Hubbry Logo
Quark modelQuark modelMain
Open search
Quark model
Community hub
Quark model
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Quark model
Quark model
from Wikipedia
Figure 1: The pseudoscalar meson nonet. Members of the original meson "octet" are shown in green, the singlet in magenta. Although these mesons are now grouped into a nonet, the Eightfold Way name derives from the patterns of eight for the mesons and baryons in the original classification scheme.

In particle physics, the quark model is a classification scheme for hadrons in terms of their valence quarks—the quarks and antiquarks that give rise to the quantum numbers of the hadrons. The quark model underlies "flavor SU(3)", or the Eightfold Way, the successful classification scheme organizing the large number of lighter hadrons that were being discovered starting in the 1950s and continuing through the 1960s. It received experimental verification beginning in the late 1960s and is a valid and effective classification of them to date. The model was independently proposed by physicists Murray Gell-Mann,[1] who dubbed them "quarks" in a concise paper, and George Zweig,[2][3] who suggested "aces" in a longer manuscript. André Petermann also touched upon the central ideas from 1963 to 1965, without as much quantitative substantiation.[4][5] Today, the model has essentially been absorbed as a component of the established quantum field theory of strong and electroweak particle interactions, dubbed the Standard Model.

Hadrons are not really "elementary", and can be regarded as bound states of their "valence quarks" and antiquarks, which give rise to the quantum numbers of the hadrons. These quantum numbers are labels identifying the hadrons, and are of two kinds. One set comes from the Poincaré symmetryJPC, where J, P and C stand for the total angular momentum, P-symmetry, and C-symmetry, respectively.

The other set is the flavor quantum numbers such as the isospin, strangeness, charm, and so on. The strong interactions binding the quarks together are insensitive to these quantum numbers, so variation of them leads to systematic mass and coupling relationships among the hadrons in the same flavor multiplet.

All quarks are assigned a baryon number of 1/3. Up, charm and top quarks have an electric charge of +2/3, while the down, strange, and bottom quarks have an electric charge of −1/3. Antiquarks have the opposite quantum numbers. Quarks are spin-1/2 particles, and thus fermions. Each quark or antiquark obeys the Gell-Mann–Nishijima formula individually, so any additive assembly of them will as well.

Mesons are made of a valence quark–antiquark pair (thus have a baryon number of 0), while baryons are made of three quarks (thus have a baryon number of 1). This article discusses the quark model for the up, down, and strange flavors of quark (which form an approximate flavor SU(3) symmetry). There are generalizations to larger number of flavors.

History

[edit]

Developing classification schemes for hadrons became a timely question after new experimental techniques uncovered so many of them that it became clear that they could not all be elementary. These discoveries led Wolfgang Pauli to exclaim "Had I foreseen that, I would have gone into botany." and Enrico Fermi to advise his student Leon Lederman: "Young man, if I could remember the names of these particles, I would have been a botanist." These new schemes earned Nobel prizes for experimental particle physicists, including Luis Alvarez, who was at the forefront of many of these developments. Constructing hadrons as bound states of fewer constituents would thus organize the "zoo" at hand. Several early proposals, such as the ones by Enrico Fermi and Chen-Ning Yang (1949), and the Sakata model (1956), ended up satisfactorily covering the mesons, but failed with baryons, and so were unable to explain all the data.

The Gell-Mann–Nishijima formula, developed by Murray Gell-Mann and Kazuhiko Nishijima, led to the Eightfold Way classification, invented by Gell-Mann, with important independent contributions from Yuval Ne'eman, in 1961. The hadrons were organized into SU(3) representation multiplets, octets and decuplets, of roughly the same mass, due to the strong interactions; and smaller mass differences linked to the flavor quantum numbers, invisible to the strong interactions. The Gell-Mann–Okubo mass formula systematized the quantification of these small mass differences among members of a hadronic multiplet, controlled by the explicit symmetry breaking of SU(3).

The spin-3/2 Ω
baryon
, a member of the ground-state decuplet, was a crucial prediction of that classification. After it was discovered in an experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Gell-Mann received a Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on the Eightfold Way, in 1969.

Finally, in 1964, Gell-Mann and George Zweig, discerned independently what the Eightfold Way picture encodes: They posited three elementary fermionic constituents—the "up", "down", and "strange" quarks—which are unobserved, and possibly unobservable in a free form. Simple pairwise or triplet combinations of these three constituents and their antiparticles underlie and elegantly encode the Eightfold Way classification, in an economical, tight structure, resulting in further simplicity. Hadronic mass differences were now linked to the different masses of the constituent quarks.

It would take about a decade for the unexpected nature—and physical reality—of these quarks to be appreciated more fully (See Quarks). Counter-intuitively, they cannot ever be observed in isolation (color confinement), but instead always combine with other quarks to form full hadrons, which then furnish ample indirect information on the trapped quarks themselves. Conversely, the quarks serve in the definition of quantum chromodynamics, the fundamental theory fully describing the strong interactions; and the Eightfold Way is now understood to be a consequence of the flavor symmetry structure of the lightest three of them.

Mesons

[edit]
Figure 2: Pseudoscalar mesons of spin-0 form a nonet
Figure 3: Vector mesons of spin-1 form a nonet

The Eightfold Way classification is named after the following fact: If we take three flavors of quarks, then the quarks lie in the fundamental representation, 3 (called the triplet) of flavor SU(3). The antiquarks lie in the complex conjugate representation 3. The nine states (nonet) made out of a pair can be decomposed into the trivial representation, 1 (called the singlet), and the adjoint representation, 8 (called the octet). The notation for this decomposition is

Figure 1 shows the application of this decomposition to the mesons. If the flavor symmetry were exact (as in the limit that only the strong interactions operate, but the electroweak interactions are notionally switched off), then all nine mesons would have the same mass. However, the physical content of the full theory[clarification needed] includes consideration of the symmetry breaking induced by the quark mass differences, and considerations of mixing between various multiplets (such as the octet and the singlet).

N.B. Nevertheless, the mass splitting between the η and the η′ is larger than the quark model can accommodate, and this "ηη′ puzzle" has its origin in topological peculiarities of the strong interaction vacuum, such as instanton configurations.

Mesons are hadrons with zero baryon number. If the quark–antiquark pair are in an orbital angular momentum L state, and have spin S, then

  • |LS| ≤ JL + S, where S = 0 or 1,
  • P = (−1)L+1, where the 1 in the exponent arises from the intrinsic parity of the quark–antiquark pair.
  • C = (−1)L+S for mesons which have no flavor. Flavored mesons have indefinite value of C.
  • For isospin I = 1 and 0 states, one can define a new multiplicative quantum number called the G-parity such that G = (−1)I+L+S.

If P = (−1)J, then it follows that S = 1, thus PC = 1. States with these quantum numbers are called natural parity states; while all other quantum numbers are thus called exotic (for example, the state JPC = 0−−).

Baryons

[edit]
Figure 4. The S = 1/2 ground state baryon octet
Figure 5. The S = 3/2 baryon decuplet

Since quarks are fermions, the spin–statistics theorem implies that the wavefunction of a baryon must be antisymmetric under the exchange of any two quarks. This antisymmetric wavefunction is obtained by making it fully antisymmetric in color, discussed below, and symmetric in flavor, spin and space put together. With three flavors, the decomposition in flavor is The decuplet is symmetric in flavor, the singlet antisymmetric and the two octets have mixed symmetry. The space and spin parts of the states are thereby fixed once the orbital angular momentum is given.

It is sometimes useful to think of the basis states of quarks as the six states of three flavors and two spins per flavor. This approximate symmetry is called spin-flavor SU(6). In terms of this, the decomposition is

The 56 states with symmetric combination of spin and flavour decompose under flavor SU(3) into where the superscript denotes the spin, S, of the baryon. Since these states are symmetric in spin and flavor, they should also be symmetric in space—a condition that is easily satisfied by making the orbital angular momentum L = 0. These are the ground-state baryons.

The S = 1/2 octet baryons are the two nucleons (p+
, n0
), the three Sigmas (Σ+
, Σ0
, Σ
), the two Xis (Ξ0
, Ξ
), and the Lambda (Λ0
). The S = 3/2 decuplet baryons are the four Deltas (Δ++
, Δ+
, Δ0
, Δ
), three Sigmas (Σ∗+
, Σ∗0
, Σ∗−
), two Xis (Ξ∗0
, Ξ∗−
), and the Omega (Ω
).

For example, the constituent quark model wavefunction for the proton is

Mixing of baryons, mass splittings within and between multiplets, and magnetic moments are some of the other quantities that the model predicts successfully.

The group theory approach described above assumes that the quarks are eight components of a single particle, so the anti-symmetrization applies to all the quarks. A simpler approach is to consider the eight flavored quarks as eight separate, distinguishable, non-identical particles. Then the anti-symmetrization applies only to two identical quarks (like uu, for instance).[6]

Then, the proton wavefunction can be written in a simpler form:

and the

If quark–quark interactions are limited to two-body interactions, then all the successful quark model predictions, including sum rules for baryon masses and magnetic moments, can be derived.

Discovery of color

[edit]

Color quantum numbers are the characteristic charges of the strong force, and are completely uninvolved in electroweak interactions. They were discovered as a consequence of the quark model classification, when it was appreciated that the spin S = 3/2 baryon, the Δ++
, required three up quarks with parallel spins and vanishing orbital angular momentum. Therefore, it could not have an antisymmetric wavefunction, (required by the Pauli exclusion principle). Oscar Greenberg noted this problem in 1964, suggesting that quarks should be para-fermions.[7]

Instead, six months later, Moo-Young Han and Yoichiro Nambu suggested the existence of a hidden degree of freedom, they labeled as the group SU(3)' (but later called 'color). This led to three triplets of quarks whose wavefunction was anti-symmetric in the color degree of freedom. Flavor and color were intertwined in that model: they did not commute.[8]

The modern concept of color completely commuting with all other charges and providing the strong force charge was articulated in 1973, by William Bardeen, Harald Fritzsch, and Murray Gell-Mann.[9][10]

States outside the quark model

[edit]

While the quark model is derivable from the theory of quantum chromodynamics, the structure of hadrons is more complicated than this model allows. The full quantum mechanical wavefunction of any hadron must include virtual quark pairs as well as virtual gluons, and allows for a variety of mixings. There may be hadrons which lie outside the quark model. Among these are the glueballs (which contain only valence gluons), hybrids (which contain valence quarks as well as gluons) and exotic hadrons (such as tetraquarks or pentaquarks).

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The quark model is a foundational framework in that describes hadrons—strongly interacting composite particles such as protons, neutrons, and —as bound states composed of more fundamental constituents called quarks. Introduced independently in 1964 by and , the model posits that baryons consist of three quarks (qqq) while are quark-antiquark pairs (q̄q), with quarks carrying fractional electric charges of ±1/3 or ±2/3 times the and obeying the for quantum numbers like , , and . Initially featuring three quark flavors—up (u, charge +2/3), down (d, -1/3), and strange (s, -1/3)—the model was later expanded to include three heavier flavors: charm (c, +2/3), bottom (b, -1/3), and top (t, +2/3), accommodating discoveries like the J/ψ in 1974. Building on the SU(3) flavor symmetry of the "eightfold way" developed by Gell-Mann and in 1961, the quark model successfully organized the proliferation of known s into multiplets and predicted the existence of new particles, most notably the Ω⁻ (sss, mass ≈1.67 GeV), which was experimentally confirmed shortly after the model's proposal. It explains key properties, including spin-parity assignments, magnetic moments (e.g., the proton-to-neutron ratio μ_p/μ_n ≈ -3/2), and decay patterns, by treating quarks as non-relativistic fermions in a potential akin to the Cornell form V(r) = -α/r + βr. The model's predictive power was bolstered by the incorporation of (QCD) in the , which introduced the concept of (red, green, blue) to ensure confinement—quarks cannot exist in isolation but form color-neutral s via exchange. Despite its triumphs, the quark model has limitations, such as the missing resonances problem, where only about 20 established N* states are observed despite dozens predicted, and struggling to describe exotic hadrons like tetraquarks (qq̄q̄q) and pentaquarks (qqqq̄), which challenge the simple q̄q and qqq paradigm. Extensions, including relativistic corrections, , and simulations, have refined its accuracy for light spectra, while ongoing experiments at facilities like the LHC continue to test its validity in heavy-quark sectors. Today, the quark model remains integral to the , providing an intuitive bridge between phenomenological spectroscopy and the perturbative regime of QCD.

Basic Principles

Quark Flavors and Generations

Quarks are fundamental particles classified as fermions, possessing intrinsic spin of 1/2 and exhibiting half-integer spin statistics, with electric charges that are fractions of the e. For instance, the carries a charge of +2/3 e, while the has -1/3 e. These particles are categorized into six distinct flavors: up (u), down (d), charm (c), strange (s), top (t), and bottom (b). The flavors are organized into three generations, reflecting a pattern of increasing mass: the first generation consists of the light up and down quarks; the second includes the somewhat heavier charm and strange quarks; and the third comprises the heavy top and bottom quarks. This generational structure arises from the of , where each generation forms doublets, with the up-type quarks (u, c, t) having +2/3 e charge and the down-type (d, s, b) having -1/3 e. Among the lighter quarks—up, down, and strange—an approximate SU(3) flavor symmetry governs their strong interactions, treating them as transforming under the fundamental representation of the SU(3) group. This symmetry incorporates the strangeness quantum number, assigned as S = -1 to the strange quark to account for its distinct behavior in weak decays and conservation in strong processes. Antiquarks, the antiparticles of quarks, serve as their charge conjugates, carrying opposite electric charges, baryon numbers of -1/3, and inverted flavor quantum numbers such as .

Hadrons as Quark Composites

Hadrons represent the fundamental building blocks of atomic nuclei and are understood within the quark model as bound states of quarks, held together by the mediated through the exchange of gluons. This binding arises from the of the strong interaction, ensuring that quarks cannot exist in isolation due to confinement. The model posits that all observed hadrons, such as protons, neutrons, and pions, emerge from specific combinations of these fundamental constituents, providing a unified description of their properties like mass and spin. Mesons form one class of hadrons, composed of a single quark and its corresponding antiquark, denoted as qqˉq \bar{q}. These pairs exhibit integer total spin (0 or 1), classifying mesons as bosons that obey Bose-Einstein statistics. Examples include the neutral pion (π0\pi^0), which consists of a mixture of up and down quark-antiquark states, and the rho meson (ρ\rho), both pivotal in mediating short-range nuclear forces. The quark-antiquark structure accounts for their zero baryon number and relatively lighter masses compared to baryons. Baryons constitute the other primary category, built from three quarks (qqqqqq), which combine to yield half-integer spin (typically 12\frac{1}{2} or 32\frac{3}{2}), rendering them fermions subject to Fermi-Dirac statistics. Antibaryons, their antiparticles, are analogously formed from three antiquarks (qˉqˉqˉ\bar{q} \bar{q} \bar{q}), such as the antiproton. The proton itself exemplifies this, comprising two up quarks and one down quark (uuduud), while the neutron is uddudd. Since quarks are spin-12\frac{1}{2} fermions, the Pauli exclusion principle mandates that any identical quarks within a baryon must occupy antisymmetric wave functions, ensuring distinct quantum states to avoid violation—this is evident in states like the Δ++\Delta^{++} baryon with three up quarks, where spatial, spin, and flavor symmetries balance the overall antisymmetry./University_Physics_III_-Optics_and_Modern_Physics(OpenStax)/11%3A_Particle_Physics_and_Cosmology/11.04%3A_Quarks) A key quantum number distinguishing these composites is the BB, conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions, defined by the equation B=13(NqNqˉ)B = \frac{1}{3} (N_q - N_{\bar{q}}) where NqN_q is the number of quarks and NqˉN_{\bar{q}} is the number of antiquarks. This assigns B=+1B = +1 to baryons, B=1B = -1 to antibaryons, and B=0B = 0 to mesons, underpinning the stability of matter and prohibiting processes like in the .

Color Charge and Confinement

In the quark model, quarks possess an additional known as , which comes in three varieties conventionally labeled , , and . This property was introduced to ensure that the wave functions of baryons, composed of three identical , remain antisymmetric under particle exchange in accordance with the . The color charges transform according to the fundamental representation of the non-Abelian gauge group SU(3)c, providing a threefold degeneracy for each quark flavor and enabling the construction of color-neutral hadronic states.90625-4) The strong interaction between quarks is mediated by gluons, which are massless bosons belonging to the (color-octet) representation of SU(3)c. Unlike photons in , gluons carry both color and anticolor charges, allowing them to interact with each other and leading to a non-linear dynamics of the strong force.90625-4) This self-interaction is a key feature that distinguishes (QCD) from . A central consequence of the is the phenomenon of quark confinement, which posits that and gluons are perpetually bound within hadrons and cannot be observed in isolation. This arises because the between quarks grows linearly with separation distance, approximated as
V(r)krV(r) \approx kr
where k1k \approx 1 GeV/fm is the string tension parameter, reflecting the formation of a flux tube of gluonic fields between the quarks. As a result, the energy required to separate quarks diverges, favoring the creation of new quark-antiquark pairs instead, which hadronize into observable particles.
Hadrons manifest as color singlets, ensuring overall color neutrality under the SU(3)c symmetry. For mesons, this is achieved through a quark-antiquark pair (qqˉq\bar{q}) in a color-singlet state, where the anticolor of the antiquark neutralizes the color of the quark. Baryons, conversely, consist of three quarks (qqqqqq) combined in a fully antisymmetric color-singlet configuration, corresponding to the invariant singlet in the decomposition of the 3333 \otimes 3 \otimes 3 representation.90625-4) Complementing confinement is the property of asymptotic freedom, whereby the strong coupling constant decreases at short interquark distances (high momentum transfers), making the interaction perturbative in that regime. This behavior, arising from the negative beta function of non-Abelian gauge theories, allows for reliable QCD calculations of high-energy processes while confinement dominates at larger scales.

Historical Development

Symmetry Groups and Pre-Quark Models

In the early development of particle physics, isospin symmetry, based on the SU(2) group, emerged as a key concept to describe the approximate degeneracy in masses and strong interaction properties among certain hadrons. Introduced by Werner Heisenberg in 1932, this symmetry treated the proton and neutron as the two components of an isospin doublet (I=1/2), reflecting their nearly identical masses and the charge independence of the strong force. This SU(2) framework was later extended to mesons like pions, forming isospin triplets (I=1), and provided a successful classification for non-strange hadrons before the inclusion of strange particles. In retrospect, this symmetry corresponds to treating the up (u) and down (d) quark flavors as a doublet with similar masses, though pre-quark models viewed it purely as an internal quantum number without substructure. The discovery of particles with unusual production and decay properties in cosmic rays during the late prompted the introduction of a new , strangeness (S), to resolve inconsistencies in selection rules. Proposed by T. Nakano and Kazuhiko Nishijima in 1953, and independently by in 1953, strangeness assigned integer values to hadrons, with non-strange particles (like nucleons and pions) having S=0 and strange particles (like K mesons and Λ s) having S=±1, explaining their associated production in strong interactions while decaying weakly. This led to the formulation of SU(3) flavor symmetry in the 1950s, extending SU(2) to a larger group incorporating strangeness, treating the u, d, and strange (s) flavors on equal footing despite mass differences that made the symmetry approximate. Early SU(3) models, such as the Sakata model, posited fundamental triplets of particles (proton, , and a hyperon like Λ) to build hadrons, but these were phenomenological without deeper dynamical insight. A major advancement came with the "eightfold way," proposed by and in 1961, which systematically classified hadrons into irreducible representations of SU(3). Baryons were organized into an octet (dimension 8) including the doublet (p, n with S=0), the Σ triplet (S=-1), the Λ singlet (S=-1), and the Ξ doublet (S=-2), while mesons formed a similar octet with (π, K, η) and vector (ρ, K*, ω/φ) members. Decuplets (dimension 10) were also predicted for spin-3/2 baryons, forming symmetric representations with equal spacing in mass due to an assumed linear strangeness dependence, as seen in the Δ (S=0), Σ* (S=-1), and Ξ* (S=-2) resonances. This scheme elegantly unified the growing "" and highlighted patterns in , though it remained a classification tool without explaining underlying dynamics. In 1962, Gell-Mann applied the eightfold way to predict the existence of a new in the decuplet: the Ω⁻ with S=-3, composed conceptually as an sss state, having spin 3/2, Y=0, I=0, and a mass around 1680 MeV. This particle completed the decuplet and served as a crucial test of SU(3) , as its properties followed directly from without adjustable parameters. The prediction underscored the of the model, distinguishing it from earlier schemes like the Sakata model, which could not accommodate an S=-3 state. Despite these successes, pre-quark symmetry models faced significant challenges, particularly in explaining electromagnetic properties such as magnetic moments. For instance, the Sakata model yielded incorrect predictions for magnetic moments, failing to match experimental values like the proton's μ_p ≈ 2.79 nuclear magnetons, which suggested a need for internal structure beyond simple fundamental particles. Additionally, the absence of free fundamental constituents in experiments contradicted expectations from these models, as no isolated "building blocks" like those in the Sakata triplet were observed, hinting at confinement or composite nature without direct evidence. These discrepancies motivated deeper theoretical refinements leading toward subconstituent ideas.

Proposal and Early Evidence

In 1964, and independently proposed the quark model as a framework to classify the growing number of observed hadrons using SU(3) flavor . introduced the term "quarks" in his seminal paper, drawing inspiration from the phrase "Three quarks for Muster Mark!" in James Joyce's novel . Zweig, working at , referred to the same entities as "aces" in his detailed but described an identical structure of fundamental triplets. The model posited three types of quarks—up (u), down (d), and strange (s)—each transforming under the fundamental (3) representation of SU(3), with hadrons composed of integer combinations of these quarks to form the observed octet and decuplet representations. This proposal provided a mathematical realization of that had been empirically successful but lacked a physical basis, predicting masses and decay patterns with remarkable accuracy for the time. However, quarks were initially viewed by many as mathematical conveniences rather than physical particles, given the failure to observe free quarks and challenges with integer charges in early formulations. Initial experimental support emerged from deep inelastic electron-proton scattering experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) starting in 1968, conducted by Jerome Friedman, Henry Kendall, and Richard Taylor. These experiments probed the proton's interior at short distances, revealing a structure function that scaled with the Bjorken variable xx, indicating scattering off point-like constituents carrying fractions of the proton's momentum and charge. The observed scaling behavior and the inferred fractional charges (approximately +2/3+2/3 and 1/3-1/3) aligned closely with the quark model's predictions, providing the first compelling evidence for quarks as real, dynamical entities within hadrons. Contemporaneous searches in experiments at accelerators sought direct signatures of free quarks through tracks with anomalous or momentum consistent with fractional , yielding some controversial reports that fueled debate but lacked confirmation. These efforts highlighted the tension between the model's implications and the absence of isolated quarks, later attributed to confinement. A key theoretical refinement strengthening the model came in 1970, when , John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani proposed a fourth "" quark to suppress flavor-changing neutral currents in weak interactions via the . This prediction extended the quark framework to resolve discrepancies between theory and observations in decays, paving the way for the discovery of charmed particles in 1974.

Acceptance and Refinements

The discovery of the J/ψ meson in 1974 provided crucial experimental confirmation of the charm quark, a fourth quark flavor predicted by the model to resolve issues with symmetries. Independent experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), led by , and at , led by Samuel Ting, observed the narrow resonance in electron-positron annihilation and proton-beryllium collisions, respectively, with a of approximately 3.1 GeV/c². This finding, which earned Richter and Ting the 1976 , elevated the quark model from a theoretical construct to a cornerstone of , as the J/ψ's properties aligned precisely with a charm-anticharm . The subsequent "November Revolution" marked a period of rapid experimental breakthroughs that solidified the model's predictions for higher generations. Shortly after the J/ψ announcement, the ψ' resonance was identified at SLAC in December 1974, confirming excited charmonium states. By 1977, the discovery of the Υ meson at by Leon Lederman's group revealed the bottom quark through the observation of the Υ meson resonance at around 9.5 GeV/c². These discoveries, occurring in quick succession, demonstrated the quark model's predictive power for heavy flavors and spurred global accelerator programs to probe deeper into the standard model's structure. Theoretical refinements addressed early discrepancies, notably through the introduction of . In 1964, O. W. Greenberg proposed color as an additional for quarks to explain the statistics of identical particles in s, allowing three quarks in a without violating Pauli exclusion. This concept was revived in 1973 amid the development of (QCD), where quarks carry one of three colors (red, green, blue) and gluons mediate the strong force as color-octet bosons, ensuring color neutrality in s. The incorporation of gluons resolved issues with the naive quark model, such as the overcounting of states, and provided a dynamical basis for confinement. The model's completeness was affirmed in 1995 with the discovery of the top quark at Fermilab's collider by the CDF and DØ collaborations. Analyzing proton-antiproton collisions at √s = 1.8 TeV, both teams reported evidence for top-antitop pairs decaying leptonically, with a mass of about 176 GeV/c², fulfilling the six-flavor structure and validating the third generation. Further refinements emerged from (DIS) experiments, which revealed that nucleons contain not only valence quarks but also a "" of virtual quark-antiquark pairs and s contributing to structure functions. Data from SLAC and in the showed deviations from pure valence quark predictions in the scaling behavior of F₂(x,Q²), necessitating the inclusion of sea quarks (especially strange and heavier flavors) and gluon distributions to account for momentum fractions and evolution under QCD. These insights, quantified through parton distribution functions, enhanced the model's description of nucleon interiors without altering its foundational composite nature.

Mesons

Classification by Quantum Numbers

In the quark model, mesons are classified as bound states of a and an antiquark, with their properties determined by key quantum numbers. The total spin angular momentum SS arises from the spins of the quark and antiquark, which are each 12\frac{1}{2}, yielding S=0S = 0 ( with antiparallel spins) or S=1S = 1 ( with parallel spins). The orbital angular momentum LL describes the relative motion between the quark and antiquark, taking non-negative values. The total JJ then results from vector addition: J=L+S\mathbf{J} = \mathbf{L} + \mathbf{S}, so JJ ranges from LS|L - S| to L+SL + S in steps. Flavor quantum numbers further organize mesons based on the up (u), down (d), and strange (s) quark content, assuming approximate SU(3) flavor symmetry for the light quarks. Isovector mesons, with isospin I=1I = 1, include charged states like the pion triplet π+=udˉ\pi^+ = u\bar{d}, π0=uuˉddˉ2\pi^0 = \frac{u\bar{u} - d\bar{d}}{\sqrt{2}}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.