Hubbry Logo
Colocation centreColocation centreMain
Open search
Colocation centre
Community hub
Colocation centre
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Colocation centre
Colocation centre
Colocation centre
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A colocation centre (also spelled co-location, or shortened to colo) or "carrier hotel", is a type of data centre where equipment, space, and bandwidth are available for rental to retail customers. Colocation facilities provide space, power, cooling, and physical security for the server, storage, and networking equipment of other firms and also connect them to a variety of telecommunications and network service providers with a minimum of cost and complexity. The term "carrier hotel" can refer to a data centre focused on connecting customer and carrier networks together.[1] Colocation centres often host private peering connections between their customers, internet transit providers, cloud providers,[2][3] meet-me rooms for connecting customers together[4] Internet exchange points,[5][6] and landing points and terminal equipment for fibre optic submarine communication cables,[7] connecting the internet, for example at the network access point known as NAP of the Americas, which connects many Latin American ISPs with networks in the US.[8]

Configuration

[edit]

Many colocation providers sell to a wide range of customers, ranging from large enterprises to small companies.[9] Typically, the customer owns the information technology (IT) equipment and the facility provides power and cooling. Customers retain control over the design and usage of their equipment, but daily management of the data centre and facility are overseen by the multi-tenant colocation provider.[10] They may also have a network operations centre (NOC), a help desk, and offices for customer employees, and they may offer remote hands or smart hands service in which on site technicians employed by the colocation provider are allowed to access customer equipment on request to solve customer issues. Some providers also provide roof access to customers for mounting wireless equipment.

  • Cabinets – A cabinet is a locking unit that holds a server rack. In a multi-tenant data centre, servers within cabinets share raised-floor space with other tenants, in addition to sharing power and cooling infrastructure.[11] Some providers sell half cabinets or quarter cabinets as well as space for single servers or rack units.
  • Cages – A cage is dedicated server space within a traditional raised-floor data centre; it is surrounded by mesh walls and entered through a locking door. Cages share power and cooling infrastructure with other data centre tenants.
  • Suites – A suite is a dedicated, private server space within a traditional raised-floor data centre; it is fully enclosed by solid partitions and entered through a locking door. Suites may share power and cooling infrastructure with other data centre tenants, or have these resources provided on a dedicated basis.
  • Modules – data centre modules are purpose-engineered modules and components to offer scalable data centre capacity. They typically use standardised components, which make them easily added, integrated or retrofitted into existing data centres, and cheaper and easier to build.[12] In a colocation environment, the data centre module is a data centre within a data centre, with its own steel walls and security protocol, and its own cooling and power infrastructure. "A number of colocation companies have praised the modular approach to data centers to better match customer demand with physical build outs, and allow customers to buy a data center as a service, paying only for what they consume."[13]

Building features

[edit]

Buildings with data centres inside them are often easy to recognise by the amount of cooling equipment located outside or on the roof.[14]

A typical server rack, commonly seen in colocation

Colocation facilities have many other special characteristics:

  • Fire protection systems, including passive and active elements, as well as implementation of fire prevention programmes in operations. Smoke detectors are usually installed to provide early warning of a developing fire by detecting particles generated by smouldering components prior to the development of flame. This allows investigation, interruption of power, and manual fire suppression using hand held fire extinguishers before the fire grows to a large size. A fire sprinkler system is often provided to control a full scale fire if it develops. Clean agent fire suppression gaseous systems are sometimes installed to suppress a fire earlier than the fire sprinkler system. Passive fire protection elements include the installation of fire walls around the space, so a fire can be restricted to a portion of the facility for a limited time in the event of the failure of the active fire protection systems, or if they are not installed.
  • 19-inch racks for data equipment and servers, 21-inch racks or 23-inch racks for telecommunications equipment
  • Cabinets and cages for physical access control over tenants' equipment. Depending on one's needs a cabinet can house individual or multiple racks.[15]
  • Overhead or underfloor cable rack (tray) and fibreguide, power cables usually on separate rack from data
  • Air conditioning is used to control the temperature and humidity in the space. ASHRAE recommends a temperature range and humidity range for optimal electronic equipment conditions versus environmental issues.[16] The electrical power used by the electronic equipment is converted to heat, which is rejected to the ambient air in the data centre space. Unless the heat is removed, the ambient temperature will rise, resulting in electronic equipment malfunction. By controlling the space air temperature, the server components at the board level are kept within the manufacturer's specified temperature and humidity range. Air conditioning systems help keep equipment space humidity within acceptable parameters by cooling the return space air below the dew point. Too much humidity and water may begin to condense on internal components. In case of a dry atmosphere, ancillary humidification systems may add water vapour to the space if the humidity is too low, to avoid static electricity discharge problems which may damage components.
  • Low-impedance electrical ground
  • Few, if any, windows

Colocation data centres are often audited to prove that they attain certain standards and levels of reliability; the most commonly seen systems are SSAE 16 SOC 1 Type I and Type II (formerly SAS 70 Type I and Type II) and the tier system by the Uptime Institute or TIA. For service organisations today, SSAE 16 calls for a description of its "system". This is far more detailed and comprehensive than SAS 70's description of "controls".[17] Other data centre compliance standards include Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) audit and PCI DSS Standards.[18]

Power

[edit]

Colocation facilities generally have generators that start automatically when utility power fails, usually running on diesel fuel. These generators may have varying levels of redundancy, depending on how the facility is built. Generators do not start instantaneously, so colocation facilities usually have battery backup systems. In many facilities, the operator of the facility provides large inverters to provide AC power from the batteries. In other cases, customers may install smaller UPSes in their racks.

Some customers choose to use equipment that is powered directly by 48 VDC (nominal) battery banks. This may provide better energy efficiency, and may reduce the number of parts that can fail, though the reduced voltage greatly increases necessary current, and thus the size (and cost) of power delivery wiring. An alternative to batteries is a motor–generator connected to a flywheel and diesel engine.

Many colocation facilities can provide redundant, A and B power feeds to customer equipment, and high end servers and telecommunications equipment often can have two power supplies installed.

Colocation facilities are sometimes connected to multiple sections of the utility power grid for additional reliability.

Internal connections

[edit]

Colocation facility owners have differing rules regarding cross-connects between their customers, some of whom may be carriers. These rules may allow customers to run such connections at no charge, or allow customers to order such connections for a monthly fee. They may allow customers to order cross-connects to carriers, but not to other customers. Some colocation centres feature a "meet-me-room" where the different carriers housed in the centre can efficiently exchange data.[19]

Most peering points sit in colocation centres and because of the high concentration of servers inside larger colocation centres, most carriers will be interested in bringing direct connections to such buildings. In many cases, there will be a larger Internet exchange point hosted inside a colocation centre, where customers can connect for peering.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Colocation centre

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A colocation centre, often abbreviated as "colo," is a specialized facility that allows multiple organizations to rent physical space—typically in the form of racks, cages, or suites—for their own servers, storage systems, and networking , while the provider delivers shared including power, cooling, connectivity, and . This model enables customers to maintain full control over their hardware and software configurations without the need to build or operate their own dedicated facilities. Colocation centres emerged prominently in the late during the dot-com boom, as businesses sought scalable solutions for housing internet-related infrastructure amid rapid growth in web hosting and demands. By the early 2000s, the industry faced a setback following the dot-com crash, but it rebounded with the expansion of , , and enterprise IT outsourcing, evolving from basic rack rental to sophisticated services integrating hybrid environments. As of 2025, these centres serve a wide range of users, from small businesses needing cost-effective to large enterprises requiring high-availability disaster recovery sites, with surging demand driven by workloads and . Key advantages of colocation include significantly lower upfront capital costs compared to constructing private data centres, as customers avoid expenses for real estate, redundant power systems, and HVAC infrastructure. They also provide access to professional-grade reliability features, such as Tier III or IV uptime certifications, diverse carrier connectivity for low-latency networking, and enhanced measures like biometric access and 24/7 monitoring. Additionally, colocation supports environmental through shared resources, reducing overall per tenant and enabling compliance with standards. However, customers must manage their own equipment maintenance and cybersecurity, often partnering with the provider for optional .

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A colocation centre, also known as a colocation data center or "colo," is a specialized facility where multiple organizations rent physical space to house their own servers, storage systems, and networking , while essential infrastructure such as power supply, cooling, and provided by the facility operator. This model allows businesses to maintain control over their hardware and software configurations without the need to construct and manage an entire themselves. The primary purposes of colocation centres include enabling cost savings through in shared resources, providing scalable capacity to accommodate fluctuating IT demands, supporting disaster recovery by offering redundant sites for data replication, and ensuring proximity to major network exchange points for reduced latency in data transmission. These facilities address the need for reliable, environments where organizations can focus on their core operations rather than maintenance. Key benefits encompass significant reductions in by avoiding the upfront costs of building private facilities, access to expert on-site maintenance and monitoring services, and enhanced operational flexibility for rapid scaling or reconfiguration of IT resources as business needs evolve. Colocation also delivers , often with uptime guarantees exceeding 99.99%, which is critical for mission-critical applications. Typical users include large enterprises seeking to optimize their IT footprints, cloud service providers extending their hybrid environments, and financial institutions requiring ultra-reliable to support high-volume transactions and . Among cloud service providers, most cloud PC providers—particularly those offering GPU-intensive applications such as gaming and rendering—opt for colocation rather than building their own data centers and hardware due to the extremely high costs involved, often ranging from millions to billions of dollars for construction and setup, as well as the specialized expertise required in cooling, power management, maintenance, and scaling, which smaller or mid-sized providers typically lack. Renting space from colocation specialists proves more cost-effective and scalable, especially for such resource-intensive workloads. Only the largest hyperscale providers, like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, fully manage their own infrastructure. This distinction highlights the fundamental difference between colocation data centres, which provide physical space and shared infrastructure for businesses to manage their own servers and IT systems, and hyperscale cloud providers such as AWS or Google Cloud, which offer fully managed cloud services where the provider handles the hardware, software, and scalability on a massive scale.

History and Evolution

Colocation centres emerged in the early 1990s amid the rapid expansion of internet infrastructure, particularly during the dot-com boom, when businesses sought reliable, shared facilities to host servers and support growing digital operations. In the United States, the facilitated deregulation, enabling competitive telecom carriers to build interconnected facilities known as carrier hotels, which laid the groundwork for modern colocation services. In , one of the earliest examples was Telehouse's facility in London's Docklands, operational since 1990 as the continent's first purpose-built neutral colocation site, catering to the burgeoning demand for high-speed connectivity. The late saw explosive growth in colocation facilities tied to the dot-com surge, but the 2000-2001 bust led to overcapacity and a market contraction, with many unfinished projects abandoned. Recovery began in the mid-2000s as enterprises consolidated operations and adopted more efficient models, setting the stage for renewed investment. By the , colocation experienced significant expansion driven by the rise of and analytics, allowing companies to scale without building proprietary infrastructure. Over time, colocation centres evolved from basic shared rack spaces with minimal redundancy to sophisticated, Tier-rated facilities emphasizing uptime and fault tolerance. This shift was influenced by the Uptime Institute's Tier Classification System, introduced in 1995, which standardized performance levels from Tier I (basic) to Tier IV (fault-tolerant), promoting advanced redundancy in power, cooling, and networking. As of 2025, colocation trends reflect integration with to reduce latency for real-time applications, alongside sustainability efforts such as adopting sources to lower carbon footprints. Hyperscale demand from AI workloads has further accelerated growth, with projections for over 10 GW of new colocation and hyperscale capacity to break ground globally this year.

Facility Design

Building Features

Colocation centres are engineered with robust structural elements to ensure the reliability and longevity of hosted IT equipment. These facilities typically employ for the building and core, providing exceptional load-bearing capacity and resistance to environmental stresses such as wind and . Raised access floors, often elevated 12 to 24 inches above the structural slab, facilitate underfloor cabling distribution and airflow while supporting heavy equipment loads up to 240 pounds per , including and operational demands. In earthquake-prone regions, seismic bracing is integrated into the , including restraints for server racks weighing up to 3,000 pounds each to comply with standards like ASCE 7-22, minimizing and overturning risks that could disrupt operations. Space allocation within colocation centres optimizes density and tenant privacy through standardized rack configurations and partitioned areas. Standard server racks measure approximately 19 inches wide by 42 rack units (U) high, equivalent to about 73.5 inches, accommodating up to 38-40 usable U for equipment while allowing for cooling aisles that occupy roughly 50% of the rack space. Tenants can opt for private cages, enclosing multiple racks (e.g., quarter or half configurations of 10-20 U) with chain-link or solid barriers for security, or larger suites offering dedicated rooms for extensive deployments. The facility layout distinguishes white space—the active IT hosting area—for racks and equipment from gray space, which supports ancillary infrastructure; a typical ratio maintains about 1:1 to balance scalability and efficiency. Environmental adaptations in colocation centres prioritize equipment protection through integrated safety and climate systems. Fire suppression commonly utilizes clean-agent gases like FM-200 (HFC-227ea), though it is being phased out in favor of lower-GWP alternatives such as Novec 1230, which rapidly extinguishes flames by absorbing heat without residue or water damage, discharging in under 10 seconds to safeguard electronics from electrical, combustible, and liquid fires. Basic humidity control adheres to guidelines, targeting 20-80% relative humidity to prevent below 20% or above 80%, achieved via integrated HVAC without overemphasizing narrow bands. Modular expansion capabilities enable phased growth, with prefabricated modules allowing addition of white space increments up to several megawatts without full facility downtime, supporting scalable colocation demands. Location selection for colocation centres emphasizes proximity to urban economic hubs and fibre optic networks to minimize latency and enhance connectivity. Facilities are often sited near major internet exchange points, such as those in —handling over 70% of U.S. due to its dense fibre infrastructure—or Frankfurt, Germany, Europe's largest colocation market with extensive carrier-neutral connectivity.

Configuration Options

Colocation centres offer tenants a range of configuration options to tailor their deployment based on operational requirements, from shared rack spaces to fully private suites. The primary configurations include rack-level setups, where customers rent individual racks or partial racks within a shared hall, providing cost-effective access to shared infrastructure for smaller-scale operations. represent an intermediate option, enclosing multiple racks in a fenced or partitioned private area for enhanced and organization, suitable for mid-sized deployments needing isolation without full control. Suites provide complete through dedicated , allowing extensive customization of the internal layout and access protocols, ideal for enterprises requiring maximum control. Hybrid models combine elements of these, such as a with additional suite-like features or modular expansions, enabling flexible scaling across configurations. Equipment deployment in colocation centres supports a variety of hardware, including standard servers and storage arrays for general needs, as well as specialized components like GPUs for AI and workloads. Modern facilities increasingly support liquid cooling solutions for high-density racks to accommodate AI and GPU-intensive workloads. Rack densities vary significantly to accommodate different profiles, with low-density setups typically ranging from 1-5 kW per rack for traditional enterprise servers, while high-density configurations exceed 20 kW per rack to handle power-intensive GPU clusters. Average rack densities have risen to around 12 kW in modern facilities, reflecting the shift toward AI-driven demands, though facilities often support scalable provisioning to match tenant growth. Customization features enhance tenant control and efficiency, including cross-connects that enable direct, low-latency interconnections between customer equipment and carrier networks without public routing. Remote hands services allow on-site provider staff to perform basic tasks like or equipment rebooting on behalf of tenants, reducing the need for constant physical presence. Scalability is facilitated through incremental additions, such as expanding from a single rack to a full cage or suite, with modular designs supporting phased deployments over time. Selection of a configuration depends on factors like security requirements, anticipated power draw, and business growth projections. For instance, organizations prioritizing high security and customization often opt for suites, while those with variable needs might choose rack-level for agility. Retail colocation models, targeting smaller tenants with rack or cage options under 10 cabinets, emphasize ready-to-use services and higher per-unit costs for flexibility. In contrast, wholesale models cater to large-scale users leasing entire suites or data hall sections with committed power capacities, offering economies of scale for hyperscale or enterprise deployments. These choices align with power allocation strategies, ensuring configurations match available facility resources without overprovisioning.

Infrastructure

Power Systems

Colocation centers rely on robust power delivery systems to ensure reliable supply to tenants' IT equipment. Primary power typically enters the facility through multiple utility feeds from the , providing high-voltage input that is stepped down via on-site transformers to safer, usable levels for operations. Power is then conditioned and distributed across the facility via power distribution units (PDUs), with PDUs featuring metering capabilities at the rack level to enable precise monitoring of power consumption by individual tenants. This setup allows for granular tracking of energy usage, supporting billing accuracy and without disrupting operations. To prevent , colocation centers implement redundancy models such as and 2N configurations, where N represents the minimum power capacity required to support the full IT load. In an setup, an additional component—like an extra (UPS) unit—provides capability if one fails, ensuring continuity during maintenance or faults. A 2N configuration doubles the infrastructure, creating two fully independent power paths that operate in parallel without shared dependencies, offering higher for mission-critical applications. UPS systems, central to these models, incorporate battery backups that sustain operations for typically 5-15 minutes at full load during outages, bridging the gap until longer-term backups activate and allowing for safe equipment shutdown if needed. Backup power is primarily provided by diesel generators equipped with automatic transfer switches (ATS) that detect utility failures and seamlessly shift the load within seconds. These generators are sized to handle the facility's and are supported by on-site fuel storage tanks capable of sustaining runtime for 48-72 hours, depending on load and refueling . As of 2025, colocation centers are adapting to higher power densities, often exceeding 50 kW per rack due to AI and demands, with a shift toward lithium-ion batteries in UPS systems for improved efficiency and shorter runtimes around 5 minutes. The Uptime Institute's Tier classification system (I-IV) further defines power reliability standards, with Tier I offering basic non-redundant power and Tier IV providing fully fault-tolerant systems with multiple independent sources and distribution paths to achieve 99.995% uptime. Efficiency in power systems is measured by (PUE), calculated as the ratio of total facility to the energy used solely by IT equipment, highlighting overhead from power delivery and backups. Colocation centers typically target PUE values below 1.5 to optimize costs and , with modern facilities achieving 1.2-1.4 through efficient transformers, metering, and designs that minimize waste.

Cooling and Environmental Controls

Colocation centers employ sophisticated cooling systems to dissipate the substantial heat generated by densely packed IT , ensuring reliable operation and preventing thermal s. These systems typically maintain inlet air temperatures between 18°C and 27°C (64.4°F to 80.6°F) for Classes A1 to A4 hardware, as recommended by guidelines, while controlling relative humidity within 20% to 80% to mitigate issues like static discharge or condensation. Precision environmental controls are essential, as overheating can reduce lifespan and increase rates, with cooling often accounting for 30-40% of a facility's . Air-based cooling remains the predominant method in colocation centers, utilizing Computer Room Air Conditioning (CRAC) units for direct cooling via refrigerants or Computer Room Air Handling (CRAH) units that circulate chilled water to manage heat. CRAC and CRAH systems incorporate variable-speed fans to adjust airflow dynamically based on load, enhancing energy efficiency by reducing fan power during low-demand periods. Liquid cooling technologies are increasingly adopted for high-density racks—particularly those exceeding 40 kW driven by AI workloads as of 2025—including direct-to-chip methods that circulate coolant through cold plates attached to processors and immersion cooling that submerges servers in non-conductive dielectric fluids to achieve superior heat transfer and up to 40% energy savings over air-based systems. In climates with consistently cool external air, free cooling leverages outside air through economizers or heat exchangers, bypassing mechanical chillers to lower operational costs and energy use when temperatures permit. Effective airflow management is critical to optimize cooling distribution, with hot/cold aisle containment designs preventing the mixing of exhaust heat from server rear intakes and cool supply air from front intakes. In these configurations, aisles receive conditioned air via perforated raised floors or overhead ducts, while hot aisles are enclosed to direct warm air back to cooling units, yielding efficiency gains of 10% to 35% by allowing higher supply temperatures and reduced fan speeds in CRAC/CRAH systems. Containment can be implemented via physical barriers like panels or curtains, with aisle containment often preferred for its compatibility with existing infrastructure and ability to support use. Environmental monitoring relies on distributed sensors for real-time measurement of , , airflow velocity, and differentials across the facility, integrated into a Building Management System (BMS) for centralized oversight. BMS platforms use this data to automate adjustments, such as modulating setpoints or fan speeds, ensuring compliance with operational envelopes and enabling through . These systems often interface with DCIM tools for holistic visibility, alerting operators to anomalies like hotspots before they impact equipment performance. Sustainability in cooling emphasizes reducing resource intensity, with designs incorporating variable-speed components and to minimize electricity use, alongside heat reuse strategies that capture waste thermal energy for or on-site applications. Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE), defined as total annual water withdrawal divided by IT equipment energy use (in liters/kWh), guides efforts to limit evaporative cooling demands, targeting values below 0.5 in water-stressed regions through closed-loop systems or air-side economizers. Such practices align with broader goals of lowering the facility's overall environmental footprint while maintaining .

Connectivity

Internal Connections

Colocation centers utilize infrastructure to enable scalable and high-performance intra-facility networking between tenant equipment and shared resources. This typically includes Category 6A twisted-pair cables, which support Ethernet speeds up to 10 Gbps over distances of 100 meters, and OM4 multimode fiber optic cables, capable of handling up to 100 Gbps over distances up to 150 meters with minimal signal loss. Patch panels, often installed in dedicated meet-me rooms, serve as centralized termination points for these cables, allowing for organized cross-connections and straightforward reconfiguration to accommodate tenant needs in dynamic environments. Cross-connect services form a core component of internal connectivity, providing direct physical interconnections between tenants' racks or equipment without relying on external networks. These links employ either cabling for cost-effective, short-distance connections or optic cables for higher-capacity transmissions, with supported speeds ranging from 1 Gbps to 100 Gbps or more depending on the medium and configuration. Facilities bill cross-connects on a per-connection basis, with monthly fees typically starting at $100 and scaling to several hundred dollars based on factors such as cable type, length, and bandwidth. This setup delivers dedicated bandwidth and ultra-low latency, enhancing performance for data-intensive applications like financial trading or content delivery. The internal backbone infrastructure, managed by the colocation provider, integrates high-capacity switches and routers to route traffic across the facility and facilitate access to shared core services. Core switches at the aggregation layer handle intra-center traffic aggregation, often using ports supporting 100 Gbps or 400 Gbps links, while routers manage protocol conversions and path optimization for reliable delivery. Tenants can leverage this backbone for communal resources, such as DNS servers for name resolution or load balancers that distribute workloads across multiple servers to improve availability and response times. To optimize resource utilization, colocation centers implement bandwidth management through (QoS) policies that classify and prioritize traffic types, ensuring critical applications receive preferential treatment amid varying loads. These mechanisms help maintain ultra-low intra-center latency, often in the sub-millisecond range for cross-connect paths, minimizing delays in real-time communications.

External Connectivity

External connectivity in colocation centres enables tenants to link their to broader networks beyond the facility, supporting high-speed exchange with global carriers, service providers (ISPs), and platforms. This is achieved through specialized that ensures low-latency, reliable access to external resources, minimizing dependence on public routes and enhancing overall . Carrier access is primarily facilitated via meet-me rooms (MMRs), secure areas within the colocation facility where tenants establish direct physical connections to telecommunications companies (telcos), ISPs, and cloud providers. These rooms allow for cross-connects that bypass traditional carrier loops, reducing latency and costs while providing carrier-neutral options for redundancy. For instance, tenants can connect to Amazon Web Services (AWS) via AWS Direct Connect, which offers dedicated private links from the colocation site to AWS cloud services at speeds up to 100 Gbps per connection, improving security and throughput over public internet. Similarly, Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute enables private extensions from colocation facilities to Azure and Microsoft 365, supporting virtual cross-connections with bandwidth options from 50 Mbps to 100 Gbps and backed by service level agreements (SLAs) for consistent performance. Proximity to internet exchange points (IXPs) further enhances external connectivity by allowing direct arrangements, where networks exchange traffic without intermediaries. Colocation centres located near major IXPs, such as in —which interconnects over 1,000 networks across more than 30 regional data centres—enable tenants to peer cost-neutrally, significantly lowering transit expenses and reducing latency through fewer hops. This setup supports high-capacity ports up to 400 Gbps, facilitating efficient data flows for applications like streaming and content delivery while maintaining to avoid outages. To ensure resilience, colocation centres incorporate diverse with multiple fibre entry points, preventing single points of failure by distributing incoming cables across separate paths. These entry points connect to extensive fibre networks, such as Lumen's ultra-low-loss system spanning over 550 sites, allowing scalable connectivity up to 400 Gbps per link for demanding workloads like AI processing. This design complies with high-availability standards and supports rapid provisioning to meet fluctuating demands. Available service options include IP transit for routed , Ethernet services for point-to-point Layer 2 connectivity, and leases for dedicated, unlit optical capacity that tenants can configure independently. IP transit connects to Tier 1 carriers and IXPs like , offering multi-terabit scalability with low latency under 50 ms. Ethernet services provide flexible bandwidth from 10 Mbps to 100 Gbps, while leases enable custom high-capacity links between facilities, ideal for secure, high-throughput private networks. These services typically include SLAs guaranteeing 99.99% uptime, ensured through redundant uplinks and 24/7 monitoring.

Security and Operations

Physical and Data Security

Colocation centers employ layered measures to protect hardware and from unauthorized access and external threats. These facilities typically feature robust perimeter controls, including high-security fencing topped with , concrete barriers, and anti-vehicle elements such as bollards and traps designed to prevent attacks. Gated entrances with vehicular inspections further restrict entry, ensuring that only approved vehicles and personnel can approach the site. Access to the facility is tightly controlled through zoned systems, where tenants receive tailored permissions, such as keycard or proximity badge entry to dedicated cages or suites enclosing their equipment. Biometric , including or scans, is commonly integrated for high-sensitivity areas like server rooms, often combined with multifactor methods such as PINs to verify identity. Mantraps—enclosed vestibules with interlocking doors and sensors—prevent by holding individuals until authentication is complete. Continuous surveillance enhances these controls, with 24/7 systems covering perimeters, entrances, and internal zones, often augmented by AI-driven motion detection for anomaly identification. As of 2025, emerging technologies such as drone monitoring and AI-powered predictive threat detection are increasingly adopted to further bolster . On-site armed guards, trained in threat response, patrol the facility, monitor feeds in real time, and conduct vehicle checks to maintain vigilance. Data security in colocation environments focuses on safeguarding digital assets through network-level protections. Cross-connects between tenant equipment and networks are secured with encryption standards like AES-256, which scrambles data in transit to ensure against interception. Facilities often provide services at the edge, absorbing and rerouting malicious traffic to prevent service disruptions for hosted systems. Firewall services, including managed intrusion detection and prevention systems, filter inbound and outbound traffic based on predefined policies to block unauthorized access. Incident response capabilities are supported by an on-site (SOC), where dedicated teams conduct real-time monitoring of physical and network activities using integrated logs and alerts. This setup enables rapid detection and containment of threats, with comprehensive audit logs recording all access and system events for forensic analysis and verification.

Management and Compliance

Colocation centers are managed through rigorous operational frameworks designed to ensure and efficiency, often incorporating service level agreements (SLAs) that guarantee 99.999% uptime, translating to no more than about five minutes of annual downtime. These SLAs typically include financial penalties for breaches and are supported by remote monitoring systems such as Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) tools, which provide real-time oversight of power, cooling, and IT assets to optimize performance and prevent disruptions. Additionally, 24/7 on-site staffing by certified engineers ensures continuous oversight, addressing challenges like talent shortages in electrical and mechanical roles that affect 30-33% of operators. Maintenance procedures in colocation centers emphasize proactive and standardized practices to minimize risks, including scheduled downtime notifications provided in advance to tenants for planned activities like equipment upgrades or system testing. Vendor certifications, such as those from BICSI for cabling and infrastructure installation, ensure that all service providers meet industry benchmarks for quality and reliability. Predictive analytics, leveraging AI and machine learning on sensor data, further enhances these efforts by forecasting potential failures in critical systems like HVAC or power distribution, allowing preemptive interventions that reduce unplanned outages by up to 50% in some implementations. Compliance in colocation centers involves adherence to international and regional standards to protect data integrity and operational resilience. ISO 27001 certification establishes an information security management system (ISMS) that systematically addresses risks to confidentiality, integrity, and availability through ongoing risk assessments and controls. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) mandates stringent data protection measures for handling EU personal data, including data minimization and breach notification within 72 hours, directly applying to colocation providers processing such information. Similarly, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) requires robust IT controls for accurate financial reporting in applicable sectors, ensuring audit trails and access restrictions in shared environments. The standard rates infrastructure on tiers (1-4) for and , with higher tiers like Rated-4 offering concurrent maintainability to support business continuity. As of 2025, compliance efforts are increasingly focusing on AI governance and requirements amid evolving global regulations. Auditing and reporting practices reinforce accountability, featuring regular third-party audits such as SOC 2 Type II reports that verify controls over a six-month period for security and availability. disclosures are increasingly mandatory, with operators using frameworks like the Protocol to report Scope 2 emissions from purchased energy, often achieving certifications such as for efficient facilities. Tenant reporting on resource usage, including power consumption via sub-metering, enables accurate allocation of emissions and costs, facilitating compliance with goals and reducing overall environmental impact by up to 24% through optimized sharing.

References

  1. https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Data-center-acronyms-1.pdf
  2. https://www.facilitiesnet.com/datacenters/article/A-Brief-History-Of-Colocation--17035
  3. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/colocation/data-centers-vs-colocation-key-differences-and-use-cases
  4. https://www.jll.com/en-us/insights/market-outlook/data-center-outlook
  5. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/colocation/colocation-data-center-vs-private-data-center-which-is-right-for-you-
  6. https://uptimeinstitute.com/tiers
  7. https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/16-more-ways-cut-energy-waste-data-center/select-sustainable
  8. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/colocation/colocation-managed-services-pros-and-cons-for-providers
  9. https://www.equinix.com/what-is-colocation
  10. https://www.digitalrealty.com/resources/articles/what-is-colocation
  11. https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/colocation-data-center
  12. https://www.tierpoint.com/it-strategic-guides/colocation-data-center/
  13. https://www.hpe.com/us/en/what-is/data-center-colocation.html
  14. https://services.global.ntt/en-us/insights/blog/data-centers-how-to-benefit-from-colocation
  15. https://ussignal.com/blog/colocation-data-centers-what-to-know/
  16. https://teamsilverback.com/six-key-benefits-of-data-center-colocation/
  17. https://cologix.com/resources/infographic-and-videos/faqs-what-are-the-key-benefits-of-colocation-for-it-infrastructure/
  18. https://www.databank.com/resources/blogs/everything-you-need-to-know-about-colocation/
  19. https://www.coresite.com/blog/how-colocation-supports-essential-services
  20. https://journal.uptimeinstitute.com/data-center-costs-set-to-rise-and-rise/
  21. https://ecosystem.aethir.com/blog-posts/gpu-colocation-meets-decentralization-why-aethirs-unique-approach-is-a-game-changer-for-ai-and-gaming
  22. https://www.datacenters.com/news/the-gaming-world-and-its-reliance-on-colocation-services
  23. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/hyperscale-vs-colocation
  24. https://blog.equinix.com/blog/2020/08/27/hyperscale-vs-colocation/
  25. https://www.digitalrealty.com/resources/articles/a-brief-history-of-data-centers
  26. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/the-rise-and-rebirth-of-carrier-hotels/
  27. https://datacentremagazine.com/top10/top-10-data-centre-companies-in-europe
  28. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/building-boom-leads-to-data-center-crash/
  29. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/marketwatch/data-centers-times-crisis/
  30. https://www.datacate.net/data-centers-a-timeline-of-growth-and-expansion/
  31. https://journal.uptimeinstitute.com/explaining-uptime-institutes-tier-classification-system/
  32. https://www.tierpoint.com/blog/data-center-industry-trends/
  33. https://www.structuremag.org/article/design-parameters-for-data-center-facilities/
  34. https://dgtlinfra.com/data-center-space/
  35. https://www.candoifp.com/blog/2019/04/18/fm-200-fire-suppression-for-data-centers/
  36. https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction/what-epas-proposed-rule-phasedown-hydrofluorocarbons-hfcs
  37. https://www.colocationamerica.com/blog/data-center-humidity-levels
  38. https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/thermal-guidelines-for-data-processing-environments
  39. https://www.colocationamerica.com/what-is-a-modular-data-center
  40. https://www.datacenters.com/news/ashburn-singapore-and-frankfurt-the-world-s-data-center-giants
  41. https://cardinalnews.org/2025/07/29/the-famous-claim-that-70-of-the-worlds-internet-traffic-goes-through-northern-virginia-is-wrong/
  42. https://www.databank.com/resources/blogs/choosing-the-right-colocation-space-rack-vs-cage-vs-suite/
  43. https://www.sttelemediagdc.com/resources/rack-vs-cage-vs-suite-vs-bespoke-which-is-better-in-a-colocation-data-centre
  44. https://encoradvisors.com/data-center-colocation-services/
  45. https://uptimeinstitute.com/resources/research-and-reports/uptime-institute-global-data-center-survey-2025-findings
  46. https://www.flexential.com/resources/blog/what-is-high-density-data-center
  47. https://blog.enconnex.com/data-center-rack-density
  48. https://www.tierpoint.com/blog/cross-connect-data-center/
  49. https://www.coresite.com/colocation
  50. https://www.flexential.com/products-services/colocation
  51. https://www.datacenters.com/news/retail-colocation-vs-wholesale-colocation-what-s-the-difference
  52. https://www.volico.com/difference-between-retail-and-wholesale-colocation/
  53. https://intelligence.uptimeinstitute.com/resource/retail-vs-wholesale-finding-right-colo-pricing-model
  54. https://www.daelimtransformer.com/how-transformers-and-pdus-work-together-for-data-center-power.html
  55. https://www.eaton.com/br/en-us/catalog/backup-power-ups-surge-it-power-distribution/eaton-metered-outlet-rack-pdu.html
  56. https://www.raritan.com/products/feature/pdu-metering-at-the-inlet-outlet-and-branch-circuits
  57. https://www.socomec.us/en-us/solutions/business/data-centers/data-center-redundancy-definition-reliability-best-practices
  58. https://www.digitalrealty.com/resources/articles/2n-vs-n-1
  59. https://blog.se.com/datacenter/2020/07/20/design-considerations-deployment-ups-systems-in-data-centers/
  60. https://www.cummins.com/generators/data-center-power-solutions/accountability-for-the-complete-power-system/automatic-transfer-switches-for-data-centers
  61. https://www.cbre.com/insights/reports/global-data-center-trends-2025
  62. https://www.vertiv.com/en-us/about/news-and-insights/articles/educational-articles/what-is-pue-power-usage-effectiveness-and-what-does-it-measure/
  63. https://www.sunbirddcim.com/blog/whats-best-pue-ratio-data-centers
  64. https://www.techtarget.com/searchdatacenter/tip/Data-center-temperature-and-humidity-guidelines
  65. https://avtech.com/articles/23418/ashrae-recommended-data-center-temperature-humidity/
  66. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/best-practice-guide-data-center-design_0.pdf
  67. https://www.ashrae.org/file%2520library/technical%2520resources/bookstore/emergence-and-expansion-of-liquid-cooling-in-mainstream-data-centers_wp.pdf
  68. https://journal.uptimeinstitute.com/data-center-free-air-cooling-trends/
  69. https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/16-more-ways-cut-energy-waste-data-center/move-hot-aislecold-aisle-layout
  70. https://www.vertiv.com/498e2b/globalassets/shared/focused-cooling-using-cold-aisle-contaiment.pdf
  71. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/Building%2520Management%2520System.pdf
  72. https://www.harting.com/en-US/data-center-infrastructure/building-management-systems
  73. https://www.nlyte.com/blog/bms-dcim-integration/
  74. https://www.sunbirddcim.com/glossary/water-usage-effectiveness-wue
  75. https://www.vertiv.com/en-ca/about/news-and-insights/articles/educational-articles/optimizing-water-usage-effectiveness-for-data-centers/
  76. https://www.ccacoalition.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/UNEP%2520U4E%2520-%2520Data%2520Centers%2520and%2520Guidance.pdf
  77. https://www.data-path.co.uk/guide-to-data-centre-cabling-best-practice/
  78. https://thenetworkinstallers.com/blog/data-center-cabling/
  79. https://www.fs.com/blog/om3-vs-om4-multimode-fiber-whats-the-difference-2592.html
  80. https://blog.equinix.com/blog/2025/05/29/networking-choices-a-guide-to-connectivity-options-in-colocation-facilities/
  81. https://www.digitalrealty.com/resources/articles/what-is-a-cross-connect
  82. https://docs.equinix.com/api-catalog/colocation/
  83. https://metanethosting.com/blog/understanding-cross-connects/
  84. https://www.coresite.com/interconnection/cross-connects
  85. https://dgtlinfra.com/data-center-networking/
  86. https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/qos-quality-of-service
  87. https://phoenixnap.com/blog/meet-me-room
  88. https://aws.amazon.com/directconnect/
  89. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/expressroute/expressroute-introduction
  90. https://www.de-cix.net/en/resources/articles/what-is-peering
  91. https://www.lumen.com/en-us/services/wavelengths.html
  92. https://firstcolo.net/en/services/ip-transit/
  93. https://www.123.net/blog/dark-fiber-lease-a-comprehensive-guide/
  94. https://uptimeinstitute.com/uptime_assets/fff48756c66a70ad900b0f7fb65d7cae20e8204b64faefa17b7b2f7bff0287ab-data-center-security.pdf
  95. https://www.databank.com/resources/blogs/security-measures-in-colocation-data-centers/
  96. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/physical-security/beyond-locked-doors-reimagining-physical-security-in-data-centers
  97. https://www.oasisdiscovery.com/colocation
  98. https://www.tierpoint.com/blog/data-center-interconnection/
  99. https://www.volico.com/colocation-security-advantages-data-protection-strategies-and-practices/
  100. https://www.coresite.com/blog/breaking-down-data-center-tiers-classifications
  101. https://www.vertiv.com/en-us/about/news-and-insights/articles/educational-articles/what-is-data-center-infrastructure-management-dcim/
  102. https://datacenter.uptimeinstitute.com/rs/711-RIA-145/images/2024.GlobalDataCenterSurvey.Report.pdf
  103. https://www.bicsi.org/docs/default-source/publications/002-2019-methodology.pdf?sfvrsn=5c4f65b5_2
  104. https://www.bicsi.org/standards/available-standards-store/single-purchase/bicsi-009-2024-data-center-operations-and-maintenance
  105. https://datacentremagazine.com/articles/predictive-maintenance-in-the-data-centre-the-power-of-ai
  106. https://dgtlinfra.com/data-center-compliance-standards/
  107. https://www.trgdatacenters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/The-Ultimate-Guide-to-Data-Center-Compliance-Standards-TRG-Datacenters.pdf
  108. https://journal.uptimeinstitute.com/accounting-for-digital-infrastructure-ghg-emissions/
  109. https://intra.ece.ucr.edu/~sren/doc/tech/greencolo_full.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.