassified Fabaceae into six subfamilies, which necessitated the segregation of four new subfamilies from Caesalpinioideae and merging Caesapinioideae sensu stricto with the former subfamily Mimosoideae.[4][56] The exact branching order of the different subfamilies is still unresolved.[57]
| Fabales |
| |||||||||||||||
Taxonomy
[edit]The Fabaceae are placed in the order Fabales according to most taxonomic systems, including the APG III system.[2] The family now includes six subfamilies:[4]
- Cercidoideae: 12 genera and ~335 species. Mainly tropical. Bauhinia, Cercis.
- Detarioideae: 84 genera and ~760 species. Mainly tropical. Amherstia, Detarium, Tamarindus.
- Duparquetioideae: 1 genus and 1 species. West and Central Africa. Duparquetia.
- Dialioideae: 17 genera and ~85 species. Widespread throughout the tropics. Dialium.
- Caesalpinioideae: 148 genera and ~4400 species. Pantropical. Caesalpinia, Senna, Mimosa, Acacia. Includes the former subfamily Mimosoideae (80 genera and ~3200 species; mostly tropical and warm temperate Asia and America).
- Faboideae (Papilionoideae[58]): 503 genera and ~14,000 species. Cosmopolitan. Astragalus, Lupinus, Pisum.
Ecology
[edit]Distribution and habitat
[edit]The Fabaceae have an essentially worldwide distribution, being found everywhere except Antarctica and the high Arctic.[10] The trees are often found in tropical regions, while the herbaceous plants and shrubs are predominant outside the tropics.[3]
Biological nitrogen fixation
[edit]

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF, performed by the organisms called diazotrophs) is a very old process that probably originated in the Archean eon when the primitive atmosphere lacked oxygen. It is only carried out by Euryarchaeota and just 6 of the more than 50 phyla of bacteria. Some of these lineages co-evolved together with the flowering plants establishing the molecular basis of a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship. BNF is carried out in nodules that are mainly located in the root cortex, although they are occasionally located in the stem as in Sesbania rostrata. The spermatophytes that co-evolved with actinorhizal diazotrophs (Frankia) or with rhizobia to establish their symbiotic relationship belong to 11 families contained within the Rosidae clade (as established by the gene molecular phylogeny of rbcL, a gene coding for part of the RuBisCO enzyme in the chloroplast). This grouping indicates that the predisposition for forming nodules probably only arose once in flowering plants and that it can be considered as an ancestral characteristic that has been conserved or lost in certain lineages. However, such a wide distribution of families and genera within this lineage indicates that nodulation had multiple origins. Of the 10 families within the Rosidae, 8 have nodules formed by actinomyces (Betulaceae, Casuarinaceae, Coriariaceae, Datiscaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Myricaceae, Rhamnaceae and Rosaceae), and the two remaining families, Ulmaceae and Fabaceae have nodules formed by rhizobia.[59][60]
The rhizobia and their hosts must be able to recognize each other for nodule formation to commence. Rhizobia are specific to particular host species although a rhizobia species may often infect more than one host species. This means that one plant species may be infected by more than one species of bacteria. For example, nodules in Acacia senegal can contain seven species of rhizobia belonging to three different genera. The most distinctive characteristics that allow rhizobia to be distinguished apart are the rapidity of their growth and the type of root nodule that they form with their host.[60] Root nodules can be classified as being either indeterminate, cylindrical and often branched, and determinate, spherical with prominent lenticels. Indeterminate nodules are characteristic of legumes from temperate climates, while determinate nodules are commonly found in species from tropical or subtropical climates.[60]
Nodule formation is common throughout the Fabaceae. It is found in the majority of its members that only form an association with rhizobia, which in turn form an exclusive symbiosis with the Fabaceae (with the exception of Parasponia, the only genus of the 18 Ulmaceae genera that is capable of forming nodules). Nodule formation is present in all the Fabaceae sub-families, although it is less common in the Caesalpinioideae. All types of nodule formation are present in the subfamily Papilionoideae: indeterminate (with the meristem retained), determinate (without meristem) and the type included in Aeschynomene. The latter two are thought to be the most modern and specialised type of nodule as they are only present in some lines of the subfamily Papilionoideae. Even though nodule formation is common in the two monophyletic subfamilies Papilionoideae and Mimosoideae they also contain species that do not form nodules. The presence or absence of nodule-forming species within the three sub-families indicates that nodule formation has arisen several times during the evolution of the Fabaceae and that this ability has been lost in some lineages. For example, within the genus Acacia, a member of the Mimosoideae, A. pentagona does not form nodules, while other species of the same genus readily form nodules, as is the case for Acacia senegal, which forms both rapidly and slow growing rhizobial nodules.
Chemical ecology
[edit]A large number of species within many genera of leguminous plants, e.g. Astragalus, Coronilla, Hippocrepis, Indigofera, Lotus, Securigera and Scorpiurus, produce chemicals that derive from the compound 3-nitropropanoic acid (3-NPA, beta-nitropropionic acid). The free acid 3-NPA is an irreversible inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration, and thus the compound inhibits the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This inhibition caused by 3-NPA is especially toxic to nerve cells and represents a very general toxic mechanism suggesting a profound ecological importance due to the big number of species producing this compound and its derivatives. A second and closely related class of secondary metabolites that occur in many species of leguminous plants is defined by isoxazolin-5-one derivatives. These compounds occur in particular together with 3-NPA and related derivatives at the same time in the same species, as found in Astragalus canadensis and Astragalus collinus. 3-NPA and isoxazlin-5-one derivatives also occur in many species of leaf beetles (see defense in insects).[61]
Economic and cultural importance
[edit]Legumes are economically and culturally important plants due to their extraordinary diversity and abundance, the wide variety of edible vegetables they represent and due to the variety of uses they can be put to: in horticulture and agriculture, as a food, for the compounds they contain that have medicinal uses and for the oil and fats they contain that have a variety of uses.[62][63][64][65]
Food and forage
[edit]The history of legumes is tied in closely with that of human civilization, appearing early in Asia, the Americas (the common bean, several varieties) and Europe (broad beans) by 6,000 BCE, where they became a staple, essential as a source of protein.
Their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen reduces fertilizer costs for farmers and gardeners who grow legumes, and means that legumes can be used in a crop rotation to replenish soil that has been depleted of nitrogen. Legume seeds and foliage have a comparatively higher protein content than non-legume materials, due to the additional nitrogen that legumes receive through the process. Legumes are commonly used as natural fertilizers. Some legume species perform hydraulic lift, which makes them ideal for intercropping.[66]
Farmed legumes can belong to numerous classes, including forage, grain, blooms, pharmaceutical/industrial, fallow/green manure and timber species, with most commercially farmed species filling two or more roles simultaneously.
There are of two broad types of forage legumes. Some, like alfalfa, clover, vetch, and Arachis, are sown in pasture and grazed by livestock. Other forage legumes such as Leucaena or Albizia are woody shrub or tree species that are either broken down by livestock or regularly cut by humans to provide fodder.
Grain legumes are cultivated for their seeds, and are also called pulses. The seeds are used for human and animal consumption or for the production of oils for industrial uses. Grain legumes include both herbaceous plants like beans, lentils, lupins, peas and peanuts,[67] and trees such as carob, mesquite and tamarind.
Lathyrus tuberosus, once extensively cultivated in Europe, forms tubers used for human consumption.[68][69]
Bloom legume species include species such as lupin, which are farmed commercially for their blooms, and thus are popular in gardens worldwide. Laburnum, Robinia, Gleditsia (honey locust), Acacia, Mimosa, and Delonix are ornamental trees and shrubs.
Industrial farmed legumes include Indigofera, cultivated for the production of indigo, Acacia, for gum arabic, and Derris, for the insecticide action of rotenone, a compound it produces.
Fallow or green manure legume species are cultivated to be tilled back into the soil to exploit the high nitrogen levels found in most legumes. Numerous legumes are farmed for this purpose, including Leucaena, Cyamopsis and Sesbania.
Various legume species are farmed for timber production worldwide, including numerous Acacia species, Dalbergia species, and Castanospermum australe.
Melliferous plants offer nectar to bees and other insects to encourage them to carry pollen from the flowers of one plant to others thereby ensuring pollination. Many Fabaceae species are important sources of pollen and nectar for bees, including for honey production in the beekeeping industry. Example Fabaceae such as alfalfa, and various clovers including white clover and sweet clover, are important sources of nectar and honey for the Western honey bee.[70]
Industrial uses
[edit]Natural gums
[edit]Natural gums are vegetable exudates that are released as the result of damage to the plant such as that resulting from the attack of an insect or a natural or artificial cut. These exudates contain heterogeneous polysaccharides formed of different sugars and usually containing uronic acids. They form viscous colloidal solutions. There are different species that produce gums. The most important of these species belong to the Fabaceae. They are widely used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, and textile sectors. They also have interesting therapeutic properties; for example gum arabic is antitussive and anti-inflammatory.[medical citation needed] The most well known gums are tragacanth (Astragalus gummifer), gum arabic (Acacia senegal) and guar gum (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba).[71]
Dyes
[edit]
Several species of Fabaceae are used to produce dyes. The heartwood of logwood, Haematoxylon campechianum, is used to produce red and purple dyes. The histological stain called haematoxylin is produced from this species. The wood of the Brazilwood tree (Caesalpinia echinata) is also used to produce a red or purple dye. The Madras thorn (Pithecellobium dulce) has reddish fruit that are used to produce a yellow dye.[72] Indigo dye is extracted from the indigo plant Indigofera tinctoria that is native to Asia. In Central and South America dyes are produced from two species in the same genus: indigo and Maya blue from Indigofera suffruticosa and Natal indigo from Indigofera arrecta. Yellow dyes are extracted from Butea monosperma, commonly called flame of the forest and from dyer's greenweed, (Genista tinctoria).[73]
Ornamentals
[edit]
Legumes have been used as ornamental plants throughout the world for many centuries. Their vast diversity of heights, shapes, foliage and flower colour means that this family is commonly used in the design and planting of everything from small gardens to large parks.[18] The following is a list of the main ornamental legume species, listed by subfamily.
- Subfamily Caesalpinioideae: Bauhinia forficata, Caesalpinia gilliesii, Caesalpinia spinosa, Ceratonia siliqua, Cercis siliquastrum, Gleditsia triacanthos, Gymnocladus dioica, Parkinsonia aculeata, Senna multiglandulosa.[74]
- Subfamily Mimosoideae: Acacia caven, Acacia cultriformis, Acacia dealbata, Acacia karroo, Acacia longifolia, Acacia melanoxylon, Acacia paradoxa, Acacia retinodes, Acacia saligna, Acacia verticillata, Acacia visco, Albizzia julibrissin, Calliandra tweediei, Paraserianthes lophantha, Prosopis chilensis.[74]
- Subfamily Faboideae: Clianthus puniceus, Cytisus scoparius, Erythrina crista-galli, Erythrina falcata, Laburnum anagyroides, Lotus berthelotii, Lupinus arboreus, Lupinus polyphyllus, Otholobium glandulosum, Retama monosperma, Robinia hispida, Robinia neomexicana, Robinia pseudoacacia, Sophora japonica, Sophora macnabiana, Sophora macrocarpa, Spartium junceum, Teline monspessulana, Tipuana tipu, Wisteria sinensis.[74]
Emblematic Fabaceae
[edit]- The cockspur coral tree (Erythrina crista-galli), is the national flower of Argentina and Uruguay.[75]
- The elephant ear tree (Enterolobium cyclocarpum) is the national tree of Costa Rica, by Executive Order of 31 August 1959.[76]
- The brazilwood tree (Caesalpinia echinata) has been the national tree of Brazil since 1978.[77]
- The golden wattle Acacia pycnantha is Australia's national flower.[78]
- The Hong Kong orchid tree Bauhinia blakeana is the national flower of Hong Kong.[79]
- The Bluebonnet, a regional name for Lupins such as Lupinus texensis, is the state flower of Texas[80]
Image gallery
[edit]-
Acacia baileyana (wattle)
-
Loments of Alysicarpus vaginalis
-
Calliandra emarginata
-
Cassia leptophylla tree
-
Dichrostachys cinerea sickle bush
-
Delonix regia tree
-
Tendrils of Lathyrus odoratus (sweet pea)
-
Inflorescence of Lupinus arboreus (yellow bush lupin)
-
Pisum sativum (peas); note the leaf-like stipules
-
Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom)
-
Senna pendula (Easter cassia)
-
Hosackia stipularis (stipulate lotus)
-
Lupinus nanus (sky lupine)
-
Vigna caracalla (snail vine) flowers
-
Lupinus succulentus (arroyo lupine succulent)
-
Lupinus stiversii (harlequin lupine)
-
Virgilia oroboides (Cape lilac) mauve flowers
References
[edit]- ^ "Fabales". www.mobot.org. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- ^ a b Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (2): 105–121. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x. hdl:10654/18083.
- ^ a b c d e Watson L.; Dallwitz, M. J. (1 June 2007). "The families of flowering plants: Leguminosae". Archived from the original on 8 October 2017. Retrieved 9 February 2008.
- ^ a b c The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG). (2017). "A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny". Taxon. 66 (1): 44–77. doi:10.12705/661.3. hdl:10568/90658.
- ^ a b Schrire, B. D.; Lewis, G. P.; Lavin, M. (2005). "Biogeography of the Leguminosae". In Lewis, G; Schrire, G.; Mackinder, B.; Lock, M. (eds.). Legumes of the world. Kew, England: Royal Botanic Gardens. pp. 21–54. ISBN 978-1-900347-80-8. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
- ^ a b International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. Archived 27 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine Article 18.5 states: "The following names, of long usage, are treated as validly published: ....Leguminosae (nom. alt.: Fabaceae; type: Faba Mill. [= Vicia L.]); ... When the Papilionaceae are regarded as a family distinct from the remainder of the Leguminosae, the name Papilionaceae is conserved against Leguminosae." English pronunciations are as follows: /fəˈbeɪsi(i), -siaɪ, -sieɪ/, /ləˌɡjuːməˈnoʊsi/ and /pəˌpɪlioʊˈneɪsii/.
- ^ "List of plants in the family Fabaceae". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- ^ Christenhusz, M. J. M.; Byng, J. W. (2016). "The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase". Phytotaxa. 261 (3): 201–217. Bibcode:2016Phytx.261..201C. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1.
- ^ a b c d Judd, W. S., Campbell, C. S. Kellogg, E. A. Stevens, P.F. Donoghue, M. J. (2002), Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, Sinauer Axxoc, 287–292. ISBN 0-87893-403-0.
- ^ a b c d Stevens, P. F. "Fabaceae". Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 7 May 2006. Retrieved 28 April 2008.
- ^ Magallón, S. A., and Sanderson, M. J.; Sanderson (2001). "Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades". Evolution. 55 (9): 1762–1780. Bibcode:2001Evolu..55.1762M. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00826.x. PMID 11681732. S2CID 38691512.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Burnham, R. J.; Johnson, K. R. (2004). "South American palaeobotany and the origins of neotropical rainforests". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 359 (1450): 1595–1610. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1531. PMC 1693437. PMID 15519975.
- ^ a b Lewis G., Schrire B., Mackinder B. and Lock M. 2005. (eds.) Legumes of the world. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Reino Unido. 577 pages. 2005. ISBN 1-900347-80-6.
- ^ Doyle, J. J., J. A. Chappill, C.D. Bailey, & T. Kajita. 2000. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequences and non-molecular data. pp. 1–20 in Advances in legume systematics, part 9, (P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
- ^ Kajita, T.; Ohashi, H.; Tateishi, Y.; Bailey, C. D.; Doyle, J. J. (2001). "rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies". Systematic Botany. 26 (3): 515–536. doi:10.1043/0363-6445-26.3.515 (inactive 1 July 2025). JSTOR 3093979.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ Wojciechowski, M. F., M. Lavin and M. J. Sanderson; Lavin; Sanderson (2004). "A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported sub clades within the family". American Journal of Botany. 91 (11): 1846–1862. Bibcode:2004AmJB...91.1846W. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846. PMID 21652332.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Angiosperm Phylogeny Group [APG] (2003). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 141 (4): 399–436. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x.
- ^ a b c Burkart, A. Leguminosas. In: Dimitri, M. 1987. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería. Tomo I. Descripción de plantas cultivadas. Editorial ACME S.A.C.I., Buenos Aires. pages: 467–538.
- ^ Seabrook, Janet E. A. (1973). A Biosystematic Study of the Genus Apios Fabricius (Leguminosae) with Special Reference to Apios americana Medikus (M.Sc. thesis). University of New Brunswick, Fredericton.
- ^ Hélène L. Citerne; R. Toby Pennington; Quentin C. B. Cronk (8 August 2006). "An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation". PNAS. 103 (32): 12017–12020. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10312017C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600986103. PMC 1567690. PMID 16880394.
- ^ Taylor, Ronald J. (1994) [1992]. Sagebrush Country: A Wildflower Sanctuary (rev. ed.). Missoula, MT: Mountain Press Pub. Co. p. 100. ISBN 0-87842-280-3. OCLC 25708726.
- ^ a b c Herendeen, P. S., W. L. Crepet, and D. L. Dilcher. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Pages 303 – 316 in Advances in Legume Systematics, part 4, the fossil record (P. S. Herendeen and D .L. Dilcher, eds). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
- ^ Crepet, W. L.; Taylor, D. W. (1985). "The Diversification of the Leguminosae: First Fossil Evidence of the Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae". Science. 228 (4703): 1087–1089. Bibcode:1985Sci...228.1087C. doi:10.1126/science.228.4703.1087. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17737903. S2CID 19601874.
- ^ Crepet, W. L.; D. W. Taylor (1986). "Primitive mimosoid flowers from the Palaeocene-Eocene and their systematic and evolutionary implications". American Journal of Botany. 73 (4): 548–563. doi:10.2307/2444261. JSTOR 2444261.
- ^ Crepet, W. L., and P. S. Herendeen. 1992. Papilionoid flowers from the early Eocene of south eastern North America. Pages 43–55 in Advances in Legume Systematics, part 4, the fossil record (P. S. Herendeen and D. L. Dilcher, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
- ^ Herendeen, P. S. 1992. The fossil history of Leguminosae from the Eocene of south eastern North America. Pages 85–160 in Advances in Legume Systematics, part 4, the fossil record (Herendeen, P. S., and D. L. Dilcher, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
- ^ Herendeen, P. S. 2001. The fossil record of the Leguminosae: recent advances. In Legumes Down Under: the Fourth International Legume conference, Abstracts, 34–35. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
- ^ Herendeen, P. S., and S. Wing. 2001. Papilionoid legume fruits and leaves from the Palaeocene of north western Wyoming. Botany 2001 Abstracts, published by Botanical Society of America (http://www.botany2001.org/).
- ^ Wing, S. L., F. Herrera, and C. Jaramillo. 2004. A Palaeocene flora from the Cerrajón Formation, Guajíra Peninsula, north eastern Colombia. Pages 146–147 in VII International Organization of Paleobotany Conference Abstracts (21–26 March). Museo Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Argentina.
- ^ Herendeen, Patrick S.; Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.; Herrera, Fabiany; Wing, Scott L. (January 2022). "Fossil papilionoids of the Bowdichia clade (Leguminosae) from the Paleogene of North America". American Journal of Botany. 109 (1): 130–150. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1808. ISSN 0002-9122. PMC 9306462. PMID 35014023.
- ^ Bruneau, A., Lewis, G. P., Herendeen, P. S., Schrire, B., & Mercure, M. 2008b. Biogeographic patterns in early-diverging clades of the Leguminosae. Pp. 98–99, in Botany 2008. Botany without Borders. [Botanical Society of America, Abstracts.]
- ^ Bruneau, A.; Mercure, M.; Lewis, G. P. & Herendeen, P. S. (2008). "Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes". Canadian Journal of Botany. 86 (7): 697–718. Bibcode:2008Botan..86..697B. doi:10.1139/B08-058.
- ^ Lavin, M., Herendeen, P. S., y Wojciechowski, M. F.; Herendeen; Wojciechowski (2005). "Evolutionary Rates Analysis of Leguminosae Implicates a Rapid Diversification of Lineages during the Tertiary". Systematic Biology. 54 (4): 575–594. doi:10.1080/10635150590947131. PMID 16085576.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Wikstrom, N.; Savolainen, V.; Chase, M. W. (2001). "Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 268 (1482): 2211–2220. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1782. PMC 1088868. PMID 11674868.
- ^ Wojciechowski, M. F. 2003. Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): An early 21st century perspective. Pp. 5–35, in Klitgaard, B. B. & Bruneau, A. (eds), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 10, Higher Level Systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
- ^ Wojciechowski, M. F. (2005). "Astragalus (Fabaceae): A molecular phylogenetic perspective". Brittonia. 57 (4): 382–396. doi:10.1663/0007-196X(2005)057[0382:AFAMPP]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 4098954. S2CID 21645067.
- ^ Wojciechowski, M. F.; Sanderson, M. J.; Baldwin, B. G.; Donoghue, M. J. (1993). "Monophyly of aneuploid Astragalus: Evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences". American Journal of Botany. 80 (6): 711–722. doi:10.2307/2445441. JSTOR 2445441.
- ^ Wojciechowski, Martin F., Johanna Mahn, and Bruce Jones. 2006. Fabaceae. legumes. Version 14 June 2006. The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/
- ^ Schrire, B. D.; Lavin, M.; Lewis, G. P. (2005). "Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies". In Friis, I; Balslev, H. (eds.). Plant diversity and complexity patterns: local, regional and global dimensions. Biologiske Skrifter. Vol. 55. Viborg, Denmark: Special-Trykkeriet Viborg A/S. pp. 375–422. ISBN 978-87-7304-304-2.
- ^ Pan, Aaron D.; Jacobs, Bonnie F.; Herendeen, Patrick S. (2010). "Detarieae sensu lato (Fabaceae) from the Late Oligocene (27.23 Ma) Guang River flora of north-western Ethiopia". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 163: 44–54. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01044.x.
- ^ Doyle, J. J.; Luckow, M. A. (2003). "The Rest of the Iceberg. Legume Diversity and Evolution in a Phylogenetic Context". Plant Physiology. 131 (3): 900–10. doi:10.1104/pp.102.018150. PMC 1540290. PMID 12644643.
- ^ Yokota, Keisuke; Hayashi, Makoto (2011). "Function and evolution of nodulation genes in legumes". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 68 (8): 1341–51. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0651-4. PMC 11114672. PMID 21380559. S2CID 13154916.
- ^ Markmann, Katharina; Giczey, Gábor; Parniske, Martin (2008). "Functional Adaptation of a Plant Receptor- Kinase Paved the Way for the Evolution of Intracellular Root Symbioses with Bacteria". PLOS Biology. 6 (3): e68. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060068. PMC 2270324. PMID 18318603.
- ^ Rodríguez-Llorente, Ignacio D.; Pérez-Hormaeche, Javier; Mounadi, Kaoutar El; Dary, Mohammed; Caviedes, Miguel A.; Cosson, Viviane; Kondorosi, Adam; Ratet, Pascal; Palomares, Antonio J. (2004). "From pollen tubes to infection threads: Recruitment of Medicago floral pectic genes for symbiosis". The Plant Journal. 39 (4): 587–98. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02155.x. PMID 15272876.
- ^ Downie, J. Allan (2005). "Legume Haemoglobins: Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation Needs Bloody Nodules". Current Biology. 15 (6): R196–8. Bibcode:2005CBio...15.R196D. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.007. PMID 15797009. S2CID 17152647.
- ^ a b Martin F. Wojciechowski; Johanna Mahn; Bruce Jones (2006). "Fabaceae". The Tree of Life Web Project.
- ^ Wojciechowski, M. F.; Lavin, M.; Sanderson, M. J. (2014). "A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported sub clades within the family". American Journal of Botany. 91 (11): 1846–62. Bibcode:2004AmJB...91.1846W. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846. PMID 21652332.
- ^ Käss, E.; Wink, M. (1996). "Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: phylogeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL sequences". Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 24 (5): 365–378. Bibcode:1996BioSE..24..365K. doi:10.1016/0305-1978(96)00032-4.
- ^ Käss, E.; Wink, M. (1997). "Phylogenetic relationships in the Papilionoideae (Family Leguminosae) based on nucleotide sequences of cpDNA (rbcL) and ncDNA (ITS1 and 2)". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8 (1): 65–88. Bibcode:1997MolPE...8...65K. doi:10.1006/mpev.1997.0410. PMID 9242596.
- ^ Doyle, Jeff J.; Doyle, Jane L.; Ballenger, Julie A.; Dickson, Elizabeth E.; Kajita, Tadashi; Ohashi, Hiroyoshi (1997). "A phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation". American Journal of Botany. 84 (4): 541–554. Bibcode:1997AmJB...84..541D. doi:10.2307/2446030. JSTOR 2446030. PMID 21708606.
- ^ Lavin, M.; Doyle, J. J.; Palmer, J. D. (1990). "Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast-DNA inverted repeat in the Leguminosae subfamily Papilionoideae" (PDF). Evolution. 44 (2): 390–402. doi:10.2307/2409416. hdl:2027.42/137404. JSTOR 2409416. PMID 28564377.
- ^ Sanderson, M. J.; Wojciechowski, M. F. (1996). "Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: are there "so many species" of Astragalus (Fabaceae)?". Am. J. Bot. 83 (11): 1488–1502. doi:10.2307/2446103. JSTOR 2446103.
- ^ Chappill, J. A. (1995). "Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: the development of an explicit hypothesis". In Crisp, M. D.; Doyle, J. J. (eds.). Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 7: Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. pp. 1–10. ISBN 9780947643799.
- ^ Bruneau, Anne; Mercure, Marjorie; Lewis, Gwilym P.; Herendeen, Patrick S. (2008). "Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes". Botany. 86 (7): 697–718. Bibcode:2008Botan..86..697B. doi:10.1139/B08-058.
- ^ Cardoso, D.; Pennington, R. T.; de Queiroz, L. P.; Boatwright, J. S.; Van Wyk, B.-E.; Wojciechowski, M. F.; Lavin, M. (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". S. Afr. J. Bot. 89: 58–75. Bibcode:2013SAJB...89...58C. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001. hdl:10566/3193.
- ^ Koenen, Erik J. M.; Ojeda, Dario I.; Steeves, Royce; Migliore, Jérémy; Bakker, Freek T.; Wieringa, Jan J.; Kidner, Catherine; Hardy, Olivier J.; Pennington, R. Toby; Bruneau, Anne; Hughes, Colin E. (2019). "Large-scale genomic sequence data resolve the deepest divergences in the legume phylogeny and support a near-simultaneous evolutionary origin of all six subfamilies". New Phytologist. 225 (3): 1355–1369. doi:10.1111/nph.16290. PMC 6972672. PMID 31665814.
- ^ Zhang, Rong; Wang, Yin-Huan; Jin, Jian-Jun; Stull, Gregory W; Bruneau, Anne; Cardoso, Domingos; De Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci; Moore, Michael J; Zhang, Shu-Dong; Chen, Si-Yun; Wang, Jian; Li, De-Zhu; Yi, Ting-Shuang (2020). "Exploration of Plastid Phylogenomic Conflict Yields New Insights into the Deep Relationships of Leguminosae". Syst. Biol. 69 (4): 613–622. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa013. PMC 7302050. PMID 32065640.
- ^ NOTE: The subfamilial name Papilionoideae for Faboideae is approved by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, Article 19.8
- ^ Lloret, L.; Martínez-Romero, E. (2005). "Evolución y filogenia de". Rhizobium. 47 (1–2): 43–60. Archived from the original on 11 April 2013.
- ^ a b c Sprent, J. I. 2001. Nodulation in legumes. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
- ^ Becker T.; et al. (2017). "A tale of four kingdoms – isoxazolin-5-one- and 3-nitropropanoic acid-derived natural products". Natural Product Reports. 34 (4): 343–360. doi:10.1039/C6NP00122J. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002C-51D4-1. PMID 28271107.
- ^ Allen, O. N., & E. K. Allen. 1981. The Leguminosae, A Source Book of Characteristics, Uses, and Nodulation. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, USA.
- ^ Duke, J. A. 1992. Handbook of Legumes of Economic Importance. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
- ^ Graham, P. H.; Vance, C. P. (2003). "Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use". Plant Physiology. 131 (3): 872–877. doi:10.1104/pp.017004. PMC 1540286. PMID 12644639.
- ^ Wojciechowski, M.F. 2006. Agriculturally & Economically Important Legumes.. Accessed 15 November 2008.
- ^ Sprent, Janet I. (2009). Legume Nodulation: A Global Perspective. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-4051-8175-4. Preview available at Google Books.
- ^ The gene bank and breeding of grain legumes (lupine, vetch, soya and beah) / B.S. Kurlovich and S.I. Repyev (Eds.), – St. Petersburg, The N.I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry, 1995, 438p. – (Theoretical basis of plant breeding. V.111)
- ^ Hossaert-Palauqui, M.; Delbos, M. (1983). "Lathyrus tuberosus L. Biologie et perspectives d'amélioration". Journal d'Agriculture Traditionnelle et de Botanique Appliquée. 30 (1): 49–58. doi:10.3406/jatba.1983.3887. ISSN 0183-5173.
- ^ "Tuberous Pea, Lathyrus tuberosus - Flowers - NatureGate". www.luontoportti.com. Retrieved 28 July 2019.
- ^ Oertel, E. (1967). "Nectar and Pollen Plants". US Dep. Agr. Handbook. 335: 10–16.
- ^ Kuklinski, C. 2000. Farmacognosia : estudio de las drogas y sustancias medicamentosas de origen natural. Ediciones Omega, Barcelona. ISBN 84-282-1191-4
- ^ Marquez, A. C., Lara, O.F., Esquivel, R. B. & Mata, E. R. 1999. Composición, usos y actividad biológica: Plantas medicinales de México II. UNAM. First edition. México, D.F.
- ^ "Broom, Dyer's". Retrieved 1 September 2020.
- ^ a b c Macaya J. 1999. Leguminosas arbóreas y arbustivas cultivadas en Chile. Chloris Chilensis Año 2. Nº1.
- ^ Ministerio de Educación de la Nación. Subsecretaría de Coordinación Administrativa. Día de la Flor Nacional "El Ceibo" Archived 12 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Efemérides Culturales Argentinas. Consulted 3 March 2010.
- ^ Gilbert Vargas Ulate. 1997. Geografía turística de Costa Rica. EUNED, 180 p. ISBN 9977-64-900-6, 9789977649009.
- ^ "Lei Nº 6.607, de 7 de dezembro de 1978. O Presidente da República, faço saber que o Congresso Nacional decreta e eu sanciono a seguinte Lei: Art. 1º- É declarada Árvore Nacional a leguminosa denominada Pau-Brasil (Caesalpinia echinata, Lam), cuja festa será comemorada, anualmente, quando o Ministério da Educação e Cultura promoverá campanha elucidativa sobre a relevância daquela espécie vegetal na História do Brasil."
- ^ Boden, Anne (1985). "Golden Wattle: Floral Emblem of Australia" (http). Australian National Botanic Gardens. Retrieved 8 October 2008.
- ^ Williams, Martin (1999). "Golden Enigmatic Beauty" (http). Bahuninia. Retrieved 8 October 2008.
- ^ "How Bluebonnets became the state flower". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 1 August 2025.
External links
[edit]Fabaceae
View on GrokipediaMorphology and Anatomy
Growth Habit
The Fabaceae family exhibits remarkable diversity in growth habits, encompassing herbs, shrubs, vines, lianas, and trees, which allows members to occupy a wide array of ecological niches worldwide.[8] This morphological plasticity is evident in forms ranging from diminutive annual herbs, such as the pea (Pisum sativum), which typically reaches 30-60 cm in height, to towering trees like Koompassia excelsa, which can attain heights of up to 88 m in tropical rainforests.[9][10] Shrubs, such as various Acacia species, often grow to 2-10 m, providing structural support in arid and savanna environments, while vines and lianas, exemplified by genera like Mucuna, employ tendrils or hooks for climbing and can extend several meters in length through forest canopies.[8] Adaptations to specific environments further highlight this versatility; for instance, many shrubby Fabaceae, including palo verde (Parkinsonia spp.), demonstrate high drought tolerance through deep root systems and reduced transpiration, enabling survival in desert conditions.[11] In contrast, climbing vines like those in the Phaseolus genus utilize modified leaf tips as tendrils to ascend supports, facilitating access to light in dense vegetation.[8] Some species also develop spines or prickles for defense, as seen in certain Acacia shrubs, enhancing their persistence in herbivore-rich habitats.[8] Life cycle strategies vary correspondingly, with annual herbs like peas completing their growth, reproduction, and senescence within a single season, perennials such as alfalfa (Medicago sativa) persisting for multiple years through vegetative propagation, and occasional monocarpic species in genera like Lupinus flowering once before dying. Long-lived trees and shrubs, including acacias, often endure for decades or centuries, supporting repeated reproductive episodes and contributing to ecosystem stability.[8] These habits are bolstered by root systems that anchor and nourish the plant, though detailed symbiotic roles are addressed elsewhere.[8]Leaves and Stems
Leaves in Fabaceae are typically alternate and compound, most commonly pinnate or bipinnate, though they can also be palmately compound, trifoliolate, simple, or unifoliolate in certain genera.[12][13] For instance, pinnate leaves with multiple leaflets are prevalent in genera like Phaseolus and Vicia, while bipinnate arrangements occur in Senegalia (formerly part of Acacia).[14] In some cases, leaves are reduced or modified into phyllodes—flattened, leaf-like petioles or rachises that function photosynthetically—particularly in the subgenus Phyllodineae of Acacia s. str., where they aid in reducing water loss in arid environments by minimizing surface area exposure.[15] These phyllodes often exhibit linear or reticulate venation patterns, supporting efficient nutrient transport and structural integrity.[15] A hallmark of Fabaceae leaves is the presence of stipules at the petiole base and stipels at leaflet bases, which are often persistent but can be caducous, varying in size, shape, and function across species.[8] Stipules may serve protective roles, such as spinescent modifications in genera like Machaerium or Senegalia, deterring herbivores, or attract mutualists, as in Vachellia (formerly part of Acacia), where swollen stipular thorns form ant domatia to house protective ants.[14][15] Stipels, when present (e.g., in Rhodopis), are typically minute and subulate, contributing to leaflet attachment stability, though absent in genera like Canavalia.[14] Petioles are often pulvinate, enabling responsive movements for optimal light exposure.[14] Fabaceae leaves generally display bifacial (dorsiventral) structure, with distinct adaxial and abaxial surfaces optimized for photosynthesis: palisade mesophyll on the upper side for light capture and spongy mesophyll below for gas exchange.[13] Venation is predominantly reticulate, with pinnate secondary veins and a hierarchical fine venation density of 1.7–5.7 mm/mm², facilitating efficient water and photosynthate distribution while enhancing mechanical support in compound forms.[15] Some species, like those in the Neltuma clade, exhibit amphistomatous leaves with stomata on both surfaces, an adaptation for enhanced CO₂ uptake in variable light conditions.[15] Stems in Fabaceae range from herbaceous and cylindrical in annuals to woody and robust in trees and shrubs, with diameters up to 30 cm and lengths reaching 30 m in lianas.[14] Modifications include thorns or prickles for defense, as in Gleditsia with branched trunk thorns or Prosopis with massive stem prickles, which can be irregularly distributed or derived from stipules.[15] Climbing species often feature twining stems, tendril-bearing modifications, or successive cambia for increased girth in vines like Schnella.[14] These stem traits support diverse growth habits, such as vining, without delving into broader plant form.[14]Roots and Nodules
The root systems of Fabaceae species are predominantly taproot-based, consisting of a primary root that elongates deeply into the soil, often accompanied by lateral fibrous roots that branch extensively for nutrient and water uptake.[16] This architecture is characteristic of many dicotyledonous plants, including legumes, and contrasts with the more uniformly fibrous systems typical of monocots.[17] In perennial species such as alfalfa (Medicago sativa), the taproot can penetrate several meters into the soil, facilitating access to deeper water reserves.[18] Arid-adapted Fabaceae, like certain species of Prosopis and Acacia, exhibit particularly deep taproots that can extend beyond 10 meters, enabling survival in dry environments by tapping into groundwater unavailable to shallower-rooted plants.[19] Annual legumes, such as subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum), may develop a robust taproot with extensive fibrous laterals during their short lifecycle, prioritizing rapid soil exploration over extreme depth.[20] A defining feature of Fabaceae roots is the formation of nodules, specialized organs induced by infection from soil-dwelling rhizobia bacteria (*Rhizobium* spp. and related genera).[21] Nodule morphology varies between two primary types: determinate nodules, which are spherical and lack a persistent meristem, typically occurring in tropical and subtropical legumes like soybean (Glycine max); and indeterminate nodules, which are elongated and cylindrical with an active apical meristem that allows continuous growth, as seen in temperate species like pea (Pisum sativum).[21] Both types develop through bacterial entry via infection threads, but their internal organization differs, with indeterminate nodules featuring persistent infection zones and vascular tissues.[22] Nodulation initiates when rhizobia release Nod factors—lipochitooligosaccharide signals—that bind to receptors on the host root epidermis, triggering calcium oscillations and subsequent root hair deformation and curling around bacterial clusters.[23] This curling facilitates bacterial attachment and the formation of a tubular infection thread within the root hair, through which rhizobia invade deeper tissues.[24] Concurrently, Nod factors stimulate cell division in the root cortex and pericycle, generating a nodule primordium that differentiates into mature nodules housing bacteroids.[23] Beyond nodulation, Fabaceae roots display adaptations for nutrient acquisition independent of nitrogen fixation, notably through associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). These symbioses, common across the family, involve fungal hyphae penetrating root cortical cells to form arbuscules that enhance phosphorus uptake from soil, particularly in phosphorus-poor environments.[25] Fabaceae exhibit high mycorrhizal dependency compared to other plant families, with AMF colonization often complementing or occurring in non-nodulating species.[25] These root-fungal interactions improve overall nutrient efficiency and plant resilience.[26]Flowers and Inflorescences
The flowers of Fabaceae, also known as the legume family, are typically bisexual and exhibit a high degree of morphological diversity, particularly across its major subfamilies: Papilionoideae (Faboideae), Caesalpinioideae, and Mimosoideae (now included within Caesalpinioideae s.l. in revised classifications that recognize additional subfamilies such as Cercidoideae and Detarioideae).[8][27] In the largest subfamily, Papilionoideae, flowers are predominantly zygomorphic, displaying bilateral symmetry that facilitates specialized pollination mechanisms.[1] The calyx consists of five sepals that are often gamosepalous, forming a tube or campanulate structure with five lobes, which may be equal or unequal in length; this variation aids in species identification and can be more prominent in Caesalpinioideae, where sepals are frequently free and imbricate.[14][8] The corolla in Papilionoideae is characteristically papilionaceous or butterfly-like, comprising five petals arranged in a distinctive pattern: the uppermost petal, known as the standard or banner, is the largest and often brightly colored; two lateral petals form the wings; and the two lowermost petals are fused to create the keel, which encloses the reproductive organs.[1] This arrangement, seen in genera such as Pisum (pea) and Phaseolus (bean), provides zygomorphic symmetry and structural protection for the stamens and pistil.[14] In contrast, Caesalpinioideae flowers are usually zygomorphic with imbricate petals where the median petal overlaps the laterals, as in Cassia species, while Mimosoideae flowers are actinomorphic, with small, valvate petals and radially symmetrical corollas, exemplified by the globose heads of Acacia.[8] The androecium typically includes 10 stamens, though numbers vary from 1 to over 100 in some taxa; in Papilionoideae, they are often diadelphous (nine fused into a tube with one free stamen) or monadelphous (all ten fused), as observed in Lupinus and Crotalaria, respectively, promoting efficient pollen transfer.[12][28] Inflorescences in Fabaceae are indeterminate and highly variable, serving as key taxonomic features. Common types include axillary or terminal racemes, which are prevalent in Papilionoideae (e.g., elongated racemes in Clitoria with resupinate flowers), spikes, and panicles; these may be ascending, hanging, or cauliflorous in some tropical genera.[14] In Mimosoideae, inflorescences often form compact heads or spikes, as in Mimosa or Senegalia, aggregating numerous small flowers for mass display.[8] Caesalpinioideae show a range from solitary flowers to capitula or thyrses, such as the showy spikes in Caesalpinia.[1] Many species incorporate nectar guides, including ultraviolet patterns on the standard petal and volatile scents, to attract pollinators like bees by directing them to nectar rewards within the keel.[29]Fruits and Seeds
The fruits of Fabaceae, known as legumes or pods, are characteristically dry structures derived from a single carpel that typically contain multiple seeds arranged in a single row.[30] These pods vary widely in form and dehiscence, influencing seed dispersal; dehiscent types split open along one or both sutures upon maturity, often explosively in species like Cassia (partridge pea), propelling seeds away from the parent plant to reduce competition.[1] Indehiscent pods remain closed, relying on external agents such as animals or water for dispersal, as seen in Arachis (peanut) where pods develop underground and are unearthed by foraging.[30] Loment types, found in about 50 genera such as Desmodium, feature constrictions between seeds, allowing the pod to break into indehiscent, one-seeded segments that attach to animal fur for zoochory.[30] Specialized fruit forms occur in certain tropical lineages, including samaras—winged, indehiscent, single-seeded structures that facilitate wind dispersal. In the pantropical tribe Dalbergieae, species like Dalbergia produce samara fruits with extended, papery wings that enable autorotative flight, enhancing long-distance dispersal in forested habitats.[31] Seeds of Fabaceae are typically kidney-shaped with a prominent hilum, the scar marking the attachment point to the funicle, and an adjacent lens (strophiole) that serves as a water entry site upon activation.[32] The seed coat, or testa, is often hard and impermeable, imposing physical dormancy to protect against premature germination; this impermeability arises from lignified palisade layers in the outer integument, requiring scarification—mechanical abrasion, acid treatment, or fire—to breach the coat and allow imbibition, as demonstrated in Andean species like Lupinus.[33] Germination follows radicle emergence through the softened hilum region, with the cotyledons providing nutritional reserves for seedling establishment.[32] Legume seeds are rich in storage proteins, comprising 20–40% of dry weight, primarily salt-soluble globulins such as vicilin (7S) and legumin (11S) that accumulate in protein bodies within cotyledons for efficient packaging and mobilization during germination.[34] Nutritionally, these proteins contribute high levels of essential amino acids like lysine, though often limited in sulfur-containing methionine and cysteine, making legumes complementary to cereal grains in human diets; lipids (2–5%) and carbohydrates (up to 65%) round out the composition, supporting their role as energy reserves.[35]Physiology and Biochemistry
Fabaceae species predominantly utilize the C3 photosynthetic pathway, which involves direct fixation of CO₂ by the enzyme Rubisco in mesophyll cells, making it efficient in moderate temperatures but susceptible to photorespiration in hot conditions.[36] The family is categorized into cool-season (C3) and warm-season types.[37] This adaptation is particularly relevant for tropical and subtropical members, enhancing survival in resource-limited habitats. The family is rich in secondary metabolites, which play crucial roles in adaptation and defense. Alkaloids, such as quinolizidine types including lupinine in genera like Lupinus, accumulate in leaves and seeds, deterring herbivores and pathogens while contributing minimally to nitrogen export.[38] Flavonoids and isoflavonoids are ubiquitous, providing UV protection through absorption of harmful radiation and facilitating signaling in symbiotic interactions, with isoflavonoids like those in Glycine max being restricted to the Papilionoideae subfamily.[38] These compounds exhibit patchy phylogenetic distribution, suggesting convergent evolution for ecological advantages.[39] In nitrogen metabolism, many Fabaceae species, especially tropical legumes, rely on ureides—allantoin and allantoic acid—as primary forms for long-distance transport of fixed nitrogen from root nodules to shoots via xylem.[40] These purine-derived compounds are synthesized in nodules through enzymatic pathways involving xanthine dehydrogenase and allantoinase, comprising up to 90% of xylem nitrogen in species like Phaseolus vulgaris, and are catabolized in sinks to release ammonium for assimilation.[41] This ureide system supports efficient recycling of nitrogen resources post-fixation. Stress responses in Fabaceae involve the rapid production of phytoalexins, antimicrobial secondary metabolites induced by pathogen attack or abiotic stress. In the Papilionoideae, pterocarpan phytoalexins such as medicarpin and glyceollin accumulate in response to fungal elicitors, inhibiting microbial growth and contributing to disease resistance, as observed in red clover (Trifolium pratense).[42] These compounds are biosynthesized de novo via isoflavonoid pathways, highlighting the family's biochemical versatility in countering biotic threats.[43]Evolutionary History and Systematics
Origins and Fossil Record
The Fabaceae family is believed to have originated in the Late Cretaceous, with the earliest known fossil evidence consisting of a legume fruit, Leguminocarpum olmensis, dated to approximately 73.5 million years ago (Ma) from the Olmos Formation in Coahuila, Mexico.[44] This discovery extends the family's record into the Campanian stage and supports an early diversification in low-latitude regions of North America, potentially linked to the initial radiation of rosid angiosperms.[44] While direct macrofossils from earlier Cretaceous stages remain scarce, phylogenetic estimates place the stem age of Fabaceae between 80 and 60 Ma, aligning with broader angiosperm expansions during this period.[45] Fossil pollen records provide additional evidence of Fabaceae presence in the Paleocene, shortly after the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Tricolpate pollen grains attributable to early legumes have been identified from late Paleocene sediments (ca. 58–56 Ma) in sites such as the Denver Basin in Colorado, USA, and the Cerrejón Formation in Colombia, indicating rapid post-extinction recovery and initial crown-group diversification.[46] Similar pollen assemblages from middle to late Paleocene deposits in India and England further document the family's early global spread, often in tropical to subtropical paleoenvironments.[47] These microfossils suggest that Fabaceae were already establishing ecological roles, including potential nitrogen-fixing symbioses, by the early Cenozoic. Macroscopic fossils become more abundant in the Eocene, offering insights into fruit and pod morphology. The Messel Pit in Germany, a middle Eocene lagerstätte dated to about 47 Ma, has yielded exceptionally preserved legume pods, including Mimosites spiegeli—elongate, curved structures up to 11 cm long with multiple seed chambers—and Leguminocarpon herendeenii, asymmetrical stipitate pods containing 1–2 seeds.[48] These specimens, alongside winged fruits from early Eocene sites like the Tepee Trail Formation in Wyoming, USA, highlight the family's diversification into diverse pod forms during the Paleogene.[49] Amber inclusions from Eocene deposits, containing pollen-laden insects such as bees and thrips, infer early co-evolutionary interactions between Fabaceae and pollinators, paralleling the family's adaptation to insect-mediated reproduction.[50] The post-Cretaceous diversification of Fabaceae is closely tied to the broader radiation of angiosperms following the K/Pg mass extinction, with nested shifts in diversification rates accelerating in the Paleogene.[45] This period saw the family expand alongside emerging forest ecosystems, facilitated by innovations like nitrogen fixation and specialized pollination syndromes, leading to its current status as one of the largest angiosperm families.[51]Phylogenetic Relationships
The Fabaceae family is monophyletic and occupies a basal position within the order Fabales, where it forms a clade sister to Polygalaceae, with the combined group supported by both plastid and nuclear data.[52] This relationship is corroborated by phylogenomic analyses incorporating thousands of nuclear genes, which resolve Fabales as a robust monophyletic order distinct from other rosids.[53] Genomic studies further affirm the monophyly of Fabaceae itself, highlighting shared genomic features such as conserved synteny in plastid genomes across its diverse lineages.[54] Phylogenetic reconstructions recognize six main monophyletic subfamilies within Fabaceae, as established by the Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) in 2017: Cercidoideae (basal, with varied floral structures), Duparquetioideae (monogeneric), Dialioideae, Detarioideae, Caesalpinioideae (diverse habits from trees to shrubs and lianas), and Faboideae (syn. Papilionoideae; the most species-rich, with papilionoid flowers featuring a banner, wings, and keel).[27] These subfamilies form a branching pattern in molecular phylogenies, with Cercidoideae diverging first, followed by Duparquetioideae, Dialioideae sister to Detarioideae, and then Caesalpinioideae sister to Faboideae, as evidenced by analyses of plastid loci such as matK and rbcL.[27] Key clades within Fabaceae are delineated by molecular markers such as the plastid genes rbcL and matK, which have been pivotal in resolving interfamilial and intersubfamilial relationships; for instance, matK sequences from over 700 genera support the nested structure of these subfamilies and highlight early divergences in non-nodulating lineages.[55] A major distinction emerges between nitrogen-fixing clades, predominantly within Faboideae where root nodule symbiosis is widespread, and non-fixing basal lineages in Cercidoideae and parts of other subfamilies, reflecting multiple evolutionary transitions in symbiotic capability as reconstructed from phylogenomic data.[56] Post-2010 phylogenomic approaches, leveraging whole-genome sequencing and nuclear transcriptomes, have refined these relationships by resolving longstanding ambiguities in problematic genera, such as recircumscribing boundaries in Caesalpinioideae through dense taxon sampling and multi-locus datasets.[51] These studies, including the comprehensive Legume Phylogeny Working Group framework, integrate matK with nuclear markers to confirm the stability of major clades while identifying polyploidization events that underpin diversification in Faboideae.[27]Taxonomy and Subfamilies
The Fabaceae, also known as Leguminosae, represent the third-largest family of flowering plants, encompassing approximately 751 genera and 19,500 species worldwide, making it the largest family within the order Fabales under the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) classification system established in 2016.[57] The dual nomenclature reflects historical conventions: "Leguminosae," proposed by Antoine Laurent de Jussieu in 1789, emphasizes the characteristic legume fruit, while "Fabaceae," introduced by Augustin Pyramus de Candolle in 1825, derives from the genus Faba (broad bean); both names remain valid under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, with Fabaceae prioritized in modern phylogenetic contexts.[8] The current taxonomy, refined by the Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) in 2017 based on a comprehensive molecular phylogeny sampling over 90% of genera, recognizes six monophyletic subfamilies, resolving longstanding issues with the traditional three-subfamily system (Faboideae, Caesalpinioideae, and Mimosoideae) that treated some groups as paraphyletic. This APG IV-influenced framework integrates morphological, anatomical, and DNA sequence data (e.g., matK and other plastid genes) to delineate subfamilies, with Faboideae comprising the majority of diversity.[57] The subfamilies are as follows:- Cercidoideae: The basalmost subfamily with 12 genera and about 335 species, primarily tropical trees or shrubs; notable genera include Bauhinia (butterfly trees) and Cercis (redbuds).[58]
- Duparquetioideae: A monogeneric subfamily with 1 genus (Duparquetia) and 2 species, restricted to West African rainforests.
- Dialioideae: Contains 5 genera and approximately 70 species of tropical trees; examples include Dialium (velvet tamarinds).
- Detarioideae: Includes 84 genera and around 760 species, mostly African tropical trees with some economic importance; representative genera are Tamarindus (tamarind) and Baikiaea.[58]
- Caesalpinioideae: Encompasses 171 genera and roughly 4,760 species, featuring diverse tropical and subtropical trees, shrubs, and lianas; key examples include Cassia (cassias) and Senna, with the former mimosoid clade now integrated here.[58]
- Faboideae (syn. Papilionoideae): The most species-rich subfamily with 478 genera and about 14,000 species, predominantly herbs, shrubs, and vines with papilionoid flowers; prominent genera include Phaseolus (beans), Pisum (peas), and Astragalus (milkvetches, the largest genus with over 3,000 species).[59]