Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Data General
View on WikipediaData General Corporation was an early minicomputer firm formed in 1968.[1] Three of the four founders were former employees of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC).
Key Information
Their first product, 1969's Data General Nova, was a 16-bit minicomputer intended to both outperform and cost less than the equivalent from DEC, the 12-bit PDP-8. A basic Nova system cost two-thirds or less than a similar PDP-8 while running faster, offering easy expandability, being significantly smaller, and proving more reliable in the field. Combined with Data General RDOS (DG/RDOS) and programming languages like Data General Business Basic, Novas provided a multi-user platform far ahead of many contemporary systems. A series of updated Nova machines were released through the early 1970s that kept the Nova line at the front of the 16-bit mini world.
The Nova was followed by the Eclipse series which offered much larger memory capacity while still being able to run Nova code without modification. The Eclipse launch was marred by production problems and it was some time before it was a reliable replacement for the tens of thousands of Novas in the market. As the mini world moved from 16-bit to 32, DG introduced the Data General Eclipse MV/8000, whose development was extensively documented in the popular 1981 book, The Soul of a New Machine. Although DG's computers were successful, the introduction of the IBM PC in 1981 marked the beginning of the end for minicomputers, and by the end of the decade, the entire market had largely disappeared. The introduction of the Data General/One in 1984 did nothing to stop the erosion.
In a major business pivot, in 1989 DG released the AViiON series of scalable Unix systems which spanned from desktop workstations to departmental servers. This scalability was managed through the use of NUMA, allowing a number of commodity processors to work together in a single system. Following AViiON was the CLARiiON series of network-attached storage systems which became a major product line in the later 1990s. This led to a purchase by EMC, the major vendor in the storage space at that time. EMC shut down all of DG's lines except for CLARiiON, which continued sales until 2012.
History
[edit]Origin, founding and early years: Nova and SuperNova
[edit]Data General (DG) was founded by several engineers from Digital Equipment Corporation who were frustrated with DEC's management and left to form their own company. The chief founders were Edson de Castro,[2] Henry Burkhardt III, and Richard Sogge of Digital Equipment (DEC), and Herbert Richman of Fairchild Semiconductor.[3] The company was founded in Hudson, Massachusetts, in 1968.[4] Harvey Newquist was hired from Computer Control Corporation to oversee manufacturing.
Edson de Castro was the chief engineer in charge of the PDP-8,[5] DEC's line of inexpensive computers that created the minicomputer market.[2] It was designed specifically to be used in laboratory equipment settings; as the technology improved, it was reduced in size to fit into a 19-inch rack. Many PDP-8s still operated decades later in these roles. De Castro was watching developments in manufacturing, especially more complex printed circuit boards (PCBs) and wave soldering that suggested that the PDP-8 could be produced much more inexpensively. DEC was not interested, having turned its attention increasingly to the high-end market. Convinced he could improve the process, De Castro began work on his own low-cost 16-bit design.

The result was released in 1969[6] by Data General as the Nova. The Nova, like the PDP-8, used a simple accumulator-based architecture. It lacked general registers and the stack-pointer functionality of the more advanced PDP-11,[5] as did competing products, such as the HP 1000; compilers used hardware-based memory locations in lieu of a stack pointer. Designed to be rack-mounted similarly to the later PDP-8 machines, it was packaged on four PCB cards and was thus smaller in height, while also including a number of features that made it run considerably faster. Announced as "the best small computer in the world",[7] the Nova quickly gained a following, especially in scientific and educational markets,[2] and made the company flush with cash. DEC sued for misappropriation of its trade secrets, but this ultimately went nowhere.[citation needed] With the initial success of the Nova, Data General went public in the fall of 1969.

The original Nova was soon followed by the faster SuperNova,[8] which replaced the Nova's 4-bit arithmetic logic unit (ALU) with a 16-bit version that made the machine roughly four times as fast. Several variations and upgrades to the SuperNova core followed. The last major version, the Nova 4, was released in 1978. During this period the Nova generated 20% annual growth rates for the company, becoming a star in the business community and generating US$ 100 million in sales in 1975.[4] In 1977, DG launched a 16-bit microcomputer called the microNOVA to poor commercial success. The Nova series played a very important role as instruction-set inspiration to Charles P. Thacker and others at Xerox PARC during their construction of the Xerox Alto.[9]
Late 1970s to late 1980s: crisis and a short term solution
[edit]
In 1974, the Nova was supplanted by their upscale 16-bit machine, the Eclipse.[10] Based on many of the same concepts as the Nova, it added support for virtual memory and multitasking more suitable to the small office environment.

Production problems with the Eclipse[11] led to a rash of lawsuits in the late 1970s. Newer versions of the machine were pre-ordered by many of DG's customers, which were never delivered. Many customers sued Data General after more than a year of waiting, charging the company with breach of contract, while others simply canceled their orders and went elsewhere. The Eclipse was originally intended to replace the Nova outright, evidenced by the fact that the Nova 3 series, released at the same time and utilizing virtually the same internal architecture as the Eclipse, was phased out the next year. Strong demand continued for the Nova series, resulting in the Nova 4, perhaps as a result of the continuing problems with the Eclipse.
Fountainhead
[edit]While DG was still struggling with Eclipse, in 1977, Digital announced the VAX series, their first 32-bit minicomputer line,[12] described as "super-minis". This coincided with the aging of DEC's 16-bit products, notably the PDP-11, which were coming due for replacement. It appeared there was an enormous potential market for 32-bit machines, one that DG might be able to "scoop".
Data General immediately launched their own 32-bit effort in 1976 to build what they called the "world's best 32-bit machine", known internally as the "Fountainhead Project", or FHP for short (Fountain Head Project). Development took place off-site so that even DG workers would not know of it. The developers were given free rein over the design and selected a system that used a writable instruction set. The idea was that the instruction set architecture (ISA) was not fixed, programs could write their own ISA and upload it as microcode to the processor's writable control store. This would allow the ISA to be tailored to the programs being run, for instance, one might upload an ISA tuned for COBOL if the company's workload included significant numbers of COBOL programs.
When Digital's VAX-11/780 was shipped in February 1978, however, Fountainhead was not yet ready to deliver a machine, due mainly to problems in project management. DG's customers left quickly for the VAX world.
Eagle
[edit]
In the spring of 1978, with Fountainhead apparently in development hell, a secret skunkworks project was started to develop an alternative 32-bit system known as "Eagle" by a team led by Tom West. References to "the Eagle project" and "Project Eagle" co-exist.[11] Eagle was a straightforward, 32-bit extension of the Nova-based Eclipse. It was backwards-compatible with 16-bit Eclipse applications, used the same command-line interpreter, but offered improved 32-bit performance over the VAX 11/780 while using fewer components.
By late 1979, it became clear that Eagle would deliver before Fountainhead, igniting an intense turf war within the company for constantly shrinking project funds. In the meantime, customers were abandoning Data General in droves, driven not only by the delivery problems with the original Eclipse, including very serious quality control and customer service problems, but also the power and versatility of Digital's new VAX line. Ultimately, Fountainhead was cancelled and Eagle became the new MV series, with the first model, the Data General Eclipse MV/8000, announced in April 1980.[13]
The Eagle Project was the subject of Tracy Kidder's Pulitzer Prize-winning book, The Soul of a New Machine, making the MV line the best-documented computer project in recent history.
MV series
[edit]
The MV systems generated an almost miraculous turnaround for Data General. Through the early 1980s sales picked up, and by 1984 the company had over a billion dollars in annual sales.
One of Data General's significant customers at this time was the United States Forest Service, which starting in the mid-1980s used DG systems installed at all levels from headquarters in Washington, D.C. down to individual ranger stations and fire command posts.[14] This required equipment of high reliability and generally rugged construction that could be deployed in a wide range of places, often to be maintained and used by people with no computer background at all. The intent was to create new kinds of functional integration in an agency that had long prized its decentralized structure. Despite some tensions, the implementation was effective and the overall effects on the agency notably positive. The introduction, implementation, and effects of the DG systems in USFS were documented in a series of evaluative reports prepared in the late 1980s by the RAND Corporation.
The MV series came in various iterations, from the MV/2000 (later MV/2500), MV/4000, MV/10000, MV/15000, MV/20000, MV/30000, MV/40000 and ultimately concluded with the MV/60000HA minicomputer. The MV/60000HA was intended to be a High Availability system, with many components duplicated to eliminate the single point of failure. Yet, there were failures among the system's many daughter boards, back-plane, and mid-plane. DG technicians were kept quite busy replacing boards and many blamed poor quality control at the DG factory in Mexico where they were made and refurbished.
In retrospect, the nicely performing MV series was too little, too late. At a time when DG invested its last dollar into the dying minicomputer segment, the microcomputer was rapidly making inroads to the lower-end market segment, and the introduction of the first workstations wiped out all 16-bit machines, once DG's best customer segment. While the MV series did stop the erosion of DG's customer base, this now smaller base was no longer large enough to allow DG to develop their next generation. DG had also changed their marketing to focus on direct sales to Fortune 100 companies and thus alienated many resellers.
Software
[edit]
Data General developed operating systems for its hardware: DOS and RDOS for the Nova, RDOS and AOS for the 16-bit Eclipse C, M, and S lines, AOS/VS and AOS/VS II for the Eclipse MV line, and a modified version of UNIX System V called DG/UX for the Eclipse MV and AViiON machines. The AOS/VS software was the most commonly used DG software product and included CLI (Command Line Interpreter) allowing for complex scripting, DUMP/LOAD, and other custom components.
Related system software also in common use at the time included such packages as X.25, Xodiac, and TCP/IP for networking, Fortran, COBOL, RPG, PL/I, C and Data General Business Basic for programming, INFOS II and DG/DBMS for databases, and the nascent relational database software DG/SQL.
Data General also offered an office automation suite named Comprehensive Electronic Office (CEO),[15] which included a mail system, a calendar, a folder-based document store, a word processor (CEOWrite), a spreadsheet processor, and other assorted tools. All were crude by today's standards, but were revolutionary for their time. CEOWrite was also offered on the DG One Portable.
Some software development from the early 1970s is notable. PLN (created by Robert Nichols) was the host language for a number of DG products, making them easier to develop, enhance, and maintain than macro assembler equivalents. PLN smacked of a micro-subset of PL/I, in sharp contrast to other languages of the time, such as BLISS. The RPG product (shipped in 1976) incorporated a language runtime system implemented as a virtual machine which executed pre-compiled code as sequences of PLN statements and Eclipse commercial instruction routines. The latter provided microcode acceleration of arithmetic and conversion operations for a wide range of now-arcane data types such as overpunch characters. The DG Easy product, a portable application platform developed by Nichols and others from 1975 to 1979 but never marketed, had roots easily traceable back to the RPG VM created by Stephen Schleimer.
Also notable were several commercial software products developed in the mid to late 1970s in conjunction with the commercial computers. These products were popular with business customers because of their screen design feature and other ease-of-use features.
- The first product was IDEA (Interactive Data Entry/Access),[16] which consisted of a screen design tool (IFMT), TP Controller (IMON), and a program development language (IFPL).
- The second was the CS40 line of products, which used COBOL and their own ISAM data manager. The COBOL variant used included an added screen section. Both of these products were a major departure from the transaction monitors of the day which did not have a screen design tool and used subroutine calls from COBOL to handle the screen. IDEA was identified by some market watchers as a precursor to fourth-generation programming languages.
The original IDEA ran on RDOS and would support up to 24 users in an RDOS Partition. Each user could use the same or a different program. Eventually, IDEA ran on every commercial hardware product from the MicroNova (4 users) to the MV series under AOS/VS, the same IDEA program running all those systems. The CS40 (the first of this line) was a package system which supported four terminal users, each running a different COBOL program.
- These products also led to the development of a third product, TPMS (Transaction Processing Monitoring System (announced in 1980)) which could capably run a large number of COBOL or PL/I users with a smaller number of processors, a major resource and performance advantage on AOS and AOS/VS systems. TPMS had the same screen design tool as the earlier products. TPMS used defined subroutine calls for screen functions from COBOL or PL/I, which in some users' eyes made it more difficult to use. However, this product was aimed at the professional IS Programmers as were its competitors—IBM's CICS and DEC's TRAX. As with IDEA, TPMS used INFOS for information management and DG/DBMS for database management.
Xodiac
[edit]In 1979, DG introduced their Xodiac networking system.[17]: 247 This was based on the X.25 standard at the lower levels, and their own application layer protocols on top. Because it was based on X.25, remote sites could be linked together over commercial X.25 services like Telenet in the US or Datapac in Canada.[18] Data General software packages supporting Xodiac included Comprehensive Electronic Office (CEO).[17]: 247
In June 1987, Data General announced its intention to replace Xodiac with the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) protocol suite.[19]
Dasher terminals
[edit]
Data General produced a full range of peripherals, sometimes by rebadging printers for example, but Data General's own series of CRT-based and hard-copy terminals were high quality and featured a generous number of function keys, each with the ability to send different codes, with any combination of control and shift keys, which influenced WordPerfect design. The model 6053 Dasher 2 featured an easily tilted screen, but used many integrated circuits; the smaller, lighter D100, D200 and eventually the D210 replaced it as the basic user terminal, while graphics models such as the D460 (with ANSI X3.64 compatibility) occupied the very high end of the range. Terminal emulators for the D2/D3/D100/D200/D210 (and some features of the D450/460) do exist, including the Freeware 1993 DOS program in D460.zip.
Most Data General software was written specifically for their own terminals (or the terminal emulation built into the Desktop Generation DG10, but the Data General One built-in terminal emulator is not often suitable), although software using Data General Business BASIC could be more flexible in terminal handling, because logging into a Business BASIC system would initiate a process whereby the terminal type would (usually) be auto-detected.
Data General/One
[edit]
Data General's introduction of the Data General/One (DG-1) in 1984 is one of the few cases of a minicomputer company introducing a truly breakthrough PC product. Considered genuinely portable, rather than "luggable", as alternatives often were called, it was a nine-pound battery-powered MS-DOS machine equipped with dual 31⁄2-inch diskettes, a 79-key full-stroke keyboard, 128 KB to 512 KB of RAM, and a monochrome LCD screen capable of either the full-sized standard 80×25 characters or full CGA graphics (640×200). The DG-1 was considered a modest advance over similar Osborne/Kaypro systems overall.
Desktop Generation
[edit]Data General also brought out a small-footprint "Desktop Generation" range, starting with the DG10 that included both Data General and Intel CPUs in a patented closely coupled arrangement, able to run MS-DOS or CP/M-86 concurrently with DG/RDOS, with each benefiting from the hardware acceleration given by other CPU as a co-processor that would handle (for instance) screen graphics or disk operations concurrently. Other members of the Desktop Generation range, the DG20 and DG30, were aimed more at traditional commercial environments, such as multi-user COBOL systems, replacing refrigerator-sized minicomputers with toaster-sized modular microcomputers based around the microECLIPSE CPUs and some of the technology developed for the microNOVA-based "Micro Products" range such as the MP/100 and MP/200 that had struggled to find a market niche. The Single-processor version of the DG10, the DG10SP, was the entry-level machine with, like the DG20 and 30, no ability to run Intel software. Despite having some good features and having less direct competition from the flood of cheap PC compatibles, the Desktop Generation range also struggled, partly because they offered an economical way of running what was essentially "legacy software" while the future was clearly either slightly cheaper Personal Computers or slightly more expensive "super minicomputers" such as the MV and VAX computers.
Lock-in or no lock-in?
[edit]Throughout the 1980s, the computer market had evolved dramatically. Large installations in the past typically ran custom-developed software for a small range of tasks. For instance, IBM often delivered machines whose only purpose was to generate accounting data for a single company, running software tailored for that company alone.
By the mid-1980s, the introduction of new software development methods and the rapid acceptance of the SQL database was changing the way such software was developed. Now developers typically linked together several pieces of existing software, as opposed to developing everything from scratch. In this market, the question of which machine was the "best" changed; it was no longer the machine with the best price–performance ratio or service contracts, but the one that ran all of the third-party software the customer intended to use.
This change forced changes on the hardware vendors as well. Formerly, almost all computer companies attempted to make their machines different enough that when their customers sought a more powerful machine, it was often cheaper to buy another from the same company. This was known as "vendor lock-in", which helped guarantee future sales, even though the customers detested it.
With the change in software development, combined with new generations of commodity processors that could match the performance of low-end minicomputers, lock-in was no longer working. When forced to make a decision, it was often cheaper for the users to simply throw out all of their existing machinery and buy a microcomputer product instead. If this was not the case at present, it certainly appeared it would be within a generation or two of Moore's law.
In 1988, two company directors put together a report showing that if the company were to continue existing in the future, DG would have to either invest heavily in software to compete with new applications being delivered by IBM and DEC on their machines, or alternately exit the proprietary hardware business entirely.
Thomas West's report outlined these changes in the marketplace, and suggested that the customer was going to win the fight over lock-in. They also outlined a different solution: Instead of trying to compete against the much larger IBM and DEC, they suggested that since the user no longer cared about the hardware as much as software, DG could deliver the best "commodity" machines instead.
"Specifically", the report stated, "DG should examine the Unix market, where all of the needed software already exists, and see if DG can provide compelling Unix solutions."[This quote needs a citation] Now the customer could run any software they wished as long as it ran on Unix, and by the early 1990s, everything did. As long as DG's machines outperformed the competition, their customers would return, because they liked the machines, not because they were forced; lock-in was over.
AViiON
[edit]De Castro agreed with the report, and future generations of the MV series were terminated. Instead, DG released a technically interesting series of Unix servers known as the AViiON. The name "AViiON" was a reversed play on the name of DG's first product, Nova, implying "Nova II". In an effort to keep costs down, the AViiON was originally designed and shipped with the Motorola 88000 RISC processor. The AViiON machines supported multi-processing, later evolving into NUMA-based systems, allowing the machines to scale upwards in performance by adding additional processors.
CLARiiON
[edit]An important element in all enterprise computer systems is high speed storage. At the time AViiON came to market, commodity hard disk drives could not offer the sort of performance needed for data center use. DG attacked this problem in the same fashion as the processor issue, by running a large number of drives in parallel. The overall performance was greatly improved and the resulting innovation was marketed originally as the HADA (High Availability Disk Array) and then later as the CLARiiON line. The CLARiiON arrays, which offered SCSI RAID in various capacities, offered a great price/performance and platform flexibility over competing solutions.
The CLARiiON line was marketed not only to AViiON and Data General MV series customers, but also to customers running servers from other vendors such as Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard and Silicon Graphics. Data General also embarked on a plan to hire storage sales specialists and to challenge the EMC Symmetrix in the wider market.
Joint venture with Soviet company
[edit]On December 12, 1989, DG and Soviet Union software developer NPO Parma announced Perekat (Перекат, “Rolling Thunder,”) the first joint venture between an American computer company and a Soviet company. DG would provide hardware and NPO Parma the software, and Austrian companies Voest Alpine Industrieanlagenbau and their marketing group Voest Alpine Vertriebe would build the plant.[20]
Final downturn
[edit]

Despite Data General's betting the AViiON farm on the Motorola 88000,[21] Motorola decided to end production of that CPU. The 88000 had never been very successful, and DG was the only major customer. When Apple Computer and IBM proposed their joint solution based on POWER architecture, the PowerPC, Motorola picked up the manufacturing contract and killed the 88000.
DG quickly responded by introducing new models of the AViiON series based on a true commodity processor, the Intel x86 series. By this time a number of other vendors, notably Sequent Computer Systems, were also introducing similar machines. The lack of lock-in now came back to haunt DG, and the rapid commoditization of the Unix market led to shrinking sales. DG did begin a minor shift toward the service industry, training their technicians for the role of implementing a spate of new x86-based servers and the new Microsoft Windows NT domain-driven, small server world. This never developed enough to offset the loss of high margin server business however.
Data General also targeted the explosion of the internet in the latter 1990s with the formation of the THiiN Line business unit, led by Tom West, which had a focus on creation and sale of so-called "internet appliances". The product developed was called the SiteStak web server appliance and was designed as an inexpensive website hosting product.
EMC takeover
[edit]CLARiiON was the only product line that saw continued success through the later 1990s after finding a large niche for Unix storage systems,[22] and its sales were still strong enough to make DG a takeover target. EMC, the 800-pound gorilla in the storage market, announced in August 1999 that they would buy Data General and its assets for $1.1 billion or $19.58 a share.[23] The acquisition was completed on October 12, 1999.[24]
Although details of the acquisition specified that EMC had to take the entire company, and not just the storage line, EMC quickly ended all development and production of DG computer hardware and parts, effectively ending Data General's presence in the segment. The maintenance business was sold to a third party, who also acquired all of DG's remaining hardware components for spare parts sales to old DG customers. The CLARiiON line continued to be a major player in the market and was marketed under that name until January 2012.[25] CLARiiON was also widely sold by Dell through a worldwide OEM deal with EMC. The Clariion and Celerra storage products evolved into EMC's unified storage platform, the VNX platform.
Data General would be only one of many New England based computer companies, including the original Digital Equipment Corporation, that collapsed or were sold to larger companies after the 1980s. On the Internet, even the old Data General domain (dg.com), which contained a few EMC webpages that only mentioned the latter company in passing, was sold to the Dollar General discount department store chain in October 2009.
Marketing
[edit]Data General exhibited a brash style of marketing and advertising, which acted to set the company in the spotlight. A memorable advertising campaign during the early 1980s Desktop Generation era, was issuance of T-shirts with the logo "We did it on a desktop". The early AViiON servers were portrayed as powerful computing in the size of a pizza box.
Data General sponsored the Tyrrell Formula 1 team in the Formula 1 World Championships in 1985, 1986 and 1987, with prominent placing on the team's 014, 015 and DG016 cars. The DG016 used in 1987 was prefixed DG in deference to Data General.
Alumni
[edit]- DJ Delorie designed PC motherboards and BIOS code for Data General for four years. He authored DJGPP, and as of 2019[update] works for Red Hat on GCC.[26]
- Peter Darnell was a developer of DG/L and went on to develop C compilers for Unix and Windows. He wrote a book on C and is the developer of the visual programming language VisSim by Visual Solutions.[citation needed]
- Jean-Louis Gassée was with Data General in France before moving to Apple Computer and Be Inc.
- Ronald H. Gruner was head of Data General's Fountainhead project which competed with the MV/8000. After leaving DG he co-founded Alliant Computer Systems along with former DG colleague Craig Mundie.[27]
- David C. Mahoney founded Banyan Systems and pioneered Local Area network technologies in late 1980s along with Novell.[citation needed]
- Craig Mundie was a software developer at Data General and later became Chief Technologist at Microsoft.
- Mike Nash worked on AOS/VS kernel virtual terminal services for PCI and was a Corporate Vice President at Microsoft and is currently Vice President, Consumer PC & Solutions, Printing and Personal Systems Group, Hewlett-Packard Company.[28][29]
- Ray Ozzie was a software developer at Data General. He subsequently worked for Software Arts, Lotus Development, Iris Associates, and Groove Networks. Groove Networks was acquired by Microsoft in 2005, and Ozzie replaced Bill Gates as chief software architect at Microsoft from 2006 until 2010.
- Jonathan Sachs co-founded Lotus Development where he authored 1-2-3.
- Jit Saxena founded Netezza, search technology company
- Christopher Stone founded Object Management Group (created CORBA) and became vice chairman/CEO of Novell.
- Asher Waldfogel was a software engineer in Special Systems (software) who later went on to found Redback Networks, Tollbridge Technologies and PeakStream.[30]
- Steve Wallach cofounded Convex Computer.
- Joshua Weiss was a manager in the Xodiac Networking group who went on to co-found Prominet (bought by Lucent Technologies) and later was founder and CEO of Nauticus (bought by Sun Microsystems).[citation needed]
- Vernon Weiss was a manager in the portable computing group who led the development of the Data General/One, the Data General/Two, and the Data General Walkabout.[31][32] He was later a key person in the creation of the XPS family of personal computers at Dell and was the director of the personal computing division at Packard Bell and a product manager at Northgate Computer Systems.[33][31][34]: 1
- Tom West was the manager for the MV/8000 and later projects. He was the main protagonist of the Pulitzer Prize winning 1981 non-fiction book The Soul of a New Machine.[35]
- Edward Zander was product marketing manager at Data General before his positions at Apollo Computer, Sun Microsystems and Motorola as CEO.
- Wayne Rosing was hardware manager of Special Systems (hardware) who left to design the Lisa workstation for Apple. Though not a commercial success, stripped down it became the Macintosh. Rosing later went to Sun Microsystems where he was Vice President of Advanced Development, appearing on the cover of Fortune magazine. He retired as VP of Hardware at Google.
- George Woltman went on to found the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) and is the author of Prime95 (which is used to search for Mersenne Prime numbers and for hardware stress testing.)
Notes
[edit]- ^ Klein, Stanley (October 2, 1977). "The Maxigrowth of Minicomputers". The New York Times.
- ^ a b c "Computer History Museum - Data General Corporation (DG) - 840 the loaded nova". www.computerhistory.org. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
- ^ White, Donald (July 28, 1968). "The Data General Corp., New firm, new line of computers". The Boston Globe. p. B-25.
- ^ a b "The Business That Time Forgot Data General is gone. But does that make its founder a failure? - April 1, 2003". money.cnn.com. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
- ^ a b "What Have We Learned from the PDP-11?". December 4, 2017.
Edson de Castro, the product manager of the PDP-8, ...
- ^ "Data General Nova, serial #1".
This first completed Nova was shipped to Unitech in Austin, TX to be used by Mobil Oil... 1969.
- ^ "Nova brochure" (PDF). 1968. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
- ^ "Data General Corporation (DG) - Selling the Computer Revolution".
- ^ Charles P. Thacker; Edward M. McCreight (December 1974). "Alto: A Personal Computer System" (PDF). p. 13. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-08-14. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
- ^ "Data General".
- ^ a b "Data General's Tom West dies". The Register. May 24, 2011.
The 16-bit Eclipse was a problem-strewn product
- ^ "VAX 11/780". Retrieved 13 March 2022.
The VAX 11/780 was introduced on 25 October 1977 at the Digital Equipment Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders. It was the first member of the VAX family.
- ^ "CPSC 3300: The Soul of a New Machine".
- ^ Transferring technology to improve forest land management. 1989.
In the first 2 years of Data General operation, the Forest Service increased its productivity by saving almost 1/2 million hours of employee time.
- ^ Brian Kelly. "Minicomputers and Software". TechArchives.
The Comprehensive Electronic Office (CEO) featured word processing...
- ^ Henryk Sawoniak; Maria Witt (1994). New International Dictionary of Acronyms in Library and Information Sciences. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 3110957825.
Interactive Data Entry/Access (Data General Corp. - US) IDEA
- ^ a b Eriksen, Denise C. (1984). "A synopsis of present day practices concerning decision support systems". Information & Management. 7 (5): 243–252. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(84)90048-X. ISSN 0378-7206.
- ^ "Networking that Works". Computerworld. 10 December 1979. p. 23.
- ^ King, Julia (14 September 1987). "Data General: out to make money the connectivity way". Network World. Vol. 4, no. 37. IDG. pp. 1, 35–38, 40. ISSN 0887-7661.
- ^ Donker, Peter P. (13 December 1989). "DG to Enter Soviet Market 'Foothold' in Untapped Area". Worcester Telegram & Gazette.
- ^ "History of Data General Corporation".
... a long way to go .... Skates proceeded to pare costs and plan Data General's future around the AViiON line.
- ^ "EMC to buy Data General for $US1.1B". ComputerWorld. August 10, 1999.
Storage systems, software and services vendor EMC is to buy Data General for ... of Data General whose flagship Clariion line targets midrange storage systems
- ^ "EMC to Acquire Data General" (Press release). August 9, 1999.
- ^ "EMC Announces Completion of Data General Acquisition" (Press release). October 12, 1999.
- ^ Connor, Deni (23 August 2011). "EMC Discontinues Clariion, Celerra Storage Lines". Network Computing. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- ^ "dj delorie".
- ^ "Ron Gruner: Geek of the Week - Simple Talk". 25 July 2012.
- ^ Microsoft PressPass – Microsoft Executives and Images
- ^ "Executive Biography - Mike Nash" (PDF).
- ^ "Asher Waldfogel: A choice beyond reason". 2003. Archived from the original on March 10, 2008.
- ^ a b Krohn, Nico (April 1, 1991). "Not as Easy as 1-2-3". InfoWorld. 13 (13). IDG Publications: 40–41. ProQuest 194255983.
- ^ Damer, Bruce; Allan Lundell (2004). "Data General Walkabout". DigiBarn.com. DigiBarn Computer Museum. Archived from the original on February 25, 2004.
- ^ Polilli, Steve (August 9, 1993). "Dell listened to customer needs in redesign of its desktop lines". InfoWorld. 15 (32). IDG Publications: 28 – via Google Books.
- ^ Chen, Elaine (January 5, 1998). "Low prices will shape the year". Electronic News. 44 (2200). Reed Business Information: 1, 46. ProQuest 209720097.
- ^ Kidder, Tracy (1981) [1997]. The Soul of a New Machine. Modern Library. ISBN 978-0-316-49170-9.
References
[edit]- Kidder, Tracy (1981). The Soul of a New Machine. Little, Brown and Company. Reprint edition July 1997 by Modern Library. ISBN 0-679-60261-5.
External links
[edit]- Official Website, circa 1996
- SimuLogics ("dedicated to preserving the history and legacy of the Data General Nova, Eclipse, MV and compatible computers") Archived 2012-07-06 at the Wayback Machine
- Carl Friend's Computer Museum (has pages for over a dozen DG systems)
- data general facebook alumni group
Data General
View on GrokipediaHistory
Founding and Early Years (1968–1969)
Data General Corporation was founded in 1968 in Hudson, Massachusetts, by former Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) employees Edson de Castro, Henry Burkhardt III, Richard Sogge, and Herbert Richman.[9][10] De Castro, who had led the design of DEC's PDP-8 minicomputer, grew frustrated with DEC's reluctance to develop a successor 16-bit system, prompting him and his colleagues to leave and establish an independent venture focused on innovation in minicomputer technology.[1] The company secured initial funding of $400,000 upfront as part of a larger $800,000 investment to support its operations.[11] Initially headquartered in the former mill town of Hudson, with operations later moving to Westborough, Data General adopted a lean startup approach, operating from modest rented space to foster a culture of engineering-driven agility and rapid development.[10][12] This setup emphasized cost efficiency and close collaboration among a small team of engineers, reflecting the founders' vision of building affordable computing solutions without the bureaucratic constraints they experienced at DEC.[13] From its inception, Data General targeted scientific and industrial markets with a design for a 16-bit minicomputer intended to outperform and undercut DEC's PDP-8 in performance and price.[1] The team developed the first prototype in 1968, culminating in the announcement of the Nova system at the 1969 national Computer Conference, marking the company's entry into the competitive minicomputer industry.[10][6]Nova Era and Initial Success (1969–1974)
Data General achieved its breakthrough with the launch of the Nova minicomputer in 1969, a 16-bit word-addressable system designed to compete directly with Digital Equipment Corporation's PDP-8 by offering superior performance at a lower cost.[1] The initial model featured 4K words of core memory, basic input/output capabilities via a bi-directional bus, and was priced at a base of $3,995, making it accessible for scientific and educational applications.[14] This compact design, utilizing medium-scale integration TTL logic on a single large printed circuit board, marked a significant advancement in minicomputer architecture and quickly positioned Data General as an innovator in the field.[3] The Nova's market reception was swift and strong, with approximately 500 units sold in its first 15 months and contributing to the company's total Nova family sales exceeding 50,000 units over its lifetime.[10] This rapid adoption helped Data General capture a notable portion of the growing minicomputer sector, particularly in process control, laboratory automation, and academic settings, where its reliability and affordability shone.[6] By 1971, annual revenues had reached $10 million, reflecting doubled sales from the previous year and underscoring the Nova's role in establishing Data General as a major player.[15] In response to demand for enhanced performance, Data General introduced the Supernova series in 1970, followed by the Supernova SC model in 1971, which incorporated faster 800-nanosecond core memory and optional semiconductor memory with a 300-nanosecond cache for improved speed in demanding computations. These upgrades targeted high-performance needs in scientific computing and education, enabling more complex simulations and data processing tasks while maintaining compatibility with the original Nova architecture.[16] Concurrently, the company expanded internationally by establishing sales operations in Europe in 1970, laying the groundwork for broader global distribution.[17]Mid-1970s Challenges and Eclipse Development
By the early 1970s, Data General's rapid expansion strained its manufacturing capabilities, particularly in scaling production for Nova upgrades during 1973 and 1974. These scaling issues resulted in significant delivery delays, frustrating customers and enabling competitors like Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) to capture market share with more reliable offerings such as the PDP-11 series.[18][19] In response, Data General launched the Eclipse line in October 1974, with the C/300 model marking the company's entry into more advanced 16-bit minicomputers designed for both scientific and commercial applications. The Eclipse C/300 introduced innovative features including virtual memory support and demand paging, allowing for efficient memory management in multitasking environments, while maintaining compatibility with existing Nova software to ease customer transitions. Although the architecture supported configurations with up to 16 processors in later expansions, initial models like the C/300 focused on single-processor performance with eight accumulators and microprogrammable control for flexibility.[10][18][20] Despite these advancements, the Eclipse rollout faced substantial hurdles, including hardware bugs and immature software that hindered reliability until major fixes were implemented by 1976. Production problems, stemming from overambitious internal projects and managerial discord under founder Edson de Castro, exacerbated these issues and delayed widespread adoption.[19][18][10] The broader economic turmoil of the 1973–1974 oil crisis further compounded these challenges, as soaring energy prices disrupted industrial clients who formed a key segment of Data General's customer base, leading to reduced demand for computing equipment. Company revenues dipped to $108 million in fiscal 1975, prompting aggressive cost-cutting measures such as streamlining research initiatives and tightening operational controls to stabilize finances.[21][22] In parallel, Data General began a strategic pivot toward business computing markets, developing software like Business BASIC to target administrative and data processing applications beyond traditional scientific uses, aiming to diversify revenue streams and compete more directly with IBM in enterprise settings.[10][18]Fountainhead Project and Eagle Computer (Late 1970s)
In response to Digital Equipment Corporation's 1976 announcement of its 32-bit VAX minicomputer, Data General initiated Project Fountainhead that year as a highly secretive effort to develop an advanced 32-bit architecture capable of outperforming competitors in the emerging high-end minicomputer market.[23] The project, headquartered in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, aimed to create a groundbreaking system using innovative design principles, including high-level language support and variable-word-length processing, but it encountered significant management challenges and fell behind schedule.[24][25] Faced with Fountainhead's delays and the urgent need to counter the VAX—particularly after its commercial launch in 1978—Data General engineering manager Tom West launched a clandestine parallel initiative codenamed Eagle in late 1977 or early 1978, operating as a skunkworks project from the company's Westborough, Massachusetts, facilities.[23][24] West, skeptical of Fountainhead's ambitious approach, directed his team to extend the existing 16-bit Eclipse architecture to 32 bits while ensuring backward compatibility, leveraging off-the-shelf components for faster development.[23] This effort produced the Eagle CPU, which powered the MV/8000 minicomputer—a system featuring a 32-bit CISC design with a 4 GB virtual address space divided into privilege rings, virtual memory support via an Address Translation Unit, and compatibility with Unix-like operating systems through XENIX integration on top of Data General's AOS/VS.[26][27] The MV/8000 achieved approximately 1.3 MIPS performance, competitive with the VAX-11/780, and was released in April 1980 after Eagle outpaced the still-delayed Fountainhead, which was ultimately canceled.[26][23] The Eagle project's development was marked by an intense, high-pressure team culture under West's leadership, involving around two dozen young engineers divided into hardware ("Hardy Boys") and microcode ("Microkids") subgroups, who endured grueling schedules—often seven days a week—with limited resources and internal corporate rivalries.[24] This dynamic, characterized by burnout, fierce dedication, and West's aloof yet protective management style, was vividly chronicled in Tracy Kidder's 1981 Pulitzer Prize-winning book The Soul of a New Machine, which portrayed the engineers' rivalries and the existential stakes of the effort as Data General's potential salvation.[24][28] Initial production faced challenges, including component sourcing issues common to the era's semiconductor shortages, but the MV/8000 began shipping in 1980 and saw brisk early sales, with Data General delivering systems that solidified its position as a key player in multi-user minicomputer environments.[23] The Eagle design laid the foundation for the broader MV series, enabling Data General's temporary market recovery in the early 1980s.[23]MV Series and 1980s Recovery
The MV series emerged from the Eagle project, a high-priority effort to develop a 32-bit minicomputer capable of competing with Digital Equipment Corporation's VAX line. The Eclipse MV/8000, codenamed Eagle, was released in April 1980 as the flagship model, featuring advanced architecture for improved performance over prior Eclipse systems.[10] This was followed by the MV/6000 in 1981, a mid-range system designed for broader market accessibility, and the MV/4000 in 1983, a compact entry-level option that enhanced the line's scalability for smaller installations.[29][30] The series incorporated enhancements in reliability through modular design and supported clustering configurations of up to 15 processors connected via high-speed local links, enabling distributed processing up to 150 feet apart.[29] The commercialization of the MV series drove a significant recovery for Data General in the early 1980s, stabilizing the company after financial strains from 1970s overexpansion and development delays. Revenue grew to over $800 million by fiscal 1983, with sales rebounding 40% in early 1984 to exceed $1 billion, largely attributed to MV adoption in sectors like government and finance.[17][10] Notable implementations included the U.S. Forest Service's distributed processing network, which deployed over 900 MV-series superminicomputers across 880 field sites to support administrative and scientific applications, boosting operational efficiency.[31] The MV line became a bestseller, with an installed base reaching 40,000 machines by 1990, generating $600 million in annual revenue at its peak.[32] This focus on the MV series resolved short-term crises, averting bankruptcy risks from earlier losses—such as a 51% profit drop to $24.6 million in fiscal 1982—by prioritizing high-volume sales of reliable, multi-user systems.[10] Workforce expansion accompanied the recovery, growing to approximately 17,700 employees by 1984 to support increased production and global distribution.[28] Data General also pursued international manufacturing to meet demand, including operations in Scotland tied to disk drive production via Rodime Ltd. in Glenrothes, established in 1979.[33] These efforts provided a temporary lifeline, allowing the company to refocus on core minicomputer strengths before transitioning toward Unix-based systems like AViiON in the late 1980s.[10]Late 1980s to 1990s: Diversification and Decline
In the mid-1980s, Data General sought to diversify into the burgeoning personal computing market with the introduction of the Desktop Generation series in 1985, a family of desktop professional computers designed for compatibility with its minicomputer ecosystem and upward scalability.[34] These systems aimed to counter the microcomputer revolution but struggled due to high pricing and limited software availability, failing to gain significant traction against competitors.[10] Similarly, the company launched the Data General/One portable computer in 1984, an IBM PC-compatible laptop weighing nine pounds with MS-DOS, dual 3.5-inch floppy drives, and a monochrome LCD display, intended to capture mobile computing demand.[7] However, its poor display readability and the rapid rise of more affordable IBM PC clones overshadowed it, resulting in overestimated demand and commercial underperformance.[35] By the late 1980s, Data General pivoted toward open systems to address declining minicomputer sales, introducing the AViiON series of Unix workstations and servers in 1989, initially powered by Motorola 88000 RISC processors.[10] This line marked a strategic embrace of Unix and scalable architectures, transitioning from proprietary designs to compete in the workstation market; by fiscal 1991, AViiON generated $200 million in revenue, with projections for further growth to $500 million.[32] Later iterations incorporated x86 processors, broadening its appeal amid the "Unix wars" where vendors vied for open systems dominance. In December 1990, founder Edson de Castro was removed as CEO and chairman amid ongoing financial challenges.[36] In 1992, Data General debuted the CLARiiON storage system, a mid-range disk array using RAID technology to provide high-capacity, fault-tolerant data storage for Unix environments, supporting up to 20 drives in a compact enclosure.[37] Targeted at memory-intensive applications, it gained market traction through original equipment manufacturer (OEM) partnerships, including deals with Storage Technology Corporation, Hewlett-Packard, NEC, Bull, and Silicon Graphics by 1994, positioning it as a key diversification into enterprise storage.[38] Despite these efforts, Data General faced persistent financial challenges in the 1990s as the PC boom eroded minicomputer demand and intense competition in the Unix server market squeezed margins.[39] Company revenue stagnated around $1.12 billion by the mid-1990s, with cumulative losses exceeding $547 million from 1986 to 1995, prompting significant cost-cutting measures including the layoff of 1,000 employees in 1992 and an overall workforce reduction of two-thirds to approximately 6,900 by 1993.[10][40]Acquisition by EMC (1999)
In August 1999, EMC Corporation announced its intent to acquire Data General Corporation in a stock-for-stock transaction valued at approximately $1.1 billion, or $19.58 per share based on EMC's closing stock price on August 6.[41] The primary motivation was to expand EMC's presence in the rapidly growing $10 billion midrange storage market by incorporating Data General's CLARiiON disk array technology, which provided scalable, Fibre Channel-based storage solutions that complemented EMC's high-end Symmetrix enterprise systems.[41][42] This move also brought Data General's AViiON server lineup and research expertise in network-attached storage, enabling EMC to offer integrated solutions for UNIX and Windows NT environments.[41] The acquisition faced no major regulatory hurdles and closed on October 12, 1999, with each Data General share exchanged for 0.3125 shares of EMC common stock.[43] At the time, Data General employed about 5,000 people worldwide, including 1,800 in Massachusetts, all of whom were integrated into EMC's operations based in nearby Hopkinton.[44] EMC immediately discontinued Data General's legacy minicomputer lines, such as the Eclipse and MV series, which had become obsolete amid the industry's pivot to Intel-based architectures and client-server models.[45] However, the company retained the AViiON workstation and server teams, as well as the CLARiiON development and sales groups, relocating key personnel to facilities in Maynard, Massachusetts, to focus on high-value storage and compute innovations.[43][45] Data General's decision to sell stemmed from ongoing financial pressures, including quarterly net losses reported throughout fiscal 1998—such as $4.5 million in the second quarter—and broader challenges from heavy investments in Y2K compliance for legacy systems alongside the market's rapid shift toward Windows NT and open systems.[46] Post-acquisition, EMC rebranded several Data General offerings to align with its portfolio, while the CLARiiON line remained a cornerstone product, continuing sales and evolution until its end-of-life in 2012 under the Dell EMC banner following Dell's 2016 acquisition of EMC.[47] This integration marked the end of Data General as an independent entity and bolstered EMC's dominance in enterprise storage.[48]Products
Minicomputers
The Nova family represented Data General's foundational line of 16-bit minicomputers, featuring a word length of 16 bits with support for 8-bit bytes and four accumulators (two of which could function as index registers).[49] The architecture included a 15-bit program counter and instruction sets for jumps/modify memory, data moves, I/O operations, and arithmetic/logic functions.[49] Early models like the Nova 1200 series offered a memory cycle time of 1.2 microseconds, enabling efficient processing for scientific and industrial tasks.[50] Memory was based on magnetic core technology, expandable in increments of 1K, 2K, 4K, 8K, or 16K words, up to a maximum of 32K words in standard configurations.[49] The Nova 3, introduced in October 1975, enhanced this lineup with standard direct memory access (DMA) capabilities for high-speed I/O transfers and an optional floating-point unit that added 31 specialized instructions, supporting up to 128K words of memory with a memory management unit (MMU).[51] Supernova variants built on the Nova design by introducing overlapped instruction fetch and execution, along with early adoption of bipolar semiconductor memory for improved speed in demanding environments.[52] These systems achieved a core memory cycle time of 0.8 microseconds, dropping to 0.3 microseconds with read-only memory (ROM), which allowed for faster arithmetic and logical operations.[52] Memory capacity extended up to 32K words, with options for mixing core and semiconductor modules, and included hardware for multiply/divide operations as well as memory protection features.[49] Supernovas were particularly suited for real-time control applications, such as high-speed laboratory monitoring and precision manufacturing, due to their enhanced throughput—over three times that of the original Nova.[52] The Eclipse series advanced Data General's minicomputer offerings with a more sophisticated 16-bit architecture featuring eight accumulators and built-in support for virtual memory, marking a shift toward multitasking and larger-scale processing.[53] The C/300 model, released in 1974, utilized a microprogrammed design with an effective cycle time as low as 0.2 microseconds through memory interleaving, enabling high-performance commercial applications. Virtual memory was implemented via a memory allocation and protection (MAP) unit that supported up to 256K bytes (128K words) of physical memory, with segmentation into eight regions for security and resource management. The S/130, introduced in 1976, provided a compact configuration for smaller installations, offering 128K bytes (64K words) of maximum main memory and compatibility with the full Eclipse instruction set, including stack management and queue operations.[29]| Model Family | Cycle Time (μs) | Max Memory Capacity (words) | Key Performance Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nova | 1.2 (1200 series); 0.8 (later) | 32K (standard); 128K (extended) | Load/store: 1.6–2.55 μs; Add/subtract: 0.8–1.35 μs; Relative power index: 2.5–4.5[49][54] |
| Supernova | 0.8 (core); 0.3 (ROM) | 32K | >3x original Nova speed; DMA rates up to 1.25M words/sec[52][54] |
| Eclipse | 0.2 (effective, C/300) | 128K (C/300); 64K (S/130) | Virtual memory support; Interleaved access for 0.3 μs effective in some ops[29] |
Servers and Workstations
Data General's MV series marked a significant advancement in 32-bit computing for multi-user server applications, deriving from the Eclipse CPU architecture to support demanding enterprise workloads. The initial MV/8000 model, launched in 1980, achieved approximately 1 MIPS of performance while offering up to 14 MB of RAM, enabling efficient handling of business processing tasks in multi-user configurations. Later expansions in the series introduced Symmetric Multi-Processing (SMP) capabilities, scaling from 2 to 15 CPUs to distribute workloads across multiple processors for enhanced throughput in server environments. For instance, the MV/40000 HA models delivered up to 50 MIPS with 4 processors and supported up to 256 MB of RAM, facilitating clustered configurations for high-transaction loads such as database operations.[56][57][58] Early MV systems employed emitter-coupled logic (ECL) for rapid signal propagation and high-speed execution, contributing to their competitive edge in performance-critical applications. Over time, the series transitioned to complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology in models like the MV/35000, which supported six-way multiprocessing using custom CMOS designs for improved power efficiency, reduced heat, and greater integration density without sacrificing speed. This evolution allowed the MV line to bridge proprietary minicomputer roots with emerging open systems standards, powering servers in sectors like finance and manufacturing. The MV series' clustering features further enabled transaction processing rates suitable for online systems, with configurations handling thousands of users through load-balanced nodes.[59][60][58] In 1989, Data General introduced the AViiON line of UNIX-based workstations and entry-level servers, targeting engineering and scientific computing with support for multi-user access. These systems utilized the Motorola 88000 RISC processor at clock speeds up to 25 MHz, paired with the DG/UX operating system for robust multitasking and networking. Subsequent AViiON models shifted to Intel Pentium Pro processors, retaining DG/UX compatibility while boosting performance for workstation clusters in collaborative environments. Hardware innovations included integrated cache and memory management units from the 88000 family, enabling seamless handling of graphics-intensive and simulation workloads. Performance metrics highlighted the line's strengths, with a 40 MHz 88110-based model achieving 37.8 SPECint92 and 50.5 SPECfp92 ratings, underscoring its efficiency in integer and floating-point computations relative to contemporaries.[61][62][63] The Xodiac servers, debuted in 1988, offered fault-tolerant computing akin to Tandem systems, optimized for online transaction processing (OLTP) in mission-critical settings. Featuring hot-swappable modules for minimal downtime and non-stop processing via redundant hardware paths, Xodiac ensured continuous operation even during component failures, with integrated network buses supporting distributed fault recovery. These servers emphasized reliability through modular design, allowing real-time reconfiguration without interrupting services, and were particularly suited for high-availability applications like banking and telecommunications.[64][65]Storage Systems
Data General entered the storage market in 1992 with the introduction of the CLARiiON line of RAID-based disk arrays, marking one of the earliest commercial implementations of redundant array of independent disks technology tailored for open systems like UNIX and Windows environments.[38] The initial models, such as the deskside Series 2000, featured modular architectures comprising a Disk Processor Enclosure (DPE) for controllers and cache, paired with Disk Array Enclosures (DAEs) for drive expansion, offering capacities up to 24 GB in configurations suited for memory-intensive applications like imaging and voice recognition.[18] These systems emphasized high availability through fault-tolerant designs derived from earlier High Availability Disk Array (HADA) prototypes, including data integrity checks via SNiiFER monitoring that appended 8 extra bits per block for error detection.[38] Key features of the early CLARiiON arrays included dual controllers for redundancy, enabling failover to maintain operations during hardware faults, and support for snapshot capabilities in evolving models to facilitate point-in-time data copies for backup and recovery.[18] Scalability was a core strength, allowing configurations to expand from small deskside units to larger rack-mounted setups, with later iterations under Data General reaching multi-terabyte capacities before the 1999 acquisition by EMC Corporation, which extended growth to petabyte scales in subsequent releases.[38] The systems initially used SCSI interfaces for both front-end host connectivity and back-end drive access, providing reliable performance in mid-range environments. To broaden market reach, Data General forged OEM partnerships in the mid-1990s, reselling CLARiiON through vendors including Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Storage Technology Corporation, NEC, Bull, Sun Microsystems, and Silicon Graphics, which integrated the arrays into their UNIX-based server ecosystems for mid-range storage area networks (SANs).[18][38] By 1997, these efforts propelled CLARiiON to generate approximately $500 million in annual revenue, with nearly 60% derived from partner channels, establishing Data General as a leader in sub-$100,000 storage segments for enterprise applications.[39] The CLARiiON platform evolved technically from SCSI-dominant designs to incorporate Fibre Channel interfaces, transitioning front-end connectivity to 2 Gb/s Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL) for improved bandwidth and distance in SAN deployments.[38] Drive capacities advanced from 3.5-inch 4 GB units to 73 GB models, while controller processing upgraded to configurations with up to four Intel Pentium CPUs at 2 GHz. Following the EMC acquisition in 1999, the lineage continued with the CLARiiON CX series introduced around 2001–2002, which supported 10,000 RPM drives for enhanced input/output operations per second (IOPS) in high-performance scenarios.[2] CLARiiON implemented multiple RAID levels to balance redundancy, capacity, and performance: RAID 0 for striping to maximize throughput at the cost of fault tolerance; RAID 1 for mirroring to ensure data duplication and quick recovery; and RAID 5 for distributed parity, offering efficient storage utilization with single-drive fault tolerance suitable for random I/O workloads.[38] These levels enabled tunable performance, with RAID 0 delivering the highest IOPS for sequential reads (up to drive-limited speeds), RAID 1 providing balanced read/write symmetry around 100–200 IOPS per spindle in typical 1990s configurations, and RAID 5 achieving comparable reads but reduced writes due to parity calculations, often 50–75% of RAID 0 rates in mid-range arrays. Such implementations positioned CLARiiON as a versatile solution for database and file-serving applications demanding both reliability and scalability.Peripherals and Terminals
Data General developed a range of peripherals and terminals to complement its minicomputer systems, emphasizing compatibility with Nova and Eclipse architectures through standardized interfaces like RS-232. These devices facilitated data input, output, and interaction in multi-user environments, supporting operating systems such as RDOS.[66] The Dasher series represented Data General's primary line of CRT-based display terminals, starting with the Dasher D2 introduced in October 1976. The D2 featured a 12-inch diagonal CRT display capable of showing 1,920 characters in a 24-line by 80-column format, using a 96-character ASCII set with options for highlighting such as blink and underscore. It included a detachable typewriter-style keyboard with tactile feedback, N-key rollover, and up to 11 user-defined function keys, connected via a standard RS-232-C interface supporting transmission rates from 110 to 19,200 baud; an optional 20 mA current loop was available, along with a printer interface at 110-1,200 bps. Priced at approximately $1,990 for the base model, the D2 was designed for interactive use with Data General systems, including buffered transmission and compatibility with AOS and RDOS.[66] Evolutions in the Dasher series included the Dasher D3, released in March 1979, which built on the D2 with enhanced editing capabilities and a more advanced keyboard featuring 18 user-defined function keys (expandable to 72 functions), a dedicated numeric pad, and screen management controls. The D3 maintained the 12-inch display with 1,920-character capacity and added programmable attributes like dual-intensity, reverse video, and block fill, while supporting a standard RS-232-C printer interface up to 2,400 baud. Priced at $2,590, it emphasized operator convenience through its sculptured, detachable design and compatibility with earlier Dasher models. Subsequent models like the D4, introduced around 1982, incorporated bitmap graphics support on a 14-inch screen, enabling 80-column text display alongside vector drawing capabilities, further extending the series' utility for graphical applications in Eclipse-based environments.[66][67] Data General's output peripherals included line printers and magnetic tape drives optimized for Nova and Eclipse systems. The model 4326 line printer operated at 300 lines per minute (LPM) with 132 columns and a 96-character set supporting upper- and lower-case text, using a programmed input/output (PIO) interface; it was compatible with Eclipse-based CS/200 series computers and offered optional multilingual fonts for international use. For backups and data transfer, the 6026 9-track tape transport and controller provided densities of 800 or 1,600 bits per inch (bpi) on 10.5-inch reels, supporting up to eight drives per controller at 75 inches per second; it was designed for microEclipse and Eclipse systems in the CS/100 and CS/200 series. An additional 1,600 bpi streaming tape drive handled 8.5-inch reels at 30 inches per second offline, ensuring reliable archival storage integrated with RDOS batch operations.[68][69] Keyboards for Data General terminals adopted custom QWERTY layouts tailored to RDOS prompts, featuring a main typewriter-style array, a 14-key numeric section, a 12-key screen management keypad for cursor and editing functions, and a 15-key user function keypad for system-specific commands. These capacitively switched, solid-state keys ensured reliability in multi-user setups. Expansion cards, such as general-purpose interface boards, allowed integration of custom peripherals into Nova and Eclipse I/O buses, supporting asynchronous terminal subsystems and RDOS device drivers without altering core system architecture.[70][71] Dasher terminals integrated seamlessly with later Data General systems like the MV and AViiON series through serial ports, enabling console and keyboard operations. The following table outlines key compatibility aspects:| System | Interface | Key Features Supported | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| MV Series | RS-232 Serial | Keyboard entry, SCM commands (e.g., ATTACH, BOOT) | Up to 19,200 baud; Dasher D3/D4 for interactive processing[17] |
| AViiON 530/4600 | RS-232 Asynchronous (DB9/DB25) | Terminal attachment, baud rate configuration via SCM | Dasher keyboards compatible; avoids ports B/C for console; supports job processors[72] |
