Hubbry Logo
EthnoburbEthnoburbMain
Open search
Ethnoburb
Community hub
Ethnoburb
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ethnoburb
Ethnoburb
Ethnoburb
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Box Hill, Victoria contains a sizeable Chinese population. According to the 2021 Australian census, 46.6% of the suburb's population were of Chinese ancestry, 29.5% of the suburb's population was born in China, while 42.4% of the suburb's population spoke either Mandarin or Cantonese at home.[1]

An ethnoburb is a suburban residential and business area with a notable cluster of a particular ethnic minority population, which may or may not be a local majority.[2] That can greatly influence the social geography within the area because of distinct cultural and religious values. Ethnoburbs allow for ethnic minority groups to maintain their traditional identity, forestalling cultural assimilation.[3]

According to Dr. Wei Li, the author of many writings on the subject, the ethnoburb has resulted from "the influence of international geopolitical and global economic restructuring, changing national immigration and trade policies, and local demographic, economic and political contexts."[2]

Although many assume that an ethnoburb is composed of immigrants with a lower economic status, that may not always be the case, as many ethnoburbs are made up of wealthy and high economic status individuals in more expensive neighbourhoods and communities.[4]

History of term

[edit]
Little India (Edison/Iselin) in New Jersey comprises residents over 30% of whom are of Indian-American ancestry.

The term was first coined in 1997 by Dr. Wei Li, then assistant professor of geography and Asian American studies at the University of Connecticut, in a paper examining the suburban Chinese population in Los Angeles.[2] She further examines and delineates the difference between "Chinatowns" and "ethnoburbs" in "Ethnoburb versus Chinatown: Two Types of Urban Ethnic Communities in Los Angeles."[5]

Ethnoburbs emerge in combination or as separate entities for reasons like significant changes in world politics and the world economy, policy changes in the US, and demographic shifts in individual or in local connecting neighborhoods. Such communities have substantial external connections to the globalised mainstream economy, leading to higher socioeconomic levels in its residents. An ethnoburb functions as a social hub and a place in which immigrants may work and do business within their own networks. That definition of an ethnoburb closely resembles that of the ethnic enclave as defined and studied by sociologists Wilson and Portes. Though the terms are different, the types and functions of these hubs are nearly identical. The formation of ethnoburbs also have an effect on the cultural and political characteristics of a city. In cities like San Francisco, Vancouver, and Toronto; in the New York City-Philadelphia and Washington, DC areas; and in the San Gabriel Valley, for example, Chinese immigrants have built large houses and malls catering to Chinese businesses, changing the landscape of the communities and a significant number of smaller ones throughout Canada and the US.[6]

Ethnoburb: The New Ethnic Community in Urban America explores in depth the phenomenon of ethnoburbs scattered through the United States. The book used the term "ethnoburb" for the first time, in 1997, to describe the new formation of contemporary suburban Asian settlements, and the author continues her studies in larger metropolitan areas in the US and in Canada.[2]

The term has become widely used in academia and is slowly gaining usage in the popular vernacular.[7]

Community dynamics

[edit]

Ethnoburbs present interesting benefits and disadvantages to those within the community. They can be shaped to meet the specific cultural and social needs of those who live there because of the high degree of ethnic similarities.[8] That can be seen as a benefit as it aids in the adaptation of immigrants to a new environment in terms of language, culture, education, and job training. Also, the sharing of common cultural traditions and new experiences encountered allows a greater sense of community to be developed. An ethnoburb not only contributes to the fostering of cultural preservation particularly amongst immigrants but also can play an important role in the larger cultural tapestry of a greater regional area or country as a whole.[5]

On the other hand, ethnoburbs are sometimes viewed in a negative. It is thought that they can inhibit cultural assimilation because those living in these regions will become comfortable within the community and not expand to incorporate social elements from outside their community. One way that can be mitigated is educational programs and the completion of public or private schooling.[8] Because the dominant culture within an ethnoburb is not always the majority of the population since other ethnicities are also present,[5] it can be helpful if the other cultures are also integrated into the regional identity to lessen the degree of severe representation and catering towards one ethnic group.

White flight can also be a result of ethnoburbs. Min Zhou, Yen-fen Tseng, and Rebecca Y. Kim claim:

In the past, the movement of ethnic minorities of lower SES [socioeconomic status] into urban neighborhoods triggered white flight into the suburbs. The current movement of immigrants of higher SES into the suburbs has ushered in a similar trend because newcomers have settled without going through the time-honored process of acculturation. They pose a new threat to the established white middle-class residents, who fear being “un-Americanized” by the newcomers. The Chinese ethnoburb shows that affluent immigrants from Asia, no less than blacks and Hispanics, can be perceived as a threat to white middle-class communities when they achieve a substantial presence.[9]

Within Canada, the presence of ethnic communities is often favoured. That is a result of the country's belief in supporting a cultural mosaic in which individuals maintain their unique cultural identity after their immigration. Ethnoburbs are often viewed as an "expression of preferences, common interests, social networks and the cultural and/or religious residents... [serving] as the basis for their integration into the Canadian economy and society."[8]

That view may not be shared by all geographical regions and is still an issue of contention in some areas of Canada, as ethnoburbs can present both beneficial and negative elements that may either provide a pathway for the adaptation into a new society or the hindering of assimilation by cultural division.

In comparison, the United States has historically often discouraged the maintenance of cultural identity after immigration by melting pot policies and encouragement to adopt the "American" way of life. However, there has still been an increasing trend in the United States for ethnic minority groups to maintain their cultural identity and individuality from the general American identity after immigration.[10]

Contrasting concepts

[edit]

The ethnoburb concept was developed in reference to the United States, and mainly applies there and in countries with similar immigration and urban planning contexts, such as Australia and Canada. Suburban ethnic enclaves in other counties are described with other concepts.

Banlieue

[edit]

In the French-speaking world, the word for a suburb, banlieue, has taken on a connotation of racial and economic segregation and deprivation. In the inverse of the "white flight" phenomenon seen in the United States in the twentieth century, immigrants to France—primarily from former French colonies, notably Francophone Africa—often moved to Habitations à Loyer Modéré (low-rent apartment buildings) building in suburban areas around Paris and other large cities, rather than to older neighbourhoods in the "inner city". Of course immigrants moved to the city proper as well, but rents in Paris are generally too high for the newly-arrived; therefore the banlieues (or many of theme) became increasingly identified as immigrant neighbourhoods, even as new generations of Black- and Arab-descended French citizens were born there.

Examples

[edit]

Vancouver, British Columbia

[edit]
Further information: Residential segregation in Greater Vancouver, Chinese Canadians in Greater Vancouver, and South Asian Canadians in Greater Vancouver
Geographic distribution of residents of Chinese ancestry in Greater Vancouver
Geographic distribution of residents of South Asian ancestry in Greater Vancouver

The Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) is home to a number of ethnic suburbs, each with its own unique characteristics. In recent years, changes to immigration policies have made the municipalities magnets for immigrants. Here, members of the community find acceptance, security and comfort in the presence of common cultural practices. However, in some situations, increasing segregation has led to tension.

In the past 40 years, the Canadian immigration policy has adopted a multicultural model, with immigrants being granted equal rights in all facets of society[11] Prior to 1962, the Canadian federal government used a country of origin preference system to grant immigration status. The removal of this policy and the introduction of a points system in 1967 caused an influx of immigration to the GVRD.[12] The integration of newly arrived immigrants into the ethnoburbs of Metropolitan Vancouver has increased the diversity of the city but some might argue segregation based on ethnicity has risen in recent years.[12]

This socially constructed segregation has physical ramifications on the landscape. In Vancouver's case, increased immigration of affluent East Asians has also meant a boom in the housing market. The expansion of real estate development in the 1980s and 1990s lead to the transformation of post war suburbs into areas dominated by infamous "Vancouver Specials," monster homes, and megamalls. The extravagant building types have become points of contention in the GVRD. Along with that, a growing fear of longtime Canadians is that increasing immigration means decreased space in "good schools".[12] Such factors feed the argument that spatial segregation based on ethnicity effects the social fabric of communities. Today, nearly 40,000 people immigrate to the GVRD every year, approximately 30,000 from Asia, with China and India as the two major source countries.[13] The result has been the formation of ethnically-distinct municipalities such as Richmond and Surrey.

Richmond and Surrey are not the only ethnic enclaves in the GVRD. Several neighbourhoods in Vancouver proper have formed, based on lines of heritage. Chinatown, Little Italy, Little India (Punjabi Market) and more are examples of such communities. They are on a smaller scale than Richmond or Surrey. Mapping of ethnicity in Greater Vancouver shows that populations, although concentrated in some areas, disperse out on a gradient. Research on the subject depicts the landscapes as places of integration and acceptance. Increasing diversity has increased the liveability of this growing metropolis. There are, of course, challenges to multiculturalism. Nonetheless, they are communities with deep roots, unique traditions, and shared social identities. From May 2013, the Canadian government tightened the language requirements for all immigrants, and reduced the benefits for immigrants who spoke both of Canada's two official languages. Here, there are increased opportunities for immigrants upon arrival in Canada.

Richmond, British Columbia

[edit]

Large communities of visible minorities have changed the cultural landscape Vancouver's suburbs, adding to the diverse society that the GVRD prides itself on. Massive shopping malls built in the 1980s such as Aberdeen and Yaohan centres, are focused solely on Chinese clientele. Such shopping centres are highly specialized and highly successful. On average, 19.6% of the GVRD's population is Chinese. In some parts of Richmond, British Columbia, 66.9% of the population have Chinese heritage.[14] For many new immigrants and long time residents alike, it is a great comfort to be able buy familiar foods and communicate with shop keepers in their native languages. However, some would argue the absence of English from signage and service creates tension within the Richmond community.[15]

However, tensions aside, Richmond's unique blend of culture has added to the mosaic of the city. Some Christians with Hong Kong roots take comfort in Cantonese sermons, being able to connect on personal, congregational, regional and international levels of community.[16] Richmond is also home to many Buddhist temples and societies. The Ling Yen Mountain Temple is an active monastery, and boasts 10,000 members in Greater Vancouver.[citation needed] This micro and macro scale involvement and sense of identity is beneficial in an increasingly global community.

Richmond also hosts many festivals, including the Summer Night Market. which highlights East Asian Canadian culture and celebrate diversity.[17]

Surrey, British Columbia

[edit]

Another predominant ethnoburb filled with temples and shopping centres is in Surrey, British Columbia. Stretching from Newton to Bear Creek Park, from Strawberry Hill to Kennedy Heights, the neighbourhood is a picture of ethnic integration. According to Douglas Todd of The Vancouver Sun, a fifth of Canada's South Asian community is found in Surrey, and many neighbourhoods are "intensely monoethnic." Moreover, census data reveals that two thirds residents of Surrey have South Asian heritage. On average, 12.0% of the GVRD's population is South Asian however in some parts of Surrey, South Asians account for 70.7% of residents, a higher concentration than Chinese residents in Richmond.[14]

Based on Todd's case study of west Newton, people there do not feel segregated by ethnicity. Instead, there is a sense of familiarity, and community cohesiveness, despite Surrey's reputation for violence.[14] That unique sense of place and the resulting geographies of such communities is in part due to the high occurrence of family migration practices.[18] These practices are another result of evolving Canadian immigration policies.

Like Richmond, Surrey residents are proud of their contributions to social aspects of their communities. There are numerous Sikh gurdwaras, Hindu mandirs and Muslim mosques, alongside western houses of worship.[14] Festivals in both cities invite thousands of people every year to experience a sampling of different ethnic backgrounds. Surrey hosts a massive Vaisakhi Parade & Celebration during April, the largest outside India.[19]

Los Angeles, California

[edit]

One of the largest cities in the United States, Los Angeles, California is a culturally-diverse urban area with pockets of ethnic communities within the city, including many Chinatowns. As populations in the urban regions continued to grow and became increasingly congested, many ethnic groups began migrating out of the urban centre of Los Angeles and into newer and more affordable suburban communities surrounding the city,Li, Wei (2009). Ethnoburb: The New Ethnic Community in Urban America. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. p. 62. thus increasing their quality of life from that of a downtown, inner-city neighbourhood, to a more open and clean suburban community. In particular, many ethnic communities in Los Angeles moved to the nearby San Gabriel Valley, especially Monterey Park.[2] In addition to escaping regional congestion, this area offered further geographical opportunities as it "is bordered by three major freeways... making it easier to get downtown, where most jobs were located, and to Chinatown."[20]

Los Angeles is also an interesting example when examining the distinct difference between an ethnoburb and a Chinatown. In the article "Ethnoburb Versus Chinatown: Two Types of Urban Communities in Los Angeles," Dr. Wei Li looks at these differences by comparing the Chinatown communities within downtown Los Angeles and the ethnoburbs in the surrounding San Gabriel Valley area. By examining historical records, census data, and conducting interviews, she reveals how the Chinese community within the region, in particular, has greatly evolved from densely populated Chinatowns in the downtown to more geographically spread out regions in an ethnic suburb. For example, according to Li, "the San Gabriel Valley ethnoburb had become by 1990 a more important Chinese residential area than Chinatown."[5] Li also explains how the ethnoburb offers more opportunities than a Chinatown, as there are additional economic benefits through business opportunities when catering towards the regional cultural identity.[5]

She reveals further differences between an ethnoburb and Chinatown in that the composition of the populations vary in terms of age, socioeconomic level, and time since their immigration. Within a Chinatown, the population is mainly "immigrants of Chinese descendants from mainland China and Southeast Asia, with a much older age structure and longer duration of residence... [and] socio-economic status of its residents is lower."[5] In contrast, although culturally an ethnoburb may appear to cater towards a specific ethnic group, the regional areas tend to include a more ethnically diverse population, which is composed of a greater variety of age groups with a higher socioeconomic status. In addition, a higher level of education is more common within an ethnoburb when compared to a Chinatown, thus allowing for a greater degree of use and understanding of English within the areas.[5] Thus, Li's findings show that an ethnoburb can be culturally positive in the sense that it allows for more opportunities than a Chinatown.

Auckland, New Zealand

[edit]

Auckland, which has a predominantly European population, as well as one of the highest Polynesian populations in the world, experienced a dramatic increase in Asian migration during the 1900s. Over the past 20 years, many Asian immigrants migrating to Auckland have settled into "ethnoburbs". About 60% of the Chinese population in New Zealand lives in Auckland and by 1990, they were the fourth-largest ethnic group, and people started settling in East and South Auckland. The areas were of existing high quality housing or brand new neighborhoods. By 2006, all of Auckland was considered its own Chinese ethnoburb because of Auckland's already small population, based on Li Wei's concept of ethnoburbs. The spatial distributions in Auckland proposed there would be three large ethnoburb regions: North Shore City (North Auckland), Auckland City (Central East Auckland) and Manukau City (East Auckland).[21] It is said that Chinese people come to New Zealand not only for economic reasons but also for better education, the relaxed lifestyle and the stable political system.

Washington, D.C. area

[edit]

The Washington D.C. area has a large amount of significant ethnoburbs for its immigrant populations, due to the rising house prices and limited space in the District itself. The immigrant populations that have notable ethnoburbs in the D.C. area are Salvadoran, Guatemalan, Ethiopian, Indian, Korean, Vietnamese, and Chinese.

Many Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants have increasingly settled into suburbs in Prince George's County on the border with D.C., with suburbs such as Chillum, Brentwood, Wheaton, and Langley Park, some which have developed a majority or plurality-Central American population, in particular Langley Park, which is up to 75% Central American, as well as Brentwood (41% Central American), Chillum (39% Central American), and Wheaton (29% Central American).

Despite the existence of a thriving Little Ethiopia in D.C., as Ethiopians are D.C.'s second-largest immigrant population, rising property prices in the areas where Ethiopians established businesses, such as Shaw and Adams Morgan, Ethiopians have now been moving northwards and establishing significant populations and businesses in areas such as Silver Spring, Takoma Park, Wheaton, and Forest Glen. Silver Spring in particular is known for its second "Little Ethiopia" with a concentration of Ethiopian-owned businesses.

Bangladeshi, Indian, and Pakistani American communities have rapidly established population centers in Northern Virginia and Montgomery County; Vietnamese ethnoburbs include Seven Corners, Falls Church, and Springfield; Korean ethnoburbs include Annandale and Centreville; and Chinese ethnoburbs in Montgomery County include Potomac, North Potomac, and Rockville.

Toronto, Ontario

[edit]

Many Chinese residents live outside the downtown Chinatown area and in suburbs of the Greater Toronto Area. Spatial patterns of ethnic residential and business districts have been shaped mainly by development in the suburbs. Only 18% of the 338,265 Chinese residents in Toronto live in the downtown area, as the rest live in suburbs. Areas with a lower population Chinese residents (closer to the downtown area) are in East York, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, and York, which account for 47% of the Chinese population.[3] Areas that are on the outer suburb zone (Markham, Richmond Hill, and Mississauga) make up the remaining percentage of Chinese population. In recent years, the Chinese economy in the Greater Toronto Area has changed from local restaurants and grocery stores to consumer services in large shopping centres. That has brought more shopping centres to the inner and outer suburbs, enlarging Toronto's economy.

Much like in Los Angeles, the Chinese population in Toronto also stratifies along lines of origin and socioeconomic class that show up in residential patterns.[3] Immigrants from Hong Kong were the largest population from China to Toronto and moved to Markham and Richmond Hill, which influenced the style of the new upscale shopping centres. Immigrants from Taiwan settled in North York because of the public school system.

In addition to the Chinese community, Toronto's massive South Asian community has also developed in the suburbs of Brampton (52% South Asian) and Mississauga (25% South Asian).[22][23] Notably, South Asians are the fastest growing minority group in the distant Toronto suburbs of Milton and Ajax, and numerous Hindu, Sikh, and Muslim places of worship have been built in those areas.

Melbourne, Australia

[edit]

Australia is also undergoing a shift in its demography with large numbers of Asian immigrants settling in the country. From 2010 to 2011, Australia recorded 14,611 settlers from China[24] and according to the 2011 census, there were 393,924 people in Australia born in Mainland China and Hong Kong.[25] Sydney had nearly half of all Chinese-born citizens (46.6%) and Melbourne had slightly over a quarter (28.5%) according to the census data.[26][27]

Melbourne has received some of the focus of the changing demographics because of Asian immigration. Glen Waverley is a community in Melbourne with a large proportion of Chinese-Australian citizens. According to an article in The Age, Glen Waverley has many Chinese immigrants because the area provides high-quality education, good transportation and safety, making it the hub of Chinese Melbourne.[28] According to the article, public high schools in the area have been inundated with Chinese Australians, representing up to 80% of the student population. According to another article in The Age, European luxury vehicles, such as Audi and BMW, are the most popular car brands in Glen Waverley.[29]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ethnoburb

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![Saravanaa Bhavan in Edison, New Jersey, exemplifying commercial vibrancy in a South Asian ethnoburb]float-right An ethnoburb is a suburban ethnic enclave in large metropolitan areas, comprising residential neighborhoods and business districts where a particular ethnic minority group maintains significant presence and economic influence without fully dominating the multiethnic community. The term, coined by geographer Wei Li in 1998, describes these formations as distinct from traditional urban Chinatowns, emphasizing affluent, professional-led settlements driven by post-1965 immigration waves of skilled workers and entrepreneurs. Ethnoburbs emerged prominently among Asian immigrant groups, such as Chinese and Indians, who leveraged high levels and capital to establish culturally oriented enterprises amid suburban expansion and economic opportunities. Exemplified by the in —where Chinese professionals transformed areas like Monterey Park and Arcadia into hubs of ethnic commerce and higher-income housing—these communities facilitate spatial attainment, blending assimilation with cultural retention through specialty markets, institutions, and networks unavailable in mainstream suburbs. Unlike low-income urban enclaves, ethnoburbs reflect causal dynamics of selective migration, where affluent immigrants bypass inner-city traps to directly access suburban resources, fostering and community vitality but occasionally sparking local tensions over rapid demographic shifts and property value surges. This model has extended to other groups, including Hispanics and , underscoring broader patterns of ethnic suburbanization in the United States.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition

An ethnoburb is a suburban ethnic cluster comprising residential areas and business districts in large metropolitan regions, characterized by a significant concentration of one or more immigrant ethnic groups alongside multiethnic and multicultural dynamics. The term was coined by geographer Wei Li in her study of Chinese settlements in ' , describing formations that emerged prominently after the U.S. and Nationality Act of 1965 facilitated entry of skilled, educated immigrants who bypassed inner-city enclaves to settle directly in suburbs. These areas feature overrepresentation of specific ethnic populations—such as Chinese in parts of the or South Asians in suburban —but lack ethnic majorities, fostering voluntary, affluent communities with diverse socioeconomic profiles. Unlike traditional urban ethnic enclaves, such as Chinatowns, which often arise from economic exclusion and concentrate low-income immigrants in central zones, ethnoburbs reflect upward mobility and choice, with residents accessing suburban amenities like quality schools and housing while sustaining ethnic networks through specialized businesses, services, and cultural institutions. Ethnoburbs typically host thriving , including ethnic-owned retail, restaurants, and that serve both co-ethnics and broader populations, contributing to economic vitality without the isolation or poverty traps associated with older models. This pattern aligns with post-1960s and shifts, where high-skilled migrants from and elsewhere leverage resources for suburban integration, often achieving higher median incomes and homeownership rates than urban counterparts. The concept underscores causal links between policy changes, like relaxed quotas, and spatial outcomes, enabling ethnic preservation amid assimilation pressures; empirical data from U.S. analyses show ethnoburbs correlating with elevated and professional occupations among residents, distinguishing them as adaptive responses to modern rather than relics of segregation. While initially U.S.-focused, the model has been observed globally in contexts like Canadian suburbs, where similar demographic concentrations emerge from selective migration streams.

Key Distinguishing Features

Ethnoburbs differ from traditional urban ethnic enclaves, such as Chinatowns, by their suburban spatial configuration, encompassing dispersed residential neighborhoods and integrated districts in metropolitan peripheries rather than centralized inner-city zones. This suburban orientation accommodates larger-scale development and avoids the and infrastructural strain typical of urban ghettos or enclaves, enabling ethnic clusters to form amid established middle-class communities. A core distinguishing trait is their multiethnic makeup, featuring significant populations from multiple immigrant groups—often Asian nationals including Chinese, Indian, Korean, and Vietnamese—rather than dominance by a single . In areas like ' , dubbed the first Chinese ethnoburb, Chinese residents comprised about 40% of Monterey Park's population by 1990, coexisting with Latinos, whites, and other Asians in a diverse that fosters cross-ethnic economic ties. This contrasts with monoethnic urban enclaves, where isolation reinforces insularity. Socioeconomically, ethnoburb inhabitants exhibit higher average and levels, with many holding professional roles in , , or , bypassing the low-wage entry points of traditional enclaves. Post-1965 U.S. reforms prioritizing skilled workers facilitated this, as seen in Silicon Valley's ethnoburbs where immigrant-founded firms contributed over 25% of venture-backed startups by the early 2000s. Yet, these communities sustain ethnic-specific amenities like supermarkets and language schools, blending cultural preservation with mainstream integration and global supply chains.

Historical Development

Origin of the Concept

The term "ethnoburb" was coined by geographer Wei Li in 1997 as part of her PhD dissertation at the , titled Spatial Transformation of an Urban Ethnic Community from to Chinese Ethnoburb in . Li developed the concept to describe the emergence of suburban ethnic clusters characterized by high concentrations of middle-class immigrants and their businesses, distinct from impoverished inner-city enclaves like Chinatowns. This formulation drew from empirical observations of ' , where post-1965 immigration waves—facilitated by the Immigration and Nationality Act—brought skilled, affluent Chinese professionals who bypassed traditional urban ghettos for peripheral suburbs with quality schools, housing, and infrastructure. Li formally introduced the term in her 1998 peer-reviewed article "Anatomy of a New Ethnic Settlement: The Chinese Ethnoburb in ," published in . In it, she defined ethnoburbs as multiethnic, multicultural suburbs featuring residential areas and business districts dominated by non-white immigrant groups, often with significant intra-ethnic economic activity yet integration into broader suburban economies. The article highlighted causal factors such as selective migration patterns favoring educated elites, suburban land availability, and from areas like Monterey Park, which shifted demographics without the socioeconomic isolation typical of earlier ethnic settlements. Li expanded the framework in her 2009 book Ethnoburb: The New Ethnic Community in Urban America, published by the University of Hawaii Press, applying it beyond to other U.S. cities and emphasizing ethnoburbs' role in redefining urban ethnic geography amid and policy changes. This work underscored the concept's basis in and census data, revealing how ethnoburbs represented voluntary, prosperity-driven clustering rather than exclusionary segregation. Subsequent scholarship has credited Li's origination while critiquing potential overemphasis on economic success, noting persistent cultural insularity in some cases.

Evolution Since the 1990s

Since the , ethnoburbs have proliferated , particularly among Asian populations, with the number of Asian ethnoburbs in the 150 largest metropolitan statistical areas rising from 445 in 1990 to 695 by 2010, representing a 56% increase. This expansion extended beyond Asians to include ethnoburbs, which grew from 299 to 793 over the same period—a 165% surge—and black ethnoburbs, which increased from an unspecified base to 493 by 2010. The phenomenon reflects a dynamic process of minority tied to rising affluence, as ethnoburbs are defined by concentrations in suburbs with median household incomes at or above the 75th percentile. For Asian groups, the suburbanization trend accelerated markedly between 1990 and 2000, with the number and share of ethnic neighborhoods expanding significantly, outpacing central-city enclaves. By 2010, census data indicated that 42% of Chinese Americans, 50% of Filipino Americans, and 60% of Asian Indian Americans resided in suburbs, underscoring the shift toward ethnoburban settlement patterns. Examples include the San Gabriel Valley east of Los Angeles, which emerged as the largest U.S. ethnoburb cluster encompassing around 11 suburban towns by the 2010s, and Korean-dominated areas in Bergen County, New Jersey, where the Korean population grew from 16,000 in 1990 to over 60,000 by 2010 amid white resident exodus. Key drivers of this evolution included sustained post-1965 immigration waves, amplified by 1990s expansions in high-skilled visa programs like H-1B, alongside economic booms in Asian source countries that elevated immigrant socioeconomic profiles and enabled investments in suburban real estate and businesses. Rising source-country economies also facilitated circular migration and capital flows, fostering vibrant ethnic commercial hubs within ethnoburbs, while events like the September 11, 2001 attacks prompted some shifts in settlement but did not halt overall growth. These factors contributed to increased segregation from whites in Asian and Hispanic ethnoburbs—by 2.65 and 5.21 index points, respectively, from 1990 to 2010—contrasting with slower integration in black ethnoburbs. By the 2010s, ethnoburbs had spread to new regions, such as the U.S. South, exemplified by , which became one of the most diverse counties due to immigrant influxes forming multi-ethnic suburban clusters. The model also extended to non-Asian groups, including Jewish ethnoburbs accounting for nearly half of Jewish households in certain surveys by 2010, and Hispanic variants in sprawling suburbs. Overall, the share of foreign-born residents in ethnic neighborhoods, including suburban forms, climbed to 67.2% by 2010 from 43% in 1970, signaling ethnoburbs' role as primary settlement nodes for contemporary immigrants.

Socio-Economic Dynamics

Economic Structures and Entrepreneurship

Ethnoburbs exhibit economic structures characterized by high concentrations of immigrant-owned businesses, particularly in , retail, , and , which integrate ethnic into suburban economies while leveraging global networks. These areas differ from traditional urban ethnic enclaves by attracting affluent, skilled immigrants who arrive with capital and , enabling the establishment of scalable enterprises rather than reliance on low-wage, insular labor markets. In such settings, ethnic economies expand to serve both co-ethnic consumers and broader populations, contributing to regional growth through job creation and investment. Entrepreneurship rates among ethnoburb residents surpass national averages, driven by immigrants' and transnational ties. For Chinese immigrants, a key group in many ethnoburbs, business ownership grew dramatically from 23,270 firms in 1977 to 286,041 in 2002, with 31% employing paid workers and concentrations in suburban hubs like Los Angeles County's , the largest U.S. Chinese business center outside New York. Foreign-born Chinese aged 25-34 in 2000 held college degrees at a rate of 65%, compared to 30% for U.S.-born , facilitating ventures in diverse sectors such as supermarkets, banks, professional consulting, and supplementary education centers like cram schools. Korean immigrants in ethnoburbs show rates of 24%, more than double the next highest immigrant group per U.S. data, often in retail and services that capitalize on suburban accessibility. These enterprises foster stratified labor markets, demanding both high-skilled managers and low-wage workers, while ethnic-specific directories reveal clustered economic activities tied to residential patterns, as seen in Korean clusters with specialized retail and services. Transnational capital inflows support expansion, with businesses exporting goods or attracting investment from origin countries, enhancing local tax revenues and property values without the poverty traps of inner-city ghettos. In , an Indian ethnoburb, immigrant-owned chains like Saravana Bhavan exemplify scalable food enterprises serving global diasporas and locals alike. ![Saravana Bhavan in Edison, NJ, representing South Asian entrepreneurial ventures in an ethnoburb][float-right] Overall, ethnoburb reflects causal drivers like selective immigration policies favoring skilled workers since the 1965 Immigration Act, enabling middle-class ethnic groups to bypass urban poverty cycles and build outward-oriented economies. This model promotes economic vitality but can intensify local competition and housing pressures, as evidenced by San Gabriel Valley's Asian population growth of 22% from 2000 to 2010 amid business proliferation.

Demographic and Class Composition

Ethnoburbs are characterized by a demographic makeup dominated by immigrants and their descendants from a primary ethnic group, often comprising 40-70% of the population, with Asians—particularly those of Chinese, Indian, Korean, or Vietnamese origin—forming the core in North American examples. In , a prototypical Chinese ethnoburb in the , Asians account for 64.4% of residents, predominantly non-, alongside (26.7%) and (5.6%) minorities, reflecting voluntary clustering rather than segregation driven by . Similarly, in , over two-thirds of residents are immigrants, with East Asians exceeding 50% of the population, drawn from skilled migration streams post-1980s. This composition contrasts with traditional enclaves by including multi-generational families, professionals, and entrepreneurs who select suburban locations for and cultural proximity, rather than economic necessity. Class composition in ethnoburbs skews toward middle- and upper-middle socioeconomic strata, with residents exhibiting higher and incomes than national or urban averages, often surpassing those of the majority population. For instance, Chinese residents in ethnoburbs have historically achieved household incomes above county medians, supported by concentrations in professional fields like , , and business ownership. Educational levels are elevated, with over 50% holding bachelor's degrees or higher in many cases, facilitated by selective policies favoring skilled workers. While income inequality exists—encompassing both affluent entrepreneurs and service-sector workers—the overall profile features homeownership rates above 60% and low compared to inner-city ethnic areas, underscoring voluntary affluence over deprivation. This middle-class orientation enables ethnoburbs to sustain ethnic businesses and institutions without relying on low-wage labor pools typical of older enclaves.

Social and Cultural Aspects

Integration Patterns

Residents in ethnoburbs demonstrate patterns of selective , leveraging ethnic networks for while participating in mainstream labor markets. Many achieve higher median household incomes and levels than in traditional urban enclaves, with professional occupations predominant among groups like Chinese and Indian immigrants. For example, in Asian ethnoburbs, household wealth growth correlates with suburban settlement, yet co-ethnic residential clustering persists due to ethnic stratification rather than deliberate isolation. This enables business expansion into non-ethnic markets, as seen in where immigrant-led firms form cross-racial economic alliances. Social integration occurs primarily through shared suburban institutions, such as public schools and community services, where second-generation residents interact with diverse peers, fostering and cultural adaptation. However, adults often prioritize ethnic-specific organizations for , resulting in segmented rather than complete assimilation. Empirical analyses reject explanations for ethnoburb formation, attributing persistence to mutual preferences for proximity amid rising affluence, with segregation indices lower than in inner-city enclaves but higher than fully dispersed patterns. These dynamics challenge classical assimilation theories by showing that economic success in affluent suburbs does not necessarily erode ethnic identity, allowing parallel paths of incorporation. While some studies note potential barriers to intermarriage and civic participation due to concentration, overall evidence points to ethnoburbs facilitating upward mobility and selective mainstream engagement without the poverty traps of urban ghettos. Critics, however, contend that sustained ethnic dominance in local politics and commerce may delay broader societal blending, though data from cases like reveal increasing multiracial collaborations.

Cultural Maintenance and Identity

In ethnoburbs, ethnic minorities sustain cultural practices through dense networks of institutions tailored to their heritage, including language schools, religious centers, and media outlets that promote linguistic continuity and traditional customs. For example, in the San Gabriel Valley's Chinese ethnoburb, over 60 Chinese-language newspapers and multiple television stations broadcast content reinforcing familial values and festivals like , enabling residents to preserve Mandarin and proficiency at rates exceeding 70% among first-generation immigrants. These resources counteract assimilation pressures by providing daily immersion, distinct from urban enclaves where economic survival often dilutes cultural expression. Religious and community organizations further bolster identity retention, with temples, mosques, and gurdwaras serving as hubs for rituals and social cohesion. In Valley's Indian ethnoburbs, Hindu temples host celebrations attended by thousands, fostering intergenerational bonds and sub-ethnic ties among Gujaratis and Punjabis. Empirical studies indicate that such proximity correlates with higher ethnic —marriage within the group—and cultural knowledge transmission to children via weekend heritage classes, where enrollment can reach 20-30% of school-age youth in concentrated areas. This contrasts with more assimilated suburbs, where dispersion erodes these supports, leading to faster identity dilution. Identity in ethnoburbs often manifests as transnational or hybrid, blending host-country norms with origin-country loyalties, facilitated by affordable international travel and remittances. Residents maintain dual frames—economic integration via high-tech jobs while prioritizing cultural fidelity—resulting in self-reported strong ethnic pride in surveys of Chinese Americans, where 80% affirm ongoing ties to homeland politics and cuisine. However, this maintenance can reinforce in-group preferences, with some analyses noting limited cross-ethnic interactions despite suburban diversity, potentially sustaining distinct sub-identities over full societal blending. Academic sources on these dynamics, often from immigration geographers, emphasize empirical residential patterns but may underplay voluntary segregation's role in causal identity persistence due to institutional emphases on diversity narratives.

Comparative Concepts

Versus Traditional Urban Ethnic Enclaves

Traditional urban ethnic enclaves, exemplified by historic Chinatowns, originated as dense inner-city clusters serving as initial settlement points for low-wage, low-skilled immigrants confronting labor market exclusion, housing discrimination, and language barriers in the early 20th century. These areas concentrated ethnic businesses focused on basic retail, restaurants, and services catering primarily to co-ethnics, often perpetuating economic insularity and reliance on informal networks for survival. In comparison, ethnoburbs form in affluent suburbs, drawing post-1980s immigrants—predominantly skilled professionals and entrepreneurs—who voluntarily cluster for cultural familiarity while accessing superior schools, low-density housing, and proximity to white-collar job centers like Silicon Valley or metropolitan tech hubs. Socio-economically, ethnoburbs diverge sharply, hosting residents with median household incomes often exceeding national averages and rates consistently below those of urban enclaves—for example, Chinese ethnoburbs in the U.S. show levels under 10% versus 20-30% in traditional Chinatowns. This affluence stems from selective migration patterns post-1965 Immigration Act reforms, which prioritized educated workers, enabling direct suburban entry without the stepwise urban-to-suburban progression assumed in classic assimilation models. Ethnoburb economies feature upscale ethnic enterprises, including high-tech firms, , and that engage broader markets, contrasting the enclave's niche, immigrant-labor-dependent . Socially, traditional enclaves fostered tight-knit amid marginalization, sometimes hindering outward mobility through concentrated , whereas ethnoburbs blend ethnic retention with mainstream integration, evidenced by higher English proficiency (e.g., over 70% in some Asian ethnoburbs versus lower in enclaves) and multiethnic neighborhoods that dilute isolation. Empirical data link this to divergent outcomes, such as reduced in ethnoburbs due to stable family structures and resources, challenging narratives of uniform ethnic clustering as inherently segregative. Nonetheless, both forms sustain cultural institutions like temples and markets, but ethnoburbs adapt them to suburban scales, reflecting causal shifts from exclusion-driven formation to choice-driven .

Versus Inner-City Ghettos and Banlieues

Ethnoburbs differ fundamentally from inner-city ghettos in their spatial, socioeconomic, and structural characteristics. Whereas ghettos represent areas of concentrated and involuntary segregation in decaying urban cores, often marked by high unemployment, limited business ownership, and , ethnoburbs emerge as voluntary, suburban ethnic clusters with affluent residents, robust , and integration into broader metropolitan economies. Ghettos, historically tied to and economic exclusion, exhibit small-scale, high-density configurations with few internal economic resources, perpetuating cycles of and . In contrast, ethnoburbs feature larger geographic footprints, lower population densities, and higher median household incomes—often exceeding national averages—driven by skilled immigrants who establish ethnic businesses alongside mainstream interactions. This divergence stems from distinct causal mechanisms: s arise from structural barriers like job flight from urban centers and discriminatory housing policies, trapping lower-skilled populations in conditions with elevated rates of family breakdown and violence. Ethnoburbs, however, reflect selective migration patterns under policies favoring educated professionals, enabling rapid socioeconomic mobility through and homeownership in amenity-rich suburbs. Empirical data from U.S. metropolitan areas show ethnoburb residents achieving higher and English proficiency compared to ghetto inhabitants, fostering outward-oriented networks rather than insularity. Banlieues in , while suburban in location, parallel ghettos more closely than ethnoburbs due to their association with concentrated immigrant , high (often exceeding 20% in affected zones), and recurrent social unrest, including riots in and 2023. These peripheral housing projects, built post-World War II for working-class and North African migrants, have devolved into traps with 57% rates—nearly triple the national average—and elevated linked to markets and activity. Unlike ethnoburbs' voluntary, multi-ethnic affluence sustained by professional inflows and , banlieues exhibit , cultural , and limited economic vitality, exacerbated by 's generous social model that discourages labor participation among low-skilled arrivals. Ethnoburbs demonstrate lower insecurity and better prospects for generational advancement, attributable to immigrants' pre-arrival rather than host-country redistribution.

Global Examples

North American Cases

The in , represents a prototypical Chinese ethnoburb, emerging from post-1965 immigration waves that concentrated affluent Chinese professionals and entrepreneurs in suburban areas rather than downtown enclaves. By 2000, numerous census tracts in cities such as Monterey Park, , and Arcadia exceeded 25% Chinese population, fostering an ethnic economy with specialized businesses including supermarkets, banks, and real estate firms tailored to immigrants. This development transformed Valley Boulevard into a commercial corridor boasting over 300 Chinese restaurants by the early 2020s, supporting residential assimilation patterns where Chinese households achieved homeownership rates comparable to or exceeding local averages. In , —a suburb of —evolved into a prominent Chinese ethnoburb, driven by and migration in the 1980s and 1990s. Ethnic Chinese residents accounted for 47% of Richmond's population by 2015, with significant numbers from and contributing to a diverse yet predominantly Chinese demographic profile. Linguistic data from 2011 indicated that 10% of residents spoke neither English nor French as a first language, reflecting sustained cultural ties amid suburban prosperity marked by high median incomes and professional occupations in tech and . Edison Township, New Jersey, exemplifies a South Asian ethnoburb centered on the , with comprising 28.3% of the population per the 2010 U.S. , up from 17.75% in 2000. This suburban hub, often termed "," features dense clusters of Indian grocery stores, restaurants like Saravana Bhavan, and cultural centers along Oak Tree Road, sustained by holders and family-chain migration from , , and other regions. Economic vitality is evident in the area's median household income surpassing $100,000 by 2020, alongside community events such as festivals that reinforce ethnic networks without inner-city concentrations. Markham, Ontario, illustrates a multi-ethnic ethnoburb in the , blending Chinese, South Asian, and other immigrant groups in wards with over 50% visible minorities by 2011. Unlike mono-ethnic examples, Markham's composition includes 40% Chinese and 20% South Asian residents, supporting hybrid commercial strips with pan-Asian supermarkets and tech firms that leverage diverse skilled labor pools. This pattern underscores ethnoburbs' adaptability to Canada's points-based favoring educated professionals, yielding low and high among residents.

Cases in Australia and New Zealand

In , ethnoburbs have developed in suburban areas of major cities, often featuring high concentrations of middle-class Asian immigrants, including Chinese and Indian populations, who establish ethnic businesses and cultural institutions while integrating into affluent residential zones. These areas contrast with traditional urban enclaves by their suburban setting, socioeconomic diversity, and entrepreneurial activity, fueled by skilled migration policies since the that prioritized economic contributors. Hurstville in Sydney exemplifies a Chinese-dominated ethnoburb, where immigrant entrepreneurship has transformed commercial spaces into hubs for ethnic consumption and identity maintenance. By the 2011 census, nearly 8,900 residents of its 26,000 population were born in China, comprising about 34% mainland China-born by 2017 estimates; the 2021 census recorded Chinese ancestry in 47.1% of the local government area, with China as the top birthplace at 13.9%. This growth reflects waves of post-2000 migration, leading to vibrant retail districts with Chinese supermarkets, restaurants, and services catering to both immigrants and locals. In , Box Hill has evolved into Victoria's largest Chinese-Australian enclave, with approximately one-third of residents claiming Chinese heritage as of 2019, and 27% identifying as Asian by recent surveys. Originally a postwar suburban area, it attracted affluent Chinese migrants from the onward, fostering "ethnoburb" characteristics like interethnic commerce and trans-spatial networks beyond pure enclaves. Similarly, Point Cook represents a super-diverse ethnoburb, with the 2016 showing Chinese ancestry at 11.3% and Indian at 10%, alongside only 43% Australian-born in 2021; it ranks as Australia's most multicultural suburb by birthplace diversity, driven by Indian (17%) and other Asian inflows into new housing developments. Brisbane's Sunnybank illustrates another Chinese-focused ethnoburb, where Chinese ancestry reached 31% in the 2016 and 35% by 2021, supported by Asian investments in retail and housing since the 1980s. This suburb's , exceeding 14% post-2021, underscores sustained appeal for skilled Chinese migrants establishing professional and business networks. In , hosts prominent ethnoburbs amid rapid Asian population growth, with Asian residents quadrupling from 1991 to 2006 and comprising significant clusters by 2015. Albany, a planned northern developed since the , exemplifies a Chinese ethnoburb, attracting hundreds of recent immigrants through high-tech jobs and new housing, forming sub-ethnic communities distinct from older urban patterns. By 2022, it featured dense Chinese settlement patterns, aligning with broader trends where 69% of New Zealand's Chinese reside in , often in suburban professional enclaves rather than central areas.

Impacts and Controversies

Economic and Community Benefits

Ethnoburbs foster through immigrant and , particularly in areas like the where Chinese immigrants purchased homes and established businesses, driving local development in Monterey Park starting in the 1970s. This activity has led to neighborhood revitalization, including upscaling of and efforts that enhance commercial viability. Property values in early ethnoburbs such as Monterey Park experienced sharp increases during the late 1970s and early 1980s, contributing to higher revenues for local governments. The proliferation of ethnic businesses, including restaurants, markets, and financial institutions like ethnobanks, creates jobs and stimulates consumer economies tailored to immigrant preferences, as seen in the transformation of suburban landscapes by foreign capital inflows. Ethnoburbs have expanded significantly, from 45 communities in 1980 to over 1,250 by 2010, reflecting sustained entrepreneurial activity among groups with high rates, such as 24% for Korean immigrants. These developments often yield economic booms by integrating global networks and professional skills, with residents typically possessing higher education and income levels than in traditional urban enclaves. On the community level, ethnoburbs provide social capital through dense ethnic networks that support upward mobility and resource sharing, enabling immigrants to leverage co-ethnic ties for business opportunities and mutual aid without the isolation of inner-city poverty. Compared to urban Chinese enclaves, ethnoburbs exhibit lower poverty rates and higher English fluency, fostering environments conducive to family stability and educational attainment. These suburbs allow second-generation residents to maintain cultural practices alongside assimilation, offering a sense of belonging in diverse yet ethnically anchored settings that promote community cohesion.

Criticisms Regarding Segregation and Assimilation

Critics have raised concerns that ethnoburbs foster voluntary among affluent immigrants, particularly Asians, by enabling residential concentrations that mirror urban enclaves but in suburban settings, potentially limiting inter-ethnic interactions and perpetuating ethnic boundaries. This pattern is evidenced by steady declines in many Asian ethnoburbs, with U.S. data from 2000 to 2010 showing consistent outflows of non-Asian residents despite the areas' middle-class appeal, suggesting dynamics akin to racial turnover rather than seamless integration. Such trends challenge classical spatial assimilation models, which predict dispersal into diverse suburbs as rises, and instead indicate that ethnic affinity and network effects can sustain segregation even among high-income groups. Regarding assimilation, some analysts argue that ethnoburbs allow immigrants to defer full cultural incorporation by providing self-sustaining ecosystems of ethnic businesses, media, and social institutions, where native languages dominate and host-society norms are optional, potentially creating "parallel societies" that slow and intergenerational mixing. For instance, in areas like the San Gabriel Valley's Chinese ethnoburb, the prevalence of Mandarin signage and imported goods has been cited as evidence of cultural insularity, contrasting with expectations of rapid Anglo-conformity under traditional theories. Critics from assimilationist perspectives, including policy reports, warn that this setup risks long-term social fragmentation, as second-generation residents may prioritize ethnic over broader , with limited empirical counterevidence from enclaves showing higher isolation risks in concentrated communities. However, these criticisms are contested by empirical research emphasizing that ethnoburb formation aligns more with selective spatial assimilation—where immigrants achieve suburban socioeconomic gains via ethnic resources—than deliberate segregation, as Asian residents often exhibit higher English proficiency and than in urban enclaves. Studies of second-generation outcomes in U.S. ethnoburbs reveal no significant hindrance to cultural adaptation, with intermarriage rates rising to 30-40% among in suburban contexts by 2010, and economic metrics indicating faster integration than predicted by segregation fears. In Australian ethnoburbs, similar patterns show voluntary clustering aiding initial settlement without blocking eventual dispersal, as tracked in data from 2006-2016, underscoring that criticisms may overstate isolation given the voluntary, resource-driven nature of these communities.

References

  1. https://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/1018
  2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wqxsr
  3. https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/title/ethnoburb-the-new-ethnic-community-in-urban-america/
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310497390_Ethnoburb_The_New_Ethnic_Community_in_Urban_America
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9782721/
  6. https://paa2015.populationassociation.org/papers/152427
  7. https://matrix.berkeley.edu/research-article/mapping-the-los-angeles-ethnoburbs-an-interview-with-margaret-crawford/
  8. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/asian-american-society-an-encyclopedia/chpt/ethnoburbs
  9. https://www.myasianvoice.com/from-chinatowns-to-ethnoburbs
  10. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098984871
  11. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/442671/pdf
  12. https://asu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/anatomy-of-a-new-ethnic-settlement-the-chinese-ethnoburb-in-los-a
  13. https://theconversation.com/from-chinatowns-to-ethnoburbs-and-beyond-where-chinese-people-settle-reflects-changing-wealth-levels-and-political-climates-206561
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259857969_Ethnoburb_The_New_Ethnic_Community_in_Urban_America_by_Wei_Li
  15. https://news.asu.edu/content/article-focuses-lis-concept-ethnoburb
  16. https://psmag.com/news/ghosts-of-white-people-past-witnessing-white-flight-from-an-asian-ethnoburb/
  17. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/365635/summary
  18. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/b078ed45-daa9-483c-8920-b1b89fc430df/download
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9526211/
  20. https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824830656.003.0007
  21. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0739456X241291292
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45472643
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094119023000396
  24. https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/2014-02-12%2520Min%2520Zhou%2520paper.pdf
  25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2747/0272-3638.19.6.502
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227794602_Chinese_Ethnic_Economy_San_Gabriel_Valley_Los_Angeles_County
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26562945
  28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/psp.1764
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12134-022-00990-x
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10259831/
  31. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-asians-sgv-data-20180221-story.html
  32. https://datausa.io/profile/geo/monterey-park-ca/
  33. https://thetyee.ca/News/2016/08/05/Ethnoburbs/
  34. https://news.asu.edu/content/ethnoburb-new-form-immigrant-community
  35. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA20567467&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00420980&p=AONE&sw=w
  36. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/23326492231151589
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6655532/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286674610_Ethnoburb_The_new_ethnic_community_in_Urban_America
  39. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bj8c6ds
  40. https://repository.wellesley.edu/_flysystem/fedora/2023-11/WCTC_2020_YuanIsabelle_CulturalProtectorsRe.pdf
  41. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=cfe_etd
  42. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=geography_honors
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10495084/
  44. https://www.oxy.edu/sites/default/files/Tam%252C%2520Nathan_UEP%2520Comps.pdf
  45. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=kent1239900533&disposition=inline
  46. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Ethnoburb-versus-Chinatown-%253A-Two-Types-of-Urban-in-Wei/7c56072fde2762fe264df10f04d0814b26cb524a
  47. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780824874520-005/html
  48. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1536504218812874
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9128625/
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236696887_Ethnoburb_The_New_Ethnic_Community_in_Urban_America_review
  51. https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/regional-review/1997/spring/ghettos-the-changing-consequences-of-ethnic-isolation.aspx
  52. https://www.huduser.gov/periodicals/cityscpe/vol3num3/article3.pdf
  53. https://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/blackspeech/wjwilson.html
  54. https://items.ssrc.org/from-our-archives/neighborhoods-and-communities-in-concentrated-poverty/
  55. https://search.proquest.com/openview/0d950df5e4a421059553938844d93860/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=5247
  56. https://coascenters.howard.edu/french-banlieues-and-consequences-spatial-segregation
  57. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66071455
  58. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/life-frances-banlieues-overview-and-battle-plan
  59. https://www.euronews.com/2023/07/27/a-power-struggle-what-lies-behind-the-anger-in-frances-banlieues
  60. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03281704/file/Ch14-Banlieues-HAL.pdf
  61. https://france-amerique.com/singing-the-banlieue/
  62. https://vancouversun.com/news/metro/richmond-global-centre-of-a-demographic-explosion
  63. https://eastside-online.org/community/edison-provides-a-hub-of-south-asian-culture/
  64. https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2017/08/17-08-26-summer-reading-2017-ethnoburbs-majority-minority-melting-pot-suburbs/
  65. https://suburbs.info.yorku.ca/2012/10/the-making-of-a-multi-ethnic-ethnoburb-a-case-study-of-markham-ontario/
  66. https://theconversation.com/the-rise-of-the-super-diverse-ethnoburbs-90926
  67. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/1198122
  68. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/changing-face-of-a-suburb-20120804-23mb4.html
  69. https://www.sbs.com.au/language/chinese/en/article/do-chinese-australians-prefer-living-in-chinese-districts/gp4d0c7d7
  70. https://profile.id.com.au/georges-river/ancestry?WebID=310
  71. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXroK7dv6_U
  72. https://www.smh.com.au/goodfood/eating-out/a-tale-of-two-chinatowns-a-closer-look-at-box-hill-and-melbournes-hubs-20230120-h29aag.html
  73. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ciso.12113
  74. https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2016/SSC32718
  75. https://abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/SAL32694
  76. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2008.tb00297.x
  77. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regional/268214/auckland-%27ethnoburbs%27-on-the-rise
  78. https://www.massey.ac.nz/about/news/albany-the-making-of-an-ethnoburb/
  79. https://asiatimes.com/2025/02/asian-immigrants-rejecting-assimilation-created-us-ethnoburb/
  80. https://www.pbssocal.org/shows/departures/how-chinese-entrepreneurs-transformed-the-san-gabriel-valley
  81. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/crcl/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2018/11/Sarkar-Rosenthal.pdf
  82. https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/2014-02-12%20Min%20Zhou%20paper.pdf
  83. https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5481&context=luc_theses
  84. https://phys.org/news/2014-08-ethnoburbs-segregation-suburbia.html
  85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226691514_Spatial_Disparities_in_the_Expansion_of_the_Chinese_Ethnoburb_of_Los_Angeles
  86. https://irpp.org/research-studies/ethnocultural-minority-enclaves-in-montreal-toronto-and-vancouver/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.