Hubbry Logo
EuryapsidaEuryapsidaMain
Open search
Euryapsida
Community hub
Euryapsida
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Euryapsida
Euryapsida
Euryapsida
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A euryapsid skull.

Euryapsida is a polyphyletic (unnatural, as the various members are not closely related) group of sauropsids that are distinguished by a single temporal fenestra, an opening behind the orbit, under which the post-orbital and squamosal bones articulate. They are different from Synapsida, which also have a single opening behind the orbit, by the placement of the fenestra. In synapsids, this opening is below the articulation of the post-orbital and squamosal bones. It is now commonly believed that euryapsids (particularly sauropterygians) are in fact diapsids (which have two fenestrae behind the orbit) that lost the lower temporal fenestra. Euryapsids are usually considered entirely extinct, although turtles might be part of the sauropterygian clade[1] while other authors disagree.[2] Euryapsida may also be a synonym of Sauropterygia sensu lato.[3]

The ichthyosaurian skull is sometimes described as having a metapsid (or parapsid) condition instead of a truly euryapsid one. In ichthyosaurs, the squamosal bone is never part of the fenestra's margin.[4] Parapsida was originally a taxon consisting of ichthyosaurs, squamates, protorosaurs, araeoscelidans and pleurosaurs.[3]

Historically, a variety of reptiles with upper fenestrae, either alone or with a lower emargination, have been considered euryapsid or parapsid, and to have had their patterns of fenestration originate separately from those of diapsids. This includes araeoscelidans, mesosaurs, squamates, pleurosaurids,[5] weigeltisaurids, protorosaurs, and trilophosaurs.[6][7] With the exception of mesosaurs, which only have the lower temporal opening, all of these are universally agreed to be diapsids which either secondarily closed the lower opening (araeoscelids, trilophosaurs) or lost the lower bar (squamates, pleurosaurs, protorosaurs).

Euryapsida was proposed by Edwin H. Colbert as a substitute for the earlier term Synaptosauria, originally created by Edward D. Cope for a taxon including sauropterygians, turtles and rhynchocephalians. Baur removed the rhynchocephalians from Synaptosauria and Williston later resurrected the taxon, including only Sauropterygia (Nothosauria and Plesiosauria) and Placodontia in it.[3]

A parapsid skull.

The terms Enaliosauria and Halisauria have also been used for a taxon including ichthyosaurs and sauropterygians.[8][9]

Some 21st century studies have found that ichthyosaurs, thalattosaurs and sauropterygians were close relatives, either as stem-archosaurs[2][10] or as stem-saurians.[11][12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Euryapsida

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Euryapsida is a polyphyletic assemblage of extinct sauropsid reptiles distinguished by a euryapsid skull condition, characterized by a single supratemporal fenestra as the sole temporal opening behind the orbit, typically resulting from the secondary closure or reduction of the infratemporal fenestra in ancestors that possessed the diapsid configuration of two fenestrae. This group, which flourished primarily in marine environments during the Mesozoic era from the Early Triassic to the Late Cretaceous (approximately 252 to 66 million years ago), includes diverse lineages adapted for aquatic life, such as the dolphin-like ichthyosaurs (Ichthyosauria), long-necked plesiosaurs and their kin (Sauropterygia), as well as other forms like thalattosaurs (Thalattosauria) and placodonts (Placodontia). Historically, Euryapsida was proposed as a formal taxonomic category in the mid-20th century by paleontologists like Edwin H. Colbert (), who grouped these reptiles based on their shared temporal skull morphology, viewing them as a distinct subclass alongside anapsids, synapsids, and . However, subsequent cladistic analyses have demonstrated that this classification is artificial and convergent, driven by similar selective pressures for underwater predation and locomotion rather than shared ancestry; for instance, ichthyosaurs are now placed as a basal or early-branching lineage, while sauropterygians nest within Neodiapsida. The euryapsid condition thus represents a derived trait in multiple independent radiations, with no evidence for . Key anatomical adaptations unifying euryapsids under this outdated umbrella include streamlined bodies, modified limbs into flippers for propulsion, and specialized skulls with large orbits for enhanced and robust jaws for capturing prey, enabling them to occupy top predator and piscivorous niches in ancient oceans. Ichthyosaurs, appearing shortly after the end-Permian mass extinction, evolved fish-like forms with dorsal fins and , reaching sizes from 1 meter to over 20 meters in length (e.g., ). Sauropterygians, another major component, displayed remarkable neck elongation in some plesiosauroids (up to 72 in elasmosaurs) and short-necked, crocodile-like forms in pliosaurs, with evidence suggesting possible endothermy in certain taxa. These reptiles played a pivotal ecological role in marine ecosystems, filling niches left vacant by the extinction of pre-existing aquatic vertebrates and contributing to the "reptilian invasion of the seas." Fossil discoveries, first documented in the early (e.g., in 1821), span global deposits like the of and the Holzmaden Lagerstätte, revealing exceptional preservation that highlights soft tissues, embryos, and stomach contents. Despite their extinction at or before the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary—likely due to environmental changes and competition—their evolutionary innovations underscore the versatility of reptiles in adapting to fully aquatic lifestyles.

Definition and History

Etymology and Definition

The term Euryapsida derives from the Ancient Greek words eurys (εὐρύς), meaning "broad," and apsis (ἀψίς), meaning "arch" or "vault," alluding to the broad upper temporal arch observed in the skulls of reptiles classified within this group. The term was proposed in 1945 by paleontologist Edwin H. Colbert as a more descriptive replacement for the earlier designation Synaptosauria, introduced by Edward Drinker Cope in the late 19th century. Euryapsida was initially established as a subclass of reptiles, positioned alongside Anapsida (no temporal fenestrae), Synapsida (single lower temporal fenestra), and Diapsida (two temporal fenestrae), based on skull architecture as a primary classificatory criterion. In anatomical terms, Euryapsida encompasses a polyphyletic assemblage of sauropsids distinguished by a single upper located behind the and positioned high on the roof. This , which accommodated adductor musculature, represents a derived condition arising from the evolutionary fusion or complete loss of the lower (infratemporal) fenestra in ancestors that originally possessed the skull configuration of two openings.

Historical Classification

The concept of Euryapsida arose from 19th-century efforts to classify marine reptiles based on shared cranial and postcranial features. In 1869, proposed the term Streptosauria for a group encompassing plesiosaurs, interpreting their vertebral structure as indicating a reversed orientation relative to other reptiles. This early grouping highlighted the distinctiveness of these aquatic forms but was limited in scope. Subsequently, in 1874, Harry Govier Seeley introduced Enaliosauria to unite a broader array of marine reptiles, including ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and related taxa, emphasizing their adaptations for as a unifying theme. By the early 20th century, classifications shifted toward skull fenestration as a key diagnostic trait. Samuel Wendell Williston, in 1925, applied Synaptosauria for reptiles exhibiting a single upper temporal fenestra, incorporating sauropterygians, ichthyosaurs, and placodonts while excluding synapsids with their lower fenestra. This term reflected a growing recognition of temporal arch patterns as evolutionary markers, building on earlier work by Cope and Seeley. Edwin H. Colbert formalized Euryapsida in 1945 as a subclass defined by the presence of a single upper temporal fenestra bounded laterally by the postorbital and squamosal bones, explicitly substituting it for Synaptosauria (a suggestion originally from A.S. Romer via personal correspondence). Colbert's framework included core groups such as Sauropterygia, Ichthyosauria, and Placodontia, positioning Euryapsida as a parallel lineage to Anapsida, Synapsida, and Diapsida. Mid-20th-century refinements expanded Euryapsida to encompass additional fossil taxa tentatively linked by the euryapsid skull condition. Groups like and Mesosauria were briefly incorporated, with Araeoscelidia viewed as potential basal members due to their fenestration and Mesosauria assigned based on aquatic affinities and primitive features. However, these inclusions were provisional, as ongoing discoveries revealed inconsistencies in their affinities. By the , accumulating evidence from cladistic analyses indicated that Euryapsida represented an artificial assemblage resulting from in temporal fenestration among unrelated lineages, prompting proposals for revised groupings that avoided the term in favor of more precise phylogenetic categories.

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Included Taxa

Traditionally, Euryapsida encompassed several major clades of extinct marine reptiles characterized by the euryapsid skull condition, featuring a single upper formed by the fusion or loss of the lower temporal bar, which provided structural support for musculature adapted to aquatic predation. This grouping, proposed as a subclass by early paleontologists, primarily included and , with occasional minor inclusions like based on superficial similarities in temporal morphology. Sauropterygia formed the largest component of traditional Euryapsida, comprising diverse semi-aquatic to fully pelagic reptiles that dominated marine ecosystems from the to the . This clade subdivided into several subgroups, including , which consisted of heavily armored, durophagous forms like with turtle-like bodies and crushing dentition suited for feeding on mollusks and crustaceans in shallow coastal waters. Nothosauria, another key subgroup, included semi-aquatic predators such as , characterized by elongated snouts, robust limbs for near-shore ambulation, and piscivorous diets during the Middle to . Plesiosauria, the most iconic sauropterygian lineage, encompassed long-necked plesiosaurs (e.g., ) for pursuit predation and short-necked pliosaurs (e.g., ) as apex ambush hunters, both with modified limbs as flippers for efficient swimming across and seas. Ichthyosauria, another core euryapsid group, comprised dolphin-like fully aquatic reptiles ranging from the to the , with streamlined bodies, large eyes for low-light hunting, and viviparous reproduction. Their skulls exhibited a euryapsid-like condition, though debated as potentially derived from a ancestor via fusion of temporal elements, enabling powerful bites on and cephalopods in open oceans. Thalattosauria represented a minor historical inclusion in Euryapsida, consisting of Middle to marine reptiles like with elongated snouts, paddle-like limbs, and varied diets from piscivory to scavenging along continental margins. Early classifications also erroneously placed certain groups, such as marine turtles, within Euryapsida due to convergent skull modifications.

Modern Phylogenetic Position

Modern cladistic analyses, incorporating both morphological and molecular data, have established that Euryapsida is a polyphyletic assemblage rather than a natural , with the defining euryapsid skull condition—a single upper —arising through in disparate lineages adapted to aquatic environments. Studies from the 2000s onward, including comprehensive phylogenetic matrices of relationships, demonstrate that this fenestration pattern evolved independently at least twice among marine reptiles, reflecting parallel adaptations for musculature and cranial streamlining rather than shared ancestry. Recent analyses (e.g., Simões et al., 2022) further suggest these groups form a monophyletic of basal archosauromorphs specialized for . Within this framework, , encompassing the diverse marine reptiles such as plesiosaurs and their relatives, is positioned within Diapsida, often as the to or closely related to Testudines within Archosauromorpha, based on shared cranial and postcranial synapomorphies. , the armored durophagous forms traditionally included in Euryapsida, is resolved as the to Eosauropterygia (the remaining sauropterygians), forming the basalmost of Sauropterygia and confirming their nested position within diapsids. In contrast, occupies a more basal position among diapsids, often as stem-ichthyopterygians near the base of or as its immediate sister taxon, supported by shared derived features such as elongated snouts and vertebral modifications despite the superficial similarity in temporal fenestration. The inclusion of turtles (Testudines) in historical euryapsid classifications has also been refuted by modern phylogenies, which place them firmly within Diapsida despite their anapsid-like skull lacking temporal fenestrae; this condition is now interpreted as a secondary loss, with molecular evidence strongly supporting turtles as the sister group to Archosauria or more broadly within crown-group . Key contributions to these resolutions include Motani's (1999) cladistic analysis of ichthyopterygian osteology, which affirmed their diapsid affinities and basal archosauromorph position, and Neenan et al.'s (2013) examination of placodont cranial anatomy, which bolstered the sister-group relationship of to other sauropterygians through shared synapomorphies in and structure.

Morphology

Cranial Characteristics

The euryapsid is defined by a single supratemporal , an opening in the temporal region that is laterally bounded by the postorbital and squamosal bones, with the lower temporal either absent or fused due to secondary closure. This configuration results in a broad postorbital-squamosal bar that separates the fenestra from the region, providing structural support while accommodating musculature. The supratemporal is typically bordered dorsally by the parietal and sometimes the supratemporal bone, contributing to a reinforced roof adapted for marine predation. In sauropterygians, the supratemporal bone is particularly prominent, forming a key part of the fenestral margin and enhancing the attachment area for adductor muscles essential for powerful bites in aquatic environments. Ichthyosaurs exhibit a modified euryapsid condition, often termed metapsid, where the lower temporal elements are reduced and the infratemporal fenestra is closed, resulting in a streamlined temporal region with the fenestra primarily bounded by the postfrontal, parietal, and squamosal. This arrangement reflects convergence from diapsid ancestors, emphasizing efficiency in hydrodynamic skull design. Variations among euryapsid groups highlight adaptations to specific ecological niches. In placodonts, the is notably reduced in size relative to the , with thickened surrounding bones supporting a robust cranium suited for durophagous feeding on hard-shelled prey. Plesiosaurs exhibit a supratemporal fenestra typically similar in size to the , contributing to their overall streamlined . Thalattosaurs, with their elongate snouts and single bordered by postorbital, squamosal, and parietal bones, show adaptations for piscivory in coastal environments. Functionally, the euryapsid primarily housed the adductor muscles, such as the pterygoideus and temporalis, enabling strong closing forces for capturing elusive marine prey despite the challenges of underwater biting. This muscular accommodation, combined with the 's position, optimized bite mechanics in a high-drag medium, distinguishing euryapsid crania from terrestrial counterparts.

Postcranial Adaptations

Euryapsids displayed a range of postcranial modifications that facilitated to fully or partially aquatic lifestyles, with a predominant emphasis on streamlined body shapes for reduced drag during . These forms often featured pachyostotic bones—increased density and thickness in the —for buoyancy regulation, particularly evident in early sauropterygian ancestors like Hanosaurus, which possessed an elongate trunk supported by dense ribs. Dermal ossicles provided protective armor in some taxa, such as placodonts, where osteoderms formed dorsal and pelvic shields to safeguard against predators while foraging on the seafloor. The vertebral column in ichthyosaurs was characterized by numerous elongated, disc-like that enhanced lateral flexibility for thunniform (tail-driven) , allowing efficient cruising in open water. In contrast, sauropterygians showed an ancestral pattern of an extended trunk with approximately 25 dorsal vertebrae, often accompanied by pachyostotic for stability and , though derived plesiosaurs shortened the trunk while elongating the neck. , or belly , were present but exhibited varying degrees of reduction in sauropterygians, with microstructural analyses revealing fibrolamellar bone formation indicative of aquatic adaptations, differing from the more robust of terrestrial diapsids. Limb modifications were diverse, reflecting degrees of aquatic specialization. In ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs, hyperphalangy—the linear addition of phalanges beyond the ancestral count—produced rigid, paddle-like flippers optimized for hydrodynamic lift and , a trait linked to modified perichondral that minimized long bone shaft development. Placodonts, however, retained pentadactyl limbs without significant elongation or hyperphalangy, featuring short, robust elements suited for bottom-walking rather than sustained swimming, as seen in taxa like with no specialized propulsion adaptations. Nothosaurs represented transitional semi-aquatic forms, with dorsoventrally flattened humeri forming hydrofoil-like structures for paraxial motions and inferred between elongated digits to enhance paddling efficiency. Pectoral and pelvic girdles were typically expanded to accommodate powerful flipper strokes in more derived euryapsids. Ancestral sauropterygians like Hanosaurus had disc-like coracoids, rounded pubes, and reduced ilia, providing broad attachment surfaces for limb muscles while supporting an axial swimming style. In nothosaurs, massive, flat pectoral girdles anchored musculature for primary , with thin-walled limb cortices in larger reducing for agile maneuvering in coastal habitats. Placodont girdles remained compact and unexpanded, aligning with their less pelagic lifestyles and emphasis on armored, benthic mobility.

Evolutionary History

Origins and Early Evolution

The earliest records of euryapsid-like reptiles trace back to the aftermath of the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, with possible precursors in Permian aquatic forms such as mesosaurs, though modern phylogenies reclassify mesosaurs as basal sauropsids rather than direct ancestors of euryapsids. True euryapsids, characterized by their distinctive temporal fenestration, emerged in the , approximately 252 million years ago (Ma), coinciding with the recovery of marine ecosystems. The oldest known sauropterygian, a key euryapsid , is represented by basal forms like Prosaurosphargis yingzishanensis from , dated to the late stage (~251 Ma), marking the initial radiation of these aquatic adapters. Recent discoveries include the oldest sauropterygian, a from dated to ~246 Ma (as of 2024), and Lijiangosaurus yongshengensis, the earliest known long-necked form with 42 from the (as of 2025). Similarly, early ichthyopterygians, another euryapsid group, appeared around the same time in near-shore environments, indicating a rapid colonization of marine habitats by reptiles. Transitional forms between terrestrial diapsids and fully aquatic euryapsids include basal sauropterygians such as and pachypleurosaurs, which exhibit intermediate adaptations like elongated bodies and paddle-like limbs for axial undulatory swimming. These taxa, originating from stock, represent early aquatic adapters; for instance, Lariosaurus sanxiaensis from the of is identified as a basal linking to more derived pachypleurosaurs and nothosaurs. Phylogenetic analyses place these forms at the base of , highlighting their role in bridging terrestrial origins to marine lifestyles through gradual modifications in locomotion and . The post-Permian extinction recovery provided key environmental drivers for euryapsid origins, as depleted marine communities allowed opportunistic invasion by reptiles into shallow coastal and lagoonal niches. This radiation occurred primarily in the Tethys Sea and associated epicontinental basins, where warming climates and increased nutrient availability post-extinction facilitated the establishment of simple food webs dominated by these predators and herbivores. Fossils from these deposits reveal a top-down ecosystem restructuring, with euryapsids filling apex roles by the Middle Triassic. Key fossil localities underscore this early evolution, including Alpine Triassic sites like (Switzerland-Italy border) for placodonts, which preserve articulated specimens from Lagerstätten revealing basal durophagous forms. In the Germanic Basin, the Muschelkalk Formation of , particularly around and (extending into the ), yields abundant nothosaur remains, such as Nothosaurus mirabilis, documenting the diversification of these transitional aquatic reptiles in shallow marine settings. These sites highlight the Tethyan distribution of early euryapsids, rooted within the broader Diapsida clade.

Diversification and Extinction

The euryapsids, encompassing groups such as ichthyosaurs and sauropterygians, achieved their peak diversity during the era, particularly from the through the periods. Plesiosaurs underwent a notable radiation in the , with diversification continuing across the first 20 million years of the period and resulting in nearly 120 recognized species that occupied diverse marine habitats. Ichthyosaurs, meanwhile, maintained a limited presence with some morphological variation in the , particularly in European faunas, but overall diversity was low compared to earlier periods, prior to their extinction around the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary. This expansion involved niche partitioning among euryapsids, exemplified by pliosaurs such as , which served as apex predators preying on large marine vertebrates in seas. Ecologically, euryapsids filled a range of roles in marine food webs, comparable in overall diversity to modern cetaceans. Many acted as top predators, with robust skulls and conical teeth adapted for capturing and other vertebrates, while placodonts functioned as durophagous feeders, crushing hard-shelled mollusks and in nearshore environments. Some elasmosaurs, such as , developed tooth arrangements suggestive of filter-feeding on small prey, showing convergence with adaptations. These groups displayed remarkable convergence with cetaceans in , locomotion, and ecological niches, including streamlined forms and blubber-like insulation in ichthyosaurs. Extinction events profoundly shaped the euryapsid record. Ichthyosaurs underwent a two-phase extinction culminating at the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary around 94 million years ago, linked to oceanic anoxic events that reduced productivity and evolutionary rates in marine ecosystems. Sauropterygians, including plesiosaurs, persisted until the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary approximately 66 million years ago, succumbing alongside non-avian dinosaurs due to the combined effects of asteroid impact and volcanism, which triggered and habitat disruption. Although euryapsids left no direct descendants, their evolutionary history has informed studies of , highlighting how unrelated lineages independently adapted to similar aquatic pressures.

References

  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.12751
  2. https://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/geol431/lectures/18euryapsida.html
  3. https://www.palaeodiversity.org/pdf/03/Palaeodiversity_Bd3_Maisch.pdf
  4. https://en.bab.la/dictionary/english/euryapsid
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2406776
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/diapsid
  7. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/obl4he/vertebratediversity/glossary.html
  8. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/243473
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229994272_On_the_cranial_morphology_of_ichthyosaurs
  10. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03436.x
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352030468_Morphology_of_the_temporal_skull_region_in_tetrapods_research_history_functional_explanations_and_a_new_comprehensive_classification_scheme
  12. https://iucn-tftsg.org/wp-content/uploads/file/Articles/Laurin_and_Reisz_1995.pdf
  13. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01796.x
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323607515_Origin_and_Evolution_of_Euryapsids
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9722468/
  16. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq1898
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2633
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1999.10011160
  19. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14226
  20. https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7007-10-65
  21. https://bioone.org/journals/Palaeodiversity/volume-13/issue-1/pale.v13.a6/The-evolution-of-the-temporal-region-of-placodonts-Diapsida/10.18476/pale.v13.a6.full
  22. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4c18/408c5cc62348040c500846e33ace3322d86e.pdf
  23. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61070-7
  24. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.24140
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1571266/
  26. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158448
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3937355/
  28. https://elifesciences.org/articles/83163
  29. https://www.gns.cri.nz/news/ancient-polar-sea-reptile-is-the-oldest-ever-found-in-the-southern-hemisphere/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12606328/
  31. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0139-y
  32. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1985.0091
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7012838/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018223003681
  35. https://www.palaeontologyonline.com/?p=3247
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9422981/
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982223004669
  38. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/2/2/11
  39. https://theconversation.com/plesiosaurs-pliosaurs-hybodonts-looking-back-at-three-prehistoric-predators-of-the-jurassic-seas-174828
  40. https://sjpp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13358-024-00304-x
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4632572/
  42. https://peerj.com/articles/2340/
  43. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25119
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10825
  45. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/fossils/mass-extinctions-through-geologic-time.htm
  46. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61089-w
  47. https://laelaps.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/convergence-or-parallel-evolution/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.