Hubbry Logo
Gravity trainGravity trainMain
Open search
Gravity train
Community hub
Gravity train
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gravity train
Gravity train
from Wikipedia

Simple harmonic motion (SHM) of a mass in unrestricted freefall in a body's gravitational field.
Ceres gravity train concept. Mining the asteroid belt could use gravity trains to haul raw material to a central refining point and launch point / space elevator

A gravity train is a theoretical means of transportation for purposes of commuting between two points on the surface of a sphere, by following a straight tunnel connecting the two points through the interior of the sphere.

In a large body such as a planet, this train could be left to accelerate using just the force of gravity, since during the first half of the trip (from the point of departure until the middle), the downward pull towards the center of gravity would pull it towards the destination. During the second half of the trip, the acceleration would be in the opposite direction relative to the trajectory, but, ignoring the effects of friction, the momentum acquired during the first half of the trajectory would equal this deceleration, and as a result, the train's speed would reach zero at approximately the moment the train reached its destination.[1][better source needed]

Origin of the concept

[edit]

In the 17th century, British scientist Robert Hooke presented the idea of an object accelerating inside a planet in a letter to Isaac Newton. A gravity train project was seriously presented to the French Academy of Sciences in the 19th century. The same idea was proposed, without calculation, by Lewis Carroll in 1893 in Sylvie and Bruno Concluded. The idea was rediscovered in the 1960s when physicist Paul Cooper published a paper in the American Journal of Physics suggesting that gravity trains be considered for a future transportation project.[2]

Mathematical considerations

[edit]

Under the assumption of a spherical planet with uniform density, and ignoring relativistic effects as well as friction, a gravity train has the following properties:[3]

  • The duration of a trip depends only on the density of the planet and the gravitational constant, but not on the diameter of the planet.
  • The maximum speed is reached at the middle point of the trajectory.

For gravity trains between points which are not the antipodes of each other, the following hold:

  • The shortest time tunnel through a homogeneous earth is a hypocycloid; in the special case of two antipodal points, the hypocycloid degenerates to a straight line.
  • All straight-line gravity trains on a given planet take exactly the same amount of time to complete a journey (that is, no matter where on the surface the two endpoints of its trajectory are located).

On the planet Earth specifically, since a gravity train's movement is the projection of a very-low-orbit satellite's movement onto a line, it has the following parameters:

  • The travel time equals 2530.30 seconds (nearly 42.2 minutes, half the period of a low Earth orbit satellite), assuming Earth were a perfect sphere of uniform density.
  • By taking into account the realistic density distribution inside the Earth, as known from the preliminary reference Earth model, the expected fall-through time is reduced from 42 to 38 minutes.[4]

To put some numbers in perspective, the deepest current bore hole is the Kola Superdeep Borehole with a true depth of 12,262 meters; covering the distance between London and Paris (350 km) via a hypocycloidical path would require the creation of a hole 111,408 metres deep. Not only is such a depth nine times as great, but it would also necessitate a tunnel that passes through the Earth's mantle.

The straight line path between London and Paris would only require a maximum depth of 2.4 kilometres - well within the depths reached by deep mines. Such a tunnel would have an initial declination of 1.57 degrees.

Mathematical derivation

[edit]

Using the approximations that the Earth is perfectly spherical and of uniform density , and the fact that within a uniform hollow sphere there is no gravity, the gravitational acceleration experienced by a body within the Earth is proportional to the ratio of the distance from the center to the Earth's radius . This is because underground at distance from the center is like being on the surface of a planet of radius , within a hollow sphere which contributes nothing.

On the surface, , so the gravitational acceleration is . Hence, the gravitational acceleration at is

Diametric path to antipodes

[edit]

In the case of a straight line through the center of the Earth, the acceleration of the body is equal to that of gravity: it is falling freely straight down. We start falling at the surface, so at time (treating acceleration and velocity as positive downwards):

Differentiating twice:

where . This class of problems, where there is a restoring force proportional to the displacement away from zero, has general solutions of the form , and describes simple harmonic motion such as in a spring or pendulum.

In this case so that , we begin at the surface at time zero, and oscillate back and forth forever.

The travel time to the antipodes is half of one cycle of this oscillator, that is the time for the argument to to sweep out radians. Using simple approximations of that time is

Straight path between two arbitrary points

[edit]
Path of gravity train

For the more general case of the straight line path between any two points on the surface of a sphere we calculate the acceleration of the body as it moves frictionlessly along its straight path.

The body travels along AOB, O being the midpoint of the path, and the closest point to the center of the Earth on this path. At distance along this path, the force of gravity (directed from point X towards the center of the Earth, along ) depends linearly on distance to the center of the Earth as above. (Expressed in terms of , and using the shorthand for length OC, ). We have:

The resulting acceleration on the body, because it is on a frictionless inclined surface, is :

Diagram of forces on a gravity train on non-diametrical straight line path

But , so substituting both:

which is exactly the same for this new , distance along AOB away from O, as for the in the diametric case along ACD. So the remaining analysis is the same, accommodating the initial condition that the maximal is the complete equation of motion is

The time constant is the same as in the diametric case so the journey time is still 42 minutes; it's just that all the distances and speeds are scaled by the constant .

Dependence on radius of planet

[edit]

The time constant depends only on so if we expand that we get

which depends only on the gravitational constant and the density of the planet. The size of the planet is immaterial; the journey time is the same if the density is the same.

In fiction

[edit]

In the 2012 movie Total Recall, a gravity train called "The Fall" goes through the center of the Earth to commute between Western Europe and Australia.[5][6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A gravity train is a theoretical transportation concept in which a travels between two points on 's surface through a straight-line bored through the , propelled solely by without the need for engines or fuel. The accelerates downward due to as it descends toward the 's center and then decelerates symmetrically as it ascends to the destination, arriving with zero under ideal conditions. This idea assumes a frictionless environment, evacuated air to eliminate drag, and a uniform for simplified calculations, resulting in a remarkably consistent travel time of approximately 42 minutes for any pair of antipodal or non-antipodal surface points. The concept originated in the late 17th century when English scientist described it in a 1679 letter to , predating Newton's publication of the law of universal gravitation and drawing on early ideas about motion through the . Mathematically, the motion follows from Newton's shell theorem, which states that inside a uniform spherical shell, gravitational force is zero, while the net force within a solid sphere is proportional to the distance from the center, leading to along the tunnel. For a realistic, non-uniform , advanced models adjust the travel time slightly to 37–40 minutes along optimal brachistochrone paths, such as hypocycloids, but straight-line tunnels remain the baseline for theoretical analysis. Despite its elegance, practical implementation faces insurmountable challenges, including the immense engineering feats required to drill tunnels through and core, extreme pressures and temperatures at depth, and the need for near-perfect conditions to minimize loss. The idea has inspired scientific discussions, educational projects like the Purdue Gravity Train initiative modeling routes from to France, and references, but it remains a highlighting principles of rather than a feasible .

Definition and Concept

Basic Principle

A gravity train is a theoretical transportation system for moving a vehicle between two points on the surface of a spherical celestial body, such as Earth, via a straight-line tunnel excavated through its interior, with propulsion provided exclusively by the body's gravitational field and no external energy input required. The vehicle, assumed to be a point mass or low-friction capsule, is released from rest at the starting point on the surface. In operation, the vehicle experiences an initial acceleration along the tunnel due to the component of gravitational force parallel to the path, directed toward the tunnel's lowest point: the Earth's center for a diametric tunnel connecting antipodal points, or the geometric midpoint for shorter chordal tunnels between non-antipodal locations. This acceleration increases the vehicle's speed until it reaches maximum velocity at the bottom, after which the gravitational component reverses direction, causing symmetric deceleration as the vehicle ascends to the exit point, arriving with zero velocity. The motion is idealized as frictionless, ignoring air resistance, tunnel wall friction, and other dissipative effects that would occur in practice. The model further assumes the spherical body has uniform mass density throughout, which linearizes the gravitational restoring force along the tunnel and enables analytical solutions. Under these conditions, the vehicle's path exhibits , similar to that of a undergoing small oscillations or a attached to a spring, where the is directly proportional to the displacement from the equilibrium (lowest) point but opposite in direction. This oscillatory behavior ensures periodic motion if not damped, with the period independent of the tunnel's specific length for uniform density spheres. The term "gravity railroad" typically refers to 19th-century inclined-plane railways designed for freight transport, such as the constructed in 1827 in , which relied on to propel loaded coal cars downhill along surface slopes while using mules or animal power to haul empty cars uphill. These systems were engineered for efficiency in operations but operated entirely on the Earth's surface, following contoured terrain rather than straight subsurface paths. In contrast, vacuum-tube transit concepts, such as the gravity-vacuum transit proposed by engineer Lawrence K. Edwards in the 1960s, envisioned underground low-pressure tubes to minimize air resistance, with vehicles propelled primarily by gravity along inclined routes but supported by additional infrastructure like dynamic airlocks and potentially magnetic suspension systems. Similarly, modern initiatives like the Hyperloop, as detailed in Elon Musk's 2013 conceptual whitepaper, utilize near-vacuum tubes for pods accelerated by linear electric motors and levitated via magnetic bearings, emphasizing engineered propulsion over unassisted gravitational motion. The theoretical gravity train differs fundamentally by positing straight-line tunnels bored directly through a planetary body's interior, such as from one surface point to its antipode, where motion arises solely from the conversion of energy into in a frictionless environment, resulting in simple harmonic oscillation without any post-launch energy input. Unlike surface-based gravity railroads or vacuum-assisted systems, which depend on inclines, pumps for pressure maintenance, or electromagnetic aids, gravity trains exploit the uniform inside a spherical for bidirectional along chordal or diametric paths.

History and Development

Origin of the Concept

The concept of a , involving travel through tunnels bored through a under the influence of alone, originated as a theoretical in the late amid early explorations of universal gravitation. , in a letter to Isaac Newton dated November 24, 1679, speculated on the motion of a body dropped into a hypothetical straight-line path through the Earth, suggesting it would accelerate toward the center and describing the trajectory as resembling an ellipse if gravity were constant inside the planet. This idea was part of Hooke's broader writings on . Newton replied on November 28, 1679, engaging with the speculation by sketching a spiral path for the falling body in a rotating frame and debating the deflection due to , which he calculated as eastward. Their exchange, continuing through early 1680, highlighted disagreements—Hooke favoring an elliptical path under constant force, while Newton argued for based on varying —but it marked the first detailed intellectual discussion of motion in subterranean channels. This correspondence occurred against the backdrop of the Hooke-Newton dispute over gravitational theory, with Hooke claiming priority in inverse-square ideas from his 1666 lecture. Newton's (1687) provided implicit support for the concept through Proposition 12 of Book I, the , which demonstrates that inside a spherically symmetric mass distribution, the is zero for a hollow shell and proportional to distance from the center for a solid uniform sphere—enabling in a diametric without explicitly proposing travel applications. Though not directly addressing tunnels, this mathematical framework, derived from the of gravitation, established the physical feasibility of oscillatory paths through planetary interiors as a tool for illustrating gravitational principles.

Historical Proposals

The concept of gravity trains gained traction in the 19th century through practical engineering applications and speculative theoretical proposals. Early precursors emerged in the form of , which utilized inclines to harness gravitational force for transporting goods without continuous engine power. A prominent example is the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company's , completed in 1829 in , , designed to haul from mines over the Moosic Mountains to canal boats; loaded cars descended under gravity while empty ones were pulled uphill by stationary engines or mules, demonstrating efficient use of terrain for industrial transport. Theoretical subsurface gravity trains were proposed around the same period, building on earlier mathematical explorations of motion through planetary interiors. In the , an anonymous group presented a detailed project for a straight-line gravity train through the Earth to the , envisioning rapid global transit powered solely by gravity; however, the academy deferred consideration due to the era's technological constraints. These ideas were influenced by prior calculations, such as those by in the late , who outlined the acceleration of objects falling through hypothetical Earth s in correspondence with , estimating transit times based on gravitational attraction. In the , renewed interest arose through scientific publications that analyzed gravity trains as potential future infrastructure. Physicist Paul Cooper's 1966 paper in the , titled "Through the Earth in Forty Minutes," rigorously modeled the dynamics of a frictionless in a diametric , calculating a 42-minute journey from pole to pole and advocating for its consideration in long-term , though it highlighted immense engineering barriers. Speculations like Cooper's were sometimes prompted by mentions in science fiction, which spurred physicists to verify the underlying orbital-like motion analogies. No full-scale gravity trains have been implemented, as proposals consistently stalled due to limitations in deep-drilling technology and the immense geological challenges of excavating straight-line tunnels through varying densities and high pressures. A brief modern analog appeared in 2022 when Australian mining firm Fortescue announced the "," a battery-electric system for haulage that recharges downhill via to power uphill segments, but the project was scaled back in September 2025 amid high costs and it remains a surface-based, non-subsurface design. Over time, the notion evolved from 19th-century incline-based systems for resource extraction to idealized subsurface concepts for passenger transit, continuing to inform debates on sustainable, gravity-assisted .

Physics Fundamentals

Gravitational Field Inside a Sphere

The inside a spherical body of uniform density can be determined using , which relates the flux of the through a closed surface to the enclosed . For a sphere of radius RR and uniform mass density ρ\rho, consider a Gaussian surface that is a concentric sphere of radius r<Rr < R. The enclosed is then 43πr3ρ\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \rho, and the symmetry implies a radial field uniform over this surface. Applying Gauss's law yields the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration g(r)g(r) at distance rr from the center: g(r)=43πGρrg(r) = \frac{4}{3} \pi G \rho r directed toward the center, where GG is the gravitational constant. This expression demonstrates that g(r)g(r) increases linearly with rr, vanishing at the center (r=0r = 0) and attaining its maximum value of 43πGρR\frac{4}{3} \pi G \rho R at the surface (r=Rr = R). At the center, the net field is zero, resulting in stable equilibrium for a test mass placed there, as contributions from all surrounding mass elements cancel out. In contrast, for points outside the sphere (r>Rr > R), the field behaves as if all mass were concentrated at , following the : g(r)=GMr2g(r) = \frac{GM}{r^2}, where M=43πR3ρM = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3 \rho is the total mass. Inside the sphere, however, the field is harmonic, meaning it is directly proportional to the displacement from , akin to a restoring force in . This analysis assumes a perfectly homogeneous density throughout the sphere, which simplifies the but approximates real planetary bodies like only to a . In 's case, the denser iron-nickel core (surrounded by the less dense mantle) causes deviations: remains nearly constant through much of rather than increasing linearly, reaching a maximum at the core-mantle boundary before decreasing towards the center. The radial nature of the field inside a uniform is often illustrated in diagrams showing field lines converging toward , with arrow lengths (representing ) starting from zero at and growing proportionally outward to the surface, emphasizing the linear variation and spherical .

Motion Dynamics in a Tunnel

In a straight tunnel bored through a spherically symmetric body such as , modeled with uniform , the motion of a frictionless object is governed by the component of the internal along the tunnel axis. The at a rr from the body's is directed toward the with magnitude g(r)=grRg(r) = g \frac{r}{R}, where gg is the surface gravity and RR is the . For a position along the tunnel, the component of this vector onto the tunnel direction yields an effective aa that acts as a restoring toward the tunnel's , the point closest to the . The component of the along the tunnel direction results in a restoring exactly proportional to the displacement ss from the , a=gRsa = -\frac{g}{R} s. Under the frictionless assumption, this linear restoring force results in (SHM) for the object along any straight chord tunnel connecting two surface points. The equation of motion is d2sdt2=ω2s\frac{d^2 s}{dt^2} = -\omega^2 s, where ω=g/R\omega = \sqrt{g/R}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.