German Labour Front
View on Wikipedia
The German Labour Front (German: Deutsche Arbeitsfront, pronounced [ˌdɔʏtʃə ˈʔaʁbaɪtsfʁɔnt]; DAF) was the national labour organization of the Nazi Party, which replaced the various independent trade unions in Germany during the process of Gleichschaltung or Nazification.
Key Information
History
[edit]As early as March 1933, two months after Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor, the Sturmabteilung began to attack trade union offices without legal consequences. Several union offices were occupied, their furnishings were destroyed, their documents were stolen or burned, and union members were beaten, thrown out of windows and in some cases killed outright; the police ignored these attacks and declared itself without jurisdiction.[2] These early attacks occurred at random, carried out spontaneously by rank-and-file Nazis motivated by a desire to destroy Marxism,[3] and the Nazi Party leadership only implemented a general policy in May. On 2 May 1933, trade union headquarters throughout Germany were occupied, their funds were confiscated, and the unions were officially abolished and their leaders brutally beaten and arrested.[4] Many union leaders were sent to concentration camps, including some who had previously agreed to cooperate with the Nazis.[4]

The German Labour Front (DAF) was then created in May 1933 as the organization that was to take over the assets seized from the former trade unions. Robert Ley, who had no previous experience in labour relations, was appointed by Hitler to lead the DAF upon its creation.[5] Three weeks later, Hitler issued a decree that banned collective bargaining and stated that a group of labour trustees, appointed by him, would "regulate labour contracts" and maintain "labour peace."[6] This decree effectively outlawed strikes, since workers could not oppose the decisions of the trustees.[6] Meanwhile, Robert Ley promised "to restore absolute leadership to the natural leader of a factory—that is, the employer... Only the employer can decide."[6]
The leadership of the DAF stressed that there was no need for antagonism between workers and employers in the new Nazi state. To underline this, its laws were couched in a neo-feudal language of reciprocity.[dubious – discuss] This new system of industrial relations represented a major victory for the employers, backed by the Nazi leadership, who needed the co-operation of industry in their drive to rearm.[7]
Unlike the trade unions it had replaced, the DAF did not aim to be an organization representing the interests of workers alone; it also included employers and members of the professions, and defined itself as "the organization of creative Germans of brain and fist."[8] The law establishing the DAF stated that its aim was not to protect workers but "to create a true social and productive community of all Germans" and "to see that every single individual should be able to perform the maximum of work."[8] The labour trustees, who had the power to set wages, in practice followed the wishes of employers and did not even consult the workers.[8] There was also a mandate from Hitler to keep wages low, as he declared that the hourly wage should remain the same and workers should only be able to earn more through increased productivity.[8] Although Germany experienced an economic recovery throughout the 1930s and employment greatly increased, wages remained as low as they had been during the Great Depression, and sometimes even lower.[9]
The DAF also gave employers the ability to prevent their workers from seeking different jobs. In February 1935, the "workbook" (Arbeitsbuch) system was introduced, which issued every worker with a workbook that recorded his skills and past employment. These workbooks were required for employment and they were kept by the employer; if a worker desired to quit his job, the employer could refuse to release his workbook, preventing the worker from being legally employed anywhere else.[10]
To compensate for these restrictions on wages and employment, the DAF sought to provide workers with leisure and entertainment. Robert Ley explained his policy as aiming to "divert the attention of the masses from material to moral values," as he believed that "it is more important to feed the souls of men than their stomachs."[10] Thus, the DAF established the Strength Through Joy organisation, which provided factory libraries and concerts, swimming pools, adult education programmes, variety performances, theatre visits, athletic events, subsidized tickets to the opera, and subsidised vacations with a focus on cruises. The number of people taking holiday cruises went from 2.3 million in 1934 to 10.3 million in 1938.[11]
The DAF financed the building of ocean-going vessels that permitted German workers to pay minimal prices to sail to many foreign destinations. Up to six ocean liners were operating just before the start of World War II. According to the chief of the Associated Press in Berlin, Louis P. Lochner, ticket prices for ocean steamer vessels ranged from twelve to sixteen marks for "a full week on such a steamer".[12] For those who desired vacations closer to home, the DAF constructed spa and summer resort complexes. The most ambitious was the 4.5 km long Prora complex on Rugen island, which was to have 20,000 beds, and would have been the largest beach resort in the world. It was never completed and the massive complex largely remained an empty shell right through until the 21st century.[12][13]
The DAF was one of the largest Nazi organizations, boasting of over 35,000 full-time employees by 1939.[14] It operated one of the largest financial institutions—the Bank of German Labour—as well as various workplace programmes such as medical screening, occupational training, legal assistance and the Beauty of Labour organization.[14] To help Hitler keep his promise to have every German capable of owning an affordable car (Volkswagen—the People's Car) the DAF subsidised the construction of an automobile factory, which was partially paid from workers' payroll deductions. None of the 340,000 workers who were paying for a car ever received one, since the factory was retooled for war production after Nazi Germany invaded Poland.
DAF membership was theoretically voluntary, but any workers in any area of German commerce or industry would have found it hard to get a job without being a member. Furthermore, many unemployed people were drafted into the Labour Front where they were given uniforms and tools and put to work; the disappearance of unemployed people from the streets contributed to the perception that the Nazis were improving the economic conditions of Germany.[15] Membership required a fee within the range of 15 Rpf. to 3 ℛ︁ℳ︁, depending on the category a member fell into, on a large scale of 20 membership groups. A substantially large amount of income was raised through fees. In 1934, the total DAF revenue from fees was 300,000,000 ℛ︁ℳ︁. In US dollars, the annual income from dues to the Labour Front came to $160,000,000 in 1937 and $200,000,000 by 1939.[16]
Organization
[edit]
There were two main components of the DAF:
- Nationalsozialistische Betriebszellenorganisation (NSBO; National Socialist Factory Cell Organization)
- Nationalsozialistische Handels- und Gewerbeorganisation (NSHAGO; National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization)
Several other sub-organizations were set up, including:
- Kraft durch Freude (KdF; Strength through Joy) – Organization giving the workers cheap/free holidays in addition to subsidised sporting and leisure facilities.
- Schönheit der Arbeit (SdA; Beauty of Labour) – Aimed to make workplaces more enticing to workers (e.g., renovations of outdated factories, new canteens for workers, smoking-free rooms, cleaner working spaces etc.).
The Front also organised the Reichsberufswettkampf, a national vocational competition.
See also
[edit]- Arbeitsfront der Volksdeutschen in der Slowakei (Labour Front of the Volksdeutsche in Slovakia)
- Class collaboration
- Corporatism
- National syndicalism
References
[edit]Notes
- ^ Benz, Wolfgang (2007). A Concise History of the Third Reich. University of California Press. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-520-25383-4.
- ^ T. W. Mason, Social Policy in the Third Reich: The Working Class and the "National Community", 1918–1939, Oxford: UK, Berg Publishers, 1993, pp. 74, 77
- ^ T. W. Mason, Social Policy in the Third Reich: The Working Class and the "National Community", 1918–1939, Oxford: UK, Berg Publishers, 1993, pp. 74, 77
- ^ a b William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 202
- ^ T. W. Mason, Social Policy in the Third Reich: The Working Class and the "National Community", 1918–1939, Oxford: UK, Berg Publishers, 1993, pp. 88–89
- ^ a b c William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 203
- ^ J., Evans, Richard (2008). The Third Reich in power, 1933–1939. Allen Lane. p. 461. ISBN 978-0-7139-9649-4. OCLC 282554619.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 263
- ^ William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 264
- ^ a b William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 265
- ^ T. W. Mason, Social Policy in the Third Reich: The Working Class and the "National Community", 1918–1939, Oxford: UK, Berg Publishers, 1993, p. 160. Völkischer Beobachter, Nov. 21, 1936
- ^ a b Louis P. Lochner, What About Germany? New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1942, p. 32
- ^ Hatherly, Owen (6 November 2017) Hitler's holiday camp: how the sprawling resort of Prora met a truly modern fate. in TheGuardian.com. Retrieved 15 January 2019
- ^ a b Richard Bessel, Nazism and the War, New York: Modern Library, 2006, p. 67
- ^ Childers, Thomas (2001). "Racial Policy and the Totalitarian State". A History of Hitler's Empire, 2nd Edition. Episode 7. The Great Courses. Event occurs at 12:20–12:41. Retrieved 28 March 2023.
- ^ William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 266
Bibliography
- McDonough, Frank (1999): Hitler and Nazi Germany (Cambridge Perspectives in History). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ISBN 0-521-59502-9
- Smelser, Ronald M. (1988): Robert Ley, Hitler's Labour Front Leader. Oxford: Berg Publishers ISBN 0-85496-161-5
External links
[edit]- DAF information for AS Level History Unit 3
- Deutsche Arbeitsfront (DAF) at Lebendiges Museum Online, in German.
- Erste Verordnung des Führers und Reichskanzlers über Wesen und Ziel der Deutschen Arbeitsfront vom 24. Oktober 1934
- Ranks of various paramilitary organizations (NSKK, DLV, NSFK, DAF, RAD, Hitlerjugend, BDM)
German Labour Front
View on GrokipediaHistory
Formation in 1933
On May 2, 1933, detachments of the Sturmabteilung (SA) occupied trade union offices across Germany, arresting numerous leaders and confiscating funds, records, and properties, which effectively dissolved the independent trade unions.[9][10] This action followed a Nazi Party directive issued by Robert Ley on April 21, 1933, announcing a "co-ordination" (Gleichschaltung) campaign targeting the unions, viewed as centers of opposition to National Socialist control over labor.[10] The unions, including socialist, Christian, and liberal variants, had represented over 8 million members and possessed significant assets estimated at hundreds of millions of Reichsmarks, which were subsequently transferred to the nascent state labor organization.[11] Eight days later, on May 10, 1933, the German Labour Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF) was formally established by a decree from the Reich government, merging the remnants of employer associations and worker groups into a single, compulsory framework under Nazi oversight.[12] Robert Ley, a chemist and early Nazi Party member who had directed the party's political staff, was appointed as the DAF's Führer, granting him absolute authority over its operations. The DAF's stated purpose was to foster "community of labor" (Gemeinschaft der Arbeit), eliminating class conflict by subordinating both workers and employers to National Socialist goals, while prohibiting strikes and independent bargaining.[13] By the end of 1933, DAF membership had swelled to approximately 5 million, initially promoted as voluntary but increasingly enforced through workplace pressures and propaganda tying affiliation to job security and access to benefits.[11] This rapid formation reflected the broader Nazi consolidation of power post-Enabling Act, aiming to neutralize labor as a political force and redirect its resources toward rearmament and ideological indoctrination, with union assets funding DAF initiatives from the outset.[14]Expansion and Institutionalization (1934–1938)
The German Labour Front (DAF) consolidated its dominance over the labor sector in 1934 through the enactment of the Law for the Organization of National Labour on January 20, which empowered plant leaders to issue customized wage and condition regulations under DAF supervision, effectively embedding Nazi control into enterprise-level bargaining while prohibiting strikes and collective actions independent of the regime.[15] This legislation marked a key step in institutionalizing the DAF as the sole mediator between workers and employers, supplanting pre-existing union structures and aligning industrial relations with National Socialist ideology.[6] Membership expanded rapidly during this period, driven by compulsory enrollment pressures and the absorption of former union assets, reaching over 16 million adherents by 1936 and approaching 20 million by 1938, encompassing nearly the entire non-agricultural workforce as well as employers.[16] Under Robert Ley's direction, the DAF developed auxiliary institutions to extend its influence, including the German Labour Bank, which grew to 34 branches by 1938, and sickness-insurance funds insuring millions, thereby monopolizing worker welfare and financial services.[17] A pivotal institutional development occurred in 1934 with the founding of the Schönheit der Arbeit (Beauty of Labor) office, tasked with upgrading factory environments through aesthetic reforms, sanitation improvements, and ergonomic designs to elevate worker morale and productivity in service of the "national community."[18] Complementing this, the Kraft durch Freude (Strength Through Joy) leisure arm, established in late 1933, scaled up operations significantly; travel participation surged from about 2 million in 1934 to 6 million by 1936, encompassing subsidized vacations, cruises on purpose-built ships, and cultural events designed to instill racial and ideological discipline.[19] These initiatives, while promoting regime loyalty, relied on confiscated union funds and state subsidies, reflecting the DAF's dual role in propaganda and practical mobilization.[3] By 1938, the DAF's institutional framework had permeated economic life, with Ley proclaiming the transcendence of class conflict in favor of unified "national labor," as evidenced in his 1935 addresses and the organization's integration into NSDAP hierarchies.[16] This phase solidified the DAF's bureaucratic apparatus, including regional cells and affiliated bodies, enabling coordinated oversight of labor deployment amid rearmament-driven industrial growth, though underlying coercion ensured compliance rather than genuine voluntary alignment.[20]Wartime Operations and Adaptations (1939–1945)
With the outbreak of war on 1 September 1939, the Deutsche Arbeitsfront (DAF) shifted its focus from pre-war welfare initiatives to supporting total economic mobilization, enforcing worker discipline and directing labor toward armaments production and essential industries under the Four-Year Plan.[21] Strikes and lockouts, already prohibited since 1933, were rigorously suppressed, with DAF officials monitoring factories to prevent disruptions and promoting ideological commitment to the war effort through propaganda emphasizing communal sacrifice.[22] By 1942, DAF membership had expanded to around 25 million, covering nearly the entire German workforce and enabling centralized control over domestic labor allocation.[21] The DAF adapted its organizational structure to wartime exigencies, collaborating with Armaments Minister Albert Speer after his appointment in February 1942 to implement productivity enhancements, including worker suggestion systems that yielded efficiency improvements in sectors like aircraft manufacturing, where annual audits documented incremental gains from employee input formalized by DAF forms.[23] Its economic enterprises, such as construction firms and industrial holdings, were repurposed for military output, contributing to the regime's armaments "miracle" despite resource constraints, though internal audits revealed limits to these gains amid Allied bombing and material shortages.[23] The Beauty of Labour office, previously focused on workplace aesthetics, pivoted to practical rationalizations like simplified tooling and ergonomic adjustments to sustain output under longer shifts, often exceeding 10 hours daily by 1943.[24] In parallel, the DAF's Strength Through Joy (KdF) program curtailed leisure cruises and mass tourism—discontinued after 1939—and redirected resources to factory-based recreation, such as canteen improvements and morale-boosting events, to counteract declining worker enthusiasm amid rationing and urban devastation from air raids starting in 1940.[21] While primary recruitment of foreign forced laborers fell under Gauleiter Fritz Sauckel's plenipotentiary office from March 1942, which deported over 5 million from Eastern Europe by 1944, the DAF administered workplace oversight and rudimentary hostels for these workers, enforcing segregation from German employees and ideological indoctrination to frame exploitation as contribution to the Volksgemeinschaft.[25] [26] Foreign laborers, comprising up to 30% of the workforce in armaments by 1944, received inferior rations and conditions, with DAF records indicating their deployment in mining, agriculture, and construction to offset German male conscription, which reached 17 million by war's end.[27] As defeats mounted after Stalingrad in February 1943, DAF leader Robert Ley advocated intensified mobilization in response to Joseph Goebbels' 18 February "total war" speech, though practical adaptations lagged due to bureaucratic rivalries and Ley's diminished influence.[28] Women, initially discouraged from industrial roles by DAF ideology favoring domesticity, were increasingly drawn in via targeted campaigns, with over 14 million female workers by 1944, supported by DAF training programs despite persistent gender segregation policies.[29] The organization's role eroded in 1945 amid collapse, with assets seized by Allied forces and formal dissolution by May, leaving a legacy of coerced productivity that sustained the regime longer than military setbacks alone might suggest.[21]Dissolution and Immediate Aftermath
The German Labour Front (DAF) ceased effective operations upon the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany on 8 May 1945, coinciding with the collapse of the Nazi regime and the onset of Allied occupation.[30] Formally, the DAF was dissolved as an affiliated organization of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) under Allied Control Council Law No. 2, enacted on 10 October 1945, which prohibited and liquidated the NSDAP along with its subordinate bodies.[31] This legal measure targeted the DAF's extensive infrastructure, including administrative offices, welfare programs, and economic holdings amassed through mandatory membership dues equivalent to 1-3% of wages and the seizure of pre-1933 trade union assets.[32] Robert Ley, the DAF's longtime leader since its founding in 1933, was arrested by U.S. forces shortly after Germany's capitulation in early May 1945 and indicted at the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.[33] Ley committed suicide by hanging on 25 October 1945 in his Nuremberg cell, evading trial and averting detailed scrutiny of the DAF's role in labor conscription and wartime exploitation.[33] Other senior DAF officials faced denazification proceedings, with many lower-level functionaries barred from public employment under Allied directives, though enforcement varied across occupation zones due to manpower shortages in reconstruction efforts. In the immediate postwar period, Allied authorities confiscated DAF assets—estimated to include billions in reichsmarks from contributions, property, and programs like Strength Through Joy—for reparations, victim compensation, and postwar rebuilding.[34] Labor reorganization diverged by zone: in the Western sectors, independent trade unions reemerged starting in late 1945, with collective bargaining and strike rights restored by military government ordinances, culminating in the formation of the German Trade Union Confederation (DGB) in 1949.[35] In the Soviet zone, former DAF members were integrated into state-controlled unions under the Free German Trade Unions (FDGB), aligned with the emerging socialist framework and excluding overt Nazi sympathizers through purges. This bifurcation reflected broader Cold War divisions, with Western reforms emphasizing pluralism to counter communist influence, while Eastern structures prioritized centralized control over wages and production for rapid industrialization.[35]Organizational Structure
Leadership and Administration
The German Labour Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF) was established by decree on 10 May 1933, immediately following the regime's dissolution of independent trade unions on 2 May 1933, with Robert Ley appointed as its supreme leader (Leiter der Deutschen Arbeitsfront) by Adolf Hitler.[33][36] Ley, a long-time Nazi Party member who had risen through organizational roles since the 1920s, retained this position until the organization's collapse in 1945, overseeing a membership that expanded to approximately 25 million by the late 1930s.[37] As head of the DAF, Ley exercised centralized authority over labor policy, effectively functioning as the "undisputed dictator of labor" in the Third Reich, with responsibilities extending to coordinating economic mobilization, worker discipline, and the integration of labor into National Socialist ideology.[33] Ley simultaneously held the position of Reichsorganisationsleiter (Reich Organization Leader) of the NSDAP, placing him fourth in the party's formal hierarchy behind Hitler, Rudolf Hess, and Heinrich Himmler, which allowed the DAF to operate as an extension of party apparatus rather than an autonomous entity.[38] This dual role facilitated administrative overlap, with DAF leadership drawing personnel from NSDAP structures and aligning labor administration with broader party goals, including the suppression of strikes and the enforcement of compulsory labor contributions.[36] Under Ley's direction, the DAF's administration emphasized hierarchical command, with regional offices (Landesämter) mirroring Gaue divisions and local factory cells (Betriebszellen) led by appointed trustees (Betriebsobmänner) to monitor compliance and productivity.[37] Administratively, Ley's tenure was marked by efforts to consolidate control over wages, working conditions, and worker welfare programs, though his personal alcoholism increasingly impaired effective governance, leading to reliance on subordinates and eventual wartime encroachments by figures like Fritz Sauckel for foreign labor recruitment.[37][33] The DAF's bureaucratic expansion included specialized offices for propaganda, training, and economic planning, but ultimate decision-making remained vested in Ley, who reported directly to Hitler on key labor directives, ensuring alignment with rearmament priorities from 1936 onward.[36] Despite its scale, the administration prioritized ideological conformity over efficiency, with internal purges and party loyalty oaths reinforcing Ley's unchallenged authority until the regime's defeat.[33]Subdivisions and Affiliated Bodies
The German Labour Front (DAF) operated under a hierarchical structure adhering to the Führerprinzip, with central authority vested in the Reichsleitung under Robert Ley, extending downward through regional Gaue (initially ten, aligning with NSDAP divisions), Kreise, Ortsgruppen, and local cells including Betriebsgemeinschaften (factory communities), Zellen, and Blöcke to ensure permeation into workplaces.[12] This territorial organization, comprising approximately 315 Ortsgruppen by the mid-1930s, facilitated administrative control and ideological indoctrination at all levels.[39] Functionally, the DAF established ten specialized Ämter (offices) subordinate to the Reichsleitung to address social-political objectives, such as the Amt für Berufserziehung und Betriebsführung, which oversaw vocational training in collaboration with research institutes, and the Amt für soziale Selbstverantwortung, which coordinated the Reichsberufswettkampf competitions involving up to 2.2 million participants annually by 1938 to promote skilled labor and model factories.[12][40] Additional offices included the Arbeitswissenschaftliches Institut (AWI), founded in 1935 for efficiency studies and social policy research, and the Haupt- und DAF-Amt für Volksgesundheit, created in 1936 to implement workplace health measures including the deployment of Betriebsärzte (factory doctors).[40] Prominent affiliated bodies encompassed the NS-Gemeinschaft Kraft durch Freude (KdF), established on 27 November 1933 as a mass leisure organization, which by 1938 arranged 10 million vacation trips and cultural events for 38 million attendees to integrate workers ideologically and boost productivity.[40] The Amt Schönheit der Arbeit, founded at the end of January 1934 and formally subsumed under KdF, concentrated on workplace enhancements like improved lighting, hygiene, and rationalization to cultivate "Arbeitsfreude" (joy in work), including model factory initiatives and wartime barracks construction.[12][40] The Nationalsozialistische Betriebszellenorganisation (NSBO), the pre-existing Nazi factory cell network, was absorbed into the DAF following the 2 May 1933 dissolution of independent unions, forming the core of workplace oversight through Vertrauensräte (trust councils) and Betriebsobmänner (foremen) to supplant traditional union roles.[41] Other integrated entities included the Deutsches Institut für technische Arbeitsschulung (DINTA), incorporated for technical training rationalization with thousands of REFA (efficiency) trainees by 1943.[40] During wartime, offices like the Amt für Arbeitseinsatz (renamed in August 1940 from Sozialamt) managed foreign labor camps and welfare, expanding DAF's reach to millions of non-German workers.[40]Membership and Internal Operations
![DAF Werkscharführer uniform from 1943 Organisationsbuch der NSDAP][float-right]Membership in the German Labour Front (DAF) was compulsory for virtually all German workers and employees across economic sectors following its formation in May 1933, as independent trade unions were dissolved and integrated into the DAF to ensure alignment with National Socialist economic objectives.[42] Non-participation risked unemployment or exclusion from the workforce, with employers required to deduct DAF dues from wages.[3] Dues varied by occupational category within 20 membership groups, ranging from 15 pfennigs to 3 Reichsmarks weekly, funding operations including welfare programs.[43] By 1942, membership reached approximately 25 million, encompassing manual laborers, white-collar workers, and civil servants, making the DAF the largest mass organization in the Third Reich.[44] Internally, the DAF structured membership through hierarchical factory cells (Betriebszellen) at individual workplaces, each overseen by a Betriebsführer (factory leader) tasked with mobilizing workers for production goals, ideological education, and surveillance against dissent.[43] These cells operated as basic units for disseminating directives from DAF leadership under Robert Ley, conducting mandatory meetings, vocational training, and performance evaluations without provisions for collective bargaining or strikes, which were prohibited.[42] Higher-level operations involved regional offices coordinating cell activities, enforcing quotas for initiatives like Strength Through Joy leisure programs, and integrating membership data for labor allocation during wartime mobilization.[44] Enforcement relied on party loyalists within cells to report non-compliance, blending coercive oversight with incentives like access to subsidized recreation to maintain operational cohesion.[3]