Hubbry Logo
ElectrometerElectrometerMain
Open search
Electrometer
Community hub
Electrometer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Electrometer
Electrometer
Electrometer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Kolbe electrometer, precision form of gold-leaf instrument. This has a light pivoted aluminum vane hanging next to a vertical metal plate. When charged the vane is repelled by the plate and hangs at an angle.

An electrometer is an electrical instrument for measuring electric charge or electrical potential difference.[1] There are many different types, ranging from historical handmade mechanical instruments to high-precision electronic devices. Modern electrometers based on vacuum tube or solid-state technology can be used to make voltage and charge measurements with very low leakage currents, down to 1 femtoampere. A simpler but related instrument, the electroscope, works on similar principles but only indicates the relative magnitudes of voltages or charges.

Historical electrometers

[edit]

Gold-leaf electroscope

[edit]
Gold-leaf electroscope
Main article: electroscope

The gold-leaf electroscope was one of the instruments used to indicate electric charge.[1] It is still used for science demonstrations but has been superseded in most applications by electronic measuring instruments. The instrument consists of two thin leaves of gold foil suspended from an electrode. When the electrode is charged by induction or by contact, the leaves acquire similar electric charges and repel each other due to the Coulomb force. Their separation is a direct indication of the net charge stored on them. On the glass opposite the leaves, pieces of tin foil may be pasted, so that when the leaves diverge fully they may discharge into the ground. The leaves may be enclosed in a glass envelope to protect them from drafts, and the envelope may be evacuated to minimize charge leakage. This principle has been used to detect ionizing radiation, as seen in the quartz fibre electrometer and Kearny fallout meter.

This type of electroscope usually acts as an indicator and not a measuring device, although it can be calibrated. A calibrated electrometer with a more robust aluminium indicator was invented by Ferdinand Braun and first described in 1887. According to Braun, the standard gold-leaf electrometer is good up to about 800 V with a resolution of 0.1 V using an ocular micrometer. For larger voltages up to 4–6 kV Braun's instrument can achieve a resolution of 10 V.[2][3]

The instrument was developed in the 18th century by several researchers, among them Abraham Bennet (1787)[4] and Alessandro Volta.

Early quadrant electrometer

[edit]
Early quadrant electrometer.

While the term "quadrant electrometer" eventually referred to Kelvin's version, this term was first used to describe a simpler device. Its body consists of an upright stem of wood affixed to a semicircle of ivory with angle markings. A light cork ball hangs by a string from a pivot at the center of the semicircle and makes contact with the stem. When the instrument is placed upon a charged body, the stem and ball become charged and repel each other. The amount of repulsion is quantified by reading the angle between the string and the stem off the semicircle, though the measured angle is not in direct proportion to the charge.[5] Early inventors included William Henley (1770) and Horace-Bénédict de Saussure.[4]

Coulomb's electrometer

[edit]
Coulomb electrometer

Torsion is used to give a measurement more sensitive than repulsion of gold leaves or cork-balls. It consists of a glass cylinder with a glass tube on top. In the axes of the tube is a glass thread, the lower end of this holds a bar of gum lac, with a gilt pith ball at each extremity. Through another aperture on the cylinder, another gum lac rod with gilt balls may be introduced. This is called the carrier rod.

If the lower ball of the carrier rod is charged when it is entered into the aperture, this will repel one of the movable balls inside. An index and scale (not pictured) is attached to the top of the twistable glass rod. The number of degrees twisted to bring the balls back together is in exact proportion of the amount of charge of the ball of the carrier rod.

Francis Ronalds, the inaugural Director of the Kew Observatory, made important improvements to the Coulomb torsion balance around 1844 and the modified instrument was sold by London instrument-makers.[6] Ronalds used a thin suspended needle rather than the gum lac bar and replaced the carrier rod with a fixed piece in the plane of the needle. Both were metal, as was the suspending line and its surrounding tube, so that the needle and the fixed piece could be charged directly through wire connections. Ronalds also employed a Faraday cage and trialled photography to record the readings continuously. It was the forerunner of Kelvin's quadrant electrometer (described below).

Peltier electrometer

[edit]

Developed by Peltier, this uses a form of magnetic compass to measure deflection by balancing the electrostatic force with a magnetic needle.

Bohnenberger electrometer

[edit]

The Bohnenberger electrometer, developed by J. G. F. von Bohnenberger from an invention by T. G. B. Behrens,[1] consists of a single gold leaf suspended vertically between the anode and cathode of a dry pile. Any charge imparted to the gold leaf causes it to move toward one or the other pole; thus, the sign of the charge as well as its approximate magnitude may be gauged.[7]

Attraction electrometer

[edit]

Also known as "attracted disk electrometers",[1] attraction electrometers are sensitive balances measuring the attraction between charged disks. William Snow Harris is credited with the invention of this instrument, which was further improved by Lord Kelvin.

Kelvin's quadrant electrometer

[edit]
Lord Kelvin's Quadrant Electrometer

Developed by Lord Kelvin, this is the most sensitive and accurate of all the mechanical electrometers. The original design uses a light aluminum sector suspended inside a drum cut into four segments. The segments are insulated and connected diagonally in pairs. The charged aluminum sector is attracted to one pair of segments and repelled from the other. The deflection is observed by a beam of light reflected from a small mirror attached to the sector, just as in a galvanometer. The engraving on the right shows a slightly different form of this electrometer, using four flat plates rather than closed segments. The plates can be connected externally in the conventional diagonal way (as shown), or in a different order for specific applications.

A more sensitive form of quadrant electrometer was developed by Frederick Lindemann. It employs a metal-coated quartz fiber instead of an aluminum sector. The deflection is measured by observing the movement of the fiber under a microscope. Initially used for measuring star light,[citation needed] it was employed for the infrared detection[citation needed] of airplanes in the early stages of World War II.

Some mechanical electrometers were housed inside a cage often referred to as a “bird cage”. This is a form of Faraday Cage that protected the instrument from external electrostatic charges.

Electrograph

[edit]

Electricity readings may be recorded continuously with a device known as an electrograph. Francis Ronalds created an early electrograph around 1814 in which the changing electricity made a pattern in a rotating resin-coated plate. It was employed at Kew Observatory and the Royal Observatory, Greenwich in the 1840s to create records of variations in atmospheric electricity.[6] In 1845, Ronalds invented photographic means of registering the atmospheric electricity. The photosensitive surface was pulled slowly past of the aperture diaphragm of the camera box, which also housed an electrometer, and captured ongoing movements of the electrometer indices as a trace.[8] Kelvin used similar photographic means for his quadrant electrometer (see above) in the 1860s.

Modern electrometers

[edit]

A modern electrometer is a highly sensitive electronic voltmeter whose input impedance is so high that the current flowing into it can be considered, for most practical purposes, to be zero. The actual value of input resistance for modern electronic electrometers is around 1014Ω, compared to around 1010Ω for nanovoltmeters.[9] Owing to the extremely high input impedance, special design considerations (such as driven shields and special insulation materials) must be applied to avoid leakage current.

Among other applications, electrometers are used in nuclear physics experiments as they are able to measure the tiny charges left in matter by the passage of ionizing radiation. The most common use for modern electrometers is the measurement of radiation with ionization chambers, in instruments such as geiger counters.[10]

Vibrating reed electrometers

[edit]

Vibrating reed electrometers use a variable capacitor formed between a moving electrode (in the form of a vibrating reed) and a fixed input electrode. As the distance between the two electrodes varies, the capacitance also varies and electric charge is forced in and out of the capacitor. The alternating current signal produced by the flow of this charge is amplified and used as an analogue for the DC voltage applied to the capacitor. The DC input resistance of the electrometer is determined solely by the leakage resistance of the capacitor, and is typically extremely high, (although its AC input impedance is lower).

For convenience of use, the vibrating reed assembly is often attached by a cable to the rest of the electrometer. This allows for a relatively small unit to be located near the charge to be measured while the much larger reed-driver and amplifier unit can be located wherever it is convenient for the operator.[11]

Valve electrometers

[edit]

Valve electrometers use a specialized vacuum tube (thermionic valve) with a very high gain (transconductance) and input resistance. The input current is allowed to flow into the high impedance grid, and the voltage so generated is vastly amplified in the anode (plate) circuit. Valves designed for electrometer use have leakage currents as low as a few femtoamperes (10−15 amperes). Such valves must be handled with gloved hands as the salts left on the glass envelope can provide leakage paths for these tiny currents.[12]

In a specialized circuit called inverted triode, the roles of anode and grid are reversed. This places the control electrode at a maximum distance from the space-charge region surrounding the filament, minimizing the number of electrons collected by the control electrode, and thus minimizing the input current.[13]

Solid-state electrometers

[edit]

The most modern electrometers consist of a solid state amplifier using one or more field-effect transistors, connections for external measurement devices, and usually a display and/or data-logging connections. The amplifier amplifies small currents so that they are more easily measured. The external connections are usually of a co-axial or tri-axial design, and allow attachment of diodes or ionization chambers for ionising radiation measurement. The display or data-logging connections allow the user to see the data or record it for later analysis. Electrometers designed for use with ionization chambers may include a high-voltage power supply, which is used to bias the ionization chamber.

Solid-state electrometers are often multipurpose devices that can measure voltage, charge, resistance and current. They measure voltage by means of "voltage balancing", in which the input voltage is compared with an internal reference voltage source using an electronic circuit with a very high input impedance (of the order of 1014 Ω). A similar circuit modified to act as a current-to-voltage converter enables the instrument to measure currents as small as a few femtoamperes. Combined with an internal voltage source, the current measuring mode can be adapted to measure very high resistances, of the order of 1017 Ω. Finally, by calculation from the known capacitance of the electrometer's input terminal, the instrument can measure very small electric charges, down to a small fraction of a picocoulomb.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Electrometer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An electrometer is an electrical instrument designed to measure very small electric charges, voltages, or currents with high precision and extremely high , minimizing any disturbance to the quantity being measured. Unlike the simpler , which qualitatively detects the presence and sign of charge through repulsion, the electrometer provides quantitative measurements, often down to fractions of a picocoulomb or femtoamperes. Early electrometers, developed in the , relied on electrostatic principles such as the repulsion of like charges to deflect lightweight indicators like gold leaves or pith balls. Electrometers are vital in high-precision disciplines where standard multimeters are inadequate due to circuit loading from their relatively low input impedance, which disturbs the measured system. In radiation dosimetry, electrometers accurately measure integrated charge from ionization chambers to determine absorbed doses, critical for ensuring patient safety in radiation therapy for cancer treatment. In semiconductor research, they enable precise characterization of ultra-low leakage currents, essential for the design of next-generation integrated circuits. The history of the electrometer traces back to the mid-1700s, with inventions like Timothy Lane's pith-ball electrometer in 1767, which used suspended balls to indicate charge via attraction or repulsion. Significant advancements came in the 19th century, including William Thomson (Lord Kelvin)'s quadrant electrometer in 1867, a device featuring a charged vane swinging between divided metal quadrants to enable absolute measurements of electrostatic potential. Other notable designs include Gabriel Lippmann's capillary electrometer in 1873, which employed the deformation of a mercury meniscus in a capillary tube under electric fields for sensitive voltage detection, and the Curie brothers' piezoelectric electrometer in the 1880s, which amplified weak currents using quartz crystal compression. Electrometers operate on principles of electrostatic force or high-impedance amplification; traditional mechanical types measure deflection angles proportional to charge or potential, while modern solid-state versions use field-effect transistors (FETs) or operational amplifiers with feedback to detect signals without drawing significant current. Common types include the gold-leaf electrometer, quadrant electrometer, attracted disk electrometer, and or solid-state electrometers capable of input impedances exceeding 10^{14} ohms. These instruments have been essential in fields like for detection, for measuring cellular potentials, and precision metrology for calibrating electrical standards.

Principles of Operation

Basic Concept and Sensitivity

An electrometer is an electrical instrument designed for high-impedance electrometry, measuring extremely small electric charges down to the femtocoulomb range (typically 10 fC resolution), currents at femtoampere levels (down to approximately 1 fA or lower), or potential differences as low as microvolts (starting from 10 µV), without drawing appreciable current from the source. This capability distinguishes electrometers from conventional ammeters, which measure current flow, and standard voltmeters, which have lower input impedances that can load the circuit and distort measurements. Central to an electrometer's performance is its exceptionally high input impedance, typically ranging from 1014 Ω10^{14} \, \Omega to over 1016 Ω10^{16} \, \Omega (and up to 1017 Ω10^{17} \, \Omega in some models), combined with minimal leakage current, often below 10−15 A10^{-15} \, \mathrm{A} (1 fA). Such high input impedance is essential for non-invasive measurements of small charges, voltages, or currents. When measuring voltage from a high-impedance source, the electrometer must draw negligible current to prevent loading effects that alter the source's true potential. For example, if a voltage source has an impedance of 10 MΩ, a standard voltmeter with 1 GΩ input impedance introduces about 1% error due to loading, whereas an electrometer with 1014 Ω10^{14} \, \Omega input impedance reduces this error to approximately 0.00001%. This ensures accurate measurements without disturbing the system, which is critical when source impedances exceed 1012 Ω10^{12} \, \Omega or when detecting femtoampere-level currents and femtocoulomb charges. These attributes allow the device to detect subtle electrostatic forces or induced voltages with negligible disturbance, providing high accuracy in applications requiring isolation from the circuit. Electrometers arose from the need for precise electrostatic measurements in scenarios where ordinary meters introduce unacceptable loading effects, such as early studies of by in 1859–1861, which demanded high-impedance probes to capture potential gradients without altering the field (e.g., resistances of 101410^{14}–1016 Ω10^{16} \, \Omega). In contrast to the , which offers only qualitative indication of charge via deflection, electrometers provide quantitative results with superior precision and sensitivity.

Measurement Techniques

Electrometers operate on the principle of electrostatic forces between charges, as described by Coulomb's law, which states that the force FF between two point charges q1q_1 and q2q_2 separated by a distance rr is given by F=14πϵ0q1q2r2F = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}, where ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the permittivity of free space. In mechanical electrometers, this force produces a deflection or torque on a movable component, such as a vane or needle, allowing quantification of charge or voltage through the resulting mechanical displacement. The deflection arises from the repulsion or attraction between like or opposite charges, balanced against a restoring force like gravity or a spring. Potential difference in electrometers is measured by exploiting changes in or induced currents without discharging the source, preserving the high-impedance input required for sensitive readings. For instance, a varying between electrodes alters the stored charge for a given voltage, producing a detectable mechanical or electrical signal proportional to the potential. Induced currents from charge redistribution in asymmetric fields also enable non-contact voltage detection, minimizing leakage in low-current scenarios. Electrometer measurements can be absolute or relative, depending on calibration. Absolute methods involve direct comparison to known charge quantities, such as from a calibrated or radioactive source, to establish quantitative values without external references. Relative measurements, conversely, use standard voltage or charge references to indicate proportional changes, suitable for qualitative assessments or when absolute precision is not critical. Key error sources in electrometer measurements include from ambient , which can generate spurious charges, and effects that promote charge leakage through adsorbed water layers on insulators. Calibration procedures for high-sensitivity setups typically involve shielding against , using dry atmospheres or desiccants to mitigate , and periodic verification against stable charge standards to correct for drift. In simple mechanical systems, the deflection angle θ\theta can be derived from torque balance. The electrostatic torque τ\tau on a charged element with charge qq in an electric field EE over an arm length ll is τ=qEl\tau = q E l. For a uniform field between parallel plates, E=V/dE = V / d, where VV is the potential difference and dd is the plate separation, yielding τ=qVl/d\tau = q V l / d. The controlling torque from a torsional spring is τc=kθ\tau_c = k \theta, where kk is the spring constant. At equilibrium, τ=τc\tau = \tau_c, so qVl/d=kθq V l / d = k \theta. Solving for θ\theta, θ=(qVl)/(kd)\theta = (q V l) / (k d).

Historical Electrometers

Gold-Leaf Electroscope

The gold-leaf electroscope, one of the earliest electrometers, was developed in the 1700s and gained widespread use following improvements by English clergyman and physicist Abraham Bennet in 1787, who enhanced its sensitivity for detecting small electric charges. Bennet's design, detailed in a letter to published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, introduced a more reliable configuration that surpassed previous pith-ball electroscopes in precision and ease of observation. This invention marked a key advancement in electrostatic instrumentation during the late Enlightenment era. In construction, the device features two extremely thin strips of gold leaf, typically about 0.0001 mm thick, suspended vertically from a horizontal crossbar at the base of a conducting metal rod, often brass, which extends upward through an insulating stopper into a protective glass jar or bell jar to shield against external disturbances. The top of the rod terminates in a metal knob or plate for introducing charge, while the leaves hang close together inside the sealed enclosure, allowing their divergence to be viewed through the glass. Gold is chosen for its malleability, low mass, and conductivity, enabling the leaves to respond quickly to even minute charges without significant inertia. Operation relies on the principle of electrostatic repulsion: when charge is applied to the knob—either by conduction from a charged object or induction from a nearby charged body—it distributes evenly across the rod, crossbar, and both leaves, causing the like-charged leaves to repel each other and diverge symmetrically. The repulsive force between the leaves follows , proportional to the square of the charge (q²), and the resulting divergence angle θ provides a qualitative or semi-quantitative measure of the charge magnitude, with larger angles indicating greater charge; for precise readings, scales can convert the angle to charge values. The device detects both positive and negative charges by the direction of leaf movement relative to a reference, though it primarily indicates relative charge strength rather than absolute polarity without additional tests. Despite its simplicity, the gold-leaf electroscope has notable limitations, including high sensitivity to environmental factors such as , which can cause charge leakage through moisture absorption on the leaves, and air convection currents that may induce unwanted leaf motion even without applied charge. It is inherently designed for charge detection and not direct potential measurement, requiring modifications like grounding or additional electrodes for voltage applications, and its response becomes nonlinear at higher charges due to leaf stiffness and enclosure effects. Historically, the gold-leaf electroscope played a pivotal role in early electrostatic experiments, enabling scientists like Bennet and contemporaries to investigate charge transfer, induction, and , and serving as a foundational tool that paved the way for more advanced electrometers in the . Its widespread adoption in laboratories facilitated discoveries in electricity, from verifying to early studies of dielectrics, underscoring its enduring legacy as a precursor to modern electrostatic detectors.

Torsion and Attraction Electrometers

The torsion electrometer, pioneered by Charles-Augustin de Coulomb in 1785, utilized a twisted fiber to balance electrostatic forces, enabling precise quantification of electric repulsion or attraction between charged objects. The instrument consisted of a thin silver filament suspending a horizontal rod with lightweight pith balls at each end, enclosed in a glass cylinder to minimize air currents; one pith ball was fixed, while the other was approached by a charged sphere, causing torsional deflection proportional to the repulsive force. By measuring the angle of twist with a micrometer, Coulomb determined that the force FF followed the inverse-square law, F=kq1q2r2F = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}, where kk is a constant, q1q_1 and q2q_2 are the charges, and rr is the distance between centers, with the torsion constant of the fiber providing the balancing torque. This setup allowed Coulomb to verify the law through experiments where halving the distance quadrupled the force, establishing a foundational principle in electrostatics. A variation, the Bohnenberger electrometer developed around by Johann Gottlieb Friedrich von Bohnenberger, employed a suspended or fine needle between two oppositely charged metal plates to detect and measure charge via attraction. The leaf, connected by a thin wire to one plate and positioned within a bell-jar, received charge through an external sphere linked to dry batteries; upon , the leaf deflected toward the plate bearing the opposite charge, with the extent of attraction indicating the charge's magnitude and sign. This design improved sensitivity over earlier repulsion-based devices by leveraging electrostatic attraction in a controlled parallel-plate configuration, allowing qualitative and semi-quantitative assessments of differences. In the , attraction electrometers evolved into balance instruments that quantified charge by pitting electrostatic attraction against gravitational or mechanical restoring forces, often using suspended disks or plates. For instance, William Snow Harris's balance electrometer, designed in the 1830s and refined by 1846, featured a conducting disk as one pan of a sensitive balance suspended above an electrified plate, where added weights restored equilibrium against the attractive force, enabling direct measurement of charge quantity relative to attractive power. These devices balanced the electrostatic force, derived from potential differences, with known mechanical forces, facilitating applications in early determinations where Coulomb's torsion balance had laid the groundwork by comparing charge storage in Leyden jars. Key advancements in these electrometers included the refinement of torsion wires for enhanced control and sensitivity, allowing finer angular resolutions down to fractions of a degree. The operating equated the electrostatic τ=qVd\tau = \frac{q V}{d} (where qq is charge, VV is potential difference, and dd is plate separation) to the elastic torsional restoring τ=κθ\tau = \kappa \theta (with κ\kappa as the and θ\theta as the twist angle), solved by θ=qVκd\theta = \frac{q V}{\kappa d} to yield charge or potential from observed deflection. This torsional approach, building on Coulomb's innovations, supported quantitative throughout the , underpinning developments in electrical theory and measurement precision.

Quadrant Electrometers

The quadrant electrometer represents a significant 19th-century advancement in measuring electrical potential through changes in between divided conductive plates. An early form appeared in the late , invented by William Henley in 1770 as the first single-pendulum repulsion electrometer. This basic design featured four metallic quadrants arranged in a cylindrical , with a movable vane suspended centrally; the vane's deflection was proportional to the applied potential difference, allowing qualitative detection of voltage via electrostatic attraction and repulsion. A major refinement came with Lord Kelvin's (William Thomson) quadrant electrometer, first developed in 1867 and improved in the 1880s for greater precision and absolute measurements. In this version, opposite quadrants were electrically connected—one pair typically grounded and the other charged—while a lightweight aluminum needle or vane, suspended by a fine , rotated within the central space. When a potential difference V was applied across the quadrant pairs, the needle experienced a due to differential attraction, with the deflection angle θ related to V through the formula tan⁡(θ/2)=C1−C2C1+C2⋅Vd\tan(\theta/2) = \frac{C_1 - C_2}{C_1 + C_2} \cdot \frac{V}{d}, where C1C_1 and C2C_2 are the capacitances between the needle and the respective quadrant pairs, and d is the characteristic distance in the setup. This configuration enabled quantitative voltage readings, often observed via a mirror and scale for . Construction across these instruments typically involved or metal cylinders divided into quadrants, enclosed in for insulation, and shielded with Faraday cages (early "bird-cage" models) to minimize external interference; the central vane was often aluminum or , torsionally suspended to balance restoring forces against electrostatic . Sensitivities reached up to 100 divisions per volt in well-adjusted setups, depending on fiber tension and quadrant spacing. The deflection in quadrant electrometers derives fundamentally from imbalance induced by the vane's rotation. As the vane tilts by angle θ, the effective overlapping area changes, producing a difference ΔC ≈ ε₀ (A/d) sin(θ), where ε₀ is the of free space, A is the vane area, and d is the quadrant separation. This ΔC alters the electrostatic stored (½ C V²), generating a τ = (½ V² dC/dθ) that rotates the vane until balanced by the fiber's torsion; for small θ, θ ∝ V, providing linear response. Quadrant electrometers found historical application in early experiments for detecting signal potentials and in pioneering studies, such as those by Pierre and in the 1890s, where they quantified ionization currents from .

Fiber and Specialized Electrometers

Fiber electrometers represented a significant advancement in early 20th-century , utilizing fine or metalized fibers suspended in sealed environments to minimize disturbances from air currents and enhance portability for field measurements. These designs addressed limitations in earlier mechanical electrometers by employing lightweight suspensions that allowed for greater sensitivity to small charges, particularly in detecting from cosmic rays and atmospheric phenomena. The sealed tubes enclosing the fibers reduced convective air movements, which could otherwise cause erratic deflections, enabling more reliable recordings in outdoor settings. The Wulf electrometer, developed in 1907 by Theodor Wulf, featured a pair of platinum-coated fibers suspended within a sealed glass tube, allowing it to measure through subtle fiber deflections induced by charge accumulation. This instrument was specifically designed for cosmic ray detection, where it quantified the ionizing effects of penetrating by monitoring the rate of charge leakage in an enclosed air volume. Its high sensitivity, capable of detecting currents as low as approximately 10−1310^{-13} A, made it suitable for low-intensity radiation environments. In 1910, Wulf's measurements from the demonstrated that radiation intensity did not decrease with altitude as expected from terrestrial sources alone, providing early evidence for the existence of s. The Lindemann electrometer, introduced in the 1910s by Frederick Lindemann, built on quadrant electrometer principles with a torsion-based design incorporating slotted plates to enable differential current measurements, particularly in radioactivity studies. The slotted quadrants allowed for precise balancing of electrostatic forces on a suspended fiber needle, facilitating the detection of small differences in ionization currents between two chambers. This configuration improved accuracy for comparative analyses, such as in detection. Post-1915, the Lindemann electrometer was employed in breath analysis to assess internal contamination in workers, measuring exhaled levels through differential ionization currents with high precision. In the late , the electrograph emerged as a self-recording electrometer, utilizing a or mechanism to trace continuous variations in atmospheric potential onto via an optical projection system. This device automated long-term monitoring by capturing deflections of a charged dropper or as time-series traces, essential for studying diurnal fluctuations in without manual intervention. Its photographic recording capability provided permanent records of potential gradients, advancing the systematic observation of . The electrometer, developed in the early , employed a balanced fiber suspension to measure , with opposing fibers calibrated to nullify external influences and detect potential differences with minimal drift. This design enhanced stability for prolonged field exposures, making it particularly useful for monitoring fair-weather and ionospheric variations. By balancing the fibers in a controlled , it mitigated asymmetries caused by or , contributing to more consistent data in geophysical surveys.

Modern Electrometers

Vacuum-Tube Electrometers

Vacuum-tube electrometers, also known as valve electrometers, emerged in the 1930s and gained prominence through the 1950s as a transitional technology from mechanical devices to fully electronic measurement systems. These instruments utilized specialized thermionic valves, such as configurations or dedicated electrometer tubes like the FP-54, designed for ultra-high . The grid input of these tubes drew extremely low current, often less than 10−1210^{-12} A, with specialized tubes like the FP-54 capable of detecting currents as low as 10−1710^{-17} A (approximately 60 electrons per second), enabling the detection of feeble charges without significant loading of the source. In operation, an input signal applied to the tube's grid modulates the flow from the to the , producing an amplified output voltage while drawing negligible current from the input. This amplification occurs without substantially altering the measured potential, as the grid remains virtually isolated. The voltage gain AA of such a stage is given by A=gmRLA = g_m R_L, where gmg_m is the tube's (in ) and RLR_L is the load resistance. For AC signals, the effective input resistance RinR_{in} is dominated by the and approximated as Rin≈12πfCinR_{in} \approx \frac{1}{2\pi f C_{in}}, where ff is the and CinC_{in} is the input ; this is minimized in electrometer tubes through low-capacitance designs, often below 5 pF, to extend sensitivity at higher frequencies. These electrometers played a key role in mid-20th-century nuclear physics, where they amplified signals from ionization chambers to measure radiation-induced charges with precision unattainable by mechanical means. During World War II, they were integral to early radiation detectors, facilitating portable monitoring of ionizing radiation in military applications such as field dosimetry. Compared to mechanical electrometers, vacuum-tube versions offered faster response times—on the order of microseconds—and reduced susceptibility to mechanical drift or vibration, though they required less operator skill for setup. However, limitations included inherent tube noise from thermal electrons and flicker effects, as well as a warm-up period of several minutes for filament stabilization, which could introduce initial drift.

Vibrating-Reed Electrometers

Vibrating-reed electrometers represent a key advancement in mid-20th-century electrometry, developed in the 1940s by the Applied Physics Corporation under the leadership of inventor Howard Cary to address the need for highly sensitive DC current and charge measurements. The design was refined in subsequent models, such as the Cary Model 31 introduced around 1950 and the widely adopted Model 401 from the 1960s, which became laboratory standards for over three decades due to their stability and low input leakage. These instruments convert static charges into measurable AC signals through mechanical vibration, enabling amplification without the direct exposure of high-impedance inputs to vacuum tubes, thus improving long-term stability. The core mechanism involves a thin metal reed, typically driven by an , that oscillates at frequencies of 50-100 Hz adjacent to a fixed , forming a variable air . With a fixed charge qq on the , the time-varying C(t)=ϵ0A(t)dC(t) = \epsilon_0 \frac{A(t)}{d}, where ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the of free , A(t)A(t) is the time-dependent effective plate area, and dd is the fixed gap, induces an oscillating voltage V(t)=qC(t)V(t) = \frac{q}{C(t)}. This modulation generates an AC output signal proportional to qq, which is then amplified and demodulated—often via rectification and integration—to yield a stable DC reading. The underlying derivation stems from the induced current in the circuit: i=qd(1/C)dti = q \frac{d(1/C)}{dt}, arising from the rate of change in the inverse as the reed motion alters C(t)C(t). An approximate expression for the peak output voltage amplitude is Vout=qfΔdCavgV_\text{out} = \frac{q f \Delta d}{C_\text{avg}}, where ff is the vibration frequency, Δd\Delta d is the reed displacement amplitude, and CavgC_\text{avg} is the average . These electrometers achieved exceptional sensitivity, capable of detecting currents as low as 10−1510^{-15} A (1 fA) with minimal drift, making them superior for precision applications where input bias currents below 10−1710^{-17} A were essential. In operation, the vibrating modulation isolates the high-impedance input from noise, allowing integration times up to minutes for enhanced resolution without significant leakage affecting measurements. Vibrating-reed electrometers found prominent use in , where they measured faint ion currents with high accuracy, enabling reliable isotope ratio determinations to within 0.02%. They were also integral to pH measurement systems, providing stable amplification for potentials in high-impedance setups. Notably, instruments like the Cary Model 401 supported low-current sensor analyses in the , including isotopic studies of lunar samples that required femtoampere-level precision for .

Solid-State Electrometers

Solid-state electrometers emerged in the 1960s through the adoption of junction field-effect transistors (JFETs), which provided exceptionally high input impedances and minimal gate leakage currents suitable for precise low-level measurements. Early implementations, such as those using commercially available JFETs in operational amplifier input stages, enabled detection of currents as low as 10^{-13} A, marking a shift from vacuum-tube designs to fully electronic amplification. By the late 20th century, advancements in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication processes further refined these devices, incorporating MOSFETs with gate currents below 1 fA in the input stage, enhancing sensitivity for ultra-low signal applications. This evolution built upon historical electrometer sensitivities, achieving resolutions approaching single-electron levels in integrated formats. These electrometers operate using high-impedance amplifiers featuring or inputs, often configured in a feedback loop to establish a at the input for accurate current-to-voltage conversion. A representative example is the OPA129 , which employs a Difet () input stage with typical bias currents of ±0.4 pA and maximum values of ±20 pA (at 25°C), minimizing loading effects on the source. More recent electrometer-grade operational amplifiers, such as the ADA4530-1, achieve maximum input bias currents of ±20 fA at 25°C, supporting high-impedance electrometry at femtoampere-level currents (10^{-15} A and below) with input impedances typically exceeding 101510^{15} \Omega. The feedback resistor determines the transimpedance gain, while modern designs support bandwidths up to several MHz, allowing for faster response times in dynamic measurements without compromising noise performance. Key performance specifications include input impedances greater than 10^{14} \Omega, as exemplified by instruments like the Keithley 6517B, which parallel this with low capacitance (typically 20 pF) to preserve signal integrity. These devices can measure resistances up to 10^{16} \Omega by applying controlled voltages and detecting resulting currents. In modern solid-state electrometers, input impedances ranging from 101410^{14} to 101710^{17} \Omega enable non-invasive measurements where circuit loading is negligible. Recent advancements integrate solid-state electrometers into compact, multifunctional instruments like the Keithley 6487 picoammeter, which combines 20 fA current resolution with a built-in 500 V voltage source and digital interfaces (GPIB/RS-232) for automated data acquisition up to 1000 readings per second. These developments extend to specialized uses, such as picoamp current detection in electrophysiology and single-molecule analysis. Emerging quantum electrometry techniques utilize Rydberg atoms for SI-traceable electric field measurements with high accuracy and minimal field disturbance. Rydberg-atom-based electrometers leverage laser-excited atoms in vapor cells or chip-scale designs to achieve non-invasive sensing, with recent chip-scale implementations demonstrating radar cross-sections 20 dB lower than traditional atomic cell-based systems. These quantum approaches complement classical high-impedance electrometry and represent a path toward quantum standards in electrometry. The ultra-high input resistance in MOSFET-based designs stems from the insulated gate structure, which provides impedances approaching theoretical limits through low leakage and careful fabrication.

Applications and Developments

In Scientific Research

Electrometers have played a pivotal role in and measurements, particularly in determining constants of materials. Historical methods employed quadrant electrometers to compare changes when a test material was inserted between capacitor plates, allowing precise calculation of by balancing electrostatic forces against known standards. For instance, in the early , such techniques quantified properties of liquids and gases, providing foundational data for understanding molecular polarization in . A landmark application occurred in Robert Millikan's oil-drop experiment (1909–1913), where a quadrant electrometer measured the strength by detecting charge-induced deflections, enabling the balancing of gravitational and electrostatic forces on charged oil droplets to isolate multiples of the . This setup confirmed that is quantized, with the e=1.602176634×10−19e = 1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} C serving as a fundamental constant in physics. In , quadrant electrometers facilitated charge collection in early particle detectors; Ernest Rutherford's 1908 experiments on alpha particles used a Dolezalek quadrant electrometer to detect pulses from scattered particles, quantifying charge deposits and supporting the nuclear model of the atom. In modern scientific research, solid-state electrometers, such as single-electron transistors (SETs), enable ultrafast readout of charge s in by sensing minute charge displacements with femtojoule sensitivity. Advancements in the have integrated radio-frequency SETs into silicon-based quantum dots, achieving dispersive charge detection for scalable qubit arrays while minimizing decoherence. These devices differ fundamentally from historical electrometers, which excelled in static field measurements over seconds, whereas contemporary solid-state variants handle dynamic signals at gigahertz frequencies for real-time monitoring. Electrometry, the science of precise measurement of electric charge (QQ) and potential (VV), has evolved to include quantum-enhanced techniques. Rydberg-atom electrometers provide ultra-sensitive, SI-traceable measurements of microwave and RF electric fields by exploiting the large dipole moments of Rydberg states in laser-excited atoms. Recent developments have achieved sensitivities approaching the standard quantum limit, such as 10.0 nV cm⁻¹ Hz⁻¹/² at frequencies around 6.9 GHz and 36.9 GHz, enabling applications in metrology, radar, radio astronomy, and fundamental physics. At the nanoscale, Scanning Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM) serves as a form of electrometry for mapping surface potentials with high spatial resolution. This technique is essential in semiconductor research for characterizing charge distribution, trapped charges, and leakage currents in materials and devices, supporting the development of next-generation chip designs.

In Radiation and Environmental Monitoring

Electrometers have played a pivotal role in detection since the early , particularly when paired with ionization chambers to measure from cosmic rays. In the 1910s and 1920s, Theodor Wulf's electrometer, an improved device for quantifying production in sealed gases, was instrumental in initial balloon-borne experiments to assess atmospheric . Victor Hess utilized Wulf electrometers during his 1912 ascents, observing increased at altitudes above 1,000 meters, which indicated an extraterrestrial source of . Concurrently, the Lindemann electrometer, featuring a torsion system for enhanced sensitivity, was employed with spherical ionization chambers filled with high-pressure to detect cosmic ray-induced currents during ground and aerial measurements. This historical work culminated in Victor Hess's 1936 , awarded for discovering cosmic rays through electrometer-based measurements that confirmed their extraterrestrial origin, independent of solar influence via night and observations. In these setups, the electrometer quantified the ionization current II, arising from the production of ion pairs by incoming radiation particles, where I=nqfI = n q f, with nn as the number of ion pairs produced, qq the (1.6×10−191.6 \times 10^{-19} C), and ff the production rate. To determine total collected charge for dose assessment, the current is integrated over the collection time tt, yielding Q=ItQ = I t. In modern radiation monitoring, solid-state picoammeters, such as Keithley models, serve as electrometers for precise dosimetry in ionization chambers, measuring low currents from X-ray or gamma-ray interactions. For instance, the Keithley 6487 picoammeter records detector responses in graded-gap semiconductor dosimeters exposed to high-energy photon beams, enabling linear dose-rate evaluations with resolutions down to femtoamperes. These high-impedance measurements (often exceeding 1014 Ω10^{14} \, \Omega) are critical in radiation dosimetry for cancer therapy, where accurate charge integration ensures precise dose delivery and patient safety. These instruments facilitate portable radiation surveys, building on the portability of earlier fiber electrometers for field deployment. Electrometers also underpin environmental monitoring of , particularly potential gradients that signal fair-weather fields or activity. Field mills, rotating electrostatic sensors, pair with solid-state electrometers to measure vertical from 1 V/m to 1 MV/m, offering high and interference resistance for continuous ground-based observations. Solid-state electrometers, leveraging field-effect transistors with input resistances up to 101410^{14} Ω, provide multifunctional detection of currents as low as 100 pA, ideal for stationary atmospheric studies despite slower responses at sub-picoampere levels. The Global Circuit Atmospheric Electricity Monitoring (GloCAEM) network, operational as of 2025 with 17 sites across , uses such field mills and electrometers to track real-time potential gradients, integrating at 1-second resolution to monitor the global electric circuit influenced by and aerosols. This enables detection of -related , complementing dedicated networks like the World Wide Lightning Location Network for comprehensive assessment.

References

  1. https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/316/lectures/node14.html
  2. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/principles-physics-ii/electroscopes-and-electrometers
  3. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/6/2012
  4. https://www.keysight.com/gb/en/assets/3125-1288/application-notes/Capacitance-Leakage-Current-Measurement-Techniques-Using-the-Electrometer-High-Resistance-Meter.pdf
  5. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstl.1767.0046
  6. https://physics.kenyon.edu/EarlyApparatus/Electrical_Measurements/Quandrant_Electrometer/Quadrant_Electrometer.html
  7. https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/lippmanns-electrometer/8877.article
  8. https://history.aip.org/exhibits/curie/resbr1.htm
  9. https://web2.ph.utexas.edu/~phy116l/Exp0.pdf
  10. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3327/
  11. https://assets.testequity.com/te1/Documents/pdf/keithley/Low-Current-Msrment-eGuide.pdf
  12. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/centre-for-bio-inspired-technology/7293196.PDF
  13. https://www.tek.com/en/documents/brochure/high-accuracy-electrometers-low-current-high-resistance-applications
  14. https://www.electrotechsystems.com/how-to-get-precise-high-voltage-readings-with-electrostatic-voltmeters/
  15. https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/4/83/2013/hgss-4-83-2013.pdf
  16. http://physics.bu.edu/py106/notes/Coulomb.html
  17. https://www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/electronic_engineering/Electrometer.pdf
  18. https://nationalmaglab.org/magnet-academy/history-of-electricity-magnetism/museum/gold-leaf-electroscope-1787/
  19. https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electricity_and_Magnetism/Electricity_and_Magnetism_(Tatum)/01%3A_Electric_Fields/1.04%3A_Experiments_with_a_Gold-leaf_Electroscope
  20. http://www.ampere.cnrs.fr/i-corpuspic/tab/Sources/coulomb/Coulomb_El_1785.pdf
  21. https://nationalmaglab.org/magnet-academy/history-of-electricity-magnetism/museum/torsion-balance-1785/
  22. http://virtualtours.musei.unipd.it/itinerary/museo-di-storia-della-fisica/66/relic/bohnenberger-electroscope
  23. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co1563/harriss-balance-electrometer-1840-74
  24. https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11048/
  25. https://catalogue.museogalileo.it/object/HenleyQuadrantElectrometer.html
  26. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co53908/peltier-type-electrometer-1848
  27. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.1891.0013
  28. https://lamethodecurie.fr/en/article23.html
  29. https://commons.princeton.edu/motorcycledesign/wp-content/uploads/sites/70/2018/06/A_history_of_electric_telegraphy_to_the.pdf
  30. https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2019/08/wulf-publishes-evidence-cosmic-radiation
  31. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.02927
  32. https://utsic.utoronto.ca/wpm_instrument/electrometer/
  33. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1.7.400
  34. https://www.orau.org/health-physics-museum/collection/electrometers/index.html
  35. https://zenodo.org/record/1234794/files/article.pdf
  36. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5197158
  37. https://www.academia.edu/4413188/THE_PHOTOGRAPHIC_SELF_RECORDING_OF_NATURAL_PHENOMENA_IN_THE_NINETEENTH_CENTURY
  38. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1946PA.....54..504W
  39. https://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/141/f/FP54.pdf
  40. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0015894.pdf
  41. https://www.valvewizard.co.uk/Common_Gain_Stage.pdf
  42. https://tubes.njunis.net/?p=311&lang=en
  43. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/circ/nbscircular476.pdf
  44. https://www.njarc.org/manuals/Articles-books/Tubes-in-WWII_article-IRE-3-1947-Gorham.pdf
  45. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article-pdf/18/5/298/19136666/298_1_online.pdf
  46. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19670003795/downloads/19670003795.pdf
  47. https://chsi.emuseum.com/objects/16810/vibrating-reed-electrometer
  48. https://archives.sciencehistory.org/repositories/3/archival_objects/73639
  49. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4126907
  50. https://www.orau.org/health-physics-museum/collection/ionization-chambers/miscellaneous/cary.html
  51. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1970GeCAS...1.1311H
  52. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19640017443/downloads/19640017443.pdf
  53. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/opa129.pdf
  54. https://www.analog.com/en/products/ada4530-1.html
  55. https://download.tek.com/manual/6517B-900-01B_August_2022_User.pdf
  56. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18163
  57. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.24.396
  58. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.30.925
  59. https://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~phys128/experiments/electron/Millikan-Oil-Drop-Manual-AP-8210A.pdf
  60. https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?e
  61. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1908.0066
  62. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/90/4/043109/333801/Multiplexing-single-electron-transistors-for
  63. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85231-4
  64. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/nr/d5nr00384a
  65. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ads0683
  66. https://www.nist.gov/mml/mmsd/nanomechanical/kelvin-probe-force-microscopy-developments-and-applications
  67. https://three.jsc.nasa.gov/articles/CosmicRayDetectors.pdf
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241267834_Discovery_of_Cosmic_Rays
  69. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1936/hess/facts/
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168900209006068
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374325494_Analysis_of_modern_atmospheric_electrostatic_field_measuring_instruments_and_methods
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682618304541
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.