Hubbry Logo
DinomyidaeDinomyidaeMain
Open search
Dinomyidae
Community hub
Dinomyidae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dinomyidae
Dinomyidae
Dinomyidae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Dinomyidae
Temporal range: Early Miocene–Recent
Pacarana (Dinomys branickii)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Superfamily: Chinchilloidea
Family: Dinomyidae
Peters, 1873
Genera

See text

The Dinomyidae are a family of South American hystricognath rodents: the dinomyids were once a very speciose group, but now contain only a single living species, the pacarana. Several of the extinct dinomyids were among the largest rodents known to date; these included the bison-sized Josephoartigasia monesi[1] and the smaller Josephoartigasia magna.[2] The dinomyids are thought to have occupied ecological niches associated with large grazing mammals due to their ability to compete with the native ungulates of South America. Conversely, they could feed on aquatic or swampy plants along the ancient rivers.[3] These large forms disappeared after the formation of a connection to North America. The modern pacarana is only modest, considerably smaller than the capybara.

The Neoepiblemidae, an entirely extinct family, may be part of the Dinomyidae; both groups are undoubtedly closely related.

Genera

[edit]
Josephoartigasia

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Dinomyidae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Dinomyidae is a family of South American caviomorph rodents within the superfamily Chinchilloidea, distinguished by their cheek teeth and ranging from medium to gigantic body sizes, with the group originating in the early and achieving peak diversity during the late before declining sharply, leaving only one extant species, the (Dinomys branickii). Phylogenetically, Dinomyidae forms a monophyletic closely related to and Neoepiblemidae, sharing synapomorphies such as specific upper molar configurations that evolved from pentalophodont to tetralophodont patterns over time, reflecting adaptations to abrasive in diverse habitats. The family's fossil record spans from the early to the Pleistocene, with early forms in the early-middle and later subfamilies including Potamarchinae (protohypsodont) and Tetrastylinae (euhypsodont), documented across northern and central in formations such as the Cerro Azul in and the Solimões in . Extinct genera, such as Tetrastylus, Diaphoromys, and Arazamys, exhibit morphological diversity in cranio-dental features, indicating ecological roles from browsing to grazing in forested and open environments during the radiation of ctenohystricans. The sole living representative, Dinomys branickii, is a large, stocky weighing 10–15 kg, with a broad head, short legs, coarse dark brown fur marked by pale stripes and spots, and teeth adapted for a folivorous diet. Found in Andean and tropical regions from , , , , , and at elevations of 250–3,200 m, it inhabits forests and shrublands, exhibiting nocturnal, predominantly terrestrial but with some climbing, and slow-moving behavior with vocalizations for communication. As of the 2016 IUCN assessment (confirmed unchanged as of 2025), it is classified as Least Concern, though threats including from and , , and predation by domestic dogs persist, with population trend unknown.

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Classification

Dinomyidae is a family of caviomorph rodents classified in the kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Mammalia, order Rodentia, suborder Hystricomorpha, infraorder Hystricognathi, parvorder Caviomorpha, and superfamily Chinchilloidea. The family was established by Wilhelm Peters in 1873 based on the type genus Dinomys. Phylogenetically, Dinomyidae forms a distinct lineage within Chinchilloidea, positioned within a polytomy with Cephalomyidae and Neoepiblemidae as sister to the pan-Chinchillidae clade, based on comprehensive morphological analyses of cheek teeth and cranial features. This placement reflects the family's inclusion in the broader hystricognath radiation, with Dinomyidae encompassing both the extant genus Dinomys and several extinct genera such as Tetrastylus and Scleromys. Historically, taxonomic revisions have expanded the 's scope beyond its living representative; for instance, Mones (1981) recognized four subfamilies (Potamarchinae, Gyriabrinae, Phoberomyinae—now often treated as Neoepiblemidae—and Dinomyinae) to accommodate diversity from the onward, though contemporary phylogenies emphasize a monophyletic without formal subfamilies. The is monotypic in terms of extant , containing only Dinomys branickii, but polytypic when including the rich record of medium- to giant-sized forms. Key diagnostic traits at the family level include the hystricognath jaw structure, featuring an enlarged with a significant posterior opening that allows the to insert along the , enhancing masticatory efficiency. The dental formula is I 1/1, C 0/0, P 1/1, M 3/3 (total 20 teeth), with molars composed of transverse lophs adapted for grinding vegetation.

Evolutionary History

Dinomyidae originated in during the early , approximately 23–16 million years ago (Ma), as part of the extensive radiation of caviomorph rodents that followed the continent's isolation after the breakup of around 34 Ma. This diversification occurred in the context of evolving tropical ecosystems, with the earliest definitive records of the family appearing in middle deposits, such as the Formation in , dated to about 13 Ma, where primitive forms like Drytomomys are documented. Phylogenetic analyses position Dinomyidae as a basal within the superfamily Chinchilloidea, supported by both morphological and molecular data, with estimates suggesting divergence from close relatives like around 25–20 Ma, aligning closely with the fossil timeline. The family underwent significant diversification from the to the (11–2.6 Ma), during which giant forms emerged, adapting to increasingly open habitats amid expanding grasslands across . This period saw the development of specialized and robust cranial structures in genera such as Tetrastylus and Potamarchus, enabling exploitation of abrasive vegetation in diverse environments from northern to southern . Peak diversity was achieved in the to (5.3–0.01 Ma), with over 50 extinct species across at least 10 genera, reflecting adaptive radiations that produced some of the largest known, including species exceeding 100 kg in body mass. The decline of Dinomyidae began in the late Pliocene, around 3 Ma, coinciding with the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI), when the formation of the facilitated northward migration and subsequent southward invasion by North American taxa, including competitive like cricetids. This biotic exchange, combined with cooling climate shifts that altered habitats and vegetation, led to the of most giant forms, with diversity plummeting from dozens of to the single surviving genus Dinomys by the . Late-surviving taxa, such as , persisted until the (ca. 2 Ma) in eastern , representing the final remnants of this once-dominant lineage.

Description

Living Species

The pacarana (Dinomys branickii), the only living species in the family Dinomyidae, is a large, robust rodent with a broad head, stocky body, short limbs, and plantigrade stance. Adults typically measure 73–79 cm in head-body length, with a tail of approximately 19 cm—about one-quarter to one-third of the head-body length—and weigh 10–15 kg. The coarse fur is dark brown to blackish dorsally, often lighter in females, and features two discontinuous white stripes along the back and scattered white spots on the flanks, aiding camouflage among vegetation. Short, rounded ears, a blunt muzzle with a deep-cleft upper lip, and long, grayish vibrissae (whiskers) complete the external appearance. Anatomically, D. branickii exhibits hystricognathous adaptations characteristic of advanced South American rodents, including an angled jaw joint and ever-growing incisors that increase in size by up to 77% in anteroposterior length during . The molars are euhypsodont, with complex occlusal surfaces that widen transversely and shorten anteroposteriorly with age, facilitating the grinding of fibrous plant material. The limbs terminate in broad feet with four digits each—reduced from the primitive five—bearing long, curved claws for scratching burrows and climbing rocky terrain. As a nocturnal species, the pacarana relies on sensory adaptations suited to low-light forest environments, featuring prominent, sensitive vibrissae for tactile navigation and detection of nearby objects, alongside small eyes that indicate limited . Auditory and olfactory senses are more pronounced, with a larger caudal colliculus in the for enhanced hearing and glandular secretions used in scent-marking. Vocalizations are diverse and include low grunts when disturbed, rhythmic teeth chattering for intra-specific communication, and high-pitched screams or "songs" during and interactions. Sexual dimorphism is subtle, primarily in size rather than shape, with males averaging slightly larger than females; for instance, basal skull length differs by about 4%, and some cranial widths show statistically significant variation between sexes.

Extinct Species

The extinct members of Dinomyidae represent a highly diverse group, with numerous genera documented from the to the Pleistocene epochs across . These fossils reveal a remarkable range in body sizes, from relatively small, medium-sized species such as Scleromys, estimated at around 10 kg, to enormous forms like Phoberomys at approximately 100 kg and the record-breaking Josephoartigasia monesi, which reached an estimated mass of 1,000 kg, making it the largest known from the record. Morphological features of these extinct dinomyids highlight adaptations to varied diets and environments. Giant species often possessed elongated skulls with prominent temporal crests, supporting robust jaw musculature for generating substantial bite forces suitable for processing tough vegetation. High-crowned () molars, characterized by transverse plates with thin enamel and cement infilling, were well-suited for grinding abrasive plant material such as grasses. Some taxa, including Telicomys, exhibited skeletal traits suggesting semi-aquatic habits, such as robust limbs potentially adapted for maneuvering in wetland settings. Among the most notable extinct species are Josephoartigasia magna, weighing about 300 kg and known from deposits in , and various forms from , such as early relatives of later giants. These large dinomyids are inferred to have functioned as primary grazers in open savannas or as dwellers in swampy floodplains, exploiting ecological roles analogous to those of later herbivores, with diets centered on soft to fibrous in forested or deltaic habitats.

Distribution and Habitat

Current Range

The family Dinomyidae is represented today solely by the pacarana (Dinomys branickii), which has a patchy distribution confined to the Andean foothills and western portions of the Amazon basin in northern and western South America. This range spans Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and western Brazil, typically at elevations between 250 and 3,200 meters above sea level. The species' occurrence is fragmented, with records concentrated in humid montane regions rather than continuous across its potential habitat. Pacaranas inhabit tropical humid forests, including premontane and cloud forests, as well as rocky slopes with dense undergrowth. They show a strong preference for areas near or sources, where forest cover exceeds 20% and slopes range from 15% to 30%, providing both foraging opportunities and protective cover. These habitats are characterized by high and proximity to rocky outcrops, which facilitate shelter and movement. Populations of the remain extremely rare and localized, with overall low densities across the range due to from and human activities; local estimates in suitable Andean sites suggest 5.5 to 9.9 family groups per km², each comprising 4 to 5 individuals, yielding approximately 22 to 50 individuals per km² in optimal patches. For shelter, pacaranas utilize deep caves (>4 m) and natural crevices in rocky outcrops on steep slopes (>40% exposed rock), as well as excavated burrows in along hillsides.

Fossil Distribution

The fossil record of Dinomyidae is confined to , with occurrences spanning the late to the Pleistocene, reflecting a primarily continental distribution across diverse paleoenvironments. The earliest known fossils date to the late Oligocene (~27–23 Ma) from the Contamana locality in the , where Scleromys is documented. Middle records (~13.8–11.8 Ma) occur in the northern Andean region, particularly from the locality in Colombia's Honda Group, with genera such as Scleromys in fluvial and lacustrine deposits indicative of tropical wetlands. This temporal range extends southward and temporally to the Pleistocene in the southern of Argentina, with the latest records including Telicomys giganteus from Lujanian (late ) sediments in , associated with open grassland formations. Key fossil localities highlight the family's broad paleogeographic spread. In , giant forms like are known from deposits (~4–2 Ma) in coastal San José Formation outcrops, representing some of the largest ever recorded and linked to estuarine-fluvial settings. In and adjacent regions, diverse genera such as Potamarchus occur in (~10–7 Ma) strata of the Acre Basin (including the Solimões Formation equivalents), yielding remains from and mega-wetland environments in southwestern Amazonia. preserves a rich record, including medium-sized dinomyids like Tetrastylus from the late Miocene Andalhualá Formation in , as well as multiple taxa (Scleromys, Phoberomys, and others) from the Chasicoan (~9 Ma) Cerro Azul Formation at Arroyo Chasicó in , both tied to semi-arid fluvial and palustrine habitats. Dolicavia, a late genus, is known from formations in . Biogeographic patterns suggest an initial diversification in the late , with further radiation in Andean highlands during the , followed by southward and eastward expansion into Amazonian lowlands and Patagonian plains amid climatic warming and habitat connectivity. Fossils from these sites, often preserved in fluvial, lacustrine, and aeolian deposits, indicate adaptive shifts from forested wetlands to more open, arid landscapes over time, underscoring the family's response to environmental changes.

Behavior and Ecology

Diet and Foraging

Dinomyidae are strictly herbivorous , with the sole living species, the (Dinomys branickii), primarily consuming foliage, fruits, succulent stems, and rhizomes from vegetation in tropical forests. Specific components of their diet include leaves and fruits of tree species such as spp., as well as geophagy at mineral licks to supplement their folivorous intake with essential . This supports their large body size and low metabolic rate, with occasional consumption of cultivated plants like manioc in disturbed areas near settlements. Pacaranas exhibit nocturnal foraging behavior, emerging from rocky dens at to search for within home ranges of approximately 2.5 hectares, often along established trails near . They are typically solitary or observed in pairs, moving slowly on the and using their forepaws to manipulate and hold while feeding in a seated position. Sensory reliance on olfaction aids in detecting patches, complemented by tactile exploration with vibrissae and paws, though no evidence of food caching in burrows has been documented. The pacarana's dentition features high-crowned, lophodont molars with complex occlusal surfaces adapted for grinding fibrous plant material, facilitating efficient mastication of tough leaves and stems. In extinct giant dinomyids, such as Eumegamys paranensis, cheek teeth exhibit even greater crown complexity, measured via , enabling the processing of abrasive, fibrous foods like scrubs, twigs, and possibly grasses. Estimated bite forces exceeding 1,000 N in large fossil forms like Josephoartigasia monesi suggest capability for tackling resilient vegetation, supporting a diet of coarse herbaceous matter. Fossil evidence indicates that Miocene and Pliocene dinomyids maintained herbivorous diets dominated by C3 vegetation, such as leaves and fruits from forested or riparian environments, though dental hypsodonty in giants like Phoberomys implies incorporation of tougher C4 grasses or aquatic plants in open, wetland habitats. Stable carbon isotope (δ¹³C) analyses of associated South American herbivores from similar paleoenvironments reveal mixed C3/C4 signatures, supporting inferences of opportunistic grazing on emergent grasses or swamp vegetation for these large dinomyids.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Dinomyidae, represented solely by the living species Dinomys branickii (), exhibits with limited documented details on its . Observations suggest pair formation may occur in when individuals are housed together in spacious enclosures, but wild behaviors remain poorly understood. Courtship involves vocalizations, including a distinctive "crying" sound to attract partners, bipedal approaches by males, and marking via cheek-rubbing and secretions from eye glands. Reproductive parameters indicate a low reproductive rate characteristic of large hystricognath . Gestation lasts 223–283 days, the longest recorded among , with females typically producing litters of 1–2 precocial young annually. Newborns weigh approximately 900 g, are fully furred, and have open eyes at birth. The age of is unknown, though suggests it occurs within a few years. In the wild, pacaranas have an estimated lifespan of about 9 years, while captives can live over 12 years, up to at least 13 years. Parental care is primarily maternal, with the female cleaning the young post-birth and facilitating , as evidenced by passage and stool production within days. The precocial exhibit immediate activity and curiosity, enabling rapid integration into groups, though age remains undocumented. No male involvement in post-birth care has been observed, and the overall life cycle features slow development aligned with the species' low , contributing to vulnerability. Births often occur in burrows or shelters, providing initial .

Conservation Status

Threats

The primary anthropogenic threat to the (Dinomys branickii), the sole living species in Dinomyidae, is driven by for and in the Andean . These activities have severely fragmented the species' habitat, isolating populations in small, vulnerable patches. Hunting and persecution further endanger pacaranas, which are targeted as agricultural pests responsible for crop damage or pursued for their and . Incidental capture in snares set for other also contributes to mortality, particularly in areas overlapping with human settlements. Additional environmental pressures include , which disrupts rainfall patterns and alters vegetation structure in Andean ecosystems, reducing availability. The ' naturally low compounds these risks by increasing susceptibility to and genetic bottlenecks. Overall population impacts are uncertain, with no reliable estimates of total numbers and an unknown trend per the IUCN assessment (2016). Despite these threats, the species does not qualify for a threatened category globally.

Protection Efforts

The pacarana (Dinomys branickii), the sole living species in the family Dinomyidae, is currently classified as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List (assessed 2016; no updates as of 2025) due to its wide distribution across the western Amazon basin and presence in protected areas, with no evidence of significant population decline. This assessment reflects ongoing habitat availability despite localized pressures, though earlier evaluations in 1996 had listed it as Vulnerable. Legal protections for the are primarily provided through systems in its range countries. In , populations occur within , a spanning 1.5 million hectares of diverse ecosystems that safeguard the from habitat encroachment. Similarly, in , the has been documented in the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve, a 950,000-hectare where camera traps first recorded a family group in 2018, highlighting the reserve's role in conserving Amazonian biodiversity. Efforts to enhance connectivity include proposals for corridors in fragmented Andean-Amazonian landscapes to mitigate isolation effects on populations. Conservation actions emphasize research and monitoring over large-scale interventions, given the species' elusive nature and low density. has been documented in zoological settings, with successful observed in spacious enclosures, providing insights into and that inform wild ; however, no widespread programs exist in European or American zoos. Community-based initiatives in and focus on to curb opportunistic hunting, often integrated with broader plans that promote sustainable practices in indigenous territories. Reforestation projects in concessions, such as those in Peru's southwestern Amazon, indirectly benefit habitat by restoring forested corridors essential for dispersal. Ongoing research addresses key gaps in and . Camera trap surveys, deployed since the early 2010s across sites in and , enable non-invasive population estimates and reveal habitat preferences, with recent studies in southeastern documenting activity patterns and densities at elevations up to 2,000 meters. Genetic assessments, including phylogenetic analyses, evaluate diversity and evolutionary distinctiveness, supporting targeted protections for this ancient lineage amid and fragmentation risks; these efforts continue through collaborative fieldwork in protected areas.

References

  1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103704
  2. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12895
  3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-018-0435-3
  4. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Dinomyidae/
  5. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/6608/22199194
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273581/
  7. https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=105768
  8. https://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Biology/VHAYSSEN/msi/pdf/i0076-3519-410-01-0001.pdf
  9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1645
  10. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/92/1/169/940376
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316522010_History_taxonomy_and_palaeobiology_of_giant_fossil_rodents_Hystricognathi_dinomyidae
  12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-015-9288-1
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2599941/
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05266-z
  15. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Dinomys_branickii/
  16. https://www.science.smith.edu/departments/biology/VHAYSSEN/msi/pdf/i0076-3519-410-01-0001.pdf
  17. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/96/6/1224/1170868
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259522456_Large_caviomorph_rodent_footprints_of_the_Late_Oligocene_Vinchina_Formation_Argentina
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227577703_Notes_on_the_behaviour_and_breeding_of_pacaranas_Dinomys_branickii_in_captivity
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332362982_Gross_Anatomy_and_Vascularization_of_the_Brain_of_Pacarana_Dinomys_branickii
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5653653_The_largest_fossil_rodent
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264370299_Fractal_dimension_and_cheek_teeth_crown_complexity_in_the_giant_rodent_Eumegamys_paranensis
  23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2025.2518447
  24. https://www.mammaldiversity.org/taxon/1001237/
  25. https://www.int-res.com/articles/esr_oa/n016p273.pdf
  26. https://repository.si.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/de07eeb8-2d2c-4350-a2d3-0d1419edaf76/content
  27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/spp2.1068
  28. https://ia800202.us.archive.org/26/items/hystricom00fiel/hystricom00fiel.pdf
  29. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app61/app000912014.pdf
  30. https://www.mindat.org/paleo_strat.php?id=892
  31. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2024.2390518
  32. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app63/app004642018.html
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/evolution-of-the-rodents/history-taxonomy-and-palaeobiology-of-giant-fossil-rodents-hystricognathi-dinomyidae/50C6C20F165EA8337ABD05510CC04475
  34. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2024-0127
  35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/let.12015
  36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1502-3931.2011.00265.x
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366926840_Paleodiet_and_paleoenvironment_of_fossil_giant_rodents_from_Uruguay
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285282390_On_the_evolution_of_large_size_in_mammalian_herbivores_of_Cenozoic_faunas_of_southern_South_America
  39. https://genomics.senescence.info/species/entry.php?species=Dinomys_branickii
  40. https://a-z-animals.com/blog/meet-the-pacarana-the-large-and-slow-moving-rodent-of-south-america/
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230640579_Multiscale_patterns_of_habitat_and_space_use_by_the_pacarana_Dinomys_branickii_Factors_limiting_its_distribution_and_abundance
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339413997_Running_to_the_mountains_mammal_species_will_find_potentially_suitable_areas_on_the_Andes
  43. http://world-heritage-datasheets.unep-wcmc.org/datasheet/output/site/manu-national-park
  44. https://forestsforward.panda.org/?325975/Rare-species-seen-for-the-first-time-in-Chico-Mendes-Reserve-in-Brazil
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421000019
  46. https://www.andesamazonfund.org/news-blog/new-conservation-concession-in-the-cloud-forests-of-peru-expands-corridor-of-protected-areas/
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388875534_New_ecological_aspects_of_the_pacarana_Dinomys_branickii_in_southeastern_Peru
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295814849_Phylogenetic_position_of_Dinomys_branickii_Peters_Dinomyidae_in_the_context_of_Caviomorpha_Hystricognathi_Rodentia
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.