Hubbry Logo
Clemmensen reductionClemmensen reductionMain
Open search
Clemmensen reduction
Community hub
Clemmensen reduction
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Clemmensen reduction
Clemmensen reduction
Clemmensen reduction
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Clemmensen reduction
Named after Erik Christian Clemmensen
Reaction type Organic redox reaction
Reaction
Ketone or Aldehyde
+
Zn(Hg)
+
HCl
↓
Reduction product
Conditions
Catalyst
+Δ
Identifiers
Organic Chemistry Portal clemmensen-reduction
RSC ontology ID RXNO:0000038

Clemmensen reduction is a chemical reaction described as a reduction of ketones or aldehydes to alkanes using zinc amalgam and concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl).[1][2] This reaction is named after Erik Christian Clemmensen, a Danish-American chemist.[3]

The Clemmensen reduction
Scheme 1: Reaction scheme of Clemmensen Reduction.

Clemmensen reduction conditions are particularly effective at reducing aryl[4]-alkyl ketones,[5][6] such as those formed in a Friedel-Crafts acylation. The two-step sequence of Friedel-Crafts acylation followed by Clemmensen reduction constitutes a classical strategy for the primary alkylation of arenes.  

Mechanism

[edit]
Scheme 2: A mechanism of Clemmensen reduction was proposed in 1975.[7][8] The carbonyl is first converted to radical anion (shown as blue), then to zinc carbenoid (shown as red), and then reduced to alkane.

Despite the reaction being first discovered in 1914, the mechanism of the Clemmensen reduction remains obscure. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the reaction, mechanistic studies are difficult, and only a handful of studies have been disclosed.[9][10] Mechanistic proposals generally invoke organozinc intermediates, sometimes including zinc carbenoids, either as discrete species or as organic fragments bound to the zinc metal surface. Brewster proposed the possibility of the reduction occurring at the metal surface. Depending on the constitution of the carbonyl compound or the acidity of the reaction, a carbon-metal or oxygen-metal bond can form after the compound attaches to the metal surface.[9] Furthermore, Vedeja proposed a mechanism involving the formation of radical anion and zinc carbenoid, followed by reduction to alkane[7][8] (as shown above). However, alcohol and carbanion are not believed to be intermediates, since exposing alcohol to Clemmensen conditions rarely affords the alkane product.[9][11]

Application

[edit]

Highly symmetrical hydrocarbon compounds have attracted much interest due to their beautiful structure and potential applications, but the challenges in the synthesis persist. Suzuki et al. synthesized dibarrelane, a type of hydrocarbon compound, using Clemmensen reduction.[12] They hypothesized that the secondary alcohol underwent an SN1 reaction, forming a chloride. Then, an excess amount of zinc reduced the chloride. Importantly, the reaction effectively reduced the two ketones, alcohol, and the methoxycarbonyl group while avoiding any by-products, giving the product in high yield (61%).

Scheme 3: The synthesis of Dibarrelane.[12]

Clemmensen reduction is not particularly effective with aliphatic or cyclic ketones. A modified condition, involving activated zinc dust in an anhydrous-solution of hydrogen chloride in diethyl ether or acetic anhydride, results in a more effective reduction. The modified Clemmensen reduction allows for the selective deoxygenation of ketones in molecules that contain stable groups such as cyano, amido, acetoxy, and carboalkoxy. Yamamura et al. effectively reduced cholestane-3-one to cholestane using the modified Clemmensen condition and gave the product in high yield (~76%).[13]

Scheme 4: Reducing cholestane-3-one to cholestane using Clemmensen reduction.[13]

Problems and alternative approaches

[edit]

To perform the Clemmensen reduction, the substrate must be tolerant of the strongly acidic conditions of the reaction (37% HCl). Several alternatives are available. Wolff-Kishner reduction can reduce acid-sensitive substrates that are stable to strong bases. For substrates stable to hydrogenolysis in the presence of Raney nickel, a milder two-step Mozingo reduction method is available.

Further reading

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Clemmensen reduction

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Clemmensen reduction is a chemical reaction used in organic synthesis to convert a carbonyl group in aldehydes or ketones to a methylene group (or methyl for aldehydes), producing the corresponding hydrocarbon. It involves treatment with zinc amalgam (Zn/Hg) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl) under reflux conditions. This method is particularly suited for acid-tolerant substrates, such as aryl ketones, and complements the Wolff–Kishner reduction, which requires basic conditions. Named after the Danish Erik Clemmensen, who reported it in 1913, the reaction reduces ketones and aldehydes to hydrocarbons using amalgamated and HCl.

Introduction and History

Discovery and Development

The Clemmensen reduction was first discovered in 1913 by Erik Christian Clemmensen, a Danish , while investigating methods to convert aryl alkyl ketones into hydrocarbons. Clemmensen, born in 1876 in , Denmark, had earned his M.S. degree from the Royal Polytechnic Institute in and was affiliated with the , where he received his Ph.D. in the same year as his key publication. His initial experiments involved treating ketones with zinc amalgam in concentrated , leading to the unexpected and complete reduction of the to a methylene moiety. Clemmensen detailed this transformative process in his seminal 1913 paper published in Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft, establishing it as a general method for deoxygenating aldehydes and ketones under acidic conditions. The reaction's simplicity and effectiveness for aryl systems distinguished it from prior reduction techniques, which often required more forcing conditions or produced side products. By the 1920s, the Clemmensen reduction had been widely adopted in synthetic , particularly for preparing alkylated aromatic compounds and polynuclear hydrocarbons from Friedel-Crafts products. Its utility grew through , as evidenced by its frequent application in complex molecule syntheses, though limitations with acid-sensitive substrates prompted early explorations of alternatives. A notable early modification came in 1975 from chemist Eriks Vedejs, who adapted the procedure to anhydrous organic solvents like or with dry gas, enabling milder conditions and higher yields for polyfunctional ketones that were incompatible with the original aqueous protocol. This variant expanded the reaction's scope without altering its core principles, solidifying its role in modern .

Principle of the Reaction

The Clemmensen reduction is a chemical transformation that converts the (C=O) of aldehydes or ketones into a (CH₂), effectively deoxygenating these functional groups to form the corresponding alkanes. This reaction is particularly valuable for aryl ketones and is widely employed in the synthesis of complex polycyclic hydrocarbons where direct alkane formation is required. The general reaction can be represented as: R2C=O+2[H]→R2CH2+H2O\mathrm{R_2C=O + 2[H] \rightarrow R_2CH_2 + H_2O} where the reducing equivalents are provided by amalgamated zinc in acidic conditions, though the exact stoichiometry involves the zinc amalgam and hydrochloric acid. Unlike the Wolff-Kishner reduction, which operates under strongly basic conditions using hydrazine and a base like potassium hydroxide, the Clemmensen reduction proceeds in strongly acidic media, making it complementary for substrates sensitive to base. This acidic environment enables the selective reduction of carbonyl groups in molecules bearing base-labile functionalities, serving as a key step in deoxygenating carbonyls to construct alkane frameworks within intricate synthetic targets. The reaction's selectivity arises from the harsh acidic conditions, which tolerate a range of functional groups such as cyano, acetoxy, phenolic ethers, and alkoxycarbonyl moieties that might otherwise react under basic conditions, while targeting the carbonyl for reduction without affecting isolated double bonds or aromatic rings. This tolerance positions the Clemmensen reduction as an essential tool for late-stage modifications in where preserving other structural elements is critical.

Reaction Conditions and Procedure

Reagents and Preparation

The primary reagents for the Clemmensen reduction are (a Zn/Hg alloy), concentrated (HCl, 37% aqueous solution), and the carbonyl substrate (an or ). The serves as the key , with mercury incorporated in a small amount to activate the zinc surface by removing the layer. Preparation of the zinc amalgam begins with clean , typically in the form of granules, , or mossy pieces, which is activated by washing with dilute HCl if an oxide coating is present. Amalgamation is achieved by treating the with an of mercuric (HgCl₂), often slightly acidified with HCl; for example, 20 g of HgCl₂ is dissolved in 300 mL of containing 10 mL of concentrated HCl, and this is added rapidly to 100 g of under vigorous stirring for 10–15 minutes to form the alloy. The resulting amalgam is filtered through a , washed successively with 500 mL of water (containing trace HCl), , and to remove impurities, and dried briefly in air before use, as prolonged exposure to air can degrade its activity. Mercury handling requires strict precautions due to its and environmental hazards; operations must be performed in a with gloves, goggles, and protective clothing, and all mercury wastes should be collected and disposed of via specialized protocols to prevent contamination. used should be of high purity to ensure effective amalgamation. The reaction solvent is primarily the aqueous medium from the concentrated HCl, which generates upon reaction with the amalgam; for poorly soluble substrates, co-solvents like , , or acetic acid may be added to enhance without interfering with the reduction. Essential equipment includes a reflux setup with a , efficient mechanical stirrer (e.g., Hershberg type), and condenser to manage the and prevent solvent loss; for air-sensitive substrates, a or atmosphere can be maintained using a gas inlet adapter. Stoichiometrically, the zinc amalgam is employed in large excess, typically 10–20 equivalents relative to the carbonyl substrate, while concentrated HCl is used in vast excess (often 20–50 volumes) to maintain acidic conditions and facilitate hydrogen generation throughout the reaction.

Step-by-Step Procedure

The standard laboratory procedure for the Clemmensen reduction begins with the preparation of amalgamated zinc. Zinc dust (typically 10-20 equivalents relative to the substrate) is treated with a dilute aqueous solution of mercuric chloride (0.5-2% HgCl₂) for 5-10 minutes, then filtered, washed thoroughly with water, dilute HCl, and acetone or ethanol to remove excess mercury, and dried under vacuum or air. This fresh amalgam is crucial to ensure reactivity and avoid low yields from inactive metal surfaces. The substrate or (1 equivalent) is dissolved in concentrated (typically 6-12 , 10-20 volumes), often with a co-solvent like 95% (1-5 volumes) if the substrate has limited in acid alone. The solution is placed in a equipped with a condenser and mechanical stirrer. The amalgamated is added portionwise to the stirred solution, and the mixture is heated to (approximately 80-100°C) while monitoring for the evolution of gas, which indicates the onset of the reduction. The reaction is maintained under for 4-24 hours, depending on the substrate, with additional portions of zinc added if gas evolution ceases prematurely. Following the reaction period, the mixture is allowed to cool, and the excess zinc residue is removed by through a pad of Celite or . The filtrate is transferred to a and extracted multiple times (3-4 times) with a non-polar such as , , or (equal volume each time) to isolate the reduced product. The combined organic extracts are washed successively with water, saturated solution (to neutralize residual acid), and , then dried over or . The drying agent is filtered off, and the is removed by rotary evaporation under reduced pressure. The crude product is purified by under vacuum or if necessary. Yields for the Clemmensen reduction typically range from 60-90% for aryl s under standard conditions, though aliphatic s may give lower yields (40-70%) due to side reactions. low yields often involves using freshly prepared amalgam, ensuring conditions to prevent passivation, and avoiding overheating, which can lead to formation. For water-insoluble substrates, a two-phase variation is employed to improve efficiency. The is dissolved in or (5-10 volumes), and this organic phase is vigorously stirred with the aqueous HCl (concentrated, 10-20 volumes) and amalgamated at for 6-12 hours. The phases are then separated, and the organic layer is worked up as described above, often yielding 70-85% for aromatic systems. This method minimizes issues and is particularly useful for acid-sensitive functional groups elsewhere in the molecule.

Mechanism

Proposed Pathways

The Clemmensen reduction begins with acid-catalyzed of the , forming an (R₂C=OH⁺) that resembles an iminium-like species in its electrophilic activation of the carbon center. Two principal theoretical pathways have been proposed for the reduction process, alongside a radical mechanism. The carbanionic mechanism proceeds via a polar pathway involving zinc-mediated to the protonated carbonyl, generating a Zn(II)-bound intermediate that undergoes to form a , ultimately yielding the upon further and . A radical mechanism, involving single-electron transfer (SET) from the surface to the protonated carbonyl to form a , followed by further reduction steps on the metal surface, has also gained support in recent studies. In contrast, the carbenoid mechanism involves initial formation of a dichloride from the protonated carbonyl under the acidic conditions, which eliminates HCl to produce a chloromethylene intermediate; this then coordinates with to form a zinc carbenoid, which is reduced to the final product. Mercury in the zinc amalgam plays a crucial role by preventing surface passivation of the zinc through removal of oxide layers and by promoting efficient to the substrate. The precise pathway remains uncertain owing to the absence of direct observational evidence, with indications that the dominant mechanism may differ based on substrate type, such as aryl versus alkyl carbonyls.

Supporting Evidence

Isotopic labeling studies have provided key insights into the hydrogen sources during the Clemmensen reduction. In the mid-20th century, early kinetic studies such as those by Bachmann and Klug examined the reductions of aryl ketones, laying groundwork for mechanistic probes, while later deuterium labeling experiments confirmed significant incorporation of hydrogen from the solvent and hydrochloric acid into the product. For instance, reduction of ArCOCH₂R substrates in DCl/D₂O led to deuterium incorporation at the reduced methylene position, indicating protonation steps involving the acidic medium rather than direct zinc-hydrogen transfer, consistent with carbenoid, polar, or radical intermediates. These findings challenge purely ionic pathways without solvent participation. Spectroscopic techniques have offered evidence for transient intermediates in controlled model reactions. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy has detected shifts corresponding to zinc-coordinated enolates or chloromethyl zinc species during the early stages of ketone reduction, with characteristic bands around 1600-1700 cm⁻¹ for C=O perturbation and new absorptions near 500-600 cm⁻¹ suggestive of Zn-C bonds. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies on simpler aliphatic models, often conducted under modified anhydrous conditions to isolate intermediates, reveal broadening or shifts in alpha-proton signals indicative of organozinc carbanion formation, supporting stepwise electron transfer and protonation. These observations align with polar, carbenoid, or radical mechanisms but are limited by the heterogeneous nature of standard conditions. Comparative kinetic analyses further bolster a polar or SET mechanism. Studies from the late 1950s demonstrated that aryl ketones, such as , undergo reduction more rapidly than analogous aliphatic ketones like under identical conditions, with activation energies lower for aromatic systems due to stabilization of intermediates by the . This disparity favors pathways involving positively charged or radical intermediates stabilized by the . Representative rate data confirmed dependence on substrate and acid concentration, reinforcing the role of in rate-determining steps. Ultrasound-assisted studies in the showed enhanced reaction efficiency, with yields increasing for challenging aryl alkyl ketones when was applied. This improvement, attributed to cavitation-induced microstirring and localized heating at the zinc surface, implies facilitation of single-electron transfer from amalgam to the carbonyl. The effect was particularly pronounced for electron-deficient substrates, supporting an SET-initiated mechanism. Recent computational modeling using (DFT) has explored carbenoid and radical pathways. Studies employing DFT predict favorable energetics for zinc-bound carbenoids or radical intermediates in heterogeneous environments, aligning with labeling data and providing support for hybrid mechanisms.

Scope and Applications

Substrate Compatibility

The Clemmensen reduction exhibits optimal compatibility with aryl alkyl ketones, which are readily converted to the corresponding alkylbenzenes under the reaction conditions. For instance, is reduced to , highlighting the method's efficacy for such substrates where the aromatic ring stabilizes reactive intermediates. This preference stems from the enhanced reactivity of conjugated carbonyl systems in acidic media. Aldehydes can also undergo the reduction to yield alkanes, though this application is less frequent owing to potential over-reduction side products under the strongly acidic environment. Aromatic aldehydes generally perform better than their aliphatic counterparts, but yields may vary depending on steric factors. Structural limitations significantly impact the reaction's success; aliphatic and dialkyl ketones often afford low yields below 50%, attributed to competing pathways like pinacol coupling or incomplete conversion. The method tolerates several functional groups, including aromatic rings, , and nitro moieties, which remain intact without reduction under the standard conditions. Nitro groups, in particular, show good stability unless highly activated, allowing selective carbonyl deoxygenation in multifunctional molecules. In contrast, acid-labile functionalities such as acetals and epoxides are incompatible, as they undergo or ring-opening during the reaction; for these, basic alternatives like the Wolff-Kishner reduction are preferred to maintain integrity.

Key Synthetic Uses

The Clemmensen reduction plays a significant role in , particularly in steroid chemistry, where it facilitates the of groups to methylene units under acidic conditions that preserve sensitive polyfunctional structures. In early routes developed during the , the method was applied to reduce 3-keto steroids, enabling the construction of key carbon frameworks in and related derivatives by avoiding base-sensitive transformations. For example, the reduction of steroid ketones such as those derived from diosgenin has been utilized to generate triols and other intermediates essential for side-chain modifications, achieving overall yields suitable for multistep sequences. In industrial applications, the Clemmensen reduction is employed to prepare alkylbenzenes from aryl ketones like , yielding compounds such as that serve as precursors in the synthesis of perfumes and pharmaceuticals. This transformation is particularly valuable after Friedel-Crafts acylation steps, where the carbonyl is selectively reduced to an unbranched hydrocarbon chain, supporting large-scale production of aromatic building blocks tolerant to acidic media. A classic laboratory demonstration of its efficiency is the conversion of to fluorene, which proceeds in high yield (typically 80-90%) and exemplifies the method's utility for deoxygenating cyclic aryl ketones without skeletal rearrangement. The reaction also functions as a deoxygenation strategy akin to a protecting group tactic, allowing temporary masking of carbonyls through reduction after other synthetic operations, such as selective functionalizations elsewhere in the molecule. This approach is beneficial in complex syntheses where acidic conditions are preferred over basic alternatives. In modern contexts, the Clemmensen reduction finds use in alkaloid total synthesis when substrates tolerate acidity, as seen in the preparation of Lycopodium alkaloid (+)-heilonine, where it effects methylene installation in a late-stage cyclization sequence with 25% yield alongside deprotection. Similarly, in the synthesis of marine alkaloid halichlorine, the method delivers key reduced intermediates in high yield, highlighting its continued relevance in natural product assembly.

Limitations and Alternatives

Drawbacks of the Method

The Clemmensen reduction employs strongly acidic conditions with concentrated and elevated temperatures, typically refluxing at 80–100°C, which can degrade acid-sensitive functional groups and limit its applicability to substrates bearing such moieties. The use of zinc amalgam introduces mercury, a highly that poses significant risks to handlers and environmental hazards through potential release or . Disposal of the resulting mercury-laden waste further complicates safe and contributes to long-term ecological concerns. The reaction often suffers from low selectivity, particularly with aliphatic ketones, where side reactions such as pinacol coupling or alcohol formation predominate, leading to complex mixtures and reduced efficiency in non-aromatic systems. Yields in the Clemmensen reduction are highly variable, especially for non-aromatic ketones, where moderate to low conversions (e.g., around 56% in representative aliphatic cases) are common, compounded by prolonged reaction times extending up to several days. Scalability remains a major challenge due to the heterogeneous reaction mixture, which hinders efficient stirring and processing at larger volumes, alongside the generation of substantial zinc waste and the inherent toxicity issues that deter industrial adoption.

Comparative Alternatives

The Clemmensen reduction serves as one of several methods for converting carbonyl groups to methylene units, with alternatives chosen based on substrate sensitivity to acid or base, reaction mildness, and synthetic efficiency. The Wolff-Kishner reduction, involving followed by at elevated temperatures (typically 150–200°C), operates under strongly basic conditions and is particularly suited for acid-sensitive substrates that cannot tolerate the acidic environment of the Clemmensen process. However, it is incompatible with substrates bearing acidic protons or base-labile functional groups, such as esters or halides, due to potential or elimination side reactions. Typical yields for the Wolff-Kishner reduction range from 70–95% for aryl and alkyl ketones, with broad applicability to non-enolizable carbonyls but requiring anhydrous, high-boiling solvents like . Another classical alternative is the desulfurization of thioacetals, where a carbonyl is first protected as a dithioacetal (using ethane-1,2-dithiol and a Lewis acid catalyst like BF3·OEt2), followed by reductive cleavage with in or acetone under or at . This two-step sequence provides milder conditions than the Clemmensen reduction, avoiding strong acids altogether, and achieves high yields (80–98%) across a wide substrate scope, including sensitive heterocycles and polyfunctional molecules, though it necessitates the initial sulfur introduction step, which can complicate scalability. The method excels for carbonyls in complex syntheses where to other protecting groups is needed. Modern catalytic approaches, such as palladium-catalyzed using (PMHS) as the source, offer enhanced selectivity and milder conditions compared to traditional methods. In one protocol, 0.4 mol% Pd/C in at with PMHS reduces aromatic ketones and aldehydes to methylene compounds in 87–99% isolated yields, tolerating halides, esters, and nitro groups without affecting them, unlike the harsh conditions of Clemmensen or Wolff-Kishner reductions that may degrade such functionalities. Similarly, rhodium-catalyzed variants using [Rh(μ-Cl)(CO)2]2 (1 mol%) and in at to 40°C deliver good to excellent yields (75–95%) for acetophenones and diaryl ketones, providing a cost-effective, heterogeneous option for late-stage modifications in drug synthesis, though catalyst costs and limited aliphatic scope remain drawbacks. These developments prioritize environmental benignity and functional group compatibility over the robustness of older methods. The Clemmensen reduction is preferentially selected for robust aryl systems that withstand acidic conditions and refluxing HCl, particularly in early synthetic stages where acid tolerance aligns with overall route design, avoiding the high temperatures or multi-step preparations of alternatives.
MethodConditionsTypical YieldsSubstrate ScopeWhen Preferred
Wolff-Kishner reduction, then KOH, 150–200°C, basic70–95%Acid-sensitive s, non-enolizable carbonylsAcid-labile groups present; base-tolerant substrates
Thioacetal desulfurization (Raney Ni)Thioacetal formation (BF3·OEt2), then Raney Ni, EtOH, reflux80–98%Broad, including heterocycles and multifunctionalMild conditions needed; orthogonal required
Pd/C-catalyzed (PMHS)0.4 mol% Pd/C, PMHS, MeOH, RT87–99%Aromatic s and aldehydes, /ester tolerantFunctional group compatibility; scalable, mild

References

  1. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/clemmensen-reduction.shtm
  2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471264180.or001.07
  3. https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/ezine/4719091/100th_Anniversary_Clemmensen_Reduction/
  4. https://www.organicreactions.org/pubchapter/the-clemmensen-reduction/
  5. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Aldehydes_and_Ketones/Reactivity_of_Aldehydes_and_Ketones/Clemmensen_Reduction
  6. https://juniperpublishers.com/omcij/pdf/OMCIJ.MS.ID.555868.pdf
  7. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-03979-4_64
  8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/047084289X.rz003
  9. http://www.orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=CV4P0695
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/clemmensen-reduction
  11. http://orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=CV4P0203
  12. https://hwpi.harvard.edu/files/myers/files/5-reduction.pdf
  13. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264180.or022.03
  14. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01500a029
  15. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01500a030
  16. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2018/08/27/the-wolff-kishner-clemmensen-and-other-sidechain-reductions/
  17. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01653a035
  18. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1986/c3/c39860000893
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040403900605889
  20. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2015/nr/c5nr01356a
  21. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2317-6778
  22. https://annamalaiuniversity.ac.in/studport/download/engg/pharm/resources/BPHARM_2Y_4S_401T_Pharm.Org.Chemistry.pdf
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/clemmensen-reduction
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039128X06000493
  25. https://documents.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LCD/Handbooks/named-reactions-organic-synthesis-ebook.pdf
  26. https://academic.oup.com/bcsj/article-pdf/35/5/735/56183259/bcsj.35.735.pdf
  27. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c13492
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10654894/
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040402023006208
  30. https://www.organicreactions.org/pubchapter/desulfurization-with-raney-nickel/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4471587/
  32. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/nj/c9nj02954k
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.