Hubbry Logo
FlatboatFlatboatMain
Open search
Flatboat
Community hub
Flatboat
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Flatboat
Flatboat
Flatboat
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A flatboat passing a long cigar-shaped keelboat on the Ohio River.

A flatboat (or broadhorn) was a rectangular flat-bottomed boat with[1] square ends used to transport freight and passengers on inland waterways in the United States. The flatboat could be any size, but essentially it was a large, sturdy tub with a hull.

A flatboat was almost always a one-way (downstream) vessel, and was usually dismantled for lumber when it reached its destination.[2]

Flatboat on an American river in the 1800s carrying barrels of whiskey and food
George Caleb Bingham, Jolly Flatboatmen in Port, (1857, St. Louis Art Museum)

Early history

[edit]
An Alfred Waud engraving showing persons traveling down a river by flatboat in the late 1800s.
Flatboats among the river traffic at New Orleans, 1873

The flatboat trade first began in 1781, with Pennsylvania farmer Jacob Yoder building the first flatboat at Old Redstone Fort on the Monongahela River. Yoder's ancestors immigrated from Switzerland, where small barges called weidlings are still common today, having been used for hundreds of years to transport goods downriver. Yoder shipped flour down the Ohio River and Mississippi River to the port of New Orleans. Other flatboats would follow this model, using the current of the river to propel them to New Orleans where their final product could be shipped overseas. Through the antebellum era, flatboats were one of the most important modes of shipping in the United States.[3]

The flatboat trade before the War of 1812 was less organized and less professional than during later times. Flatboats were generally built and piloted by the farmers whose crops they carried. They were limited to 20 feet (or approximately 6 meters) in width in order to successfully navigate the river, but could range from 20 to 100 feet (or approximately 6 to 30 meters) in length. Flatboats could be built by unskilled farmers with limited tools and training, which made them an ideal mode of transport for isolated farmers living in the Old Northwest and the Upper South. Farmers could make the journey down the river after the harvest. The boats themselves were usually salvaged for lumber at New Orleans, because they could not easily make the journey upriver. A boatman's return journey up the river was long and usually arduous. Passage on a (human-powered) keelboat was expensive and took weeks to make the journey up the Mississippi. Returning to the northern reaches on foot required about three months.[4]

A flatboat itself was a serious investment for a Midwestern farmer. One generally cost about $75 to construct in 1800 (which was equivalent to $1,389.56 in 2024), but could carry up to $3,000 worth of goods.[5] These flatboats could typically be salvaged for around $16 in New Orleans, recouping some of the initial investment.[6] Flatboats carried a variety of goods to New Orleans, including agricultural products like corn, wheat, potatoes, flour, hay, tobacco, cotton, and whiskey. Livestock such as chickens, cows, and pigs also made their way down the Mississippi in flatboats. Indiana native May Espey Warren recalled that as a young girl she saw a flatboat loaded with thousands of chickens headed down the Mississippi. Other raw materials from the Old Northwest, like lumber and iron, were also sent down the Mississippi to be sold in New Orleans.[7]

Many American cities along the river network of the Mississippi boomed due to the opportunities that the flatboat trade presented. New Orleans was the final destination for most flatboats headed down the Mississippi, and it was from there that most of the goods were shipped on the oceans. Cincinnati, another major American trading city, first built itself on the flatboat trade. Its large sawmills produced most of the heavy lumber sent downriver on flatboats, and it also became a large hub for the pork trade. Other cities, like Memphis, Tennessee and Brownsville, Pennsylvania became hubs for outfitting and supplying flatboat traders.[7]

The flatboat trade also led to a series of cultural and regional exchanges between the North and the South. Many Northern flatboatmen had not seen the Deep South before, and rural farmers of the time generally did not travel. Flatboatmen brought tales of antebellum mansions lining the Mississippi and of the Cajun culture of lower Louisiana. They also brought back exotic foods such as bananas, and animals such as parrots.[4] Abraham Lincoln served as a flatboatman twice, in 1828 and 1831. It was on these journeys that he first witnessed slavery, and in New Orleans he also saw a slave auction firsthand. Lincoln would later recall these journeys as essential in shaping his personal views on slavery and the slave trade.[8]

Advent of steamboats

[edit]

The invention of the steamboat greatly reduced the costs of flatboat journeys, and caused the trade to boom through the antebellum period. Introduced to the Mississippi in the 1810s, the steamboat greatly reduced the time of the return journey for flatboat crews. After reaching New Orleans, many flatboat crews scuttled their craft and bought passage on steamboats upriver. What had once been a three-month hike for many flatboaters now took only days. These reduced labor costs saw flatboat operating costs plummet and profits boom. In some cases steamboats would also drag cargo-carrying flatboats upriver, allowing flatboat operators to profit on the return journey as well. These uses of steamboats caused the flatboat industry to grow from 598 arrivals in New Orleans in 1814 to 2,792 arrivals in 1847.[9]

The steamboat also changed the nature of flatboat crews, making them more professional and more skilled. Returning upriver on steamboats allowed flatboat crews to make multiple journeys per year, which meant that a crew could earn a living wage simply by flatboating. These crews were known as "agent boatmen," as opposed to the earlier "dealer boatmen" or "peddler boatmen" for whom flatboating was only a seasonal job. This change ended up benefiting the flatboat industry significantly, because it seriously reduced wreckage and loss of cargo. River improvements also helped, and experienced flatboat crews were able to reduce cargo losses from $1,362,500 in 1822 to $381,000 in 1832.[9]

Decline

[edit]
Modern replica of an old-time flatboat, located at Mud Island, Tennessee

The flatboat trade stayed vigorous and lucrative throughout the antebellum period, aided by steamboats (and later by railroads) in returning crews upriver. However, these same technologies, which earlier had made the flatboat trade significantly more efficient, would eventually overtake the flatboat trade along the Mississippi and render flatboats obsolete. Steamboats and railroads simply carried freight much more quickly than flatboats, and could bring cargo upriver as well as downriver. By 1857, only 541 flatboats reached New Orleans, down from 2,792 in 1847, and also fewer than the 598 flatboats that had traveled down the Mississippi in 1814.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Flatboat

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A flatboat was a rectangular vessel characterized by a flat bottom and square ends, employed for transporting freight and passengers along inland waterways, particularly shallow rivers. These boats, also termed broadhorns, typically ranged from 20 to 100 feet in length and drew only 2 to 3 feet of water, enabling navigation of obstructed channels like those on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. Constructed affordably from local timber, flatboats were propelled downstream by poling, oars, or the current, after which crews often disassembled them for lumber upon reaching destinations such as New Orleans. Pivotal to the economy from the late , flatboats facilitated the downstream shipment of bulky including agricultural produce, , and , supporting westward migration and networks until steamboats supplanted them around 1820. Their simplicity and low cost made them indispensable for settlers lacking access to advanced , embodying efficient adaptation to riverine geography's causal demands for one-way bulk transport.

Design and Construction

Physical Characteristics and Capacity

Flatboats were characterized by a rectangular hull featuring a flat bottom, square ends at both bow and , and the absence of a , which enabled operation in shallow river drafts typically measuring 2 to 3 feet when loaded. This simple, box-like structure prioritized load distribution and stability over speed or upstream capability, suiting the variable depths and currents of western American rivers such as the and . Standard dimensions for these vessels ranged from approximately 55 to 65 feet in length and 10 to 20 feet in beam, allowing adaptation to local timber resources and needs while maintaining structural integrity under heavy loads. capacities commonly reached 30 to 40 tons, with larger examples accommodating up to 50 tons of freight such as , , or bulk goods. A notable variant, the broadhorn, retained the core flatboat form but included large projecting side sweeps—long oars resembling horns—positioned to extend beyond the hull for enhanced steering leverage and maneuverability, particularly beneficial for voyages involving or navigating obstructed channels. These features underscored the flatboat's focus on cost-effective, one-way downstream efficiency rather than versatility.

Materials and Building Process

Flatboats were primarily constructed from locally sourced green planks, chosen for their availability in regions and resistance to water despite the use of unseasoned timber. Wooden pins secured the planks without reliance on or iron, minimizing costs and enabling rapid assembly with basic resources. The building process utilized chine-girder techniques, starting with split log halves forming the gunwales to support floor planks, augmented by wooden uprights inserted as simple framing and crossbeams for structural integrity. This straightforward method, akin to framing, allowed small crews of farmers or laborers to complete assembly at riverbanks using axes for trees and adzes for shaping planks, often drawing timber directly from nearby farms or forests. Construction typically required only weeks of labor by a handful of builders, with total costs around $75 for a standard vessel in 1800, reflecting the emphasis on disposable over durability. Seams were caulked with pitch or to address leakage from , and hand pumps were incorporated for ongoing management during use. Embodying a one-way operational philosophy, flatboats were engineered for downstream voyages only, after which crews dismantled them at ports like New Orleans to repurpose the lumber for urban construction, thereby materials and offsetting initial outlays.

Operation and Navigation

Crew Roles and Voyage Mechanics

Flatboats were manned by small s of typically 4 to 6 men, comprising a or steersman, polers, and occasionally a lookout or cook, drawn from farmers or professional rivermen who managed and during downstream voyages. The steersman operated a broad or large rear sweep , up to 55 feet long, to direct the vessel amid the river's current and avoid obstacles. Polers wielded 12- to 20-foot poles to thrust the clear of shallows, sandbars, and snags, working in shifts to maintain momentum and safety. Lookouts positioned forward scanned for hazards, signaling adjustments to the crew for proactive maneuvering. Propulsion depended chiefly on the natural downstream flow of rivers like the and , augmented by manual efforts including poling for directional control, side-mounted sweeps or oars for supplemental thrust, and rudimentary sails deployed in favorable winds. These methods enabled average speeds of 3 to 5 , with daily progress ranging from 24 to 60 miles depending on travel hours and conditions, facilitating journeys such as those from ports to New Orleans in approximately 2 to 4 weeks for segments covering 800 to 1,000 miles. Logistics involved securing with lashings to withstand river motion, often grouping loads centrally for stability while reserving amidships for any passengers under basic covers or small deck shelters providing minimal protection from elements. Crews timed departures for fall or early winter to exploit higher levels, avoiding summer lows that impeded , and maintained operations through a rotation of duties emphasizing individual alertness and physical endurance.

Risks and Challenges Encountered

Flatboat operators encountered substantial natural hazards stemming from the unpredictable dynamics of western rivers like the and . Snags—fallen trees partially submerged and often lodged in the riverbed—were a primary peril, as their sharp branches could readily puncture the thin, flat hulls, leading to rapid sinking and total cargo loss; such obstructions caused $1,362,500 in damages to boats and cargoes between 1822 and 1827 alone. Sandbars, formed by shifting sediments in low-water conditions, frequently grounded vessels, necessitating strenuous manual efforts with setting poles to push free, which exposed crews to exhaustion and falls. Seasonal floods, while aiding downstream momentum, heightened collision risks with debris and altered channels, whereas winter ice floes could jam and crush boats or halt progress entirely. Human-induced threats compounded these environmental dangers, particularly in the frontier era. Early flatboat traffic, from the onward, faced sporadic attacks by Native American groups using canoes to board and plunder vessels, prompting defensive adaptations like barred entry points on boats. River banditry plagued voyages, with organized gangs preying on isolated craft along wooded banks; notorious figures such as the and led raids on and traffic in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, targeting cargoes and crews for and murder. Poor sanitation on cramped, open-deck boats facilitated disease transmission among crews and passengers, creating conditions ripe for outbreaks of gastrointestinal and respiratory pathogens during prolonged exposures to contaminated water and close quarters. Absence of mechanical aids left mitigation dependent on crew expertise and rudimentary techniques, such as poling around obstacles or timing departures for high water. However, accumulating experience among flatboatmen, combined with federal snag removal initiatives starting in the , substantially curbed losses; aggregate cargo damages fell from over $1.3 million in the mid- to $381,000 by 1832. Despite these advances, voyages remained high-risk endeavors for young, often inexperienced frontiersmen, who endured elevated chances of from heavy labor or death from accidents and exposure without institutional measures.

Historical Development

Origins in the American Frontier

Flatboats originated in the late amid the post-Revolutionary push for westward settlement, serving as a simple, inexpensive means for farmers to transport goods downstream on western rivers. The first recorded commercial flatboat was constructed in 1782 by Pennsylvania farmer Jacob Yoder near Brownsville on the , costing approximately $75 to build from local timber. Yoder used it to carry pelts and other produce down the and Rivers to New Orleans over three months, selling the cargo in for a $2,000 profit after dismantling the vessel. This design offered a practical alternative to more expensive keelboats, relying on the flat-bottomed structure's shallow draft suited for one-way downstream hauls by unskilled builders. Adoption accelerated in the 1780s and 1790s among settlers in the upper Valley, including and frontiers, where abundant timber and river access met the causal need to circumvent the ' overland barriers. Farmers constructed these vessels locally to ship surpluses like corn, , and , enabling economic viability for isolated homesteads remote from eastern markets. The post-1783 influx of migrants leveraged the system as a natural highway, with flatboats—typically 40 feet long and 10-20 feet wide—allowing groups to pool resources for voyages that took 8-12 weeks. This innovation directly supported settlement by providing low-cost mobility and trade links, as overland trails proved arduous and uneconomical for bulky . Early voyages targeted southern markets such as Natchez and New Orleans, where boats were sold for lumber upon arrival, underscoring the disposable nature tied to downstream currents. By the 1810s, flatboats facilitated family migrations, as exemplified by Thomas Lincoln's 1816 relocation from to , crossing the with his wife Nancy, daughter Sarah, and seven-year-old son Abraham to access free soil and better opportunities. Such trips highlighted the vessels' role in personal and communal expansion, with crews navigating snags and floods while drifting toward outposts.

Peak Usage and Regional Expansion

During the early 19th century, flatboat traffic experienced a marked expansion, driven by increasing agricultural output in the Ohio Valley settlements, with annual descents averaging around 3,000 boats on the between 1820 and 1830. This surge reflected the growing surplus of commodities such as , tobacco, and from frontier farms, which flatboats efficiently transported downstream to southern markets, particularly New Orleans. In 1816 alone, records show 1,287 flatboats reaching New Orleans, underscoring the scale of this one-way commerce before competition intensified. Major construction hubs developed in cities like Louisville and Cincinnati, where local timber and labor supported the rapid assembly of fleets for voyages originating from upper Ohio River tributaries such as the Monongahela, Allegheny, and Muskingum rivers. These centers enabled the scaling of operations, with boats built seasonally to capitalize on high water levels in spring and early summer. Flatboat designs adapted to regional hydrology: smaller vessels, typically 20-40 feet long, navigated shallower tributaries, while larger broadhorns exceeding 100 feet in length and carrying up to 100 tons handled the deeper main stems of the and . The trade integrated with overland networks for upstream logistics, as flatboat crews and materials often arrived via wagons from eastern and , compensating for the vessels' downstream-only design. This expansion extended flatboat use across a broader geographic footprint, from Pittsburgh's vicinity to the lower , supporting the of the American interior with Atlantic trade routes via New Orleans exports. By the late , the volume of traffic had transformed riverine commerce into a vital for prosperity, with fleets numbering in the thousands annually.

Economic and Commercial Role

Transport of Goods and Markets

Flatboats served as primary carriers for bulk agricultural and frontier products destined for southern markets, emphasizing volume over speed in their low-cost, downstream-only operations. Cargoes typically consisted of corn, flour, tobacco, whiskey, potatoes, hay, and livestock including hogs and cattle, with boats often stacked high to exploit their broad, shallow design for maximum payload efficiency. These goods, sourced from inland farms along the and upper valleys, were loaded at local landings and floated southward, minimizing overhead through simple construction from local timber and reliance on river currents for . Trade routes centered on long downstream hauls of 1,000 to 2,000 miles from origins like , , or Louisville via the Ohio and rivers to New Orleans, the principal terminus where flatboats converged for wholesale disposal of loads. At the port, produce was auctioned or sold directly to exporters and factors, linking isolated western producers to Gulf shipping lanes and broader Atlantic commerce, often in exchange dynamics tied to and outflows from the lower region. Crews typically dismantled and sold the boat itself for lumber post-unloading, further reducing return logistics costs. By the , flatboat traffic had scaled significantly, with an annual average of 3,000 boats navigating the alone, each capable of hauling 50 to 100 tons of cargo, reflecting the method's dominance in volume-driven frontier trade. In , New Orleans records noted 598 flatboat arrivals alongside other craft, indicating robust market integration even as competition loomed. This system enabled efficient, one-way flows that underpinned early 19th-century regional economics, with profits derived from high-volume sales offsetting the labor-intensive voyages.

Support for Western Settlement and Trade

Flatboats facilitated the rapid trans-Appalachian migration of by providing an affordable means to transport families, , and down rivers such as the , enabling establishment of communities in emerging states like and . Pioneers constructed these vessels on-site from local timber, floated downstream with the current, and often dismantled them upon reaching destinations or markets, minimizing upstream return costs. This method supported land acquisition booms, as arrivals in fertile river valleys spurred agricultural development and population growth in the Ohio Valley during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The economic mechanism operated through private initiative, with flatboat operators bearing the risks of navigation hazards like snags and currents without governmental subsidies, driving in . Surpluses from initial harvests were transported to distant markets, generating cash inflows that funded reinvestments in farm improvements, tools, and expanded cultivation, creating a virtuous cycle of gains. Flatboat crews served as a seasonal mobile labor force, often comprising local farmers or hired hands who disseminated skills and market intelligence across settlements, enhancing regional . Flatboats' low freight rates—approximately 1 cent per ton-mile downstream—contrasted sharply with overland costs of 15 to 30 cents per ton-mile, underpinning the 19th-century westward shift by making bulk transport viable for modest producers. This efficiency contributed to the of , converting subsistence operations into surplus-oriented enterprises that bolstered U.S. through exported goods, though precise GDP attribution remains indirect amid broader transportation advancements.

Technological Transition and Decline

Competition from Steamboats

The advent of steamboats on the , commencing with the New Orleans—the first such vessel to navigate western waters, departing in October 1811 and arriving in New Orleans on January 10, 1812—introduced bidirectional travel capability that flatboats lacked, as the latter depended exclusively on downstream currents and manual poling for . This upstream proficiency, even at modest early speeds averaging 2-3 miles per hour against the current in the , enabled steamboats to facilitate return cargoes and repeated voyages, contrasting sharply with flatboats' one-way disposability. Steamboat competition drove freight rates down dramatically, from approximately $5 per ton in 1810 via flatboat to $2 per ton by 1830 via , a decline of about 60 percent that intensified to 75 percent or more in subsequent decades as steam efficiency improved. Initially, from the to early , hybrid operations emerged wherein transported flatboat crews upstream for return, slashing overland trek times from months to days and temporarily boosting flatboat viability by reducing labor costs. However, post-1820 advancements in reliability and hull eroded this synergy, as steamboats assumed direct cargo roles with superior scalability for bulk goods like and timber. The causal mechanism of steamboat ascendancy lay in their mechanized , which minimized reliance on human poling crews—typically 4-8 men per flatboat exerting constant labor—while leveraging wood or for consistent power, yielding lower per-ton operational costs amid rising volumes. By 1840, tonnage and arrivals on the had overtaken flatboat equivalents in commercial throughput, with vessels handling diversified freights and passengers at scales that flatboats could not sustain, marking the onset of flatboat marginalization.

Factors in Obsolescence and Persistence

Flatboats maintained viability into the 1850s and 1860s primarily in shallow tributaries and low-water sections of major rivers, where steamboats' deeper drafts—often exceeding 3-4 feet when loaded—rendered them inoperable due to grounding risks on snags and sandbars. Their shallow draft, typically under 2 feet, allowed access to upstream regions inaccessible to powered vessels, sustaining use for downstream bulk cargo like timber and produce from frontier settlements. Construction costs remained a key economic advantage, with materials for a standard 40-foot flatboat averaging about $75 in the early 19th century, far below the thousands required for even modest steamboats, enabling small-scale operators to deploy them without capital-intensive investments. This low barrier supported persistence for one-way hauls, as boats were often dismantled and sold as lumber upon reaching markets like New Orleans. Decline intensified from the onward due to competing infrastructures, including over 3,000 miles of canals completed by that facilitated overland transport, and railroads that expanded rapidly post-1830, offering year-round speed and bypassing seasonal river fluctuations. These alternatives eroded flatboats' role in and movement, as railroads captured with lower per-ton-mile costs and immunity to low or . Concurrently, steamboat safety enhancements, such as improved designs and pressure regulations implemented in the 1830s-1850s, curtailed incidents—which had previously claimed hundreds of lives annually—and bolstered reliability for high-volume trade. By the Civil War's start in 1861, flatboat traffic had contracted sharply amid these shifts, comprising a marginal fraction of river commerce dominated by steamboats and rail, driven fundamentally by the causal efficiencies of powered propulsion and integrated networks over manual, downstream-only poling.

Legacy and Modern Perspectives

Influence on American Expansion

Flatboats provided a low-cost means of downstream that facilitated the rapid settlement and economic incorporation of the Midwest into national markets during the early 19th century, predating significant federal river improvements or upstream technologies. By enabling farmers in regions like and to ship produce such as corn, flour, and livestock to New Orleans without reliance on expensive overland routes, flatboats lowered barriers to market access and encouraged agricultural expansion westward. Between 1820 and 1830, an average of 3,000 flatboats annually descended the alone, underscoring the scale of this trade that integrated interior production into the export economy via the . This decentralized system spurred the 1800s to 1840s push associated with , as settlers could recoup investments in frontier land through viable commerce, fostering in the Ohio Valley from under 1 million in 1800 to over 4.5 million by 1840 without initial need for centralized infrastructure projects. The flatboat trade cultivated a cultural archetype of the self-reliant pioneer, exemplified by figures like , who navigated flatboats down the in 1828, embodying the required to build, pilot, and trade amid river hazards. Lincoln's experiences as a flatboatman informed his later emphasis on personal initiative and technological adaptation, as seen in his 1849 for a device to buoy vessels over shoals, reflecting broader lessons from flatboat navigation in promoting inventive problem-solving among frontiersmen. This archetype contributed to a decentralized where individual risk-taking drove , contrasting with later centralized systems and enabling early industrialization by supplying raw materials to southern ports for . Despite inherent risks such as snags causing annual losses exceeding $1 million in boats and cargoes from to , the aggregate benefits in volume and settlement outweighed individual perils, as evidenced by rising flatboat arrivals in New Orleans from 1,287 in to nearly 2,800 by the early , which sustained growth in Midwestern output. These outcomes affirm flatboats' causal role in U.S. territorial and economic consolidation, prioritizing empirical facilitation over narratives of uniform safety or equity in expansion.

Recreations and Historical Assessments

In the , replicas of flatboats have been constructed to recreate historical navigation methods, support educational programs, and facilitate along American rivers. Builders such as Cooper Flatboats produce authentic reproductions modeled on designs from the early , spanning variations over approximately 25 years of period use. These modern vessels enable empirical testing of original flatboat performance, including load capacity, maneuverability in currents, and structural durability under contemporary conditions, confirming the practicality of unpowered downstream transport for bulk goods. Such recreations have been employed in historical demonstrations and short voyages to illustrate techniques like poling and oaring, adapted from archival accounts. While full transcontinental journeys remain rare, these efforts validate the boats' viability for one-way expeditions, with s employing period-appropriate adaptations to hazards such as snags and low water, mirroring documented 19th-century practices but with safety modifications. Economic histories assess flatboats as highly efficient for pre-steam riverine , particularly in conveying low-value staples like and downstream where upstream return viability was limited. Analysis of their persistence into the era attributes this to comparative cost advantages: flatboats achieved transport rates as low as 10-20% of equivalents for certain cargoes, due to minimal capital investment and reliance on local timber . This counters claims of inherent inefficiency by demonstrating market-driven specialization, where flatboats filled niches unprofitable for steam vessels until regulatory and infrastructural changes post-1850 favored mechanized alternatives. Scholarly views emphasize flatboat crews' adaptive strategies, such as selective routing during high-water seasons to minimize losses, supported by quantitative reconstructions of volumes showing annual downstream exceeding 100,000 tons in peak decades. No significant controversies surround these assessments, as empirical data from freight records affirm their role in enabling without overstating technological limitations relative to era constraints. Recent analyses reinforce this by modeling opportunity costs, debunking narratives of through alone and highlighting regulatory barriers to rather than flaws.

References

  1. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1802/ML18023A186.pdf
  2. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D103-PURL-gpo107276/pdf/GOVPUB-D103-PURL-gpo107276.pdf
  3. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/flatboats-transportation-during-the-cherokee-removal-1837-1839.htm
  4. https://maritimemuseumlouisiana.org/maritimeblog/mississippi-river-flatboats-the-semis-of-yesteryear
  5. https://www.nps.gov/natr/learn/historyculture/kaintuck.htm
  6. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/67823/dot_67823_DS1.pdf
  7. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/steamboats-and-mississippi-river
  8. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/imh/article/download/7619/8952
  9. https://bhs802.org/how-did-flatboats-work/
  10. https://adamsfamilydna.com/2012/12/14/flatboats-and-ohio-rivier-migration/
  11. https://www.encyclopediadubuque.org/index.php/FLATBOATS
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/persistence-of-old-technologies-the-case-of-flatboats/F86A6A2C8CB6C16F6A5BB519C7A34C43
  13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/imh/article/download/7619/8952/
  14. https://lithub.com/how-americas-river-wanderers-built-a-life-on-the-water/
  15. https://www.facebook.com/groups/888581527839885/posts/9414525901912029/
  16. https://digital.lib.niu.edu/islandora/object/niu-twain:10921
  17. https://www.hrmm.org/history-blog/evolution-of-craft-from-the-raft-to-the-steamboat-on-the-mississippi-river
  18. https://indianahistory.org/stories/ohio-river-trade/
  19. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/plugins/books/135/format/1196/download/
  20. http://sites.rootsweb.com/~msalhn/Outlaws/harpes.html
  21. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/1/ac-2201_article
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2116689
  23. https://arch.astate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=all-etd
  24. https://www.mariettatimes.com/opinion/local-columns/2024/04/flatboats-helped-move-america-west/
  25. https://npshistory.com/publications/libo/hrs/chap6.htm
  26. https://www.southernpartisan.com/voyaging-the-mississippi-how-flatboats-shaped-american-history/
  27. https://www.nps.gov/articles/abraham-lincoln-boyhood-in-indiana-1816-to-1830.htm
  28. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1956/june/merchant-fleet-ohio
  29. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/flatboats-and-keelboats
  30. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/29155531.pdf
  31. https://64parishes.org/lincoln-louisiana
  32. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/36866/noaa_36866_DS1.pdf
  33. https://kygs.org/flatboat-kentucky-pioneer-families/
  34. https://warren.ohgenweb.org/Bogan/bogan054.html
  35. http://www.nextexithistory.us/explore/historical-sites/flatboats/
  36. https://heritagevillagecincinnati.org/flatboat/
  37. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=2&psid=3509
  38. https://jmparman.people.wm.edu/341-materials/transportation-revolution-all.pdf
  39. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/history/us-history-i/economic-growth-and-development-18151860/improvements-in-transportation
  40. https://www.heinzhistorycenter.org/blog/western-pennsylvania-history-the-incredible-journey-of-the-steamboat-new-orleans/
  41. https://history.hanover.edu/texts/1811/Web/1811-Winter.html
  42. https://www.exploros.com/summary/Steamboats-of-the-1800s
  43. https://outrunchange.com/2015/02/24/transportation-costs-dropped-95-in-the-1800s/
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2116652
  45. https://www.museum.state.il.us/RiverWeb/landings/Ambot/TECH/TECH2.htm
  46. https://wthhistory.wordpress.com/2016/02/12/rolling-down-the-river/
  47. https://www.ushistory.org/us/25a.asp
  48. https://www.nps.gov/miss/learn/historyculture/river-of-history-chapter-4.htm
  49. https://www.tba.org/?pg=Articles&blAction=showEntry&blogEntry=101024
  50. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/apush/flatboats
  51. https://www.workboat.com/viewpoints/abe-lincoln-riverboat-builder
  52. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a19439/abraham-lincoln-patent/
  53. https://cooperflatboats.net/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.