Hubbry Logo
The FrondeThe FrondeMain
Open search
The Fronde
Community hub
The Fronde
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
The Fronde
The Fronde
The Fronde
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Fronde
Part of the Franco-Spanish War (1635–1659) and the General Crisis

Battle of the Faubourg St Antoine (1652) by the walls of the Bastille, Paris
Date1648–1653
Location
France
Result Royalist victory
Belligerents
Kingdom of France
Spanish Empire[1]
Commanders and leaders
Casualties and losses
50,000+ total deaths[2]

The Fronde (French pronunciation: [fʁɔ̃d] ⓘ)[3] was a series of civil wars in the Kingdom of France between 1648 and 1653, occurring in the midst of the Franco-Spanish War, which had begun in 1635. The government of the young King Louis XIV confronted the combined opposition of the princes, the nobility, the noble regional court assemblies (parlements), as well as much of the French population, and managed to subdue them all. The dispute started when the government of France issued seven fiscal edicts, six of which were to increase taxation. The parlements resisted, questioned the constitutionality of the king's actions, and sought to check his powers.[4]

The Fronde was divided into two campaigns, the Parlementary Fronde and the Fronde of the Princes. The timing of the outbreak of the Parlementary Fronde, directly after the Peace of Westphalia (1648) that ended the Thirty Years' War, was significant. The nuclei of the armed bands that terrorized parts of France under aristocratic leaders during that period had been hardened in a generation of war in Germany, where troops still tended to operate autonomously. Louis XIV, impressed as a young ruler with the experience of the Fronde, came to reorganize French fighting forces under a stricter hierarchy, whose leaders ultimately could be made or unmade by the king. Cardinal Mazarin blundered into the crisis but came out well ahead at the end. The Fronde represented the final attempt of the French nobility to confront the king, and ended in its humiliation. In the long run, the Fronde served to strengthen royal authority, but weakened the national economy. The Fronde facilitated the emergence of absolute monarchy.[5]

The Spanish Empire promoted the Fronde to the point that without its support, it would have had a more limited character; it benefited from the internal upheaval in France, as it contributed to the Spanish military's renewed success in its war against the French between 1647 and 1653, so much so that the year 1652 could be considered a Spanish annus mirabilis.[6] However, following the end of the Fronde and an English intervention on the side of France, the course of the war largely changed in France's favour, and it ultimately achieved some territorial gains in the Peace of the Pyrenees.

Name

[edit]
Look up fronde in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

The French word fronde means "sling"; Parisian crowds used slings to smash the windows of supporters of Cardinal Mazarin.[7] Jean François Paul de Gondi, Cardinal de Retz, attributes the usage to a witticism in Book II of his Memoirs: "Bachaumont once said, in jest, that the Parlement acted like the schoolboys in the Paris ditches, who fling stones [frondent, that is, fling using slings], and run away when they see the constable, but meet again as soon as he turns his back." He goes on to state that emblems based on that nickname became quite popular and were placed on hats, fans and gloves and even were baked onto bread.

Origins

[edit]
Cardinal Mazarin, French diplomat and statesman; portrait attributed to Mathieu Le Nain

The insurrection did not start with revolutionary goals but aimed to protect the ancient liberties from royal encroachments and to defend the established rights of the parlements – courts of appeal rather than legislative bodies like the English parliaments – and especially the right of the Parlement of Paris to limit the king's power by refusing to register decrees that ran against custom. The liberties under attack were feudal, not of individuals but of chartered towns, where they defended the prerogatives accorded to offices in the legal patchwork of local interests and provincial identities that was France. The Fronde in the end provided an incentive for the establishment of royalist absolutism, since the disorders eventually discredited the feudal concept of liberty.[5]

The pressure that saw the traditional liberties under threat came in the form of extended and increased taxes as the Crown needed to recover from its expenditures in the recent wars. The costs of the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) constrained Mazarin's government to raise funds by traditional means, the impôts, the taille, and the occasional aides. The nobility refused to be so taxed, based on their old liberties, or privileges, and the brunt fell upon the bourgeoisie.[5]

The movement soon degenerated into factions, some of which attempted to overthrow Mazarin and to reverse the policies of his predecessor, Cardinal Richelieu (in office 1624–1642), who had taken power for the crown from great territorial nobles, some of whom became leaders of the Fronde. When Louis XIV became king in 1643, he was only a child, so France was ruled by Anne of Austria and though Richelieu had died the year before, his policies continued to dominate French life under his successor Cardinal Mazarin. Most historians consider that Louis's later insistence on absolutist rule and depriving the nobility of actual power was a result of those events in his childhood. The term frondeur was later used to refer to anyone who suggested that the power of the king should be limited and has now passed into conservative French usage to refer to anyone who shows insubordination or engages in criticism of the powers in place.[8]

First Fronde, the Parlementary Fronde (1648–1649)

[edit]

In May 1648 a tax levied on judicial officers of the Parlement of Paris provoked not merely a refusal to pay but also a condemnation of earlier financial edicts and a demand for the acceptance of a scheme of constitutional reforms framed by a united committee of the parlement[7] (the Chambre Saint-Louis), composed of members of all the sovereign courts of Paris.[5]

The military record of the Parlementary Fronde is almost blank. In August 1648, feeling strengthened by the news of Prince Louis II de Condé's victory at Lens (20 August 1648), Mazarin suddenly arrested the leaders of the parlement, whereupon Paris broke into insurrection and barricaded the streets.[7]

The noble faction demanded the calling of an assembly of the Estates General, which had last been convoked in 1615. The nobles believed that in the Estates-General, they could continue to control the bourgeois element, as they had in the past.

The royal faction, having no army at its immediate disposal, had to release the prisoners and to promise reforms; on the night of 22 October, it fled from Paris. However France's signing of the Peace of Westphalia (Treaty of Münster, 24 October 1648) allowed the French army to return from the frontiers, and by January 1649, Condé had put Paris under siege. The two warring parties signed the Peace of Rueil (11 March 1649) after little blood had been shed. The Parisians, though still and always anti-cardinalist, had refused to ask for Spanish aid, as proposed by their princely and noble adherents under Armand de Bourbon, prince de Conti, and having no prospect of military success without such aid, the noble party submitted to the government and received concessions.[5][7]

Second Fronde, the Fronde of the Princes (1650–1653)

[edit]

From then on the Fronde became a story of intrigues, half-hearted warfare in a scramble for power and control of patronage, losing all trace of its first constitutional phase. The leaders were discontented princes and nobles: Gaston, Duke of Orleans (the king's uncle); the great Louis II, Prince de Condé and his brother Armand, Prince of Conti; Frédéric, Duke of Bouillon, and his brother Henri, Viscount of Turenne. To those must be added Gaston's daughter, Anne, duchess of Montpensier (La grande Mademoiselle); Condé's sister, Madame de Longueville; Madame de Chevreuse; and the astute intriguer Jean François Paul de Gondi, the future Cardinal de Retz. The military operations fell into the hands of war-experienced mercenaries, led by two great, and many lesser, generals.[7]

January 1650 – December 1651

[edit]
"Louis XIV Crushes the Fronde" by Gilles Guérin 1654

The peace of Rueil lasted until the end of 1649. The princes, received at court once more, renewed their intrigues against Mazarin. On 14 January 1650, Cardinal Mazarin, having come to an understanding with Monsieur Gondi and Madame de Chevreuse, suddenly arrested Condé, Conti, and Longueville. This time, it was Turenne, before and afterwards the most loyal soldier of his day, who headed the armed rebellion. Listening to the promptings of Madame de Longueville, he resolved to rescue her brothers, particularly Condé, his old comrade in the battles of Freiburg and Nördlingen.[7]

Turenne hoped to do that with Spanish assistance; a powerful Spanish army assembled in Artois under Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria, governor-general of the Spanish Netherlands, but peasants of the countryside rose against the invaders; the royal army in Champagne was in the capable hands of César de Choiseul, comte du Plessis-Praslin, who counted 52 years of age and 36 of war experience; and the little fortress of Guise successfully resisted the archduke's attack.[7]

At that point Mazarin drew upon Plessis-Praslin's army for reinforcements to be sent to subdue the rebellion in the south forcing the royal general to retire. Then Archduke Leopold Wilhelm decided that he had spent enough of King Philip IV of Spain's money and men in the French quarrel. His regular army withdrew into winter quarters, and left Turenne to deliver the princes with a motley host of Frondeurs and Lorrainers. Plessis-Praslin by force and bribery secured the surrender of Rethel on 13 December 1650 and Turenne, who had advanced to relieve the place, fell back hurriedly. But he was a formidable opponent, and Plessis-Praslin and Mazarin himself, who accompanied the army, had many misgivings as to the result of a lost battle. The marshal chose nevertheless to force Turenne to a decision, and the Battle of Blanc-Champ (near Sommepy-Tahure) or Rethel was the consequence.[9]

Both sides were at a standstill in strong positions, Plessis-Praslin doubtful of the trustworthiness of his cavalry, but Turenne was too weak to attack, when a dispute for precedence arose between the French Guards Regiment and the Picardie regiment. The royal infantry had to be rearranged in order of regimental seniority, and Turenne, seeing and desiring to profit by the attendant disorder, came out of his stronghold and attacked with the greatest vigour. The battle (15 December 1650) was severe and for a time doubtful, but Turenne's Frondeurs gave way in the end, and his army, as an army, ceased to exist. Turenne himself, undeceived as to the part he was playing in the drama, asked and received the young king's pardon, and meantime the court, with the maison du roi and other loyal troops, had subdued the minor risings without difficulty (March–April 1651).[10]

Condé, Conti, and Longueville were released, and by April 1651 the rebellion had everywhere collapsed. Then followed a few months of hollow peace and the court returned to Paris. Mazarin, an object of hatred to all the princes, had already retired into exile. His absence left the field free for mutual jealousies, and for the remainder of the year anarchy reigned in France.[10]

December 1651 – February 1653

[edit]

In December 1651, Cardinal Mazarin returned to France with a small army. The war began again, and this time, Turenne and Condé were pitted against each other.[10]

After that campaign, the civil war ceased, but in the several other campaigns of the Franco-Spanish War that followed, the two great soldiers were opposed to one another, Turenne as the defender of France, Condé as a Spanish invader.[10]

The début of the new Frondeurs took place in Guyenne (February–March 1652), while their Spanish ally, the archduke Leopold Wilhelm, captured various northern fortresses. On the Loire, where the centre of gravity was soon transferred, the Frondeurs were commanded by intriguers and quarrelsome lords, until Condé's arrival from Guyenne. His bold leadership made itself felt in the Bléneau (7 April 1652) in which a portion of the royal army was destroyed, but fresh troops came up to oppose him. From the skillful dispositions made by his opponents, Condé felt the presence of Turenne and broke off the action. The royal army did likewise. Condé invited the commander of Turenne's rearguard to supper, chaffed him unmercifully for allowing the prince's men to surprise him in the morning, and by way of farewell remarked to his guest, "Quel dommage que de braves gens comme nous se coupent la gorge pour un faquin" ("It's too bad decent people like us are cutting our throats for a scoundrel")—an incident and a remark that displayed the feudal arrogance which ironically led to the iron-handed absolutism of Louis XIV.[10]

After Bléneau, both armies marched to Paris to negotiate with the parlement, de Retz and Mlle de Montpensier, while the archduke took more fortresses in Flanders, and Charles, duke of Lorraine, with an army of plundering mercenaries, marched through Champagne to join Condé. As to the latter, Turenne maneuvered past Condé and planted himself in front of the mercenaries, and their leader, not wishing to expend his men against the old French regiments, consented to depart with a money payment and the promise of two tiny Lorraine fortresses.[10]

A few more manœuvers, and the royal army was able to hem in the Frondeurs in the Faubourg St. Antoine (2 July 1652) with their backs to the closed gates of Paris. The royalists attacked all along the line and won a signal victory in spite of the knightly prowess of the prince and his great lords, but at the critical moment Gaston's daughter persuaded the Parisians to open the gates and to admit Condé's army. She herself turned the guns of the Bastille on the pursuers. An insurrectionist government appeared in Paris and proclaimed Monsieur lieutenant-general of the realm. Mazarin, feeling that public opinion was solidly against him, left France again, and the bourgeois of Paris, quarreling with the princes, permitted the king to enter the city on 21 October 1652. Mazarin returned unopposed in February 1653.[10]

Spanish Fronde

[edit]
Main article: Franco-Spanish War (1635–1659)
The Battle of the Dunes by Charles-Philippe Larivière, 1837. The battle was a decisive victory for France and its English allies over the Spanish in 1658
Reception of the Grand Condé at Versailles following his victory at Seneffe. The Grand Condé advances towards Louis XIV in a respectful manner with laurel wreaths on his path, while captured enemy flags are displayed on both sides of the stairs. It marked the end of Condé's exile, following his participation in the Fronde.

The Fronde as a civil war was now over. Tired of the turmoil and disgusted with the princes, the country came to look to the king and his party as representing order. Thus, the Fronde paved the way for the absolutism of Louis XIV. Meanwhile, the Franco-Spanish war continued in Flanders, Catalonia, and Italy wherever a Spanish and a French garrison were face to face. Condé, along with the remnant of his army, defiantly entered the service of the king of Spain.[10]

In 1653, France was so exhausted that neither invaders nor defenders were able to gather supplies to enable them to take the field until July. At one moment, near Péronne, Condé had Turenne at a serious disadvantage but could not galvanize Spanish General Count Fuensaldaña, who was more solicitous to preserve his master's soldiers than to establish Condé as mayor of the palace to the king of France and the armies drew apart again without fighting. In 1654 the principal incident was the siege and relief of Arras. On the night of 24/25 August the lines of circumvallation drawn round that place by the prince were brilliantly stormed by Turenne's army and Condé won equal credit for his safe withdrawal of the besieging corps under cover of a series of bold cavalry charges led by himself as usual, sword in hand.[10]

In 1655, Turenne captured the fortresses of Landrecies, Condé and St Ghislain. In 1656 the prince of Condé avenged the defeat of Arras by storming Turenne's circumvallation around Valenciennes (16 July) but Turenne drew off his forces in good order. The campaign of 1657 was uneventful and is only to be remembered because a body of 6,000 English infantry, sent by Oliver Cromwell in pursuance of his treaty of alliance with Mazarin, took part in it. The presence of the English contingent and its purpose of making Dunkirk a new Calais, to be held by England forever, gave the next campaign a character of certainty and decision which was entirely wanting in the rest of the war.[10]

Dunkirk was besieged promptly in great force and when Don Juan of Austria and Condé appeared with the relieving army from Fumes, Turenne advanced boldly to meet them. The Battle of the Dunes, fought on 14 June 1658, was the first real trial of strength since the battle of the Faubourg St Antoine. Successes on one wing were compromised by failure on the other but in the end Condé drew off with many losses, the success of his cavalry charges subverted by the defeat of the Spanish right wing among the dunes.[10]

Here the "red-coats" made their first appearance on a continental battlefield, under the leadership of Sir William Lockhart, Cromwell's ambassador at Paris. They astonished both armies by the stubborn fierceness of their assaults. Dunkirk fell and was handed over to the English Protectorate, as promised, flying the St George's Cross until Charles II sold it to Louis XIV in 1662.[10]

One last half-hearted campaign followed in 1659—the twenty-fifth year of a conflict between France and Spain which had begun during the Thirty Years' War—then the peace of the Pyrenees was signed on 5 November. On 27 January 1660 the prince asked and obtained at Aix-en-Provence the forgiveness of Louis XIV. The later careers of Turenne and Condé were as obedient subjects of their sovereign.[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

In French

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

The Fronde

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Fronde was a series of civil wars and uprisings in spanning 1648 to 1653, occurring during the minority of King and pitting nobles, judicial bodies like the , and urban crowds against the regency of Queen Anne of Austria and her chief minister, Cardinal Jules Mazarin. The name "Fronde," meaning "sling" in French, referred to the slingshots wielded by Parisian rioters to shatter windows of Mazarin's allies, evoking both childish defiance and broader resistance to authority. Triggered by fiscal exhaustion from the ongoing Franco-Spanish War and Mazarin's aggressive centralization policies—inheriting and intensifying Cardinal Richelieu's efforts to curb noble and provincial privileges—the initial phase, known as the Fronde of the , erupted in 1648 over demands to register royal edicts and limit arbitrary taxation, culminating in riots after the arrest of popular magistrate Pierre Broussel. A fragile peace followed Mazarin's brief exile in 1651, but the second phase, the Princes' Fronde, saw high nobles like the Great Condé and d'Orléans ally against the crown in personal vendettas and bids for power, fracturing rebel unity and prolonging chaos through provincial revolts such as the Ormée in . Though the Frondeurs briefly threatened the Bourbon monarchy's stability, their internal divisions and the crown's strategic concessions enabled Mazarin's return and the suppression of major resistance by 1653, ultimately fortifying absolutist rule. The turmoil profoundly shaped the young , instilling a visceral aversion to factionalism and disorder that informed his lifelong commitment to undivided royal authority upon assuming personal governance in 1661. Pamphleteering, exemplified by thousands of vitriolic Mazarinades, amplified the conflict's ideological dimension, waging a parallel war of words that exposed but failed to dismantle the emerging absolutist state.

Historical Background

Economic and Fiscal Strains

The French monarchy's fiscal system, already strained under Cardinal Richelieu's aggressive foreign policy, reached a breaking point during Cardinal Mazarin's administration amid the regency of Anne of Austria (1643–1651). Participation in the Thirty Years' War (from 1635) and the concurrent Franco-Spanish War (1635–1659) drove military expenditures to unsustainable levels, surging from roughly 10 million livres per year in the early 1630s to over 41 million by the mid-1640s, far outpacing revenue growth. These costs, funded through short-term expedients rather than structural reforms, accumulated debts that by the late 1640s consumed most ordinary income, with interest payments alone devouring up to 80% of tailles (direct land taxes) in some provinces. Mazarin's policies exacerbated the crisis by prioritizing war finance over fiscal equity or efficiency. Lacking parliamentary consent mechanisms, the crown imposed arbitrary tax hikes on staples like salt (gabelle) and wine (aides), while selling venal offices—creating over 45,000 new judicial and administrative posts between 1640 and 1648 to generate quick revenue from purchase fees and subsequent inheritance taxes. In May 1648, a specific edict taxing the salaries of judicial officers (known as the "édit des offices" or "paix") targeted the robed nobility, who had evaded traditional levies, but this alienated key administrative elites already burdened by inflation and currency debasements that eroded real incomes by 20–30% since the 1620s. Forced loans from creditors and municipalities further eroded trust, as defaults became routine; by 1647, provincial intendants reported widespread tax farming abuses, where private collectors retained up to 50% of collections as profit, inflating effective burdens on peasants and urban laborers. These strains manifested in acute liquidity shortages, prompting the issuance of seven fiscal edicts on 19 May to avert default, including creations of monopolies and enhanced duties projected to yield 20 million livres annually but resisted for undermining exemptions held by nobles and . The edicts' failure to address root inefficiencies—such as the nobility's immunity, which shielded 1–2% of the controlling 40% of —intensified perceptions of inequity, as direct taxes fell disproportionately on the Third Estate amid harvest shortfalls and trade disruptions from naval blockades. By late , total indebtedness approached 300 million livres, equivalent to five years' peacetime revenue, setting the stage for institutional backlash as parlements invoked their registration rights to block what they deemed ruinous policies.

Regency Government and Mazarin's Centralization

Following Louis XIII's death on 14 May 1643, his four-year-old son Louis XIV succeeded to the throne, with Anne of Austria designated as regent. Anne swiftly consolidated power by appointing Cardinal Jules Mazarin—Richelieu's former protégé and an adept diplomat—as chief minister, effectively sharing governance and leveraging his control over royal patronage to direct policy. Mazarin's regency policies emphasized administrative centralization to bolster monarchical authority amid fiscal exigencies from prolonged warfare, including the Franco-Spanish War (1635–1659). He intensified deployment of intendants—central royal agents—to provinces, enabling direct enforcement of edicts while circumventing noble governors and regional assemblies that resisted royal impositions. This approach diminished local autonomies, aligning with Richelieu's prior efforts to subordinate feudal structures to the crown. Fiscal measures under Mazarin prioritized war financing through arbitrary tax hikes, such as augmentations to the taille (a direct tax on land and non-privileged persons) and indirect levies like the gabelle on salt, alongside sales of offices and forced loans. These impositions, totaling multiple edicts by 1648, burdened peasants and urban dwellers disproportionately, as the government eschewed convening the Estates General—last held in 1614—and compelled parlements to register laws via lits de justice, overriding their remonstrances against unconsented levies. To counter noble influence, Mazarin targeted high through exiles, arrests, and exclusion from councils, viewing their factionalism as antithetical to unified royal command. Such tactics, while stabilizing central control temporarily, alienated judicial elites in parlements—who claimed oversight of fiscal legality—and grandees, fostering resentment that eroded legitimacy without addressing underlying revenue shortfalls from inefficient collection and costs exceeding 200 million livres annually by the late 1640s.

Outbreak and Phases

The Parliamentary Fronde (1648–1649)

![Portrait of Cardinal Mazarin attributed to Mathieu Le Nain][float-right] The Parliamentary Fronde emerged in 1648 from fiscal strains imposed by the regency of Anne of Austria and Cardinal Mazarin to finance the Franco-Spanish War and aftermath of the Thirty Years' War, including demands that officials surrender up to four years' salaries. The Parlement of Paris, comprising magistrates whose offices were threatened by the impending expiration of the paulette hereditary tax right, resisted registering new tax edicts that bypassed traditional consent mechanisms. On January 15, 1648, Mazarin convened a to force the 's registration of five fiscal edicts, eliciting formal remonstrances from the court against arbitrary taxation. Throughout spring and early summer, the Parlement drafted 27 articles of reform, seeking limits on intendants' powers and protections against unchecked royal borrowing. On June 26, 1648, without regency approval, the Parlement assembled the Chambre Saint-Louis, uniting sovereign courts to amplify grievances nationwide. Escalation occurred on August 26, 1648, when Mazarin, emboldened by Prince de Condé's victory at Lens, ordered the arrest of vocal opponents including councillor Pierre Broussel, aged 73, and another magistrate. Parisians responded on August 27 with the Days of , erecting over 1,200 wooden barriers across streets and mobilizing thousands in armed defense, repelling royal guards and compelling the release of prisoners by August 28 to avert full-scale assault. Persistent unrest prompted the royal family to flee for on January 8, 1649, positioning troops under Condé for a potential siege while food shortages plagued the city. Negotiations, mediated by figures like Mathieu Molé, president of the , yielded the Peace of Rueil, initialed March 11 and ratified April 1, 1649, abolishing uncollected new taxes, mandating Parlement consent for future levies, withdrawing provincial intendants, prohibiting arbitrary detentions, and extending amnesty to participants. The episode involved minimal casualties, primarily manifesting as urban disturbances rather than pitched battles, yet exposed vulnerabilities in Mazarin's centralization efforts and emboldened noble factions for subsequent phases.

The Princes' Fronde: Early Uprisings (1650–1651)

The Princes' Fronde commenced with the arrests ordered by on January 18, 1650, targeting Louis II de Bourbon, Prince de Condé, his brother the Prince de Conti, and the Duke de Longueville, Condé's brother-in-law, who were imprisoned at Vincennes Castle. These actions stemmed from Mazarin's fears of Condé's growing ambition and disloyalty, exacerbated by patronage disputes and Condé's pivotal role in suppressing the Parliamentary Fronde, which had elevated his influence yet bred resentment among regency officials. While Parisians initially celebrated the arrests with bonfires and pamphlets decrying the princes' overreach, the move alienated provincial allies and intensified noble opposition to centralized authority. Supporters swiftly mobilized, with Condé's sister, the Duchesse de Longueville, fleeing to —where her husband held the governorship—and coordinating resistance efforts, including appeals for Spanish that materialized by March 1650 with 6,000 and 2,000 pledged to secure the princes' release. Provincial uprisings erupted, particularly in Guienne and , where crowds rallied against Mazarin with chants supporting the king and princes, though local institutions required coercion to align. The Princesse de Condé further bolstered these efforts by escaping to in April 1650 to garner support, transforming the arrests into a broader aristocratic revolt that challenged regency control beyond . Sustained pressure from these decentralized uprisings weakened Mazarin's position, culminating in his flight from in February 1651 and the subsequent release of the imprisoned princes that same month, allowing Condé to briefly join a restructured royal council. This early phase concluded with a fragile truce by 1651, as rebellions subsided amid shifting alliances, though underlying factional tensions persisted and foreshadowed further escalation.

The Princes' Fronde: Escalation and Collapse (1651–1653)

Following Cardinal Mazarin's exile in February 1651, the release of Louis II de Bourbon, Prince de Condé, and his restoration to dignities on February 25, 1651, offered a brief respite, but underlying rivalries soon reignited conflict. The declaration of Louis XIV's majority on September 6, 1651, diminished Condé's influence within the new royal council, leading him to flee to Saint-Maur and commit to armed rebellion by September 22, 1651. Condé then relocated to , securing Spanish commitments of 30 vessels and 4,000 troops to bolster his campaign against . Military engagements escalated in 1652 as Condé's coalition challenged royal forces across multiple fronts. On April 7, 1652, Condé's army routed elements of the royalist troops at Bléneau, though Henri de La Tour d'Auvergne, vicomte de Turenne—having defected back to the royal side—reorganized the survivors to avert total disaster. Tensions peaked near , where Condé entered the city in April 1652 amid popular unrest; on July 2, 1652, during the Battle of the , Condé repulsed Turenne's offensive, aided by Anne Marie Louise d'Orléans, Duchess of Montpensier, who directed artillery fire from the against royal positions. Condé's victories proved unsustainable amid supply shortages, internal divisions among the frondeurs, and Turenne's persistent maneuvers. Royal forces gradually isolated rebel strongholds, eroding Condé's support base. By October 1652, Condé abandoned and retreated to the , entering service under Don Luis de Benavides Carrillo, Marquis of Caracena (Fuensaldana), effectively fragmenting the princely alliance. This exodus signaled the Fronde's collapse; Mazarin reentered and arrived in on February 3, 1653, to reaffirm his role as chief minister under . The episode yielded no structural reforms, instead entrenching centralized royal power by discrediting noble factionalism.

Provincial and External Dimensions

Provincial Revolts like the Ormée

The Ormée, a radical urban uprising in from 1651 to 1653, exemplified provincial discontent during the Fronde's later phases, driven by economic burdens from royal taxation and resentment toward local elites aligned with Cardinal Mazarin's centralizing policies. Heavy impositions, such as wine excise taxes dating to 1634 and intensified during the Franco-Spanish War, exacerbated fiscal strains on merchants and artisans, fostering demands for municipal autonomy and opposition to the governor, Duc d'Épernon, perceived as tyrannical. Unlike noble-led provincial rebellions, the Ormée mobilized lower and popular elements, initially aligning with the Princes' Fronde against Mazarin but evolving into a challenge to the Parlement de Bordeaux, viewed as complicit in tax enforcement. Outbreaks escalated in early 1651 with assemblies at the Ormière tree, protesting Épernon's rumored return and royal encroachments, drawing crowds of up to 3,000 artisans and shopkeepers who formed to defend city privileges. By mid-1652, amid Condé's broader , the movement radicalized: on June 24–25, Ormistes stormed the Châpeau Rouge district and seized the Hôtel de Ville, expelling parlementaires labeled "Mazarinists" and establishing committees like the Cent-et-Trente for governance. Key figures included Geoffroy Gay, who mobilized mobs of 1,500, and leaders Villars and Dureteste, who negotiated with Condé's agent Pierre Lenet while advocating fairer taxation and . This bourgeois , numbering hundreds in armed actions, briefly supplanted traditional authorities, reflecting aspirations for deliberative power rooted in pre-Fronde municipal traditions. The revolt's intensity alienated Condé's faction and local nobles, prompting a backlash as royal forces under Turenne besieged in 1653, disrupting trade and isolating Ormiste appeals for foreign aid. By July 19, 1653, the Ormée was formally abolished, followed by a accord on granting but culminating in executions, including Dureteste's, to restore order. Similar uprisings, such as the 1649 popular revolt in against the royal governor led by judges, shared anti-centralization motifs but lacked the Ormée's sustained bourgeois radicalism, often resolving via elite negotiations. These provincial disturbances underscored the Fronde's decentralized chaos, ultimately reinforcing absolutist reactions by highlighting popular militancy's threat to hierarchical stability.

Spanish Alliances and Interventions

During the Princes' Fronde, exploited French internal divisions to advance its position in the ongoing , providing financial subsidies, military coordination, and territorial incursions to support anti-Mazarin factions. Spanish diplomats maintained contacts with frondeur leaders as early as , offering aid to weaken royal authority, though direct intervention remained cautious until 1652. In spring 1652, Archduke Leopold Wilhelm, governor of the , launched offensives in northern , capturing La Capelle on May 21 after a brief , followed by , Vervins, and other and Champagne strongholds by midsummer; these gains, totaling over a dozen fortified towns, diverted French troops from suppressing domestic revolts in and . Frondeurs, including the Beaufort faction and Condé's allies, reciprocated by timing uprisings to coincide with Spanish advances, such as the February–March disturbances in , aiming to fragment royal forces. Louis II de Bourbon, Prince de Condé, formalized ties with after his July 2 defeat at the , receiving subsidies and defecting to Spanish lines near the border on September 13, 1652, with a small entourage; this alliance supplied him approximately 4,000 troops and artillery, enabling continued guerrilla operations into 1653. Spanish support, while tactically opportunistic, proved insufficient against Turenne's loyalist campaigns, which recaptured most gains by late 1652, underscoring the limits of foreign backing amid frondeur disunity and Mazarin's diplomatic maneuvers, including temporary exiles to appease rebels.

Key Figures and Motivations

Royal Leadership: Mazarin, Anne of Austria, and Louis XIV

Cardinal Jules , appointed chief minister in 1643 following the death of on May 14 of that year, wielded effective control over France during the regency of for her son, the five-year-old . extended Richelieu's absolutist policies, prioritizing centralization of royal authority and sustained military efforts against the Habsburgs, including the ongoing and the Franco-Spanish War, which imposed severe fiscal burdens through increased taxation and loans. These measures, enforced amid economic distress, fueled resentment among parlements, nobles, and urban populations, precipitating the Fronde's outbreak in 1648 with the Paris Parlement's resistance to royal edicts. Anne of Austria, serving as regent until Louis's declared majority in 1651, provided unwavering political backing to Mazarin, navigating court factions and public unrest without yielding to demands for his dismissal. Her resilience was tested during key crises, such as the 1648 arrest of magistrate Pierre Broussel, which sparked barricades in ; Anne and Mazarin responded by releasing the prisoner but later fled the capital with Louis in January 1649 to rally provincial support and military forces. Anne's loyalty, possibly deepened by a rumored romantic attachment to Mazarin, enabled coordinated countermeasures, including temporary concessions to parlement demands while preserving core absolutist aims. Louis XIV, though nominally king from 1643, functioned primarily as a symbol of monarchical continuity during his minority, with real decisions resting with Mazarin under Anne's oversight. The Fronde's chaos—marked by royal exiles, urban sieges, and princely defections—left enduring impressions on the adolescent Louis, who witnessed events like the 1652 Battle of the Faubourg Saint-Antoine from the Louvre windows; this instilled a profound distrust of noble ambitions and parliamentary interference, informing his post-1661 personal rule. The leadership triad's strategies emphasized tactical flexibility: Mazarin self-exiled twice—first in February 1651 amid riots, returning in August after negotiated amnesties, and again in April 1652 to defuse the Princes' Fronde, facilitating his October 1652 recall. Supported by loyal generals like the Vicomte de Turenne, they leveraged royal armies to isolate rebels, culminating in the 1653 submissions of key Frondeurs such as the Great Condé, who fled to Spanish service in 1652 but whose forces were defeated. On September 7, 1651, Louis attained legal majority at age 13, yet Mazarin retained influence until 1661, using the Fronde's resolution to dismantle aristocratic networks and bolster administrative control.

Leading Frondeurs: Condé, Retz, and Factional Interests

Louis II de Bourbon, Prince de Condé (1621–1686), renowned for his military prowess during the , transitioned from royal service to leading opposition in the Princes' Fronde driven by disputes over rewards and authority following his victories, including on May 19, 1643, and Lens on August 20, 1648. These triumphs elevated his status as France's premier general, yet Cardinal Mazarin's reluctance to grant him dominant influence in the regency fueled resentment, culminating in Condé's arrest on January 18, 1650, alongside his brother the Prince de Conti and the Duc de Longueville, an act that ignited princely uprisings against perceived ministerial overreach. Upon release in August 1651 after Mazarin's temporary exile, Condé mobilized forces, besieged Paris, and clashed with royal troops at the on February 8, 1652, where his defeat marked a , prompting his flight to Spanish territory and alliance with France's external foes until reconciliation in 1659. His actions reflected a blend of injured honor and ambition to supplant Mazarin's control rather than broader constitutional aims, as evidenced by his prioritization of personal dominance over coordinated noble resistance. Jean-François-Paul de Gondi, later Cardinal de Retz (1613–1679), as coadjutor archbishop of from 1643, spearheaded agitation in the Parliamentary Fronde by leveraging clerical networks and Parlement influence to challenge fiscal edicts, notably orchestrating unrest during the Day of the Barricades on August 26, 1648. Retz's maneuvers, including secret negotiations and public exhortations against Mazarin, positioned him as a key agitator seeking to exploit popular discontent for ecclesiastical and political advancement, aiming ultimately to replace the cardinal-minister. His memoirs, composed post-imprisonment in 1652–1654, reveal self-serving intrigues, such as patronizing Jansenist elements and shifting alliances to maintain leverage amid noble divisions, underscoring motivations rooted in personal ambition over ideological reform. Retz's arrest in December 1652 and subsequent escape highlighted his opportunistic role, as he briefly commanded urban militias but failed to unify disparate groups, contributing to the Fronde's fragmentation. Factional interests among the Frondeurs undermined any potential for cohesive , with alliances fracturing over , precedence, and vendettas rather than shared opposition to absolutism. Condé's princely cadre, emphasizing military and Bourbon prestige, clashed with Retz's urban-clerical faction, which prioritized Parlementary leverage and anti-fiscal grievances, leading to betrayals like the coadjutor's defection from princely demands in 1652. Other figures, including the Duc de Beaufort and Vendôme family, pursued localized gains, such as provincial governorships, exacerbating rivalries; for instance, Condé's dominance in during the Ormée revolt alienated bourgeois supporters who initially backed him against Mazarin but recoiled from noble overreach. These divisions, exploited by through selective pardons and exiles, reveal the Fronde as a congeries of elite self-interests—honor for Condé, primacy for Retz—lacking the causal unity needed for systemic change, as primary accounts and contemporary analyses attest.

Consequences

Short-Term Political and Military Resolutions

The military phase of the Fronde concluded with the suppression of provincial revolts, particularly the Ormée in Bordeaux, which collapsed in July 1653 following royal intervention. Royal forces, loyal to the crown under commanders like Turenne, resecured key urban centers after the recapture of Paris in October 1652, preventing further coordinated uprisings. This rapid pacification minimized prolonged engagements, as rebel cohesion fractured amid internal divisions and lack of foreign support beyond sporadic Spanish aid. Politically, the resolutions centered on the restoration of Cardinal Mazarin's authority, who returned from self-imposed exile on February 3, 1653, unopposed after the young Louis XIV's triumphant entry into on October 21, 1652. This reestablished the regency's control, with key Frondeurs facing selective reprisals: Cardinal Retz was arrested in December 1652 and imprisoned, while the Great Condé fled to the , remaining in exile until 1659. No comprehensive extended to all rebels immediately; instead, the government prioritized reintegrating compliant nobles and members through targeted pardons, averting broader aristocratic alienation. These measures ensured short-term stability by leveraging the monarchy's fiscal and coercive resources, though underlying fiscal strains persisted, shifting focus to the ongoing Franco-Spanish War. The absence of formal treaties beyond earlier pacts like Rueil underscored the Fronde's resolution through exhaustion rather than negotiated concessions, reinforcing royal dominance without institutional reforms.

Economic and Social Disruptions

The Fronde compounded France's pre-existing fiscal strains from the and conflicts with , where taxation had reached unprecedented levels since 1635, fueling widespread peasant discontent and sporadic revolts in the late 1630s. The regency government's issuance of new fiscal edicts in 1648, including increases to the taille and renewal of the paulette tax on offices, provoked immediate opposition from the and urban mobs, culminating in the Day of the Barricades on August 26-27, 1648, which paralyzed commerce and administration in the capital. These measures, enforced amid poor harvests coinciding with the Fronde's onset in 1648, exacerbated food shortages and subsistence crises across rural and urban areas. Socially, the conflicts fragmented authority, sparking provincial uprisings that blended elite factionalism with popular grievances over taxation and governance. In , unrest erupted in January 1649 as judges and crowds protested the royal governor's policies, with demonstrators chanting against taxes and for liberty, highlighting intersections of judicial resistance and lower-class anger. Bordeaux's Ormée movement (1651-1653) exemplified urban social disruption, where artisans and merchants seized control from traditional elites, establishing a radical assembly that redistributed resources but devolved into factional violence and economic paralysis through disrupted trade routes. communities, burdened by irregular but oppressive levies amid foraging, faced heightened vulnerability to and crop destruction during sieges, such as the 1649 of , though these rural protests rarely aligned directly with aristocratic Frondeurs. Overall, the Fronde's disruptions hindered revenue collection and military provisioning, deepening from debased coinage and failures, while eroding social hierarchies through mob actions and temporary power vacuums that empowered transient popular committees in cities like and . Recovery lagged into the 1650s, with rural economies suffering from depopulation and abandoned fields, underscoring how civil strife amplified the era's structural vulnerabilities without resolving underlying fiscal inequities.

Legacy and Impact

Consolidation of Royal Absolutism

The suppression of the Fronde between 1648 and 1653 marked a pivotal turning point that fortified the monarchy's authority, exposing the disunity among nobles, parlements, and provincial assemblies that prevented a coherent challenge to central power. 's strategic exiles, military campaigns, and diplomatic maneuvers, including his temporary withdrawal in 1651 followed by return in 1652, allowed the crown to divide opponents and reclaim control over and key provinces by late 1653. This outcome demonstrated the monarchy's resilience, as factional infighting—evident in conflicts between the Prince de Condé and figures like the coadjutor Retz—undermined rebel cohesion, paving the way for absolutist consolidation. Louis XIV's formative experiences during the Fronde instilled a deep-seated distrust of aristocratic and judicial overreach, shaping his resolve to centralize governance upon assuming . In his memoirs, the king reflected on the "terrible disorders" of his childhood, attributing them to noble ambitions that necessitated undivided royal sovereignty to prevent recurrence. Following Mazarin's death on March 9, 1661, dismissed the superintendent of finances on September 5, 1661, after uncovering , and restructured the council to eliminate intermediaries, embodying the principle of absolute personal monarchy. The king's declaration, "," encapsulated this shift, prioritizing direct royal oversight over ministerial dominance. Key military and diplomatic victories further entrenched absolutism by neutralizing external threats and reintegrating rebel leaders. The French triumph at the Battle of the Dunes on June 14, 1658, against a Spanish-Condé alliance, secured by alliances with Cromwell's , led to the on November 7, 1659, which ceded territories to France and arranged Louis XIV's marriage to , bolstering dynastic legitimacy and fiscal recovery. Condé's pardon in 1660 and subsequent service under the crown exemplified the monarchy's strategy of co-optation, stripping princes of independent military retinues while binding them to court etiquette. Parlements, chastened by forced registrations via —as in the 1648 revocation of their declarations—lost veto powers over edicts, ensuring fiscal and legal centralization. The Fronde's legacy thus transitioned France from regency vulnerabilities to unyielding absolutism, with Louis XIV's policies curtailing feudal exemptions and provincial through intendants and standardized administration. By 1665, the construction of Versailles began as a gilded cage for the , compelling attendance to rituals that symbolized submission to royal will, thereby preventing future cabals. This era's reforms, unmarred by the biases of later historiographical narratives favoring precedents, affirm the causal link between the Fronde's defeat and the monarchy's unchallenged apex until 1789, rooted in empirical suppression of divided oppositions rather than ideological fervor.

Lessons on Aristocratic Power and Stability

The Fronde exposed the inherent fragility of aristocratic power when exercised through fragmented rebellions rather than unified action. Nobles, including high-ranking figures like the Prince de Condé and the coadjutor Retz, pursued personal vendettas and factional gains over collective objectives, such as curbing Mazarin's influence or reforming taxation, which diluted their military and political efforts from to 1653. This disunity allowed to exploit rivalries, as evidenced by Mazarin's temporary exiles in 1651 and 1652, followed by his return amid noble infighting, ultimately restoring royal control without conceding structural reforms. Empirical outcomes, including the failure of provincial uprisings like the Ormée in to link with Parisian Frondeurs, demonstrated that aristocratic autonomy, untethered from monarchical oversight, bred anarchy rather than leverage, with over 1,000 documented clashes eroding noble credibility among urban mobs and rural populations. Causal analysis reveals that aristocratic overreliance on clientage networks and short-term alliances, rather than institutional coalitions, undermined long-term stability. The Fronde's two phases—the Parlementary Fronde (1648–1649) and the Princely Fronde (1650–1653)—saw nobles shift allegiances opportunistically, such as Condé's brief alliance with in 1652, which alienated potential domestic supporters and invited foreign intervention without decisive gains. This pattern of factionalism, rooted in the nobility's dependence on royal for and titles, precluded the emergence of a viable alternative to absolutism; by 1653, treaties like the of Rueil and subsequent amnesties reintegrated rebels on the crown's terms, preserving the fiscal and military apparatus intact. Stability, in turn, hinged on monarchical of noble disputes, as unchecked aristocratic ambitions fueled economic disruptions, including harvest failures and trade halts that cost an estimated 100 million livres in lost revenue. The revolts' resolution underscored a core lesson: aristocratic power thrives under stable hierarchies but destabilizes regimes when mobilized against the without broad societal backing. Louis XIV's subsequent policies, informed by the Fronde's chaos, curtailed noble through Versailles' courtly rituals and intendants' oversight, reducing factional revolts to mere court intrigues by the 1660s. Where nobles succeeded, as in isolated provincial concessions, it was through submission rather than confrontation, affirming that monarchical resilience—bolstered by loyal armies and administrative centralization—outweighed divided elite challenges, a dynamic echoed in contemporaneous European absolutisms but absent in more parliamentary systems like England's. This empirical precedent cautioned against romanticizing noble resistance, revealing it as a catalyst for centralized authority rather than a bulwark against it.

Historiographical Perspectives

Traditional Narratives of Noble Resistance

Traditional historiographical accounts, particularly those from the Enlightenment and 19th-century liberal perspectives, depicted the Fronde as a principled aristocratic stand against Cardinal Mazarin's despotic rule and the erosion of noble privileges during Louis XIV's minority. These narratives emphasized the nobles' defense of pays d'états , feudal exemptions from taxation, and the right to remonstrate against royal edicts, framing the conflicts as a bulwark against unchecked centralization inherited from Richelieu's policies. For instance, the of Paris's registration of fiscal complaints on May 13, 1648, was portrayed as a constitutional assertion of corporate liberties, triggering the first phase of unrest amid widespread grievances over paulette fees, tailles, and gabelle impositions that burdened the and robe officials alike. In these accounts, key figures such as the Great Condé and Cardinal de Retz embodied heroic resistance, with Condé's military prowess—fresh from triumphs like in 1643—mobilized against Mazarin's Italian "intriguer" persona, allegedly prioritizing personal enrichment over French interests through loans from financiers like the Particelli d'Émery. Retz's orchestration of barricades in on August 26-27, 1648, was lauded as a spontaneous uprising for liberty, echoing classical republican ideals against monarchical overreach, though contemporaries like later critiqued the chaos while sympathizing with the anti-despotic intent. The second Fronde phase (1650-1653), involving princely cabals and provincial echoes like the Ormée in , was narrated as a culmination of elite opposition to intendants' administrative intrusions and Mazarin's exile-and-return cycles, culminating in the Peace of Rueil on March 11, 1650, as a temporary vindication of noble influence. Such interpretations often invoked the mazarinades—over 5,000 pamphlets flooding from onward—as evidence of ideological fervor, casting Mazarin as a foreign subverting the lois fondamentales and nobles as guardians of Gothic . However, these narratives downplayed factional self-interest, such as Condé's post-1651 alliance shifts or Retz's ambitions for the archbishopric, presenting the Fronde instead as a proto-revolutionary check on absolutism that, despite its failure by 1653, prefigured later struggles for . This view persisted in works attributing the unrest to systemic fiscal pressures, with noble revenues squeezed by 20-30% inflation-adjusted declines since the 1630s, justifying resistance as economically rational preservation of status.

Modern Analyses: Factionalism vs. Revolutionary Potential

Modern historians, drawing on archival evidence of elite correspondences and fiscal records, largely characterize the Fronde as a product of factional rivalries among nobles, officials, and provincial interests, rather than a movement with coherent aims. Roland Mousnier, analyzing the period's institutional dynamics, argued that participants defended entrenched status privileges—such as venal offices held by magistrates—against perceived royal overreach, reflecting a society stratified by orders rather than emerging class antagonisms. This perspective underscores how grievances stemmed from Mazarin's aggressive taxation, which raised 120 million livres in extraordinary levies between 1648 and 1653, but lacked a unifying to challenge absolutism itself. Orest Ranum's examination of highlights a breakdown in and among elites, evidenced by vitriolic pamphlets (mazarinades) numbering over 5,000, which personalized attacks on Mazarin while revealing opportunistic alliances, such as the Great Condé's shift from royal service to in over disputes. Shifting coalitions, including the brief parlement-noble pact in 1648 that collapsed by 1649 due to mutual distrust, exemplify this factionalism, preventing sustained opposition. Richard Bonney's fiscal analysis further supports this, showing how war debts from the fueled elite discontent but resulted in fragmented revolts, with no evidence of coordinated efforts to redistribute power or property. Debates over revolutionary potential center on localized uprisings like the Ormée in (1651–1653), where artisans and merchants briefly established a radical assembly excluding nobles, drawing on democratic precedents from . Yet, scholars such as David Parker note its co-optation by elite factions and suppression by royal forces, illustrating limited scalability absent broader social mobilization. Unlike the , the Fronde featured no equivalent ideological tracts advocating constitutional limits or ; instead, rebels invoked feudal liberties or divine-right critiques tied to personal slights, as seen in Retz's memoirs prioritizing ecclesiastical influence. This absence of transformative vision, combined with urban mobs' transient role—peaking during the 1648 barricades but waning without institutional backing—confirms the consensus that revolutionary sparks ignited by economic distress (e.g., bread riots amid 300% inflation in grain prices) were extinguished by elite divisions.

References

  1. https://www.folger.edu/blogs/collation/publishing-against-the-king-french-civil-war-pamphlets/
  2. https://library.harvard.edu/collections/mazarinades
  3. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/cardinal-mazarin-and-the-fronde/
  4. https://history.rutgers.edu/files/225/2017/368/The-Ormee-of-Bordeaux-Travens-2017.pdf
  5. https://history.as.uky.edu/reign-louis-xiv-1643-1715-overview
  6. https://www.academia.edu/8375120/Financing_the_wars_of_Richelieu_and_Mazarin_The_methods_means_and_effectiveness_of_a_fiscal_system_at_breaking_point
  7. https://www.britannica.com/place/France/The-Fronde
  8. https://history.as.uky.edu/france%E2%80%99s-mid-17th-century-crisis-fronde-1648-1653
  9. http://se17.bowdoin.edu/filemanager/active?fid=114
  10. http://courses.washington.edu/hsteu302/iv.2.3%2520louis%252014.htm
  11. https://webpages.cs.luc.edu/~dennis/106/106-Bkgr/15-Absolutism
  12. https://www.cristoraul.org/ENGLISH/readinghall/THIRDMILLENNIUMLIBRARY/MODERN-HISTORY/The-Age-of-Louis-XIV/pdf/France-under-Mazarin-with-a-review-of-the-administration-of-Richelieu.pdf
  13. https://history.as.uky.edu/france%25E2%2580%2599s-mid-17th-century-crisis-fronde-1648-1653
  14. http://www.thenagain.info/WebChron/WestEurope/Fronde.html
  15. https://www.timewisetraveller.co.uk/fronde.html
  16. https://asset.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/KLNEQGIZOYW3X8Z/R/file-aa60b.pdf
  17. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/wars-of-the-fronde-1648-1653
  18. https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/the-fronde
  19. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CHMO/article/download/83221/4564456564606
  20. https://journals.openedition.org/1718/606?lang=en
  21. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-349-20626-1_7.pdf
  22. https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130365/9781526130365.pdf
  23. https://dokumen.pub/conflicts-of-empires-spain-the-low-countries-and-the-struggle-for-world-supremacy-1585-1713-1852851619-9781852851613.html
  24. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/battle-of-lens-20-august-1648
  25. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/727378
  26. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/361847/summary
  27. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3846/3846-h/3846-h.htm
  28. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/51044/272.pdf?sequence=1
  29. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/wars-fronde
  30. https://academic.oup.com/book/33734/chapter/288373594
  31. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/famine-and-inflation-17th-century-france
  32. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/51044/272.pdf
  33. https://scholar.colorado.edu/downloads/f4752j15d
  34. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/w/wsfh/0642292.0042.002/--cult-of-france-and-its-king-political-theory?rgn=main%3Bview=fulltext
  35. https://en.chateauversailles.fr/discover/history/great-characters/louis-xiv
  36. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-euro/fronde
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x1db0
  38. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/nfs.1987.001
  39. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6725&context=etd
  40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/286384
  41. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft500006j4&chunk.id=s1.4.20&toc.id=&brand=ucpress
  42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24417754
  43. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026569147800800104
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.