Hubbry Logo
Fort LyonFort LyonMain
Open search
Fort Lyon
Community hub
Fort Lyon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fort Lyon
Fort Lyon
Fort Lyon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Fort Lyon
One of the Fort's main buildings in 2013.
Fort Lyon is located in Colorado
Fort Lyon
Fort Lyon is located in the United States
Fort Lyon
LocationBent County, Colorado
Nearest cityLas Animas
Coordinates38°04′27″N 103°07′57″W / 38.07417°N 103.13250°W / 38.07417; -103.13250
BuiltThe second Fort Lyon was built in 1867
ArchitectU.S. Army; et al.
Architectural styleColonial Revival, Bungalow/Craftsman
NRHP reference No.04000388[1]
CSRHP No.5BN.117
Added to NRHP5 May 2004

Fort Lyon was composed of two 19th-century military fort complexes in southeastern Colorado. The initial fort, also called Fort Wise, operated from 1860 to 1867. After a flood in 1866, a new fort was built near Las Animas, Colorado, which operated as a military post until 1897.

It has been used as a United States Army fort, a sanatorium, a neuropsychiatry facility, and a minimum security prison. The state closed the prison in 2011, and in early 2013 proposed to use the site as a rehabilitation center for homeless people. Then in late 2013 it became a rehabilitative transitional housing facility for homeless people with some form of substance abuse problem. This is run by the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless and has been a developing program to the present day.

The fort is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Part of the site, the Fort Lyon National Cemetery, which began burials in 1907, remains open.

History

[edit]

Fort Lyon (1860–1867)

[edit]
Bent's New Fort was rented to the U.S. government and used as a military post from 1860 to 1867

In July 1860, the Army rented Bent's New Fort and used it for storage of annuity goods for the Cheyenne and Arapaho.[2][a] Annuity goods were provided by treaties in exchange for reduced access to ancestral land, such as hunting grounds.[4] Barracks were built around the fort[5] and additional defensive features were added, like diamond-shaped gun emplacements on newly erected earthenworks that surrounded the fort.[6]

At the same time (1860) the Army constructed a new fort about one-half mile west of Bent's New Fort adjacent to the Arkansas river, naming it Fort Wise for Henry A. Wise, the governor of Virginia. After the start of the American Civil War and Virginia's secession from the Union, it was renamed Fort Lyon in 1862 for Brigadier General Nathaniel Lyon, who had been the first Union general killed in the Civil War.[5]

In 1861, the Treaty of Fort Wise was signed at the fort. The goal, which was short-lived, was to ensure peace between settlers and the Cheyenne and Arapaho people.[7] Old Fort Lyon was the staging post used by Colonel John Chivington in 1864 as he led an attack on friendly Cheyenne and Arapaho camps that became known as the Sand Creek massacre. To prevent word spreading of the impending attack, Chivington had guards posted at the fort to prevent people and mail from reaching Sand Creek.[7][8]

In 1866 after flooding on the Arkansas River, the U.S. Army relocated Ft. Lyon 20 miles upstream to a site near Las Animas. The new facility was completed in 1867 and the old site, including Bent's New Fort, was abandoned.[5][9]

Fort Lyon (1867–1897)

[edit]

In 1867, a new fort called Fort Lyon was built near the present-day town of Las Animas, Colorado. The U.S. Army used Fort Lyon until 1897, when they abandoned it after the end of the Indian Wars.[7]

Medical, prison, and psychiatric facilities

[edit]

In 1906, the U.S. Navy opened a sanatorium there to treat sailors and Marines with tuberculosis. The dry climate and rest by isolation at the fort were thought to be beneficial by contemporary treatment methods. On 22 June 1922, the Veteran's Bureau assumed operations. In 1930, administration of the hospital was transferred to the newly created Veterans Administration. Within three years, the VA designated Fort Lyon a neuropsychiatry facility. In 2001 the hospital was closed and the facility was turned over to the state of Colorado for conversion to a minimum security prison. The prison was closed in 2011.

In September 2013, Governor John Hickenlooper announced that Fort Lyon had reopened as an isolated transitional housing facility for homeless people with substance abuse issues[10] operated by the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.[11][12] As of November 2018, there were over 200 clients there.[13]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fort Lyon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Fort Lyon was a United States Army outpost in southeastern Colorado, established in 1860 as Fort Wise at the confluence of the Arkansas and Bijou creeks to protect emigrants and freight along the Santa Fe Trail from raids by Cheyenne and Arapaho warriors. Renamed Fort Lyon in 1861 after Union General Nathaniel Lyon, the original post operated until a 1866 flood prompted relocation downstream near present-day Las Animas, where a new fortification served as a base for military operations in the Plains Indian Wars until its abandonment by the Army in 1897. The site housed units including the Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry during the 1870s and 1880s, contributing to campaigns securing the region for settlement. Following military decommissioning, Fort Lyon was converted in into a U.S. Naval treating patients, reflecting early 20th-century efforts to address respiratory diseases among sailors amid limited medical options. It later functioned as a veterans' hospital under the Department of Veterans Affairs until the 1970s, then as a state correctional facility from the 1990s until 2012, before repurposing as emphasizing recovery for homeless individuals, with a focus on veterans. The complex, designated a National Register , encompasses a national cemetery interring over 4,000 veterans and remains a landmark of Colorado's defense, medical, and penal .

History

Establishment and Early Operations (1860-1862)

Fort Wise was established in 1860 by the U.S. Army on the north bank of the Arkansas River in present-day Bent County, Colorado, approximately 12 miles east of the confluence with the Purgatoire River. The post was built to safeguard the Mountain Branch of the Santa Fe Trail amid rising depredations by Cheyenne and Arapaho warriors against wagon trains and stagecoaches. The Army leased the adjacent Bent's New Fort, a stone trading post constructed by William Bent in 1853, and erected temporary log and adobe structures for quarters, stables, and storage nearby. Initially garrisoned by Company B, 1st Infantry Regiment under Captain J. B. Plummer, the fort served as a supply depot and patrol base for escorting travelers through the vulnerable Big Timbers area. Named for , , the outpost facilitated diplomatic efforts with Plains tribes during its first years. On February 18, 1861, Southern Cheyenne chief and leaders signed the Treaty of Fort Wise at the fort, ceding approximately 4 million acres of land in eastern Colorado Territory for a 600-square-mile reservation near the [Arkansas River](/page/Arkansas River), along with annuities and agricultural provisions; however, the treaty was rejected by many tribal members and non-signatory bands, sowing seeds of ongoing tension. Military operations focused on patrols, skirmish responses, and trail security, with the numbering around 100-150 troops by late 1861. Following Virginia's secession and the Civil War's onset, Fort Wise was renamed Fort Lyon in mid-1862 to honor Union Brigadier General , the first federal general killed in action at the Battle of Wilson's Creek on August 10, 1861. Under commanders like Major Edward Wynkoop, the post continued protective duties but saw troop diversions to counter Confederate incursions in ; in early 1862, elements of the 1st Colorado Volunteers reinforced the garrison before marching south to participate in the in March. These years marked the fort's role in frontier defense amid escalating sectional conflict and indigenous unrest.

Involvement in the Colorado War (1862-1865)

Fort Lyon, originally established as Fort Wise in 1860 and renamed in mid-1862 to honor Union General , functioned as a primary U.S. military outpost in southeastern during the , a conflict initiated by and raids on settlers and wagon trains starting in 1862. The fort's garrison, bolstered by companies E through H of the 1st Colorado Cavalry arriving on December 10, 1862, and additional units such as companies A, B, D, and others by April 1863, conducted patrols and operations to secure the corridor and suppress depredations by Plains tribes amid broader Civil War distractions. These efforts included responses to specific incidents, such as and attacks reported by Major Scott J. Anthony from the fort in 1863, reflecting its role in frontier defense against perceived threats to emigration routes and mining settlements. Escalation peaked in 1864 following events like the Hungate family murders near in late June, prompting territorial Governor John Evans to issue a on July 11 inviting peaceful Cheyenne and to seek safety at Fort Lyon or other posts. Major Edward W. Wynkoop, then commanding the fort, led negotiations in September, escorting Cheyenne leaders including to for talks, after which approximately 750 members of Black Kettle's band relocated initially near Fort Lyon before being directed about 40 miles north to a camp along Sand Creek, under assurances of military protection issued by fort authorities. Wynkoop's replacement, Major Anthony, continued these directives, though subsequent orders prohibited large encampments near the fort, contributing to the band's vulnerable positioning. On November 28, 1864, Colonel John M. Chivington arrived at Fort Lyon with around 700 men from the 1st and 3rd Cavalry regiments, conferring with Anthony and other officers; while some Fort Lyon troops joined the subsequent march, key subordinates including Captain and Lieutenant Joseph Cramer declined participation, citing the camp's protected status. Chivington's force departed that evening, attacking the Sand Creek encampment at dawn on November 29, resulting in the deaths of approximately 230 and , predominantly women, children, and elders, in an action later investigated by federal authorities as involving non-combatants who had raised a U.S. and of truce. The fort itself did not dispatch its full garrison to the assault, serving instead as a logistical staging point, but its prior peace overtures and proximity—about 40 miles south—placed it at the epicenter of the controversy, with post-event reports from Soule and others highlighting internal dissent and the breakdown of protection guarantees. Congressional inquiries in 1865 and 1867, drawing on testimony from Fort Lyon personnel, condemned the event as a , underscoring tensions between territorial militias and federal oversight in Indian affairs.

Final Military Years at Original Site (1865-1867)

In the aftermath of the Colorado War's primary campaigns, which concluded with negotiations in , the original Fort Lyon transitioned to a routine garrison role, housing U.S. Army detachments tasked with securing the against sporadic raids and facilitating overland travel. The Southern Plains experienced relative calm during late and 1866, with no major engagements reported at the post, allowing focus on logistical maintenance amid diminishing local timber resources and persistent sanitary issues from the river's proximity. The fort's vulnerability to Arkansas River flooding intensified, culminating in significant damage in 1866 when ice flows and high water destroyed remnants of the adjacent Bent's New Fort and threatened the main structures. A large in 1867 further eroded the bluffs underpinning the installation, compromising stability and habitability. These environmental hazards, combined with unhealthful conditions, prompted post commander Major H. Penrose to select a new upstream location approximately 20 miles west near Las Animas in June 1867. Construction of the replacement fort began promptly, with troops transferring operations by late 1867, effectively decommissioning the original site for military use. The relocation reflected pragmatic adaptation to geophysical constraints rather than strategic shifts, as the sought elevated terrain to mitigate future risks while continuing regional defense duties.

Relocation and Protection of the Santa Fe Trail (1867-1880s)

In the summer of 1867, severe flooding along the Arkansas River, combined with unhealthful conditions and a diminishing supply of timber at the original site near Bent's New Fort, prompted the U.S. Army to relocate Fort Lyon approximately 20 miles upstream to a new position east of Las Animas, Colorado. The Army leased land near Las Animas in June 1867 and transferred the post there, establishing the second Fort Lyon as a permanent installation designed for better defensibility and resource access. Construction at the new site incorporated traditional late-19th-century frontier fort layouts, with barracks, officers' quarters, and warehouses built primarily of adobe and wood to support ongoing operations. The relocated fort played a key role in safeguarding the Mountain Branch of the , serving as a critical outpost between Fort Larned in and points further west toward . Positioned along the corridor, it housed troops tasked with escorting wagon trains, patrolling against raids by Plains Indian tribes such as the and , and maintaining supply lines amid escalating conflicts in the post-Civil War era. As part of the Army's Department of the Missouri—a regional network of forts—the post facilitated rapid response to threats, though by the late , the intensity of protection duties began to wane as railroad expansion and shifting Indian campaigns reduced overland traffic vulnerabilities. During the 1870s, Fort Lyon remained an active hub for frontier defense, hosting units including the famed Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry, who conducted reconnaissance and skirmishes to secure the trail against intermittent hostilities. Specific operations included patrols that deterred depredations, with the fort's strategic location enabling it to supply and reinforce travelers until the trail's commercial dominance declined in the early 1880s due to rail alternatives. By the mid-1880s, as Native American resistance subsided following events like the and the subjugation of southern Plains tribes, the fort's focus shifted from trail protection to broader regional garrison duties, marking the transition toward its eventual decommissioning.

Decommissioning as a Military Post (1880s-1897)

By the 1880s, the strategic necessity of Fort Lyon had significantly declined as U.S. military campaigns successfully subdued Native American resistance across the Great Plains, including the relocation of tribes to reservations following conflicts with the Cheyenne, Arapaho, and other groups. Railroads facilitated civilian settlement, cattle ranching expanded, and homesteads proliferated, rendering permanent frontier garrisons like Fort Lyon obsolete for protecting the Santa Fe Trail, which saw reduced overland traffic. The post's adobe structures also suffered from deterioration due to harsh weather and recurrent Arkansas River flooding, exacerbating maintenance costs. In response to these factors, the U.S. Army ordered the closure of Fort Lyon on August 31, 1889, withdrawing the final contingent of troops and transferring equipment and supplies to Fort Logan in . A caretaker was appointed to oversee the vacant site, and on January 20, 1890, formal custody passed to the Department of the Interior. The post cemetery, containing 44 soldier remains, was exhumed that year and reinterred at Fort Leavenworth National Cemetery in to consolidate military burials. Military operations at Fort Lyon ceased entirely after 1889, though some historical narratives associate full abandonment with 1897, marking the effective end of the Indian Wars era and the broader demobilization of Plains frontier posts. No active presence returned in the interim, as national defense priorities shifted eastward and to emerging overseas territories following the Spanish-American War. The site's transition reflected a systemic reduction in western outposts, from over 200 in the to fewer than 100 by the 1890s, driven by fiscal constraints and stabilized regional security.

Post-Military Transformations

In 1906, the United States Navy acquired the abandoned Fort Lyon site in Bent County, Colorado, and initiated a comprehensive renovation to transform it into a specialized hospital for treating tuberculosis among sailors and Marines. The decision leveraged the region's arid climate, elevation, and isolation, which were believed to promote recovery through fresh air, sunlight exposure, and enforced rest—core elements of the prevailing sanatorium model for pulmonary tuberculosis at the time. Construction efforts included erecting new wards, administrative buildings, a power plant, and modern water and sewer systems to support patient care, with all funding sourced through congressional appropriations dedicated to naval medical facilities. By 1907, the had established two cemeteries on the grounds—one exclusively for naval personnel and another for civilian staff—to accommodate burials resulting from the disease's high ; the first interment occurred that year with the burial of Youayoshi Hoshi, a Japanese national employed at the facility. Treatment protocols emphasized heliotherapy, graduated exercise, and high-calorie nutrition to bolster patients' strength, supplemented by experimental interventions such as mercury administration advocated by Barton Lisle Wright, who reported encouraging outcomes in reducing bacillary loads and improving symptoms in select cases during 1907–1908 trials. These methods reflected the era's limited pharmacological options prior to antibiotics, with mercury's purported effects on drawing scrutiny from naval medical inspectors, who noted near-conviction in its efficacy when dosed judiciously. Operations through focused on isolating contagious patients to prevent shipboard outbreaks, with the facility serving as the Navy's primary western sanitarium; admissions prioritized active-duty personnel exhibiting early- to moderate-stage , though exact capacity figures from this period remain undocumented in available records, emphasizing qualitative recovery metrics over quantitative throughput. By this juncture, the hospital had solidified its role in naval health infrastructure, predating broader expansions that later incorporated prisoner-of-war care.

Veterans Administration Hospital Era (1912-1960s)

In 1922, the U.S. Navy transferred control of the Fort Lyon facility to the newly established U.S. Veterans Bureau, which repurposed it as a open to veterans from all branches of military service regardless of war era. This marked a shift from its prior focus on naval patients to broader veteran care, with the Bureau assuming operations on June 22. The facility's isolated rural location in , spanning 556 acres, supported therapeutic environments conducive to recovery, building on existing infrastructure from its period. By 1930, administration passed to the consolidated Veterans Administration (VA), which designated Fort Lyon a specialized neuropsychiatric facility within three years, emphasizing treatment for conditions among veterans. This specialization aligned with rising demand for psychiatric services post-World War I, including for and related disorders, though exact patient demographics reflected the era's evolving understanding of combat-related trauma. Expansions included construction of Georgian Colonial Revival-style buildings in , featuring slate roofs and detailed brickwork, which formed a 20-acre VA complex integrated with the site's historic stone and frame structures. Operations during this era prioritized long-term residential care, with the hospital complex accommodating inpatient psychiatric treatment, , and supportive services tailored to s' needs. The VA maintained the facility's role through and into the postwar period, adapting to increased populations while leveraging its established —initiated in 1907—for burials of patients who died on-site. By the , shifting federal priorities and state-level demands prompted gradual transition away from VA control, culminating in its handover for state psychiatric use, though it remained a key site for care until then.

State Psychiatric Facility (1960s-2000s)

In the post-World War II era, Fort Lyon operated as a specialized neuropsychiatric branch of the Veterans Administration Medical Center, focusing on long-term residential treatment for veterans suffering from severe mental illnesses, including , manic-depressive illness, and combat-related neuroses. This designation, established in 1933, persisted through the 1960s and beyond, with the facility adapting to evolving psychiatric practices such as and amid national deinstitutionalization efforts under the of 1963, though VA hospitals like Fort Lyon retained inpatient capacity for chronic cases due to the unique needs of veteran populations. The campus featured interconnected red-brick wards and therapy buildings constructed in the late and , supporting a self-contained environment with occupational programs in farming and maintenance to promote patient rehabilitation. Patient census at Fort Lyon fluctuated with veteran demographics; by the and , it housed hundreds annually, emphasizing custodial care over acute intervention, as federal VA policy prioritized specialized neuropsychiatric services in rural settings to reduce urban hospital burdens. Empirical outcomes included stabilization for long-term residents, though critiques from veteran advocates highlighted underfunding and outdated facilities compared to urban VA centers, with limited integration of evidence-based therapies like cognitive-behavioral approaches until the . The facility's isolation on 500 acres facilitated a therapeutic milieu but also contributed to staff shortages and higher operational costs, as documented in VA internal reviews. Facing federal consolidation amid declining admissions—driven by shorter hospital stays and community-based care shifts—the VA announced closure plans in the late , culminating in a 2000 rally by s protesting the loss of specialized rural access. Operations ceased in 2001, with the property transferred to the state of ; contrary to the period's designation as a state facility, Fort Lyon remained under exclusive federal VA administration throughout the 1960s-2000s, without state operational control or funding for psychiatric services. The handover enabled state repurposing as a correctional center, ending its role in mental health care.

Minimum-Security Prison (2000s-2011)

In 2001, following the closure of the hospital at the site, the state of repurposed Fort Lyon as a minimum-security correctional facility under the . Originally proposed to house medically compromised , it instead primarily accommodated low-risk, non-violent offenders suitable for minimum-security conditions, emphasizing rehabilitation through work programs and structured routines. The facility maintained a rated capacity of 500 beds for male inmates. During fiscal year 2010-11, it operated with an average daily population of 478 offenders, incurring annual costs of $30.7 million, or $175.94 per inmate per day. Operations aligned with state standards for minimum-security prisons, including perimeter fencing rather than walls, and focused on preparing inmates for reintegration via vocational training and minimal supervision. Declining statewide prison populations and persistent budget deficits prompted closure announcements in early 2011. Lawmakers initially delayed the shutdown by six months to March 2012 to mitigate economic impacts on Bent County, where the facility ranked as the second-largest employer. The full closure proceeded that year under Governor John Hickenlooper's administration, yielding projected state savings of $6.3 million annually post-transfer of inmates.

Modern Recovery Community

Establishment of Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community (2013-Present)

In 2013, the Colorado General Assembly passed Senate Bill 13-210, designating a portion of the former Fort Lyon property in Bent County as a supportive residential community for homeless individuals, with an emphasis on providing substance abuse supportive services, medical care, job training, and transitional housing to facilitate recovery and reintegration. The legislation repurposed the site, which had served as a state minimum-security prison until its closure in 2011 due to budget constraints, into a recovery-oriented facility aimed at addressing chronic homelessness and addiction statewide. This statutory framework authorized the state to allocate resources for operations, prioritizing flexible support for residents regardless of income or background, with a focus on achieving sobriety and permanent housing transitions. The program officially launched in September 2013 under the management of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, in partnership with the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, which provided initial funding for establishment and operations. It opened with 27 residents on the 1,000-acre campus, utilizing existing dormitory-style buildings from prior uses to house up to 300 individuals at capacity, combining peer-based recovery support with on-site educational and vocational programs offered through collaborators like and . The initiative targeted primarily those experiencing due to substance use disorders, including a significant proportion of veterans, drawing from urban shelters and streets to offer a rural, structured environment for stabilization. Since its inception, the community has expanded services while maintaining its core transitional model, serving over 2,200 individuals by 2023 through state appropriations and demonstrated cost savings compared to and incarceration alternatives. Annual evaluations by state agencies have tracked participation, with early data showing 968 residents admitted by June 2017, underscoring the program's role in statewide efforts to reduce in without relying on permanent subsidies. Operations continue under ongoing legislative oversight, with funding renewals tied to metrics like housing retention rates.

Program Structure and Services

The Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community (SRC) operates as a recovery-oriented program designed for residents with a who are experiencing or at risk of . Eligibility prioritizes individuals regardless of income, background, or status, provided they have a documented and commit to upon entry; referrals typically come through partnering organizations like the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, with an intake process emphasizing voluntary participation and individualized recovery plans. Stays last up to two years, structured in phases that progress from stabilization to reintegration, allowing flexibility to address personal recovery milestones such as achieving , skill-building, and community reentry. Core services integrate peer-led support with practical rehabilitation elements, including daily case management to coordinate recovery goals and campus operations where residents contribute through workgroups maintaining the facility's grounds and buildings. Educational offerings encompass GED completion programs, vocational training in trades like and , and life skills workshops focused on and relapse prevention. Employment services provide supported job placement, resume assistance, and on-site opportunities, often in partnership with local employers, to foster self-sufficiency. Health and wellness components feature an on-site clinic for medical and behavioral , including substance use counseling and medication-assisted treatment where appropriate, alongside peer-facilitated groups such as (AA), (NA), and culturally specific programs like the Wellbriety White Bison initiative for Native American residents. Post-discharge support extends through housing navigation, continued employment linkages, and alumni networks to sustain long-term recovery. The program's capacity supports up to 250 residents, with services delivered by a multidisciplinary team including peer recovery specialists who model sobriety based on their own experiences.

Outcomes and Empirical Evaluations

The primary empirical evaluation of the Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community Program was conducted by the State Auditor's Office, with a final report released in August 2018 covering operations from September 2013 to June 2017. Among 777 participants who exited the program during this period, 47 percent (333 of 715 with complete exit data) transitioned to permanent , while program completers—defined as those meeting individualized goals—achieved a 77 percent rate of permanent placement. The average length of stay was 217 days (ranging from 2 to 1,227 days across 968 total participants), with longer stays strongly correlating to success: participants in the highest (>281 days) were 17 times more likely to exit to permanent than those in the lowest (<28 days). Participant demographics included 82 percent male, average age of 49.5 years, and 19 percent veterans, with most reporting histories of , substance use disorders, and behavioral health needs. Health and quality-of-life metrics showed self-reported improvements, including reductions in anxiety and depression scores, alongside enhanced overall , based on surveys of 124 current participants in January 2018. Employment engagement was limited, with only 11 percent participating in vocational programs, though 75 percent rated employment as important and 19 percent reported progress. Cost analyses indicated a 33 percent reduction in per-participant public costs post-enrollment (versus 12 percent for a comparison group of similar homeless individuals), driven by 80 percent lower judicial system expenditures (suggesting decreased incarceration involvement, though direct recidivism rates were not tracked), 65 percent fewer shelter/voucher uses, and declines in physical (9 percent) and behavioral (34 percent) costs; annual program cost per participant averaged $18,800. Legislators described these results as mixed, citing data limitations such as missing records (e.g., 11 percent incomplete exit data), reliance on self-reports for substance use, absence of centralized jail data, and lack of long-term follow-up beyond one to two years. A 2023 self-reported 10-year review by the operating nonprofit, Coalition for the Homeless, covering over 2,200 residents since 2013, indicated 58 percent overall placement upon exit (40 percent permanent, 18 percent temporary or ), a decline from the initial five-year figure of 76 percent (47 percent permanent plus temporary). This adjustment reflects broader data inclusion amid challenges like the shortage and disruptions, with the state citing the model's overall effectiveness in prompting replication efforts. No peer-reviewed studies or independent analyses were identified, limiting causal assessments of sustained recovery; outcomes appear influenced by program completion rates (around 40 percent in earlier data) and participant factors like milder behavioral health needs.

Geography and Physical Layout

Location and Environmental Context

Fort Lyon is situated in Bent County, southeastern , at approximately 38°05′ N latitude and 103°09′ W longitude, about 10 miles east of Las Animas along the . The site occupies a bluff overlooking the river, positioned roughly two miles below the mouth of the , which provided strategic access to water but exposed the location to periodic flooding, as evidenced by major inundations in 1866 and 1867 that prompted relocation of the original fort upstream. The surrounding terrain consists of the flat to gently rolling High Plains, part of the broader physiographic region, with elevations around 3,800 to 4,000 feet above and vegetation adapted to sparse cover and drought conditions. The local climate is semi-arid continental, featuring extreme temperature variations—average July maximums near 96°F and January minimums around 13°F—low annual precipitation typically under 15 inches, low humidity, variable winds, and vulnerability to dust storms and droughts characteristic of the basin. These environmental factors historically influenced military operations, health challenges like outbreaks due to dry air and isolation, and agricultural limitations in the region.

Infrastructure Evolution and Preservation

The infrastructure of Fort Lyon originated with its establishment as a U.S. Army post in 1867, featuring adobe structures arranged around a rectangular parade ground, including officers' quarters, barracks, a hospital, and administrative buildings. During its tenure as a U.S. Navy tuberculosis sanatorium from 1906 to 1922, the site expanded with hip-roofed frame buildings to accommodate patients, alongside agricultural fields and an irrigation system to support self-sufficiency. Upon transfer to the Veterans Administration in 1922, significant construction occurred between 1929 and 1945, adding a complex of standardized, multi-story brick buildings in Georgian Revival style clustered near the original parade ground; the first of these red brick patient facilities were completed between 1929 and 1931. .jpg) Subsequent uses as a neuropsychiatric facility, minimum-security prison until 2012, and supportive residential recovery community from 2013 onward involved minimal new construction but adaptive modifications to repurpose existing structures for housing, counseling, and vocational services. Preservation efforts recognize Fort Lyon's architectural and historical value, with the site listed as a district on the and Colorado State Register of Historic Properties, encompassing approximately 91 contributing buildings and features across 512 acres along the and . Designated as one of 's Most Endangered Places in 2013 due to deterioration following prison closure, the property has seen targeted interventions, including a $132,000 EPA Brownfields grant in 2017 for site cleanup and assessments to facilitate revitalization. Partial funding from the History Colorado State Historical Fund has supported ongoing work toward a comprehensive master plan for , aiming to maintain historic integrity while converting buildings into a self-sustaining for recovery programs; renovations were scheduled to commence in 2024 to address deferred maintenance estimated in the millions. These initiatives balance functional reuse with conservation of the site's layered military and medical heritage, preventing further losses like those from earlier demolitions during institutional shifts.

Fort Lyon National Cemetery

Establishment and Historical Burials

The Fort Lyon National Cemetery originated in 1907 as the burial ground for the U.S. Navy's , established the prior year on the grounds of the decommissioned Fort Lyon military post in . The treated sailors and suffering from pulmonary , a prevalent affliction among naval personnel due to shipboard living conditions and limited medical interventions at the time. Initial interments thus primarily comprised deceased patients from this facility, reflecting the era's high mortality rates from the disease, which claimed an estimated one in seven U.S. adults before effective treatments emerged in the mid-20th century. The cemetery also included a separate section for civilian employees and dependents associated with the hospital. Burials continued under Navy administration until 1922, when the facility transitioned to the Veterans Bureau amid broader federal efforts to consolidate care for ex-servicemen disabled by World War I-era exposures, including chemical agents that exacerbated respiratory conditions. By 1930, the site had been transferred to the Veterans Administration, extending its use for veteran hospitalizations and incorporating additional military burials into the cemetery. Historical records indicate that early interments numbered in the hundreds during the Navy period, focused on tuberculosis victims whose remains were documented through hospital ledgers rather than comprehensive grave registries initially. These burials underscored the cemetery's foundational role in addressing service-related illnesses, predating its formal designation within the national cemetery system. The site's prior use as a 19th-century Army post suggests possible earlier informal graves, but the national cemetery's documented history begins with the 1907 activations, distinguishing it from any antecedent post cemetery remnants. Over time, these historical sections integrated into the expanded grounds, now encompassing over 7,000 documented interments from the early 20th century onward, with markers reflecting naval and veteran honors.

Current Operations and Significance

Fort Lyon National Cemetery is administered by the National Cemetery Administration of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, with day-to-day operations managed by a small staff that reports to in . It functions as an active burial site for eligible veterans, active-duty servicemembers, their spouses, and dependent children, offering committal services, military honors coordination, and interment options for both casketed remains and cremains across ten designated sections (A through J). The facility supports ongoing burials, with records faxed to the National Cemetery Scheduling Office for processing, and provides public access for visitation and memorial tributes via the VA's Virtual Legacy Memorial digital platform. As of June 2016, the cemetery encompassed 2,542 interments on 10.7 developed acres within its 51.7-acre footprint, with over 41 undeveloped acres ensuring projected capacity through at least 2030. Infrastructure enhancements sustain its operations, including a modular administration building constructed in , a maintenance garage added in 2010, and an upgraded irrigation system installed that same year to support groundskeeping amid the site's arid southeastern environment. These improvements reflect standard VA protocols for preserving historic national cemeteries while accommodating modern accessibility and needs. The cemetery's contemporary significance lies in its embodiment of the federal government's expanded commitment to veterans' burial benefits, evolving from its origins as a naval hospital post cemetery in 1907 to a cornerstone of the National Cemetery Administration's network post-1973. It serves as a enduring memorial to military service, particularly for those treated at the adjacent former VA , and underscores the system's adaptation to post-World War II demands for nationwide honorable interment. Nationally registered for , Fort Lyon National Cemetery continues to symbolize dignified commemoration, with its active status reinforcing the causal link between military sacrifice and sustained governmental stewardship of veterans' legacies.

Controversies and Assessments

Role in the Sand Creek Massacre: Context and Events

In the lead-up to the Sand Creek Massacre, escalating violence between settlers and in 1864 stemmed from mutual raids, including the August murders of the Hungate family, which heightened demands for military retaliation. Cheyenne leader , advocating peace, led a delegation including chiefs White Antelope and Left Hand to Fort Lyon in September 1864 to negotiate with U.S. Army Major Edward W. Wynkoop, the post's commanding officer. Wynkoop, seeking to avert further conflict, assured the chiefs of protection if they encamped under the U.S. flag near the fort, prompting Black Kettle's band of approximately 500-600 Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho to relocate to a site along Sand Creek, about 40 miles northeast of Fort Lyon, by late October. Fort Lyon served as a key military outpost on the , supplying federal troops and militia during the , but its commanders diverged on handling the tribes. Wynkoop's successor, Major George L. Scott , maintained the protective status of the Sand Creek camp, yet territorial governor John Evans and Colonel John M. Chivington, commander of the 3rd Colorado Cavalry Regiment, pursued aggressive action amid reports of ongoing depredations attributed to other Cheyenne Dog Soldier bands not under Black Kettle's influence. On , 1864, Chivington marched roughly 700 militia from to Fort Lyon, where he ordered to detach about 250 federal troops to join the assault on the Sand Creek encampment, citing it as a hostile village despite intelligence from Fort Lyon officers confirming its peaceful nature. The massacre unfolded on November 29, 1864, when Chivington's combined force departed Fort Lyon at dawn and reached Sand Creek by mid-morning, launching a surprise attack on the village flying a of truce and the U.S. flag. Federal officers Captain Silas S. Soule and Lieutenant Joseph A. Cramer, stationed at Fort Lyon, refused to participate, with Soule later testifying that the camp contained only non-combatants and that the assault violated military assurances of safety; their units largely held back, limiting Fort Lyon's direct troop contribution to minimal levels under Anthony's contingent. The attack resulted in the deaths of 150-200 and , predominantly women, children, and elderly, with reports of mutilations amid chaotic firing that lasted several hours; survived by rallying defenders but recounted the betrayal of Fort Lyon's promised sanctuary in subsequent accounts. Congressional investigations, including the 1865 Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, condemned the event as a , highlighting Fort Lyon's role in the failed peace signals that lured the tribes into vulnerability.

Debates on Military Necessity vs. Atrocity Narratives

The attack on the Cheyenne and encampment near on November 29, 1864, led by Colonel John M. Chivington of the Third Cavalry, sparked immediate controversy over whether it constituted a legitimate against a perceived threat or an unprovoked slaughter of non-combatants. Proponents of , including Chivington himself, argued that the action was essential amid escalating violence from warriors against settlers, such as the August 1864 of the Hungate and subsequent raids that heightened fears during the Civil War when federal troops were diverted eastward. Chivington testified before a congressional that from scouts indicated the Sand Creek camp harbored hostile elements, including warriors with fresh scalps and plunder from recent attacks, necessitating a preemptive strike to deter broader tribal aggression and protect emigrant routes and settlements vulnerable to hit-and-run tactics. This view was echoed by territorial Governor John Evans, who had issued proclamations in August and October 1864 declaring war on "hostile" Indians and urging civilians to arm themselves, framing the operation as part of a defensive campaign against tribes unwilling to distinguish friend from foe in fluid alliances. Opposing narratives, dominant in federal military and congressional assessments, portrayed the event as an atrocity violating promises of protection extended from Fort Lyon, where Major Edward Wynkoop had earlier parleyed with Black Kettle's band and assured them safety if they camped nearby under a U.S. . The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War's report, based on eyewitness testimonies including those from Captain —who refused to order his men to fire on the village—concluded that the encampment consisted primarily of women, children, and elderly (estimated 200 killed, with fewer than 10 warriors), who offered no organized resistance despite flying American and white flags signaling peace. Investigations highlighted post-attack mutilations of bodies, including and genital disfigurement by U.S. troops, as evidence of disproportionate brutality rather than battlefield exigency, with Major Scott Anthony's prior directive from Fort Lyon placing the camp at Sand Creek under implied military safeguard that Chivington disregarded. Historians note that while broader Cheyenne depredations—totaling dozens of deaths in —provided a factual basis for Colorado's alarm, primary evidence from the site, including survivor accounts and minimal U.S. casualties (none fatal), undermines claims of a , suggesting instead a targeted enabled by the fort's ambiguous protection policies. Chivington's defenders, including some veterans, maintained that tribal in raids blurred lines between "friendly" and hostile bands, justifying decisive action to break a , but federal inquiries rejected this, attributing to Chivington's ambition and Evans's inflammatory rhetoric over verifiable threats from Black Kettle's specific group. These debates persisted in military courts and public discourse, with no conviction of Chivington due to his state status, underscoring tensions between territorial imperatives and national oversight in conflicts.

Broader Legacy in Westward Expansion and Native Conflicts

Fort Lyon served as a critical outpost in the , safeguarding key overland routes such as the Mountain Branch of the during the Civil War era, which facilitated the movement of emigrants, traders, and supplies essential to American westward expansion into the Southwest. Established initially as Fort Wise in 1860 and renamed Fort Lyon in 1861 following General Nathaniel Lyon's death, the post's garrison provided escorts for wagon trains along the to , countering threats from Confederate incursions and Native American raids that disrupted commerce and settlement in the . In 1862, elements of the fort's forces marched southward to , contributing to the Union victory at the on March 26–28, which secured federal control over the region and prevented Southern expansion that could have hindered northern migration patterns. Beyond immediate trail protection, Fort Lyon exemplified the U.S. Army's fort network strategy under the Department of the Missouri, established in 1867, which aimed to project power across the Plains to enable mining booms—like Colorado's 1859 gold rush—and agricultural by deterring intertribal warfare and resistance from displaced tribes such as the and . Relocated upstream in 1867 to mitigate flooding (becoming Fort Lyon No. 2), the installation housed units including the Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry in the late and , who patrolled against raids and supported enforcement of treaties like the 1867 Medicine Lodge Creek agreements, which sought to confine Southern Plains tribes to reservations but often failed due to inadequate provisions and ongoing settler encroachments. In the broader arc of Native conflicts, Fort Lyon's operations contributed to the escalation and resolution of the Plains Indian Wars by 1897, when the post was abandoned as tribal resistance waned under sustained military pressure. During 1868–1869, it played a minor logistical role in General Philip Sheridan's winter campaign against non-compliant and bands, following the Sand Creek events and subsequent retaliatory strikes that fragmented tribal cohesion and opened vast tracts for white homesteaders—evidenced by Colorado's population surge from 34,277 in 1860 to 39,864 by 1870, driven by secured access to fertile valleys. This military posture, rooted in causal pressures of demographic influx and resource competition, ultimately displaced nomadic hunting economies, confining survivors to diminished reservations and enabling the territory's path to statehood in 1876, though at the cost of thousands of Native lives across campaigns where forts like Lyon supplied forward bases for scorched-earth tactics.

References

  1. https://www.nps.gov/places/wayside-fort-lyon-reservation.htm
  2. https://www.bentcountyheritage.org/kit-carson-chapel/
  3. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/co-fortlyon/
  4. http://www.historycolorado.org/location/fort-lyon
  5. https://doh.colorado.gov/meet-fort-lyon
  6. https://www.cem.va.gov/cems/nchp/FtLyon.asp
  7. https://www.coloradopreservation.org/endangered-place/fort-lyon/
  8. https://www.nps.gov/places/beol-sand_bents_new_fort.htm
  9. https://columbinegenealogy.com/records/civil-war/history/
  10. https://kclonewolf.com/sand-creek-timeline-02-1860-1863.html
  11. https://www.nps.gov/sand/learn/historyculture/index.htm
  12. https://www.nps.gov/sand/learn/historyculture/massacre.htm
  13. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2001/summer/sand-creek-massacre-1
  14. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D110-PURL-gpo53902/pdf/GOVPUB-D110-PURL-gpo53902.pdf
  15. https://www.historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/media/document/2018/ColoradoMagazine_v45n4_Fall1968.pdf
  16. https://www.chieftain.com/story/news/2003/06/08/former-fort-s-history-diverse/8734246007/
  17. https://fortwiki.com/Fort_Wise
  18. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/soldier/sitec3.htm
  19. https://www.coloradopreservation.org/endangered-places/fort-lyon-3/
  20. https://www.historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2018/5bn1331.pdf
  21. https://www.fortwiki.com/Fort_Lyon_(2)
  22. https://www.denverpost.com/2011/09/22/a-landmark-worth-preserving/
  23. http://www.historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2018/5bn1331.pdf
  24. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/428548
  25. https://www.nytimes.com/1908/05/18/archives/mercury-for-consumption-doctors-in-government-hospital-in-colorado.html
  26. https://www.nytimes.com/1908/09/22/archives/mercury-for-tuberculosis-naval-medical-inspector-is-almost.html
  27. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1004291.pdf
  28. https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/from-hospital-to-prison-to-rehab-facility-fort-lyons-fractured-past/article_bab76ed8-058c-11ea-abfa-8f27f6ae1bbb.html
  29. https://sah-archipedia.org/buildings/CO-01-BN05
  30. http://www.historycolorado.org/location/us-naval-hospital-fort-lyon-veterans-administration-medical-center-fort-lyon-correctional
  31. https://www.chieftain.com/story/news/2000/02/21/veterans-rally-against-closure-fort/8931088007/
  32. https://www.chieftain.com/story/news/2000/03/31/fort-lyon-transfer-delayed-but/8928218007/
  33. https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/cb5-03-19-21.pdf
  34. https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/corhrg_4.pdf
  35. https://www.cpr.org/show-segment/former-prison-makes-list-of-endangered-places/
  36. https://www.denverpost.com/2011/03/15/closure-of-bent-countys-fort-lyon-prison-delayed-six-months/
  37. https://www.kunc.org/2011-03-16/southeastern-colorado-courting-new-employers-to-fill-fort-lyon-facility
  38. https://legiscan.com/CO/text/SB210/id/845038/Colorado-2013-SB210-Enrolled.pdf
  39. https://coloradosun.com/2023/10/16/homeless-recovery-campus-fort-lyon/
  40. https://coscda.org/projects/fort-lyon-supportive-residential-community/
  41. https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/1771s_highlights.pdf
  42. https://www.coloradocoalition.org/fortlyonreferral
  43. https://www.coloradocoalition.org/fortlyonprogram
  44. https://www.findhelp.org/colorado-coalition-for-the-homeless--las-animas-co--fort-lyon-supportive-residential-community-program/6077331696254976?postal=81001
  45. https://doh.colorado.gov/fort-lyon-resident-stories
  46. https://www.nachc.org/its-amazing-what-can-be-done-here-colorado-health-center-offers-community-for-those-in-recovery/
  47. https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/audits/1771s_fort_lyon_ii_evaluation.pdf
  48. https://coloradosun.com/2018/09/11/fort-lyon-colorado-homeless-audit/
  49. https://www.coloradocoalition.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/Fort%20Lyon%2010%20Year%20Report%202023_Digital.pdf
  50. https://colorado.hometownlocator.com/co/bent/fort-lyon.cfm
  51. https://latitude.to/articles-by-country/us/united-states/208699/fort-lyon-colorado
  52. https://www.bentcounty.net/about_us/index.php
  53. https://secog.colorado.gov/bent-county
  54. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/sopn-beol-climate-monitoring-wy2024.htm
  55. https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/bent-county-colorado-cleanup-project-receives-132k-revitalize-fort-lyon-campus.html
  56. https://www.historycolorado.org/location/fort-lyon-national-cemetery
  57. https://www.achp.gov/sites/default/files/2018-07/VA%2520Section%25203%2520-%25202004%2520Baseline%2520Report.pdf
  58. https://www.cem.va.gov/facts/Dates_of_Establishment_2.asp
  59. http://www.historycolorado.org/location/fort-lyon-national-cemetery
  60. https://www.nps.gov/sand/learn/historyculture/black-kettle-biography.htm
  61. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/sand-creek
  62. https://assets.mission-us.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/16183737/psd-eyewitness_accounts_of_the_sand_creek_massacre-mission3.pdf
  63. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=1150
  64. https://www.historycolorado.org/story/2023/01/09/saving-soule-cramer-letters
  65. https://5280.com/the-mysterious-history-behind-the-murders-that-led-up-to-the-sand-creek-massacre/
  66. https://kclonewolf.com/sand-creek-documents-chiv-defense.html
  67. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/evanssupport/18/
  68. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/june-27/colorado-governor-orders-indians-to-sand-creek
  69. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/sand_historicaloverview.htm
  70. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=696
  71. https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset/1676/
  72. https://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre/
  73. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-954
  74. http://npshistory.com/publications/sand/urj-v2n1-2009.pdf
  75. https://www.nps.gov/people/john-chivington.htm
  76. https://www.historycolorado.org/location/fort-lyon
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.