Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Automorphism
View on Wikipedia
In mathematics, an automorphism is an isomorphism from a mathematical object to itself. It is, in some sense, a symmetry of the object, and a way of mapping the object to itself while preserving all of its structure. The set of all automorphisms of an object forms a group, called the automorphism group. It is, loosely speaking, the symmetry group of the object.
Definition
[edit]In an algebraic structure such as a group, a ring, or vector space, an automorphism is simply a bijective homomorphism of an object into itself. (The definition of a homomorphism depends on the type of algebraic structure; see, for example, group homomorphism, ring homomorphism, and linear operator.)
More generally, for an object in some category, an automorphism is a morphism of the object to itself that has an inverse morphism; that is, a morphism is an automorphism if there is a morphism such that where is the identity morphism of X. For algebraic structures, the two definitions are equivalent; in this case, the identity morphism is simply the identity function, and is often called the trivial automorphism.
Automorphism group
[edit]The automorphisms of an object X form a group under composition of morphisms, which is called the automorphism group of X. This results straightforwardly from the definition of a category.
The automorphism group of an object X in a category C is often denoted AutC(X), or simply Aut(X) if the category is clear from context.
Examples
[edit]- In set theory, an arbitrary permutation of the elements of a set X is an automorphism. The automorphism group of X is also called the symmetric group on X.
- In elementary arithmetic, the set of integers, , considered as a group under addition, has a unique nontrivial automorphism: negation. Considered as a ring, however, it has only the trivial automorphism. Generally speaking, negation is an automorphism of any abelian group, but not of a ring or field.
- A group automorphism is a group isomorphism from a group to itself. Informally, it is a permutation of the group elements such that the structure remains unchanged. For every group G there is a natural group homomorphism G → Aut(G) whose image is the group Inn(G) of inner automorphisms and whose kernel is the center of G. Thus, if G has trivial center it can be embedded into its own automorphism group.[1]
- In linear algebra, an endomorphism of a vector space V is a linear operator V → V. An automorphism is an invertible linear operator on V. When the vector space is finite-dimensional, the automorphism group of V is the same as the general linear group, GL(V). (The algebraic structure of all endomorphisms of V is itself an algebra over the same base field as V, whose invertible elements precisely consist of GL(V).)
- A field automorphism is a bijective ring homomorphism from a field to itself.
- The field of the rational numbers has no other automorphism than the identity, since an automorphism must fix the additive identity 0 and the multiplicative identity 1; the sum of a finite number of 1 must be fixed, as well as the additive inverses of these sums (that is, the automorphism fixes all integers); finally, since every rational number is the quotient of two integers, all rational numbers must be fixed by any automorphism.
- The field of the real numbers has no automorphisms other than the identity. Indeed, the rational numbers must be fixed by every automorphism, per above; an automorphism must preserve inequalities since is equivalent to and the latter property is preserved by every automorphism; finally every real number must be fixed since it is the least upper bound of a sequence of rational numbers.
- The field of the complex numbers has a unique nontrivial automorphism that fixes the real numbers. It is the complex conjugation, which maps to The axiom of choice implies the existence of uncountably many automorphisms that do not fix the real numbers.[2][3]
- The study of automorphisms of algebraic field extensions is the starting point and the main object of Galois theory.
- The automorphism group of the quaternions () as a ring are the inner automorphisms, by the Skolem–Noether theorem: maps of the form a ↦ bab−1.[4] This group is isomorphic to SO(3), the group of rotations in 3-dimensional space.
- The automorphism group of the octonions () is the exceptional Lie group G2.
- In graph theory an automorphism of a graph is a permutation of the nodes that preserves edges and non-edges. In particular, if two nodes are joined by an edge, so are their images under the permutation.
- In geometry, an automorphism may be called a motion of the space. Specialized terminology is also used:
- In metric geometry an automorphism is a self-isometry. The automorphism group is also called the isometry group.
- In the category of Riemann surfaces, an automorphism is a biholomorphic map (also called a conformal map), from a surface to itself. For example, the automorphisms of the Riemann sphere are Möbius transformations.
- An automorphism of a differentiable manifold M is a diffeomorphism from M to itself. The automorphism group is sometimes denoted Diff(M).
- In topology, morphisms between topological spaces are called continuous maps, and an automorphism of a topological space is a homeomorphism of the space to itself, or self-homeomorphism (see homeomorphism group). In this example it is not sufficient for a morphism to be bijective to be an isomorphism.
History
[edit]One of the earliest group automorphisms (automorphism of a group, not simply a group of automorphisms of points) was given by the Irish mathematician William Rowan Hamilton in 1856, in his icosian calculus, where he discovered an order two automorphism,[5] writing:
so that is a new fifth root of unity, connected with the former fifth root by relations of perfect reciprocity.
Inner and outer automorphisms
[edit]In some categories—notably groups, rings, and Lie algebras—it is possible to separate automorphisms into two types, called "inner" and "outer" automorphisms.
In the case of groups, the inner automorphisms are the conjugations by the elements of the group itself. For each element a of a group G, conjugation by a is the operation φa : G → G given by φa(g) = aga−1 (or a−1ga; usage varies). One can easily check that conjugation by a is a group automorphism. The inner automorphisms form a normal subgroup of Aut(G), denoted by Inn(G); this is called Goursat's lemma.
The other automorphisms are called outer automorphisms. The quotient group Aut(G) / Inn(G) is usually denoted by Out(G); the non-trivial elements are the cosets that contain the outer automorphisms.
The same definition holds in any unital ring or algebra where a is any invertible element. For Lie algebras the definition is slightly different.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ PJ Pahl, R Damrath (2001). "§7.5.5 Automorphisms". Mathematical foundations of computational engineering (Felix Pahl translation ed.). Springer. p. 376. ISBN 3-540-67995-2.
- ^ Yale, Paul B. (May 1966). "Automorphisms of the Complex Numbers" (PDF). Mathematics Magazine. 39 (3): 135–141. doi:10.2307/2689301. JSTOR 2689301.
- ^ Lounesto, Pertti (2001), Clifford Algebras and Spinors (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–23, ISBN 0-521-00551-5
- ^ Handbook of algebra, vol. 3, Elsevier, 2003, p. 453
- ^ Sir William Rowan Hamilton (1856). "Memorandum respecting a new System of Roots of Unity" (PDF). Philosophical Magazine. 12: 446. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
External links
[edit]Automorphism
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Basics
Formal Definition
In abstract algebra and related fields, the foundational concepts leading to automorphisms are homomorphisms and isomorphisms. A homomorphism is a map between two mathematical structures of the same type that preserves the operations and relations defined on those structures.[5] An isomorphism is a bijective homomorphism, meaning it is both injective and surjective, thereby establishing a one-to-one correspondence that maintains the structural properties.[6] An automorphism is an isomorphism from a mathematical object to itself, representing a symmetry of the object that preserves all its intrinsic operations and relations.[7] More formally, for a structure equipped with operations or relations (such as a group, ring, or graph), an automorphism is a bijective function satisfying the preservation conditions specific to the structure. For instance, in a multiplicative structure, for all ; analogous conditions hold for additive structures, where , or relational ones, where maps relations to corresponding relations.[8][9] The collection of all automorphisms of a structure , under the operation of function composition, forms a group known as the automorphism group, denoted .[10] This group structure arises because the identity map is an automorphism, composition of automorphisms yields another automorphism, and every automorphism has an inverse that is also an automorphism.Relation to Isomorphisms
An automorphism of a mathematical structure is a special case of an isomorphism where the mapping is from the structure to itself, preserving all relevant operations and relations in a bijective manner.[11] This self-mapping ensures that the structure's properties are maintained bidirectionally, distinguishing it from general isomorphisms between distinct structures.[1] In contrast to endomorphisms, which are structure-preserving mappings from a structure to itself but not necessarily bijective, automorphisms are precisely the invertible endomorphisms.[11] The invertibility requirement guarantees that the mapping can be reversed while still preserving the structure, making automorphisms the bijective subset of endomorphisms.[12] If is an automorphism of a structure, then its inverse is also an automorphism, as the inverse of an isomorphism is itself an isomorphism, and applying it to the same structure maintains bijectivity and preservation properties.[11] This closure under inversion is a fundamental aspect that allows the collection of automorphisms to form a group under composition. Automorphisms fundamentally capture the symmetries inherent in a mathematical object, representing all ways to transform the object while leaving its essential properties unchanged.[13] These symmetries provide insight into the object's intrinsic structure, often revealing equivalences that simplify analysis or classification.[14]Automorphism Groups
Structure and Properties
The automorphism group of an algebraic structure consists of all automorphisms of , with the group operation defined by composition of functions. This set forms a group because the identity mapping on serves as the identity element, as it preserves all operations and relations of . Composition is closed: if and are automorphisms, then is also an automorphism, since it bijectively maps to itself while preserving structure. Additionally, every automorphism has an inverse , which is itself an automorphism, ensuring the group axioms are satisfied.[15] embeds as a subgroup of the symmetric group on the underlying set of , where the symmetric group comprises all bijections of under composition. This embedding arises because every automorphism is a bijection, and the subgroup test confirms the inclusion: is nonempty, closed under the operation, and closed under inverses.[15] For a finite structure with , Lagrange's theorem implies that the order of divides , the order of . In the infinite case, may be infinite, exhibiting potentially more intricate topological or cardinal properties not present in finite scenarios. Key properties of include its center , the subgroup of automorphisms that commute with every element of under composition, which captures "central symmetries" of the structure. Normal subgroups of play a central role in its quotient structure; notably, the inner automorphism subgroup forms a normal subgroup. These properties distinguish as a rich algebraic object, with finite cases often yielding computable structures while infinite cases require advanced tools from set theory or topology.[16]Inner Automorphism Subgroup
In group theory, an inner automorphism of a group is an automorphism induced by conjugation by an element of . Specifically, for each , the map defined by for all is an automorphism of . This follows from the properties of conjugation preserving the group operation: .[17] The collection of all inner automorphisms forms a subgroup of the automorphism group , denoted . The map given by is a group homomorphism, as composition satisfies for all . The kernel of is precisely the center , since if and only if commutes with every element of . By the first isomorphism theorem, this yields .[18] The inner automorphism subgroup is normal in . To see this, consider any and ; then , which is again an inner automorphism, confirming that is invariant under conjugation by elements of . This normality highlights the central role of inner automorphisms within the full automorphism group.[18]Examples in Structures
In Groups
In group theory, automorphisms preserve the group operation and structure, and concrete examples illustrate their role in various group classes. For cyclic groups, consider the finite cyclic group of order , generated by 1 under addition modulo . Any automorphism is determined by , where is coprime to to ensure is bijective, as the order of must be . Thus, the automorphism group is isomorphic to , the multiplicative group of units modulo , which consists of integers from 1 to coprime to .[19][20] For a prime, has order and is cyclic, generated by a primitive root modulo .[21][22] Symmetric groups provide another key example. The symmetric group on letters, consisting of all permutations of , has automorphism group isomorphic to itself for , meaning all automorphisms are inner, arising from conjugation by elements of .[23][24] In this case, inner automorphisms via conjugation permute the transpositions while preserving the group's structure. However, for , is larger than , admitting outer automorphisms that do not arise from conjugation.[23] For abelian groups, particularly free abelian groups, automorphisms correspond to linear transformations. The free abelian group of rank , additively generated by the standard basis , has isomorphic to the general linear group , the group of invertible matrices over with determinant .[25] Each such matrix defines an automorphism by sending the basis to new generators that form a -basis for . A specific finite abelian example is the Klein four-group under addition modulo 2, where the three non-identity elements have order 2. Here, , as automorphisms permute these three elements arbitrarily while fixing the identity, reflecting the symmetric action on indistinguishable order-2 elements.[26]In Rings and Fields
An automorphism of a ring is a bijective ring homomorphism that preserves both addition and multiplication, as well as the multiplicative identity .[27] These maps are more constrained than group automorphisms because they must respect two operations simultaneously. For example, in the ring of integers , any automorphism must send the generator 1 to itself, and thus fix all multiples of 1, making trivial and consisting solely of the identity.[28] In field theory, automorphisms similarly preserve addition and multiplication but are defined relative to a base field. For a field extension , a field automorphism of fixing pointwise must fix the prime subfield of elementwise, as it is generated by the multiplicative identity.[29] When is a Galois extension, the Galois group coincides exactly with the automorphism group .[30] Specific examples illustrate the restrictiveness of field automorphisms. The automorphism group of the rational numbers is trivial, as any automorphism fixes (generated by 1) and thus all quotients.[31] Similarly, is trivial; any automorphism preserves squares (hence positivity) and the order structure, fixing densely and extending uniquely to all reals.[31] In contrast, the only continuous field automorphism of (over ) is complex conjugation (besides the identity), though the full automorphism group is vastly larger, of cardinality . Complex conjugation is given by for .[32] For polynomial rings over a field , the automorphism group consists of the affine transformations with and , forming the affine group .[33] This structure arises because any automorphism is uniquely determined by the image of , which must be a linear polynomial to preserve the ring's grading and irreducibility properties.[34]Advanced Concepts
Outer Automorphisms
The outer automorphism group of a mathematical structure , denoted , is defined as the quotient group , where is the full automorphism group of and is its normal subgroup consisting of inner automorphisms. The elements of are the cosets of in , each corresponding to an equivalence class of automorphisms that agree up to composition with an inner automorphism. This construction captures the automorphisms of modulo those induced by conjugation by elements of itself. The group quantifies the "non-conjugacy" symmetries of , representing those automorphisms that cannot be obtained via internal conjugation and thus reflect external or exceptional symmetries of the structure. It may be trivial—for instance, when every automorphism is inner—or non-trivial, and its structure can range from abelian to non-abelian, depending on . For many groups, is finite and solvable, highlighting the limited extent of such external symmetries in algebraic structures. A prominent example occurs with the symmetric group , where . This isomorphism arises because admits exactly one outer automorphism up to composition with inner automorphisms, yielding , in contrast to other symmetric groups (for ) which have trivial outer automorphism groups. The exceptional nature of stems from its duality with the symplectic group , enabling this unique non-inner symmetry. For finite groups , the outer automorphism group relates to the Schur multiplier in the study of covering groups, particularly for perfect groups where the automorphism group of the Schur cover involves extensions incorporating both and actions on . Computations for finite simple groups of Lie type illustrate this interplay, as the structures of and together determine the full automorphism tower and covering extensions.[35]Applications in Geometry and Graphs
In geometry, automorphisms preserve the underlying structure of spaces, with isometries of Euclidean space forming a key example; these include rotations, reflections, translations, and glide reflections that maintain distances and orientations.[36] The automorphism group of the Euclidean plane, viewed as an affine space, is the affine group, comprising all invertible affine transformations that map the space to itself bijectively while preserving collinearity and ratios of distances along lines.[37] Crystallographic groups extend these ideas to discrete symmetries in materials science and physics, acting as subgroups of the isometry group of Euclidean space that preserve a lattice structure, such as atomic arrangements in crystals.[38] In three dimensions, there are 230 such space groups, obtained by combining the 14 Bravais lattices with the 32 crystallographic point groups, which classify the possible symmetry operations compatible with translational periodicity and underpin phenomena like diffraction patterns in X-ray crystallography.[39] In graph theory, automorphisms are bijections on the vertex set that preserve adjacency, effectively capturing the symmetries of the graph's edge structure. For the complete graph on vertices, where every pair of vertices is adjacent, the automorphism group is isomorphic to the symmetric group , as any permutation of vertices maintains the full connectivity.[40] A notable example is the Petersen graph, a 3-regular graph with 10 vertices and 15 edges, whose automorphism group has order 120 and is isomorphic to , reflecting its high degree of symmetry despite being non-Hamiltonian. Outer automorphisms of graph automorphism groups can model exceptional symmetries in combinatorial structures, such as those arising from exotic embeddings that extend standard permutation actions beyond inner conjugations.[41]Historical Development
Origins in Geometry
The concept of automorphisms originated in the study of geometric symmetries, where self-mappings of figures preserve distances, angles, and incidence relations. In ancient Greek mathematics, particularly in Euclid's Elements (circa 300 BCE), congruences were established through the method of superposition, which implicitly treats rotations and reflections as rigid transformations mapping one figure onto another while maintaining their properties. For instance, Proposition I.4 demonstrates that if two triangles have two sides and the included angle equal, then the triangles are congruent by superposing one upon the other, aligning corresponding parts so that vertices coincide, thereby proving equality of the bases and remaining angles.[42] This approach, rooted in practical constructions, prefigures automorphisms as structure-preserving maps, with rotations around a point and reflections over a line serving as basic examples of such symmetries in plane geometry.[43] During the 18th and early 19th centuries, geometric investigations increasingly emphasized transformations that preserve specific properties, laying groundwork for group-theoretic interpretations without yet formalizing abstract groups. Mathematicians like Gaspard Monge and Jean-Victor Poncelet advanced projective geometry, focusing on collineations—transformations preserving incidence between points and lines—as invariant under perspective projections.[44] August Ferdinand Möbius, in 1827, classified geometric configurations by properties invariant under certain transformation classes, such as similarities and affinities, effectively describing early notions of symmetry groups acting on space.[44] Jakob Steiner's synthetic geometry in 1832 further highlighted these transformations in studying conic sections and polygons, treating them as operations that reorder elements while conserving relational structures.[44] A pivotal advancement came with Felix Klein's 1872 Erlangen program, which systematically classified geometries according to their associated groups of automorphisms—transformations preserving the fundamental incidence relations of the space. In his inaugural address at the University of Erlangen, Klein proposed viewing a geometry as the study of invariants under a "principal group" of collineations for projective geometry, or metric-preserving motions for Euclidean geometry, thereby unifying diverse branches like affine and hyperbolic geometries under group actions.[45] For example, Euclidean geometry is characterized by the group of rigid motions (rotations, translations, reflections) that leave distances invariant, while projective geometry relies on broader collineations preserving only point-line incidences.[45] Klein's framework emphasized automorphisms as the "Hauptgruppe" defining geometric properties through their invariance, marking a transition from ad hoc transformations to organized symmetry studies.[45] These geometric developments predate the abstract theory of groups, with early actions manifesting as collections of transformations composing under composition and inversion, applied to figures like polygons and curves to reveal symmetries. By the mid-19th century, such actions on geometric objects, as in the classification of regular polyhedra via rotational symmetries, anticipated modern algebraic generalizations of automorphisms.[44]Developments in Abstract Algebra
In the early 20th century, the study of automorphisms gained prominence in group theory through the foundational work of William Burnside. His 1897 book Theory of Groups of Finite Order, revised in 1911, systematically explored the structure of finite groups, including the role of automorphisms in determining isomorphisms and the holomorph of a group as the semidirect product of the group with its automorphism group. This framework highlighted automorphisms as essential for classifying groups and understanding their symmetries, influencing subsequent developments in abstract algebra.[46] A key advancement came from Issai Schur in 1911, who identified the first known non-trivial outer automorphism in the symmetric group , demonstrating that the automorphism group of is larger than its inner automorphism group by a factor of 2. Schur's discovery, detailed in his analysis of group representations, revealed an exceptional case where conjugacy classes are not preserved under all automorphisms, challenging the expectation that symmetric groups beyond are complete.[47] This work extended the understanding of outer automorphisms beyond inner ones, paving the way for deeper investigations into group structures in the 1920s. The integration of automorphisms into Galois theory, originating with Évariste Galois's ideas in the 1830s, was formalized in the 20th century, emphasizing the Galois group as the automorphism group of the splitting field. Emil Artin's 1944 lectures, published as Galois Theory, presented the subject through field automorphisms and their fixed fields, establishing the fundamental theorem as a bijection between subfields and subgroups without relying on polynomial solvability first.[48] This approach solidified automorphisms as central to solvability criteria, bridging field theory with group automorphisms and influencing ring and field extensions.[49] Post-World War II, automorphisms played a crucial role in representation theory, particularly in modular representations and character theory. Richard Brauer's extensions of Frobenius's work in the 1940s and 1950s on modular representation theory, including the development of block theory and decomposition numbers, aided the classification of finite simple groups, where group automorphisms are essential. By the 1960s, the exceptional outer automorphism of , discovered by Schur, continued to be analyzed in the context of representation theory, confirming its impact on irreducible characters and contributing to the ongoing classification efforts. From the 1960s onward, category-theoretic perspectives extended the algebraic view of automorphisms, treating them as endomorphisms in categories of algebraic structures. Alexander Grothendieck's applications in algebraic geometry, such as topos theory and schemes, framed automorphism groups abstractly, limited to algebraic contexts like sheaves and motives.[50] This shift emphasized universal properties over explicit computations, influencing modern abstract algebra while remaining grounded in group, ring, and field theories.[51]References
- https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Automorphism_Group_is_Subgroup_of_Symmetric_Group
- https://groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Inner_automorphism