Hubbry Logo
Cross-beatCross-beatMain
Open search
Cross-beat
Community hub
Cross-beat
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cross-beat
Cross-beat
from Wikipedia

In music, a cross-beat or cross-rhythm is a specific form of polyrhythm. The term cross rhythm was introduced in 1934 by the musicologist Arthur Morris Jones (1889–1980). It refers to a situation where the rhythmic conflict found in polyrhythms is the basis of an entire musical piece.[1]

Etymology

[edit]

The term "cross rhythm" was introduced in 1934 by the musicologist Arthur Morris Jones (1889–1980), who, with Klaus Wachsmann, took-up extended residence in Zambia and Uganda, respectively, as missionaries, educators, musicologists, and museologists.

Cross-rhythm. A rhythm in which the regular pattern of accents of the prevailing meter is contradicted by a conflicting pattern and not merely a momentary displacement that leaves the prevailing meter fundamentally unchallenged.

African music

[edit]

One main system

[edit]
Niger-Congo linguistic group (yellow and yellow-green).

African cross-rhythm is most prevalent within the greater Niger-Congo linguistic group, which dominates the continent south of the Sahara Desert. (Kubik, p. 58)[3] Cross-rhythm was first identified as the basis of sub-Saharan rhythm by A.M. Jones. Later, the concept was more fully explained in the lectures of Ewe master drummer and scholar C.K. Ladzekpo, and in the writings of David Locke.[4] Jones observes that the shared rhythmic principles of Sub-Saharan African music traditions constitute one main system.[5] Similarly, Ladzekpo affirms the profound homogeneity of sub-Saharan African rhythmic principles.[6] In Sub-Saharan African music traditions (and many of the diaspora musics) cross-rhythm is the generating principle; the meter is in a permanent state of contradiction.

An embodiment of the people

[edit]

At the center of a core of rhythmic traditions and composition is the technique of cross-rhythm. The technique of cross-rhythm is a simultaneous use of contrasting rhythmic patterns within the same scheme of accents or meter ... By the very nature of the desired resultant rhythm, the main beat scheme cannot be separated from the secondary beat scheme. It is the interplay of the two elements that produces the cross-rhythmic texture.

— Ladzekpo, a: "Myth"[6]

From the philosophical perspective of the African musician, cross-beats can symbolize the challenging moments or emotional stress we all encounter. Playing cross-beats while fully grounded in the main beats, prepares one for maintaining a life-purpose while dealing with life’s challenges. Many sub-Saharan languages do not have a word for rhythm, or even music. From the African viewpoint, the rhythms represent the very fabric of life itself; they are an embodiment of the people, symbolizing interdependence in human relationships.

— Clave Matrix, p. 21[7]

Cross-rhythmic ratios

[edit]

3:2

[edit]

The cross-rhythmic ratio three-over-two (3:2) or vertical hemiola, is the most significant rhythmic cell found in sub-Saharan rhythms. The following measure is evenly divided by three beats and two beats. The two cycles do not share equal status though. The two bottom notes are the primary beats, the ground, the main temporal referent. The three notes above are the secondary beats. Typically, the dancer's feet mark the primary beats, while the secondary beats are accented musically.

Polyrhythm 3:2
Additive
Divisive
Three-over-two cross-rhythm Play

Watch: Stepping to the main beats within 3:2 cross-rhythm. Afro-Cuban "Obatalá Dance" (Marta Ruiz) on YouTube

We have to grasp the fact that if from childhood you are brought up to regard beating 3 against 2 as being just as normal as beating in synchrony, then you develop a two dimensional attitude to rhythm... This bi-podal conception is... part of the African's nature

— Jones (1959: 102)[5]

Novotney observes: "The 3:2 relationship (and [its] permutations) is the foundation of most typical polyrhythmic textures found in West African musics."[8] 3:2 is the generative or theoretic form of sub-Saharan rhythmic principles. Agawu succinctly states: "[The] resultant [3:2] rhythm holds the key to understanding ... there is no independence here, because 2 and 3 belong to a single Gestalt."[9]

African xylophones such as the balafon and gyil play cross-rhythms, which are often the basis of ostinato melodies. In the following example, a Ghanaian gyil sounds the three-against-two cross-rhythm. The left hand (lower notes) sounds the two main beats, while the right hand (upper notes) sounds the three cross-beats. (Clave Matrix p. 22)[7]

Ghanaian gyil
Ghanaian gyil sounds 3:2 cross-rhythm. Play

6:4

[edit]

The primary cycle of four beats

Polyrhythm 6:4

A great deal of African music is built upon a cycle of four main beats. This basic musical period has a bipartite structure; it is made up of two cells, consisting of two beats each. Ladzekpo states: "The first most useful measure scheme consists of four main beats with each main beat measuring off three equal pulsations [12
8
] as its distinctive feature ... The next most useful measure scheme consists of four main beats with each main beat flavored by measuring off four equal pulsations [4
4
]." (b: "Main Beat Schemes")[6] The four-beat cycle is a shorter period than what is normally heard in European music. This accounts for the stereotype of African music as "repetitive." (Kubik, p. 41)[3] A cycle of only two main beats, as in the case of 3:2, does not constitute a complete primary cycle. (Kubik, Vol. 2, p. 63)[3] Within the primary cycle there are two cells of 3:2, or, a single cycle of six-against-four (6:4). The six cross-beats are represented below as quarter-notes for visual emphasis.

Six-against-four cross-rhythm (note that this is identical to the three-over-two cross-rhythm above, played twice).

Interacting the four recurrent triple structure main beat schemes (four beat scheme) simultaneously with the six recurrent two pulse beat schemes (six beat scheme) produces the first most useful cross rhythmic texture in the development of Anlo-Ewe dance-drumming.

— Ladzekpo (c: "Six Against Four")[6]

The following notated example is from the kushaura part of the traditional mbira piece "Nhema Mussasa." The left hand plays the ostinato "bass line," built upon the four main beats, while the right hand plays the upper melody, consisting of six cross-beats. The composite melody is an embellishment of the 6:4 cross-rhythm. (Clave Matrix p. 35)[7]

Holding an mbira dzavadzimu

3:4

[edit]
Polyrhythm 3:4

If every other cross-beat is sounded, the three-against-four (3:4) cross-rhythm is generated. The "slow" cycle of three beats is more metrically destabilizing and dynamic than the six beats. The Afro-Cuban rhythm abakuá (Havana-style) is based on the 3:4 cross-rhythm.[10] The three-beat cycle is represented as half-notes in the following example for visual emphasis.

Three-against-four cross-rhythm. Play

In contrast to the four main beat scheme, the rhythmic motion of the three beat scheme is slower. A simultaneous interaction of these two beat schemes with contrasting rhythmic motions produces the next most useful cross rhythmic texture in the development of sub-Saharan dance-drumming. The composite texture of the three-against-four cross rhythm produces a motif covering a length of the musical period. The motif begins with the component beat schemes coinciding and continues with the beat schemes in alternate motions thus showing a progression from a "static" beginning to a "dynamic" continuation

— Ladzekpo ("Three Against Four")[6]

The following pattern is an embellishment of the three-beat cycle, commonly heard in African music. It consists of three sets of three strokes each.

1.5:4 (or 3:8)

[edit]
Polyrhythm 4:1.5

Even more metrically destabilizing and dynamic than 3:4, is the one and a half beat-against-four (1.5:4) cross-rhythm. Another way to think of it is as three "very slow" cross-beats spanning two main beat cycles (of four beats each), or three beats over two periods (measures), a type of macro "hemiola." In terms of the beat scheme comprising the complete 24-pulse cross-rhythm, the ratio is 3:8. The three cross-beats are shown as whole notes below for visual emphasis.

1.5:4 or 3:8. Play

The 1.5:4 cross-rhythm is the basis for the open tone pattern of the enú (large batá drum head) for the Afro-Cuban rhythm changó (Shango).[a] It is the same pattern as the previous figure, but the strokes occur at half the rate.

Drum pattern based on 1.5:4 cross-rhythm (Play).
Ewe gankoqui bell

The following bell pattern is used in the Ewe rhythm kadodo.[11] The pattern consists of three modules—two pairs of strokes, and a single stroke. The three single stroke are muted. The pattern is another embellishment of the 1.5:4 cross-rhythm.

kadodo bell pattern (Play)

4:3

[edit]

When duple pulses (4
4
) are grouped in sets of three, the four-against-three (4:3) cross-rhythm is generated. The four cross-beats cycle every three main beats. In terms of cross-rhythm only, this is the same as having duple cross-beats in a triple beat scheme, such as 3
4
or 6
4
. The pulses on the top line are grouped in threes for visual emphasis.

4:3 cross-rhythm in modular form.

However, this 4:3 is within a duple beat scheme, with duple (quadruple) subdivisions of the beats. Since the musical period is a cycle of four main beats, the 4:3 cross-rhythm significantly contradicts the period by cycling every three main beats. The complete cross-beat cycle is shown below in relation to the key pattern known in Afro-Cuban music as clave. (Rumba, p. xxxi)[12] The subdivisions are grouped (beamed) in sets of four to reflect the proper metric structure. The complete cross-beat cycle is three claves in length. Within the context of the complete cross-rhythm, there is a macro 4:3—four 4:3 modules-against-three claves. Continuous duple-pulse cross-beats are often sounded by the quinto, the lead drum in the Cuban genres rumba and conga. (Rumba, pps. 69–86)[12][b][c]

Quinto drum
Complete cycle of 4:3 cross-rhythm shown in relation to clave.

While 3:2 pervades ternary music, quaternary music seldom uses tuplets; instead, a set of dotted notes may temporarily make 2:3 and 4:3 temporal structures.

— Locke ("Metric Matric")[13]

Duple-pulse correlative of 3:2

[edit]

In sub-Saharan rhythm the four main beats are typically divided into three or four pulses, creating a 12-pulse (12
8
), or 16-pulse (4
4
) cycle. (Ladzekpo, b: "Main Beat Scheme")[6] Every triple-pulse pattern has its duple-pulse correlative; the two pulse structures are two sides of the same coin. Cross-beats are generated by grouping pulses contrary to their given structure, for example: groups of two or four in 12
8
or groups of three or six in 4
4
. (Rumba, p. 180)[12] The duple-pulse correlative of the three cross-beats of the hemiola, is a figure known in Afro-Cuban music as tresillo. Tresillo is a Spanish word meaning ‘triplet’—three equal notes within the same time span normally occupied by two notes. As used in Cuban popular music, tresillo refers to the most basic duple-pulse rhythmic cell.[14] The pulse names of tresillo and the three cross-beats of the hemiola are identical: one, one-ah, two-and.


{
       \relative c' <<
        \new Staff <<
           \new voice {
              \clef percussion
              \time 2/4
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100       
              \stemDown \repeat volta 2 { g4 g }
       }
          \new voice {
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100      
              \time 2/4
              \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { f'8.[ f16]^~ f8[ f8] } \bar ":|."
       } >>
       \new Staff <<
          \new voice {
              \clef percussion
              \time 2/4
              \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 6/8
              \scaleDurations 2/3 {
                 \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 8 = 100       
                 \stemDown \repeat volta 2 { g,4. g }
              }
       }
          \new voice \relative c' {
              \time 2/4
              \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 6/8
              \scaleDurations 2/3 {
                 \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100      
                 \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { f4 f8^~ f f4 } \bar ":|."
              }
       } >>
  >> }

The composite pattern of tresillo and the main beats is commonly known as the habanera,[15] congo,[16] tango-congo,[17] or tango.[18] The habanera rhythm is the duple-pulse correlative of the vertical hemiola (above). The three cross-beats of the hemiola are generated by grouping triple pulses in twos: 6 pulses ÷ 2 = 3 cross-beats. Tresillo is generated by grouping duple pulses in threes: 8 pulses ÷ 3 = 2 cross-beats (consisting of three pulses each), with a remainder of a partial cross-beat (spanning two pulses). In other words, 8 ÷ 3 = 2, r2. Tresillo is a cross-rhythmic fragment. It contains the first three cross-beats of 4:3. (Rumba, p. xxx)[12]

Tresillo over two Video

\layout {
  \context {
    \Score
    \remove "Timing_translator"
    \remove "Default_bar_line_engraver"
  }
  \context {
    \Staff
    \consists "Timing_translator"
    \consists "Default_bar_line_engraver"
  }
}

{
       \relative c' <<
        \new Staff <<
           \new voice {
              \clef percussion
              \time 4/4
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100       
              \stemDown \repeat volta 2 { g4 g g }
       }
          \new voice {
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100      
              \time 4/4
              \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { f'8.^\markup { "four against three" } f16^~ f8 f^~ f16 f8. } \bar ":|."
       } >>
       \new Staff <<
          \new voice {
              \clef percussion
              \time 3/4
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 8 = 100       
              \stemDown \repeat volta 2 { g,4 g }
       }
          \new voice \relative c' {
              \time 3/4
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100      
              \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { f8.^\markup { "tresillo" } f16^~ f8[ f] } \bar ":|."
       } >>
  >> }

Cross-rhythm, not polymeter

[edit]

Early ethnomusicological analysis often perceived African music as polymetric. Pioneers such as A.M. Jones and Anthony King identified the prevailing rhythmic emphasis as metrical accents (main beats), instead of the contrametrical accents (cross-beats) they in fact are. Some of their music examples are polymetric, with multiple and conflicting main beat cycles, each requiring its own separate time signature. King shows two Yoruba dundun pressure drum ("talking drum") phrases in relation to the five-stroke standard pattern, or "clave," played on the kagano dundun (top line).[19] The standard pattern is written in a polymetric 7
8
+ 5
8
time signature. One dundun phrase is based on a grouping of three pulses written in 3
8
, and the other, a grouping of four pulses written in 4
8
. Complicating the transcription further, one polymetric measure is offset from the other two.

Dundun drum ensemble represented as polymeter.

African music is often characterized as polymetric, because, in contrast to most Western music, African music cannot be notated without assigning different meters to the different instruments of an ensemble

— Chernoff (1979: 45).[20]

More recent writings represent African music as cross-rhythmic, within a single meter.

Of the many reasons why the notion of polymeter must be rejected, I will mention three. First, if polymeter were a genuine feature of African music, we would expect to find some indication of its pertinence in the discourses and pedagogical schemes of African musicians, carriers of the tradition. As far as I know, no such data is available...Second, because practically all the ensemble music in which polymeter is said to be operative in dance music, and given the grounding demanded by choreography, it is more likely that these musics unfold within polyrhythmic matrices in single meters rather than in ... "mixed" meters ... Third, decisions about how to represent drum ensemble music founder on the assumption, made most dramatically by Jones, that accents are metrical rather than phenomenal...phenomenal accents play a more important role in African music than metrical accents. Because meter and grouping are distinct, postulating a single meter in accordance with the dance allows phenomenal or contrametric accents to emerge against a steady background. Polymeter fails to convey the true accentual structure of African music insofar as it creates the essential tension between a firm and stable background and a fluid foreground

— Agawu (2003: 84, 85).[21]

[The] term ‘polymetric’ is only applicable to a very special kind of phenomenon. If we take "metre" in its primary sense of metrum (the metre being the temporal reference unit), ‘polymetric’ would describe the simultaneous unfolding of several parts in a single work at different tempos so as not to be reducible to a single metrum. This happens in some modern music, such as some of Charles Ives' works, Elliott Carter’s Symphony, B.A. Zimmermann’s opera "Die Soldaten," and Pierre Boulez’s "Rituel." Being polymetric in the strict sense, these works can only be performed with several simultaneous conductors

— Arom (1991: 205).[22]

When written within a single meter, we see that the dundun in the second line sounds the main beats, and the subdivision immediately preceding it. The first cell (half measure) of the top line is a hemiola. The two dunduns shown in the second and third lines sound an embellishment of the three-over-four (3:4) cross-rhythm—expressed as three pairs of strokes against four pairs of strokes. (Clave Matrix p. 216)[7]

Dundun drum ensemble represented as cross-rhythm within a single meter.

Adaptive instruments

[edit]

Sub-Saharan instruments are constructed in a variety of ways to generate cross-rhythmic melodies. Some instruments organize the pitches in a uniquely divided alternate array – not in the straight linear bass to treble structure that is so common to many western instruments such as the piano, harp, and marimba.

Lamellophones including mbira, mbila, mbira huru, mbira njari, mbira nyunga, marimba, karimba, kalimba, likembe, and okeme. These instruments are found in several forms indigenous to different regions of Africa and most often have equal tonal ranges for right and left hands. The kalimba is a modern version of these instruments originated by the pioneer ethnomusicologist Hugh Tracey in the early 20th century which has over the years gained world-wide popularity.

Hugh Tracey treble kalimba
Signature Series Gravikord

Chordophones, such as the West African kora, and Doussn'gouni, part of the harp-lute family of instruments, also have this African separated double tonal array structure. Another instrument, the Marovany from Madagascar is a double sided box zither which also employs this divided tonal structure. The Gravikord is a new American instrument closely related to both the African kora and the kalimba. It was created to exploit this adaptive principle in a modern electro-acoustic instrument.[23]

On these instruments one hand of the musician is not primarily in the bass nor the other primarily in the treble, but both hands can play freely across the entire tonal range of the instrument. Also the fingers of each hand can play separate independent rhythmic patterns and these can easily cross over each other from treble to bass and back, either smoothly or with varying amounts of syncopation. This can all be done within the same tight tonal range, without the left and right hand fingers ever physically encountering each other. These simple rhythms will interact musically to produce complex cross rhythms including repeating on beat/off beat pattern shifts that would be very difficult to create by any other means. This characteristically African structure allows often simple playing techniques to combine with each other and produce cross-rhythmic music of great beauty and complexity.

Jazz

[edit]

The New Harvard Dictionary of Music calls swing "an intangible rhythmic momentum in jazz," adding that "swing defies analysis; claims to its presence may inspire arguments." The only specific description offered is the statement that "triplet subdivisions contrast with duple subdivisions."[24] The argument could be made that by nature of its simultaneous triple and duple subdivisions, swing is fundamentally a form of polyrhythm. However, the use of true systematic cross-rhythm in jazz did not occur until the second half of the twentieth century.

3:2 (or 6:4)

[edit]

In 1959 Mongo Santamaria recorded "Afro Blue," the first jazz standard built upon a typical African 3:2 cross-rhythm.[d] The song begins with the bass repeatedly playing 3 cross-beats per each measure of 6
8
(3:2), or 6 cross-beats per 12
8
measure (6:4). The following example shows the original ostinato "Afro Blue" bass line. The slashed noteheads are not bass notes, but are shown to indicate the main beats, where you would normally tap your foot to "keep time."


    \new Staff <<
       \new voice \relative c {
           \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"acoustic bass"
           \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 105
           \time 12/8
           \clef bass        
           \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { d4 a'8~ a d4 d,4 a'8~ a d4 }
       }
       \new voice \relative c {
           \override NoteHead.style = #'cross
           \stemDown \repeat volta 2 { g4. g g g }
       }
   >>

3:4

[edit]

On the original "Afro Blue," drummer Willie Bobo played an abakuá bell pattern on a snare drum, using brushes. This cross-rhythmic figure divides the twelve-pulse cycle into three sets of four pulses. Since the main beats (four sets of three pulses) are present whether sounded or not, this bell pattern can be considered an embellishment of the three-against-four (3:4) cross-rhythm. Bobo used this same pattern and instrumentation on the Herbie Hancock jazz-descarga "Succotash."[e]

2:3

[edit]

In 1963 John Coltrane recorded "Afro Blue" with the jazz drummer Elvin Jones.[f] Jones inverted the metric hierarchy of Santamaria's composition, performing it instead as duple cross-beats over a 3
4
"jazz waltz" (2:3). This 2:3 in a swung 3
4
is perhaps the most common example of overt cross-rhythm in jazz.[g]

Two-over-three (2:3).

Duple-pulse correlative of 3:2

[edit]

The Wayne Shorter composition "Footprints" may have been the first overt expression of the 6:4 cross-rhythm (two cycles of 3:2) used by a straight ahead jazz group.[h] On the version recorded on Miles Smiles by Miles Davis, the bass switches to 4
4
at 2:20. The 4
4
figure is known as tresillo in Latin music and is the duple-pulse correlative of the cross-beats in triple-pulse. Throughout the piece, the four main beats are maintained. In the example below, the main beats are indicated by slashed noteheads. They are shown here for reference and do not indicate bass notes.


{
       \relative c, <<
        \new Staff <<
           \new voice {
              \clef bass \time 12/8 \key c \minor
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100       
              \stemDown \override NoteHead.style = #'cross \repeat volta 2 { es4. es es es }
       }
          \new voice {
              \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100      
              \time 12/8
              \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { c'4 g'8~ g c4 es4.~ es4 g,8 } \bar ":|."
       } >>
       \new Staff <<
          \new voice {
              \clef bass \time 12/8 \key c \minor
              \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 4/4
              \scaleDurations 3/2 {
                  \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 8 = 100       
                  \stemDown \override NoteHead.style = #'cross \repeat volta 2 { es,4 es es es }
              }
       }
          \new voice \relative c' {
              \time 12/8
              \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 4/4
              \scaleDurations 3/2 {
                  \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 100      
                  \stemUp \repeat volta 2 { c,8. g'16~ g8 c es4~ es8. g,16 } \bar ":|."
              }
       } >>
  >> }

In recent decades, jazz has incorporated many different types of complex cross-rhythms, as well as other types of polyrhythms.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In music, a cross-beat, also known as a cross-rhythm, is a specific form of involving the simultaneous superposition of two or more independent and conflicting rhythmic patterns, often within the same metric framework, to create a sense of rhythmic tension and complexity that serves as the structural basis for the entire piece. This technique contrasts with simpler additive rhythms by emphasizing the "clash of rhythms," where patterns like 3:2 (three beats against two) interweave to produce a divisive that challenges the listener's perception of the . The concept of cross-beat was pioneered in 1934 by musicologist A. M. Jones in ethnomusicological studies of , where it functions as a cardinal rhythmic principle underlying drumming ensembles, vocal accompaniments, and dance forms across Bantu and other Niger-Congo cultures. Drawing from fieldwork in and , Jones described it as the interweaving of contrasting patterns that provides aesthetic satisfaction akin to in European music, exemplified in hand-clapping sequences and drum patterns that maintain a steady underlying while layering off-beat accents. In these contexts, cross-beats play a central role in the music's rhythmic structure and cultural practices. Beyond African traditions, cross-beats have influenced global music genres, appearing in jazz improvisation, Latin American salsa, and contemporary electronic music to add depth and syncopation. For instance, the 3:2 cross-rhythm recurs in Cuban clave patterns, as in the son clave rhythm. This enduring technique highlights the rhythmic sophistication of non-Western musics and continues to inspire composers seeking to expand metric possibilities.

Definition and Origins

Definition

In music, cross-beat, also known as cross-rhythm, is a specific form of in which two or more conflicting rhythmic patterns are layered simultaneously, producing accents that systematically oppose the prevailing meter and its inherent stresses. This layering arises from the combination of divisive and additive rhythmic structures, where one pattern's accents are deliberately offset from the other's, creating a staggered interplay rather than mere . The term cross-rhythm was introduced in 1934 by musicologist Arthur Morris Jones to characterize this rhythmic technique observed in African musical traditions. The perceptual effect of cross-beat stems from the tension generated by these opposing pulses, which intersect to form a sense of rhythmic "crossing" that alternates between clash and partial resolution, often evoking a thrilling and vital texture. Listeners and performers experience this as a dynamic conflict of rhythms, where the misalignment enhances the overall intensity without disrupting the underlying cohesion. A fundamental illustration of cross-beat occurs when a triple-meter pattern is superimposed over a duple-meter foundation, such as in a 3:2 ratio, resulting in interference patterns where accents from each layer alternately reinforce and contradict one another.

Etymology and Historical Introduction

The term "cross-beat," also referred to as "cross-rhythm," was coined by British musicologist and missionary Arthur Morris Jones in 1934 during his ethnomusicological studies of African drumming traditions. In his seminal article "African Drumming: A Study in the Combination of Rhythms in African Music," published in Bantu Studies, Jones introduced the concept to describe the layered rhythmic structures he observed in sub-Saharan African percussion ensembles, distinguishing them from Western notions of . This coinage emerged from his direct engagement with local musicians in (then ) and , where he emphasized the cultural specificity of these interlocking patterns as integral to Bantu musical performance. Jones's work built upon earlier scholarly discussions of "," a broader term used in Western to denote simultaneous contrasting rhythms, but he shifted focus to "cross-beat" to highlight its role as a foundational, culturally embedded technique in African music rather than a generalized phenomenon. He described this as "crossing the beats," a process where multiple rhythmic streams intersect against a steady , creating tension and resolution unique to African aesthetics. This emphasis marked a departure from prior analyses, such as those by Erich von Hornbostel, by grounding the term in empirical observation of indigenous practices rather than comparative theory. The historical context for Jones's coinage stems from his extensive fieldwork in the and , beginning with his arrival in in 1923 as a at St. Mark's College in Mapanza. Over nearly three decades, he conducted immersive studies among Bantu-speaking communities, making pioneering recordings of drum ensembles, songs, and dances that captured the intricate cross-beat structures . These efforts, including collaborations with local performers and assistants, provided the firsthand data that illuminated how cross-beats functioned as correlative frameworks in African , influencing his later theoretical formulations. Jones formalized the concept of cross-beat in his landmark publication Studies in African Music, a two-volume work that synthesized decades of transcription, analysis, and recording. Drawing on his earlier 1934 insights, the book presented detailed notated examples from Bantu traditions, establishing cross-beat as a core element of African musical theory and advocating for its recognition beyond colonial . This text remains a foundational reference in , underscoring Jones's role in documenting and theorizing indigenous rhythmic innovations.

Core Concepts

Cross-rhythm Versus Polyrhythm and Polymeter

Cross-rhythm, also known as cross-beat, refers to the simultaneous occurrence of two or more rhythms that share the same measure length and underlying but feature offset accents, creating interference and tension within a unified metric framework. In contrast, involves multiple rhythms with differing cycle lengths that align periodically over time, often implying contrasting subdivisions of the beat without necessarily altering the overall measure. Polymeter, meanwhile, entails independent metrical structures operating at the same but with distinct time signatures, leading to desynchronization between parts. In analyses of African music, particularly Ewe drumming traditions, cross-rhythms are distinguished from polymeter by their reliance on a shared underlying that integrates all parts into a cohesive texture, rather than allowing true metric independence. Ethnomusicologists argue against classifying African cross-beats as polymeter, as this view imposes a Western perspective that overlooks the cultural intent where rhythms interlock to produce layered perceptual textures that enhance communal expression and interdependence. Instead, these rhythms reflect a single metric background, with accents designed to create layered acoustic images through shifting listener perceptions, not dissonance. A fundamental theoretical insight is that cross-beat preserves a single underlying across all layers, fostering perceptual where listeners may momentarily shift metric interpretations without disrupting the ensemble's unity, unlike the separate frameworks of polymeter. For instance, a 3:2 cross-rhythm might feature one part accenting every three beats while another accents every two, resulting in clashes such as off-beat emphases, all without requiring multiple time signatures or cycle misalignments. This structure highlights cross-rhythm's role in generating rhythmic vitality through accent offset, distinct from the periodic convergence of polyrhythms or the desynchrony of polymeters.

Duple-Pulse Correlative Structures

Duple-pulse correlative structures describe the adaptation of cross-beats by mapping them onto even subdivisions of time, such as eighth notes within a 4/4 meter, thereby correlating triple-based rhythmic feels to a duple grid framework. This approach, exemplified by the tresillo rhythm—a three-note pattern structured as 3-3-2—serves as the duple-pulse equivalent of triple-pulse cross-beats, allowing the integration of syncopated elements into straightforward even-meter contexts. The underlying mechanism involves subdividing pulses to recast a 3:2 ratio into its correlative, where the secondary beat cycle of six pulses aligns over four primary beats, thus preserving the polyrhythmic tension and interference without altering the core cross-beat identity. In this transformation, the tresillo's strokes span two main beats across a four-beat cycle, creating a layered interplay that emphasizes on off-beats like the "and-of-two." Perceptually, these structures facilitate comprehension for audiences accustomed to duple by embedding the cross-beat's triple subdivision within familiar even divisions, enabling the recognition of rhythmic drive and tension-release patterns without disrupting the overarching duple . This maintains the cross-beat's participatory and embodied , as listeners can physically align with the duple grid while sensing the overlaid interference. A detailed example appears in , where a 3:2 pattern—correlating to tresillo—overlays a steady duple bass line, as in Mongo Santamaría's "" (1959), with bassist Al McKibbon employing the tresillo to evoke the 3:2 cross-rhythm's forward propulsion against the 4/4 foundation.

Rhythmic Ratios

Primary Ratios: 3:2 and

The 3:2 ratio represents the foundational structure of cross-beat, where three evenly spaced pulses occur against two pulses of equal duration, generating a hemiola-like rhythmic clash that underpins much of sub-Saharan African drumming and . This ratio manifests as a simultaneous layering of ternary and binary subdivisions, often perceived through contrasting instrumental parts such as a in duple meter overlaid with triple-meter phrases from drums like the or . In notational terms, it is commonly represented in 12/8 time, with triplets articulating the three pulses over two duplets within a single bar, aligning accents to emphasize the cross-relationships. The ratio extends the 3:2 through further subdivision, positioning six pulses against four in the same temporal span, typically derived from handclaps or bass lines marking the binary flow while treble parts accent the ternary. This expanded form is notated using sixteenths, with accents on beats 1, 5, and 9 of the six-pulse layer contrasting against 1, 5, 9, and 13 of the four-pulse layer, often within a 12/8 framework to capture the multidirectional metric feel. Mathematically, both ratios operate on cycle lengths where the —six units for 3:2 and twelve pulses for 6:4—provides periodic resolution, unifying the conflicting streams after alignment points. Auditorily, these primary ratios produce a strong sense of forward propulsion through offbeat accents and , creating rhythmic tension that resolves at cycle endpoints and drives the overall groove in ensemble performances. The interplay fosters a dynamic , with the 3:2 offering intimate clashes and the amplifying scale for larger textures, as heard in Ewe drumming where the duality of two and three infuses the music with vitality.

Secondary Ratios: 3:4, 4:3, and 3:8

The 3:4 ratio in cross-beats superimposes three even pulses against a quadruple metric framework, generating a characteristic dragging effect where the triple layer appears to lag persistently behind the duple foundation. This tension arises from the offset accents, as seen in Southern Ewe drumming traditions, such as the Nyayito ensemble, where the and drums maintain a 3:4 cross-rhythm through permanently displaced main beats relative to the . A standard notational approach for this ratio employs 12/8 time, with the triple pulses accented on the first and third eighth notes of each group of four, while the quadruple layer aligns with the underlying duple subdivision, emphasizing the resultant over a of 12 units. In Imbem dance accompaniments from , this ratio structures the interplay between the first drum's triple rhythm and the second drum's quadruple phrasing, enhancing the ensemble's forward momentum through subtle metric displacement. The inverse 4:3 ratio reverses this dynamic, layering four pulses against three to produce a propulsive effect that pushes accents ahead of the triple beat, often heightening urgency in rhythmic solos. In Ewe master drum patterns, such as those in the Husago dance, the lead drum executes a 4:3 cross-rhythm against the gankogui's duple timeline, creating staggered phrases that emphasize off-beat arrivals and drive improvisational variations. This configuration is prevalent in percussion solos within West African drumming, where the quadruple layer asserts dominance, contrasting the foundational triple meter and fostering a sense of rhythmic anticipation, as analyzed in principles of off-beat timing. The notational equivalent mirrors the 3:4 but inverts the accent positions, typically resolving over 12 units to align the cycles. The 3:8 ratio, interpretable as a half-speed variant of 3:4 (or 1.5:4 in reduced terms), integrates three pulses across eight beats, commonly manifesting in additive rhythmic structures that elongate the triple layer for broader metric spans. In paddle songs from West African traditions, melodic accents in 3/8 time lag one quaver behind the duple paddle-strokes, producing a subtle cross-beat conflict resolved at the of 24 units. Similarly, in Nyayito variations, the sogo's 3/4 phrasing offsets against the kagay's 3/8 pattern, yielding slight but persistent clashes suited to additive ensembles. This ratio's extended cycle supports layered textures in dance forms like Adzida, where irregular groupings amplify the polyrhythmic depth without overt resolution. Compared to the primary 3:2 ratio's balanced , these secondary ratios—3:4, 4:3, and 3:8—yield more asymmetric clashes, with uneven pulse distributions that suit intricate ensemble interplay and off-beat emphasis in sub-Saharan traditions. Their heightened tension, derived from quadruple or octuple extensions against triples, underscores cross-beats' role in generating vitality and complexity beyond simpler dual-pulse correlations.

Cultural and Musical Applications

Role in African Music

In traditional African music, particularly within Niger-Congo linguistic and cultural traditions, cross-beats form a core rhythmic system essential for ensemble cohesion, enabling patterns that create complex resultant rhythms among multiple performers rather than functioning as incidental ornamentation. This structural role is evident in how cross-beats synchronize diverse instrumental lines, such as in West African drumming ensembles where they maintain temporal unity across polyrhythmic layers. Cross-beats also embody profound cultural values in Bantu and West African practices, symbolizing life's oppositions—such as challenges and emotional stresses—and the pursuit of communal through interdependent relationships. From the perspective of African musicians, these rhythms represent the philosophical integration of conflict and resolution, mirroring where individual contributions align to form a unified whole, as seen in ceremonial and communal performances that reinforce . Representative examples illustrate this role: in Ghanaian gyil () music of the Dagara people, a 3:2 cross-rhythm structures the , with the left hand articulating two main beats against the right hand's three cross-beats, fostering intricate interplay. Similarly, the Zimbabwean piece "Nhema Musasa" employs a cross-rhythm, where the left hand sustains a four-beat while the right hand overlays a six-beat pattern, enhancing the instrument's polyphonic depth in Shona ancestral rituals. In the Cuban tradition, derived from West African Cross River societies, a 3:4 cross-rhythm drives ceremonial percussion, preserving African rhythmic principles in contexts. The transatlantic slave trade facilitated the spread of cross-beats to the , where these rhythms influenced genres by embedding foundational polyrhythmic structures into hybrid forms, thus perpetuating Niger-Congo musical legacies across continents.

Applications in Jazz

Cross-beat entered jazz during the 1950s and 1960s primarily through influences, as musicians integrated clave-based polyrhythms and cross-rhythmic structures into and modal frameworks. Bands like and His Afro-Cubans, active in New York since the 1940s, laid the groundwork by fusing harmonies with Afro-Cuban rhythms such as the 3:2 and 2:3 clave patterns, which emphasized cross-beats and influenced subsequent generations of jazz artists. This migration was evident in recordings that blended Latin percussion with improvisational solos, expanding 's rhythmic vocabulary beyond swing-era conventions. A seminal example is Mongo Santamaría's "Afro Blue," first recorded in 1959, which became the earliest to employ a 3:2 cross-rhythm over a 6/8 or 12/8 measure, with the bass line articulating three cross-beats per measure. John Coltrane's 1963 reinterpretation on Live at Birdland inverted this to a 2:3 cross-rhythm, performed as duple cross-beats against a 3/4 waltz, heightening tension in the modal context through the shifted metric hierarchy executed by drummer . Wayne Shorter's "Footprints," recorded in 1966 on Adam's Apple, further exemplified this evolution by incorporating a 6:4 cross-rhythm—equivalent to two cycles of 3:2—within a structure, marking an early overt use of such African-derived patterns in . In jazz improvisation of this period, cross-beats functioned as a primary tool for rhythmic displacement, enabling soloists to accent motives against the established and generate by presenting phrases at alternative metric locations. This technique, rooted in Afro-Cuban rhythmic layering, allowed performers like Coltrane and Shorter to build tension and resolution dynamically, often correlating duple-pulse adaptations to enhance soloistic interplay without disrupting the ensemble's groove.

Instruments and Techniques

Adaptive Instruments

Adaptive instruments for cross-beat execution are designed with mechanical features that allow performers to layer conflicting rhythmic patterns simultaneously, often through fixed tunings, separated string groups, or multiple sound sources that maintain acoustic clarity. The , a thumb piano central to Shona music in , features a fixed tuning across its metal keys mounted on a wooden soundboard, which enables the layering of polyrhythms through interlocking patterns played by each thumb. This design, including buzzing elements like metal beads that add harmonic overtones, ensures that the resonant acoustics amplify distinct rhythmic strands without sonic interference. The karimba variant, with its simpler key arrangement of around 15-17 tines, exemplifies this by facilitating accessible polyrhythmic executions in traditional ensemble settings. In Mandinka griot traditions of , the kora—a 21-string harp-lute—employs a notched wooden bridge that divides the strings into two independent groups (11 on the left for bass and , 10 on the right for treble), allowing thumbs and forefingers to produce polyrhythmic textures through bass ostinatos against melodic lines. The bridge's elevated structure and string tension maintain separation of pitches tuned in thirds, supporting polyphonic textures where conflicting patterns emerge clearly from the resonator's amplification. The gravikord represents a modern electric adaptation of the kora, patented in 1984 with 24 stainless-steel strings arranged in a double configuration over electromagnetic pickups, enabling amplified execution of cross-rhythms like those in polyrhythmic styles. Its separated tonal arrays allow independent hand patterns to layer complex rhythms without acoustic muddiness, as the electronic output preserves the clarity of simultaneous conflicting motifs. Other examples include the , a West African with resonators that supports layered cross-beats in ensemble playing, and the (log drum) used in Central African traditions for contrasting rhythmic pulses. These instruments' acoustic and mechanical advantages, such as multiple independent string banks or key manuals, permit the sustainment of cross-beats by isolating sound production sources, thereby avoiding the blending that could obscure rhythmic interplay in monophonic setups.

Performance and Adaptive Techniques

Performing cross-beats, particularly the foundational 3:2 ratio, often begins with simple techniques such as and vocalization to build rhythmic . Practitioners subdivide the beat mentally into smaller units, such as eighth notes, while on specific s—for instance, emphasizing the and selected off-beats to align the two against three pattern, as in counting "ONE and two and three and" with claps on the bolded syllables. Vocal mnemonics further aid this process, using phrases like "not dif-fi-cult" to internalize the triplet feel against a duple , allowing performers to feel the cross-beat without an instrument. In drumming, polyrhythmic hand and foot independence enables the execution of cross-beats by assigning separate ratios to limbs, such as maintaining a steady two-beat pattern on the while playing a three-note cycle on the to realize 3:2. This technique relies on ostinato patterns for the hands—alternating strokes on and snare—to free cognitive focus for the 's independent motion, often practiced at slow tempos like 60 bpm to develop coordination. Transcribing cross-beats into standard Western notation presents significant challenges due to their polyrhythmic nature, which often defies barline alignment and metric regularity. Bell patterns, common in African traditions, are better represented through alternative systems like TUBS (Time Unit Box System) or mnemonic syllables (e.g., "kon kon kolo kon kolo") to capture cycles, as staff notation struggles with syncopations and non-isochronous accents that lack clear metric hierarchies. For beginners adapting to cross-beats, instruction typically starts with duple-pulse correlative structures, such as alternating between quarter notes and eighth notes in a metronomic framework, before progressing to full ratios like 3:2. This stepwise approach, including foot-tapping one while another, fosters familiarity with subdivision and eases the transition to simultaneous layers.

Modern Extensions

Use in Contemporary Genres

In electronic and dance music, cross-beats, particularly the 3:2 polyrhythm, have been integrated to add rhythmic complexity and groove, drawing from IDM pioneers like . In tracks such as "Windowlicker" (1999), layers a 4/4 and snare pattern with offbeat hi-hats and vocal melodies in 6/8, creating a polyrhythmic tension where the 6/8 elements imply a 3:2 feel over the straight 4/4 foundation. This approach exemplifies how IDM uses cross-beats to evoke a disorienting yet danceable energy, influencing subsequent electronic subgenres. Similarly, has incorporated elements of , blending traditional polyrhythms with modern production techniques. In rock and pop, cross-beats appear in experimental compositions that derive tension from effects rooted in 3:2 ratios. Radiohead's "15 Step" (2007) from the album employs a time signature that functions as a hemiola, grouping beats into 3+2 pulses to generate unpredictability and forward momentum, enhancing the song's glitchy, electronic-infused rock texture. Hip-hop and trap production has embraced cross-beats through innovative layering, with producers like pioneering techniques that simulate rhythmic interplay via microtiming and swung elements. Dilla's beats often feature swung hi-hats—delaying notes slightly to create a laid-back feel against straight kicks and snares—influencing tracks across albums like Donuts (2006). Global fusion genres, such as hybrids, extend cross-beats by fusing African ratios into ensemble arrangements. incorporates African polyrhythms, including 3:2-derived patterns, in their instrumental work; for instance, the track "" from Immigrance (2019) weaves insistent grooves with layered percussion evoking Moroccan and broader African influences, complemented by and solos.

Mathematical and Theoretical Modeling

Beat-class theory provides a foundational framework for modeling cross-beats as interferences between overlapping pulse streams, employing to represent rhythmic alignments and conflicts. Developed by Richard Cohn, this approach classifies beats into equivalence classes a cycle length, such as 8 for duple meters, allowing systematic analysis of how a triplet-based stream (e.g., 3 pulses) interacts with a duple stream (e.g., 2 pulses). In a 3:2 cross-beat, for instance, the interference manifests as periodic tensions resolved at alignment points, akin to in funky rhythms like the tresillo pattern (3+3+2 over 8 units). Fractal and generative models extend this by conceptualizing cross-beats as patterns that recur across temporal scales, mirroring the recursive structures in prolation canons where motifs are rendered at ratios like 3:2. In such models, the overlapping cycles of cross-beats exhibit dimensionality, with self-similarity arising from nested rhythmic layers that refine or expand a base motif. The alignment of these cycles occurs at the (LCM) of the ratio components, providing a quantitative measure of repetition and resolution. Alignment cycle length=LCM(n,m)\text{Alignment cycle length} = \operatorname{LCM}(n, m) for a cross-beat ratio n:mn:m, where nn and mm are the pulse counts in each stream. This formulation, rooted in generative rhythmic theory, highlights how cross-beats generate hierarchical structures without strict periodicity. Computational analysis tools facilitate the simulation and exploration of cross-beats by implementing algorithms for rhythmic canons and phase shifts. Software environments like OpenMusic incorporate polynomial-based methods and Fourier transforms to model tiling conditions in polyrhythms, enabling the generation of 3:2 phase alignments through affine transformations (e.g., xax+bmodnx \to ax + b \mod n). These tools allow composers and analysts to visualize and audition interference patterns, supporting the enumeration of canons up to cycle lengths of 168 units and aiding in the study of generative extensions. Perceptual psychology research post-2000 elucidates how cross-beats contribute to groove via temporal dissonance, where conflicting layers create tension that enhances sensorimotor engagement and emotional arousal. Empirical studies demonstrate an inverted U-shaped relationship between polyrhythmic complexity (e.g., nested ratios and event density) and perceived groove, with moderate dissonance eliciting peak wanting-to-move responses, as measured in listener ratings of energy and mood. Neuroscientific correlates link this to activation in motor and reward networks, underscoring cross-beats' role in inducing rhythmic entrainment without overwhelming .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.