Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Condensed tannin
View on WikipediaCondensed tannins (proanthocyanidins, polyflavonoid tannins, catechol-type tannins, pyrocatecollic type tannins, non-hydrolyzable tannins or flavolans) are polymers formed by the condensation of flavans. They do not contain sugar residues.[1]
They are called proanthocyanidins as they yield anthocyanidins when depolymerized under oxidative conditions. Different types of condensed tannins exist, such as the procyanidins, propelargonidins, prodelphinidins, profisetinidins, proteracacinidins, proguibourtinidins or prorobinetidins. All of the above are formed from flavan-3-ols, but flavan-3,4-diols, called (leucoanthocyanidin) also form condensed tannin oligomers, e.g. leuco-fisetinidin form profisetinidin, and flavan-4-ols form condensed tannins, e.g. 3',4',5,7-flavan-4-ol form proluteolinidin (luteoforolor).[2] One particular type of condensed tannin, found in grape, are procyanidins, which are polymers of 2 to 50 (or more) catechin units joined by carbon-carbon bonds. These are not susceptible to being cleaved by hydrolysis.
While many hydrolyzable tannins and most condensed tannins are water-soluble, several tannins are also highly octanol-soluble.[3][4] Some large condensed tannins are insoluble. Differences in solubilities are likely to affect their biological functions.
Natural occurrences
[edit]Tannins of tropical woods tend to be of a catechin nature rather than of the gallic type present in temperate woods.[5]
Condensed tannins can be recovered from Lithocarpus glaber[6] or can be found in Prunus sp.[7] The bark of Commiphora angolensis contains condensed tannins.[8]
Commercial sources of condensed tannins are plants such as quebracho wood (Schinopsis lorentzii), mimosa bark (Acacia mollissima), grape seeds (Vitis vinifera), pine barks and spruce barks.[9][10]
Condensed tannins are formed in tannosomes, specialized organelles, in Tracheophytes, i.e. vascular plants.[11]
Dietary supplement
[edit]Pycnogenol is a dietary supplement derived from extracts from maritime pine bark, is standardised to contain 70% procyanidin and is marketed with claims it can treat many conditions; however, according to a 2020 Cochrane review, the evidence is insufficient to support its use for the treatment of any chronic disorder.[12][13]
Analysis
[edit]Condensed tannins can be characterised by a number of modern techniques including depolymerisation, asymmetric flow field flow fractionation, small-angle X-ray scattering[14] and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.[15] Their interactions with proteins can be studied by isothermal titration calorimetry[16] and this provides information on the affinity constant, enthalpy and stoichiometry in the tannin-protein complex.
Depolymerisation
[edit]Depolymerisation reactions are mainly analytical techniques but it is envisaged to use them as means to produce molecules for the chemical industry derived from waste products, such as bark from the wood industry[17] or pomaces from the wine industry.
Depolymerisation is an indirect method of analysis allowing to gain information such as average degree of polymerisation, percentage of galloylation, etc. The depolymerised sample can be injected on a mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization source, only able to form ions with smaller molecules.
Oxidative depolymerisation
[edit]The butanol–hydrochloric acid–iron assay[18] (Porter assay) is a colorimetric assay. It is based on acid catalysed oxidative depolymerization of condensed tannins into corresponding anthocyanidins.[19] The method has also been used for determination of bound condensed tannins, but has limitations.[20] This reagent has recently been improved considerably by inclusion of acetone.[21]
Non-oxidative chemical depolymerisation
[edit]The condensed tannins can nevertheless undergo acid-catalyzed cleavage in the presence of (an excess of) a nucleophile[22] like phloroglucinol (reaction called phloroglucinolysis), benzyl mercaptan (reaction called thiolysis), thioglycolic acid (reaction called thioglycolysis) or cysteamine. These techniques are generally called depolymerisation and give information such as average degree of polymerisation or percentage of galloylation. These are SN1 reactions, a type of substitution reaction in organic chemistry, involving a carbocation intermediate under strongly acidic conditions in polar protic solvents like methanol. The reaction leads to the formation of free and derived monomers that can be further analyzed. The free monomers correspond to the terminal units of the condensed tannins chains. If thiolysis is done directly on plant material (rather than on purified tannins), it is, however, important to subtract naturally occurring free flavanol monomers from the concentration of terminal units that are released during depolymerisation.
Reactions are generally made in methanol, especially thiolysis, as benzyl mercaptan has a low solubility in water. They involve a moderate (40 to 90 °C (104 to 194 °F)) heating for a few minutes. Epimerisation may happen.[23]
Phloroglucinolysis can be used for instance for proanthocyanidins characterisation in wine[24] or in the grape seed and skin tissues.[25]
Thioglycolysis can be used to study proanthocyanidins[26] or the oxidation of condensed tannins.[14] It is also used for lignin quantitation.[27] Reaction on condensed tannins from Douglas fir bark produces epicatechin and catechin thioglycolates.[17]
Condensed tannins from Lithocarpus glaber leaves have been analysed through acid-catalyzed degradation in the presence of cysteamine.[6]
References
[edit]- ^ Teresa K. Attwood and Richard Cammack (2006). Oxford dictionary of biochemistry and molecular biology. ISBN 0-19-852917-1.
- ^ "Phenolics in Food and Nutraceuticals" by Fereidoon Shahidi and Marian Naczk, CRC press, page 44
- ^ Mueller-Harvey, I.; Mlambo, V.; Sikosana, J.L.N.; Smith, T.; Owen, E.; Brown, R.H. (2007). "Octanol-water partition coefficients for predicting the effects of tannins in ruminant nutrition". J. Agric. Food Chem. 55 (14): 5436–5444. doi:10.1021/jf070308a. PMID 17567141.
- ^ Mueller-Harvey, I (2010). "Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health". J. Sci. Food Agric. 86 (13): 2006–2037. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577.
- ^ "Les tannins dans les bois tropicaux (Tannin in tropical woods), by Jacqueline Doat, Revue bois et forêts des tropiques, 1978, n° 182 (French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-08-01. Retrieved 2012-08-28.
- ^ a b Zhang, L. L.; Lin, Y. M. (2008). "HPLC, NMR and MALDI-TOF MS Analysis of Condensed Tannins from Lithocarpus glaber Leaves with Potent Free Radical Scavenging Activity". Molecules. 13 (12): 2986–2997. doi:10.3390/molecules13122986. PMC 6245341. PMID 19052523.
- ^ Feucht, W.; Nachit, M. (1977). "Flavolans and Growth-Promoting Catechins in Young Shoot Tips of Prunus Species and Hybrids". Physiologia Plantarum. 40 (4): 230. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb04063.x.
- ^ Chemical study of bark from Commiphora angolensis Engl. Cardoso Do Vale, J., Bol Escola Farm Univ Coimbra Edicao Cient, 1962, volume 3, page 128 (abstract)
- ^ Haslam E. Plant Polyphenols, Vegetable Tannins Revisited. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1989).
- ^ Ping, L; Laurent Chrusciel, L; Navarrete, P; Pizzi, A (2011). "Extraction of condensed tannins from grape pomace for use as wood adhesives". Industrial Crops and Products. 33: 253–257. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.007.
- ^ [1] Annals of Botany: The tannosome is an organelle forming condensed tannins in the chlorophyllous organs of Tracheophyta
- ^ Robertson, Nina U.; Schoonees, Anel; Brand, Amanda; Visser, Janicke (29 September 2020). "Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (9) CD008294. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008294.pub5. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC 8094515. PMID 32990945.
- ^ D'Andrea, G. (2010). Pycnogenol: a blend of procyanidins with multifaceted therapeutic applications?. Fitoterapia, 81(7), 724-736.
- ^ a b Vernhet, A.; Dubascoux, S. P.; Cabane, B.; Fulcrand, H. L. N.; Dubreucq, E.; Poncet-Legrand, C. L. (2011). "Characterization of oxidized tannins: Comparison of depolymerization methods, asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation and small-angle X-ray scattering". Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 401 (5): 1559–1569. doi:10.1007/s00216-011-5076-2. PMID 21573842. S2CID 4645218.
- ^ Stringano, E.; Cramer, R.; Hayes, W.; Smith, C.; Gibson, T.; Mueller-Harvey, I. (2011). "Deciphering the complexity of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) proanthocyanidins by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with a judicious choice of isotope patterns and matrices". Analytical Chemistry. 2011 (83): 4147–4153. doi:10.1021/ac2003856. PMID 21488615.
- ^ Dobreva, M.A.; Frazier, R.A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Clifton, L.A.; Gea, A.; Green, R.J. (2011). "Binding of pentagalloyl glucose to two globular proteins occurs via multiple surface sites". Biomacromolecules. 12 (3): 710–715. doi:10.1021/bm101341s. PMID 21250665.
- ^ a b "Douglas-Fir Bark: Characterization of a Condensed Tannin Extract, by Hong-Keun Song, A thesis submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, December 13, 1984" (PDF). oregonstate.edu. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
- ^ Acid butanol assay for proanthocyanidins. by Ann E. Hagermann, 2002 (article)
- ^ Porter, Lawrence J.; Hrstich, Liana N.; Chana, Bock G. (1985). "The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin". Phytochemistry. 25: 223–230. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)94533-3.
- ^ Makkar, H. P. S.; Gamble, G.; Becker, K. (1999). "Limitation of the butanol–hydrochloric acid–iron assay for bound condensed tannins". Food Chemistry. 66: 129–133. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00043-6.
- ^ Grabber, J.; Zeller, W.E.; Mueller-Harvey, I. (2013). "Acetone enhances the direct analysis of procyanidin- and prodelphinidin-based condensed tannins in Lotus species by the butanol-HCl-iron assay". J. Agric. Food Chem. 61 (11): 2669–2678. doi:10.1021/jf304158m. PMID 23383722.
- ^ Matthews, Sara; Mila, Isabelle; Scalbert, Augustin; Pollet, Brigitte; Lapierre, Catherine; Hervé du Penhoat, Catherine L. M.; Rolando, Christian; Donnelly, Dervilla M. X. (April 1997). "Method for estimation of proanthocyanidins based on their acid depolymerization in the presence of nucleophiles". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 45 (4): 1195–1201. doi:10.1021/jf9607573.
- ^ Gea, An; Stringano, Elisabetta; Brown, Ron H.; Mueller-Harvey, Irene (26 January 2011). "In situ analysis and structural elucidation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) tannins for high-throughput germplasm screening". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 59 (2): 495–503. doi:10.1021/jf103609p. PMID 21175139.
- ^ Kennedy, James A.; Ferrier, Jordan; Harbertson, James F.; des Gachons, Catherine Peyrot (1 December 2006). "Analysis of Tannins in Red Wine Using Multiple Methods: Correlation with Perceived Astringency". American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 57 (4): 481–485. doi:10.5344/ajev.2006.57.4.481. S2CID 83830030. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
- ^ Kennedy, James A.; Jones, Graham P. (April 2001). "Analysis of Proanthocyanidin Cleavage Products Following Acid-Catalysis in the Presence of Excess Phloroglucinol". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 49 (4): 1740–1746. doi:10.1021/jf001030o. PMID 11308320.
- ^ Sears, Karl D.; Casebier, Ronald L. (1968). "Cleavage of proanthocyanidins with thioglycollic acid". Chemical Communications (22): 1437–8. doi:10.1039/C19680001437.
- ^ Lange, B. M.; Lapierre, C.; Sandermann Jr, H. (1 July 1995). "Elicitor-induced spruce stress lignin (structural similarity to early developmental lignins)". Plant Physiology. 108 (3): 1277–1287. doi:10.1104/pp.108.3.1277. PMC 157483. PMID 12228544.
Condensed tannin
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Structure
Chemical Composition
Condensed tannins, also known as proanthocyanidins, are polyphenolic compounds composed of oligomers or polymers formed from flavan-3-ol monomer units, primarily (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin, which are linked together through strong carbon-carbon (C-C) interflavan bonds, such as C4–C8 or C4–C6 linkages.[6] These monomers feature a flavan skeleton with hydroxyl groups on the B-ring, contributing to the overall polyphenolic nature, and additional variants like (−)-gallocatechin, (−)-epigallocatechin, and (−)-epicatechin-3-O-gallate can incorporate extra hydroxyl substitutions.[7] The resulting structures are heterogeneous, with the specific composition varying by plant source, but they lack the depside ester linkages and glycosidic bonds characteristic of hydrolyzable tannins, although individual flavan-3-ol units may feature ester substitutions such as galloylation. The general empirical formula for condensed tannins approximates (C15H14O6)n, reflecting the core flavan-3-ol repeating unit of catechin or epicatechin (C15H14O6), though actual molecular weights range from about 500 Da for dimers to over 20,000 Da for high polymers due to variations in monomer types and minor structural modifications.[8] Procyanidins, the most common subtype, derive from catechin and epicatechin units with two or three hydroxyl groups on the B-ring, while prodelphinidins incorporate gallocatechin or epigallocatechin with three hydroxyl groups, leading to differences in reactivity and hydrogen-bonding capacity.[7] These variations influence the compound's polarity and interactions but maintain the defining C-C backbone.[6] In contrast to hydrolyzable tannins, which feature ester linkages to gallic or ellagic acid and can be cleaved by hydrolysis to yield these monomers, condensed tannins are non-hydrolyzable under mild conditions, relying solely on interflavan C-C bonds for polymerization and degrading only under harsh acid treatment to release anthocyanidins like cyanidin or delphinidin.[8] This structural stability underscores their resistance to enzymatic breakdown and distinguishes them chemically from gallotannins or ellagitannins.[6] The degree of polymerization (DP), typically ranging from 2 to 50 subunits, determines the molecular size and profoundly impacts properties such as solubility in aqueous versus organic solvents and bioactivity, with higher DP oligomers exhibiting greater protein-binding affinity but reduced solubility.[8] Mean DP values, often assessed via thiolysis or phloroglucinolysis, vary by source—for instance, grape-derived procyanidins show mDP of 2–14—highlighting the polydisperse nature of these polymers in natural extracts.[7]Molecular Architecture
Condensed tannins, also known as proanthocyanidins, exhibit a polymeric architecture composed of flavan-3-ol monomer units connected through interflavan carbon-carbon bonds, primarily between the C4 position on the B-ring of one unit and the C6 or C8 position on the A-ring of the adjacent unit.[9] These linkages, classified as B-type, enable the formation of linear chains as the predominant structure, though branching can occur when both C6 and C8 positions on an A-ring are available for additional connections, resulting in more complex, three-dimensional networks.[10] The C4→C8 linkage is the most prevalent, accounting for the majority of bonds in natural condensed tannins, while C4→C6 linkages are less common but contribute to structural variability.[10] The stereochemistry at the chiral centers C2 and C3 of the flavan-3-ol units introduces significant heteropolymeric diversity, as these configurations influence the overall conformation and flexibility of the polymer chain. For instance, the common monomer (-)-epicatechin possesses a (2S,3R) (cis) configuration, promoting a more compact, twisted conformation, whereas (+)-catechin features a (2R,3S) (trans) configuration, leading to extended chain segments.[10] This stereochemical variation allows for heterogeneous sequences within the polymer, where cis and trans units can alternate or cluster, affecting the tannin's solubility and binding properties without altering the core linkage pattern.[9] Common architectural subtypes of condensed tannins are distinguished by the hydroxylation pattern on the B-ring of the monomer units. Procyanidins, the most widespread, consist of (epi)catechin units with dihydroxylation at the 3',4' positions, often featuring a mix of 2,3-cis and 2,3-trans configurations.[10] Prodelphinidins incorporate (epi)gallocatechin units with trihydroxylation at 3',4',5', enhancing hydrogen-bonding potential, while mixed or propelargonidin types include (epi)afzelechin units with monohydroxylation at 4', resulting in lower polarity structures.[10] These subtypes typically form polymers where extension units—internal monomers engaged in two interflavan bonds—comprise the chain backbone, and terminal units—end-capping monomers with a single bond—provide closure, as illustrated in simplified models showing head-to-tail extension with occasional branching.[11]Biosynthesis and Occurrence
Biosynthetic Pathways
Condensed tannins, also known as proanthocyanidins, are synthesized in plants through a series of interconnected metabolic pathways that originate in primary metabolism and branch into specialized secondary metabolism. The biosynthesis begins with the shikimic acid pathway, which converts phosphoenolpyruvate and erythrose-4-phosphate into chorismate via seven enzymatic steps, ultimately yielding phenylalanine as the key amino acid precursor.[12] This pathway is conserved across plants and provides the carbon skeleton for phenylpropanoids, with regulation often occurring at the level of chorismate mutase to balance aromatic amino acid production.[13] From phenylalanine, the pathway proceeds through the phenylpropanoid route, initiated by phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), which deaminates phenylalanine to cinnamic acid, followed by cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) and 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL) to form p-coumaroyl-CoA.[14] This intermediate then enters the flavonoid branch via chalcone synthase (CHS), which condenses p-coumaroyl-CoA with three molecules of malonyl-CoA to produce naringenin chalcone, subsequently isomerized by chalcone isomerase (CHI) to naringenin. Further hydroxylation by flavone 3'-hydroxylase (F3'H) and reduction steps involving flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), and leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) lead to flavan-3,4-diols, the direct precursors of condensed tannin monomers.[15] These diols serve as extension units for polymerization, with the pathway's flux tightly controlled to direct intermediates toward proanthocyanidins rather than anthocyanins.[16] The formation of monomeric flavan-3-ols, the building blocks of condensed tannins, relies on two pivotal enzymes: leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR), which reduces leucocyanidin to the 2,3-trans-configured (+)-catechin, predominant in species like grapevine (Vitis vinifera), and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR), which converts cyanidin or delphinidin to the 2,3-cis-configured (-)-epicatechin, as identified in Arabidopsis and Medicago truncatula.[17] [15] LAR activity is particularly linked to trans-proanthocyanidin production and influences polymer chain length in grape skins, where polymorphisms in the VvLAR gene correlate with tannin composition.[18] Polymerization of these monomers into condensed tannins occurs primarily through non-enzymatic oxidative coupling in the vacuole, though endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized mechanisms may initiate assembly, with transport facilitated by multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins like TT12. However, recent research has identified enzymatic contributions, such as laccases (LACs) regulated by miR397a, in facilitating polymerization in species like Salvia miltiorrhiza and Populus trichocarpa.[19][20] Glycosyltransferases, such as those in the UGT72 and UGT84 families, modify flavan-3-ols (e.g., forming epicatechin glucoside) to enhance solubility and vacuolar sequestration, preventing autotoxicity during accumulation. Genetic regulation of these pathways is orchestrated by transcription factors, notably R2R3-MYB proteins that form MBW (MYB-bHLH-WD40) complexes to activate structural genes like CHS, DFR, LAR, and ANR.[21] In grapevine, activators such as VvMYB5a/b and VvMYBPA1/2 specifically drive proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in skins and seeds, with expression peaking during veraison and influenced by environmental cues like light and sugar levels.[22] Repressors like VvMYBC2L1 fine-tune accumulation to avoid overproduction, ensuring balanced flavonoid profiles across plant tissues. This regulatory network highlights the pathway's adaptability, as seen in crops where MYB overexpression enhances tannin levels for improved stress tolerance.Natural Distribution
Condensed tannins, also known as proanthocyanidins, represent a major portion, approximately 90%, of commercial tannin production and serve as the second most prevalent phenolic polymers after lignin. They are primarily distributed across the plant kingdom, with a particular prevalence in dicotyledonous species, where they accumulate in various tissues to support ecological functions.[23][24] In the family Fabaceae, condensed tannins are especially abundant, as seen in species of Acacia, where bark extracts like those from Acacia mearnsii (black wattle) yield high concentrations of prodelphinidins, often exceeding 20% dry weight in some perennial legumes. Similarly, the Vitaceae family, including Vitis vinifera (grapevine), features procyanidins concentrated in fruit skins, seeds, and leaves, contributing to the organoleptic properties of grapes and wines. These distributions highlight the ecological specialization of condensed tannins, which play key roles in plant defense by deterring herbivores through astringency and protein-binding effects that reduce forage digestibility, while also shielding tissues from ultraviolet radiation and inhibiting pathogen growth.[25][26][27] Concentrations of condensed tannins vary significantly by plant tissue and species, typically ranging from 5-20% in bark—such as in Acacia and conifer species—down to lower levels (often under 5%) in leaves and fine roots, where they localize in epidermal and vascular cells for targeted protection. In fruits, notable examples include apples (Malus domestica), where procyanidins accumulate in skins and seeds; berries like cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus), rich in A-type proanthocyanidins; and cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao), containing substantial polymeric forms.[28][29][27]Physical and Chemical Properties
Solubility and Stability
Condensed tannins exhibit varying solubility depending on their degree of polymerization (DP), with low-molecular-weight oligomers (DP < 10) being readily soluble in water due to their hydrophilic phenolic hydroxyl groups, while higher polymers show reduced water solubility and tend to form aggregates.[30] In contrast, they demonstrate good solubility across a broader range of DPs in polar organic solvents such as alcohols (e.g., ethanol and methanol) and acetone, which disrupt intermolecular hydrogen bonding and facilitate extraction.[30] Their insolubility in non-polar solvents arises primarily from extensive intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding among the multiple hydroxyl groups, rendering them incompatible with low-dielectric environments.[30] The stability of condensed tannins is influenced by environmental factors, including pH, where they maintain structural integrity in mildly acidic conditions (pH 3–5) typical of many natural plant matrices, but undergo degradation at extreme pH values through mechanisms such as bond cleavage or enhanced oxidation.[31] Thermally, purified condensed tannins display high stability, with degradation onset around 200°C, beyond which polymerization or char formation predominates, contributing to their use in high-temperature applications.[31] The degree of polymerization significantly affects the aggregation behavior of condensed tannins, with higher DP (e.g., mDP > 10) promoting stronger hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding that lead to self-aggregation in solution.[32] In environmental conditions, condensed tannins are susceptible to aerial oxidation, particularly in the presence of oxygen and trace metals, leading to the formation of quinones via phenolic ring oxidation, which can further polymerize or react with nucleophiles, altering color and bioactivity.[33]Reactivity and Interactions
Condensed tannins exhibit strong binding affinities toward proteins through a combination of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, primarily involving their phenolic hydroxyl groups and the protein's polar and non-polar regions. These interactions lead to protein precipitation, which underlies the astringent sensation in foods and beverages like wine and tea, as well as the inhibition of enzymes such as proteases and amylases by forming insoluble complexes.[24][34][35] The antioxidant properties of condensed tannins arise from their ability to scavenge free radicals via the donation of hydrogen atoms from phenolic OH groups, effectively neutralizing reactive oxygen species like DPPH and ABTS radicals. Additionally, they chelate transition metals such as iron (Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺) and copper (Cu²⁺), preventing Fenton-type reactions that generate hydroxyl radicals and thereby enhancing oxidative stability in biological and food systems.[36][37] In aging processes, particularly in wine production, condensed tannins react with aldehydes like acetaldehyde to form ethyl-linked bridges, promoting polymerization and contributing to the development of stable pigments and reduced astringency over time. This reactivity is crucial for color stabilization, as the resulting polymeric structures exhibit altered sensory profiles compared to monomeric forms.[38][39] Under ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, condensed tannins undergo photochemical reactions, including photooxidation of their flavanol units, which can lead to the formation of quinone-like intermediates and subsequent colored complexes, often in conjunction with metal ions or other phenolics. These transformations are influenced by the tannin's degree of polymerization and environmental factors, potentially limiting their stability in exposed applications.[40][41]Extraction and Analysis
Isolation Methods
Condensed tannins, primarily sourced from plant barks, woods, and leaves, are isolated through solvent-based extraction techniques that exploit their solubility in polar media. Traditional methods employ water, ethanol, or acetone-water mixtures (often 70% acetone) to dissolve these polyphenolic compounds from ground plant material, with extraction typically conducted at ambient or elevated temperatures to enhance diffusion. For instance, hot water extraction at 70–90°C is widely used for bark tannins, yielding up to 40–50 mg/g from spruce or pine sources when optimized with pH adjustments or additives like sodium carbonate, which improves selectivity and recovery by facilitating the release of tannins while minimizing degradation.[42][43][31] Fractionation of crude extracts often involves precipitation to separate condensed tannins based on molecular size and binding affinity. Proteins such as bovine serum albumin or synthetic polymers like polyvinylpyrrolidone are added to form insoluble complexes, preferentially precipitating higher-degree polymerization tannins (e.g., octamers and above) due to their stronger protein-binding capacity, allowing isolation of fractions with mean degrees of polymerization ranging from 5 to 20. This step enhances purity by removing lower-molecular-weight impurities and is crucial for applications requiring specific tannin profiles.[44][45] Modern isolation techniques address limitations of conventional solvents by improving efficiency, yield, and environmental impact. Supercritical CO2 extraction, often with 5–10% ethanol or water as co-solvents, operates at 200–300 bar and 40–60°C to selectively extract tannins while preserving their structure and avoiding toxic residues, achieving yields comparable to organic solvents but with superior purity from sources like Acacia bark. Ultrasound-assisted extraction disrupts cell walls via cavitation, enabling higher yields (up to 20–30% improvement) in shorter times (15–30 minutes) using water-ethanol mixtures at 40–60 kHz, particularly effective for fruit skins and leaves. Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) has emerged as an efficient alternative, reducing extraction times to minutes while increasing yields by 15–25% through rapid heating, as demonstrated in oenological applications as of 2024. Membrane filtration, including nanofiltration with 200–400 Da cut-offs, purifies hot water extracts by retaining tannins (molecular weights 500–20,000 Da) while rejecting smaller carbohydrates and phenolics, concentrating solutions to 10–20% tannin content post-enzymatic pretreatment. Enzymatic extraction methods, using cellulases or pectinases, have shown promise in 2025 studies for enhancing yields from bark by breaking down cell walls without harsh conditions, improving sustainability.[46][31][47][48][23] Quality control during isolation focuses on preventing co-extraction of hydrolyzable tannins, which are more prevalent in certain sources like galls. pH adjustment to 4–6 using mild acids or buffers during aqueous extractions minimizes their solubility and hydrolysis, favoring condensed tannin recovery, as hydrolyzable types are less stable and more extractable under alkaline or highly acidic conditions. Yields are further optimized by source-specific parameters, such as longer extraction times (2–4 hours) for woody barks versus shorter soaks for leafy materials, ensuring tannin content exceeds 50% in final isolates.[43][49][42]Structural Characterization
Condensed tannins, composed primarily of flavan-3-ol subunits such as catechin, epicatechin, gallocatechin, and epigallocatechin linked by B-type interflavanoid bonds, require advanced analytical techniques to elucidate their structural heterogeneity, including subunit composition, degree of polymerization (DP), branching, and stereochemistry.[50] These methods focus on non-destructive or minimally invasive approaches to verify polymer architecture post-isolation, providing insights into mean DP (mDP), procyanidin (PC)/prodelphinidin (PD) ratios, and linkage types without exhaustive depolymerization.[51]Spectroscopic Methods
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy serves as a powerful tool for linkage determination and stereochemical analysis in condensed tannins. ¹³C-NMR identifies the configuration at C2–C3 bonds (predominantly cis in many plant sources) and quantifies PC/PD ratios by analyzing carbon signals from flavan-3-ol units; for example, spectra from Lithocarpus glaber tannins showed 27.6% PC and 72.4% PD units.[51] Heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) NMR further distinguishes subunit types (e.g., prodelphinidin extensions) through cross-peak patterns, offering detailed mapping of terminal and extension units.[52] While NMR provides high-resolution structural data, it requires purified samples and expertise for signal assignment, limiting its use for complex mixtures.[50] Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques excel in subunit identification and DP estimation for condensed tannins. Electrospray ionization MS (ESI-MS) analyzes intact oligomers by generating multiply charged ions, enabling determination of subunit composition and average DP from mass distributions; optimized conditions accurately profile tannins with DP up to 26, as demonstrated in vegetable extracts where polymer heterogeneity was quantified without fragmentation. However, ESI-MS struggles with higher DP species due to spectral distortions from charge state variations.[53]Chromatographic Techniques
High-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) facilitates monomer profiling and subunit quantification in condensed tannins, often following preparative steps to release flavan-3-ol derivatives. Operating at 280 nm, it separates and identifies units like epicatechin (e.g., 222.73 mg/g in L. glaber extracts), providing quantitative data on PC and PD proportions with high resolution.[51] This method's advantages include sensitivity to structural isomers, though it necessitates authentic standards for peak assignment.[50] Thiolysis coupled with HPLC is widely applied to calculate mean DP and extension unit ratios in condensed tannins. The process involves acid-catalyzed cleavage using a thiol nucleophile (e.g., cysteamine or benzyl mercaptan), yielding terminal flavan-3-ols and thioether-linked extension subunits, which are then separated by reversed-phase HPLC-UV; mDP is computed as the ratio of total subunits (terminals + extensions) to terminals, with values ranging from 3–10 in common sources like grape seeds.[54] This technique preserves stereochemistry and offers precise subunit profiling, but results can vary with reaction time (typically 45 min) and reagent choice, potentially underestimating branched structures.[51]Colorimetric Assays
The vanillin-HCl assay provides a rapid estimate of total condensed tannin content by forming a red-colored complex with the A-ring of flavan-3-ols under acidic conditions, measured spectrophotometrically at 500 nm.[50] It is valued for its simplicity and applicability to crude extracts. Nonetheless, specificity is limited, as it reacts with free catechins, other phenolics, and even galloylated compounds, with response varying by DP (higher polymers react slower) and influenced by factors such as acid normality, reaction time, temperature, and interfering substances, necessitating prior separation for accuracy.[55]Advanced Techniques
For high-DP condensed tannins, MALDI-TOF MS offers superior resolution by ionizing polymers with a matrix (e.g., cationized with Cs⁺), revealing subunit sequences and maximum DP; analysis of L. glaber tannins confirmed PD dominance up to undecamers (DP 11).[51] This method's high mass range (up to 10,000 Da) surpasses ESI-MS for larger polymers, though it provides less sequence detail and requires careful matrix selection to avoid fragmentation.[50]| Technique | Key Structural Insight | Typical DP Range | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMR (¹³C/HSQC) | Linkages, stereochemistry, PC/PD ratio | All (structural focus) | Sample purity required; complex interpretation |
| ESI-MS | Subunits, average DP, distribution | Up to 26 | Poor for high DP; charge effects |
| HPLC-DAD (post-thiolysis) | Monomer/subunit profiling | Oligomers (2–20) | Needs standards; time-intensive |
| Thiolysis-HPLC | mDP, extension/terminal ratio | 3–20 | Reaction variability; odor from thiols |
| Vanillin-HCl | Total content | Not DP-specific | Low specificity; DP-dependent response |
| MALDI-TOF MS | High-DP composition, sequences | Up to 50+ | Matrix artifacts; semi-quantitative |