Hubbry Logo
Flavour (particle physics)Flavour (particle physics)Main
Open search
Flavour (particle physics)
Community hub
Flavour (particle physics)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Flavour (particle physics)
Flavour (particle physics)
Flavour (particle physics)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Flavour in
particle physics
Flavour quantum numbers
Related quantum numbers
Combinations
Flavour mixing

In particle physics, flavour or flavor refers to the species of an elementary particle. The Standard Model counts six flavours of quarks and six flavours of leptons. They are conventionally parameterized with flavour quantum numbers that are assigned to all subatomic particles. They can also be described by some of the family symmetries proposed for the quark-lepton generations.

Quantum numbers

[edit]
Six flavours of quarks
Six flavours of leptons

In classical mechanics, a force acting on a point-like particle can alter only the particle's dynamical state, meaning its momentum, angular momentum, and so forth. Quantum field theory, however, allows interactions that can alter other facets of a particle's nature described by non-dynamical, discrete quantum numbers. In particular, the action of the weak force is such that it allows the conversion of quantum numbers describing mass and electric charge of both quarks and leptons from one discrete type to another. This is known as a flavour change, or flavour transmutation. Due to their quantum description, flavour states may also undergo quantum superposition.

In atomic physics the principal quantum number of an electron specifies the electron shell in which it resides, which determines the energy level of the whole atom. Analogously, the five flavour quantum numbers (isospin, strangeness, charm, bottomness or topness) can characterize the quantum state of quarks, by the degree to which it exhibits six distinct flavours (u, d, c, s, t, b).

Composite particles can be created from multiple quarks, forming hadrons, such as mesons and baryons, each possessing unique aggregate characteristics, such as different masses, electric charges, and decay modes. A hadron's overall flavour quantum numbers depend on the numbers of constituent quarks of each particular flavour.

Conservation laws

[edit]

All of the various charges discussed above are conserved by the fact that the corresponding charge operators can be understood as generators of symmetries that commute with the Hamiltonian. Thus, the eigenvalues of the various charge operators are conserved.

Absolutely conserved quantum numbers in the Standard Model are:

In some theories, such as the Grand Unified Theory, the individual baryon and lepton number conservation can be violated, if the difference between them (B − L) is conserved (see Chiral anomaly).

Strong interactions conserve all flavours, but all flavour quantum numbers are violated (changed, non-conserved) by electroweak interactions.

Flavour symmetry

[edit]

If there are two or more particles which have identical interactions, then they may be interchanged without affecting the physics. All (complex) linear combinations of these two particles give the same physics, as long as the combinations are orthogonal, or perpendicular, to each other.

In other words, the theory possesses symmetry transformations such as , where u and d are the two fields (representing the various generations of leptons and quarks, see below), and M is any 2×2 unitary matrix with a unit determinant. Such matrices form a Lie group called SU(2) (see special unitary group). This is an example of flavour symmetry.

In quantum chromodynamics, flavour is a conserved global symmetry. In the electroweak theory, on the other hand, this symmetry is broken, and flavour changing processes exist, such as quark decay or neutrino oscillations.

Flavour quantum numbers

[edit]

Leptons

[edit]

All leptons carry a lepton number L = 1. In addition, leptons carry weak isospin, T3, which is −⁠1/2⁠ for the three charged leptons (i.e. electron, muon and tau) and +⁠1/2⁠ for the three associated neutrinos. Each doublet of a charged lepton and a neutrino consisting of opposite T3 are said to constitute one generation of leptons. In addition, one defines a quantum number called weak hypercharge, YW, which is −1 for all left-handed leptons.[1] Weak isospin and weak hypercharge are gauged in the Standard Model.

Leptons may be assigned the six flavour quantum numbers: electron number, muon number, tau number, and corresponding numbers for the neutrinos (electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino). These are conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions, but violated by weak interactions. Therefore, such flavour quantum numbers are not of great use. A separate quantum number for each generation is more useful: electronic lepton number (+1 for electrons and electron neutrinos), muonic lepton number (+1 for muons and muon neutrinos), and tauonic lepton number (+1 for tau leptons and tau neutrinos). However, even these numbers are not absolutely conserved, as neutrinos of different generations can mix; that is, a neutrino of one flavour can transform into another flavour. The strength of such mixings is specified by a matrix called the Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix (PMNS matrix).

Quarks

[edit]

All quarks carry a baryon number B = ⁠++1/3⁠ , and all anti-quarks have B = ⁠−+1/3⁠ . They also all carry weak isospin, T3 = ⁠±+1/2⁠ . The positively charged quarks (up, charm, and top quarks) are called up-type quarks and have T3 = ⁠++1/2⁠ ; the negatively charged quarks (down, strange, and bottom quarks) are called down-type quarks and have T3 = ⁠−+1/2⁠ . Each doublet of up and down type quarks constitutes one generation of quarks.

For all the quark flavour quantum numbers listed below, the convention is that the flavour charge and the electric charge of a quark have the same sign. Thus any flavour carried by a charged meson has the same sign as its charge. Quarks have the following flavour quantum numbers:

  • The third component of isospin (usually just "isospin") (I3), which has value I3 = ⁠1/2⁠ for the up quark and I3 = −⁠1/2⁠ for the down quark.
  • Strangeness (S): Defined as S = −n s + n s̅ , where ns represents the number of strange quarks (s) and ns̅ represents the number of strange antiquarks (s). This quantum number was introduced by Murray Gell-Mann. This definition gives the strange quark a strangeness of −1 for the above-mentioned reason.
  • Charm (C): Defined as C = n c − n c̅ , where nc represents the number of charm quarks (c) and nc̅ represents the number of charm antiquarks. The charm quark's value is +1.
  • Bottomness (or beauty) (B′): Defined as B′ = −n b + n b̅ , where nb represents the number of bottom quarks (b) and nb̅ represents the number of bottom antiquarks.
  • Topness (or truth) (T): Defined as T = n t − n t̅ , where nt represents the number of top quarks (t) and nt̅ represents the number of top antiquarks. However, because of the extremely short half-life of the top quark (predicted lifetime of only 5×10−25 s), by the time it can interact strongly it has already decayed to another flavour of quark (usually to a bottom quark). For that reason the top quark doesn't hadronize, that is it never forms any meson or baryon.

These five quantum numbers, together with baryon number (which is not a flavour quantum number), completely specify numbers of all 6 quark flavours separately (as n q − n q̅ , i.e. an antiquark is counted with the minus sign). They are conserved by both the electromagnetic and strong interactions (but not the weak interaction). From them can be built the derived quantum numbers:

The terms "strange" and "strangeness" predate the discovery of the quark, but continued to be used after its discovery for the sake of continuity (i.e. the strangeness of each type of hadron remained the same); strangeness of anti-particles being referred to as +1, and particles as −1 as per the original definition. Strangeness was introduced to explain the rate of decay of newly discovered particles, such as the kaon, and was used in the Eightfold Way classification of hadrons and in subsequent quark models. These quantum numbers are preserved under strong and electromagnetic interactions, but not under weak interactions.

For first-order weak decays, that is processes involving only one quark decay, these quantum numbers (e.g. charm) can only vary by 1, that is, for a decay involving a charmed quark or antiquark either as the incident particle or as a decay byproduct, ΔC = ±1 ; likewise, for a decay involving a bottom quark or antiquark ΔB′ = ±1 . Since first-order processes are more common than second-order processes (involving two quark decays), this can be used as an approximate "selection rule" for weak decays.

A special mixture of quark flavours is an eigenstate of the weak interaction part of the Hamiltonian, so will interact in a particularly simple way with the W bosons (charged weak interactions violate flavour). On the other hand, a fermion of a fixed mass (an eigenstate of the kinetic and strong interaction parts of the Hamiltonian) is an eigenstate of flavour. The transformation from the former basis to the flavour-eigenstate/mass-eigenstate basis for quarks underlies the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix (CKM matrix). This matrix is analogous to the PMNS matrix for neutrinos, and quantifies flavour changes under charged weak interactions of quarks.

The CKM matrix allows for CP violation if there are at least three generations.

Antiparticles and hadrons

[edit]

Flavour quantum numbers are additive. Hence antiparticles have flavour equal in magnitude to the particle but opposite in sign. Hadrons inherit their flavour quantum number from their valence quarks: this is the basis of the classification in the quark model. The relations between the hypercharge, electric charge and other flavour quantum numbers hold for hadrons as well as quarks.

Flavour problem

[edit]

The flavour problem (also known as the flavour puzzle) is the inability of current Standard Model flavour physics to explain why the free parameters of particles in the Standard Model have the values they have, and why there are specified values for mixing angles in the PMNS and CKM matrices. These free parameters – the fermion masses and their mixing angles – appear to be specifically tuned. Understanding the reason for such tuning would be the solution to the flavor puzzle. There are very fundamental questions involved in this puzzle such as why there are three generations of quarks (up-down, charm-strange, and top-bottom quarks) and leptons (electron, muon and tau neutrino), as well as how and why the mass and mixing hierarchy arises among different flavours of these fermions.[2][3][4]

Quantum chromodynamics

[edit]
Flavour symmetry is closely related to chiral symmetry. This part of the article is best read along with the one on chirality.

Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) contains six flavours of quarks. However, their masses differ and as a result they are not strictly interchangeable with each other. The up and down flavours are close to having equal masses, and the theory of these two quarks possesses an approximate SU(2) symmetry (isospin symmetry).

Chiral symmetry description

[edit]

Under some circumstances (for instance when the quark masses are much smaller than the chiral symmetry breaking scale of 250 MeV), the masses of quarks do not substantially contribute to the system's behavior, and to zeroth approximation the masses of the lightest quarks can be ignored for most purposes, as if they had zero mass. The simplified behavior of flavour transformations can then be successfully modeled as acting independently on the left- and right-handed parts of each quark field. This approximate description of the flavour symmetry is described by a chiral group SUL(Nf) × SUR(Nf).

Vector symmetry description

[edit]

If all quarks had non-zero but equal masses, then this chiral symmetry is broken to the vector symmetry of the "diagonal flavour group" SU(Nf), which applies the same transformation to both helicities of the quarks. This reduction of symmetry is a form of explicit symmetry breaking. The strength of explicit symmetry breaking is controlled by the current quark masses in QCD.

Even if quarks are massless, chiral flavour symmetry can be spontaneously broken if the vacuum of the theory contains a chiral condensate (as it does in low-energy QCD). This gives rise to an effective mass for the quarks, often identified with the valence quark mass in QCD.

Symmetries of QCD

[edit]

Analysis of experiments indicate that the current quark masses of the lighter flavours of quarks are much smaller than the QCD scale, ΛQCD, hence chiral flavour symmetry is a good approximation to QCD for the up, down and strange quarks. The success of chiral perturbation theory and the even more naive chiral models spring from this fact. The valence quark masses extracted from the quark model are much larger than the current quark mass. This indicates that QCD has spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking with the formation of a chiral condensate. Other phases of QCD may break the chiral flavour symmetries in other ways.

History

[edit]
See also: Isospin § History, Eightfold way (physics), Chiral symmetry, and J/psi meson

Isospin

[edit]

Isospin, strangeness and hypercharge predate the quark model. The first of those quantum numbers, Isospin, was introduced as a concept in 1932 by Werner Heisenberg,[5] to explain symmetries of the then newly discovered neutron (symbol n):

  • The mass of the neutron and the proton (symbol p) are almost identical: They are nearly degenerate, and both are thus often referred to as “nucleons”, a term that ignores their intrinsic differences. Although the proton has a positive electric charge, and the neutron is neutral, they are almost identical in all other aspects, and their nuclear binding-force interactions (old name for the residual color force) are so strong compared to the electrical force between some, that there is very little point in paying much attention to their differences.
  • The strength of the strong interaction between any pair of nucleons is the same, independent of whether they are interacting as protons or as neutrons.

Protons and neutrons were grouped together as nucleons and treated as different states of the same particle, because they both have nearly the same mass and interact in nearly the same way, if the (much weaker) electromagnetic interaction is neglected.

Heisenberg noted that the mathematical formulation of this symmetry was in certain respects similar to the mathematical formulation of non-relativistic spin, whence the name "isospin" derives. The neutron and the proton are assigned to the doublet (the spin-1⁄2, 2, or fundamental representation) of SU(2), with the proton and neutron being then associated with different isospin projections I3 = ++1⁄2 and −+1⁄2 respectively. The pions are assigned to the triplet (the spin-1, 3, or adjoint representation) of SU(2). Though there is a difference from the theory of spin: The group action does not preserve flavor (in fact, the group action is specifically an exchange of flavour).

When constructing a physical theory of nuclear forces, one could simply assume that it does not depend on isospin, although the total isospin should be conserved. The concept of isospin proved useful in classifying hadrons discovered in the 1950s and 1960s (see particle zoo), where particles with similar mass are assigned an SU(2) isospin multiplet.

Strangeness and hypercharge

[edit]

The discovery of strange particles like the kaon led to a new quantum number that was conserved by the strong interaction: strangeness (or equivalently hypercharge). The Gell-Mann–Nishijima formula was identified in 1953, which relates strangeness and hypercharge with isospin and electric charge.[6]

The eightfold way and quark model

[edit]

Once the kaons and their property of strangeness became better understood, it started to become clear that these, too, seemed to be a part of an enlarged symmetry that contained isospin as a subgroup. The larger symmetry was named the Eightfold Way by Murray Gell-Mann, and was promptly recognized to correspond to the adjoint representation of SU(3). To better understand the origin of this symmetry, Gell-Mann proposed the existence of up, down and strange quarks which would belong to the fundamental representation of the SU(3) flavor symmetry.

GIM-Mechanism and charm

[edit]

To explain the observed absence of flavor-changing neutral currents, the GIM mechanism was proposed in 1970, which introduced the charm quark and predicted the J/psi meson.[7] The J/psi meson was indeed found in 1974, which confirmed the existence of charm quarks. This discovery is known as the November Revolution. The flavor quantum number associated with the charm quark became known as charm.

Bottomness and topness

[edit]

The bottom and top quarks were predicted in 1973 in order to explain CP violation,[8] which also implied two new flavor quantum numbers: bottomness and topness.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Flavour (particle physics)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In particle physics, flavour (or flavor) refers to the distinct types, or species, of elementary fermions in the Standard Model, encompassing six quark flavours—up (u), down (d), strange (s), charm (c), bottom (b), and top (t)—and six lepton flavours—electron (e), muon (μ), tau (τ), and their corresponding neutrinos (ν_e, ν_μ, ν_τ). These flavours are organized into three generations, with the first generation (u, d, e, ν_e) consisting of the lightest and most stable particles, the second (c, s, μ, ν_μ) introducing heavier counterparts, and the third (t, b, τ, ν_τ) featuring the heaviest. Each flavour carries unique quantum numbers, such as electric charge, isospin, and hypercharge, which govern their interactions via the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces. The concept of flavour originated in the of hadrons, where it was introduced in 1971 by and Harald Fritzsch to describe the different varieties of quarks beyond the initial up and down types needed to explain the diversity of hadronic particles. Inspired by the assortment of ice cream flavours at a store, the term evoked the idea of multiple "tastes" or kinds of fundamental building blocks, extending the earlier discovery of the in 1964. Initially applied to quarks, the notion was later extended to leptons as the developed, recognizing parallel structures in their generations and mixing behaviors. In the , flavour is approximately conserved under strong and electromagnetic interactions but violated by the weak force, which allows transitions between flavours through processes like or meson oscillations. For quarks, these transitions are parameterized by the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, a with three mixing angles and one complex phase that introduces charge-parity (, essential for explaining matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe. Similarly, lepton flavour mixing is described by the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix, which accounts for oscillations and implies nonzero masses. Flavour-changing neutral currents, suppressed in the , provide sensitive probes for physics beyond it, such as or leptoquarks. Flavour physics encompasses experimental and theoretical studies of flavour-dependent processes, including rare decays of beauty (b) and charm (c) hadrons, kaon decays, and precision measurements at accelerators like the LHC. These investigations test the 's predictions on flavour structure, , and flavour universality—the principle that weak interactions couple equally to different flavours apart from mass effects. Anomalies in b-hadron decays to muons versus electrons, hinting at flavor universality violations, have sparked interest in potential new physics, though as of 2025, data including LHCb's recent R_K measurement remain consistent with expectations within uncertainties. Ongoing research in flavour physics continues to refine our understanding of the fundamental forces and the origins of particle diversity.

Fundamentals of Flavour

Definition and Role

In , flavour serves as a discrete that distinguishes the different types of fundamental fermions within the . It labels the six quark flavours—up (u), down (d), charm (c), strange (s), top (t), and bottom (b)—and the six lepton flavours— (e), (μ), (τ), and their corresponding neutrinos (ν_e, ν_μ, ν_τ). This classification groups these particles into three generations, with the first containing the lightest and most stable particles (u, d, e, ν_e), the second intermediate-mass ones (c, s, μ, ν_μ), and the third the heaviest (t, b, τ, ν_τ). Flavour plays a crucial role in defining particle identities by specifying their intrinsic properties and governing interaction patterns, particularly in weak processes where flavour-changing transitions occur. It determines the possible decay modes of particles; for instance, heavier quarks and leptons decay primarily through weak interactions into lighter flavours of the same generation or adjacent ones, influencing lifetimes and branching ratios. This mixing is facilitated by the charged-current weak interactions, parameterized by the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix for quarks and the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix for leptons, allowing transitions between flavours. Flavour acts as an approximately conserved quantum number in strong and electromagnetic interactions, preserving the flavour content of particles during these processes, but it is violated in weak interactions, enabling flavour-changing neutral currents (FCNCs) at higher orders and charged-current transitions at tree level. Specific flavour quantum numbers are assigned as integer labels to track these properties; for example, the strangeness number SS is defined such that S=−1S = -1 for the strange quark and S=0S = 0 for non-strange quarks like up and down.

Generations of Matter

In the of , matter is composed of fermions organized into three generations, or families, which exhibit a replicated pattern of particles with distinct flavors. Each generation consists of two types of leptons—a charged and its associated —and two types of quarks, an up-type and a down-type, with the quarks carrying under the strong interaction. The first generation includes the (e) and (ν_e) as leptons, along with the up (u) and down (d) quarks. The second generation features the (μ) and (ν_μ), paired with the charm (c) and strange (s) quarks. The third generation comprises the (τ) and (ν_τ), together with the top (t) and bottom (b) quarks. This structure accounts for all known fundamental fermions, totaling 12: six quarks and six leptons. The chiral structure of these fermions is asymmetric under the . Only left-handed fermions participate in charged-current weak processes, forming SU(2)L doublets: for leptons, these are (ν{eL}, e_L), (ν_{μL}, μ_L), and (ν_{τL}, τ_L); for quarks, (u_L, d_L), (c_L, s_L), and (t_L, b_L), where the down-type quarks are mass eigenstates mixed via the CKM matrix. Right-handed fermions, in contrast, are SU(2)_L singlets and do not participate in these interactions. This left-handed doubling ensures the parity-violating nature of the weak force. A prominent feature across generations is the mass hierarchy, with masses increasing dramatically from the first to the third generation. For charged leptons, the electron has a mass of approximately 0.511 MeV, the muon 105.7 MeV, and the tau 1776.8 MeV. Quark masses follow a similar pattern, though current quark masses are scheme-dependent: up ≈ 2.2 MeV, down ≈ 4.7 MeV, strange ≈ 95 MeV, charm ≈ 1.28 GeV, bottom ≈ 4.18 GeV, and top ≈ 172.76 GeV. Neutrinos possess distinct flavors corresponding to their charged counterparts but have extremely small masses; direct kinematic upper limits are < 0.45 eV for ν_e (KATRIN 2025, 90% CL), < 0.19 MeV for ν_μ, and < 18.2 MeV for ν_τ (PDG 2024). Neutrino oscillations require nonzero masses, with mass-squared differences of approximately 7.5 × 10^{-5} eV² (solar) and 2.5 × 10^{-3} eV² (atmospheric), implying at least one neutrino with mass ≳ 0.05 eV; cosmological data further constrain the sum of neutrino masses to < 0.12 eV. This hierarchy underscores the flavor distinctions while highlighting the replication across generations. The requirement for an equal number of quark and lepton generations—three in total—arises from gauge anomaly cancellation in the electroweak sector. Without this equality, triangle anomalies in the SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y theory would render the model inconsistent, as the contributions from doublets (factoring in three colors) precisely balance those from doublets per . Precision electroweak data confirm exactly three such generations, excluding a fourth at high confidence.
GenerationLeptonsApproximate Mass (MeV)QuarksApproximate Mass (MeV)
Firste, ν_e0.511, < 4.5 × 10^{-7}u, d2.2, 4.7
Secondμ, ν_μ105.7, < 0.19c, s1.28 × 10^3, 95
Thirdτ, ν_τ1776.8, < 18.2t, b1.73 × 10^5, 4.18 × 10^3
Neutrino masses are direct kinematic upper limits (90% CL unless noted); ν_e limit from 2025. Oscillations imply mass splittings as noted in text.

Flavour Quantum Numbers

In Leptons

In , leptons are characterized by three distinct flavor quantum numbers corresponding to the three generations: the number LeL_e, the number LμL_\mu, and the number LτL_\tau. These numbers are additive quantum numbers assigned to the charged leptons and their associated s within each family; for instance, both the (e−e^-) and the (νe\nu_e) carry Le=1L_e = 1, while Lμ=0L_\mu = 0 and Lτ=0L_\tau = 0, with analogous assignments for the (Lμ=1L_\mu = 1) and (Lτ=1L_\tau = 1) families. The total is defined as L=Le+Lμ+LτL = L_e + L_\mu + L_\tau, which remains conserved in the (SM) interactions. In the SM framework assuming massless neutrinos, the individual lepton flavor numbers LeL_e, LμL_\mu, and LτL_\tau are separately conserved due to the absence of flavor-changing neutral currents involving leptons and the structure of electroweak interactions, which couple each charged lepton to its own neutrino flavor. This conservation arises from the accidental global U(1)e×U(1)μ×U(1)τU(1)_e \times U(1)_\mu \times U(1)_\tau symmetry in the SM Lagrangian without neutrino masses. However, the observation of neutrino oscillations indicates small violations of these individual conservations, stemming from nonzero neutrino masses and mixing. Charged leptons (, , ) possess masses ranging from 0.511 MeV to 1.777 GeV and participate directly in electroweak interactions, whereas neutrinos were long assumed massless but are now known to have tiny masses on the order of 0.01–0.1 eV, arising from the seesaw mechanism in SM extensions. In this mechanism, heavy right-handed sterile neutrinos (with masses around 101410^{14}–101610^{16} GeV) mix with the light left-handed active neutrinos, suppressing the effective light neutrino masses through an inverse relative to the heavy scale, thus explaining their smallness without fine-tuning. Experimental searches for flavor violation (LFV), which would signal breakdowns in individual flavor conservation beyond the minimal neutrino mixing effects, provide stringent tests; for example, the MEG II experiment has set an upper limit on the branching ratio of the decay μ+→e+γ\mu^+ \to e^+ \gamma at 1.5×10−131.5 \times 10^{-13} (90% confidence level), consistent with SM expectations where such processes are highly suppressed.

In Quarks

In , quarks are the fundamental constituents carrying flavor quantum numbers, which distinguish the six types: up (u), down (d), (s), charm (c), bottom (b), and top (t). These flavors are assigned additive quantum numbers that are conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions but can change via the . All quarks have a B=13B = \frac{1}{3}, reflecting their role in forming baryons. The up and down quarks belong to an doublet with third component I3=+12I_3 = +\frac{1}{2} for u and I3=−12I_3 = -\frac{1}{2} for d, while the other flavors have I3=0I_3 = 0. The carries S=−1S = -1, the charm quark has charm C=+1C = +1, the bottom quark bottomness B′=−1B' = -1, and the top quark topness T=+1T = +1; all other flavor quantum numbers are zero for each respective quark. The additive flavor quantum numbers for the quarks are summarized in the following table:
QuarkI3I_3SSCCB′B'TTBB
u+1/20000+1/3
d-1/20000+1/3
s0-1000+1/3
c00+100+1/3
b000-10+1/3
t0000+1+1/3
For example, the has the assignment I3=0I_3 = 0, S=−1S = -1, C=0C = 0, B′=0B' = 0, T=0T = 0, and B=13B = \frac{1}{3}. Similarly, the bottom quark is characterized by I3=0I_3 = 0, S=0S = 0, C=0C = 0, B′=−1B' = -1, T=0T = 0, and B=13B = \frac{1}{3}. These assignments ensure that the QQ for each quark satisfies the relation Q=I3+B+S+C+B′+T2Q = I_3 + \frac{B + S + C + B' + T}{2}, consistent with observed values such as Q=−13Q = -\frac{1}{3} for d, s, b and Q=+23Q = +\frac{2}{3} for u, c, t. The strong interaction, mediated by gluons that carry no flavor quantum numbers beyond , is flavor-blind and conserves all flavor quantum numbers (I3I_3, SS, CC, B′B', TT, BB) exactly. This conservation arises because the strong force couples universally to color, independent of flavor, leading to no flavor-changing processes at the quark level in strong interactions. flavors can only mix through the , which violates flavor conservation and is responsible for processes like . In the , flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNC) among quarks are highly suppressed, occurring only at loop level. A key example is the b→sγb \to s \gamma transition, whose inclusive branching fraction has been measured as B(B→Xsγ)=(3.49±0.19)×10−4\mathcal{B}(B \to X_s \gamma) = (3.49 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-4} (for photon energy Eγ≥1.6E_\gamma \geq 1.6 GeV), consistent with the prediction of (3.36±0.23)×10−4(3.36 \pm 0.23) \times 10^{-4}. This precision constrains new physics contributions to FCNC, with LHCb experiments providing complementary measurements in exclusive modes like B+→K+π+π−γB^+ \to K^+ \pi^+ \pi^- \gamma, further tightening bounds on beyond-Standard-Model effects.

In Antiparticles and Hadrons

In , flavour quantum numbers assigned to elementary quarks extend naturally to their antiparticles by reversing the sign, preserving the additive nature of these quantum numbers. For instance, the carries strangeness S=−1S = -1, while the anti-strange quark has S=+1S = +1; similarly, the charm quark has charm C=+1C = +1, and the anti-charm has C=−1C = -1. This convention ensures that flavour conservation in strong and electromagnetic interactions holds for antiparticle processes, such as or . For composite hadrons, flavour quantum numbers are determined additively from their quark constituents, with antiquarks contributing the negative of the corresponding 's value. Mesons, composed of a quark-antiquark pair qiqˉjq_i \bar{q}_j, thus have net flavour quantum numbers given by F=Fi−FjF = F_i - F_j, where FF represents any flavour label like SS or charm CC. For example, the positively charged pion π+\pi^+ (udˉ\bar{\rm d}) has no net (S=0−0=0S = 0 - 0 = 0) beyond its electric charge, while the K+K^+ (usˉ\bar{\rm s}) carries S=0−(−1)=+1S = 0 - (-1) = +1. Baryons, made of three quarks (qqq), sum the flavours directly: the proton (uud) has no exotic flavour (S=0S = 0), whereas the Λ\Lambda baryon (uds) has S=−1S = -1 from the single . This additive structure underpins the classification of hadronic multiplets in the . Hadrons with non-zero flavour quantum numbers often reveal their internal structure through decay patterns, particularly in weak interactions. A key example is the ΔS=ΔQ\Delta S = \Delta Q rule observed in semileptonic decays of strange hadrons, where the change in ΔS\Delta S equals the change in ΔQ\Delta Q of the hadron; this arises from the structure of the charged weak current in the Cabibbo theory, forbidding transitions like K0→π−e+νeK^0 \to \pi^- e^+ \nu_e while allowing K+→π0e+νeK^+ \to \pi^0 e^+ \nu_e. Recent simulations have advanced understanding of flavour-singlet hadrons, such as the η\eta and η′\eta' mesons, by computing their masses and decay constants at physical masses, accounting for the U(1)AU(1)_A anomaly that lifts the singlet mass; for instance, these calculations yield η′\eta' masses around 958 MeV with improved precision on mixing angles.

Symmetries in Flavour Physics

Global Flavour Symmetries

In the limit where quarks and leptons are massless, the Standard Model Lagrangian exhibits a large global flavor symmetry group, specifically U(3)5=[SU(3)Q×U(1)Q]3×[SU(3)L×U(1)L]2U(3)^5 = [SU(3)_Q \times U(1)_Q]^3 \times [SU(3)_L \times U(1)_L]^2, arising from the independent transformations of the three generations of left-handed quark doublets QLQ_L, right-handed up-type quarks uRu_R, right-handed down-type quarks dRd_R, left-handed lepton doublets LLL_L, and right-handed charged leptons eRe_R (with neutrinos remaining massless in the minimal model). This symmetry treats the three flavors within each sector as identical, parameterized by unitary matrices acting on flavor indices. The generators of the non-Abelian SU(3)SU(3) subgroups correspond to the Gell-Mann matrices λa\lambda^a (for a=1,…,8a = 1, \dots, 8), satisfying the commutation relations [Ta,Tb]=ifabcTc[T^a, T^b] = i f^{abc} T^c, where Ta=λa/2T^a = \lambda^a / 2 and fabcf^{abc} are structure constants, enabling the classification of particles under irreducible representations of SU(Nf)SU(N_f) with Nf=3N_f = 3 flavors. These symmetries are accidental, emerging from the renormalizability and gauge structure of the theory, and are explicitly broken by the Yukawa couplings that generate fermion masses via the Higgs mechanism. For the light quarks (up, down, and strange), the small masses relative to the QCD scale ΛQCD≈200\Lambda_{QCD} \approx 200 MeV allow approximate global flavor symmetries. The SU(2)SU(2) isospin symmetry treats the up and down quarks as an isodoublet, with mu≈md≈5m_u \approx m_d \approx 5 MeV, preserving approximate degeneracy in hadronic spectra and enabling the classification of nucleons (proton and neutron) as an isospin doublet and pions as an isotriplet. Extending to three flavors, the SU(3)SU(3) flavor symmetry, proposed independently by Murray Gell-Mann and Yuval Ne'eman in 1961, assumes mu=md=ms=0m_u = m_d = m_s = 0 and organizes hadrons into multiplets under the eightfold way, such as the octet representation for pseudoscalar mesons (π,K,η\pi, K, \eta) and spin-1/2 baryons (N,Λ,Σ,ΞN, \Lambda, \Sigma, \Xi), and the decuplet for spin-3/2 baryons (Δ,Σ∗,Ξ∗,Ω\Delta, \Sigma^*, \Xi^*, \Omega). This symmetry predicts equal masses within multiplets and relations like the Gell-Mann–Okubo mass formula, 2mN+2mΞ=3mΛ+mΣ2 m_N + 2 m_\Xi = 3 m_\Lambda + m_\Sigma, or equivalently mΞ=3mΛ+mΣ−2mN2m_\Xi = \frac{3 m_\Lambda + m_\Sigma - 2 m_N}{2}, which holds to within a few percent for baryon masses. The quark mass hierarchy breaks these symmetries explicitly: mu≈md≪ms≈100m_u \approx m_d \ll m_s \approx 100 MeV introduces a leading-order violation in SU(3)SU(3), quantified by the symmetry-breaking Hamiltonian transforming as the eighth component of the adjoint representation, δH∝mssˉs\delta \mathcal{H} \propto m_s \bar{s} s, which splits multiplet masses (e.g., mK−mπ≈300m_K - m_\pi \approx 300 MeV) while preserving isospin to high accuracy. For leptons, the analogous U(3)L×U(3)EU(3)_L \times U(3)_E symmetry in the massless limit is broken by charged lepton masses (me≪mμ≪mτm_e \ll m_\mu \ll m_\tau), but lacks hadronic bound states for multiplet classification; instead, it underlies neutrino oscillation analyses assuming flavor universality before mixing. These global symmetries provide a framework for understanding flavor conservation in strong interactions and motivate effective theories like chiral perturbation theory, where symmetry breaking parameters are treated perturbatively.

QCD Symmetries

(QCD) describes the strong interactions among and gluons through the non-Abelian gauge group SU(3)_c of , where carry but the theory treats all quark flavors identically in its fundamental dynamics. The flavor structure in QCD arises primarily from the quark mass terms, as the gauge interactions do not distinguish between flavors. The QCD Lagrangian for the quark sector is given by LQCDquark=∑f=1Nfqˉf(iγμDμ−mf)qf,\mathcal{L}_\text{QCD}^\text{quark} = \sum_{f=1}^{N_f} \bar{q}_f (i \gamma^\mu D_\mu - m_f) q_f, where qfq_f denotes the Dirac field for the ff-th flavor, NfN_f is the number of active flavors (typically 3 or 6 depending on the energy scale), mfm_f is the corresponding mass, and Dμ=∂μ−igsGμataD_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g_s G_\mu^a t^a is the flavor-independent involving the strong coupling gsg_s and fields GμaG_\mu^a with SU(3)_c generators tat^a. This form renders the strong interactions flavor-blind, as the - vertices couple universally to all flavors via color charge alone, without any flavor-dependent coefficients. In the classical theory with massless quarks (mf=0m_f = 0), the Lagrangian exhibits an approximate global SU(NfN_f)V×_V \times SU(NfN_f)A_A , corresponding to independent vector and axial transformations on left- and right-handed fields. Quantum effects preserve the vector SU(NfN_f)V_V but break the axial SU(NfN_f)A_A through the , particularly the U(1)_A , due to contributions and the non-trivial of the gauge fields. Gluon-mediated processes thus conserve flavor quantum numbers, as gluons carry no flavor and only exchange color. QCD confinement ensures that quarks are bound into color-singlet hadrons, such as mesons and baryons, where the net flavor content is preserved because interactions do not alter quark flavors during . Recent advances in simulations have improved calculations of heavy quark (charm and bottom) dynamics, enabling precise determinations of flavor-specific observables like decay constants and form factors in heavy-light mesons, which test the flavor independence of couplings at scales.

Chiral and Vector Symmetries

In (QCD), the vector flavor symmetry group SU(N_f)_V, where N_f denotes the number of light flavors, emerges as an exact of the Lagrangian in the limit of vanishing masses. This acts on the fields through vector-like transformations that treat left- and right-handed components identically, thereby conserving individual flavor quantum numbers such as or charm. It underpins flavor conservation in strong interactions and remains approximately valid even with small masses, as the explicit breaking is perturbative. A richer structure arises from the chiral SU(N_f)_L × SU(N_f)_R, also present in the massless limit of the QCD Lagrangian. Under this symmetry, left-handed fields q_L transform as q_L → U_L q_L and right-handed fields q_R as q_R → U_R q_R, where U_L and U_R are independent SU(N_f) unitary matrices. \begin{align*} q_L &\to U_L q_L, \ q_R &\to U_R q_R. \end{align*} This separation reflects the chiral invariance of the massless . However, the symmetry is spontaneously broken in the QCD vacuum by the non-zero expectation value of the bilinear condensate ⟨\bar{q} q⟩, which aligns left- and right-handed components and reduces the symmetry to the diagonal vector subgroup SU(N_f)_V. The spontaneous breaking produces N_f^2 - 1 massless Nambu–Goldstone bosons, corresponding to the light pseudoscalar mesons like pions and kaons for N_f = 2 or 3. The pattern of this spontaneous breaking is constrained by the 't Hooft anomaly matching condition, which ensures consistency between anomalies in the perturbative regime and contributions from low-energy , such as the Goldstone bosons or other effective descriptions. This condition rules out certain symmetry-breaking vacua and supports the observed diagonal breaking in QCD. masses introduce explicit breaking of the chiral symmetry, lifting the Goldstone bosons to finite masses via the Gell-Mann–Oakes–Renner relation, which connects mass squared to the average light mass and the condensate: m_π^2 f_π^2 = -(m_u + m_d) ⟨\bar{q} q⟩. The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model offers an effective framework for understanding these dynamics, modeling as interacting fermions via a point-like four-fermion interaction that triggers spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and dynamical mass generation, mimicking non-perturbative QCD effects at low energies.

Flavour Conservation and Mixing

Conservation Laws

In the of , flavour quantum numbers are exactly conserved in and electromagnetic interactions because these forces are flavour-blind, coupling equally to all quark and lepton flavours without inducing transitions between them. The interaction, mediated by gluons, treats all quark flavours identically due to the colour charge being the sole distinguishing feature, while electromagnetic interactions involve exchange that couples diagonally to the electric charges of flavour eigenstates, prohibiting flavour-changing processes at tree level. This exact conservation manifests in the absence of flavour-violating decays in these sectors, such as the stability of protons against decay into lighter hadrons via or electromagnetic processes. In contrast, the weak interaction violates flavour conservation through charged-current processes, where a or changes flavour by one unit (ΔF = 1) while altering its charge by one unit (ΔQ = ±1), as dictated by the ± boson vertices. This violation arises because the weak Hamiltonian does not commute with flavour generators, expressed mathematically as $$[H_\text{weak}, F] \neq 0], where FF represents a flavour operator such as or charm number. A classic example is β-decay (n→pe−νˉen \to p e^- \bar{\nu}_e), where a transitions to an ; however, there is an ongoing ~4σ discrepancy between ultracold measurements of the lifetime (879.4 ± 0.6 s) and beam method results (~888 s), which has implications for precision tests of flavour-changing processes and the CKM matrix unitarity. For , the total L=Le+Lμ+LτL = L_e + L_\mu + L_\tau is conserved in the , but individual flavour numbers (Le,Lμ,LτL_e, L_\mu, L_\tau) are only approximately conserved; oscillations introduce small violations, while charged- flavour remains strictly conserved at tree level. The long lifetimes of flavour eigenstates, such as the , underscore this approximate conservation, as flavour-diagonal decays would be instantaneous via strong or electromagnetic forces if allowed, but are forbidden, leaving weak processes as the dominant (albeit slow) decay mode. Experimental tests of these conservation laws rely on precision measurements of decay rates and branching ratios, probing for deviations that could signal new physics. For instance, searches for flavour-changing neutral currents in weak decays, suppressed in the , yield stringent limits such as the branching ratio for KL0→μ+μ−K_L^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^- at (6.84 ± 0.11) × 10^{-9}, consistent with exact conservation in strong and electromagnetic sectors and the ΔF = 1 rule in weak processes. Similarly, charged-lepton flavour violation limits, like μ→eγ\mu \to e \gamma at < 1.5 × 10^{-13} (90% CL), confirm approximate individual flavour conservation, with any observed violation tightly bounded by these rates. These measurements, performed at facilities like LHCb and Belle II, provide critical validation of the 's flavour structure.

Flavour-Changing Neutral Currents

Flavour-changing neutral currents (FCNCs) are processes in the weak interaction that alter the flavour of quarks or leptons without changing their electric charge, such as transitions between different generations mediated by neutral bosons like the Z boson or photon. In the Standard Model, FCNCs are forbidden at tree level because the neutral weak currents are flavour-diagonal, and they only arise at higher-order loop levels, where they are strongly suppressed by the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani (GIM) mechanism. This suppression occurs due to the destructive interference among virtual quark or lepton exchanges in the loops, proportional to the mass-squared differences between generations, making FCNC rates extremely small and serving as a key test for new physics beyond the Standard Model. Representative examples of FCNC processes include the rare decay KL0→μ+μ−K_L^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^-, which proceeds via loop diagrams involving virtual up and charm quarks and has a measured branching fraction of approximately 6.84×10−96.84 \times 10^{-9}, consistent with predictions after accounting for long-distance contributions. Another benchmark is the radiative decay b→sγb \to s \gamma, observed in B→XsγB \to X_s \gamma transitions with a branching fraction around 3.5×10−43.5 \times 10^{-4}, where the photon's emission highlights the flavour change from bottom to and provides precise constraints on the charged Higgs mass in extensions like the two-Higgs-doublet model. These processes are highly sensitive to new particles or interactions that could enhance rates, as deviations would signal flavour-changing neutral couplings not present in the . For quarks, FCNCs are parametrized by the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, a 3×33 \times 3 unitary matrix that describes mixing among the three generations and introduces CP violation through a complex phase. The CKM elements, such as ∣Vud∣≈0.974|V_{ud}| \approx 0.974, ∣Vus∣≈0.225|V_{us}| \approx 0.225, ∣Vcb∣≈0.0409|V_{cb}| \approx 0.0409, and ∣Vub∣≈0.0036|V_{ub}| \approx 0.0036, quantify the mixing strengths, with smaller off-diagonal elements reflecting the hierarchy that suppresses FCNCs. The unitarity of the CKM matrix implies relations like VudVub∗+VcdVcb∗+VtdVtb∗=0V_{ud} V_{ub}^* + V_{cd} V_{cb}^* + V_{td} V_{tb}^* = 0, which can be visualized as the unitarity triangle, whose angles and sides are measured from processes like B→J/ψKSB \to J/\psi K_S decays and provide tests of flavour dynamics. The Wolfenstein parametrization approximates the matrix as [ V_{\rm CKM} \approx \begin{pmatrix} 1 - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} & \lambda & A\lambda^3 (\rho - i\eta) \ -\lambda & 1 - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} & A\lambda^2 \ A\lambda^3 (1 - \rho - i\eta) & -A\lambda^2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, with parameters $ \lambda \approx 0.225 $, $ A \approx 0.81 $, $ \rho \approx 0.14 $, and $ \eta \approx 0.35 $, capturing the leading-order flavour structure and GIM suppression.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-ckm-matrix.pdf) In the lepton sector, FCNCs manifest through neutrino oscillations, governed by the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix, which mixes the three neutrino flavours and includes three mixing angles $ \theta_{12} $, $ \theta_{23} $, $ \theta_{13} $, and a Dirac CP-violating phase $ \delta_{\rm CP} $. Recent measurements yield $ \sin^2 \theta_{12} \approx 0.304 $, $ \sin^2 \theta_{23} \approx 0.57 $, $ \sin^2 \theta_{13} \approx 0.022 $, and $ \delta_{\rm CP} $ preferring values around $ 1.4\pi $ (near maximal CP violation) in the normal mass ordering scenario. The PMNS matrix is parametrized as U_{\rm PMNS} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & c_{23} & s_{23} \ 0 & -s_{23} & c_{23} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} c_{13} & 0 & s_{13} e^{-i\delta_{\rm CP}} \ 0 & 1 & 0 \ -s_{13} e^{i\delta_{\rm CP}} & 0 & c_{13} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} c_{12} & s_{12} & 0 \ -s_{12} & c_{12} & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, where $ c_{ij} = \cos \theta_{ij} $ and $ s_{ij} = \sin \theta_{ij} $, enabling flavour changes via oscillations over distances set by the mass-squared differences $ \Delta m^2_{21} \approx 7.5 \times 10^{-5} \, \rm eV^2 $ and $ |\Delta m^2_{31}| \approx 2.5 \times 10^{-3} \, \rm eV^2 $. The first joint analysis of T2K and NOvA data in 2025 refined these parameters, reducing uncertainties on $ \theta_{23} $ and $ \delta_{\rm CP} $ by combining accelerator neutrino beams and reducing tension between experiments, though the neutrino mass ordering remains unresolved.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09599-3) Experimental searches for FCNC anomalies continue to probe lepton flavour universality (LFU), the Standard Model assumption that electrons, muons, and taus couple equally to gauge bosons. At LHCb, measurements of ratios like $ R_K = \mathcal{B}(B^+ \to K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-) / \mathcal{B}(B^+ \to K^+ e^+ e^-) $ show deviations from unity, with the latest value $ R_K(1.1-6.0) = 0.846 \pm 0.04 $ (stat+syst) from data up to 9 fb^{-1}, hinting at possible LFU violations in $ b \to s \ell^+ \ell^- $ transitions that could arise from new FCNC mediators like leptoquarks.[](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-021-01478-8) These tensions, at around 3σ significance including theory uncertainties, persist but are not yet conclusive, motivating further data from LHCb Upgrade II and Belle II to distinguish Standard Model effects from new physics. ## The Flavour Problem ### Number and Hierarchy of Generations The observation of three generations of fundamental fermions—quarks and leptons—represents a cornerstone of the [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model), empirically established through precision measurements at electron-positron colliders and [neutrino](/page/Neutrino) experiments. The Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP) experiments provided compelling evidence by measuring the invisible decay width of the Z boson, which primarily proceeds into [neutrino](/page/Neutrino)-antineutrino pairs. The combined result yields an effective number of light [neutrino](/page/Neutrino) species $N_\nu = 3.0025 \pm 0.0061$, in excellent agreement with three massless or nearly massless [neutrino](/page/Neutrino)s per the [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model) predictions.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-standard-model.pdf) This measurement assumes the [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model) structure where each generation contributes one [neutrino](/page/Neutrino) flavor, and the partial width for each is given by \Gamma(Z \to \nu_i \bar{\nu}_i) = \frac{G_F M_Z^3}{12 \sqrt{2} \pi} \left( g_V^2 + g_A^2 \right), with $g_V = g_A = 1/2$ for left-handed neutrinos, leading to the total invisible width scaling directly with $N_\nu$. Complementary evidence from quark sector decays into hadronic final states at LEP further supports the three-generation structure, as the visible width aligns with contributions from six quark flavors without requiring additional sequential generations.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-standard-model.pdf) Neutrino oscillation experiments independently confirm the existence of three distinct neutrino flavors, $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$, through observed transitions such as $\nu_\mu \to \nu_e$ in atmospheric and accelerator beams, and $\nu_e \to \nu_\mu$ in reactor and solar data. These oscillations arise from nonzero mass differences and mixing among three mass eigenstates, with no significant evidence for sterile neutrinos or additional flavors in the sub-eV range. Global analyses fit the data using a three-neutrino mixing framework, with parameters like $\Delta m_{21}^2 \approx 7.5 \times 10^{-5}$ eV² and $|\Delta m_{32}^2| \approx 2.5 \times 10^{-3}$ eV² establishing the scale of the hierarchy.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-neutrino-mixing.pdf) The [fermion](/page/Fermion) masses within these generations display a pronounced [hierarchical structure](/page/Hierarchy), posing a key puzzle in flavor physics. For quarks, the up-type masses follow $m_t \gg m_c \gg m_u$, with $m_t \approx 173$ GeV, $m_c \approx 1.27$ GeV, and $m_u \approx 2.2$ MeV (at 2 GeV scale), while down-type masses exhibit $m_b \gg m_s \gg m_d \approx m_u$, with $m_b \approx 4.18$ GeV, $m_s \approx 95$ MeV, and $m_d \approx 4.7$ MeV.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-quark-masses.pdf) Charged leptons mirror this pattern with $m_\tau \gg m_\mu \gg m_e$, where $m_\tau \approx 1.78$ GeV, $m_\mu \approx 106$ MeV, and $m_e \approx 0.511$ MeV. [Neutrino](/page/Neutrino) masses, though tiny ($\sum m_{\nu_i} < 0.12$ eV from cosmology as of 2024), show a [hierarchy](/page/Hierarchy) in squared-mass differences consistent with normal or inverted ordering among three states. Recent DESI [data](/page/Data) from 2024 tighten this limit to potentially $\sum m_{\nu_i} < 0.095$ eV in some analyses, further constraining the [hierarchy](/page/Hierarchy).[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-neutrino-mixing.pdf)[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-sum-neutrino-masses.pdf) This pattern underscores the empirical fact of exactly three generations, as additional lighter families would alter decay widths and [oscillation](/page/Oscillation) spectra incompatibly with [data](/page/Data). Electroweak precision observables, including the S parameter and forward-backward asymmetries, tightly constrain extensions beyond three generations. A fourth sequential generation of fermions is excluded at the 5σ level or better, primarily due to its large positive contribution to the S parameter ($\Delta S \approx 0.2$) from new doublets, which exceeds allowed deviations from [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model) fits.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-standard-model.pdf) [Higgs boson](/page/Higgs_boson) coupling measurements at the [Large Hadron Collider](/page/Large_Hadron_Collider) further disfavor such extensions; the observed yukawa couplings to top, bottom, and [tau](/page/Tau) leptons match [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model) expectations within 10-20%, and a fourth generation would suppress the effective Higgs width to gluons and photons via loop resummation, conflicting with data. Projected High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) analyses, anticipated to start operations around 2029, expect improved bounds, with sensitivities reaching 5% precision on $ \kappa_f = g_{hff}/g_{hff}^{\rm SM} $ for third-generation fermions, reinforcing the three-generation limit without evidence for new heavy flavors.[](https://cds.cern.ch/record/2947877/files/ATL-PHYS-PROC-2025-100.pdf) Theoretically, the minimal Standard Model incorporates precisely three generations to match these observations, with anomaly cancellation conditions—such as the vanishing of the U(1)_Y [SU(2)_L]^2 triangle anomaly per generation—ensuring consistency without specifying the number beyond equating quark and lepton families. Beyond-Standard-Model frameworks, such as certain grand unified theories, naturally predict three generations via group-theoretic embeddings, while others (e.g., extra-dimensional or composite models) allowing more are now strongly constrained by electroweak and Higgs data, often requiring fine-tuning to evade exclusion.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-standard-model.pdf) ### Origins of Masses and Mixing Angles In the [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model), [fermion](/page/Fermion) masses and mixing angles originate from the Yukawa sector, where left- and right-handed [fermion](/page/Fermion) fields couple to the Higgs doublet via dimensionless Yukawa couplings $ y_f $. Upon electroweak [symmetry breaking](/page/Symmetry_breaking), the Higgs field acquires a [vacuum expectation value](/page/Vacuum_expectation_value) $ v \approx 246 $ GeV, generating Dirac mass matrices for quarks and charged leptons given by M_f = \frac{y_f v}{\sqrt{2}}, where $ f $ denotes the [fermion](/page/Fermion) type (up-type quarks, down-type quarks, or charged leptons). The physical masses are the eigenvalues obtained by [singular value decomposition](/page/Singular_value_decomposition) of these matrices, requiring bi-unitary transformations $ U_L^\dagger M_f U_R = \hat{M}_f $ (diagonal). For quarks, the charged-current weak interactions involve the left-handed fields, leading to mixing between mass and weak bases; the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix $ V = U_u^L{}^\dagger U_d^L $ parameterizes the off-diagonal elements arising from the misalignment between the up- and down-type mass matrices. This framework successfully describes the data but leaves the structure of the $ y_f $ matrices unexplained. The most striking feature of the flavor sector is the hierarchical pattern of masses, exemplified by the [up quark](/page/Up_quark) [mass](/page/Mass) being approximately $ 10^{-5} $ times the top quark [mass](/page/Mass) ($ m_u / m_t \sim 10^{-5} $), spanning over five orders of magnitude across generations. This hierarchy, along with the small mixing angles in the CKM matrix, constitutes the "flavor problem," as the [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model) offers no mechanism for such structure. Texture models address this by imposing specific [patterns](/page/Pattern), such as zeros in the Yukawa matrices at a high-energy scale, which, after [renormalization group](/page/Renormalization_group) evolution, yield the observed hierarchies and mixings upon diagonalization. A influential approach is the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism, which introduces a global $ U(1) $ flavor [symmetry](/page/Symmetry) broken by a scalar "flavon" field acquiring a small [vacuum expectation value](/page/Vacuum_expectation_value) $ \langle \phi \rangle / M \equiv [\epsilon](/page/Epsilon) \ll 1 $ (where $ M $ is a high scale, e.g., the Planck scale). Fermions of different generations carry distinct $ U(1) $ charges, suppressing Yukawa entries by powers of $ \epsilon $ via effective operators like $ ( \phi / M )^n \bar{\psi}_L H \psi_R / M^{n-1} $, naturally generating the [mass](/page/Mass) ratios and small mixings without fine-tuning.[](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0703167) For neutrinos, the Standard Model predicts massless left-handed neutrinos, but oscillations require tiny masses $ m_\nu \lesssim 0.1 $ eV. The type-I seesaw mechanism extends the model by adding gauge-singlet right-handed neutrinos $ N_R $ with Majorana masses $ M_R $ at a high scale (e.g., $ 10^{14} $ GeV). The resulting $ 6 \times 6 $ neutrino mass matrix in the basis $ (\nu_L, N_R^c) $ is block-diagonalized to yield light masses $ m_\nu \approx y_\nu^2 v^2 / M_R $, suppressing $ m_\nu $ via the large $ M_R $ while generating mixing through the Dirac Yukawa $ y_\nu $.[](https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.1808) This elegantly explains the small $ m_\nu $ relative to charged lepton masses but inherits the hierarchy issue for $ y_\nu $, often addressed via Froggatt-Nielsen suppressions or textures. Despite these proposals, no underlying theory dictates the Yukawa matrices; the "anarchic" [paradigm](/page/Paradigm) posits that the $ y_f $ entries are unstructured random complex numbers of order unity, with hierarchies emerging statistically from diagonalization (e.g., via the Frobenius norm). This fits [quark](/page/Quark) and [lepton](/page/Lepton) data at the percent level but provides no predictions for unobserved parameters like CP phases. String theory offers a more fundamental perspective, where flavor structures arise from compactification geometries in heterotic or type-II models; Yukawa couplings are computed as overlap integrals of [fermion](/page/Fermion) wavefunctions on [extra dimensions](/page/Extra_dimensions), often yielding exponential hierarchies modulated by moduli stabilization, compatible with observed masses and mixings in specific Calabi-Yau constructions.[](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17704) Recent [lattice QCD](/page/Lattice_QCD) simulations, using gradient flow methods on ensembles with physical light [quark](/page/Quark)s, have refined quark mass determinations to sub-percent precision, confirming $ m_u = 2.14(3) $ MeV, $ m_d = 4.67(4) $ MeV, and $ m_s = 93.4(4) $ MeV in the $ \overline{\rm MS} $ scheme at 2 GeV, underscoring the need for theoretical explanations of these scales.[](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04268) ## Historical Development ### Isospin and Early Symmetries In 1932, [Werner Heisenberg](/page/Werner_Heisenberg) introduced the concept of [isospin](/page/Isospin) as an SU(2) symmetry to describe the strong nuclear force acting equally on protons and neutrons, treating them as two states of the same particle, the [nucleon](/page/Nucleon), despite their differing electric charges. This symmetry arose from observations that the proton and neutron have nearly identical masses (approximately 938 MeV/c²) and that nuclear binding energies are insensitive to whether a nucleon is a proton or [neutron](/page/Neutron), suggesting charge independence in the strong interaction. The third component of isospin, denoted I₃, serves as the [quantum number](/page/Quantum_number) distinguishing these states: I₃ = +1/2 for the proton and I₃ = -1/2 for the [neutron](/page/Neutron), forming an isospin doublet with total isospin I = 1/2. This multiplet can be represented as: \begin{pmatrix} p \ n \end{pmatrix}, where the strong interaction Hamiltonian commutes with the isospin operators, preserving I and I₃. In the [1940s](/page/1940s) and early [1950s](/page/1950s), following the discovery of pions in 1947, the isospin formalism was extended to these mesons, with the positively charged, neutral, and negatively charged pions forming an I = 1 triplet (I₃ = +1, 0, -1, respectively), further supporting the symmetry in pion-nucleon interactions. Isospin symmetry is approximate, primarily because the up and down quark masses are nearly equal (m_u ≈ 2.2 MeV/c², m_d ≈ 4.7 MeV/c²), allowing the strong interaction to treat them interchangeably as the building blocks of nucleons and pions. The symmetry is broken mainly by electromagnetic interactions, which distinguish charged particles, and to a lesser extent by the small quark mass difference; these effects lead to observable mass splittings, such as the neutron-proton mass difference of about 1.3 MeV/c². In modern [quark model](/page/Quark_model) interpretations, the [up quark](/page/Up_quark) carries I₃ = +1/2 and the [down quark](/page/Down_quark) I₃ = -1/2, providing a fundamental basis for this early flavor symmetry. ### Strangeness, Hypercharge, and the Eightfold Way In the early [1950s](/page/1950s), observations of particles such as kaons (K mesons) and [lambda](/page/Lambda) (Λ) baryons revealed puzzling patterns in their production and decay modes, where these "strange" particles were produced copiously in [strong](/page/The_Strong) interactions but decayed slowly via weak processes. To account for this behavior, Tadao Nakano and Kazuhiko Nishijima introduced the [strangeness](/page/Strangeness) quantum number S in 1953, assigning integer values to particles: for example, S = +1 for K⁺ and K⁰, S = -1 for K⁻, \bar{K}^0, and Λ, while ordinary hadrons like protons and pions have S = 0.[](https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article/10/5/581/1899895) [Strangeness](/page/Strangeness) is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions but can change by ±1 in weak decays, explaining the longevity of strange particles relative to their production rates.[](https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article/10/5/581/1899895) Building on isospin symmetry SU(2), which treated up and down quarks analogously for light hadrons, the inclusion of [strangeness](/page/Strangeness) suggested an extension to a larger [symmetry group](/page/Symmetry_group) incorporating a third "flavor." [Hypercharge](/page/Hypercharge) Y was defined as the sum of [baryon number](/page/Baryon_number) B and [strangeness](/page/Strangeness) S, Y = B + S, providing a conserved [quantum number](/page/Quantum_number) under strong interactions that facilitated classification of hadrons beyond [isospin](/page/Isospin) multiplets. This combination allowed strange particles to form coherent families with non-strange ones, such as the Λ (Y = 0, unlike the [nucleon](/page/Nucleon) with Y = 1). In 1961, [Murray Gell-Mann](/page/Murray_Gell-Mann) independently developed (and [Yuval Ne'eman](/page/Yuval_Ne'eman) simultaneously proposed) the eightfold way, a phenomenological scheme based on the SU(3) flavor symmetry group, which organizes hadrons into irreducible representations or multiplets degenerate under the full symmetry but split by a small breaking term proportional to the [strange quark](/page/Strange_quark) mass.[](https://doi.org/10.2172/4008239) The baryons, for instance, fit into an octet representation (dimension 8), including the proton (p), [neutron](/page/Neutron) (n), Σ⁺, Σ⁰, Σ⁻, Λ, Ξ⁰, and Ξ⁻, arranged in a weight diagram with horizontal axis as the third component of [isospin](/page/Isospin) I₃ and vertical axis as [hypercharge](/page/Hypercharge) Y. The pseudoscalar mesons form a similar octet: π⁺, π⁰, π⁻, K⁺, K⁰, \bar{K}^0, K⁻, and η, with masses satisfying the Gell-Mann–Okubo mass formula derived from the symmetry breaking. The SU(3) structure also accommodates a [baryon](/page/Baryon) decuplet (dimension 10), a symmetric representation with particles of spin 3/2, including Δ, Σ*, Ξ*, and a predicted Ω⁻ [baryon](/page/Baryon) at the corner of the diagram with I = 0, Y = -1, S = -3, and charge Q = -1. This prediction stood as a critical test of the eightfold way, as no such particle had been observed. In [1964](/page/1964), a collaboration at [Brookhaven National Laboratory](/page/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory) discovered the Ω⁻ in proton-accelerator experiments, confirming its mass around 1672 MeV/c², decay modes like Ω⁻ → Λ K⁻, and quantum numbers exactly as forecasted, providing strong empirical validation for SU(3) flavor symmetry.[](https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.204) ### Quark Model and GIM Mechanism In 1964, [Murray Gell-Mann](/page/Murray_Gell-Mann) introduced the [quark model](/page/Quark_model), proposing that baryons and mesons are composite states built from three fundamental spin-1/2 particles called quarks: the [up quark](/page/Up_quark) (u) with charge +2/3, the [down quark](/page/Down_quark) (d) with charge -1/3, and the [strange quark](/page/Strange_quark) (s) with charge -1/3, each carrying [baryon number](/page/Baryon_number) +1/3.[](https://www.nssp.uni-saarland.de/lehre/Vorlesung/Kernphysik_SS19/History/Papers/Gell-Mann.pdf) Independently, [George Zweig](/page/George_Zweig) proposed an analogous model in a CERN preprint the same year, dubbing the constituents "aces" but later adopting the term quarks.[](https://cds.cern.ch/record/1998511) This framework interprets the previously phenomenological SU(3) flavor symmetry—the eightfold way—as arising from the combination rules of these quarks under the strong interaction, treating quarks as the fundamental building blocks of hadrons rather than abstract symmetry representations.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2022/reviews/rpp2022-rev-quark-model.pdf) The quark model's spectroscopic predictions align closely with experimental hadron spectra. Baryons emerge as color-singlet bound states of three [quark](/page/Quark)s (qqq), reproducing the SU(3) octet (e.g., [nucleon](/page/Nucleon) N as uud or udd) and decuplet (e.g., Δ^{++} as uuu), with ground-state masses and magnetic moments matching observations to within a few percent.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2022/reviews/rpp2022-rev-quark-model.pdf) Mesons, as quark-antiquark pairs (q\bar{q}), form nonets under SU(3), such as the [pseudoscalar](/page/Pseudoscalar) octet including the [pion](/page/Pion) (u\bar{d}) and [kaon](/page/Kaon) (u\bar{s}), and vector nonets like the ρ and K^*, where mixing angles and decay patterns further confirm the assignments.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2022/reviews/rpp2022-rev-quark-model.pdf) These successes extend to excited states, though challenges arise for higher resonances due to relativistic effects and confinement dynamics.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2022/reviews/rpp2022-rev-quark-model.pdf) The three-quark model encountered issues with weak interactions, particularly the observed suppression of flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNCs), as naive Cabibbo theory predicted excessively large rates for processes like strangeness-changing neutral decays.[](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285) In 1970, [Sheldon Glashow](/page/Sheldon_Glashow), John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani resolved this via the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani (GIM) mechanism, postulating a fourth up-type [quark](/page/Quark)—the charm [quark](/page/Quark) (c), with charge +2/3 and mass around 3 GeV—to pair with the [strange quark](/page/Strange_quark) in a SU(4) flavor extension.[](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285) This introduces lepton-like symmetry between down-type (d, s) and up-type (u, c) [quarks](/page/Quark), ensuring unitarity in the weak mixing matrix that cancels tree-level FCNCs.[](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285) At loop level, the [GIM mechanism](/page/GIM_mechanism) manifests in box diagrams for ΔS=2 transitions, such as K^0-\bar{K}^0 mixing, where virtual u and c quarks contribute with opposite signs due to orthogonal mixing matrix elements, leading to destructive interference.[](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.6154) The residual amplitude arises from mass differences, suppressing the short-distance contribution to the mass difference Δm_K by a factor scaling as the GIM parameter.[](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.897) Specifically, \Delta m_K \propto \frac{m_c^2 - m_u^2}{M_W^2}, where M_W is the W-boson mass, reflecting the quadratic sensitivity to internal [quark](/page/Quark) propagators in the loop.[](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.897) This mechanism not only explains the empirical suppression factor of ~10^{-8} relative to charged-current processes but also predicts the existence of charmed hadrons, which were discovered in 1974, affirming the model's validity.[](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.6154) ### Discovery of Charm, Bottom, and Top Quarks The discoveries of the charm, bottom, and top quarks between 1974 and 1995 completed the three generations of quarks predicted by the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani (GIM) mechanism and the sequential quark model, which required additional flavors to suppress flavor-changing neutral currents and restore symmetry in weak interactions.[](https://cerncourier.com/a/50-years-of-the-gim-mechanism/) These experimental milestones validated the expanding quark sector and paved the way for the full Standard Model flavor structure. The charm quark was discovered in November 1974 through the independent observation of the J/ψ meson, a [bound state](/page/Bound_state) of a [charm quark](/page/Charm_quark) and its antiquark, by two teams using electron-positron colliders. At the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), Burton Richter's group detected a narrow [resonance](/page/Resonance) at 3.1 GeV in e⁺e⁻ annihilation data from the SPEAR collider, reporting a cross-section peak with a [mass](/page/Mass) of 3.105 GeV/c² and width of 70 keV. Simultaneously, Samuel Ting's team at [Brookhaven National Laboratory](/page/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory) observed the same particle, dubbed J, in proton-beryllium collisions at the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron, with a [mass](/page/Mass) of 3.1 GeV/c² and decay into electron-positron pairs. This "November Revolution" confirmed the existence of a fourth quark flavor, as anticipated by the [GIM mechanism](/page/GIM_mechanism) to explain the absence of strangeness-changing neutral currents.[](https://cerncourier.com/a/50-years-of-the-gim-mechanism/) The bottom quark followed in 1977, identified via the Υ meson, a bottom-antibottom [bound state](/page/Bound_state), in proton beam experiments at [Fermilab](/page/Fermilab). Led by Leon Lederman, the E288 collaboration observed a dilepton [resonance](/page/Resonance) at an invariant mass of 9.5 GeV in proton-beryllium interactions, with a production cross-section indicating a new heavy quark flavor. The Υ's narrow width of about 54 keV and sequential states at higher masses further supported the bottom quark's properties, motivating a third generation to maintain GIM suppression of flavor violations across all quark pairs.[](https://history.fnal.gov/this_day_1977_07_01.html) The top quark, the heaviest and final quark in the [Standard Model](/page/Standard_Model), was directly observed in 1995 by the CDF and DØ collaborations at the [Tevatron](/page/Tevatron) proton-antiproton collider at [Fermilab](/page/Fermilab). Both experiments detected top-antitop quark pairs decaying into W bosons and bottom quarks, with CDF reporting 12 candidate events consistent with a top mass of 176 +13 -13 GeV/c², and DØ observing 17 events yielding 199 +19 -21 GeV/c². This discovery, after nearly two decades of searches, completed the six-quark flavor structure and confirmed the third generation's role in GIM-mediated cancellations.[](https://cerncourier.com/a/50-years-of-the-gim-mechanism/) Subsequent precision measurements have refined the top quark mass; as of 2025, the Particle Data Group world average stands at 172.56 ± 0.31 GeV/c², incorporating LHC data from ATLAS and CMS that achieve sub-GeV uncertainties through kinematic fits in top-pair events.[](https://pdg.lbl.gov/2025/listings/rpp2025-list-t-quark.pdf)
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.